Slashdot Mirror


Stash Your Hard Drive In The Attic

RegardsSJ writes "Robert X. Cringley on his PBS website mentions a $479 wireless, fanless 120gb network storage/file server appliance (running linux) in his column. He thinks the killer app for this one is for keeping your porn storage hidden, if you're busted by the cops. I think his concept is weak, given the wireless signal is traceable (security through obscurity?), WEP is breakable, and the fact that you have to have the thing plugged in somewhere... The company selling the device is martian.com. Anybody use one?" Now that it's possible to stream audio and video through various boxes originally serving other purposes (like TiVo and PlayStation2), this looks like a good companion piece, too.

484 comments

  1. In the closet... by villain170 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why not just stuff it under your mattress? They'll never find it there...

    --

    I am over here... now I am back over here!
    1. Re:In the closet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Now you can truly say i have "uploaded" porn on my server

    2. Re:In the closet... by villain170 · · Score: 1

      Well, as we sit here, I'm sure there are a ton of microwaves flying all through us at any given time.. so, it's a small price to pay for the extra "convenience."

      --

      I am over here... now I am back over here!
    3. Re:In the closet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the matress might not be a good place assuming your attaching a claymore mine or simular anti-personel device to the remote storage. the attic is a much better place.

    4. Re:In the closet... by Telecommando · · Score: 5, Funny

      No where in Cringely's article is porn mentioned. The only mention of porn is on Slashdot.

      Which makes me wonder about the priorities of Slashdot's editors.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    5. Re:In the closet... by drunk_as_in_beer · · Score: 2, Funny

      He thinks the killer app for this one is for keeping your porn storage hidden, if you're busted by the cops.

      I was wondering if it really was porn they are trying to hide from the cops. I think I know what they were really trying to get at:

      Slashdot
      News for Warez Monkeys. Stuff that's 0-day.

      --
      --Drunk as in Beer
    6. Re:In the closet... by torpor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More to the point, since legal porn is legal, what sort of porn would you *NOT* want the cops to find?

      If you've got illegal porn (what would that be, kiddy porn?) then /.'s suggested use for this device is insidious and despicable.

      I found it a despicable suggestion, anyway. Just what sort of porn would you *not* want the cops to find?

      Disgusted.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    7. Re:In the closet... by Molt · · Score: 1
      I don't know about you, but I hate it when the cops find any of my porn. They just end up sitting in front of the computer looking at my porn and drinking my beer, and when they've gone my keyboard is all sticky.

      Eww. I don't want to think about it.

      --
      404 Not Found: No such file or resource as '.sig'
    8. Re:In the closet... by torpor · · Score: 1

      That's some sick shit you're fantasizing about there buddy.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    9. Re:In the closet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehehe....tell us more about this sick shite your on about mate, sounds like you're holding back from us! the only thing you have to be ashamed of is not sharing....

    10. Re:In the closet... by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who was accused of molesting his former roommate's daughter. His porn collection, all legal, was used as evidence, to attack his character.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
  2. Huh? by mondoterrifico · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since when is having porn illegal?

    1. Re:Huh? by k-0s · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thats what I thought but then I thought maybe *HIS* kind or porn is illegal then it all made sense.

    2. Re:Huh? by easyfrag · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Give Ashcroft time, he doesn't even like partially nude statues.

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or the retro christian US?

    4. Re:Huh? by darkonc · · Score: 1
      Since when is having porn illegal?

      Since it was done using your 12 year old sister as a 'model'?

      Anybody worried about police busting his porn site would have to be stashing some seriously hardcore stuff... and they'd also have to be pretty stupid to have a wireless node broadcasting it to the neighborhood -- even if it is 'encrypted'.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its for your sick demented kiddie porn slashdot readers.

    6. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Ashcroft's defence, the news photographers were going out of their way to get the statues in the background everytime he held a press conference. CNN showed footage of photographers lying on the floor, contorting themselves, and generally acting like retarded assholes to get the pictures. So, Ashcroft took it away from them. Sometime you have to do that when people insist on being terminal assholes. I couldn't care less about nude statues, but I would have done the same just out of spite.

    7. Re:Huh? by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Since when is having porn illegal?

      That was my reaction. Unless you're in one of the several countries governed by semi-theocratic laws where pr0n of any sort is illegal, and showing a little ankle is considered risque. :-) Or, unless you're in the business of amassing kinderporn, which is quite fortunately illegal in most Western countries.

      However, you may have other things to hide. Your real accounting books, so you can keep the IRS at bay while keeping more of your income. Your "cracker tools" and the fruits of your cracking efforts. Your copies of all those public documents formerly available on CD-ROM which the U.S. government ordered destroyed shortly after Sept. 11th in the name of national security. Your list of contacts and informants as a reporter. Your MP3 and OGG files, so that if the RIAA comes knocking...

      As you can see, some things you could use a secret storage device for are pretty bad, while some are completely good. Everyone should be entitled to a measure of privacy, and the ability to protect it. In fact, it used to be a matter of law in prior centuries that a man's personal papers, books, diaries and such, could not be used against him as evidence--because we're supposed to have freedom of thought. Sadly, this has eroded...

      This device has many waknesses which the submitter points out. However, one could very easily build a similar device without those deficiencies in security. For one thing, wireless is out--too traceable, sniffable, and breakable. So, you'd have to go wired--and disguise the wired connection as something innocuous and unconnected to a "secret network". Hmmm... The many possibilities include phoneline networking, as long as you're willing to do a little remodeling and don't mind the slow speed. If you really think about it, there are many ways in which one could adequately disguise a wired network, as long as you're willing to do a little remodeling or build custom, disguised dual-use devices. Hell, as Cringely mentioned, even TiVos have USB ports these days... The possibilities are literally endless.

      --

      Chasing Amy
      (We all chase Amy...)
      "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
    8. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I *assume* the submitter meant that you don't know the biography of the people in JPGs you download, so some of them could technically be child porn.

      But I dunno, if "the authorities" want to bust you they'll find something to bust you for.

    9. Re:Huh? by neitzsche · · Score: 1

      I am currently going through a divorce. One (rather bizarre, IMHO) allegation my wife made at one point was that I was "addicted to pornogrophy." Now besides a statement like that being outrageous on it's face, it's also not true. I occasionally d/l softcore, legal porn, then flit through the download later. She alleges that I have amassed a huge porn collection (not true.) For her to use the presence of a couple legal newsgroup d/l files on my computer as evidence that I'm a pervert I hope will eventually show the court what an over-reacting freak she is. But then again, these *are* US courts.

      --
      "God is dead." - Frederik Nietzsche
    10. Re:Huh? by t0ny · · Score: 1

      The moron is probably afraid his kiddy porn stash is going to get discovered.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    11. Re:Huh? by Wansu · · Score: 1


      Anybody worried about police busting his porn site would have to be stashing some seriously hardcore stuff ...

      Porn can be "seriously hardcore stuff" and be legal so long as the models are all 18. Therein lies the problem. As one poster pointed out, you have no way of knowing the biographies of these models. Some petite college girls can easily pass for high schoolers. Obviously, porn depicting models who appear to be 12 years old doesn't fall in this grey area. But when people get busted for possession of "child porn", that distinction is seldom made.

      --
      Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    12. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seriously hardcore stuff..

      Not hardcore, just sicko stuff which is illegal for a reason.

      Hell, if I find kiddie porn on someone's computer (not the 18-year-old-pretending-to-be-17 stuff, but the 12-13 year olds), I'll kick their ass and drag them into the police myself.

      Porn is fine. Exploitation is not. Rape is not.

    13. Re:Huh? by grammar+fascist · · Score: 1

      Why is this insightful?

      The photographers used to make a sport out of getting the best shots with both the speaker and the exposed breast. At best, it was distracting.

      Why must everything be an issue of Free speech?

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    14. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im with you on this one.. And whats with the campaign against Ashcroft. Its starting to sound about as bad as the M$ sucks crowd.

      Slashdot has turned into a political madhouse the past few years, and it is sickening.

    15. Re:Huh? by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

      Ashcroft was pushing the CIPA. Bad, bad... for free speech, anyway.

      Aside from that, he's not too bad at all.

    16. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that hiding the porn would be more about not getting Richard Jewel'ed. You're being investigated by the cops and it's printed in newspapers across the country that you have porn at home -- doesn't really have anything to with anything, but now you're Leno-fodder...

    17. Re:Huh? by slittle · · Score: 1

      If you didn't pay for it, it's probably 'stolen' - ie. copyrighted.

      There were raids on pr0n BBSs back in the 80's for various reasons (unauthorised/licensed re-distribution, supply of adult material to minors). It's not unheard of.

      If someone has it in for you, it's just more ammo for them..

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    18. Re:Huh? by Troed · · Score: 1
      I fail to see what your interest in porn has to do with a divorce.


      I don't live in the US though - I seldom understand your "morality".

    19. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give Ashcroft time, he doesn't even like partially nude statues. [bbc.co.uk]
      He should move to Iran then :p

    20. Re:Huh? by iainl · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about insightful, but Ashcroft holding a diatribe against the evils of pornography with a breast over his right shoulder is at least mildly amusing, surely?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    21. Re:Huh? by neitzsche · · Score: 1

      I share your lack of understanding. But the courts entertains her complaints nevertheless.

      --
      "God is dead." - Frederik Nietzsche
  3. If it's wireless by Spunky_Monkey · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If it's wireless, then surely ANY bluetooth (or whatever) compatible computer will pick it up - so you are sharing your pr0n with your neigbours.

    1. Re:If it's wireless by blowdart · · Score: 1

      Assuming you're not a troll, no

      • It's running SMB, which can use passwords
      • You'll be able to setup the wlan card Access Point / Infrastructure only, and stop ad-hoc sharing.
      • Bluetooth != wireless lan.
  4. illegal porn?? by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ummm... I didn't see any child-porn-storage type of usage mentioned on the website. How about the millions of people who could theoretically be shut away for their "illegal" mp3 collection?

    If only it came with a self-destruct mechanism, it might overcome the shortcomings you mentioned :) Also, perhaps better encryption with a smart-card at the PC you could remove and destroy. Then it would be a perfect product for terrorists and pedophiles alike ...and perhaps normal people who don't want anyone seizing their data.

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:illegal porn?? by k-0s · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This could pose some interesting questions. Say (for instance) your computer resides in Texas, on the very edge of the border. Then you take one of these and put it over the border in Mexico at your friends house acroos the other side of the border. Who can press charges against you for your illegal MP3's? The US? Not really, no physical evidence of the files. Mexico? Again not really because no computer is connected to the drive. Any answers anyone?

    2. Re:illegal porn?? by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      No need for smartcards for encryption, just use EFS on win2k+ or a loopback encryption scheme under linux (do any of the mainstream filesystems support encryption?)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:illegal porn?? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The US? Not really, no physical evidence of the files.

      Sure they can. Remember: in the end, you'd be judged by a jury, and to a jury a computer is a "magic box" anyway.

      And, theoretically, the US and Mexican police could just cooperate.

    4. Re:illegal porn?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or: say you stand in Texas, and shoot and kill a person in Mexico? Where (if anywhere) are you charged with a crime??

    5. Re:illegal porn?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mexico? Again not really because no computer is connected to the drive.

      That would never fly. It doesn't matter if anyone looks at the data after it has been copied, it was still copied without authorization in the first place.

    6. Re:illegal porn?? by pytheron · · Score: 1

      BestCrypt offers cool encryption for linux via a kernel module and the loopback interface. Choose from a glob of algorithms to protect your block device, such as Blowfish, Twofish, GOST and 3DES. Whilst not free, for a measly $89.95 you get the source code and 1 license, coupled with 1 years updates and online support. More than adequate for those with sensitive data.

      --
      "I am not bound to please thee with my answers" [William Shakespeare]
    7. Re:illegal porn?? by k-0s · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the computer with the CD drive attached to it are in the US, you copied into Mexico so who trys you for the crime then? Thats my only question.

    8. Re:illegal porn?? by sirsnork · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does this mean you're importing illegal music? Wouldn't that be worse (legally speaking?)

      --

      Normal people worry me!
    9. Re:illegal porn?? by afidel · · Score: 1

      There are free loopback solutions for linux such as cryptfs, what I wanted to know is if there were any solutions that could be used without loopback and the performance hit that implies (about 3X slower in the case of cryptfs).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    10. Re:illegal porn?? by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful


      A more realistic application of your suggestion woul dbe to place this box outside your residence. If you live in an apartment building, you could put it in a hallway or above some ceiling panels somewhere. If it is confiscated, there is no issue of possession to tie it to you. This follows the precedent set by clandestein farmers who grow illegal crops on National Park property.
    11. Re:illegal porn?? by arkanes · · Score: 2, Funny

      They'd probably nail you as an arms smuggler for "exporting" WEP.

    12. Re:illegal porn?? by _bug_ · · Score: 1

      IANAL

      The US could charge you with trafficing in illegal goods across the border.

      The MP3s may be stored on a machine in Mexico, but if you're going to play them, you're going to have to bring them across the border via the wireless.

    13. Re:illegal porn?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably would put up a shield, just like they put up a fence to keep illegal immigrants out.

    14. Re:illegal porn?? by yomegaman · · Score: 1

      That's a good idea. I'm picturing a long line of microwave ovens and cordless phones, as far as the eye can see... :-)

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    15. Re:illegal porn?? by de+la+mettrie · · Score: 1

      Or: say you stand in Texas, and shoot and kill a person in Mexico? Where (if anywhere) are you charged with a crime??

      Both Mexico and the United States can charge you and sentence you (that is, the nation that gets hold of you first will). This is so because a crime is considered to have occurred, for purposes of jurisdiction, in the place it was committed and in the place it caused its effect. I guess that's the solution for the HD-over-the-border variant, too.

      At least that's the law in Continental Europe, not sure about you Anglos... I guess Texas wins by default :-)

    16. Re:illegal porn?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then downloading MP3s from Mexican server would be a "trafficing in illegal goods".

    17. Re:illegal porn?? by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "If only it came with a self-destruct mechanism, it might overcome the shortcomings you mentioned :) "

      I belive military hardware has self destruct, or we destroy it. Like spy planes computer stuff that is. I belive they smash the drives and toss acid on them.

      Now this would be a neet feature in a harddrive. Have a mod you can trigger that causes the pickup head to grind the plater in pre chosen spots to be destroyed or just have a capsule of acid in the drive and when needed you can trigger it and she kills the drive. I can see hads now for the western Digital Canibal drive series, the drives that eat themselves (intentionaly).

    18. Re:illegal porn?? by CoolVibe · · Score: 1

      I heard from people (supposedly in the know) that they (the military and government) actually microwave some media to make sure one can't recover the data that's stored on it.

    19. Re:illegal porn?? by thompsok · · Score: 1

      when I was in the Navy, and we had to dispose of media that contained classified material, we ran floppy drives through a degaussing machine, and we took hard-drives apart. Then we would run the individual platters through the degaussing machine. After that, some handy work with a sledgehammer and it could be disposed of in regular trash. Keep in mind, however, that I was only dealing with material labeled SECRET. TOP SECRET, and other classifications have different disposal procedures. None of the information I have presented here is classified.

    20. Re:illegal porn?? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      I belive military hardware has self destruct

      Dunno how it's set up now, but when I was a signal intelligence analyst in the army 10 years ago, we had a small safe in the back of the truck we worked out of that held all our written notes and such. The top part of the safe held a thermite grenade that could be set off by pulling a ring, even with the safe shut. From what I heard, when they started giving 'em laptops in the field, they had to keep the hard drives in the safe when not in use. I reckon 1000+ degree molten iron would erase most any magnetic media.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    21. Re:illegal porn?? by azzy · · Score: 2, Funny

      > A more realistic application of your suggestion woul dbe to place this box outside your residence. If you live in an
      > apartment building, you could put it in a hallway or above some ceiling panels somewhere. If it is confiscated, there is

      Want to tell me where you live so I can come by and steal it?

      > no issue of possession to tie it to you. This follows the precedent set by clandestein farmers who grow illegal crops on
      > National Park property.

    22. Re:illegal porn?? by Michael+Crutcher · · Score: 1

      Where would you plug it in?

    23. Re:illegal porn?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshiat. There have been plently of people busted for growing "crops" not on their property. The coppers stake out the site and bust them when they come to check on it.

    24. Re:illegal porn?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what crime has been commited? we don't care about mexicans...

    25. Re:illegal porn?? by paganizer · · Score: 1

      I designed, built and was getting ready to market a series of 5 1/4 enclosure boxes for the express purpose of destroying the 3.5" drive inside with a key switch. You would positively NOT believe the, um, chill i soon felt.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    26. Re:illegal porn?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just put it in your car. A separate warrant is required to search your car. The police most likely won't have that if they bust into your house to take away your computer. Then you can drive away ;)

    27. Re:illegal porn?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need for smartcards for encryption,

      I don't know about you, but I would have trouble remembering a 256-bit key. You're talking about a 43 character ASCII (6-bit) password.

      A smartcard would allow you to use even longer keys and only need to remember a 8 character password. Remember, a smartcard is normally set up to only allow a certain number of tries (usually 3) before it locks. The probability of guessing a 8 character password in 3 tries is remote to say the least. Once it's locked, it's permanent and if the card is physically secure like they are suppose to be then there is no way to ever retrieve the password (but I imagine big government agencies like the NSA can still physically get at the data on the card).

    28. Re:illegal porn?? by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


      How are the cops going to see you accessing files on this hidden hard drive? It's a little different in that there is no physical relationship to this device and you. Heck. You could even put it in your neighbor's house...
    29. Re:illegal porn?? by lostchicken · · Score: 1

      The power lines that run through the building? Perhaps you could tap a light socket or something.

      --
      -twb
    30. Re:illegal porn?? by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      My GPG password is about 35 characters long, and I've got it memorized....

    31. Re:illegal porn?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just jury rig in a charge of thermite to a radioshack relay hooked up to a big red button on my desk

    32. Re:illegal porn?? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Two words: finger prints.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    33. Re:illegal porn?? by mekkab · · Score: 1

      Want to tell me where you live so I can come by and steal it?

      No. ;)

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    34. Re:illegal porn?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Jesus of Nazareth did not die so we could enjoy eggs and chocolate bunnies!

      Who?? Don't you mean Ostara didn't die for chocolate bunnies? :-)

    35. Re:illegal porn?? by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "Then you take one of these and put it over the border in Mexico at your friends house acroos the other side of the border. Who can press charges? Any answers anyone?"

      Howabout we just put all of our hard drives in Mexico? Or Canada. Or the British West Indies.

    36. Re:illegal porn?? by blibbleblobble · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I've heard from people that the military actually microwave some media to make sure one can't recover the data that's stored on it."

      No, microwaving recordable-CDs is commonplace amongst anyone who needs to securely delete a CDR. [4 seconds, put a glass of water in the microwave too, and make sure all your windows are open]

      Anyone with more money (i.e. corporate, government, military) pays for someone to come and take their CDs and grind them up using special cutting machines.

      Admittedly, the military do seem to have a thermite fetish, and perhaps many people here would be interested if they could buy a hard-drive with electronically-activated thermite pre-installed.

    37. Re:illegal porn?? by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      ok use latex gloves and clean it off with ammonia once you have in the final place to remove any traces of you and your apartment.

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    38. Re:illegal porn?? by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      yes it is if they are illegal MP3's it is actually a crime to d/l any illegal MP3's from Mexico or the US

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
  5. Why by Threni · · Score: 4, Insightful

    would you want to hide your porn collection, unless you're a paedophile?

