..so I suggest we export crack to the U.S. Hey, the shareholders and citizens agree, profit is more important than oppression of freedom and since I value freedom higher than money, distributing it directly to teenagers would mean a shorter time to market, guaranteeing a quick ROI (Return Of Investment).
Cisco leads the way, let's just be quick to follow because coorps are except from human behaviour.
I'd like to point out, without taking any side here, that free will is what enacted the contract. I'm a huge fan of Real Freedom (Tm), but any logic here would dictate that he signed the contract willfully, knowingly, and therefore must honor it. To me, no law or interpretation necessary. This is about standing by what was promised. If he had NOT had the freedom to opt out of this contract, then perhaps this would be a topic of discussion. But, again, he did this of his own free will and then decides not to honor it. That doesn't make Google or Microsoft evil. It makes him a son of a bitch and the reason why judges have to educate people that freedom is in fact freedom with responsibility.
If what you said could be visualized, you'd be wearing 3-D glasses - watching the world in shades of Red and Blue.
That doesn't make you an intellectual. That makes you look like a racist bigot with silly glasses.
Go away, little dude. I wish the Internet had a flush().
Bill Hicks, "Ever noticed how creationists look really unevolved..."
He was totally a prophet, in the sense of being a truthsayer.;)
Hello, I am an alien who has transformed into this signature. As you are reading this I am having sex with your eyeballs. I know you like it because you are smiling.
'The worst thing you can really do about racism is overreact to it. I disagree fundamentally with racism. But I respect that in the country I'm from, they have the right to say what they want. (Although not necessarily on private property or private game servers, etc, etc).'
Not on private property? Funny. Since all of America is owned by, well, America, which would imply the U.S. Government; doesn't that make you a slave?
..I told a feminist that I think most of them are just overreacting. Oh yeah? Yeah, I can prove it to you. How? I think you'll take offense from the following statement; Feminists Have Pussies.
I was right.
So you second the former guys' opinion that taking guns away from the public has somehow lead to an increase in crime. Because quite the opposite is true for the US. Gun usage is up. Gun sales are up. Lockheed are making enormous profits. And you kill more people per second than any other country has ever had the capacity to do, just counting your national lethality rate. You've bombed more than 50 countries since the end of world war 2, you've robbed countless others of their possessions, and the best way to control it all is to let the average American keep their guns so that they can keep the problem at bay.
I completely agree with that. This problem will take care of itself. In fact it already has, because there's no way you will ever change. And welcome to GM kicking another slew of people into alcoholism, higher divorce rates, and more soon-to-be uneducated pricks who grow up to be gunlovers so they can remove themselves from evolution the Darwinian way.
Bring it fucking on.
How, pray tell, does one "Google the statistics"?
One could suggest that having a firearm could lead to killing a man more easily than perhaps if he had had a kitchen knife. That means, by all distinctions you could possibly make outside of being BOOOORN IN THE UUUUSAA that lethality is down, and that crime spirals upwards due to lack of social measures. But let's say you applied that same logic to the U.S. Would you then stand corrected or just be even more sure that guns help reduce crime because they kill indiscriminately. Or just blacks. And latinos. And the off-hand teenager who blows his brains out, and possibly the rest of his family and friends as a side-order.
You can criminalize smoking pot but you can't criminalize idiots having guns. And to top it all off, it seems the Slashdot crew now fires away mod points based on instinct rather than on ability to criticize. Because I still see no link to the forementioned, relatelively politely asked for statistic that CORRELATES increasing lethality with diminishing gun use.
Nothing to see here, go back to FOX NEWS!
Scary how any word of a communist brings out gunfetischists out of the woodwork.
Look ma', he look like a damn commie chink, where's mah gun ma'.
And for your information, your information about Australia is fucking made up. I dare you to even find a hint of proof for the completely prepostorous drivel you're posting. Fucking reptile. Please. Evolve.
Of course, there exists a third "secret" option. Which contains people who believe making money off of sickness, disease, poverty, violence, crime, etc is spiteful - regardless of whatever capitalist mantra you hold in your head due to your upbringing.
Can't make money without a patent? That should be the first, sole criterium to dismiss the idea in the first place. Or imagine us all sitting there, 10 years from now, chained with invisible links to the Television set, being fed hours and hours of commercial information, what to believe, what to think, how to vote.
