Well, what they should have done is base their display system on Display Postscript. Then they wouldn't have that little problem!
(Display Postscript is an old decrepit trademark of Adobe Systems Inc.)
Could someone please give a list of real, tangible, impactful innovations by both Microsoft and the Open Source community? I'm having trouble listing any by either side, actually.
You're sure it doesn't say "\/\/3 0\/\/|\|Z04Z j00! \/\/oo+!!!!!!11!1!!"?
There's a surprising number of ways to translate that into legalese, you know...
I could take out all the GNU tools and put in the BSD tools, and then what would we have? Some kind of BSD running on the Linux kernel, that's what. But what to call it?
[Free|Net|Open]Linux? BSD/Linux? Linux OS X?
But *BSD is dying, so nobody would want to do that, right?
You are the clueless one for believing that UnitedLinux has any sort of obligation whatsoever to do anything. If they don't want to distribute binaries, that's just fine. Don't use the software if you don't agree. How much more simple can it get?
Think about it -- the music industry wins because you can't copy it perfectly digitally, because that would require infinite bits per sample and infinite sample rate, and it degrades with each analog copy you make. At the same time we win because analog sounds better than digital.
Too bad the average consumer actually believes that CDs are "perfect sound forever" and MP3s are just as good as CDs.
Well, what they should have done is base their display system on Display Postscript. Then they wouldn't have that little problem! (Display Postscript is an old decrepit trademark of Adobe Systems Inc.)
Could someone please give a list of real, tangible, impactful innovations by both Microsoft and the Open Source community? I'm having trouble listing any by either side, actually.
She don't need no stinking eBay to sell her antiques!
You're sure it doesn't say "\/\/3 0\/\/|\|Z04Z j00! \/\/oo+!!!!!!11!1!!"? There's a surprising number of ways to translate that into legalese, you know...
I have now.
so it DEMANDS reposting at every opportunity, damnit!
You'll have to write a RFC, and until then, you'll have to use "X-Evil:" instead and hope it catches on.
Light passing through a flat glass lens will diverge. Um, yeah. WHatever he says.
CBS just revealed the Iraqi reaction to the incident...
Iraqi officials are overjoyed. They see it as nothing less than Allah's retribution for America's evil actions.
What a surprise.
This artist did, except with a different pricing scheme (25 cents/minute). And they know about OGG :-)
All developers need to remember is that HTTP stands for Hyper TEXT Transfer protocol.
Not Hyper Text, Graphics, Java, JavaScript, Shockwave Flash, and MP3 Transfer Protocol (or HTGJJSFMTP).
Thank you.
www.stockhausen.org
Uh, no. Try "new music" as in classical music that's too new to be classical. Stockhausen ring a bell?
That's just about every civilized country on the globe, with the exception of the USA, actually.
AMERICA SUCKS!
Not a "new music" fan, are you? It's better than some new music I've heard.
More importantly, though, He invests.
Two words.
Madden 2003.
Sure, you can play... if it's sunny. Otherwise forget it unless you have Catalyst 2.1 or older drivers (and those are TWO releases old!)
Still, I'd rather buy Matrox than NVIDIA.
All you need is Verilog!
...or VHDL, but Verilog is better.
when you've got Audacity!
Its benefits sound, well, theoretical to me.
Linux is an OS
WRONG.
Linux is a kernel written by Linus Torvalds. The name of the operating system that runs on the Linux kernel is GNU/Linux.
HAND.
I could take out all the GNU tools and put in the BSD tools, and then what would we have? Some kind of BSD running on the Linux kernel, that's what. But what to call it?
[Free|Net|Open]Linux?
BSD/Linux?
Linux OS X?
But *BSD is dying, so nobody would want to do that, right?
You are the clueless one for believing that UnitedLinux has any sort of obligation whatsoever to do anything. If they don't want to distribute binaries, that's just fine. Don't use the software if you don't agree. How much more simple can it get?
Analog.
Think about it -- the music industry wins because you can't copy it perfectly digitally, because that would require infinite bits per sample and infinite sample rate, and it degrades with each analog copy you make. At the same time we win because analog sounds better than digital.
Too bad the average consumer actually believes that CDs are "perfect sound forever" and MP3s are just as good as CDs.
Didn't they try this once already with Xenix?