They dont directly mod the Xbox.
They say you need a modded Xbox machine to use it and they are using this clause against possible DMCA issue :
Everything done on this project is for the sole purpose of writing interoperable software under Sect. 1201 (f) Reverse Engineering exception of the DMCA.
(d) Notwithstanding any other terms in this License, this
License is not available to You if You and/or your
employer develop, produce, sell, and/or resell a
product which contains substantially similar capabil-
ities of the BitKeeper Software, or, in the reason-
able opinion of BitMover, competes with the BitKeeper
Software.
What part of this says you can develop what you want by acquiring a commercial license?
the myth of getting windows xp betas on irc even before official beta testers...Even there was some claim that Window XP Beta 2 Build 2474 was *internally* leaked by Microsoft.
Mmmm maybe microsoft has more evil tactics we may ever think of?
Anyone remember him he had hacked the a cd reseller website ( cduniverse.com afaik ) and stole about 25,000 credit card numbers and publish them on the net!
Check here for his page
"They bought the package with full faith in Microsoft and its ability to protect them from this kind of exploit."
Faith what faith? I better sell my sould to devil other than trusting Microsoft on security. Ohhh right they are just not designed for security according to Ms execs.
As far as I read on kde mailing lists , resulting software will be Free Software ( GPL/LGPL ) and afaik they will give a win32 port too , but native kde port will be first.
and If you think a Linux uses RFCs ( www.faqs.org/rfc ) as base and still a Linux system is POSIX ( http://www.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG15 ) standarts compliant.
Slashdot Mirror
They dont directly mod the Xbox.
They say you need a modded Xbox machine to use it and they are using this clause against possible DMCA issue :
Everything done on this project is for the sole purpose of writing interoperable software under Sect. 1201 (f) Reverse Engineering exception of the DMCA.
So they are perfectly legal imho...
Slackware is still going on with the latest 9.0-beta still the first choice of Slackers!
:)
/me smacks himself
Thnx for info!
(d) Notwithstanding any other terms in this License, this License is not available to You if You and/or your employer develop, produce, sell, and/or resell a product which contains substantially similar capabil- ities of the BitKeeper Software, or, in the reason- able opinion of BitMover, competes with the BitKeeper Software.
What part of this says you can develop what you want by acquiring a commercial license?
Yeah means contributing to code.
Old algorithm was better . See http://fantomaster.com/graphics/googhell.gif
the myth of getting windows xp betas on irc even before official beta testers...Even there was some claim that Window XP Beta 2 Build 2474 was *internally* leaked by Microsoft.
Mmmm maybe microsoft has more evil tactics we may ever think of?
Anyone remember him he had hacked the a cd reseller website ( cduniverse.com afaik ) and stole
:_ 278091 , 00.html
about 25,000 credit card numbers and publish them on the net!
Check here for his page
Though he never get caught....
Related Links
http://www.internetnews.com/ec-news/article.php/4
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,33539
I more like kopete which is a QT/KDE application and supports Jabber/Yahoo/MSN/Icq/AIM etc. Doesnt have a Win32 port but seems sexy :)
See http://kopete.kde.org/
"They bought the package with full faith in Microsoft and its ability to protect them from this kind of exploit."
Faith what faith? I better sell my sould to devil other than trusting Microsoft on security.
Ohhh right they are just not designed for security according to Ms execs.
As far as I read on kde mailing lists , resulting software will be Free Software ( GPL/LGPL ) and afaik they will give a win32 port too , but native kde port will be first.
Oh now you know dear Anonymous Coward!
Damn! lol
Try to be helpful and dont flame mozilla and you got redundant blah
Need More info?t ypeaheadfind.html
Visit http://www.mozilla.org/projects/ui/accessibility/
Btw Kudos to Mozilla team!
1 - How does RFCs help?
.
Gee try to connect MS Exchange Server and you will see why there are RFCs and why they make standatisation
2- They dont re-invent the wheel?
Then why they close the source as Linux applications are already %99 Open Source . So they will bring new standarts IMHO
Easier Printers ? www.cups.org
:-)
Complete M$ Office ? Nearly there www.openoffice.org
Better Add Hardware System ? Any ideas?
...while we already have standarts...
:
See
http://www.linuxbase.org/
and If you think a Linux uses RFCs ( www.faqs.org/rfc ) as base and still a Linux system is POSIX ( http://www.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG15 ) standarts compliant.
So why try to create standarts again?
KCacheGrind is KDE *frontend* to Valgrind memory debugger not another debugger!
Are you from Venezuela?
That would make the news!
Netscape spellchecker.xpi s works for mozilla too. I use them on latest mozilla cvs.
Before SSL bug :
:
IE had 22 non-fixed vulnerabilities
Add SSL bug
22 +1 = 23 non-fixed vulnerabilities
Now simple math : 30 - 23 = 7
Man only 7 more vulnerabilities to let microsoft release a "cumulative patch" for ie!
Micosoft Office License Fees
Visual Studio ( Development ) Fees
Windows itself License Fees
and many others....
sum up all !
Check here : http://www.apple.com/macosx/applications/aol/
Maybe for Clustering !
Not Star Office its OpenOffice.org . And License is LGPL + Sun's Open Source License ( Dually Licensed )
You cant create closed source products by stealing source from GPL applications that is BSD license that allows commercial stealing .
They can go to court now IMHO.