Wait. This is already happening. It's called the U.S.
Sorry for some reason this was posted under the wrong subject/headline. I blame my lack of morning coffee, not that it's going to save me from the merciless troopers of Slashdot.
Now that on the other hand was rather suitable in retrospect.
If anyone can tell me what exactly is either cool, innovative, wonderful, awesome, or so damn interesting about Google I will offer up my mod-points for whoring. I don't think anyone can come with a convincing argument. As usual, media drummed it up and you let it ring in your reptile brain. It's a search engine. It may even be the best search engine. And it has an extensively sized mailaccount. And supposedly they're not doing this for money or some other stupid horseshit from more reptiles. But no one sees it just for what it is, a well-executed Yahoo runner-up. Google is Titanic and the iceberg it is about to hit is the fact that they haven't innovated worth shit since innoculation and crowning.
If anyone can tell me what exactly is either cool, innovative, wonderful, awesome, or so damn interesting about Google I will offer up my mod-points for whoring. I don't think anyone can come with a convincing argument. As usual, media drummed it up and you let it ring in your reptile brain. It's a search engine. It may even be the best search engine. And it has an extensively sized mailaccount. And supposedly they're not doing this for money or some other stupid horseshit from more reptiles. But no one sees it just for what it is, a well-executed Yahoo runner-up. Google is Titanic and the iceberg it is about to hit is the fact that they haven't innovated worth shit since innoculation and crowning.
America is a country and can not by definition by "Evil" (Tm).
And to give something back, you are also quite accurate in your statement. I happen to agree, fully.
But I think we part ways when I say I believe your country based on the "chosen" representation does nothing to bring us further in evolution. And based on your now extinct educational system, America's population will be dumber than a rock and thus more controllable by elitists.
In short, America is a powerful ruler with the capacity to set things straight but the leadership and vision of a reptile. You're not just part of the problem. In many ways, you are the problem because you have not offered any other solution to the world other than 50+ countries bombed since AFTER World War 2. And the populaces reward for this is diminishing welfare and a country for sale that is about to be bought by China.
The cold war is over. You lost. And the weapon was capitalism.
Cheers.
...if you took a third (1/3) of all the billions spent by the U.S. on war and warmongering you would be able to feed the entire population of earth for one year.
But I guess that makes me a commie worth shooting.
Jefferson once said that the price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
But Vigilance is dead.
If you criticize, you are labeled as a deviate, or automatically induced into a two-of system for classification. Either liberal, or conservative.
But I'm a humanitarian, who belives in peace, and cooperation, and doing no harm.
Where's my politician? Where is my free country? And most of all, where are my brothers and sisters?
The problem is peaceful people are usually peaceful because they're more intelligent. And we've yet to begin intellectual discrimination. But fact of the matter is if people with no brains weren't allowed to vote, we wouldn't be run by tyrants who believe in enforcing policy through the use of an iron fist.
Fuck Bush and all reptiles who believe in him.
Yeah yeah, mod me down for believing that intelligent people solve problems without the use of force. You're so used to slashing resistance that any deviate will cause your reptile brain to summon all the feelings of inadequacy that being lost in a human world is all about.
And in the latest Harry Potter, Harry grabs his wand and zaps away idiots.
Ever wondered why Creationists look so unevolved?
-Bill Hicks, the greatest American Hero
Absolutely incredible!!! Not Denmark, not Canada, not Sweden, not France, not Belgium or some other "enlighteded" hellhole, but right here in the US of A.
The RED STATE people need to really get on the stick and keep rolling back this moral rot from the Blue State people.
I think that comment speaks for itself. I also think the concept of Red vs Blue has been seen before. And good luck trying to compete with half of Europe in terms of humanitarian thinking. But I guess that's morally despicable in Bush's america.
Wankers.
There are few people who are as dangerous as the ones who believe in the Invisible Hand of the Market. (Or any other slightly esotheric being).
According to that very logic, asbest would be in every house in America (best, cheapest insulator - unfortunately it causes cancer), cars would still run on leaded gas, and Coca-Cola would still have real Coca in it.
Wait, that last one, that might be a good one after all, but relatively little thinking goes into establishing that a market with NO regulation is the same as a massive Roman orgy - leading to an early death not just for its' citizens but for civilization itself.
If I ever earned a point it was just now. Don't fail me,/.
