You see, objects have to obey this nice thing called gravity. No matter how many times you may have heard it, you could not throw a baseball to the moon from orbit (Though a big enough railgun could do it...).
Things are not weightless in space, that is just an illusion created when falling. Throwing a baseball from the shuttle, for example, would give it a slightly diffrent orbit, but it wouldn't drift off into the unknown. It may even come back and hit you a few orbits later.
If this thing missed, the impactor (which isn't a bomb) would likely drift around in solar orbit for all eternity (well, a few million years, at least).
Giant flower robot: A few thousand dollars.
New space shuttle: Several billion dollars.
Watching idiots make fools of themselves on slashdot: Priceless.
This becomes a major problem in areas with lots of warnings. The costal areas are evacuated, lots of money is lost, and then a 8 inch wave washes up the beach, almost indistigusable from normal waves.
People start to ignore them, so when something like this happens again, they ignore it too, a possibly fatal mistake.
The farther you are from the equator, the more restricted your launch inclinations are, and it takes a LOT of fuel to make any sizeable inclination change once your in orbit.
After glancing over your post again in preview, I think you mean remap them to do something else, which I don't think is possible. It looks as if those buttons send the same signal as the mouse wheel, so there is no way to remap them.
I got it from the bugzilla entry about the libpng issues.
Actully, that image and the one above produce 2 diffrent effects in IE now that ive tested both, maybe its a diffrent issue that got mixed in the same bugzilla entry.
Don't blame them, blame the libpng devs.
IE crashes with the exact same exploit, just like Moz did.
http://www.graphicsmagick.org/libpng/beta/samples/ bigw.png
9.3: "This image cannot be displayed because it contains errors."
IE 6: Internet Explorer has encounted a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
Well, they didn't want it to be diffrent, they wanted to port CS to the source engine, as it is.
Players HATE when anything changes, generally.
Those who want a diffrent game will play CS2 instead.
I'll add that the reason a star can sustain fusion is because of the immense gravity involved, it keeps the hydrogen (well, there are others, but those are later in a stars lifetime) compacted, and the force compressing them generates the heat needed for fusion.
As we can't create miniature stars at the moment, we have to compensate by supplying the heat and containment ourselves. One of the major barriers to a useful fusion reactor is getting it to produce more power than it draws.
You seem to be forgetting that right-click is used already.
If you think people get confused when switching from IE now, just try replacing the context menu with something completely diffrent.
Its a direct quote from a transcript of Bush speaking somewhere (Don't remember), where he makes a rather sad attempt at the famous quote:
"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
The quote in full is "There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again."
I saw a recording of it, imagine him studdering at each of the '-'s to get a better idea of what it sounded like.
How or why he tried to say that is beyond me, but I'd at least hope he was ad-libbing, surely they found someone smarter than he is to write his speaches...
The "419" scams take thousands of $ from people who fall for them, and there have also been reported murders involved when the unfortunate scamee (Is that a word?) goes to another country to meet the scammer, and is then mugged.
Ive watched someone click one of those for five minutes before they gave up..I even explained that it was just an ad, but they refused to stop clicking on it.
Slashdot Mirror
You see, objects have to obey this nice thing called gravity. No matter how many times you may have heard it, you could not throw a baseball to the moon from orbit (Though a big enough railgun could do it...). Things are not weightless in space, that is just an illusion created when falling. Throwing a baseball from the shuttle, for example, would give it a slightly diffrent orbit, but it wouldn't drift off into the unknown. It may even come back and hit you a few orbits later. If this thing missed, the impactor (which isn't a bomb) would likely drift around in solar orbit for all eternity (well, a few million years, at least).
You also have to remember that shadows can play tricks with your eyes in pictures like this. Craters can look like buldges, etc.
Giant flower robot: A few thousand dollars. New space shuttle: Several billion dollars. Watching idiots make fools of themselves on slashdot: Priceless.
Looks like dust thats collected between the cracks to me. I don't now where you got shiny and clear from, but it certainly isn't.