    1. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      or a Briton!


      It's pedophile you slimy limey.

    2. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hide my pr0n because i am NOT a paedophile. Otherwise children might find it and try to seduce me!!

    3. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But...that's child pornography! I mean, apart from that, why would you hide it?

    4. Re:Why by Jamesie · · Score: 1

      No it isn't you wanky yanky.

    5. Re:Why by bedouin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's probably a lot of reasons to hide things, even if you're innocent. I'm not a porn guy myself, but let's just put forth a hypothetical situation where you're arrested for a crime, perhaps murder (in which you claim it was self defense). Somehow the prosecution manages to get ahold of your PC, and finds out you liked visiting sites about guns and other types of weapons, then uses it to argue you're an inherently violent and trigger-happy individual.

      I've seen cases where a girl was raped and the defense brought forth the fact that the woman was a stripper, as evidence that she lead a dangerous lifestyle and 'put herself in a situation to be raped.' Not saying I agree or disagree with that, but things like that do happen. Or let's say you're a Chemistry major who somehow ends up held on secret evidence; part of that evidence is that you kept materials relating to chemicals on your hard drive. You had no malicious intent, but . . . that doesn't much matter.

      So, there's a lot of reasons to hide things, especially when the idea of privacy is pretty much gone nowadays. I'd say people who make a comment like "why would you hide anything if you're not guilty" probably haven't had any run ins with the law (either through friends or directly), and don't know that prosecutors and detectives could oftentimes give a rat's ass about facts, especially if you end up being their "first big case," and finding you guilty means a promotion and big media coverage.

    6. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But if you have reason to hide things then this method is stupid. Try a crypto disk, such as cgd(4). Hiding the hard drive offers basically no protection whereas actually encrypting the drive will offer quite a bit of protection. Done properly with a pass phrase with at least, say, 45 bits of entropy cgd(4) should protect your data for the rest of your life.

      Hiding the hard drive in the attic will hide the data for a few minutes against anyone with half a clue. Also the performance hit of using WiFi for file sharing will be enormous. cgd(4) only costs a tiny amount of performance.

    7. Re:Why by bedouin · · Score: 1

      Someone else pointed this out in another thread, but essentially encrypting something might make you appear more suspicious. The best thing to do is make sure something is never found at all -- encrypted or not.

      In the case of encryption, you're just going to rot in jail until you give the key up.

      Seems the best answer for storing sensitive data might be to store it on a computer in another country, and transfer it back and forth with SSH.

    8. Re:Why by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      the defense brought forth the fact that the woman was a stripper, as evidence that she lead a dangerous lifestyle and 'put herself in a situation to be raped.' Not saying I agree or disagree with that

      Your neutrality is duly noted. But plenty of people do complain about "diryting the victum", which I think is crap. What, the accused isn't allowed to defend himself? The plaintif was walking around around a stip joint without panties and a purse thats filled with condoms and K-Y, and its somehow a traversity when the defense makes the claim that the woman was out looking for sex?

    9. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you consider your porn too important to lose, and it is well known that in the US, all your computer equipment (at least all of it that is witihn plain sight) can be confiscated as evidence if you are as much as suspected for a crime, and getting it back even after you are cleared can be impossible.

      Ever heard of Steve Jackson games?

    10. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like a really cool device that could have lots of applications we haven't even thought of yet. It could be cheaper though.

      As far as the "she was a stripper and therfore asking for it" defense for Rape... It holds no water. No woman (or man for that matter) EVER under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES gives up the right to say NO! Ironically He would have been better off to claim that she willingly had sex, and then punished him by claiming she was raped when he refused to pay. I'm not saying it's right, but it would have made a better defense.

    11. Re:Why by kent_eh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and its somehow a traversity when the defense makes the claim that the woman was out looking for sex?

      Not relevant.
      Maybe the offender was the only man in the world she was not interested in having sex with, it dosen't change the fact that it's her choice who she has sex with.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    12. Re:Why by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "In the case of encryption, you're just going to rot13 in jail until you give the key up."

      Best make sure you've got a key that you can give up then...

    13. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This depends a lot on your threat model, the system of laws under which you live and what you are actually doing. If the offense is relatively minor then the normal rules of innocent until proven guilty apply in the US, e.g. In Britain, cryptography is not the perfect answer since you can be put in jail for refusing to give up the key, although this is a recent law and I am not aware of any test cases.

      But in general if you are just keeping a collection of pornography or some accounting information, then I think that the likelihood of you rotting in jail until you give up the key is pretty low. And in most civilised countries [excluding Great Britain] the judicial system would require that other evidence be sufficient to put you in jail in the first place.

      Someone else pointed this out in another thread, but essentially encrypting something might make you appear

      more suspicious.

      Sure, but a suspicious appearance would only make your actions come under higher scrutiny. Presumably, you would discover that they [whoever they are] examined your encrypted hard drive and so would refrain from additional illegal activity. Problem solved.

      Seems the best answer for storing sensitive data might be to store it on a computer in another country, and transfer it back and forth with SSH.

      This has the same problems as not giving up the key; making you appear more suspicious. Either way the attacker can not get the information but will know what you're doing and hence they are roughly equivalent. There is a fair degree of co-operation between world governments on many levels of crime as well. It is likely that transfering data back and forth in this manner would end up being in total less secure than encrypting your hard drive because you do not have physical control over the machine from which you are retrieving the data. Without such physical control, you are much more likely to be compromised without your knowledge and be caught in the act of tranfering the data which is now a much more serious crime than the original [that is trafficking illegal data across international borders is much more serious that just storing it locally].

      And you also need to take steps to protect the other machine. You probably want to encrypt its disks as well. But now you have either unattended boot issues, or you are using a distributed cryptographic file system such as CFS[1], TCFS[2] or NCryptfs[5] not storing keys on the other machine. But again, now any man-in-the-middle can most probably tell that you are accessing a cryptographic file system outside the country which of course exposes you to much higher risk because of both the suspicion and the higher level of the crime.

      Also, just encrypting the data access says nothing about what is stored locally on your disk or in your swap space. You still need to be very careful about that, because temporary files or anonymous pages that are written to disk must be encrypted each and every time. If they are not then there is proof positive that you were both committing a crime and traversing international borders to do so. Not a good situation to be in. (Actually a lot of the same discussion applies to having a Samba box in the attic. It does absolutely nothing to protect you from swapping out and/or caching the data on the local machine and so is an incomplete solution which gives a dangerous sense of protection.)

      The only real solution to the swap and temporary file problem is to encrypt it using something like either NetBSD's cgd(4)[3], or OpenBSD's encrypted swap[4]. But now again, you are stuck with being suspicious so you've done the international dance or the Samba in the attic dance for no reason. You have reduced the overall security of you systems for no reason. And in the international dance case, you have increased the number of crimes that you are committing for abso

    14. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with a solution like rubberhose is that although they can never prove that you have the data, you can never prove that you've given them all of the keys. In the case where they are beating you with the proverbial rubberhose---this could be bad. If you do not have what they think you have then they'll beat you to death because you won't give a key that you can't prove doesn't exist.

    15. Re:Why by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Not relevant

      Of course its relevant! If a woman is accusing a man of rape, he can't make the case, using the purse full of condoms and lubricants as evidence, that she was out looking for sex and had just changed her mind after the fact?

      If you want some real life examples of how that kind of evidence would be useful, look at a couple of false accusations from Tailhook. One woman made up a story of how she was gang raped by a group of sailors. Turns out that was consensual sex, and she'd made up the story because she had a finace back hom. Another (the subject of the article) mistakenly picked out 3 guys as the one who raped her.

      Or how about the case were two boys were convicted of rape because the girl said "I should be going home now" during sex. The court ruled that that statement was sufficient revocation of consent, and ruled the boys guilty of rape. What a crock.

      Or you could just check out this archive of false accusations.

    16. Re:Why by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Thats all fine and dandy if you take the womans word as involate gospel truth that it was rape. Since its not, the defese find can present some evidence to help refute her claims...such as a purse full of lubricant and condoms.

  6. Cops??? by ELCarlsson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hide the porn from the cops? It's more like hide the porn from the wife.

    1. Re:Cops??? by chrisseaton · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah - if the cops are looking for your porn, you've probably gone too far.

    2. Re:Cops??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And just what kind of porn do you need to hide from the cops?

      Cowboy Neal Goes Wild?

      Okay, I guess that's a good reason.

    3. Re:Cops??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually kiddie porn varies from a misdemeanor in some states (california) to an extremely serious offense (10 years mandatory) in arizona.

    4. Re:Cops??? by Kibo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell that to the security guard who saved all those people at the atlanta olympics. His thanks? All of america hearing about his house full of pornography, every day, for weeks, and for the rest of his life in the occasional SNL rerun. I suppose there might be greater humiliation available, but one might have to actively pursue it.

      --
      --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    5. Re:Cops??? by chrisseaton · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think the social stigma is much more serious.

    6. Re:Cops??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, Hide the porn from your mom :-P... (for all those living in the basement of their parents house) :-P

    7. Re:Cops??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the social stigma is much more serious.

      Except in California, of course.

    8. Re:Cops??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless your wife LIKES porn. Which is cool.

    9. Re:Cops??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I never heard he had porn until you told me. I guess you're part of the problem too.

    10. Re:Cops??? by The+Tyro · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yep... you'd be hard-pressed to find a guy that got a rawer deal than Richard Jewell.

      Crucified in the media, leaks from the FBI that he's a suspect... labeled a "gun nut" (most houses in Georgia have guns in them... so what?), fired, etc, etc.

      He did win his lawsuit... but how much money does it take to make up for being pilloried like that? I'll bet it's more than he got...

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    11. Re:Cops??? by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      I think the social stigma is much more serious.

      it's not really a stigma since we all do it, but having it called attention to like that is embarrassing.

      it's like when you're buying toilet paper at the supermarket and the cashier asks for a price check, suddenly your face goes red and you think 'oh great, now everyone's going to know that I take craps.'

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    12. Re:Cops??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's not really a stigma since we all do it, but having it called attention to like that is embarrassing.

      WTF? I know lots of people who DON'T collect porn.

      And aside from a rather funny mention in a ZDNET article - which seems to have been taken down - by some fellow (a zdnet reg) who claimed one of the great things about having his new 120GB drive was he could keep online "all" the videos and pictures from PJCrew.com - a "non nude" child model site now closed because of peodphilic connections - I don't know ANYONE who would cop to collecting child porn, or even pictures of kids.

      Where do you live where "we all" are collecting kiddie porn?

    13. Re:Cops??? by chrisseaton · · Score: 1

      "we all do it"

      I don't know about you, but I DO NOT collect child porn, I think it's fucking serious that you think that "all" people do it.

    14. Re:Cops??? by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      it's not really a stigma since we all do it, but having it called attention to like that is embarrassing.

      I hope you're not insinuating that we all like to look at child porn. Because if that's what you're saying, I think you neet to take a serious reality check and I urge you to please seek some help.

      Hopefully, that's not what you ment. If that's the case, I apolagize, but that's the only thing I could make out of the way you worded your post.

    15. Re:Cops??? by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      no, we were talking abut regular porn and i think it's more serious that you associate that with child porn. get a grip.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    16. Re:Cops??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, its well known that no good deed goes unpunished. And certainly noone likes a hero to get it the way of some good death and carnage. As specially of the elite and super rich types that go to olympic events.

    17. Re:Cops??? by chrisseaton · · Score: 1

      Look down the thread - AC said "Actually kiddie porn varies", I said the stigma was more serious, you said "we all do it".

      The thread was clearly about child porn when you replied.

      You'll notice that you confused several other people too: Another AC replied to you "Where do you live where 'we all' are collecting kiddie porn?"

    18. Re:Cops??? by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      I guess I've been following this thread at a different threshhold than you because I didn't catch anything about kiddie porn, and I think it's pretty clear from the tone that it's not what I meant.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    19. Re:Cops??? by chrisseaton · · Score: 1

      That's the problem with thresholds, but other people read it the same way I did. Anyway - I believe you are not a ped.

    20. Re:Cops??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they found porn in uday hussein's mansion. go figure.

  7. oh yes.... by lylum · · Score: 3, Funny

    hm... where did I hide my HD from the police again? :-(

    1. Re:oh yes.... by outsider007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      just put a box of donuts on top. they'll never even notice it.
      mmm.. donuts

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    2. Re:oh yes.... by gauss314 · · Score: 1

      I wish I some mod points for this one...

      --


      If there weren't so many damn idiots in this world, I'd just be average.
  8. Only in America... by bullestock · · Score: 3, Funny
    He thinks the killer app for this one is for keeping your porn storage hidden, if you're busted by the cops.
    As an European I find it amusing that you can actually get arrested for possessing pornography...
    1. Re:Only in America... by eviljolly · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can?! *hides all his porn*

    2. Re:Only in America... by villain170 · · Score: 1

      So Europeans are allowed to look at kiddie porn to their heart's content?

      You guys are a bunch of sickos! he he.. :)

      --

      I am over here... now I am back over here!
    3. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, he just thinks everyone collects child porn just like him.. that sick fucking pedophile bastard

    4. Re:Only in America... by dtrent · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of Pete Townshend?

    5. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the "kiddie porn" sold in Europe actually involves young teenage girls, and yes, they are easy on the eyes! I can still remember school, see?

      Anything pre-pubescent IS sick, agreed...

    6. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As I Briton I am constantly confused as to whether I am American or European. What does Tony think this week???

      Either way, "Only in Briton" would be a more suitable subject line. I doubt that in either Denmark or the USA, arseholes have had to be airbrushed out of pornographic magazines.

      Happened here until the mid 90s. No wonder we're so fucked up.

    7. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow, and all that time I thought chicks just didn't have assholes!

    8. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the Queen you're thinking of.

      And she ain't no chick.

    9. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As a Brit, I am constantly confused as to why Yanks insist on calling us "Britons". The name is an anachroism.

      Anyway, it's not arses that need to be hidden, it's erect cocks, what with them being about the only thing left that's considered "obscene" by the law. Yes, this is a stupid law.

    10. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a surprise, an Englishman wants to see more cock.

    11. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having Brit and Anachromism in the same sentance is kind of ironic, don't you think. And I thought that you guys were supposed to me the masters of that...

    12. Re:Only in America... by Giant+Killer · · Score: 1

      well, its not just porn that illegal. its kiddie porn.

      does that not disturb other people too?

    13. Re:Only in America... by buyo-kun · · Score: 1

      Another post by an anonymous coward demonstrating American humor at its finest.

      This reminds me ever so much of the insurance commerical I've seen being shown on American networks wherein Osama Bin laden (played by the spokesman of the company) is on a game show, says some dumb dilogue, answering the questions wrong, and being crushed by a boulder followed by Hussien (also played by the spokesman) looking shocked.

      I've heard another people say it before, I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I'm glad I'm Canadian

      -With friends like Bush, who needs enemies

    14. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't in the same sentence... Mod parent -5, Dumbass yank

    15. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha Ha. You fell into my trap, like the fascist you are.

      ps. I'm not a yank!

    16. Re:Only in America... by Zirnike · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...I thought chicks just didn't have assholes!" Of course they do. They're called 'boyfriends'.

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
    17. Re:Only in America... by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1
      I've heard another people say it before, I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I'm glad I'm Canadian

      I'll wager that many of us are glad you're Canadian.

    18. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the Vern Fonk commercials. Some of them are funny, and others are just annoying.

    19. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vern Fonk, fo funk, fo funk.
      Vern Fonk, fo funk, fo funk.
      Rolling in my escalade with my can of glade
      and my stinky dog
      I stay low in this escapade, I'm on a mission

      Area 253, call Vern Fonk

    20. Re:Only in America... by buyo-kun · · Score: 1

      America, keeping you free of confrontation of grey area issues since 1776.

      Still glad I'm Canadian.

    21. Re:Only in America... by de+la+mettrie · · Score: 1

      As an European I find it amusing that you can actually get arrested for possessing pornography

      As another European, I'd like to point out that in some major European countries you can get arrested for merely possessing items with swastikas on them. (Not that I like nazis, but you get the point).

      Also, both the U.S. and European countries ban the possession of, inter alia: drugs, certain non-mainstream pornography, certain weapons, certain chemicals, etc.

    22. Re:Only in America... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      certain weapons, certain chemicals, etc.

      certain chemical weapons....

      Chuckle.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    23. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not American, but Tony thinks you're still a loyal subject of King George II. (I suggest you treat our King George the way we treated your King George.)

    24. Re:Only in America... by kwik_mart · · Score: 1

      Thanks to you generalizing the population of a whole country, I ought to feel ashamed that you're speaking from the same country as me. Hopefully nobody else will assume (like you) that everyone in our country has the same attitude, and I won't have to give a shit what you said in the first place.

      Regardless, think twice before you act like you're representing the sentiments of your countrymen.

      The "American humor" you referred to is actually just *shitty* humour, and not necessarily representative of the typical humour that comes from that country -- I'd note that I've seen some really funny stuff on TV, a great deal of which was not made in Canada, written by Canadians, or acted out by a Canadian (regardless of the fact that we do have a decent amount of talent originating here as well).

      If I was glad of where I was from because of the opinions and behaviour of the people that live in the same place, I'd have nothing to be proud of at this moment. That's Canada -- full of variety, including fucking morons.

      -kwikmart

    25. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As an European I find it amusing that you can actually get arrested for possessing pornography...

      As an american, I find it amusing that Europeans insist on mouthing off in ignorance.

      You can not get arrested for just porn in the US. It's a multi-billion dollar industry here, which is why I laugh long and loud in the face of anyone who calls us prudes.

      You can get arrested for child porn, and anyone who defends that deserves a mouth full of shattered teeth.

    26. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm glad I'm Canadian

      I'm glad you're Canadian, too. We enough bigots here as it is.

      Sleep well in your little hate filled existence, bigot.

    27. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in America? Sheesh, what about India?
      What about Singapore? There must
      be literally 100 countries in the world
      where possessing pornography is illegal.
      And the US isn't on of them, although that
      was not true just a few decades ago.

    28. Re:Only in America... by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      You're making that swastiga thing up. Okay, so you're not allowed to write "DIE JEW" on a swastiga in a public park (hehehe, "It's German, 'die' is a German word! I swear!"), but there is nothing inherently wrong with the swastiga. It was an ancient Roman and Hindu symbol for life. Look at some pre-1900s art and you'll find it a-plenty.

    29. Re:Only in America... by buyo-kun · · Score: 1

      What I'm proud of in being Canadian is that we have a virtue of less idiots (through less population) although I can't speak for the ratio of idiots.

      Regardless, think twice before you act like you're representing the sentiments of your countrymen

      I never said that all Canadians were glad they were glad the Canadians in comparsion to American, merely that I've heard Canadians say they were glad that they were Canadian, and that I'm glad I'm Canadian.

      The "American humor" you referred to is actually just *shitty* humour, and not necessarily representative of the typical humour that comes from that country

      By "American humor" I didn't, and don't, mean the entire population of America humor, I meant a form of humor in America which is not nearly as spread in other places as in America and (I'd think) that originated in America.

      (Note: I'm not talking about shitty/racist humor in general, but that off shoot of it (iraq bashing, etc))

      If I was glad of where I was from because of the opinions and behaviour of the people that live in the same place, I'd have nothing to be proud of at this moment. That's Canada -- full of variety, including fucking morons.

      I never said I was proud of the behavior or opinions of Canadians in general, I'm proud of the role of Canada in world affairs (keeping or nose out of where it doesn't belong).

