Slashdot Mirror


User: usr122122121

usr122122121's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
171
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 171

  1. RAM Craziness on Seeking Power Mac Recommendations? · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is it wiser to spend money on memory or megahertz?
    RAM, RAM, RAM!!!. My home machine is a G3 300Mhz with a pile of ram. When I have had the opportunity to work on a G4 Dual-Ghz machines with a lot less ram, it felt sluggish. Go for the RAM, and you won't regret it.

    Unless, of course, you get the RAM direct from Apple. No offense to them or anything, but they rip you off when it comes to RAM. Go to Crucial Technology and get yourself just as much ram for half as much money.
    Good Luck with the new machine!

  2. Re:Buying a PowerMac on Seeking Power Mac Recommendations? · · Score: 1
    here are no aftermarket options (that I know of) for replacing a processor on a current G4
    While I've never used either of them:
    • PowerLogix is now offering G4 update cards and such.
    • Newer Technology has recently been reincarnated... or at least transferred to new ownership. This is really promising, so please don't slashdot their site and put them out of business again :-)
      (yes, they are the people that were always 200Mhz ahead of Apple and had outstanding benchmarks as well, which is more important)
    So, no, there aren't great options, but there are options.
  3. Re:ThinkSecret Credibility on Macworld: No new Towers, But 17-inch iMac · · Score: 1
    Perhaps you should look at ".mac" as a neat thing. Perhaps Apple is starting their own TLD of .mac.
    I envy your enthusiasm :-)

    I, however, am one of those people who feel as though the standard (original) TLDs should be the only ones... .biz sounds sleazy, .info sounds not trust worthy... don't get me started on the others!

    I suppose it would be alright to have a .mac TLD, but copying a Microsoft naming practice is generally not a great idea.

    I (think|hope) that one of the other explanations I have heard is correct: it's just the apple developers monkeying around to mess up the rumor sites [and show them who is boss?]. I hope

  4. Re:ThinkSecret Credibility on Macworld: No new Towers, But 17-inch iMac · · Score: 1
    i know about themes :-)

    What I was saying, however, is that the "newer one" looks like the Graphite Theme in 10.1.5, and the "older one" looks like the Blue Theme in "10.2"

  5. Re:Business Reasoning on Macworld: No new Towers, But 17-inch iMac · · Score: 1
    Anonymous Cowards filtered. If their words aren't worth so much as a nom de plume why should I value them any more?
    how ironic a comment when you look at the name of Think Secret's Owner: Nick de Plume :-)
  6. ThinkSecret Credibility on Macworld: No new Towers, But 17-inch iMac · · Score: 3, Informative
    I recently emailed the guy in charge of ThinkSecret to ask him if he thought that it spoke any to his credibility the fact that the "System Preferences Screenshot" has "firewall" misspelled as "firewal"... and I encouraged him to place the "l" there in order to seem more credible...

    He replied that it was Apple's mistake, and that they need to fix it, not him.

    He left that image alone, but released a Newer One that is in almost a completely different style- look at the tabs... and "firewal" is now fixed.

    I will be SO MAD if apple does the .Mac sh*t. Since when do we copy Microsoft?

    Think Secret's integrity as a rumors site is existent only in the fact that it is one of the few rumors sites remaining. This, in turn, is because I believe that Apple is playing them: feeding them doctored images, blatantly false rumors, and such. That would explain why they haven't gotten in trouble yet with apple... and would also explain why half the stuff there seems ludicrous!

    I do have to confess, though, I do read Think Secret regularly. Definitely not for an authoritative source of information, but just for fun. Every thing they say should be taken with a grain of salt. No, change that, the whole salt shaker.

    uh-oh, i'm 2 cents poorer

  7. Re:No workaround my @$$ on Software Update Vulnerability · · Score: 2, Informative
    Why not just do it in NetInfo?

    1) open it up /Applications/Utilities/NetInfo Manager
    2) click the lock to authenticate.
    3) use the browser to go to /machines/
    4) click the "Create New Directory" button.
    5) modify the new directory you just made to have these attributes:
    key:ip_address value:204.179.120.93
    key:name value:swquery.apple.com
    key:serves value:./local
    6) save the modified netinfo database. it will ask you if you "REALLY" want to do it. if you're sure, agree.

  8. Re:Thank you MS on MSIE Security Updates · · Score: 1
    Now if only our feature requests were heeded - tabbed browsing, pop-up killers, ad blockers - in IE sounds good to me!
    I'm with you on that one, but the day MSIE has popup killers and ad blockers is going to be the day that lawyers collectively decide that honesty is the best policy. :-)
  9. Re:Uhhhh... on Macboy Spoofs the New Apple Commercials · · Score: 1
    True, but the commercial aired during the year 1984, during the Superbowl, in fact.
    I'm fully aware of that. I was just replying to the implication that Apple created Big Brother. No biggie.
  10. Uhhhh... on Macboy Spoofs the New Apple Commercials · · Score: 2, Funny
    and Big Brother from the 1984 commercial.
    Uh... you do know that 1984 was a book before apple used it as an idea for a commercial, right? ;-)
  11. Re:What OS X needs for better security on Apple Submits Mac OS X For Security Evaluation · · Score: 1
    Then again, I'd be much more interested in a Fink GUI (which would get me GPG et al) first.
    Check out FinkCommander, It has gotten rave reviews.

