When you hit enter in the subject line, it attempts to post. This means that if you haven't gotten to the Comments, Slashdot tells you "Cat got your tongue?" or if you need to correct your Subject line, the wrong thing gets posted. Also, it would be helpful to check for paired open/close tags.
I just went through essentially this situation with my cousin's 7 year old. She wanted me to read the passage for her homework, and then she'd answer the questions. Well, she didn't know the right answers from me reading it and then her glancing at the passage for clues, so I told her she had to read the whole passage aloud. She said that she didn't want to read the passage, she wanted to answer the questions. I said that I told her what she needed to do and that she wouldn't get any help from me if she wanted to try to do something else. She crumpled up the page the passage and questions were on and ripped up one of her other schoolwork papers, and then proceded to kick and scream and throw things until she got her way. I told her that I would not let her get her way, and that if I were to get her way she'd just act the same way the next time she wanted to get her way.
Er, what exactly do you call an intellectual movie... and then someone here will pick an element of it not known for intellectualism and proceed to rip your selection to shreds on that basis.
With that in mind, the President's idea of a free country becomes a little more clear. They say that this is a country of laws forgetting that this is a country of people first. The government is the enforcer of laws, so a free country is a country in which the government is free to enforce or not the laws as they see fit no matter upon whom they trample.
I don't recommend slapping them in the back of the head, but I do recommend getting angry at them.
Them:I don't want to know about indenting, I want to fix tabs.
Me:Okay, if you don't do what I tell you to do, I'm going to leave. ...or shut off the computer without saving or whatever.
In an ideal world paperwork would exist for accountablity, but unfortunately people have found paperwork useful for creating delays and making the process of doing something hard enough to not be able to do, the concept of ability varying somewhat.
1) The guy before you probably engaged in gerrymandering too, and look where it got him.
In most cases, in office until he got too old to serve, or moved from the House to the Senate or to the Governor's office, or from the Governor's house to the other two? However the fact is that it isn't the guy before you doing the gerrymandering, but the state's majority party. Good for you, if the state's majority party is behind you, favoring you to win the primary and the election. Bad for you if you're in the minority party or the sacrificial district(s).
2) The disposition of your district is already such that enabled you to become elected.
a) arrange the districts so that the elections are closer, so as to maximize the number of representatives from your own party. This is very risky, and the other party's attempt at this is probably what got your party into power to begin with.
Nah, I'm still going with the first way to power as the most likely. The majority party generally want to cram all of the other party's constituencies into a combination of (preferrably) just one sacrificial district with a solid vote for the opposition which they would prefer to do away with if they can put them in small enough doses in each of the majority party held districts.
The majority party has voting records with which to decide how to draw their districts. If voting is waning for them in a certain area, that is the basis for redrawing. Furthermore, they redraw it so that the swing votes and not the voters that vote consistently for the other party gets shifted so that the swing voters get left with two unfamiliar candidates and not just the guy they voted out. Plus, if there are any people who voted for the majority party in the supposedly solid minority district, they transfer them out to shore up other districts, or so that they can transfer in areas that turned bad.
That's just an approximation. They have it much more down than that.
When a main character on a show I like dies it's sad, but that doesn't mean I'm going to have any desire to go after a guy who recreates it in machinima or something!
looking at the problems of government individually, and form one solution that addresses all those problems and then develop a plan to force implementation which is where the general strike comes in.
I will continue to fight to conform the future to what I believe to be true until I die, and as I fight to conform the future to what I believe to be true, what I believe to be true conforms to what the future will be.
Put all hosts behind networks that can't forward from other networks, problem solved. Hosts can't spoof hosts from other networks, because the next network up sees that the address isn't coming from the network not allowed to forward.
Otherwise, there's still the feeling, well, gee, if it's happened to me before, then it may very well happen again. The comforting come in when you can have the illusion that not that many people could actually do it to you. A comfort I don't believe in taking.
My initial theory on the summary was that it was trying to suggest that Steve Ballmer was CEO in name but CTO in action, but I don't know why anyone would want to suggest that.
In which ways? Aren't there also tradeoffs where is is less efficient? Though I don't have much information on the stick shift vs. automatic, much less over time. All I know is that people are more likely to strip the gears than machines.
Slashdot Mirror
I currently use this program:i nkshellext.html
http://schinagl.priv.at/nt/hardlinkshellext/hardl
though I am also looking for a better way to navigate my content. DRM as it is currently, only makes the process harder.
On the other hand, it could be just a stand alone complex.
When you hit enter in the subject line, it attempts to post. This means that if you haven't gotten to the Comments, Slashdot tells you "Cat got your tongue?" or if you need to correct your Subject line, the wrong thing gets posted. Also, it would be helpful to check for paired open/close tags.
