Slashdot Mirror


Turn Real Life Into A Cartoon

Saige writes "Ever wanted to see yourself in a cartoon? Before now, there were means to turn a single image into something cartoon-like, but some folks at Microsoft Research have come up with a method to turn a video into an animated cartoon. It's not up to doing it fully automated, as you have to hand-mark various parts of the video every 10 to 15 frames, but the video of the results is quite impressive."

302 comments

  1. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    does it run in Linux?

  2. Wow. Wow. Just wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    "quite impressive" and Microsoft and not in a negative way on Slashdot.

    That's it, good night folks, I've seen it all.

    1. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by thephotoman · · Score: 1, Informative

      Indeed.

      But somebody will come up with something better and release it under the GPL. And I'll use that.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    2. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by slarshdot · · Score: 0

      What was the guys name who created it, I didn't catch it??

      --

      I'm not out of order! You're out of order! The whole freaking system's out of order!
    3. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by teklob · · Score: 1

      Since when is predicting the future 'Informative'?

    4. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by Qeantk · · Score: 0

      Since when is it not? ;)

    5. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by name773 · · Score: 1

      since the weather forecasters got it wrong consistently :)

    6. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      since "Clairvoyant" isn't in the list of moderation options?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    7. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by zsau · · Score: 4, Informative

      ... Microsoft researchers do some decent research. Not all Slashdotters are anti-Microsoft just because they can be; a lot of us don't actually like their business practices or their released software or similar.

      --
      Look out!
    8. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its interesting that on Slashdot, "real life" turns out to be video.

      In order to change real life into a cartoon, vote for Bush.

    9. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you are asking me, I think Microsoft Research should not be working on animating yourself into cartoons, but rather with their operating system and its security.

    10. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Well let's let these guys do something they actually stand a chance at.

    11. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by Penguin2212 · · Score: 1

      Let's all buy some stock in Animotion!

    12. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by skahshah · · Score: 1

      I believe Studio Artist, a graphic synthetizer that runs only on Mac for the moment just allow to do that.

    13. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by skahshah · · Score: 1

      When I say "just allow to do that", I mean it allows to do just that, among a ton of other things.

    14. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you didn't read the article in which his name was mentioned in the first paragraph?

      For the record: Michael F. Cohen, and friends.

    15. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by peawee03 · · Score: 1

      Part of research, though, is taking almost any hare-brained idea, and running with it, with the idea that you'd get some useful insight with it. You'd gotta think that a multinational corporation that doesn't even think about doing something unless it's a potentially billion-dollar market has somewhere a bit of cash that it can toss on "fun" stuff.

      Although, committing some of that cash on improving system security and performance would be useful, especially with a UI that will require a SGI supercomputer to process...

      --
      I wish I could write clever and witty sigs.
    16. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already Done like 3 years ago ppl..check it out....Microsoft aint breakin any ground http://agarwala.org/Pages/snaketoonz.html and I didn't do it..worked with this guy though. k

    17. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly. We just don't like their business practice of treating their customers as cartioon characters to be manipulated. As for their released software, this one will probably get you rooted if you scan in a video with someone in the background holding a peice of paper with the word "virus" printed on it.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    18. Re:Wow. Wow. Just wow. by slarshdot · · Score: 0

      I was being sarcastic coz it was repeated like 50 million times!!!

      --

      I'm not out of order! You're out of order! The whole freaking system's out of order!
  3. Freudian Slip by BrynM · · Score: 5, Funny
    Opps...

    "However, even the 300 frame video of the girl swinging on the money bars only needs a keyframe every 10 or 15 frames."

    I just hope they don't make it part of Wordart or something.

    --
    US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    1. Re:Freudian Slip by dealsites · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and being from Microsoft, this has the potential to be the first cartoon I've ever seen crash. Cue up the BSOD and Own3ed catoonz jokes here.

      --
      The only place to look for deals: http://www.dealsites.net/livedeals.html

    2. Re:Freudian Slip by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 4, Informative
      Cue up the BSOD...

      Still running Windows ME, I take it... For as much as a bloated whale Win2k and XP are, BSOD is history.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    3. Re:Freudian Slip by mobiGeek · · Score: 3, Insightful
      BSOD is history.
      That is (Score: +5 Slap-stick Humour), right?

      I have only had three "blue screens" on my wife's XP box, but the number of times that it spontaneously reboots (especially when using not-so-quick-switch)... it is mindboggling.

      --

      ...Beware the IDEs of Microsoft...

    4. Re:Freudian Slip by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      BSOD's in Windows 2000 are not unheard of, particularly with third-party Bluetooth drivers (I speak from experience).

    5. Re:Freudian Slip by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      Um, then don't use them.

      Any Joe Programmer can hack together a device driver that can crash your system.

      Only use WHQL certified drivers and you won't see STOP crashes.

    6. Re:Freudian Slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're such a geek, why not install and configure her windows install correctly? I haven't had a stop error with windows XP that wasn't caused by dodgy hardware.

    7. Re:Freudian Slip by shigelojoe · · Score: 3, Funny

      BSOD is history

      Technically, but that's just because they changed it to a delightful shade of indigo. Now it's a DSOISOD.

    8. Re:Freudian Slip by martinX · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be BTOD (Blue Tooth Of Death) then? Or Blue Teeth?

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    9. Re:Freudian Slip by martinX · · Score: 5, Informative

      To counter your anecdote with mine, my work-inflicted PC running XP is very stable and I run all sorts of non-standard stuff on it. Occasional programs crap out (how the hell can a 'Save as...' dialogue box be 'Not Responding', when it's owner app has been quit???), but even iMovie4 has quit under OS X 10.3.

      To summarise:
      hated '95 - buggy and unstable.
      Tolerate XP - stable.
      Always love my Mac. Just because.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    10. Re:Freudian Slip by reezle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just saw about 15 of them trying to install a D-link USB wireless card (USB) on a W2K box. If not the BSOD, then it was spontaneous reboots. Finally pulled a different one out of my pocket, and it's associated driver. (got tired of uninstall, clean cached drivers, reload software, detect hardware, BLUE-SCREEN on boot)

      Then there's my home machine that runs 2K.
      It's fine unless I plug a USB camera, Web-Cam, Scanner, or basically anything USB except a card reader into it. Heaven forbid I swap memory sticks too frequently, of it may just BS as well...

      Then there's always the customer that tries to roll back his XP after loading a Service Pack, or some daily sevurity patch, and discovers it won't boot anymore...

      Yeah, BSOD is on it's way out. (hello KDE, and Open Office) I got a Debian box on it's way to my Grandmother tomorrow morning. (for real. giggle)

    11. Re:Freudian Slip by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the auto-reboot is windows XP catching the Blue Screen and rebooting, there is a way to disable it.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    12. Re:Freudian Slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using Windows XP since shortly after Release to Manufacturing. Not a single BSoD.

      Of course that's just 1 person's positive story, but it cancels out your 1 negative story.

    13. Re:Freudian Slip by wviperw · · Score: 5, Informative

      As another poster mentioned, spontaneous rebooting is due to a 'feature' in Windows XP whereby the computer reboots rather than showing the proper BSOD.

      To turn this 'feature' off, do the following:

      1. Go to System Properties.
      2. Go to the Advanced tab and click on the Settings button in the Startup and Recovery section.
      3. Uncheck Automatically Restart.

      --
      Nothing disturbs me more than blind loyalism towards some unrealistic and over-idealistic notion of one's nationality.
    14. Re:Freudian Slip by reezle · · Score: 3, Funny

      All I can say to this is:

      http://sbnsor.com/funny/macowner.mpg

    15. Re:Freudian Slip by Twilight1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Only use WHQL certified drivers and you won't see STOP crashes.

      While there is some truth to this, if you do this you will end up running very old (and sometimes quite buggy) video drivers. I haven't seen any recent video drivers that are WHQL certified. At least, not nVidia drivers. I suspect this is the same case with ATI as well. Probably not as much so for run-of-the-mill 2D cards.

      While I've always loved to joke about how Windows blue screens at the drop of the hat, I have to say that XP has been relatively stable, both at work and at home.

      The only time I've had my XP box regularly bluescreen was when I was using a quad-head configuration (two dual-head nVidia cards, one AGP, the other PCI) and booting into Linux. If I did a warm reboot from Linux into Windows, it would bluescreen every time. Power off the system, and it would boot up fine. I suspect someone was making some incorrect assumptions the state of video RAM when initializing the drivers.

      -Twilight1

    16. Re:Freudian Slip by jrockway · · Score: 1

      It's stable if you have the task manager. But on the locked down workstations in the computer lab, IE freezes them solid all the time. All that's required is a logout-login, but try telling that to the person that just lost all their data. (I do try, and then I get yelled at. I like working in the mac labs...)

      --
      My other car is first.
    17. Re:Freudian Slip by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Cue up the BSOD and Own3ed catoonz jokes here.

      Okay, BSOD's written in the Crayon Font.

    18. Re:Freudian Slip by G-funk · · Score: 1

      I see your personal-anecdote-cum-evidence, and raise you a my xp has only ever crashed due to lousy on-board ac97 sound and copious heat put out via my gf4, and I'm running all sorts of wild shit and games.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    19. Re:Freudian Slip by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Actually, the reboot is considered a feature. If it major crashes, it will reboot to restart all your services again. I personally leave it like that for that purpose.

      My problem isn't BSOD, but I do notice that Windows will restart Explorer (blinking desktop, everything disappears, then reappears) all the time.

      That said, I finally got the video file downloaded from the article, and it IS pretty darn cool, although it will be a while before we see any actual product that does this.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    20. Re:Freudian Slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it's associated driver
      on it's way

      "its".

      There are others (e.g., "sevurity"), but they are probably just typos.

    21. Re:Freudian Slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its because his wife actually installed all kinds of malware and other assorted crap that is fucking up her system. What he really doesn't know is that she did this because her secret lover that she met over the Internet promised her that it would allow her to kill her husband.

    22. Re:Freudian Slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is (Score: +5 Slap-stick Humour), right?

      No different than your (Score: +4 Lying-out-my-ass-to-get-Karma Points) though, right?

    23. Re:Freudian Slip by polecat_redux · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Tolerate XP - stable.

      It looks like you may need to try Windows 2000 - I've never had a problem with it. Supposedly, it's not for widespread desktop use, but it has the stability of NT, the compatibility of 9x (not ME), and none of the bells and whistles of XP... perfect.

      Oh yeah, heil Linux.

    24. Re:Freudian Slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No possesive 's is allowed for the word "it" ?

      Since when?