    30. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even purple stick-pin has an asshole.

    31. Re:Only in America... by buyo-kun · · Score: 1

      I shall sleep, I sleep an existence empty of the terror of bombs falling from the sky.

    32. Re:Only in America... by kwik_mart · · Score: 1

      You made a generalized statement about Americans and then made another general statement implying that Canada was simply better. That's it.

    33. Re:Only in America... by buyo-kun · · Score: 1

      Another post by an anonymous coward demonstrating American humor at its finest. Sarcasm, not a generalized statement about Americans at all, a comment on a general style of American based (off shoot, as mentioned earlier, of racist/shitty humor) humor. I made a statement afterwards "I'm glad I'm Canadian" which implies that I prefer Canada to American, althought it can be taken as a statement implying that Canada is better, but by no means was is a general statement implying that Canada was better. Read more carefully in the future.

    34. Re:Only in America... by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      but there is nothing inherently wrong with the swastiga. It was an ancient Roman and Hindu symbol for life. Look at some pre-1900s art and you'll find it a-plenty.

      Yeah, check out the latest issue of Heeb Magazine for an article about this dude who is obsessed with the swastika, has it tattoed all over his body, and IS NOT a fascist, racist, nazi lover, hitler lover OR anti semite. He makes the same case that you do, that the swastika was around way before the Nazis, and he isn't going to let them ruin it. Apparently the swastika was a very common symbol found all over, in art, advertising, religion, before the Nazis hijacked it.

    35. Re:Only in America... by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it sucks that the penalties for child porn are the same regardless of whether the subject is 17 years old or 6 years old. There's a big difference, so why is the penalty the same?

    36. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was amused that neither of you could spell anachronism properly :)

    37. Re:Only in America... by Steven+Blanchley · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      As another European, I'd like to point out that in some major European countries you can get arrested for merely possessing items with swastikas on them.

      What countries are those? That seems extreme, especially considering that the swastika had a positive meaning until it was abused by the Nazis.

    38. Re:Only in America... by gauss314 · · Score: 1

      Native American tribes also used swastikas, as well. In fact, it was the sanskrit symbol for "Good Fortune". Here's a link with a little history about non-nazi uses of the glyph http://www.geocities.com/angryindian/page5.html

      --


      If there weren't so many damn idiots in this world, I'd just be average.
    39. Re:Only in America... by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      As an European I find it amusing that you can actually get arrested for possessing pornography...

      As an American I find it disgusting that it is legal for you to possess child pornography...

      (Hint: In case you haven't figured it out, child pornography is the only kind that's illegal here.)

    40. Re:Only in America... by gauss314 · · Score: 1

      Make no mistake, I find the concept of child pornography (and other forms of child exploitation... toy commercials, xianity, high school, Disney, McDonalds, Nike, MTV, etc) appalling, and at best, unbecoming a civilized, thinking, and considerate human being. However, I must admit that I find your typical American attitude of "You merely not agreeing with me justifies violence" ALMOST equally appalling, which is why I'm pretending to be a European, because idiots like you completely justify the phrase "ugly american". But then again, this is more tough talk from an AC, so obviously you don't have much convictions in your beliefs, or you would at least put your handle on it.

      --


      If there weren't so many damn idiots in this world, I'd just be average.
    41. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but pete is no european he is british which nowadays is more or less a exterritorial area of the usa.

      there you are ...

    42. Re:Only in America... by gauss314 · · Score: 1

      Not if King George has his way. By not gleefully indulging in his latest Iraqi bloodshed for oil program, your country has demonstrated sympathy for oil competetors (...oops, I mean terrorists), and henceforth shall be considered part of the axis of evil, which apparently means any nation that fits 2 criteria:
      1. Doesn't allow US businesses (especially ones that contributed to his campaign fund) to gut and pillage its national resources with impunity.
      2. Doesn't possess sufficient defenses to actually repel an illegal corporation (... oops, I mean coalition) invasion.

      BTW, we sleep with an existence empty of the terror of bombs falling from the sky, as well. It's the planes falling from the sky, piloted by future generations of "liberated" Iraqi children that scares us shitless.:-) But don't worry citizens of the world. In every empire, I'm sure these words have been uttered at least once...
      "Whaddya mean there's a shitload of them at the city gates, and they look really pissed?!? I thought they enjoyed us killing them off, raping their women, and looting everything of value...gurgle...thud."

      --


      If there weren't so many damn idiots in this world, I'd just be average.
    43. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, snuff porn (video usually, but still images sometimes) is also still illegal in the United States.

      However, there hasn't been any "mainstream" snuff porn (can there be such a thing?) since the mid-1970s.

    44. Re:Only in America... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      And you're calling all Americans "Yanks"? You're a funny man, oh yess you are! :P

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    45. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Germany, for instance... Of course it is also illegal to own Return to Castle Wolfenstein in Germany, and the Germans prohibit people from publishing or owning material that glorifies war or violence or defends nazi or fascist ideology or denies the holocaust. Germany also has a law against blasphemy - it is illegal to insult or offend someone's religious views, it is illegal to make pornography available to minors and certain types of pornography are forbidden outright - and that's not just child pornography. And it has its own version of the DMCA. Check out the Bundesprüfstelle für jugendgefährdende Medien BPjM here for censorship fun for the entire family.

      But don't worry, according to 328 of the German penal code, people who dentonate a nuclear bomb can be punished with up to five years in prison!

    46. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you rock.

    47. Re:Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a MAN, baby, a MAN!!!

    48. Re:Only in America... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Europe seems to have a much more professional "butler-like" approach to law enforcement than the US. Here, if the cops find porn, first they'll confinscate it just to "check" for illegal material. Then, they're just as likely to "leak" certian choice contents [legal mind you] to your wife, pastor, employer, adoption agencies, social workers, etc. as well as reporting the number of dirty pics to reporters with your name of course!
      Law enforcement should look at the Law and nothing else when enforcing the law. Europeans seem to understand this better than americans, i'm afraid. American cops personalize way too much. It seems most of the time that you have to be publically "shamed" [specifically unconstitutional, I'd add here!] rather than just have facts that point out you broke the law presented. They've taken to trying cases with neighbors, employers, and reporters to get you harmed, even if they can't get a legal case. And neatly exempted themselves from lawsuit retribution in the process!
      I guess my point it that even if you didn't do anything illegal, it still may have been "wrong" and too many US police like to wave it over your heads lately, even years later! [Think TIA here!]

  9. Or... by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

    You could actually put it _in_ you neighbour's house... where there's a will (and p0rn is a hell of a will) there's a way!

    What kind of conspiracy theory "my neighbour framed me" would stand up in court.

    Remember... most criminals are stupid, they are nothing compared with a geek's cunning!!!

  10. Already have one, cost less too by Wehesheit · · Score: 0

    I have a p200 with a whopping 128MB ram and 180GB of storage in the closet, running linux. It cost me $29 canadian for the machine and ram and $440 canadian for the HD's and network stuff. The machine is also very quiet, i tried running it without a cpu fan and just a big heatsink but it would choke up after several hours. Samba ownz, i use the machine for all my media storage.

    --
    This P.I.G. will walk on the water, This P.I.G. will walk on the sea, This P.I.G. will walk whereever he wants.
    1. Re:Already have one, cost less too by slaker · · Score: 1

      You only need 180GB?

      Wow. Slashdot has monks now.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    2. Re:Already have one, cost less too by gauss314 · · Score: 1

      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K Don't you mean Crow T. Robot, MS Server3K?

      --


      If there weren't so many damn idiots in this world, I'd just be average.
  11. Wireless Radiation by GregBildson · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Is anybody afraid of all this radiation that we are surrounding ourselves with? Sitting in front of a computer all day is bad enough but everywhere you go there is more spectrum in use. I love the idea of a wireless world but I hope our kids don't come out looking blue.

    I've seen reports that cell phones can noticeably heat up the users brain (seriously!). Anything concrete yet on the overall effect?

    1. Re:Wireless Radiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The radiation from my light bulbs worries me no end.

      BTW I read that as "there is more speculum in use" - that's why I read your comment.

    2. Re:Wireless Radiation by jointm1k · · Score: 1

      Yes, you might not want to have a WIFI laptop on your lap all day.---If you ever plan on having children with two arm and legs, that is.

      --
      You know it makes sense, a little reminder from jointm1k.
    3. Re:Wireless Radiation by AlecC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No effect yet traced, but cautious researchers saying not finding something is not the same as proving it doesn't exist, which the worried then take as an assertion it does exist.

      Mobiles are limited to ?1 watt?. A torch bulb is several watts, at higher (and conventionally more damaging) . I just don't see any mechanism for damage; and nobody (AFAIK) has followed up any suggestions with valid research.

      Sunlight is about 500w/m^2. The top of my head is about about 20 cm round of this, so a sunny day gives 10-20W onto my skull. A mobile at a total of 1W, not all of which is radiated towards me? I am not worrying.

      And, to keep on topic, I think WiFi is even less (?1/4 watt?) and you don't hold it close to you.

      I would worry far more about exhaust fumes, myself. But those seem less dangerous to ordinary people, because you can "see" them, whereas you can't see this nasty electromagnetic radiation (big bad word there).

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    4. Re:Wireless Radiation by dsfd · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm afraid. Who really knows the long term effect of microwaves ?

      In my opinion, unless there is a very good reason, network traffic is better kept inside wires.

      If somebody has good information on this topic, please post it.

    5. Re:Wireless Radiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how else am i gonna make those giant 8' tall killer ants!!! radioactive waste doesn't work, mutogen is fantasy, but now by the power of a 1 watt microwave i can finally make my 10' tall giant ants! and have blue children at the same time!

    6. Re:Wireless Radiation by afidel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Digital cellphone are fairly low powered (couple hundred mW max). Wi-Fi devices are max 100mW. I worked with guys that have been around radio tranmission equipement for 10+ years and they have had zero incidents of cancer (which is actually lower than statistical average for the pool size). Basically I spent the last 2.5 years in a building with hundreds of AP's and had no fear for my safety.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Wireless Radiation by Kibo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are a few studies. Most are inconclusive. The one guys who's studies were conclusive was discredited for faking those results. Oops.

      But much of it comes from annecdotal evidence of people who have brain tumors shaped like their cell phone antenna, and there aren't very many annecdotes at that.

      I'm not a molecular biologist or anything, but I would guess the low frequency radiation which can penetrate a little way into the body isn't damaging because it ionizes anything, but because it might trick some cells into setting up shop. So it wouldn't be the energy of the signal so much as the asymetry with which it is delivered. And it wouldn't so much cause a tumor, as choose it's location. But that's my layman's supposition. And I don't think I've seen any articles or research that support that viewpoint.

      --
      --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    8. Re:Wireless Radiation by arkanes · · Score: 1

      The entire scientific community knows all about the long term effect of microwaves. The ones from wifi can't even penetrate your skin. You can find plenty of scare-tactic information as well as rebuttals from google.

    9. Re:Wireless Radiation by GregBildson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Humans are use to light in the visible spectrum so I wouldn't worry about a light bulb. The Sun puts out a lot of nasty stuff that our atmosphere and magnetic belt protect us from.

      If we are not use to the specific spectrum in play, we can't guarantee how cellular biology will react.

      It's not the absolute wattage that worries me although I believe that signal strength is governed by an inverse square law so the closer a source is, the greater its local effect.

    10. Re:Wireless Radiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno. I got a radiation meter on Ebay and my Nokia 3210 pumps out 1.4 somethings. cGy/h (IN AIR) apparently. I tried it next to a cellphone radio mast and got a 0 reading. My WAP reads 0.

    11. Re:Wireless Radiation by atomicdragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Knowing a lot of healthy physicists that have been exposed to many times the power of a cell phone (like my boss that works with equipment that pulse around 10 kA and 5 kV), it would seem that small sources like that would not be much a threat.

      Also, I have seen various results for the number of cell phone users that have cancer, and many of them indicate that they are less likely to get cancer than the population in general. I don't have the papers with me now, but I am sure someone less lazy than me can find it on google.

      I also looked up the heat loss of the head in a book of physical constants of mine, and the head radiates around 4.6 W of energy, so unless the cell phone (around 1 W I believe) zaps a very small part of your brain like a magnifying glass, you should be able to dissipate the heat rather quickly between radiating it and cooling by the blood. I can't imagine it being any worse than a mild fever, otherwise you would be able to feel it with your hand or something.

    12. Re:Wireless Radiation by tgd · · Score: 1

      Umm... you do realize that 10-20w on your skull is the leading cause of skin cancer, right?

    13. Re:Wireless Radiation by Catnapster · · Score: 0

      Blue kids?

      Shit, I want blue kids! Anyone have any spare wireless devices I can have?

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    14. Re:Wireless Radiation by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      No effect yet traced, but cautious researchers saying not finding something is not the same as proving it doesn't exist, which the worried then take as an assertion it does exist. Mobiles are limited to ?1 watt?.

      Close, GSM is 2W maximum. There is a power control loop though, so they're usually much lower, in the 100 mW range. About 70% of the energy is absorbed by your head with current designs. And cancer may not be the problem, se below.

      And there is no conclusive study linking cancer to mobile phone use. However, it's still early days yet, we used mobiles on a larger scale for scarcely ten years. Cancers usually take longer to manifest themselves.

      Now, in your Sun argument you make the common fallacy of just looking at the energy transmitted, not taking into account that biological effects often depend on frequency and other parameters. Take the Sun for example. While same wattage X from a light bulb (high in IR and low in UV) would do nothing to your head, the same amount of Solar radiation will cause cancer. Clear frequency dependency here.

      And it's the same with lower frequency radiation from mobiles. While the energy transmitted probably is safe, from a purely heat perspective, at least with our current knowledge. Two recent reports link this type of non-ionising radition to opening the blood-brain barrier, to the protein albumin. Albumin kills brain cells perhaps by letting heavy metals tag along, and this effect has been demonstrated on rats. Note that there's no cancer here, just dementia.

      Now, this research is still in its early stages, the rat is an imperfect model of the human just to make one point, but it's an interesting result non the less.

      It's far to soon to cry "all's clear".

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    15. Re:Wireless Radiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The extra head will make up for the missing limbs.

    16. Re:Wireless Radiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently they do. Still, it is less than the amount a motorcycle helmet heats up your brain, so the long term effect is probably non-exsistant, except for an increase in the number of people with long, greasy hair...

  12. A more serious use than hiding pr0n. by devphil · · Score: 4, Insightful


    would be to store the heat-producing noisy things in a different room than the humans.

    (Perhaps this is mentioned in the article. I can't tell because their webserver is on fire.)

    Both at home and at work, I'm tired of noisy machines. I work to minimize the noise. I'd love to just say, "fuck it, be as noisy as you want," as I lovingly place all the equipment on the other side of a wall, leaving nothing but a monitor and the input devices in front of me.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:A more serious use than hiding pr0n. by Delphix · · Score: 1

      Moving the noise heat generators away from the humans eh? You can get the same effect using ethernet... and considerably cheaper I might add.

      I'd think a local ethernet running through your walls would be more secure as well.

    2. Re:A more serious use than hiding pr0n. by namespan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This could be an absolute godsend for recording hobbyists and professionals. Fanless laptop in one room, hours and hours of tracking space in the other.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    3. Re:A more serious use than hiding pr0n. by dissy · · Score: 1

      > Both at home and at work, I'm tired of noisy machines.

      I have been blessed with a small conduit between two rooms of my house.

      I've solved most of the noise problem by putting all of my systems, including my one windows machine which is the only system with a monitor/keyboard, in the 2nd room.

      Between them, i run a 15 foot high shelded VGA cable, a standard RCA audio cable, a USB cable, and a firewire cable. (I also run an ethernet cable but dont yet use it)

      The machine is located in the 2nd room.

      In my bedroom i have a 21" monitor connected to the VGA cord and power, and a hub of each USB and firewire.
      I plug my mouse and keyboard into the USB chain.
      I have an ATAPI->firewire adaptor connected to a CDROM drive and a CD-RW drive, both in an extneral enclosure, connected to power and the firewire hub.
      The RCA audio cable runs from my soundcard to my amp in the bedroom.

      I ran the ethernet cable to plug into the switch in room 2 with the machines, so i can have a small hub in the bedroom incase i have other machines (IE Laptops) to connect to the network. But, my only laptop is an iBook, and i run IP over firewire for that so havent had need for ethernet there yet.

      Perhaps if you have a large closet to use for this, that may work as well.
      Some of these cables dont play well longer than 15 feet however.
      But if you are willing to live with degrated performance, you can fix that as well. Its suppost to be possible to stream video over firewire, perhaps that would remove the VGA cable need totally, but possibly lowering performance.
      Using firewire2 and fiber, you can have an unlimited cable run.
      You can also put repeaters (or basically two port hubs) and chain as many lengths of cable together as you need. Each hub will need power however to correcly boost the signal.

      I got the cables and bridge boards (IDE to FireWire) at www.fwdepot.com
      They also have SCSI to firewire bridges too, incase you need any scsi devices where you sit.
      Most of the other parts are just common generic cables and hubs that you can find anywhere.

      Hope that helps

    4. Re:A more serious use than hiding pr0n. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm tired of noisy machines too. That's one big reason I'm concentrating in the future on building quiet machines. Most manufacturers and hobbyists just pay a lot of attention to the level of noise coming from a machine, but you really can cut noise by a lot without sacrificing much performance or $$$.

      For lots of good info on making your PC quiet (or building a new PC that's quiet), see the Silent PC Review web site. I personally have purchased a "Super Silent PRO" CPU fan they recommended, and I'm very happy with it. I did my own little bench test (read: "kitchen counter test") on it with a 12V power source and a hair dryer, and the fan was really pretty darned quiet -- waaaaay quieter than the generic fan it will replace. When my new motherboard arrives and I can actually use it, it'll be inside a new Antec Sonata ("hear the silence") case, and I'll hear even less of it.

    5. Re:A more serious use than hiding pr0n. by devphil · · Score: 1


      I've seen SCSI-over-Ethernet.

      I've even seen IDE-over-Ethernet, although it was intended as a joke.

      If you can tell me how to tunnel video signals over Ethernet, then I'll consider Ethernet. Until then, I'm liking the firewire idea that another poster talked about.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    6. Re:A more serious use than hiding pr0n. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could have done that with USB-2 and a long extension cable (and may be repeaters)...

    7. Re:A more serious use than hiding pr0n. by coldcity · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but this one is noiseless. Until of course you try to listen to some tunes and it's radio interference takes a crap on your stream.

      --
      coldcity
      code, life, art
  13. Good neighbors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why don't you just put up in your neighbors attic? That's obscurity...I'd put it in the trunk of my car, since that appears to be where I keep half my crap anyways..

    1. Re:Good neighbors by Branc0 · · Score: 1

      Can you leave your address and licence plate here please? For academic purposes only, of course...

      --

      rm -rf /home/leia

    2. Re:Good neighbors by fobbman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not a bad idea. I already have a few webcams installed over sorority house across the street, and a small server broadcasting those images into my place, so why not let it be my porn server too!

    3. Re:Good neighbors by jmt9581 · · Score: 1

      If you have webcams installed in the sorority house across the street, that server already is your porn server. How much porn do you need?

      :)

      --

      My blog

  14. uh, how about drive encryption? by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hiding pr0n (or anything) is the killer app for excellent encryption, not for a WEP-accessed drive array. ::obligatory plug:: OS X lets you create read/write/mountable disk image files that are encrypted with AES-128. Very cool stuff to play with.

