The safe bet is to assume they all do this to varying degrees and to demand proof they are not. But unless the reporters who slurred PewDiePie are fake reporters or their careers are destroyed, there you go.
Only problem is that there are no such people, or any such place. Then of course you run into the problem of stories that falsely report that a story is fake. It's a real hall of mirrors
Except reporters who do real work can insert stories deliberately trying to deceive, frighten or mislead with varying degrees of fiction in with their valid work.
I have a saying. This universe is broken, let me know when there's a new universe ready to move to. I usually invoke it when someone says if you don't like something that is happening in the country that you don't like, move to some other country that you know very little about.
I am not inferring the motive. I am saying that the person who is accusing the researcher of manipulating the data is also inferring the motive of that researcher is to suit nefarious ends.
Taking handling errors as an easy to take a stab at situation, once you have figured out general patterns for what goes into programs, you don't have to specify again how to handle the nitty gritty. You can just specify "show a file selection box" without having to specify what to do if a file gets deleted elsewhere and should cease to appear in the box or something.
When instrument calibration is examined and bad data thrown out, the researcher involved is accused of manipulation of the data to suit nefarious ends.
Except now the specification can be the code. Then the client can figure out for themselves how close they are to what they want and rephrase the specification.
I never cared about my genes anyways. Now ideas... I can feed that to the technology and it will carry them forward. I welcome our technological replacements.
Not only is it a Klingon slur word, it is a large banner ad that sticks around on Slashdot longer than the other ads that also outlast their welcome. This one does not get out of the way until you refresh the page.
The safe bet is to assume they all do this to varying degrees and to demand proof they are not. But unless the reporters who slurred PewDiePie are fake reporters or their careers are destroyed, there you go.
Only problem is that there are no such people, or any such place. Then of course you run into the problem of stories that falsely report that a story is fake. It's a real hall of mirrors
Except reporters who do real work can insert stories deliberately trying to deceive, frighten or mislead with varying degrees of fiction in with their valid work.
https://www.bing.com/search?q="doctor+to+the+daughter
http://www.letsrun.com/forum/f...
I have a saying. This universe is broken, let me know when there's a new universe ready to move to. I usually invoke it when someone says if you don't like something that is happening in the country that you don't like, move to some other country that you know very little about.
I am not inferring the motive. I am saying that the person who is accusing the researcher of manipulating the data is also inferring the motive of that researcher is to suit nefarious ends.
Have you tried taking a wild guess at filling in the gap and seeing what happens with the gap filled in?
Looking at the state of the art at any earlier level of advancement, nobody had anything to fear for their job.
Taking handling errors as an easy to take a stab at situation, once you have figured out general patterns for what goes into programs, you don't have to specify again how to handle the nitty gritty. You can just specify "show a file selection box" without having to specify what to do if a file gets deleted elsewhere and should cease to appear in the box or something.
You misspelled 'especially'.
I wasn't making a judgment, just stating what happens.
Yet another nail in the coffin for Intellectual property. Missionary_Church_of_Kopimism
When instrument calibration is examined and bad data thrown out, the researcher involved is accused of manipulation of the data to suit nefarious ends.
I'm trying, baby. I'm trying.
Except now the specification can be the code. Then the client can figure out for themselves how close they are to what they want and rephrase the specification.
I never cared about my genes anyways. Now ideas... I can feed that to the technology and it will carry them forward. I welcome our technological replacements.
All this does is make natural language a programming language.
Yet another documentary: https://openlibrary.org/works/...
Oh go cry me a river with your false lack of selfishness.
More like Penultimate. https://openlibrary.org/works/...
I've been searching for things that people who search for curry also search for.
Not only is it a Klingon slur word, it is a large banner ad that sticks around on Slashdot longer than the other ads that also outlast their welcome. This one does not get out of the way until you refresh the page.
There is a large ad for curry that will not go away after waiting the now customary time for Slashdot ads to go away.
Shandilay! At least I think that is the customary response.
And we need agreements on protocols for it.