Slashdot Mirror


"Back To My Mac" Catches a Thief

robipilot writes "Mac stolen, Mac comes online, owner connects using 'Back to My Mac,' owner takes picture of culprit, and voila, criminal caught. OK, it wasn't quite that simple, but here's an interesting story of using some built-in technology on the Mac to recover a stolen laptop."

329 comments

  1. Imagine by iminplaya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thousands of peepholes for the guys in Cupertino to look through...

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Imagine by niteice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Presumably one must use a password.

      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    2. Re:Imagine by iminplaya · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ah, yes. Very secure the Macintosh is.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How long before the paparazzi start arranging for Macs to be "won" by celebrities or "given" to them as "thanks". For that matter how long before a stalker arranges such a prize/gift?

      With this having been posted to Slashdot, Natalie Portman is going to wonder where all those Macs and cases of instant grits came from. ;P

    4. Re:Imagine by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Funny

      (Score:0, Flamebait)

      Ohhh, Okay... The girls can look, too.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Imagine by cheater512 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why do we care?

    6. Re:Imagine by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Of course, it only works if the system comes pre-attached to somebody's .Mac account, which means the culprit will be easily trackable as well. Great if you're willing to basically sacrifice yourself for an arguably crappy photo op.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    7. Re:Imagine by Niten · · Score: 5, Informative

      Like most computers with built-in webcams, the MacBooks feature a prominent green LED that lights up when the camera is in use. This LED cannot be disabled in software. If Apple were actually spying on people with their computers' built-in cameras, someone would have noticed, fast.

    8. Re:Imagine by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      I very much doubt the LED cant be disabled in software, besides if the camera was always on then youd assume it was just t show the camera was working

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    9. Re:Imagine by baboo_jackal · · Score: 0, Troll
      I'd like to respond to one of the pertinent assertions you made in your argument:

      Blah, blah, hippie crap, blah, conspiracy theory, blah, blah, blah.
      No wonder you posted AC.
    10. Re:Imagine by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 1

      Of course, if Apple actually wanted to spy on people they would have written a backdoor that allows them (and only them) to disable the LED in software.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    11. Re:Imagine by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

      If you all read TFA - *sigh* what am I saying... this is /. - you would have noticed the part where it says an on screen countdown lets you know a picture is being snapped.

      The thief actually saw that and tried to cover the lens, but was too late...

    12. Re:Imagine by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The LED is probably sitting across the power lines to the camera. Camera has power = LED is on. there is no non-physical way to disable it.

      Personally, I have Undercover installed on all my and my siblings laptops.

      I wish the guy that wrote the command line tool (iSightCapture) to take photos would either release the source or make some updates. A video capture CLI tool would be awesome.

      I'm thinking of writing my own poor man's Undercover using cron, bash scripts and curl. Attempt to curl a website which I have access to, all the website does is return a 1 or a 0. (Stolen, not stolen). If anything gets taken just update my website and next time my Mac connects to the net, it gets what it needs.

    13. Re:Imagine by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Actually I did RTFA but she was only using the photobooth due to her own stupidity, the thread was to do with possible misuse of the webcam and i suspect the green LED can be switched off (or permanently on) via a firmware hack meaning that if somebody got into your system you wouldn't be able to rely on the green light or the countdown.

      But its crappy articles like this one that mean that often there is much more content in the discussion than the actual article.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    14. Re:Imagine by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You don't *have* to use the .Mac to do this, there are numerous different scripts people have made/thought of using the built in camera.

      Taking iSight photos during invalid login attempts
      Take photos via cron every 5 minutes
      Take a photo everytime the lid is opened (Includes all of his pictures.

    15. Re:Imagine by AndGodSed · · Score: 1

      Too true. I would've did a screencap, and then got the police to get his IP addy from the bed store if he did not actually buy something. If he bought something a screencap of the shipping addy would've been jackpot.

      But, we can calmly thing through our steps, but this poor soul had a few seconds to react under pressure.

    16. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      here's a little poem i wrote entitled
      "WHEN I STEAL YOUR LAPTOP"

      When i steal your laptop
      i'm going to use it offline
      so i can harvest your personal info
      with a data miner i have on my usb keychain
      then i'm going to wipe the os clean
      and change the mac address on your network card
      and sell the fucker on kijiji
      i'll meet you in the arby's parking lot
      to sell you back your own machine
      that you no longer recognize
      because I put hello kitty decals on it.

    17. Re:Imagine by Naturalis+Philosopho · · Score: 5, Funny

      And, oddly enough, I have a .25" piece of tape which can defeat any malicious code anybody may have inserted.

    18. Re:Imagine by dotancohen · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ah, yes. Very secure the Macintosh is. Thank you for that insight, Master Yoda.
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    19. Re:Imagine by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      -1 Naivety

      Even if you don't believe in conspiracy theories, your "hard fact" makes no sense at all. If it were an optical mouse, where the laser is needed for its functioning, I would agree, but the camera can work just fine without the LED on, so which power of nature or world-wide law forces it to be on every time the camera is on?

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    20. Re:Imagine by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Presumably one must use a password. You could write a cronjob on the laptop to check an https "website" for a boolean value, and send pictures to the site if the boolean is set to true. Make it look like a weather applet for extra points.
    21. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try "Joshua".

    22. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and the thousands of glory holes said guys visit regularly...

    23. Re:Imagine by vertinox · · Score: 1

      This LED cannot be disabled in software.

      Nothing a soldering iron couldn't solve.

      I'm just saying, if they really wanted to spy on you they could install a chip that could handle such a secret thing if say the FBI got a warrant. Of course, its still just as about tin foil hattish as the rumor about the NSA having a backdoor in windows.

      Of course if that paranoid about someone looking at you with the built in camera on your Mac...

      Nothing a sharpie couldn't solve.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    24. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Personally, I have Undercover installed on all my and my siblings laptops. Dude, can I see some pictures of your sister?
    25. Re:Imagine by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      What would you gain from using HTTPS over HTTP? Just curious.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    26. Re:Imagine by somersault · · Score: 1

      Nothing a sharpie couldn't solve. Personally I'd go with a mini-backlit version of tubgirl or goatse :)
      --
      which is totally what she said
    27. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, its still just as about tin foil hattish as the rumor about the NSA having a backdoor in windows.

      Oh, come on!
      Everyone has a backdoor in Windows. Are you calling NSA incompetent?

      (Posting anonymously 'cos I have mod points. -- cp.tar)

    28. Re:Imagine by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      but can the camera work fine when the CAMERA is covered in tape?

    29. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sig:

      Since when have facts, logic, and rationality been part of a good anti-Microsoft argument?

      Pretty much always.

      Microsoft is an uncontrolled predatory monopoly which is gouging computer users and has been for decades. They have used aggressive illegal tactics to stifle dozens of competitors who would have otherwise had the opportunity to offer better products.

      Recently they corrupted one of the most valuable cooperative ventures humanity has known in order to maintain their Office document lockin. The cost of that alone, let alone the lost opportunity cost of genuinely open document formats is incalculable.

      Given that they have shown no inclination to change their ways, and the US government has shown no inclination to prosecute them, the most sensible thing for any computer user to do is ensure their failings and crimes are as publicly visible as possible. You've skipped over a lot of 'facts', your rationale is biased, and your logic is overly simplistic. None of your post supports your statement: "Pretty much always." Actually, that's kind of amusing.
    30. Re:Imagine by Aetuneo · · Score: 1

      Right. And, if you happen to be writing the software, I'm sure that it would be very hard to stick in some extra tools which let you get around it, or put in an invisible account, or whatever. In any closed source platform, you must be able to completely trust the seller. Would Apple stand up to the NSA? Or would they quietly do it, and play the innocent victim of the government if anyone ever found out (and then sue whoever found out into the ground, as companies do to white hats now)?

      --
      Everything is subjective.
    31. Re:Imagine by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      That's why I didn't replace my iMac for a long, long time after the camera version came out, and then I put a sticker over the camera. Yeah I know it's paranoid but I don't care.

      I'm also not planning on upgrading my 2004 vintage powerbook any time soon, partly because I like it sans camera.

    32. Re:Imagine by e4g4 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Would Apple stand up to the NSA? Well...this guide explains how to harden a Mac OS X system to NSA specs. I would also take issue with your description of Mac OS X as a 'closed source platform' as this link shows that a large chunk of OS X (particularly the lower level elements - yes, the GUI is closed, but things like FileVault are not) is, in fact, open source.
      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    33. Re:Imagine by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      If Apple were actually spying on people with their computers' built-in cameras, someone would have noticed, fast.

      That's why I prefer using the microphone. And if Apple wanted to spy, you can be sure the LED would be properly rigged. And don;t be the least bit surprised that the FBI, etc made a secret demand for such a function. In our hysteria, we specifically authorized them to do just that, with no oversight, without our knowledge even.

      --
      What?
    34. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably, it would take longer for people to sniff the traffic and figure out what's being sent, so that the outrage and backlash would be delayed, presumably until after you care, or at least after you manage to short AAPL stock...

    35. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are these "girls" you speak of? You must be new here, and enlightened.

    36. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the thread was to do with possible misuse of the webcam and i suspect the green LED can be switched off (or permanently on) via a firmware hack

      Why would you suspect this? Do you base that on any factual knowledge of how the iSight works?

    37. Re:Imagine by ardin,mcallister · · Score: 1

      any LED can be removed. If its soldered to the board, just unsolder and place a jumper in its place. Thats really not that hard.

      --
      "Some men just want to watch the world burn..."
    38. Re:Imagine by hobbit · · Score: 1

      Have a look at Amit Singh's procfs (a MacFUSE filesystem) -- if you read the file for the camera device it takes a photo, and it's open source software.

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    39. Re:Imagine by DotDotSlashDot · · Score: 1

      It seems that iPhoto was used to take the picture, thus providing the on-screen countdown and flash. My question is, what is the minimum time that the camera can be activated via device driver calls? If it is 1/100 second or less, the brief flash of the LED might go unnoticed.

    40. Re:Imagine by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are correct. How does this fit into the paranoid posts where people think that Apple or the Government has a back door into every Mac and are spying on the populus?

      So someone would have to break into my house. Take apart my laptop, solder some bits on, re assemble it so they could spy on me.

