Slashdot Mirror


Use Linux to Reduce Your Power Bill

Stephen Herzog writes "Linux Devices has published an article about the AcquiSuite, a Linux based hardware device that collects and reports energy consumption information. Companies who are looking at energy management solutions need to keep the cost down in order to recover their retrofit cost with savings from the energy bill. Linux is a perfect fit for cheap data collection devices in part because "Linux provides complete TCP/IP functionality, PPP... and no royalties"."

209 comments

  1. FUD! by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everybody knows that Windows machines use less power than Linux because they're not running as much.

    There, I made the obligatory Slashdot 'Windows is unstable' joke. This should render the rest of the stale jokes -1, Redundant.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:FUD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The title of the this slashdot article is stupid:
      "Reduce your energy bills with Linux"

      Uhh, no. You reduce your energy bills by turning down your thermostat in the winter, not using your air conditioning, not using as much hot water.

      This piece of gear in nothing but an energy accountant. Its like claiming an a stethoscope cures heart disease.

      Surely one can find better technology that adapts energy usage based on whether the premises is occupied or unoccupied.

  2. Did this in College by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We used proprietary software that cost a WHOLE lot and sold it to people for a lot. But it still saved money. Now the outfit is having to switch over to more Linux/OSS based stuff because they're running out of funding.

    Except for the government clients.. they alwasy seemed to have money.

  3. It's got Linux on it but.... by gpinzone · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...can it also play OGG files? Hey how about doubling it as a firewall? Come on! Where's your hacker spirit?!

    1. Re:It's got Linux on it but.... by EvilAlien · · Score: 0, Redundant
      OR BEOWULF CLUSTERS?!?!

      This is definitely "News for Nerds", but I don't know if I can agree with "Stuff that matters".

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  4. Linux increases my power bill by Drunken+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    With the stability of Linux, I can leave my boxes on for an almost infinite length of time. So I do :). I never could do that with Windows, the machine would get all borked after only a couple of days. I guess Linux increases my power bill.

    --
    Have you been stalked by Seth today?
  5. Great idea!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Use Linux to Reduce Your Power Bill

    You won't bathe, so there will be no need to waste power on hot water.

    1. Re:Great idea!!! by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      "You won't bathe, so there will be no need to waste power on hot water."

      Nothing comes with Linux drivers, so the CD-ROM doesn't spin up as much.

      Heh, it's a joke, laugh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Great idea!!! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Nothing comes with Linux drivers, so the CD-ROM doesn't spin up as much.

      Heh, it's a joke, laugh."


      Heh! I got one:

      RedHat doesn't support my sound card, so my speakers are off!

      Ha! I kill me!

    3. Re:Great idea!!! by cos(0) · · Score: 1

      So true, so true...

      RedHat 8.0 does not support my SoundBlaster 16 PCI although RedHat 7.3 supported it out-of-the-box. No music for me.

    4. Re:Great idea!!! by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      This should be modded down as -1, Stale, just like you said in your original (also funny, like this one actually) post to this article.

  6. Just Linux? by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    I save *loads* of electricity when I do a "shutdown now" on OpenBSD!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Just Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd save even more if you shutup now.

  7. hmmm... seems a little unnecessary to me... by MacOS_Rules · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm reading the article and thinking "Wouldn't it be more effective to just turn the damn thing off?"

    -Yes, this IS a joke. :)

    --
    If a man's character is to be abused there's nobody like a relative to do the business. -Thackeray, William
  8. It can't save you money on your electricity bill.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...because Linux doesn't support ACPI.

  9. Electron orbits by PhysicsScholar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Out of the various possible routes taken by an electron in orbit, one line l may be chosen with peak in point p relative to which the line is symmetric (relative distance and velocity, v(p), are minimal).

    Therefore, the scalar potential field created by such movement obeys Zipf's Law of Power (so do Web links, but that's another post).

    Bottom line -- be weary of news releases such as this one that proclaim to reduce energy use and save you money. Unlike the X10 cam, most of these crocks of crud simply don't work!

    Also, here in the UK our AC currents are very different from traditional outlets you folks may have in the States. Yet another question to ponder...

    --

    Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., Canada, B3H 3J5
    1. Re:Electron orbits by Matey-O · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      This Can't Possibly Be a Real Person

      No one thinks this way

      It's gotta be a 'bot of some sort.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    2. Re:Electron orbits by andfarm · · Score: 0, Troll

      BS

      --

      TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

    3. Re:Electron orbits by hplasm · · Score: 1
      Erm...I think he makes sense....

      I wasn't a bot last time I looked. Was quite a while ago,tho..............

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  10. Features... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting


    Linux is a perfect fit for cheap data collection devices in part because "Linux provides complete TCP/IP functionality, PPP, a horrible UI and no royalties

    1. Re:Features... by Restil · · Score: 2

      Since you chose to bring it up, an embedded device such as this is one of the applications that has need for the most minimal user interface possible. The "User Interface" consists of two buttons and a 2x16 LCD display. Drag&Drop, antialiased fonts, guesture based mouse commands and happy paperclips are the very things you DON'T need, don't want and have no room for anyway.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
  11. Should be titled... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Use Linux to Reduce Your Chances of Contracting Sexually Transmitted Diseases"

    That's right, act now and no female will want to get within 100 feet of you!

    Christ, any other trivial fucking benefits we can wow potential users with?

  12. Alternate Story Headline... by El_Smack · · Score: 5, Funny


    Use Linux to Reduce Bill(s) Power.

    --


    There are 01 kinds of cars in the world. The General Lee, and everything else.
    1. Re:Alternate Story Headline... by BESTouff · · Score: 1

      Too bad they replaced Power Gates by more spectacular Energetic Ballmer ...

    2. Re:Alternate Story Headline... by Stackster · · Score: 1

      "Use Linux power Bill"

      Bill Gates being a robot/cyborg/android would be far less surprising than him being powered by Linux

      --

      There are 010 kinds of people. Those who understand octal, those who don't, and 06 other kinds of morons.
    3. Re:Alternate Story Headline... by ghislain_leblanc · · Score: 1

      I use Linux to reduce your power, Bill.

  13. Re:It can't save you money on your electricity bil by Gimpin · · Score: 1, Insightful

    err..ok, so how about your refrigerator...oh, I guess you can shut that off when you are not using it as well

    --
    "Simon Says, Fuck You" - George Carlin
  14. Seems like a good time to mention the kill a watt by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    kill a watt meter does this too.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  15. My apartment uses similar technology... by UnidentifiedCoward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    to monitor water usage. It is actually kind of cool from my geek perspective. You get a bill for utilities from a company in Texas which is where the data is aggregated.

    At first when I saw the box and I didn't know what it was so I called the phone number and asked what it was and they said oh it is an embedded machine to remotely monitor your water usage. I guess I got a tech/service operator because they were very knowledgable and said it uses embedded linux and want on to explain how it works (in general terms). The rep said the only presence they have in Seattle is for a technician for service related calls.

    You could easily imagine running a utility company on a skeleton crew with only a strong capital investment on the onset. Makes you think.

    1. Re:My apartment uses similar technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      At first when I saw the box and I didn't know what it was so I called the phone number and asked what it was and they said oh it is an embedded machine to remotely monitor your water usage.


      So did you hack into it yet?

    2. Re:My apartment uses similar technology... by UnidentifiedCoward · · Score: 1

      You know the thought occured to me, but it might be a felony to tamper with it. After all if I break it or worse, make it report incorrectly (intentially or not), I am probably to be charged with tampering and or fraud.

    3. Re:My apartment uses similar technology... by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


      I wouldn't worry too much about it. The charge would be theft of service. I have seen precedents where some guy was using electricity for free for 30 years and only had to pay a $5000 fine. Can't find it on google, though.

      Seth
    4. Re:My apartment uses similar technology... by swb · · Score: 2

      After all if I break it or worse, make it report incorrectly (intentially or not), I am probably to be charged with tampering and or fraud.

      Our water meters here in Minneapolis actually have a tap into our phone lines so they can call in the meter readings.

      I've been tempted to disconnect it on general principal (my phone line not yours, blah blah blah). Even funnier would be presenting them with a telecommunications bill of $50 per month.

      As far as I know, I never signed an agreement with the municipal water company saying I'd provide telecommuncations services for their billing operation, nor do I recall anything that says I can't disconnect them from my phone line.

      (I know, I know, it's in my benefit to let them make a 30 second call once per month vs. paying the tax money to build a seperate signalling system, and I'm not an unreasonable jerk, but its kind of weird how they just *assume* they can do this).

  16. Re:Athalon eats the bill... by Blkdeath · · Score: 4, Funny
    How on Earth would a sports bag increase your power bill?

    Surely you weren't referring to AMD's Athlon processor, were you?

    --
    BD Phone Home!

    Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

  17. HVAC. by garcia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    my father is a HVAC mechanic. He currently works as the Maintenance Supervisor at an animal testing facility in NEPA.

    He says that such devices are practically non-sense. Changing CERTAIN devices related to HVAC will save you $200 to $500 over a 10-15 year period. There is NO way to save much more in large buildings (which this device seems to).