    Just don't put its password in your keychain, or those feds will get a chuckle as they double-click the image file and it unlocks with your autologin. ;)

    1. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The feds will get an even bigger chuckle while you rot in jail for contempt if you conveniently "forget" the password they can't just double-click the image file and unlock it. In situations like that, encryption is worse than useless without deniability.

    2. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by Submarine · · Score: 1

      Silly question: can you put encrypted partition into files (à la Linux loopback)? A colleague of mine wants to create encrypted directories without repartitioning.

    3. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check out www.jetico.com for encryption via loopback devices via linux.

    4. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just get the Linux crypto patch.

    5. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Linux allows you to mount an ISO image on your hard drive, which itself is a file. The same concept applies to encrypted file systems.

      This is not limited to Linux. Using PGP-drive under Windows gives you the same capabilities.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    6. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by firewood · · Score: 1
      The feds will get an even bigger chuckle while you rot in jail for contempt if you conveniently "forget" the password they can't just double-click the image file and unlock it. In situations like that, encryption is worse than useless without deniability.

      I'm in BIG trouble then. I've got a few old encrypted files and disk images on various archival backups for which I've forgotten the passwords long ago.

    7. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No, what you do is find a way of 'duel encrypting' a data block. You give the bad guys the password that lets them see the pictures of fluffy bunnies, the president and jesus. Oh, you didn't find what you were looking for? Too bad that's all that's on that drive.

      This way, you comply with a legal court order, and they still don't get to see your private info.

    8. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry dude.. the 5th amendment protects you.. and you can't be punished for not giving over something you claim to not remember (Clinton, anyone?)

    9. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did they ever crack Mitnick's crypto?

    10. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      Or they can ship you out to guantanamo bay or "hotel california" in afghanistan. After they get through with you there you will tell them your password and all the other secrets you were holding all your life.

      All they have to do is to call you a terrorist and boom off you go in the middle of the night.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    11. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      IANAL, to be sure, but I always thought that would fall under "self-incrimination" and therefore I couldn't be compelled. Although your lockbox analogy gives me pause--but I don't think you necessarily have to give them the key; they just have the right to force it even absent the key. I suppose they could (brute) force digital encryption, also. But the rule that allows for warrants never considered an unbreakable lock, as its creation is a feature of the rise of modern technology. Hm.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    12. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1

      This analysis suggests that compelling the production of crypto keys wouldn't be interpreted as contrary to the fifth amendment. I found it at the Rubberhose site another reply mentioned. (Rubberhose looks interesting, but for the uses they're describing, like human rights workers, being caught with the executables might be worse than being caught with the data one's opponents are looking for!)

    13. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      OS X lets you create read/write/mountable disk image files that are encrypted with AES-128.

      Only AES-128? hehehe

      [0]$ mount /dev/hda1 on / type ext3 (rw)
      none on /proc type proc (rw)
      none on /dev type devfs (rw)
      none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,mode=0620)
      none on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw)
      none on /tmp type tmpfs (rw)
      none on /proc/bus/usb type usbdevfs (rw,devmode=0664,devgid=43) /dev/hda2 on /home type ext3 (rw,encrypted,loop=/dev/loop0,encryption=AES256)

      Supports a bunch of other cyphers, too, like blowfish and serpant.

    14. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by Catnapster · · Score: 0

      If they do anything other than unencrypt it with the key, you could hit them with the DMCA.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    15. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Encrypting doesn't help you keep your equipment.

      In the US, if your computer equipment is ever confiscated as part of a police investigation, good luck trying to ever get it back, whether you are guilty or not.

    16. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by bodgit · · Score: 1

      So what you're after is this

    17. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by slim · · Score: 1

      In situations like that, encryption is worse than useless without deniability.

      Then use StegFS which gives you an arbitrary number encrypted layers. One the one hand you can give away a certain number of passwords, then insist there are no more. On the other hand, the bad guys don't know when it's OK to stop torturing you...

    18. Re:uh, how about drive encryption? by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

      Great point.

      For plausible deniability, toss the image file on a publicly read-write-accessible share.

      Of course, this puts your image file at risk, too...

  15. A better way to stash porn: by i_need_no_nick · · Score: 3, Funny

    1) Buy wireless AP 2) Get fast-assed broadband 3) Encourage neigbours to buy wifi cards to access your broadband connection And the rest writes itself!

    1. Re:A better way to stash porn: by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      Use driftnet.

  16. Hrmm... by blitzoid · · Score: 1

    It's illegal porn if it's a porno of yourself or others downloading mp3s and movies.

    --
    I am a filthy pirate.
  17. There's no market for wireless porn storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, does Cringley spend a lot of his time worrying about being the target of a big porn bust? :-)

  18. Wireless Is Too Slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who wants to copy files all the time to/from a wireless device. I'd chunk it out the window the first time I tried to copy a 1.5Gb AVI file I've pulled off my DVCAM.

  19. Bad recommendation by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Nestle a Martian box under your attic insulation if you have something to hide.

    Just because it's fanless doesn't mean it generates no heat. In fact, free airflow is probably more important than with forced-air cooling. I've seen plenty of complaints about how hot that fanless Apple cube box could get.

    Covering the box with insulation and putting it in a 140 degree F attic sounds like a sure-fire way to fry the system. I would be surprised if it's not a fire hazard as well.

    1. Re:Bad recommendation by Mr+Thundercleze · · Score: 1

      Sounds like what happens when a server gets /.ed

    2. Re:Bad recommendation by kzinti · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So hide it out in the open. The damn thing looks like a VCR. Put it in another room, away from the computer. Set a 13-inch TV on top of it. Stack a dozen VHS cassettes next to it. With no wires connecting it to the TV, you might just get away with it.

      And it doesn't have to cook in your attic.

    3. Re:Bad recommendation by Tet · · Score: 1
      140 degree F attic

      WTF? How on earth could your attic get that hot? Unless you a) live in the middle of the sahara, and b) have insulated the roof, rather than the floor. Mine is typically the coldest place in the house. In the summer, it's quite pleasant to go up there to cool down...

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    4. Re:Bad recommendation by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Let me guess; you sleep in the day and stay up all night. Try going up there on a sunny afternoon.

    5. Re:Bad recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you live up North, or are just stupid.. It gets 100+ degrees during the summer outside.. the attic is usually just as hot, if not hotter

    6. Re:Bad recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      140 degree F attic

      I cook pork in my attic all the time.

    7. Re:Bad recommendation by kzinti · · Score: 1

      With no wires connecting it to the TV...

      Of course, that should have said "... to the computer...". Read what I meant, not what I wrote.

    8. Re:Bad recommendation by evilviper · · Score: 1
      How on earth could your attic get that hot? Unless you a) live in the middle of the sahara

      Heard of Nevada? One big desert. Of course, that would, in fact, put you near the Sahara casino :-). A fair chunk of the US is deserts. Nevada, California, and Texas are the most notable.

      In addition, an attic gets direct sunlight, meaning that 120F temperature then becomes 200F. Poor insulation and/or ventilation makes any attic into a very very hot spot.

      and b) have insulated the roof, rather than the floor.

      Umm, that sentence doesn't make any sense. You might want to clarify.

      Are you sure you aren't confusing "attic" with "basement", or perhaps "cellar" ;-)
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Bad recommendation by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Think about it for a second: if you insulate the floor of your attic, and not the roof/ceiling, then you are functionally keeping the hot outdoor air out of the house, and whatever's in the attic up in the attic. your AC stays indoors. Meanwhile, the heat of the sun beating down on your asphalt roof poors through the plywood and shingles, and gets functionally stuck between the roof and insulation.

      If what you said were true, then roof shinglers wouldn't always have to worry about the intense heat radiating from the shingles - the cool air in the atticks would solve that problem for them.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  20. Setup a Samba box by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    Buy a Celeron, MB and 128 MB of RAM and a HDD etc and build your own Samba box. This is much cheaper than the product advertised and easily upgradeable - buy an extra HDD or setup Raid on it.

    1. Re:Setup a Samba box by repetty · · Score: 1

      "Buy a Celeron, MB and 128 MB of RAM and a HDD etc and build your own Samba box."

      No, buy a Celeron and build your own AppleTalk box.

      (Assumptions, assumptions...)

  21. presuming you have access.... by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you can wire a plug to a electrical box in the basement, enclose the box beams after mounting this to the floor add an 802.11g interface with an 802.11g access point above it, (and add a bit more storage to the device) you could do set up a wired network with thin clients throughout your house, and never have to worry about anyone taking off with your systems.

    Granted you would probably want to use the most recent and strongest varient of WEP, and if possible waveguide your area between the AP and the server to reduce attacks, but if you build it properly, they can set up everything they take from your house, and won't have a bootable system, and you can go to a swap meet or computer recycler and pick up enough hw to go back and wipe your server before they start tearing apart the finish of the house.

    That's if you are paranoid.

    -Rusty

    --
    You never know...
    1. Re:presuming you have access.... by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      What happenes when 802.11g is no longer king shit of the wireless ethernet options?

      Gunna tear up the floor to change it?

    2. Re:presuming you have access.... by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Nope, it will be time to remodle the basement again. Probably time to put in an x-10 outlet adapter to shut down the box when not needed, helping to keep that space cooler, and upgrade that hard drive. 120G sounds like quite a bit now, but then 10 years ago 80 Meg was quite a bit of space.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    3. Re:presuming you have access.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, that sounds like a fire hazard. What _IF_ the server caught fire? (power supplies seem to do that all too often) How would you get to the machine to put the fire out or even know the fire was there? (that is until major parts of your house are on fire).

  22. Build your own. by Greyjack · · Score: 1
    Nothing fancy here; you can buy a barebones case/mobo/CPU combo from caseoutlet.com with the Via EPIA M6000 for $230, just add RAM and an HD.

    Or, head over to mini-itx.com and dig around for info on other cases and whatnot.

  23. purr of the machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sometimes my machine makes a strange whining noise. But then it goes away. I'm just glad it's nearby so I can hear if anything went snap or smell something if it burnt.

  24. The Attic? by Unoriginal+Nick · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My attic gets very hot in the summer. There's no way a hard drive would survive a month there. The basement is a much better place since it'll stay cooler all year round.

    1. Re:The Attic? by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      Oooh, put it in the cold air return vents.

  25. If you need to store it there... by lylum · · Score: 1

    What kind of videos do you make with your DVCam?

    1. Re:If you need to store it there... by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      1.5 GB AVI files, apparently.

  26. Wouldn't power line Internet be more secure... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't a hidden server using power line communication be more secure? Either way it still has to be plugged. This reduces the number of links down to one.

  27. the article never actually says pr0n or pron... by Delta-9 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "I would, for one, but my friend David from the UK points out that such a device hidden away from sight would be ideal for storing data you wouldn't want confiscated by the police. Nestle a Martian box under your attic insulation if you have something to hide. "

    Who knows what the people at PBS have to hide from the cops.

  28. What's on your mind? by Dizzo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah, but who would want one of these things? I would, for one, but my friend David from the UK points out that such a device hidden away from sight would be ideal for storing data you wouldn't want confiscated by the police.

    The author doesn't mention porn in his article... get your minds out of the gutter

    1. Re:What's on your mind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nor does he mention hiding things from the police, which is what just about all of the posts so far have been talking about, but avoiding having your data confiscated which is a real problem if you are as much as suspected of a crime.

      This has happened to quite a few people, only some of them actually guilty of anything.

  29. bad summary by phriedom · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Cringely did not say anything about porn. He said: such a device hidden away from sight would be ideal for storing data you wouldn't want confiscated by the police."

    If you have the kind of porn that has to be hidden from police, you belong in jail. But I wouldnt' want anyone to find the plans to the death star...

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    1. Re:bad summary by aiken_d · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [quote]If you have the kind of porn that has to be hidden from police, you belong in jail.[/quote]

      Really? So if you're gay in Alabama and want porn, you belong in jail? Or if you like oral sex in your porn and you live in Mississippi, you belong in jail? That's a pretty tough stance.

      Cheers
      -b

      --
      If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
    2. Re:bad summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? So if you're gay in Alabama and want porn, you belong in jail?

      Yes.

      Or if you like oral sex in your porn and you live in Mississippi, you belong in jail?

      You're getting the hang of it.

      That's a pretty tough stance.

      Yup. Truth hurts, don't it?

    3. Re:bad summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it ever occur to you that sometimes the law is WRONG?

    4. Re:bad summary by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really? So if you're gay in Alabama and want porn, you belong in jail? Or if you like oral sex in your porn and you live in Mississippi, you belong in jail? That's a pretty tough stance.

      The law is neither just nor moral when it comes to a persons sexual lifestyles.. Its used as a tool to keep the status quo.

      Wake up people, when sodomy laws reach the us supreme court because state courts call certain life styles "Illegal", there is a massive witch-hunt and you need to protect yourself.

      This is just another tool, to protect you from prying eyes. Since the 4th amendment "Being secure with your own papers against unjust searches and seizures..." is no longer valid, you need to secure them yourself.

      The future is encryption of data. Of course how long encryption of data will remain legal, is a upto the whims of our congress critters. Patriot Act 2 here we come.

    5. Re:bad summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ez-board much?

    6. Re:bad summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it ever occur to you that gay porn and oral sex are WRONG?

    7. Re:bad summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? So if you're gay in Alabama and want porn, you belong in jail? Or if you like oral sex in your porn and you live in Mississippi, you belong in jail? That's a pretty tough stance.


      That's just cause you americans have a view on sex and porn that belongs to the 19th century.

  30. Hiding Harddrives... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've always thought that a custom ethernet connector that looks exactly like a power outlet would work well. Hide the HD in the wall, run the Cat5 to the 'outlet'. Then you just need a length of cat5 with bare ends to plug into the 'outlet'. Cops raid your place, you yank the network cable, and it lays therelooking lik, well, a cut up cat5 cable. As long as no cop trys to plug in a lamp...

    1. Re:Hiding Harddrives... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't try to plug your hard drive into a real wall socket.

    2. Re:Hiding Harddrives... by JohnnyBolla · · Score: 1

      I just looked, my electrical outlets have only three prongs. What do I use to connect the other five?

      --
      Carpe Deez
  31. Burglers by aking137 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe hiding something like this in your attic wouldn't work out if the police turned your house over, but it would almost certainly survive if you got your house burgled - I doubt that many burglars take the time (or even think) to look in the attic.

  32. Insecure by minh7749 · · Score: 1

    All the cops have to do is to get a court order to intercept your transmissions. Than have the manufacture of the encrytion break it.

    1. Re:Insecure by DMDx86 · · Score: 1

      Use your own encrytion (ssh, SSL, etc).. and route through multiple wireless hops.. also put tamper or vibration sensors on it... a small CCD camera (perhaps on more than one side of the case) is nice too..

    2. Re:Insecure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i doubt with the patriot act they need the court order anymore.

  33. Hiding data from the police by lamber45 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Police have been known to sieze computers that simply had data that might be used as evidence, even when the owners hadn't done anything wrong. Is there any legal defense against this, like "I have my website, my financial records, and tomorrow's homework on that fileserver... you can't take it away from me!"? Or does this come under the heading of "why you should always have multiple good backups"?

    1. Re:Hiding data from the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, the cops would seize the backups, too.

    2. Re:Hiding data from the police by RedX · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Semi-off-topic story:

      Friend of mine lived in an apartment that caught fire. He had a couple of PC's at the time, including a high-end (at the time) 1Ghz Athlon. He and his roommate were able to get most of the valuables out of the place, including the Athlon PC, but most of their possessions were lost. The fire investigator came across the roommate's shotgun (they were hunters) that had a shorter than normal, but legal, barrel. The police were called in, all weapons were confiscated, and amazingly so were the computers. Even if the shotgun were illegal, I still can't figure out what relationship a computer would have to it. Chalk it up to post-Columbine paranoia I suppose, although these guys were in their early 20's. No charges were ever filed, but the computers were never returned despite several iniquiries. The kids were pretty scared after the whole ordeal and never really pursued the matter.

    3. Re:Hiding data from the police by lylum · · Score: 1

      pah... after that they REALLY have a reason to go on rampage.

    4. Re:Hiding data from the police by ces · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um, the cops would seize the backups, too.

      This is why you leave a copy of your backups with your attorney.

      A company I worked for sent one of the weekly offsite sets to our corprate law firm so we would have access in case of legal entanglements.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    5. Re:Hiding data from the police by drunk_as_in_beer · · Score: 1

      Um, the cops would seize the backups, too.

      You should have multiple _offsite_ backups.

      --
      --Drunk as in Beer
    6. Re:Hiding data from the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they had bothered to call the NRA, they could have had 5,000 lobbyists on the courthouse steps the next day.

    7. Re:Hiding data from the police by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the computers "mysteriously" wound up in some cop's house loaded with FPS games. (Can you say donut deathmatch?)

      Seriously though, they should have sued for their computers. That makes me mad.

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    8. Re:Hiding data from the police by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "Police have been known [statenews.com] to sieze computers that simply had data that might be used as evidence, even when the owners hadn't done anything wrong."

      A similar case of this (Steve Jackson) led to the founding of the Electronic Frontiers Foundation, to protect against such abuses in future.

    9. Re:Hiding data from the police by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      p.s.

      A 1-year subscription to Anonymizer is included when you join the EFF

  34. Rendezvous by Eslyjah · · Score: 1

    According to the FAQ, it uses Rendezvous (aka ZeroConf) for advertising printer capability and the setup page. Great use of free technology.

    1. Re:Rendezvous by jclendenan · · Score: 1

      I guess this will advertise it's presence to the police too if they go the Wireless computer in cruiser route too. Hmm, there goes the Pr0n collection... oops.

  35. 120GB? by MourningBlade · · Score: 0, Troll

    Surely you jest. I mean, who'd need all of that to store a porn collection?

    Whoops, typo. Revised version:

    Who'd need just that to store a porn collection?

    Hardly a decent "collection" without some variety and historical context, not to mention some "best ofs."

    I mean, if you're stepping up to "collection," from "stash," you have to do your duty to librarians over the world.

    Wait, that sounds pretty kinky...and it's not in my collection! Oh, woe is me!

  36. Martian Drive + GeoCache = Data Dumps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't hide one in your house. Instead, find a nice hidden spot with good reception and a power socket in random places - at work, at the local mall, underneath bridges, in parks, etc. Mark the location with a GPS, and use them as random access points/neighborhood file repositories.

    The idea is to create a decentralized, accessible, but non-connected freenet centered around a sort of "dead-drop" concept. If you want to distribute something, drive around town uploading to these file repositories, and hopefully leechers that frequent these spots will pass the data on.

    Of course, if you wanted to network these units, all you have to do is plop one somewhere, then train a box with a wired connection at them and set up a bridge - so you can use them either way. I like the cloak-and-dagger method myself... it seems cooler 8)

    1. Re:Martian Drive + GeoCache = Data Dumps by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1

      I think it's more likely that the real leechers will be people who just steal the drives, unfortunately. I still like the idea, but don't know how to get around that drawback.

    2. Re:Martian Drive + GeoCache = Data Dumps by KiahZero · · Score: 1

      I do believe they make this nifty devices referred to as "locks" that might do the trick.

      --
      I'm a lawyer, but not yours. I wouldn't represent someone who thinks taking legal advice from Slashdot is a good idea.
    3. Re:Martian Drive + GeoCache = Data Dumps by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. Locks can be cut. And a steel box doesn't seem to be the best idea.

