Slashdot Mirror


Logitech Gives A Mouse A Laser

Kaveh writes "Looks like Logitech has introduced a successor to its popular MX line of cordless mice. In addition to a more ergonomic design, lithium ion battery, tilt wheel (read horizontal scrolling), and battery indicating LEDs, this mouse introduces laser technology. According to the Logitech this allows the MX1000 to be 20x more precise than optical mice, not to mention work on any surface, including a mirror! Check out the 3DGPU forums for pics and more info."

511 comments

  1. LASER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    With the Dr. Evil finger quotes: Cool, a mouse with a "LAAAASER!!"

    1. Re:LASER by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 4, Funny

      damnit, that was the first thing I thought of.... only...

      I want mice with a fricken laser attached to its head.

      but now for a real post:

      I really dig this idea. Being able to annihilate your roommates with your mouse? I've always had the need to take out the obnoxious kids I live with when they play their shit music.

      could this double as a laser pointer? Imagine a cordless laser-driven mouse that also had pointing capabilities for presentations and such. that'd be rad.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    2. Re:LASER by krumms · · Score: 1, Funny

      could this double as a laser pointer?

      Probably, but it could be highly inaccurate depending on what it is you were pointing at.

      Why not do as I and many others do, and use an ever-versatile lightsaber?

      Lightsabers are cool, and by cool I mean totally sweet. Lightsabers cut people's heads off and don't even think twice about it.

      Here's a story I wrote about this really cool lightsaber.

      Little Johnny: Today I'll be talking about basketball. This is a basketball (points with lightsaber)
      Lightsaber: (angrily) mweeeeeeeeeeee (chops off Tiny Tim's head)
      Tiny Tim: (crying) Arrgh, me f**ing head.
      Lightsaber: mweeeeeeeee!!!

    3. Re:LASER by swherdman · · Score: 1

      i saw this a few weeks ago. Some wabpages had it listed but only one was in english and it only had about 10 lines on it. I only just got an mx510 so im slightley anoyed. I thought this may be a fake when i first saw it but by the look of this it inst

    4. Re:LASER by mcrbids · · Score: 0, Troll

      that'd be rad.

      Let me guess.... you are between 30 and 40 years old?

      I'd guess 34. How'd I do?

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    5. Re:LASER by mkro · · Score: 4, Informative
      could this double as a laser pointer? Imagine a cordless laser-driven mouse that also had pointing capabilities for presentations and such. that'd be rad.
      No, it can't. The laser under the MX1000 has no visible light.
      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    6. Re:LASER by Rirath.com · · Score: 1

      Booyah! I ADORE my mx700, it is indeed the best mouse I've EVER owned in all my years of computer and gaming... but it's had left button problems for months now. Won't click and drag well at all, probably wore out some part in it. With this, I wouldn't mind replacing it. *drools* It's not quite sharks with freakin' laser beams attached to their heads... but it's the next best thing!

    7. Re:LASER by Greventls · · Score: 1

      Logitech already has a cordless presenter mouse with a laser pointer as part of it.

    8. Re:LASER by mikis · · Score: 1
      could this double as a laser pointer? Imagine a cordless laser-driven mouse that also had pointing capabilities for presentations and such. that'd be rad.


      You mean like Logitech Cordless Presenter?
    9. Re:LASER by visualight · · Score: 1

      The left button of my mx510 "wore out" after about 5 months. It would randomly stop working and I would have to hold it down for several seconds to get my desktop to recognize a click. Then it quit working entirely in the middle of a ut2k4 scrim. No fire, no t/l. :(

      I bought a new one, this time I paid the 9 dollars for the the two year replacement plan. I've been considering taking the old apart to see if there's an obvious fix, but it doesn's seem very "take apartable"

      --
      Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
    10. Re:LASER by mwood · · Score: 1

      I didn't think of the sharks (reference still unknown to me) until I got to the subhead. My first thought was more like:

      If you give a mouse a laser
      then he'll want a missile to shoot down with it.
      And if you give him a missile....

      (If you don't get *that* reference, find someone with small children -- they'll understand.)

    11. Re:LASER by harrkev · · Score: 3, Interesting
      No, it can't. The laser under the MX1000 has no visible light.


      I did not see any mention of laser color in the article, but I doubt that they would use and IR laser.

      First, ALL laser products have those little yellow warning stickers on them. And the troulbe with infra-red lasers is that they can burn your eye without you even knowing it. With a visible (red) laser, at least you know when it is pointing at you.

      I can just imagine some kid holding the thing up to his eye. The ONLY way for this to use IR and still be safe is if the thing has an extremely low power, and uses a lens to spread out the beam.

      Does anybody know for sure what is going on here?
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    12. Re:LASER by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      You could easily make it that the laser only comes on when the mouse is pressed flat against a surface, either by photo-sensors or micro switches, or something of the sort.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    13. Re:LASER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From "Time Bandits": "If I were creating a world, I wouldn't mess about with butterflies and daffodils. I would have started with lasers, eight o'clock, day one!"

    14. Re:LASER by javax · · Score: 0

      And the development team was called the "Alan Parson Project"...

    15. Re:LASER by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      I didn't think of the sharks (reference still unknown to me) until I got to the subhead.

      You've never seen Austin Powers? You can hand your Geek ID over to the gate guard on the way out this evening, as you won't be needing it anymore. :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    16. Re:LASER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Like your FACE?

    17. Re:LASER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can just imagine some kid holding the thing up to his eye.
      It's always fun until someone loses one.
    18. Re:LASER by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      This isn't true. Many lasers are far lower power than flourescent lightbulbs, at which you can look all day without more than mild irritation. Just because the lasers you're used to are overpowered doesn't mean that they all are.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    19. Re:LASER by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      could be highly inaccurate depending on what it is you were pointing at.

      Umm, so the accuracy of the laser is dependant on the target, eh? So, if I point it at, say, and egg, I might get +/- .000001mm accuracy; but, if I point it at a lamp, it might be +/- 300m?

      Weird! They had better win a Nobel for this one! :)

    20. Re:LASER by harrkev · · Score: 1

      It is not total power, but total power per unit of area. In this area, lasers excel because the energy does not spread. This is why a 100 watt light bulb is easily considered safe, while a 0.1 watt laser (1000 times less energy) is a definite eye hazard.

      OK. I know that light bulbs are incredibly inefficient. But you get the idea.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    21. Re:LASER by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Whereas you're correct, I didn't actually make any attempt to imply otherwise. It is the case that many consumer lasers, even when well focussed, simply do not apply enough light to even annoy the retina.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  2. Oh, they mean computer mice by ndogg · · Score: 5, Funny

    I really was hoping for mice with frickin' lasers on their headers. Darn.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    1. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 0

      aww.. me too...

      Hey! at least we still got ill tempored sea bass!

      http://club.pep.ne.jp/~polypterus/Link%20target/ Ja panese%20sea%20bass.jpg

      --
      http://brandonbloom.name
    2. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by Laser+Lou · · Score: 2, Funny

      I really was hoping for mice with frickin' lasers on their headers. Darn.

      I'm glad they don't. My snakes wouldn't like it.

      --
      No data, no cry
    3. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 5, Funny

      On their headers?

      Man, you been coding too long. Go outside for a while.

    4. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by TheContact · · Score: 5, Funny

      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h" ...

      I hope I've made your day. :)

      --

      Yume ni ikiteiru.
    5. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by DarkMantle · · Score: 1, Insightful

      LOL..... yes you did make my day! :D

      I never actually laugh at most posts... someone should submit this to Think Geek

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    6. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by ndogg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've got a new sig now. Thanks!

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    7. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by whmac33 · · Score: 1

      That was wierd,

      As I read the thread your sig had already been updated so it looked like TheContact was just redundant. But it's funny now that I understand it.

      I'm going to add a sig after a post this. And then change it.

    8. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by sharkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Yellow face, it BURNSSSSS us!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    9. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You've also got your virginity. For life!

    10. Re:Oh, they mean computer mice by acariquara · · Score: 2, Funny
      My snakes wouldn't like it.

      Neither would my
      badgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadgerbadger...

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  3. Now We Want One Mellion Cheese Wheels . . . by Dausha · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Okay, so now that they've put lasers on mice, have they developed an aquatic laser for sharks? More importantly, have the mice been trained to target specific world leaders unless the governments of the world give us 1,000,000 chees wheels? If so, which world leaders?

    --
    What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
  4. A mirror? by Hawkxor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been waiting for this. On my table with a glass plate on top, I have to use a mouse pad for my optical mouse, but I don't need one for my regular mouse. This technology actually serves the purpose an optical mouse should.

    1. Re:A mirror? by peipas · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am holding the box for the MX1000 in front of me right now and it begs to differ in fine print after an asterisk:

      "The laser sensor will not work on surfaces that reflect, like mirrors or glass."

    2. Re:A mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couple months mousing on your nice shiny glass tabletop and it will look like you have a frosted glass table top. At least in one small oval.

    3. Re:A mirror? by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the forum post linked in the article:

      "Already you might be surprised to know that this mouse has had no issues with any surface I have tried it on, including a mirror. It states that you shouldn't use it with reflective surfaces but I wanted to see what this thing could do."

    4. Re:A mirror? by mingot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I did was bought a big pack of black poster board and cut out mini mousepads. When they get a little dirty a cut out a new one. Better than a bulky mousepad, and very inexpensive.

    5. Re:A mirror? by gregh2000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I currently own a MX1000, and I have tried it on a mirror, and my computer's monitor and neither of them work. I wonder if the mirror they used had a bunch of dust on it and it was tracking the dust, or what the deal is, but it doesn't work on mine.

    6. Re:A mirror? by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm guessing that there is a health danger with reflective surfaces. You probably don't want that shit reflecting onto your retina.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    7. Re:A mirror? by Fizzl · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just imagined myself using a laser mouse on a glass table. Damn that would be hilarious.

      I have a cat. It already goes wild with ordinary flashlight. With a tiny laser dot jumping under my desk a mayhem would ensue.

      Goodbye tangled cabling I have under my desk.

    8. Re:A mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing "that shit" is quite harmless, probably more so than a simple laser pointer.

    9. Re:A mirror? by diesterne · · Score: 1

      Is there actually a chance that any surface-scanning technology other than the rubber ball is ever going to work an all surfaces? (I'm currently using old newspaper sheets as a mousepad on my glass desk, I'd really appreciate such an invention..)

      Matter, light, what else do we have (let's say, in the next 20 years)?

    10. Re:A mirror? by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wouldn't the mouse kind of get into the way ? Unless you have very long and thin optical pseudopods you can extend under it while it's working ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    11. Re:A mirror? by Terentius · · Score: 0

      Maybe the sensor in the mouse can't handle a full blown continuous reflection from a mirror.

    12. Re:A mirror? by KDan · · Score: 1

      So you reckon they'd come out with a mouse that has an exposed laser which can harm your eyes? Ever heard of safety regulations?

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    13. Re:A mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Yes, I have a mirror with lots of ... 'dust' on it.. and a razor blade!

    14. Re:A mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The MX1000 works notably well on a hooker's ass, too.

    15. Re:A mirror? by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Precise 3d positioning based on gps-like rf signals?

    16. Re:A mirror? by amadeusb4 · · Score: 1

      Your sig differs with your post.

    17. Re:A mirror? by McLoud · · Score: 1

      Say goodbye to the cables, your pants and maybe some sensible part of you. Cats are evil.

      --
      sign(c14n(envelop(this)), x509)
    18. Re:A mirror? by kulack · · Score: 1
      Anyone have problems with colorful/printed mousepads?

      I've got an MX500 (logitech wired laser mouse). It fails in an interesting fashion on one mouse pad. It has a 12x18 grid of example colors and their RGB values on it.

      When moved at the right angle, the mouse appears to detect the graphics/printing on the surface of the mouse pad and moves in unpredictable directions. Although the graphics/printing could be raised in some fashion, I can't detect any difference in it except for color.

      Replaced it with a mono-chrome mousepad, it works great.

      Ok. ok, fine. The new "mousepad" is a fricking square of cardboard with "Damn! You're tricky! No passwords here" written on its underside (for my corporate security weenies)

      --

    19. Re:A mirror? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Precise 3d positioning based on gps-like rf signals?

      Absolute spacial tracking? No thanks. I'd need selective tracking ability. I really don't want to have to carry my mouse across the room just to reach that one corner of the screen.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    20. Re:A mirror? by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Well, once you define your 2d coordinate system (easy to do by moving the mouse around on a flat surface to calibrate) you can define 3rd dimention moves (like lifting the mouse and putting it back down) to behave similar to a normal mouse.

    21. Re:A mirror? by tedwilliamsis · · Score: 1

      Now, this might not be the most aesthetically pleasing solution, but...

      Have you ever considered taping/pasting some sort of textured surface underneath the glass? I know that the optical tracking mechanism is only really designed to work on surfaces that are a set distance away from the bottom of the mouse, but it still might be able to "see" enough of a texture through the glass to function.

      Again, making no promises here, but it can't hurt to try (aside from maybe leaving some tape smudges on the bottom of the glass.)

  5. my mouse already has a laser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    how else am i able to blind my opponents

  6. Ya know... by psetzer · · Score: 2, Funny
    I always wanted to use some mirrored table as a mouse pad. Now I guess I'll have to get one of those mice.

    I might also want a mirrored table in the first place.

    --
    "Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is living in a state of sin." -- John von Neumann
    1. Re:Ya know... by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 4, Funny

      I might also want a mirrored table in the first place.

      damn cocaine addict!

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    2. Re:Ya know... by name773 · · Score: 1

      I might also want a mirrored table in the first place.
      how big is your <table>?

    3. Re:Ya know... by stromthurman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe he just likes having sex on his ceiling?

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this margin is too small to contain.
  7. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can *really* blind someone with my optical mouse.

  8. hmmmm by zippo01 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Can i scan barcodes too?!

    1. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the return of the que-cat? que-mouse?

    2. Re:hmmmm by paulthomas · · Score: 2

      Unlikely.

      The mouse will return x/y coordinates as well as click events. Typically input devices do the processing of light/dark, rolling, touch, etc. internally and then just send the info that the operating system wants to know.

    3. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how is this interesting???

      the answer is clearly a resounding no

      "funny" .. maybe, to a nerd.... I guess

    4. Re:hmmmm by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      Only with a firmware hack, and mass-produced devices like mice probably only have mask-ROM microcontrollers. But I appreciate the coolness of the idea, even though with a CueCat I never came up with much use for barcodes anyway. Everything I have with a barcode has already been bought, and if you're printing a barcode label for something then you might as well print a text label anyway. It could only be useful if you have a lot of somethings to check in and out of your possession, all within a few feet of your computer. Like a store or library.

    5. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is interessing because maybe this could be possible in a next generation mouse...

    6. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.intervocative.com/

  9. Give a mouse a laser... by bullitB · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...he'll want a shark.

    1. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by MikeXpop · · Score: 5, Funny

      Give a mouse a shark, he'll want a pool.

      Give a mouse a pool, he'll want an underground labratory to put them all in.

      Give a mouse an underground lab, he'll want a laptop with wifi to take over the world.

      Give a mouse a laptop with wifi, he'll want a coffee table to set it on.

      Give a mouse a table to set it on, he'll want an optical mouse that works with the glass.

      Give a mouse the new Logitech.

      ???

      Profit.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    2. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by Dizzle · · Score: 5, Funny

      INFORMATIVE!?

      --
      -Dizzle
      "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
    3. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by MikeXpop · · Score: 5, Informative

      FUNNY!? /sorry, couldn't resist //watch this get modded informative

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    4. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Insert some lame ass comment about Logitech Ice and the San Jose Sharks.)

    5. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by ch3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wow, didn't knew that Slashdot moderation system was based on just asking for what you want.
      That will be insightful for me then, thanks.

    6. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      Something actually informative for those who don't know what this is about...

      If you give a mouse a cookie...

    7. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by serutan · · Score: 1

      Give a man some gum and he'll chew for a day.
      Teach him how to scrape gum off things and he'll chew for a lifetime.

    8. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't work if you post AC ...

    9. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by hobo2k · · Score: 0, Troll

      The way this thread is going, I bet the grandparent gets moded as flamebait. And I'll take a Troll please.

    10. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by big_groo · · Score: 3, Funny
      These moderators should lose their status. This is bullshit.

      I'm going to metamod for the next few days in the hopes that I get one of these comments. You should too.

    11. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pinky, are you pondering what I'm pondering?

      I think so, Brain, but Bill's Long Horns are certainly taking longer to grow than we expected.

    12. Re:Give a mouse a laser... by MikeXpop · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dude, calm down.

      I remember I did something like this awhile ago. There was a comment that gave WAY too much information about that guy's life. The comment was meant to be funny, but in an attempt to be funny myself I modded him informative.

      I was metamodded unfair. It sucked. I mean, the guy already had perfect karma (as do I, and I believe the guy replying to me). I was just having a little fun. Where's the harm?

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
  10. Dr. Evil by brad-d · · Score: 0, Redundant
    All I wanted was a mouse with a fricking laser beam!

    Of course there is always the "I for one welcome our new mice with fricking laser beam overloads".

    --
    -Brad
    1. Re:Dr. Evil by mogalpha · · Score: 1

      laser beam overloads, or laser beam overlords? :)

    2. Re:Dr. Evil by brad-d · · Score: 1

      In the taste of reduntant and somewhat poor jokes I'm going to stick with overloads ;-)

      --
      -Brad
  11. "this mouse introduces laser technology." by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny
    For decades, science fiction writers and futurists alike have been predicting the day that laser technology would finally come to fruition. Who would have thought that it would be Logitech to at last bring laser technology to market, and that it would be a lowly mouse that would make it possible?

    With this breakthrough, Logitech truly enters the forefront of American innovation. We should all look to Logitech for inspiration.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:"this mouse introduces laser technology." by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      umm.. what?

    2. Re:"this mouse introduces laser technology." by dcam · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Isn't laser technology in the market? CD drives, laser pointers, range finders etc.

      --
      meh
    3. Re:"this mouse introduces laser technology." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? For crying out loud... funny, maybe.

    4. Re:"this mouse introduces laser technology." by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's his point. He was being sarcastic.

    5. Re:"this mouse introduces laser technology." by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 1

      For decades, science fiction writers and futurists alike have been predicting the day that laser technology would finally come to fruition.

      <Monty Burns>Since the beginning of time, man has yearned to destroy the Sun. I will do the next best thing... block it out!</Monty Burns>

    6. Re:"this mouse introduces laser technology." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better the Logitech mouse than the Central Floridian mouse.

