If it's going to be rendered as a hash anyway, what's the difference between that and a bad password?
Why invest in expensive hardware that will be circumvented anyway? Six months after any technology is mandated, someone finds a workaround and the hardware is useless, whether via writing around the edge with a Sharpie or using a 3d printed eyeball.
Your insistence on complete security is unattainable anyway. People remain people no matter what we do. Modern thinking on this is "assumed breach". Protect what is important, use automation to make the rest irrelevant.
The whole DoD budget for multiple years wouldn't permit "trillions" to disappear. The DoD gets audited constantly, you just aren't paying attention.
Lastly, when briefing Congress, the DoD uniformly briefs out issues of national survival, while NASA, however much you like it, is a "nice to have" cost center with no criticality.
Each case is different, but you have no blanket right to publish sex tapes.
Let's say this tape fell into the hands of the National Enquirer. They would have printed a story about the existence of the tape (probably lurid) and would have included a screen grab of a clothed portion of it, at most. The lawyers would have been happy, because in litigation of that sort, truth is an absolute defense and all they'd have to do is show the sex tape in court. But, they also know that the tape violates community standards for public display and would fall into one of those First Amendment exceptions that Wikipedia covers pretty well. Instead, Nick Denton got himself destroyed. This is why you hire lawyers and listen to them, if you want to survive.
My own kids, I have a hard time understanding their lack of ethics and social mores. After all, the example I have given them over the years is consistent with how I would like them to behave in public. I get on them about it and I get some results (they are 21 and 18), but there are lots of others who don't get that criticism. I suppose that has a lot to do with it.
Yup, the one at the outlet mall. Very much recommended, based on my experience. I was only on vacation in MN and I am not a native, but I was taken there by a native, so they must like it too.
The President can't "illegally fire" someone. That issue was settled back in the 1860s and 1870s with the impeachment of Johnson and subsequent court cases - that was essentially what his impeachment was all about, at least publicly advertised as. The Executive retains the absolute right to purge Executive Branch personnel.
Do you have Office on it? Seems to increase the minimum a bit. I do. There are some services I could disable (I haven't given the system aggressive optimization) but I don't think i'm going to get back 1.25GB.
First: North Branch MN, outside the Minneapolis/St. Paul metro area, to the north about an hour. It's rural. Instant service at the counter. They ran the soda fountain behind the counter, which was in tune. The popcorn was great. Theater was clean. Floor not sticky. Movie was fun to watch with the 10 other people in the theater. Good sound and video.
Second: White Marsh, MD, within Baltimore County and about 10 minutes from the Baltimore Inner Harbor. Had to wait 12 minutes for tickets because of a line. No explanation for the line. Then, skipped the popcorn because there was a 20-25 min line for that. This particular theater has a rewards program, meaning that one of the popcorn lines is reserved for people who pay an extra fee. Came out a half hour into the picture (chick flick, wasn't for me, so I found the trip out more interesting than listening to the movie) and still waited 5 mins for popcorn. Stale. Got a drink too, but had to dispense it myself. Drink machines were all sticky and semi-functional - some of those new Coke machines that are supposed to be so great - but are always out of service for one reason or another. Once in the movie, floor was sticky. About 15 people in the theater this time, more or less. Other patrons had BO and were leaning so far back in their seats it was hitting my knees, so I had to move. People talking during the movie - seems to be an ethnic thing in Baltimore, talking over the movie. Unpleasant theater experience overall.
#2 is more like my other recent experiences than #1. Makes a great argument for home theater. Sorry, Cameron.
Distributing classified e-mail on an unsecured, unapproved open Internet server, in violation of Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f). No one denies this now.
Trump is a good negotiator because he spent most of his life fighting with unions and city government(s) to get what he wanted and make money. There is no way to have any success in that business - particularly in New York - without steely resolve to get what you want through whatever means are available.
I can excuse you, if you have never tried to do anything with unions and government, for perhaps believing this is easy.
*I* sound like an idiot? Perhaps. You sound like you're off your meds. "The world is not going to let..." oh please, conspiracy theories are great, aren't they?
