Slashdot Mirror


Beep! Beep! You have Broken the Law.

medscaper writes "Authorities in China are using computers to spam mobile phones of law-breakers until they turn themselves in. Apparently, lots of illegal advertisements as stickers with mobile-phone numbers listed are placed around large cities and are becoming an eyesore. So, the authorities call the cell phones incessantly with recorded messages that demand the "businessmen" to turn themselves in."

322 comments

  1. Hmm... by MacFury · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How well does this actually work? Wouldn't they just get a new phone number?

    1. Re:Hmm... by Echnin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, as the article says, there are fees associated with that, and they may also lose their business. I think this is an amusing idea. I also think that advertisements should be illegal, as it only serves to make successful companies richer and create jobs where people do nothing more than convince other people to do something. So I say phonebomb EVERY phone number you see listed publicly! Even that guy Mark who was looking for partners in the Men's Room.

      --
      Lalala
    2. Re:Hmm... by bubblegoose · · Score: 4, Informative

      The article discuss that. It says that they would have to pay fees to change their number, and they would lose any business from their ad.

      --
      I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
    3. Re:Hmm... by thynk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How well does this actually work? Wouldn't they just get a new phone number?

      From the article

      Those who prefer to change their "poisoned" number rather than face punishment incur the fees and inconvenience of switching, and also lose any business their ad might have generated.

      So changing the number comes with a pretty high price. Course, I'm "sure" after they get this message, every one goes right in and turns them selves in. I wonder how long it will take before someone figures out how to bypass this.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    4. Re:Hmm... by gmack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes but that provides an easy way to DDos a competing buisness: just post the number somewhere"

      Ohh and odds are it wasn't mark who put the number in the men's room .. it was probably someone who thought it would be funny for hum to get a lot of freaky phone calls. It's a common prank.

    5. Re:Hmm... by count3r · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yes but that provides an easy way to DDos a competing buisness: just post the number somewhere

      Yah. The problem here is that the state is accusing, convicting and punishing the criminal without he/she ever getting a chance provide a defense. They are assuming that the posted phone numbers belong to criminals because (presumably) they are the ones that benefit most from the posting.

      This (I think) is sort of similar to the problems that were raised with using cameras to spot traffic violations. Early on, the cameras would record the license number of a violator (who had, for example, run a red light) and the send the registered owner of the car a ticket. The problem is/was that the violation was commited by a driver who wasn't necessarily the owner of the car.

      I think the police solved this problem by photographing both the license plate and the driver-- the photo of the driver can be compared to an existing photo of the registered owner. If they match, ticket time...

      Given these problems, would government phone-bombing be allowed here (in the US)?

    6. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not too sure how China's phone system is setup. but here in the US we can always block numbers. I think that would be better than to change the number don't you?

    7. Re:Hmm... by t0ny · · Score: 1
      How well does this actually work? Wouldn't they just get a new phone number?

      this is answered in the article...

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    8. Re:Hmm... by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      This is China, the burden of proof is not on the government.

    9. Re:Hmm... by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      If you had bothered to read the article you would know that the #s are manually verified before the bombardment begins. A supervisor with the department in question actually calls the # to see exactly what the criminal in question is doing/selling.

    10. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't they just set up their cell phones to block those numbers? I believe some phones have this capability.

      And this also means that the government is required to constantly change phone numbers to spam these people. But eventually, the government will run out of available numbers to use and the bad guys win...

    11. Re:Hmm... by CFusion · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nah, i know Mark. It was defenitely him who put his number on the bathroom wall.

      I think this is a great idea. I mean, who cares if they turn themselves in or not, just as long as they have to pay for those mobile minutes and deal with the frustration of the constant calls. I hate those damn posters too.

      --
      I used to be a MS fan but then I was brainwashed. Now I see the Light. Mac OS X pwns u.
    12. Re:Hmm... by mbogosian · · Score: 1

      I wonder how long it will take before someone figures out how to bypass this.

      I wonder if it will end up being the service providers themselves. I wonder if mobile companies will, as a "feature" to their business customers (for a fee, of course), be able to route text messages to e-mail or other text mediums based on a set of criteria (originating domain, IP, phone #, etc.).

      To all you companies out there tempted to patent this, consider this post prior art. Actually, I'm on my way to the patent office right now....

    13. Re:Hmm... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      This (I think) is sort of similar to the problems that were raised with using cameras to spot traffic violations. Early on, the cameras would record the license number of a violator (who had, for example, run a red light) and the send the registered owner of the car a ticket. The problem is/was that the violation was commited by a driver who wasn't necessarily the owner of the car.

      I remember when they first started doing this, there was a story about a guy who got a ticket in the mail with a photo of his license plate.

      So he sent it back to the police with a picture of a hundred dollar bill.

      The police then mailed him a picture of handcuffs. He paid the fine.

      Don't know how true it was but I got a good laugh out of it. ;-)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    14. Re:Hmm... by darien · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a newspaper article I read maybe 9 months ago suggesting something (admittedly only rather tangentially) related. Far from helping subscribers avoid "legal harrassment", the UK mobile networks were reportedly looking into message-bombing phones reported stolen (i.e. sending them ten text messages every minute saying "THIS PHONE IS STOLEN"). I guess in the end they came up with a cheaper idea, though, because there's now a poster campaign saying that once you report a phone stolen, its IMEI will simply be blacklisted and it'll never work in the UK again.

    15. Re:Hmm... by TheAntiCrust · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that you might recieve one of these 'poisoned' numbers the next time you get a cell phone! How would you like your nifty new technological treat to ring every twenty seconds becuase the asshole who had the number before you posted these adds?

    16. Re:Hmm... by sonatinas · · Score: 1

      It is illegal regardless of the number because the numbers are graffiti, they are posted over everything and on any surface is written on here in China. Also, the stickers with the numers on them are everywhere, trying to read a sign with big bright pink stickers all over them is a pain, and taking them off is impossible without tools.

    17. Re:Hmm... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      Given these problems, would government phone-bombing be allowed here (in the US)?

      Well I dont know if the Chinese Gov could legally phone bomb the guys here in the US... but i would assume that they do like they usually do and send in Jackie Chan to assist the US FBI and the like with the investigation.

    18. Re:Hmm... by CreepingEye · · Score: 1

      heh .... seems theres no way to lose that battle.... ok im being spammed . only way to shut it off is if it turn myself in . NO THANKS ill endure the spam.

  2. With my luck.. by Bush_man10 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would be sitting behind one of those people in a movie theater. If they are stupid enough to get into that situation you know they are one of those people who leave their cell phones on during movies. :) Excellent idea though..

    --
    "I believe in everything in moderation. Including moderation." -Dean DeLeo, Stone Temple Pilots
    1. Re:With my luck.. by thynk · · Score: 1

      I would be sitting behind one of those people in a movie theater. If they are stupid enough to get into that situation you know they are one of those people who leave their cell phones on during movies. :)

      I wonder if it would be legal to beat the crap out them before dragging them down to the police station. I bet you'd even get the price of your movie refunded!

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    2. Re:With my luck.. by tmark · · Score: 3, Funny

      I would be sitting behind one of those people in a movie theater.

      Man, if you think *THAT'S* bad, I have one for you. I was actually in a theater when someone one row ahead of me *PLACED AN OUTGOING CALL*, talking at regular cell-phone volumes (read loud): "Hello, is Justin there ? Could I speak to Justin please ? Is Justin there ?". Everyone in the theater looked at each other, stunned.

      I can understand someone forgetting to turn off their cell phones. But being so f*cking ignorant that you would place a call, when you could easily and freely walk to the lobby ? I say bully to the theaters who want to block cell phone signals.

    3. Re:With my luck.. by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      I hate pople who let them ring in the thearter....but what about those of us who put them on vib because we NEED to ahve the phone. It would really suck if they ban cell phones and I can't go to movies the nights i'm on call from work! Right now, it's not a problem. Phone goes on vib, and if it goes off, the only people who know are those that see me pull it out and check the incomming number.

    4. Re:With my luck.. by johnwroach · · Score: 1
      If you're going to theaters where a silent, vibrating phone bothers you that much, maybe you should ask the management to turn up the volume.

      Or you could just stop being so damned touchy.

    5. Re:With my luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you should see your dentist for one of this - a phone in tooth implant.

    6. Re:With my luck.. by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
      That would be unAmerican. I mean, having a home life. Most people think it is normal to work 10, 20, or 50 hours overtime, so naturally, they want to be "in the loop" all the time.

      You have it right, though, but I say take it to the logical conclusion: If your job is that "important" that you must be in contact at all times or available at a moment's notice, then please don't bother the rest of us with your problems. Simply stay at work.

      Most places have a local gym where you can shower, and food is just a Pizza Delivery phonecall away. All of your clothes can be cleaned at the local drycleaners. You only need to go home long enough to pay the bills. In fact, you really don't even need a domicile, since you don't really need to leave work.

      Any family you had is probably alienated by your absenteeism, so no loss there either. Most likely, all of your friends work where you do -- another way to say this is that you have no friends outside of work -- so be a good wage slave and stay where you belong. In 30-40 years, you can come out and we'll all have a good laugh at you.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    7. Re:With my luck.. by rpi1995 · · Score: 1

      I hope you're never in a position where you need help from a volunteer fire department. I'm sure you wouldn't want to have your life saved by someone who had to get up in a movie.

      Do you also yell at people who get up to go to the bathroom?

      Because if I look at my phone, and go outside to answer the thing, that's how disruptive it is.

    8. Re:With my luck.. by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      Um....just because someone is "on-call" doesn't mean they work tons of overtime. People don't need to live-at-work because they MIGHT be needed sometime durring the off hours. If there's a problem that requires people to come in, they call. Even if the calls are few and far between if you are on-call you need to be reachable. Now why don't you stop over-reacting. People can work 40 hours a week and have a home life, do everything that everyone else does and still be "on-call".

    9. Re:With my luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I never go to the movie theater without 30 inches of piano wire.

    10. Re:With my luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kick em out! Mob justice should be allowed for people doing things like that. Plus banned for a year. And Justin too.

    11. Re:With my luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Some tolerance should be had. Just think of all the crackling plastics of people who don't have enough time to eat before the movie, or who wish to become obese...

    12. Re:With my luck.. by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Seriously, you shouldn't have your phone in the theator. you should instead be attending phones where you must leave your phone with the from desk, and if there is a call they will answer it (some sort of script so the caller knows they got the right number and you prefer not to be interupted, but have made emergency provisions), and then after verifying that it is an important call the ushers get you, otherwise you just get a message after the show. I hope you have the sense to sit in an asile seat near the exit.

      There are many emergencys that might require you to take a phone call. None are critical enough that an extra 5 minutes will make a difference - if they are you should be at work not out on the town.

      Yes there are theators that do this for you, I'm not just making this up. Demand your local one do it.

    13. Re:With my luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude. They call it a hologram. It's part of the movie. It's not 2010 anymore, you know. The whole theatre was fake. DOH.

    14. Re:With my luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll drink Pabst Blue Ribbon and LIKE IT!

    15. Re:With my luck.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      leave your phone with the from desk, and if there is a call they will answer it (some sort of script so the caller knows they got the right number and you prefer not to be interupted, but have made emergency provisions),

      It's calles fucking VOICEMAIL!!!!!

