Slashdot Mirror


Dell Partners with Square

zenintrude writes "Gameforms is reporting that Square has signed a deal with Dell that will secure new Dell computers to be shipping with Final Fantasy XI pre-installed. This comes on the heels of another story involving Square partnering with nVidia, in which certain aspects/details in Final Fantasy XI will only be able to be accomplished with a geForce4 card."

295 comments

  1. uh oh by Raven42rac · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dude, you're gonna lose productivity.

    --
    I hate sigs.
    1. Re:uh oh by blackbeaktux · · Score: 1

      >Dude, you're gonna lose productivity.

      Dude, I can't lose any more productivity

    2. Re:uh oh by los+furtive · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dude, my overclocked Athlon whips your P4's ass!

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    3. Re:uh oh by Timmeh · · Score: 2

      Dude! You're getting some karma!

    4. Re:uh oh by Roosey · · Score: 1

      No no, I think it's more along the lines of "Dude, my work's shot to hell." :]

    5. Re:uh oh by PantherSE · · Score: 1

      You pathetic fool! What the hell does Squaresoft getting Dell to ship their Final Fantasy game have to do with looking for parties/raves?

  2. Yay, more pay to play! by Cyclone66 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Ok, so they're going to put a game that I'll have to pay a low low monthly fee in order to play it?? And it'll be included?? For free? WOW! Please tell me more? I'll get.. how many months free? Please where do I sign!?

    1. Re:Yay, more pay to play! by Hellbuny · · Score: 1

      You may not like paying a monthly fee... but..at least unlike those of use who plan on playing it, they won't have to pay for it as well

      --

      meep!
    2. Re:Yay, more pay to play! by mwjlewis · · Score: 0
      Yea, Marketing at it's best.

      Let me go out and buy this $1500-$2500 computer so I don't have to buy the game.

      Don't forget the MS tax.

      --
      www.oobersworld.com - For those that ride.
    3. Re:Yay, more pay to play! by rmadmin · · Score: 1

      Uhm... I think something very important to consider here is that you know Square will do some tweaks to make it run near perfect on Dell boxen. Theirs a certain game that says it can be played on a PII 450 and it totally played like ass on my 1.6ghz with 512M ram.. Now, if FFXI runs near perfect on a Dell, I want to buy said Dell so I don't have to fight performance issues. I don't think many people will take this into consideration when they are buying a machine. BUT, I want a Dell anyways, I've gotten to like them in the last few years, hell I'm on one now! So I'm just going to wait till I see the FFXI package included and then I'll buy my new home Dell. Woop woop!

    4. Re:Yay, more pay to play! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagen a Beowulf cluster of these!

  3. First Post. :) by BeNJ-GoS · · Score: 1

    Anyway, having a game show it's full potential (!)only(!) with a GeFore 4 sucks! :(

    1. Re:First Post. :) by MisterBlister · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Anyway, having a game show it's full potential (!)only(!) with a GeFore 4 sucks! :(

      Well, there are certain things a GF4 can do that older Radeons, etc, just can't do. They don't have the feature set. In that case, I don't mind so much if they use those features and then say "best with GF4" or something. But if they go out of their way to use pixelshaders on the GF4 and not support the equiv functionality on the Radeon 9700, for instance, that's just fucking shitty and people should boycott Square and Nvidia if that comes to pass. The last thing we need is another 3dfx Glide situation where games are pretty much card-specific.

    2. Re:First Post. :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really care. Nesticle with FF1 runs just fine on my PII 266

    3. Re:First Post. :) by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      Frankly, there is no reason that FFX shouldn't run on a GF2 other than showing signs of a poor port. There is nothing substantially amazing about the PS2 hardware in respect to current PC graphics accellerators. Something is obviously wrong with this picture.

      Perhaps there are going to be some substantial enhancements to the game? Judging by the poor quality of the ports of the previous games, I expect little from this one.

    4. Re:First Post. :) by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      You forgot a letter. This is FFXI -- Eleven, NOT X -- Ten.

      --
      Why not fork?
    5. Re:First Post. :) by Greebz · · Score: 1


      I'd expect it to run but be less pretty.

      That's fair enough, given the various enhancements that the GF4 has, such as pixel-shaders.

    6. Re:First Post. :) by BeNJ-GoS · · Score: 1

      Thats find... i don't mind that (As much), but as long as there are no "Missing" parts in the game... (As stated in previous posts)

  4. Square and Co by smashr · · Score: 1

    They seem to make a lot of friends: how many people have exclusivity agreements with Square now? It is getting so it isnt quite so exclusive anymore....

    1. Re:Square and Co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, it's like that girl in high school that was "exclusively" dating the entire football team...

    2. Re:Square and Co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theyre probably trying to pay off that exclusively awful film still though.

  5. This is sad... by jpt.d · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I sure don't mind it shipping on new computers from Dell, but requiring a nvidia card for certain things? That is rediculous. I use an ATI Radeon (aging one mind you) and would like to see some real compatibility between them!

    --
    What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
    1. Re:This is sad... by weasel47_3 · · Score: 1

      I have a Voodoo4 4500 and almost everything is compatable with that. It runs nice, why the heck would I dope up money to Nvida (no dis to thier cards) to play FF XI?

      Sounds like they are trying to hold the consumer hostage and make us compatable with them instead of them being compatable with us.

      Lemme guess, Windows XP right?

    2. Re:This is sad... by domninus.DDR · · Score: 1

      I agree, Ive liked nVidia for a while, but planned on purchasing a 9700 pro this cycle, not a gf4. I dont mind competition like the nvidia reflection extenstions to directx 8 back when geforce2s game out. I just hope they dont make a bunch of deals like this because they are having trouble with the NV30.

    3. Re:This is sad... by piznut · · Score: 0

      And I'd like to race my Chevy Cavalier in the Indy 500...but it just aint gonna happen!

    4. Re:This is sad... by packeteer · · Score: 2

      Hey i feel worse than you. I just got a Geforce4MX which has no pixel shaders so really im as screwed as you.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    5. Re:This is sad... by Unknown+Relic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because there's no article attached to the comments about the GeForce 4 I can't be sure about this, but I would imagine that the nvidia cart would be required for certain visual effects, not game content. I see nothing wrong with nVidia striking a deal with Square to include some fancy visual effects only possible with the GeForce 4. In fact this deal is probably nothing more than nVidia footing the bill for Square to add some spiffy new graphical perks for the cards that support them.

      All this does is gives nVidia a game with which to showcase some of the new features of their new cards, how is this a bad thing? Let's not forget that this game is also going to be released for the PS2, so I find it highly doubtful that anything especially important would need a GeForce 4 to run.

    6. Re:This is sad... by jpt.d · · Score: 2

      The geforce4mx has no pixel shaders? If I am not mistaken even my first generation radeon has some. I imagine even the mobile radeon i have on my ibook has them.

      --
      What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
    7. Re:This is sad... by Jim+Norton · · Score: 1

      No, your first gen. Radeon has Transforming and Lighting, not Pixel shaders. The ATI cards with Pixel Shaders are the 8500's and upwards.

      The only mobile Radeon with pixel shaders is the mobile Radeon 9000.

      --
      -- Jim
    8. Re:This is sad... by Jim+Norton · · Score: 1

      I do have a problem with this because other brands of video cards can do the same things the Geforce 4 (eg. Radeon 9700 Pro) chipset can do ... I like nVidia's products (I refuse to buy anything other than an nVidia card right now) but I do not support them in buying off developers so their products do not work as well with other cards which have the same capabilities.

      --
      -- Jim
    9. Re:This is sad... by castlan · · Score: 2

      The whole point of DirectX and other abstraction layers is so that an nVidia card wouldn't be required for certain effects. A less powerful nVidia card shouldn't have better visual effects than a top ATI card. That was the whole reason that ATI surpassing the OEM minimal performance level was significant. Real competition should be allowed to compete, not be retrained my corporate politics and back room dealings.

      Buying a graphics gard shouldn't be about politics and "us versus them", it is a tecnical issue, an issue of performance, price, andh possibly customer service. nVidia shouldn't be going over the consumers heads to screw those who vote against the party. It sounds like time for nVidia to pack it in... step aside and let some responsible competition emerge who actually wants to improve open computing standards without belittling users.

      Screw Sony - "fancy visual effects" are the sole reason why graphics accelerators exist at the consumer PC level... they are "especially important" to this discussion. The bad thing is not that nVidia can show off their fancy features. The bad thing is that nVidia paid Square dirty money to cripple the game on ATI, and Square accepted the deal. If Square already developed the new effects, why artifically restrict users from seeing them? Because they didn't vote for the right dirty... er, buy the right companies video card? Technology isn't the issue here, but is should be. That is a the bad thing. This is sad.

    10. Re:This is sad... by mobets · · Score: 1

      that's what you get for trying to be cheap :) the GeForce4MX is just a spiffed up GeForce2, you would have done better to find a used GeForce3Ti. It probobly would have been cheaper too.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    11. Re:This is sad... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      as I'm sure you know, there are effects that exist on both the nVidia and ATI cards which are not currently supported in Direct3D, except through extensions that each company has made on their own. If those are the effects being used, then they'd have to be programmed independently for each card. So, this very well could be a situation in which nVidia paid Square to add the capability to the game, rather than them paying Square not to add the same capability for the ATI card, because Square would have to do all of the coding for those effects all over again to make them work on an ATI card.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    12. Re:This is sad... by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      I'd like a 9700 pro, but Linux support for ATi cards has been pretty sucky. I currently use a PowerVR Kyro II, and it works great. Games that use pixel shaders and other modern features will make short work of it though. Supposedly I will be able to run the new UT2003 game after PowerVR fixes the driveers (it currently runs fairly well on this card under Windows), but that might be the last big title that will run properly on that generation of cards in a decent resolution.

      Personally, I prefer competition. I don't care to buy an nVidia product because I am sick of everyone pulling a 3dfx tactic with their hardware. People aren't writing games for OpenGL or DirectX anymore... They are writing games with easy tweaks and hacks that only work properly with nVidia hardware. A sign of the growing laziness of software developers...

      We're going to see what we saw a few years ago. Game developers are going to be obsessed with including features of the newest cards, and they are going to write software around specific peices of hardware (e.g. 3dfx and their GLide API). The game market is going to puke a bit until people on average can have acceptable 3D hardware, or developers stop pushing the limits. Most people don't want to upgrade upgrade their hardware constantly. GeForce 3s were only released early last year, and now nVidia's new product is about to hit the streets. Talk about quick product cycles...

    13. Re:This is sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have no evidence, but frankly, I think that nVidia does a lot of stuff like this. They've got some pretty dirty tactics. Ever read some of their letters to hardware manufacturers and chip buyers? I can really recall their note to companies that were going to be potential buyers of PowerVR Kyro 2 chips... Those chips had the speed of nVidia's current GF2 chips at a price of the MX line.

    14. Re:This is sad... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty happy with mine actually, but then again it was an upgrade from a VooDoo 3.

      btw I thought the MX was a GeForce3 not a GeForce2, do you have a link for that?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    15. Re:This is sad... by mobets · · Score: 1

      it's in the third paragraph here

      While GeForce4 Ti is the pinnacle of today's mainstream 3D chip technology, GeForce4 MX is a mere advance of GeForce2 MX technology. GeForce4 MX does not contain any nfiniteFX-engine and, therefore, no full DirectX 8.x functionality, either.

      Although, there are benchmarks further down that show the higher end MX's compeating with the GeForce3.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    16. Re:This is sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think that linux drivers are up on ATI's list of priorities? Linux gaming is by no means a large segment and developers should not make an effor to care about it. This includes hardware and software.

    17. Re:This is sad... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Thanks man!

      But honestly, I was playing the UT2003 Demo last night & was still very happy with the graphics. Hell, I looked like I was playing a Pixar movie or something. And I paid less for my new card ($80) than I did for my old VooDoo3.

      p.s. I have the 440MX w/ S-Video out.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    18. Re:This is sad... by mobets · · Score: 1

      not bad, my GeForce2 GTS doesn't quite cut it.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    19. Re:This is sad... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2

      A less powerful nVidia card shouldn't have better visual effects than a top ATI card.

      What if the less powerful card is based on an earlier generation chip? Y'know, like the GeForce MX line? A GF4 MX doesn't have a GF4 powering it. It doesn't do complete DirectX 8 compatibility, so the ATI card will some effects not found in lower end cards.

    20. Re:This is sad... by packeteer · · Score: 2

      You cant beat free. I was send my card for free from my ISP. So really im not dissapointed that they gave me a nice card to play games on my new dsl with. I am pretyt happy with it and relaly im just waiting for the next parhelia. I liked the parhelia but really its about as fast as my geforce4mx at $300.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    21. Re:This is sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, which is why we have:

      DirectX 8 (geforce edition)
      DirectX 8.1 (radeon edition)
      DirectX 9 (radeon edition)
      DirectX 9.1??? (geforce edition? parhelia edition)?

      How this is any different (and somehow better) than vendor specific extensions that migrate to ARB extensions and then migrate into the core spec is left as an exercise for the reader.

    22. Re:This is sad... by domninus.DDR · · Score: 1

      Nvidia has been on one year product cycles (release in spring, ussually an upgrade in fall (ultra for tnt2, mx for geforce 2, ti500 for 3 (I like parentheses))) since the TNT2 came out.

    23. Re:This is sad... by castlan · · Score: 2

      Perhaps MS is too immature to have a standard dictated by them.

      Maybe OpenGL lags behind DirectX, but it seems less whimsical, and a touch more concrete. Since SGI had to create hardware which falls into the spec, and has committed te spec into being a cross-platform standard, OpenSGi might be a samer graphics standard.

      Of course that could bust be my anti-MS bias poking through, but it seems that OpenGL might be a healthier standard for the graphics industry. Oh, yeah, and SGI rules. Just in case you didn't know.

      My two points are:
      1. SGI rules
      2. the standard should precede the hardware implementation. The latest point release shouldn't necessarily be sucking up to the latest graphics card's release. The most important innovation should be determined by the clients' needs, not the chipsets' innovation-implementation schedules.

  6. Partnering? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    All this promiscuous 'partnering' is sure to result in a computer virus that won't wash off so easily.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  7. hmmm... by g(zerofunk.org) · · Score: 1, Funny

    Dude, you are getting a level up. g

    1. Re:hmmm... by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      How could you miss the more obvious one? :]

      "Dude! Where's my airship?"

  8. Connections by nukey56 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interestingly enough, a large amount of market share of Square is owned by Sony, which also sells PCs. However, I have yet to see any announcement of Square products being shipped on Sony PCs. It seems strange that the reverse is not the truth.. is there something going on behind the scences here?

    1. Re:Connections by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would imagine that Sony decided to bundle their pay-to-play game with Dell PCs because they sell better then their little niche-marketed Viao (spelling?).

    2. Re:Connections by ztc · · Score: 1

      Sony has its own MMORPG -- Everquest. And they do ship it on their own notebooks and PCs. I do not see Sony putting another company's product (no matter the deals) in front of their own source of profit.

    3. Re:Connections by weasel47_3 · · Score: 1

      You are right. I bet there is some strange thing going on. Much like the airlines now sell each other's tickets. It would make much more economical sense that Sony put Sony products on thier products. But then again, maybe they don't want the whole fiasco that Microsoft had with putting Microsoft products in, well, Microsoft products.

