Perhaps but it doesn't stop spambots from just randomly checking for port 25 on systems. For example a conversation:
220 yourdomain.com ESMTP Exim 3.34 #1 Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:51:49 -0600
helo whitehouse.gov
250 yourdomain.com Hello spam.net [192.168.0.119]
mail from:gwbush@whitehouse.gov
250 is syntactically correct
rcpt to:user@yourdomain.com
250 verified
data
354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself
I hereby pardon you from all your evils on the Kazaa network.
.
250 OK id=18UIqH-0000Dv-00
I'm sure some of the smarter/.ers here could whip up a nice little perl script to automate this little function. Telnet port 25, if you get a hit send a prerecorded SMTP conversation. Repeat... Maybe just go around looking up MX records on major domains and unloading on them.
And where is the Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt in how republicans are acting. Maybe I missed it.. But the way I understood it is that he was using the common mistake of associating FUD with "BS" rather than the defined meaning which in it self may be BS but not necessarily.
True, you cannot fake a MAC address with your wireless card as it is part of the 802.11 spec that it can't be done. But MAC filtering doesn't really stop people from monitoring your transmissions. So even if they can't "step in" to your network, they can monitor it without proactive security measures.
It takes about 15 minutes to crack 64bit wep. A day to crack 128bit wep. I think that 256bit WEP IIRC would in theory take about a month of non-stop monitoring.
And I only have -1 hours to buy it to make it on time for Christmas this year....
Re:Nice quote from the article...
on
1.5 TB DVD by 2010
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Your Pentium III will be equivalent to a prion, perhaps an amoeba, or a damaged/diseased sperm cell forever searching to impregnate the first cell it "sees".
Thats the funniest thing I've read in a long time. I can't wait to use it against someone. (Where they think that it is a complement) "You're as smart as my 1.2Ghz Pentium III!"
Hopefully NASA doesn't repeat the Mars mission by making a unit conversion area. I think they'll be suspect if Lewis & Clark are shown to have discovered the Congo.
Naahh. They'll just hurl a multi-zillion dollar probe at the midwest and say,"Oh shit! Meters... Yards... I always get them confused."
Slashdot Mirror
Looks rather "manicured" to me... images.google.com search on Alyssa Milano nude
You can have one running in a terminal on your computer :)
Hercules Project
Emulates a 360/370/390 series system.
Irix:No
Solaris:Yes
Solaris PPC
habbits
Is that what you get when you cross hobbits and rabbits?
Actuall, it is ExxonMobil. ;)
http://www.exxonmobil.com
Perhaps but it doesn't stop spambots from just randomly checking for port 25 on systems. For example a conversation:
.
/.ers here could whip up a nice little perl script to automate this little function. Telnet port 25, if you get a hit send a prerecorded SMTP conversation. Repeat... Maybe just go around looking up MX records on major domains and unloading on them.
220 yourdomain.com ESMTP Exim 3.34 #1 Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:51:49 -0600
helo whitehouse.gov
250 yourdomain.com Hello spam.net [192.168.0.119] mail from:gwbush@whitehouse.gov
250 is syntactically correct
rcpt to:user@yourdomain.com
250 verified
data
354 Enter message, ending with "." on a line by itself
I hereby pardon you from all your evils on the Kazaa network.
250 OK id=18UIqH-0000Dv-00
I'm sure some of the smarter
Yes, those were the times I was quoting.
And where is the Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt in how republicans are acting. Maybe I missed it.. But the way I understood it is that he was using the common mistake of associating FUD with "BS" rather than the defined meaning which in it self may be BS but not necessarily.
True, you cannot fake a MAC address with your wireless card as it is part of the 802.11 spec that it can't be done. But MAC filtering doesn't really stop people from monitoring your transmissions. So even if they can't "step in" to your network, they can monitor it without proactive security measures.
http://www.compcc.net/wirelesssecurity.asp
It says here it took a super computer several weeks to crack 256bit wep.
petty Republican FUD would have been laughed out of existence
You have misused the term "FUD". Everyone who doesn't know what it means you should read up on it. The link below explains the meaning.
What is FUD?
256bit WEP not enough for you?
It takes about 15 minutes to crack 64bit wep. A day to crack 128bit wep. I think that 256bit WEP IIRC would in theory take about a month of non-stop monitoring.
I see the data side has very few pins, but the power side has a ton more.. What is up with that?
Wester Digital is also "missing"...
WD doesn't make small form factor drives anymore.
We've got JVC projectors at work that can do 1360x1284 (something like that) and compressed 1600x1200. The farther back you move them, the larger the picture gets. Pics of them in action mounted in a rear projection screen.
The sun is supposed to burn out in 5 billion years, I believe.
:)
So what? thats only 50 hundreds of millions years
But how many libraries of congress is it?
I think you mean fission.
GETTING STARTED WITH A NEW DOCUMENT IN THIS EARLY VERSION
When you double click on the Humane Editor icon to launch it...
Already returning to your roots, I see.
If all of a sudden a billion Indian nationals begin using Linux over Windows... I see an office suite from MS within like a year.
I may not have fingers, but I've got nubs!
"Sorry, I have no fingers. Do you mind if I provide you with a semen sample instead? Nahh, that's ok... Keep the change."
And I only have -1 hours to buy it to make it on time for Christmas this year....
Your Pentium III will be equivalent to a prion, perhaps an amoeba, or a damaged/diseased sperm cell forever searching to impregnate the first cell it "sees".
Thats the funniest thing I've read in a long time. I can't wait to use it against someone. (Where they think that it is a complement) "You're as smart as my 1.2Ghz Pentium III!"
Thanks! BTW to the ACs that replied. I love coffee! Just not a full systray.
Hopefully NASA doesn't repeat the Mars mission by making a unit conversion area. I think they'll be suspect if Lewis & Clark are shown to have discovered the Congo.
,"Oh shit! Meters... Yards... I always get them confused."
Naahh. They'll just hurl a multi-zillion dollar probe at the midwest and say