    16. Re:With my luck.. by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      If there were a trauma surgeon in the audience, then I would forgive the momentary inconvenience as minutes, even seconds, can count when they are needed in emergencies.

      Of course if anyone else in the audience is taking calls, they'd better hope there's a doctor handy too.

    17. Re:With my luck.. by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      I have a solution to the problem: get a pager. I'm on call for my department (IT/Operations) 24x7, but people know that it takes a few minutes for a page to go through. I only turn the phone on (due to short battery life) to return calls to work.

      So. Pager (on vibrate) goes off, and I check to make sure it's work. I leave the theater, turn on my phone, and call work. Nobody is bothered, and yes, I sit on the aisle. It's as if I'm getting up to use the bathroom.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    18. Re:With my luck.. by bluGill · · Score: 1

      In order to be a level I trauma hosptial (where the ambulance goes after a serious emergency) the hospital MUST have a full team of trauma surgeons on staff and ready to enter the ER within minutes. Before the ambulence arrives they are ready. (This means if brian surgery is scheduled for the day, there are two brain surgeons in the hospital, one to do the surgery, and one doing other duties just in case an emergency comes up)

      Seconds count in an emergency, and no doctor can safely get from a theator to the Emergency room in time to make a difference. So your example, while it sounds good and dramatic fails the test of realism.

  3. An AOL tiein for Americans? by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 3, Funny

    "You got trouble."

    1. Re:An AOL tiein for Americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course it would be "You've got trouble." (DUH?)

  4. Easy to cause trouble with by gorf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, if I don't like someone, all I have to do is make up a few ads with his number on and stick them up places, and the state will spam him for me?

    1. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by webslacker · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the idea is that they only go after the biggest offenders, so if you wanted to create trouble for someone you'd really have to go out of your way posting thousands and thousands of these stickers everywhere

    2. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /me starts making up ad stickers for "George Bush"..

    3. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by abhisarda · · Score: 1

      In china, there are 200 million+ mobile phones. So, for most small businesses, the mobile is the primary and only phone.
      Unlike the US where if the business is making a false claim in an advertisement then you have the ad council of America to take care of the problem(most of the time) but in China how will the ad council there (they are not so effective in the first place) pursue the case when the advertiser is a fly-by-night operator?

    4. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      So, if I don't like someone, all I have to do is make up a few ads with his number on and stick them up places, and the state will spam him for me?

      Yes, or you could post their e-mail address on Slashdot and let the spiders pick it up. They're guaranteed to start getting spam within a few weeks.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    5. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by fatty+bimble · · Score: 4, Informative
      read the article: "The numbers are also checked manually and require the approval of a senior official before the bombardment can begin, he told the People's Daily. "

      I suppose if your enemy posted up your number all over the place *AND* you answered your phone trying to sell something, you'd get in trouble.

      BTW, if you made a few ads and posted them, people interested in the ads would spam the number in response to the ad, regardless of the state's actions

    6. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by halftrack · · Score: 1

      The article says the manually check the numbers. My guess would be then senior officer approving the blacklisting would make a quick call to the number to check whether or not it's what the ad says it is.

      --
      Look a monkey!
    7. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by gmby · · Score: 1

      Read It Agin. They said that they would confirm the number fist.I would assume by calling it and talking to the person on the other end. Then they get a senior offical to OK it.

      Police Caller: Hello
      Posting Victim: Hello
      Police Caller: How much is your XXX cost?
      Posting Victum: What?
      Police Caller: I want some XXX.
      Posting Victum: Who are you? What are you talking about? GET LOST!

      --
      I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
    8. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by infront314 · · Score: 1

      So, if I don't like someone, all I have to do is make up a few ads with his number on and stick them up places, and the state will spam him for me?

      I think this works even without the police spamming. The type of phonecalls the person would receive could be of a far more disturbing nature than police spamming.

    9. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by isorox · · Score: 4, Funny

      Police Caller: I want some XXX.

      Dont we all

    10. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      It doesn't always work. I've had my e-mail address posted many times and all it does is make my mailserver work a little harder. My phone however takes a lot more work to censor, plus costs me money to block numbers.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    11. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by joggle · · Score: 1

      RTFP!! You totally misread the guy's post. All he asked was whether you could spam someone you don't like by sticking up false advertisements with their cell's number on them. Considering that the police manually approve adding numbers to the spam list, they probably would call the number first to verify that it a) exists and b) verifies that the number is related to the advertisement.

    12. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by MousePotato · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Been done for years this way really... How many rest stops and public bathrooms are covered with the numbers of people who are being harrassed?

    13. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very insightful post there young man

    14. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea! All you have to do is find out George Bush's personal cell phone number, and then travel to China and put these stickers up all over the place!

    15. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by treat · · Score: 1
      Unlike the US where if the business is making a false claim in an advertisement then you have the ad council of America to take care of the problem(most of the time)

      "Ad council of America"? I've never even heard of them. In the US, false advertising is only actionable in the most egregious cases of fraud. In particular, it is perfectly OK to make false claims as long as it can't be proven that the claim is false.

    16. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      So it's illegal to sell Vin Diesel movies in China?

    17. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by ndogg · · Score: 1

      For a good time, call 555-9348...

      Gotta love bathroom stalls.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    18. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      In particular, it is perfectly OK to make false claims as long as it can't be proven that the claim is false.

      You can do a lot of things as long as you don't get caught...

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    19. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      +5 Insightful?

      If this bozo had RTFA he would have known that they call the number to verify that they are actually selling what the advertisement posted says.

      So, the only way to get at your 'enemy' is to convince him to answer his phone "Hello, Tony's Penis Enlargers" when the cops call.

      Someone please mod parent back down to where it is supposed to be:

      -1 Didn't Bother to Read Article

    20. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by gorf · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did RTFA.

      The numbers are also checked manually...

      Whether this involves somebody calling the number or not is subject to interpretation. Having seen others' reponses I now see the interpretation that most hold, and I more or less agree. However, the article doesn't actually say that the phone number is called.

    21. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by mbogosian · · Score: 1

      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010

      01101110 01100101 01101001 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010 01100001 01101101 01101001

      Yes, I have enough to do, thank you.

    22. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that they will call your enemy first and ask a leading question like: "Hi, I saw your sticker-ad in the park, are you the guy selling reconditioned typewriters?" To which your enemy will say, "Uh, no you must have the wrong number." If they're still suspicious, there's another probe or two they can try before deciding that somebody is trying to mess with him and finally they would move on.
      I suspect that after this happens a few times (and it *will*) they may drop the whole thing, way too much hassle for them. 'Jamming' is an old practice, and I'm sure it will be used here.

    23. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      The numbers are also checked manually...

      Whether this involves somebody calling the number or not is subject to interpretation. Having seen others' reponses I now see the interpretation that most hold, and I more or less agree. However, the article doesn't actually say that the phone number is called.


      How does one check a phone number manually (manual: by hand) if not to dial it and see what happens? Is there any other way to check a phone number 'manually'? I don't think looking in the phone book counts...

    24. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      How freakin' stupid does one have to be to not understand "The numbers are also checked manually.." means calling the number?

      Are you really going to try to recover your what's left of your dignity by claiming to be that stupid?

    25. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01100001 01101100 01101100 01101111 01100110 01111001 01101111 01110101 01101000 01101111 01101101 01101111 01110011

      Now shut up.

    26. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by mbogosian · · Score: 1

      01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01100001 01101100 01101100 01101111 01100110 01111001 01101111 01110101 01101000 01101111 01101101 01101111 01110011

      How did you know? I didn't mention it in my profile....

    27. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

      Actually, call Jenny, 867-5309

      --

    28. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by gorf · · Score: 1

      Checking manually that the number matches the one shown in the photo.

    29. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by TaoJones · · Score: 1

      Actually, call Jenny, 867-5309

      In the area of the US I live in, "867" is a valid phone prefix. Who knows how many contless drunk/stoned locals have tried calling that number over the years. Nobody ever answers - I just tried ;)

      __
      "That'd be the Necrotelecomnicom - the Tibetan phone book of the dead."
      odaiwai

      --
      "Fear is the rootkit of democracy.." Blarkon
    30. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely Slashdot has enough Chinese readers willing to help out.

      Maybe even the Chinese government.

    31. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by spiny · · Score: 1

      Checking manually that the number matches the one shown in the photo.

      checking it against what exactly ?

      --

      Fry: heh, Yakov Smirnoff said it
      Leela: No he didn't.
    32. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this bozo had RTFA he would have known that they call the number to verify that they are actually selling what the advertisement posted says

      So, it won't work against personal numbers, only against your business rivals. Oh, that's MUCH better.

      Wanker.

    33. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by Gleef · · Score: 1

      While false advertising is illegal in the US, as far as I know the Ad Council has nothing to do with stopping it. They are an agency who coordinates resources and pro bono time donated by professional ad agencies to produce Public Service Announcements and other advertisements to "stimulate positive social change". They did the Rosie The Riveter ads in the 1940s, the "Crying Indian" ads in the 1970s, the Crash Test Dummy ads, stuff like that.

      AFAIK there is no agency in the US looking for false advertising claims. Most false advertising issues here are people who get taken by a fradulent ad suing the company who made the ad.

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
    34. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

      That phone number, 867-5309 is the main reason that everyone now uses 555-#### whenever you see a phone number n TV or in the movies. 867-5309 was a valid phone number in many localities, and people were getting tons of calls for "Jenny" I believe that the band who came out with the song was actually sued by people who were inconvenienced. 867 is still a valid prefix in many areas, but i doubt youll find anyone at 867-5309 in any of those areas, because the phone company knows better than to assign it to anyone, its now a dead number

      --

    35. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      I thought 867-5309 was the grid coordinates for Edmonton?! :) MDK2 referred to it in the opening cinematic. Lots of great hidden references in that game.

    36. Re:Easy to cause trouble with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that would be XxX.

  5. I swear.. by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    this "we're going to annoy the hell out of you" method of law enforcement is rather entertaining... imagine the fun someone could have by posting bills with the telephone number of your competition!

    Proving that you did *not* post bills with your phone number could prove difficult but by that time, you've already racked up 543,766,246,742 voicemails and text messages.

    Do they have free incoming text messages in China? I certainly hope so.. in addition to a fine, you'd have a whopping phone bill.

    Hrm. maybe Verizon is in on this!

    1. Re:I swear.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The USA is about the only country in the world that charges for INCOMING cell phone contact

    2. Re:I swear.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it pays them back with their own medicine! Imagine if all the locksmiths in New York, those pricks who stick round advertisements for their service OVER your keyhole, were harrassed like this. It would stop very quickly.

    3. Re:I swear.. by sholden · · Score: 1

      While we aren't charged for incoming calls in Australia, many plans do have a charge for the storage (and/or retrieval) of messages left when you didn't answer or the phone was off/out of service area.

    4. Re:I swear.. by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1

      I guess I don't get this. If they have their telephone number why not just get their address from the phone company and mail them a fine or arrest them?