    4. Re:Connections by Jrono · · Score: 1

      Except Sony doesn't own Square. Square is still just a third party developer and distributes their games on their own (at least in North America through Square EA). They develop games for Sony's competitors too, such as for Bandai's Wonderswan (some old Final Fantasy games) and soon again for Nintendo (Final Fantasy Tactics and Final Fantasy Crystal Chronoicle). They will sell games for whatever platform that will make them the most money.

    5. Re:Connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies can't own "market share" in each other. Market share refers to what % of total sales in a particular market a company represents, eg Macs have about 2-3% marketshare in worldwide personal computer sales. Sony may own a large amount of stock in Square, but, even if that's true, I'm willing to bet it isn't large enough to stop Square from making money just because it hurts Sony.

    6. Re:Connections by Tofuhead · · Score: 2

      Bandai and Sony are not competitors. Sony has no handheld systems of their own (Pocketstation doesn't count), and Bandai hasn't had a home console for a long time.

      Bandai is considered a partner of Sony, actually. The Swan Crystal is listed in the hardware section of the Japanese Sony site, even.

      < tofuhead >

      --
      It is still the dark of night.
    7. Re:Connections by tb3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Silly Mods, this isn't insightful, this is wrong.


      Sony becoming a sleeper PC giant

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    8. Re:Connections by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 2

      When ever you wonder why a company does something. Think $$$. Its really as simple as that.

      You want to know what's going behind the scenes, Dell offered a better deal/or has more customers or something resulting in the bling bling.

  9. Next years headline: by Sir+Bard · · Score: 0

    People getting addicted to FFXI causing a the US to loose productivity.

  10. Why won't they move on? by LighthouseJ · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Why can't square move on from the Final Fantasy name? Do they bank that much on the Final Fantasy name because they are that afraid of beginning another project? I think it's time for Square to move on gracefully now, rather than when Final Fantasy XV comes out and it's completely dead.

    1. Re:Why won't they move on? by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why can't square move on from the Final Fantasy name?

      Bushido Blade
      Einhander
      Ehrgeiz
      Vagrant Story
      Xenogears
      Parasite Eve
      Chrono Trigger/Cross
      Driving Emotion Type S
      The Bouncer
      Kingdom Hearts

      I think that Square pumps out the quality non Final Fantasy titles, and you're just not paying attention.

    2. Re:Why won't they move on? by jaiteend · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that SquareSoft has pushed out a large number of the FF series games, but have you taken a look at their other offerings?

      Parasite Eve? I've had numerous hours playing, but more importantly, replaying the first of that series. As for the second one, it's still a good play.

      FFT? Okay the name is the same, but the play is much different and welcome to replay.

      There are also a couple of other RPG titles that I've yet to buy/play (Salsa(?) Frontier, etc).

      So, I'd have to say that they put out more than just FF games and those ones are quite good.

      --
      and the Irishman took the fly in his hands and yelled, "spit it out!"
    3. Re:Why won't they move on? by PhiberOptix · · Score: 1

      > Driving Emotion Type S

      hmmm...this one didn't counted, right?
      this game is the single best reason why square should never ever try to make racing titles again.

      well, Home Alone titles (oh, the pain!) didn't stopped THQ from making games at all...so square will probably keep trying too...

    4. Re:Why won't they move on? by AndrewGoat · · Score: 0

      Bushido Blade was good, and very difficult, they only made 2. Einhander i didnt play, although I bet there was probably Espers in it somehow. Ehrgeiz was entertaining for the 10 minutes it took to beat it, and they couldnt go without sneaking in Final Fantasy characters. Vagrant Story was boring. Xenogears I never got a chance to play. Parasite Eve was decent but it was just the same 'save the world from villian a' role playing game. Chrono Trigger/Cross. Both these games are awesome, too bad everyone hated Cross except me. Driving Emotion Type S...who gives a shit. The Bouncer, again I dont think anyone cared about this game, since Square's fanboys just want Final Fantasy. Kingdom Hearts, Final Fantasy 10.5 meets 8, meets 7, meets Disney. Real Original. Oh yes.

    5. Re:Why won't they move on? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your list was going very well till you mentioned Driving Emotion Type S and Bouncer..

    6. Re:Why won't they move on? by Vinum · · Score: 1

      That would be ok except for the fact that "Final Fantasy" means absolutly nothing. None of the sequences have anything to do with each other, in fact they all pretty much have radically different combat systems.

      Not to mention, that Square has always been the best at showing the visual quality of consoles. Final Fantasy VI blowed out of the water what people thought was possible with the SNES. I play Chrono Cross to this day and it is hard to believe it is for the Playstation One. Final Fantasy X is the de facto example of the graphical power of the Playstation Two. I can guarentee you things done in Final Fantasy X just could not of been done on the xbox. Look at any of the still screens from Final Fantasy X and they usually look blurry and like crap if something complicated is going on... But actually being animated on a 57" TV it is smooth as silk.

      It makes sense really. In real life every "frame" your eye perceives is just a blur and it signifies to your brain how fast it is actually moving. It is hard to make action really smooth with the low refresh rate of NTSC televisions... but the 24fps on a DVD look extreamly smooth.

      So ya, Square is defiently moving on. Just keep in mind that Final Fantasy==Square's latest showcase. Any other release they make is them just learning hardware better in order to make their next game.

      Parasite eve was only made to develop the rendering engine for Final Fantasy VIII. (Of course Final Fantasy VIII was never finished and was released early thanks to the marketing depeartment.) Chrono Cross was released to make the rendering engine for Final Fantasy IX. Believe it or not, "The Bouncer" was released to develop the rendering engine for Final Fantasy X.

    7. Re:Why won't they move on? by koh · · Score: 1

      --Chrono Cross was released to make the rendering engine for Final Fantasy IX.

      Really ? Seems strange, the Chrono Cross engine has the same look and feel as the previously released Xenogears engine (and even roughly the same file layout). I don't think it bears much resemblance with the FFIX engine though...

      --
      Karma cannot be described by words alone.
    8. Re:Why won't they move on? by Genom · · Score: 2

      the Chrono Cross engine has the same look and feel as the previously released Xenogears engine (and even roughly the same file layout).

      ???

      Xenogears (great game, btw - looking forward to Xenosaga ep. 1 next year...) used a polygonal background with sprite characters animated on top of it for the exploration. The Gear sequences were fully polygonal, but seemed to use VERY simplified backgrounds. In fact, it seemed to be the exact opposite of the FF7 engine, which used polygonal characters over static (or fmv) backdrops.

      Chrono Cross was all polygonal, IIRC (Can't seem to find my copy to verify this). Again, the backgrounds during combat were very simplified, but enginewise, that appears to be the only similarity I can find. (the other similarity between the two games being the exceptional music, by Yasunori Mitsuda, IIRC)

      I can't speak for the file layout, though. =)

    9. Re:Why won't they move on? by koh · · Score: 1

      Graphics-wise, you're pretty much right. Xenogears's engine was limited to 2D sprites on a richer background, and 3D models on a coarser background. Crono Cross is full 3D, that's why I consider it as an improvement over the Xenogears engine, kinda "Xeno engine 2.0"

      Consider the controls and the gameplay... Don't you think they're quite the same ? you have 3 attacks, light/medium/hard, you have (roughly) the same combo system and the same way to "charge" techniques/elementals. The gameplay is not ATB-based : in both games, when it's the player's turn to play the game just waits forever for your command.

      Given that and the file layout, the Crono Cross engine is definitely "Xeno engine 2.0" IMHO. Of course, I may be plain wrong on this one, anyone knows better ?

      --
      Karma cannot be described by words alone.
    10. Re:Why won't they move on? by amokk · · Score: 1
      Every single time square wavers from the RPG genre the result is a game that really sucks.

      I liked Final Fantasy all the way up to FF7. FF8 and onwards have been among my least favorite games.

      Take Driving Emotion type S for instance. Many people would tell you that it's quite possibly the worst racing game ever programmed on ANY platform. Likewise with Ehrgeiz (sorry, I shouldn't have done that to the English language).

      It could be that my tastes are evolving... Hell, it could be that I haven't really played a console game that I enjoyed since FF7; I don't know. Either way the conclusion is the same: Square is (or rather was) good at making one specific genre of game.

      I predict that FFXI will be a failure and that even the biggest square fanboys will abandon it in a moments notice.

      I also predict that it will be a failure on the PS2 for the following reasons:
      • You need the PS2 network adapter to connect.
      • You need the PS2 hard-drive to install and maintain the game.


      Both of these accessories cost money. Almost as much as a second PS2. Almost every gaming accessory ever released for any console has failed miserably (Sega CD, 32X, etc...)

      Square was one of those companies that used to be cool. Now however, it's just producing sub-stanard games with revolting storylines who's sales are driven by the memory of what Square once was.
      --
      I think, therefore I am an Atheist.
    11. Re:Why won't they move on? by m.e.l.l.e.n.t.i.n.e · · Score: 1

      ...rather than when Final Fantasy XV comes out and it's completely dead.

      Yeah, look how dead it is now. I don't think 4 more is going to kill it. btw, FF6 is the best one ever. ;)

      --

      Producer: NEXT!!
      Ralph Wiggum: Chicken necks
    12. Re:Why won't they move on? by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      Every single time square wavers from the RPG genre the result is a game that really sucks.

      I'm sorry, but youre wrong. Bushido Blade was amazing, and Einhander is the best sidescrolling space shooter ever

      As for RPGs, FF8 sucked, bu FF9 and FFX were both very good, and very different (albiet not plot wise) from other games in the series. Squaresoft's other RPGs are also very good, and are typically completely different from each other. They often have a unique combination of the classic Square RPG with some action gaming added in. Vagrant Story and Parasite Eve are perfect examples.

      And what's wrong with RPGs anyway? They happen to be my favorite type of game.

      I predict that FFXI will be a failure

      I personally agree about FFXI, but not for the reasons you mention. Online gaming just isn't as popular as all the hype. Most gamers like to play games alone or with friends that are there with them. The majority of gamers aren't the type you see in internet forums, they're at home playing EA's Madden 2002 with their buddies on the couch. I'll personally be avoiding it because online RPGs require you do dedicate WAY too much of your life to them to be any good at it, and I have other things I like to do besides play video games, and other games I like to play.

      FFXI doesn't require the hard drive, and the PS2 network adapter and software are only $30. That's chepaer then what you need to buy to get online with any other console, including the Xbox with it's already builtin interface. I don't think that either of those two things are going to be a factor in FFXI acceptance.

      Square was one of those companies that used to be cool. Now however, it's just producing sub-stanard games with revolting storylines who's sales are driven by the memory of what Square once was.

      Sounds to me like somebody's making excuses and kicking themselves because they bought an Xbox instead of a PS2. :)

    13. Re:Why won't they move on? by LighthouseJ · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, the only thing that keeps the Final Fantasy series together is the name and the adventure/battle system concept. I think Square could have done better if the plots were organized in a series, so that you only knew the whole thing if you bought/played all of them in order of their release to get the whole story.

      I also agree that Square has done a fine job of showing what kind of graphics power the console it was designed on can handle. My sister bought and played some of FF X for PS2 while I was around and it looks great.

      If these peripheral games like Parasite Eve and The Bouncer are merely exercises in game design, I'd like the real masterpiece to be in a much different game than Final Fantasy [i+1]. I don't doubt that Square is a leading company in game development, I just want them to go in new directions.

  11. Dude... by daemonc · · Score: 1

    Don't even start.

    --
    All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.
    1. Re:Dude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People will buy it and pay for the game. And if you're comparing FFXI to EverQuest, don't. FFXI will toddle where EverQuest strides.

      Compare it to Sega's doomed Phantasy Star Online.

      And pray that Square can do better than Sonic Team.

      If they don't, you can expect a bug-ridden cheat-filled piece of dung, that totally bastardizes an entire world that you've come to know and love. :p

    2. Re:Dude... by Ty · · Score: 1

      Insightful?? How about uninformed!

      Everquest, alone, has a fanbase of over 375,000 subscribers who are willing to play a monthly fee to play.

      Just because you personally did not like the game doesn't mean that many, many other do and are willing to pay a trivial monthly fee ($13) to play as much as they want.

    3. Re:Dude... by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 2

      You know, your sig seems somehow appropriate... But seriously, is 375,000 really that big? Think of how many millions of copies of FFX got sold. It wouldn't take too many of them to get hooked on XI to beat 375,000...

    4. Re:Dude... by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 2

      Oh, Square claims FFXI already has 140,000 subscribers.

    5. Re:Dude... by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      375,000 * 6 (completely guesstimated average time subcribed) * $10 (using the lower figure from back in the day) $22.5 MILLION Dollars. Thats big money from a video game standpoint.

      Before I became unaddicted I threw about $150 bucks into their coffers. I don't feel ripped off though.. I didn't buy 6 other video games that year like I normally would have, because I didnt need them. There's my 150 right back.
      Now I didn't go to class either... or shower... So i suppose they ripped off a year of my life... heh.

      Note that I'm not saying FFXI will not get to this level. I'm sure they'll top a million subscribers or something crazy compared to EQ. Its just that Eq's success is nothing to scoff at.

  12. If you can't beat em with technology by SpiffyMarc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    nVidia has finally realized the edge it needs to put ATI under: marketing dollars. No amount of cool tech from ATI will stop the fact that Square signed this deal with nVidia. This is where the GeForce4 will get its' edge against the technically superior Radeon 9700 Pro.

    It's the same way with Sony. If you can't win with better games, win with more money and an unstoppable juggernaut of a marketing department.

    1. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The facts that nVidia puts out drivers to fix problems and puts out drivers to boost performance and does both of these very frequently while ATI takes MONTHS to put out even a first driver upgrade set for a $500 video card despite the fact that problems with the cards cause them to be quite useless for a majority of buyers puts nVidia lightyears beyond ATI.

      I will never buy another ATI card.

    2. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Archfeld · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I will echo the above AC's comments LOUDLY and logged in. I've got a ti-4600 and a radeon 9700 pro, the Radeon is a better faster board, that has bugs in places I've never even considered. The 4600 is rock solid and compliant. ATI has yet to realize that a video card IS the drivers. ATI support is slow to respond, they often send the wrong info out, heck they did not even have drivers up for the 9700 for nearly 2 weeks after issue. My cd arrived damaged and I had to plead on IRC to get someone to let me ftp the drivers...
      I hope ATI gets it together but how long have people been saying that ?

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    3. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Well, kudos to Square. But all I can say is that they lost my money after FF7. That whole genre has just been hit too much for me to ever waste any more of my time on it. Once novel, actually fun, games start coming out again for the PC which require the stupid GF4, then I will be pissed. Talk to me then. Square Soft, is just a drop in the bucket.

      Square got some people hooked on the graphics in FF7, and some stayed with it, talking about how great the game was just because it had some nice videos and was kind of dark. I think the whole Final Fantasy series (at least these newer ones) are just big marketing ploys to begin with, riding on the success of its past, and just drawing people in with its sparkly graphics and stereotypical epic movie soundtrack in the commercials, giving the viewer a sense of grandeur and a purpose for the people with no lives. Its all just a big marketing gimmick. But I suppose just about everything these days is. Entertainment has been abstracted to its most raw, cheaply mass produced, generically marketed, and easily unoriginal pieces of multimedia feedback tripe influenced from what the majority of our society registers in their mind as a good use of time, but only because it throws up certain characteristics and not because it is entirely a good game. People just play it because they know people play it, and because it has been established that certain characteristics present in the game are repeatedly established as positive characteristics in games by our culture. Also, you say it has some kind of artistic merit and people jump all over it thinking that somehow they are "cooler" than everyone else because they play a video game thats kind of artistic, sort of. You are no better than a spectator. You have no place in the game beyond the set of impulses traveling between the logic gates in the CPU. You are not actually living it, you are replaying it at your own pace. I can't believe people still play this game or games like them. Our society is either sick or stupid. Judging by the majority of articles on slashdot, I would say both.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    4. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GF4 doesn't need an edge against the Radeon 9700. The 9700 is brand new (only a couple weeks on retail sale) while the GF4 is at least 6 months old. Soon enough the 9700 will get its ass handed to it by the next nvidia product (which is already overdue).

