You are completely ignoring the fact that they agreed to the amendment.
Amazon at some point was offering 20% Amazon then wrote to them and said "what about 0%" They said, no, what about 20%? Amazon said, no, it's 0% THEY AGREED.
"In the US, the bulk of net use (in pure data) is business related"
Got any stats to back this up? I would have guessed that YouTube/NetFlix/piracy/porn..etc would be orders of magnitude greater than pure business traffic. Unless you mean YouTube is a business and therefore business related?
They are likely grateful that people are using their software rather than the superior (and free) Microsoft Security Essentials. (Yes, MS makes a piece of software that is superior in virtually every way to its competition. Hard to believe, but it's true.)
Security Essentials isn't "free" for businesses with more than 10 PC's. The original owner of the Avast licence had 14 PC's so wouldn't qualify for Security Essentials.
Aside from the obvious point-of-view that this is almost theft, doesn't this mean the University can afford to invest in more research and therefore invent more cool technologies?
No YOU RTFA. You are ONLY being routed to the local 911 operator based on your address. You are NOT having your address presented to the operator. There is a VERY big difference.
Comment retraction in 3....2....1....
Re:So what? There is still a Linux flavoured produ
on
Linksys WRT54G drops Linux
·
· Score: 2, Informative
They AREN'T dropping support for Linux. They are releasing a separate model with Linux support and making the mainstream one a cheaper design. The product I linked to is a Wireless router that can, with the addition of the USB port, act as a NAS unit.
So what? There is still a Linux flavoured product.
on
Linksys WRT54G drops Linux
·
· Score: 4, Informative
Great article research. Linksys will/have released a Linux version and labled the packaging "Open Source". Here's the FCC information on the Linux device.
IANAL. Does a foreign VoIP company have to answer to the different national telecom regulations anyway? Given no bricks-and-morter presence in country A and being based in foreign country B why should they have to answer to in country A?
[...]the first step towards being able to "reverse" the digest process, and extract the original data from the digest
So as a result of breaking the encryption have they just found the best compression method? Did I read what you said correctly or is that what you are suggesting?
I use a computer all the time in examination situations. Coding and network administration are two such examples.
> And if they do, what's to stop the kids from creating an ad-hoc network and sharing answers?
A packet monitor
> Or maybe downloading the info earlier and just going off of it during the exam?
A freshly imaged computer
> If they must have computers for a final exams, then that's what computer labs are for.
Great point sherlock. Do you suggest they leave these labs totally detached from the LAN all the time? It goes back to the original question which you have failed to answer - how do you lock out a particular room/location if all computers have access to the same AP/wireless setup? Hint: the answer isn't ban computers or kill the electricity.
Slashdot Mirror
You are completely ignoring the fact that they agreed to the amendment.
Amazon at some point was offering 20%
Amazon then wrote to them and said "what about 0%"
They said, no, what about 20%?
Amazon said, no, it's 0%
THEY AGREED.
End of story.
No..seems pretty clear. Amazon offered 0%. They accepted and got 0%. 0% of $0 is....well, $0.
Moral of the story - read the contract?
Not long now until they place that chip in your head.
In other news...tin foil sales have gone through the roof.
"In the US, the bulk of net use (in pure data) is business related"
Got any stats to back this up? I would have guessed that YouTube/NetFlix/piracy/porn..etc would be orders of magnitude greater than pure business traffic. Unless you mean YouTube is a business and therefore business related?
Don't let facts get in the way of a good story.
They are likely grateful that people are using their software rather than the superior (and free) Microsoft Security Essentials. (Yes, MS makes a piece of software that is superior in virtually every way to its competition. Hard to believe, but it's true.)
http://www.microsoft.com/security_essentials/
Security Essentials isn't "free" for businesses with more than 10 PC's. The original owner of the Avast licence had 14 PC's so wouldn't qualify for Security Essentials.
The Linux kernel uses something called kernel shared memory (KSM) to achieve this with it's virtualization technology. LWN has a great article on it:
http://lwn.net/Articles/306704/
Is the reverse possible? I.e. explicit content only??!! :)
Aside from the obvious point-of-view that this is almost theft, doesn't this mean the University can afford to invest in more research and therefore invent more cool technologies?
At what point does the cost of refinement and R&D this process demands outweigh the benefits of increased yield?
No YOU RTFA. You are ONLY being routed to the local 911 operator based on your address. You are NOT having your address presented to the operator. There is a VERY big difference.
Comment retraction in 3....2....1....
They AREN'T dropping support for Linux. They are releasing a separate model with Linux support and making the mainstream one a cheaper design. The product I linked to is a Wireless router that can, with the addition of the USB port, act as a NAS unit.
Great article research. Linksys will/have released a Linux version and labled the packaging "Open Source". Here's the FCC information on the Linux device.
Hardly critical mass if one geek has bleeding edge technology. HDTV isn't there yet.
Thats all well and good but what kind of display can handle that resolution?
IANAL. Does a foreign VoIP company have to answer to the different national telecom regulations anyway? Given no bricks-and-morter presence in country A and being based in foreign country B why should they have to answer to in country A?
http://scrippsnews.ucsd.edu.nyud.net:8090/video/ar go_animation.mov
2.6MB coralized link.
...and how is that any different to election day? Vote early, vote often I say :)
Sounds great but I cbf'd going to get the pill. Can't they put it in the water or something?
[...]the first step towards being able to "reverse" the digest process, and extract the original data from the digest
So as a result of breaking the encryption have they just found the best compression method? Did I read what you said correctly or is that what you are suggesting?
> BUFFERING... 0%... 13%... 27%... 34%... 58%... 72%... 88%... 97%... 100%
You should be so lucky
BUFFERING... 0%... 13%... 3%... 1%... -5%... 72%... 21%... 97%... 10%... 107%... 4%
...and 2.7 can be called Longhorn. Not due soon..etc..etc. Har Har.
> I suspect that Burt Rutan and Paul Allen already have reservations.
Yeah but have you seen Paul? Thats really like taking 4 people.
I use a computer all the time in examination situations. Coding and network administration are two such examples.
> And if they do, what's to stop the kids from creating an ad-hoc network and sharing answers?
A packet monitor
> Or maybe downloading the info earlier and just going off of it during the exam?
A freshly imaged computer
> If they must have computers for a final exams, then that's what computer labs are for.
Great point sherlock. Do you suggest they leave these labs totally detached from the LAN all the time? It goes back to the original question which you have failed to answer - how do you lock out a particular room/location if all computers have access to the same AP/wireless setup? Hint: the answer isn't ban computers or kill the electricity.