Slashdot Mirror


Olympics Committee Says Non-Sponsors Are Banned From Tweeting About the Olympics (gizmodo.com)

An anonymous reader shares a Gizmodo report:The U.S. Olympics Committee has gone off the deep end, when it comes to intellectual property. It's willing to sue anyone to protect their trademarks, even when the use is no real threat. But the committee's latest claim is an entirely new level of absurdity. What's getting the U.S. Olympics Committee in a tizzy this time? Tweets. Specifically any company that tweets about the Olympic Games and isn't a sponsor. ESPN obtained a letter from the U.S. Olympic Committee chief marketing officer Lisa Baird who outlines the absurd demands. "Commercial entities may not post about the Trials or Games on their corporate social media accounts," Baird writes, apparently in earnest. "This restriction includes the use of USOC's trademarks in hashtags such as #Rio2016 or #TeamUSA. And according to ESPN, it gets even more absurd. Apparently the letter says that any company whose primary mission isn't media is forbidden from using any pictures taken at the Olympics, sharing, and even reposting anything from the official Olympics account.

247 comments

  1. Rhetorical... by dj.delorie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So what would happen if they held the olympics, and nobody showed up?

    1. Re: Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Trees would make noise.

    2. Re:Rhetorical... by Nidi62 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So what would happen if they held the olympics, and nobody showed up?

      They don't care as long as the IOC gets their bribes.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re:Rhetorical... by roman_mir · · Score: 0, Interesting

      They'd save on gold and silver.

      But seriously, the amount I care about the Olympics: 1.01-1.011%

      Olympic games are all about politics, nothing is about sport (and I don't care watching people perform sports, but I realize many do).

      If games have to happen they should be happening in Greece, there should be permanent stadiums there, they could be maintained by everybody who cares about the games.

      But this way how could the governments steal billions from the populations and redistribute that money to their close friends? That's the real problem, apparently governments still need some pretext for stealing for some reason.

    4. Re:Rhetorical... by robkeeney · · Score: 1

      You think that's rhetorical, but I guess we'll find out this year.

    5. Re: Rhetorical... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I was going to say "insects"

    6. Re:Rhetorical... by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I expect we have enough people willing to watch just to see if it is a train wreck to make it worth it to the sponsor.
      Rio seems to be a disaster. I expect people will just want to see how bad it will be.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:Rhetorical... by GLMDesigns · · Score: 3

      They could also be held in place like NYC which has all the stadiums already built, the personnel in those stadiums have experience running major sporting events: the World Series,Superbowls, NBA and NHL playoffs, US Open (Tennis); there is good, existing mass transit, etc..., tons of hotels. About the only thing that would need to be built would be the swimming and kayaking venues.

      But no. It's unfair to developing nations to have all the prestige remain in the hands of colonial / first-world nations / pick your SJW bullsh!t.

      So we need to "fairly" allocate the games around the world.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    8. Re:Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Olympic games are all about politics, nothing is about sport.

      You forgot money, doping, bribery and corruption. Loads and loads of that as well.

    9. Re:Rhetorical... by whoozwah · · Score: 1

      If games have to happen they should be happening in Greece, there should be permanent stadiums there, they could be maintained by everybody who cares about the games.

      agreed 100%

    10. Re:Rhetorical... by RevRagnarok · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hey hey hey... it's "The Big Game" not "Super Bowl." Or the NFL will come after you the exact same way.

      --
      I should put something clever here. Maybe someday.
    11. Re: Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you make sense, way too much sense to be of practical use in this insane world.

    12. Re:Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd agree with you, but I would be there was another letter that went to the news media about how they are required to play down any problems. Sure, make some minor mention of the stuff that everyone already knows - the polluted water, etc. But don't talk about things like the water heaters not working in the dormitory at Olympic village or about the power going out, etc. (things that haven't happened yet, but will). The media probably already agreed not to cover those things much at all.

    13. Re:Rhetorical... by RenderSeven · · Score: 4, Funny

      You forgot money, doping, bribery and corruption.

      He said "politics" which I'm pretty sure covers money doping bribery and corruption.