    5. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Crapflooder+Supreme · · Score: 1

      Two words.

      Madden 2003.

      Sure, you can play... if it's sunny. Otherwise forget it unless you have Catalyst 2.1 or older drivers (and those are TWO releases old!)

      Still, I'd rather buy Matrox than NVIDIA.

      --
      "Don't worry, it's not loaded." --Terry Kath
    6. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Knightmare · · Score: 1

      I am sure nVidia will come out with a card to rival the 9700... give them time, it just came out. They are always one upping eachother. The 8500 when it came out was greater than the nVidia complement, but that didn't stop people from buying nVidia. I will tell you why, stability. ATI can't make drivers that work well to save their lives. I owned an 8500 and gave it away, I couldn't use it for what I needed and felt too bad to sell that piece of crap.
      The first round of drivers, crashed my machine at random times. The next few versions just crashed applications, not the whole machine, thanks ATI. The next set almost didn't crash but looked like absolute dog crap in any 3d game I enjoy playing, mainly Quake 3. But don't take my word on it, most around here seem to idolize John Carmack, here is a quote from his plan file "I didn't speak to ATI for
      months after they gave me a beta 8500 board last year with drivers that
      rendered the console incorrectly. :-)"

    7. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Vinum · · Score: 1

      How is this any worse than reading a book?

      We are just spectators when we read. We have no place in the book beyond the set of impulses traveling between our eyes and our brain. You are not living a book, just reading it at your own pace. I can't believe people still read books. Our society is either sick or stupid. Judging by the majority of people in college, I would say both.

      On a serious unsarcastic note... the only negative thing about the Final Fantasy series (I have played them all), is the bad social skills you will gain from them. What I mean is this.. people are all sponges, we absorbe what we think life should be like judged by what we see other people doing. Back in the old days liteature and religion filled this gap, now TV shows like "Friends" do this. Me and my closest friends these days spent a lot of time playing Final Fantasy and games like it... Because of that we value certain things like honor, dignity, doing what is right, etc etc. Needless to say we don't fit in well with other people... This isn't really a bad thing, just that it is sad you pretty much have to have your life ran by TV in order to know how to act socially in certain situations. Heh. The last woman I married spent a lot of her time glued to TV shows like Ally McBeal. Gah, I will only marry women now who either read the bible or play Final Fantasy. :)

    8. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Atryn · · Score: 1

      Me and my closest friends these days spent a lot of time playing Final Fantasy and games like it... Because of that we value certain things like honor, dignity, doing what is right, etc etc.

      With that hallywood malleable brain of yours its a good thing you didn't just play Grand Theft Auto, Dungeon Keeper, Leisure Suit Larry, Unreal Tournament, etc.

      I'm pretty sure your argument there asserts that violence and immorality in games and on TV leads to those behaviors in people. I couldn't disagree more. Heaven forbid there might have been parental influence in your life...

      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    9. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      The obsession with Final Fantasy has caused the gaming community to neglect other outstanding RPG titles that are of high quality. Some notable games are things like Skies of Arcadia (Sega), Arc the Lad and the Lunar series (from Working Designs), Panzer Dragoon Saga (when it was still available), and others like the Grandia series. I also lost interest after FF7- I had followed the series since the beginning, and after they went graphics-crazy, the stories started to suck and it became a series of rehashed ideas. It really sucks that FF is the standard now for RPG games, because now everyone tries to emulate it without offering something original. Which brings me to another point... Game reviewers always try to compare a game to the Final Fantasy series, always citing its weaknesses in comparision... Yet when a game is a blatant ripoff of Final Fantasy, they diss it as much as they can. I don't understand the concept here.

      I've personally been playing more games from smaller developers these days. A notable one is a twitch game called Space Tripper. You can download it for Windows, Linux, and MacOS and the full version only costs $12.00. How can you beat that? The game is totally fun and addictive, and has some of the best 3D graphics that you will see in any shooter. It runs on a very minimalistic 3d accellerator too (by todays standards). You can get it from http://www.pompom.org.uk

      Of course, I still have a ton of PSX and Dreamcast games to play. Until these newer consoles start getting decent material, then I'll still be set for years of gaming.

    10. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      You know you make quite a few good points there. Except for the fact that books are supposed to be in a sequence, games are supposed to be interactive (i.e. non-linear). Unfortunately this is almost never the case. A game should challenge you, not occupy all of your time to meet one ultimate goal. Because you know you feel very little satisfaction until you beat the game. Well, just think of all that time you wasted just playing the stupid thing, just for the bragging rights to say, "I beat it." Of course, I agree on the fact that pieces of media like this are just used in society as conversational pieces to establish commonality of interests, but when its such a small cliche that actually plays it, maybe you should start reevaluating what a good use of your time is. There is a reason why people watch football, and its not because its interesting (oooh look at the ball go, give me a break). Its because it is a communal event. People come together and everyone reinforces each other, which illicits positive responses in the brain. While at the same time, it gives people the ability to dominate over the people cheering for the other team (assuming their team is winning) so its like a double dose of dopamine for them :-P. Anyways, people act like they like things that make them seem unique, when they don't realize that the only things they actually like are what their culture has implanted in their brain as being good. People don't realize how big a drone they really are.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    11. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Vinum · · Score: 1

      Parents? What are those... Ohh you mean those people who usually got home after I had already gone to bed even when I was 6 or so? :)

      But seriously... IANAP (psychologist) there are different types of influences out there. I played a crap load of Doom and Grand Theft Auto in my life but it was just a video game so it never had much influence. In fact, I have never in my life physically harmed another human except in self defence. Even then, I have been jumped before and won fights without hurting the other person...

      But books and stories and movies are a little different... It isn't that what you watch on TV can MAKE YOU DO THINGS. ;) But it does influence your PERSONALITY. Especially when see some type of role-model in what you are watching... when I was a kid I used to worship Cyrano (not from video games... from the french play). I always tried to be well rounded and good at everything I did. If a kid is growing up and really likes Snoop Dog or whatever he may get really engrossed in him and act like him as much as possible. But that doesn't mean this kid is going to go out and sell dope.

      I guess what I am trying to say is... everything you see influences you in someway. But you ultimatly have say in your behavior. We know the difference between right and wrong and the rules are explained to us very clearly through our life. But no one really sits down and tells your how to dress, or how to think, or how to talk, etc...

    12. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, downloading the drivers off of the website would have been outside of the realm of your capability...

    13. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen

    14. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      and reading the comment would be beyond yours ? The catalyst drivers that support the 9700 were NOT available on the support site for almost 2 weeks after I got the card. The wonderful ATI support page has *required* validated fields that did not EVEN INCLUDE the 9700 for nearly 2 weeks after they began marketing it. I guess I shouldn't feed the trolls....

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    15. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by The+Kow · · Score: 1

      Actually ATI can always attempt to fall back on the hardcore gamer demographic, which largely drives the high-end sector of the consumer graphics card market.

      "If the hardcore gamers are using it, and you're not, well then what's wrong with you?"

      --
      Moo
    16. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Vinum · · Score: 1

      Hehe, good points. :)

      Regarding your last couple of sentences.. I go to a club down here in Norman, OK and on the front door it says..

      "You are a unique person. Just like everyone else."

    17. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gotta love when the theory comes up in this shit... anyways its not about just games. its society in general. ur looking too small here. its much bigger than just the games! society in general has wired our brains to think a certian way. from birth we have been molded into what we are today. and another thing, people dont all look for just good fmvs and what not in a game nor are they just trying to be "cool".... many ppl play games due to wanting to escape reality. ppl have their different reasons, but not all of us have the same ones. but then again its much like any other form on entertainment which takes u away from ur life... alot is about escape...

      on the other hand i see repeats of games all the time. there are always origonal things comming out though cuz ppl get bored and are greedy for more... thats how society has made ppl into (majorty wise speaking)

      oh and yes it does suck that they have to limit the graphics in a game to get ahead.... just wait a month and see what the programmers do (3rd party patches to fix the issue)

    18. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize there were any clubs down here in Norman, OK. I know city hall was trying to establish the abandoned food lion on 12th as kind of a club/gym/restaurant kind of deal (don't ask me, it was the brain-child of the people who own Sooner Fitness), but other than that I was aware of no others. But then again, maybe its because I've been out of the social pipeline too long because of all the video games I play ;-) :-P. My uniqueness I think is purely dictated by my DNA. In other words I'm 99.9999% the same as every other person, damn. Anyways, nice to see a fellow Normanite (I feel your pain :-P), assuming you really do live in Norman, on /. .

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    19. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, and do I know you? I'll just assume that the odds of somebody else from Norman actually posting a reply to one of my 40 or so posts on slashdot would be extremely low.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    20. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Vinum · · Score: 1

      I doubt you know me, I don't live in Norman. I do live in OKC though. Norman is a college town, it has more places to get drunk than at OKC. Just look in the "Norman Transcript", it usually has a section in there showing all the places.

      The Deli is where we usually go, Resident Funk is the best band that shows up there. :)

    21. Re:If you can't beat em with technology by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Oh ok, you call The Deli a club. I just call it a bar. Yeah, I've been kicked out of there many a times (those huge $1 glasses of beer before 11 really do me in). Do you like Mike Hosty Duo by any chance. I think they are playing there tonight. Oh yeah, and if you're ever looking for who's playing almost anywhere in Norman www.normanmusicscene.com is the place to go.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  13. Whats up with that? by Ectropy · · Score: 0

    Well I dont mind Square paretnering up with Dell, well actually I do because I find it so dumb that when you buy a new computer it comes factory installed with so much bloatware it feels like a much slower computer that you couldve found at the thrift store. Lets see, new computers already come with AOL all over the desktop, so many proprietary programs for periphrials, and so many options configured that arent needed that it makes the entire experience of having a new computer not any fun. Now granted, I can see it helps out new people, but there should be a guide instead of just already having it installed. Some people might like this deal with square, but i personally dont (flame me if you like), but i really dont like anime, and I cold find much better uses off the 300 mb on my hard drive. About the thing with NVIDIA - I never heard that, but that is outrageous! So many companies are going out of their way to be standards compliant, while some companies are trying to write their own rules. This is no fair at all to competition, and should be frowned upon as a microsoft-like deal. When will companies realize that wed rather have something work on more platforms than how fancy their cross pens are on their desk? It disgusts me.

    --
    Kyle "DotCom" Lynch :: http://www.kylelynch.com
    ...I need some cheeze-its...
    1. Re:Whats up with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I'd suggest that you're making alot out of nothing! Here are some easy steps you can take!
      1. uninstall the game
      2. Don't buy a dell

      Neither of which cost you any appreciable money. Real computer people make their own computers from parts anyway, so I'd suggest your whining on slashdot is OT.

  14. great idea for selling computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Dell Preinstalling computers with FFXI is a nice idea. It will probably help assure compatibility with their machines. Both Dell and Square would benefit from the sales.

    Now only if Dell could convince them to port the game to Linux, they could have a killer game, on a killer OS!

  15. Drats, we use Compaqs at work.... by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1

    Maybe I can talk my supervisor into putting in an order in with IT for a Dell, I just need to find a clever way to justify a Dell and not something else...Hmm, let's see, Dell will offer "alternative" operating systems while Compaq does not - I can always say that I need Linux for rapid mySQL and other sophisticated-web-related acronyms that he won't understand...no wait, I don't think that FFXI is going to run in Redhat.

  16. Correct me if I am wrong... by esper_child · · Score: 1

    Didn't FFXI already fail?

    Seriously how many games like EQ are we going to see made? Why didn't square try to cut into some totally uncharted territory and offer something that no one had ever seen. They could have done so much more with the idea but they didn't. Might have worked well too if they had done something totally unique. What the game market needs is originallity not rehashes of things that have been and are being done to death.

    However show me a MMORPG of Shadowrun (done well please) and I might take interest. Shadowrun has always been a wonderful world to play in, and it is a shame that no one has really done much with it.

    1. Re:Correct me if I am wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I played Final Fantasy once. I think it was 8 or something. I don't know. It was a recent one. It was more boring than even Diablo 2. It seemed like it was aimed for the six year old demographic. The plot was too set. There wasn't really any flexibility or chance in the game. You just go from point A to point B and do whatever is required in between and you don't go forward until you've done that. The HP's and leveling up seems almost superfluous.

      One of the most boring games I have ever played.

    2. Re:Correct me if I am wrong... by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1

      Online gaming has become the new hotness. There was the era of the fighting game, the platformer, the FPS, then the rise of the MMORPG.The online success of FPSs like Halflife, Quake, and Unreal T, and the stupifying profits of Lineage (Korea), UO, and EverQuest, it was only a matter of time before every able company would begin taking their titles into the online realm. Sony is pioneering this movement with a slew of PS2 titles, Sega has ported Phantasy Star Online to the GameCube (not to mention their success with PSO in Japan on the Dreamcast), and Xbox has a bunch of titles ready to go. It's just the next big thing in gaming.

    3. Re:Correct me if I am wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm...the FF series is considered by most (including myslef) as the best rpg series ever created. why not make another?

    4. Re:Correct me if I am wrong... by esper_child · · Score: 1

      I have no problem with sequils as long as there is something new and inovative involved. The problem with what square is doing with the final fantasy series is proving that chunking out similar games over and over again with out any real inovation will get you more and more money. They are doing exactly what we need to get to stop. I have no problem if they make a new FF game if it isn't a reitteration of something hasn't or currently is being done to death.

    5. Re:Correct me if I am wrong... by nycbrujah · · Score: 1

      If there were a MMORPG of Shadowrun, I'd actually think about entering the monthly pay to play world. So far I don't see the point of paying for the game initially and then paying to play monthly. Then again nothing had jumped out and snagged my attention. Yet. Shadowrun manages to feed my techno lust and my fantasy cravings as well. The rolling handfuls of six sided dice did get kind of annoying though. I wonder if Whiz Kids would license a company to produce a Shadowrun MMORPG. A decent one.

      --
      'Pleasure is the Disease, Pain is the Cure' - Lilith
    6. Re:Correct me if I am wrong... by Vinum · · Score: 1

      Ya, I mean... drawing magic/refining items/juctions in Final Fantasy VIII was just a repackaging of the materia system from Final Fantasy VII. I swear, they never change anything. :) The level up system in Final Fantasy X was soooo similar to the one in Final Fantasy IX. Not to mention how similar the plot was between Final Fantasy IX and Final Fantasy VIII.

      On yet another serious unsarcastic point... our entire society is repackaging of something else. I mean... Doom was just a reitiration of Wolfenstein was no real innovation. I bet no one has writen an origional song since the Medieval ages. Even Elvis just got rich singing music already written by African Americans. Most of the shows on TV are just remakes of movies, which are remakes of other movies. Disney likes to release cartoons already made in Japan. We just elected a repackaged president in America, another Bush. I can't believe they made the internal space station, no innovation over Mir. And all these new medicines in the world, when will doctors give up and just making more stuff to make money? You know what is even worse?!? They released another Nirvana song, wtf? That is sooo 10 years ago. It sounds like all the other Nirvana songs back then. Microsoft the other day invented symbolic links! And Linux... they just reiterated Minix. Every story on slashdot is just a reiteration of a real story posted by a real news site which covers an event that has already happened before--because HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF.