    7. Re:"this mouse introduces laser technology." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The technology behind the original optical mouse was developed at Hewlett-Packard Labs, in Palo Alto, California.
      The technology behind the laser mouse was developed at Agilent Technologies Labs, in Palo Alto, California, after Agilent was spun off from HP.
      The former was introduced in a Microsoft Mouse, the latter in a Logitech mouse.

    8. Re:"this mouse introduces laser technology." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sun had optical mice long before MS did. How 'original' do you mean?

  12. Mice with Lasers? Are they ill tempered? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You know, I have one simple request. And that is to have sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads! Throw me a bone here! What do we have?"

    "Well, we hear Logitech attached a laser to a mouse."

  13. This is nice by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I was actually considering going back to a 'ball' mouse, as my Logitech optical tends to be jumpy on some surfaces. I tend to use it outside a lot, and I think the sunshine affects the tracking.

    Precise, and wireless - this might be just the ticket.

    1. Re:This is nice by ThogScully · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My first optical mouse was an MS Intellimouse Explorer (the original, freaking huge one). I use that on my laptop, but got a wireless Logitech MX700 for my desktop.

      Honestly, I'm a bit disappointed in the Logitech because of exactly what you're talking about. My Intellimouse Explorer has no problem tracking on any surface or any fine control. The Logitech is a pain to use with graphics apps.

      I've always been a fan of MS's mic, but decided to try out Logitech because MS hadn't released a wireless optical yet. I wish I hadn't in retrospect. And this comes from a very anti-MS attitude regarding software.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    2. Re:This is nice by loonicks · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's because over time, photons get trapped underneath the mouse when you are outdoors. Every few seconds you must pull the mouse away from the surface to allow for photon release. Ok ok, actually the plastic on the mouse is probably not opaque enough. Paint the inside of the mouse's top panel black or something.

    3. Re:This is nice by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1
      --
      badness 10000
    4. Re:This is nice by wolrahnaes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      re-read the post dumbshit. "MS hadn't released a wireless optical YET"

      meaning that at the time he purchased the mouse, that MS that you linked to WASN'T OUT YET!

      tard

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    5. Re:This is nice by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 1
      Man, I liked that freaking huge one. Better than the version 3 that has much smaller side buttons, and less of an arch (which I like for my hand).

      Currently I have my trusty version 2, but it's getting on in years (optical sensor gets freaked out more, buttons sometimes don't click).

      I might go for one of these.

      --

      My other sig is funny!
    6. Re:This is nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      The Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer (V1.0) has been around since early 2002 dumb fuck.

      the MX 700 came out half a year later.
      http://www.tweak3d.net/reviews/microsoft/explorerw ireless/

      tard

    7. Re:This is nice by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's funny, my MX700 is OUTSTANDING in precision. I don't use it on just any surface. I use it on a mouse pad, just like I did before I had optical mice.

      Just because optical mice don't "NEED" a mouse pad, doesn't mean you shouldn't still use one.

      The do gain some performance boost off of them, if for no other reason than they don't slide around as smoothly as they do on a desk. That "rough feel" of dragging a mouse over a mouse pad has always kept the mouse pointer moving around with smooth precision in my experience. It's not nearly as good on just the desk, or something else (like a glossy magazine).

      I think the misconception that one can use a optical mouth without a mouse pad leads people to do just that and thus they complain about the precision.

      I hear mixed reports, but I'll swear by my MX700. I play games, do graphics editing, and everything else with it.

      Of all the mice I've owned over the years, the MX700 is clearly the best mouse I have ever owned. I'll never go back to a mechanical mouse for the very reasons that everyone says they hate optical mice. They just lose all of their advantages the moment both mice are side by side on a pad. Well, that's the case of my MX700 anyway. I've had some optical mice that were just garbage, but...

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    8. Re:This is nice by mst76 · · Score: 1

      My first optical mouse was a Microsoft Basic Optical Mouse. For some reason I decided to go with a brand name for my first optical mouse instead of the nobrand mice I used in the past. It was awful. Just like the Amazon reviews say, the cursor jumps all over the place. (Too bad I discovered the reviews too late). OK, I know it was the cheapest MS mouse, but it still cost me 19 euros, twice as much as some noname Chinese optical mouse. How hard is it to screw up something as basic as, well, a Basic Optical Mouse? Anyway, my second one was a 22 euro Logitech, of which I have no complaints.

    9. Re:This is nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had some optical mice that were just garbage, but...

      you cant end a post with an incomplete thought. it just isnt...

    10. Re:This is nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello there, Mr Chimpanzee! You can't begin a sentence without a capital letter, and you can't refrain from using an apostrophe when you leave out letters...

    11. Re:This is nice by Lispy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Microsofts mice are all I use. I started out with the "Microsoft Intellimouse Explorer" and now use a "Microsoft Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse® 1.0A", according to dmesg.

      I can't wait to grab my "Microsoft Microsoft Microsoft Wireless Optical Laser Mouse® 1.0A".

      Honestly, MSFTs hardware really isn't bad. I had lots of trouble with Logitechs and their inconsistent quality so I decided just to not use it anymore.

    12. Re:This is nice by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      Then I hadn't seen it yet. Grow up dude - not everyone's as perfect as you.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    13. Re:This is nice by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Strangely I used to use an original Intellimouse explorer and just recently traded up to the new Wireless Intellimouse Explorer 2... This new explorer model is sweet... Smooth as can be and not one hiccup...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    14. Re:This is nice by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      I haven't used a mousepad with either my new MS intellimouse explorer or my old one and I've never had a precision problem... In fact my new wireless one is insanely smooth in it's tracking...

      So in other words I've found no advantage what-so-ever in using a mousepad with my optical mice...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  14. laser? by khrtt · · Score: 0

    So... Can you use it as a laser pointer?

  15. Finally! by Piranhaa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    WOW! I've been waiting for this day for quite some time now. I knew lasers would soon enough be used in mice due to the surfaces optical mice couldn't work on (ie, glass, mirror, etc). This is definetly just a little step into laser mice, but I'm sure eventually they'll start turning to green or even blue lasers for mice. The only problem I see here is when little Jonny picks up his mouse and looks into the laser ... Could there be ways to stop this from happening?

    1. Re:Finally! by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The only problem I see here is when little Jonny picks up his mouse and looks into the laser ... Could there be ways to stop this from happening?

      Yeah, just slip a MEMS accelerometer in there to determine if it's right side up or not. Turn the thing off if it's rotated too far from being the proper side down. No help if little Jonny sticks his head under the mouse but you can only do so much.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Finally! by khrtt · · Score: 1

      Erm.. Poke his eyes out, maybe? Nah, he'd keep tripping on the mouse cord.. WAIT!

    3. Re:Finally! by knodi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      or a tilt switch. just because the mouse is high-tech doesn't mean you need to make it as complex as possible.

      --
      Austin is more fun than Dallas.
    4. Re:Finally! by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      Odds are, Little Johnny already looked directly into that solar eclipse, so I don't see this as a problem.

    5. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just add a caution side: "Do not look into laser with remaining eye."

    6. Re:Finally! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      A tilt switch usually means either a switch with a weight meaning you need two of them to make it work to cover two axes, or a mercury switch which has the same problem plus the drawback that the contents can be toxic if they escape the switch in exchange for being more reliable than a mechanical tilt switch. A two-axis MEMS accelerometer is available quite cheaply from Analog Devices and is a quite small little part. I am sure they will become even cheaper and smaller in the future.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem I see here is when little Jonny picks up his mouse and looks into the laser ... Could there be ways to stop this from happening?

      If he's tall enough to reach the top of a desk, he should be smart enough to not do things you tell him are dangerous. If he isn't, then, being blind, he is less likely to reproduce, and humanity as a whole will be smarter in generations to come.

    8. Re:Finally! by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      use a lens to focus the laser very close to the mouse, that way it will be attenuated by the time it reaches little Jonny's eye

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    9. Re:Finally! by prockcore · · Score: 4, Funny

      or a tilt switch.

      Yes! Dangerous eye melting lasers combined with mercury! I like your style.

      Now let's just make it small enough to be a choking hazard.

    10. Re:Finally! by BillyBlaze · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lasers are absolutely not inherently more dangerous than any other form of light. The danger comes from the amplitude of light that enters your eye, which is a function of the power of the source, the distance, and the focusing. So assuming they focus the laser as diffusely as they focus the red light from current optical mice, it's no more dangerous.

    11. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There exist electrolytic tilt sensors. Tiny. 2 axes. I've got one. Happy?

      (Although I do prefer the mems solution, or even better, none at all. Tough shit for little Billy if he wants to play with lasers and hurts himself.)

    12. Re:Finally! by wizrd_nml · · Score: 1

      Or the same thing optical mice currently do: when the receiving lens stops seeing a red light (i.e. no reflective surface such as when the mouse is lifted), the red light (in this case laser) is significantly dimmed.

    13. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Austin is more fun than Dallas.

      I was talking to a stripper the other night and she mentioned that the Strip Club scene in Austin blows compared to Dallas. Whadda have to say about that?

    14. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By fun, I'm sure he meant Good Clean fun, like internet porn. It's better in Austin, or so I've heard.

    15. Re:Finally! by dbIII · · Score: 1
      The only problem I see here is when little Jonny picks up his mouse and looks into the laser
      Warning - do not look at laser with remaining eye.
    16. Re:Finally! by spectecjr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Lasers are absolutely not inherently more dangerous than any other form of light. The danger comes from the amplitude of light that enters your eye, which is a function of the power of the source, the distance, and the focusing. So assuming they focus the laser as diffusely as they focus the red light from current optical mice, it's no more dangerous.

      1. In that case, why use a laser at all? Why not use an ultrabright red LED? To have any benefit in using a laser at all, they must be making use of interference effects, which means they need a coherent light source. Which meas that no, they won't diffusely focus the light at all.

      2. The danger comes from the fact that laser light is planar, and because of this not only will your eye will attempt to focus it, and will open the pupil wider in response to it at the same time, for maximum retinal damage.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    17. Re:Finally! by mikeage · · Score: 1

      or a tilt switch.

      Yes! Dangerous eye melting lasers combined with mercury! I like your style.

      Now let's just make it small enough to be a choking hazard.


      Don't forget powering it off 120V, with exposed terminals...

      On a serious note- I was running my laptop without ground for a while (on a plug adapter that only did two prongs), and there was some _serious_ leakage... if I touched the back of the PC while inserting a USB device, I definitely could tell...

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    18. Re:Finally! by Piquan · · Score: 1

      Don't forget powering it off 120V, with exposed terminals...

      Oh, no, 120V is way too obvious to the user. Let's use microwave power transmission, so they don't jerk back immediately.

    19. Re:Finally! by Piquan · · Score: 1

      or a tilt switch. just because the mouse is high-tech doesn't mean you need to make it as complex as possible.

      Still too complex, and I'd hate to go through the legal hassle of putting mercury in consumer products-- particularly if you're selling them in California. Nah, just use a simple mechanical switch.

    20. Re:Finally! by Piquan · · Score: 1

      I was talking to a stripper the other night and she mentioned that the Strip Club scene in Austin blows compared to Dallas.

      That's because Dallas has no social night life, so there's a lot of strip clubs. That, and there's more shipping involving Dallas, so you've got the lonely trucker factor.

      Austin, on the other hand, actually is fun at night. And during the day. And in the strange time events that don't fit into the normal diurnal sequence, and seem to happen more frequently in Austin than anywhere else, including Santa Cruz, CA. Seriously. I had a friend of mine whose car carried a bit of the time warp field around it; he picked it up in Austin once and it stayed there.

    21. Re:Finally! by seek31337 · · Score: 1

      My word, with all the laser pointers in use, how many people do you know that have been disabled by such a device?

      from http://www.drgreene.com/21_607.html :
      A laser (light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation) pointer is a device that transforms ordinary light into an extremely intense and nearly non-divergent beam of light of a single color, with the light waves all in synch. Depending on the intensity of the light, lasers can mobilize immense heat and power when focused at a short range. They are being used for exciting new surgical techniques.

      Lasers are classified according to the maximal power output. Class 1 lasers (500 mW) are dangerous military, medical, or industrial lasers.

      Laser pointers are class 3A (1 to 5 mW) and are required to carry a warning cautioning users to avoid shining a laser pointer beam into anyone's eye. But class 3A lasers are less dangerous than most people think. The most well-supported risk estimate suggests that the retina can theoretically be damaged if someone were to stare into the beam for 10 seconds (Ophthalmology 1997; 104:1213).

      This is nearly impossible to achieve. In this situation, 10 seconds is nearly an eternity. The pupil, blink, and gaze-averting reflexes stop significant exposures in less than 0.25 seconds. Even in the office of an eye surgeon, with a chin rest, a target, and a machine to aim the beam steadily, it is difficult to keep a beam on a single spot for more than a few tenths of a second. So, a laser pointer in mischievous hands carries no real risk for immediate or delayed retinal damage.

      Lasers can, however, dazzle the eyes. Both pain and dazzle spot images are common results of looking at a laser beam. This has given rise to panic in many individuals. Although laser pointers have never been found to do damage, they have produced hysterical blindness--people who can't see because they are convinced they can't (The Lancet 1998; 351:1291).

      Alan Greene MD FAAP

      --
      No SIG for you!
    22. Re:Finally! by bheerssen · · Score: 1

      Could we also make them explode spontaneously? You know, like those crappy Nokia phones. That would be a nice trick.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    23. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then you could'nt lie on your back and use the mouse on a vertical or underside surface while staring up at the screen projected on the ceiling.

    24. Re:Finally! by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      Maybe just because of the higher efficiency of laser diodes (around 45%) compared to regular LEDs (around 20%).

    25. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um. My optical mouse already dims the LED when I pick it up...?

    26. Re:Finally! by Thurn+und+Taxis · · Score: 1

      Nice explanation! Too bad it's mostly wrong.

      Focusing laser light doesn't affect its coherence. In fact, they almost certainly focus the light, to make sure that they only get a strong signal back from where they expect the surface to be. So even if you held the mouse up right to your eye, your retina is far enough away that the laser would be unlikely to cause damage (aside from the fact that they use an IR laser, so most of the light wouldn't get absorbed by your retina anyway).

      Also, the original poster was right about the damage from lasers. The reason they're dangerous is that when the light is collimated, the intensity doesn't drop off with distance the way it does with ordinary light. If a laser beam were to get into your eye, it wouldn't matter how wide your pupils were since the beam is narrowly confined to begin with. It also wouldn't matter whether your eye tried to focus on it or not, since a ray passing through a lens still comes out as a ray.

      Oh, and LEDs are also coherent. They just have a much shorter (less than 50 micrometer) coherence length.

      --
      On stereophonic equipment, the monaural sound obtained through multiple channels will enhance your listening pleasure.
    27. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a mouse, not a pinball machine.

      Besides, what about people who use wirless mice at weird angles?

    28. Re:Finally! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      My word, with all the laser pointers in use, how many people do you know that have been disabled by such a device?

      Right, the question becomes which is more expensive, the cost of lawsuits or the cost of installing a protection device.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re:Finally! by Strontium-90 · · Score: 1

      I spent four years in Houston (Rice U) and have lots of friends who have migrated to Austin. While I like Houston, I have to say that Austin is the coolest city I've ever been to. The only things that Austin is lacking are quick access to beaches or skiing. It has everything else: any type of music you care to listen to, active night life, good football (UTexas), plenty of outdoor activities for those of us that venture into the sunlight, and food that I would be willing to KILL for. I'm living in Pasadena (CA) now, but would move to Austin in a heartbeat if I could.

    30. Re:Finally! by Piquan · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on everything except the football.

      - Texas A&M Class of 97

    31. Re:Finally! by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Focusing laser light doesn't affect its coherence

      Diffusely focusing it, as suggested by the original poster, however, does affect its coherence. Unless you're claiming that diffusing a light source has no effect on its coherence, which is an argument I'd love to see you back up.

      In fact, they almost certainly focus the light, to make sure that they only get a strong signal back from where they expect the surface to be. So even if you held the mouse up right to your eye, your retina is far enough away that the laser would be unlikely to cause damage (aside from the fact that they use an IR laser, so most of the light wouldn't get absorbed by your retina anyway).

      Highly unlikely as that completely removes the possibility of using interference on the surface being lit as a way of determining how the mouse is being moved - which is the feature which would allow it to be used on any surface.

      Also, the original poster was right about the damage from lasers. The reason they're dangerous is that when the light is collimated, the intensity doesn't drop off with distance the way it does with ordinary light. If a laser beam were to get into your eye, it wouldn't matter how wide your pupils were since the beam is narrowly confined to begin with. It also wouldn't matter whether your eye tried to focus on it or not, since a ray passing through a lens still comes out as a ray.

      That's completely incorrect. Even lasers have a coherence length, so their intensity does drop off over time - and it will anyway, even if just by scattering and absorption.

      And, again, the reason it's a problem is because parallel light gets focused to a spot on your retina. If you look around the web, you'll see that the spot it gets focused to is on the order of the size of a blood cell. All of the energy of the beam gets focused into that area because it is a parallel beam - and your pupil opens wider in response to it automatically.

      As for LEDs being coherent... that's great and everything, but nearly every ultrabright LED in consumer electronics is covered by a glass lens which spreads and diffuses the light making it incoherent.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    32. Re:Finally! by Strontium-90 · · Score: 1

      Even someone from A&M has to admit that the University of Texas plays good football. I'm not saying that you have to *like* the team, just that there is good football to watch in Austin. Heck, being a Rice Owl, I hate UT and A&M equally, but I'd much rather watch a UT football game than a Rice football game. - Rice U. Class of 2003

    33. Re:Finally! by Piquan · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'll agree with that.

      I live in the SF Bay Area now, and would much rather watch a UT game than a Raiders game.

      Although I'd rather watch the MOB than much anything else on the field. :-)

    34. Re:Finally! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's a valid point, but I think that you could detect whether the behavior was mousing-type or just sitting upside down (or probably anything 75 or 80 degrees off flat) without being moved in the typical mouse fashion and get past that particular problem.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    35. Re:Finally! by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      Honest question - if diffusing laser light with a lens affects it's coherence to the point where it's impossible to derive any benefit at all from interference patterns, then how does holography work? My understanding is, you split a laser beam, one half bounces off an object, and when it is recombined with the reference beam, it creates an interference pattern which is recorded on the film.

    36. Re:Finally! by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      See http://www.intl-light.com/handbook/ch04.html - look at the top of the page.

      Holography doesn't involve diffusing the laser light. I was talking specifically about diffusion - as mentioned by the original poster.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  16. Hate to tell you this... by CdnZero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...but Logitech is Canadian. HQ is in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

    1. Re:Hate to tell you this... by Raul654 · · Score: 1

      So, by your logic, if Des Moines is 2 years behind, then Canada is 25 years behind?