    14. Re:Rhetorical... by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      I'd agree with you, but I would be there was another letter that went to the news media about how they are required to play down any problems. Sure, make some minor mention of the stuff that everyone already knows - the polluted water, etc. But don't talk about things like the water heaters not working in the dormitory at Olympic village or about the power going out, etc. (things that haven't happened yet, but will). The media probably already agreed not to cover those things much at all.

      There have already been several stories about plumbing and electrical not working in the village, as well as numerous other issues such as leaks. In fact the Australian team very publicly refused to move into their assigned apartments and are staying at a hotel until the games officially start because their rooms are in such poor condition.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    15. Re:Rhetorical... by pz · · Score: 2

      Actually, there was a lot of talk in Athens after 2004 that the Olympic games should be moved there permanently: the venues and necessary infrastructure had been built, the games were largely successful from a logistical viewpoint, and Greece knows how to handle mobs of tourists. And, of course, history and all that.

      Personally, having been at the 2004 Games, I'm kind of glad it didn't work out. But it's shameful to see how the Olympic venues are largely just sitting idle and decaying. Currently at least one of them is being used as a staging area to handle UN donations and supplies for the Syrian refugees, but it's not in good condition. Others are being used as trash dumps. Be careful what you wish for.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    16. Re:Rhetorical... by RenderSeven · · Score: 1

      I expect people will just want to see how bad it will be.

      This might be the only thing that saves it. Can the New Zealand sailing team recover the lead after striking a floating corpse in the harbor? Did the exploding water heater ruin the chances for Olympic Gold for the plucky runner from Zimbabwe? And can Mauritania raise enough cash in time to pay the ransom for their volleyball team? It's like reality TV but better! "Survivor Rio Edition"!!

    17. Re:Rhetorical... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      So what would happen if they held the olympics, and nobody showed up?

      I would try going the opposite way: have everybody tweet something about the Olympics. Let the IOC go bananas trying to identify and sue a billion or more people all over the world who use a medium that is largely anonymous.

    18. Re:Rhetorical... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      It's a nationalist circle jerk - the exact opposite of how they pitch it.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    19. Re:Rhetorical... by lgw · · Score: 2

      I don't think "doping" was covered by "politics", as AFAIK politicians don't use performance enhancing drugs.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    20. Re:Rhetorical... by arit · · Score: 1

      I'll let you know ... in about a week.

    21. Re:Rhetorical... by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      Hey hey hey... it's "The Big Game" not "Super Bowl." Or the NFL will come after you the exact same way.

      My favorite was Superb Owl.

    22. Re:Rhetorical... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I would try going the opposite way: have everybody tweet something about the Olympics. Let the IOC go bananas trying to identify and sue a billion or more people all over the world who use a medium that is largely anonymous.

      FTS:

      Specifically any company that tweets about the Olympic Games and isn't a sponsor.

      So you as an individual aren't barred from tweeting about the Olympics, but if you tweet on behalf of "Applehu Akbar's Cereal", then they'll go after you.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    23. Re:Rhetorical... by RenderSeven · · Score: 1

      politicians don't use performance enhancing drugs.

      You may have me on a technicality. Perhaps we could make PED's mandatory for politicians? If nothing else steroid use would make them less likely to reproduce.

    24. Re:Rhetorical... by rahvin112 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's why the games should only be held in LARGE cities with all the infrastructure already built. LA made money on the summer Olympics, one of the few summer Olympics to make money because they already had all but one or two facilities.

    25. Re:Rhetorical... by dafradu · · Score: 1

      Lies Nidi62, lies... there are pictures everywhere of the problems mentioned, like clogged drains, dirty floor or windows... too much drama for me but OK, they had a reason for that.

      "things that haven't happened yet, but will". lol, what if the power goes out one night? The power went out during the superbowl recently, isn't that true? I didn't see anyone reporting how crap that place was because the power went out for a few minutes. I don't remember any power failure during the WC in Brazil...

      You people think because a place has poverty than EVERYTHING must be crap. People should actually experience a day in a developing country to wake up from all the bad things the media throws at them.

      "Don't go to Brazil, you'll get a exotic disease and lose a liver to some drug lord. And they can't control their own crimes, i'm sure terrorists will wander free there. Here, go to France instead to see the UEFA Cup. Don't mind the terrorist attacks that just took place, i'm sure they will be able to stop any terrorist attempts."
      -
      And Australia returned to the village today, sure there were some problems but it is not cataclysmic like most people think.

