True, unless he was smart enough to use someone elses network first.
As for the articles author I think you just have an army of 1337 k0d3 kiddies knocking at your gates.
Give em a honeypot that sends em frags. Not like they can report you to anyone.
hacker: Yeah I was just minding my own buiness trying to hack into root on XX.XXX.XX.XXX and the admin sent back frags and killed my box. abuse@yourip: So you were hacking another network, and the admin killed you? hacker: well yeah, is there anything you can do to this guy. abuse@yourip: grow up kid. get some clearasil and go out on a date. steer clear of donkey pr0n.
There is noting at all laughable concerning loss of our freedoms.
These are people WE PUT IN OFFICE they feel the need to create these systems, in an effort to "Protect us".
Do you need protection? I don't at least not protection from legislators.
I'm all for the military and the difficult tasks they do, but why do we need to be kept track of? Is it so they can come to your house during the middle of the night? Are we heading toward Minority Report?
I agree with you, what will happen WHEN this system is compromised, and all the prints in the database are forged? Will I be arrested because someone left a fake print of mine at a murder scene on the murder weapon?
As I stated earlier these are the people wwe put into office.
Simple solution, if your arogant ass has never been arrested. Your prints aren't there. Don't want big bro to have em? Them burn em off. If thine eye offend thee pluck it out. If thine fingerprints can track thee, burn them off.
He wasted his talent and I use that term loosely on rewriting virii. I think a better solution is keep him out of the overcrowded system, and put his ass to work pouring over hours of logs doing forensic analysis for companies. Otherwise keep his ass of a computer for the rest of his life.
As for phantom damages, they don't expect these people to pay that, take Mitnick for example what was it 80 to 800 million? At $300 a month it would take him roughly 222 thousand years to pay back.
Has anyone else noticed a recent change in the shift of doing business? Time was a company went through this process: 1) brainstorm a new product 2) market product 3) PROFIT Now it seems the model is thus: 1) Patent a product we didn't make, or purchase the patent rights 2) sue the pants off all those who use it for patent infringement 3) PROFIT
I bought one of those for gaming. I was surprised at the amount of filangy strength needed to depress keys. Not to mention that on occasion keypresses repeat and sometimes arent read at all, though that could be a driver issue.
[blockquote]Something like this could be used as a tool to even influence the spammers themselves if anyone could actually gain access to their addresses.[/blockquote]
They are probably smarter than us, and do not use any form of personal email account.
I had originally thought the site was intended to teach semi secure code, by that I mean as secure as it could be.
I thought the idea was to teach common methods and vulnerabilities so admins could pen test their own systems, but alas I was wrong.
Re:While Priest was only doing his job
on
Blackhat/Defcon Report
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
LMFAO. I read that and a switch went off. I know that kid.
Last year I did some development on a website whose owner spoke often of going to Defcon in Vegas. He also spoke of Anarchy, and causing Civil Disobedience at the Democratic convention. It didn't take me long to figure out he was using his site not to teach admins how to spot vulnerabilities in their web code, but to spread his own political agenda, and gather a willing army of script kiddies.
Needless to say our beliefs on hacking weren't the same. Whoever this person was at Defcon, he is an embarassment to the hacking community, both whitehats and blackhats.
I stopped in on the sites IRC server to see what was up with some old friends, turns out this guy has a court date not too far off something about striking a police officer.
I would bet it's the same guy.
His politics, and genuine lack of interest in teaching admins the skills necessary to find and fix flaws in thier code is why I left.
I'm all for hacking code, but the art would be better suited to securing systems and spreading the knowledge of how to secure, instead of teaching an army of script kiddies to be a leet hax0rz.
With a bit of common sense and google, there is no tweak I cant perform on my system. Best part, since I made the tweak I know what it does and when.
After many years of using Win98 for gaming and refusing to upgrade to either 2000 or XP though I have pro editions of both. A few recent disconnects of win98 on my wifi and I was ready to try the 2000. Low and behold what I ended up with did shock me. With the same hardware from my win98 install I did see a perfomance increase in the speed at which my game ran. Load time was lessened though not noticable by me.5 secs, big deal.