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    2. Re:Hate to tell you this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada is part of (North) America. Go back to geography class.

    3. Re:Hate to tell you this... by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

      So, by your logic, if Des Moines is 2 years behind, then Canada is 25 years behind?


      Actually, with the exchange rate, Canada would be about (aboot?) 2.6206 years behind. ;P

    4. Re:Hate to tell you this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did I miss the part where Vancouver annexed Switzerland?

      http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/about/company/CA /EN,CRID=296

    5. Re:Hate to tell you this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America means "United States of America."

      If we had meant Canada, we would have said Canada.

      In other news, Logitech is based in Switzerland, which is not located in America or Canada.

    6. Re:Hate to tell you this... by mwood · · Score: 1

      Canada is in America. Perhaps you meant that it's not in the United States of America.

    7. Re:Hate to tell you this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Canada isn't a state yet? I would have thought something that was an American territory for so long would have managed full statehood by now.

  17. Potential danger? by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dangerous! You know, the "I'll clean my mouse" routine... flip mouse toward face... arghhh! My eyes!

    Of course, if you`re lucky AND already have bad vision, you could just laser-correct your problem, i guess :) 2000$ saved, 50$ investment, Do It Yourself! Isn`t technology cool?

    1. Re:Potential danger? by MikeXpop · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Or maybe you'll be really really lucky with your aim and accidently give yourself laser eye surgery.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    2. Re:Potential danger? by Matrix9180 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You probably should have finished reading that post before adding your witty comment ;)

      --
      120chars for a sig is teh suck
    3. Re:Potential danger? by visgoth · · Score: 1

      Nah, considering nobody reads the fine article, this gent is just taking the next logical step, and not reading the fine posts... quite a visionary, actually. Sir, I salute you!

      --
      My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    4. Re:Potential danger? by emorphien · · Score: 1

      Your standard laser pointer, even the seemingly blinding green ones (which only seem that way because we're at least 2x as sensitive to that wavelength) won't blind you without considerably prolonged exposure. I know you're joking but people seriously exaggerate the dangers of any of the small lasers the public has access to on a day to day basis.

      --


      Presently here, but not there.
    5. Re:Potential danger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, if you`re lucky AND already have bad vision, you could just laser-correct your problem, i guess :) 2000$ saved, 50$ investment, Do It Yourself! Isn`t technology cool?

      Of course the second time you attempt to clean your mouse will then burn your retinas out.

    6. Re:Potential danger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I looked into the trap, Ray!"

    7. Re:Potential danger? by fyonn · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that there are many milliard people who read neither the article, nor the comments on slashdot. we call these people "normal" :)

      back on topic, I've got an mx700 and it's one of the best mice I've ever had (reminds me of the naksha mouse I bought for my amiga actually, heavier than you'd think, but has a very solid, yet fluid feel).

      being as a friend might want my mx700, when the mx1000 comes out in the UK I might well go for one. assuming it works well with my macintrash (which I can't imagine it won't, the 700 works great).

      dave

  18. wireless + laser = short battery life? by sjalex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've heard people griping about the short battery life on the wireless mice they already have. Won't a laser exacerbate the problem?

    1. Re:wireless + laser = short battery life? by harikiri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have an MX700 from Logitech. The beauty of this device is that it comes with a stylish cradle, that serves both as the wireless base station for the mouse, along with being a recharger unit as well.

      I remember a few years back having an early Logitech wireless mouse/keyboard combo. Then, one late night while we were doing a change - the batteries died, and I had none spare. At that point I decided never to use a "wireless" keyboard or mouse till they came with a recharge unit. Thus, the MX700 was awesome for me.

      I would be very suprised if this new model didn't use the same system.

      --
      Man watching 6 MSCE's around a sun box, looks alot like the opening scene's of 2001:space odyssey...
    2. Re:wireless + laser = short battery life? by kaveh · · Score: 1

      Not only does the MX1000 use the same system (that is it can be recharged on its base), but it also uses lithiom ion (actually lithium polymer) batteries instead of AA. So the battery life should be better. Not to mention you have a battery charge indicator right on the mouse so you should have fair warning before it dies on you.

    3. Re:wireless + laser = short battery life? by wviperw · · Score: 1

      While in theory I would agree that the MX700 charger is nice, it doesn't seem to work as well as it should. Now, only 6 months having had my MX700, my mouse will last maybe a night's worth of computer use and then will be dead. The charger seems to only charge the mouse about 10% now, so you would think it would be a "memory" thing, but I've already checked that.

      Just saying the MX700 isn't all that awesome for some others.

      --
      Nothing disturbs me more than blind loyalism towards some unrealistic and over-idealistic notion of one's nationality.
    4. Re:wireless + laser = short battery life? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Did you try a new set of batteries? NiMH, NiCD, and Li+ all have a limited number of recharge cycles before they start crapping out much earlier than when they were new.

    5. Re:wireless + laser = short battery life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      might wanna check out if everything is well with your mouse or the power contacts, I had to clean them once. I leave my mouse off the cradle for days at a time with heavy use befor it runs down. and I've had it for at least six months as well.

    6. Re:wireless + laser = short battery life? by CamTarn · · Score: 1

      I definately wouldn't use a mouse or keyboard which didn't have a built-in charger, and I probably wouldn't use one which had a cradle charger instead. My own wireless mouse has a simple power port on the top of the mouse, so when it runs out of battery I just plug in a charger (5V, tip positive, standard 1mm barrel plug - the charger I use cost me a few quid from Maplin, since the mouse only came with a USB charger.) This means that I can continue using the mouse while it's charging, with only a thin power cable protruding from below the scroll wheel. With a power cradle, I'd have to switch to a different mouse while it charged. And if the batteries run out of capacity, they're just AAA rechargables, so I can pop them out and replace them. My mouse is about a year and a half old, from A4Tech, and cost about a fifth of what the equivalent Logitech cost at the time.

    7. Re:wireless + laser = short battery life? by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      I've had mine for 8 months now. The batteries (the ones that came with it) now last longer than they used to. I used to get 3-4 days out of the mouse. Now I get a week to 10 days.

      I've heard lots of problems like yours, so I may just be lucky.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    8. Re:wireless + laser = short battery life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will not buy any unit that *does* have a recharge unit, because that's means they'll almost certainly use custom batteries. Custom batteries = more expensive. That's why there's rechargable AA/AAA batteries. And you can get one spare set for all your battery-operated toys.

    9. Re:wireless + laser = short battery life? by rale,+the · · Score: 1

      MX700 uses plain ordinary AA NiMH rechargables. Mine seems to go about 3 days before it stops working if I forget to charge it, and I never have any problems as long as I put it in the cradle each night. This is with fairly heavy use, btw.

    10. Re:wireless + laser = short battery life? by Agret · · Score: 1

      "In addition to a more ergonomic design, lithium ion battery, tilt wheel (read horizontal scrolling), and battery indicating LEDs, this mouse introduces laser technology"

      I'm sure that you can buy Lithium Ion batteries to put into your mouse. Dude RTFA and you'll realise it is the same.

      --
      Have you metaroderated recently?
    11. Re:wireless + laser = short battery life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't say whether they're built-in batteries or the standard ones you can buy in any store.

      If they're built-in/custom, you'll have to buy a new mouse once the inevitable moment comes when the batteries won't recharge any longer.

  19. Text by McKinney83 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Main point: HIGH PERFORMANCE CORDLESS MOUSE WITH LASER TRACKING
    PI DATE : JULY 2004
    TECHNOLOGY : Fast RF cordless
    SYS REQS : IBM or compatible PC,
    Windows 98, 2000, Me or XP,
    Available USB or PS2 port, CD-ROM drive
    Macintosh system - Mac OS X+,
    Available USB port, CD-ROM drive
    FEATURES : * MX Laser Engine provides 20 x times the tracking power
    of optical
    * a built-in lithium-ion battery & rapid-charging base station
    * Fast RF cordless delivers cordless performance that equals USB corded connection
    * New thumb-button controls include universal page forward and back buttons and application switch to quickly move between open windows
    * Illuminated 4-level batt indicator precisely monitors batt strength
    * Wheel tilts for side-to-side scrolling, zoom with a click of the wheel
    * Cruise Control rocker for speed scrolling up and down
    * Deep-sculpted thumb support for incredible comfort, outside finger grips enhance control

    PACKAGE CONTENT :
    * Logitech MX-1000 Laser cordless mouse
    * Recharging base station,
    * CD-ROM with SetPoint SW
    * Installation guide,
    * PS2 to USB adapter

    --
    Winner of The Second Annual Montgomery Burns Award for Outstanding Achievement in the Field of Excellence.
  20. Does It Fix This Problem? by ArchAngel21x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So it is more accurate. That is fine, but the optical mouse seems pretty accurate. The only thing I do not like is the weird quark all optical mice have. When you move the, mouse the cursor will go shooting off in the opposite direction. It is very annoying. It does not happen all the time, but it is still annoying.

    1. Re:Does It Fix This Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never noticed that until now.
      Now i can't stop doing it!

    2. Re:Does It Fix This Problem? by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only thing I do not like is the weird quark all optical mice have.

      Ahem.

      I think you meant strange quark .

      Sorry, correcting incorrect assumptions about physics is a strange quirk. of mine. :)

    3. Re:Does It Fix This Problem? by Lisandro · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is the so called "bouncing" problem, and it's specially noticeable on earlier, lower DPI optical mouses. Gamers particularly bitched on this - i know quite a few who brought the new Microsft Intellimouse just because it fixed the problem (or so they say).

      In my mouse (Genius Powerscroll EYE optical) it happens when you do an extreme move to one direction; the pointer jumps and "jitters" to the oposite for a second; i use high sensitivity so it never bothered me. Newer optical mouses have to be moved very, very (and i do mean very) fast in order for this to happen.

    4. Re:Does It Fix This Problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using a Microsoft Intellimouse optical for years, and I've never had this problem. I do remember having a similar problem on a Logitech optical trackball, but only when I spun the ball really fast.

    5. Re:Does It Fix This Problem? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that the fact that it does not happen all of the time is what makes it annoying. If it happened all of the time, it would be the correct, expected behavior.

    6. Re:Does It Fix This Problem? by Temporal · · Score: 1

      My optical mouse (Logitech MX700) does not have that quirk. At least, not when using a proper surface (in my case a cafepress mouse pad).

      Incidentally, my previous mouse was a first-generation (I think) MS Intellimouse Explorer, and it had that problem specifically when hooked up to USB. It did not have problems with hooked up to the PS/2 port. Funny that.

    7. Re:Does It Fix This Problem? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      ball mice have the same behavior, however usually if you are moving one fast enough to get the effect you are already jostling the ball enough to lose any semblance of control.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    8. Re:Does It Fix This Problem? by pmcc · · Score: 1

      My first generation MS Intellimouse Explorer had this problem if I made quick, sudden movements. However, after an unfortunate accident (read: dropping it down a flight of stairs while moving my computer around) I had to replace it. By this time the 3rd generation Intellimouses were out, and I couldn't make this mouse lose it's tracking or have the quirk you mentioned in my life depended on it. As much as I don't like MS software, their optical intellimouses are very very high quality products.

    9. Re:Does It Fix This Problem? by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1
      The only thing I do not like is the weird quark all optical mice have.

      Ahem.

      I think you meant strange quark .

      Sorry, correcting incorrect assumptions about physics is a strange quirk. of mine. :)

      I don't know I like the sound of it, I'm sure I have plenty of weird quarks in my head, infact judging by postings most /.'s do. :-P
      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    10. Re:Does It Fix This Problem? by anti-trojan · · Score: 1

      I am still using a first generation IntelliMouse Explorer and it works great with both USB and PS/2. Yours must have had a problem.

      Actually first generation seems to be better than the later builds. I also have a later one, and the side buttons stopped working. I once tried a wireless one (somewhat differently shaped, but still an explorer) and its accuracy was horrible. You could never move the mouse just 1 pixel. I returned it and bought a corded one.

  21. Hopefully it has better resolution than mx700 by ndogg · · Score: 1

    I like my MX700, and while it never skips, it has rather poor resolution. I keep my corded optical mouse around just in case I need more fine-grained control (yes, I like sniping.)

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    1. Re:Hopefully it has better resolution than mx700 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But dude, optical is obsolete.

      (Is Logitech marketing stupid or what?)

  22. 20x more precise by chrono325 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this really useful? I mean, I have never had a problem with my mouse not having the resolution to click the "submit" button. Seriously though, I think mouse (and keyboard) makers have run into a similar problem as sound card makers: our mice/soundcards are already good enough. I personally have a Logitech mx500 and love it to death, but I do not see any way the pointing function could be improved. Oh well, its a frickin laser.

    1. Re:20x more precise by Rew190 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Games, CAD, image-work, folks that use high resolution displays, etc....

    2. Re:20x more precise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 20x precision is salesman lingo (bait) for suckers, it will help buyers rationalize the money spent on a useless toy.

      "...but its 20x more precise! They said I can get subpixel resolution."

    3. Re:20x more precise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      trying to do CAD with an optical mouse qualifies as cruel and unusual punishment. This is no different than the soundcard you mention. Many people need better mice and soundcards, you just dont happen to be one of them.

    4. Re:20x more precise by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know and I agree. But.
      *sigh*
      I'm still gonna have to get one.

    5. Re: 20x more precise by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1
      That's a non-argument. Common mice already have far higher resolution/smaller movement steps than any common screen resolution. Translated: you already have sub-pixel accuracy.

      Far more important (for gaming, for instance) is how well the mouse tracks it's movement. This is where optical mice get their advantage: there isn't a rubber ball and dirty, unregular running sensors anymore, but direct optical sensing. Also, how many times/second (and with what delay) movement info is passed to the computer, can make a difference. This latter being a connection type/OS/driver issue.

      So 'diminishing returns' certainly applies here. I like a good FPS game, and mechanical -> optical mouse makes a small, but very noticable difference for an experienced gamer. Optical mouse -> newer, better model optical mouse makes much less of a difference.

    6. Re:20x more precise by Engineer+Andy · · Score: 1

      CAD wont be a great user of this, as in CAD, you tend to snap to the nearest point of interest anyway.

      Our drafters use the vanilla flavored optical mice that came with the hp compaq boxen.

      I too question the need for 20x the accuracy.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
    7. Re:20x more precise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this really useful? I mean, I have never had a problem with my mouse not having the resolution to click the "submit" button

      Your missing the point, now my mouse has enough resolution I can use it to make 3d models in a computer! Now I finally have an excuse to run my mouse over every square inch of my body! Thank you Logitech!

    8. Re:20x more precise by Hacksaw · · Score: 1

      I think people have visions of the R&D staff sweating over each multiple of precision.

      "Boss, we got it up to 13 times."

      "Not good enough! We need twenty if we're going to compete!"

      No. They switched from a non-collimated light source, an LED, to a collimated source, a laser. DING! 20x more accurate.

      The real point is that it can track on surfaces that it couldn't before.

      The write up mentions mirrors for a reason.

      --

      All the technology in the world won't hide your lack of vision, talent, or understanding.

    9. Re:20x more precise by synthrabbit · · Score: 1
      Is this really useful? I mean, I have never had a problem with my mouse not having the resolution to click the "submit" button.
      Plus you can get a Microsoft Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer (which is prettier, IMHO) for less than half the amount.
    10. Re:20x more precise by rich99 · · Score: 1

      When talking about precision (delicate movements) and not movement speed (jump-180 railgun). Your mouse would need to be able to slide on the desk a lot more to develop ultra high precision.

      Try doing slow precise movements with a high-res optical mouse. How well it slides on the desk could be a limiting factor.

    11. Re:20x more precise by stonedonkey · · Score: 1
      Is this really useful? I mean, I have never had a problem with my mouse not having the resolution to click the "submit" button.

      And the MX1000 won't change this, as it turns out. It's 800 DPI, just like the MX510. I think "20x the tracking of optical mice" refers to how accurately the sensor updates pointer location according to how the mouse is being physically moved. But it won't give you more precise aim.

    12. Re:20x more precise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a snipers wet dream. All the Barret hugging camping whores just had a second christmas.

    13. Re:20x more precise by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree with your .sig--I personally would love to collect servers of all types. Unfortunately, I am in grad school and can't afford too.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    14. Re:20x more precise by Hacksaw · · Score: 1

      Well, you could certainly spend a lot of money on servers. On the other hand: a few figures for you:

      CA basic TDM recording system useful for professional recording: $25,000.

      A high end recording console: $600,000 -$1,000,000.

      High end compressor: $2500.

      Number needed in a typical recording: 4-20, depending on the music.

      High end reverb unit: $50,000

      Building a high end recording studio, not including equipment: Twice the cost of just the building.
      (Recording studio have double walls, floors and ceilings, with special sound dampaneing spacers, sound baffling ducting for the HVAC, and astonishing amounts of wiring. Plus nothing can be prefabbed that is larger than a sheet of drywall.)

      Renting the studio, hiring musicians, paying a good producer, for ten songs aimed at the pop market: $250,000.

      A Stradivarius violin: $5-10 million.

      And all that before you can even attempt to turn a profit on any of it.

      But I want it ALL!

      --

      All the technology in the world won't hide your lack of vision, talent, or understanding.

    15. Re:20x more precise by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      But it DOES make a difference.
      I can't count how many times i've been fragged online and even in single player FPSs just because I tried to move the mouse very fast to aim on a target behind me and the mouse didn't register the fast movement, but rather a slow movement, TO THE OTHER DIRECTION.
      Try it yourself, take almost any optical mice (except maybe some high-end dual-eye logitechs) and move it really fast (twitch speed) to some direction, it will usually not register it correctly.

      --
      ^_^
    16. Re:20x more precise by Politburo · · Score: 1

      The real point is that it can track on surfaces that it couldn't before.

      The write up mentions mirrors for a reason.


      Yeah, but the box, according to other posts, specifically says the mouse won't work well on mirrors and other reflective surfaces, so that can't be it.

    17. Re:20x more precise by wed128 · · Score: 1

      hey i just had an idea from your post...

      someone should write a driver for those fancy shmancy umpteen button meese that when one of the extra ones is held held, slows down mouse movement...so with the press of a button and the roll of the wheel it can become jump-180 railgun-long range snipe...

    18. Re:20x more precise by Daniel · · Score: 1

      I just tried with my cheap optical mouse that I'm using here, and it seems to work fine. I've seen this same mouse be unreliable, though -- when using it *on other surfaces*. You might want to see if your mouse works better if you change its pad (right now I'm actually using a potholder!)

      Daniel

      --
      Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
    19. Re:20x more precise by Hacksaw · · Score: 1

      If you read the 3dPGU posting, right under the diagram showing the comparison to the old style optical mouse, it says "Already you might be surprised to know that this mouse has had no issues with any surface I have tried it on, including a mirror. It states that you shouldn't use it with reflective surfaces but I wanted to see what this thing could do."