      In short, who cares. If you like something, do it. I like Dr. Pepper, it always taste the same yet I still drink it. I wake up in the morning and enjoy seeing my daughter, who hasn't really innovated herself much since yesterday. I enjoy fresh releases of music that really offers nothing new. If you live your life looking for innovation you will not find what you are looking for. Square will release more Final Fantasy titles, and people will buy them... and have fun. :)

    7. Re:Correct me if I am wrong... by esper_child · · Score: 1

      Shadowrun has a bit of something for everyone. Todate it is the only RPG to be able to keep my attention for more than a few years. I have been playing it for about 7 or 8 years. Great game, truely awsome if there is a great GM for it too. It is a shame that the only thing to be done with the liscense for it is a poor game for the SNES and an ok game for the Genesis. It sits there not touched much if at all, yet D&D et al get a new product everyyear or so. FASA needs to market some more I guess.

    8. Re:Correct me if I am wrong... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Seriously how many games like EQ are we going to see made? Why didn't square try to cut into some totally uncharted territory and offer something that no one had ever seen.

      Well, to be fair, it is one of the first console MMORPGs, they're just porting it to the PC. There are some things that are fairly original about the title, but you'd be better served reading a review/preview of the title than getting my rehashed summary on it, since it would simply be based on those rather than actually playing the game. It *might* actually convince me to pay $10/month for a game (or whatever they're charging for monthly fees). I tried UO and EQ, but UO didn't keep my interest for more than a few days, and EQ didn't for more than a couple of weeks.

      I agree on Shadowrun, though I'd rather see an RPG with good multiplayer options than an MMORPG, just because I haven't seen an MMORPG yet that I thought was done well.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    9. Re:Correct me if I am wrong... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since MSFT bought FASA for BattleTech, isn't Shadowrun now owned by them?

  17. Lineage 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm much more excited about Lineage 2.

  18. ok, so let me guess what OS it ships with by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 1

    unless they're gonna port ff to linux, it's windows all over the world again!

    1. Re:ok, so let me guess what OS it ships with by Profe55or+Booty · · Score: 1

      no shit. what's your point?

      --
      sig - .
  19. Dude! by decipher_saint · · Score: 1, Troll

    You're getting a hit-point bonus!

    And then, at that moment there was a Final Fantasy that didn't fly off the shelves...

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:Dude! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, you're a fucking troll according to some faggot admin... which means the quality(your post) = quality(my post) HAHAHAHHA owned by faggot admins again. :] w00t.

      +5, InFormative. for shizzle.

  20. No ATI? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

    Does this mean this game won't run on an ATI or anoy other 3D card? If thats the case then thats one game I won't be able to play.

    1. Re:No ATI? by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Does nVidia have its own proprietary 3D api?
      Nope, it's pretty much DirectX or OpenGL.

      Of course it will. Probably look alot nicer on a 256 meg Radeon 9700 Pro, to boot.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:No ATI? by Zenki · · Score: 1

      Well, it's possible for the application to query the driver in either DirectX or OpenGL and get a reasonable signature that allows the application to make a really good educated guess what video card the user has installed on his machine.

      Based on this, the gaming experience is purposely changed for the user, which is evil in my opinion. Not that I care, because I think most of Square's games are just the same stuff rehashed.

    3. Re:No ATI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does nVidia have its own proprietary 3D api? Nope, it's pretty much DirectX or OpenGL.

      Oh, you're referring to Cg, nVidia's own "graphics programming language?" Gee, I wonder which manufacturer will have an extremely large lead time to market? Not exactly proprietary, but it will serve the purpose well enough.

    4. Re:No ATI? by jeremyhu · · Score: 1

      nVidia doesn't have its own 3d API, but it has propriatary extensions to OpenGL

    5. Re:No ATI? by Greebz · · Score: 1

      ... as does ATI.

      The plans to unite these features under a standard API is part of the OpenGL 2.0 spec.

  21. Dude... by shadowcabbit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...these jokes are getting old.

    But seriously, this could be a good thing and it could also be a bad thing. If FFXI gains enough popularity to generate the fanbase it needs in Japan, a US port (to PC) would be almost guaranteed. But, considering that nobody wants to pay (monthly) for FFXI after buying it, is giving it away free going to make people want to buy it? I think not. Take Everquest, for example-- you can pick up a jewel case copy for $10, a huge slash over what it was back in the day. I did this. And I stopped paying for it two months later, when I found that I don't like that style of game. If anything, it's going to get a huge fanbase for the first month or so and then everyone will quit.

    Of course, that's all just my speculation, being a typical FF fan. See sig.

    --
    "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  22. FF X was a nice comeback... by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 1

    but I mostly agree that with the exception of ff7, everything else since ff6 (US, and the greatest game ever made IMHO) has been complete and utter ass.

    1. Re:FF X was a nice comeback... by AndrewGoat · · Score: 0

      Its like this man...I tried playing Final Fantasy 8. I hated the draw system, I hated Squall because I didnt want to play an asshole, I hated how it was just another love story, I hated everything about it, it sucked. I tried Final Fantasy 9. I was pissed off. It was all the crap from their old games, thrown together in like 4 months, with a 4 year old designing the characters. Square sucks. I /WISH/ someone would realize this other than 2% of the universe.

    2. Re:FF X was a nice comeback... by Student_Tech · · Score: 1

      One probably I have had with FFX (haven't had a chance to go any further since some one borrowed and never gave back my brothers PS2...) was that it seemed really linear, kinda like an interactive story with out a lot of explor and do random stuff between the goal points. Most of the FFs I have played have some explore and do random stuff while going between points and just seemed more than an interactive story.
      ( I was almost up to Zanarkland and I didn't have the airship in my control yet if you want an idea how much I had played (using the FFX guide it seemed about 85% or more through the game). )
      I am hoping that if FFXI has an online component it might be something like Phantasy Star Online where it can be played on or offline.

      It is nice that it FFXI going to be included on the new Dells though, although I hope they won't be the minium specs for it to play decently on...

  23. Square is loosing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a long time FF fan I can honestly say that FFX is and will be my last FF adventure. Square is whoring itself out left and right (Disney, Dell, Nvidia... etc.) Not only that but the series has gone from rewarding strategy and skill to what hardware your running!?! Please.

    Well it seems that Square is soon to be following the footsteps of FF: The Spirits Within.

    Hopefully they are happy in their new hell with monkeys and pointy sticks and goatse.cx... and monkeys WITH pointy sticks wearing t-shirts of the goatse.cx guy.

    Crash and burn Square.

    1. Re:Square is loosing... by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Square's been doing this stuff forever.. Remember Super Mario RPG? Actually, that Disney one looks kind of intriguing.. Probably pick that up for 'the kids'.

      I'm just upset they're abandoning the installed FF fanbase in favor of a 'trendy' MMORPG. What made the series great was the story lines, characters, the single player experience.

      Now instead of leveling up to track down Sephiroth or defeat the Ultimate Weapon, I get to have Jimmy McNutsack in his parents basement in Iowa call me a 'big gay fag homo'.

      I swear to god, those things are just irc chatrooms with 3d avatars, and less intelligent conversation.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Square is loosing... by jgalun · · Score: 1

      I swear to god, those things are just irc chatrooms with 3d avatars, and less intelligent conversation.

      Says you, big gay fat homo! :)

      j/k, of course. Read his post before you moderate me down, please! :)

    3. Re:Square is loosing... by Maul · · Score: 2

      Agreed. While the concept of being able to have my own custom black mage running around is intriguing, I have yet to find an MMORPG that I really enjoyed and didn't require me to treat it like a part time job to advance.

      I would have rather seen another traditional FF game taking the spot of FF11. Another game like 9 would have been great. Oh well.

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    4. Re:Square is loosing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of people talking about how they won't buy another Final Fantasy game because they're all the same. Maybe Play wise, but EVERY one gets a whole new story, new characters, with a couple old ones thrown in and new graphics.

      I look at buying a new Final Fantasy game like buying a new book, that will take me a looong time to finish, and along the way I'll get to see some wacked out stuff, some funy stuff etc etc along the way...... All in all good value for the money in my eyes.

      If that's not what people are into, stop buying, it'll make it easier for me to find a copy of FF-XII on release day without a pre-order ticket.

      A.C.

  24. They understand! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It took someone long enough to understand how to deal with the MMORPG market, and it took Square to do it.

    The thing is, rpgs of this sort are -addictive-. There isn't alot of gameplay to them, never has been. (I hold this true of games like NWN and the like; you don't actually -play- the game, you -experience- it. And this is addictive. It's also why I refuse to play them anymore.)

    So what are they understanding? That 'Hey! You can give the game away for free and charge for subscription, like AOL cds!' If there's very little cost of entry, you're more likely to try it and, thus, be addicted by it. Behold, instant cash cow.

    I'm just wondering why it took so long for companies to figure this out, seeing as how I've read speculation on this crap for years...

    1. Re:They understand! by afidel · · Score: 2

      Sorry but if you are not playing NWN then you need to find a better community. I play on a fairly large PW and we have tons of people who roleplay their hearts out. Depending on your leaning between total HCR and action you have the entire spectrum from diablo alikes to a 99 server 1000+ player PW using hard core rules. I would say that any MMORPG is going to be better then single player follow the script games simply because your interaction with the other people even if they are not strict rp'rs will be more interactive then a read the script type "interaction".

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:They understand! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but you see, the community and social infrastructure is not the game. Why should I sit through a game I do not like in order to talk to the people within?

      I just despise the level treadmill and the almost complete lack of interaction to _the game_. This is why people tend to drift towards believing these games are little more than graphical chat rooms. It's because they are.

      Do not confuse the two.

    3. Re:They understand! by afidel · · Score: 2

      level treadmill, hardly. I have not progressed past level 5 despite playing a couple dozen hours a week for the last couple weeks. The game is VERY interactive, between the DM's, questing, things like the tradeskills system which allow you to do something other then hack and slash etc the world I play in is like a small community. If you believe that talking to a script in a game like the Final Fantasy series is better then talking to live humans playing their characters then I guess there isn't much that NWN can do for you, but I think most people prefer actual intelligence to be behind the sprites they are interacting with =)

      p.s. Did I mention that the world I play in has removed almost everything Bioware put into the game from the default merchants to the way that experience is gained? We haven't gone as far as the HCR folks because we believe that game fun should come before following the DnD 3'rd edition rules to the letter, but we lean much more towards them then towards Biowares Diablo wannabe)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:They understand! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where on earth did I say final fantasy is a great, in-depth game to play? Tell me. The games are more like interactive books these days than games. (Admittedly, NES/SNES era ones actually had a game attached that was moderately fun.) I also would not consider NWN's single player to be all that far off from that, so no use trying to point fingers -there-. Sidequests do not an interesting game make.

      Now, I'm just going to sit here and rant. I do not like how PC RPGs work(though Morrowind is definitely a step in the right direction), and this pretty much encompasses the entire MMORPG spectrum. Now, why is this? It's because I differentiate between playing the game, and experiencing the game.

      As far as playing the game goes, which I define as the actions a player takes in order to accomplish things, I think it's, quite frankly, rubbish. Combat is, for all intents and purposes, a statistic fight with preparation thrown in. I've played far, far too many of these things over time to believe that there's a great deal of strategy. (This is an area where I will give console rpgs points, though mostly older ones) And yes, slow leveling is still a level treadmill, for it affects how you play the game. It's just that you spend more time with your character at a specific level, getting to know it a bit better.

      Now, here's where we differ. The main thing you see in these games is the human, social contact. Other players, communities, and gameplay modifications to enhance these. I see these things as a good thing. But they don't make up for a bad game!

      This holds true for non-computerized RPGs as well. D&D is a bad game. Period. I'm not even going to get into ranting about _that_. It'd take too long.

      If you look at it from a playing stance, you basically end up with a munchkin-gamer's fantasy. And nobody wants that. (I'm a bit of a GURPS fan myself, anyway) But, as a social _setting_ and ruleset for making that setting make sense, it is actually very good.

      The main thing here is whether you look at games as a social thing, or as a playing thing. If you look at NWN as a social game, then I have to admit that yeah, it is quite good. But as far as playing goes? I'll pass.

      Which is the point in the first place; MMORPGs and most PC rpgs don't do anything for me because their gameplay is, quite frankly, crap. The only way they make up for it is in the social atmosphere, and I can't stomach the stupidity of the game long enough to put up with it. I don't even like most MMOs because your average player is a munchkin non-RPing weenie. (Or someone who takes it way, way, way too seriously.)

      Strict RP servers are not too bad, but if you do that, then where does the game go? The allure is the social nature of it, and what game there is changes to accomodate the RP.

      Anyway, I'm very tired right now and I don't feel like logging in, but my email is lowen@sandwich.net if you want this to continue...

  25. Reformat, reinstall. by Lendrick · · Score: 2

    Your best bet is to borrow an OS install disc from one of your friends and install the OS again from scratch.

    1. Re:Reformat, reinstall. by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be easier to just highlight "Final Fantasy XI" in "Add/Remove Programs" and then hit the 'OK' button?

    2. Re:Reformat, reinstall. by Lendrick · · Score: 2

      Sure, if you just want to remove FFXI. For some of the other bundled crap, though, you either need to reformat or get a priest.

  26. I want a recompiled FF7 by man_ls · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I want to be able to play FF7 on my new PC.

    There would be such a massive market if they released a patch, or released a remastered version of the game (updated graphics, perhaps?) that it would easily cover it's own production costs.

    1. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1
      Even though most people my age (23) were not into role playing games when it hit, I would love to see an update of the first Final Fantasy for the NES. I would say update the graphics, add more items, update the interface, and redo the combat screens (anyone else remember cranking up the dialogue speed and just holding down A battle after battle?). If they decided to do this on the GameBoy Advance and release it for 23 bucks, they would sell a bajillion.

      I have very fond memories of me and my pal sneaking back into the den at 3 in the morning to find the air ship or hunt down the rat tail.....memories.

    2. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by jgkastra · · Score: 1

      There was a PC version of FFVII ported by Eidos for the Windows PC. It works fine on older video cards (Voodoo2), but I have heard of problems with newer ones.

      I had forgotten how fun this game is. Time to fire up WINE...

    3. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      It's not exactly what you're thinking of, but PS1 (remake) versions of FF1 and FF2 are confirmed for release in Japan last I knew. Can't imagine it'll be too long before an english version appears :)

    4. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did remake FF1, on the wonderswan color. Plenty of info here. The system never made it state-side, so it's a bit obscure. Though if you really wanted to I bet you could find an emulator, I've never bothered though.

      As anothe rposter mentioned, I believe it's getting a bit more souped up and making its way to the PS1. Fear.

    5. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by ChronosX · · Score: 1

      Square actually did issue a full remake of the original Final Fantasy 1 and 2, with 3 coming soon (maybe recently released??). The catch is that they are only available in Japanese, and only available for a handheld game system called the WonderSwan Color, made by Bandai and only sold in Asia. Many importers carry these little beauties, but playing imported RPGs is impossible unless you're proficient in Japanese.

      I'm also refering to the Japanese FF numbering system... FF2 and FF3 were only released for the Japanese Famicom system (aka the NES). FF1-3 on the WonderSwan feature new SNES quality graphics and greatly improved battle systems.

      I do believe that the previously mentioned PSOne release is a port of those remakes. Now that Square is on speaking terms with Nintendo again, perhaps we'll see them ported to GameBoy Advance as well. Start writing to Square.