    26. Re:Rhetorical... by GLMDesigns · · Score: 2

      There are three large Outdoor Stadiums seating 40,000+ people:

      Meadowlands,
      Yankee Stadium
      Citi Field (Mets)

      There are at least four smaller stadiums - Red Bull Arena (soccer) and minor league baseball (brooklyn, staten island, long island)

      There is the Arthur Ashe stadium (US Open Tennis), and tons of other, smaller venues not including horse racing tracks Belmont, Aqueduct and others.

      For indoors there are
      MSG, the Barclay Center, Nassau Coliseum, Prudential Stadium and a whole slew of smaller ones: the Felt Forum, Roseland Ballroom, etc...

      All the buildings aside from those for swimming (which would ideally be placed at / by Chelsea Piers on the hudson river ) exist and are in use.

      There is good public transportation. Very little would have to be built. Would I, living here, want to put up with extra crowds? No. Not really. But would it truly be worse than when a President comes to the UN? Yeah, the subways would be more crowded. Outside of that ... it would be life as usual.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    27. Re:Rhetorical... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      So have individuals who create Twitter accounts that look like companies & tweet all about the Olympics (hashtags owned by the IOC!). Bring on the massive work by the IOC for nothing.

      Heck use all the supported unicode!

      http://unicode-table.com/en/#l...

      @cke

      Here's some help as to how:
      https://metacpan.org/pod/Acme:...
      Acme::Unicodify - Convert ASCII text into look-somewhat-alike unicode

      LOL at Slashdot not supporting unicode. There's a unicode 'o' between the c and the k so it looks like @coke.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    28. Re:Rhetorical... by budgenator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Bullshit they use Inderal, Adderal and Provigil quite regularly just like professional poker players. The Adderal and Privigil keeps them wake and alert, the Inderal suppresses micro expressions that give away their lies and bluffs.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    29. Re: Rhetorical... by WarJolt · · Score: 4, Funny

      I trademarked my full name, so that no one can talk about me one twitter. I'm fairly certain that's how it works.

    30. Re:Rhetorical... by budgenator · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was at Atlanta in 1996, (Dept of Defense, Joint Task Force-Olympics (JTF-0)) big difference between what the public sees, the MSM decides to show the public and what happens behind the scenes. Knowing how well Atlanta went, and what a train-wreck it was behind the scenes, I can't imagine what kind of horror storey Rio is going to be.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    31. Re:Rhetorical... by Outta_the_way_peck! · · Score: 1

      Has less to do with poverty than the fact these are hastily built structures. Russia had a number of issues too. I remember a story of one athlete having to break through the door or wall after being locked in the bathroom because the handle fell off.

    32. Re:Rhetorical... by magarity · · Score: 1

      If any local economy could do with subscriptions from the other countries to cover maintenance crews on permanent Olympic venues, it's definitely Greece.

    33. Re:Rhetorical... by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Where's the line between individual and company as far as the IOC is concerned? If I tweet something from my personal Twitter account is that ok? What if it's associated with a website that I make money off of?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    34. Re:Rhetorical... by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

      So what would happen if they held the olympics, and the Russians couldn't show up?

    35. Re:Rhetorical... by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure this would be a non-signed non-disclosure agreement, which would be thrown out in the court.

      They are basically going to fine companies for breach of a contract these companies have not signed and in some cases may not even be aware of.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    36. Re: Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, otherwise, how would the IOC spread Zika around the globe?

    37. Re:Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize that hosting the olympic games usually bankrupts the hosting nation city right? Why the hell would NYC want to bankrupt itself? Not to mention the absurd costs just to place a bid for hosting the games all of which are paid for by....guess who....tax payers.

    38. Re:Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly though, saving everyone the time and headache of having to build all new crap every single time that all goes to waste and rot afterwards, bankrupting the city/nation that has to host the olympics, and all the other drama that comes up every time...it would be better just to pick a place on earth and set it as the designated UN Olympics Area. Save everyone the headache, only have to build the structures once and then just maintain/rebuild when needed.