      In fact, I would bet they said not to use it on mirrors and surfaces like that more because of the safety issue of bouncing the laser off the mirror. There should be plenty of surface imperfections in a typical mirror for the thing to read.

      --

      All the technology in the world won't hide your lack of vision, talent, or understanding.

    20. Re:20x more precise by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Other posts here have indicated that it does not work on mirrors, so who knows what it's actual capabilities are. IMO, the safety/liability issue is overblown. This thing shouldn't be using a laser anywhere near powerful enough to do any damage. The light only has to travel a cm or so and reflect back.

    21. Re:20x more precise by Hacksaw · · Score: 1

      Actually, now that I look at the bottom of the mouse in the picture more closely, I see its listed as a class 1 laser product, which is considered not harmful to the eye.

      Anyway, it's still really just about being able to use it on a large variety of surfaces.

      You might not b able to use of a computer monitor, but a highly polished desk or a crappy mirror.

      But, sure, it's mostly marketing hype.

      --

      All the technology in the world won't hide your lack of vision, talent, or understanding.

    22. Re:20x more precise by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      I'm using the table, it has a fine wooden texture, which should be a decent texture for the mouse.
      More than likely that you don't move it fast enough. Every time i'm trying a new mouse (usually at friends' house), I ask them if it has this problem. They say no and I tell them to do this, for them it works. But when I move it, it's again stuck. Specifically try moving it left to right, not a big movement, but rather a subtle, fast movement.

      --
      ^_^
    23. Re:20x more precise by Daniel · · Score: 1

      WARNING: mostly unfounded speculation follows!

      Actually, a wooden table is probably one of the worse surfaces you could use (and my experience has borne this out), for two reasons:

      (1) many tables have vanished, glossy surfaces. 'nuff said.

      (2), probably more important: wood grain. I believe that optical mice use an algorithm along the lines of "try to compare the image I see with the previous image, match similar points, and guess how I moved". This algorithm is confused by textures that have long, mostly parallel lines, because it's hard to tell which way, if any, the mouse moved. Wood grain on tables generally has a lot of parallel lines, so it's going to trigger this problem.

      Humans have the same problem: imagine an object covered in stripes moving parallel to the stripes. Depending on how uniform the stripes are, it can be difficult or impossible to tell how quickly the object is moving along that axis; if the stripes are very regularly spaced, it can even be difficult to figure out how fast it's moving along the perpendicular axis as well.

      The hotpad in question has a crosshatch pattern (ie, squares whose sides are 45 degrees from vertical) with a relatively large distance (~1 inch) between lines, so there's always at least one clear line that the mouse is not moving parallel to; in fact, the more parallel its motion is to one set of lines, the less parallel it is to the other.

      My reasons may be wrong, but I've found that my optical mouse is least reliable on wood-grain tables.

      Daniel

      --
      Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
    24. Re:20x more precise by anethema · · Score: 1

      Any logitech in the MX series is not susceptable to this unless used on a very poor surface.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    25. Re:20x more precise by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      So my next mouse will be a LogitechMX ;)
      I've been considering this for a while already.

      --
      ^_^
  23. Site Slashdotted Cache link by kunjan1029 · · Score: 1

    http://3dgpu.com.nyud.net:8090/forums/index.php?sh owtopic=310

    Hmmm works pretty good!

  24. Still no bluetooth rechargable mouse by futurekill · · Score: 1

    I wish logitech would come out with a Bluetooth version of this thing. I have the M$ bluetooth mouse that I use with my PowerBook. It works great except for the fact that I have to put new batteries in it every month or so.

    --
    The gates in my computer are AND, OR and NOT; they are not Bill.
    1. Re:Still no bluetooth rechargable mouse by Soldevi · · Score: 1

      Logitech does have a bluetooth rechargable optical mouse, just not a laser one yet. The only problem I have with it is that I have to remove the batteries when it's in my bag or they quickly go dead.

    2. Re:Still no bluetooth rechargable mouse by yetiman · · Score: 2, Informative

      uuhh...yes they do, and have for some time now...

      http://www.logitech.com/index.cfm/products/detai ls /CA/EN,CRID=3,CONTENTID=7110

    3. Re:Still no bluetooth rechargable mouse by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Naw, what they (and Microsoft) really need is to add an on/off switch so that I can take my MS bluetooth mouse with me without the battery wearing down in my bag.

      I know there's one bluetooth mouse that has this, but it only has 3 buttons : (

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Still no bluetooth rechargable mouse by jerw134 · · Score: 1

      The MX1000 actually does have an on/off switch.

    5. Re:Still no bluetooth rechargable mouse by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for this one. Looks nice, and it has an "off" switch!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:Still no bluetooth rechargable mouse by HFShadow · · Score: 1

      Read the article, there is one on the bottom :)

    7. Re:Still no bluetooth rechargable mouse by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it's not bluetooth -- I want a mouse that works with my iBook without a dongle.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:Still no bluetooth rechargable mouse by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      But it's not bluetooth.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Still no bluetooth rechargable mouse by Jord · · Score: 1

      Actually there are two but the other one only has one button...

    10. Re:Still no bluetooth rechargable mouse by futurekill · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...didn't realize that...thanks for the info...

      --
      The gates in my computer are AND, OR and NOT; they are not Bill.
  25. Uh Oh by Crystalmonkey · · Score: 1

    Darn, I was hoping for super mice soldiers to invade the RIAA headquaters, now I'll just settle for Plan B, my Ralph Nader blow-up doll.

  26. "20x more precise than optical mice" by KB1GHC · · Score: 0

    even with a laser it will still be optical

  27. Slashdotted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Slashdotted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      coralized doesn't work worth a crap...

    2. Re:Slashdotted.. by jeriqo · · Score: 1

      Coral is going to be the favorite tool of karma whores :-)

      "FCP !"

      (First Coral Post)

      --
      Alexis 'jeriqo' BRET
  28. I like my original title better... by kaveh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "World's 1st Laser Mouse! (Optical is obsolete)"

    Either way I'm hoping I can just swap this mouse in for my current MX700 in my logitech cordless keyboard/mouse set. That way I can use the same reciever that also connects the mouse. It is important to note that this mouse uses Fast RF technology like the MX700 and not Bluetooth like the MX900. Some gamers weren't happy with the performance of the Bluetooth model.

    1. Re:I like my original title better... by KB1GHC · · Score: 0

      laser mouse is still optical

    2. Re:I like my original title better... by Roofus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah whatever! Next you'll probably tell me the 'L' in LASER stands for 'Light'. What, do you think I'm a sucker?

      KC2LJL

    3. Re:I like my original title better... by Raptor+CK · · Score: 1

      Do you know if that's backwards compatible with the pre-MX wireless receivers?

      I've got an older Cordless Freedom set at home, and it would be nice to replace the mouse with something with more buttons, although I won't give up my non-split, minimal fancy-buttons Logitech Cordless Keyboard for anything these days. (My girlfriend would kill me if I went back to my old M-series keyboard, sadly.)

      Also, the Bluetooth mouse does suck for gaming. For everything else, though, it's fine. I think Bluetooth's just a little slow. It's the best mouse I'll ever use with my Powerbook, though, since I just need a fresh pair of AA's every so often, and it pairs almost automatically with the built-in Bluetooth module.

      --
      Raptor
      "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
  29. Clickable like ;) by kunjan1029 · · Score: 4, Informative

    opps

    here's the clickable one

    Mirror

    Damn have to wait 2 minutes~

  30. KARMA WHORING ALERT!! WEE-OOO-WEE-OOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Karma Whoring Alert is in effect! Hide your children!

  31. Sounds pretty sweet... by gordlea · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As long as the battery life is decent, I want one. Screw the Starck mouse... This sounds like it should be great for games.

    Would there be much difference in power draw between an led and a laser? I realize they must have some pretty low power lasers (like in a discman); how powerful of a laser would you need to be able to track movement like this?

    --

    Choose yer poison: Prophets or Profits

    1. Re:Sounds pretty sweet... by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      Well, as you said, a discman laser is pretty low power, yet those are able to read the pits in a CD. Seeing as how you can't see the pits, and CDs look like a mirror, I'd imagine that a discman laser would work wonderfully.

  32. Poor Philip S+arck by neuro.slug · · Score: 1

    Too bad his name / design isn't on something as nice as this. Ergonomically, it looks very finicky. If it fits, it'll fit wonderfully. However, if your thumb doesn't feel right on that resty-island thing, then you're screwed.

    -- n

  33. Mice and What They're Good For by captnitro · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it ever make you wonder 'what if computing advanced like mice do'? In some ways, they do, but I mean, we have wireless mice, wireless optical and laser mice, wireless optical laser geneboosted mice that have nine buttons with integrated phone features, and they're all totally transparent, incredibly essential cruxes of the modern computing experience.

    can we get somebody from the mouse department over to the HD storage density department? Or the hardware installation department, because I still have to visit my grandfather every time he needs to install RAM. Perhaps, even, we should transfer the entire mouse department over to the user interface department, so they can explain to me why 'Exit' is for the love of god still after 20 years in the 'File' menu (Mac users, you're OK on this one). Those two, after all, have a lot to do with each other. Finally, they could stop over at the Windows dev group and explain to them that I should not have to notify Windows of my intention to disconnect my fully hotswappable device.

    I could go on, but I think you get the idea.

    1. Re:Mice and What They're Good For by josh3736 · · Score: 1
      Finally, they could stop over at the Windows dev group and explain to them that I should not have to notify Windows of my intention to disconnect my fully hotswappable device.

      Why must you notify? To sync and dismount the filesystem.

      Windows doesn't care about it too much anymore (I can just pull out my USB key drive and it doesn't say a thing) since write caching is usually disabled for USB devices, but if you do turn caching on, you'll need to dismount your "fully hotswappable" device.

      On topic, when are we going to see improvements in the laptop pointing arena? My touchpad is great, but I wonder if there's anything better out there...

    2. Re:Mice and What They're Good For by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      I still have to visit my grandfather every time he needs to install RAM.
      Yeah, man, I feel your pain.
      I know that my grandfather needs to install RAM two or three times a month; what a bore.
      If only I didn't have to visit my grandfather every time he needed to install RAM, I'd never have to visit him at all.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    3. Re:Mice and What They're Good For by shadowlordseth · · Score: 1

      The only reason for notifying windows about disconnecting hardware is write caching. If you turn this off (system control panel) you can safely remove hardware with doing the clicky thing. Write caching is a Good Thing (TM) with a slow external USB 1.1 device.

    4. Re:Mice and What They're Good For by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I share your desire for quickly and easily installed RAM. Why can't they make it so that you can just power down the system, shove a stick of RAM in some type of slot, and turn the damn thing back on and have it just work?

      That would be so much faster than the way we currently have to install the RAM, you know the drill... power down the system, shove a stick of RAM in some type of slot, and turn the damn thing back on and it just works.

    5. Re:Mice and What They're Good For by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because Exit belongs in the File menu. In a document-centric view of using applications, closing a document (the file) is equivalent to exiting the program.

      Besides, HD densities have increased faster than Moore's law in the past 5 years or so (yes, I know Moore's law is only meant for semiconductors but it's been surpassed here). Three years ago I got a 20 GB drive and now I could get a 200 GB drive for a little less money than that. I don't think the HD density development has been slow at all. CPU speeds on the other hand..

  34. Needed warning label by dougmc · · Score: 4, Funny
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye
    (No, it's not mine. And the laser isn't likely to have enough power to really hurt anybody's eye. But it still seems appropriate. :)
    1. Re:Needed warning label by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's probably very low power like some digital cameras that are intended to be pointed at people's faces.

      IIRC, my camera says the laser it projects is rated at 30,000 seconds (or something like that) meaning that you could stare directly at it for over 8 hours with no damage to your retina.

  35. Exactly. Law of diminishing returns... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. law of diminishing returns

  36. Yeah I know, I'm using one by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And it's cool. Better than my optical mouse that got bumped down to my other computer? I don't really know. I'm still in that brief "getting used to a different mouse" phase so what I can tell you about it is limited.

    The one it replaced was a Logitech basic cordless optical It did it's job well but I've been using my second computer more lately and the mouse on it was a POS so I needed another. In terms of accuracy I'm sure the laser mouse is better (Logitech wouldn't lie about that would they?) but I doubt that it's going to be something that 90% of us would notice.

    Getting past the claims of improved accuracy that I can't really address it's a nice mouse. I'd have bought the Bluetooth model but this one was $20 cheaper and I liked the feel of it.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    1. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by jargonCCNA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is it available in a lefthanded model? No?

      Then fuck you, Logitech.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
    2. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you know why they don't make very many lefthanded mice? It's because left handed people DO NOT BUY THEM. If they did then Logitech would sell them, but they keep ending up with a lot of unsold lefthanded mice.

      It's a strict business decission, so blame the other lefties who use righthanded mice. ;->

    3. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you too!

      Love,
      Logitech

    4. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by jewps · · Score: 1

      thats true, i'm left handed but i'm right handed for a lot of things, sports, i can write with my left and right hand, etc..

      hell, fuck the left handed mouse, just use your right hand..

    5. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by jargonCCNA · · Score: 1

      I spent all but the last year of my computing existence using a righthanded mouse. It feels a lot better, having switched over. Works with my computer desk a hell of a lot better, too.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
    6. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by jargonCCNA · · Score: 1

      That's a bit of a catch-22, now isn't it? No wonder lefties don't buy lefty mice... because there aren't any on the market! I'm not asking for equal numbers here.. You know.. a ninth as many lefthanded mice as there are righthanded mice would be nice.. But they aren't there. You say if lefties bought lefty mice, then Logitech would sell them... but Logitech doesn't make lefty mice, lefties won't be buying lefty mice, now will they?! You can't buy what doesn't exist! I won't blame the lefties who use righty mice, I'll blame the righties who made them use righty mice! There is one arena where I get militant--the lack of support for lefties. It's nigh-impossible to find lefty desks at my university and it's nigh-impossible to find lefty mice. Lefties have been persecuted and ignored for centuries. I'm not asking for "affirmative action" regarding enrollment.. just put enough lefty desks on campus for us to use, god damn it!

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
    7. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, Logitech (and other companies) have made lefthanded mice and they didn't sell. I had the change to buy a large number of pallets worth and that excess invetory was a drain on their profits for a quarter.

      http://thelefthand.com/lefconmous.html

      Don't say your being persecuted when you are too fucking lazy to use google. The above URL was the FIRST google result for left handed mouse. ;->

    8. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use it anyway. What exactly is the problem?

    9. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You made my night.

    10. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by MoggyMania · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure which hand one mouses with would actually make that much of a difference.

      My father is a thorough leftie and has always used his right hand for mousing without a problem (he started back in the days when mice were symmetrical so this was his choice). I asked him once about it, and he said that for mousing, dominance didn't make much of a difference for him.

      Last year, after developing a neurological problems that made lifting my right arm painful, I started mousing with my left hand. It took me almost no time to acclimate, and now as long as I have a non-curved mouse I can use either hand easily depending on which arm is functional.

      What I keep wondering is whether there will ever be a mouse that fits or can be adjusted to fit long hands. I find most mice too tiny to use comfortably -- I have to either bend my fingers unnaturally, put my palm in an awkward spot to click, or otherwise hold the mouse in a fashion that puts an unusual strain on my hand/wrist.

    11. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then what have you decided you will allow to oppress you this cycle?

    12. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, that's a quality looking mouse all right. I'd rather keep my universal ms wheel mouse optical thanks. I kinda use the scroll wheel a lot.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    13. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

      That's a bit of a catch-22, now isn't it? No wonder lefties don't buy lefty mice... because there aren't any on the market! I'm not asking for equal numbers here.. You know.. a ninth as many lefthanded mice as there are righthanded mice would be nice.. But they aren't there. You say if lefties bought lefty mice, then Logitech would sell them... but Logitech doesn't make lefty mice, lefties won't be buying lefty mice, now will they?! You can't buy what doesn't exist! I won't blame the lefties who use righty mice, I'll blame the righties who made them use righty mice! There is one arena where I get militant--the lack of support for lefties. It's nigh-impossible to find lefty desks at my university and it's nigh-impossible to find lefty mice. Lefties have been persecuted and ignored for centuries. I'm not asking for "affirmative action" regarding enrollment.. just put enough lefty desks on campus for us to use, god damn it!

      Damm lefty commies, terrorists the lot o' them we should shoot em all with their la-di-dah using the wrong hand, when I was a lad .... ....
      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    14. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      No wonder lefties don't buy lefty mice... because there aren't any on the market! I'm not asking for equal numbers here.. You know.. a ninth as many lefthanded mice as there are righthanded mice would be nice..

      Look, it's very simple. No right-handed people buy left-handed mice. Tons of left-handed people (including myself) buy right-handed mice. In addition, most people don't buy a mouse at all, they get the mouse that came with their pc. So only a relatively small percentage of a tenth of all mouse users will buy left-handed mice. I guess the market just isn't big enough to support many left-handed mouse models.

      When I started out there was no such thing as a left-handed mouse (at least, I didn't see one). They were all symmetric. But I used it right-handed because that's how every mouse I stumbled across was used and I didn't want to move it over to the left side of the keyboard.

      It has nothing to do with availability of left-handed mice, just with the practicality of being different just for the sake of being different.

    15. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by u01iz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just use it on a mirror.

    16. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by Destoo · · Score: 1

      but but.. that'll make him right handed!

      The real solution is that you need to turn the mouse inside out, just like the "two left gloves" trick.

      ->-
      All hail Eris.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    17. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

      Yea, quality is not the only problem! Did you see how much he wanted for those plain PS/2 mice with no scroll wheels? $82.95... On Sale!!

      Man, you'd have to be pretty hard-up to pay $80 for a left-handed mouse when you can buy a universal lefty/righty mouse at Best Buy for $20 (with a scroll wheel)!

    18. Re: Yeah I know, I'm using one by iantri · · Score: 1
      Many mice are still ambidextrous.. completely symmetrical.

      I have in my hand a Logitech optical scroll wheel mouse.. it can be used equally in either hand. (I am left-handed, but use my right hand for mousing.. it is not worth the hassle whenever you need to use someone else's computer).

      It may not have a cool laser on it, but I've never been convinced that fancy mice make a difference, anyway.. the ambidextrous ones are cheaper, and there is none of that crazy ergonomic design shit.