    4. Re:Martian Drive + GeoCache = Data Dumps by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      Well, if someone managed to drop one of these boxes off at the local police station, I think leechers would be inclined to just access the data via wireless, rather than try and make off with the box. Of course, some people rented cherrypickers and went around pulling Metricom boxes off of power poles after they went under, so I wouldn't underestimate anyone...

      I'm sure some enterprising blackhat will try creating a "reverse honeypot" by putting one of these boxes right up to some big corporation, and configuring it to look like additional disk space...

    5. Re:Martian Drive + GeoCache = Data Dumps by mrmag00 · · Score: 1

      please publish the locations of the drives so we can access them too. Not that I plan to steal them or anything...

  37. No, but I built one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I built something just like this for my parents. They are both wireless now with laptops for each of them. When my older bro and I went home for xmas a few months ago we each brough all the parts we needed to make it happen. Our xmas gift to our parents was this file server (among other things).

    The rationale was this: as my parents move to digital cameras and start scanning in older things, our family albums will increasingly be digital, rather than a chest full of pictures. Since preserving this data is important to me I decided that we should have a 'Family Digital Library'. Now they store all kinds of stuff on there, and I expect that we'll be adding more disks to in the coming years.

    Secret file storage? Nah... Family Library? YES.

    1. Re:No, but I built one. by adamruck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      thats a good point.. now that were seing more and more digital pictures, digital films, etc, there will be an increase in need to keep backups. Not just on a floppy either. How hard would it be for someone design a fireproof little vault that you could stuff in some remote corner of the house, wireless enable it.. and have it easy enough to hook up that grandma could use it for data storage?

      Just think.. then instead of having to try and mount the hardrive on a different computer when it breaks.. I can just format it.. install a fresh OS, and copy and paste from my little safe.

      Or bettery yet.. just keep a copy of the whole hard-drive.. not just the data files.. so when grandmas computer breaks.. I can tell here to pop in the restore cd.. have it boot up.. and automatically restore the lastest stable image of her hardrive. I wouldn't even have to run across town.

      --
      Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
    2. Re:No, but I built one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he mentioned if they were doing any sort of backups (just a file server up in the attic to keep photos). If not, bad monkey!

    3. Re:No, but I built one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fireproof container with any sort of electronics in it can be difficult because a true fireproof vault is air-tight. No air circulation is not good for things that generate heat.

      Of course if there was a way to use the vault itself as an effective radiator then that might work, but good luck finding a motherboard and PCI cards that would allow every single little chip to be hooked to the steel of the vault.

  38. am I stupid or will it be detected? by Submarine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, if you hide your file server in your attic, it will be found with difficulty. Still, if the cops really want to find it, they'll just come with radio tracking equipment! 802.11 transmitters should be easily located.

    1. Re:am I stupid or will it be detected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As mentioned elsewhere, you could hack it so that you could power it down remotely (powering it back up would be interesting if it's hidden in the insulation, though). Still, a metal detector would find it....

    2. Re:am I stupid or will it be detected? by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      As mentioned elsewhere, you could hack it so that you could power it down remotely (powering it back up would be interesting if it's hidden in the insulation, though). Still, a metal detector would find it...

      With all the internet storage sites (apple idrive/etc), maybe someone over at dataheaven needs to start a "Secure Online Data Backup" service outside the reach of the US courts. Then with a fast Internet connection you can store your data without the need of a local copy.

      We already have secure, untracable email accounts overseas, maybe this could be an extension of that idea.

    3. Re:am I stupid or will it be detected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but if they aren't expecting to have a wireless harddrive hidden somewhere why would they search for it?

  39. He doesn't mention porn. by ccweigle · · Score: 1

    Not that it matters to anyone. Clearly from reading the comments here, the porn angle was the way to go to get this widely read (not the Cringely article, obviously, just the slashblurb).

    But, Cringely talks about hiding data . And, yes, current consumer wireless tech is a poor fit to the task of
    securing data, but that will change.

    Personally, I just like the plug-and-play, out-of-sight storage idea. You could, very seriously, drop this in any closet with electrical outlets and serve up media/storage to a host of gadgets in your house. For current implementations, I'd worry about robustness (can I really just turn it on and forget about it till the drive dies?). I know my damn wireless router gets all screwed up if I try to activate MAC address controls.

  40. If the cops are looking, it's too late by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The best way to keep anything hidden from anybody is to keep them from ever knowing it existed in the first place - if they already know, or suspect, then it's already too late.

    Sure, you might have your super-leet miniserver stuck in your heating ducts, powered by a little mini-windmill and linked via 802.11g to your house, with an emergency "shut up for 24 hours" command, and that might keep it from being found in a cursory search. But if the cops really think you have something on a computer in your house that is worth finding, they will find it. They will keep searching until they do, even if it takes days.

    So the day after you are hauled downtown, one of the forensics team says "Hey, there's a signal here on 5GHz - get the spec-an in here and let's DF that puppy."

    Now, if you used strong encryption, you might keep them from knowing what is on the disk, but find it they will. And they can compel you to provide the key - even here in the US, all they have to do is say "Fine - we won't charge you based on anything we find." That "poofing" sound was your 5th Amendment right becoming irrelevant - you can no longer incriminate yourself, so you can no longer refuse to testify and be protected. Continue to refuse, and they find you in contempt of court and lock you up until you change your mind.

    Robert Heinlein made the point in "If This Goes On..." that the best thing in the world is to let them find something bad, but not bad enough to get you into trouble. So, if you are plotting the overthrow of the known world, you keep that info a deep, dark secret tattooed on the inside of your eyelids encrypted with a 4096 bit key, but you keep your goat porn on a drive they will find (with a little looking). Then, when they think you are hiding something and find the drive, they look a little longer, don't find anything, and move on.

    But once again, the big trick is not to arouse suspicions in the first place. If they knock on the door, you've already lost.

    1. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't work like that. You can't be compelled to give up your key because of the 5th ammendment. Now supposing that the DA offers you immunity for anything in your encrypted file (the police don't do that, it's the DA) you then cannot be prosecuted for anything they find, even if it is clearly illegal and/or incriminating.

      I suggest you lay off the big brother theories and do a little law research.

    2. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Continue to refuse, and they find you in contempt of court and lock you up until you change your mind.

      Has someone been locked up indefinately for not holding over encrypted files? I'm not disagreeing with you, but I heard of people not getting prosecuted because police couldn't find evidence because of encryption. Mitnick had encrypted files on his computer and he never held over the key.

      And cops miss stuff all the time. Serial killer Paul Bernardo video taped his crimes and hid them in his house so well the cops couldn't find them (he got his lawyer to retrieve them).

    3. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      Read the 5th amendment. You cannot be compelled to incriminate yourself. If the testimony would not incriminate you (due to immunity being granted) then the 5th amendment does not apply.

      Sorry, but this already has been done several times.

    4. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by Dean+Sas · · Score: 1

      In Britain they'd just bring a charge of not giving the police your encryption key (only in legalese) I think the maximum prison length for this is five years. So if you've got details that will get you locked up for any longer than that...

    5. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, if the object of the case involves finding something on your harddrive that is illegal (to use as evidence to convict you), why would they grant immunity on anything found on the harddrive?

    6. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by ikeleib · · Score: 1

      Continue to refuse, and they find you in contempt of court and lock you up until you change your mind.

      You can be found in contempt of court by a judge at your trial. This means that the DA has gotten enough evidence of your crime to convince a grand jury to indict you, and you are on trial for this crime. Furthermore, you cannot be compelled by comtempt of court or ortherwise to give up your fifth ammendment right.

    7. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they can compel you to provide the key - even here in the US, all they have to do is say "Fine - we won't charge you based on anything we find." That "poofing" sound was your 5th Amendment right becoming irrelevant - you can no longer incriminate yourself, so you can no longer refuse to testify and be protected

      As long as you're immune, why NOT testify?

    8. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My encryption key is 'blah'.... Oh, it didn't work? Oh, well, the file must be corrupt. Too bad, coppers!"

      Prove me wrong!!

    9. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no requirement to leave it on 24/7 either.
      A modified smoke detector (the hard wired style) could easily be fitted with an IR remote receiver to control power to the server, with a manual switch under the flip cover.

    10. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, I'll take this slowly.

      The DA wants to decrypt your drive. He cannot.

      He hits you with a supeona for the key. You have two choices - supply or refuse.

      You refuse, citing your 5th amendment rights.

      The DA offers you immunity.

      You continue to refuse.

      Since you have been offered immunity, you no longer have the protection of the 5th amendment, as you cannot incriminate yourself.

      Therefor, you are in violation of the supeona - a court document.

      You are, therefor, in contempt of court.

      You are missing the point here - your 5th amendment right does not apply, because you are no longer incriminating yourself. That is the "trick" they use.

    11. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      But if they can't prosecute you due to said immunity, then whats the point? That would only be useful in cases where they care more about the information than in sending you to jail.

    12. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      IMHO, you're thinking about this all wrong:

      The best way to keep anything hidden from anybody is to keep them from ever knowing it existed in the first place - if they already know, or suspect, then it's already too late.

      The best way is to both, try and keep anyone from knowing it exists in the first place AND to cover your ass. Yeah you should try to keep things hidden, obviously. That doesn't mean you shouldn't take precautions in case the worst does happen.

      Sure, you might have your super-leet miniserver stuck in your heating ducts, powered by a little mini-windmill and linked via 802.11g to your house, with an emergency "shut up for 24 hours" command

      Actually, your desktop should send the hidden PC "stay alive" commands as long as you're logged in. Once you disappear suspiciously, it should begin making preparations to destroy all data. Depending on the size of the data it could start loading it all into RAM and wiping the contents of the HD's. After a certain amount of time, it would then reboot killing the data for good.

      So the day after you are hauled downtown, one of the forensics team says "Hey, there's a signal here on 5GHz - get the spec-an in here and let's DF that puppy."

      First off, by then the PC has probably had enough time to destroy anything sensitive. Maybe it's even had enough time to load some dummy data in its place as well. Second, the network interfave doesn't have to beacon, or even respond to packets if they don't have the proper WEP key.

      Robert Heinlein made the point in "If This Goes On..." that the best thing in the world is to let them find something bad, but not bad enough to get you into trouble. So, if you are plotting the overthrow of the known world, you keep that info a deep, dark secret tattooed on the inside of your eyelids encrypted with a 4096 bit key, but you keep your goat porn on a drive they will find (with a little looking). Then, when they think you are hiding something and find the drive, they look a little longer, don't find anything, and move on.

      Right. The PC will automatically have wiped the really bad stuff by the time they even ask for your WEP key (As a side note, it should have a UPS good enough to allow for this.) When the finally get to your house with the WEP and SSH keys you gave them, they find your dummy data. This actually seems like it could be a pretty good way to handle things if the system was designed properly.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    13. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Do I hear you saying that they then use the information you give them to prosecute you anyway?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    14. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by torpor · · Score: 1

      The best way is to both, try and keep anyone from knowing it exists in the first place AND to cover your ass.

      No, the best way is to just not do anything illegal in the first place.

      Of course, in this day and age, that may be more difficult than it sounds.

      But regardless, I find the suggested uses for this wireless hard drive to be despicable. "Hide porn", indeed.

      If you can't be open and honest about the porn you're looking at, then you're looking at bad porn.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    15. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Right, and if immunity has been granted, you have nothing to fear. It doesn't matter what they find in there, if they've offered you immunity from prosecution, it cannot be used against you. If they withdraw the immunity later not only does this shhot their credibility to hell, put them in the line for action by the bar assosication, it also invalidates anything they got and will get it thrown out at trial.

      That's what immunity means, you are immune from prosecution. If you are granted immunity for your testimony, it means that no matter what you say, it can't be used against you. If you are granted immunity for what they will find in an encrypted file, no matter what they find they can't use it to prosecute you.

      So they aren't taking an end run around the 5th ammendment with immunity, actually they are giving you a free pass. They only do this if they suspect that the evidence in there will be more important in another case and it isn't worth going after you for.

      It's not like immunity is a word they can say to make you give them stuff and then suddenly take that and present it in court against you. No, they give you immunity on something, that's it, they've agreed to let you skate on it.

      So let's say you had an archive full of finincial information about drug transaction. They have enough evidence for a warrant, so they come and sieze your computer. They send it to their technicians who carefully analize your drive, but can find no trace of anything. The only place they can't check is the encrypted archive. They interrogate you, but you refuse to give up your password.

      Now at this point they are stuck, tehy had probable cause to suspect you had this information, but no proof of it. You are invoking the 5th so tehy can't make you open the archive. So the DA decides, well, you are just some low-rung finincial monkey. You probably just keep the books. They don't really need to nail you for this. So, they offer you complete immunity for what is in the file. You and your lawyer accept, and they open it up. Inside they find a ton of shit, including a good deal of it that incriminates you in a number of things. Too damn bad, they can't use a single bit of it in court. What's more, anything that the discover as a result of this new information, they can't use in court against you either. YOu just got off for everything that is in that archive.

      So I don't see what the problem is here. The 5th ammendment says you can't be forced to incriminate yourself. If the DA want to immunize you from incriminating yourself, great, show them what they want and who cares if it is incriminating or not.

    16. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      I never said they wanted the info to persecute^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hprosecute you - just that if they wanted the data on the drive they could get it.

      However, if the data on the drive is embarassing, they could bring it out in court and make it a matter of public record.

      If they REALLY want you, they use your data to find somebody else (say, the person you bought something illegal from) and then crack him to get the data to bust you.

      These are some of the reasons that things like double jepordy are so important - with the resources of the state behind him, a prosecutor can crush anybody he wants without strong limits.

    17. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by Srdjant · · Score: 1

      Or, encrypt your file with PGP or whatever, then rot13. When the police ask for more info and a password, just give them the password - they'll find the archive corrupt.

      You might want to chop up the file or whatever as well, to make it look more corrupt.
      Chop the file into 4 parts, then swap over the parts and put together the file, then rot13 it again.

      As long as you know how to bring it back to how it was, and you can tell them its a pgp file (or whatever), you should be able to convince them that it is corrupt.

      Or get a program that logically inverts the bits of the i-nodes that belong to the encrypted file - rendering that part of the filesystem useless - corrupt. You'd have to hide the program that does this though...

    18. Re:If the cops are looking, it's too late by ikeleib · · Score: 1

      The DA may not offer you immunity to all possible venues of prosecution (ie federal, state, municipal, and county). He therefore cannot offer you full immunity.

  41. Roll your own.. by Weavus · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is just an Epia Mini-ITX motherboard in a bog standard Morex Cubid Mini-ITX case. I have both sat here on my desk and its a great little silent linux server.

    They cost a lot less to buy what this company wants to charge you. Sure they added wireless card/hard drive/memory but $500 still seems a bit expensive.

    Check out http://www.mini-itx.com for details of the motherboard / case. They also have an online store for Europeans...

    BTW, you can easily get 2 hard drives in that case if you take out the included hd enclosure so you could make one with a lot more space than 120gb...

    1. Re:Roll your own.. by jjshoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      i was just thinking this, aprox. $150 for the unit, $25 in ram if you dont have any, and $100 for the drive, the itx has built on ethernet, two usb, and even a tv out if you want to hook it up to tv as your console for trouble shooting..

      thats only $275. not to mention how much easier it would be to modify this unit to your needs.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    2. Re:Roll your own.. by really? · · Score: 1

      don't forget the:
      1. US$ 100 or so for the PCI-> PC-CARD addapter and the wireless card.
      2. US$ 60 or so for the case.
      3. The time to put it all together.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    3. Re:Roll your own.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also buy a $50 PII off of eBay, a $24 Promise Card and $120 of hard drives to get a better setup. Why spend extra for the slow wireless? But if you want, you will still have a lot of money left for that. Also add that some $50 computers on eBay have SCSI-enabled mobos. That would boost the speed even more. RAID can also be used to improve performance and or reliability. Compile kernel modules with crypto, use loop-AES or compile the full-blown international kernel patch and your data can be encrypted. Compile IPSec/Freeswan (or, use SSH), and the communication can be encrypted. Or, go with OpenBSD.

      It wouldn't be hard to put together something cheaper AND more secure than this offering, if you know what to do.

    4. Re:Roll your own.. by slim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can roll your own version of most innovations if you have the time and the inclination. However many people reach a point where their time is worth more to them than the money.

      I'd rather pay the money for a TiVo that works out of the box, than spend time building a box that does the same thing.

      I'd rather spend $500 on this box than spend $400 and several hours of my free time building and configuring a homebrew version.

      Ironically, I guess, the time I would have been prepared to put in the effort would be the time before I knew how to do it. Then it would have been in interesting challenge. Now it would just be a chore.

    5. Re:Roll your own.. by jjshoe · · Score: 1


      don't forget the:

      1. US$ 100 or so for the PCI-> PC-CARD addapter and the wireless card.

      2. US$ 60 or so for the case.

      3. The time to put it all together

      pci pc card adapter? what a waste. you can pick up pci wireless cards for $75. my fault for leaving that out, brings our grand total to $350 sinceas you know from following the message i replied to that the $150 is case included.

      and if you have any skill at all it shouldnt take you more then 10 minutes to put it all together.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    6. Re:Roll your own.. by topham · · Score: 1

      The only problem with the Tivo is the price.

      Their additional $100 charge for the Home Media Option is a bit expensive for what you get; but better than spending 3-400 on another standalone unit for the living room (aka Audiotron). (Wish the Tivo had digital audio out... they should add that option via USB...)

      Unlike the hacked hardware strewn all over my apartment, the Tivo 'just works'. It is easy enough to use that I've considered picking one up for my parents.

    7. Re:Roll your own.. by stickyc · · Score: 1
      If this is supposed to be an unattended SAMBA server for no more than 1 or 2 clients at a time, you should be able to easily get away with a P200 box. I highly recommend also getting ATA100 controller (which you'll likely need to see the larger drives anyway).

      Such machines can easily be found (with NIC & RAM) for under $25 on Ebay (although shipping's usually more than the PC). Try cruising the local garage sales or putting the word on the street you're looking for an old Garage Shelf Space Taker-Upper and you might just get it for free from someone who's just happy it's out of their garage and not in landfill. Heck, if you're the kind of person who would rather roll your own than buy, you've probably already got a few of these machines collecting dust and should already know all of this anyhow.

      Another $15 for the ATA controller and $100 for a 120gb drive (some larger drives are often bundled with the controller, YMMV) and you're good to go for way under $275.

      And if you really enjoy this kind of thing, pick up an HD44780 display (~$20 on EBay + $10 on wiring bits from RS or Frys) and run LCDProc so you can just look at the box to see if it's crashed before hauling out the spare KB and monitor.

    8. Re:Roll your own.. by really? · · Score: 1

      yes one can save US$25 by bying a PCI wireless card, but then one is "locked in." With an adapter one can use any PC card - cardbus, actually.

      Anyhow, the point is that, while it's cheaper to roll your own - I have made a LOT of these boxes - it's not for everyone. The extra money gives you your time back, and some kind of system warranty.

      I guess I must look around for a better case source, a case like the one they use costs me to 75~80 bucks. I like the quietness of the external DC power supply though ...

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
  42. I think... by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 1

    I think longer cables for your mouse, keyboard, monitor, and speakers would be better -- then you could get the entire noisy machine, fans and all, out of your room and into the attic.

    --
    evil adrian
  43. No, that problem's for the British. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same people who don't enjoy the benefit of the 5th Amendment in their own legal system.