    41. Re:Imagine by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      isightcapture test.jpg

      About a one-one thousand before the LED comes on
      About a four-one thousand when the LED is on.

      File is available immediately.

    42. Re:Imagine by DotDotSlashDot · · Score: 1

      4/1000 of a second may indeed be sufficiently brief to be unobservable, especially if this is done a 1 second or greater intervals. It's likely that the same brief activation period is achievable on other platforms because the underlying hardware is so similar. Big Bot-herder is watching...

    43. Re:Imagine by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Ok, I guess it's a vernacular thing.

      One-one thousand is an American colloquialism for one second. We use it for counting out in sports or other events when a stop watch isn't needed.

      That's 1 second until the camera takes
      4 seconds that the light is on, it's definitely noticeable.

    44. Re:Imagine by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      I have a .25" piece of tape which can defeat any malicious code anybody may have inserted.

      Hey so do I! But I'm not worried about Apple, or any natural people spying on me. I don't like the iMac checking me out, how do I know she hasn't developed sentience? Maybe she gets jealous when I work on the nix box next to her? It's just not worth the risk.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    45. Re:Imagine by munrom · · Score: 1

      just to be on the safe side don't do anything naughty in front of a computer that has a camera......

    46. Re:Imagine by kesuki · · Score: 4, Informative

      in this case, the 'victim' had her IM automatically sign in whenever the laptop went online, and she got a call from a good friend, congratulating her on getting her laptop back. But the thing is, the laptop owner was paying '$99 a year' for the 'ability' from any 'mac' to sign in and control the computer from anywhere (including, taking a photo and sending it over IM)

      now, you could have a an automatic program to upload to a web server, but in this case, the owner used a subscription service from apple to gain control of the camera remotely, and snap a picture, ironically, the laptop starts a timer , and he tried to raise his hand to obscure the camera, but apparently, the picture is taken too fast for a person to realize what's going on.

      just the picture the cops said would have been useful in catching the crook (they would have given copies to the places that fence stolen stuff, and they'd call the cops while 'figuring out the value' of the goods before they knew what was happening... it's a crime to purchase stolen goods after all) but in this case, the person was an acquaintance of their roommate, so they went to the cops to tell then who had the stuff, before they had even fenced the goods.

      so apparently, you should fence your stolen laptops without hooking them to the internet. (and with automatic wireless networking and people with open networks, that might be hard in some cities if you even turn it on)

    47. Re:Imagine by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

      There are sniffing apps that listen for images and display them as a collage. I friend who owns an ISP was telling me they exist.

    48. Re:Imagine by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

      A jumper with the electrical characteristics of a led I hope...

    49. Re:Imagine by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Meh, it's just Twitter. Kind of funny, AC posts have a higher starting moderation than his actual accounts.

      That said, you must be new here. Welcome to Slashdot.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    50. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps a diode would work...

    51. Re:Imagine by The+Slashdot+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, it can. If you want pictures of tape.

    52. Re:Imagine by kelnos · · Score: 1

      I've never heard anyone use it conversationally, though. I'm American, and I was just as confused as to what unit if time you were using.

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    53. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see the Microsoft shills are out in force today.

    54. Re:Imagine by PCMaulTim · · Score: 1

      How about looking at it from another prospective, let's say you're an IT mgr and laptops with important info get stolen, information can be worth millions. Software like CompuTrace's Lojack for computers, the standard software just traces the product down, and alerts the authorities, the professional version can enable the IT mgr to call in to have the hard drive erased remotely. It's not new technology, it's been around for several years, the positives seem to outweigh the negatives.

  2. A viola? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm curious to know how would taking a picture of a musical instrument help in this matter...

    1. Re:A viola? Really? by prof_peabody · · Score: 1

      I think the submitter meant voila. I think you mean voilÃ.
    2. Re:A viola? Really? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because by using this technology violins was avoided.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    3. Re:A viola? Really? by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, you misunderstood. They were able to use the software with no strings attached.

    4. Re:A viola? Really? by jlindy · · Score: 2, Funny

      That took some pluck...

    5. Re:A viola? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's rare that a viola was actually used for something good. Cue the viola jokes:

      What's the difference between a viola and an onion?

      No one cries when you cut up a viola.

    6. Re:A viola? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's an awful pun. You should be ashamed of yourself, you've really lowered the tone in this thread.

    7. Re:A viola? Really? by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Come on. There's always time for a little off-beat humor.

    8. Re:A viola? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      If it were funny, sure, but the joke just fell flat.

    9. Re:A viola? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought it was rather sharp.

    10. Re:A viola? Really? by Gnavpot · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but does it run C#?

      (I don't know why I bother. Most /.'ers will probably not catch the musical reference anyway.)

    11. Re:A viola? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Take a rest on the puns

    12. Re:A viola? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know there was a Bb coding language. :o

    13. Re:A viola? Really? by mattr · · Score: 3, Funny

      You should take a bow. That strikes a chord with me, no bars to use. No rest for the evil. And the finale! Sounds like the whole progression ended on a good note.

    14. Re:A viola? Really? by Agripa · · Score: 3, Funny

      For good measure, just bar the original poster.

    15. Re:A viola? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean voilÃ. I think you mean voilà.
    16. Re:A viola? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it runs Db.

      (Thank you for a good joke - from those /.'ers, who did catch it!)

    17. Re:A viola? Really? by Zygamorph · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you have to B# to know how to do it :-)

    18. Re:A viola? Really? by Whiteox · · Score: 2, Funny

      For whoever orchestrated that, would you all please stop droning on and on!
      Geez I know I'm highly strung, but this is the pits!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    19. Re:A viola? Really? by defile39 · · Score: 2

      No need to be brass.

    20. Re:A viola? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, under what rock have you been?

      C# is a programming language which already runs on the Mac thanks to mono.

    21. Re:A viola? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's what happens when you fiddle with someones laptop ;)

      I'll get me coat

    22. Re:A viola? Really? by splatter · · Score: 1

      I don't know I thought the joke presentation was a little flat ;)

      --
      "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
    23. Re:A viola? Really? by somersault · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, people really need to learn how to better conduct themselves around here

      --
      which is totally what she said
    24. Re:A viola? Really? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Let's not pick on the guy just because he misspelled "walla".

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    25. Re:A viola? Really? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You should take a bow. That strikes a chord with me, no bars to use. No rest for the evil. And the finale! Sounds like the whole progression ended on a good note. And watch out for flying chairs from Washington because Steve Ballmer likes to throw chairs and he lives in Washington and he did that once a long time ago and... uh.. oh man. Why is that joke funny 300 times but no 301?
      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    26. Re:A viola? Really? by Agripa · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is better then stringing him along.

    27. Re:A viola? Really? by UncleTogie · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...and if those puns didn't blow ya away, would wind?

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    28. Re:A viola? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, under what rock have you been?

      C# is a programming language [wikipedia.org] which already runs on the Mac thanks to mono.


      Quite seldom to see a double Whoosh.

      One thing is that you did not catch the musical reference and thought that this was about Macs.

      Even worse is it that you did not catch your own opportunity to make a musical joke about Mono.
    29. Re:A viola? Really? by scipiodog · · Score: 0

      I thought it was rather sharp. Really? I thought it fell a bit flat, myself.
      --
      http://clightnirish.wordpress.com/
    30. Re:A viola? Really? by cwingrav · · Score: 1

      Ah, a string of puns leaping from the midst of thousands of IT hours lost. And in the distance, the soft sobs of managers weeping over lost time...

    31. Re:A viola? Really? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      C# is a programming language which already runs on the Mac thanks to mono.
      I thought it was part of Lotus Notes.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    32. Re:A viola? Really? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      You fail at enharmonics.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    33. Re:A viola? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... dude, you just made the same joke as the "sharp" comment was replying to.

    34. Re:A viola? Really? by hawk · · Score: 1

      Take that, Mozart.

      It's about time we came up with a technological solution for all this sax and violins on the internet!

      hawk

    35. Re:A viola? Really? by hawk · · Score: 1

      for crying out loud, who's orchestrating this nonsense?

      hawk

    36. Re:A viola? Really? by hawk · · Score: 1

      So? Most real programmers won't catch the Microsoft reference, either . . .

      hawk

    37. Re:A viola? Really? by justme8800 · · Score: 1

      It's fine, really. There's no need to fret.

    38. Re:A viola? Really? by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      D.S. al Fine.

    39. Re:A viola? Really? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Seems it's more of a jam session. We're sticking it to the man and his preset notions of what the internet should be!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    40. Re:A viola? Really? by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Wow, this conversation has really gone of a clef, hasn't it?

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    41. Re:A viola? Really? by CWRUisTakingMyMoney · · Score: 1

      Eh, I wouldn't fret about it.

      --
      Those who anthropomorphize science and/or nature already believe in an intelligent designer.
    42. Re:A viola? Really? by somersault · · Score: 1

      That's easier phrased than played out - personally, I'm always on a downward slide

      --
      which is totally what she said
    43. Re:A viola? Really? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Future generations should take note, otherwise they'll be playing the same sheet as us.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  3. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac thieves are dumber than mac users? I guess that makes sense...

    Hey now. Put your lattes back on stun. Don't be too offended by the joke -- that means I'm right. :o)

  4. Not so useless by zwc101 · · Score: 1

    Glad to see all those silly little programs aren't so silly after all.

    1. Re:Not so useless by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      Glad to see all those silly little programs aren't so silly after all.

      It's hardly "silly" or "little" at a minimum of 99 bucks a year!
      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    2. Re:Not so useless by k1980pc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It is not silly. But it is not "just works" either. The person seems to be extremely lucky. I never saw anyone get it to work outside Apple Store

    3. Re:Not so useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $99 a year for Remote Desktop, sounds like a steal!

    4. Re:Not so useless by rizzo320 · · Score: 1

      It's hardly "silly" or "little" at a minimum of 99 bucks a year!

      I think the comment refers to Photo Booth, not .Mac.

    5. Re:Not so useless by carpe.cervisiam · · Score: 1

      The person seems to be extremely lucky. I never saw anyone get it to work outside Apple Store Not lucky. She works in an Apple store, so she probably had some training on the "bells and whistles" as the article puts it.
      --
      It's not paranoia when they really are out to get you.
    6. Re:Not so useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be worse. You could be paying $99/year for an XBox360 account.