    You are going to have to pay for new equipment to save then you are going to have to watch the savings over the years after the equipment is changed.

    it's really not as great of a device as they say it is.

    It's pretty much on the front page b/c of free advertising at least IMHO.

    1. Re:HVAC. by DaCool42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Your father doesn't know what he's talking about. Power quality is a MAJOR issue. Any place with large amounts of inductive loads (ie fluorescent lights, motors, etc) can easily triple their electrical bill by not having a good power factor. It is standard practice for electrical companies to charge extra if your power factor is bad as well. What he may be referring to is heaters. A heater is not an inductive load, so it will already have a power factor close to unity. However, in a large building with lots of motors/fans/air conditioning, power factor is a very important consideration. And if you get into an industrial setting, you would have to be completely insane not to care about power quality.

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
    2. Re:HVAC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Front page stories on Salsadot are ANYTHING but free bud. The going rate for the front page advertisement stories is over $500. Not bad considering the state of the web economy.

    3. Re:HVAC. by garcia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, he replaced MANY parts of the HVAC equipment in the facility he currently works at.

      First of all, he had to determine the amount of power that the current units were consuming. Then he had to figure out what the new units would consume. After that he had to present this material to the reviewers.

      Now. Let's say he gets paid $X/yr. The people under him get paid $Y/yr. They are going to have to replace Z amount of fans at such and such a price.

      Now. How many hours these changes will have to take coupled w/the cost of the changes, is going to save HOW much?

      When you become a certified HVAC mechanic w/30+ years of experience, you can come talk, until then, please express your views to someone else.

    4. Re:HVAC. by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      When you become a certified HVAC mechanic w/30+ years of experience, you can come talk, until then, please express your views to someone else.

      (And for those who missed it... )

      my father is a HVAC mechanic...

      Bill, it doesn't matter if your father is a billionare who invented indoor electricity. Unless HE signs in with his own UID and posts, it's just heresay.

      I wager that your father didn't read the article, and that you're not a certified HVAC mechanic, either. Aruging from authority's a despicable practice, especially when it's not YOUR authority.

      Eventually, everything gets replaced. When doing so, it's important to look into the savings of more expensive "smart" components as opposed to the traditional ones; the cost differnece doesn't have to factor in time to replace if that's going to happen anyway.

    5. Re:HVAC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's not going to post, but I did send him a link to the article.

      I am a historian. I know what it means to use primary source documents. What I wrote is what he said.

    6. Re:HVAC. by pjrc · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Even if this is true, there's a lot of other loads in the building besides the HVAC system.

      I know a story of a company (which I can't mention due to former NDA) that used a system similar to this AcquiSuite. The guy who saw the facilities manager for a large "campus" hired a database consultant to build some scripts to automatically update a "naughty" and "nice" list of the departments who used the most and least power per square foot of their respective areas. He had it automatically send emails to the managers of any sections that wasted a lot of power relative to the other areas.

      Much of their power bill turned out to be for lighting, and by the managers simply telling their people to turn the lights off, their power bill went down considerably. The peer pressure of having the departments compared to each other went a long way towards motivating and sustaining measures to save power.

      So your dad may be right, or he may be wrong about HVAC, but there's a lot of ways to save power besides ripping out your furnace and cooling systems.

      Just to mention another one, I know of a place where they had a large peak demand charge (power companies charge for peak usage as well as comsumed kwh on the east coast), and it turned out large machines which melted material with heaters were all "warming up" at the same time. By having the machine operator come in to work an hour earlier and turn the machines on in a sequence they saved thousands on their monthly bill. I heard a similar story of a heat-based machine that caused a large peak because whoever installed the machine went "overkill" on the number of heating elements. They just cut the wires to half the heaters, and the machine took twice as long to warm up (was on a timer anyway in that case) but didn't set a record peak and thus the power bill went way down. In both those cases, they believed their excessive peak demand bills were from actual useful work, but once detailed data was logged it turned out to be from machine startups and they saved lots of money by simply starting the machines up differently.

      So you may not think it's such a great device, but there are a lot of people who've saved a lot of money simply by learning where they were really using power and making simple changes to the way they operated. They would probably not agree with you.

    7. Re:HVAC. by seney · · Score: 1

      as well, yes - your uncle does not know what he's talking about. please read "natural capitalism", which is written by some people from rocky mountain institute {www.rmi.org}.

      one example: it is standard practice for contracted electricians to install the smallest guage electrical wire required. this standard (in the u.s.) is set so the building won't catch on fire - not so the power is transmitted efficiently as possible. sure, so i can't remember the figures - but a whole buncha power is lost to resistance in the too small wire. this the same concept as using larger guage speaker wire in order to get better quality sound (i think).

      anyways, i would recommend anyone interested in efficiency to read "natural capitalism". it would be a good book review for this site.

    8. Re:HVAC. by tuuw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ummm, electrical devices with a poor power factor do NOT consume more power, ie they wont
      increase your power bill. What they will do is increase the line current to the device.
      But since this increased line current is out of phase with the voltage on the line no additional real power is used.
      Industry and electrical suppliers tend to be concerned with power factor because increased line current means you need larger conductors to supply the load which means higher cabling costs.

      Trust me, I'm an electrician

    9. Re:HVAC. by smillie · · Score: 1

      I wrote a program for an aluminum foundry that controled their electric melting furnaces. My part moved the peak usage control from a mechanical switch to computer control. They also added two more furnaces to the four origionals. The end result was a lower electric bill for the six furnaces than they were getting for four. Melting times were also faster because the computer didn't mind switching power around for a 30 second benifit but the human operators didn't have the time to do so.

      --

      Dyslexics Untie!

    10. Re:HVAC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the HVAC is not updated - your dad is correct.
      Most modern HVAC options pursued with Linux controls are much more complex than simple bang on/off control of the compressors , fans and vent controls..
      These systems use newer HVAC units with variable speed controls of the fans and compressors...
      So what! you say ......
      Air is compressable..
      a fan running 100 % speed with a on/off ratio of 50% consumes twice as much power compared to the same fan running continously at 50% speed..
      interesting... but if you only vary the speed of the fans in the system you create other problems with optimizing the use of the compressors..
      With mulitiple offices using the same system - the problems become complex.
      Thus the more complex controls.

      Typically, we got ( modest building size) savings of 30% , and peak power usage reduced by 50%...

      Payback ... less than 5 years - including the cost of the more complex HVAC and lighting controls.

    11. Re:HVAC. by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

      i never said they did consume more power.

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
  18. You've forgotten a few things by burgburgburg · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Reboots tend to be big energy drains.

    And for those times that the Windows box is running, there are large energy draws from the mechanisms in place that
    a) ensure you do nothing to violate any copyrights of anyone anywhere ever
    b) contact your employers, friends and family should you start expressing interest in any form of open-source solutions
    c) track your every move and thought for future marketing purposes.

  19. Re:suuuuuuure by questionlp · · Score: 1
    Ahh... Linux devices might not, but the hard drive guys at IBM/Hitachi use pixie dust. I guess someone at IBM used Portman grits instead of pixie dust, which probably explains why those drives are named "Deathstars" ;-)

    Laugh... it's funny... kind of.

  20. But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their heating bills went through the roof because of the penguins.

  21. It's true. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 5, Funny

    We had an improperly-vented Athlon machine running Windows that was fine (as much as could be expected). We installed RedHat 7.2 on it and redeployed it as a server, and the CPU melted. Apparently, Windows was under-utilizing the CPU.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:It's true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      We had an improperly-vented Athlon machine running Windows that was fine (as much as could be expected). We installed RedHat 7.2 on it and redeployed it as a server, and the CPU melted. Apparently, Windows was under-utilizing the CPU.

      I've heard a lot of dodgy arguments for switching to Linux, but this one takes the cake.

      "Linux is so much better than windows that when I installed it, it fried my machine! This is concrete proof that Microsoft cannot write an OS"

    2. Re:It's true. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      ""Linux is so much better than windows that when I installed it, it fried my machine! This is concrete proof that Microsoft cannot write an OS""

      Actually I think he was saying "Windows is more efficient than Linux because it's getting stuff done so fast that the CPU is underutilized."

      Heh. At least I got a laugh out of it. :)

    3. Re:It's true. by ahaning · · Score: 1

      Perhaps your problem was that Linux's ACPI support sucks? Or maybe the hardware support for your particular setup isn't that great.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    4. Re:It's true. by coldascold · · Score: 1

      Probly started the sound server with no sound card

    5. Re:It's true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After we switched all our servers to Redhat 7.3 from WIndoze our power supply burn out all of a sudden dissappeared first we thought we had poor quality power supply but actually it was to powering on and off windoze server that caused the issue!!!!

    6. Re:It's true. by jsse · · Score: 1

      That explains everything.

      We found that the servers line running Linux consumed more power than those running Windows last year, and we need to explain for this.

      We wrote a report pointing out the fact that most Linux servers runs on older hardware than the Windows', and the possibilities of older hardware could drain more power than newer ones...