      --
      Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
    5. Re:I swear.. by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

      Mailing them a fine would just be ignored. Sending someone to arrest them costs money and manpower... probably not worth it for a simple misdemeanor.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    6. Re:I swear.. by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

      But what if the police don't pick up the number for some reason? In that case, you just spent a bunch of money posting advertisements for your competitor.

      We've got a similar problem here. Every telephone pole in town is covered with a bunch of signs advertising weight loss/appliance repair/whatever.
      My favorites are the one that say "Home Internet Business! Make up to $200 a day!". They're invariably hand-written with black marker on a torn piece of cardboard.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
  6. Instead of "You've Got Mail" by Montgomery+Burns+III · · Score: 2, Funny

    "You've Got an Arrest Warrant", including an all expense paid trip to the People's Center for Re-Education and enlightenment.
    --

    'ta
    1. Re:Instead of "You've Got Mail" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No idea what they do in Russia, but in comminist China, the spammer get spammed !

  7. Beep Beep. Your Credit Card has been charged... by presroi · · Score: 5, Funny

    with the current fee of US $200 Thank you for committing this crime. Your local Police Department.

  8. Good, until... by bbk · · Score: 1

    ... someone posts a bunch of messages with the phone number of someone they don't like.

    Or of a police station. That would be great - "Sir, the system we implemented to get rid of those illegal adds is flooding our 911 call center".

    Needs work.

    BBK

    1. Re:Good, until... by iamweezman · · Score: 1
      RTFA. I don't know much about chinese law enforcement, but when the article says that it has to be manually verified and then approved by a senior official I don't think the chinese version of 911 would get by.

      Plus, if someone wants to prank you, I'm sure that all these ads take plenty of time and money to produce and post. You can imagine that the police are going to waste all their money calling every phone number ever seen on the streets and bathroom stall, so they are going to go after the biggest posters first.

    2. Re:Good, until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, if someone wants to prank you, I'm sure that all these ads take plenty of time and money to produce and post. You can imagine that the police are going to waste all their money calling every phone number ever seen on the streets and bathroom stall, so they are going to go after the biggest posters first.


      Not the biggest- the moisy annoying. So, you can joe-job your business rival by posting his number on the wall of the police station itself, or some other VERY obvious place. Maybe even throw in a reference to how your number is "unblockable" or something.

  9. This is the police by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you do not turn yourself in by noon tommorow we shall send you another message asking you politely to do so again!

    1. Re:This is the police by wolf- · · Score: 4, Funny

      In future generations, this approach will be termed as "UN Action".

      --
      ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
    2. Re:This is the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to launching cellphone-homing missle instead, which will be termed as a 'spam prevention'.

    3. Re:This is the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...will be termed "UN Action"


      I thought the term was "inaction"; are they synonyms?

    4. Re:This is the police by dreamchaser · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now, now, let's be realistic. You know that the UN would never do something so bold and effective.

    5. Re:This is the police by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      ObSimpsons: police mailed out flyers saying "You have won a free motor boat!"

      Wiggum: I mailed these bogus prize certificates to every scofflaw in Springfield. When they show up for their free motor boats we arrest them and beat them to the full extent of the law.
      Eddie: So the hook is baited.
      Lou: Nice metaphore Eddie!
      Wiggum: Yeah, good work, Eddie!
      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    6. Re:This is the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sore:2???
      Bashing the UN??? what is this...what's next, you have all the right to invade the Check Republic and Poland?

    7. Re:This is the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check ? Are you an idiot ?

  10. Unfortunately... by Theaetetus · · Score: 5, Funny
    They're using that 'text-message speak' that's become so popular here:
    "UShdTrnURslfIn,Lwbrkr"

    and no one can figure out what it means. ;)

    -T

    1. Re:Unfortunately... by Nakago4 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "You should turn yourself in, lawbreaker"

    2. Re:Unfortunately... by anonymous+loser · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually the Chinese and Japanese languages lend themselves better to text messaging. I suspect that's why it is so much more popular in Asia, along with the fact that it's still a nightmare to send messages between providers in the US (i.e. dumbass wireless companies shooting themselves in the foot).

      The difference is that a single character typically represents an "idea" rather than a sound, although there are some cases of the latter, as well. When you can make most words in your language by combining at most 3-4 characters, it is much more efficient to express yourself in writing compared to English, whose average word length is 5 (according to my typing teacher from high school). Added on to that, Asian languages don't use a lot of the "superfluous" words you find in English like definite articles, pronouns, etc. Also, a lot more of the content is picked up by context and left "unwritten".

      So, packing all of these language "features" together means that it takes a lot less writing to express exactly the same concept. As a point of reference, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is 752 pages in English (paperback edition), and 210 pages in simplified Chinese (also paperback).

      p.s. a side note on "predictive text input"

      US cell phones have "predictive text input", Chinese and Japanese phones have this as well, and for a much longer time. It is a necessary component of entering any kind of text into a digital device in Asia, and has been constantly researched and developed basically since those languages were available on computers. If you want to try this out, and you have Windows 2000 or XP, try installing the IME for Chinese or Japanese, and playing with it.

    3. Re:Unfortunately... by Suidae · · Score: 5, Funny

      Asian languages don't use a lot of the "superfluous" words you find in English like definite articles, pronouns, etc. Also, a lot more of the content is picked up by context and left "unwritten".

      Contextual English possible. But make speaker sound Asian.

    4. Re:Unfortunately... by The_Rook · · Score: 1

      anonymous loser (58627)said:

      ahhh, but what does it lose in translation?

      --
      when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
    5. Re:Unfortunately... by SynKKnyS · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. Chinese input on my T68mc (Traditional Chinese) is done through bopomofo (a chinese "alphabet" based on sounds) and pinyin (a romanization of the chinese "alphabet" based on sounds). Although, it is true that entering Chinese text is much simpler on the T68mc because it predicts what you are going to write next, however most phones here are not so fortunate (such as everything by Nokia, Motorola, Siemens, OkWAP, etc). The T68mc (the T68i contains the same software) is much slower in Chinese than the already slow input in English, making it nearly unbearable to type messages.

      In other words it is just as fast or faster to type in T9 predictive input in English than to type in any Asian language. The reason why messaging hasn't taken off is just as you said: Sprint and Verizon's (PCS services) messaging agreements don't include AT&T, Cingular, and T-Mobile (GSM/GPRS services).

    6. Re:Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or like reading news titles.

    7. Re:Unfortunately... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      I suspect that's why it is so much more popular in Asia...

      Actually, not. The Philippines is considered the world capitol of "texting", and they use a mixture of English and Tagalog, with the standard shortened words (your==yr, etc.)

      I've seen it first-hand, a few times. It costs a couple of pesos (less than a US nickel) to send a text, but talking is expensive. So they type incredibly long messages to each other.

    8. Re:Unfortunately... by radish · · Score: 1

      Contextual english good for Jedi, Hmmm?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    9. Re:Unfortunately... by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      You have, of course, ignored the obivious problem of the number of chinese characters. There are 50,000 characters in the Chinese alphabet. A person is considered literate if they know the 1,000 to 1,500 of them. A typical college educated person may know between 10,000 and 25,000 characters.

      Sometimes it can be better to be a little verbouse rather than have the most compact and efficient language, look at all the people that complain about Perl.

    10. Re:Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only problem is that it is a lot tougher to enter Chinese without some sort of hand writing recognization system - the telephone keypad is pretty useless.

    11. Re:Unfortunately... by anonymous+loser · · Score: 1

      Typically phoenetics are used. Each key is tied to a subset of phoenetics, similar to the way we have multiple letters on English cell phones. When you enter a combination of phoenetics, the "predictive input" system provides you a ranked list of the possible matches, that you can select from. This is roughly the same way one enters Chinese or Japanese text using a full-sized keyboard on a computer.

    12. Re:Unfortunately... by jjeffrey · · Score: 1
      Contextual English possible. But make speaker sound Asian.

      Sounds more like Yoda to me.

  11. Creative Law Enforcement, Possible Issues by silvakow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is perhaps the most creative way to enforce a law I've ever heard of. More power to 'em. It would be easy, however, to anonymously attack someone by putting their cell phone number on a sticker and posting it around town. I hope they don't prosecute people that have been attacked this way.

    --
    In the long run, we're all dead.
    1. Re:Creative Law Enforcement, Possible Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article states that it's not a simple case of just instantly spamming any old number.

      I'm sure it would be easy enough to check that the phone number was actually being used to conduct the business advertised. A fake customer/client call is all it would take.

    2. Re:Creative Law Enforcement, Possible Issues by Frac · · Score: 1

      RTFA!

      Authorities verify each cell phone number in the ads first. If you were the victim of a fake posting and you never had any intent to sell things in the first place, a cop asking you how he can buy fake identification would go nowhere.

  12. Or as Ellen Feiss would say... by psoriac · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was having a conversion, on the cell phone. And it was like, beep beep beep beep! And then, like, I had broken the law. And I was like... hunh?

    --
    I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
    1. Re:Or as Ellen Feiss would say... by fatty+bimble · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would be, like, a bummer.

    2. Re:Or as Ellen Feiss would say... by frog51 · · Score: 1

      A conversion? What like you were an atheist, but some smooth talking religious fundamentalist called you up out of the blue and wheedled and cajoled the $1000 from you to prove your love for Jesus?

      Oh sorry, I guess it was just a spelin mistook.

  13. Demoliton Man by tweakt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dr. Cocteau: Be well, John Spartan.
    John Spartan: Be fucked.
    Moral Statute Machine: John Spartan, you are fined one credit for a violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.
    [Spartan shoots the machine]

    1. Re:Demoliton Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh, BEST MOVIE EVER!!! I love every minute of this great flick!

      Sandra Bullock: "Smoking has been determined unhealthy, and therefore, illegal."

      John Spartan Stallone: (closes eyes, puts hand to forehead) "Somebody put me back in da fridge."

      LOL! (SCREAMING)

  14. Turn yourself in by sssmashy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Upon answering the call, the wrongdoer hears the pre-recorded message--

    "You have broken the law by posting illegal ads. You must immediately stop this activity and go to the Hangzhou Urban Administrative Bureau for punishment. DO NOT PASS GO, DO NOT COLLECT $200."

  15. I'm mad as hell, and I'm not gonna take it anymore by agentkhaki · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So basically, rather than taking the time to track these folks down, they're just going to annoy the culprits into submission...?

    At first, I was going to say "why not just turn the phone off?"

    But phone being off -> no incoming business calls either. Turn the phone on -> be spammed by police and have your minutes wasted. Turn yourself in -> no more spam + you getting a fine + you no longer hanging stickers.

    But couldn't you just block whatever number the cops are calling from?

    --
    Ack!
  16. Manual check? by fastdecade · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The numbers are also checked manually and require the approval of a senior official before the bombardment can begin, he told the People's Daily.

    This is the bit I'd be worry about. You'd hate someone to target you and have you taken "for punishment" by pasting a few stickers in your name.

    So how effective is the manual check?

    1. Re:Manual check? by Drachemorder · · Score: 2, Funny
      "So how effective is the manual check?"

      Well, I'd guess it would be fairly effective. Just call the number and say "YES! I'd like to enlarge my (well, you know) by five inches like you said in the ad!"