    No affiliation, just observation.

  12. An Alternative Plan... on Mac Hebrew Soap Opera Continues · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Hey-
    Yes, I was as quick as you guys to jump on microsoft about this... but then I thought about it a little bit. Here's a better plan:
    1) Wait until RTL languages are supported natively in Mac OS X (MWNY).
    2) THEN Email MBU @ microsoft and complain about lack of support.

    Honestly, how can you complain that microsoft doesn't support languages that apple hasn't yet included in the OS? [OS X, not 9].

  13. Re:FYI, no reboot needed on OS X Security Update: Apache, SSL and SSH · · Score: 1, Funny
    I don't mind myself, not being one of those people who equates uptime with anatomical endowment.
    Geez! Didn't you read the FAQ?
    Uptime+Karma^2=Anatomical Endowment
    People these days...
  14. Re:Bring your MP3's to work on CD-Rom... on Cracking Down on MP3s at the Office · · Score: 2, Funny
    These days it's tantamount to having porno on the corporate fileserver.
    so, what if you work for a porn distribution corporation? are mp3s okay then?
  15. Re:Works pretty well (in beta, anyway) on XPlay: iPod with Windows · · Score: 1
    The hard part is that it's more expensive to own a Mac than it is to own a PC.
    ARGH!!! Common misconception!
    The Gartner research firm recently showed in a report what all serious mac owners have known for a long time: Macs are cheaper than PCs in the long run.

    You fell into the trap: Macs are more expensive to BUY, but less expensive to OWN.

    I have macs running that are 8 years old [and older] and they still work just as well as they did when they came out of the box. Nothing has been replaced in these, I just added some more RAM. That's something you don't usually see in wintel machines... instead you see planned obsolescence.

    Apple's products aren't cheap, but they last.

  16. Re:paperweight on XPlay: iPod with Windows · · Score: 5, Informative
    [snip!]... my 400 dollar toy is now a farking paperweight!!!
    Quick fix:
    1) Find a mac.
    2) Use the mac to restore it to Factory Condition.
  17. Re:32 dual g4's! on 200-Gigaflop Mac Cluster · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    your full of shit. that is all.
    your --> you're
  18. Two Things on MSIE 5.2 for Mac OS X Released · · Score: 1
    1) Why do some software developers consider anti-aliasing the holy grail of software development worthy a point release?

    2) Did they actually publish a list of security fixes? I usually like to know what an update does before I install it...

  19. Re:POPable? on PowerLogix Releases G4 1GHz Upgrade Cards · · Score: 1
    I cant remember but are these PCI cards?
    No.
  20. Re:Waste of money on PowerLogix Releases G4 1GHz Upgrade Cards · · Score: 1
    For the price of these 'upgrades' you can get a new G4 at the same speed. Maybe that's what the 'upgrade' is. You send us your old computer, and for the price of a new computer we'll... send you a new computer.
    These upgrades are the first ones to work in the cube, so people who have the cube and admire its design probably will be buying this upgrade.

    Sure, if it were a choice between upgrading a QuickSilver G4 or buying a new one for a little more money, people would spring for the new one... but it's not the same deal with the cubes.

  21. Re:Do NOT install UFS on Unix File System Issues on Mac OS X? · · Score: 1
    AFAIK, UFS doesn't allow files to have resource forks, therefore programs that rely on the ability to manipulate resource forks are messed up by being on UFS. Two words: CARBON APPLICATIONS.

    In addition, if you're moving from a HFS+ drive to a UFS, and you just simply copy all your stuff over, all your invisible "Icon " files will no longer be invisible on folders that have custom icons. this is a PAIN.

  22. Re:HFS+ versus UFS on Unix File System Issues on Mac OS X? · · Score: 5, Informative
    UFS is case sensitive. HFS+ is not (it might seems to be but is not)
    Minor addition to your post: UFS is case sensitive [and as a result has to be case-retaining]. HFS+ is case-insensitive, but is still case-retaining.
  23. registrars on MacSlash Up at macslash.org · · Score: 1
    I understand that they missed the warning email that their domain was expiring. That makes sense, and it would be easy [as a spam filter] to confuse something from Dotster as spam.

    What I am wondering about is this: when my domain is about a month from expiring, I start to receive PILES of [real] mail from registrars who want me to transfer over to their service... all these letters say stuff like "your domain is expiring..." on the outside of the envelope.

    It makes sense that they missed the email, but how did they miss all the letters? [or were they [un]lucky enough to not get them?]

  24. Re:You jest but... on lowercase music · · Score: 1

    The assertion that 4'33" didn't require an instrument is false.
    For a very good analysis of 4'33" check out Larry J Solomon's essay on it.

  25. Hmmm... on CDs or not? An interesting take on Key2Audio · · Score: 1

    It's a good thing I don't listen to her music, my sharpie ran out of ink a while ago...