      Now your discovery makes sense, thank you very much. Along with the CPU utilization statistics I could make a stronger argument on it. :)

    7. Re:It's true. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      interesting, does that spike the CPU?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:It's true. by CompVisGuy · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can fairly compare the two systems given that you changed two varibales (the OS *and* the computer's job).

      I would imagine that, given you redeployed the PC as a server, this would account for the extra load, and hence the CPU burning up, not Linux magically using the CPU all the time.

      Q: Which would you prefer, an OS that used your system resources efficiently (i.e. when they are needed), or one that drove your hardware at 100% all the time?

      I'm not saying that Linux is better than Windows in this respect, or vice versa, I'm just trying to point out the flawed comparison.

      --


      "The noble art of losing face will one day save the human race"---Hans Blix
  22. Windows Crashes by SniffleBear · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Did you know that booting up your system takes a lot more power initially than to run the computer itself?

  23. At our office... by qurob · · Score: 5, Informative


    We call the power company, and they give us detailed reports on how much power each site is using, and day-by-day breakdowns, comparisons with last year...

    1. Re:At our office... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      they probabbly use linux to generate those reports

    2. Re:At our office... by thetman · · Score: 1

      Undoubtedly. Nothing else could handle the complexity without becoming unstable.

  24. Which chip though? by toupsie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you want to reduce power usage, would you want to use an Intel x86 chip in that goal? Wouldn't a PPC Linux be more power efficient? I am sure others can bring up other lower power consuming chips that have Linux ports than Intel's power hungry beast.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Which chip though? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Funny

      You could use a PPC chip, but that would mean that you would have to buy a stove to do the cooking. Intel is ahead of the game having converged computing with the kitchen.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    2. Re:Which chip though? by JesseL · · Score: 2
      If you want to reduce power usage, would you want to use an Intel x86 chip in that goal? Wouldn't a PPC Linux be more power efficient?

      I doubt it, they are using a 16MHz 386 for this. That probably uses less than 400mW and runs cool to the touch without a heatsink. Something based on a MIPS/ARM/PPC core would provide a lot more MIPS/Watt though.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    3. Re:Which chip though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even read the article? The monitoring device (embedded PC running Linux) is just the tool for collecting the data.

  25. Linux use to reduce Bill's power by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Rearrange the words and now it makes sense.

  26. I've been using Linux for years to save money by krray · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Using Linux itself has just saved me money in my time. "It just works". Make a change, reboot, make a change, reboot, reboot? Never. Mysterious crashes? Long gone.

    I've also always had I believe a CM11a plugged into one of the serial ports. It's called X10 and allows signalling to take place over the electrical lines.

    Linux takes care of outside lighting, HV/AC, and a host of other operations for me around the house. Add in a RF remote and all of a sudden you can control/dim the lights throughout the house with X10 and the remote in your hand (Linux does nothing here).

    Can Windows control the lights? Of course, but I've never seen a Windows box "just work" with no human intervention for years on end.

    I like the fact that when I walk into the bathroom at 2am (for obvious reasons :) that the lights turn on automatically (sensored to X10) and the Linux box sees this (and the time) and dims the lights automatically for me. HHmmm, this saves power too!

    1. Re:I've been using Linux for years to save money by Restil · · Score: 2

      I'm using linux to control the X10 devices in my house as well. While its not a perfect technology, it works remarkably well as cheap consumer products that in some cases cost very little more than the conventional physical interfaces.

      I just wish X10 would spend their efforts on expanding and perfecting their home automation devices instead of spending all their marketing funds pimping those crappy wireless cameras.
      I've talked to many people that think simple cheap home automation is still a futuristic dream, yet when I mention X10, they've heard of it but equate it only to the cameras.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    2. Re:I've been using Linux for years to save money by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      I've talked to many people that think simple cheap home automation is still a futuristic dream, yet when I mention X10, they've heard of it but equate it only to the cameras.

      Yeah, I know the moment I read the parent post I was thinking "oh, those stupid cameras with those godamned pop-up ads? I'll never buy their stuff" However, i've seen your website, and that's some cool stuff, maybe i'll have to look into it ;)

      -matt

    3. Re:I've been using Linux for years to save money by netsharc · · Score: 5, Funny

      What an insightful comment! I'm sure a lot more people would be interested if their ads said "Turn on your heater 10 minutes before you get home, and come home to a nice warm house.", "Let X10 simulate an occupied house while you're gone. And have a webcam as well to monitor in case someone does break in!" and all those clichés associated with home automation... someone want to email them?

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    4. Re:I've been using Linux for years to save money by netsharc · · Score: 1

      I wasn't being sarcastic, by the way. Just realised people might think so..

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    5. Re:I've been using Linux for years to save money by autocracy · · Score: 2

      Isn't the X-10 camera a very different thing from the X-10 standard for all this home control stuff?

      --
      SIG: HUP
    6. Re:I've been using Linux for years to save money by Restil · · Score: 2

      The only thing that's common is the company that sells them.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
  27. Nothing New by JesseL · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've already worked with two companies doing almost exactly the same thing.Check these out:

    www.enflex.net/products/mg-200.html
    www.envenergy.com/products/medhardware.shtml

    Both are embedded linux systems for building automation, power consumtion monitoring, and providing information about the monitored systems over the internet.



    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    1. Re:Nothing New by dethkultur · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I also think it is worth pointing out that the author is employed by the company (http://www.obvius.com/) that sells the reviewed product....

    2. Re:Nothing New by f97tosc · · Score: 2

      What were the typcial savings that could be achieved when these systems were installed?

      Which of the companies would you recommend?

      Tor

    3. Re:Nothing New by JesseL · · Score: 2

      I wasn't involved from a customer perspective, the company I work for does hardware design/development and manufacturing for Envenergy and did some prototyping for Enflex. Sharing an opinion on which company has a better system may put me in an uncomfortable position here at work.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  28. Cost savings verification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    With respect to persons saying that energy savings is not practical.

    We typically sell the AcquiSuite product to contractors who work on a performance based contract. The building owner pays some fixed amount for a retrofit which includes things like CF lamps, new motors, etc. The contractor only gets paid when the proposed reduction in electricity is verified. Typical contracts suggest 7-8% reductions in buildings with $20k anual electric bills. The AcquiSuite is used in these projects as a measure of before and after, and is used for ongoing maintainance.

  29. Not only does it reduce your power bill.... by I_am_Rambi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But linux is also proven to reduce your processor heat as well. Its called two little assembaly opcodes that Linux uses.

    EI
    Halt

    This two little commands enable all interupts and then halt the processor (in that order). So while the box is doing nothing, the processor is also doing nothing, excepting waiting on some interupts to go back to work. Because the processor has halted and is doing absolutely nothing, it has time to cool down.

    Windows, as far as I know, does not implement these opcodes, and I don't know excatly how they could get away with it. I guess that is how processors burn up. Maybe these opcodes help in the deduction of your power billsince the processor is no longer "active".


    All opcodes are for the Z80, I do not know if they are the same for the x86 processors as well, but the theory is the same.

    1. Re:Not only does it reduce your power bill.... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 5, Informative

      Windows 9x doesn't. NT/2K/XP do.

      You can get apps for 9x, such as Rain, that will run as a lowest-priority thread and issue the HLT commands.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Not only does it reduce your power bill.... by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      OK I'll bite...

      How did you get Linux running on a Z80? I think you might be pulling this stuff out of the air.

    3. Re:Not only does it reduce your power bill.... by MrEd · · Score: 4, Interesting
      That's as may be, but my Linux box still uses more energy than my 2k because the boot disk won't ever spin down! I have hdparm set to powerdown both the drives after half an hour, but the root drive is being accessed every five minutes or so for various things.


      I realize that I could dig through my logs and find out why sound-slot-0 is being modprobed every so often even though my one ALSA-driven sound card is inserted at boot. Or I could find a way for my log files to be written to ramdisk (since I'm not running a server and have a UPS). Sure is a lot of work though! Aren't there laptop users that have gotten distros to hack together workarounds for this stuff?


      Last HOWTO I saw on this was about 20 pages long and looked mighty timeconsuming. Anyone have any tips on quick-ish ways to make Debian Sid disk-friendly?

      --

      Wah!

    4. Re:Not only does it reduce your power bill.... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you run an intel processor, it systematically shuts down logic thats not in use (fpu, etc), and it has nothing to do with the OS. It will shut itself down, the equivalent of a halt, without the halt.

      Only the Athlons need the archaic halt command.

      Nice troll, though.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:Not only does it reduce your power bill.... by lmfr · · Score: 1
      Win98 SE does it. But not in rescue mode nor if APM/ACPI is installed (not sure about that second one).

      It's easy for me to verify: if the processor just keeps running for (;;), it will heat up and the notebook's fan will start up. Another way is to use vmware and check processor usage. :)

      (BTW, it isn't EI, it's STI in x86 and not all archs have a HLT).