Slashdot Mirror
..so I suggest we export crack to the U.S. Hey, the shareholders and citizens agree, profit is more important than oppression of freedom and since I value freedom higher than money, distributing it directly to teenagers would mean a shorter time to market, guaranteeing a quick ROI (Return Of Investment).
Cisco leads the way, let's just be quick to follow because coorps are except from human behaviour.
I'd like to point out, without taking any side here, that free will is what enacted the contract. I'm a huge fan of Real Freedom (Tm), but any logic here would dictate that he signed the contract willfully, knowingly, and therefore must honor it. To me, no law or interpretation necessary. This is about standing by what was promised. If he had NOT had the freedom to opt out of this contract, then perhaps this would be a topic of discussion. But, again, he did this of his own free will and then decides not to honor it. That doesn't make Google or Microsoft evil. It makes him a son of a bitch and the reason why judges have to educate people that freedom is in fact freedom with responsibility.
What happens at Slashdot, stays at Slashdot.
If what you said could be visualized, you'd be wearing 3-D glasses - watching the world in shades of Red and Blue.
That doesn't make you an intellectual. That makes you look like a racist bigot with silly glasses. Go away, little dude. I wish the Internet had a flush().
Bill Hicks, "Ever noticed how creationists look really unevolved..." ;)
He was totally a prophet, in the sense of being a truthsayer.
Hello, I am an alien who has transformed into this signature. As you are reading this I am having sex with your eyeballs. I know you like it because you are smiling.
'The worst thing you can really do about racism is overreact to it. I disagree fundamentally with racism. But I respect that in the country I'm from, they have the right to say what they want. (Although not necessarily on private property or private game servers, etc, etc).'
Not on private property? Funny. Since all of America is owned by, well, America, which would imply the U.S. Government; doesn't that make you a slave?
..I told a feminist that I think most of them are just overreacting. Oh yeah? Yeah, I can prove it to you. How? I think you'll take offense from the following statement; Feminists Have Pussies. I was right.
If there were as many jokes as there were bullets in the world.... there'd be a lot of dead comedians.
So you second the former guys' opinion that taking guns away from the public has somehow lead to an increase in crime. Because quite the opposite is true for the US. Gun usage is up. Gun sales are up. Lockheed are making enormous profits. And you kill more people per second than any other country has ever had the capacity to do, just counting your national lethality rate. You've bombed more than 50 countries since the end of world war 2, you've robbed countless others of their possessions, and the best way to control it all is to let the average American keep their guns so that they can keep the problem at bay.
I completely agree with that. This problem will take care of itself. In fact it already has, because there's no way you will ever change. And welcome to GM kicking another slew of people into alcoholism, higher divorce rates, and more soon-to-be uneducated pricks who grow up to be gunlovers so they can remove themselves from evolution the Darwinian way.
Bring it fucking on.
How, pray tell, does one "Google the statistics"?
One could suggest that having a firearm could lead to killing a man more easily than perhaps if he had had a kitchen knife. That means, by all distinctions you could possibly make outside of being BOOOORN IN THE UUUUSAA that lethality is down, and that crime spirals upwards due to lack of social measures. But let's say you applied that same logic to the U.S. Would you then stand corrected or just be even more sure that guns help reduce crime because they kill indiscriminately. Or just blacks. And latinos. And the off-hand teenager who blows his brains out, and possibly the rest of his family and friends as a side-order.
You can criminalize smoking pot but you can't criminalize idiots having guns. And to top it all off, it seems the Slashdot crew now fires away mod points based on instinct rather than on ability to criticize. Because I still see no link to the forementioned, relatelively politely asked for statistic that CORRELATES increasing lethality with diminishing gun use.
Nothing to see here, go back to FOX NEWS!
Scary how any word of a communist brings out gunfetischists out of the woodwork.
Look ma', he look like a damn commie chink, where's mah gun ma'.
And for your information, your information about Australia is fucking made up. I dare you to even find a hint of proof for the completely prepostorous drivel you're posting. Fucking reptile. Please. Evolve.
Of course, there exists a third "secret" option. Which contains people who believe making money off of sickness, disease, poverty, violence, crime, etc is spiteful - regardless of whatever capitalist mantra you hold in your head due to your upbringing.