      If they say "Get lost, you pervert!" and hang up, you know somebody was framing them.

    2. Re:Manual check? by fastdecade · · Score: 1

      Sure, you can eliminate some problems that way - but what if someone has a legitimate business and someone else (their competitor, their eternal nemesis, their ex) decorates the streets of Beijing with their phone number?

    3. Re:Manual check? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, just imagine how many legitimate penis enlargement businesses would be affected!

    4. Re:Manual check? by truesaer · · Score: 1

      Can't be too hard, just call once and pretend you want to buy. If they offer to sell, then you reveal you're the police and demand they turn themselves in. They hang up, you begin harrassment.

    5. Re:Manual check? by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      I would _hope_ that they phone up at least once pretending to be a prospective customer; If the guy on the other end says "what the fuck? I don't do that stuff!" then it could be a revenge-posting Or perhaps it's just not even an issue; printing and putting up hundreds of posters just to get someone else's phone cut off is a hassle; probably easier to just find out where the guy lives and go beat the shit out of him.

      OTOH if these people are advertising something illegal the police could phone them up and arrange a meeting, then arrest them when they turn up..?

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
  17. i've a brilliant idea by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

    to save "taxpayer" dollars, why dont they just instead, pull down the stickers upon their discovery, im sure most of these "businessmen" are using prepaid, hence disposable cell-phones and are not stupid enough to turn themselves in. the chinese government really is kooky. why do they not just put these cell phone numbers into "411", or post them on internet forums, i think that would get the point across better than any annoyance factor the police may be able to bring upon them. :)

    --
    I hate sigs.
    1. Re:i've a brilliant idea by thynk · · Score: 2, Funny

      why do they not just put these cell phone numbers into "411", or post them on internet forums,

      Better yet, just post the number on /.

      John: Why don't you answer your phone anymore?
      Joe : It got slashdotted last week.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    2. Re:i've a brilliant idea by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      that too, would be an excellent idea, slashdotting phones, i think that this is probably not too far off.

      --
      I hate sigs.
  18. Re:We Live in a Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny that Michael Moore would prattle on about fiction, since that's what all of his "documentaries" are.

  19. Fun fun fun by sholden · · Score: 1

    Better hope people who don't like you don't make some ads with your mobile number on them and stick them up.

    And the "senior official" who approves the "bombardment" better make sure it isn't President Hu Jintao's phone or that of some random army officer...

  20. Article Text - the site is getting slow already by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Authorities in China are turning to technology to nab vandals--they use a computer program that spams the wrongdoers' mobile phones until they turn themselves in.

    Officials in Hangzhou, the capital of China's Zhejiang province, have developed a system which bombards mobile phones with pre-recorded voice messages, according to the official newspaper, the People's Daily.

    Businessmen who put up illegal advertisements which contain mobile numbers have become the target of the computerized phone-spammer.

    According to the report, illegal stickers have become an eyesore in recent years, with China's coastal and urbanized areas blighted with a blizzard of advertisements.

    This is because the postcard-sized stickers, which promote everything from fake identity cards to counterfeit academic certifications, are cheap to produce and offer some anonymity.

    The new system rings the mobile phone numbers of illegal advertisers at 20-second intervals, said the People's Daily.

    Upon answering the call, the wrongdoer hears the pre-recorded message--"You have broken the law by posting illegal ads. You must immediately stop this activity and go to the Hangzhou Urban Administrative Bureau for punishment."

    Those who prefer to change their "poisoned" number rather than face punishment incur the fees and inconvenience of switching, and also lose any business their ad might have generated.

    The system also dents the advertisers' bottom line as ad respondents are unlikely to get through, thanks to the mobile barrage. As the anti-sticker scheme is newly launched, results have yet to come in, said the report.

    Ordinary folks need not worry about being spammed by mistake as the phone numbers are taken from photos of illegal advertisements, said Wei Yunxiang, an official with the Hangzhou Urban Administrative Bureau.

    The numbers are also checked manually and require the approval of a senior official before the bombardment can begin, he told the People's Daily.

    --
    Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    1. Re:Article Text - the site is getting slow already by panaceaa · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I don't think you need to worry about C|Net/ZDNet getting Slashdotted. I hope you have wonderful dreams about your increased karma tonight.

    2. Re:Article Text - the site is getting slow already by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Yeah....because you really need to karma whore when you already have +2.

      Try again.

      They were getting /.'ed believe it or not (although I'm sure your super k-rad enough to have inside sources and access to their network and server load monitoring). Then they aparrantly took down the graphics in the article and it appears fine again.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
  21. A better way by Jack+Comics · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This idea is all fine and dandy, but just asking for people to turn theirselves in won't work. It's all bark and no bite. It needs teeth. Now, if the police called me and said that if I didn't turn myself in by noon tomorrow, that they'd sic a naked Richard Simmons on me and have him follow me everywhere and even move into my house, *then* I'd want to turn myself into the authorities.

    It may not work the first few times, people thinking it's a joke and no police force would be so cruel, but after the first few times it gets reported by the media and several suicides later, the criminals would get the hint.

    --
    "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:A better way by The+Bungi · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I think the logic is that since they're using the number in the advertisement, the fact that the police are bombing the number makes it difficult for the person to do business over it - of course they can just buy another phone but they'd lose any profit they would have otherwise made with the original ad.

      I agree that "turn yourself in at your earliest convenience" is a bit dumb, but at least it's not "we know where you live, the phone company told us. Wer'e coming to get you" which is what I'd expect from the Chinese.

    2. Re:A better way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's just me, but I think Richard Simmons probably looks scarier WITH the "clothes" he wears.

    3. Re:A better way by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Maybe in Communist China the criminal looks for the police. :)

      In China there's a death penalty for all sorts of things. I saw a documentary of life in a village in China, and once a bunch of youth were fighting and somebody got killed, a few of them said they were not guilty of murder/manslaughter. They preferred to plead guilty to a lesser charge of hooliganism. The sentence was still death. But they visibly seemed happier with that - I suppose less dishonor to the family name.

      People there are really afraid of the police. (Just like in LA, or NYC I guess :) ).

      --
  22. err by Eudial · · Score: 1

    Why does the sentence "We are the Borg. Existence as you know it is over. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Resistance is futile." pop up in my head as i read this?

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    1. Re:err by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you're insane, don't blame it on us. Maybe try avoiding Star Trek for a little while, hmm?

    2. Re:err by Eudial · · Score: 1

      waddayamean?
      You can not-watch startrek?

      o.o

      Why hasnt anyone told me this before?

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  23. SO NOT FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    You need to go to funny school.

    1. Re:SO NOT FUNNY by standsolid · · Score: 1

      you need to go to signing-in schol if you're going to be all bitter like that (wait...)

      --
      WTPOUAWYHTTOTWPA
      What's the point of using acronyms when you have to type out the whole phrase anyways?
  24. from the headline... by r00t_ur_b0x · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought Ellen Feiss had become a cop.

    1. Re:from the headline... by ShoeHead · · Score: 1

      Idiot! Can't you tell that this is the very thing he was alluding to?

      For all you trolls out there, here's a little lesson in humor for you:

      When someone intelligent says something, stupid/ignorant or otherwise, that begs a certain response--something that's so obvious it's almost as if they're setting themselves up for an insult or joke--guess what? They are!! That's the joke! You're supposed to understand the joke, laugh inside, and perhaps chuckle on the outside.

      For those at the head of the class (and I hesitate to mention this to the Slashdot crowd), you can take it even further. You-the-other-person might respond in a stupid/ignorant or other manner, which just begs a reply from the other person, but which is *not* in the spirit of the expected reply. Get it? So that *they* are tempted to reply quickly.

      Now, it's possibly you were using this second tactic in the parent. The problem is, the combination of your fairly awkward grammar here, and your lame joke on the last McDonalds article tend to point the other way.

      But please. Let's try and have bring in some intelligent humor here. It's really lame how many "That is the sound of a webserv3r grinding to a halt" jokes still get modded up. Honk if you feel my pain.

      </karmaburn>

    2. Re:from the headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I'd give you my mod points, but I ain't got em. It's like a tic-tac-toe game, where you can try to look ahead to see if the game's a tie.

      Good luck.

  25. Call blocking by bubblegoose · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How long before the cell phone companies offer call blocking? They must have a limited bank of phone numbers these police calls can come from.

    I know they have had something like that for a while on land lines here in the U.S. When my sister broke up with an abusive boyfriend she was able to block all calls from his phone number.

    --
    I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
    1. Re:Call blocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but if somebody calls from inside a telephone network, for example, an internal office number (I have to dial 9 to dial outside the office) the number doesn't show up on my cell.

      Cellphones can only block calls which originate from a traceable phone number (numbers which show up on a caller-id enabled cellphone).

    2. Re:Call blocking by henrik · · Score: 1

      Ericsson phones have offered this on the phone for years.

    3. Re:Call blocking by Atlantix · · Score: 1

      While that might work in some countries, don't you think in China the phone companies would have to make exceptions for the police? Especially if the police phrase it as "you WILL allow us to call him."

      --Atlantix

    4. Re:Call blocking by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      I know they have had something like that for a while on land lines here in the U.S. When my sister broke up with an abusive boyfriend she was able to block all calls from his phone number.

      They can make caller id illegal. Until just a few years ago, caller id was illegal in California (although it was legal in other states). For instance, your sister could have blocked the telephone of her abusive boyfriend, but the boyfriend could have switched to a different pay phone everytime. If there was ever a stupid law, this was one of them.

      In any case, now caller id is legal in California. It's pretty cool. It can't display all the phone numbers in Europe yet, but it can display most phone numbers in Hungary (including pay phones). Soon, I assume my caller id display will be able to display numbers from most countries in the world (of course, anyone has the option to hide their number if they want, but the receiving telephone can refuse to ring if the person calling still refuses to display his number).

    5. Re:Call blocking by castanaveras · · Score: 1

      As long as they're charging by the minute, they have no motivation to make it easy for you to avoid calls.

      They don't care if its a wrong number, just that it's one more minute they can bill you for.

    6. Re:Call blocking by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Especially if the police phrase it as "you WILL allow us to call him."

      Why can't the police simply go to the phone co, and find out on whose name the subscription runs, and then go and arrest the guy? The phone co must have that info somewhere, or how would they know where to send the bill?

    7. Re:Call blocking by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In every country, the telcos and the ISPs are making "exceptions" for the police. Or have you been asleep the past 10 years? ;-) I don't see any opposition to this scheme in any country, not just "in communist china".

      Obviously the phone networks won't be allowed to block these numbers, and they won't have caller ID on the DOS originator so local call blocking is useless. I doubt every phone network in China has caller ID, (hell, I can't think of anywhere with that), so blocking non-identifiable numbers is way out.

      It's quite a good idea. Could we not implement a similar scheme on the net? Any links and reply-to addresses in tagged spam become DOS'ed by a volentary "zombie" that subscribers run. Putting the Slashdot effect to good use.

    8. Re:Call blocking by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      The phone co must have that info somewhere, or how would they know where to send the bill?

      Prepaid cellphone minutes purchased at a convenience store. No record exists.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    9. Re:Call blocking by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Except that a lot of the reply-tos are fake, and the links point to shared hosting sites that many other people use.