    6. Re:Not only does it reduce your power bill.... by Phil+Gregory · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had noflushd installed on my laptop for a while. It not only spins the drives down (well, it tells hdparm to tell the drives...), it caches all filesystem writes. So, if your problem is things writing to the disk, noflushd will be of use to you.

      I stopped using it because I put XFS on the disk. Journaling filesystems tend to bypass some of the kernel disk-writing procedures in order to make sure the journal is correct. If you're using a journaling filesystem, that may be the cause of your problems. I'm not sure there's any way around this, because the filesystem seemed to write things about every five or so minutes regardless of whether I was actually reading or writing to the disk.



      --Phil (And now the laptop itself is dead. Sigh.)
      --
      355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI, but an incredible simulation!
    7. Re:Not only does it reduce your power bill.... by MrEd · · Score: 1
      ReiserFS! Of course!


      Brilliant deduction, I've got Reiser on most of my boot disk partitions and that could very easily be the cause of its insomnia. I suppose this is a feature not a bug. Oh well, it's worth the electricity I guess.

      --

      Wah!

    8. Re:Not only does it reduce your power bill.... by heim913 · · Score: 1

      Or I could find a way for my log files to be written to ramdisk (since I'm not running a server and have a UPS).

      Why not just use a logger which buffers disk output? metalog does this, and seems to work great.

  30. Industrial Linux by jukal · · Score: 2

    With the mention of modbus and all :), I guess this thread might be a good time to ask for links on cases where Linux has been put to industrial use. Is there something significant, I mean for example cases where Linux is crucial part of keeping a $100 million industrial machine running and producing somethoids. Anyone?

    1. Re:Industrial Linux by Nick+Harkin · · Score: 1

      IIRC googles server farm runs on linux. something i found on /. a while ago, when the 'google guy' answered questions from /.ers.... I'm not sure where the article is, sorry.

  31. Ok, wheres the green penguin? by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    The only thing Linux needs to attract the wierdos! Lets go guys, what can we come up with?

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  32. Speaking of things like this... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

    Does anyone know of any inexpensive power meters that you can stick between an appliance and a wall socket that records power usage? My electric bill is insane nowadays, but it's really hard to track down exactly where the power is going. I've tried to find a cheap device like this ($50?) but have had no luck.

    The idea is not to have just a meter that take an instantaneous reading, but to have something that adds it up over a 24 hour period (or whatever).

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re: Speaking of things like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Electricity can escape unless you keep plugs in every outlet to keep the electrons from leaking out onto your floor.

    2. Re:Speaking of things like this... by Neil+Blender · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Look at your power meter when things are running. Then turn some of them off. Shortly after I moved into a new house, I noticed my meter was going pretty fast. After turning things on and off, I realized that the 5 vanity lights above my bathroom mirror were using a boatload of electricity, more than any other thing in my house. Probably more than any three things running at once.

    3. Re:Speaking of things like this... by JesseL · · Score: 5, Informative

      Radio Shack has one here

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    4. Re:Speaking of things like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just now checked it. In true Radio $hack fashion, it's not available on the website.

    5. Re:Speaking of things like this... by pheph · · Score: 2
      Yea, $50 exactly:

      Kill A Watt

    6. Re:Speaking of things like this... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      Exactly the thing! Thanks!

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    7. Re:Speaking of things like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Discovery Zone store at my local mall (Southern NH, USA but they're a chain) had a 'kill-a-watt' type clone for $30. 120V 15A max input, measures peak, average and provides a estimated monthly wattage. Also allows you to plug in the kw-hr cost for your area and does the monthly cost math automagically. Cool toy. My house's top three are: well pump, freezer, and computer room :-). Can't measure things like lights, furnace, ovens, etc. as either they're 220v and/or hardwired (no plug, no measurement).

    8. Re:Speaking of things like this... by cr0sh · · Score: 2
      First off, turn everything off, including any stoves, dishwashers, hot water heaters, A/C units, refrigerators, etc - in fact, what might be easiest (but make sure you have surge protectors for computers and electronics) is to simply turn off the breakers. The disk (if your meter has it) should be not be turning at all - if it is, then you have a parasite load attached (alarm system backup power or doorbell most likely), but it should only turn really slow with those. If it is turning faster, then someone is either tapping your power in some manner (for whatever reason), or you have some kind of short in the system somewhere (of course, if you have all the breakers off, and it is still turning, you have big problems) - which is a bad thing (don't laugh - it is possible to have a high-resistance short in a line that goes for years without any noticing, other than a high electric bill - my brother-in-law's parent's house recently had a fire due to a drywall nail that had been driven through the wires of one of the circuits - it had been that way for YEARS before the fire happened).

      Anyhow, that is one way to find out what circuit or appliance is sucking the power. Another way is deduction - the biggest power users in a house are typically the hot water heater, the refrigerator/freezer, and the air conditioning unit (which means AC/heater if equipped). Not much you can do on any of those except replace them.

      One thing to remember on a hot water heater is whether it has been flushed/cleaned recently (ie, do it every year) - if not, sediment can build up on the coils, insulating them from the water, meaning it takes more energy to bring the water up to temperature.

      Regarding the AC unit - how are you running it? In the summer, set it for about 77 degrees when at home, but raise it to about 85 when nobody is at home (reverse for winter) - DON'T TURN IT OFF. If you turn it off, the house heats up (or cools down in winter), and it takes that much more energy to bring the air, and EVERYTHING ELSE in the house, including the walls, back down to the proper temperature. Remember as it warms up/cools off, adjust the temperature accordingly to raise/lower it - so that the outside temperature keeps your house comfortable. One other thing - make sure you don't have any "leakage" or drafty areas - break out the weatherstripping/caulk, and go to it! Also - do you have a combo A/C and swamp cooler (or separate heater/cooler units) that use the same duct works? If you do, then there are probably auto-dampers to shut the air flow off from each unit when one is in use, but not the other. If this is the case, check to make sure those dampers are working properly, and shutting off the air flow - no sense in cooling or heating the neighborhood (this also goes for fireplace flue dampers - shut 'em!). Also, if you have a "whole house" fan (which vents air from inside the house through windows and into the attic), that it's damper is shutting when it is off (and don't turn it on when the AC is on).

      Those are going to be your main energy wasters. The other appliances about all you can do is replace them with newer appliances (main the fridge - if you stove/oven is using a lot, then don't worry too much about it, because it isn't on all the time).

      One more thing about parasitic loads - if someone is stealing the power, check to see how it is hidden, and where it is going. If it is a neighbor, it may be for grow lights (work out a trade?)...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    9. Re:Speaking of things like this... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      in fact, what might be easiest (but make sure you have surge protectors for computers and electronics) is to simply turn off the breakers.

      I've done some of this, but to be honest I can't really say that I've gone to that much trouble at this point. Also, my breaker box is completely insane with circuits going all over the house. Too many past "homeowner jobs".

      If you turn it off, the house heats up (or cools down in winter), and it takes that much more energy to bring the air, and EVERYTHING ELSE in the house, including the walls, back down to the proper temperature.

      This is interesting... you think it takes less overall energy to maintain the temperature through an entire day, rather than turn it completely off during the day and then bring it down in the evening? I would have thought the opposite. Obviously, at some point it must make sense to turn it off (keeping it off for a month, for example).

      Anyway, the A/C obviously sucks power like it's going out of style, but even when I don't run the A/C the power level just seems way too high. I have my suspicians that it might be my pool's pump motor.

      But overall, you're right. You can tell a lot through the use of the circuit breakers and some investigative work, but I've been too busy/lazy/childrened to track it down. :)

      I should also mention that I live in California where power rates are beyond out of control.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    10. Re: Speaking of things like this... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      that's sort of like all the smoke escaping from your machine when you hook it up to 220, right?

    11. Re:Speaking of things like this... by cr0sh · · Score: 2
      Regarding the breaker box - were these past "homeowner" jobs that you did, or the previous homeowner (or the current one, if you are renting)? I ask this because of my statement about the nail through the wire - the owner of the house was a "do-it-yourselfer", and I have the feeling that he may have accidentally driven the nail through (can't ask him now - he passed away about 3 weeks prior to the house burning - talk about tragedies to befall a family), having seen his handy work on other projects in a house me and my wife rented from them. So, the statement about a high resistance issue is something to think about.

      As far as the A/C is concerned, I was told this by a trusted and respected A/C repairman I personally know (an old irish dude that will talk your ear off if you let him - but is one of the most honest men I know). I tried this on the house that I rented from my brother-in-law's parents, which had two large A/C units (big house - 3500 sf or so), and cut my bill way down. It makes sense (think of a bicycle - how much effort it takes to get going, but how much easier it is to keep going, or to speed up).

      If you have a pool pump, then there is another power drain. I don't know much about pools, as I don't own one yet, but I do know that /. had an article on a guy who was using a homebrew Linux system to monitor and control the pool pump and chemicals in his pool to help save money, as well as to keep the pool properly maintained. Look into it - pretty involved project, but might be worth it.