      -Those who can't do, try to teach...

    25. Re:Freudian Slip by randyest · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen any recent video drivers that are WHQL certified. At least, not nVidia drivers.

      Eh? The 61.76 drivers from nvidia are whql-certified. In fact, all released (non-beta) nvidia drivers are whql-certified. Perhaps you're thinking of ATI? I wouldn't know about that.

      But I challenge you to point to a non-beta nvidia driver release in the last 3 years that wasn't whql certified.

      --
      everything in moderation
    26. Re:Freudian Slip by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      It's worth it -- clicky

    27. Re:Freudian Slip by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      The "Save as..." question is easy. Your drive was busy or is having a problem, you went into a directory with too much stuff in it, or a number of related things.

      Or, in the case of my girlfriend's XP machine, it did it just because. :)

      She got really upset a few days ago. Her printer disappeared. No real reason for it, it just stopped printing. It said it was there, it would self-test from the button, it just wouldn't do anything from the PC. She called me at work, so I told her to reboot. That usually fixed it before. This time, I had to uninstall and reinstall the drivers. WTF?

      To add to the Pro-Linux spin of this site, I just did something *REALLY* cool. I downloaded clusterssh, and installed it on my Linux box. I have a bunch of servers to make the same change to, and a friend had sent me the link a few months ago. I just had windows open to 94 servers, and did the same change on every one of them simultaniously. I'd be afraid to have 94 (98 with a shell, cssh input box, browser, and email program) open on any Windows machine.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    28. Re:Freudian Slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you can find your answers at alt.possessive.its.has.no.apostrophe.

    29. Re:Freudian Slip by dhakbar · · Score: 0

      Since forever? it's = it is its = possessive form ot "it"

    30. Re:Freudian Slip by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "That is (Score: +5 Slap-stick Humour), right?"

      For some yes, for a lot of others, no. If XP or 2k ever caused me to lose a multi-day-long-render, you bet ur ass I'd toss it without a second thought.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    31. Re:Freudian Slip by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "As another poster mentioned, spontaneous rebooting is due to a 'feature' in Windows XP whereby the computer reboots rather than showing the proper BSOD."

      Some dude used this little detail to try to tell me my computer was secretly unstable. Like I wouldn't notice that all my apps etc are closed. Moron.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    32. Re:Freudian Slip by Naffer · · Score: 1

      Not always. The 61.76 drivers are WHQL certified for all of the 6800 cards but not for my 5900u.

    33. Re:Freudian Slip by sweede · · Score: 1

      omg that just owned everything.. the best part is now at work i use a Mac (OS/X) and I HATE IT !

      --
      I follow the SDK and GDN principles.. Spelling Dont Kount, Grammer Dont Neither
    34. Re:Freudian Slip by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      You joke, but I honestly think I could die from looking at all the spyware on my girlfriend's PC. My little old linux laptop runs five times faster than hers, and it's 4 years older. But she just won't make the switch. Something about being able to play this really old game that probably works under WINE.

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    35. Re:Freudian Slip by BancBoy · · Score: 1

      Banner day on Slashdot. Not only do we have a pro Microsoft comment in the summary, but a comment moderated Informative on how to RESTORE the Blue Screen of Death. Anyone know how I can replace my PowerBook's kernel panics with the death chimes of my old Mac?

      --
      [UID-HeinzIntel]
    36. Re:Freudian Slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno which version of XP your running. Is this a clean install? If not, then don't bitch. In order to remove the BSODs, MS had to remove lots of its backward compatibility... so if you have a clean install on XP, you NEVER see a BSOD. I've had computer hang once or twice, from which I rebooted, and found nothing out of place, 'cept a small user preference here or there. Say whatever you want about MS, but XP is without doubt the most stable home OS from MS thus far.

    37. Re:Freudian Slip by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have only had three "blue screens" on my wife's XP box, but the number of times that it spontaneously reboots (especially when using not-so-quick-switch)... it is mindboggling.

      Speaking as someone who works on windows machines all day doing tech support for end users (on verticle market database frontends) I can honestly 90% of all bluescreens are caused by hardware problems or buggy device drivers.

      I've had buggy device drivers kernel panic my linux box too - so its not just a windows thing.

      I honestly can't remember the last time either my work pc (which runs Windows 2000) or my home pc which runs XP bluescreened.

    38. Re:Freudian Slip by name773 · · Score: 1

      and it's an actual newsgroup too!
      i kid you not, (link)

    39. Re:Freudian Slip by martinX · · Score: 1

      nahh, i need to use whatever the hell they give me at work :-/

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    40. Re:Freudian Slip by incog8723 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As an aside, Win2K on my box has been running stable for over 3 months, and I run all kinds of weird shit on it.

    41. Re:Freudian Slip by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 1
      I'll bite, we've been here a million times.

      The English language has some quirks. this is one of them.

      Most possessives use an apostrophe, some don't:

      • Its
      • His
      • Hers
      • Ours
      • Theirs
      • Mine
      There are possibly others, but these make a good start. Note that 'mine' doesn't even have an "s"
    42. Re:Freudian Slip by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      While there is some truth to this, if you do this you will end up running very old (and sometimes quite buggy) video drivers. I haven't seen any recent video drivers that are WHQL certified. At least, not nVidia drivers. I suspect this is the same case with ATI as well. Probably not as much so for run-of-the-mill 2D cards.

      Wow... Just... Wow.

      How about looking on ATI.com and nVidia.com?

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    43. Re:Freudian Slip by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you're thinking of ATI? I wouldn't know about that.

      ATI also release WHQL certified drivers.

      ( which aren't "old" :-P )

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    44. Re:Freudian Slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just install an adware remover? Would make her happier as her pc would run faster and would stop you from dying from looking at all the spyware on her pc...

    45. Re:Freudian Slip by Bob+Bobbinson · · Score: 1

      That could be due to a setting in Windows, that when a blue screen occurs (I think only under certain conditions), it can be set to take a memory dump (for potential debugging), in which case you will see a blue screen for as long as it takes, or it can instantly reboot (taking I think a 64k dump, or some such).

      Sometimes it can be quite handy to keep the blue screen coming up, instead of letting it just reboot, as sometimes a quick google of the error message can solve the problem (recently I've had this problem, and mostly it tends to correspond to the IDE devices, and their corresponding drivers).

      The setting is under System Propertires - Advanced - Startup and Recovery. Switching off automatically reboot will keep the BSOD.

    46. Re:Freudian Slip by Xilman · · Score: 1
      I'll bite, we've been here a million times.

      The English language has some quirks. this is one of them.

      Most possessives use an apostrophe, some don't:

      • Its
      • His
      • Hers
      • Ours
      • Theirs
      • Mine
      There are possibly others, but these make a good start. Note that 'mine' doesn't even have an "s"

      Another in standard, though somewhat archaic English is "Thine". Some dialects use "Yourn" for the second person singular, to distinguish from the plural "Yours". I've heard it used quite a bit around the Liverpool area and, indeed, use it myself moderately often but only in speech and, up to now, never in writing. I'm fairly sure this posting is the first time I've used it in text. Note that neither of these has either an apostrophe nor an 's'.

      Ob-on-topic: IMO, it doesn't matter a whit what license is used on the code written by the MSR people. The researchers are doing research, not selling apps. Now that the ideas are being published they can be implemented by anyone and the results distributed under any license. There may be patents involved, I don't know, but if so they can be circumvented (use different ideas to gain the same overall effect); accommodated (abide by Microsoft's licensing requirements); or out-lived (wait until the patents have expired).

      Paul

      --
      Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate
    47. Re:Freudian Slip by Superfluid+Blob · · Score: 1

      Netcraft comfirms - the BSOD is dying!!!

    48. Re:Freudian Slip by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 3, Informative

      No recent NVIDIA WHQL drivers?

      http://www.nvidia.com/object/winxp_2k_61.76.html

      Released July 20, 2004. Not the very latest driver, but it is definately "recent". Hell, it's less then 30 days old.

      Or how about ATI?

      http://www2.ati.com/drivers/Catalyst_46_Release_ No tes.html

      Released June 9, 2004. Also not the latest (the latest is 4.7) but not exactly old.

      So, there are indeed recent WHQL 3D drivers for both ATI and NVIDIA cards. Moreover, their new drivers are usually as good as the WHQL drivers.

    49. Re:Freudian Slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when I used XP it was quite stable but my brother upgraded and had loads of problems (he then reformated and reinstalled and the problems went away, his case is not unique), did you upgrade from 9x?

    50. Re:Freudian Slip by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1
      "It's" is a contraction of "it is" or it has".

      If you substitute the expanded form of the contraction into the sentence and it doesn't make sense, don't use the apostrophe.

      An example: "on it's way" == "on it is way" or "on it has way". Doesn't make sense, right? So leave out the apostrophe.

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    51. Re:Freudian Slip by HRH+King+Lerxst · · Score: 1

      My XP box at work blue screens about three times per week, usually the problem is listed as "Bad Pool Caller", whatever that means.

      --
      No one got beat up more often than the mimes of the old west!
    52. Re:Freudian Slip by Twilight1 · · Score: 1

      Wow... Just... Wow.

      How about looking on ATI.com and nVidia.com?

      Okay. I seem to have been incorrect here, older releases are WHQL certified. But, I spent a good 15 minutes checking the latest version from nVidia.com and I don't see any indication that it is WHQL certified.

      As for ATI, I noted that my knowledge was mere suspicion in my post. Indeed I did not and will not bother to check it. I do not, nor ever will again own any piece of ATI hardware until they decide to support Linux. *shrug*

      But, to tell you the truth, what I stated earlier was not based on the drivers I downloaded from nVidia, but rather Microsoft's own Windows Update. Windows Update (until very recently) wanted to install ("update") me to a very old nVidia driver, despite my having already downloaded and installed the latest from nVidia.

      Maybe I am completely mistaken and am recalling some other piece of hardware for which there is new (and better) drivers for which the WHQL certified version are old and have problems. Maybe I am smoking crack. Oh well...

      -Twilight1

    53. Re:Freudian Slip by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who works on windows machines all day doing tech support for end users (on verticle market database frontends) I can honestly 90% of all bluescreens are caused by hardware problems or buggy device drivers.
      Out of curiousity, is this based upon your own expert opinion or from the messages Windows gives after a crash? I personally find it mildly suspicious that every problem in Windows XP is definitely due to device drivers according to Microsoft, and yet they can't seem to tell us what device driver caused the problem...