I did notice a serious increase in frame rates it jumped up 40 fps same hardware. I was also using the latest drivers for my hardware.
I attribute the increased frames to the way win 2000 interacts with DX9. My only complaint is now my analog rudder pedals dont work. Through searching though I have found that few pedal systems do work with 2000.
I would like to know how it performs at sea trials. In monster currents, and how much draw the extra currents add. This would be awesome combined with cold fusion, but then again so would cold fusion alone.
But when I buy cellular service I just want one thing in my phone, a freaking phone.
I dont care if it surfs the web, why do I need content if I'm not at home? I dont care if i can get Brittany Spears ring tones, WTF is wrong with a standard ring?
I dont care if the display is monchrome or color I dont care if it has Grand Turismo as the video game, or even if it has games. I dont care if it has gps, if you dont know where you are your fscked anyways.
All these things are not gadgets, they are gimmicks. It is an effort by manufacturers to seperate a fool from his money.
To all the fools taken in, thatnks for increasing my marketshare.:)
For the record my cell, is a LG TM510 and it does the job it was intended, for getting and sending phone calls.
THinks this is a security risk how? Are Iraqi troops going to see these photos and recognize a rock and then scud them?
As for the list has he not heard of disinformation, why would anyone send out a list of names and addresses through P2P, email would be much more secure and alot faster. My guess is they want the list to be seen.
As for troops you think Jane or Joe America in the trenches knows every movement they are going to make. If they did we wouldn't need radio operators to coordinate. The average troop would already know where he or she should be.
You can damn well be that our government monitors what passes through their networks, it would be assinine to assume otherwise. There are blackout periods where friends that I have on ship aren't allowed to use a computer to even check their email.
Military netwroks in combat are as secure, if not more secure than any regular network, or at least as secure as a network can be.
If our troops do want to share with us the images they see when over seas, then I support them in that. It gives the people they left back home a glimpse into what has become their daily lives, it's almost like having them home.
And the ships out at sea. I read one post who said a friend of his got deployed on a days notice and went out for ten days and made giant circles in the ocean. I think they call it a readiness exercise.
Most times when a ship pulls out, the captain only has coordinates to where he is either to open his orders or radio back for them, then they are told what they are doing and where they are going.
To our troops overseas. Share away my brothers and sisters. Share away.
Regardless of wether or not we want them to do this for us, the government in other areas has seen fit to play parent to us. Motorcyclists must wear a helmet (in some states) S.S.I. for retirement.
With the estimated number of zombies out there, I think the bandwidth loss would be a small price to pay to secure the net even one iota.
"O'Dowd thinks that unfriendly countries will attempt to hide intentional bugs that the Open Source community will have no chance of finding."
Hmmm vs what. One mega conglomerate corporation that will only show the source code to you if you sell your soul to them?
Seems to me if you pay 500 coders to review code for bugs, it still does not equal 50,000 or even 5,000 who do it just because they want to contribute. Seems like it would be very difficult for foreign countries to hide those bugs.
And what of outsourcing. Does he think that software that is closed source will be anymore secure?
Regardless if they go open or closed source there will be bugs to be found, and a country that really wants to can dedicate the monies and people needed to find and exploit those bugs.
YOu can get a patent on anything, even if you had nothing to do with creating or maitaining it. Just amatter of who applies and gets granted first.
You could prolly patent the way software uses licensing agreements. Patent a system by which a user agrees to a license before the software is installed. Imagine the licensing fees you could collect. All for filing for a patent.
Also see Acacia for more on BS digital patents.
Slashdot Mirror
Homemade Hentai anime.
True, unless he was smart enough to use someone elses network first.
As for the articles author I think you just have an army of 1337 k0d3 kiddies knocking at your gates.