      One thing I forgot to mention (though you are probably doing this) is to remember to only use lights when you need them, shut them off when you don't. Also, you might look into compact flourescents for certain lights. For those lights where CFs won't work, try to put in electronic dimmers (ie, the ones that vary the cycle of the current going through the bulb, rather than use a rheostat, which wastes the energy as heat), and dim them as needed (like at night when you want to provide a bit of light for a hallway or something).

      I don't know what you are paying in electricity there in CA, but here in Phoenix, AZ - my bill hasn't been much over $200.00/month, the entire summer, and that is with two heatpumps (while expensive to buy - heatpumps are supposedly more efficient than AC/heater units - so you might look into them). Of course, like I said, I don't have a pool pump...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    12. Re:Speaking of things like this... by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      I don't know what you are paying in electricity there in CA,

      I'm almost embarrassed to tell you, but my last month's bill was $422 for 1,967 kWh. That should go way down now that it's cooling off, but I'm sure that no more than $100 is A/C. I *really* should care more about getting it down, but I bought the house about 1.5 years ago as a fixer upper, and there have been much larger fish to fry every weekend. :)

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    13. Re:Speaking of things like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clueless web designers strike again.

      Enable cookies and it works. Disable them and suddenly the page is unavailable.

      Morons.

    14. Re:Speaking of things like this... by domefreak · · Score: 1
      I'm amazed that the Kill-a-watt has been mentioned numerous times in this discussion, but I've seen no reference to the far superior (if a bit more expensive) Brand power meter ($150 - $350) or the Watts Up? meter ($100 - $130). Both are capable of measuring a single 120V AC load both instantaniously and cumulatively over time. They can also show the Voltage and power factor and such (check out individual specs, as I forget which does what).


      The high-end Brand meters can also connect to a PC via RS-232 serial (Win 95/98 only) and log data that way, and there is even a model with non-volitile memory and a datalogger onboard, so that you can plug in your fridge and come back in a month and download its power consumption history. I highly recommend these meters, since they don't simply measure Watts as Volts * Amps, but calculate an implicit power factor by sampling instantanious Volts (this is a sine wave in AC, remember) & Amps at 4 kHz in order to measure your power consumption just like your utility does.


      For more & larger loads, check out the Brand "One Meter" which can handle 120 or 240 V AC loads, DC loads, and 64 channels simultaniously. Sensors are networked to the datalogger via Cat-5 (not over TCP-IP, though). There is a small LCD for instantanious readout, and it can download data through any com program and a serial cable (I use Win 2k, never got it to work with my Mac).


      One of the coolest devices I've seen is the WebDAQ which is a 32-channel datalogger with built-in server; just plug in some sensors and an ethernet network, and you can view data live over the web! A little pricey for me at $1k, but cheaper than putting together the pieces.

  33. Use it ... by YahoKa · · Score: 0

    Use it to reduce your [b]software[/b] licence bill.

  34. misdirection by alandrums · · Score: 1

    sounds like another idea that mentions linux simply to get as many participants as possible because of the current "prestige" involved with being a linux user. "use linux to lower your power bill" = misdirection.

  35. Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It MONITORS you power usage. It does NOT reduce your power bill, assholes!

  36. I think NT and newer does. by Atomizer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I remember hearing about this ages ago from people that dual booted W95 and had could see the CPU temp. Whenever they ran W95 the CPU would always be hotter than when the booted into Linux. I think once Windows went to the NT kernel (NT, W2K, XP), it has the same feature where it waits on interupts like Linux.

  37. Reduce Bill's Power by cyber_rigger · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I read this as using Linux to reduce Bill's power (as in Microsoft Bill). :^)

  38. What DIY equipment is out there? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Especially for retrofit situations? All outlets can be X-10 managed, but this doesn't say anything about actual power consumption. I'd like something at my breaker box to measure the actual Kilowatt usage on the different circuits. Also it needs to be something passive, so if the computer goes down the system still needs to work perfectly (and then can poll the devices when it comes back up).

    1. Re:What DIY equipment is out there? by deacon · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Call your local power company and ask if they will give you an old electric meter..There are piles of old meters at the dump as the utility changes to meters with remote reading capability.

      Mount the meter in a box with a plug and an outlet.. Take the reading of the meter

      Plug in your device, see what the meter reading after 24 hours. Subract this from the first reading you took.

      Result is the KWH used by your device averaged over 24 hours. You can obviously use a longer or shorter time period, as appropriate to the device.

      For 120 V devices, wire between either one of the hot meter legs and the neutral. For 240 V devices, wire between the 2 hot legs. Don't put 240 V on the meter between a hot and the neutral leg!

    2. Re:What DIY equipment is out there? by cr0sh · · Score: 2
      Very little (it seems) exists:

      Sean Adams Laser Meter Reader

      There are also a couple of other links on that page - basically it is a "meter reader" that counts the pulses coming from the spinning disk in the reader (for some reason, meters in America use spinning disks, even if they are digital - this probably isn't the case everywhere - the link to the British dude, when it was up and I visited - showed what appeared to be a fully digital meter, no mechanical parts). He has it hooked up to a Linux box that reads these pulses via the parallel port.

      Such a setup, while not as advanced as what is being offered by Obvious (which seems to allow for monitoring of multiple circuits and other such niceties - which would be cool to do, because then you could get the monitoring down to circuit, and almost device, level), would still be useful for a homeowner and such.

      What I am wanting to do, though, is figure out how digital meters work. The meter on my house is one of the digital/mechanical hybrids. I could use Sean's circuit, but there is a "plug" on the front, that looks optical in some regard, that the meter reader guy uses to interface a handheld data logger device to - I would rather be able to use that interface, since it is what should be used, rather than a clunky external laser and detector system (though I wonder what my power company would think - one thing I wonder, is if you can program/reset through that interface - they wouldn't like that).

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    3. Re:What DIY equipment is out there? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      I could always combine that with the other suggestion, and buy/find/steal a whole bunch of old electric meters and hook them up to each breaker (even to each outlet if I was psycho enough). Then use the laser system to read those meters.

      Of course at that point I'd have to consider how much power the actual meters/lasers were using. Not to mention I'd have to convice the inspectors that it was perfectly safe (or tear the system down and hide it every time I did any new electrical work).

      And then there's the question of just how much usefulness I'd get out of it. Probably not enough to justify the hassle, though setting up the laser system at the current meters would probably be worth it - they don't mention the actual prices, just that it's cheap.

      Thanks for the info.

  39. Linux toggles less gates for workload... by hopscotch · · Score: 5, Informative

    For CMOS devices, the power consumed is proportional the TOGGLING of GATE STATES NOT the length of time that the device is energized.

    From a processor viewpoint, just saying the Linux consumes more power because the machine in on more misses an important effeciency of Linux.

    For friend of mine measured the CPU temperature for both Linux and Windows on the same machine.

    Linux ran at about 78F degrees. Windows ran at about 92F degrees. Same tasks for both.

    Hotter chip means more energy consumed and shorter chip life.

    Linux should get credit for measurebly more effecient use of cpu gates.

    --Hopscotch

    1. Re:Linux toggles less gates for workload... by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Linux ran at about 78F degrees. Windows ran at about 92F degrees. Same tasks for both.

      Same tasks? Pray tell, which tasks? vi vs. MS Word? 78F CPU temp is awful freakin cold. Was linux running in an IGLOO?

      You're comparing a linux CLI to Windows with a full GUI, and getting heat of the video card, extra proc time devoted to rendering.

      Compare the heat generated in the Q3 timedemo on both, and see if there's a difference with the CPU under a full load. There won't be.

      Bah to cooked benchmarks.

      Also, I've never seen a CPU vary that much from full idle to a full load.

      Either A) Your friend misapplied the ASIII and heatsink, B) Your friend is a liar, or C) You made this shit up knowing a MS slam would get you karma.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Linux toggles less gates for workload... by tuuw · · Score: 1

      Which version of windows was used to make the comparision?
      Could it be that linux runs cooler because it actually makes use of the HLT instruction during cpu idle time? In an idle state my CPU runs about 15 degrees cooler in linux compared with windows 98. Using an application such as Waterfall pro or CPU Idle in windows reduces this temperature difference to almost nothing. Apparently later versions of windows do issue the HLT instruction during idle time.

    3. Re:Linux toggles less gates for workload... by hopscotch · · Score: 1

      Regarding "78F CPU temp is awful freakin cold" The CPU temperatures were external, so the internal chip temperatures were *obviously* higher. However, the relative observation remains the same.

      The physics of the CMOS devices can be used to measure the effeciency of software implementations. CMOS power consumed is proportional to the number of gates toggled.

      We also did other more rigorous evaluations which measured the ratio of energy consumed for specific work done.

      Inefficiency simply can't hide when measuring WorkDone/EnergyConsumed.

      Bottom Line: ineffecient software (no matter who writes and sales it) does have some impact on our world energy consumption.

      It's really a question of "How many gate toggles did the programmer use to screw in a light bulb?"

      --Hopscotch

    4. Re:Linux toggles less gates for workload... by hopscotch · · Score: 1

      Congratutions, your observation is correct on both the Windows 98 and the energy penalty of not using the HLT instruction when appropriate.