      --
      This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    54. Re:Freudian Slip by theCoder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I agree that Win2k and XP are usually very stable, Microsoft's choice to disable the BSOD is, quite frankly, disingenuous, and causes people like the poster above to say things like the "BSOD is history". Sure, it's history because most people don't see it anymore -- their computer just spontaneously reboots. I know that was one of the first things I changed back when I upgraded to 2k (though to be fair to MS, I don't think it ever did BSOD, except when I had some bad memory, and that's hardly Windows' fault). If Windows dies, I want to know that. If the computer just reboots, I start thinking there's some sort of weird hardware problem. I don't know if that was Microsoft's intention, or if it was to just reduce the number of appearences of BSOD's to the general public.

      In any case, it doesn't really matter to me, since I only run Linux at home now :)

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    55. Re:Freudian Slip by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      A super-annoying shade of blue.

      --
      ^_^
    56. Re:Freudian Slip by Bedouin+X · · Score: 1

      If you actually read the BSOD it will tell you where the error is or what caused the error. Just look for a file extension.

      I remember I would always get a "GPF in nvid.dll" error and when I updated my nVidia drivers all was well.

      --
      Dissolve... Resolve... Evolve...
    57. Re:Freudian Slip by Mishkin · · Score: 1

      XP still has BSOD. MS just hides it with automatic restarts. If you really miss the warm blue glow of the BSOD you can turn off automatic retarts. Right click my Computer > Properties > Advanced Tab > Start and Recovery Settings > uncheck "Automatically Restart".


      Shhhh. Don't tell MS we know.

    58. Re:Freudian Slip by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      They have solitare for Linux.

    59. Re:Freudian Slip by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      As a former Windows NT4 Server, Workstation, and 2k pro support rep and current admin, I can tell you that this behavior is not normal. If it's rebooting like someone hit the reset button, you have a hardware problem. Usually, it's the motherboard or PSU. Other hardware problems will cause blue screens. If you're getting a blue screen for a few seconds followed by a reboot, you need to disable the auto reboot option in the System applet (Control panel). Then troubleshoot the blue screen now that you can actually take the time to copy down the parameters. Usually, blue screens are caused by bad hardware, incorrect drivers, or software that needs to be updated. The amount of clues or direction the blue screen provides depends on the problem. Some errors like storage system errors give very specific codes. Buggy drivers on the other hand can give nearly useless parameters. Just google the main error and hex code. If there's too many different types of articles and newsgroup posts going in different directions, try including some of the hex parameters (There's four of them) to help narrow the search down.

      -Lucas

    60. Re:Freudian Slip by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      The blue screens I get at work give me no such thing. Just MACHINE_CHECK_EXCEPTION.

      Plus a bunch of error codes that, for all my research haven't led me to anythng other than, "it might-could be a driver error". Or hardware error. But no idea what driver or what hardware

    61. Re:Freudian Slip by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Exactly. When we first got 2000 at work it took me a long time to figure out why some of our developer machines would spontaneously reboot. Finally figured out it was a new 'feature' in Win 2000 that caught the BSOD and just rebooted rather than displaying it.

      Not very handy for us IT people out here. I had users complaining that their machines just rebooted. Thought I was having electrical problems, or problems with power supplies. Nope, just Microsoft giving out even FEWER error messages than they used to.

    62. Re:Freudian Slip by randyest · · Score: 1

      Yes always. I'm afraid you're confused. Nvidia's drivers are all unified (one update for all cards.) The 61.76 drivers are WHQL certified for all nvidia cards. Being all-in-one, it would be impossible for them to be certified for only some cards and not others. MS doesn't even provide a mechanism for that.

      And I happen to have a 6900u as well. I run 61.76 also. Definitely WHQL-certified.

      --
      everything in moderation
    63. Re:Freudian Slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Cue up the BSOD
      BSOD's sleeping.
    64. Re:Freudian Slip by Lacutis · · Score: 1

      A "MACHINE_CHECK_EXCEPTION" usually means that there is something wrong with a physical component of the machine. Usually it's leaking capacitors or a damaged processor.

    65. Re:Freudian Slip by Lacutis · · Score: 1

      BAD_POOL_CALLER is most definately a device driver doing evil things with memory.

      Technet BAD_POOL_CALLER

    66. Re:Freudian Slip by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

      after looking at the m$ article, i was reminded of the desire to take an insulin injection.

    67. Re:Freudian Slip by Xilman · · Score: 1
      I forgot "Ones". There are probably more.

      Paul

      --
      Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate
    68. Re:Freudian Slip by FCAdcock · · Score: 1

      Because that is her computer and she's happy with it. She can download an adware blocker if she wants. Plus: I don't touch that machine. EVER!

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    69. Re:Freudian Slip by splorp! · · Score: 1

      I ran Windows 98 SE and had relatively few BSODs. Then, I switched to Win 2k Pro and had 1-3 BSODs/spontaneous reboots a day. This confused me as everyone had been telling me how stable Win 2k was. I heard that Win XP was even better, so I switched to Win XP Pro and had 3-5 BSODs/spontaneous reboots a day. I did search after search and finally nailed it down to my cheap-ass PNY RAM. I switched to Kingston memory and have had 0 BSODs/spontaneous reboots in 18 months. The moral? Don't buy cheap RAM.

      --
      Please don't humanize the morons around me. It makes me very uncomfortable.
    70. Re:Freudian Slip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not there anymore ...

  4. Why not? by erick99 · · Score: 1
    After reading the article it seems like something I'd like to try. The sample pics looked pretty good. It's a great idea.

    cheers,

    erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  5. I'll buy it! by Penguin2212 · · Score: 1

    Time to buy stock in Animotion...d'oh!

  6. Animatrix 2? by IanthePez · · Score: 1

    Does this give new meaning to the animatrix?

    1. Re:Animatrix 2? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:Animatrix 2? by proj_2501 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      no, but it would have made Waking Life and Bakshi's Lord of the Rings a lot easier.

    3. Re:Animatrix 2? by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      Nothing would have made Bakshi's Lord of the Rings any easier to sit through. Not even Homestar Runner-like flash animation and scripting. Okay, perhaps if Homestar was cast as Denthor and Strong Bad was Frodo.

      Though I would like to see what this software could do in a H*R kind of situation.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    4. Re:Animatrix 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea, the software is called Rotoshop and it was written by Bob Sabistan here in Austin. It's badass. Kind of like a vector video tracing tool that does keyframing and tweening. He was in talks with Adobe about releasing it, but it fell apart. He's working on A Scanner Darkly now but I don't know if he's written new software or not...

  7. Like Eyetoy? by dealsites · · Score: 1, Informative

    Sony has something similar with the EyeToy. It's doens't really make cartoons, but will put you live in the action of a video game. It probably woudn't be too hard for them to add some filters to "cartoonize" the video.
    --
    Constant deal updates. Every 10 minutes!

    1. Re:Like Eyetoy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What??? Thats what this *is*. t's the FILTER.

    2. Re:Like Eyetoy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget about toysite for the mac.
      http://www.toysight.com/

      -krakelohm

  8. Mickey Mouse... by wviperw · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always knew Microsoft was a Mickey Mouse corporation.

    --
    Nothing disturbs me more than blind loyalism towards some unrealistic and over-idealistic notion of one's nationality.
  9. Cue the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...posts from people who say you can do the same thing with sourceforge project x, y, and z AND they can get the source! Also, be sure to throw plenty of "M$" in there, it makes you look very clever.

    1. Re:Cue the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I call it AO HELL in a delicious twist!" "I refer to them as Nutscrape and Internet Exploder, respectivley." "I spell Microsoft with a dollar sign because I'm yet another cocksucker!" -Leisuretown

  10. Microsoft? by Dwedit · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So do we like Mircosoft now or what?

    1. Re:Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no.

    2. Re:Microsoft? by WarMonkey · · Score: 1


      So do we like Mircosoft now or what?

      Sometimes flowers grow in a pile of sh*t. That's no reason to go swim in a cesspool, but the wise man will still acknowledge the flower.

      --
      -- I could tell right away that she was impressed with my HUGE Slashdot Karma.
  11. Pixar envy by paiute · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bill's kid comes home crying. Seems his little schoolchum's dad Steve has a hip movie studio that makes way cool animated features. Why can't you do that, Dad? I want an animation studio! I want it right now! So Daddy Bill picks up the phone and commands that Megacorp also begin work on animation. Unfortunately, Megacorp's work ends up looking a lot like old Clutch Cargo episodes. Bill's kid cries himself to sleep.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Pixar envy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Cool animated features?" I wouldn't refer to "Finding Nemo," "Monsters Inc," or "Toy Story" as particularly "cool." Honestly, I think I've taken shits that were more interesting to watch for two goddamned hours. And I hate those "interview with Pixar" crap where some tool is like, "We spent eighty billion dollars per second to use all this processor time that could have gone towards curing cancer so we could make a movie about some goddamned useless fish and THAT MAKES US HEROES or something!"

    2. Re:Pixar envy by jackbird · · Score: 1
      Point to a recent kids movie with better writing, then. Or better character animation. And it's the same movie.

      Come on, the central conceit of Monsters (monster civilization powered off kids' screams; monsters scared to death of the kids; monster energy crisis because kids are getting harder to scare; multi-leveled examination of personal and societal anxiety ensues) is pretty incredible for a kiddie flick.

  12. Already a cartoon by introverted · · Score: 5, Funny

    My life is already quite cartoonishly silly. The only way software could make it more so would be to automatically drop an anvil on me as I fell off a cliff like Wylie Coyote.

    1. Re:Already a cartoon by __aaahtg7394 · · Score: 1

      That's Wile Coyote. Sometimes spelled "WhyMe Coyote."

    2. Re:Already a cartoon by Snocone · · Score: 1

      That's Wil E. Coyote.

      Sheesh. Kids these days...

    3. Re:Already a cartoon by UserGoogol · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    4. Re:Already a cartoon by __aaahtg7394 · · Score: 1

      You are indeed correct, sir. I have no idea where my mind was (i'd have to check with the bottle of rum, but it was found empty in the kitchen sometime this morning ;^)

  13. real life? by sgtron · · Score: 1, Funny

    My real life is like a cartoon already. A badly drawn cartoon.. but a cartoon none the less.

    --
    No todo lo que es oro brilla
  14. Similar to Waking Life... by Cranston+Snord · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Similar to Waking Life, one of my all-time favorite movies. On the dvd, there's a 20 minute segment explaining the technology behind it...very labor intensive, as every curve ultimately still had to be hand-done.