  37. Class of Laser? by Soldrinero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I actually read the article (I am new here) but didn't see anything mentioning what class of laser it uses. It does say that the manufacturer recommends not using it on mirrored surfaces. It's possible, though unlikely, for a class II laser (such as is found in a laser pointer) to cause eye damage. I've been in classrooms with optical mice invoerted and shining their light out at students. Is this something that we're going to have to worry about with a laser mouse? Of course, if it's a class I (such as is found in CD players) there's no concern at all. Does anybody have any information on this?

    --
    I would rather be killed by a terrorist than enslaved by my government.
    1. Re:Class of Laser? by grondin · · Score: 3, Informative

      The picture of the bottom of the mouse shows the laser label. "Class 1 laser device"

    2. Re:Class of Laser? by Technician · · Score: 5, Informative

      The picture of the bottom of the mouse shows the laser label. "Class 1 laser device"


      If memory serves me right, a class 1 LASER device has a totaly enclosed interlocked LASER system.

      This means no external radiation of LASER light unless the device is opened and interlocks are defeated. It's the same rating CD drives have. The drive must be opened (cover removed) and tricked into operation without a CD in place to turn on the LASER and cause any exposure.

      If it truly uses a LASER to track and is class 1, it must have another LED to sense the presence and movement of the target (table, pad, etc) before it will turn on the laser. Otherwise it would have a class 2 or 3b rating like a supermarket UPC scanner. They may have done this to save power when the mouse is not moving (low power LED when stationary or not on a surface) and to get the safer LASER class 1 rating.

      I imagine it will only kick on the LASER when the low power light detects movement and kicks on the LASER for the resolution.

      LASER is an acronym. I'm not shouting.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Class of Laser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      LASER is an acronym. I'm not shouting.

      You are shouting.

      It's good that you know the concept of acronyms. Now learn the concept of acronyms being assimilated into everyday language.

      Nobody capitalizes laser, scuba, sonar etc. anymore.

      Some people call these words anacronyms, from anachronistic + acronym.

    4. Re:Class of Laser? by Serious+Simon · · Score: 1
      If memory serves me right, a class 1 LASER device has a totaly enclosed interlocked LASER system.

      Your memory doesn't serve you right :)

      Class 1, according to the CDRH regulations (USA) and IEC825-1 (international), means that the laser product will not be harmful if used in foreseeable ways. These standards are based on extensive biophysical research to determine the allowable limits of optical energy entering the human eye. They prescribe the configuration and optical power calculations to determine the laser class of a product. In most countries, marketing of laser products is only allowed if they comply to these standards.

    5. Re:Class of Laser? by Piquan · · Score: 1

      If memory serves me right, a class 1 LASER device has a totaly enclosed interlocked LASER system.

      If it's harmless, it can be a class 1 without any sort of interlock. You're thinking of how class 2 lasers can become class 1 lasers by adding interlocks.

    6. Re:Class of Laser? by RichardX · · Score: 1

      I actually read the article (I am new here) but didn't see anything mentioning what class of laser it uses.

      According to the specs it's a 31 gigawatt military grade ion-pulsed trilithium laser. It can burn holes in the moon and come out the other side*

      (*yeah, okay, I made that up)

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    7. Re:Class of Laser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STFU

      p.s. STFU is an acronym, I'm not shouting.

    8. Re:Class of Laser? by Technician · · Score: 1

      If it's harmless, it can be a class 1 without any sort of interlock.

      Good call. I thought it was fully enclosed, no radiation.. I just looked it up.

      http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/rss/laser/laserhazard.ht m

      Quote
      Class 1
      Not capable of emitting in excess of the Class 1 AEL
      Most lasers in this class are lasers which are in an enclosure which prohibits or limits access to the laser radiation


      It says most, not all as I had assumed.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    9. Re:Class of Laser? by Speare · · Score: 1

      Unless you pronounce that "stuffoo," it's not an acronym. Acronyms are word-like and pronounced like words. STFU is an initialism, an abbreviation, but not an acronym.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    10. Re:Class of Laser? by base3 · · Score: 1

      Just because a large part of the world is uninformed or chooses to be incorrect does not mean he has to succumb to their ignorance.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    11. Re:Class of Laser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah, but the world has moved on and now it's you who's incorrect! Take that, you supercilious pedant!

    12. Re:Class of Laser? by Random832 · · Score: 1

      So much the more reason to capitalize it.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    13. Re:Class of Laser? by wed128 · · Score: 1

      They used the term Class 1 LASER because Death Ray didn't sound so marketable

    14. Re:Class of Laser? by base3 · · Score: 1

      You hardly represent the world, anonymous troglodyte.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    15. Re:Class of Laser? by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

      I must concur. "The only thing people hate more than a smartass is a smartass who's right." Especially a pedantic one.

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    16. Re:Class of Laser? by Pendersempai · · Score: 2, Informative

      'Laser' WAS an acronym. Now it's vernacular. Get over yourself. :)

  38. word. by MoOsEb0y · · Score: 1

    That thing looks sweet! Anyone catch how much it'll cost?

  39. Dear Logitech: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just wanted to drop you a note to remind you that some of the people in the world who want a fancy-schmancy, full-featured mouse are LEFT HANDED!

    I guess I'll just have to keep giving my money to the companies that want my business (i.e. make symmetrical mice with lots of bells and whistles).

    You had a clue once, even making lefty versions of your mice back in the day. What happened?

    Signed,

    Someone who can play first person shooters using the actual arrow keys, not that "WASD" shit.

    1. Re:Dear Logitech: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Anonymous Coward,

      We don't care. You can grasp your market-share firmly in your left hand and insert it into the space between your rectal buns.

      Signed,

      Someone who is rich.

      P.S. We really don't care.

    2. Re:Dear Logitech: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I used to use the arrow keys myself, and shunned WASD until I realised that WASD actually gives you easier access to a lot of extra useful keys. If I was left handed, I would still use an area of the main keyboard to play games (whether it would be WASD or IJKL I'm not sure).

    3. Re:Dear Logitech: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a.k.a. Someone too stubborn to try better key setups.

      I only needed to try WASD once to see what I was missing. 9 out of 10 left handed dentists who play video games agree with me. Like the other poster mentioned, IJKL works too, and I've used that in many games with ease.

    4. Re:Dear Logitech: by Destoo · · Score: 1

      The advantage of using the numeric pad is that there's a nipple to reorient your middle finger.
      (did I really type that... one of these mondays, heh?)

      And since I can reach the control/shift/enter/backslash/backspace keys from the same position, I'm all set.

      Anyway, I always plug in two mice on my station. It confuses people trying to use it.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    5. Re:Dear Logitech: by Politburo · · Score: 1

      I think there are much more 'useful' keys nearer to the arrows (maybe our definition of useful is different?). When you're using WASD or IJKL (harder to type those on a dvorak.. its
      Just MHO. Everyone has their own preferences of course.

    6. Re:Dear Logitech: by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      We all can play the shooters with the arrow keys. We just have to slide the keyboard over. The advantage of using "WASD" is the large amount of auxiliary characters present on *all* keyboards. Because of the way keyboards are designed, virtually all of them have space-bars for a thumb-key and shift or control for a pinky key, along with another row of easy-access keys above and a bunch of keys to the left and right.

      Arrows are usually hidden in all sorts of different places on keypads (especially laptops), and someplace aren't present at all.

      Nothing to do with handedness, just standardness.

    7. Re:Dear Logitech: by MacTenchi · · Score: 1

      i've got a mx310 here on my desk that's symmetrical and from logitech.

    8. Re:Dear Logitech: by jafuser · · Score: 1

      I always plug in two mice on my station. It confuses people trying to use it.

      Too bad there aren't any programs which will read each mouse independently so we can do neat manipulation stuff in 3d apps =)

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    9. Re:Dear Logitech: by Destoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, there might be. I remember the kung-fu/string puppets game by Lionhead studios was played using 7-8 mice, so there might be some easy way to do it.

      I'm sure someone on /. can enlighten us..

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    10. Re:Dear Logitech: by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 2, Informative

      You want the Logitech MX 310. It's totally symmetrical. 6 buttons, scroll wheel, optical. I use it on a Mac with USB overdrive, works fine, good for gaming.

      The left-side button takes a *little* practice to get right -- you have to sort of cock your hand sideways a little to get at it easily -- but it's like anything else, you get used to it.

      - Alaska Jack

  40. Wireless Lag by viggen9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have used some wireless mice in the past, and they always seem to have a slight delay between the time I move the mouse and the pointer on the screen actually moves. A 20X improvement in accuracy won't solve this problem, though, so will the difference really be noticeable? You will still be moving the mouse to a place where you expect the pointer to land a few moments later, then you will still probably have to correct the movement after the pointer catches up. I dunno...I'm not convinced. I guess I'll have to wait until a friend buys one and try it.

    1. Re:Wireless Lag by MJOverkill · · Score: 2, Informative

      You must be using an early generation wireless mouse then. I have been using an mx700 since they came out, and there is no delay between mouse movement and pointer movement. Since the mx1000 uses the same 'FastRF' communication the mx700 does, then it will have no delay either.

    2. Re:Wireless Lag by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree with that. On a similar note, what's the point in super-high resolution when the mouse is at an ideal refresh rate of 80 Hz (closest I can manage to set PS/2 refresh rates in relation to my monitor's refresh, 75 Hz). When you're moving the mouse across the screen at a moderate rate, it's actually jumping about 20 or so pixels per update. Most mice I've used, to exclude some really old ones, which coincidentally had really fat rollers, are accurate down to the pixel and the only problems I've seen are when the mouse sticks to the pad and it jumps a bit too far in the direction you mean to move it. If you want to help sensitivity, use a cloth mouse pad and a mouse with clean, smooth feet.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    3. Re:Wireless Lag by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Well, there is a trade-off between batteries and responsiveness. Every wireless mouse I have used, after sitting still for several seconds, goes into a "doze" mode where it only checks to see if it has been moved a couple of times a second - hence the lag between moving the mouse and the mouse realizing its been moved. Once the mouse is "awake", there is no lag time on any decent mouse, until you stop moving the mouse and it dozes off again. This is done to save battery power, because if the wireless mouse checked to see if it has been moved ~60 times a second like a corded mouse, it would eat batteries like a 1st generation digital camera.

      That lag is what really drives me nuts, which is why I don't use a wireless mouse (besides the fact that I don't see the point of having a wireless mouse when the damn thing never leaves the 9" x 9" mousepad anyway)

    4. Re:Wireless Lag by TheBashar · · Score: 1

      I have an MX700 using FastRF and I can tell you I still experience lag, though it's not exactly as you describe it. While I don't regularly experience lag, the mouse goes into a power saving mode after a certain period of inactivity. When in this mode it only checks for movement what looks about once a second. Moving the mouse once it's sat still for a good while (5 minutes mmaybe?) you can notice a significant lag until it wakes up and realizes stuff is happening.

    5. Re:Wireless Lag by MJOverkill · · Score: 1

      umm... I don't know what wireless mouse you are talking about, but mice that auto-power down do not power down every few seconds, they do it after a few minutes of inactivity. The mx700, specifically, powers down after 5 minutes of inactivity. All of logitech's mice power down after 5 minutes, and the the two microsoft wireless mice that I have used (wireless intellimouse explorer, wireless optical) both power down after about 10 minutes of inactivity. I'm assuming microsoft is using the same timing device in their other mice as well. If the mouse is powering down after a few seconds, it is either defective, or the batter power is low.

      And the benefits of using a wireless mouse are centered around the elminiation of the cord (no pull, snags, etc.), not just the reach that it affords.

  41. My Boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He has always called optical mice 'laser mice' anyway. At least now he will be right.

  42. Hmm... by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new laser-wielding mice overlords.

  43. Picking nits. by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just to be a dick, this isn't the first mouse that uses a laser. There were a few laser mice (pre "optical" mice) but they required a special pad so the advantages over a regular mouse were minimal (really just that you didn't have to clean them).

    1. Re:Picking nits. by andrewagill · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I mentioned this below. Sun had this type of optical mouse, and the mouse pads kicked ass!

    2. Re:Picking nits. by Dahan · · Score: 1

      Those mice, popular on Sun workstations, used LEDs, not lasers.

    3. Re:Picking nits. by Piquan · · Score: 1

      Oh, I've seen "Real Genius", I know what happens when you don't clean your lasers! I'll be scrubbing my laser mouse every day, thank you!

    4. Re:Picking nits. by anynameleft · · Score: 1
      Sure, those Sun optical mice were nice, with a metal mousepad.

      They did have a problem, though, and that is that mouse movement with them wasn't really smooth (have worked on a SS/20 with optical mouse). I have read that you could overclock them to make movement smoother, but even then a normal PS/2 ball mouse moves smoother because the PS/2 port has much more throughput than the Sun serial ports. Not to mention that the design wasn't exactly ergonomical.

      So all in all, I'm really happy that I have an original MS Intellimouse, and not a Sun Optical mouse.

    5. Re:Picking nits. by Incadenza · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I mentioned this below. Sun had this type of optical mouse, and the mouse pads kicked ass!

      Silicon Graphics had them too. At the time I was working in IT, and our department had to maintain an outrageous expensive Silicon Graphics workstation. Biggest maintenance problem: stolen mousepads, because they were so cool.
      In the end people had to use the machine with a xerox of the pad, which worked more or less as well.

  44. Other Links by jaaron · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a (currently) non-/.'ed image of the mouse:

    http://img16.exs.cx/img16/8692/mx-1000.jpg

    Another Forum Review on the Logitech MX1000

    If all else fails, check Google

    --
    Who said Freedom was Fair?
  45. Power effeciency of lasers by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lasers actually don't take all that much power- they're highly efficient. Then again, the LED which they're replacing doesn't usually take too much power either. My guess is that it's not a significant change.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:Power effeciency of lasers by bn557 · · Score: 1

      I'd guess the radio transmitter uses more power than the leds.

      P

      --
      Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
    2. Re:Power effeciency of lasers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably want to go away from the standard optical mouse to avoid having to pay royalties to Agillent technologies for their patent(s) on optical mice.

    3. Re:Power effeciency of lasers by anethema · · Score: 1

      If by highly efficient you mean less than 1%, yes highly ;)

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    4. Re:Power effeciency of lasers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From Sam's laser faq:

      In their favor, laser diodes are very compact - the active element is about the size of a grain of sand, low power (and low voltage), relatively efficient (especially compared to the gas lasers they replaced), rugged, and long lived if treated properly.

      In fact, high power laser diodes - those outputting WATTs of optical power - are without a doubt the most efficient light emitter - not just lasers - in existence. Some have electrical to optical efficiencies (DC W in to light W out) of greater than 50 percent! In other words, put 2 watts of DC power in and get out 1 W of light. And, research is in progress to improve this to 80 percent or beyond. The common incandescent lamp is only 5 percent, fluorescent lamps are 15 or 20 percent efficient, high intensity discharge lamps are somewhat better, but even the best can't match the laser diodes in existence now. Just think: If those super high efficiency high power laser diodes could be mass produced in visible wavelengths and were used to replace all light bulbs, the World's energy crisis would be over, not to mention hobbyist access to high power lasers! OK, back to reality. :)

      You calling Sam a liar?

    5. Re:Power effeciency of lasers by anethema · · Score: 1

      Good post anon, sams laser faq is great. I just dont find laser diodes in the wild with this kind of efficiency...

      Picking some random 10mW laser from digikey...
      http://rocky.digikey.com/WebLib/Sharp/ Web%20Data/G H06510B2A.pdf

      I calculate the efficiency around 11 percent. (88mW in, 10mW out)

      Picking some other random 7mW laser..
      http://rocky.digikey.com/WebLib/Sharp/Web %20Data/G H06507B2A,%202B.pdf

      Efficiency here works out to be less than 7 percent.

      Either way, I have never personally seen a 50%+ efficient diode, but if sam says they exist im sure hes right ;)

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  46. An improvement... by Tesko · · Score: 0

    That might just be the first cordless mouse Ill purchase.

    Ill just wait til they come out with the same model but in a marble finish like my MX-510.

  47. Do not look into mouse laser.... by stox · · Score: 3, Funny

    with remaining eye.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  48. Finally! by seven5 · · Score: 1

    No more nerds correcting me when I call it a laser mouse.

  49. Punctuated equilibrium by Deep+Fried+Geekboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    OK, the first thing you should know is that FPS gamers like me have a whole different take on the mouse thing. We want insanely high resolution, massless, frictionless mice with lots of buttons we can map to ordinance.

    You know, the thing about mice is that the technology advances in spurts. Optical was a big spurt, at least when the resolution started to improve. However, wireless was a big BACKWARDS spurt since the mice are now heavy as hell and gobble batteries at a ridiculous rate. I retired my wireless and went back to the wiry MX500 which is great.

    However it still requires an exotic mousepad (currently a large dinnermat from Habitat which my friend Rick discovered was the slickest and most trackable mousing surface ever invented). Continuing the culinary theme, my desk is an acid-etched glass dining table from Ikea (awsome desk, by the way -- and I use their kitchen cabinets as office storage) which would be a ROCKING mousepad if an optical mouse which actually track on it. But it won't.

    So, is this a dodo or a turkey vulture (very successful in these parts)? Only time and money will tell.

    --

    I'm not wrong. You haven't thought about it hard enough.

  50. Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Finally, we're one step closer to a convenient means of do-it-at-your-desk-while-you're-at-home laser eye surgery!

    w00t

  51. What I want to know is... by haroldK · · Score: 1

    When they came up a non-optical device that can take input from a laser. Unless laser no longer means "light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation"...

  52. mouse pads by Paralizer · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who still uses a mouse pad with optical mice?

    It just feels better..

    1. Re:mouse pads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you're not. I tried it on the bare desk, but it just felt... wrong. Also, the finish on my desk that was too smooth for a mechanical mouse's ball to get good traction was also too shiny for my optical mouse to behave.

      Finally, the raised edge of the mousepad keeps the junk on my desk from encroaching on my mousing area.

    2. Re:mouse pads by Wild+Bill+TX · · Score: 1

      I use a mouse pad with my optical mouse on an old table that has slight sudden raise, as I'd have difficulty moving the mouse otherwise. On my good desk, I don't use a mouse pad. The sliding of the mouse on the mouse pad does feel better because it's not so rough sounding. But because mouse pads tend to get so filthy over time, I just don't worry with one where it's not needed.

  53. Ergonomic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, what the hell is the deal with this "ergonomic" mice that have your hand all sideways and require you rest your entire palm on it, moving it with your arm? It's getting harder and harder to find good small mice that just fit under your fingers, allowing you to control them with your hand. In mice, "ergonomic" just means "really really big and sorta cool looking, but completely impractical."

    1. Re:Ergonomic by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      Hence, I still use an Intellimouse from Microsoft. This bad boy is kinda old, but works wonderfully for me.

    2. Re:Ergonomic by Tetrad69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree completely. Put the laser tracking engine inside of the MX300 shell and I'd buy it in a heartbeat.