      At home, Ken happened to have a dual boot system with Windows 98 and Linux at the time. One day the CPU fan became intermittent so he put a temperature sensor on the CPU to know when to give the fan an assist.

      At work, we both were involved with a research project which required highly efficient coding, OS, and processors. His home computer experience made an interesting story which complemented our more rigorous research project.

      Developers need to keep in mind that ENERGY EFFICIENT CODE is *more* that just using HLT instructions. Effecient code will toggle less gates and use less energy.

      For example, a fully-optimized hand-coded assembly FFT will use less energy than high level language FFT for the same data throughput .

      If you run fully-optimized FFTs, you can measure the gate toggling effeciency of different CPU architectures relative to FFTs. {Of course, optimized to each CPU.}

      At one point we estimated that a switch from Pentiums to PowerPC would reduce US national energy consumption by about 1%. However, a massive switch of processors is not likely to happen for other obvious non-energy-related economic reasons.

      --Hopscotch

    5. Re:Linux toggles less gates for workload... by hopscotch · · Score: 1

      > Pray tell, which tasks?

      Well, several different tasks were run.

      However, the most *interesting* task turned out to be simply 'idle'.

      Even after turning on the energy saving options for Windows 98, Windows still ran hotter. The disks would spin down and sleep, but Windows would still run the CPU hotter.

      Apparently, the Windows developers had did not care enough to use the HLT instruction.

      Does this really suprise anyone???

      --Hopscotch

  40. Re:The sniper has been identified... by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "...along with every heterosexual Slashdot poster..."

    Every troll should know that there's no such thing as a heterosexual slashdot poster, you silly goose.

    : /

    Nobody likes my jokes.

    --

    --
    pants ahoy
  41. I've got to get new glasses by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought you wrote "*robots* tend to be big energy drains."

    Robots that ensure you do nothing to violate copyrights, that contact your employers, and that track every move you make.

    And remember: RIAA representitives that deny the existence of robots may be robots themselves.
    GMFTatsujin

  42. Just a pick.... by Nick+Harkin · · Score: 1

    AC current, incorrect. AC stands for alternating current (as no doubt you know) so calling it AC current would be wrong, as it stands for alternating current current.

    In short, you can drop the 'current' part, and also flame me for nitpicking. :)

    1. Re:Just a pick.... by hplasm · · Score: 1

      They're similar to Direct Current Raisins....

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  43. Linux has poor power management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if any one else has expierenced this, but my laptop battery lasts 2.5-3 hours if I don't use any of the drive or heavily the CPU under windows lets say I am word processing. If I play DVD under windows it goes down to 1.5-2 hours. If I boot redhat and word process my battery only lasts 45 min to an hour. Its a Dell.

  44. Cheaper alternative: use your UPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use your UPS with computer interface to tell you how much electricity is being used by an appliance. Just hook up the serial or USB connection to monitor the UPS and plug your appliance into the UPS power socket (but not the computer also silly). Then monitor the watt usage.

  45. I'm sure it was a spic or a nigger... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but there is a chance that it was a dune coon, I won't rule that one out.

  46. software to save on cluster costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sort of offtopic, this related to saving power on linux not saving power using linux.

    i've got a linux cluster with over a hundred cpus, but the cluster isn't used all the time (probably only 50% utilized). is there any way to reduce the power consumption of this system when it isn't being used--other than turning off the machines.

    i've heard laptops are good at reducing power drain in sleep mode, but how about for desktops?

    ps this cluster it uses dual-PIII nodes.

  47. Selective perception by Stackster · · Score: 1

    Oops. Should be "Use Linux to power Bill".
    Now I've totally spoiled it.

    --

    There are 010 kinds of people. Those who understand octal, those who don't, and 06 other kinds of morons.
  48. I work for a metering/energy management company by ikekrull · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And I use Linux all the time.

    In fact, all our web-based energy visualisation products were developed and run on Linux, and the 3D energy visualisation work I do on this in my spare time:

    screenshot

    is also developed and run on Linux.

    The devices we use to interface ethernet with meters are too lightweight to run linux, they simply provide a TCP-IP -> serial connection for the meter's RS-232/422 interface and an ethernet port for connection to a LAN.

    Many meters only support pulse-output, which does require a device such as this to count pulses, convert them to kWh or other relevant measurement, buffer these readings for some period and provide a interface for this data to be extracted, which is what this device is.

    It is nice to see multiple inputs for temperature etc, as energy consumption data alone often does not provide enough of a picture to make decisions that can really cut your energy peaks or identify areas of inefficiency.

    --
    I gots ta ding a ding dang my dang a long ling long
  49. Slow day? by f97tosc · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know which is less interesting; that somebody makes electricity monitoring equipment that runs Linux, or that somebody managed to exchange a drive on his Mac.

    Please put up something more thrilling. Otherwise I might have to return to work.

    Tor

  50. Some perspective... by gtwreck · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work for a building automation systems manufacturer and have designed, built, and sold energy management/building automation systems since 1987. Your father is operating from the perspective of an HVAC mechanic and has a particularly narrow perspective on energy management in general. Yes, replacing inefficient equipment can reduce costs at apparently minimal levels. However, he likely has never worked with a BAS that was configured correctly and adequately supported by the vendor.

    A properly installed and configured building automation solution will find most of the savings are in finding ways to reduce demand through scheduling, staging, load sharing, load shedding, cycling, super-cooling, and other strategies. By reducing demand, you can go to a utility and negotiate reduced rates based on staying withing certain demand levels during peak times during the day.

    Simple things like making sure the lights, HVAC, and things like escalators come on at the right time in a staged order (to prevent demand spikes), and only where they are needed and are shut off when they are not in use (at night) can save a large facility literally millions every year.

    Changing out HVAC equipment for more efficient equipment is a very tiny part of the puzzle.

    BTW- all of the major BAS manufacturers (including my employer) have such a meter-monitoring unit, and many of them or related systems are increasingly based on embedded Linux. Meter monitoring units are useful to monitor a facility before it is put under complete control to determine where the savings can be found. Once the facility is in place, meter monitoring and associated daily reports are typically used to ensure that the system is operating properly, but in this case there is much more information available.

    So to say you might only get a $200 to $500 payoff over 15 years is small potatoes compared to the potential millions you can save at a typical big-box retail, manufacturing facility, or large high school.

    GTWreck

    1. Re:Some perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I, too, work in that field - for a BAS equipment dealer. I can vouch for the fact that a well designed and implemented BAS can save millions.

      - Demand spikes are handled by a simple software delay, telling the controllers to power up in 1(or 10 or 30) second intervals after power off or power failure.

      - Heating systems generally start a warm-up sequence in early morning so the building is warmer when people arrive. This makes the units work less when people start cranking up their room t-stats. The same idea applies for cooling in the summer. This also reduces demand spikes.

      - Software-based scheduling can save tons by shutting systems down at night.

      - Lighting systems can be monitored for efficiency. Large sections of buildings can be scheduled to go dark after hours.

      - Heat recovery can save energy, and this *will* require a BAS of some sort. Heat recovery wheels, return air dampers, variable speed drives... they must all work together to recover energy that would otherwise go out the building exhaust. This has the side effect of putting less runtime on electric heaters, which do eventually fail, therefore saving repair costs as well.

      - Time savings must also be accounted for. Troubleshooting time is greatly reduced by a BAS. This allows a small maintenance crew to maintain a large campus/district/building, reducing payroll.

      The aforementioned "$200 to $500" figure is vastly inaccurate, and in some cases, companies could save thousands of times that much.

      Some companies I know of that use our system are(without giving away location or affiliation):

      IBM
      Lucent
      AT&T
      Edward Jones
      United States Air Force (DITCO)
      Southwest Bank ... along with several local school districts and universities.

      Trust me, if this wasn't saving more money than it costs, they WOULD NOT use it. And it IS NOT cheap.

      Our stuff doesn't use embedded Linux AFAIK, though. Everything is done with small "driver" programs installed on a flash ROM. By "small" I mean usually 16kB. The rest of the flash ROM is used for the custom BAS programs we make.

      Mattintosh

  51. Re:Fucking WINDOWS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what makes you think he's gonna run linux when he obviously doesn't understand windows?

    Seriously. If you cant make windows work, pack up your PC, take it to the store, and tell them you need a refund because you're TOO FUCKING STUPID TO OWN A COMPUTER.

    Perhaps a Mac, or maybe a Super Nintendo.

  52. Here's the proof by toupsie · · Score: 5, Funny
    That's right, act now and no female will want to get within 100 feet of you!

    You think this is a joke but here's the proof that its true!

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Here's the proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL www.fark.com did a photoshop contest on that picture. Heres the link

      http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLi nk =327588

    2. Re:Here's the proof by leroybrown · · Score: 1

      i never thought i'd say this but i think linus is the best looking guy in that picture. and yes, i am secure in my manhood, thank you for asking.