    --
    And now for something completely different...a man with three buttocks.
    1. Re:Similar to Waking Life... by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Informative

      And he's currently doing P.K. Dick's A Scanner Darkly the same way.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Similar to Waking Life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you're talking about is an old technique called Rotoscoping.

    3. Re:Similar to Waking Life... by ILL+Clinton · · Score: 2, Funny
      300 frames is 10 seconds. User draws every 10 or 15 frames. 300 divided by 15 (help me out, I'm an animator not a mathemetician,) that's about 40 drawings? That can become quite time consuming (and boring to an non-animator.)

      But here's my favorite part of the article...

      "I hope there will be a time when people will be able to use this for their home videos. But at the moment it's not a one click process," said Cohen.

      Wait a minute! Isn't that patented by Amazon!

      ILL Clinton Live Machinima Show, August 28th, NYC.

    4. Re:Similar to Waking Life... by Cloudface · · Score: 1

      Technically, Cohen seems to be doing splineoscoping rather than rotoscoping, by mapping out splines from the video and somehow fleshing them out. Cool. And personally I thought "Waking Life" appeared to be mostly Studio Artist video...

  15. I wonder what this will do for anime? by tobar+mersa · · Score: 0

    I can't imagine it will save on expenses, unless there are some things it is easier to film an actual actor doing rather than just drawing (either cell or CGI). But IANAA (I Am Not An Animator), so I could be missing something.

    But it's still very cool.

    <required_slashdot_bias>
    At least for something from Microsoft
    </required_slashdot_bias>

    --
    This sig space intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:I wonder what this will do for anime? by Fancia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is basically a way of partially automating the process of rotoscoping, which goes back to the 1930s. It's not generally used because the resulting animation looks choppier and less cartoon-like; it's the reason why Ralph Bakshi's later films (Lord of the Rings, Cool World, American Pop) generally are considered not to look as good as his previous films: they were almost entirely rotoscoped.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
    2. Re:I wonder what this will do for anime? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Well, they're making it look like a child's drawing. Anime looks much cooler. And from how long it takes Piro to update MegaTokyo sometimes, I bet there are TONS of scenes in your typical romance/comedy which are much easier to film. Of course, they'd look different, and it'd probably be harder to go from CGI to that than from cell to CGI.

      Basically, anything without supernatural elements, especially something blog-ish (like a lot of MegaTokyo) would be within reach of 3-5 hours with 2-3 people, instead of 3-5 weeks with 10-20 people. But IANAA either.

      Still, I want it to look like anime, not crayon.

      I bet the Open-Source clone will do anime before Microsoft does!

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    3. Re:I wonder what this will do for anime? by tobar+mersa · · Score: 1
      Crayon look, eh?? I didn't catch that. But then again, being the slashdoterati I am, I naturally didn't RTFA. So it looks like the joke's on me.

      Still, I want it to look like anime, not crayon.
      I couldn't agree more. Even though making it look like crayon is a first step, it's nowhere near the level that anime is at.
      I bet the Open-Source clone will do anime before Microsoft does!
      Let's hope so! Not to mention a blue hair, red eye option.
      --
      This sig space intentionally left blank.
    4. Re:I wonder what this will do for anime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really looks to me like a pastel painting rather than crayon. But yeah. It looks like something that should be on the fridge for a week or so...Before it's sent to mom's scrapbook.

      Nifty technology though, all together. It IS impressive, though it looks like a child put it out.

    5. Re:I wonder what this will do for anime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well as far as the page said or the actual clip it was supposed to look like a child made it. The narrator was talking about taking and putting his daughter into a picture she made. Of course that could be cover but still, we don't know

    6. Re:I wonder what this will do for anime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the wrong approach to anime though. It takes video and makes it look as if drawn by a retarded child. Not anything you would actually want to watch.

      What anime needs is some sort of 3-D wire frame mapping with Flash on top.

      A lot of cartoons are already being done in Flash, but there is no way to automatically switch perspectives because it's all in 2-D.

      Maybe someone will create a program which would recognize the edges and shapes of objects in 3-D, so that you can draw key frames for different sides of the object in an anime style and it can intelligently morph from one perspective to the other. That way you can take advantage of vector graphics in a 3-D environment to make some really cool cartoons that would normally require a lot of hand drawn, or CG animation. For example you could use a wire frame model of a car and paint thick lines around the edges wand fill the body solid colors to make it look cartoonish .Draw the perspective from top bottom, front back and sides and the program will understand what it should look like as it drives past.

    7. Re:I wonder what this will do for anime? by May+Kasahara · · Score: 1
      I don't recall Cool World using rotoscoping-- I always thought that Bakshi's "rotoscope period" was from the mid 70s up through the early 80s. Come to think of it, maybe Holli was rotoscoped, but the rest of the cartoon cast was too, well, cartoony.

      There are effective uses of rotoscoping (the humans in An American Tale, for instance), but the technique has to be used sparingly.

    8. Re:I wonder what this will do for anime? by Fancia · · Score: 1

      I could well be wrong about that; I haven't seen Cool World myself, I fear. You're absolutely right that rotoscoping is good sued sparingly; I recall it being striking in Wizards, with its rotoscoped World War II footage.

      --

      Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
  16. sounds cool, but... by blisspix · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'd prefer to attempt rotoscope. The results are amazing. Best example is probably Waking Life

    I tinker occasionally with animation and despite all the technology we have today, if you are a 2D/cel animator it's still an extremly slow process. But fun.

    1. Re:sounds cool, but... by JMPrice · · Score: 1

      Can you point to any sub-best examples online so we can see it in action?

  17. Physics Engine for cartoons... by argent · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll be most impressed when they have a Cartoon Physics Engine.

    1. Re:Physics Engine for cartoons... by BrynM · · Score: 3, Informative
      " I'll be most impressed when they have a Cartoon Physics Engine."
      You know, I think most of it is doable in many 3D game engines, such as id's. Sure, it would take some serious modding, but i think it could be done with some specialized entities or areas where you would only have to pay attention to a few of the laws at a time. I think you may have just given some people ideas...
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    2. Re:Physics Engine for cartoons... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      All I need to know about quantum mechanics I learned while watching Road Runner cartoons.

    3. Re:Physics Engine for cartoons... by Boglin · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd just be willing to settle for having it make my girlfriend look like Jessica Rabbit.

    4. Re:Physics Engine for cartoons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use a sock puppet.

  18. A cartoon from Microsoft? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Funny

    Didn't we already this back in 1994?

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    1. Re:A cartoon from Microsoft? by jx100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was a kickass show. I even bought the Season 4 DVD. Absolute shame it doesn't give the show a proper ending...

    2. Re:A cartoon from Microsoft? by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      holy shit i loved reboot...

      gotta remember to find the DVDs some time

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  19. Hasn't this already been done? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Funny

    I used to work at a place where some sort of technique was applied to turn the work environment into a Dilbert episode.

    1. Re:Hasn't this already been done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well then I have your job now. Still the same..

  20. Seems simple enough by cgenman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you're running at a good clip per second, that's several frames per second that you're giving it animation information. As the microsoft researcher says, it's interpolating between keyframes, smoothing for trajectory. It's probably also taking averages of color inbetween the frames, and running it through a natural media highlight algorithim. Think those oldfangled "morph" programs mixed with a photoshop filter.

    It should be doing some edge detection for the inbetween frames, but it probably isn't. I hate to say this, but this is a simple application of known and existing technologies. Nifty for the guys that made it, but not exactly groundbreaking.

    1. Re:Seems simple enough by Quarters · · Score: 1
      "I hate to say this, but this is a simple application of known and existing technologies."

      I hate to say this, but I seriously doubt that you read a one page synopsis and have 100% accurately reverse engineered the system they are using.

      "...not exactly groundbreaking."

      So, you'll have the OSS knockoff written in no time then, right?

    2. Re:Seems simple enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to say this, but this is a simple application of known and existing technologies. Nifty for the guys that made it, but not exactly groundbreaking.

      Or so you assume from casual viewing of an online demonstration. Then again you might be right, but damn... nice way to instantly write something off.

    3. Re:Seems simple enough by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      No, it's pretty obvious that this is something that an application like Commotion has been doing for years. So, three cheers if they can make the technique easy enough for kids to use, but there is nothing ground breaking going on here. And I thought Microsoft R&D was the cutting edge!

      Wake me up when Longhorn gets here, so I can rag on that, too.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    4. Re:Seems simple enough by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I re-read TFA and this time for comprehension. This is a new combination of technologies and different from rotoscoping in Commotion. If anything, I'd describe it as a cross between rotoscoping and motion tracking. So, it's a bit more original than I first thought, but nothing to cream your jeans over.

      And I mistook their childish examples for this being a product for kids. There is no product yet. Just a patent.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    5. Re:Seems simple enough by mabinogi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > I hate to say this, but this is a simple application of known and existing technologies. Nifty for the guys that made it, but not exactly groundbreaking.

      Why does everything have to be groundbreaking?
      Sometimes the most important developments are the ones that simply involve someone taking the time to put two and two together.

      "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants"
      If it's good enough for Newton, why not these guys?

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    6. Re:Seems simple enough by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      It should be doing some edge detection for the inbetween frames, but it probably isn't.
      They claim it is.
    7. Re:Seems simple enough by saden1 · · Score: 1

      If it isn't groundbreaking then it's tweaks and adaptation. There is nothing exciting about tweaks and adaptation. Admittedly, when I first read the article, I wrote it off because I've heard of something like this being done before. In fact there's was an animated movie produced in similar fashion. Maybe not the same exact method was used but it did convert a live action movie into animated movie. I think the movie was called Alive. Also, I believe Volkswagen has had commercials produced in similar fashion.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    8. Re:Seems simple enough by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I believe you're thinking of 'Waking Life'. Never seen it myself...

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    9. Re:Seems simple enough by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this, but this is a simple application of known and existing technologies. Nifty for the guys that made it, but not exactly groundbreaking.

      Don't worry. I'm sure they'll try to patent it anyways.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  21. Good results still require: by EvilCabbage · · Score: 1

    1: Artistic ability
    2: Camera ability


    That said, I'd be interested in giving this a shot for various projects.

  22. I'm not bad... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm just drawn that way.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  23. Great. by huchida · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My first thought-- oh, great. Put me out of work.

    But then I came to my senses. Of course this kind of thing would never replace traditional animation. After all, you'd still have to have actors enact the scenes to be animated, the backgrounds would have to be set up or altered, etc. Setting up a shoot of a scene to be animated could end up being more of a PITA than just animating it to begin with. Though the end result could be a cool rotoscope/Waking Life effect, it's not a "cheat" to get an animated feature without the tedious work of animating.