      This idea has been hashed over many many times, the conclusion almost always it that there is too much collateral damage.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  26. This probably isn't going to work by dmarx · · Score: 1
    Those who prefer to change their "poisoned" number rather than face punishment incur the fees and inconvenience of switching, and also lose any business their ad might have generated. The system also dents the advertisers' bottom line as ad respondents are unlikely to get through, thanks to the mobile barrage.

    OK, these people probably have a fair ammount of money, so "fees" aren't going to be an issue. And as for losing business, the "mobile barrage" will cause them to do that anyway. I see no reason why these people won't just change their numbers.

    --
    "Do I dare disturb the universe?"
    1. Re:This probably isn't going to work by lazyl · · Score: 1

      I see no reason why these people won't just change their numbers.

      They will. But then their ads become useless because the number is wrong, and all their previous business contacts have to be informed of the number change. Sounds like a big pain in the ass to me. Eventually they will have to stop using that advertising method. So, no, it won't catch anybody, but it will probably curb the practice.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
  27. TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one in their right mind would follow a link to rotten.com

    1. Re:TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops... I did... Sorry...

    2. Re:TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is exactly why slashdot is the place to post rotten.com links.

  28. Profit by agentkhaki · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait, wait, wait... Couldn't you just get a 900 number associated to your phone, and post that all over town? Every time the cops call you, if they wanted to talk to you, they'd have to agree to the charge (or can they just bill you without asking - even better) ... Pure profit, at the expense of the government.

    --
    Ack!
    1. Re:Profit by darien · · Score: 1

      Pure profit, at the expense of the government.

      (Or, you might say, the taxpayer.)

  29. Re:In Communist China, the Law BREAKS YOU!!!! by PunchMonkey · · Score: 1

    I don't know what that is.... and I don't think I want to know....

    --
    I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  30. Law Enforcement in China...well, Hong Kong by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Amazing how on top of the latest trends in people abusing public places, spamming, etc. the chinese police are. Granted, they have a tradition of being viewed as repressive in the US, I was impressed with a small matter I had with a Hong Kong seller not delivering the goods and how they hauled the guy in and grilled him (not literally.) After he scampered home he sent me an email faster than the investigating detective. I get a hit and run in San Jose, CA, and the cops have better things to do... Probably explains a lot of why obvious crime efforts in Spam go unpunished.

    I'm sure the answer exists somewhere in the middle ... it just seems I was lead to believe in a different future by Adam-12 and Dragnet.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Law Enforcement in China...well, Hong Kong by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      HK is part of China, now, but the police are not integrated at all. (Thank God.) In fact a big problem is HK residents whose company has a business dispute in China are arrested by the local authorities and held till a ransom is paid. The HK govt does even less than the former colonial British did to protect its people from from being chewed up by the Mainland "legal" system.

  31. Next by pcgamez · · Score: 1

    I hope they will figure out a way to get rid of all the locksmith stickers in NYC next...

  32. Okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently, lots of illegal advertisements as stickers with mobile-phone numbers listed are placed around large cities and are becoming an eyesore

    Wha... Ever heard of commas, or sentences that actually make sense when you read them?

  33. Re:First Post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got em on dialup. The secret to it is....oops gotta go.

  34. Re:In Communist China, the Law BREAKS YOU!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean you do not want to see a whole glass container of jam caught up someone's ass?

    It makes a penis look tiny in comparison. Ouch indeed.

  35. I wish they'd implement something like this.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... with people who run red lights. Here in Portland, people think red lights are optional. I'm getting rather sick of it. I think if their cell phone were to start ringing every time they do it then we might see a pavlovian effect here to deter this problem.

    1. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by Smidge204 · · Score: 2, Informative

      In NYC, there are cameras set up at every intersection. If you run a red light, they take a snapshot... ...about a week later you receive a ticket in the mail, with a photo of your car going through the intersection and a closeup of your license plate. Try and talk your way out of that ticket!
      =Smidge=

    2. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      " ...about a week later you receive a ticket in the mail, with a photo of your car going through the intersection and a closeup of your license plate. Try and talk your way out of that ticket!"

      My aunt had that happen, only she got the ticket instead of her son that was driving the car. That's probably why the photo radar option's not so popular here, though we do have it.

      I wish I had a phone numberr I could call so that I could report license plate #'s of ppl who do that. Then, what'd happen is the police would send out a warning (not one that appears on their record...) saying "Somebody complained about you, stop it." Eventually, enough complaints could lead to something worse.

      Normally I wouldn't be a fan of something like that, but I've watched Tri-Met busses (yes, plural) run red lights. One actually caused a train/trolley to stop and honk at it.

    3. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      So a national registry of license plates mapped to cell phones? Hmmmmmmmmmm.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    4. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by jjhall · · Score: 3, Informative

      This doesn't work. In my area, they tried this and it got shut down pretty quick. Unless there is a solid picture of the driver in the car, it does no good. The driver is to be fined, not the owner of the car.

      Too many cases had to be thrown out, due to "Yes, your honor, that is a picture of my car. However I was not driving my car."

      "Who was driving your car at that day and time?"

      "Well, that was 3 months ago by the time I got the mail and got this court date was set, and I don't remember if I let Marv, Harry, or Bill drive it to get lunch that day. Or it could have been my wife or daughter, I don't know which one of us took the car that day."

      Burdon of proof of the driver is on the State side, not the accused. As long as you can give a reasonable doubt whether or not it was you, then you're off.

      Now if they were to have several camera angles with polarized lenses take a picture, to combat window glare, they may have a chance of these holding up in court.

      Photo Radar is the same way, it proves too hard to prove who was driving the car, it takes less effort for an officer to hide behind a road sign and write tickets to the person sitting in the drivers seat.

      I definitely agree that people need to stop running red lights, as that is more dangerous than pretty much any other traffic violation, but these automated systems have a very long way to go before they will be acceptable evidence in court.

    5. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by mheckaman · · Score: 1

      Simple -- You say you were not the one driving the car at the time. This works in Maryland.

      Matt

      --

      Don't take life so seriously; it isn't permanent.

    6. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by sik+puppy · · Score: 2, Funny

      That was done in Germany too. Until one day some prominent politician got one. The wife opened up the mail. Hmmm - the woman in the passenger seat was NOT her.

      Pictures are no longer mailed with the ticket. I would assume that they would be available in court though.

      --
      The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
    7. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by flonker · · Score: 1

      According to the constitution, if you commit a crime, you have the right to face your accuser. OTOH, you give up lots of your rights when you sign to get your driver's license. (Yes, there's more to it than just that.)

    8. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, is this true? What was the politician's name?

    9. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Or a signal sent from a stoplight to the phone to make it beep.

      If you're saying that it couldn't be implemented today, I'd tend to agree. It'd take updated phones.

      It just struck me as a neat inspiration, not as a well thought out plan. heh.

    10. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In NYC, there are cameras set up at every intersection. If you run a red light, they take a snapshot... ...about a week later you receive a ticket in the mail, with a photo of your car going through the intersection and a closeup of your license plate. Try and talk your way out of that ticket!"

      Remind me to "borrow" your car sometime....

    11. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Offtopic, I know.

      I got lucky (I guess) a few weeks ago and caught video of a Tri-Met bus crunching a little Escort wagon up near St. John's as the bus whipped out from a bus stop into the side of the car.

      I love how "Yield! It's the Law!" translates into "Get the Fuck outta the way! Comin' Through!" Sometimes I wish I drove a vehicle that a) wasn't mine b) I didn't care about and c) was big enough to tangle with a bus. I'd follow the bus around, "Just in case" they pulled that.

      I understand that they have schedules to keep, but State Law has given them the idea that they can do what they want in the interest of keeping schedule, safety or other drivers be damned. You'd think the 3-hour-wait whilst the driver kneels the bus and gets out of his seat to fold up other seats and buckle in the person in the wheelchair, then returns to his seat and rights the bus could be shortened, instead of giving bus drivers blanket irresponsibility for accidents.

    12. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Funny, is this true? What was the politician's name?"

      It was D.J. Quimby in a small city about 100mi south of Portland, Oregon.

    13. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by zurab · · Score: 1

      Try and talk your way out of that ticket!

      Actually, many have. I have heard of some rulings that make this evidence inadmissible or inconclusive in courts. Many have successfully argued that technology is not accurate all the time (i.e. camera may take a picture after a delay, or even in error). Also, in many areas these cameras are regarded as unreasonable and as an invasion of privacy, and thus are not allowed.

      Also, most of the places I've seen such cameras, only take one picture of a violation; and that's the picture of a license plate of the car. I wonder how they can prove or allege a violation by the owner of that vehicle. It could have been anybody driving the car. And burden of proof is on prosecution.

      To link this to the Chinese lazy government spamming the cell phones, how can they be sure who actually put up those cell phone ads and stickers? A company could have hired an advertizing agency or a person to distribute their ads and otherwise advertize their business. Then the advertizer, without the knowledge of the client, could have engaged in illegal practices such as sticking the ads in places where they are not allowed. Also, another variation is, what has been mentioned by other posters already, that a malicious competitor could hire a person to put up the stickers of their competitors phone numbers close to police and government offices so they get noticed by the law enforcement. I am not aware how they, or any "senior official", can verify who put up the stickers.

      I say, if the act of putting up these ads is illegal, then catch these people *in the act*. Otherwise, you'd be like communists - everybody is guilty by default. But again, that's China - they are communists, and everybody is guilty by default.

    14. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by Bad_Feeling · · Score: 1

      My cell phone sends out it's min/esn every 5 minutes. I know so because i can hear it on stereo. If it is possible to send a signal to make the cell phone send out its # on command, then you could just use that information to dial the number.

      --
      Disclaimer: On the other hand, I am kind of a psycho...
    15. Re:I wish they'd implement something like this.. by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1


      Actually, those photo stoplights are a crock. The municipal governments tend to cut the yellow light timing and use it as a Ca$h Cow.

      --
      My rights don't need management.
  36. Location Based Service ? by makapuf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Erm, I suppose they get some information about where the guy is (what cell, or better via triangulation or radio waves), or who he is talking to, too.

    or (shudder) they'll force him to use .. WAP ! (argh.)

  37. Fight SPAM with SPAM by techentin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Isn't it obvious? Spammers annoy everybody because they can do so without cost. The police have found a way to cost them money, which may actually result in less (sticker) SPAM.

    The logical extension is to apply the concepts of open source collaboration for email SPAM. Today a shady business can pay $5000 to a spammer to send 10,000,000 emails, and they get a profit because of the 0.01% response rate. Wouldn't it be a lot more fun if they got 10,000,000 emails and 10,000,000 web hits? Then let them try to sort the wheat from the chaff.

    Stop filtering, and just hit REPLY

    1. Re:Fight SPAM with SPAM by lmedcalf · · Score: 1

      I've been considering this, as a way to make SPAM less profitable... Schedule one (or two, or three) of my desktop systems to download the entire contents of SPAMmed websites several times a day. Consuming their bandwidth with non-profitable traffic. (Evil grin)

    2. Re:Fight SPAM with SPAM by themo0c0w · · Score: 1

      Stop filtering, and just hit REPLY

      This would work, except for the fact that most of the header information in spam is thoroughly spoofed and sent through open mail relays. In fact, spammers ofter use legitimate email addresses as the reply-to address, meaning some unwitting soul wakes up with 10,000 angry replies and 20,000 more undeliverable messages.