      "Hey, we fleeced you extra cash on all your 'next generation' hardware, accessories, games, etc. - so what's a little more?"

      That is perhaps the most retarded thing ever done by any company, ever, and what's even more amazing is that all the fanboys have rationalized away the sodomy.

    7. Re:Not so useless by k1980pc · · Score: 1

      Flamebait? It's plain experience, though anecdotal. Get a grip mods.

  5. That`s weak by Joseph1337 · · Score: 0

    Takes picture without the user knowing it? Wooow... most windows boxes do that and more every day for years

    1. Re:That`s weak by ildon · · Score: 1

      RTFA. It puts a timer on the screen and by the time the thief realized what was going on it was too late for him to cover the lens.

  6. Re:Spelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A viola is a musical instrument.

    and a flower

    and a "minor planet"

    and my mum's name

  7. their real occupation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mr. Jackson said that Mr. Frias and Mr. Shahikian were arrested last year on a felony marijuana possession charge, but are not career criminals. No, just career idiots.
  8. Why take a snapshot? by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At first, the photo application revealed only a smoky room and an empty chair, Mr. Jackson said, but then a man sat down. Ms. Duplaga, again using remote technology, typed in the command to snap a photo. When you take a picture with that computer, it shows a countdown, and when it does, this guy figures out whats going on, Mr. Jackson said. It all clicks for him, and he puts his hand up to cover the lens, but it was too late. She had already taken the picture.
    If she could see him, why would she need to use the software to take a snapshot? Don't apple computers have Prnt Scrn or an equivalent button?
    1. Re:Why take a snapshot? by wizardforce · · Score: 1, Interesting

      for that matter, why is it showing a countdown at all??

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    2. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Apple computers don't have a "print screen" button - it's more convenient to save a screen image to the clipboard or the file system.

      But she could have just done a screen grab on her local desktop.

    3. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      Because it's sexy.

      (Disclosure: I own a Mac.)

    4. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, Apple computers don't have a "print screen" button - it's more convenient to save a screen image to the clipboard or the file system. This is exactly what the PrtSc (Print Screen) button does on a modern Windows system.

      But she could have just done a screen grab on her local desktop. And this is exactly what was suggested.
    5. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      Good question. I'm not sure how the Back To My Mac application works, but yes, she could easily have used Grab to do a screen capture on the remote end if she already had a video connection going. It seems like a part of the story is missing.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    6. Re:Why take a snapshot? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Don't apple computers have Prnt Scrn or an equivalent button?

      Not a purposed button, but six key combinations that do various types of screen capture, either
      going directly to a file or to a buffer. It's well thought out, but you do have to learn the keys.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    7. Re:Why take a snapshot? by HeroreV · · Score: 1

      it's more convenient to save a screen image to the clipboard or the file system That's what the Print Screen button is used for (at least on Windows, KDE, and Gnome). Mac doesn't have the key to make room for more function keys.
    8. Re:Why take a snapshot? by zwc101 · · Score: 0

      Macs have a shft+command+3 command which does take a screen grab, but it takes it in an akward format that you probably couldn't change remotely or something. And that wouldn't take a picture with the laptop's built-in webcam you silly goose.

    9. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She took multiple camera snapshots, and only at the last snapshot did the person realize their picture was being taken. That's the only thing that logically makes sense to me, because yes, OS X has a screen capture command. Not only that but it's a lot more fscking useful than Window's print screen, since it captures the screen and places it in a file, instead of just placing it in the clipboard.

      Ideally you'd want to get remote control of the laptop (via Apple Remote Desktop or something similar), setup a videoconference, then minimize the videoconference window on their system. Direct the video feed from the stolen system to a file. Until they notice that minimized window you've got a dozen frames/sec or more of the sucker.

    10. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I didn't realize that png format was considered "awkward." :-)

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    11. Re:Why take a snapshot? by wizardforce · · Score: 1

      Well no offense, but the "sexiness" of the Mac seems to have given the heads up, if it were not for the fact that the photo had already been taken [it counted down after it took the shot???]

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    12. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the webcam image is displayed on the remote screen, it's displayed on the local screen, which is where she would be taking the screenshot. The "awkward format" you speak of is PNG. And yes, it can be changed.

    13. Re:Why take a snapshot? by HAKdragon · · Score: 4, Informative

      You use CMD+SHIFT+3 to take a screen shot on a Mac. Then again, it saves it to a file on the desktop, and not to the clipboard.

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    14. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Dana+W · · Score: 4, Informative

      Its part of Photobooth, its to warn you its going to take a "flash" picture for icons or whatever. It flashes by turning the screen brightness up all the way and turning it white for a second. The countdown is an an aid to compose your pictures, I don't think stealth photos is quite what Photobooth is meant for.

    15. Re:Why take a snapshot? by imboboage0 · · Score: 1

      Seconded. I'm a proponent of the format for most uses. JPEG has its place, but PNG is great for vector-based images. SVG also has its place, but it feels slow to me. I love that PNG has support for 8 bit transparency.

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    16. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 1

      It seems like a part of the story is missing. The part that talks about people's varying levels of familiarity with not-really-advertised features of the OS they use?
    17. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Print screen often fails miserably at capturing rendered video overlays, go ahead try it, 9 times outta ten you get a blank black box where the video was. You need to actually use a capture program to get a still from a video.

    18. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, no. I did a little reading on Back To My Mac and it has nothing to do with the OS. It's an application that works through .Mac and uses IPv6, UPnP and one or two other technologies. It allows you to connect to your Mac no matter where it is located, but from the sound of it it is a finicky application. It only worked because the thieves had left the computer signed in to its .Mac account and had UPnP on their local router. It also means she either hadn't logged out or the computer was set to automatically log in, something that generally seems like a bad idea but in this case worked to her advantage.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    19. Re:Why take a snapshot? by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

      No, it counted down before it took the shot, but the guy didn't realize what was going on until the time between "1" and "0". By the time he covered the camera, the picture was taken.

      I'd think the length of the countdown could be used a measure of the thief's idiocy.

    20. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Diordna · · Score: 1

      Not having read the article, but inferring from the 'typing a command' bit, I think we can assume that she didn't see the man until the photo was sent to her. If she's typing a command, she probably can't see a live-updating window.

    21. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You use CMD+SHIFT+3 to take a screen shot on a Mac. Macs are so intuitive!

    22. Re:Why take a snapshot? by acrobuddy · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily, using my media player of choice(Zoomplayer) and choosing a video overlay, in my case: Haali's Video Renderer, even the VMR9 choices work with Prnt Scrn.

      It works the same as if I moved the video screen over to the second display and all it would show would be black box, why I changed it from the standard 'Overlay Mixer'. I also believe VMR7 works with Prnt Scrn as well.

    23. Re:Why take a snapshot? by JeremyBanks · · Score: 1

      Add CTRL to the mix to clipboard it instead.

    24. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Then again, it saves it to a file on the desktop, and not to the clipboard.

      If you also hold the control key it goes to the clipboard. If you use 4 instead of 3 you get to select an area of the screen.

    25. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you take a screenshot of your own screen while you're remotely accessing theirs.

    26. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2, Informative
      Macs are so intuitive!

      That goes all the way back to the original 128K Mac, when you had a few special commands wedged in there. If I recall correctly, Apple-shift-1 (and 2) ejected the floppy, and 3 was the picture and 4 did something else (maybe actually print it.)

    27. Re:Why take a snapshot? by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      You can always change it. From what I recall, that particular shortcut key is configurable.

    28. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CMD+SHIFT+4 - then select what you want while holding down ALT/Option will take a shot and put it on the clipboard.

    29. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFA:

      "One of the laptops was a Macintosh belonging to Kait Duplaga, who works at the Apple store in the Westchester mall and thus knows how to use all its bells and whistles."

      Apparently not.

    30. Re:Why take a snapshot? by ChameleonDave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not having read the article, but inferring from ... And, surprise-surprise, you are completely fucking wrong.
    31. Re:Why take a snapshot? by carpe.cervisiam · · Score: 1

      ...she could easily have used Grab to do a screen capture on the remote end if she already had a video connection going. It seems like a part of the story is missing. Not so much. Remember, we're talking about a sales person from an Apple store who is not necessarily a geek. She would have been trained on how to show customers both the Photobooth and the Back To My Mac features. She gets points for figuring out how to use that knowledge to take the picture even though the less conspicuous method would have been a screen capture. When has a screen capture been a selling point for a Mac? She used the tools that she knew to accomplish her goal, even if it wasn't the best way to do it.
      --
      It's not paranoia when they really are out to get you.
    32. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And command-control-shift-3 will take that screenshot to the clipboard instead of a file on the desktop.

    33. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Khakionion · · Score: 2, Informative

      Command+Shift+Ctrl+3 copies to the clipboard.

      Also, Command+Shift[+Ctrl]+4 gives you a reticle to do a rectangular selection before copying to the desktop/clipboard.

      --
      OMG! Wau!
    34. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Damn that is smexy.

      On another note, I hope the thief wasn't setting up a MySpace web page. It just screams Death Penalty!

      P.S. Note. Viola? Apologies...

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    35. Re:Why take a snapshot? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Agreed shes an idiot, what if the guy had blocked it, what if the guy couldnt be recognised, she just blew her cover for nothing. shes a complete idiot. FFS he was buying beds just let the guy buy a bed then give that address, THEN take a screenshot of his face, that way the guy doesnt know hes been caught.

      If the guy wasnt just a local theiving idiot, then her photo would have been useless compaired to what she could have got, but then again if he wasn't such an idiot hed have wiped the system before connecting it to the internet

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    36. Re:Why take a snapshot? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      I always wonder how to setup a secure recoverable system, i mean if i encrypted my HDD & lock my bios for security then if it gets stolen its a brick, but atleast none of my deatils are stolen. OTOH if i leave my system open, i can run a script to report where it is at all times and try and recover it, but ofc they get all my details.

      Currently im too lazy to do either so i just keep my laptop safe.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    37. Re:Why take a snapshot? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      I have a purpose key and 4 buttons (possibly more if i can be bothered to set them up), does that mean I win?

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    38. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why exactly is an auto-login a bad idea? Ah, I see, you have to hide your porn collection from your mom.