    39. Re:Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sir, I think you underestimate the amount of crap you can get done with all the energy you gain from a meth/coke binge with a side of aderral to help focus that cosmic concoction.

    40. Re:Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But no. It's unfair to developing nations to have all the prestige remain in the hands of colonial / first-world nations / pick your SJW bullsh!t.

      No!

      It's unfair to IOC bosses, since if existing venues are used, then the IOC-approved construction companies won't get contracts to build new venues. And then the IOC bosses don't get their fair share from those millions. And that would be a great injustice.

    41. Re:Rhetorical... by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Actually, there was a lot of talk in Athens after 2004 that the Olympic games should be moved there permanently: the venues and necessary infrastructure had been built, the games were largely successful from a logistical viewpoint, and Greece knows how to handle mobs of tourists.

      They also know (or should have known) that most Olympic venues fall into disuse after the event and end up being a massive waste of money for little more than temporary international bragging rights. Greece was foolish to play host with their economy being what it was even back in '04.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    42. Re:Rhetorical... by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      But no. It's unfair to developing nations to have all the prestige remain in the hands of colonial / first-world nations / pick your SJW bullsh!t.

      I'm no fan of SJW, but I think that this is not a SJW issue. For the highest bidder they will hold the games anywhere. The Olympics are just a scam for the uber rich to make money off of unpaid athletes hoping for stardom. For reference the Olympic Committee is a not for profit based in Switzerland, land of the tax scams.

    43. Re:Rhetorical... by Ranbot · · Score: 2

      I guess New York's stadiums are all just sitting idle hoping for the Olympics to come to town, right? The multi-billion dollar sports teams won't mind vacating their homes for a few weeks, right? Also it would be so nice and neighborly of New York to offer the Olympic games their largest "New York" stadium, Meadowlands, located in East Rutherford, NJ; and Prudential Stadium in Newark, NJ; and Red Bull Arena in Harrison, NJ. I'm glad some crowded subways wouldn't bother you.

    44. Re:Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can also bring out Dr. Drew to do a running count of how many athletes contract Zika while attending the Olympics.

    45. Re:Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They claim "The Big Game" and one or two other euphemisms in addition to "Super Bowl". I expect they'd do their best filing any newcomers, too.

    46. Re:Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Greek let me say I no longer support the IOC version of the "Olympics". I have no doubt ancient Greeks would have heartily disapproved.

      When the Olympics was restarted in the 19th century it was about the spirit of competition and camaraderie with your fellow man. It was also a toast to accomplishments of antiquity. Today the IOC has become primarily about money. They don't even give a damn about ancient Greece or the athletes. Just product to be marketed so overweight execs on the IOC board can make even more money. Visit the Nemean games in Greece today. It's far closer to real a Olympics than the marketing monstrosity the IOC calls an Olympics. Even local national events in other countries are closer in spirit to the Olympics than the so-called "Olympics".

    47. Re:Rhetorical... by SeriousTube · · Score: 2

      They held the Olympics in Greece 2000 some years ago and none of the accommodations are usable anymore. Sad.

    48. Re:Rhetorical... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking the same... Tokyo had better put a stop to all their expensive construction projects - 2016 will be the year the Olympics died.

    49. Re:Rhetorical... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      The Russians would still declare themselves the winners of every event.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    50. Re:Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what would happen if they held the olympics, and nobody showed up?

      The golfing event is looking like that might just happen.

    51. Re:Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kim Jong Un probably has a few Olympic medals.

    52. Re:Rhetorical... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I don't think "doping" was covered by "politics", as AFAIK politicians don't use performance enhancing drugs.

      Maybe it's time they start.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    53. Re:Rhetorical... by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      But wouldn't the same media companies make the same money if it was held in NYC this year as opposed to Rio? My objection isn't to the Olympics as a sporting event; it's with nations spending money that they don't have, for something they don't need long term, in order to get some temporary prestige. (Granted some people may believe it's in the best interest of their nation ... but I think that's rarely the case.)

      I think that NYC is eminently suited for the summer olympics but I wouldn't be surprised if many other cities around the world would be as well. But these are all cities in first world nations.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    54. Re:Rhetorical... by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      No. NY stadiums are not all running idle. But MLB could schedule away games for the Mets and Yankees, and I'm sure MSG and other venues would be more than willing to block out some time for the Olympics. There would be more than enough time to schedule events.

