I agree with your general point, but in this case the wording is correct. If it weren't for that sentence I would have no idea about who Devin is and why an anti-game attorney is involved.
Your point is only valid if people are not only negating their contributions but actually hindering the product test cycle, by using this trick. If they hold off on FF3 until it is released, they are negating their contributions just as much.
The answer to the first question is probably that no one who can do something about it (ie develop it or pay someone to do it) is sufficiently interested.
You can never prove something does not exist. Nothing can contradict the idea of a super natural being in abstract, but then there is also no empirical reason to believe it exists. As soon as you come up with empirical reasons to believe it exists, those can certainly be contradicted. This doesn't detract from the possibility of believing out of faith alone.
Original sin is a good question, but the rest is not new, considering the evangelization of Africa, America and Asia, in past centuries, and current drive for ecumenism. Would these alien civilizations have their own religions? If so, they wouldn't necessarily be treated differently than Muslims, or Buddhists, or Hindus, and if they were atheists they would be just like the ones on Earth.
It was a joke, breaking every rule in Western Columbia law, but apparently not a very good one, since no one seems to have understood it. Or perhaps it was just ahead of its time. Yes, that's what I'll tell myself.
Yeah, and then Ms. Duplaga described the tattooed subject of the picture to one of her roommates. Why didn't she just show her the picture?!
Maybe the software she was using didn't display the full resolution of the camera, to save bandwidth. Just guessing.
Then you can have left blink, right blink, double blink... Better not use it in a public computer near that girl who likes you. I bet if there were any cyclops left they would all be using Macs.
Slashdot Mirror
Of course the low tech solution would be to tie a string to a real mouse and put some cheese on the other end.
Until they make a stick so big that it will destroy them all.
Nuclear bombs?
crypto cracking
I agree with your general point, but in this case the wording is correct. If it weren't for that sentence I would have no idea about who Devin is and why an anti-game attorney is involved.
Perhaps they are moving the host from a Slashdotted state to a non-Slashdotted state.
Yeah, precisely the people with bell bottoms.
Your point is only valid if people are not only negating their contributions but actually hindering the product test cycle, by using this trick. If they hold off on FF3 until it is released, they are negating their contributions just as much.
I think that will screw with your shopping more than it will screw with their data.
The answer to the first question is probably that no one who can do something about it (ie develop it or pay someone to do it) is sufficiently interested.
Its that sort of arrogant crap that makes people vow to never use a computer.
That's a bit childish too. "I really need a computer, but I need to spite those arrogant geeks, so there."
Cue xkcd reference: - Give me the Nobel. - Do some research first. - Sudo give me the Nobel. - Ok.
The problem with using humans as carbon sequestration units is short lifespan and decay after death. Think of them as carbon time bombs.
My initial reading was worse. It included the "Fight" part.
You can never prove something does not exist. Nothing can contradict the idea of a super natural being in abstract, but then there is also no empirical reason to believe it exists. As soon as you come up with empirical reasons to believe it exists, those can certainly be contradicted. This doesn't detract from the possibility of believing out of faith alone.
Original sin is a good question, but the rest is not new, considering the evangelization of Africa, America and Asia, in past centuries, and current drive for ecumenism. Would these alien civilizations have their own religions? If so, they wouldn't necessarily be treated differently than Muslims, or Buddhists, or Hindus, and if they were atheists they would be just like the ones on Earth.
Yeah, if you read the original report there are probably many blacked out words, like "The Chinese do *** like censorship"
There are tons of reports contradicting this analysis, but unfortunately they have been censored.
It was a joke, breaking every rule in Western Columbia law, but apparently not a very good one, since no one seems to have understood it. Or perhaps it was just ahead of its time. Yes, that's what I'll tell myself.
Yeah, and then Ms. Duplaga described the tattooed subject of the picture to one of her roommates. Why didn't she just show her the picture?! Maybe the software she was using didn't display the full resolution of the camera, to save bandwidth. Just guessing.
Man, those whitey, god forsaken, senile, retarded, pussy, shackled Canadians are so gay.
I was liking your projection of the future, but you lacked ambition in the end. Why couldn't the robot be your bread machine too?
Then you can have left blink, right blink, double blink... Better not use it in a public computer near that girl who likes you. I bet if there were any cyclops left they would all be using Macs.
How would filtering e-mail on the age of the account help? Spam would only be delayed for a week.