    39. Re:Why take a snapshot? by MagdJTK · · Score: 1

      It's png, which is the best format for screenshots. If I see another screenshot in jpeg, I might just flip.

      If you really, really wanted to change it, the program Cocktail allows you to (and presumably there's a command line way of doing it too).

    40. Re:Why take a snapshot? by MagdJTK · · Score: 1

      Gah, ignore that --- didn't see that someone else had already posted a more informative post!

    41. Re:Why take a snapshot? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      And if you hit the spacebar when you do a Command-Shift-4 you can select a specific window instead of having to try the best that you can to select one.

    42. Re:Why take a snapshot? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And using TinkerTool or other such applications you can change it to be:
      PNG, PDF, TIFF, PICT, JPEG, JPEG 2000, BMP, GIF, PSD, CGI or TGA.

    43. Re:Why take a snapshot? by jediknil · · Score: 1

      Also...Cmd-Ctrl-Shift-3 for area-of-screen capture, Cmd-Shift-4 for capture to clipboard, and Cmd-Ctrl-Shift-4 to capture an area to the clipboard.

      Of course I remapped all of these to a function key +modifiers anyway...maybe that makes me a bit less of a Mac user but it's more useful to make "capture an area to clipboard" the default case.

    44. Re:Why take a snapshot? by nfk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and then Ms. Duplaga described the tattooed subject of the picture to one of her roommates. Why didn't she just show her the picture?! Maybe the software she was using didn't display the full resolution of the camera, to save bandwidth. Just guessing.

    45. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      A porn collection on a mac, you must be joking ;)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    46. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and "Print Screen" can't possibly be misinterpreted.

    47. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey now. Mac users like porn too. It was probably just gay porn.

    48. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CTRL+CMD+SHIFT+3 saves to the clipboard.

    49. Re:Why take a snapshot? by iPirate06 · · Score: 1

      There is a terminal command to save to a file anywhere you define on the computer. It just makes a snapshot sound when the picture is taken.

    50. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Lepton68 · · Score: 1

      And my favorite is Command-Shift-4 which gives you the crosshairs, but tap the Space bar and the cursor turns into a camera icon, position the cursor over any window and click, and you get a perfect snapshot of that one window.

      --
      Mike from www.myallo.com/blog
    51. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1

      Cmd+Shift+4 on newer Macs lets you select a specific area of the screen to take a screenshot of by clicking and dragging. If you don't click+drag but instead press Space, you can hover over a window, click and get a screenshot of it.

      After years of Print Screen - Open Paint - Paste - Select region you want - Copy - Make new picture - Paste - Save, I found that pretty damn nifty :)

    52. Re:Why take a snapshot? by pizzach · · Score: 1

      The key combination is a mixture of 3 buttons to take a screenshot. The number is just large enough and the frequency of usage is just low enought that many people just don't remember it. (Command-Shift-3)

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    53. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You use CMD+SHIFT+3 to take a screen shot on a Mac. Then again, it saves it to a file on the desktop, and not to the clipboard.


      +5 Informative???!!!

      CMD+SHIFT+3 was a way to take a screen shot in Mac OS 9. We're talking about Mac 10.5 here. (OS 9 didn't have Back To My Mac, Photobooth, etc...)
    54. Re:Why take a snapshot? by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Alt+PrtScr to capture just the currently focused window...

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    55. Re:Why take a snapshot? by netsharc · · Score: 1

      You could always use TrueCrypt and store your data there; then you can unmount the disk and have a boring system that is running normally, but your data is protected.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    56. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1

      Which you then have to paste into Paint/image editor of your choice and save...

    57. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you want intuitive, use the Grab application. Keyboard shortcuts are for power users, and are not meant to be intuitive.

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
    58. Re:Why take a snapshot? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      If she could see him, why would she need to use the software to take a snapshot? Don't apple computers have Prnt Scrn or an equivalent button?

      If the camera display on-screen is done via an overlay in the video card, then a "capture screenshot" won't work (you'll just get a black box where the camera output would be).

      No idea if that's how OS X handles it, just sayin'...

    59. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Nixoloco · · Score: 1

      You can do all of those conversions with OSX's native preview application as well,

    60. Re:Why take a snapshot? by e4g4 · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...only in IE 6 - but then it's *really* awkward.

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    61. Re:Why take a snapshot? by GregNorc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I wanted to make my fingers cry out in pain, I'd use eMacs.

      I use the screencapture command in terminal to take screenshots.

    62. Re:Why take a snapshot? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I meant you can change the Command-Shift-3/4 command to output a different file type. Instead of dropping a PNG to the desktop, you can have it make a PDF.

      I know you can convert it at a later time using Preview.

    63. Re:Why take a snapshot? by yo_tuco · · Score: 1

      "You use CMD+SHIFT+3 to take a screen shot on a Mac."

      And you can optionally use the /Applications/Utility/Grab.app to capture a Selection, Window, Screen or Timed Screen.

    64. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a keyboard shortcut to do the same thing, and there is a built-in utility called "Grab" to make copies of various on-screen elements, but there is no dedicated button. But I doubt many average people know about this kind of function anyways - I've had to point it out repeatedly to my family in situations where it was useful.

    65. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Alt+PrtScr to capture just the currently focused window..."

      And there is no feedback. Did something happen? OSX the keyboard shortcut Cmd+Shift+4+Spacebar has a camera icon appear. As you move your mouse around the screen, it shows you what what it will capture with audible feedback when it does. Further, it conveniently puts the PNG file on the desktop for you.

    66. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Macs are so intuitive!

      You know what's funny? The "CMD" key is not marked "CMD" (or even "command"), it just has the Apple symbol and the 'cloverleaf' symbol.

      You know what's even funnier? NONE of the fonts bundled with the original Mac included the 'cloverleaf' symbol - that's right, there was NO WAY to type the symbol that you would almost certainly need in the documentation of menu shortcuts for your Mac program!

      And the developers did weep...

    67. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Add the Control key to copy to the clipboard instead.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    68. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Uh, on a laptop? are you kidding?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    69. Re:Why take a snapshot? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >does that mean I win?

      Only if somebody steals your laptop and you use them to get it back.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    70. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Nixoloco · · Score: 1

      OK.. I had never heard of TinkerTool, so didn't realize what it did. Thinks for the tip!

    71. Re:Why take a snapshot? by hawk · · Score: 1

      *Boggle*

      Isn't that the command to print the screen? Or was that shift-command-4, with -3 saving to disk?

      hawk, revealing his age

    72. Re:Why take a snapshot? by ArAgost · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I think that he was trying to take a picture of the thief, not a screenshot. But hey, it's just an idea.

    73. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holding control will dump the screenshot into the clipboard.
      CONTROL-COMMAND-SHIFT-3.

    74. Re:Why take a snapshot? by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      Why do people continue to refer to a screen capture as though it would be equivalent to a picture taken by the built in camera? Unless the perpetrator made a picture of himself the desktop background, a screen dump is not likely to be even slightly useful. In fact it is almost certain to be useless except for the possible coincidence that personal information happened to be visible on the screen exactly when the screen dump is performed.

      The salient points to recall from the article is that the thief was an acquaintance of the victim and the photograph was decisive in solving the case.

    75. Re:Why take a snapshot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not getting it - they are suggesting that she could have snapped a screen shot on the Mac she was using to observe him, not telling the remote machine to take a screen shot.

      I don't know why that would help, though, since Photo Booth still has to be running on the remote machine, and the guy would still see his image on the screen. The only difference is that he wouldn't see the "three-two-one-snap" while she was taking a screen shot of the remote window.

  9. Re:But... its a mac by nawcom · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So when he got it back.. Did he check his e-mail, browse slashdot, then realize there is nothing else to do? I feel bad for the thief who was dumb enough to steal one, let alone the victim who was dumb enough to buy one (victim of apple, not thief). heh and buying a laptop that is "vista capable" would be better? I guess that makes Apple users "dumb" and Microsoft users "retarded".

    Please explain what the features built into Windows are that would provide such advantage.

    Yeah. I thought so. I am not saying Mac OS X is better, I am simply stating that your post is ignorant, stupid, and lacks a decent point.

  10. Re:Spelling by Assoupis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yep ! Viola is french for rape. And voilà is written with an accent.

  11. Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone else a little concerned that this could be used to spy on you if it becomes compromised?

    1. Re:Privacy concerns by Dana+W · · Score: 1

      If it creeps you out you turn the camera off in the settings. I keep mine off. Also, if the camera goes live a little green light goes on. You can't miss it. It's a Mac, its easy to use. Thats the point. BTW to the trolls, so far the only thing I want to do on my Mac that I can't is play Portal. I just keep a Wintendo for that, games are about all Windows is any good for these days.

    2. Re:Privacy concerns by contrapunctus · · Score: 1

      If my computer (also mac) were compromised, a picture is least of my worries compared to the data on it...

    3. Re:Privacy concerns by GeffDE · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is no different than any webcam. The fact that it is built-in and constantly connected physically is a problem, but it can easily be disabled.

      A short applescript could be make that would enable/disable the iSight with the click of a button. Hella easier than having to unplug a USB cable...less wasted motion and lord knows I hate having to do anything physical because I post on slashdot.

      Step away from the tinfoil, man. Are you a little concerned that people can study your online habits because you broadcast that information over the World Wide Web? A webcam is a useful thing, and all useful things can be used or abused; that's a fact of life and there's no getting around it. So either put up with some security concerns or live your life in a padded room (though, admittedly, this will only mitigate security risks, not eliminate them...)

      --
      It has been a nervous year, with people beginning to feel like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.
    4. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nice. Except that the intruder into your system could just as easily change the settings to have the webcam be on. Oh, and a light is great notice if you are paying attention to the light on the webcam instead of, oh, I don't know, the screen. Or if you're not looking at the computer.

    5. Re:Privacy concerns by Dana+W · · Score: 1

      Well, I keep waiting for all the security issues, and intruders..... Still waiting. BTW I lock my settings. You can't change any of them without the password. Or install anything. Its called security. And the light is in the center top of the screen frame. If you can't see a glowing green light at eye level, may I suggest spectacles?