    1. Re:No, that problem's for the British. by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1

      I wish you were right, but I doubt that a judge would hold you any less in contempt for failing to hand over an encryption key than for failing to hand over the keys to a strong box for which there was a search warrant. Except the strong box can be easily broken into without the key--in the case of an encryption key, the defendant has to be broken.

    2. Re:No, that problem's for the British. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That's why you encrypt in such a way that you can give them a password and it will decrypt some things, but it still won't decrypt the "interesting stuff", whatever that may be in your case.

      See Rubberhose for one possible implementation of this idea.

  44. unless by joeflies · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    unless your wife's running airsnort

  45. Drug dealers, hide your drugs in the attic. by IvyMike · · Score: 3, Funny

    After all, the cops, even though they have a warrant and some sort of indication that you have illegal material, will probably just give up without looking in the attic. I mean, who would think someone might hide stuff up there? I learned this trick from the "porn computer in the attic article."

  46. Security through obscurity works... by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

    until they find it. I mean seriously. He could encrypt it too. It's not like hiding it is going to hurt in any way.

  47. RTA! he doesn't suggest you hide porn on it by fiddlesticks · · Score: 2, Informative
    Cringely doesn't mention p0rn at all, merely that it might be good for '...data you wouldn't want confiscated by the police.'

    Maybe that's the only sort of data that /. editors would want to conceal :)

    A different form of security is available to purchasers of wireless file servers from Martian.com. These book-sized Linux servers that were featured recently in the New York Times have no fans and use hard drives with liquid bearings, making the units almost totally silent. With a WiFi connection you can have almost instant Network Attached Storage for your PC, Mac, or Linux network with 120 gigabytes of encrypted disk space for under $500. There is literally nothing to configure. Just plug it in. Yeah, but who would want one of these things? I would, for one, but my friend David from the UK points out that such a device hidden away from sight would be ideal for storing data you wouldn't want confiscated by the police. Nestle a Martian box under your attic insulation if you have something to hide.

    1. Re:RTA! he doesn't suggest you hide porn on it by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Unless you're into nasty shit from the Stile project or kiddie porn, how the hell can it be so bad you'd have to hide it from the police?

      I think the editors just gave us Too Much Information.

    2. Re:RTA! he doesn't suggest you hide porn on it by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      surely its more useful for data you wouldn't want confiscated by the burglars.

  48. too slow... by ethanms · · Score: 1

    eew... only 802.11b?

    Nuts to that... you wouldn't dream of using a wired 10Mb connection when 100Mb (or even 1Gb) is available... so why use an (at best) 11Mb? And don't bother to say price, because then you obviously haven't been to Best Buy lately...

    If they were smart they would have stuck a PC Card or USB wireless adapter in there... even just as an internal thing... that way they could update... it's not like they didn't see the a/g spec coming!

  49. Thanks for the editorial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He thinks the killer app for this one is for keeping your porn storage hidden, if you're busted by the cops.

    There is no mention of storing porn in the linked article. It suggests hiding data from the cops. Thanks to your thoughtless editorializing in the submission, half the posts here are off-topic. A simple skim of the article by an editor would have caught this. Anyone want to point me to the subscriptions page now?

  50. Security? by cgenman · · Score: 1

    So if you want to prevent anyone from knowing you have something to hide, you broadcast it over the most insecure protocols known to man in a computer with no other plausable use "hidden" in open space? Did he used to work for a Savings and Loan?

  51. Re:Europe - land of child pornography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, yea, and the 500,000 Iraqi children that starved to death in the last decade because of economic sanctions on Iraq. For those children, we look the other way.

    No, they starved because Saddam would rather spend money building palaces and statues of himself than on the Iraqui people.

    Now that Saddam is no longer in charge, things will (hopefully) change. I agree -- the Iraquis, men and women in addition to children -- have been ignored far too long. Now we have done something about it.

  52. Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He did not mention porn in the article, although I think the MPEG-4/ Windows Media 9 discussion was interesting

  53. Oh, brilliant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using similar logic, why would anyone use encryption unless they are a terrorist? Thanks for that 'insight'.

    1. Re:Oh, brilliant. by Threni · · Score: 1

      In which was is that even remotely similar logic?
      Oh, and all analogy is fraud.

  54. Complete wireless freedom by Mr+Thundercleze · · Score: 1

    Ahh... to think of a computer with no wires is a dream. Wireless mouse, keyboard, and internet are just a few that I have. Soon I'll be able to put those trash ties to some other use than bundling my cords.

  55. My plan: by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bury a fanless computer six feet down in the back yard. Run power and cat-5 into the garage. Add physical intrusion detection. By the time the police figure out where the cable leads, the thermite charges packed around the hard drives have done their work and there's nothing to find but a glass-encased lump of slag.

    If anyone's interested, thermite is actually very easy to make. Igniting it from the computer would probably require a multi-stage ignition, though - say, electric match to black powder to magnesium strip to thermite. And you'd want to make sure the ignition signal didn't get accidentally flipped on reboot or core dump or anything. =]

    Encryption's all well and good, but you've got to keep the keys somewhere. Just try recovering data from a hard drive when you can't identify which lump of metal IS the hard drive.

    1. Re:My plan: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a pysical failure of any of those components would mean the death of whatever data you were trying to preserve...

    2. Re:My plan: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      thermite is actually very easy to make

      Is it also very legal to make and detonate? I don't know about your jurisdiction, but in my law class I remember something against detonating explosives without a permit.

    3. Re:My plan: by SUB7IME · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the cops nail you for possessing Thermite anyways??? =)

    4. Re:My plan: by Alsee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >thermite is actually very easy to make

      Is it also very legal to make and detonate? I don't know about your jurisdiction, but in my law class I remember something against detonating explosives without a permit.


      Thermite is not an explosive. It just makes an incredibly hot pool of molten metal.

      Thermite = Powdered aluminum + rust (aka iron oxide). That's all there is to it.

      Once you ignite it the oxygen moves from the iron to the aluminum. You get aluminum oxide, pure iron, and lots and lots of heat.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    5. Re:My plan: by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

      Thermite = Powdered aluminum + rust (aka iron oxide). That's all there is to it.

      Yes, but keeping the Aluminum from premature oxidization is still a pain. Not that I've ever messed with that kind of thing.... (grin)

    6. Re:My plan: by Macgyver7017 · · Score: 1

      You can order thermite, and lots of other cool things you never would have thought you could order from www.unitednuclear.com i have done buisiness with them in the past and would highly reccomend them to any other college students with time on your hands =) Jon Sullivan

    7. Re:My plan: by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      Didn't know they had thermite, but I've got a beautiful chunk of metallic pitchblende (Uranium Oxide) from them.

      Hey, I needed something to test my new geiger counter design, and nothing else around the house could get it up to 30,000 counts/min...

  56. Drug dealer's trick by swb · · Score: 1

    Just use the drug dealer's trick. Don't hide it in your house, hide it outside your house in some publicly accessable area. Yes, it leaves the device more vulnerable but it also leaves you less culpable since it wasn't in your posession.

    An electronic device that needs power is trickier, but a wireless device mitigates some of that since you don't even have to touch it to use it. The right kind of device could run for a long time without external power (batteries, solar) or the right hiding place could provide it with power (hidden in wall, behind an outlet or something).

  57. Re:Europe - land of child pornography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Iraquis, men and women in addition to children -- have been ignored far too long. "

    Wrong. The wonderful, child-porn free country of America have been helping Iraqis all along. Where do you think they got the expertise and material for chemical weapons from?

    Clue: Check this out

  58. backward. by twitter · · Score: 1
    I think longer cables for your mouse, keyboard, monitor, and speakers would be better -- then you could get the entire noisy machine, fans and all, out of your room and into the attic.

    The only long wire you need is ethernet. As many have noticed, you can put all the noisy things in a room by themselves. All you need for a terminal is an old P90 laptop. X forward via ssh and never worry about noise again. Long wires for keyboards and VGA and all only useful if you are running an OS that has poor networking software or lack a quiet one.

    On the other hand you could just buy one of these $500 gizmos and never fool with boxes in a closet again. If I were stupid rich, I might.

    My choice is neither! I've already got the boxes. I'm too cheap to buy a replacement and too lazy to move them into a closet. I do, however have my laptop set up in another room on a desk where I can read and write to dead trees. Quiet is nice from time to time, but the machine noise does not bother me.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:backward. by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 1

      Quiet is nice from time to time, but the machine noise does not bother me.

      Problem for me is I have my computer in my bedroom... during the day it's fine, but sometimes it feels like I'm trying to sleep in a plane's engine!

      --
      evil adrian
  59. Re:Europe - land of child pornography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess it's okay to kill them, as long as you don't fuck them.

  60. Re:Europe - land of child pornography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "...Scandinavia are the greatest child-porn production areas in the world"

    Yeah, but Scandinavia is a clean, efficient, well-run collection of countries. Denmark has some of the most beautiful women I've ever seen. The people there are intelligent and charming.

    America, on the other hand...

    > Christian U.S. where we depose dictators

    Heh! You clearly know *nothing* about American foreign policy over the last 50 odd years.

  61. Hide it where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    We all know the safest place to hide that garbage file from the law is on a floppy in an empty cigarette carton in the cieling above your bed.

  62. Re:Europe - land of child pornography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must watch FOX then?

  63. This is where I will store� by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...my collection of Anne Frank jpegs.

    1. Re:This is where I will store� by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you sick fuck.

  64. Hard drive in the attic? by GrBear · · Score: 1

    Personally, I keep my hard drive in my pants.. to each their own I guess. :o)

  65. If the cops are looking, it's NOT too late by Nitrometano · · Score: 0

    Put some termite on it with a very sensible movement fuse. So the thing couldn't be moved anymore. Termite is not a explosive, so it's no damaging. It will turn instead the box in a melted slug without remision. It's used for heavy-duty-rapid-outdoor-emergency iron soldiering. Of course tring to avoid the in-course melting process could be very hazardous, and imposible. Put the termite just over the HD, for the extreme paranoid.

  66. Let's clear up some things: by BKX · · Score: 5, Informative

    First, thermite doesn't explode. It reacts quickly and violently, with extremely high heat. The parent poster was right, a multistage computer controlled ignition system would work and be tits.

    For those you who think it burns and/or requires oxygen, your wrong. This is the equation for a thermite reaction:

    Fe2O3(s) + 2AL(s) -> AL2O3 + 2Fe + energy

    That's right. Powdered aluminum and powdered rust make thermite. It's ignition temperature is so high that it is normally lit with burning magnesium metal. It reacts so hot that a small amount (like a kilo) can melt a hole through the engine block of a car and keep going through the concrete. That'll definitely be suffucient to melt your porno.

    1. Re:Let's clear up some things: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's correct technically. Suggestion about multi-stage ignition is correct also. However, fears that The Law could prosecute for possession/use of Thermite are not groundless. "Infernal Device" statues are much broader than actual technical exposives -- if you can prosecute a hair-spray / tennis-ball mortar, this probably qualifies also.

      Of course, Destruction of Evidence statutes might cover even an industrial degausser hooked to the intrusion detection.

    2. Re:Let's clear up some things: by sohp · · Score: 1

      "For those you who think it burns and/or requires oxygen, your wrong."

      My wrong what? Oh you mean you're wrong. Well what's that O3 in the equation? Mud?

    3. Re:Let's clear up some things: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at the equation it does not require any extra oxygen for the reaction to take place. If the reaction required oxygen, say from the air, then they it would have something like + 02, but the O3 is part of the Iron Rust.

    4. Re:Let's clear up some things: by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Nope, it's part of rust. He meant it didn't need atmospheric oxygen, which it doesn't.

    5. Re:Let's clear up some things: by hmatt · · Score: 0

      What makes an explosive?

      Simple. Rate of combustion. If you ignite black powder in a small pile, it simply burns quickly. If you encase it in a pipe or cardboard tube, it becomes the fuel for an explosive.

      The same is true of thermite. It burns quickly and without atmospheric oxygen. You can make a bomb out of it if you can contain it.

    6. Re:Let's clear up some things: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Well what's that O3 in the equation? Mud?"

      Rust.

  67. duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So only allow known mac addresses to access the WAP. Most WAPs support this. If they don't, get a firmware upgrade or get a WAP that allows filtering on known mac addresses, and use 128bit encryption.

  68. Re:Europe - land of child pornography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Only American media tells the truth

    Then look for an American news source with the same information - there are plenty.

  69. Streaming Audio/Video through PS2? by kasek · · Score: 1

    you can stream audio and video through your PS2? how may i ask? unless you mean with the linux kit, but thats a lil bit different.

    1. Re:Streaming Audio/Video through PS2? by bigbubbaj · · Score: 1

      Software is called BroadQ. I have my ps2 set up with a WET11 bridge to the network (ps2 net adaptor of course).

      Program runs on a PC acts as a media server, ps2 will browse and play those files. It's really quite cool.

      It plays divx, xvid, mp3s,oggs and mpeg2s...

      Check it out at www.broadq.com

  70. easy encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "He thinks the killer app for this one is for keeping your porn storage hidden" Here is what you need: http://www.olsen-design.com

  71. What if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you cheap bastards just bought one music CD-ROM, made 5 backups, break the original music CD-ROM in 5 peices and give out backups with a peice of the original Music CD-ROM to your cheap friends. Hey, I did it.

    And to prove my theory, I was walking out on my nearby railroad tracks and found a smashed Metalica CD-ROM. The largest peice of it was missing about 33% of its mass, or rather it is 2/3 of a Metalica CD-ROM. Does possesion of this Disc give me right to goto Gnutella or Kaazza and download Unforgiven2 and all the titles on the Disc?

    FUCK YA! And I saved the schards, recognizable to this specific Metalica CD-ROM, gave those to more friends and they too have a right to download all the music. Why? Because this is why we need to backup our music...to keep the ORIGINAL CD-ROM in a safe place, or at-least, keep the remnants of the CD-ROM in a safe-place to provide proof of right to use the music. Now, I have 20 friends with what's left of their implied-over-used-and-broken Metallica Music...

    I am such a krook... (c:

    1. Re:What if... by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I hear that you can download ANYTHING as long as you only keep it for 24 hours. So as long as you download it, keep it for 23 hours, and then delete it and download it again, you never have to pay for software! Ever!

    2. Re:What if... by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      and If you blow out all the candles on your birthday cake with the first puff you will get your wish.

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
  72. hiding the data by PCGod · · Score: 1
    He thinks the killer app for this one is for keeping your porn storage hidden, if you're busted by the cops. I think his concept is weak, given the wireless signal is traceable (security through obscurity?), WEP is breakable, and the fact that you have to have the thing plugged in somewhere

    I think the perfect solution to that would be to hide the device (say, in the crawl space under the house if you have it, far away from the entry to the crawl space to make it even more difficult to find), connect it to power through an X10 module and just hit the off switch when the police come knocking on the door. no wireless signel. no wires going near it, save the AC line that was already there that you tapped into. no reason to tear up the floor to find it.

    Just my two cents
  73. Not privacy, simple thieves? by marcovje · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everybody seems to want to pull this into the
    extreme, by mentioning police, feds etc.

    I think a more normal, and more common cause would be simple protection for thieves:

    - They have to work quickly in general.

    - They are relatively low tech

    - They are after the hardware, not the data. (why search the house for a $400 appliance for which they probably don't even get $100

    So simple separating the visible part to of your
    computers from the storage/data as far as thieves are concerned.

    Target: normal, ordinary people with important records: dentist, doctors, some journalists, politicians (including local, often worth a lot of money to real-estate entrepeneurs) etc.

    1. Re:Not privacy, simple thieves? by NaDrew · · Score: 1

      Like the bastard(s) who broke into our place last month. Somehow missed the huge Dell monitor on my wife's desk and the rack of PCs next to mine in their race upstairs. Presumably looking for drugs or jewelry in the bedroom. Anyway, we came home just as they hit the top of the stairs and they took off through the bedroom balcony--her expen$ive heirloom necklace (and my laptop) untouched, as was the rest of the house.
      It freaked us out though, and we're thinking of creating some secured storage in the empty space under the stairs.
      First, the door would be difficult to see if you weren't looking for it. Then once you got in, everything of value would be securely locked down (think heavy bars bolted to concrete foundation) or in fire safes themselves so secured.
      I'd really like to put the computer rack in there too, if I can figure out the long-distance SVGA problem--the idea of cheap laptops as dumb terminals had simply not occurred to me. So thanks to the three or four people up there who mentioned it.

      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  74. In your attic? by OS24Ever · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Am I the only one who's attic is about 110 deg F or higher in the summer?

    Can't see something with no fans surviving long in the attic. Now in the winter, heck yeah, but in the summer?

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    1. Re:In your attic? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 0

      Uh, my attic has gotten around 130F in the depth of August. I doubt that's a good temp to run a hard drive at..

  75. The Link... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  76. Re:Europe - land of child pornography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Yeah, but Scandinavia is a clean, efficient,
    > well-run collection of countries. Denmark has
    > some of the most beautiful women I've ever
    > seen. The people there are intelligent
    > and charming.

    Yeah, yeah, yeah, and there is no crime in communist eastern European countries, and the Soviet Union is the greatest force for peace in the world, and ...

    And idiots like you are constantly making general statements like "all Danes are beautiful and intelligent."

    > > Christian U.S. where we depose dictators
    > Heh! You clearly know *nothing* about
    > American foreign policy over the last 50
    > odd years.

    Heh! Clearly you have not been paying attention to UN Security Council debates between the cultured, wise, and beautiful Europeans and the ignorant, backward (and now ugly) Americans.

    Please remove your head from your ass at your next opportunity and observe the world around you, dumpling.

  77. Re:Europe - land of child pornography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where do you think they got the expertise and material for chemical weapons from?

    The French, Soviets/Russians, and Chinese.

    Yes, in the 80's, the US gave Iraq pesticide (for killing insects) and Anthrax samples (for making vaccines). Unfortunately, Hussein saw fit to use them as weapons, rather than using them to benefit the Iraqi people. Of course, if we hadn't given him these things, the "America is always wrong" crowd would be bitching that we were trying to murder the Iraqi people by not giving them insecticides for their crops or vaccines for their livestock, but there you go.

  78. MacOS X by Submarine · · Score: 1

    How about MacOS X? (I do use cryptoapi under Linux, but my colleague uses OS X)

    1. Re:MacOS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it'll do loopback mounts. Those .dmg files (that most software from Apple is distributed in) are nothing more than loopback file system, in a file, with a checksum.

  79. That explains it... by Snaller · · Score: 1

    He thinks the killer app for this one is for keeping your porn storage hidden, if you're busted by the cops.

    So porn is illegal in the United States? That explains why everybody is so trigger happy!

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  80. security by passion · · Score: 1

    the only truly good security is abstinence. Remove the wireless card, unplug your net connection, and disconnect the power supply. Nobody can root your box then.

    --
    - passion
    1. Re:security by Catnapster · · Score: 0

      And he posts this to /. over the Internet.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
  81. Re:Europe - land of child pornography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, Denmark has some beautiful women, but name one country that doesn't. If you've ever actually been to Denmark you should realise that most of them look like high-speed roadkills.
    Now Sweden, that's a completely different place... and Norway too.

  82. Constitutional rights, 5th ammendment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To tell you, in basic terminology, the looseness of correspondance the 5th ammendment of the Constitution of the united States of America:

    You are not required to provide an answer to a Police Officer(s)' request for information.

    You are not required to give them information!

    You are not required to answer a question!

    You are not required to incriminate yourself!

    You are not required to incriminate another person!

    You are not required to provide any information about another person!