      --
      Founder, Americans Allied Against Alliteration
    3. Re:Here's the proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well done .. if ya cant beat em , berate em ...
      asshole

    4. Re:Here's the proof by toupsie · · Score: 2
      i never thought i'd say this but i think linus is the best looking guy in that picture. and yes, i am secure in my manhood, thank you for asking.

      I had the same thought! :)

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    5. Re:Here's the proof by digidave · · Score: 2

      I don't know about that. The old guy in the beanie is kind of hot. And I'm not gay either, not that there's anything wrong with that. My father was gay.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    6. Re:Here's the proof by Drakkar · · Score: 1

      So is mine... tough thing to hear when you're 21.

    7. Re:Here's the proof by akamoe · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... Linus is the best looking (secure manhood, etc), and also the only one wearing a wedding ring.

      Wonder if the two are related...

  53. How Bill reads the subject by jukal · · Score: 2
    Use Linux to Reduce Your Power Bill

    Bill, Use your Power to Reduce Linux.

  54. Re:Fucking WINDOWS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch it! I've been using computers since fucking 1985! I've got 2 Linux and 1 BSD boxes and I'm a Unix sysadmin (HP-UX). Windows is Windows - it doesn't matter how experienced you are, it JUST DOESN'T WORK! ..and the reason why I have Windows2000 on my laptop is because company rules force so. (This laptop is property of the company I work for) I SURE HELL wouldn't use windows if I didn't have to.

  55. The Kill-a-Watt by ChicoLance · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Recently, I found a little personal power meter that you plug into the wall, and the device you want to measure in front of that. It then shows the amount of kWh that device is used. It's a stand-alone device, and runs between $40-50.

    It's called the Kill-A-Watt, and is available from ETA Engineering, CCrane, and Radio Shack. .

    I'm not involved in this, but just bought one, and it's answered a bunch of questions about how much everything uses. Interesting!

  56. Low-Power Isn't a Benefit for me... by puppetman · · Score: 2

    I steal power from BC Hydro to run my marijuana-grow-operation.

    1. Re:Low-Power Isn't a Benefit for me... by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I steal power from BC Hydro to run my marijuana-grow-operation.

      Sure there's a benefit then.

      The closer to 0 kWh usage you stay, the harder it will be for them to find the "leak".

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  57. YHBT YHL HAND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy is a troll; read his journal for crying out loud. He likes to post nonsense like this to get karma to troll some more. Don't take my word for it, read his journal & mod DOWN!

  58. Re:Seems like a good time to mention the kill a wa by pjrc · · Score: 5, Informative
    I hope this post can explain a bit about what the AcquiSuite is all about.

    I know Steve and the guys behind the AcquiSuite. I designed the Veris Enercept power meter that's shown on their home page. In fact, I can probably take credit for convincing them to go with Linux on x86 a few years ago (they were also seriously considering PSOS on the netsilicon ARM+ethernet hardware). I didn't actually participate in the AcquiSuite though, and I'm not affiliated with them, and I recently left Veris Industries. So take the rest of this comment with a grain of salt... I'm not totally impartial, but I do know quite a bit about the system.

    The AcquiSuite is designed for use in commercial buildings and groups of buildings. It can monitor many power lines, not just one socket. The Veris Enercept meters are typically installed in the breaker boxes that feed major sections or subsystems of a building. These meters are meant for 3-phase power systems in the 20 to 2400 amp range, not single-phase 120 volt, 15 amp residential. The AcquiSuite also interfaces to temperature, humidity and other types of sensors.

    There's three major factors (as I understand):

    1. Data is logged, so you can see when the power was used
    2. It's cost effective to collect the data, as many AcquiSuites can call to a single PPP dial-up account and transmit their data to a server
    3. They've done a lot of work to make it inexpensive to install the AcquiSuite and its related sensors

    One of the key factors is cost... since this thing is supposed to save energy, it needs to be a lot less expensive that what it costs to install.

    Compare to the "Kill A Watt" (which actually offers similar functionality for single-phase 120 volt as the Veris Enercept, but on a LCD instead of RS-485 network). With a simple meter like that, you can look over at it and see the power company is give the correct voltage, and how much current/power you're using at any particular time. You can see the accumulated consumption, so you could jot that number down every month and see how much the attached load cost you.

    But to be useful in truely saving money, you need to log the data, collect that data, and get an analysis of that data in a timely manner.

    You can go to your conventional power meter, be it the "Kill A Watt", Veris Enercpt, or the "glass meter" on the side of your house and read what it says. If you remember what it was last time to read it, say a week ago, you might say "damn, I used a lot of power this week, I'll have to try to do better next week... but how?"

    Now enter the AcquiSuite (or other data logging methods): when you're wondering about your power usage, you visit a website using your browser, and in seconds you have a detailed plot showing how much power you were using throughout the day. It's similar to those bandwitch graphs from MRTG, you see a massive anamoly and say "holy sh*t, what happened the night before last that used so much power"? Or perhaps you see the longer time scale and see that something hogs lots of power every Monday morning. Or perahsp you compare graphs for similar office spaces in different buildings and see that one office uses a lot more power than the others, and perhaps only in the morning.

    This is the sort of information that you really need to find where power is being wasted. And it's the timely fashion that's required to actually do something about it. You can find the janitor who didn't turn the light off, or modify a factory start-up proceedure for sequencing those machines properly on Monday morning, or fix the heating system in that one office that's using too much power.

    That is what the AcquiSuite, and systems like it, are all about. They log data on a fine enough time scale from enough locations that you can (hopefully) see those unexpected events that are wasting power and costing money, and you can see them very shortly after they occur, so you can actually go do something about them.

    One of the neat things about the AcquiSuite is it's ability to use the internet (linux tcp/ip stack and ppp). It can call an ISP and upload its data to a server, and as I recall it can be set to do this on a schedule with many others, so that a whole bunch of them can share just one dial-up account to send their data. I was told that a lot of people install them on their existing fax line, since it only makes calls infreqeuently and off of business hours. There were a bunch of other simple but nice features to the AcquiSuite that Steve was telling me about, but they escape me right now. Oh well.

    I hope this has cleared up some of what this is all about. I know a lot of slashdotters see a product and only think of its application in a resedential application, mainly their house, appartment, dorm room, etc. This thing is targeted at commercial builds and groups of buildings.

  59. Been done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This was done along time ago by a company called Enertec. Real cool tech that runs and monitors the building with 3D models, etc.

  60. Re:Fucking WINDOWS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1985! you dont say. Well, you should know how to configure one by now.

    You're a Unix sysadmin whos forced to use Windows, huh? yeh.. Silly troll..

    You're as computer literate as my dead great grandmother. Admit it.

    You couldnt find the reset button on a nintendo, all the VCRs in your house blink 12:00, and your tamagotchi is probably in a fishbowl with a years worth of flakes floating over it.

  61. I couldn't tell you by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Funny
    Because I do not use Linux. I use Emacs. I just wish I had a good selection for linux based editors for Emacs though.

  62. It's not an issue of the power usage of the device by gtwreck · · Score: 1

    Even if the device is truly inefficient, it's usage will be many orders of magnitude lower than the devices that will be monitored by such equipment.

    Rooftop units, cooling towers, boilers, lighting grids, and other items are actually worth measuring on a building-wide scale. You would never bat an eye at the kind of usage associated with computers *much* larger than the device in the article.

  63. I thought linux running on all those 386/20 by SensitiveMale · · Score: 2, Funny

    machines rather than the new portable heaters (P4's) would give enough power savings.

  64. Very nice, but by Sivar · · Score: 2

    This device sounds great, but what many people I know and myself have been looking for is an affordable device which you plug in to a power outlet, then plug something (say, a computer) into the device, and get a simple readout of how many watts are being used, then we could use Ohm's law to find how many amps are in use. This would be extremely convenient for testing the real power usage of new PC components, major appliances, etc.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
    1. Re:Very nice, but by gruntvald · · Score: 2

      You need one of these my friend. Don't forget our chums at home power magazine for other energy related goodies and reviews.

    2. Re:Very nice, but by Sivar · · Score: 2

      Excellent, that is exactly what I was looking for. Thankyou!

      --
      Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  65. It's been a while... by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

    Linux provides complete TCP/IP functionality, PPP...

    God, I need to update my kernel. When the hell did Linux get those, anyway?

  66. Gosh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linus actually looks like a cool dude, surrounded by those nerds.

  67. It's being worked on, not ignored... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ACPI support
    CONFIG_ACPI
    ACPI/OSPM support for Linux is currently under development. As such,
    this support is preliminary and EXPERIMENTAL. Configuring ACPI
    support enables kernel interfaces that allow higher level software
    (OSPM) to manipulate ACPI defined hardware and software interfaces,
    including the evaluation of ACPI control methods. If unsure, choose
    N here. Note, this option will enlarge your kernel by about 120K.

    This support requires an ACPI compliant platform (hardware/firmware).
    If both ACPI and Advanced Power Management (APM) support are
    configured, whichever is loaded first shall be used.