    6. Re:Privacy concerns by Poppler · · Score: 1

      The fact that it is built-in and constantly connected physically is a problem, but it can easily be disabled. If your system were compromised, that wouldn't help. All the attacker would have to do is find the file and put it back.

      Yeah, I read your last paragraph too. Just saying ;-)
      --
      What's the ugliest part of your body? Some say your nose, some say your toes, but I think it's your mind. -Zappa
    7. Re:Privacy concerns by Dana+W · · Score: 1

      I am real, just because fishing the password out of a Windows system is about as difficult as putting on a hat is no reason to brag. Darwin isn't quite that easy to own. And considering I BOUGHT My Macbook Pro I'm hardly concerned. If a webcam scares you that badly a bit of tape about the size of a kernel of corn fixes that no? Why are you are that afraid of a webcam? Stealing many Macbooks? Besides, I didn't install it, and this wasn't malware, it was installed by the user. Its proof of good security not bad. Do try to stay on topic. When someone writes an exploit that owns the Macbook webcam, then bitch. Till then you are talking out your ass.

    8. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you're that paranoid you could always just put some tape over the webcam lens.

    9. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truecrypt or equilivent or Seagate FDE and perhaps a security dongle.

      Problem solved in most cases.

    10. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what use is requiring a password when said intruder presumably has an escalation vulnerability ready to go? Oops. That password does nothing. And, again, what use is a light if you're not actively paying attention to the computer? A green light popping on if I'm in another room isn't exactly noticable. And if it's still on when I come back in the room, well... it joins about half a dozen other glowing green lights. Sorry if that doesn't raise alarm bells in my head.

    11. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darwin isn't quite that easy to own. Are you sure?
    12. Re:Privacy concerns by carpe.cervisiam · · Score: 1

      Truecrypt or equilivent or Seagate FDE and perhaps a security dongle. Problem solved in most cases. Nah. Just put a shape charge on the hard drive or solid state drive of your laptop and rig it so that if the password isn't entered correctly after say 10 tries the charge detonates. Not only does the thief never have to worry about buying shoes ever again, but your data is probable safe.
      --
      It's not paranoia when they really are out to get you.
    13. Re:Privacy concerns by Dana+W · · Score: 1

      Already patched that, Nice try,

    14. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A green light popping on if I'm in another room isn't exactly noticable. And if it's still on when I come back in the room, well... it joins about half a dozen other glowing green lights
      you seem to be complaining about your own laptop, rather than about macbooks which dont suffer from excessive LEDs scattered all over them
    15. Re:Privacy concerns by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Yeah but how long until the next one, nice fanboying,

      Besides once somebody got access to your machine, e.g you through your back to mac account, lets say they used a phising (site because safari wont protect you from them), I suspect the green LED can be turned off with a firmware patch

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    16. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. You see, the webcam can be disabled through the clever use of duct tape.

    17. Re:Privacy concerns by mea_culpa · · Score: 1

      I'd keep a small piece of tape over the lens and jab the mic a few times with an unfolded paper clip. Two things on my PC that I never plan to use and will never miss.

    18. Re:Privacy concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um...

      A) I wasn't complaining. Merely pointing it out.
      B) The half dozen green LEDs I was talking about? On my router and cable modem. It's hard to see "green LED" and think something is amiss when, gosh darn it, I'm surrounded by them as status lights.

    19. Re:Privacy concerns by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      Compare the two statements:

      "I suspect the green LED can be turned off with a firmware patch"

      and

      "The green LED can be turned off with a firmware patch"

      The second statement actually provides useful information which could be either true or false. The first statement is a pointless waste of keystrokes. I realize that may be a bit harsh but why would it matter what you suspect?

  12. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The white guy got half the punishment of the darker guy.. funny shit Nah, they just were not as sure it was really him in the photo since all white guys look alike.
  13. the TFA requires subscription !!! by kaynaan · · Score: 1

    would the original poster mind putting up an article that is locked behind registration !

    1. Re:the TFA requires subscription !!! by contrapunctus · · Score: 1

      Registration is not required if cookies are enabled. I sucks I know.

    2. Re:the TFA requires subscription !!! by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

      The article doesn't require registration or any subscription, but I'll post it here anyway:

      WHITE PLAINS -- The thieves were voracious, filching flat-screen televisions and computer games, purloining iPods and DVDs, even making off with a box of liquor and a set of car rims in a burglary two weeks ago at an apartment three young people shared here. Luckily, they also took two laptop computers.

      One of the laptops was a Macintosh belonging to Kait Duplaga, who works at the Apple store in the Westchester mall and thus knows how to use all its bells and whistles. While the police were coming up dry, Ms. Duplaga exploited the latest software applications installed on her laptop to track down the culprits and even get their photographs.

      On Wednesday, the police arrested Edmon Shahikian, 23, of Katonah, and Ian Frias, 20, who lives in the Bronx. Virtually all of the property stolen from the apartment was recovered at the two men's homes. They face charges of burglary and possession of stolen property; Mr. Shahikian was released on $3,500 bail, while Mr. Frias was at the Westchester County Jail, held in $7,500 bail.

      "It doesn't get much better than their bringing us a picture of the guy actually using the stolen property," Daniel Jackson, the deputy commissioner of public safety in White Plains, said in a telephone interview on Friday. "It certainly made our job easier. The fact that they knew who these guys were certainly added solvability."

      The high-tech solving of the White Plains burglary, which was reported Friday in The Journal News, is one of several recent cases in which the police and crime victims have turned the keyboards on their adversaries, so to speak, taking advantage of computer software and other high-tech tools.

      In March in Modesto, Calif., for example, the police recovered a stolen computer containing vital personal information, including Social Security numbers, belonging to the public school system's 3,500 employees. Detectives used tracking software on the computer to apprehend a suspect, who had a long criminal record. The police said he had stolen the computer from a data processing firm, perhaps with the intention of committing identity theft.

      Here in White Plains, a break in the case came on Tuesday when a friend of Ms. Duplaga's sent her a congratulatory text message on the return of her stolen computer. "She said, 'I don't know what you're talking about,' and her friend said, 'Well, you popped up as being online,' " Mr. Jackson said.

      He said that Ms. Duplaga immediately signed on to another Macintosh computer and, using a feature called "Back to My Mac," was able to gain access to her missing laptop remotely. She could see that that the person who had her computer was shopping for beds, Mr. Jackson said. Then it occurred to her that she could activate a camera on her laptop and watch the thief live.

      At first, the photo application revealed only a smoky room and an empty chair, Mr. Jackson said, but then a man sat down. Ms. Duplaga, again using remote technology, typed in the command to snap a photo. "When you take a picture with that computer, it shows a countdown, and when it does, this guy figures out what's going on," Mr. Jackson said. "It all clicks for him, and he puts his hand up to cover the lens, but it was too late. She had already taken the picture."

      Had the suspect been a complete stranger, the photographic evidence would have been a "great lead," but not the decisive clue, Mr. Jackson said. He said that when Ms. Duplaga described the tattooed subject of the picture to one of her roommates, the roommate replied: "Oh, I know exactly who that is -- it's Ian," referring to Mr. Frias.

      Mr. Frias and Mr. Shahikian, it turns out, had been among the guests at a party at the apartment weeks before, and were friends of friends of the victims, as Mr. Jackson put it. Ms. Duplaga was able to retrieve a photograph of Mr. Shahikian from the laptop as well, but Mr. Jackson was not aware of the circumstances. Mr. Jackson said that

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    3. Re:the TFA requires subscription !!! by Kamokazi · · Score: 2, Funny

      the TFA...this acronym redundancy brought to you by the makers of the NIC card and ATM machine.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
  14. Format C: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wouldn't the first thing you'd want to do is format the machine? I highly doubt this laptop would have been returned if some basic ... maintenance... had been preformed. And for the extra paranoid... purchase a new system board would all but guarantee the thing would never come back.

    1. Re:Format C: by shoemilk · · Score: 1

      It depends, are you stealing the computer because you want info or because you want a computer?

      Second, I didn't rtf but I atleast read the summary and noticed where it said "Mac". "Macs" aren't know for running DOS programs as well as the lack of being able to up grade them (ie replacing the system board)

  15. Here's an idea by blackfrancis75 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This makes me think a good idea would be to have some software running on my laptop that invisibly records it's IP address to a log file on an external server. This should be enough in most cases to get a pretty good idea of the location of the laptop when the thief boots it. Might even lead to an exact location if the ISP was forthcoming. Has this idea been thought of? Is it in use? Obvious problems with the idea?

    1. Re:Here's an idea by dave1791 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... this is a good idea. It would be defeated by wiping the drive and re-installing, but then again the woman from TFA would never have found her mac had the thief done that; so I guess we can rely on the fact that not all thieves are smart enough to wipe the drive and reinstall before going online.

  16. privacy?? by peavy · · Score: 0

    so whats to stop a unruly script kiddie from gaining access to your mac and noting your account info or watching personal activities with your wife/hubby. it's great the bandit got busted but i don't feel good about that kind of remote access. just my 2 cents worth

    1. Re:privacy?? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      so whats to stop a unruly script kiddie from gaining access to your mac and noting your account info or watching personal activities with your wife/hubby.

      The same thing that stops said people from breaking into any VPN. The strength of your password, along with the need to know a valid account.

      I also do not leave laptops open and pointing at me during "personal activities". It would take a mighty hacker indeed to break into a sleeping Macbook and raise the lid via remote connection. I guess if you turned on the screen real bright, the force of all the photons emitted might slowly raise the screen.... :-)

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:privacy?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This is Slashdot. Many laptop using geeks have them open, turned on and pointing at them during "personal activities" in orgies with Playmates and supermodels.

    3. Re:privacy?? by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      It would take a mighty hacker indeed to break into a sleeping Macbook and raise the lid via remote connection. I hear that feature's coming in Mac OS X 10.6.
  17. The Honeynet Project by sharp-bang · · Score: 2, Funny

    did something like this in 2000. See p. 15 of this 3 MB zipped Powerpoint.

    See also P-p-p-Powerbook! for a possible laugh.

    --
    #!
    1. Re:The Honeynet Project by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      See also P-p-p-Powerbook! for a possible laugh. Ah, yes. The Internet's most well-documented case of mail fraud.
      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  18. Poetic Justice by beadfulthings · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know, this being Slashdot we have to worry about the privacy issues, compare the Mac to somebody's Vista laptop, disparage the cops, fret about security in general, and not fail to point out that a viola is indeed a stringed instrument.