      And why shouldn't the Olympics also be held in NJ? Why only in NY when there are so many great places a few minutes away? There is public transportation to Newark. And NJ Transit has been running buses to the Meadowlands for decades. Would there be extra traffic and congestion that would inconvenience people? Of course.

      I really don't think NJ would be upset if some of the NY olympics took place in NJ stadiums. Conversely I think they would be pissed if NYers tried to prevent usage of any NJ stadiums.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    55. Re:Rhetorical... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The idea is to rejuvenate areas by building new infrastructure that lasts longer than the games. Transport links, an athlete's village that can then become housing, stadiums that can then be used as venues to attract visitors to the area etc.

      Sometimes it works. When Japan last had it in the 60s it was a great opportunity to show off their world leading high speed rail and other technical abilities, and provided some buildings and infrastructure that are still in use today. Even London 2012 did some good to the area. I worked on the athlete's village and the transformation in that area was quite remarkable. The long term effects are still being judged but the area is now a lot less of a dump than it was before.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    56. Re:Rhetorical... by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Governments try that all the time. It's the argument many city planners use to convince residents to support bonds for building sports stadium. "Think of all the revenue!!!"

      Sometimes its works. But most of the time it fails miserably.

      Now amplify the expense 10x for hosting the Olympics. The gamble better be based on reality.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    57. Re:Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer Super Bowel.

    58. Re:Rhetorical... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      They could also be held in place like NYC

      Why do you hate NYC so much as to wish the Olympics on them?

    59. Re:Rhetorical... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      And, of course, history and all that.

      The only history the modern Olympics and the ancient Greek Olympics share is the name.

    60. Re:Rhetorical... by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      Funny. :-)

      I live in NY so part of me thinks it would be cool to have the Olympics here. Part of of me doesn't want the extra crowds and BS. But I see all the stadiums around here; all the sporting events. We have World Series, the US Open, NHL and NBA playoffs and the crowds are barely noticeable. Barely a blip on the radar.

      Of course the Olympics are on a different scale but I think this place can easily handle the strain.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    61. Re:Rhetorical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember in the preparation for the Atlanta Olympics that the Olympic Committee forced a local Greek restaurant out of business because 20 years prior they had the audacity to put the word "Olympus" in their name.

    62. Re:Rhetorical... by nmr_andrew · · Score: 1

      For the highest bidder they will hold the games anywhere. The Olympics are just a scam for the uber rich to make money off of unpaid athletes hoping for stardom.

      I partially agree, the Olympics overall have become incredibly commercial and care more about profit than anything else. But I disagree on two points. First, for some sports (swimming, diving, track and field/athletics to name a few), the Olympics are really their "spotlight" event and are important to the athletes - sure there are worlds every year but it's the only time they really get good media coverage. Second, the Olympics haven't "belonged" solely to unpaid athletes in a long time now. I can't remember exactly when the IOC first started allowing it except it was sometime after 1984, but most if not all sports allow professionals to compete in the Olympics. Some of whom are making 10s of millions each year.

    63. Re:Rhetorical... by pz · · Score: 1

      The only history the modern Olympics and the ancient Greek Olympics share is the name.

      Not exactly. The modern IOC-run Olympics started in 1896. In Athens. The reason, of course, that Athens was chosen for 1896 was because of the ancient games that were held in Olympia (thus, the name, of course). There was a strong push to have the 1996 games in Athens as well (I was tangentially involved in the bid) because of the 100 years celebration, but Greece was not in sufficiently modern shape to be able to handle the necessary infrastructure upgrades -- for example, an entire new phone system would have had to been overlaid on top of the existing one (that eventually happened in the guise of the mobile phone system, but, recall, the bid for 1996 was made back in the late 1980s when the technology was different). Because of the obvious marketing potential, Athens made it all the way into the final decision round before losing out to Atlanta (indeed, Athens was the leading candidate through the first few selection rounds), and, naturally, I'm condensing things a lot. But back to the 1896 games; prior to that inaugural Olympics, there was a strong revival effort in Greece starting around the 1800s. The revivalist efforts eventually included the restoration of the Panhallenic Stadium in Athens (known in Greece as the Marble Stadium), within sight of the Acropolis, and the organizing of a series of pre-IOC Olympic games there. The IOC games started out in 1896 with many of the same athletic contests that were held in Olympia, including various foot races, (a different version of) long jump, discus, and wrestling. They are held every four years just as the ancient games. Again, by historical inspiration.