    1. Re:Great. by jdkane · · Score: 1

      It might be a good product to help create a live story-board, but it will never take over animation because animation is all about style. The real world will probably never translate into any current animation style ... it's so subjective.

  24. SP2 BAD, MS Cartoons GOOD? by aardwolf204 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wait, I dont get it...

    SP2 and its funky TCP/IP stack BAD
    MS Research Cartoon Videos GOOD

    Am I on the right slashdot? I just read an article about how SCO is good and everyone loves them. Whats next, slashdotters start Reading TFAs? I'm so confused, all this talk about lana swinging on the monkey bars, wheres the cowboyneal option when I need it.

    I'll just pretend that MS bought this from another company and is going to integrate it into longhorn in order to keep the competition out, yeah thats it, back to writing it M$ for me.

    Breathe in... Breathe out...

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    1. Re:SP2 BAD, MS Cartoons GOOD? by pgpckt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I think the difference is that neither Microsoft, nor the MPAA, and not even the RIAA is totally evil or without their good side. In decreasing order of likelyhood, they all occasionally redeem their overall negative reputation by doing something really cool, innovative, original, new, fair, inspiring, and dare I even say "good" (in the sense of right / wrong) .

      However, SCO is totally evil, and can do no good.

      --
      Lawrence Lessig is my personal hero.
    2. Re:SP2 BAD, MS Cartoons GOOD? by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is bad, but cartoons are good. As is mindless R&D with no commercial value.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  25. /. Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What better way to /. Microsoft than linking to page with a video.

    The only problem with this is that most people don't go to the linked pages, and the video is a .wmv

    1. Re:/. Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /. Microsoft

      Good luck with that...

  26. Oh.. by FractalPenguin · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Oh.. by stubear · · Score: 4, Informative

      Did you happen to read the article or did you automatically go into anti-Microsoft asshole mode? If you RTFA you'd see the name Michael Cohen mentioned. What's that you say? You don't recognize that name? Perhaps if you had read the link you provided you'd see these two bits of information:

      "I am also working with Michael Cohen at Microsoft Research on some graphics topics."

      and further down the page there's this:

      "Video Tooning

      Summary: We build a system for transforming an input video into a highly abstracted, spatio-temporally coherent cartoon with a range of styles. We also go a little bit further to do a free-form deformation on Tooning results for exaggeration.

      Jue Wang, Yingqing Xu, Heung-Yeung Shum and Michael Cohen. Video Tooning. ACM Trans. on Graphics (Proc. of SIGGAPH2004). (pdf) (demo video, low resolution version at 10M)

      Jue Wang, Yingqing Xu and Michael Cohen. Free-form Video Tooning Deformation. Poster on SCA2004. (pdf)"


      Yes, this guy was working on the project. However, it was part of a team effort of which Microsoft Research (or at least Michael Cohen on behalf of Microsoft Research) was a part. You might also notice that Jue Wang has worked on other projects of which Microsoft Research was a part. Perhaps he's collaborating with Microsoft Research?

    2. Re:Oh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid fuck gets modded up... how Informative your comment is. I'm sure you probably just went to Google, typed in a couple names, and pasted the link to a slashdot comment. How fucking Informative is that. I'm sorry actually, your comment had most of the information: "Oh.. this?" You are a fucking genious. But I guess with Penguin in your name, your possible motives become all too clear.

    3. Re:Oh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...did you automatically go into anti-Microsoft asshole mode?"

      And what are you doing? Your giving Microsoft too much credit for work done largely by others. Let us stop giving the credit of people to the corporations, because that only gives them an image they do not deserve. What is wrong with being anti-Microsoft? Microsoft may produce software, but when that comes with a price of freedom, jobs, security, credit where it is due, monopolies, inflated prices, inferior software, etc. then of course we will despise just about everything they do. Simple reality is that we must not buy into what small good they do if they are still doing a lot of bad. It is like a person with two personalities, you give the kind, generous one compensation for poor work that would be too difficult too ask another to do, and then the other personality will feed himself crap and spend the rest on beating the crap out of his competition. In the end, supporting this anticompetitive monstrousity is bad for us all.
      Anyone else have pity for MS? I believe it is time we get the bad personality out of MS.

    4. Re:Oh.. by FractalPenguin · · Score: 1

      Hey, I was just wanted to be an Informative. :p

  27. I don't get it by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    Real Life is already a comic?

  28. I've converted it to mpeg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone got a host for me?

  29. Not real impressed by bishop666 · · Score: 0

    The results are kind of colorful blobs. I've seen it done much better with other software and several years back. Kind of classic Microsoft. We did it last and not half as good but we were still first and the best. Who needs facts when you have spin!

    1. Re:Not real impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are always people like you that show up. What software? How is it "better"?

    2. Re:Not real impressed by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      Not all of us are as enlightened as you. Which better, older software are you referring to?

      I'm genuinely interested.

  30. Spectacular crashes by SysKoll · · Score: 0, Troll
    Somehow I am not surprised. Working under Windows already has many similarlies with a Road Runner cartoon. You get this awkward contraption and you try to use it in order to earn your food, and it always ends up in a spectacular failure followed by a painful crash.

    Windows XP my ass. They should rename it the ACME Operating System.

    Does someone else have these visions of a penguin emerging from a hole and asking "Hey, what's up, Steve" to a round-headed, baby-faced bald guy with murderous intents?

    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

    1. Re:Spectacular crashes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, they'll rename XP whatever you want, but first they'll call yo momma by her real name, 7-11. Open 24 hrs, and 0wnd by an Indian. Suck that, bitch.

    2. Re:Spectacular crashes by SysKoll · · Score: 1

      Hey, moderators, you blew it. This was humor, not MS bashing!

      --

      --
      Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

  31. Full circle? by 4minus0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Isn't it interesting how throughout the last several years we've been researching and coding like hell to take cartoon(ish) characters and make them look as realistic as possible? Look at the work that went into transforming an artist's sketches of Dr. Aki Ross et al into the very real looking characters of Final Fantasy.

    Now we're researching and coding like hell to go back the other way.

    I'm sure there's a Microsoft joke in there somewhere :)

    --
    You've got an easy breezy wind at your back...most of the time.
  32. Cohen, remember the guy? by hsa · · Score: 5, Informative

    Anybody remember this guy?

    This is one of the pioneers in computer graphics for a long time. You should remember him for his radiosity papers:

    Cohen, M. F. and Greenberg, D. P., "The Hemi-Cube: A Radiosity Solution for Complex Environments", Computer Graphics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp 31-40, 1985.

    Cohen, M. F., Chen, S. E., Wallace, J. R., and Greenberg, D. P., "A Progressive Refinement Approach to Fast Radiosity Image Generation", Computer Graphics, vol. 22, no. 4, pp 75-84, 1988.

    And his book.

    He even received SIGGRAPH award for his work

    1. Re:Cohen, remember the guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very smart fellow. Why Microsoft has him working on filters for Premiere, I have no idea.

    2. Re:Cohen, remember the guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because there is no money in graphics research that doesn't directly translate to a product your co-worker will want to buy to compliment his new digicam. That's the way corporate "research" goes.. make money now, screw the future.

    3. Re:Cohen, remember the guy? by zozzi · · Score: 2, Funny
      He even received SIGGRAPH award for his work

      What's this like? I've only ever received SIGKILL, SIGTERM, SIGINT....

      --
      ---
  33. It's a very short interview ... by jdkane · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    However I suppose the interview is not necessarily the primary section of the magazine -- Hmmm, (moving along rapidly) let's see what else they have in this issue that *may* be of interest ...

  34. Damn! by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    I thought Greg Dean was getting his own TV series.

  35. What do you mean, turn it into a cartoon? by foxtrot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Real Life is already a cartoon!

  36. What about using fitlers by syousef · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just a thought. I've played with Photoshop/Paintshop Pro and various standard filters can turn individual photos into an artistic rendering eg. Brushstrokes or Charcoal drawing. What's to stop someone from writing software that will extract each image from a video, apply the filter and then re-encode to video? Has this already been done elsewhere?

    As an aside I love the effect on pets using the charcoal filters drawing filters. The fur translates surprisingly well.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:What about using fitlers by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you read the fine article :) they say that a technique like this tends to produce a rather jittery, jumpy effect where backgrounds aren't sufficiently similar, and the noise on them moves around way too much to be aesthetically pleasing.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:What about using fitlers by tschak · · Score: 1

      It's called Adobe AfterEffects.

      --
      -tschak
    3. Re:What about using fitlers by key134 · · Score: 0
      The article mentions this actually:
      Some people say it's easy. They use the technique for still images and apply it frame-by-frame. The problem is, if you do this, the images jump all over the place. The background shakes around a lot, and each frame looks like a different drawing.

      I would like to see that too, but I don't think it would look good. This technique is a lot smoother.
    4. Re:What about using fitlers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, it has been done. Way back in the Amiga days, using V-Lab Motion for video capture/encoding and Digi-Paint offered a Arexx script pluggin so you could easily "oil-paint" a series of frames.. and before that electronically by people like "Nam June Paik" , Peer Bode, and Sherry Miller Hocking. you might enjoy some of the art here http://www.experimentaltvcenter.org/

    5. Re:What about using fitlers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you haven't seen Apple's CoreVideo preview for Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger? http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/core.html

    6. Re:What about using fitlers by gaspyy · · Score: 1

      You didn't read the artcle carefully and/or you never actually tried to do it yourself.

      The prblem with a PS filter is that it has no knowledge of time. Each drawing would be different without continuity. Given its random nature, such a filter would apply different strokes on sequential frames, even on static areas. This can be very distracting. I've seen it done, sometimes it's OK as an "animated sketch" effect, (think A-Ha, Take on Me video) but usually it doesn't look really good.

    7. Re:What about using fitlers by jeff+munkyfaces · · Score: 2, Informative

      you would need to mask out the background and have that seperatly, so it stayed static, and apply the filter only to the character.
      then you would probably want some control over how details were controlled - eyes blurring into nose/etc. if you want something that looks like it was really done by hand

      it all gets more complicated then when information is required to be passed on throughout the film.

  37. shake? digital fusion? combustion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We use a method called segmentation. We extend 2D segmentation to 3D. This creates shapes inside the video. It's as if you took a stack of photographs and then cut them with a knife as though they were a solid chunk of color,"

    hey, that's great, except any nodal based compositing program can do about the same thing (minus some of the vaguely explained 3D object creation that the article claims the program does -- i'd like to see more details on that), albeit it would take a bit more in terms of initial setup to manage (except maybe in combustion's paint tools -- those are pretty intelligently designed).

    any other compositors out there think that those splines look awful to work with? if they make beziers or b-splines it might be worth checking out.