    But there's just something so damned satisfying about imagining these two thugs being caught red-handed with the loot. There's the impression of the victim realizing that she may be onto something. Her "Now I've got you, you son of a bitch!" as the fatal snap takes place. The "Oh, shit" realization of the thief, probably followed by frantic thoughts of how he might go about flushing two widescreen TV's and assorted recreational electronics. The genuine gratification of being able to walk into the police station and say, "Here are photographs of the guys who ripped off our stuff, actually using some of our stuff, and we know who they are..." Perhaps then the THUD THUD THUD at the malefactors' door.

    It's got all the elements of the classic cautionary tale, and just reading it should bring at least a brief and sarcastic smile to the face of anybody who's ever been robbed.

    --
    "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
    1. Re:Poetic Justice by denzacar · · Score: 1

      It's got all the elements of the classic cautionary tale, and just reading it should bring at least a brief and sarcastic smile to the face of anybody who's ever been robbed. Yeah. Next time I go laptop.. umm... "shopping" - bring some black duct tape to cover camera and microphone.

      On a side note... anyone notice how many laptop users, particularly new ones have no idea they have a camera or a microphone pre-installed and turned on?
      Not so long ago, I was talking to a friend of mine through skype, and he mentions how the computer shop has ripped him off for the headphones+mic combo he bought - so his family could skype.
      See... they wanted to talk to their relatives in "the faraway land" but they had no microphone, so he went out and bought one.
      But the comp shop only had the combos, so they sold him the headphones too...

      In the middle of this talk, he notices that his microphone is picking up some really quiet sounds. Like, him trying to peal of a sticker from the laptop.

      "Laptop? Umm... did you check if you might have a microphone installed in it?"
      "No way. Why would I..."
      "Try plugging out the headphones."
      "OK. But I tell you, there is no way... There, you hear me now?"
      "Yup. Loud and clear. Look at your laptop screen's frame. There should be a small hole with some kind of icon not really resembling a mic next to it..."
      "Umm... wait... Shit! There is one. But this thing is so tiny!... Damn. Guess that was 30$ thrown out the window for the phones and mic."

      And he is not my "tech challenged friend".
      He just didn't notice the tiny pin-hole all this time.
      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    2. Re:Poetic Justice by pclminion · · Score: 1

      The "Oh, shit" realization of the thief, probably followed by frantic thoughts of how he might go about flushing two widescreen TV's and assorted recreational electronics.

      Only an idiot would panic. Just ditch the laptop. Good luck proving I stole your laptop when I don't *have* your laptop, and all you have is a picture of me that could have come from anywhere.

    3. Re:Poetic Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a bit of the old P-p-p-powerbook!

    4. Re:Poetic Justice by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Well not all the elements.

      It is missing the pool of blood where one of the criminals decided to run from the police and gets shot in the leg, causing a permanent limp. It is also missing the brief but satisfying scene where the remaining criminal learns to actually enjoy "tossing salad."

      Few things are as infuriating as a thief. I only wish that more of them would be killed in the process of stealing things and that is was still legal to hang their bodies from the buildings they were caught stealing from.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  19. Mug shots by xPsi · · Score: 2, Funny

    It was nice of those guys to stand in front of her computer and pose for her like they were in mug shots. It's almost like they knew they did something wrong! Oh wait...

    --
    i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
  20. Note to self by wilsoniya · · Score: 1

    Install faraday cage in macbook chop shop.

    Alternatively, wear Nixon mask while chopping (I am not a crook!).

    --
    I can't remember the last time I forgot anything.
  21. Why? by eguanlao · · Score: 1

    She took a picture of a viola?

  22. "Back to My Mac" ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, wtf is this about Back to My Mac costing money to use? Since when does remote desktop to a machine and operating system you paid for require a subscription? Microsoft isn't the only evil son of a bitch.

    Apple -= 6_666_666_666;

    1. Re:"Back to My Mac" ripoff by ByteGuerrilla · · Score: 1

      It's not Back to My Mac that costs $99 a year, it's .Mac, which contains Back to My Mac.

      --

      A block of code, sufficiently well-written, is indistinguishable from magick.

    2. Re:"Back to My Mac" ripoff by dn15 · · Score: 1

      I might also add that there is a built-in VNC server that can be enabled free. Back to My Mac just makes it easier to get to it when you're dealing with NAT and firewalls.

  23. So what's the big deal? by LS · · Score: 1

    This has been done several times before, on Mac and other platforms. Does anyone remember the original backdoor software for windows 10 years ago?

    This just looks like a bunch of Apple marketing hype. Nothing new here folks.

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  24. Off topic - example of poor journalism by Lloyd_Bryant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mr. Jackson said that Ms. Duplaga did not wish to be interviewed. On Friday, no one answered the door at the beige colonial-style house on Ridgeview Avenue where she rents an apartment diagonally opposite a church. The neighborhood is on the edge of the city's downtown; in recent years, many of the prewar homes have been renovated. Gee, anybody in White Plains want to have a go at tracking her down? Thanks to this superfluous info, you now know:

    a) She lives on Ridgeview Avenue.
    b) She's at the edge of the city's downtown.
    c) Many of the homes in the area have been renovated recently.
    d) She lives in a colonial-style house.
    e) The house is diagonally opposite a church.

    If that's not enough info:

    One of the laptops was a Macintosh belonging to Kait Duplaga, who works at the Apple store in the Westchester mall and thus knows how to use all its bells and whistles. Just tail her from where she works.

    The only info in this that's actually relevant is the fact that she works at an Apple store, and that's she did not wish to be interviewed. The rest is either a reporter padding an article with irrelevant information, or attempting to indirectly violate her right to privacy.

    Either way, very poor journalism.
    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I had one once. It sucked.
    1. Re:Off topic - example of poor journalism by ByteGuerrilla · · Score: 1

      Yeah I had to do a double-take on that one. Why on Earth would you post a description of the house and its position relative to a landmark in story about the inhabitant having lots of valuable stuff stolen? That's like a big "Try it yourself" invitation to any criminals smarter than the guys who got caught.

      Journalist who wrote that needs to think about what he's writing.

      --

      A block of code, sufficiently well-written, is indistinguishable from magick.

    2. Re:Off topic - example of poor journalism by hyperz69 · · Score: 4, Funny

      His first draft containing her Social, Blood Type, City of Birth, and Mothers Maiden name was lost when his notebook was stolen.

    3. Re:Off topic - example of poor journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why in White Plains? With google maps and all that everybody can find out where she lives. Took me about 10 minutes.

      I think this sort of information ("lives near a whatever") used to be harmless but makes it easy to track down someone now.

    4. Re:Off topic - example of poor journalism by node+3 · · Score: 1

      So? Where you reside is not generally considered private information. There's nothing particularly sensitive about this case which would suggest a need for privacy.

      In fact, many people's addresses are easily found in the phone book.

      As for the info being unnecessay, it's called telling a story. A simple parsimonious statement of fact wouldn't be very interesting.

    5. Re:Off topic - example of poor journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad I'm not the only one to notice this....

      What does her living in a beige house have to do with anything (apart from possibly being ironic)

    6. Re:Off topic - example of poor journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Maps to the rescue...

      http://maps.google.com/maps?f=l&hl=en&geocode=&q=church&near=Ridgeview+Ave,+White+Plains,+NY+10606,+USA&sll=41.02286,-73.77891&sspn=0.006953,0.009838&ie=UTF8&ll=41.023278,-73.778244&spn=0.001738,0.00246&t=h&z=19&iwloc=A

    7. Re:Off topic - example of poor journalism by numbski · · Score: 1

      I was wondering why no one picked up on that. When I was reading, I took it as a bitter reporter that wanted an interview, got turned down, so they (the reporter) place all of the personal details available in the article itself as retribution. Not just poor journalism - very unprofessional, childish....looking for another term, but it gets away from me...

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    8. Re:Off topic - example of poor journalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. It's the touches like "diagonal from a church" that make it bad - why not just describe the neighborhood using more general terms?

      2. It's not so dangerous, and sure anyone could find her via the phonebook or other means if they were really determined. But making someone even a minor public figure can have unwanted effects, and make strange people interested in you.

      3. She is in the paper because she just had a whole bunch of valuable stuff stolen from her, and now presumably has it back - telling exactly where she lives in an invite for more trouble, however small.

  25. why? because you need the flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to get a good image in low light. If you use the capture method you might get a darkish and hard to see image.

    But you use the snapshot function and it flares the backlight acting like a flash and you get a nice clearly lit image. Hence the countdown timer so you are ready for when it snaps your pic....

    Which would you rather have in court?

  26. fuck mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and fuck alan alda, the fag.
     
    at least he doesn't suck steve jobs dick.
     
    and who the fuck would steal a mac but another fag? at least he'll enjoy getting fucked up the ass in prison.

  27. Even more amazing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she's captured proof of living descendants of homo neanderthalensis... I smell a Nobel!

  28. Rome was burning by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    I guess it was the Emperor Nero effect, so he needed a violin to chill out about his Mac being stolen.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Rome was burning by KGIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I probably shouldn't...

      The violin wasn't invented until many centuries after the burning of Rome. Nero did play an instrument, a cithra I believe it is called, and did consider himself to be quite a musician. (Oddly I don't recall any mention of his skill level in my studies, just that he was passionate and competed and organized competitions.)

      Titicus (spelling?), the historian, was pretty clear in what Nero really did during the burning of Rome. He was much more effective than, say, FEMA. He rushed down, helped to fight the fires, gave shelter, and provided food at either a discounted or free rate. I'm not entirely sure if it was free or discounted and I lack the initiative to look this stuff up.

      So, while the idea of a tyrant (which Nero certainly was) ignoring the plights of the people makes for great copy it just didn't happen that way. What did happen is that Nero used this fire to persecute the Christians but that was after the fire when the people were looking for someone to blame.

      Anyhow... To the point... Err... Wait, no... I didn't have a point.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    2. Re:Rome was burning by Petrushka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nero did play an instrument, a cithra I believe it is called, and did consider himself to be quite a musician. (Oddly I don't recall any mention of his skill level in my studies,

      That's because no one knows. No matter how good or how bad he was, he would still be awarded every prize there was.