    This code DOES NOT currently provide a complete OSPM implementation
    -- it has not yet reached APM's level of functionality. When fully
    implemented, Linux ACPI/OSPM will provide a more robust functional
    replacement for legacy configuration and power management
    interfaces, including the Plug-and-Play BIOS specification (PnP
    BIOS), the Multi-Processor Specification (MPS), and the Advanced
    Power Management specification (APM).

    Linux support for ACPI/OSPM is based on Intel Corporation's ACPI
    Component Architecture (ACPI CA). The latest ACPI CA source code,
    documentation, debug builds, and implementation status information
    can be downloaded from:
    <http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/d ownloads.htm>.

    The ACPI Sourceforge project may also be of interest:
    <http://sf.net/projects/acpi/>

  68. I don't get it by dh003i · · Score: 2

    I mean, we all know that in general, the TCO for Linux is cheaper than for other OS' for a variety of reasons.

    But what does this specifically have to do with Linux? This guy's talking about calculating ways to save power. That can be done under any OS.

    The title of this article is like saying, "Use Porsche's to get from point A to point B". Yes, you can use Porshe's to get from point A to point B; but you can also use any other car.

  69. Not really going to save.. by EvilStein · · Score: 2

    My power bill is *higher* because of Linux. I'm crazy and have multiple servers running about the house.

    However, a few of them are Pentium III units, so my gas bill (for heating) has dropped like a rock.

    I just wish it was equal to the amount my power bill went up. :-)

    The apartment stays nice and warm. If I lived in Alaska, this would not be a bad thing. But in Sacramento, CA... well, I like my home sauna, let's just leave it at that.

    1. Re:Not really going to save.. by adolf · · Score: 2

      I concur.

      The weather here in Ohio is starting to get chilly. When I had a couple of friends over the other night, one of them remarked to me "Man, why is your door open? It's -cold- outside. Why don't you shut it and turn on the heat?"

      I then gave him a brief tour of my furnace: A couple middle-of-the-road FreeBSD and Linux boxen, the slothly Windows machine in the corner, more than 100 pounds of fan-cooled UPS, an extraordinarily warm SMC 10/100 switching hub, HP Laserjet III, an old Scanjet IIcx, 19" monitors, 20" TV, and a stereo that draws a couple hundred Watts at idle.

      I had him hold his hand in the (quite warm) exhaust stream from the BSD machine for emphasis.

      I then told him that if it did get much cooler out, I would shut the door, but would leave the thermostats alone. My usual trick, which I expect to work fine until December or so, has been to use a fan to circulate heat from the living room to the rest of the apartment.

      And even after the snow flies, I'm not sure I'll be switching on the electric baseboard heaters. It seems like it'd be so much more fun to keep the TV on, and the recessed lights above the kitchen sink and range and in the bathroom could stay on more often. If things are still cold, I'll start firing up hideously-inefficient DJ lighting gear until it it warms up, and enjoy the technicolor splendor in the meantime.

      Technology is highly underrated as a source of heat in cooler climates. It's also "free" heat, if it's a device you'd leave on whether or not it was cold in the room.

      All this for ~$60/mo (or about twice that in the month of July, with AC and circulation fans going 24/7).

  70. Re:Fucking WINDOWS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha...
    computer literate my ass.

    I bet you blow on your nintendo games to make them work. Then fumble around for the reset button. You F'ing dumbass. I'd applaud if you could operate a public telephone.

  71. Linux doesn't play games by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 1

    Of course Linux saves on the electric bill, you cannot sit in front of a linux box for 12 hours playing Everquest.

    --
    ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
  72. I agree data logging is key. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    I wish that every single outlet in my home had a kill a watt type meter being logged.

    What do you recommend for the home user that wants something like this just for the nerd factor and doesn't have a million bucks to spend?

    I suppose we could rip open the kill a watt and try to create an interface for it so we could log it's data but still that's not very practical.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:I agree data logging is key. by domefreak · · Score: 1

      I recommend the Brand meter. See my other post on this topic for more details and other meters to use for the same purpose.

    2. Re:I agree data logging is key. by pjrc · · Score: 2
      What do you recommend for the home user that wants something like this just for the nerd factor and doesn't have a million bucks to spend?

      There just aren't many products targeted at residential applications, because the money spent on power (withint one hoursehold) and the opportunity for reducing it just isn't enough to justify buying equipment.

      I suppose we could rip open the kill a watt and try to create an interface for it so we could log it's data but still that's not very practical.

      Ask me this question again in 15 months, when my non-compete agreement with Veris is expired. Normally I don't worry too much about that, but this is a power meter, and I spent years at Veris designing power meters.

  73. Texas doesn't get power bills... by Farmbubba · · Score: 1

    Actually, since texas de-regulated, most big buidlings and large consumers of power have not gotten a power bill (since Janurary) I don't know how the power companies are staying in business. The problem is that the central agency for keeping the meter data can not get the information back out the the power companies to send out bills! Funny thing is that the residential billing seems to be working, only companies that use more than a megawatt seem to be affected with the blight of free power.

  74. Penguin Power! by J1a2o · · Score: 1

    =)

  75. He's not using Excel, dipshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The device doesn't "calculate ways to save power". It logs power usage and reports it. If you think a Winblows computer can do this, why don't you find one and post it, smarty-pants.

  76. use Linux to reduce Bill's power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You read it right...its a subliminal message....Use Linux to reduce Bill's Power!
    He wont have much of a monopoly if no one wants to use his garbage

  77. DO turn your air conditioner off when you're gone by bleeeeck · · Score: 2
    Regarding the AC unit ... DON'T TURN IT OFF. If you turn it off, the house heats up (or cools down in winter), and it takes that much more energy to bring the air, and EVERYTHING ELSE in the house, including the walls, back down to the proper temperature.

    I'm pretty sure that is wrong. I'm lazy and only found one source here. It says:

    "It is a myth that it is cheaper to keep a house cool all the time than to cool a house that has had the air conditioner turned off or set to a warmer setting for part of the day. It actually takes less energy to run an air conditioner hard for a short time than to run it over a long period of time."
  78. Is linux really needed? by brad3378 · · Score: 2

    Yeah, its great for companies,
    but for residential applications?

    How about this?
    A programmable thermostat with a
    $ meter.

    Of course it wouldn't be exact, but
    it might teach a few people (myself included)
    that turning my thermostat up those last two degrees makes a huge difference in my energy bill.

    --

  79. Re:My apartment uses similar technology...taps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking of tapping. Landlord at my old apartment installed an outside security light. Guess who's power circuit he tapped into? Good thing I left before the power bill came due.

  80. my bill wasn't reduced after i got to know linux by malana-cream · · Score: 1

    before: 1 Desktop-Computer, dial-in AOL, only on when I use it after: 1 Desktop-Computer 1 Linux-Fileserver always on 1 Linux-Firewall always on about 20 Computers in our House connected to this Network, rising So I definetely have to pay more for Electricity. stupid Linux, stupid

  81. actually by ciryon · · Score: 2
    I thought it said Use Linux to Reduce Your Power, Bill

    I bet Bill's grand house could use some Linux to reduce power.


    Ciryon
  82. Re:Fucking WINDOWS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey dude, you're a dipshit!

  83. Use Linux to Reduce You Power, Bill by Glabrezu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its amazing what a single comma might do...

    --
    Santiago
  84. Re:Fucking WINDOWS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck off lamer!!! When you're old enough to get a job then perhaps you'll understand that large companies have a certain policy for certain things. Do you fucking idiot think that everybody can install whatever they want? I myself use TeraTerm to telnet Unix servers.. That's why windows is sufficient OS on my laptop although I'm a Unix admin.

  85. Re:X10 camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tiny! Wireless! Fits anywhere! Allows you to look at photos of scantily-clad women!

  86. improperly vented by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    The machine should have had 3 case fans in it the way it was loaded up; only the power supply fan was operational (and the CPU fan).

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  87. Re:Fucking WINDOWS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey buddy.....that blowing shit really works. Come over and I'll show you on Kung-Fu.

  88. Re:My apartment uses similar technology...taps by swb · · Score: 2

    That's common, I'm sure.

    Although at the last apartment building I lived in, I saw it done in reverse. People on the 1st floor used to bitch about the heat -- 1920s building, heat rises to top floor, bad/no insulation, leaky roof door, etc.

    The landlord couldn't fix it (short of a $200k remodel job), so the tenants ran an extension cord to the hallway circuit and ran a space heater in their apartment off of it. I saw it there most of the winter several winters in a row, so the landlord must have figured that an extra $10 on the monthly electric bill was better than bitchy tenants.

    Strangely, these tenants were an elderly couple (late 60s) who had lived in the same apartment for like 35 years.

  89. Re:It can't save you money on your electricity bil by joib · · Score: 2

    I currenlty use the ACPI support included as default in the 2.4 kernels. You were saying...?

  90. Re:Linux doesn't play games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can now :) check out the new wine ;)

  91. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    There is is no reason for any individual to have a computer in their home.
    -- Ken Olsen (President of Digital Equipment Corporation),
    Convention of the World Future Society, in Boston, 1977

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...