  38. too much time... by frank86 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Microsoft have too much sparetime, they should use it too improve they're software.

    1. Re:too much time... by IANAAC · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Microsoft have too much sparetime, they should use it too improve they're software.

      Like any large company, there are many different departments handling many different things.

      Research is but one of those departments. And why deny them the ability to do further research? In the end, with what they've learned doing research it can only help their products that are already out in the market.

    2. Re:too much time... by Dominatus · · Score: 1

      How is this "insightful", it's a clear troll.

      This *IS* Microsoft software. They are coding new technology, how is this...argh..I give up...it's not even worth it..

  39. Re:let me guess by WarMonkey · · Score: 1


    So now it's just very cool. But if Microsoft applies for patent on it then it will be Evil Microsoft.

    An accomplishment is an accomplishment.
    Taking away some of your freedom is taking away some of your freedom.
    There is no inconsistency in lauding one and condemning the other.
    This is not a difficult concept.

    --
    -- I could tell right away that she was impressed with my HUGE Slashdot Karma.
  40. MOD PARENT DOWN OFFTOPIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It probably woudn't be too hard for them to add some filters to "cartoonize" the video.

    Then why the fuck don't you do it so Slashdot can write a story about you?

    Oh, is it because you don't know SHIT? IS THAT WHY??

  41. another Freudian Slip? by adpowers · · Score: 1

    BSOD is history.

    Didn't you mean "BSD is history?"

    *rimshot*

    1. Re:another Freudian Slip? by name773 · · Score: 1

      good one :)

  42. Innovative... by zxflash · · Score: 1

    Does this mean I can replace the paperclip that keeps giving me sass with an animation (derived from a video) of a man dressed up as a paperclip... Who has more free time on their hands... Me or MS???

    --

    All the torrents you could want.
  43. If I'm a mouse by stretch0611 · · Score: 1

    If I'm a mouse and use this software is Disney going to sue me?

    --
    Looking for a job?
    Want your resume written professionally?
    DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
    1. Re:If I'm a mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Sir, as Counsel for the Disney corporation, The Microsoft Corporation, SCO, The Federal Government, Enron and Halliburton, we find you to be violating the DMCA by stating the words mouse, software and Disney in the same sentence. Please refrain from these actions, and send your check for $5,000,000 to the political party of your choice as penitence. Thank you, that will be all. Oh, and we know all about those "free" MP3s on your hard drive, you THIEF. Yours Truly, Anal Ianal, Attorney at Law.

  44. 3.141 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone calm down. Great news. Might be a rumor, but this gives you cancer. Just heard it from a friend of a friend of mine that heard it from Steve Ballmer. I swear.

    Now we can all go back to hating Microsoft.

  45. Family Tree by mhollis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some time ago, Microsoft purchased a company called SoftImage. Turned out to be a good investment in 3D development and film compositing with a product called the DS.

    Meanwhile, in Tewksbury, the Avid Media Composer which ran only on the Apple Macintosh platform was ported to Windows when Microsoft made some investments in Avid. About that time Apple (unwisely) discontinued their six PCI-Slot Macintosh..

    When Avid noted that their product was dead-ended because its code basis assumed a raster that was limited to NTSC and PAL television format, they purchased SoftImage's DS in order to be able to easily produce software that will do film and high definition video.

    Microsoft doesn't make investments for nothing. I believe I can do something very close to what Microsoft is doing for Mini-DV video on any format of video or film with the Avid DS -- though for a lot more money (something like $120K USD). I would not be surprised if they got the technology from that very old investment.

    As a creative person though, I have to say I don't like the fact that the DS-Nitris will probably never run on a Macintosh. We have problems with ours that are related mostly to two issues: Operator screw-ups (expected) and Microsoft Windows XP Professional limitations, many of which do not exist in Apple's current versions of Unix.

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
    1. Re:Family Tree by randyest · · Score: 1

      Interesting post.

      Microsoft Windows XP Professional limitations

      Such as? I'm really curious.

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:Family Tree by mhollis · · Score: 1

      For workflow and data sharing (that would be video, audio, still images and the like) Avid came up with something they call the Avid Unity. We have seventeen Avid DS workstations and one Unity shared between three of them for two specific purposes that I shall not elaborate on.

      When we do file copies through the Unity from any workstation that is in the midst of a render, Windows XP Professional crashes. Cannot hit [Ctrl]-[Alt]-[Del] and end the application. Avid tells us not to do this, they cannot solve a Microsoft problem. And, since it's someone else pulling files out of your workstation's RAID, you don't usually know what happened until after someone apologizes for taking your system down.

      When we're in the middle of a long render, we cannot pop out to the desktop and do any Windows file management (organizing, cleaining up, emptying the Recycle bin, anything). Avid tells us that Windows XP multi-tasking model is not truly pre-emptively multi-tasking and that we're looking for a crash there. Generally, I've been able to [Ctrl]-[Alt]-[Del] and end the application but sometimes XP just bites the dust. This is not related to the Unity server.

      I notice a lot of screen redraw problems when the system is taxed. I have never seen Apple's OS X fail to redraw a screen. Now, maybe I've been being spoiled by using Unix but I cannot imagine why updating an operator's environment should come second to some other task. This is not related to the Unity server.

      We have been told never to print when doing a file copy. I don't ususlly do that bue we've been told that Windows XP Professional cannot run their printer drivers when doing that.

      The Avid DS is a pretty massive application and the file transfer operations are transfering a lot of data. It is very taxing of the processor, though the Nitris breakout box does a fair amount of real-time processing. I think one of the big problems is I/O from hard drives, networks and processor-intensive work can't all happen at once. But I don't see anything here that a modern operating system ought not to be able to handle.

      I suppose one could blame all of this on the Avid DS but SoftImage wrote this with partnership help from Microsoft. There is no reason why the DS software people should have not been able to deal correctly with Microsoft's APIs

      --
      Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
    3. Re:Family Tree by multimed · · Score: 1

      If it makes you feel better, we do have some similar problems, though not nearly as serious with our Mac setup. Dual G4 Macs, a Rourke SAN and Media100. Rourke blames OS X & Media100, Media100 Blames OS X & Rourke, Apple blames Media100 & Rourke. Round and round we go.

      --
      Vote Quimby.
  46. whoa..my chance to be famous.... by sussotheclown · · Score: 1

    Cool. Now I can do my own version on the Ah-ha clip...

    1. Re:whoa..my chance to be famous.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do undertstand that there'll be a whole bunch of people who come from a newer generation, who'll have no idea wtf A-HA was right? One has to wonder what "Take On Me" really means though.....

  47. LOTR Cartoon by after · · Score: 1

    One day one of my teachers kept some people after school to watch an experimental method of creating cartoons. It was Lord of The Rings, but the animated figures were toon-ized by using cell-shading and color manipulation based on edge algorithms.

    It looks pretty cool, but you can tell that it's completely fake, not from the visuals, but because the motion is too human-like.

  48. oh i know what error that is by vena · · Score: 1

    pebkac.

  49. Naw, people will just use it for PORN by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    "....and then the one-eyed snake, Captain Wiggly, enters the cave. He is so happy to be in the cave that he pukes with pleasure....."

  50. Ralph Bakshi would love this by tekrat · · Score: 1

    He spent millions painting on top of film when he did the animated Lord of the Rings in the early 80's (remember kids?), which was half-rotoscoped, half bizzare drug trip. But it was better than Cool World.

    Anyhow, this is exactly what Ralph needs -- a way to film actors, and then make it sorta' look like a cartoon. I see it now, "American Pop 2"... oy.

    Still, I spent a summer tracing from Super-8 onto paper and my results were less than spectacular, although my test film did get me some work back in the days of Liquid Television...

    Maybe someone can come up with a really good creative application for this technology and I wish them good luck!

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  51. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  52. Hey...this sounds familiar by thephotoman · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Rotoscoping, anyone? Or have we forgotten how bad Bakshi's LOTR was.

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    1. Re:Hey...this sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "Rotoscoping, anyone? Or have we forgotten how bad Bakshi's LOTR was."

      Snow White, made in 1937 (with rotoscoping), isn't
      bad at all, aside from being owned by Disney.

  53. Re:let me guess by NineNine · · Score: 1

    But also realizing that by taking away patents, you're taking away my freedom to earn money from my product as I see fit.

  54. Yeah but.... by rune2 · · Score: 1

    It's great until to realize it means clippy appearing in every frame.

  55. Not Already a cartoon by twitter · · Score: 1, Funny
    My life is already quite cartoonishly silly.

    Just do something "newsworthy" and watch what M$NBC does to it. Coyote was a genius.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Not Already a cartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      START SUCKING BOY!

      - Stallman

    2. Re:Not Already a cartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "M$NBC"?? WTF is that?

  56. Nothing new. by twitter · · Score: 1
    M$NBC has been doing this for years! There you have it, pure evil.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Nothing new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twitter, my little boy, you have been gone too long. You better start sucking my dick again or else I am going to be very mad. And I don't mean the quick sucky sucky that you do, but I want you to do it like your job is at stake, which it is. Now get back to work boy!

      - Stallman

    2. Re:Nothing new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "M$NBC"?? Haw, haw, haw!!!! I GET IT!!! as in "M$" and "NBC", right??? Haw, haw haw!!!!!!!!!

      OMFG twitter, yuo r teh bombz!!!!!1!

  57. Microsoft used to have another product... by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1

    Microsoft used to have "Comic Chat" which turned IRC into comic strips. It's been put to good use by our friends at Jerkcity

  58. O great.... by thegoogler · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now i have to put up with DIGITAL cosplayers, "hey look, i edited myself to look like some anime character" i'm going to LOVE this....

  59. Great by bedouin · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to see how many people abuse this whenever (if ever) it's integrated into Microsoft's lame Movie Maker program. Prepare knock-offs of Ah-Ha's "Take on Me" video in 3, 2, 1 . . .

    And you know some obnoxious dad who films every moment of his kid's life will just love this. Prepare to be bored whenever your friend of family member sends you his oh-not-so interesting home movies saturated with this, and other effects (sometimes better is less, okay?)

    That said, it looks kind of cool, though I suspect it has been done before.

  60. Another concept.. by sinner0423 · · Score: 1

    If you guys dig this, you may also get in to NPRQuake which takes quake 1, and turns it in to sketch art. It works on the shareware Q1 client, and doesn't require the amount of user intervention that this MS project does.

