The local cache is used when the remote side hasn't changed. But when a new version is available in the server, it has to be completely download again (although only the components that have changed).
What the parent describes, on the other hand, uses a third server in between that also has the client's local version. When the client requests the page again, if it has changed that third server will compute a diff and send only that to the client.
network-transparent? Have you ever tried to put a X server with a sound card that connects to a remote XDM server to work?
I had to do the following:
create.mcoprc to tell remote arts to use X11 communication. That's because each new artsd has different connection values, even with the same port, host, etc. And do a rsync of/tmp/mcop to every user and host isn't acceptable.
stop arts from resetting the configuration file to defaults: chmod -w.mcoprc
create a/etc/X0.hosts so localhost can connect locally
create a script that kills any local artsd, launchs the X server, and afterwards runs the new artsd
change inittab to run that script instead of X -broadcast
"The PCI you find in your average computer is 133 MBps - 32 bit, 33 Mhz. On servers you may find faster PCI backbones, and I believe the top of the line with the current PCI spec is 64-bit at 66 MHz, giving you 533 MBps transfer rate."
It was, until a few months ago. The new PCI-X spec allows (AFAIK) a top frequency of 133Mhz and 64bits bus width. Almost 1GBps.
As has been said previously, if we had open software package X that "accidentally" used a library copyrighted by Microsoft, does anyone thing that Microsoft wouldn't sue us? Write your own code.
Does that mean that every program written for Win32 belongs to Microsoft? Or that they could sue the developers?
Can you really write a win32 application using only your code? Without linking to any library?
I have found gnome-terminal+vte slow but not because of gnome it self but because of Xft. The rendering of anti-alias text is what is consuming my processor power...
I'm also not sure if the little red piece of glass between the 2 buttons is a display of some sort or an IR receiver - the latter would make more sense and be more useful (think remote control).
It is a IR receier, or so they say:
The included remote will also prove useful here, and help it compete with stand alone DVD players.
If... your company is using child laber... and if you... share copyright content are two very distinct situations. In the first, your company, without your knowledge, is breaking the law. In the second, you, without your company knowledge, are breaking the law.
In linux you can achieve the same functionality of "#!/bin/sh" for windows executables, java binaries, images, etc, with "Kernel support for MISC binaries".
OT, and sorry for posting this here, but I couldn't find any other way to contact you and was afraid you wouldn't see my reply to your comment to my comment =).
About RH 8.0 compiled for i686, please check my journal
Win98 SE does it. But not in rescue mode nor if APM/ACPI is installed (not sure about that second one).
It's easy for me to verify: if the processor just keeps running for (;;), it will heat up and the notebook's fan will start up. Another way is to use vmware and check processor usage.:)
(BTW, it isn't EI, it's STI in x86 and not all archs have a HLT).
Slashdot Mirror
HISTFILE=/dev/null
Till today it supported any DVD I inserted in my laptop and played them smoothly.
What the parent describes, on the other hand, uses a third server in between that also has the client's local version. When the client requests the page again, if it has changed that third server will compute a diff and send only that to the client.
Ex:
and compare the size of the pages and of the dif.I think it was MS-DOS. It had some GWBASIC version, that I can't check right now. Maybe after the weekend, if you're interested.
I do have the three instalation disks for MS-Dos 4.0.
"So Linux is Unix.
Why should it not be?"
Because it isn't! Unix is a registered trademark and its holders don't like it used loosely.
More information can by found in the OpenGroup and Unix pages.
My internet connection isn't working well, so I couldn't check them for accuracy.
Some Sci-Fi authors say we shouldn't terraform (adapt the planet to earth conditions), but should adapt ourselfs to the planet's natural conditions. :)
as soon as the child calls execve, the parent unblocks.
It was, until a few months ago. The new PCI-X spec allows (AFAIK) a top frequency of 133Mhz and 64bits bus width. Almost 1GBps.
As has been said previously, if we had open software package X that "accidentally" used a library copyrighted by Microsoft, does anyone thing that Microsoft wouldn't sue us? Write your own code.
Does that mean that every program written for Win32 belongs to Microsoft? Or that they could sue the developers?
Can you really write a win32 application using only your code? Without linking to any library?
I have found gnome-terminal+vte slow but not because of gnome it self but because of Xft. The rendering of anti-alias text is what is consuming my processor power...
Not quite. Mplayer is a good piece of software, but in order to be work at full it needs proprietary, limited distributable codecs.
It is a IR receier, or so they say:
But to have dd ignore the errors caused by them use conv=noerror,sync.
If ... your company is using child laber... and if you ... share copyright content are two very distinct situations. In the first, your company, without your knowledge, is breaking the law. In the second, you, without your company knowledge, are breaking the law.
Blame where blame is due, please.
Pantenting removes the secrecy. That's one of the advantages of patents to the society.
And anyway, the acls for syscalls and files, etc, would be to specific to the application...
Mind you, it was broken last time I tried (sigh).
Why does perl? Why does bash? Why does any interpreter execute any file you specify it? +x or not.
About RH 8.0 compiled for i686, please check my journal
It's easy for me to verify: if the processor just keeps running for (;;), it will heat up and the notebook's fan will start up. Another way is to use vmware and check processor usage. :)
(BTW, it isn't EI, it's STI in x86 and not all archs have a HLT).
The Unix philosophy is to have many small tools. So, while you could already do yes n | cp, why now add an '-n' option to do the same?
PS: the moderator could at least give some classification...
I thought *BSD weren't so for the masses, so why the '-n' for cp and mv when you have yes?