      It isn't difficult to draw a pretty clear path from the ancient Olympic Games to the modern IOC-games. That the closer we get to the present, the more grotesque the Olympics become is certainly true, but the history is there.

      And then there's the whole Marathon, which, as I'm sure you know, is named after a fabled run from the town of Marathon to Athens to report the defeat of the Persians. The 2004 Athens games had runners use the same (more-or-less) path.

      So, yea, history and all that.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    64. Re:Rhetorical... by PlaynBass · · Score: 1

      Don't even bother to tell me when they're over: I could not be LESS interested. It's no longer about the athlete drones, but about the money: Like everything else in this F#$ked World! Human beings are worthy of a Darwin Award for self-extinction! They can't seem to get beyond this obsession with counting imaginary bits of value, placing the unobtainable goal of infinite growth in imaginary wealth over & above above taking care of the real business of survival on a planet with only "enough" resources.

      --
      PlaynBass
    65. Re:Rhetorical... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm aware of all of that. But none of that makes it clear to me that the modern Olympics has anything to do with the original Olympics aside from wanting to resemble them.

    66. Re:Rhetorical... by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I am sorry, what was your question?

      All I saw was, "So what would happen if they held the, and nobody showed up?"

    67. Re:Rhetorical... by Gussington · · Score: 1

      I was at Atlanta in 1996, (Dept of Defense, Joint Task Force-Olympics (JTF-0)) big difference between what the public sees, the MSM decides to show the public and what happens behind the scenes. Knowing how well Atlanta went, and what a train-wreck it was behind the scenes, I can't imagine what kind of horror storey Rio is going to be.

      How is this different from anything ever? I'm a consultant and have been in a lot of large organisations, and they're all the same. Billion dollar businesses that look all big and shiny and professional on the outside, but are a complete clusterfuck behind the scenes.
      This is all quite normal behaviour.

    68. Re:Rhetorical... by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      The money that various companies pay to be the official XYZ sponsor of the Olympics is paid to the Olympic Committee, which is a "not for profit" yet takes in billions and putts draconian restrictions on everyone attending. Here are some details of their various demands: https://mises.org/blog/olympic... Reasons like those outlined in the link are why any sensible country is opting out.

  2. How can this possibly go wrong? by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

    #CensorshipTwats #Rio2016 #TeamUSA #Olympics

    1. Re:How can this possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if all the companies respect that, they'll still get an ocean of dumb tweets from trolls, teens, bots and maybe even normal humans. Good luck stopping that.

    2. Re:How can this possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #USOCidiots #Rio2016 #TeamUSA #Olympics

    3. Re:How can this possibly go wrong? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't even necessarily be legal to try.

    4. Re: How can this possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't censorship. It is, however, a case of Slashdot overreacting. Reading the article and looking up some background on this shows it's a big fuss about nothing.

      Let's get two things straight:

      1) Individuals who aren't selling something can use Olympic hashtags with no restriction. Fans and critics aren't being censored.

      2) Media can use Olympic hashtags without restriction. For example, ESPN can use the hashtags and report on the Olympics, without any fuss from the USOC. They're not being censored, either.

      Many athletes have sponsorships, meaning that businesses pay to use their name and likeness in advertisements. Those athletes, however, do not have the ability to license trademarks owned by others. You can't license out someone else's intellectual property without their permission. That's common sense. These sponsorships aren't limited to Olympic athletes, but are common with athletes in all sports.

      LeBron James has a sponsorship deal with McDonald's. However, McDonald's isn't a sponsor of the NBA, having been replaced by Taco Bell. McDonald's can use LeBron James in their advertisements because he's agreed to it. But LeBron can't license the NBA's intellectual property to McDonald's. Only the NBA can do that. The NBA also owns the broadcast rights to their games, and trademarks like the Cleveland Cavaliers and their logos. LeBron can't license those to McDonald's because they're owned by the NBA. And NBA isn't going to do so because they've given exclusive rights among fast food companies to Taco Bell. That means McDonald's can't use NBA game footage in their ads featuring LeBron. Also, LeBron can't wear something like a Cavaliers jersey in the ads, because the NBA owns the rights to the logo and the name. This is true for any sport or event, not just the Olympics or the NBA.