      (Before someone jumps in and "corrects" me, I should mention that FF4, known as FF2 in the US, has also been ported to the WonderSwan. It came out before the FF3 port. I assume this is because new graphics and whatnot were not required.)

    6. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by Cecil · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can confirm that it doesn't work on newer cards (GeForce2+ and Radeon 7500+), because it claims to require 8-bit paletted textures. Which apparently newer cards don't support.

      It will still run in software mode, but it seems to crash a lot anyway (under Win2000, at least). I still insist that it's one of the best console to PC ports I've seen in a long time, in terms of preserving the 'feel' of the game, and the 'feel' of the console. (Particularily when using a good gamepad, like the Logitech Wingman series)

      Unfortunately it really is showing its age. I can't really blame it, considering it is just a port, but I'd love to see a patched version that works on newer systems.

    7. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by amccall · · Score: 2

      Install the patch for the TNT2/Geforce. It will allow the game to work on any newer video card. I've played through the whole thing with a Radeon with no problems. (It tooks some playing around with the settings though...)

      --
      ------ 24.5% slashdot pure
    8. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by lingqi · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I want to be able to play FF7 on my new PC.

      yeah and for fsck's sake re-do the game so you can bring Aeris back to life for the ending, man... I swear there is this entire generation of gamers who are scarred because of it.

      granted, some would say that it was that part that made it one of the most memorable games ever, but still! huge emotional (?) scar vs. memorable game... i'd choose over happy memory anyday, kay?

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    9. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by Artana+Niveus+Corvum · · Score: 1

      You know, I hear this complaint a lot... that FFVII for the PC doesn't run on win2k correctly or only runs in software mode or whatever... I've not had this experience...it runs on my win2k machine with a Geforce4 Ti card just splendidly..hardware mode and all (it also works under XP too on the same machine) . Wish I knew what I did to make it work, don't think that I did anything. hmmmm, dang

      --
      -----------------------------------------
      Remove the Greed which plagues mankind.
    10. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by axolotl_farmer · · Score: 1

      You could try running the PSX version in an emulator like epsxe. Other than that you only need a playstation bios and the old CDs. The backgrounds will still be in PSX resolution, but the polyogons will be rendered by hardware in any resoultion you want!

    11. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a patch available here. Just install it over a "normal" FF7-PC and it should work with newer cards :)

    12. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by CrazyDuke · · Score: 2

      Here ya go:
      FF1
      FF2

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    13. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by CrazyDuke · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that really fucked me up...

      On the plus side, you can see Aeris again in FFT.

      BTW: anyone know if an english version of the story it was based off of is available. (The name of it is in the FF7 end credits.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    14. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by Tofuhead · · Score: 1

      If your Geforce works with full HW acceleration, you probably applied the TNT update from Eidos. If FF7PC itself works perfectly fine on w2k/wxp (including the chocobo races), you probably installed the unofficial (non-Eidos) w2k patch.

      If you haven't applied the w2k patch and aren't seeing problems, you probably either haven't gotten to Gold Saucer yet, or you are playing with saved game files from after the mandatory race, and haven't gone back to race again.

      < tofuhead >

      --
      It is still the dark of night.
    15. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by Genom · · Score: 2

      On the plus side, you can see Aeris again in FFT. ...and again in Kingdom Hearts. Haven't played it too much yet, but from the looks of things, Sephi's in it too (check out the latest commercial)...wonder if we'll get a re-enactment of the scene that made my fiancee quit playing FF7 for about a month...

    16. Re:I want a recompiled FF7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you _didn't_ see her open her eyes at the end, right after the white flash when the Meteor, Holy and Lifestream meet each other?

      Consensus is - Holy brought her back to life, she's in the church where you found her, that's where everyone's going to see her (assuming Holy didn't think humans were scum-suckers and wipe them out too, which is possible given the Mako reactor thing).

      And hey - in any case, she knew what the deal was, even if you didn't, and she chose it. Iron will under that pretty pink dress.

      A shame that when Square try and pull the same "sacrifice" thing in FFX, they bodge it by making summoner-dudette spineless, whiny and, well, posh, and the whole damn game depressive and lounging on that one sacrifice thing. Yawn. I really didn't enjoy that one as much as 6 (damn good), 7 (also damn good), 8 (controversial but I kinda like it) and 9 (oldschool and quite endearing). (Haven't finished 4, 5, can't stomach the repetition of 1.)

      Anyway.

  27. Nvidia strongarming... *sigh* by supabeast! · · Score: 2

    Does anyone else remember when the really great thing about an Nvidia card was incredible performance at great a great price, and not gimmicks?

    1. Re:Nvidia strongarming... *sigh* by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      Nature of the beast I'm afraid.

      In a perfect world we'd have open-source graphics designs available. So shopping for a video card might go like this:

      1) Load up OS-designs.org
      2) Search the graphics sub-section for a type of design that fits your needs.
      3) Upload the design to a fab shop in Korea or Taiwan.
      4) Give them your credit card number/address.
      5) 2 weeks later get your graphics card in the mail.

      Something tells me we're not quite there yet.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    2. Re:Nvidia strongarming... *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nVidia has been a dirty market player from day one.

      They downplayed the godawful image quality of the Riva 128.

      They partnered with MS to further promote DirectX in an attempt to drive out Glide. They are the big player at the MS-farm 3d conferences/shows.

      They started the hype game that 3dfx was ultimately drawn into by announcing the specs for the TNT2 as the original TNT (the TNT2 was basically a TNT with a better fab process, higher clock speeds, faster RAM).

      Anyone who's after the 'glory days' of nVidia should pull their heads out of their asses and realize that nVidia went into a hard market that was already dominated by a strong player and beat them, first by politics, them by tech.

    3. Re:Nvidia strongarming... *sigh* by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      the really great thing about an Nvidia card was incredible performance at great a great price, and not gimmicks?

      You mean like:
      -32-bit colour
      -hardware T&L ('GPU')
      -DirectX extensions
      -pixel shaders
      -FSAA
      -implementing AGP4x/8x etc before any motherboards supported it
      -The MX line and it's predecessors
      -releasing cards that are essentially the previous card at higher speeds simply to push the release cycle

      Eventually they all resulted in better performance and a more competetive environment, but most of them were nothing more than hype and marketing for at least 1 generation of cards. Usually the first release with a new feature couldn't perform well with that feature enabled, or the feature wasn't implemented in a single game until at least one more release of cards with that feature.

      Their cards still give great performance for the price, but now ATI's competetive and nVidia has to rely more on their reputation and drivers during certain parts of the release cycle. Making deals with various developers and manufacturers helps them with the reputation side (and could hurt them in some ways), just as it does for ATI. Of course, nVidia mostly brought the competition with ATI on themselves by targetting ATI's historically dominated market: OEM sales. ATI didn't even start producing competetive 3d cards until nVidia started taking business from them in that segment with the MX and nForce lines.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  28. Random numbers strike again by Jay+Carlson · · Score: 1, Troll
    Ugh.

    Is it just me, or did anybody else see this exact story come out of the random Slashdot story generator?

  29. missing the point by WinPimp2K · · Score: 1

    they are saying that there are some parts of the game you will not be allowed to play if you don't have the GF4 installed.
    Being unfamiliar with the game, lets just guess that there will be a quest for some semi-uberweapon, but if you have a Radeon 9700,for instance, you will be unable to equip it or something equally sucky

    --

    You either believe in rational thought or you don't
    1. Re:missing the point by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Ummm...No?

      Do you have any actual proof to back up this assertion?

      From all i've seen, the only effect will be on graphics, not gameplay.

  30. Counter-proposal by parliboy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why don't they port FFIX and FFX first. And I mean really make an effort to port it -- I don't want to have to kick in anti-aliasing x3 to enjoy the game.

    What? Don't think it'll sell? So quit trying to port XI.

    --
    "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    1. Re:Counter-proposal by stratjakt · · Score: 2

      They aren't MMORPGs! The latest buzzword, they're riding the wave, thinking outside of the box, surfing the curve, flipping the bird, and doing other jingoistic marketing things.

      You can emulate all the originals nicely on the PC. And the ports of 7 & 8 didn't sell well, AFAIK.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Counter-proposal by rizawbone · · Score: 1
      What? Don't think it'll sell? So quit trying to port XI.

      you know you're really short on points when you have conversations with the "invisible developers".

    3. Re:Counter-proposal by esper_child · · Score: 1

      prohaps they should have picked ones that didn't ride completely on graphics if they wanted it to sell well. Oh yeah I forgot shiney is what sells these days, so I don't know why these didn't sell well. Prohaps anyone who wanted to play the game already had it on the gamesystem it was ment for. BTW, the controls on FFVII for the PC were lacking, doesn't play very well in my opinion without a control pad to bind everything too.

    4. Re:Counter-proposal by parliboy · · Score: 1

      Nah, I've been maxed out for months. I'm just a karma whore.

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    5. Re:Counter-proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no such thing as anti-aliasing x3.

    6. Re:Counter-proposal by parliboy · · Score: 1

      Tell that to my old GForce2 (old Gforce2? I am addicted to tech). It called it x3, and in fact I had to run it at that, and not x2 or x4, just because FF8 for the PC had a bug with that card otherwise. Who am I to argue?

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    7. Re:Counter-proposal by Junta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, for one, I think 7 and 8 set the precedent that it wasn't that valuable of a franchise for porting to PC as single player games (at least, not after the PS versions are out for months before PC, same problem as Loki).
      Now, two factors are diffent. One, this is MMORPG, a genre that has proven itself to have worked best on the PC platform in the past. Sure, there have been console MMORPG's like PSO, but nothing so widely successful as Everquest, for example. Also, as an MMORPG, it is absolutely critical for its sucess to have as rapid growth of users as possible. With standalone games, the overall sales are not affected so much by how many people get it as soon as possible, but the quality of a MMORPG is dependent on a large user base, so if it starts slow, it would hamper later sales badly.

      Secondly, this will be a simultaneous release. Unlke the PC ports, people can immediately pick their favorite, most convenient platform without suffering a time penalty, so the sales figures will more accurately and fairly reflect the viability of Square games on the PC versus Playstation. This may be important to show that PC ports are not a waste and bring efforts to port FFXII immediately.

      Of course, in my opinion, FFXI has a high probability of failure. Even if executed perfectly on technical terms, the Final Fantasy series fanbase is not necessarily big on MMORPG. I know I like standalone games better, because playing MMORPGs put certain pressures on me that I don't want to deal with. I don't feel like I can play at my own pace, sometimes for the best affect I have to coordinate my playtime with other, and I like a cohesive story that comes to some sort of definitive close. Those differences between traditional FF and MMORPG may cause FFXI to fail, if MMORPG and standalone are sufficiently exclusive communities. I know several people who plan to skip XI because they have no love of MMORPG, and also know several MMORPG players who aren't impressed in the least bit by the name 'Final Fantasy'. Of course, this is only among the people I know, so I have no idea what the true picture is..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    8. Re:Counter-proposal by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      The port of FFVII did pretty well, especially since they revamped the graphics and redid the translation. FFVIII was almost a straight port, and didn't work well on nVidia cards at a time when 3dfx was pretty much dying. They eventually fixed most of the nVidia problems (portions of the cut-scenes were upside down last time I tried to play it, ie the backgrounds would be upside down and the characters right-side-up, or vice-versa), but the graphics were roughly the same as the PSX version. Plus FFVIII generally didn't sell as well as FFVII on the console, either, IIRC.

      I would like the see a port of FFIX, if just to ditch the 'jaggies' in the PSX version, but I'm just as happy playing all of them on the PS2. In fact, I'd just like to be able to find the releases of IV-VI and see I-III on the PSX/2.

      As for FFXI, my only question is does the PC version play online with people using the PS2 version?

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    9. Re:Counter-proposal by delus10n0 · · Score: 2

      And the ports of 7 & 8 didn't sell well, AFAIK

      Probably because they were shoddy ports and loaded with bugs. I still have never been able to play through my copies of FF7 and FF8 on the PC. FF7 had issues with the movies playing upside down and the video not syncing with the audio.. and FF8 has issues with pretty much any video card out there (I've tried a Rage Pro, Radeon, and GeForce2/3).. the graphics all show up as "tiles". Not even the patch (which is supposed to fix the tiles) fixes the problem.

      Pretty lame. I believe FFXI's PC port will be handled by Square themselves, so maybe this time they'll get it right.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    10. Re:Counter-proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. These cards anti-alias by tiling and supersampling (in hardware, naturally), and they can do that easily by any integral multiplier. They just prefer to do it by powers of two because, well, that's just neater and fits their hardware better because the divisors are shifts.

      x2 supersampling buys you 4 subpixels, x4 superasmpling buys you 16 subpixels. x3 supersampling would buy you 9 subpixels (3 squared).

      x16 supersampling, if done anisotropically (if not, you'll get keftale interference patterns although they will likely be invisible, being only 1 grey level apart), will give you _perfect_ results in 24-bit colour, as at that point there will be 256 subpixels per pixel, each one of which can make a maximum difference to the pixel of 1 grey level - yes, you could subpixel on that - MS's ClearType font renderer does, as indeed did some graphic tricks on much older things - but that runs the risk of tinting unless you understand the display structure, and the display structure corresponds well and regularly to the pixels (LCDs do, RGB screens occasionally do okay).

      The GeForce 2 had an option which newer cards label correctly - it's called QuinCunx, which is a trademark I believe, and nVidia have a pattern on it. I don't know the details, and I can't be bothered to look (because we don't have the patent licence and in any case it probably wouldn't be useful for us), but I wouldn't be shocked if it calculated five subpixels in an X pattern, which would improve the quality quite a bit beyond x2 (as it would take account of the "middle" of the pixel and thus near-diagonals would improve), but less than x4, with a performance rather closer to x2, assuming dedicated hardware, which of course it has.

      I am not a graphics card _designer_, but my PS2 graphics engine uses tiled clipped rendering, the texture scaler, and some idle DMA (it loves DMA) to antialias its graphics x16 in a fashion so appropriately interleaved fashion, that the texture cache loves me. Yes, there are 1 gl keftales still, and larger keftales will survive, because the texture mapping is isotropic, but that's what the VU and some low pass filter/gradient matrices are for - blurring the bits that would otherwise keftale, and if you can see one grey level, I want to borrow your RGB monitor. And it only draws lines that are being displayed next field too, which keeps the vram usage way down (first saw that rather nifty hack on Chrono Cross' status/menu screen, blew my mind).

      (All that, and the lens flares still look like bloody Photoshop. I really need to fix the glint overtextures, make them much more subtle, and smaller so they don't eat all the cache - oughtn't matter, they'll interpolate well, until the vectors blend in... <sigh> am I paying too much attention to small details here?)

      Right! Less slack, more shininess. Where's the Blue Mountain?

  31. Wow! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2, Funny
    What hoars!

    Before you know it every Dell box will come with Windows pre-installed. Oh, wait...

    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to quote Einstein, learn how to fscking spell! The word you were looking for is whores.

  32. Square hasn't produced anything of worth lately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do we care about this again?
    Does this mean my whole desktop will be a Full Motion Video now? What ever happened to basic gameplay in Square games. They also lost the elements in creating games with replayability like Secret of Mana. Dell would be best to avoid anything to do with Square.

    My two Gil

  33. Re:Square sucks anymore... by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

    I wish Square would do something BESIDES put out the same game every year or so. They havent done anything original or compelling since Final Fantasy 7

    I don't think you have the right to accuse them of this. While they've rehashed the same genre over and over, they did put thier hearts into making Final Fantasy the Movie. It didn't do too well in the box office, so now they're back to making games.