      Titicus (spelling?), the historian,

      Tacitus, Annals 15.38-44. Accounts are also given by Cassius Dio book 62, and Suetonius' Life of Nero.

      He rushed down, helped to fight the fires, gave shelter, and provided food at either a discounted or free rate. I'm not entirely sure if it was free or discounted and I lack the initiative to look this stuff up.

      Not everyone is as lazy. Tacitus continues after the passage you refer to (15.39), "These acts, though popular, produced no effect, since a rumour had gone forth everywhere that, at the very time when the city was in flames, the emperor appeared on a private stage and sang the Sack of Troy, comparing present misfortunes with the calamities of antiquity." The same story is given by Suetonius and Cassius Dio, who appear to have used different evidence for their accounts, making it all but certain that the story is pretty accurate.

      What did happen is that Nero used this fire to persecute the Christians but that was after the fire when the people were looking for someone to blame.

      Based on the evidence of Tacitus, Cassius Dio, and Suetonius, there is a possibility, albeit slim, that he was entirely accurate in this allocation of blame.

    3. Re:Rome was burning by hawk · · Score: 1

      >He was much more effective than, say, FEMA.

      This standard could be made by,

      a) fiddling while your capitol burns,
      b) dousing gasoline upon your capitol, or
      c) ripping your capitol, church bells and all, from the space-time continuum, by Mary, by the paradox of using gasoline nearly two millennia before its invention

      hawk

  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. openvpn = win by blhack · · Score: 1

    It is for this reason that i have OpenVPN and a running SSH server on my laptop.

    And yes, the endpoint is firewalled off...so thieves shall not be sneaking into my network over it.

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
  31. In the early days of webcams ... by brunos · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the early days of webcams I used to work for this tech company, the bos (a techofile) had just set up a webcam from his computer in the London office to his computer in the New York office. He then flow to New York, a cople of guys and I where working quite late, when I see this other junior guy sat in the boss's chair saying with his legs on the boss's desk imitating the boss's voice "I am the boss and I am gay". When suddenly the computer screen turned on and he saw the boss telling him "YOU ARE FIRED". It was so funny to see this guy's face! (in fairness, the boss was gay ...)

  32. prison cam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the thieves night in jail is now on a gay bondage site
    scumbags

  33. Re:Maybe I'm being stupid, but by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

    add to that that she took a photo instead of just using printscreen.

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  34. Re:Spelling by frenchbedroom · · Score: 1

    No, "viola" doesn't mean anything in french. "Viol" means rape.

  35. Undercover by merdaccia · · Score: 2, Informative

    Undercover does this sort of thing. It transmits network information, screenshots, and pictures from Macs with iSights. http://www.orbicule.com/undercover/

    --

    *blinking cursor*

    1. Re:Undercover by decavolt · · Score: 1

      Undercover also runs as a root process so that the thief doesn't have to login in order to get his mugshot taken and info sent.

      And, even more importantly, Undercover gives the thief no indication whatsoever that the iSight is in use, that pics have been take or data has been sent. Back to My Mac is seriously flawed in that it shows the Photo Booth countdown and gives all sorts of clues that it's taking photos.

      Also, Undercover is fully automated so that you don't have to manually connect and take pics. You just have to report your Mac as stolen and they do the rest.

    2. Re:Undercover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Undercover gives the thief no indication whatsoever that the iSight is in use, that pics have been take or data has been sent.

      Does the iSight LED light up? If not, how does Undercover prevent this?

      AFAICT, they don't address this in their FAQ.

  36. advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is this a mac ad?
    hahahaha...

  37. Re:Spelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep ! Viola is french for rape. And voilà is written with an accent. Actually, the French word for rape is viol, Viola is an Argentine dictator form the 1980s.

    And yes, voilà IS written with an accent.
  38. Re:Maybe I'm being stupid, but by dn15 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The thing is, most people haven't enabled a password to log into their computer or to wake it from sleep mode. It certainly is smart to have a login password, but the vast vast majority don't, and most also don't even realize that you [i]can[/i] have one.

  39. Behind a router? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would "Back to my mac" work behind a router? I don't think it would.

    1. Re:Behind a router? by AHuxley · · Score: 1
      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  40. Phoning home not just for "them." by mlwmohawk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was thinking about something like this for a while, and this is a practical example, albeit, with different technology.

    Did anyone see the movie, with Patrick Stewart, "Safe House?" To make a long story short, he has to enter a password every day to ensure an automated system does not activate. If he ever fails to enter that password, the system assumes he's dead and will let loose damaging blackmail that keeps him alive.

    Anyway, a system like that would be very cool for home users. A small "safe house" program that gets run at startup that prompts for a password and gives you a number of tries. If the password is unsuccessful, the camera is activated, and web cam photos are sent to a known server when the network comes up, along with sound as well. Possibly key strokes and new documents web traffic and sites. All this happens quietly, in fact, there is no feedback as to the password being unsuccessful after the second try.

    This information, along with the IP address, can be used to identify the thief and recover the property.

  41. Re:Spelling by gfilion · · Score: 1

    No, "viola" doesn't mean anything in french. "Viol" means rape.

    Well, it's the verb to rape (violer) at the third person of the simple past. A bit far fetched, but technically right...

  42. Home Version by DeanFox · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I run Ubuntu on my home PCs and changed the default login screen to list the users. I created a 'Guest' account and in it's description I put 'Password = 123qwe' (not the real password). The assumption is that a burglar , not knowing much about OS'es, will want to use the PC and will choose the easiest path to gain access. When they turn the PC on the login screen gives them a list of users and an option of choosing "Guest Account with the Password shown. All household users have been told to *never* use this account and why.

    This 'Guest' account is CharRooted and has Firefox, IM and other Internet clients all on the desktop but that's about it. Under the hood it opens up SSH, VNC, Terminal Server and every other conceivable way of gaining access. It starts a script that every 30 minutes emails my Gmail account with IP address and connection information. Also, logging on to this account invokes a 'Nuke' scrip that will DBAN type wipe the system if I don't deactivate it within 7 days.

    It's not a perfect solution but it has all the capabilities and features of the subscription tracking services that can cost hundreds a year and it's all pretty easy to setup. If any thief steals my PC and uses it to connect to the Internet I will know everything about their connection and have full access to the machine. If it's truly lost and I can't regain control after they login, it self destructs.

    Now that I thinks about it, this should be a Ubuntu package or at least a HowTO.

    -[d]-

    1. Re:Home Version by chord.wav · · Score: 1

      That's great! I would vote for a long HowTo or a script. Making it a package may make it very popular and the feature may get known by everybody, including the thieves.

    2. Re:Home Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah can you create a howto i would like to try it in ubuntu

    3. Re:Home Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      definitely do a howto

    4. Re:Home Version by chuckymonkey · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yes, please write up a little howto and post a link, many of us would be very grateful for that.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    5. Re:Home Version by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

      But won't the most likely scenario be that the person who steals your computer will immediately be confused by Ubuntu and just reformat the drive and install windows? How many thiefs are familiar with Ubuntu?

    6. Re:Home Version by rwyoder · · Score: 1

      If it's truly lost and I can't regain control after they login, it self destructs.
      Ahhh...The Corbomite Maneuver.
    7. Re:Home Version by junglee_iitk · · Score: 1

      This 'Guest' account is CharRooted and has Firefox, IM and other Internet clients all on the desktop but that's about it. Under the hood it opens up SSH, VNC, Terminal Server and every other conceivable way of gaining access.

      And thanks to you, your Ubuntu will be used to spam everyone once it gets stolen. :)
    8. Re:Home Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most thieves won't know how to use Linux to access the Internet. You should have it boot to Windows so they will know how to use it.

    9. Re:Home Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that I thinks about it, this should be a Ubuntu package or at least a HowTO. Precisely. When can you start?
    10. Re:Home Version by mister.f · · Score: 1

      Now that I thinks about it, this should be a Ubuntu package or at least a HowTO. That sounds really good, fancy writing one?
    11. Re:Home Version by syousef · · Score: 1

      All household users have been told to *never* use this account and why.

      Congrats. You've just given all household users a way to create a headache for you by wiping your computer. Even if they don't do it intentionally, they may do it out of curiosity.

      Also, logging on to this account invokes a 'Nuke' scrip that will DBAN type wipe the system if I don't deactivate it within 7 days

      I hope your account has a script for checking that it hasn't been activated by mistake.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    12. Re:Home Version by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

      why not write one? I'd read it!

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    13. Re:Home Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, it costs $99 a year! Clearly not hundreds a year
      Oh, and you forgot about poland

    14. Re:Home Version by bjr · · Score: 1

      I made a similar system for a Mac that captures network information, screenshots, and photos. It then uploads them to a webserver, and turns on Remote Login and creates a reverse tunnel so that you can use ssh to get login even if there is a firewall on the other end. I wrote up a description of it over on blogspot and posted the scripts for anyone who wants to try them.

  43. Rule 1 by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If you steal a computer, unless you are after its data, REFORMAT it first.

    even if it doesn't have some sort of tracing, it might have a virus.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Rule 1 by Kalak · · Score: 1

      You can set a password on a MacBook that will not boot off of another device without entering that first, so no easy re-format possible. We're geeks, so we can come up woth 100 ways to get around this, but hopefully, we're not stealing notebooks.

      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
    2. Re:Rule 1 by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not stealing macbooks? How else can we afford them :)

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  44. built-in technology on the Mac by nguy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wow, "built-in technology on the Mac" makes it sound so important. I guess those brilliant inventors at Apple must have labored very hard to copy the idea of building in a camera above a laptop screen from Sony.

    1. Re:built-in technology on the Mac by Kalak · · Score: 1

      The software to do the whole method she used is built into Mac OS X, so it's not just the camera. It's the dynamic remote access software combined with the camera that did it.

      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
    2. Re:built-in technology on the Mac by nguy · · Score: 1

      It's not "built into" the Mac, it's a $99/year subscription.

      You've been able to get similar subscriptions for Windows for far longer than for OS X. And Linux has had this functionality built in for about a decade. I don't think that this is even the first case of recovering a laptop by using its webcam.

  45. Re:Maybe I'm being stupid, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or she had nothing on the computer she wanted to password protect. Why must a computer be password protected?