      Previously, the USOC said athletes couldn't appear in any advertising for non-sponsors of the Olympics within a month of the Olympics. That means the Olympics wouldn't allow athletes to license their name and likeness for advertisements to appear within a month of the Olympics, even if intellectual property owned by the Olympics wasn't used in the advertisements. That was, indeed, ridiculous. These restrictions have been reduced, allowing athletes to appear in advertising at any time, just as long as any intellectual property owned by the Olympics aren't user. That's actually pretty standard and not something that's unique to the Olympics. It's really no different than the LeBron example I described. All they're saying is that you can't use intellectual property owned by the Olympics to advertise your business unless you license the intellectual property from the Olympics. That doesn't sound crazy to me.

      Perhaps some of those words and phrases shouldn't be eligible for trademarking. I'd agree on those grounds. But that's a completely different issue.

    5. Re: How can this possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get out of here with your logic and well-reasoned arguments. No one needs facts here mister.

    6. Re: How can this possibly go wrong? by fermion · · Score: 1

      I think most of us understand this. I think most of us know that this has to do with selling stuff using the olympics without the permission of the Olympics. However, the olympics is lawsuit happy so it is not unreasonable to think the policy might have some negative impact on people who are just tweeting.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  3. I say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good luck with this!

    1. Re:I say by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Indeed. Last I checked, facts aren't copyrightable, trademarked, or otherwise protected by intellectual property rights (with the possible absurd exception of patented prime numbers), so if someone wants to report on the facts of the Olympics, such as the results or highlights, in their own words, they're entitled to do so. You can bluster and threaten as much as you want, but reporting on the facts is perfectly legal.

    2. Re:I say by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is true - but in the case of the Olympics, I'd rather that instead of reporting the facts of who's won what, they report the facts of Olympic corruption and how the Olympics does damage to the host country. And the ongoing cheating and doping.

      Or show pictures of the sh#t floating in the Olympic rowing area. And the people who have been displaced. And how only the well-to-do will benefit from the new subway extension "for the Olympics." And the funding crisis for hospitals that can't treat patients because of a lack of basics such as gloves and syringes.

      While we're at it, why not have a campaign to nominate #ZikaMosquitoes as the official Olympics 2016 animal?

      Only a bunch of pinheads would get excited about the actual Olympics. Maybe the IOC is secretly hoping to spread Zika to create more pinheads? #OlympicZikaConspiracy :-)

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    3. Re:I say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Only a bunch of pinheads would get excited about the actual Olympics

      Ouch! My wife is a training Olympic athlete and we are excited about the Olympics. We agree with the horrendous political issues and aren't blind to it. We can't pick where we go to compete but we can at least be happy at the progress made to get to this level of competition and be on this stage, even if it's a stage covered in human waste. Considering the long history of athletes struggling to make ends meet the level of safety and risk we are going through is honestly not that much different thanks to terrible governing bodies like the USATF.

    4. Re:I say by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      I personally expect this Olympics in brazil to be a shitstorm of epic proportions. I wouldn't be surprised if an athlete or two were abducted by one of the Favella gangs. Brazil has a poverty and law enforcement problem, they've ignored the Favellas and police corruption for decades and it's going to bite the games in the ass.

    5. Re:I say by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      I loved the recommendation that people who are long distance swimming should keep their mouths shut while swimming.

      Who in their right mind would risk their life this way?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:I say by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      We can't pick where we go to compete

      Bullshit. Nobody is saying you have to compete in Brazil's shit-hole. You have free choice. Others are refusing to go because of the risks.

      happy at the progress made to get to this level of competition and be on this stage, even if it's a stage covered in human waste

      Do you realize how stupid that sounds? Even mud wrestling is more hygienic.