    Still, it is an interesting concept.. and as I understand, the playstation2 is a huge seller. I had no idea there was such a market for this stuff.

    1. Re:Another concept.. by sinner0423 · · Score: 1

      oops. this is what i get for hitting the submit instead of preview.. sorry :P

  61. Link to PDF by squidfrog · · Score: 1

    Here's the associated paper (PDF).

  62. I'm Disappointed. by injury0314 · · Score: 1

    I was hoping for near cel-shading quality.

    But it'd be nice to have the Waking Life http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0243017/ footages re-done using this, and then we can compare. I bet it'd become boring before it reaches a thousand frames.

  63. Tell Elmo, muppets are "Old School" by macz · · Score: 1

    How long before a crappy kids show comes along which derives it's sappy content EXCLUSIVELY from this one effect... like gen-locking in Blues Clues.
    At least they can pay an extra scale to be whichever Tele-Tubbie doesn't show up that day.

    Yeeesh.

    --
    ...But I digress. TREMBLE PUNY HUMANS!ONE DAY MY SPECIES WILL DESTROY YOU ALL!
  64. Re:let me guess by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    No, you're still free to earn money from your product just as you see fit. Unless your "product" is a patent.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  65. MS got rid of the blue screen in XP... by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    ...because they made the computer reboot before it could show up. And if you're clever or lucky enough to avoid that, you'll see that they changed the colour to black! (at least that is what I observed)

    Shoulda changed it to another colour though because the BSOD acronym still fits...oh well.

    The new and improved B(lack)SOD includes brand new, even more vague and useless error messages too! Yay! At least they are MUCH less common than in Win9x/Me or NT.

    Anyways, I saw the sample animation...looks way cool but it looks like it is far from automatic. It does really make the rotoscoping process much faster and doesn't seem to impede too much on the "creativity" aspect--looks like it allows a lot of latitude to apply your own artistic style.

    Don't think it'll ever replace "pure" animation (manually done frame by frame). It just has this "stiff" characteristic. It's hard to explain, but it is kinda like how you can almost always tell when a drawing is traced from a photograph. "Real" animation seems to add warmth and character--for all the computer rendering in Shrek for example, the actual character animation was manually done by artists with mice and digitiser pads at workstations (ie the position of the characters were manually set every few frames--computers did the rendering, camera movements, lighting, in-betweens etc).

    1. Re:MS got rid of the blue screen in XP... by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Actually, it still is blue. They just changed the font into some hideous yellow serifed font. And changed their wording. It doesn't look as... er.. "professional"... I think all of /. should right microsoft, and ask them for their nice fixedsys/system BSOD font back. Or at least an option.

      Seriously though, I've been running XP Pro for about a year and a half and have seen maybe 4 BSODs, 2 of them this week (and completely my fault, messing with the boot files, and deleting a system file that I shouldn't have). XP has never done the spontanious reboot on me either. All it ever does is the explorer restart thing, which isn't bad since it doesn't close apps, and no data is lost.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  66. howabout the other way around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just waiting for the ability to turn cartoons into real life.

    MMmm... tentacle porn and catgirls.

    Oh, wait. Did I say that out loud?

  67. Not a big leap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This must be an adaptation of the technology they used to turn Windows 2000 into Windows XP.

  68. NICE introduction... by JasdonLe · · Score: 1
    "Hey dad, can I go outside and play?" That's what most kids say to their parents. But one day Michael Cohen's daughter said, "Hey, dad, can I go into my picture and play?" And he said yes.

    Worst...Introduction...Ever!

    --
    ** A Sketch a Week **
    http://www.sketchplease.com
  69. safe mode by AbsolutCamper · · Score: 1

    ASE's safe mode really needs this software. It'd be making fun of stupid people, but in video.

  70. Astroturfing, already? by Doches · · Score: 1

    http://slashdot.org/articles/04/08/12/1749235.shtm l?tid=88&tid=1

    Wow. And it's still on the front page. I smell salmon.

    1. Re:Astroturfing, already? by Saige · · Score: 1

      Oh gee, thanks for suggesting that I am somehow working for those idiotic bastards at SCO. Of course, five minutes looking at my posting history and journal articles should demonstrate clearly that is not the case. SCO sucks and I hope the company collapses.

      Yes, I do work at MS, but I did not submit this to 'astroturf' or whatever - I saw this due to an internal link, thought it was pretty interesting and cool, and thought perhaps some others might find that to also be the case. I've been a Slashdotter for a lot longer than working for my current employer.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
  71. Microsoft's Not Really the 'Innovator' Here Anyway by bedouin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So basically MS is taking credit for work largely done by three Asian graduate students? Kind of like three Ph.D. students at Harvard finding a cure for AIDS, and then Harvard claiming it's their discovery.

    Cohen's colleagues get zero name recognition in the MS article. Kind of awkward don't you think? It comes off as if the other workers' contributions are insignificant.

    The parent is still very informative. We wouldn't have even known about the other contributors if it weren't for him.

    And anyone who has worked under a big-name advisor on a project knows they have a tendency to take credit for more than they actually did, especially when foreign students are involved.

  72. Life is Cartoons!!! by richhall · · Score: 1
  73. So does this mean... by AvantLegion · · Score: 5, Funny
    ... that all porn can potentially be converted to hentai?

    1. Re:So does this mean... by shfted! · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but all the naughty tentacles will look like Bill's tongue.

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
  74. Microsoft by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    DRM DCMA Blue Screen of Death Security holes M$ Windoze Unstable Patch Is there anything I left out ?

    1. Re:Microsoft by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      All the above in form of cartoons?

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  75. Possibly better tecnique by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

    Why do the "Colorising" trick that a pain to keep correct and looks like junk any way. Most animation uses limited set of colors. So why noy use "Color Vectorising". Adobe and others have this function. Then back to a picture. Make it easer and no adjustment to keep it in line so to speak. Would look better than this.

  76. It does indeed look cool... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    Does it remind anyone else of the Dire Straits "Money For Nothing" video? Especially the picture of the girl with stripes on her trousers?

  77. Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The result is quite impressive"?

    No it's not. It's about as impressive as any number of basic video effects that can be applied in near-real-time.

  78. Waking Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought waking life was made with similar retroscoping software, developed by a group in Texas. So it would have made in harder for them.

    The software can pair two strokes over keyframes to follow the action between, more in tune with painting.

    http://tinyurl.com/4mmss (old wired article)

  79. Re:Family Tree - Expression! by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1

    This probably also uses technology Microsoft got when they bought Creature House. They had two products: "Expression", a natural-media vector package (Expression : Illustrator :: Painter : Photoshop), and, more importantly, "Living Cels", an animation program that applied the same natural-media techniques involved in Expression to animation. I miss Expression.

    --
    egypt urnash minimal art.
  80. Thats not informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its speculation, just because its GPL doesn't make it a great piece of software. Oh wait this is /. "Micro$oft si teh suxor." My lord the trolling that takes place these days.

  81. Shrek's your mama by jmlyle · · Score: 1

    >> Shrek for example, the actual character animation was manually done by artists with mice and digitiser pads at workstations (ie the position of the characters were manually set every few frames--computers did the rendering, camera movements, lighting, in-betweens etc).

    That must be why I find it so difficult to watch Shrek. It gives me a headache, because the visual style is so crisp and detailed, but the character motion is so sloppy and irregular.

    --
    I have misplaced my pants.
  82. Uh, yeah Microsoft is by Raistlin99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article was written by some tech writer as a PR piece. Cohen was the biggest name on list of people who wrote the paper. Of the other three, two appear to work for Microsoft Research in Asia and the other is a grad student who also works with Microsoft Research in Asia. Oh my God, you mean a lowly tech writer didn't give full credit but the paper did? That's absurd. Oh and if you can't find the paper yourself by going to Cohen's webpage linked in the article its Video Tooning

    And by checking the authors we have Yingqing Xu and Heung-Yeung Shum as well as Cohen and Jue Wang from above. So we have 3 PhDs working for Microsoft and a doctoral student working at Microsoft doing research, and its Microsoft stealing credit?

    Troll. And you have a fairly low UID compared to most I see in these threads

    --
    I/O, I/O, its off to disk I go, with a read and a write, and a bit and a byte, I/O, I/O, I/O, I/O
    1. Re:Uh, yeah Microsoft is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Troll. And you have a fairly low UID compared to most I see in these threads

      I see a lot of low UIDs in Slashdot threads, and they're usually the worst for taking sides. If you have an ID of less than 50,000 then you're probably among the more socially inept people on this planet!

    2. Re:Uh, yeah Microsoft is by bedouin · · Score: 1

      A lowly tech writer would be someone working for peanuts at relatively unknown magazines, newspapers, and news sites. Suzanne Ross just writes news releases disguised as 'articles' for MS (do a search for her name on research.microsoft.com, she has a slew of articles to her name).

      Students or not, I find it interesting that three Asian researchers get no credit in the article, while Cohen gets the spotlight. Mentioning their names in the article wouldn't have required much effort. If I were Cohen's colleagues I'd be a bit upset after doing equal, if not more work than him but receiving no recognition from my employer. Something tells me that if they weren't 'foreigners' they'd be sharing equal time with Cohen.

      And no, most people quickly reviewing a news blurb aren't going to hunt down the paper on Cohen's website to find out who his other colleagues are.

      So we have 3 PhDs working for Microsoft and a doctoral student working at Microsoft doing research, and its Microsoft stealing credit?

      If I were reading an academic paper on linguistics, and discovered it was made possible by a research grant from General Mills, do you think I'd give General Mills credit, or the author(s) of the article?

      Troll. And you have a fairly low UID compared to most I see in these threads

      Oh no! Just a hint, if you're going to argue try not to begin with strong statements, then end with something really moronic. It kind of destroys the credibility you were working to build.

    3. Re:Uh, yeah Microsoft is by Synistar · · Score: 1

      What does UID have to do with anything?

    4. Re:Uh, yeah Microsoft is by Raistlin99 · · Score: 1

      Students or not, I find it interesting that three Asian researchers get no credit in the article, while Cohen gets the spotlight. Mentioning their names in the article wouldn't have required much effort. If I were Cohen's colleagues I'd be a bit upset after doing equal, if not more work than him but receiving no recognition from my employer. Something tells me that if they weren't 'foreigners' they'd be sharing equal time with Cohen.