    They tried branching out, and it didn't work out as well as they had hoped. Give them some credit, they tried.

    --
    The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
  34. Good idea, bad idea. by AnamanFan · · Score: 2

    Good idea:
    Striking a business deal to provide your game on a large customer base.
    [Please note that I say this for games, not utilities or operating systems]

    Bad idea:
    Requiring your game to only be 'optimized' on a specific company's chip-set.

    --
    AnamanFan - Trying to find the Truth, one post at a time.
  35. You guys are pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Listen, I will make this point once, so listen up. I know you guys are regular Linux nuts, but when it comes to games, you obviously don't have a clue.

    The reason Square is making so many 'exclusive' deals with Final Fantasy XI is because they want this product to be a success. MMORPGs, whether the cheap ****s who won't and never will float the monthly fee will admit it, are quit good and successful games. If this is a quality MMORPG, Square could have themselves a big money maker on their hands. Not only that, but an MMORPG that is insanely popular is a great way to get consumers interested in your other console games. Even better, its a good way to convince them to buy the console where near all Square games live.
    ( Exception being for portable Squaresoft games. No portable Sony system. )

    Square knows it needs as many people playing its MMO as possible. More subscriptions means more monthly cash, more 'friends' of possible subscribers online, etc. . They don't want barriers such as 'which gaming system you prefer' to stand in the way of addicting you to their game. ( especially with that nice monthly fee ;) )

    Basically, this story means that a great number of people will play this game purely because it comes with their new Dell computer. It ensures a greater online gaming population of players, and more subscriptions for Square. Its a smooth move.

    1. Re:You guys are pathetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? I don't understand why you were reacting so strongly to "port to Linux please" comments. It's not an unreasonable request.

      I don't think anyone disagrees that pre-bundling a FF game with Dell machines is a bad move on Square's part, given that it's a subscription game and they must be clawing for money after the Final Fantasy movie bombed and nearly took the entire company with it.

      The points disliked are:

      (1) More "bundled" shit on the desktop of Dell machines by default. Coupled with the "recovery disk" attitude of most manufacturers, it's becoming difficult to obtain a completely fresh, uncluttered install of Windows - particularly for newbies who don't know, for example, that the AOL icon can be removed. You just paid $2000 for a new computer - and you can't remove the commercials from the desktop? WTF?

      (2) Specific features only enabled on GEForce 4 cards. This might be a good idea for nVIDIA, but for Square it's retarded. Not only because it changes the game experience for a proportion of the user base (increasing possible technical support costs, etc), but also because of the resentment it builds from users who *don't* have a GEForce - even if it's slower and less capable than the hardware they have.

      And for today's advertisement wary gamers, Squaresoft comes off looking greedy - not benevolent - in the eyes of the current fans.

  36. Obligatory Business Model Post by gleffler · · Score: 1

    1. Give away someone else's software with your new computers, with a monthly fee that doesn't go to you, but in fact goes to someone else.
    2. ????????
    3. Profit!!

    1. Re:Obligatory Business Model Post by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      lets see if I can help:

      1. Give away someone else's software with your new computers, with a monthly fee that doesn't go to you, but in fact goes to someone else.
      2. Receive a cut of each of the user's monthly fees.
      3. Profit!!

      Now please shut the FUCK up until you have something funny to say.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    2. Re:Obligatory Business Model Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note the "Obligatory" legend in the parent post. It's almost as if the post were composed as a labor of love, and to stifle the thousand other less-imaginative responses that would appear. Give the guy a break. No, it's not funny anymore, but it's going to be around for a while.

  37. Re:Square sucks anymore... by mao+che+minh · · Score: 1

    Honestly, you can't expect a company to turn their nose up to licensing offers ($$$) just to honor some "no sell out" philosiphy. The phrase "sell out" is not in the vocabulary of marketing people. Partnering with every company that wants a piece of the action might rub the hardcore fans the wrong way, but it makes Square millions.

  38. nVidia Isn't Appearing So Virtuous Anymore... by chip2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Heh. I remember back when nVidia support was in the minority and 3dfx was 'the' graphics card chip. nVidia didn't use any sick tactics back then: their business practice was clean. It seems that has changed; though I suppose Intel was that way once, too.

    It's a lesson in monopoly. You keep a company at bay, balanced by another and they BOTH behave and keep prices down. You leave one alone, and prices go up, service goes down, and the customer gets screwed.

    I can only hope ATI does well with the latest Radeon Pro (quite highly rated from what I've seen). I'm disgusted with nVidia. This kind of business practice makes me think I should never buy an nVidia card again. Some areas only playable if you buy a ridiculously expensive card? It's incredible what capitalism gives us, just incredible.

    --

    Logic is the ultimate device.
    1. Re:nVidia Isn't Appearing So Virtuous Anymore... by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      This is no good. I just got a spam from ATI this morning. I emailed them back (it was an @ati.com address) and said I hate spam, and I'll make sure to purchase my next card from nvidia.

    2. Re:nVidia Isn't Appearing So Virtuous Anymore... by chip2000 · · Score: 1

      Would you rather have rich monopolies teaming up against the user (in effect) or some spam from ATI (still struggling I might add -- nVidia has a LARGE market share)?

      --

      Logic is the ultimate device.
    3. Re:nVidia Isn't Appearing So Virtuous Anymore... by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      Well, I sent the email before I read the article here. Good question though. Do you want your vendor stealing from you openly, or behind your back?

    4. Re:nVidia Isn't Appearing So Virtuous Anymore... by Billobob · · Score: 0

      Uh, and just how do you know Square didnt come to nvidia and ask for a deal so they could earn some extra cash? To me it looks like NVidia is fine (please, nvidia != 3dfx, its getting old), and Square is the one that is taking drastic measures.

      --
      If you have to ask, you'll never know.
  39. nVidia=3dfx? by puppetman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We just saw a story on the collapse of 3dfx. One thing the story didn't mention was Glide, and 3dfx pushing it down the throats of game developers to try to get a monopoly on the market. Thank God for John Carmack, Id Software, and OpenGL.

    Now nVidia is doing the following: "This comes on the heels of another story involving Square partnering with nVidia, in which certain aspects/details in Final Fantasy XI will only be able to be accomplished with a geForce4 card"

    Now a geForce4 is a nice card, but the ATI 9700 is the only card that fully supports DirectX 9. You would think the 9700 would be better for Final Fantasy.

    There is probably a chunk of code that says,

    if (card_manufacturer = nVidia)
    {
    frame_rate=fast;
    colors=vibrant;
    special_effects=on;
    }

    It seems like nVidia is going the 3dfx route. Too bad; competition in the graphics card market is good for the consumer.

    1. Re:nVidia=3dfx? by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      The reason it (the story) didn't mention Glide was the whole piece was a whine trying to blame management for 3dfx's failure - when it was pretty clear that the technical teams were consistenly failing to deliver.

    2. Re:nVidia=3dfx? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      It would be less subtle then that

      texture_mapper = hyper-23-stage-8-port-texture_mapper_that_only_nvi dia_has;

      light_mapping = double-precision-14-source-phong-shading;

      vertext_shader = GHZ_GPU|DBL_PREC|NVONLY;

      if (above == fails) {
      emulate_very_slowly();
      }

      That way they can claim the game needs some super-duper feature that only the Nv chipset has and not be guilty of actually putting a label

      if (chip == Nv) { play_goodly(); } else { play_like_pirated_copy_of_tribes_2(); }

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:nVidia=3dfx? by grasshoppah · · Score: 1

      //if (card_manufacturer = nVidia) //{ // frame_rate=fast; // colors=vibrant; // special_effects=on; //}

      only if you want an error. we need to test if (card_manufacturer == nVidia)

    4. Re:nVidia=3dfx? by LordZardoz · · Score: 2

      Actually, the direction of the interaction is not the same. NVidia is not telling a developer ot use only its tech and provide crippleware for other cards. In this instance, a Developer is approaching the Hardware manufacturer.

      Also, Square has become more concerned with making Pretty Games then making Good Games (at least since FF7). I am sure that if ATI was the recognized leader in Graphics technology in PC circles, they would have approached ATI instead.

      END COMMUNICATION

    5. Re:nVidia=3dfx? by cobar · · Score: 2

      Glide got pushed after glQuake came out. It was basically glQuake that sold the original generation of voodoo cards. All the other games that came out at the time took advantage of the install base that Quake generated and targetted Glide because 3dfx was the only company with a 3D accelerator on the market. At the time I got my Voodoo 1, there were only like 3 games that used it including Quake. The other thing to remember is that Glide worked in DOS as the last of the DOS mode games were coming out.

      Later, as Direct3D got better and there started to be useful 3d accelerators like the Riva and TNT, companies started writing multiple renderers for both Glide and Direct3D. That was a small part of what killed 3dfx - their drivers for everything other than Glide sucked. They took a long time to get multitexture support in D3D (which gave a 100% boost in games that supported it), and even longer (post-Voodoo 3 launch) to get a full OpenGL driver out the door which helped some games and the professional market.

      Potentially, this game may work on some other more advanced card further down the line. I guess we won't know till somebody hacks the game and tries to enable the feature on a Radeon. Then again, the Geforce 4 uses the same architecture as the Geforce 3 so they're probably lying.

    6. Re:nVidia=3dfx? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as nVidia bought the 3dfx IP and took on many if not all of their support staff this would seem on the surface to be partly true.

      However as someone who works on graphics cards compatibility for games I can say easily that it is often the case that different features and effects are disabled on different cards because they simply don't work. This can be either because the card doesn't support the feature being used or combinations of features being used or because the card or drivers work in a way that is different from the ones effects were developed on and so even though the features appear to be there they just don't work.

      Now most people in these threads seem to be saying 'what about the 9700'. Well it's a very nice card, I'm running it now and it is in a different class to the GeForce 4, however wait for the next chipset from nVidia to see what it'll really be competing with.

      Also I notice that everyone here is saying 'what about my poor Radeon'. Well quite simply tough. If you want a system that is garunteed to run your games exactly the same as everyone else and to be fully optimised for then go buy a console. There is plenty of really good ones - the XBox with nVidia gfx, the Gamecube with ATI gfx and the PS2 with the emotion engine. Also what about the people who have the new matrox parhelion cards - they're fine cards and the drivers appear to be at least as stable as the ATI ones, why are they dissmissed. Not to mention the forthcoming cards from Trident and 3Dlabs. Yup you see it's not just the one/two horse race that is being dicussed, there is no all defining monopoly and there is an open marketplace that does benefit the consumer. Just look at how the market has evolved rescently.

      Finally why shouldn't nVidia use it's PR and marketing muscle, which after all that is what this is - its just marketing hype coordinated between 3 different companies each hoping to increace their brand standing.

      P.S. Didn't Carmack help make 3dfx the graphics vendor of choice, not the other way around. After all the only reason people were buying 3dfx was to run quake, which was at the time optimised to work best with those cards because - they had the biggest installed market share and you try to please most of the people most of the time.

    7. Re:nVidia=3dfx? by non · · Score: 1

      for starters your code snippet assigns the value of nvidia to card_manufacturer, so if it was coded like that, ALL cards would be considered nVidia.

      while i agree with your basic point about competition, you seem to be overlooking some facts. you're praising ATI for DirectX 9 support? why? talk about trying to get a monopoly on a market. as far as the radeon being a superior card, that it may be, in a laboratory. but when you put the card in a number of different machines running a number of different OS, its the interface to that hardware that really matters. and there's no doubt that nVidia make the best drivers. i could include a veritable litany of praise for their drivers, both from engineers who write drivers for OS, as well as game developers (including the famous mr carmack).

      don't you think that as soon as radeon can they'll find some game company to produce a game that exploits the features in their chipset?

      its a tit-for-tat game, but graphics hardware is not an easy way to make a living.

      --
      ...vividly encapsulates that post-Watergate/pre-punk/coked-up moment when you could trust no one, least of all yourself.
    8. Re:nVidia=3dfx? by SageLikeFool · · Score: 1
      I am not going to worry about Nvidia going the way of 3DFX until they buyout or merger with a board manufacturer (like 3DFX did with STB).

      It is one thing to strategically partner with a company to have the support your stuff, it is another to alienate your 2nd party board makers so that they turn to your competitor for sales (Like 3DFX did to Creative Labs and others).

      On top of that Nvidia isn't exactly falling behind technology wise. ATI may be keeping up, but there is room for both of them in the market.

    9. Re:nVidia=3dfx? by The_Shadows · · Score: 2

      I, personally, haven't paid attention to FFXI's (proposed) release date. Whatever is announced is probably BS anyway.

      My point is that by the time it's out, the GF5 could well be out. The card will, doubtless, tear up the Radeon 9700. Now, I've seen the Radeon in action, and it really can tear up any other card. The GF4 can't hold a candle to it.

      My point is that now that ATI looks to be serious about graphics again, we're going to see quite the fight between them and nVidia. The cards are going to keep going back an forth. One company will gain an edge, retain it for awhile, and then the other will make a come-back.

      It's not a huge stretch to figure this out.

      It honestly doesn't make sense to optimize for any one platform / card. It makes sense to optimize the hell out the entire game. Sweet merciful crap, look at UT2003. That game/engine is optimized.

      The cards don't make a lick of differnce. The newest will usually beat the latest from the other guy, especially now that ATI is being a more serious threat. DX9 doesn't matter that much. NV30 (the GF5) will have that too.

  40. Is this a good thing or bad thing? by higuy48 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a mixed blessing. On the one hand, Dell is offering pre-installed games (albeit with only one choice). This increases the number of people with the game, and we all know that when your friends tell you to play something, you should give in to peer pressure. On the other hand, this is just another app that the common computer user will never figure out. They'll probably try to do a straight delete of the game and accidentally delete their important documents in the process (so goes the way of Windows). You know, maybe if these people read Slashdot, they would instantly become intelligent and open-minded.

    --
    And now, for a sig that's a complete copout.
    1. Re:Is this a good thing or bad thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      open minded.?!

      ahem.. wanna test that statement try posting something vaguely anti-linux (with out having your facts perfectly straight)

      actually nevermind

    2. Re:Is this a good thing or bad thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's this:

      GNU/Linux sucks at just about everything, especially user interface!

  41. Re:Square sucks anymore... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

    Approps. page-bottom quote tonight-

    "If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. -- W.E. Hickson "

  42. Re:Square sucks anymore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't call a Final Fantasy movie 'branching out'.

    What I'd like to see is Square get into roleplaying games. No, not what they've mislabeled as roleplaying*, actual roleplaying games.

    True, roleplaying is quite dependant on the imagination of the player, but what with Square's penchant for graphic beauty (I swear, if they and Carmack ever team up, we'll have true lifelike games!), it might bring the vast majority of people who lack an imagination into roleplaying.

    * Roleplaying is not, "I get level, kill monster, win the game! A winner is me!" Nor is it sitting there and clicking on the B button and listening to preformatted text. There's a reason behind the world roleplaying, and that reason is that there is a role to be played. Call games like Final Fantasy what you will (Interactive stories, etc.), but they are most certainly not roleplaying.

  43. This is strange by thelinuxking · · Score: 2

    I find this to be a puzzling move by Square to have aspects/details that only run on a Geforce4. The XBOX basically has a custom Geforce 4 chipset, which obviously is made by NVIDIA. I don't understand why they would target such a chipset on computers, and not the XBOX while they are at it. Maybe Sony won't let them...