      Thus, replying to the email doesn't work. /.'ing their website, however...

      --
      ph34r teh p0w3r 0f th3 c0w
    3. Re:Fight SPAM with SPAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of my spam is pump&dump stock "tips"; there's no connection to the originator, since he's using the stock market as an unwitting middle-man

  38. The riddle is solved by YAN3D · · Score: 1

    We finally figured out who voted that spam was good all the time!

  39. This is the Perp. by The+Jonas · · Score: 4, Funny

    No! "Now Go Away Or I Shall Taunt You A Second Time".

  40. Wait for them to go to the theatre by chrisseaton · · Score: 4, Funny

    They won't have to turn themselves in

  41. May be a tad off topic but... by Yoquimbo · · Score: 1, Interesting
    ...does anyone remember anything about a terrorist/crime organization that used telephones as assassination tools?

    As far as I can remember, and I may be wrong, they took apart their target's telephone, wired it up with explosives and a special detonator. Then I believe they waited till their target was home, called them, made sure it was the target speaking on the phone, and then detonated the explosives using a special tone over the phone line...

    --
    Death to Reefer Addicts.
    --
    1. Re:May be a tad off topic but... by Rosonowski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you had the chance to get into their house and rewire their phone, why the hell wouldn't you just shoot them?

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    2. Re:May be a tad off topic but... by L0k11 · · Score: 1
      I remember reading about this somewhere. It may have been New Scientist. It was the Isreali secret service... Mossad or something (if I remember from Tom Clancy novels hehe)


      They hacked an exchange to prevent a terrorist / palestinian leaders phone from working. Then when he took it to the dealership they modified it.


      Then they gave him a call, confirmed it was him on the phone... and pressed a few buttons... BOOM


      Anyone remember the movie Wedlock? Where the prison population had these collars around their necks wired with explosives... and yeah they blew up on some kind of signal (I saw the movie when I was really young)


      Combine the ideas and it give you some sort of futeristic totalitarian martial law society where everyones mobile phones are wired with explosives... you break the law and boom... you die :)


      I am not trying to make any political statement (with the isreali thing or be flamebait, just trying to be interesting / informative

      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything" -- Josef Stalin
    3. Re:May be a tad off topic but... by Yoquimbo · · Score: 1
      Hmm, was Wedlock the one with Rutger Hauer in it? Sort of the prisoners had to stay within 15ft of each other or the collars'd explode right?

      Gads I love the SciFi channel... But Brimstone was cancelled damn them! Just as well, it was getting more than a tad stupid.

      --
      Death to Reefer Addicts.
      --
    4. Re:May be a tad off topic but... by alizard · · Score: 1
      There's a story floating around that Mossad built a touch-tone activated bomb into a cell phone and made sure it was delivered with the next batch of deliveries going to a high-ranking terrorist.

      The last thing the guy ever heard was "Hello, I'm Avi {can't remember the name), head of Israeli Intelligence." followed by the touch-tone sequence.

      Not as funny as "My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die" would have been in this context, but this was before The Princess Bride hit video.

  42. Knee jerk reaction by wiggys · · Score: 3, Insightful
    At first I thought this was a truly great idea.

    However, there is a huge problem with it: If you hate someone all you do is make some fake ads with their phone numbers on and leave them for the Chinese authorities to find and then spam.

    Result: an innocent person has a whole lotta shit to clean up.

    If the authorities do take some time to investigate the ads (ie actually try phoning the numbers and try to buy the products would be a start) then I think it might be a good way to deal with the criminals who promote their wares.

    Similar tactics have been done before against email spammers whereby people find out the spammer's home address and send them junk mail in the post. It pisses the spammers off, but unfortunately finding out the senders of such crap is much more difficult as they don't rely on an email address to take orders with.

    --

    Sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.

    1. Re:Knee jerk reaction by medscaper · · Score: 2, Informative
      If the authorities do take some time to investigate the ads (ie actually try phoning the numbers and try to buy the products would be a start)

      Yeah, actually...I would say RTFA, but it's the first time I actually read one in five years - I sorta had to to submit it - but it says that the police personally verify all numbers by calling them first before turning this thing on, and even then, a senior administrator has to personally vouch for the number.

      So, I guess it's his ass if they goof.

      --
      Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    2. Re:Knee jerk reaction by sethaw · · Score: 1

      However, there is a huge problem with it: If you hate someone all you do is make some fake ads with their phone numbers on and leave them for the Chinese authorities to find and then spam.

      My thoughts exactly. The only other question I have is, Are there any slashdotters in china who will post something for me?

    3. Re:Knee jerk reaction by BaCkBuRn · · Score: 1

      If you read into it they call the number to find out if its truely represented as on the sticker. It is then approved by one of the higher ups. Although I see this idea entertaining I doubt it will become a problem. -bb

      --
      PRINT "Signature line broken."
      GOTO 1
    4. Re:Knee jerk reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm! Yes, good thought. Next time RTFA, MF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    5. Re:Knee jerk reaction by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1

      Usually those who post these illegal ads are outright criminals: including loan sharks, fake passport/document seller, drug trafficker or those who control prostitutes etc...

      If the police do follow the procedure (ie ring up first), it is not too possible to affect the innocent. How do you normally answer you call, "Hello this is Tom speaking" or "Hey bro, I can sell you some Speed!!!".

      Making fun on those bastards was one of our favourite in the past (early 90's) when we were young. We wasted the bastards' time (and money--only listener paid the call that time) by calling those sticker numbers and striked fake deals with them. To stop being traced back, we normally use public free phone, eg those placed in school for local calls. Well, I grow up in Hongkong but I am quite sure the mainland criminal network has picked up all the tricks in sticker business even before unification...

  43. Shut up, Ellen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put the joint _down_.

  44. Same here in the Netherlands by CvD · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They did this about a year ago here in the Netherlands. Phones listed as stolen were sent a barrage of SMS messages, basically every couple minutes, making the phone nearly unusable (incessant beeping of arriving messages, full inbox, etc)

    In the GSM system, there is a SIM card which is linked to your phone number, subscription, etc. You put this card into your phone and use it. The phone itself has a unique identifyer as well, the IMEI number. It was these serial numbers which were used to identify stolen phones. So putting in a new SIM card won't work, because the phone will still identify itself to the network with its IMEI number.

    I never saw any report on how sucessfull this was, however. I can imagine that in a lot of cases the owner didn't even know it was stolen (if they bought it second hand)...

    Anyways, seems like a good way to harass people who use stolen phones.

    Cheers,

    Costyn.

    1. Re:Same here in the Netherlands by FinnishFlash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember reading about this particular expirement, and they said that the cell-phone thefts were reduced by 90 % in a year.

      Which is quite easy to understand, as this makes it practically impossible to sell the stolen phone.

      --
      please proff read !
    2. Re:Same here in the Netherlands by stephanruby · · Score: 3, Interesting
      They did this about a year ago here in the Netherlands. Phones listed as stolen were sent a barrage of SMS messages, basically every couple minutes, making the phone nearly unusable (incessant beeping of arriving messages, full inbox, etc)

      They're already doing this to me here in the US, although my phone wasn't even stolen. By linking sequential phone numbers directly to email addresses, they made it _very_easy_ for spambots to spam the hell out of us.

      Does anyone know of a US provider who doesn't use phone numbers as an email id?

    3. Re:Same here in the Netherlands by McWilde · · Score: 1

      I remember the experiment didn't work out. At least at first they just spammed the phone number of the stolen phone. If your phone was stolen you'd get a new one and a new SIM card, with the same number. So the police were actually spamming the legit owner. I don't recall if they changed the setup to target IMEI numbers later on.
      I was working for one of the Dutch mobile phone companies at the time. Everyone there thought it was all a pretty lame idea, exactly because they just used phone numbers.

      --
      Maybe
    4. Re:Same here in the Netherlands by CvD · · Score: 1

      Hmm...ok, well, I suppose that you know more about it than I. :-) I thought I remembered reading about them using the IMEI number, which I thought was pretty clever, since changing SIM card wouldn't be effective.

      Cheers,

      CvD.

  45. ILLEGAL OPERATION by intermodal · · Score: 3, Funny

    press ctrl+alt+del to restart

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  46. Chinese People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, those Chinese are stupid. Maybe we should just LET them steal all our technology to eliminate all this third-world stupidity.

  47. Now that is a creative way by mpost4 · · Score: 1

    You have to give it to the China Goverment for coming up with that idea, maybe we could get the US goverment to do it too.

  48. How it really works. by SourceHammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ring Ring...

    Hello, locksmith here.

    We saw you bills advertising locksmith service, we can post bills for one half price of the competition. Can we send you a quote?

    Yes.

    Here it comes...

    --



    Open source development is my way of competing with the low-cost programmers in India...
  49. Something All of you missed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    So what if you change your number, So what if you block the police.

    THIS IS CHINA!!!! You are not protect from the Government. The phone company is not autonomous (no one is, not even the enterprise zones along the south east coastal areas.

    This is not the USA where the police have to work within the rules. This is MAINLAND CHINA kids, ive been there a lot and can tell you the following:

    #1 if you got the clout you can get anything done
    #2 if the police (read government) decides your a problem, you can kiss it goodbye!

    #3 You cant block the police/govt over there with your silly little 900 / 3 blocking DIPSHITS!!! they already offer 100% censorship (this includes phone systems)

    As it is so painfully obvious, that most of you NIMRODS have never been over there, had you, you would understand very cleary why CHINA is NOT the USA!!!...

    And actually this will probably work VERY well for China!

    1. Re:Something All of you missed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So tell me, where in China are you from? Where are these "enterprise" zones you speak of? Where's your proof of police suppression, especially in these enterprise zones?

      Answer those questions, and I might believe you go to China "a lot", and aren't just basing this off of the websites you visit.

  50. You have been fined.... by LittleGuy · · Score: 1
    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  51. Because cops are too busy making money on drugs. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Busting someone for drugs earns the department all the cash and assets of the person. Busting someone for hit and run gets them nothing but paperwork, and the expense of dealing with it.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  52. Re:I'm mad as hell, and I'm not gonna take it anym by joggle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Given the number of people they're spamming, the police could potentially set up 1000 lines or more to call from.

  53. AHAHAHAHAH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "In the future, every resturaunt it Taco Bell"

    Talk about your distopias!

  54. I'm all for this by Noksagt · · Score: 1

    This is great! I have always been annoyed that I've never had a good time when I call one of those numbers that say "For a good time, call...."

  55. Spam Solution by DoNotTauntHappyFunBa · · Score: 1

    Whoa. Could this be the solution to email spam as well? Calling, emailing (spam the spammer), DDOS-ing the link back to spamming client?

    --
    Well, hey, I didn't spend all those years playing Dungeons and Dragons and not learn a little something about courage.
    1. Re:Spam Solution by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      The weird thing is, the types of products/services those illegal ads offer resemble spam to a great degree.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  56. vewy funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tanks vewy much

  57. Re:In Communist China, the Law BREAKS YOU!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It makes a penis look tiny in comparison.