    IF THEY SAY YOU MUST GIVE THEM INFORMATION, TELL THEM THEY ARE BREAKING THE LAW AND SHOVE THAT RED PEN UP THEIR ASSHOLE!


    BE AWARE OF ANY AND ALL INFORMATION YOU _VOLUNTEER_ AND BE AWARE OF YOUR PERCEPTION TO THE "POLICE OFFICER" (they are slandering and libelous bastards at taking notes on your physical/emotional appearance).

    NEVER SPEAK WITHOUT THE COUNCIL OF SOMEONE WHO KNOWS THE LAW!

    TO SEIZE PROPERTY, THEY MUST FIRST PROVIDE A NOTICE/REQUEST TO SEIZE THE PROPERTY ALONG WITH A _PROBABLE_CAUSE_ (not just "Probable Cause"), AND IF YOU DO NOT _VOLUNTEER_ TO THEIR REQUEST FOR EVIDENCE THEN YOU TELL THEM TO GET A WARRANT. THEY CANNOT ISSUE A WARRANT BEFORE FIRST INQUIRING TO YOU WITH AN INITIAL REQUEST/NOTICE.

    If they do otherwise than what the LAW OF THE LAND, Common Law and Constitution of the united States of America, then you will understand that they are NOT operating under the LAW OF THE LAND. Do not confuse municipal corporation laws (local, county, state, etc) with the LAW OF THE LAND (Common Law and Constitution of the united States of America).

    When your secured rights are violated, then you will obviously wonder where the fuck all your slanderous neighbors went. Why do they turn a blind eye to your private property and humanity, and always suspect:

    "Gosh, that always looked suspicious and was quite...he must have done somthing to deserve the police on his doorstep. Hope they turn him strait! Heil Commander-In-Chief!"

    YOU AND I ARE THE PRINCIPLE, We the People, THAT OF WHICH CORRECTS THOSE THAT BREAK LAWS THEY HAVE CONTRACTUALY OPERATED UPON. PERHAPS NOW YOU KNOW WHY THERE IS A "FREEMEN OF MONTANA".

    1. Re:Constitutional rights, 5th ammendment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember kids, people have been known to show up with fake court orders to obtain stuff. Since there is no way to verify a court order (that any sane person would use), This is an increasing type of crime.

  83. Already did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I put one in your attic, and in Cardinal Mahoney's attic.

  84. Colocation boys & girls... by QwkHyenA · · Score: 4, Informative
    If you've bought a colo spot through a fake ID, your files aren't anywhere a Cop would figure out. Next, access the files through a ssh tunnel and life is good...

    Just be sure to write a script into your .bash_logout that wipes your .bash_history & all relevant log files...

    Not that I've done this or anything...
    Wonder if I should have posted this anonymously...

    --
    LFS. Have you built your system today?
    1. Re:Colocation boys & girls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But what about the IP address from which you're accessing that SSH tunnel? And you're sure the colo site doesn't keep its own connect logs? Dangerous assumptions to make when one's freedom is at stake.

      ~~~

    2. Re:Colocation boys & girls... by lommer · · Score: 1

      As long as YOUR logs aren't giving away the fact that there even is a colo, they won't even know to look for a colo and subpoena its logs...

    3. Re:Colocation boys & girls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      But presumably, one would be worried about confiscation of data in connection with some kind of warrant. Ideally, the best thing to do is to avoid arousing suspicion in the first place. But if one has failed at that, one's goose is already cooked--they'll be watching outbound traffic from the user's residence or business (Carnivore?) which will show SSH connections and reveal the existense of a colo. The next step is to ask for the encryption keys? Forgot them? Sitting in jail may jog the user's memory.

      ~~~

    4. Re:Colocation boys & girls... by BitHive · · Score: 1
      Or just add the following to your .bash_history:

      HISTFILESIZE=0

    5. Re:Colocation boys & girls... by yarbo · · Score: 1

      I hope you pay with cash

    6. Re:Colocation boys & girls... by QwkHyenA · · Score: 1
      Exactly...

      QH types HISTFILESIZE=0 in .bash_history file

      Thanks! :)

      --
      LFS. Have you built your system today?
    7. Re:Colocation boys & girls... by lmfr · · Score: 1

      HISTFILE=/dev/null

    8. Re:Colocation boys & girls... by BitHive · · Score: 1

      Oops, I meant .bash_profile. Sorry.

    9. Re:Colocation boys & girls... by QwkHyenA · · Score: 1
      Doh!

      No problems. Thx!

      --
      LFS. Have you built your system today?
    10. Re:Colocation boys & girls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One could make the argument that the encryption keys (a 25-alphanumeric sequence) is rather complex and easily forgotten/erroneously memorized. I don't think you'd be sitting in jail forever. It'd be a blatant violation of your rights, and a stamping-out of habeas corpus.

  85. it's not that far off to use it for hiding.. by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if you're american don't read the following since it could be used to hide information from 'the man' and such is terroristic activity.*bad humour to half mode*

    because most of the time the cops won't bother snooping around totally, and in other countries than usa they might not have the right to stay at the computer and look whats going on once they bust you (basically, they can't alter the data, so they can't keep it on, or don't even have anyone available who would be able to figure it out). and i would bet that still most of the busts(the actual seizing of the machines) are held by not very geeky officers. and such hw is easy to place at your neighbours house or where ever, just make sure you got lots of other suspicious computers to seize. why would one want this privacy is his own thing(for one, it's not certain you will get your hw back as it is, even if you are innocent)..

    not that hiding cd's was that difficult either, but that would involve too much running around the house.

    though, using home-pna could prove out to be more convinient/cheaper and wouldnt involve wireless sniffing possibility, and you could place that out of sight pretty easily too.

    i would put the machine inside a cast-beton case that had it's own ups inside that(that when disconnected would start to wipe the hd), and that would explode the innards if opened or wrong button pressed(while at it have the hd's spinning open without top covers and have some good goo/acid flow on them..), and while at it have it built into houses base too.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  86. How about some peace and quiet? by YeOldeGnurd · · Score: 1

    I would think the killer app would be running a nice quiet diskless machine in your office and stashing the noisy drives elsewhere in your home.

    But then, I suppose I would need to load all of my CDs into it so that I'd never have to deal with CD drivenoise, which is way more annoying.

    --
    ...Nothing interesting here. Just move along...
  87. But... by Zlo1_tigR · · Score: 0

    WEll they say it doesnt make noise .. therfore I do not see the problem of storing the thing in the room together with the computer. Why on earth would you want to hide something that doesnt even make noise?

  88. this looks to be the case by dhuff · · Score: 1

    The case they used seems to be a Morex Cubid 2688R, thus the 1980's VCR look ;) However, this page of Mini-ITX compatible cases has several more attractive designs...

  89. Cops & FBI understand radio. by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They may not have "all the rech"
    but they can easily bring along a
    signal strength meter in the appropriate band
    and wander around until they find the source

    Powerline would be the answer.. how do you track that down?
    just to figure out which branch it's on would require
    tripping each circuit breaker one at a time until you know.
    Then you have to rip out all the walls
    bury it in your neighbors yard, tapped into his electricity, and they'll never find it

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  90. Erm.. Speed? by Zone-MR · · Score: 2, Informative

    Surprised its not been mentioned before. Assuming its 802.11b, I get 5MBps speeds right next to the AP. In a room next door with my laptop I get 2MBps over wifi. A room further away is an erratic 0.5MBps.

    Now a 120GB hard drive over a wireless link? Possibly enough to stream DivX, forget about DVD, and to fill the drive would take over two days!

  91. Why aren't you discussing the real topic.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His dog pees on the floor lots and he gets a telepathic pet shrink in for $85.
    And the problem is fixed!
    Wow!

  92. Why? by DumbWhiteGuy777 · · Score: 1

    I can't beleive someone put this much effort into trying to hide their porn. Jeez. All these ideas of hiding porn across the border and underground with secret rooms and compartments. I mean, if James Bond had a bunch of porn and stuff, I'm sure he'd do this stuff, but c'mon, do you really need to hide it that well? I remember back in the days where you could just hide a CD-R in a cd case, and write a band on it, and that would be way more than enough.

  93. Question about illegal porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So I'm 15, and in the US. If I film a video of me fucking my (16 year old) girlfriend, can I be arrested for possessing child porn?

    1. Re:Question about illegal porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and you would also be charged with statuatory rape (depending on state) since the video would be evidence of that as well.. just FYI

    2. Re:Question about illegal porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, dat ain't so for any state I know. Perhaps it would land his GF in trouble (he's the younger, after all, and under 16) but it's unlikely.

      Where I live you can hit it at 15 - 13 if you're not the first to plant a flag (and, I would guess, can prove this).

      Anyway, no matter how old you are you can be hit for distributing child porn if you actually share that video with anyone. I don't see how you could be prosecuted for possession unless you went bragging about it and your parents wouldn't cooperate with social services when the inevitable questions came, but if you were to actually share that video you surely can be prosecuted it's been done already: ageofconsent.com (I believe) has an article about a TWELVE year old boy who was prosecuted for selling a video of him banging his 11 year old GF.

      Here's an even better one: you videotape yourself and your girlfriend - at the tender age of, say, 14 and 13 - and keep the tape. You marry. You have a long, happy life together. Then one day someone finds the tape and you go to jail for possession of child pornography!

      The law sucks, but this isn't the only one. US drug laws are just as ludicrious, and it's even easier to get away with public rebukes, and that still hasn't changed anything except, perhaps, made the problem worse because every time a little progress is made the thought police use this as justification to clamp down harder to "eliminate this growing social problem."

      I keep EVERY fucking thing on my drive - except the OS and the executables - on encrypted virtual partitions. Not because I worry about the police, but because I don't want every detail of my life exposed to anyone who manages to hack (or gain physical access to) my machines. A PC is like an intimate diary of someone's thoughts - do you really want to leave it lying about "unlocked?" I sure don't.

    3. Re:Question about illegal porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, dat ain't so for any state I know. Perhaps it would land his GF in trouble (he's the younger, after all, and under 16) but it's unlikely.

      Where I live you can hit it at 15 - 13 if you're not the first to plant a flag (and, I would guess, can prove this).

      Anyway, no matter how old you are you can be hit for distributing child porn if you actually share that video with anyone. I don't see how you could be prosecuted for possession unless you went bragging about it and your parents wouldn't cooperate with social services when the inevitable questions came, but if you were to actually share that video you surely can be prosecuted - it's been done already: ageofconsent.com (I believe) has an article about a TWELVE year old boy who was prosecuted for selling a video of him banging his 11 year old GF.

      Now, I personally think he has a right to sell a video of himself wanking it if he so desires, but
      having a second party involved likely sealed his fate. What I find despicable, however, is that anyone so prosecuted would end up forever on "sex offender" lists.

      Here's an even better one: you videotape yourself and your girlfriend - at the tender age of, say, 14 and 13 - and keep the tape. You marry. You have a long, happy life together. Then one day someone finds the tape and you find yourself being cast as a "sex offender" on the local news. Screw jail - the press will destroy your life without even bothering a judge.

      The law sucks, but this isn't the only one. US drug laws are just as ludicrious, and it's even easier to get away with public rebukes, and that still hasn't changed anything except, perhaps, made the problem worse because every time a little progress is made the thought police use this as justification to clamp down harder to "eliminate this growing social problem."

      I keep EVERY fucking thing on my drives - except the OS, the executables, and video captures - on encrypted virtual partitions. Not because I worry about the police, but because I don't want every detail of my life exposed to anyone who manages to hack (or gain physical access to) my machines. A PC is like an intimate diary of someone's thoughts - do you really want to leave it lying about "unlocked?" I sure don't.

  94. Hiding your porn collection from the cops by Loosewire · · Score: 1

    Porn is illegal???
    What kind of porn are you into buddy? :-s

    --
    Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
  95. Re:Europe - land of child pornography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who gave Saddam all that weaponry, training etc? Perhaps the same people put Hussein in power that did the Duvaliers in Haiti, Bin Laden (yes, the one we are trying desperately to kill nowadays), Castro, etc. Not to mention the horde of other decomcratic procecies that 'they' have demolished in central america over the years. Think the Iran Contra Scandal. Oliver North... In case anyone hasnt caught on yet, I'm talking about the US and the CIA in particular... because the ends justify the means.

  96. Now we Know What the "X" Stands For. by cmacb · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Actually, I thought a much more interesting part of the article, which covered several topics, was:

    "As a result, whenever a server fails at Google, THEY DO NOTHING. They don't replace the broken machine. They don't remove the broken machine. They don't even turn it off. In an army of drones, it isn't worth the cost of labor to locate and replace the bad machines. Hundreds, maybe thousands of machines lie dead, uncounted among the 10,000 plus."

    Is this common knowledge? Great concept. In the long run I'd think they would be better off running blade computers to save power and reduce heat etc.

    Tieing back to the subject... Network Attached Storage is the way of the future. Ultimately I'd rather have everything online somewhere where is it getting backed up properly. If I have to keep the data in my house at all I'd certainly rather it be on a specialized device that does one thing and does it well rather than on a Windows machine where it is at the mercy of the latest service pack.

  97. Is this supposed to be clever? by The_Laughing_God · · Score: 2, Interesting
    *Yawn* I basically did this *years* ago, using a $40 NT-150 (a tiny K5-133 box with built-in smart card reader, A-V circuitry and IR remote, designed as a TV set-top box, then dumped as surplus).


    I experimenting with various uses. It was a poor DVR DVR, due to the limited CPU and the small HDDs back then; it was an okay MP3 server but sometimes hiccuped if playing songs locally while streaming to other machines; NT-150 hackers still use the smart card slot for satellite card hacking, but that wasn't my gig.


    It eventually became the least powerful CPU in my junkbox, but I liked its small, silent form factor and hated to trash its other capabilities. With a few components, I added an IR data reciever. the transfer rate never reached 10Mbps, but it was faster than the wireless networks of the time.


    In the 70's, when lasers diodes ran $10+ surplus, hobbyists routinely used IR LEDs to communicate 100s of meters. A cluster of today's high-powered IR LEDs might reach a km or more (the transmitter needn't be directional if it's bright (illuminate a 6" translucent plastic cap and make the reciever directional with a cheap lens+tube focused on the emitter. Imagine, for example, a detector with a 1" dia "directional" tube fixed high in a tree on a distant hill, connected by RF or camouflaged wire to a buried server.

    To be really clever, plant a second set-top box, filled with legal but embarrassing material in your backyard. When the cops "persuade" you to surrender the device, they won't suspect the existence of the real one.

    As a matter of fact, I never got around to getting it back from the distant tree I used for range testing. If the battery weren't long since dead, I might give it a spin. Sure, rain, fog, and foliage would be problems over time, but depending on your location, you might be able to find a suitable location (e.g. the roof of a distant building). Power is also a problem, but the NT-150's current 10W draw could easily be handled by a small solar cell charging a battery (it'd charge 8-16 hours a day, but would probably only be used a few minutes a day) and even building technicians are hesitant to mess with unknown devices.

    (The Stazi kept a covert surveillance station in Prague's old clock tower, but never gave a second thought to a wiring box along the power lines they ran up the tower stairway. It recently was found to contain a radio relay believed to be have been used by the KGB to relay small local KGB bugs to a Soviet office downtown. The KGB stole Stazi power because the tower -perfect for a relay- wasn't otherwise electrified, and they did not want to inform the Stazi about their local bugs)

    This was, and is, beginner-level hardware hacking. It costs more in ingenuity than cash.

  98. Finally some Rendezous implementation! by miradu2000 · · Score: 1

    I like companies that have these kinds of quotes in their FAQ's.

    "Does your device use Rendezvous (aka ZeroConf) to make it easier to use?
    Yup! We advertise the location of the NetDrive's setup web page on your network via Rendezvous. We also support connecting to the NetDrive's printer sharing feature via Rendezvous printing. We think Rendezvous is a really cool technology, and as we add more Rendezvous-related features, we'll roll them out as software updates to our users."

    With more and more devices supportign ZeroConf, (apple, tivo, this, some printers) - networking is going to hopefully finally get a lot easier. what other rendezvous features could be added?

  99. I think it's funny porn was never mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's really funny that porn was never mentioned in the article. Slashdot editors just automatically thought of having illegal porn I guess... a little disturbing!

    My site: humans.com

  100. What about ISPs? by taped2thedesk · · Score: 0

    If you've accessed suspecious internet content, the police can just deliver a subpoena to your ISP, and get all sorts of great info on your surfing habits. Even if you find a way to make the data on the server or drive 'self-destruct', those logs will still be there.

    1. Re:What about ISPs? by PyroMosh · · Score: 1

      Not often any more. Many ISPs these days intentionally DON'T keep these kinds of logs so they can avoid getting these kinds of subpoenas. The way they see it, it costs them time and money. By not keeping the records, they can just say "sorry, we'd love to help, but we just don't have the info you need".

      I can't speak for all ISPs, but I've delt with at 2 that I know of that have this policy for this very reason.

  101. Uplink game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, use it as a Gateway for the dirty work you have to do for Uplink Corporation....

  102. Re:unless - MOD PARENT BACK UP - qwertyuiop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To whomever moderated this offtopic, I have moderated you unfair. This reduces the chance that you will moderate in the future.

    The topic is a wireless storage device. Airsnort tries to find wireless connections. How is that off-topic?

    If/when you do get to moderate again, please learn to read either the moderation guidelines or the context of the message you're moderating.

    Anonymous MetaMod

  103. Not even remotely good enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...not at all. A poor attempt.

    Now, a box at the bottom with a hardware entropy source and a gigantic Rubberhose filesystem on a raid array with the disks, memory and chipset below a large cascade-trigger thermite stack...

    We take data retention policy SERIOUSLY. Destruction of evidence be damned, at least the evidence (if there IS any) is destroyed.

    The less sensitive stuff gets backed up on the rubberhose box (hosted on Sealand).

  104. Re:illegal porn?? - Self Destuct by Oscar_Wilde · · Score: 1
    If only it came with a self-destruct mechanism

    You could find some wire, wrap it around your server room doorframe a few times then hook it up to a power supply. Tadah! you've now go an electromagnet that people will need to carry your computer through when they take it away. With any luck they'll turn it on decide the harddrive is blank.

    The really clever could add a small solid state boot disk that checked to see if this had happened and made a new, empty, file system on the drive so it didn't look so odd.

  105. My solution to an ongoing problem. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    PORN.

    This is what I did to combat the police problem. I bought several industrial demagnetizers and installed hard drives on the demagnetization surface. The demagnetizers are all attached to a solenoid. Pushing a single switch, which is hidden in a convenient place, immediately and irretrievably destroys all information on the hard drives. (That's because the demagnetizer stays on for the entire time the police are searching the place.) By the way, the information stored on these hard drives is as follows:

    • Photographs proving that the women in my family have walked in public without being covered by a tablecloth. (We live in Afghanistan.)
    • Videos proving that we have taught children how to read and write.
    • MP3s, purchased from the Internet per the intellectual rights requirements of the content provider. (Music is illegal here.)
    • Documents that criticize the actions of our local politicians.
    No other information is stored on any of our hard drives.
    1. Re:My solution to an ongoing problem. by dasunt · · Score: 1

      When did you move from Mexico?

  106. Move over Miss Cleo! by mabu · · Score: 1


    I really like Cringely. His Revenge of the Nerds PBS special is good and his book Accidental Empires is essential reading for anyone even close to the tech field. He's a great writer.

    But I wouldn't put much weight into his advice or predictions. This is a guy who got into a dispute with a former employer over the rights to his own name, and was an Apple employee in the very early days and turned down stock options in lieu of more pay.

