Yes, you let us know when that happens, and we'll see how many people you can pry away from social media, videogames, etc to risk their lives supporting your highly abstract, theoretical ideas completely divorced from their everyday lives.
> Yes, actually, being this volatile makes Bitcoin worthless as a currency. and > There are blockchain technologies with a grand future, and Bitcoin is not one of them.
If being volatile makes a cryptocurrency worthless, then why would other cryptocurrencies have a grand future, unless they are not volatile?
Since you can't point to me any cryptocurrencies that aren't volatile, then according to your own logic, they must all be worthless. Hence, there cannot be any cryptocurrency with a "grand future". You are fundamentally wrong. Either you don't realize it, or are trying to distract from your failure by coming up with other reasons to support your conclusion without acknowledging your premise.
Oh, I see. You can't defend your original reason for your conclusion, so now you come up with new ones. You had trouble coloring within the lines when you were a child, yes?
Wait, so the reason that bitcoin will fail is because it's volatile, and we should look to other cryptos with a more grand future? Hmm... where are these very stable cryptos you are talking about?
People have been arguing the same point for several years now about volatity. It didn't stop it from gaining ground then, so it probably won't affect it now. Your prediction will probably be proven wrong, and therefore not age well.
But if he did grant power of attorney, the only way that would be useful in a situation in which one only has the documents on the person's body to go by, means that he'd have had to write the power of attorney contract on his chest as well. And in order for that signature to be valid, he'd need another power of attorney to validate that power of attorney, and...
Nope. Whenever you send any money the entire amount gets sent and the change goes to a newly created address. It's impossible to tell which address is the change and which is the actual payment, because the order in the transaction is randomized.
But why can't the same 18 y.o. person who can sign their life away in the military not be deemed responsible enough to decide whether or not to smoke a cigarette?
Gods? Gods wouldn't send 99.999% of what humans communicate with each other every day. We are using the tools of greatness to propagate trash. We are the mold growing from the cracks beneath the God machines, and one day we will be scraped off and washed away, never to be heard from again.
It costs money to do anything legally. Even defending yourself I'm court requires time taken off of work and at least bus fair get to the court. A fee to the private companies to read the law is just on top of what one normally does to respect the judicial system.
Besides which, think of the added benefit to the economy and additional tax revenue on this exchange which is used to help support public services from fire and police to public libraries, infrastructure and child protection services. Won't anyone think of the children?
-- Your Congressional Representative and Public Servant
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, you let us know when that happens, and we'll see how many people you can pry away from social media, videogames, etc to risk their lives supporting your highly abstract, theoretical ideas completely divorced from their everyday lives.
GVMTSRTYRNTS
Please, go on. I'm all ears. Where did I go wrong?
From your own words:
> Yes, actually, being this volatile makes Bitcoin worthless as a currency.
and
> There are blockchain technologies with a grand future, and Bitcoin is not one of them.
If being volatile makes a cryptocurrency worthless, then why would other cryptocurrencies have a grand future, unless they are not volatile?
Since you can't point to me any cryptocurrencies that aren't volatile, then according to your own logic, they must all be worthless. Hence, there cannot be any cryptocurrency with a "grand future". You are fundamentally wrong. Either you don't realize it, or are trying to distract from your failure by coming up with other reasons to support your conclusion without acknowledging your premise.
Oh, I see. You can't defend your original reason for your conclusion, so now you come up with new ones. You had trouble coloring within the lines when you were a child, yes?
Wait, so the reason that bitcoin will fail is because it's volatile, and we should look to other cryptos with a more grand future? Hmm... where are these very stable cryptos you are talking about?
People have been arguing the same point for several years now about volatity. It didn't stop it from gaining ground then, so it probably won't affect it now. Your prediction will probably be proven wrong, and therefore not age well.
Will not age well.
Newsflash! The workers on the farm don't own the land.
Did the GOP trick Obama into not vetoing it?
Explain Transformers, then.
You ever wire someone $ 0.50? Strawman.
But if he did grant power of attorney, the only way that would be useful in a situation in which one only has the documents on the person's body to go by, means that he'd have had to write the power of attorney contract on his chest as well. And in order for that signature to be valid, he'd need another power of attorney to validate that power of attorney, and...
Nope. Whenever you send any money the entire amount gets sent and the change goes to a newly created address. It's impossible to tell which address is the change and which is the actual payment, because the order in the transaction is randomized.
He is sure going to gloat when he proves himself right over the round earthers
But why can't the same 18 y.o. person who can sign their life away in the military not be deemed responsible enough to decide whether or not to smoke a cigarette?
tldr summary: Just keep them benefits a'comin', asshole!
None of what you said applies in the context of the parent comment.
What's a "fucking computer"?
How can cities be a week from starvation when the human body can go for 3 weeks without food?
I agree that "were" people don't deserve their predicament, but what are you going to do when the full moon comes out again?
(Sorry, too much dwarf fortress)
Gods? Gods wouldn't send 99.999% of what humans communicate with each other every day. We are using the tools of greatness to propagate trash. We are the mold growing from the cracks beneath the God machines, and one day we will be scraped off and washed away, never to be heard from again.
Then ascii is racist
And two out of three of those things require cellphones!
It costs money to do anything legally. Even defending yourself I'm court requires time taken off of work and at least bus fair get to the court. A fee to the private companies to read the law is just on top of what one normally does to respect the judicial system.
Besides which, think of the added benefit to the economy and additional tax revenue on this exchange which is used to help support public services from fire and police to public libraries, infrastructure and child protection services. Won't anyone think of the children?
-- Your Congressional Representative and Public Servant