      They get a mention in passing right after we are introduced to Cohen. If the article is to be believed Cohen was the one who came up with the idea for the research projecct, which isn't to far out there considering his graphics work. And as I stated earlier he is a pretty decent sized name in graphics considering he won the SIGGRAPH award and chaired a couple confrences

      And no, most people quickly reviewing a news blurb aren't going to hunt down the paper on Cohen's website to find out who his other colleagues are.

      So what we have is someone who quickly scans the article, comes into to a discussion about it, and then makes a post without having looked at the background information even if it can be found by clicking one link in the article, but is willing to believe another post making it look like Microsoft didn't do much even if researching that post would have led to the conclusion I came up with. But this is /., so I'm not to suprised.

      If I were reading an academic paper on linguistics, and discovered it was made possible by a research grant from General Mills, do you think I'd give General Mills credit, or the author(s) of the article?

      Thats a different scenario, Microsoft apparently didn't hand out a grant to a university. They handed out a paycheck to its employees. So yes Microsoft does indeed deserve some of the credit. I'm sure Microsoft gets to approve the work done by its researchers. And even if it was just a grant Microsoft would still deserve some credit for providing money for the research to continue, at least thats the way it worked at my university.

      Just a hint, if you're going to argue try not to begin with strong statements, then end with something really moronic. It kind of destroys the credibility you were working to build.

      Hey, I call them like I see them. I saw someone who didn't do any real research before claiming academic dishonesty posting on a forum. Thats pretty trollish, even if it's during everyone's favorite game, "Lets bash Micro$oft".

      --
      I/O, I/O, its off to disk I go, with a read and a write, and a bit and a byte, I/O, I/O, I/O, I/O
    5. Re:Uh, yeah Microsoft is by Raistlin99 · · Score: 1

      Well, for people with low UIDs you don't get as much fanboy kneejerk reactions, or accusations of academic dishonesty from what I can see. It's not a hard and fast rule, but it seems to work most of the time. I don't post often and I try to read articles and such and read some background on it. But maybe I'm wasting my time by doing all of that on /.

      --
      I/O, I/O, its off to disk I go, with a read and a write, and a bit and a byte, I/O, I/O, I/O, I/O
  83. It ain't all that by epepke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although the MS Research work is interesting and pretty good, it was only one of several papers this year that described techniques that could produce similar effects. Good quality work in this area has been going on since the 1997 paper by Litwinowicz, and the techniques have been used in industry.

    I hate Microsoft products as much as the next guy, but MS research does do a lot of good work. However, it's usually in collaboration with research universities, as in this year's papers by Agarwala et. al. and Wang et. al. So it's not as if these papers just magically emerged from the bowels of MS.

    Also, the two biggest names in CG, Blinn and Kajiya, have published jack by comparison since they went to MS. Blinn isn't even followed by an entorage of groupies any more.

  84. Jessica Rabbit by payndz · · Score: 1

    Woohoo! Now I can finally put myself into some animated pr0n!

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  85. Got it.... by mseeger · · Score: 4, Funny
    Ever wanted to see yourself in a cartoon?

    Not again, thanks! I already found it here.

    Regards, Martin

  86. at bath university by n__0 · · Score: 1

    at bath university a similar thing is being done: http://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/~vision/cartoon/

  87. Re:Family Tree - Expression! by EddWo · · Score: 1

    So why don't you download the latest version from Microsoft

    --
    "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
  88. Thanks Microsoft... by hashwolf · · Score: 1

    I just can't wait to transform these videos into cartoons.

    --
    - "They misunderestimated me."
  89. Link to the full paper by while(true) · · Score: 1

    Here's the full paper that was presented at SIGGRAPH 2004.

  90. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahem, Bob Sabiston? Rotoshop anyone?

  91. Sounds great by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    ... so when can I pirate it?

    From the article audio.. 'a symantic relationship?' What does that have to do with video?

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  92. Real Life? by metalligoth · · Score: 1

    Real Life Comic? You mean this?

  93. Wow. by Xyl3ne · · Score: 1

    That's pretty damn stupid.

  94. Waking Life? by TrentL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This isn't that impressive in 2004. If anyone has seen Richard Linklater's Waking Life, they did this kind of thing in 2001.

    1. Re:Waking Life? by Evangelion · · Score: 4, Informative


      That's called Rotoscoping, and it's been around since before the original Lord of the Rings movie by Ralph Bakashi (1978).

      That's not what the article was about, really, if you read it. Rotoscoping is modifying each frame individually, in a manner similar to how you do a cartoon.

      If you RTFA (fat chance, I know), the article addresses this: "In addition, current techniques to turn videos into cartoons are very labor intensive; the artist has to render each frame by hand. And it still doesn't solve the 'jumping' problem.".

    2. Re:Waking Life? by alecks · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but in Waking Life they had a team of animators each doing one character; tracing and coloring over the video frame. If you would have RTFA, you'd've known that they mention this and that this process sometimes creates a "jumping" effect. (less so by proffessionals spending lots of time on each frame) They didn't do this by painting over the frames.

    3. Re:Waking Life? by cygnus · · Score: 1
      If you RTFA (fat chance, I know), the article addresses this: "In addition, current techniques to turn videos into cartoons are very labor intensive; the artist has to render each frame by hand. And it still doesn't solve the 'jumping' problem.".
      Waking Life's software used keyframes and interpolation, too. you should watch the "Making of" documentary.
      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    4. Re:Waking Life? by zonker · · Score: 0

      actually rotoscoping is *much* older than that...

      max fleisher developed the technique for koko the clown (out of the inkwell) in 1916.

  95. Bah. Been done before by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    Big deal. Doctor Appleby and Larry, Moe and Curly did this back in 1962.

  96. LOTR by ledow · · Score: 1

    I was expecting this to be something along the lines of the LOTR original 70's "cartoon movie" but it's more like edge detection and then crayon in the shape. Although clever, hardly groundbreaking, especially as it's not even automatic.

    When they can feed in a film and get out something like the LOTR animation out of it without having to fiddle every single second of footage, maybe then it'll have a use.

  97. Next up by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Homemade Hentai anime.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  98. All right! by Performaman · · Score: 0

    Now we can have fun with "Alien vs BSA Copyright Ferret!"

    --

    I have gas, but my car uses petrol.
  99. There is loads of talent at Microsoft by rben · · Score: 1

    It's just a shame that Microsoft doesn't let their people compete using their full talents and insists on using bully tactics.

    I've met lots of bright people that work at Microsoft and I've no doubt that MS could make loads of money letting them do their thing. Instead any project that threatens the MS Office/Windows cash cow is put on the back burner indefinately.

    This is one of the reasons that monopolies are so bad for the economy and even the people who work for them. Even the stockholders of Microsoft would be better off, IMHO, if the company was split into several different units, say Operating Systems, Applications, Games, Hardware, and Languages. The areas in which these seperate units would compete would just result in more innovation and better products.

    Look at how much the Internet has slowed down since IE "won". The progress we all expected in multimedia and innovative interfaces has been slowed to a crawl.

    I can only hope that some brave soul in the Justice department of the next administration will take his job seriously and work to break up monopolies instead of seeking some kind of accomodation with them. We'll all be better off for it.

    --

    -All that is gold does not glitter - Tolkien
    www.ra

  100. Wow! Impressive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish i could swing like that when I was 5yo.

  101. A Scanner Darkly by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's great news. I liked the book, it was a very cutting portrayal of the idiocy of the "drug war", AND the idiocy of being a total stoner. PKD was one of the best, no doubt about it.

    The dedication (to all his friends who'd died, been permanently injured, or gone to jail because of their drug habits) was one of the saddest things I've ever read.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:A Scanner Darkly by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Well... Let's wait and see how good a treatment of A Scanner Darkly it is. Hollywood's batting average on PKD works hasn't been great.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  102. Follow-on by Odonian · · Score: 1

    For their next research project, they are looking at turning Windows into an operating system!

  103. What we'd REALLY NEED... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Is a way for amateurs to make Anime movies or episodes without spending trillion dollars on software, or trillions of hours on 3D modelling. ^_^ My 2 cents.

  104. Don't we already have this? by NIN1385 · · Score: 1

    Isn't this called ACID?

    --

    If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
  105. Microsoft's Previous Animation Venture by RonBurk · · Score: 1
    If you have to keyframe every half second, then you can pretty much already get this effect using Hash's Animation:Master (www.hash.com).

    Oddly enough, the author of A:M relates that Microsoft actually owned the source code to Animation:Master some years back. Apparently, he got pissed off, quit, and filed a lawsuit to get the code back. Microsoft strange story #298.

  106. Re:Family Tree - Expression! by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1

    I did - but making it available like this gives me the suspicion that there won't be an Expression 4. And whatever it appears as in the future, I bet there won't be a Mac version...

    --
    egypt urnash minimal art.
  107. Twitter: Life and times of a petulant cock-gobbler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twitter, you're a petulant cock-gobbling sycophant to Linux Torvaldyos! Quit taking DP from ESR and RMS's feculent cocks and why don't you try to stop sucking quite so much? M$NBC OhohoHOHOOH LOLORRRSZ YOUR SO CLEVER YOU FUCK! Get out of your parents' basement and see the real world - maybe then you'll see how pathetic you sound, with your neverending stream of bullshit about how Microsoft is stalking you. Wasn't it you who said that Microsoft believes your insane ranting is actually a threat to them, so they PAY PEOPLE to reply to you on Slashdot? No sir, I don't get any money. I do it for the love. Someone has to go up against your paranoid whining. So get back in your cage and shut the fuck up already.

  108. See Life as a Cartoon by ripcrd · · Score: 1

    Hey, my life is already like a cartoon. What with the Acme products strewn around, safes falling on me, and some of the weird characters I work with that have speech impediments. This is the last thing I need.

    --
    --Somewhere there is a village missing an idiot.
  109. Re:let me guess by WarMonkey · · Score: 1


    But also realizing that by taking away patents, you're taking away my freedom to earn money from my product as I see fit.

    It is a misconception to assume that you have any moral right to forbid someone to do something that does not harm you directly.

    Example:Stealing from your restaurant would be harming you directly.

    Opening a restaurant across the street is mere competition.

    Patents are like saying "You can't open a restaurant across the street from me because the government granted me the privilege of being the only business allowed to wrap hamburgers in paper and put them in sacks, which nobody would have thought of if it wasn't for my heroic innovation!"

    --
    -- I could tell right away that she was impressed with my HUGE Slashdot Karma.
  110. Micros~1's opinion of their customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I hope there will be a time when people will be able to use this for their home videos. But at the moment it's not a one click process," said Cohen.

    How F*cking patronising does he want to be!? This one line more than anything else sums up microsofts entire view of their users imvho.