Give em a honeypot that sends em frags. Not like they can report you to anyone.
hacker: Yeah I was just minding my own buiness trying to hack into root on XX.XXX.XX.XXX and the admin sent back frags and killed my box.
abuse@yourip: So you were hacking another network, and the admin killed you?
hacker: well yeah, is there anything you can do to this guy.
abuse@yourip: grow up kid. get some clearasil and go out on a date. steer clear of donkey pr0n.
Ok all burned off.
There is noting at all laughable concerning loss of our freedoms.
These are people WE PUT IN OFFICE they feel the need to create these systems, in an effort to "Protect us".
Do you need protection? I don't at least not protection from legislators.
I'm all for the military and the difficult tasks they do, but why do we need to be kept track of? Is it so they can come to your house during the middle of the night?
Are we heading toward Minority Report?
I agree with you, what will happen WHEN this system is compromised, and all the prints in the database are forged? Will I be arrested because someone left a fake print of mine at a murder scene on the murder weapon?
As I stated earlier these are the people wwe put into office.
It's time we took the office back!
Simple solution, if your arogant ass has never been arrested. Your prints aren't there. Don't want big bro to have em? Them burn em off. If thine eye offend thee pluck it out. If thine fingerprints can track thee, burn them off.
I agree!!!!
Let's all burn off our fingerprints in protest.
There is a Gift Shop located across from the lockers where they can purchase a package of Gummi Bears to bypass the biometric locks on the lockers.1 5254&tid=172
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/25/13
He wasted his talent and I use that term loosely on rewriting virii. I think a better solution is keep him out of the overcrowded system, and put his ass to work pouring over hours of logs doing forensic analysis for companies. Otherwise keep his ass of a computer for the rest of his life.
As for phantom damages, they don't expect these people to pay that, take Mitnick for example what was it 80 to 800 million? At $300 a month it would take him roughly 222 thousand years to pay back.
If I were Mitnick I'd say FUCK YOU bill me.
Has anyone else noticed a recent change in the shift of doing business?
Time was a company went through this process:
1) brainstorm a new product
2) market product
3) PROFIT
Now it seems the model is thus:
1) Patent a product we didn't make, or purchase the patent rights
2) sue the pants off all those who use it for patent infringement
3) PROFIT
[blockquote]televangelist Jerry Falwell was found dead in his Alabama home[/blockquote]
Mr and I use the term loosely Falwell lives in Lynchburg, Va.
I know because I was arrested twice for painting grafiti on his walls.
I bought one of those for gaming. I was surprised at the amount of filangy strength needed to depress keys. Not to mention that on occasion keypresses repeat and sometimes arent read at all, though that could be a driver issue.
[blockquote]Something like this could be used as a tool to even influence the spammers themselves if anyone could actually gain access to their addresses.[/blockquote]
They are probably smarter than us, and do not use any form of personal email account.
The article never said he couldn't work for WD for two years.
Problem #1 How will they enforce this?
#2 He could still do work for WD as a freelance consultant.
Stick it to em bro.
I had originally thought the site was intended to teach semi secure code, by that I mean as secure as it could be.
I thought the idea was to teach common methods and vulnerabilities so admins could pen test their own systems, but alas I was wrong.
LMFAO. I read that and a switch went off. I know that kid.
Last year I did some development on a website whose owner spoke often of going to Defcon in Vegas. He also spoke of Anarchy, and causing Civil Disobedience at the Democratic convention. It didn't take me long to figure out he was using his site not to teach admins how to spot vulnerabilities in their web code, but to spread his own political agenda, and gather a willing army of script kiddies.
Needless to say our beliefs on hacking weren't the same. Whoever this person was at Defcon, he is an embarassment to the hacking community, both whitehats and blackhats.
I stopped in on the sites IRC server to see what was up with some old friends, turns out this guy has a court date not too far off something about striking a police officer.
I would bet it's the same guy.
His politics, and genuine lack of interest in teaching admins the skills necessary to find and fix flaws in thier code is why I left.
I'm all for hacking code, but the art would be better suited to securing systems and spreading the knowledge of how to secure, instead of teaching an army of script kiddies to be a leet hax0rz.
ME.
