in order to run fast enough, but Sun and other non-XFree86 X11 implementations don't support this extension?
Why don't/won't they support the XRender extension?
Are the features available from STSF (which is under the BSD license) sufficiently better than what is available to warrant the work necessary for making the changeover?
Remove mountains? Good start. The real question:
on
Synthetic Vision
·
· Score: 3, Funny
They are contractually obligated to support NT 4.0 until June 30, 2003. Not forever. Just until then. "It's old and boring and we don't understand it" isn't an acceptable excuse.
If you had to deal with half as many security flaws/exploits/holes as Microsoft, you'd be tired too.
Plus, why are people so irksome in not upgrading to ever newer and more expensive operating systems like they're supposed to? Constantly forcing Microsoft to keep looking back over legacy code. It's ugly, dirty and scary back there, not like in candy XP land.
Can we get some names of "companies that make misleading or unsupported claims about their security" that people keep buying (other than Microsoft, which is too obvious to list)?
Five 9s is old school. Five reboots a day, that's the cutting edge!
If the system never goes down, how can upper management ever appreciate your valiant efforts at 3:00 am to restore the essential programs underpinning your whole corporations future? Again?
Windowsize it! Because you haven't suffered enough!
Things too reliable? Predictable? Functional? Secure? Just can't find anything to do?
Windowsize it! Just ten lines of Windows code will have you scrambling for hours to try and figure out what in the heck has gone wrong!
Add twenty lines of Windows code and you've got a month worth of worries on your hands!
And for the truly daring: A mission-critical Windows application! Kiss the wife and kids goodbye! You'll never eat/sleep/bathe in peace again!
Windowsize it! (Not approved for those with heart conditions/risk of stroke/high blood pressure/pregnant)
A.G. John Ashcroft requires all citizens to carry mobile monitoring system. "Stop whining, be patriotic and recognize that this is for your own good. Now bend over."
are distracting, destructive and a thing of the past. Haven't you been listening? Stop being so selfish and unpatriotic. Now go unlock your doors. It makes it easier for us to check your homes for illegal content while you sleep.
"Justice" Scalia has explained that you are wrong. You see, "Most of the rights that you enjoy go way beyond what the Constitution requires." But don't worry; he promises to protect the constitutional minimum. I feel safer already.
With so very many vulnerabilities (and ever expanding), it's easy to see why you'd assume that Windows was the only buggy vulnerable bloated operating system. This isn't true. It just seems that way. It feels that way. And, considering how wide rangingly destructive Windows vulnerabilities tend to be, for all intensive purposes, it is that way. But, deep down, we all acknowledge that it isn't technically true.
All seven of them? All long fixed? Page not updated since January 23, 2003? I'd LOVE to send them that. Comparing that to the long and varied string of IIS compromises/failures/destruction would be enough to get even the pointiest headed boss to make the switch. Good idea. Thanks!
In your consulting capacity (and without naming names), have you ever run across a companies security implementation that was so bad, so insecure, so open to exploitation that you felt an overwhelming compulsion to shut down the servers, lock the doors and call in a security SWAT team? That you actually felt like going out and shorting the companies stock? That you had to hold back from whomping someone upside the head? That you inquired about having the head of security investigated to make sure he wasn't a black hat hacker/competitor's security spy/foreign agent? How bad was the worst implementation you've ever seen?
What about all of the other non-automotive industries that are dependent on hydrocarbons? Like (say it with me) plastics. Hydrocarbons are not just an automotive thing, after all.
That said, burning hydrocarbons up for vehicles should be stopped. No problem with that.
Why don't/won't they support the XRender extension?
Are the features available from STSF (which is under the BSD license) sufficiently better than what is available to warrant the work necessary for making the changeover?
Remove clothes?
Oh, and it does the opposite of setting you free.
They are contractually obligated to support NT 4.0 until June 30, 2003. Not forever. Just until then. "It's old and boring and we don't understand it" isn't an acceptable excuse.
Plus, why are people so irksome in not upgrading to ever newer and more expensive operating systems like they're supposed to? Constantly forcing Microsoft to keep looking back over legacy code. It's ugly, dirty and scary back there, not like in candy XP land.
Can we get some names of "companies that make misleading or unsupported claims about their security" that people keep buying (other than Microsoft, which is too obvious to list)?
And don't call me Surly.
http://www.rot13.com/index.php gives you the awesoma powa of rot13.
If the system never goes down, how can upper management ever appreciate your valiant efforts at 3:00 am to restore the essential programs underpinning your whole corporations future? Again?
Windowsize it! Because you haven't suffered enough!
Things too reliable? Predictable? Functional? Secure? Just can't find anything to do?
Windowsize it!
Just ten lines of Windows code will have you scrambling for hours to try and figure out what in the heck has gone wrong!
Add twenty lines of Windows code and you've got a month worth of worries on your hands!
And for the truly daring: A mission-critical Windows application!
Kiss the wife and kids goodbye! You'll never eat/sleep/bathe in peace again!
Windowsize it!
(Not approved for those with heart conditions/risk of stroke/high blood pressure/pregnant)
"Un Chien Andalucia", I was initially referring to the Pixies song Debaser, where the lyric is the mixed language "I am un chien Andalucia".
I am un chien Andalucia.
Oh, I see. Like cheezy pr0n and bad MP3s. Okay. I understand now.
A.G. John Ashcroft and crew: "Stop having thought crimes and we won't have to arrest you."
A.G. John Ashcroft requires all citizens to carry mobile monitoring system. "Stop whining, be patriotic and recognize that this is for your own good. Now bend over."
Seemed relevant at the time.
are distracting, destructive and a thing of the past. Haven't you been listening? Stop being so selfish and unpatriotic. Now go unlock your doors. It makes it easier for us to check your homes for illegal content while you sleep.
hot swappable
quick couplings
Now I feel dirty. In a bad way.
b) What is the phrase or action that will get the developers to actually do my bidding? I'm very busy and quite imperious.
You may answer me now.
"Justice" Scalia has explained that you are wrong. You see, "Most of the rights that you enjoy go way beyond what the Constitution requires." But don't worry; he promises to protect the constitutional minimum. I feel safer already.
With so very many vulnerabilities (and ever expanding), it's easy to see why you'd assume that Windows was the only buggy vulnerable bloated operating system. This isn't true. It just seems that way. It feels that way. And, considering how wide rangingly destructive Windows vulnerabilities tend to be, for all intensive purposes, it is that way. But, deep down, we all acknowledge that it isn't technically true.
will come out when it's ready. Not before. Now go away.
All seven of them? All long fixed? Page not updated since January 23, 2003? I'd LOVE to send them that. Comparing that to the long and varied string of IIS compromises/failures/destruction would be enough to get even the pointiest headed boss to make the switch. Good idea. Thanks!
In your consulting capacity (and without naming names), have you ever run across a companies security implementation that was so bad, so insecure, so open to exploitation that you felt an overwhelming compulsion to shut down the servers, lock the doors and call in a security SWAT team? That you actually felt like going out and shorting the companies stock? That you had to hold back from whomping someone upside the head? That you inquired about having the head of security investigated to make sure he wasn't a black hat hacker/competitor's security spy/foreign agent? How bad was the worst implementation you've ever seen?
That said, burning hydrocarbons up for vehicles should be stopped. No problem with that.