    3. Re:Ergonomic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah the MX300. Mouse design perfected IMO. Better tracking is always nice, not that the MX300 is
      in any way lacking. They can keep the design that is the MX310. (it's not even close) Just give me better guts in a 300 shell and I'll be a customer for life.

    4. Re:Ergonomic by Meowing · · Score: 1

      You know those mice that come with Wacom tablets that nobody uses because they already have mice and they bought the tablet for the pen, dammit, so forget the stupid mouse? Well, those mice are really nice to work with. Since the sensing is done by the tablet, you get to hold the mouse at any angle you like but up is still up. It's wonderful not to have to keep the fingers locked in a certain direction, much less tiring.

    5. Re:Ergonomic by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      The idea behind the "Ergonomic" mouse was spawned by product liability lawsuits. People were getting carpal tunnel syndrome and mouse manufcaturers were being sued, so they got together with doctors to figure out a way to make mice more CT friendly. What they came up with was the idea for a mouse that didn't require compression of the transverse carpal ligament, the overuse of which can cause compressive neuropathy of the medial nerve at the wrist. Of course, what this translates to in laypersons' terms is a mouse that doesn't require use of the hand at all, or more specifically, oppositional pressure of the thumb and pinky, or compression of the palm (as you would do if you were trying to hold the tip of your thumb to the tip of your pinky). If you pay attention to your hand while you use your mouse, you'll notice what I'm talking about - you'll become cognizant of the pressure at the vertex of the palm at the wrist. If you try to hold the tips of your thumb and pinky together for any prolonged period of time, you'll notice it will start to hurt at this vertex, which is where the medial nerve is compressed against the phalangeal flexor tendons. Corrective surgery usually involves incision of the ligament to relieve the compression.

      IANAD...

    6. Re:Ergonomic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You use your mouse incorrectly. Using your entire arm puts a great deal of stress on your shoulder. You should have your forearm near your elbow on a rest and the mouse should be set so that you can cover most of your work area with a flick of the wrist. In this way you should neither be supporting the weight of your arm with your hand or off-axis torque on your body.

      The reason these mice force your hand to rest sideways if because that is how your hand is aligned. If you hold your hand perfectlly straight on the desk, the most natural motion is toward your body and to the inside. Have you ever wondered why the most useful functions on the screen are on the left and bottom and the most dangerous (the x button and trash) are on the top right? It's no coincidence, it's Ergonomics. The science of making work more efficient. Your bad habits are what are causing your annoyance not the device. A poor craftsman blames the tool.

    7. Re:Ergonomic by smkndrkn · · Score: 1

      As would I. I used mice that were too big for too many years. Since buying an mx300 and remembering how nice it was to to have a small mouse that was perfect I do not want to give it up. I treat my "cheap" mx300 with much care.

      --
      ======== In the future, everything will be artificial. ========
    8. Re:Ergonomic by aztechClanIII · · Score: 0

      I completely agree. I had to take back an egronomic POS mouse for this reason. Whenever I picked the darn thing up (to do a 180turn in 1st person shooter for example), I would accidentally push all those thumb buttons!@!! arggh!

  54. Nice for UT and doom3! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    More precision means you have a head on advantage when firing the sniper rifle or rail gun in quake3 over your oponents.

    I may just buy one when I upgrade my system in a month or 2 to make it doom3 ready.

    1. Re:Nice for UT and doom3! by ebrandsberg · · Score: 1

      more precision will only help in games if at the same time it has a higher sample rate. From what I recall, one of the problems with PS2 interfaces is the sample rate. USB interfaces may provide a better sample rate, but I haven't seen any info on this.

    2. Re:Nice for UT and doom3! by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      There is no purpose to running a mouse at a sample rate higher than your monitor's refresh. If you're using an LCD screen, set your PS/2 refresh rate to 60 Hz to match the monitor. For CRT screens set higher, set it to the rate that matches it the closest, 80 Hz mouse for 75 Hz or 85 Hz monitors for example. At 125 Hz, USB mice just look plain jittery when you move the cursor around.

      Also, what is more pointless is worrying about mouse refresh being too low in games like Doom 3, which probably run from 15-40 fps depending on your computer. The worst it has been is 40 Hz in Windows 3.1/95/98 by default, and even that could be adjusted via a tool called PS/2Rate. The default in 2000/XP is 60 Hz if your monitor is also set to that rate, and 100 Hz if it's set higher. As said before, I'd recommend 80 Hz for CRT monitors.

      If you're having mouse lag issues in games, but not the desktop, I'm thinking it might be because of mouse smoothing being enabled (and averaging samples 3 back or so) and/or triple buffering, which buffers three frames of video and draws the video three frames behind, which is unnoticable at high frame rates, but causes big lag at lower rates. Triple buffering is pointless at low frame rates anyway, as it's only really good for acheiving VSync since it manages to do so more often than waiting for VBlank when the framerate is close to monitor refresh.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  55. Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by cbreaker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They make some nice mouse pads- I hate but bulky ones with the big gel-packs and crap, but I like the ones with a really nice surface like a velvet-like material I have on my main workstation.

    They help the mouse move smoother; if you have a hard surface they get "sticky" and make it difficult to make precise movements. The pads get dirty really fast without a mouse pad. AND, you can really screw up the surface of your desk if you use the mouse without a pad.

    Who wants a sticky mouse that grinds over dirt and wears out your desk? I'll take my nice comfortable mouse pad any day.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    1. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, me too. I do not use a mouse pad at work, but I could care less about scratching that desk.

      At home, I use some giant mousepad I found at CompUSA. Unfortunately, they do not list the product on their website. It is about 4x the size of a normal pad and is the old school fabric over foam type. It does great for FPS gaming, as I never run out of room.

      The ones with fabric/velvet do suck for ball mousing due to the amount of crud they tend to transfer to the ball over time, but seem to be the best thing for an optical.

      Another thing I have learned from using a mouse on a desktop surface for years is that the little feet on the bottom of the mouse wear out quicker, causing the mouse's action to not feel very smooth.

    2. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by TheRealStaunch · · Score: 1, Informative

      Your crazy (Somebody had to do it) On another note: You can visibly see a difference on the surface of my desk where my mouse is.

      --

      -- Get
    3. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who wants a sticky mouse that grinds over dirt and wears out your desk? I'll take my nice comfortable mouse pad any day.

      Agreed. I am, at this very moment, using a very nice plaid woolen mousepad by Pendleton. It is by far the best mouse pad I have ever used, of any kind. I have been using if for a couple years now, and it's in as good condition as the day I got it. Get yourself a woolen mousepad, and you'll never go back!

    4. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you can buy into the whole "performance mouse pad" thing (it took a lot of convincing from other people before I could), check out the func1030. It really is worth it, the surface is slicker than any desk or other mouse pad I have used and one side has more tack. For FPS games, I am superbly satisfied and the fact that my desk surface doesn't have a huge rubbed off spot on it makes me happy too.

      I've had mine for about a year now with no complaints. The pad is nice and large and comes with a silly gimmick that is actually handy for people w/ corded mice - a clip that keeps your cord from moving... Give it a little slack and you never have to worry about dragging that cord again.

    5. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by RichardX · · Score: 1

      I came across a really good mousepad solution a while back
      You know those transparent polythene pockets you get for putting paper into binders?.. I've got one of those taped flat to my desk.. it gives a really good smooth surface for my mouse (Logitech MX700 wireless, fwiw).. when it gets too stretched/cruddy (usually once every 6 months or so) I just tear it up and tape a new one down.. and by printing out an image onto an A4 sheet and putting it inside the pocket before I tape it down I can have any design I want in it.

      Really though, it's the best thing I've found.. it's got a really smooth glidey feel to it, but with just enough texture to avoid the mouse slipping about unintentionally. It's also really cheap - 25 polypockets will set you back about 50p from Tesco's stationery aisle.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    6. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by titzandkunt · · Score: 3, Funny


      "...At home, I use some giant mousepad I found at CompUSA. Unfortunately, they do not list the product on their website. It is about 4x the size of a normal pad and is the old school fabric over foam type. It does great for FPS gaming, as I never run out of room..."

      You must use Dogbert's technical support:

      Dogbert: Hello you've reached Dogbert's technical support, how may I abuse you?

      PHB: My cursor is in the middle of the screen and my mouse is stuck right at the edge of my mousemat.

      Dogbert: I see. Have you tried moving your desk to the left?

      PHB: Yup. No dice.

      Dogbert: In that case you're going to need our $800 mousemat upgrade...

      T&K.

      --
      Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
    7. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new microfiber top mouse pads are pretty swanky.

    8. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey crazy

    9. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by TargetBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe those things are actually made for printers.

    10. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by edremy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another thing I have learned from using a mouse on a desktop surface for years is that the little feet on the bottom of the mouse wear out quicker, causing the mouse's action to not feel very smooth.

      Scotch tape. Use the good stuff, not the cheap imitations. Just put fresh pieces over all the feet every day or so and it feels nice and smooth again. Eric

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    11. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by mwood · · Score: 1

      We don't get "polythene" over here on the left side of the Atlantic. What does it call itself when it leaves the UK?

    12. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      They aren't made/sold for anything in particular. Just giant foam pads with fabric glued to the top. I've seen em. You could use them as a mouse pad, sit a printer/cpu or something on it to dampen some vibrations (old mouse pads work better than that expensive dynamat crap from auto stores).

      They'd make a good blotter too, if you're the type to write with a quill and ink well.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    13. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      It's called polyethylene, and it's fairly common stuff.

    14. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Just put fresh pieces over all the feet every day or so and it feels nice and smooth again.

      Once the tape builds up a quarter inch or so I'd think the mouse would stop working. Or maybe you use this new laser mouse, lasers should have better range.

    15. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by Wakkow · · Score: 1

      Where'd you buy yours from? Not many places to buy it, according to their website.

    16. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, me too. I do not use a mouse pad at work, but I could care less about scratching that desk.

      It's "I couldn't care less"! I don't know how the wrong expression caught on, but cmon people think about it.

    17. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by Jbrecken · · Score: 1

      At home, I use some giant mousepad I found at CompUSA. Unfortunately, they do not list the product on their website. It is about 4x the size of a normal pad and is the old school fabric over foam type.

      You can get a big piece (about 3ft by 4ft) of wetsuit material from American Science and Surplus. It's fabric bonded to neoprene foam, and is pretty much what those old school mouse pads were made of.
      Scuba Do

    18. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      "It does great for FPS gaming, as I never run out of room."

      That's why *I* use a trackball. One of those Kensington models that are almost as big as a cueball and actually have some heft to it.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    19. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 1

      I bought it direct.

    20. Re:Call me crazy but I like mouse pads.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. I have seen a mousepad that looks like a mini Persian carpet. Ok, its not handwoven but it is made of some kind of fabric (either wool or cotton)and it works very, very well.

  56. NewEgg is shipping them. That's great and all, but by Guspaz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    does anyone know of some place in Canada that will ship them? NewEgg, in their infinite wisdom, doesn't ship to Canada.

    BTW, all you Americans, NewEgg is sold out, looks like we slashdotted their stock ;)

  57. Anybody got a Sun optical mouse pad? by andrewagill · · Score: 1

    This would go great with the old-school Sun Type(3/4/5) optical mouse pads. Remember those? My brother was a lab monitor in some of the Sun computer labs at his university, and he mentioned that that was the #1 thing stolen from those labs. The rigid metal surface with the clear covering was just the pinnacle of vacuumpunk technology.

  58. wonderful but.... by binarybum · · Score: 1

    can it tout museum quality?

    --
    ôó
  59. newegg link by halo1982 · · Score: 1

    cause the site is so slow, check out pictures here: http://www.newegg.com/app/viewProductDesc.asp?desc ription=26-104-158&depa=0

  60. lasers, and bluetooth by OmniVector · · Score: 1, Interesting

    um. maybe i've just been mislead here. but if they haven't been using lasers in optical mice all this time, wtf is that red light coming out of the bottom of my mx700?

    also. the mx1000 while nice, has one immediate turn off: lack of bluetooth. i rather like the ability to take one mouse, and without needing to switch which computer the RF base station is hooked up to, use it on another computer.

    there's also that capability of using it on the go with a powerbook or something, and not needing the bulky base station.

    --
    - tristan
    1. Re:lasers, and bluetooth by simoncion · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope, that's a red LED that you're seeing.

  61. What happend to their keyboards? by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What happened to the Logitech 'natural' keyboards? I know they make the wireless ones, but what happend to the wired ones? I would love to buy one but they do not appear to make them anymore.

  62. Totally. by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Glad I'm not the only one. I, like the other replier to your post, also use an older first-gen Microsoft Optical mouse. Small, easy. And I like mouse pads for multiple reasons so being able to use the thing on a mirror doesn't mean crap to me.

    I'd like to have a mouse that had better tracking during moments of high movement (ie some games) but it works just fine.

    And I don't want a cordless mouse dammit. Who wants to worry about having your mouse die on you? Or having the batteries eventually not take a charge? Some people are hell bent on removing the cords from everything but for some things like the mouse, it just adds complexity where none is needed nor wanted.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    1. Re:Totally. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Who wants to worry about having your mouse die on you?

      Somebody who carries extra batteries and hates the mouse cable tangling around any available object in my laptop bag.

      You don't want one. I do. Market serves us both.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:Totally. by bob65 · · Score: 1
      Some people are hell bent on removing the cords from everything but for some things like the mouse, it just adds complexity where none is needed nor wanted.

      Even worse is cordless keyboards. I mean, what the heck? Do you carry your keyboard around while you type or something? And most cordless keyboards aren't even rechargeable.

    3. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are quite useful for those of us that have HTPCs (home theater pcs)

    4. Re:Totally. by Piquan · · Score: 1

      Even worse is cordless keyboards.

      I have a Maltron keyboard which uses an unconventional layout, so I also have a cordless that guests can use but I can stash when they're not around.

      I also have my second head going to the TV.

      For a while, I liked to lean back in my chair and put my keyboard in my lap without getting the wires tangled.

      For a while, I'd check my work email from bed. ("Did the Boss email? No? Okay, I can go back to sleep.") I kept the keyboard on my nightstand, and the computer was close enough to the bed for me to see it.

      There's four ways I'd use my cordless, and that's just me.

    5. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out Razer's new "Viper" mouse - light cord, optical, and low profile to fit under your fingers. And more accurate than an MX700 (dunno about this new beast).

    6. Re:Totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, the keyboard isn't rechargeable, whatever will you do? I've had a wireless keyboard for four years, I think I've switched the battery once.

      Oh, and sometimes its nice to sit back in your chair with your keyboard in your lap not having to worry about the cord. Or using it to control your media from a distance.

  63. Left-handed / ambidextrous version? by chgros · · Score: 1

    I won't buy one unless I can, well, use it.

  64. left handed by Lucia_Inverse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    right now im STILL stuck with a MSFT intellimouse optical (the first unihand 5 button optical mouse released) im SO SICK OF THIS i understand the need for a comfy right handed mouse for right handed people and i dont expect them to set up a production line for lefties but a slightly lower end (ie non ergo for right hand) corded or cordless ver would be great i want a new mouse why do they ignore 25% of us!

    1. Re:left handed by arexu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Feh. I'm a lefty who mouses right-handed, so that anywhere I go, I can get the job done. Left-handed mice are like left-handed monkey wrenches-- three of us will own them, and none of us will have them with us when we need them...

      --
      I'd love to help you out -- which way did you come in?
    2. Re:left handed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the Logitech MX310 -- it's ambidextrous, ergonomic, uses the high-resolution MX optical engine, and many-buttoned (although one of the buttons will be hard for either handedness).

    3. Re:left handed by Politburo · · Score: 1

      It's not insightful to say 'deal with it'. While I am a lefty who doesn't use left mice (but use my left hand, though i can easily do either). I don't think that it's right to go around saying "Oh, I'm left handed and I use right, so you should too!" People should use what they think is most comfortable and what they can get and afford. Unfortunately, the market for left mice is limited. Demand is low, supply is low, and prices are high (compared to right mice). That doesn't mean that the peopel that want them shouldn't demand them (how else will manufacturers know that demand exists?)

    4. Re:left handed by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      www.leftorium.com

      (/ObSimpsons)

    5. Re:left handed by Thurn+und+Taxis · · Score: 1

      Does it have to be symmetric in order to be useable by lefties? I'm right handed, but I just tried my MX700 with my left hand and it actually felt quite comfortable. The thumb buttons are now pinky buttons, but otherwise I think I could easily use this mouse southpaw.

      --
      On stereophonic equipment, the monaural sound obtained through multiple channels will enhance your listening pleasure.
    6. Re:left handed by devinhedge · · Score: 1

      Personally, I've found that Logitech Optical Marble Mouse and the Kensington Expert Mouse Trackball are the only real options for Lefties. I called Logitech several years ago and their VP of Product Development told me "Yeah... so."

      The Kensington Expert Mouse Trackball is the most comfortable input device I've ever used. Two of the biggest drawbacks are that their drivers STINK and the device is too expensive.

      Of course I could go into some of the studies that show how a trackball is better for your wrist, but all of us know that a mouse tends to be better for FPS games.

  65. Mirror by atari2600 · · Score: 0, Redundant
  66. smart mice by loonicks · · Score: 1

    The only thing the mice in my old apartment introduced was poop. Into that bag of doritos I mistakenly ate.

  67. Kernel 2.6 + Wacom + Logitech MX700 problems? by katz · · Score: 1

    Anyone else experiencing having pointer freezes/lockups when the Wacom Intuos tablet is connected? I didn't have these problems under kernel 2.4, and no one else seems to have a wacom+mx700 combination...

  68. Still no optical 3 button without wheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm alittle supprised none of us from the hardcore old school crowd haven't complained yet in this thread about the fact that Logitech still has yet to provide us wheel-o-phobic people with an optical cordless 3button mouse without a stupid wheel. Am I alone in this?

  69. what a SHITTY SHAPE for a mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even a northpaw would find a mouse that stupidly shaped a pain in the ass to use. how long until logitech puts this in a mouse that doesn't make me want to throw up?

  70. Offtopic, I know by inaeldi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Anyone want this? Gmail invite

  71. sweet by obli · · Score: 0

    Sweet, looks like I won't be using my 5 year logitech warranty to its end after all.

  72. On/Off Switch by Endareth · · Score: 1

    Don't know if anyone else noticed this, but on a pic of the bottom of the mouse I finally see something I've been seeking since my first wireless mouse -- an on/off switch! Huzzah for Logitech!!