    Speak for yourself.

  58. Spam.... by t0ny · · Score: 1

    This would be great if implimented in the US against spam email. Set up a 'honeypot' email account, then spam-bomb the destination email address. Its like stealing from theives!

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  59. Re:We Live in a Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And then he got BOOED OFF THE STAGE. That was GREAT. I loved that.

  60. Finally, Law Enforcement that makes Sense.... by BaCkBuRn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in the good ol days officers of the law had discression when it came to interpretation of the law. When I was a youngin and was caught blowing up the neighbors mailbox I wasn't made a posterchild for federal anti-blowing-up-stuff ads like today. I was repermanded by a 7 foot tall ogre with a gun and a badge. I stopped blowing up mailboxes reeeeal fast.
    China's police figured out that jail and fines arent the way to stop most crime. It's all about the psychological punishment of having your phone ring untill your brain explodes. Hopefully more law enforcement agencies will catch on to the use of psycho-enforcement. (yey I coined another buzzword)
    -bb

    --
    PRINT "Signature line broken."
    GOTO 1
  61. A short play. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    {man walks into police station}

    Man: Hello, I've come to turn myself in.
    Policeman: {starts laughing}
    Man: No really, I have. I feel all dirty and stuff.
    Policeman: {points at man, and starts laughing again}
    Man: Stop it! Stop it!!
    Policeman: {Regains breath. Tries to speak, and starts laughing again}
    Man: What's so funny?
    Policeman: Get out.

    THE END

  62. Better Idea... by j0hnfr0g · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I doubt someone would actually turn themself in from spamming, so they ought to call and say:

    Hello. I have seen your advertisements and would like to learn more about your products/services since I think there is a high potential of purchasing at a large volume. Please meet me at (location) at (date/time).

    Then the police nab them at the location.

    1. Re:Better Idea... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Depends on whether your priority is reducing crime or punishing criminals.

      Maybe they prefer to leave jail space for other shadier characters?

      If you are trying to get rid of ads for illegal stuff (with phone numbers as contact) this would work reasonably well.

      Even if you don't catch the crooks, they switch to a different business model which does not involve littering a whole city with ads for illegal stuff.

      Result: City looks better.

      Sure seems more practical than physically catching them one by one, esp if there are thousands. The rest will usually think they won't get caught so your city remains littered.

      --
  63. Haha, I do that in Canada by Ace905 · · Score: 1

    I do something similar to Spammers that have a contact form on their web site.

    Proof of concept code contained within.

    --

    Ace
  64. You could use a nice cold jail cell John Anderton by llamalicious · · Score: 1

    Combine this with cellphone GPS/tower triangulation location methods, and some hypersonic sound and you could probably spam the person using the cellphone, as well as the phone itself.

    I better check and make sure my tinfoil hat doesn't have any holes!

  65. Similar problems in VN by dutky · · Score: 4, Interesting
    When I was in Viet Nam we saw these short strings of digits painted on almost every vertical surface in HCMC. Each number was accompanied by a very short message (one or two words in vietnamese) but no other information whatsoever. When I asked our guide about them he told me that those were 'advertisements' and that the numbers were telephone numbers. He also said that the advertisments were highly illegal (because they were eyesores) and that the police would have any number found thus posted shut off by the telephone company (government run, of course).

    While this policy didn't seem to be having a discernable effect in HCMC, we didn't see the advertisements (at least not to the same degree) in other large cities (specifically Da Nang, Hue and Hanoi).

  66. Great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To Whom It May Concern,

    This is a wonderful idea. Where can we sign up for your product? We'd like to use it for proper enforcement of the DMCA and Patriot laws, respectively.

    Sincerely,

    Disney and John Ashcroft

  67. Only if there were a phone version of Slashdot... by j0hnfr0g · · Score: 1

    Then all the Chinese police would have to do is post their cell phone #, and there would be free spamming from the /. effect!

  68. A better question.... by IshanCaspian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What does this do to the cellular phone networks? If I ran the verizon network, I'd be really glad to have a bunch of pissed off chinese commie gestapo guys /.'ing me 24/7.

    --

    But there is another kind of evil that we must fear most... and that is the indifference of good men.
    1. Re:A better question.... by Spyffe · · Score: 1

      Not if the customer being /.ed were paying for each call they received!

      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
  69. YOU FAIL IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are the failure. Suck my ass bitchtits.

  70. Here's an idea by brkello · · Score: 1

    A lot of people are complaining that none of these people would actually turn themselves in (obviously). So let's take advantage of their greed. Send them a single message saying, "Congratulations, you won --insert trip/money/etc--. Meet us at --insert location-- to pick up your prize." Now all you do is set up a fake award place and when you take them to the back room, you arrest em...problem solved. I saw this done on some TV show that demonstrated techniques cops used to safely arrest people who have violated their parole.

    --
    Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    1. Re:Here's an idea by satterth · · Score: 1

      Isn't that entrapment?

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    2. Re:Here's an idea by brkello · · Score: 1

      Nope, entrapment is defined as: a person is 'entrapped' when he is induced or persuaded by law enforcement officers or their agents to commit a crime that he had no previous intent to commit; and the law as a matter of policy forbids conviction in such a case. They are not getting them to commit a crime, they already did that, they are just getting them to turn themselves in.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  71. Wait...wouldn't this be illegal by Qapf · · Score: 0

    Don't know status of japenese law, but wouldn't this be illegal under US law because you are costing them money by calling them every 20 seconds?

    --
    What does one cow say to the other? Moo.
  72. Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, why didn't Bush think of this. He could have kept calling Saddam

  73. Re:How it really works. (your sig) by rinderpestofshank · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    as an indian programmer, i must admit that i find your sig offensive. >> Open source development is my way of >> competing with the low-cost programmers in >> India

  74. lots of abbrieviations in Chinese by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The main technique is to concatinate the first syllable of each word or phrase. Like "SoMa" meaning "South Manhattan in English.

    The counter-example is to wade through Mao's political writings. Never has so much (words) said so little. He uses lots of four-syllable words (two is the average).

  75. ...and less sophisticated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and less sophisticated.

  76. Interesting comment by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those who prefer to change their "poisoned" number rather than face punishment incur the fees and inconvenience of switching, and also lose any business their ad might have generated.

    This is an interesting statement to be made against spam in general. Those who get spammed incessently have to incur all of the costs, and either suffer through it (as most people do), or lose the revenue/contacts that have the old "poisoned" address.

    I think from this point on, I am going to call my addresses that receive 20+ spams a day "poisoned" addresses. Because that is basically what they are.

    --
    ~ kjrose
  77. Cruel and Unusual by joel_archer · · Score: 1

    While this might happen in a Communist regime like China, the US Constitution prohibits "Cruel and Unusual Punishments" which this clearly is. I am deeply shocked by this clear violation of human rights.

  78. Read the article by xenocidex · · Score: 1

    The idea is taht there are numerous ads placed around china on little cards that have people's phone numbers on them. they are illegial, but probably only the equivilient of a class c misdemeanour in america. However, they are becoming quite an eyesore. So in order to fix the problem, they are goign to enter in the phone numbers into a database, and have computers call them and leave a message once every 20 seconds asking them to turn themselves in. this will force them to eithier 1) turn themselves in to get the cops to stop calling them, or 2) get a new number, which involves cancelling thier current cell phone contract, since its now useless.Hopefully it will put an end to all the ads.

    --
    There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence.
  79. Ways to DDoS a phone number. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Place an ad for a very popular and call intensive business and list the mark's number as it's contact number.

    2) Place an ad as a woman in many personals sites. Submit the mark's number to contact.

    3) Use an automated online dialer to call banks of pager numbers, and enter the mark's number.

  80. Re:Because cops are too busy making money on drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your truthfulness humors me.

  81. I know some girl who got her phone stolen... by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    She called the number..
    Girl answers: Who this?
    Phone owner: This is so and so, who's this?
    Girl: You mean that (*&^'s car we bussed in?
    click.

  82. Does this prevent harassing businesses? by zipwow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Okay, so if its an individual, clearly things will be figured out early on.

    However, what if its a competing business? If someone calls up XYZ company and says, "I saw your ad, I'd like to buy some of your things.." I'm sure the business in question will be more than happy to oblige them. Is there anything else that could be done to demonstrate that they didn't put the signs up in the first place?

    I suppose its the same question in the US without a phone number. Say you print a bunch of stickers with your competition's name on them, then put them in places that are obviously vandalizing, like car windshields. Does the business get in trouble?

    -Zipwow

    --
    I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
    1. Re:Does this prevent harassing businesses? by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      They arent going after people who put stickers in illegal places, they are going after people whose stickers advertise illegal things. So yes, if you put up a sticker with the # of the neighborhood crack dealer then he SHOULD get in trouble.

  83. Poetic Justice by serutan · · Score: 1

    I gotta say, this is a beautiful thing. Someone plasters the town with useless shit, and their phone gets spammed relentlessly. Doesn't get any better than that. The phrase, "You asked for it asshole" comes to mind. Now if only this could work on telemarketurds.

  84. anything else? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
    Busting someone for drugs earns the department all the cash and assets of the person. Busting someone for hit and run gets them nothing but paperwork, and the expense of dealing with it.

    Soooo... cops are less inclinded to 'bust' people when there's no money in it for them?

    Wicked.

    *spark spark*
    puuuuffffffffff

    *cough* I love cops... *cough*

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:anything else? by jred · · Score: 1

      Smoking the evidence? :)

      A real story. I stopped off to say hi to some friends. Long story short, as I was leaving, police were arriving. They are upset that I see them & lock the door behind me. Young white cop (I'm white) starts searching me & finds a bowl. They take me around the corner, try to get me to say those guys (my friends) were selling me drugs. In the end, the older black cop (good cop in the whole good cop/bad cop routine)asks me if I'm hungry & points out they can't arrest me with no evidence. Let me tell you, a half smoked bowl does *not* taste good :P I got to walk home, "or they'd have to arrest me for DUI", but no lasting scars.

      I told those jerks they shouldn't be throwing records at cars from the roof of their own place. What's really ironic is that's why I was leaving in the first place.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  85. sounds to me like... by meldon+corintur · · Score: 1

    Chinese water torture gone hi-tech.

  86. I can see it now.. by weeboo0104 · · Score: 1

    Can you hear me now? .......Good.
    500 times a day. Not much different than the cell phone commercials we get bombarded with on a daily basis.

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  87. Easily avoidable ... by DaemonGem · · Score: 1

    What's stopping the "businessmen" from getting a new mobile phone? Would this not solve the problem?
    -Dae

    --
    "Alle reden vom wetter. Wir nicht." - SDS Sozialistischer Deutscher Studentenbund.
    j00 4r3 3n73r1ng l337 w0r1d.
  88. Thats a great idea! by greymond · · Score: 1

    Fight fire with fire!

    Although I wonder - how long does it take to get them on the list of people to spam? Example: If a spammer posts his ads up on monday and then decides to change his phone number the following monday will he still be able to be bothered BEFORE he can change it?

  89. Should be done better by makapuf · · Score: 1

    Like, the bad behaving people would have their number posted on slashdot. Now THAT would be slashdotting !