    1. Re:This is strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, simply, they don't think an xbox version is worth the effort. PS2 has market penetration, while PCs have a successful track record with this type of game. xbox has neither.

  44. Is partnering related to SEX? by Rufus211 · · Score: 1

    From jargon file:

    SEX /seks/

    [Sun Users' Group & elsewhere] n. 1. Software EXchange. A technique invented by the blue-green algae hundreds of millions of years ago to speed up their evolution, which had been terribly slow up until then. Today, SEX parties are popular among hackers and others (of course, these are no longer limited to exchanges of genetic software). In general, SEX parties are a Good Thing, but unprotected SEX can propagate a virus. See also pubic directory.

  45. Sucks? Pish. by pla · · Score: 2

    While they've rehashed the same genre over and over, they did put thier hearts into making Final Fantasy the Movie [imdb.com]. It didn't do too well in the box office, so now they're back to making games.

    Damn, do I count as the only person on Earth who actually liked "Spirits Within?"

    I mean, it had a decent plot (even if large portions of it did drew heavily from the games IV/II, VI/III, and VII), the graphics made for amazing eye-candy (good enough CGI to "forget" it counted as an animated movie after the first fifteen minutes), and a reasonably consistent game (er, movie) world.

    I really suspect it flopped only due to the same anti-animation prejudice American audiences have against anime in general. I don't know a single person who said they hated it - But at the same time, I don't know more than two or three people who actually saw it.

  46. What does this mean for the PS2 Version? by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 1

    This game is one of only two reasons I'll be buying a PS2 (the other is Kingdom Hearts). So, if ertain aspects/details in Final Fantasy XI will only be able to be accomplished with a geForce4 card, will that leave PS2 users out of those aspects and details? I'm not a hardware junkie, so I'm not sure of the specifics of the PS2, nor do I much care. I just want a kickass game experience. But if there are going to be GeeWhizForce4-only parts, am I really going to get what I pay for if I buy the PS2 port? As an FF fan since FF1, I'd feel a little jaded...

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
    1. Re:What does this mean for the PS2 Version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a quick question.....you say your a ff fan, but your just now buying a ps2 for FFXI and Kingdom Hearts.....What about FFX?

  47. Problems with MMO games in general by Killjoy76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a problem with all Massively Multiplayer Online Only games... and I think a lot of other people have the same problem with them... monthly fees! I don't want any game where I HAVE to have an Internet connection (broadband preferably) and also HAVE to pay a monthly fee just to play a game. You may also even be required to pay for the game up front too. This just doesn't seem like something that the general consumer wants to bear. I like gaming a lot, and I like playing my games online... but I only play the ones that are free to play online (Unreal Tournament, Medal of Honor, Warcraft 3, etc.). I have played Asheron's Call, Ultima Online, and EverQuest but it turned out that I had a lot more fun playing those types of games (RPGs) by myself. Also, a huge problem with MMO games, is their longevity. Think about it, if you have your NES, Sega, TurboGrafix, NeoGeo, etc. games still and the consoles, you can still play them now. This will probably (95% sure) not be the case with all your MMO games. How many of those will still be around and playable 5-10 years from now. My guess, not many. There goes your time and money investment.

    1. Re:Problems with MMO games in general by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2
      Well, it seems to me that these games are aimed at people who are really heavy gamers -- a lot of people will buy 3 or 4 video games a month; for them, the fees are just part of their monthly game allowance. These people probably won't mind that their games become outdated and unplayable -- because they have new ones to play.


      I enjoy going back to my old games, and can't imagine spending hundreds of dollars a month on games. However, I figure that they're not really trying to target me. (So much the better, because I've never really liked "online communities" of any sort; these things really don't appeal to me.)

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:Problems with MMO games in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that why you're here? Because you don't like "online communities"?

      Too funny!

    3. Re:Problems with MMO games in general by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      This is a discussion board, not a "community." (Though Taco is making the attempt to turn it into one through the friend/foe system -- an effort which I hope fails.)

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  48. Yea, 3df/x tried that... by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

    3df/x tried that foolishness. It was just before they died...

  49. Nvidia scared shitless of ATI? by Araxen · · Score: 1

    Kind of ironic Nvidia is trying to have their card look better in games and have their competition look shitty by paying the developers of games do so. Maybe the next generation of Nvidia cards won't be all the great from them. Why else would they have to resort to this. All this will do in the end, is drive ppl away from PC games and more towards consoles. The PC Game market isn't in the greatest shape atm and this will only compound the problem.

  50. Re:Square is losing... by ChronosX · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't despair. They haven't abandoned the loyal, traditional fans with FFXI. In case you missed the announcements, shortly after Square revealed the details of FFXI, they mentioned they would soon start designing FFXII which would take them back to the original single-player RPG format.

  51. Heh... by SpiffyMarc · · Score: 1

    The XBox has an integrated GeForce3 GPU. ;-)

  52. And... by djupedal · · Score: 1

    ...did anyone mention Dell's new all-in-one package? TFT-LCD on a stand, with a clip-on CPU that hides behind?

  53. Re:Sucks? Pish. by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

    I mean, it had a decent plot

    No, it didn't. It wasn't a Final Fantasy plot, it wasn't an american plot... and it wasn't even a very good Jappanese plot.

    it was bloodthirsty, distopian, anti-establishment, and mundane. Every good FF game I've ever seen has magic and a villian that the heroes actually fight and face down... Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within did not.

    Now, don't get me wrong--the CG was great, the design of the gagets was great, and the story had a message... but between every character aside from the two non-military folk dying and the utter lack of FF's traditional "different" feel, it just wasn't a good movie.

    Great CG. Bad Movie.

    I really suspect it flopped only due to the same anti-animation prejudice American audiences have against anime in general. I don't know a single person who said they hated it - But at the same time, I don't know more than two or three people who actually saw it.

    The last movie I saw that I hated was "Superstar," and I got dragged to go see that. I'm an anime fan, I saw the movie twice... and while I won't say that I hated the movie, I hate the fact that they wasted the chance they had with a bad script, lousy voice sync, and bad market research.

    Making a movie isn't art. Making a scene or playing a character is, but making a movie is a business, just like making an art gallery is.

  54. Oh boy... by demonbug · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    More crap I have to remove if I buy a Dell. Good thing I build my own computer, I probably save time in the long run as I don't have to spend all my time removing shitty programs taht they force on their customers. Like anyone is actually going to WANT to play FFXI.

  55. Re:Sucks? Pish. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No character development. Purely plot driven. The result: bad cinema.

    It sure had the potential to be a great story, though.

    Surprising for Square, because FF7 and especially FF8 were very character-driven. Haven't played 9+; I haven't broken down and bought a PS/PS2 yet.

  56. The reference and the referent by bluecalix · · Score: 1

    The 'story' linked to is actually shorter than the slashdot 'story' reporting on the linked 'story'......my head hurts.

    --
    e x p e c t d e l a y . c o m
  57. Re:Sucks? Pish. by esper_child · · Score: 1

    I would have liked it if I hadn't predicted the entire out come of any plot element the minute it was presented. What it needed was a plot that wasn't quite so predictable. The only thing it was to me was a CG fest (much like their games tend to be)

  58. Not quite by Longinus · · Score: 1

    While the Radeon 9700 Pro might be cock of the walk at the moment, ATI has always had a horrible reputation with drivers, and it looks as though (while things are a bit better with the 9700) this trend will continue. Meanwhile, nVidia has consistently produced the most asskicking drivers around (for Windows anyway...). The NV30 might be a little late, but I'll take a proven track record of solid drivers in addition to powerful cards over anything ATI offers me. I hate to sound like an nVidia fanboy, but ATI has yet to prove themselves and I'm not willing to risk jumping ship just yet.

    That being said, I'm extremely pleased to see ATI making the headway they are into the market. We haven't seen any competition since nVidia hit the scene and eventually blew 3dfx out of the water. Can ATI do the same to nVdia as they did to 3dfx? Maybe, but at least until then we've got some real competition. The downside of course, is that both companies may resort more and more to partnerships like this in lieu of real innovation and solid tech.

  59. You are wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FFIX did NOT already fail, it isn't even released yet.

  60. Another Vote for Shadowrun by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Good call. Shadowrun would be a great MMORPG. The "D&D" style fantasy games, even with FF's added technology aspects, are played out to beat the band. Give us Seattle, plus (with game technology's capabilities these days) an expanded Shadowrun universe (worldwide, perhaps?), and you have something that would put MMORPG on the map for keeps. Deckers, Mercs, Street Docs, awesome weapons and wild magic. This game is screaming to be made for the online audience.

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
    1. Re:Another Vote for Shadowrun by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      Ah Shadowrun...brings back vague memories of rolling about 20 die-sixes at once.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
  61. Re:Square sucks anymore... by hyeh · · Score: 1

    I totally agree with you. FF1 was a good Ultima 4 clone, but since then they put out exactly the same game every year! Not to mention they are far too linear to be considered real RPGS. They have more in common with the Sierra games of old.

  62. How Lame by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They can bundle a friggin' game, but where's the JVM?

    That must be part of the "real operating system" option--the one that Dell doesn't offer.

  63. Where? by Jrono · · Score: 3, Informative

    The deal was with Dell Japan, and I would imagine this is only going to happen with Dell's Japanese computers. Here is a relevant link at Dell's page, and another story in English.

  64. Re:interestingly enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i found that article interesting and informative and I would wish to suscribe to your newsletter.

  65. my point is... by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 1

    ...that you're gay!

    1. Re:my point is... by Profe55or+Booty · · Score: 1

      oh. ok. i missed that, somehow

      --
      sig - .
  66. do me do me do me, yabba dabba do meee, do me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    English, doc! English!

  67. Maybe Dell wants to do something ala XBox? by DaWorm · · Score: 1

    You never know...they already announced to make PPC PDAs, soon enough, they might announce to make an XBox clone or a Squaresoft Console.

    --
    Alea jacta est!
  68. Portable Sony system by yerricde · · Score: 1

    ( Exception being for portable Squaresoft games. No portable Sony system. )

    Vaio?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  69. Ehrgeiz by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Kingdom Hearts

    More like "I Got You Babe".

    Ehrgeiz

    Now that was a good fighting game, better than C(r)apcom's Street Fighter. But you have to mention where Ehrgeiz came from: it was essentially a texture-mapped version of Square's earlier Tobal No. 1, with obstacles.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Ehrgeiz by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      More like "I Got You Babe" [everything2.com].

      Yeah, it's the only thing keeping me from buying it. It looks like loads of fun, too. I'll probably just borrow it from a friend when he's done playing it...

      Damn Disney...

      Did you hear they're kicking Eisner out?

  70. and why is this good for Dell? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

    Aside from kickback fees from Square, what does Dell get out of it? Certainly noone is going to buy a Dell over something else simply beause of a $50 game preinstalled.

    Can the fees possibly cover the increased support and installation costs?

  71. 137 comments later noone think this may be a hoax? by lingqi · · Score: 3, Interesting
    i mean... seriously... are there ANY other sources backing this up?

    Square USA has nothing even close to this; Dell is silent as hell. even square japan has nothing at all:

    the only press release i can find is here but it just says Nvidia chips are used for testing and with the "best way to play" logo -- so does Unreal Tournament 2003 -- it says nothing about GeForce being the ONLY playing video-card (as all directX compatible (OpenGL?) should work okay. (just like UT2k3 runs just fine on my radeon)

    besides this is all for japan anyway. There are rumors (Electronic Gaming Monthly) that says there may not ever be a FFXI release because of the massive amount of support square will have to burden -- and if EA does not want to do it, they may just skip it. (can't find online version of article)

    small side note: i remember back in the days when FF7 supported every videocard *except* nvidia TNT... haha... but eventually nvidia gained enough popularity / people bitched about it and they released a patch to allow nvidia. (they even had software rendering back then!) i bet if us radeon users bitch enough they will make a patch for it too.

    another small side note: again. back in FF7 pre-nvidia-patch days -- the software rendering was so slow it was possible to predict the slot-machine thingy for one of the mini-games. i actually did much worse in that mini-game after the patch was installed. -- so i finished that part with software rendering, and played the rest with the patch.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  72. "Sir, I'm scared." by Saxerman · · Score: 3, Interesting
    So, when Microsoft does it it's bad, but when Sony does the same thing it's a good thing? I don't know about the rest of you, but this deal scares me. In terms of revenue Sony is on pretty equal footing with Microsoft and when giant companies like that make deals with their 'partners' to promote their products I can't help but feel that the consumer is the one who suffers.

    As a Linux convert I've come to really like having choices. When a piece of software (open or closed) rises to the top on its own merits I don't have much to complain about. The problem is when a product is artificially bootstrapped the alternatives tend to get ignored, even if there are 'better' choices. I really liked my Amiga and Atari Lynx. Unfortunately I was 'forced' to switch to the 'inferior' substitutes of a Windows 3.1 PC and a Gameboy in order to stay mainstream. Certainly poor company management was a factor in both these cases, but I consider them clear examples of quantity beating out quality.

    Hopefully I'm just old and bitter. I used to play Everquest, enjoyed it for a time, but in the end it was just sucking up time and providing little enjoyment. I was aware of the amount of willpower I needed to exert in order to give up the game. MMORPGs can be fun, but addictive. Everquest was certainly much harder to give up playing than any MUD I played, and those were free.

    FF11 might be a great game. Square has certainly rarely disappointed me. But this is a new and wide open market, and name recognition will sell units even if the game sucks. I just don't want to take another step backward, and I'm pretty sure deals like this aren't designed to improve the market for me.

    --

    A steaming cup of soykaf would be real wiz right now.

    1. Re:"Sir, I'm scared." by Junta · · Score: 2

      While you have some interesting points, I'd like to point out that the fundamental base part of your argument is based on incorrect knowledge. Square is not Sony or part of Sony, they merely have produced FF7-10 for Playstation systems (7&8 were released for PC as well by Eidos and EA, repsectively). I think they are somehow merged with Electronic Arts, but not Sony.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:"Sir, I'm scared." by Saxerman · · Score: 2
      I'd like to point out that the fundamental base part of your argument is based on incorrect knowledge. Square is not Sony....

      *blink* Wow. Thank you for kindly pointing out my complete and utter lack of a clue. I must have missed a fnord or two in the article.

      You are certainly correct that Square is not Sony, so I'm not sure why I ignored that very obvious fact while I was crafting my rant. I humbly withdraw my unfounded complaint.

      --

      A steaming cup of soykaf would be real wiz right now.

    3. Re:"Sir, I'm scared." by BlameFate · · Score: 1

      Apart from the fact that Sony is the second largest Squaresoft shreholder, with an 18.6 % stake of the company.

      --

      --is not to be confused with user #672982 - Bame Flait

    4. Re:"Sir, I'm scared." by mgblst · · Score: 1

      So, when Microsoft does it it's bad, but when Sony does the same thing it's a good thing?

      Exactly, consider it this way - When you have sex with your girlfriend, it is good, but when I have sex with you girlfriend, it is bad!

    5. Re:"Sir, I'm scared." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? When I have sex with his girlfriend, it's really good!

  73. XI? by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

    I would be more pleased if Dell would ship computers with vi preinstalled. :-)

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:XI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      vi sucks!!!!!!!!!

      edit.com is better!

  74. 140,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 140,000 being refered to, is only JAPAN..!! and people over there are having just as hard time as we are over here finding broadband adapters.

    Squaresoft is THE reason I bought my PS2

    A.C.