I just went through essentially this situation with my cousin's 7 year old. She wanted me to read the passage for her homework, and then she'd answer the questions. Well, she didn't know the right answers from me reading it and then her glancing at the passage for clues, so I told her she had to read the whole passage aloud. She said that she didn't want to read the passage, she wanted to answer the questions. I said that I told her what she needed to do and that she wouldn't get any help from me if she wanted to try to do something else. She crumpled up the page the passage and questions were on and ripped up one of her other schoolwork papers, and then proceded to kick and scream and throw things until she got her way. I told her that I would not let her get her way, and that if I were to get her way she'd just act the same way the next time she wanted to get her way.
Er, what exactly do you call an intellectual movie... and then someone here will pick an element of it not known for intellectualism and proceed to rip your selection to shreds on that basis.
Like it's any less realistic than whatever the MPAA's cooked up. At least his is understandable.
No, there is always an exchange of freedoms.
With that in mind, the President's idea of a free country becomes a little more clear. They say that this is a country of laws forgetting that this is a country of people first. The government is the enforcer of laws, so a free country is a country in which the government is free to enforce or not the laws as they see fit no matter upon whom they trample.
I don't recommend slapping them in the back of the head, but I do recommend getting angry at them.
...or shut off the computer without saving or whatever.
Them:I don't want to know about indenting, I want to fix tabs.
Me:Okay, if you don't do what I tell you to do, I'm going to leave.
Get it straight. Vista is XP with Glass, and new audio and networking stacks.
"we all know it is a terrible thing when a loved one gets cancer" is not a very good argument for not using emotionally charged arguments.
In an ideal world paperwork would exist for accountablity, but unfortunately people have found paperwork useful for creating delays and making the process of doing something hard enough to not be able to do, the concept of ability varying somewhat.
1) The guy before you probably engaged in gerrymandering too, and look where it got him.
In most cases, in office until he got too old to serve, or moved from the House to the Senate or to the Governor's office, or from the Governor's house to the other two? However the fact is that it isn't the guy before you doing the gerrymandering, but the state's majority party. Good for you, if the state's majority party is behind you, favoring you to win the primary and the election. Bad for you if you're in the minority party or the sacrificial district(s).
2) The disposition of your district is already such that enabled you to become elected.
a) arrange the districts so that the elections are closer, so as to maximize the number of representatives from your own party. This is very risky, and the other party's attempt at this is probably what got your party into power to begin with.
Nah, I'm still going with the first way to power as the most likely. The majority party generally want to cram all of the other party's constituencies into a combination of (preferrably) just one sacrificial district with a solid vote for the opposition which they would prefer to do away with if they can put them in small enough doses in each of the majority party held districts.
The majority party has voting records with which to decide how to draw their districts. If voting is waning for them in a certain area, that is the basis for redrawing. Furthermore, they redraw it so that the swing votes and not the voters that vote consistently for the other party gets shifted so that the swing voters get left with two unfamiliar candidates and not just the guy they voted out. Plus, if there are any people who voted for the majority party in the supposedly solid minority district, they transfer them out to shore up other districts, or so that they can transfer in areas that turned bad.
That's just an approximation. They have it much more down than that.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22county+tax ation t ml
yields
http://www.etax.dor.ga.gov/ptd/adm/indexcounty.sh
which since you're from Georgia seems right up your alley.
Yeah, I don't really have much in common with those who are in their little hidey holes around me.
And where, perchance, will you draw it so that it's between you and whatever it it that you are against?
When a main character on a show I like dies it's sad, but that doesn't mean I'm going to have any desire to go after a guy who recreates it in machinima or something!
looking at the problems of government individually, and form one solution that addresses all those problems and then develop a plan to force implementation which is where the general strike comes in.
I will continue to fight to conform the future to what I believe to be true until I die, and as I fight to conform the future to what I believe to be true, what I believe to be true conforms to what the future will be.
Why doesn't Slashdot parse for open and close tags.
Then on top of that there's Gerrymandering, where if the incumbants don't like a group of constituents they can break them up and assign them to different districts where they will be minority voices.
Put all hosts behind networks that can't forward from other networks, problem solved. Hosts can't spoof hosts from other networks, because the next network up sees that the address isn't coming from the network not allowed to forward.
Once that's over, things will change. You can never go back to normal though, no matter what they tell you. You can only create a new normal.
Otherwise, there's still the feeling, well, gee, if it's happened to me before, then it may very well happen again. The comforting come in when you can have the illusion that not that many people could actually do it to you. A comfort I don't believe in taking.
My initial theory on the summary was that it was trying to suggest that Steve Ballmer was CEO in name but CTO in action, but I don't know why anyone would want to suggest that.
In which ways? Aren't there also tradeoffs where is is less efficient? Though I don't have much information on the stick shift vs. automatic, much less over time. All I know is that people are more likely to strip the gears than machines.