    My laptop is password protected but all my personal data isn't on it anyway - thats what networks are for - so when I take my laptop on the plane if not carrying information about my finances with me.

  46. SGI did this in mid-90s by dwater · · Score: 1

    IIRC, SGI did this back in the mid-90s. There had been many repeated computer thefts from the building and surrounding buildings, so they put some motion detection s/w onto an SGI Indy to record anything that moved. All Indy's shipped with a webcam - I think they were one of the first to do so.

    Worked like a charm, apparently.

    This was at their HQ in Reading, UK. I heard about this second hand, so I don't know the details.

    --
    Max.
  47. You learn something new every day by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

    This experience has taught me to never steal someone's macbook on the rare occasion I don't have electrical tape in my backpack.

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  48. Re:But... its a mac by joocemann · · Score: 0, Troll

    There are a million more things you can do on a PC than a Mac. If you don't know the difference you are either blind, or in a state of denial because you own a mac. Yeah. I thought so. I'm not saying 'vista' is any good, but ANY PC (laptop or desktop) is better. Simply stating that you do not seem to realize the awesome variety of capabilities of a PC compared to a MAC. Example? Do you have team fortress 2? lol. no. you just have e-mail.

  49. No camera. Alternatives? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've already got my laptop making hourly requests to a non-existent image on a website I control. So if it ever goes walking, I might get an IP address from that. As someone pointed out, I might want to create a guest account, so that the thief would be willing to use the laptop as-is.

    But what other sensory information does my laptop have? One thought: Wifi. Even before it connects, it can give you the names of wireless networks nearby. If you could somehow upload that list to a server you control, there is a small chance you might be able to wardrive your way to victory. But command-line wifi utilities seem to be rare. Any ideas?

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  50. Another "dumb criminal" story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, how stupid do you have to be to actually use a laptop you stole? I mean, the camera thing was funny, but even without it, it's not exactly a new story to hear of a stolen laptop tracked down once it was connected to the net.

    Smart thieves fence their stuff and forget about it.

  51. Re:Maybe I'm being stupid, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that the real idiot here was the owner of the laptop.

    But she's an idiot who got her laptop back, Einstein.

  52. Re:Maybe I'm being stupid, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe "knows how to use all the bells and whistles" has a different meaning for most people than it does for the Slashdot crowd?

    All they are saying in this article is that she is smarter than the average word processor/email/web browsing computer user, not that she is some technical wizard.

    Talk to the average person on the street, and they will think this is pretty impressive. They don't know what 'printscreen' is, they wouldn't know how to use remote access software, if they even knew it existed, and there's probably a surprising number of mac owners who don't even know what that "funny black square" (the camera) on top of their laptop does..

  53. great movie by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

    Did anyone see the movie, with Patrick Stewart, "Safe House?"

    I don't know if it ever played in theatres - I found it in the bargain bin at a walmart - too bad, I thought it was a great little movie.

    --
    The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    1. Re:great movie by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Too bad it's impossible to get here...thankfully it was aired few years ago in the middle of the night by some local channel...I wouldn't ever know about it.

      It was stunning how swiftly it menaged to go from lighthearted to...well, you know the ending.

      Gotta get my hands on it again...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  54. Linux motion by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    There is a Linux program called 'motion' that works pretty good. http://www.lavrsen.dk/twiki/bin/view/Motion/WebHome

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Linux motion by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Any word on how to use it with the iSight? I got it compiled (had to do a --without-mysql and change setpgrp to setsid) but it compiles and runs now.

      Searching their site for iSight turned up nothing.

  55. Re:No camera. Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most laptops have a microphone (of dubious quality, but present nonetheless) - pipe that to a personal ShoutCast server or something along those lines. Odds are pretty good that the thief will have their name called at some point or another.

  56. Why do we... wtf is wrong with you? by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 4, Funny

    We care because I have it on good authority that women often use their Macs after having just come out of the shower, a good workout, being smeared in grits, rolling in Jell-O, bathing in whipped cream, and/or while do a self-breast exam. That's why we care!

    You act like you haven't had your domain sqatted on by Jenny's Personal Co-Ed Webcam Sexperience after missing a payment that one time that it happened to me.

  57. Re:Maybe I'm being stupid, but by vaporland · · Score: 3, Informative

    A Mac doesn't have a traditional PC-style BIOS. Instead what it has is called an EFI. EFI stands for Extensible Firmware Interface. This does essentially the same thing as BIOS.

    Unless the owner has disabled alternate booting through the EFI, you can change anyone's Mac OS user password by booting with a Mac OS installer DVD and using a standard password utility to change the root password or any user password.

    A program called Undercover will transmit pictures using the built-in iSight camera (with the green indicator light disabled - despite what other posters have said, you CAN transmit video and disable the indicator light in software) and also report back the public IP address of the illegitimate user. If the owner has disabled alternate booting through the EFI, this software is very difficult to remove.

    --
    Ask Me About... The 80's!
  58. Re:Home Version ... why didn't you tell me ... by pbhj · · Score: 1

    Why didn't you tell me this a few days ago before my laptop was stolen!

    I'm resigned to checking the local pawnbrokers and looking on ebay. Sad thing is that they didn't take the power cable so it's next to useless, this IBM Thinkpad R40e has 30 seconds of battery life (awesome ain't it)! That means the laptop is probably in a skip / river somewhere whilst I rue missing backing up last week!

  59. F@#$%^g Stupid New York Times! by Tiger4 · · Score: 1
    Congrats to the woman for having the smarts to recover her laptop. Most people would be just lost. Seriously good work.

    But the fucking New York Times has screwed her over again. First the article describes what was stolen from her home (thanks for the inventory). Then it describes where she lives, including nearby landmarks! So now anyone else that might wants another crack at her place knows where to find it. Including friends and relatives of the accused!!

    Nothing beats being made a victim for having a brain and knowing how to use it! Thanks so much NYT :(

    --
    Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
    1. Re:F@#$%^g Stupid New York Times! by neminem · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to steal something from someone who is a. momentarily famous, and b. proven to be intelligent at crook-finding? Seems like that'd be a perfect recipe for getting caught quickly? And anyway, oh no, god forbid people know approximately where I live. For the record: I live in Santa Cruz, near the Safeway on the west side, and our house contains several tvs, and several computers. That only describes several hundred houses...

  60. Re:No camera. Alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best way would be to fit a GPS module e.g. http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/categories.php?cPath=4_17

    Mount it inside your laptop somewhere, hook it up to a serial header internally.

    Write a small bit of code to send location to your website/email cc: police.

    Some GPS modules have built-in cell phones- they can call you wirelessly, or you can call them for a location fix.

  61. Blatant slashvertisment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for back to my mac.

  62. Re:But... The moral of the story... by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    Amoung the things a Mac can do, is run Windows in a window. But in this case, The Mac had enough hardware and software support to aid in its recovery. We know there are lojack programs out there we can buy for money and install. In this case, the built in support was goof enough. I suppose the thief is a VICTIM because he didn't authorize his picture to be taken? I am sorry they didn't post the thief's picture on the Internet. I LOL about the thought of the the thief realizing his picture was about to be taken. HA HA HA.

  63. Not sure if this is already posted by ubrgeek · · Score: 2, Informative

    (Too lazy to lower my comment threshold) but if you're interested in setting up Back to My Mac without a .Mac subscription, check our this article.

    --
    Bark less. Wag more.
  64. re: ever been robbed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i was robbed a long time ago: someone climbed in the window of my apt & took my stereo & albums (yes, vinyl, it was that long ago;-)

    after the sinking feeling subsided, i called a friend, who had just dropped in to visit the day before in the company of 2 friends of his, to commiserate...

    he called back a few minutes later, told me that the 2 guys had just been with him when he took my call...they turned white when they heard i was calling & had 2 leave suddenly;-}

    my friend gave me their names & car description, which i passed on the the cops, who stopped them 1/2 way back 2 pittsburgh in posession of my stuff, drugs & a gun...the next day i got my stuff back, and my friend & i learned all about the company 1 keeps;-}

  65. Apple key by Slur · · Score: 1

    But option-shift-k has always been a fine way to type the apple logo for those who cant stop calling it the "apple key."

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  66. Re:Maybe I'm being stupid, but by mgblst · · Score: 1

    Well, it worked out well for her in this instance. I would imagine that anyone wanting to make use of any such software as this, will also have to remove their login passwords. I guess i should put a big notice on my laptop saying finger print scanner, so that nobody will try to steat it (it is an IBM, so there is no chance they are getting in).

  67. undoing crap moderation n/t by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

    sorry everybody!

    --
    -mkb
  68. Physical Access by Slur · · Score: 1

    If someone gains physical access to your Mac laptop it doesn't matter if you've set a password or not. They can connect its firewire port to another Mac and reboot it in Target mode to gain full access to the hard drive. They can start it up in single-user mode and set any password they want or change permissions on any files and folders.

    The thieves had no savvy, that much is certain.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
    1. Re:Physical Access by mfnickster · · Score: 1

      If someone gains physical access to your Mac laptop it doesn't matter if you've set a password or not. They can connect its firewire port to another Mac and reboot it in Target mode to gain full access to the hard drive. They can start it up in single-user mode and set any password they want or change permissions on any files and folders.

      Not if they set an Open Firmware password they can't.

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  69. Re:But... its a mac by nawcom · · Score: 1

    There are a million more things you can do on a PC than a Mac. If you don't know the difference you are either blind, or in a state of denial because you own a mac. Yeah. I thought so. I'm not saying 'vista' is any good, but ANY PC (laptop or desktop) is better. Simply stating that you do not seem to realize the awesome variety of capabilities of a PC compared to a MAC. Example? Do you have team fortress 2? lol. no. you just have e-mail. http://www.tuaw.com/2007/10/04/crossover-6-2-supports-team-fortress-2/

    Bad argument. Try again, and at least study up before you give false support.

  70. fantastic- Georgia Giatras by Georgia-Giatras · · Score: 1

    this reminds me of New Yorkers using cell phone cameras to help prevent rape and other crimes. i hope i never have to do this, but glad to know i can. - Georgia Giatras

  71. Trent Decatur by Trent-Decatur · · Score: 1

    good to know, good to know. Trent Decatur