    If anything, Cringely is a great storyteller, but not very good at predicting the future or recognizing the best use of technology.

  107. Re:Europe - land of child pornography by Threni · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And idiots like you are constantly making general statements like "all Danes are beautiful and intelligent."

    That's not what I said, fucktard. I've spent a bit of time there - a girlfriend I went out with is Danish. I know what I'm talking about. Certainly you don't see many lumps of lard floating around like in the US.

    Heh! Clearly you have not been paying attention to UN Security Council debates between the cultured, wise, and beautiful Europeans and the ignorant, backward (and now ugly) Americans.

    No, i`ve been paying attention. What does that have to do with US foreign policy - helping fasict governments overthrow democratically elected one?

    Please remove your head from your ass at your next opportunity and observe the world around you, dumpling.

    Heh - pretty rich, coming from an American.

  108. An old concept by thogard · · Score: 1

    The book "True Names" by V Vinge (now back in print) starts out with a guy talking about how they will bust you if you have too much processing power, storage or bandwidth since only illegal hacker types need that kind of power.

    Its also talks about IRCisms which is odd since the book was written long before that happened.

  109. It's called a... by bengoerz · · Score: 1

    Freudian Slip!

    He thinks the killer app for this one is for keeping your porn storage hidden, if you're busted by the cops.

    Freudian Slip - Definition: 'An inadvertent mistake in speech or writing that is thought to reveal a person's unconscious motives, wishes, or attitudes.' - Courtesy of The Random House College Dictionary, 1980

  110. Ummmmm... by Lshmael · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why does my "I, Cringely" slashbox still display the 3 April entry? Is the 10 April entry on one of these wireless drives somewhere, or something?

  111. the quote is incorrect by 2057 · · Score: 0

    i think the quote should be modified because, Cringley never says porn only "data", and the fact that he would want to hide the porn leads to the assumption that it is child porn. It may be a short time before Mr.Cringleys lawyers ask slashdot to change it, it is better to beat them to it.

    -ALi

    --
    For The Best Jazz/Hip-hop fusion > COlD DUCK
  112. Re:Hard drive in the attic?-Driving a point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Personally, I keep my hard drive in my pants.. to each their own I guess. :o)"

    Disadvantages of having a hard drive in your pants.

    1-Warrenty returns are a bitch.

    2-You get funny looks everytime you access your hard drive.

    3-If it's an IBM Deskstar? You get even stranger looks when a loud screeching, clicking noise comes from your pants. See #1

    4-"Chesnuts roasting" is not just limited to Christmas. See #3

    5-The comment about how it's just your hard drive winding up get old after having been repeated for the 100th time.

    6-Not being able to go out in public without people making comments like "Is that a hard drive in your pants, or you just glad to see me?"

    7-The SCSI people laughing at your IDE.

    8-The cache is bigger than everything else.

    9-That confounded 12v battery you have to run it off of.

    10-You learn to loath metal detectors.

  113. Wireless + security = oxymoron by stuartkahler · · Score: 1

    Let me get in line first to laugh at the idiot who puts his ultra nasty porn collection on this and finds out the cops downloaded the entire thing as evidence using a laptop and van parked across the street. You know, after your neighbor's 12 year old kid cracks your network password and downloads it all first. You'll get as far in your 'illegal search' argument as the rare idiot drug dealer who openly discusses his product on a cordless phone.

  114. Doorway wipes your HD by Bob+Munck · · Score: 1
    In Cryptonomicon, Stephenson suggests the possibility of wiring a doorway to wipe any magnetic disks carried through them. You would wrap many hundreds of turns of wire around the frame (and under the threshold) and run A/C through them to create an electromagnetic field that would demagnitize the disk. I suppose you'd have to have the PC in a plastic case or no case and I don't know how far away from the doorway you'd need to keep it. (Heck, I'm not at all sure it would work at all; he's writing fiction, after all.)

    Let's see, doorway wipes the disk if it's taken out, server software wipes the disk if anyone plugs a monitor or keyboard into it, encryption key generated automatically and stored on an RFID chip in a false tooth that's destroyed when you bite down hard ... I think you can probably keep your data secret.

    1. Re:Doorway wipes your HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The weak link: electricity to the building containing the machines to be seized is shut off 30 seconds before the door is kicked down.

      ~~~

    2. Re:Doorway wipes your HD by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      So you got this big honking electromagnet. And you've got your FBI agent walkign through it. Hmm... itn't ge gonna suspect somethign when the case rips itself out of his hands and slams into the frame of the door. Don;t forget about FBI man's watch that just got ripped off his wrist. Nah... they'll never guess it!

    3. Re:Doorway wipes your HD by Bob+Munck · · Score: 1
      It's an alternating current (AC) field, probably at a fairly high frequency (30 KHz or so). His watch will just vibrate a tiny bit, completely unperceptable.

      Stephenson wouldn't make that kind of mistake, even if he was wrong about the meaning of BIOS and about the existance of showcrashes.

    4. Re:Doorway wipes your HD by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      Shows what I know. I'll go eat my humble pie! Thanks for the info.

  115. Self-Incrimination by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

    You cannot, at least in the US, be required to assist the cops in collecting evidince agianst you. If you wanted, you could say to the judge that the encrypted stuff would prove you had been doing something illegal. At that point, the equipment would be locked away until the cops figure some way into it.

    You might never see your hard drive agian, but at least you wouldn't be in jail.

    On a side note, if the cops suspect that the hard drive of one computer is evidince, then they will keep every peice of computer-related equipment you own. A friend of mine had 3 computers, 2 monitors, a printer, a digital camera, and other related stuff taken. They even took a binder of his licensed software and his frickin Game Boy Advanced. All this was so they could analyse a hard disk on one of the computers.

    Moral? Expect the cops to coerce you by seizing everything you own.

    --
    I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    1. Re:Self-Incrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      My wife would demand that they also take the 8088, 80286, 80386, 80486 and pentium part machines in the garage. Excellent way to get a house cleaning. Do they charge storage? I have about 150 part machines plus monitors, etc, that should really go to the junkyard, but the garbage men refure to take them.

    2. Re:Self-Incrimination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You paranoid geeks read too much into things. Cops are cut from the same cloth as the criminal scum they chase down now and then.
      Unless you hire a lawyer to badger the police department, they WILL get away with the THEFT of your equipment.
      If you hire some loser of a lawyer who does not have a strong background in criminal law, and getting results you will lose your equipment.
      You have to cause them all sorts of problems by keeping your equipment. And if you do not do your civic duty by burning them beyond what you think is reasonable, they will NOT learn.

  116. Forensic Analysis by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

    I'd just rig a switch over the fileserver. Flip the switch and a magnesium flare ignites a small packet of powdered aluminum over the hard drive. Isn't thermite wonderful?

    You might get in trouble for destroying evidince, but if you planned it right, they'd never know there was a WAP in the basement.

    --
    I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    1. Re:Forensic Analysis by Catnapster · · Score: 0

      Of course, the thermite would go directly through the drive -- and the ceiling, and the floor underneath, and so on. (The shit burns at 1500 degrees, IIRC.)

      If you live in a high-rise apartment, the damage would be incredible.

      Of course, that might be a reason for some to do it.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
  117. hiding porn huh? by NoRemorse · · Score: 1

    he must be talking about the illegal type of porn such as kiddy porn. why would one need to hide porn from the cops? if anything people would hide porn from ones wife/children/family

  118. Pre-emptive strike by PD · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've got some porn. Actually, quite a lot of it. It's on my hard drive.

    Now the cops can threaten me with revealing my secret porn empire and I'll just yawn and say "old news, and nobody cares."

  119. Re:Europe - land of child pornography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who gave Saddam all that weaponry, training etc?

    All what weaponry?

    Let's see, his army carried Russian and Chinese AK-47's and rode around in Soviet T-73 tanks, and his air force flew mostly French Mirages, with a few Soviet MIGs thrown in for good measure.

    Oh yeah, and remember that Iraqi missile that hit the US ship back in the 80's. It was an Exocet anti-ship missile, made by our good friends and allies the French - who also built that nice nuclear reactor for Chirac's good friend, Mr. Hussein, which fortunately the Israelis had the foresight to blow up.

    But hey, keep slamming the US for "giving Saddam all that weaponry", maybe some hippie chick in the coffeehouse will think you're "deep" and want to sleep with you.

  120. or pay even less... by g4dget · · Score: 1
    Just get the case and mobo from CaseOutlet.com, get your favorite drive and WIFI card, install any standard Linux distro, and you are done. And you get a lot more flexibility on hardware (e.g., an 802.11a card).

    Such a setup is nice mostly because it keeps noisy disk drives out of your living room and doesn't require cabling.

    However, last I checked, porn was still legal in the US, so there is no reason to hide it. However, if you keep illegal pornography (violating copyright or child pornography laws), just get rid of it--one might argue that US laws are paranoid and silly, but that's an argument to be made in the legislatures, not from behind bars. The FBI may not be at the forefront of technology, but they aren't completely stupid either, and they probably have seen it all before.

  121. YOU, SIR, ARE A GENIUS by StupidKatz · · Score: 1
  122. Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article clearly says that Ashcroft had nothing to do with the decision. Can you read, or do you just repeat what you're told to repeat?

    1. Re:Bullshit. by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      The article clearly says that Ashcroft had nothing to do with the decision.

      No it doesn't, it actually quotes a dept. of justice spokesman as saying that Ashcroft has nothing to do with the decision "because he has more important things to worry about." Big difference.

      Now, wheter you choose to belive said spokesperson is another matter entirely. If it's really as people here say, that photographers have been bending over themselves to get the shot with conservative Ashcroft in the foreground and breast in the bakground (what is it with you americans and breasts anyway), I'd be very surprised if Ashcroft wasn't driving the change. To be a high ranking politician in one of the most cut-throat environments in the world, and not worry or care enough about your public image (or the perception of said, at best a distraction as someone else here said) to control a photo op such as this one, would be naive to say the least.

      To think that someone like Ashcroft has gotten this far without managing his image carefully is naive as well.

      Now, whether Ashcroft made this particular decision himself, or actually has people on staff to do it for him is less of an issue, he's still the man behind it, he has to be. That's not to say that it's unbelievable he did. Politicians usually look to image first (i.e. tend to it themselves), and the rest second (IMHO), so this is indeed an issue that I'd be surprised if it didn't get run by him.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    2. Re:Bullshit. by espilce · · Score: 1

      Ashcroft in the foreground and breast in the bakground (what is it with you americans and breasts anyway)

      Oh, I don't know... Maybe it's because I relied on them for my very survival since a very early age, like, since birth? Everyone is obsessed with breasts. Men want them. Women want them. Breasts are absolutely beautiful. What does this have to do with anything?

      And as far as Ashcroft, he is a fuck. A disgusting, evil piece of shit. any decision he makes is against the wishes of the good people of the United States. He needs to be punished for his crimes, as should all of the president's lackeys (john poindexter, you're a fucking war criminal, you bastard).

      --
      :q!
    3. Re:Bullshit. by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      Everyone is obsessed with breasts. Men want them. Women want them. Breasts are absolutely beautiful. What does this have to do with anything?

      Well, that was my point exactly. Here in Europe, an attorney general with a semi nude statue in the backdrop would be no big deal.

      I remember watching news footage from the rivera on US TV, and all the brests were covered over by a black little strip (you know, the kind that usually covers eyes of criminal suspects and the like). I laughed my ass off all the while my american hosts couldn't understand what was so funny. Topless on the beach is no big deal here.

      Now, if you're so obsessed with them, why do you insist on having to have them covered up all the time?

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    4. Re:Bullshit. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Now, if you're so obsessed with them, why do you insist on having to have them covered up all the time?

      For the same reason slashdot insists on all software being free, while slashdot insists on getting big salaries for programming jobs: the United States is not a monolithic entity. I admit the dichotomy can be humourous or sad, but it does exist. I would argue that the heat created by the friction of various groups is what drives the country. And is perhaps the intent of our much cherished and revered first amendment. Although the rights guaranteed by it are often subject to the whims of politicians listening to the hordes of soccer moms.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  123. Your wife will be the cops... by MacFury · · Score: 1

    In Ashcrofts new police state, your wife will be the cops. I forgot, are we in a war against Eurasia and in an alliance with Eastasia, or is it the other way around?

  124. to improve the p0rn stash idea by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    To champion the idea of hidden data:

    - have the data store power down when other end is broken, inc. turned off
    -> then has to be restarted manually.

    30 sec timeout enough to beat the feds? perhaps you could have it start destroying the data after 1min? >:)

  125. Remote Storage by rf0 · · Score: 1

    Surely it wouldn't be to hard to role you own? A mini-ITX case with software raid and a couple of 120GB disk with a wireless card in the back. External CD-ROM if necessary and thats about it. Remote admin and redundancy

    Simple

    rus

  126. OT .sig reply by NaDrew · · Score: 1
    "C:\My Documents" a concept invented by idiots and only supported by idiots.
    What about SHFOLDER.SHGetFolderPath()? Any programmer who assumes the personal documents directory will always be "C:\My Documents" needs to have his head examined.
    --
    Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    1. Re:OT .sig reply by Snaller · · Score: 1

      True. But its not just that. I don't like to be forced to have one mega partition where all programs will insist on saving data.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    2. Re:OT .sig reply by Spreetin · · Score: 1

      /home anyone? OK, it's not exactly the same, but it's in many ways comparable.

      --
      8 * 7 = 42
  127. This subject is important and it must be clarified by dsfd · · Score: 1

    If users of cell phones are less likely to get cancer, this means that the microwaves HAVE an effect. If this effect exists, then it MUST be investigated.

    Clearly, the potential effect is not related with heat disipation, 1W is small compared with the energy gains due to solar radiation impinging in the head in summer.

    The potentially dangerous effect is related with the interaction of the microwaves with the complex biochemistry in the brain. And this is not known yet.

    We have plenty of examples of possible hazards to public health that were underestimated and then they become a problem.

    Serious, independent research must be carried out. It must be payed by public institutions, not by manufactures of cell phones or wireless devices. The results must be published in serious, peer-reviewed journals.

  128. The real interesting aspect is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that if you don't protect yourself from the cops, at least you will still recover a backup of your work when some jerks break in your room and steals all your computers.

  129. At Last by Alcoyotl · · Score: 1

    If you're interested in hacking your NetDrive to do other stuff, send us an email at dev@martian.com and we'll see about getting you the right info
    At last a company that understands the /. crowd needs. Everyone's a winner : they won't sue you because you hack the device, and they get free developpers for future versions ! Who said commercial products had to be closed source and overly protected ?

  130. HIDING data? What about encryption? by caveat · · Score: 1

    I don't know about all the rest of you, but my sensitive data is all kept on a spare drive, packed into 3-DES/RC6/Blowfish (depends on my mood) archives which are then stored on convenient 4.37-GB AES-encrypted disk images (thanks apple!).
    Give it your best shot, Herr Asscrack.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  131. Depends on what they want me for... by caveat · · Score: 1

    The feds will get an even bigger chuckle while you rot in jail for contempt
    Depending what's on my drive (or more accurately what they want to find on the drive), I might rather just sit in jail on a contempt charge. But that's just me.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  132. Wireless protocol a giveaway? by ChefPsyconaut · · Score: 1

    A computer using a wireless HD would have at least some small bits of stored protocol info for interfacing with the HD, wouldn't it? So a confiscated computer might not have incriminating files on it, but would contain a big message for the feds saying: go back to the house, you forgot something... People are lazy, I can't imagine anyone entering their WEP code every time they want to look at boobies.

  133. I've got plenty of coffee coasters already, thanks by bsdadmin99 · · Score: 1

    My Ex-Router was kept in the loft/attic. Stable as rock she was. Until one day.. I went down to the beach one fine summers day, the temperature climbed and climbed. Oh S#^T!! It was too late :@ Like hell I'm gonna blow $500 on something else that could meet a similar fate. Then again I dont live in Alaska :(

  134. Reverse honeypots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that is just E V I L.

    I think I'll go and use it....

  135. Ultimate home network using these devices by chapmanvfx · · Score: 1
    I've written up some design ideas for using these devices for a home network.

    My main desire for using these is to prevent my data from being lost (and personal stuff getting into the wrong hands) if my PC is stolen.

    Check it out:

    http://www.technolumiere.com/personal/ultimate_pc_ setup.html

    Andrew Chapman

    1. Re:Ultimate home network using these devices by 1eyedhive · · Score: 1

      i have a similar setup, though i am a proponent of WIRED LAN's (speed and security). I have a single (albeit overpowered for the task) boxen running RH8, shorewall and SMB (it is my network router/firewall and file server (i know, bad combo, ltd. HW i have). the box itself if an athlon XP 1800 off a MSI KT3-Ultra board (on-board ATA RAID) running 3 hd's (20GB boot drive) and two 80GB Western digitals in a RAID 1. I don't NEED more giggage right now, but will soon. that box provides connectivity to my other boxes in the house: 2 personal boxes (one gaming rig, one work/TV box) 2 accessory boxes (my parents run these, uber minimalist) 1 devbox (old PII running RH8, Apache and MySQL, for code development) 1 laptop (old P-120, no CDROM...) 2-5 addl boxes (LAN PARTY!) NAS is a great thing, though it has it's downsides: slower (100Mb/s, slower with wireless) upsides: independent of a workstation box, faster secure from crashes on said boxen no user intervention direct to server on regular basis (SSH only) RAID! (optional, but essential in my case)

      --
      Logistical Chaos Officer http://www.slagg.org - LAN Gaming in Sarasota FL,USA
  136. Mod parent up. Excellent idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you guys can put your tinfoil hats away for just a moment... :)

    I can replace a $2000 computer...even several, if I had to. I *cannot*, however, replace all the data I had on those $2000 systems. That would be far more devastating for me to deal with.

  137. Doesn't have to be porn.... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    those kids that were raided by the police for hacking their broadband had their computers taken, and as far as I know they were never returned, so that just goes to show you that you don't necessarily need to have illegal files for the police to take your PC.

    And yes, I believe "security through obscurity" would work very well if the police did raid your place, I don't think they turn the PC on and search the network for wireless connections, they simply remove every biege box with wires protruding from them.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  138. Cool tool for the future! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    I could see this more common. I'd like a Media Distributor in the house. Connect my cable, phone, DSL, etc to a black box in the basement connnect with network wires or wireless and access all the features from anywhere in the house! I don't see why storage wouldn't be connected the same way. I think the secrecy issues are exagerated over the invisible issues. A black box storage appliance [running ?? OS but not crashing, ever] in the basement is looking like a better option to people as they have data for years-moving it from PC-to-PC is a continuing lesson in futility--that's why most offices went to central servers years ago--home users are discovering the same thing!

  139. You should have seen our filing cabinets! by AKAJack · · Score: 1

    Thermite plates in the top with neat little safety pins and rings to pull.

    The idea was that when the "evil horde" came into over run the facility you smartly yank the rings and the resulting incendiary mess melts down through the cabinet/safe turning the contents into nothing recognizable.

  140. Moderators on drugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why was the parent given a +5? Sigh, don't the moderators pay attention to what's happening in the world?

    Janet Reno herself approved the purchase of the drapes. Just because they were delivered just after Ashcroft took office doesn't mean he agreed with them.

    A good question would be why did the lesbian want to cover female breasts?

  141. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    Nietzsche says that we will live the same life, over and over again.
    God -- I'll have to sit through the Ice Capades again.
    -- Woody Allen, "Hannah and Her Sisters"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...