  90. The obvious abuse... by LeoDV · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...if you ever dislike someone, report his phone stolen.

  91. Re:I'm mad as hell, and I'm not gonna take it anym by rabidcow · · Score: 1

    Why would the cops let you know what number they're calling from? You can only block numbers if your phone company tells you what number it is.

  92. Maybe you should try to figure out why people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...are doing that.

    Maybe your lights are not timed correctly (i.e. not to MUTCD standards).

    Maybe there is something wrong with the intersection (e.g. a lane ends) or drivers are distracted by something (e.g. merging into another lane).

    Actually fixing the problem would be much more effective than sending out tickets. But of course it's less profitable, so it's rarely done.

  93. wow... by hahn · · Score: 1

    a good use for spam has been found. who would've thought?

    --
    "The only normal people are the ones you don't know very well."
  94. Re:How it really works. (your sig) by CyberBill · · Score: 1

    as an indian programmer, i must admit that i find your sig offensive. >> Open source development is my way of >> competing with the low-cost programmers in >> India

    Grow up.

    -Bill

    --
    -Bill
  95. Sweet by mellomutt · · Score: 1

    If there were someone that I was not too fond of, I'd put up some illegal advertisements with *their* mobile phone numbers.

  96. Mr. Gates, you have a call on line #2 by Stalcair · · Score: 1

    Hello, this is Bill
    *slight static**Hello, _Mr or Mrs. Bill Gatees_, this is a reminder of your friendly authorities*
    Ummm, its Gates, G, A, T...
    *It has come to our attention that your software is sold not on the basis of quality and efficiency but through manipulation of the sheepish masses and equally sheepish decision makers.*
    Look, if this is about those Halloween papers, I can explain... you see I have this ferret...
    *It is also known that your software causes millions in lost annual revenue and is a playground for both virus and cracker alike. Your policy of taking existing or emerging standards and adjusting them so that no choice is available to the user, administrator or developer goes against the innovative nature of the USA.*
    Well, you see we at Microsoft call that "embrace and extend." By focusing the majority of our energies upon marketing and legal we are able to put just the right spin... I mean "angular momentum" upon the issues people never knew they were interested in. Furthermore, our latest .NET intitiative uses...
    *_Mr. or Mrs. Gatees*, you are hereby ordered to, for the first time in your history to actually INNOVATE and come up with SOLUTIONS that people and business needs and by playing in this wonderful game of Free Market Capitalism you increase both the wealth and productivity/output of the nation and thus increase prosperity for not just our great nation but the whole world*
    Ummm, did I mention I am the richest man in the world. Logically I am thus right in everything I have done, or at least more than anyone else before.
    *slight pause**Bitch, please**slight pause**that is illogical and proves that not only must you not be the best to be the richest but you prove how stupid people are that blindly support you when you kick them**slight pause**As I was saying...*
    HEY! You responded to my speech, this isn't just a recording. You use speech recognition and lexical parsing... and it works! Who wrote you and your underlying system environment?
    **HAAAHAAAHAAAHAAA***Obvsiously not anyone you employ**Ahem**As I was droning, you are hereby ordered to actually compete by having a superior product, not tricky advertising, shady deals or hypocritical patent lawsuits. If you wish to live off the fruits of our society and economy than you too must till the soil and grow your own orchards instead of buying up some farms and burning the rest. You will be spammed with this message at an increasing frequency up to and to include once every 5 minutes if you do not begin to compete in the marketplace.*
    You have no idea what you are suggesting. How will you enforce this?
    *By first eliminating the government mandated monopolies of your software inside the government and eliminating those who obviously have no business making purchasing or architecture decisions in the government and contracting arenas. Then the natural order of thigns will progress, resulting in your worst nightmare... an informed and quality conscious minded consumer base.*
    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOO!
    *HAAHAAHAAHAA**I love my thread execution space* (job, btw)

    --

    I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

  97. No, death is still a better option by allrong · · Score: 1

    A firing squad would be a more permanent solution to stop the spammer (although John Edwards might start channelling penis enlargements and Nigerians - "I'm picking up something about money. Do you have a rich relative in Africa who died...")

    --
    What is the inverse of the Matrix?
  98. timothy by psycho · · Score: 1

    but-what-are-they-doing-with-the-organs-dept

    Was this meant to be facetious? It only comes
    across as offensive and in bad taste...

  99. Hmm. by LHN · · Score: 1

    Couldnt the "businessmen" just pay their provider to filter out such calls?

  100. Re:my sig (sorry off topic, not a Troll) by SourceHammer · · Score: 1
    No offense was intended towards my fierce competition in India; it is just my way of expressing fear.

    All paid jobs absorb and degrade the mind. - Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC)
    --



    Open source development is my way of competing with the low-cost programmers in India...
  101. confirmation? by binarybum · · Score: 1

    can anyone actually confirm that this is taking place as described in the article? I have a hard time believing anything coming from the Chinese press, and this just sounds like a cover for the government to nail whomever's cell phone they'd like.

    --
    ôó
  102. Ah! by Uncle+Gropey · · Score: 1

    Ah! So... it seems they have found chinks in the armor of these phone schemes?

  103. Red light running by tfoss · · Score: 1
    This (I think) is sort of similar to the problems that were raised with using cameras to spot traffic violations. Early on, the cameras would record the license number of a violator (who had, for example, run a red light) and the send the registered owner of the car a ticket. The problem is/was that the violation was commited by a driver who wasn't necessarily the owner of the car.

    I think the police solved this problem by photographing both the license plate and the driver-- the photo of the driver can be compared to an existing photo of the registered owner. If they match, ticket time...

    Actually, at least here in san diego, that's not the case at all. Many intersections have red-light cameras that just photograph the license plate. The argument is, regardless of who is driving, the person who registers it is responsible for the car. In other places, you can get out of the ticket with a sworn affadavit that you weren't driving at that time

    The cameras here were stopped, but that was due to a totally different legal issue. There were some cameras that were claimed to be timed improperly, such that non-offenders were being caught. This blew up into a legal & PR nightmare and the cameras got switched off & as far as I know, haven't been turned back on yet.

    -Ted

    --
    -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
  104. M4kb3th by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

    Um, in that makb3th version, they ask you to actually carry your mobile phone to the show.

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  105. Re:How it really works. (your sig) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    as an indian programmer, i must admit that i find your sig offensive. >> Open source development is my way of >> competing with the low-cost programmers in >> India

    Tough shit. Pay everyone in India US union scale and the snide remarks will stop. And by the way, despite the seeming bent of laws and lawsuits, there is no condtitutional right to go through life unoffended.

  106. Re:Because cops are too busy making money on drugs by Nameles · · Score: 1

    Now besides quotas, how do you explain the asshole cops that ticket people for going 2mph over the speed limit. More paperwork right?

  107. In Soviet Russia.......... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The law breaks you.

  108. Re:I'm mad as hell, and I'm not gonna take it anym by agentkhaki · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure about cell, but my caller ID here *always* displays the number... Just sometimes, it doesn't include a name (or the right name for that matter).

    --
    Ack!
  109. There's another way... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    that they could get around this. A lot of phones have a blacklist facility, so callers with certain CLIDs (or unlisted ones. for that matter) could just be re-routed. For instance, my cheapie Ericsson allows "?" wildcard placeholders in listed numbers, so it could filter whole ranges of numbers. It wouldn't take long for the authorities to run out of money. That's assuming, of course, that China is pretty much like the rest of the world in that it's the caller who pays for the call.

  110. Re:I'm mad as hell, and I'm not gonna take it anym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Turn the phone on -> be spammed by police and have your minutes wasted.

    Do you have to pay to RECEIVE calls in the USA?

    The idea seems completely unnatural to me, although it fits in with the glorification of money and greed.

  111. good by sonatinas · · Score: 1

    Living in China's first experiment in capitalism,Shenzhen, i see these advertisments EVERYWHERE. They cover the bus route maps, they litter the walls, they are on top of advertisments, and they are written on every wall in this city. It is pathetic. On one wall i saw at least 200 numbers and advertisments, there was no description of what the number was for just a 1389292038 type of number. I thought it was for migrant workers to get work, but i guess its for more decpitive means. Spamming the numbers is a great idea because they spend money every time they answer the phone in China. Come to Hong Kong and take teh KCR over to Shenzhen to witness this eyesore.

  112. Re:Because cops are too busy making money on drugs by antistuff · · Score: 1

    Uh..you pay money for that ticket.

    Did you really need me to say that?

  113. To which I will simply reply... by No.+24601 · · Score: 0, Troll

    BEEP BEEP!

  114. You Need a Stealth Wall by chadjg · · Score: 1

    http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns999 92461 P.S. Has anybody ever gotten into trouble for abusing a cell phone jerk in a theatre? What is the penalty for 3rd degree public service, anyway?

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  115. Phone numbers are plentiful by gotr00t · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that would be actually be a very viable solution, as in China, cell phone numbers are literally sold cheaply by the dozens by people sitting on the street, holding pieces of paper with the numbers that they offer on them.

    Usually, no names are tied with these phone numbers, and that just makes it much easier for people to change them, effectively rendering this inscentive kinda useless.

  116. Not possible by gotr00t · · Score: 1

    Nah, that's very insightful, but in China, all the cell phones are in a single "area code" followed by a 8 digit number. It's impossible to tie a 900 number to a cell phone.

  117. cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make sure you have your browser cache set to zero and also add a ?randomfoo to the end of the url so the page does not get cached at the ISP level

  118. Re:I'm mad as hell, and I'm not gonna take it anym by agentkhaki · · Score: 1

    I think that's the way it works - not owning a cell myself, I couldn't say for sure though.

    --
    Ack!
  119. Since I've been living in China... by michiel.h · · Score: 1

    ... for a while now, I think I can say that they had better spend the money somewhere else.

    China is a relatively safe place, but that's only because there are so many people. It's almost impossible to do anything here without half the town knowing about it.

    However, the traffic police, food and health-inspection people are only two of the many organisations who could use some more money to buy some real equipment or to just be able to pay their employees a decent salary.

    The Chinese government and it's workers prefer investing a lot of money in things they don't really need but look good (what will improve their carreer), instead of investing in those important matters an outsider won't notice.

    I don't mind the phonenumbers on the walls (yes, there are lots of them). I do mind health-inspection being neglected.

  120. They did another thing in Holland by Snaller · · Score: 1

    They've run some experiments sending SMS's(Short Message System) to stolen mobile phones. One every 3 minuttes. Apparently far fewer phones are being stolen now :)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  121. wait a minute, what did i read? by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

    business men in the p.r.c.? chairman mao must be turning over in his grave.

  122. Wouldn't work by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    They're probably already talking on their cell phone while running lights.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  123. Yep, it's IMEI now by morie · · Score: 1

    They use IMEI nr's now and are very successfull

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  124. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    "Our attitude with TCP/IP is, `Hey, we'll do it, but don't make a big
    system, because we can't fix it if it breaks -- nobody can.'"

    "TCP/IP is OK if you've got a little informal club, and it doesn't make
    any difference if it takes a while to fix it."
    -- Ken Olson, in Digital News, 1988

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...