This becomes a major problem in areas with lots of warnings. The costal areas are evacuated, lots of money is lost, and then a 8 inch wave washes up the beach, almost indistigusable from normal waves.
People start to ignore them, so when something like this happens again, they ignore it too, a possibly fatal mistake.
'Impact' tsunamis (we've seen them from landslides) are much, much larger than even the most powerful earthquakes.
Netscape 8 or whatever they plan to call it is based on Firefox, rather than the Mozilla Suite.
Except for the fact that Trademarks are already limited to a certain industry.
'starting to use it again'
You mean like the Russians have been using for years now?
Those guys who go up in Soyuz do come back, ya know.
The farther you are from the equator, the more restricted your launch inclinations are, and it takes a LOT of fuel to make any sizeable inclination change once your in orbit.
Ive got a MX-700, and I didn't have to do anything to use those, the only ones that need work are the side buttons.
i cle.php?articleid=46
You could try this:
http://www.linux-gamers.net/modules/wfsection/art
After glancing over your post again in preview, I think you mean remap them to do something else, which I don't think is possible. It looks as if those buttons send the same signal as the mouse wheel, so there is no way to remap them.
As opposed to the piece-of-crap HPs with Pentiums in them?
Don't judge a processor by its packaging.
Try This image
I got it from the bugzilla entry about the libpng issues.
Actully, that image and the one above produce 2 diffrent effects in IE now that ive tested both, maybe its a diffrent issue that got mixed in the same bugzilla entry.
http://www.graphicsmagick.org/libpng/beta/samples/ bigw.png
Got it from bugzilla.
I know its a joke, but it seems to work in IE as well, or at least an example PNG crashes it, i suppose one could be crafted for IE to exploit it.
Don't blame them, blame the libpng devs. IE crashes with the exact same exploit, just like Moz did.
/ bigw.png
http://www.graphicsmagick.org/libpng/beta/samples
9.3: "This image cannot be displayed because it contains errors."
IE 6: Internet Explorer has encounted a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
Bah, properly formatted version, and a link while i'm at it.
Don't blame them, blame the libpng devs. IE crashes with the exact same exploit, just like Moz did. http://www.graphicsmagick.org/libpng/beta/samples/ bigw.png
9.3: "This image cannot be displayed because it contains errors."
IE 6: Internet Explorer has encounted a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
Well, they didn't want it to be diffrent, they wanted to port CS to the source engine, as it is. Players HATE when anything changes, generally. Those who want a diffrent game will play CS2 instead.
And if you read the replies to that, you will see that it won't work in this case.
These aren't plain music cds, they have an autorun.ini launched executable, which will still run and install the driver.
I'll add that the reason a star can sustain fusion is because of the immense gravity involved, it keeps the hydrogen (well, there are others, but those are later in a stars lifetime) compacted, and the force compressing them generates the heat needed for fusion.
As we can't create miniature stars at the moment, we have to compensate by supplying the heat and containment ourselves. One of the major barriers to a useful fusion reactor is getting it to produce more power than it draws.
You seem to be forgetting that right-click is used already. If you think people get confused when switching from IE now, just try replacing the context menu with something completely diffrent.
Which is why no one had morals before Christans showed up...oh wait, they did.
Its a direct quote from a transcript of Bush speaking somewhere (Don't remember), where he makes a rather sad attempt at the famous quote:
"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."
The quote in full is "There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again."
I saw a recording of it, imagine him studdering at each of the '-'s to get a better idea of what it sounded like.
How or why he tried to say that is beyond me, but I'd at least hope he was ad-libbing, surely they found someone smarter than he is to write his speaches...
The "419" scams take thousands of $ from people who fall for them, and there have also been reported murders involved when the unfortunate scamee (Is that a word?) goes to another country to meet the scammer, and is then mugged.
Wikipedia Article
Ive watched someone click one of those for five minutes before they gave up..I even explained that it was just an ad, but they refused to stop clicking on it.