Don't be retarded, people will continue to do what is in their economic interest. Trump will change what that means. The result cannot be determined at this time, because if you think you have a crystal ball, you really are nuts.
I think you strongly misread Trump's motivations and likely response to an act of Russian aggression. I don't think Putin misunderstands, though. He can see clearly through the NATO talk.
Remember that Trump knows how to negotiate, and most positions that he takes are intended to be bargained away while he achieves his real intention. We haven't seen an actual negotiator in office for a very long time, so we may expect our Presidents to be straight man dupes for foreign leaders. That doesn't have to be the case, though.
Trump wants to save the US effort, or get funds for defending Europe. He has no intention of dropping out of NATO or anything like that. I mean, I doubt I am spoiling things for him by saying this. I suspect Europe's leaders will find the risk too high to avoid doing business with him.
Putin allowed these to be released to poke Obama in the eye. No more, no less. The fact that they feed into a long standing story of dishonesty and fraud on the part of the Clintons is incidental. He saw maximum value to let them go right before the DNC, because he knows, like I do, that these e-mails aren't going to decide the election. It wasn't worth holding them until November, as they'd be ineffectual then with all the mud flying in the last couple of weeks.
They are, however, one of hundreds of data points that will decide this election.
He doesn't "support Trump" at all. He'd prefer a HRC in charge - less risk, but he doesn't believe he could turn a US election anyway with any of his tools available. Those who believe otherwise are conspiracy theorists.
Slashdot Mirror
...I see DIP switches...
If it's going to be rendered as a hash anyway, what's the difference between that and a bad password?
Why invest in expensive hardware that will be circumvented anyway? Six months after any technology is mandated, someone finds a workaround and the hardware is useless, whether via writing around the edge with a Sharpie or using a 3d printed eyeball.
Your insistence on complete security is unattainable anyway. People remain people no matter what we do. Modern thinking on this is "assumed breach". Protect what is important, use automation to make the rest irrelevant.
The whole DoD budget for multiple years wouldn't permit "trillions" to disappear. The DoD gets audited constantly, you just aren't paying attention.
Lastly, when briefing Congress, the DoD uniformly briefs out issues of national survival, while NASA, however much you like it, is a "nice to have" cost center with no criticality.
FF has not been listening to the user for a long time. You can just use a fork. There are a few out there.
Each case is different, but you have no blanket right to publish sex tapes.
Let's say this tape fell into the hands of the National Enquirer. They would have printed a story about the existence of the tape (probably lurid) and would have included a screen grab of a clothed portion of it, at most. The lawyers would have been happy, because in litigation of that sort, truth is an absolute defense and all they'd have to do is show the sex tape in court. But, they also know that the tape violates community standards for public display and would fall into one of those First Amendment exceptions that Wikipedia covers pretty well. Instead, Nick Denton got himself destroyed. This is why you hire lawyers and listen to them, if you want to survive.
This wasn't a First Amendment issue at all. You have no right to publish video footage of people having sex unless you have their permission.
I wonder how you'd feel about a live feed of you masturbating beamed into your mom's house? Thought so.
It's going to suck.
Data aggregation appears to not be a concept you know about. Luckily, I do.
My own kids, I have a hard time understanding their lack of ethics and social mores. After all, the example I have given them over the years is consistent with how I would like them to behave in public. I get on them about it and I get some results (they are 21 and 18), but there are lots of others who don't get that criticism. I suppose that has a lot to do with it.
Yup, the one at the outlet mall. Very much recommended, based on my experience. I was only on vacation in MN and I am not a native, but I was taken there by a native, so they must like it too.
The President can't "illegally fire" someone. That issue was settled back in the 1860s and 1870s with the impeachment of Johnson and subsequent court cases - that was essentially what his impeachment was all about, at least publicly advertised as. The Executive retains the absolute right to purge Executive Branch personnel.
That sounds very much like the Windows 95 experience with most old 3.1 hardware. Meaning - probably generally true.