  75. Can you say ID software? I knew you could! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah Like ID never optimised any of their games for any particular chipset?? And how many games has ID sold over the years.....

    Would you like to play DOOM III? hope you have the dough for the game + a new video card! Because your kick-ass card of today will MAYBE be able to play it at 640x480 with NO effects turned on...

    Better start saving your pennies....

    A.C.

  76. Did you play FF9? by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    I had a lot of fun with that game.
    It had a whole LOT of references to the pre-FF7 games.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  77. Get your portable playstation here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actual Portable Playstation

    http://www.classicgaming.com/vcsp/PSp/PSp1.htm

  78. C programmer humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if (card_manufacturer = nVidia)
    {
    frame_rate=fast;
    colors=vibrant;
    special_effects=on;
    }


    Yo, if you can turn any videocard I buy into an nVidia, you could make a killing on that little app you're talking about right there.

  79. Heh...Loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your gonna get cocky be right, it's a GPU in between 3 and 4 (3.5?) and got it's own NV number which i don't remember and won't make up to sound smartypants.

  80. Not quite by castlan · · Score: 1

    The comparison is off base. Now if your Formula 1 were denied because it didn't have the pre-approved endorsements on the hood, then that would be relevant. It's not a technological feasibility issue, performance is out of the question. The issue is corporate politics extorting consumers to defray fair and open competition.

    Cute metaphor anyway. Maybe Get your Honda Civic Turbocharged and see how it fares...

  81. Re:Square sucks anymore... by Vinum · · Score: 1

    Isn't that the whole point behind Final Fantasy XI? To actually be able to roleplay? With the technical expertise and the sheer amount of time they have been working on this. Playonline.com which is what was made to host FFXI was registered back in 2000. They started planning it long before then. I seriously hope it is a world where I can play a role and get fame and build social characters from it. Evercrack really failed in that aspect.

    Though I do agree, if Square made a table top Final Fantasy with a GM and the whole 9 yards it would totally kick ass. But I doubt it would sell to well :(

    And people who just kill things to get exp and have strong characters are not roleplayers... we call them rollplayers :)

  82. A point of contention by castlan · · Score: 1

    Just a reminder, Slashdot was better when it was a site for discussion, and not a game where superiority was measured in accrued karma points. I believe that was the motivation for obscuring your karma score.

    In light of this (discussion vs. karma), please reevaluate what the parent meant when they said "points".

    1. Re:A point of contention by parliboy · · Score: 1

      I knew I should have enclosed that last comment in tags.

      A fair point, but one not really needed to be made here.

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
  83. Re:Square is losing... by Vinum · · Score: 1

    They started designing FFXII and FFXI at the same time. :) I saw screen shots of FFXII almost a year ago. I would send you the link, but I seem to be lacking the macromedia programs necessary to view squaresoft.com :/

    I do remember this, the chick in this one has a bare midrift ;)

  84. LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up, for pointing out a typical dumbass C mistake that we make on a daily basis.

  85. Who cares?? by EvlPenguin · · Score: 1

    FFXI will be relased first for the Playstation 2. If you don't own one already, buy one. It's a lot cheaper than the gosh-wow Nvidia cards.

    Besides, everyone knows consoles are better than PCs.

    --

    --
    #nohup cat /dev/dsp > /dev/hda & killall -9 getty
    1. Re:Who cares?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup consoles become better by becomming more like pcs every release.... wait a sec whose trying to be who again!? o ya thats y consoles are better right? lol

  86. Re:Square is losing... by Tofuhead · · Score: 1

    The alleged image of the FFXII girl in the flower field that you are probably talking about is a hoax. It doesn't come from Square.

    < tofuhead >

    --
    It is still the dark of night.
  87. (ATI driver) If you can't beat em with technology by phorm · · Score: 2

    Definately agreed. My ATI card (Radeon All-In-Wonder) was beautiful for what it could do, but severely hampered by drivers. The thing was loaded with features, and quite fast. However, due to incredibly crappy drivers, 90% of my games (particularly those needing directX in fullscreen mode) would not play in Windows 2000/XP. I have a dual install of 98, but it was annoying to have to reboot to play my games.

    Also, on a few games I noticed that sound would go to crap in win98 games after awhile. While the video card had no relation to my soundcard, once installing a GeForce4MX this problem went away. I'm guess that the ATI drivers for 98 had a memory leak or something.

    It's like having an awesome car, and a pair of undersized tires and low axles. It's great to drive around, but go anywhere with a bump and something gets torn out from underneath you...

    Good video card=hardware+drivers+support+compatibility - phorm

  88. (Port FFX please!?). Re:Counter-proposal by phorm · · Score: 2

    Yes, for godsakes, port FFX. I've been waiting for ages to play this damn game. I hardly think it fair that I have to shell out money for a PS2 console just to play FFX, since it doesn't seem to be available for any other systems.

    Thus far I've collected all of the FF series available to North America up to FFIX. I have FFI on NES, and the rest as part of the FF Anthology/etc. I was somewhat saddened that FFIX didn't come out on PC, although I ended up buying the PS1 disc and played it through on emulator (which worked surprisingly well).

    Unless a decent emulator comes out or a port for PC is announced, I may end up not playing FFX at all, even though I love squaresoft games.
    Limiting themselves to a single console seems to eliminate a lot of people from getting the game. I haven't seem PS2's coming out overly cheap on eBay yet either.

    Anyone know of FFX/PC or a good PS2 emulator? - phorm

  89. Re:Square is losing... by Vinum · · Score: 1

    So why would it have been on a Square web site?

  90. Don't forget drivers + support by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 1

    You would THINK that the 9700 would be better for FF -- if the support and mature drivers were there, since it seems the hardware outguns the GeForce4 by a solid margin. However, it sounds like there are still plenty of kinks to be worked out in the 9700 line.........

    Look at it another way: if you were Dell, who would you part with? nVidia, which has market share majority, excellent customer support, regularly releases improved drivers, and is constantly working on bringing bleeding-edge tech to market in a timely manner. Or ATi, which has traditionally focused on the lower-end, OEM markets; has a long history of shoddy drivers support; and an unproven track record in the higher-end markets to which Dell is marketing their computers?

    At the end of the day, Dell is going to choose the company with the best all-around features. Having a magnificent piece of technology doesn't mean squat if it can't run reliably, due to driver / compat issues.

  91. Why not try to pose a valid argument? by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 1

    I find it amusing that this actually got modded up to +5:Interesting -- but it did allude to the fact that Slashdot users are more intelligent and open-minded than the rest of the populace, so I suppose that could explain it.

    I don't even know why you bothered with the "one-hand/other-hand" argument -- both sides seem to be fairly negative, and offer no real argument. Yes, people recommend good games they play to their friends -- it's not peer pressure, it's them making an informed recommendation to another person, in the hopes that they'll derive the same amount of enjoyment from playing.

    On to your app argument -- yes, clearly this is "just another app the common computer user will never figure out". Because it's pretty damn hard to locate the game in the same way they do all their other apps: Start Menu >> Programs >> Final Fantasy XI >> Play Final Fantasy. I suspect it'll be even simpler than that, since they'll probably provide a desktop icon. And yes, this process will be easily confused with the process of deleting a directory -- in which you press the "Delete" key and choose "Yes" from the ensuing confirmation screen.

    "So goes the way of Windows"? I'd like to see the common user you've described try to install a game on Linux without any kind of programming experience, as opposed to being presented with a Windows interface. There's a reason Windows is in 85-90%+ of desktop computers............. see if you can't figure out why.

    Ah yes.... because people who read Slashdot are instantly transformed into intelligent and open-minded beings, once they deign to join the community you figure so prominently in, yes? Of course, I see far fewer misspelled, immature and poorly thought-out posts here than any other board I post to. And open-minded? Please........ I have three words for you: "knee", "jerk" and "reactionists". This doesn't describe all Slashdot users, or even most, but there's an awful lot of defensive posts to read the minute anybody says anything negative about Linux or an alternative OSS project.

    1. Re:Why not try to pose a valid argument? by higuy48 · · Score: 1

      To tell you the truth, about a quarter of my post was sarcasm, while the rest was my opinion on Windows and Dell. Dell may be the best truly mainstream computer builder, but they are still painfully inefficient. I actually use Windows Me, and I really don't like it. Unfortunately, I don't have a choice in my current situation.

      --
      And now, for a sig that's a complete copout.
  92. Glued shut by grip · · Score: 1

    Taking a lesson from Epic Records will Dell and/or Square deliver the machines with the CD-ROM Burner glued shut to prevent illegal copying of game software?

    --
    Failure is not an option. It comes automatically enabled in every Microsoft product.
  93. Please stop to think for a moment.. by dmouritsendk · · Score: 1

    From wire.ign.com

    "While the game was developed with a wide range of computer configurations in mind, only those users with NVIDIA hardware, specifically GeForce4 Ti GPUs, can experience unique visual effects and other optimisations exclusive to NVIDIA hardware."

    So, a game is not optimised for the latest and greatest card on the marked(Radion 9700 PRO @ the moment). Is this a new thing? No, not so much. A lot of the games that have been released since the GF3 introduced pixelshaders, haven't supported them.

    The new thing here is in the marketing department i believe, they are actually saving in a press release that "We will support the Nvidia way of doing pixel/vertex shaders". The real question right now is: Will they eventually support ATIs pixel/vertex shaders to?

    Even if they do, the damage to ATI is already done. Final Fantasy fans with older hardware, will upgrade to a GF not a Radion.

  94. The REAL Story... No thanks to SlashDot... by delus10n0 · · Score: 3

    This is the REAL story (courtesy of RPG Warehouse):

    Dell Japan has decided to release two versions of their PCs packaged with Final Fantasy XI. Dell Japan will release the Dimension 8200 and Dimension 4500 with the PC version of Final Fantasy XI. Both PCs will come equipped with an Intel Pentium 4 1.8Ghz processor and a GeForce4 Ti4200 64MB DDR video card. So if you live in Japan and want to get the best performance from Final Fantasy XI this might be a PC you could consider buying.

    Here's a link to Dell's website showing off the systems:

    http://www.dell.com/html/jp/products/dimen/ff11. ht m

    No where do I see that you will be forced to use an nVidia card on the PC version of the game, and no where do I see this deal being in the United States (yet.)

    Also, FFXI isn't even out for the PC in the U.S., much less Japan. Squaresoft says November 7th for Japan... with the U.S. version slated for early 2003 release.

    Why do I have to do your job for you, SlashDot?

    --
    Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    1. Re:The REAL Story... No thanks to SlashDot... by delus10n0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since SlashDot doesn't automatically generate HREF's from URLs (wtf?), here's a nice link to the Dell website.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
  95. ATI isn't righteous either... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    remember quack3?

  96. Re:Square is losing... by Tofuhead · · Score: 1

    It never was on the official Square sites, and still isn't. Someone on one of the gaming sites (perhaps in one of the forums, I don't remember) even made a list of all the flaws in the image that pointed out how it is extremely unlikely to be from Square, since no one can verify its source, despite the 2001 Square copyright printed on the picture.

    You may be confusing this image with the promo FFXI illustrations (still available on the Square sites) that detail the different races in that game.

    < tofuhead >

    --
    It is still the dark of night.
  97. Fair enough......... by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 1

    Taken as a serious post, I think you can see why I responded the way I did. Going on the premise that there's a bunch of sarcasm mixed in makes it easier to swallow.........

    Anyway, maybe your problem lies primarily with Windows ME? I've been extremely happy with Windows 2000, coming from a WinNT @ work and Win95 @ home. And what do you mean by "painfully inefficient"? From a corporate standpoint, it appears as though they are the most efficient brand-name (PC) box builder in the business........ even if their components aren't necessarily upgrade-friendly.

  98. my adventure at shopping for a computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    so one day I walk into Best Buy to look for a new computer system. Going from aisle to aisle, I stop only to view the specs on a specific monitor or joystick displayed out of curiousity, all the while my hips sway and pop up, left then right, left then right, while my knees move forward and rotate outward at 20 degrees left then right, left then right. Suddenly I spy some salesmen. A few are anchored to the floor on one spot moving their heads left then right, left then right, while they bounce furtively about 6 inches up and down, up and down. The rest swash around in random patterns stopping only to say the same thing over and over again, all the while gyrating and pumping their bodies to some unheard slow but very unhumanly steady music for timing.

    I try to cut through the other patrons statically pasted to the floor at various seemingly random spots only to notice that some are blocking the restrooms and the Automobile A/V room. It is no use getting past them, as that is not an option in speech (I find myself extremely limited in what I can say to anyone) as well as I only can walk and move my arms in semblence of life but not push them out of the way as I would expect. Suddenly my vision gets blurry, the lights flash, music begins to pump and thump from all around...

    FIGHT!!!Oh no! I now face one perfectly perpendicular (to me) row of store thugs with an equal row of shoplifters behind them... all of which are twisting, humping, gyrating and swishing their feet, arms and heads in an oddly repetative and very unrealistic pattern that makes me laugh. However, this laugh seems to have odd powers here. It summons a storm that rips the entire roof off of the whole store, exposing a group of about 12 meteors approximately 40 feet in diameter travelling at unholy speeds towards us all. When they strike they hit with such force that the kinetic energy is converted to the most brilliant display of light, heat and sound you could possibly imagine. Besides the direct impact of approximately 1.2 kilotons per sq inch of super heated rock and metal, the shards flying out in all directions slice through the poor shoplifters with the force of depleted uranium supersonic projectile.

    Luckily for them however, I am too low a Level for them and they suffer only one or two superficial scratches upon their hands or face (about 2 inches long and irritated but not bleeding). Unluckily for me however, they are now mightily pissed and as they one after another jump forward and mechanically and repetatively slash, cut and hammer I find myself unable to evade, counterattack or even parry.

    It seems hopeless for me, but just then a 'mysterious' (read: he looks like a dork who forgot to take his lithium) jumps out and mightily defeats them all with one flash of his sword. (ironically he will NEVER perform like this again especially since he is lower level than even I) After the fight, I find my self performing a silly gyrating dance of victory, then the light show returns and vision fades again... returning me to the store where people are exactly where they were before as if nothing happened. The roof is still there and in fact none of the merchandise looks even touched by fire or rock. As I talk with my new 'little buddy' I see some cops that armed with submachine guns are too busy randomly walking obviously to have helped out or get rid of the innevitable thugs remaining. Perhaps they too cannot see enemies until the 'random encounter' happens.

    Oh well, lesson learned... I'm sticking with building my own damn computers and putting Linux back on them.

  99. That is exactly my point by castlan · · Score: 1

    Should the latest ATI card, which has greater capabilities than the GeForce 4 MX line (more like a GF2) have inferior displays? Technology should be the bottleneck, not politics and name-brand compatibility.

    The ATI with more effects should not act crippled compared to a lesser nVidia card. and vice-versa. DirectX, if supprted, should actually be a detrmining factor in video compatibility.

  100. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    A certain monk had a habit of pestering the Grand Tortue (the only one who
    had ever reached the Enlightenment 'Yond Enlightenment), by asking whether
    various objects had Buddha-nature or not. To such a question Tortue
    invariably sat silent. The monk had already asked about a bean, a lake,
    and a moonlit night. One day he brought to Tortue a piece of string, and
    asked the same question. In reply, the Grand Tortue grasped the loop
    between his feet and, with a few simple manipulations, created a complex
    string which he proferred wordlessly to the monk. At that moment, the monk
    was enlightened.

    From then on, the monk did not bother Tortue. Instead, he made string after
    string by Tortue's method; and he passed the method on to his own disciples,
    who passed it on to theirs.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...