    --
    Disclaimer: The above comment was made while under the influence of too much coding and not enough sleep.
  73. Some pictures of the MX1000 by z3021017 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since the site is /.ed:
    Picture One

    Picture Two

    --
    Bored? Visit my exciting counter page!
  74. Suggestion: by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 1

    Hey, I got a tip for ya. When using it outside... make sure the optics are facing down.

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  75. Re:Some background on water and U.S. law by davidgay · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nothing like Slashdot for gross misinformation. From Logitech's web site:

    Founded
    1981 -- Apples, Switzerland

    (I found it pretty amusing when, years ago, I was using a mouse from "Apples" with an Apple IIe. It was a rather sucky mouse back then, mind you...)

    Of course, these days its a large multinational company, so claiming it for any particular country is just pointless nationalism.

  76. Mirror, Shmirror by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

    So it works on a mirror. I'll remain unimpressed until they can design a mouse that works on oatmeal.

    All joking aside, I love logitech mice. Got an MX700 here at home. The only problem is, I've got a crappy 2-button scroll wheel mouse at work, so I'm constantly pushing extra mouse buttons that don't exist on the work mouse.

    --
    "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    1. Re:Mirror, Shmirror by kylearin · · Score: 1

      I had this problem too (phantom "back" button) and asked my boss to buy me an MX510. It didn't have the "Executive" feature of being cordless, but it still had all the buttons I cared about and it's a nice red that stands out on my desk. He had no problem with that.

      Maybe you should just ask? If you're worth the $X/per hour they pay for your time, then it's probably worth $50 once in a while to keep you happy.

  77. i wonder if by hdd · · Score: 1

    We can bring this thing into a commercial flight or a school as a matter of fact, I think laser pointer aren't allowed in those places

    --
    This Sig is removed due to factual inaccuracy
  78. Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Ignominious+Cow+Herd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mechanical mouse with rubber ball that gets gummed up with dust and crud: $19.00

    Optical mouse that doesn't work well on many surfaces: $39.00

    Laser mouse that works on any surface and spawns lots of "frickin laser" jokes: Priceless.

    --
    Lump lingered last in line for brains, and the ones she got were sorta rotten and insane.
    1. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Gherald · · Score: 1

      Where do you get those horrible prices?

      Ball mice are at most $10 and good opticals are $20. And I'm talking Logitechs.

      Of course, there are flashier opticals for > $20, but that's beside the point.

    2. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Canadian dollars probably.

    3. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe not, heh.. Must be Rubles.

    4. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by issachar · · Score: 1

      > $20 CDN is still too high. You can get optical logitech's in Canada for $16.50. Of course the page you linked to also has an optical for

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    5. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Curtman · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not going to mail order a mouse to save myself $3.50 and have to wait 3 days for it. Hrmm. $10 next day delivery, that sounds like a good deal....

      Wait a minute.

    6. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by dorsey · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Cease and Desist letter from Mastercard will be arriving in your mail shortly.

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    7. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      'Scuse, my laser mouse cost £4 and has 5 buttons. It'll probably fall apart after a few months of use, but for £4 you can't really go wrong.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    8. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by legirons · · Score: 1

      "Laser mouse that works on any surface and spawns lots of "frickin laser" jokes: Priceless."

      Allows horizontal scrolling in which operating system? (I have a logitech MX500, and 5 of the buttons don't do anything useful in X)

      I bought it in preference to the sideways-scrolling microsoft one, because for those of us who use the middle mouse-button all the time for opening tabs in mozilla, scrolling by accident when you're trying to click this button can be quite a time-waster (scrollwheel-up counts as 5th button, and is therefore eligable to drag windows, which will then follow the mouse untill you scroll-up again)

      Anyone know how to map the smooth-scroll-up and smooth-scroll-down buttons on an MX-series without losing the scrollwheel?

    9. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by tempmpi · · Score: 1

      It was a parody of the mastercard commercials and the mastercard commercials got unrealistic prices, too.

      --
      Jan
    10. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Nerull · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ive got a MX-700, and I didn't have to do anything to use those, the only ones that need work are the side buttons.

      You could try this:
      http://www.linux-gamers.net/modules/wfsection/arti cle.php?articleid=46

      After glancing over your post again in preview, I think you mean remap them to do something else, which I don't think is possible. It looks as if those buttons send the same signal as the mouse wheel, so there is no way to remap them.

    11. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by legirons · · Score: 1

      "After glancing over your post again in preview, I think you mean remap them to do something else, which I don't think is possible. It looks as if those buttons send the same signal as the mouse wheel, so there is no way to remap them."

      I've just realised that was probably quite a confusing question, as in Windows I had been using the "side" (thumb) buttons to scroll up and down, since they seemed to be in quite a covenient place for that, rather than reaching all the way over the top of the mouse and to the buttons at the front (lifts your wrist off the table, further from the keyboard, etc.)

      I did once have zaxismapping 6 7 which enabled those two buttons to scroll the document, but it only did it one step at a time, and if you held the buttons down it didn't scroll any further.

      S'pose it's time to disappear into the bowels of XF86Config with only a shotgun and maglite for protection...

    12. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Ba3r · · Score: 2, Funny

      Decision to respond to a comment: 1ms
      Decision to do yet another 'Mastercard' post: 1ms
      Time spent writing the post: 360,000ms
      Satisfaction of having wasted another 360,002 ms: 100%

    13. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by jellybear · · Score: 1

      That mouse is crap. I had one and it sucked/broke.

      Decent Logitech mice begin at the MX series:
      http://www.ncix.com/products/index.php?sk u=12108&v pn=931179-0215&manufacture=Logitech

      The listed price C$55.61, but I've seen them as low as C$30. That's about US$23.

    14. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by jellybear · · Score: 1

      You need the logitech applet to take full advantage of your MX series mouse. It also allows you to activate/deactivate "cruise control", which I think is how they refer to the two buttons above/below the scroll wheel for scrolling up and down.

      http://www.linux-gamers.net/modules/wfsection/ar ti cle.php?articleid=47

    15. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is _you_ sir that is beside the point.

      --
      No Comment.
    16. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      The Cease and Desist letter from Mastercard will be arriving in your mail shortly.

      It's not just Mastercard. I think we'd all pretty much wish these "priceless" jokes would stop.

    17. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by mwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, good. Another "hardware" feature that's actually buried in the (useless) driver code.

      Maybe we need a law requiring vendors to clearly label which features are actually implemented in hardware (and will work anywhere) and which are faked in software (and thus only worth money if you run MS Windows).

    18. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by tgd · · Score: 2, Funny

      As well as a half dozen offers for low interest rate credit cards.

      Per week.

    19. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by tater86 · · Score: 1

      Any hardware feature would just be a couple extra buttons. For that to do anything the signal has to be interpreted by software. If a piece of hardware actually implemented the features itself it would be windows specific and totally useless under any other operating system.

    20. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe we need a law requiring vendors to clearly label which features are actually implemented in hardware (and will work anywhere) and which are faked in software (and thus only worth money if you run MS Windows).
      Maybe we need a law stopping people from calling for the government to babysit the people.
    21. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      Mine works without the logitech software. Have you heard of google?

    22. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by ImpTech · · Score: 1

      Bah, I'm sure its just a couple more buttons you can map to whatever you want in imwheel. Besides, how exactly would you implement cross-platform horizontal scrolling in hardware? The regular scroll wheel requires software support too...

    23. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Edie+O'Teditor · · Score: 1

      1) Take slashdot joke meme
      2) Whinge about it
      3) ...
      4) Karma!!!!!!

      --
      If X is the new Y, and Y is "X is the new Y", solve for X.
    24. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by tsa · · Score: 1

      If you pay three times as much it'll last at least 10 times as long. So what's the cheap option?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    25. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by default+luser · · Score: 1

      That mouse is crap.

      Hardly. I have a 1st-generation model of this mouse that I got for $30 (US) back in 2000, and it still works fine. I also have a second generation version that I picked up for $15 a year later. Both get daily use, for hours, and work great in games.

      I've also recommended this mouse to several friends as a cheap optical workhorse, and not a one has had an issue or been dissatisfied.

      I get the impression that you're just brainwashed into believeing that nobody will respect you on the internet unless you have a big, expensive, heavy mouse with ten thousand buttons. Perhaps you're not telling us why it sucked/broke because you'd have to make up some BS on the fly.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    26. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      It's some nameless thing - fine except it has an annoying habit of jumping (but that's quite rare and could be the surface) I'm also not sure about the resolution on the thing, but if I need to do hi-res image editing I have a graphics tablet - but that's not suitable for everyday use and doesn't have 5 buttons.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    27. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by issachar · · Score: 1

      true, but then I just drop by because they're local to me. Or if I don't want to go that far, I just stop into Office Depot. They're always price-matched ncix.

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    28. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Now that I look, the actual price difference is $1.45. I didn't see this, which is the same model as the one you linked to, But yeah thats my point, I'd buy local rather than mail order every time, unless I'm going to save a substantial amount of cash.

    29. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, the mice mount lasers on you!

      Ok, yeah, that was weak...

      --
      *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
    30. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by nial-in-a-box · · Score: 1

      Canadian dollars wouldn't make sense, not that it really matters though. A Canadian dollar typically exchanges for less than a USA dollar, therefore one would assume that prices given in Canadian would appear higher. It seems that perhaps better deals can be had in Canada though. Ultimately it seems to come down to location. I don't know what the technology sales market is like in Taiwan, but I'm willing to be you can get a really damn nice mouse there for about $5 (pick your currency). Regardless, there is no point in getting in a pissing contest over who thinks what is a good value and whatnot.

      --
      I am feeling fat and sassy
    31. Re:Or you could go the MasterCard approach... by Curtman · · Score: 1
      Did you read the thread at all? I'll give you a summary:

      • Ignominious Cow Herd made a funny comment about frickin lasers that included some (slightly overpriced) mouse pricing
      • Then Gherald said "Ball mice are at most $10 and good opticals are $20. And I'm talking Logitechs"
      • So then I said "Canadian dollars probably" and quickly found a link to the mouse pricing at my local store without actually looking at the prices
      • Having looked at the prices, I replied anonymously to myself, "Or maybe not, heh.. Must be Rubles"
      • issachar and I then somehow began discussing the fact that I could get a mouse for $1 or so less elsewhere.
      But your lesson in economics was very interesting though. Thanks for coming out.
  79. Microsoft's drivers are still better by hackshack · · Score: 1
    ...and yes, that's a fscking insult.

    I tell ya, I love my MX500 / MX700, but the drivers suck. No app-specific settings. No modifier key maps (heaven forbid I might want to use a button to drag around in Photoshop). I could go on. Microsoft's IntelliMouse drivers have covered all this crap for years.

    Apparently if I buy the MX510 I can get app specific drivers. Nice sales work, Logitech.

    They fix some things with the Advanced utility, but why isn't it rolled into the main MouseWare driver set? FWIW, this is in Windows. Yeah, I said it! Until I can get SolidWorks on my Mac I've gotta use Windows!

    1. Re:Microsoft's drivers are still better by z3021017 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The mouse drivers are fine, but the software is not. The drivers work as they are supposed to - they make the mouse work. However, it's the craptastic software that lets the drivers down.

      The MX series are considered the best mice for twitch gaming like First Person Shooters, yet the majority of these gamers don't use the Logitech software because it doesn't play nice with many games. To avoid all this nastiness with the mouse software, they instead use the generic Windows XP PS2 mouse driver, and then lose the ability of the topmost, 'task switch' button.

      There is a way to install the drivers without the software though:
      1. Download the Logitech Mouseware.
      2. Use WinZip to open up the install .exe file.
      3. Unzip to a temp directory
      4. Goto Control Panel -> Mouse
      5. Look for and install the mouse driver within the temp directory

      It doesn't really offer any advantages over the generic PS2 mouse driver (the topmost button still doesn't work), but at least you can say that you're using the correct drivers!

      --
      Bored? Visit my exciting counter page!
  80. If you give a mouse a laser... by JonToycrafter · · Score: 1

    If a little traveler from Logitech shows up at your house, you might want to give it a laser. If you give it a laser, it's going to ask for a non-reflective surface. It'll want to compare itself to a Microsoft mouse to make sure it performs better. Soon, the Microsoft mouse will want to be paid for. The money will go to anti-Linux FUD. Soon you'll put a brick through your computer, and have to buy a new one. And when you take home that new Logitech mouse....

    ...it's going to want a laser!

  81. Is it safe for kids? by shadowmas · · Score: 1

    laser is all nice but would it be safe with kids who might try to look at the laser?

    1. Re:Is it safe for kids? by Open_The_Box · · Score: 1

      Yeah, should be totally safe. It's a laser where the intention is that the beam will exit the device - they're not gonna be allowed to use more than a weak class I laser. It'll be safer than most laser pointers and the only way to damage someone with one of those is to shine it directly in their eyes and prevent them from blinking. Well, I guess there are more ways but they require a bit of ingenuity.

      Kids will be safe. Adults with a penchant for overclocking... well, better get a desk with good optical and thermal dissipation is all I'm sayin'...

      --
      If you can't think of something nice to say then don't say anything at all. No, REALLY.
  82. Re: 2-axis mercury tilt switches by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    A tilt switch usually means either a switch with a weight meaning you need two of them to make it work to cover two axes, or a mercury switch which has the same problem plus the drawback that the contents can be toxic if they escape the switch in exchange for being more reliable than a mechanical tilt switch.
    Mercury switches exist that can detect tilt over two axes.
    They work by having the electrical contacts at the bottom of a depression shaped like a very shallow bowl.
    A tilt in any direction causes the mercury to flow away from the contacts, breaking the circuit.

    The main problem that I can see with using any kind of acceleration-detecting device on a mouse is that it would be triggered by sudden mouse movements.

    Also, the toxicity of mercury is somewhat exaggerated.
    Mercury vapor can cause problems over an extended period of time, but it is unlikely that the small amount from a tilt switch will cause problems (unless it is used in a sealed room that has no ventilation, but radon would probably be of greater concern in such an environment).
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  83. If you... by Facekhan · · Score: 1

    If you give a mouse a laser he is going to want to take over the world.

    1. Re:If you... by mblumber · · Score: 1

      That is so true.

      --
      Anyone who posts about bad moderation are themselves off-topic and should be moderated accordingly.
  84. we-can't-say-frickin'-on-the-air by Sinner · · Score: 1

    Why not? Why are people so complacent and accepting about censorship? Why are people so happy to surrender their right of self-expression for a paycheck?

    Yeah, yeah, -1 Offtopic, I know. I'll get me coat.

    --
    fish and pipes
  85. guns have lasers, and so do mice! by KingPunk · · Score: 1

    who would've thought that both real guns, and now our prized virtual guns, BOTH have lasers! wheeew! hook me up.

    looks like a good product, cant wait to try it out at like best buy or something
    gotta love the "free as in sex" mentallity with the "try before you buy" feel. mmm

    cool article. peace captian breasy cheesey wheezy! :)

  86. Logitech mini wheel mouse by riqnevala · · Score: 1

    I got the logitech mini wheel mouse as a gift from my girlfriend ages ago, and it is still my favourite mouse. It was pretty cheap, and I got another one at work - optical! Fits nicely into both hands (I am left handed) and it is as a MOUSE should be (with a tail on it).

    It lacks the frickin' laser, but I prefer getting my mice for 20 euros.

    --
    love slashdot. populate it. use it. abuse it. hate it. kill it. miss it. stop following links, they only kill servers.
  87. Re:NewEgg is shipping them. That's great and all, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well, they don't have it yet, but I would expect it pretty soon at http://www.vibecomputers.com

    They had the MX-510 quite quickly, even when it was hard to find outside of Best Buy.

  88. Re: 2-axis mercury tilt switches by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Also, the toxicity of mercury is somewhat exaggerated.

    That's fine if you're making one or two of these. What about thousands? You know that the vast majority of them will go right in the trash when they break, right?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  89. Kinda funny.. by catwh0re · · Score: 1
    I was wondering if the laser could pose eye trouble.. but that thought quickly passed when I saw the packaging. It's not the laser that will be sending you blind. It looks like a designer snorted a mixture of sugar and speed, then sneezed every embellishment effect onto the outer box.

    If you can survive the box.. then some laser isn't going to do you any harm.

  90. Dumb users by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

    Maybe this will ease the pain when some Idiot User calls his optical mouse a "laser mouse."

  91. laser is cool, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  92. Looks Nice, But... by Blic · · Score: 1

    As other posters have pointed out, I think mice and keyboards have gotten to the point where companies are innovating for the sake of simply getting new product on the shelves every year.

    There's a lot of stupid stuff coming out that maybe a few people like, but really. Vibrating mice? All these extra little buttons? Horizontal scrolling? Stupid software that eats up memory to add "extra features" you don't use?

    Optical was good (and maybe laser is the way of the future, who knows). The scroll wheel is great. Cordless mice still suck (not responsive enough). Outside of that mice haven't really significantly changed in 20+ years whether you like 1, 2 or 3 buttons.

    What is even more annoying is they all seem to arbitrarily change the "ergonomic" (whatever) design of their mice every year or two. Which means that when the mouse you love and are used to dies you won't be able to buy another one like it and will have to get used to whatever new design they have out there.

    Bah! =)

  93. humm by Mr._Hole · · Score: 0

    I can see it now... you want to clean the bottom of your mouse, awwwwww, the laser burns.. my eyes... (waving fist)I'll get you for this logi-tech, and your little dog toooo.. Sounds like a law-suit waiting to happen haha my idea just wasted part of your brain.

  94. MX700 and paint problems anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd really like to buy this new mouse, but I'm having serious paint issues with my MX700, which I bought in a european store called BEEP.

    For the record, I haven't had issues with any other previous mouses.

    1. Re:MX700 and paint problems anyone? by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Do you never wash your hands? Geez. I've had my 700 for quite awhile and it still looks like new.

  95. Screw lasers and look at that color by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Current MX1000 will break my desk color harmony! Requesting a silver one :-)

  96. speaking of the intellimouse... by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Funny


    I was working on a virus the other day. I thought it would be cool to write a virus that would replace the Intellimouse USB driver with a full-blown scanner and OCR combination. I was going to have this virus then post any text the mouse was hovering over on peoples' desks to an IRC channel. You know, it would be interesting / valuable to see what documents people had laying on the surface of their desks.

    So I was disassembling the Intellimouse USB driver just to see if I would have to build mine from scratch or if I could patch into the existing binary.

    Well, to my extreme surprise, I was late to market with my innovation: Microsoft has already built this into their driver! Somewhere in Redmond, there's got to be a room with guys staring at screens going, "Goddamnit Cheney! Push the mouse a little more to the left! We still need three more digits of the nuclear launch codes!"
    1. Re:speaking of the intellimouse... by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      it's for comments like this that we need a (Score:6, Funny)

      --
      TIAEAE!
  97. Re:Some background on water and U.S. law by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Your comment got me thinking....