I have undone some inadvertent Windows 10 upgrades and that's generally what condition those systems were in while running under 10.
Do you have Office on it? Seems to increase the minimum a bit. I do. There are some services I could disable (I haven't given the system aggressive optimization) but I don't think i'm going to get back 1.25GB.
First: North Branch MN, outside the Minneapolis/St. Paul metro area, to the north about an hour. It's rural. Instant service at the counter. They ran the soda fountain behind the counter, which was in tune. The popcorn was great. Theater was clean. Floor not sticky. Movie was fun to watch with the 10 other people in the theater. Good sound and video.
Second: White Marsh, MD, within Baltimore County and about 10 minutes from the Baltimore Inner Harbor. Had to wait 12 minutes for tickets because of a line. No explanation for the line. Then, skipped the popcorn because there was a 20-25 min line for that. This particular theater has a rewards program, meaning that one of the popcorn lines is reserved for people who pay an extra fee. Came out a half hour into the picture (chick flick, wasn't for me, so I found the trip out more interesting than listening to the movie) and still waited 5 mins for popcorn. Stale. Got a drink too, but had to dispense it myself. Drink machines were all sticky and semi-functional - some of those new Coke machines that are supposed to be so great - but are always out of service for one reason or another. Once in the movie, floor was sticky. About 15 people in the theater this time, more or less. Other patrons had BO and were leaning so far back in their seats it was hitting my knees, so I had to move. People talking during the movie - seems to be an ethnic thing in Baltimore, talking over the movie. Unpleasant theater experience overall.
#2 is more like my other recent experiences than #1. Makes a great argument for home theater. Sorry, Cameron.
Instead, he's wrong about everything.
It has a lower RAM utilization than a basic Win7/64 system (~2.25GB at idle)?
It's a big turd every year, anyway.
Why would anyone run this thing? "New, shiny" seems to be the only argument I have heard that has any relationship to reality.
Distributing classified e-mail on an unsecured, unapproved open Internet server, in violation of Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f). No one denies this now.
Banning Milo eliminated the most entertaining thing on Twitter. The guy is a scream.
The idiots should have left well enough alone. There was no way they could prevent people from hearing about it, anyway.
Trump is a good negotiator because he spent most of his life fighting with unions and city government(s) to get what he wanted and make money. There is no way to have any success in that business - particularly in New York - without steely resolve to get what you want through whatever means are available.
I can excuse you, if you have never tried to do anything with unions and government, for perhaps believing this is easy.
*I* sound like an idiot? Perhaps. You sound like you're off your meds. "The world is not going to let..." oh please, conspiracy theories are great, aren't they?
Don't be retarded, people will continue to do what is in their economic interest. Trump will change what that means. The result cannot be determined at this time, because if you think you have a crystal ball, you really are nuts.
I think you strongly misread Trump's motivations and likely response to an act of Russian aggression. I don't think Putin misunderstands, though. He can see clearly through the NATO talk.
Remember that Trump knows how to negotiate, and most positions that he takes are intended to be bargained away while he achieves his real intention. We haven't seen an actual negotiator in office for a very long time, so we may expect our Presidents to be straight man dupes for foreign leaders. That doesn't have to be the case, though.
Trump wants to save the US effort, or get funds for defending Europe. He has no intention of dropping out of NATO or anything like that. I mean, I doubt I am spoiling things for him by saying this. I suspect Europe's leaders will find the risk too high to avoid doing business with him.
Putin allowed these to be released to poke Obama in the eye. No more, no less. The fact that they feed into a long standing story of dishonesty and fraud on the part of the Clintons is incidental. He saw maximum value to let them go right before the DNC, because he knows, like I do, that these e-mails aren't going to decide the election. It wasn't worth holding them until November, as they'd be ineffectual then with all the mud flying in the last couple of weeks.
They are, however, one of hundreds of data points that will decide this election.
He doesn't "support Trump" at all. He'd prefer a HRC in charge - less risk, but he doesn't believe he could turn a US election anyway with any of his tools available. Those who believe otherwise are conspiracy theorists.