.5 secs, big deal.
With a bit of common sense and google, there is no tweak I cant perform on my system. Best part, since I made the tweak I know what it does and when.
After many years of using Win98 for gaming and refusing to upgrade to either 2000 or XP though I have pro editions of both. A few recent disconnects of win98 on my wifi and I was ready to try the 2000. Low and behold what I ended up with did shock me. With the same hardware from my win98 install I did see a perfomance increase in the speed at which my game ran. Load time was lessened though not noticable by me
I did notice a serious increase in frame rates it jumped up 40 fps same hardware. I was also using the latest drivers for my hardware.
I attribute the increased frames to the way win 2000 interacts with DX9. My only complaint is now my analog rudder pedals dont work. Through searching though I have found that few pedal systems do work with 2000.
I would like to know how it performs at sea trials. In monster currents, and how much draw the extra currents add. This would be awesome combined with cold fusion, but then again so would cold fusion alone.
But when I buy cellular service I just want one thing in my phone, a freaking phone.
:)
I dont care if it surfs the web, why do I need content if I'm not at home?
I dont care if i can get Brittany Spears ring tones, WTF is wrong with a standard ring?
I dont care if the display is monchrome or color
I dont care if it has Grand Turismo as the video game, or even if it has games.
I dont care if it has gps, if you dont know where you are your fscked anyways.
All these things are not gadgets, they are gimmicks. It is an effort by manufacturers to seperate a fool from his money.
To all the fools taken in, thatnks for increasing my marketshare.
For the record my cell, is a LG TM510 and it does the job it was intended, for getting and sending phone calls.
Paving the way for yet another biological weapon.
THinks this is a security risk how? Are Iraqi troops going to see these photos and recognize a rock and then scud them?
As for the list has he not heard of disinformation, why would anyone send out a list of names and addresses through P2P, email would be much more secure and alot faster. My guess is they want the list to be seen.
As for troops you think Jane or Joe America in the trenches knows every movement they are going to make. If they did we wouldn't need radio operators to coordinate. The average troop would already know where he or she should be.
You can damn well be that our government monitors what passes through their networks, it would be assinine to assume otherwise. There are blackout periods where friends that I have on ship aren't allowed to use a computer to even check their email.
Military netwroks in combat are as secure, if not more secure than any regular network, or at least as secure as a network can be.
If our troops do want to share with us the images they see when over seas, then I support them in that. It gives the people they left back home a glimpse into what has become their daily lives, it's almost like having them home.
And the ships out at sea. I read one post who said a friend of his got deployed on a days notice and went out for ten days and made giant circles in the ocean. I think they call it a readiness exercise.
Most times when a ship pulls out, the captain only has coordinates to where he is either to open his orders or radio back for them, then they are told what they are doing and where they are going.
To our troops overseas. Share away my brothers and sisters. Share away.
Regardless of wether or not we want them to do this for us, the government in other areas has seen fit to play parent to us. Motorcyclists must wear a helmet (in some states) S.S.I. for retirement.
With the estimated number of zombies out there, I think the bandwidth loss would be a small price to pay to secure the net even one iota.
Hmmm vs what. One mega conglomerate corporation that will only show the source code to you if you sell your soul to them?
Seems to me if you pay 500 coders to review code for bugs, it still does not equal 50,000 or even 5,000 who do it just because they want to contribute. Seems like it would be very difficult for foreign countries to hide those bugs.
And what of outsourcing. Does he think that software that is closed source will be anymore secure?
Regardless if they go open or closed source there will be bugs to be found, and a country that really wants to can dedicate the monies and people needed to find and exploit those bugs.
5 to 10 in the state pen.
"Get your paws off me, DAMN, filthy ape!"
YOu can get a patent on anything, even if you had nothing to do with creating or maitaining it. Just amatter of who applies and gets granted first. You could prolly patent the way software uses licensing agreements. Patent a system by which a user agrees to a license before the software is installed. Imagine the licensing fees you could collect. All for filing for a patent. Also see Acacia for more on BS digital patents.