Can't make money without a patent? That should be the first, sole criterium to dismiss the idea in the first place. Or imagine us all sitting there, 10 years from now, chained with invisible links to the Television set, being fed hours and hours of commercial information, what to believe, what to think, how to vote.
Wait. This is already happening. It's called the U.S.
Sorry for some reason this was posted under the wrong subject/headline. I blame my lack of morning coffee, not that it's going to save me from the merciless troopers of Slashdot.
Now that on the other hand was rather suitable in retrospect.
If anyone can tell me what exactly is either cool, innovative, wonderful, awesome, or so damn interesting about Google I will offer up my mod-points for whoring. I don't think anyone can come with a convincing argument. As usual, media drummed it up and you let it ring in your reptile brain. It's a search engine. It may even be the best search engine. And it has an extensively sized mailaccount. And supposedly they're not doing this for money or some other stupid horseshit from more reptiles. But no one sees it just for what it is, a well-executed Yahoo runner-up. Google is Titanic and the iceberg it is about to hit is the fact that they haven't innovated worth shit since innoculation and crowning.
If anyone can tell me what exactly is either cool, innovative, wonderful, awesome, or so damn interesting about Google I will offer up my mod-points for whoring. I don't think anyone can come with a convincing argument. As usual, media drummed it up and you let it ring in your reptile brain. It's a search engine. It may even be the best search engine. And it has an extensively sized mailaccount. And supposedly they're not doing this for money or some other stupid horseshit from more reptiles. But no one sees it just for what it is, a well-executed Yahoo runner-up. Google is Titanic and the iceberg it is about to hit is the fact that they haven't innovated worth shit since innoculation and crowning.
America is a country and can not by definition by "Evil" (Tm).
And to give something back, you are also quite accurate in your statement. I happen to agree, fully. But I think we part ways when I say I believe your country based on the "chosen" representation does nothing to bring us further in evolution. And based on your now extinct educational system, America's population will be dumber than a rock and thus more controllable by elitists.
In short, America is a powerful ruler with the capacity to set things straight but the leadership and vision of a reptile. You're not just part of the problem. In many ways, you are the problem because you have not offered any other solution to the world other than 50+ countries bombed since AFTER World War 2. And the populaces reward for this is diminishing welfare and a country for sale that is about to be bought by China.
The cold war is over. You lost. And the weapon was capitalism.
Cheers.
...if you took a third (1/3) of all the billions spent by the U.S. on war and warmongering you would be able to feed the entire population of earth for one year.
But I guess that makes me a commie worth shooting.
I guess my obvious answer is that I don't believe we're all equal.
Jefferson once said that the price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
But Vigilance is dead.
If you criticize, you are labeled as a deviate, or automatically induced into a two-of system for classification. Either liberal, or conservative. But I'm a humanitarian, who belives in peace, and cooperation, and doing no harm.
Where's my politician? Where is my free country? And most of all, where are my brothers and sisters? The problem is peaceful people are usually peaceful because they're more intelligent. And we've yet to begin intellectual discrimination. But fact of the matter is if people with no brains weren't allowed to vote, we wouldn't be run by tyrants who believe in enforcing policy through the use of an iron fist. Fuck Bush and all reptiles who believe in him. Yeah yeah, mod me down for believing that intelligent people solve problems without the use of force. You're so used to slashing resistance that any deviate will cause your reptile brain to summon all the feelings of inadequacy that being lost in a human world is all about.
And in the latest Harry Potter, Harry grabs his wand and zaps away idiots. Ever wondered why Creationists look so unevolved? -Bill Hicks, the greatest American Hero
" The media has nothing to do with it. It's all about the quality."
Two words; Fox News.
That's NOT off-topic, you wankers! It doesn't GET much more ON-topic!
http://toolshed.down.net/lyrics/aenimamaster.html ...anyone else hearing Aenima in the background? ...learn to swim, learn to swim, learn to swim...
There are few people who are as dangerous as the ones who believe in the Invisible Hand of the Market. (Or any other slightly esotheric being). According to that very logic, asbest would be in every house in America (best, cheapest insulator - unfortunately it causes cancer), cars would still run on leaded gas, and Coca-Cola would still have real Coca in it. Wait, that last one, that might be a good one after all, but relatively little thinking goes into establishing that a market with NO regulation is the same as a massive Roman orgy - leading to an early death not just for its' citizens but for civilization itself. If I ever earned a point it was just now. Don't fail me, /.