    My first IBM PC in the home was a 286/16, somewhere between '86 and '88 - I can't remember. It came with a Logitech 3 button mouse.

    That mouse was with all my machines until around '96 or '97. A roommate's cat gave it a bath by knocking it in a soda cup. Sadly enough, I remember how angry I got over that. :)

    Naturally, given the quality of the mouse I had, I figured I'd buy another logitech. That thing didn't last 2 weeks. At least I got my money back for that one.

    2-3 years down the road, I was in the market for yet another mouse, so I figured I'd get another Logitech - that thing lasted about 3 months.

    After going through tons of mice since around '96, I finally settled on something that I like: a shitty Microsoft Optical that cost me $20. Combine it with a nice $25 mouse pad and it plays better than or equal to your MX<insert number of the week here>. I have recieved several unsolicited comments about how smooth it works and how well it tracks.

    MX1000 sounds very neat but I'll be sure to wait for the corded version - I've done my tour with wireless mice and now the only thing that bothers me about them is that my wife complains because I pawned the $120 mouse off to her to take the $20 mouse I have now. :)

    What I don't get - when microsoft first started selling mice, you could look on the bottom of the mouse and it would say something to the effect of "manufacturered by logitech". If they can manage to make MS mice better than their own....sigh.

  98. Warning Sticker on mouse. by Nikkodemus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mouse user notices small sticker close to laser and puts mouse up to face to read it..
    (singe, crackle)
    **Do not look at underside of mouse with remaining eye!**

  99. fingers crossed about the thumb & scroll butto by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

    I love the MouseMan series of mice... but I feel like the design has been going downhill since around the time they introduced the cordless ball MouseMan mouse, and the MX700 I found to be quite odd to use... the thumb button was no longer where my thumb was, I had to move my thumb in an awkward way to reach the button, also, they introduced two buttons by the scroll wheel, one in front and one behind, the front button was easy to click, but the one behind was, again, awkward... I'd love to see a better design, until then I'll be using my first edition blue MouseMan Optical USB.

    --
    sig.
  100. The disposable mousepad by Mal-2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Having to share a computer at an office full of people with grungy hands led me to do two things:

    1. Demand (and get) a Dvorak keyboard. That cut down the popularity of my station considerably. :)

    2. Invent the disposable mouse pad.

    "What is this wonderful device?", you might wonder. Well here's how to make one.

    1. Take about 25 sheets of letter size paper and stack them neatly. It doesn't matter if they are laser-printed, but you probably don't want inkjet prints. You can do a lot more than 25 if you have a heavy-duty stapler handy, but this assumes you don't.

    2. Staple them together as many times as necessary along one edge.

    3. When the top page gets dirty, or when the shift changes, tear off the top page and throw it away. When you get down to the last 10 or so sheets, remove the staples, get another 15 sheets of paper, and re-staple. If you spill your drink on it, throw away the wet pages, or the whole thing if necessary.

    Think I can get a patent on this?

    The lazy can just get a notepad and flip the cover back (or tear it off), but doesn't that violate the whole "do it yourself" ethic?

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:The disposable mousepad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lawyers have been informed, your invention breaches our IP on 'Joined Sheets of Paper for use in the disposal of waste material' which was granted to us when we made bog rolls, before we started using the SCO business model.

    2. Re:The disposable mousepad by indros13 · · Score: 1
      Save staples, try a legal pad.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  101. Sure it will work on any surface... by mrjb · · Score: 1

    ... but in the process the LASER MOUSE will burn your desk to ashes. Use it on a mirror folks, that'll keep the little bastard in check!

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  102. Re:Some background on water and U.S. law by Tschaess · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apples is actually a village in the french speaking part of switzerland.

    The headquater for europe afrika and estern counries is still here (about 8km east of apples in Romanel-sur-Morges)

  103. Some things are not meant to be wireless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mice, along with keyboards, are one of them. I know they have been out for quite some time now, but I am not sure if the whole idea is really necessary. I can see the aspect in wireless networking and WiFi, but I do not see a real big purpose in wireless mice and keyboards. Surely I would think it gets irritating to replace a battery in both the mouse and keyboard. (Correct me if I am wrong.) Is it easier just to deal with two extra wires, no batteries, and something that is less expensive? I use optical mice (and one ball mouse on one of my older machines with no USB port), and I think that they are just fine for the job. I see no reason to upgrade to wireless with such equipment. What are the real benefits that Slashdot users encounter when using wireless mice and keyboards in exception to the two extra said wires?

  104. Modula-2 by Jonathan · · Score: 1

    Also, I seem to remember that back in the 1980's Logitech not only sold mice but Modula-2 compilers as well. Modula-2 was a followup language to Pascal that fixed many of the problems Pascal had, but it never really caught on.

  105. this mouse is fake by salaude · · Score: 1

    I could not find this mouse on logitechs website, so I called up Logitechs costumer support. The MX1000 is not a logitech product. Too bad, I'd love the sidescroll

    1. Re:this mouse is fake by electragician · · Score: 1

      You do realise that Newegg is selling this "fake" mouse, right?

      The mouse is, as yet, unannounced and you were probably speaking to a call-center rep that knows less about the company he's taking calls for than you do.

    2. Re:this mouse is fake by kylearin · · Score: 1

      This mouse was indeed on sale at CompUSA in Bloomington, MN yesterday for $99.99. I picked up the package myself and looked it over. The tilting scroll wheel seems nice (Microsoft got there first, though) and the box does indeed proclaim the optical mouse dead (aren't lasers optical?). I couldn't tell if the battery was replaceable like my MX700 because of the security plastic holding the demo mouse down. It does not appear to use Bluetooth, but looks very exciting. Maybe I'll get one when they're on sale. For now, the MX700 will have to do.

  106. Sun Mice? by Vandil+X · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure that the Sun machines I have in my server room have had their laser mice (mirrored mousepad even!) long before this Logitech offering.

    But great news for consumers.

    I wonder if they'll make a wired version.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
  107. What about... by beaverbrother · · Score: 1
    Battery life, which is a big factor in the purchase of any cordless device.

    This laser seems like it is much stronger (uses more power im assuming). How long would it last before a recharge?

    Also, this thing looks a bit heavier than my MX700. One of the good qualities of the mouse was that you could pick it up easily. Also, after long use, a heavy mouse could tire out many (unathletic - typical of many computer people) people's arms.

    No bluetooth? I always thought that the MX900 was making a step in the right direction by adopting this protocol for its wireless. It allowed more freedom of what devices it could be used on.

    I'm skeptical. It sounds like the technology is a good step forward... but at what cost to the user?

  108. Me Sherlock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I actually read the article (I am new here) (emphasis mine)


    How did you know to preempt the funnies if you are indeed new here?

    AHA! Gotcha!

  109. In other news... by beaverbrother · · Score: 1

    Logitech develops mice with "a personality".
    Strangely colored "Ladybug" and "Football" mice fill up their product line.
    I'm still waiting for a mouse-colored mouse.

  110. Like the Laser, dislike new battery solution. by guidryp · · Score: 1

    While I welcome an increase in precision as I nearly returned my MX-700 and went back to a ball mouse because the ball handles small movements more precisely, I don't like the Lithium battery solution.

    The current batteries work well and imporantly are ubiquitous and easily replaceable. Do yo see a door on the Lithium model?

    What happens when the expensive Laser mouse has a battery failure. Lithiums do have a limited lifespan (Warranty +10 days usually).

  111. Trackballs are the future! by Zobeid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If only the original Macintosh had come with a trackball 20 years ago, they might well be ubiquitous today and mice would be the niche product. Perhaps someday the masses will wake up and correct this mistake. (Yeah, right. . . Probably at the same time when we all switch to Dvorak keyboards.)

    I have a Logitech Marble Mouse USB, the older one with only two buttons. It's more efficient than a mouse: fingertip control, less movement, less effort, and takes less desk space. I have it configured so I can hold down my control key and scroll with the trackball.

    It works pretty well for me.

    1. Re:Trackballs are the future! by cm5oom · · Score: 0

      i have allways wonderd why it is that people who use X when 99% of the world use Y, feal the need to constitly tell the world that X is so much better. just because its better for you doesn't mean it's better for me, or the other 99%.

  112. There are lasers and then there are by sita · · Score: 1

    ...BIG MUTHAFUCKIN LASERS.

    This is probably the former. That is Class 1 lasers that are unlikely to cause any harm unless you punch them into your eye balls.

  113. Phaser? by hellstorm · · Score: 1

    Mmmmmm, can this mouse be hacked to convert it into a phaser? ;-)

    --
    --------------------------------------------------
    Programming is good for health
  114. The great advancements of the world. by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
    This new laser mouse will herald a new era of productivity and precision throughout the world, and it's effects will be felt for all time.

    "Headshot...Headshot...Headshot...Headshot...Heads hot..."

  115. geek factor: microscope? by perler · · Score: 1

    i wonder if this woud make a great mikroscope/scanner. all you need is some lego and a way to get the image from the laser..

    PAT

  116. Looks like it's... by EvilNutSack · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dangermouse! Now armed with a laser!

    --
    --
  117. Oh, goody, in plenty of time for Christmas! by abb3w · · Score: 1
    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  118. I just use a pad of paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no staples, and easily transportable.

  119. am I alone in my low sensitivity? by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    Interesting.

    Anyone else set their sensitivity really low for games (3 in Halflife), so easier to aim - it makes sensitivity less useful.

    Sometimes it seems like the rest of the world is moving thier move tenths of a millimeter while I'm moving mine inches.

    Anyone else like thier sensitivity low?

    1. Re:am I alone in my low sensitivity? by thrash242 · · Score: 1

      I find that if it's too low, it's harder to make quick turns and the like. I am one of the few people that still uses the keyboard to help turn (when it's available in game), so it's not as critical for turning around. But I don't want to have to move my whole forearm around, as it's less precise than wrist and finger movement. I set my sensitivity about in the middle, maybe a little less (depending on the game). Getting used to higher sensitivities just takes a little practice using smaller movements. Maybe try using your fingers to move the mouse rather than your wrist or forearm, if you're not already.

      I don't like mine too high, though, as it's hard to aim.

  120. I am SHOUTING about LASERS!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Official Laser Webpage

    Real Ultimate Power

    Hi, this site is all about lasers, REAL LASERS. This site is awesome. My name is Robert and I can't stop thinking about lasers. These guys are cool; and by cool, I mean totally sweet.

    Facts:

    1. Lasers are mammals.

    2. Lasers fight ALL the time.

    3. The purpose of the laser is to flip out and kill people.

    Weapons and gear:
    Laser Sword
    Laser Stars
    Laser Outfit

    Testimonial:

    Lasers can kill anyone they want! Lasers cut off heads ALL the time and don't even think twice about it. These guys are so crazy and awesome that they flip out ALL the time. I heard that there was this laser who was eating at a diner. And when some dude dropped a spoon the laser killed the whole town. My friend Mark said that he saw a laser totally uppercut some kid just because the kid opened a window.

    And that's what I call REAL Ultimate Power!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    If you don't believe that lasers have REAL Ultimate Power you better get a life right now or they will chop your head off!!! It's an easy choice, if you ask me.

    Lasers are sooooooooooo sweet that I want to crap my pants. I can't believe it sometimes, but I feel it inside my heart. These guys are totally awesome and that's a fact. Lasers are fast, smooth, cool, strong, powerful, and sweet. I can't wait to start yoga next year. I love lasers with all of my body (including my pee pee).

    Q and A:.

    Q: Why is everyone so obsessed about lasers?

    A: lasers are the ultimate paradox. On the one hand they don't give a crap, but on the other hand, lasers are very careful and precise.

    Q: I heard that lasers are always cruel or mean. What's their problem?

    A: Whoever told you that is a total liar. Just like other mammals, lasers can be mean OR totally awesome.

    Q: What do lasers do when they're not cutting off heads or flipping out?

    A: Most of their free time is spent flying, but sometime they stab. (Ask Mark if you don't believe me.)

  121. How well does this work.... by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

    Correct me if i'm wrong but if you use this on a textured surface, won't that laser not reflect correctly due to the tight focus of the beam?

  122. Re:Some background on water and U.S. law by mwood · · Score: 1

    Mouse Systems. Unfortunately you'll have to scour the Earth to find anybody who sells them.

  123. Mouse as linear encoder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm interested about using cheap mice as linear encoders in cnc machinery. Industrial encoders are of course way too expensive but mice are cheap.

    So, does anybody know what resolution this laser mouse gives to its output? Typical mice give about 200 dpi but cnc machines can handle resolutions up to 5000 dpi, so typical mouse is not enough.

  124. Re:NewEgg is shipping them. That's great and all, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they will trade for cheap prescription drugs?

  125. I remember the original laser mouse by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    It used a grid mousepad and had a serial cable...

    that's old skool =)

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  126. More retarded marketing by MasTRE · · Score: 1

    Optical = of or relating to the science of optics, of or relating to vision. Lasers are optical, so it cannot be 20x more precise than.. itself.

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  127. Say, while we're at it ... by LordPixie · · Score: 0, Troll

    Could I get some troll points ? Thanks.


    --LordPixie

  128. Lookout for you eyes by Gw33do · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I read this artical all I could think of was turning the mouse upside-down and firing the laser at somebody. McBain:THE GOGGLES THEY DO NOTHING ... Tod: My EYEBALL

  129. Having tested this... by drakewolf · · Score: 1

    I have had the opportunity to play with the new MX1000 and yes it works with the MX700 base station - it can even be charged on the same station. It does NOT however work with the pre-MX technology. Sorry. It also works with the notebook fastRF reciever! (of course you cannot charge with the notebook reciever) I am going to be meeting with the logitech reps soon and will suggest they bundle the notebook USB reciever with the MX1000. I think the laser is cool but what is even better is the thumb rest. It was the first thing I noticed when I held the mouse in my hand. The ergonomics of this mouse outstrips everything I have ever found for sheer comfort. It is a right hand mouse ONLY though. The final nifty feature is the on-off switch on the bottom. This allows you to turn the dang thing off and throw it into your bag when taking either your laptop elsewhere or going to LAN parties.

    --
    Lousy german with a laser
  130. Laser? Feh... by StoatBringer · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'm waiting for the Logitech Nuclear Mouse.

    --
    Cress, cress, lovely lovely cress
  131. The Animal Arms Race by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you are going to give lasers to mice, don't be surprised when the cats decide to fight back.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  132. Whooooaaaaaahhhhhh Kewl!! by GhodMode · · Score: 0, Troll

    A laser, hmmm..... What's that look like .... AAAAAHHHHHH!!!!! I'm Blind!!! I'm Blind!!!!! I'M GONNA SUE!!!!!

  133. Years ago... by sczimme · · Score: 1


    motorcycle racers began using something called "tear-offs". (This may be an Oakley trademark - I'm not sure.) These were goggles that were overlaid with multiple layers of clear plastic across the eye area. When the goggles became covered in dust/mud, the rider could grab a tab and pull off the top layer, revealing the clean strip beneath - repeat as needed or until all the strips are gone.

    There was another version that used two spools, like a film camera (remember those?). The rider pushed a button and a predetermined length of clear plastic would be wound on to the empty spindle, pulling a clean strip into the rider's field of vision. I never found out if the motor simply turned the receiving spindle N times or if there were markers on the strips themselves to shut off the motor. It seems like the "N rotations" model would be flawed, since the covering of dirt (especially mud) would change the thickness of the plastic strip and thus the effective radius of the receiving spindle, unnecessarily increasing the amount of new material used. Hmmm.

    Anyway, re: your patent question - I think there is prior art. :-)

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Years ago... by Pope · · Score: 1

      The "two spools" is used for auto racing to have an easily cleaned shield in front of the in-car cameras. If you watch the races, when they switch to car view you can often see the dirt sliding off to one side as a new bit of transparent film comes in. It's a brilliant solution IMO.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  134. Re:Some background on water and U.S. law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it hard to believe that you're getting such short life spans from your Logitech mice. I've got two at home. One is about 5 months old now, no problems. The other I've been using since 1998, and I paid $30 for it back then. It's been a great mouse. Both are optical.

  135. 20x more precise-Graphics Tablet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might want to sit down for this. I use a graphics tablet for CAD, and image work. A mouse (optical or otherwise) isn't really good for image work, and a graphics tablet with overlays is better. Now that's were i would like to see higher resolution.

    I also have a notbook standalone thumb mouse. Portable one handed operation.

  136. And now to even things out... by LordPixie · · Score: 1

    ...flamebait ? Anyone ? =)


    --LordPixie

  137. jumble of posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, slashdot needs a separate jokes forum and on-topic discussions forum for each article. I came here to read about the Logitech mouse, not a really old joke repeated over and over...

  138. Re:NewEgg is shipping them. That's great and all, by Entropy2016 · · Score: 1

    I got mine at a "Fry's" computer store.
    You could try seeing if they would ship you one.

  139. Logitech ignored one important thing .... by RockDoctor · · Score: 0

    This might be the acme of mouse technology as far as Logitech are concerned, but it won't get me opening my wallet. It's right-handed, and as such it's totally useless.

    I know all the arguments about catering to the average user, and frankly, I don't care. I use my mouse left-handed, and I see no reason to change. I still carried on on the left when I had my left hand in a plaster cast because I simply cannot coordinate pointer and mouse movement with my right hand.


    Naturally, I can use the touch screen and keyboard on my PDA fully ambidexterously. Which might be a hint about how un-intuitive mice actually are.


    The last site mentions the use of touch screens as a tool in managing RSI issues, which is some info that people might wish to take to work with them.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    1. Re:Logitech ignored one important thing .... by RockDoctor · · Score: 0

      That last link (to Giton ) seems rather flaky - I can't get the PDF to reliably open in a new tab or window, but if I "save target as ..." onto my hard drive, I get a valid 96kb PDF.
      YMMV.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  140. This is ridiculous by gracefool · · Score: 1

    Buying a very accurate cordless mouse is like buying a very accurate gun with a short range.

    A USB 2.0 connection is many times faster than the wireless connection these mouses use.

    The increased accuracy is pretty pointless when the wireless mouse has such a low polling rate.

  141. Best mouse I've ever used. by kevmit · · Score: 1

    This is probably OT, but we ARE speaking about mice...so be karmically kind, please.
    I bought this mouse as a presentation tool and, based on prior experience with motion-sensing presentation mice, really didn't expect it to work very well at any other application. I was wrong...this thing works GREAT! I use it as my default desktop mouse now. The ability to set up custom events based on directional "swipes" is a feature I didn't think I would use very much but now I use it in every class.
    Unfortunately, it's currently only supported under Windows. I have to unplug it when I boot into Sid or none of my pointing devices work properly.