      Considering the long history of athletes struggling to make ends meet

      Big f*cking deal. Go get a real job instead of living off the sports welfare system - a system that, for most, leaves them with no marketable skills when they're done, no future, and does significant damage to the cities that host it.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    7. Re:I say by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Just as likely to get abducted by the police. When the best you can say is "at least it's not Venezuela ... yet" .... Of course, money and power and fame are more important than common sense when it comes to decision-making. And let's face it, for every Caitlyn Jenner who uses it as a spring board, there are thousands who end up with nothing afterwards.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    8. Re:I say by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Considering the long history of athletes struggling to make ends ...

      Did you know that as recently as the late 1980's professional athletes were barred from entering the Olympics?

      They can't make ends meet? They can cry me a river and go whore themselves out on sponsorship deals like the rest. Hell, if an olympic diver can make some coin advertising laundry detergent then I've no sympathy at all.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    9. Re:I say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Olympics aren't covered by normal copyright or trademark law. It is a special case covered by the Nairobi Treaty. The IOC has a frankly absurd amount of power over how these marks are used that goes well beyond intellectual property.

    10. Re:I say by thogard · · Score: 1

      The Olympics are its own type of Intellectual Property covered under different laws than the normal copyright and trademark laws in most countries.

    11. Re:I say by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Last I checked, facts aren't copyrightable, trademarked, or otherwise protected by intellectual property rights ...

      There must be limits to this, otherwise I could film Olympic events and broadcast them, since it is all just facts. Those photons did in fact reflect those wavelengths at those exacts points in time...

    12. Re:I say by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Agreed. At some point, there's a line that gets crossed between "fact" and "representation". Representations of facts (e.g. a video, a written story, etc.) are copyrightable, yet the data itself isn't. Where that line is, I'll admit I can't say (not to mention that I still haven't dealt with the question of using someone's likeness in text/image/whatever), but we have plenty of examples to point towards the idea that textual reporting on what occurred falls well on the side of "fact".

    13. Re:I say by Gussington · · Score: 1

      This is the problem with technology, it makes lines disappear quite easily. eg If all I'm doing is reporting data, in extreme detail, but it's still just data, and then you have some tool that can construct that data into some sort of easily viewable format, then you're effectively doing the same thing, but off the hook from a legal standpoint. All the is being reported is data, the location and description of every photon 60 times per second.
      Information wants to be free. Technology is only going to make the information laws harder and harder to enforce.

  4. Begun the Trademark Wars have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/a

  5. Oh dear lord... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes. This. OMG please please PLEASE do this more USOC! Cut your own tail off and eat it until there is nothing left! Please try and force non-sponsor businesses to avoid using your marks, your copyrights, heck, tell they can;t even mention that the Olympics are even happening so that we can all fucking forget about you, watch you finally die, and then maybe, MAYBE, see something better that is actually about the athletes and not lining the pockets of greedy scum.

    #tiredofyourshit #stopscrewingathletes #GFYUSOC

    1. Re:Oh dear lord... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, and hopefully the donations from individuals will decline/stop. And, if consumers tell the companies
      who are sponsoring the that they, the consumers, aren't going to buy their products because
      of the onerous restrictions imposed by the USOC, maybe they'll get the hint, too.

      Years ago, I used to watch the with a fervor, and bought merchandise such as t-shirts, sweatshirts,
      jackets, etc. to help support them. If this is their attitude nowadays, well, so sad, too bad, I'm no longer a supporter.

      And even though it will be a waste of time and electrons, I plan to ask my Representative and my Senators
      to withhold government funds (i.e., our tax money) from the USOC.

      Hopefully, that will incite the potential athletic participants and their families to force changes in USOC leadership.

    2. Re:Oh dear lord... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      LOL. The entire point of our social structure is to line the pockets of the rich. Everything on Earth works towards that goal.

    3. Re:Oh dear lord... by skaag · · Score: 1

      I actually already forgot about them. If not for this absurdity showing up on Slashdot, I wouldn't even be reminded that the olympics existed in the first place.

      And honestly? good riddance.

      --

      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain... time... to... die...

  6. oh if only... by yodleboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if only all media companies would just say "screw it" and not post anything about the Olympics. No athlete info, no sob stories, no results, nothing, nada, zip, anywhere. I'd love to see USOC's collective heads implode. Sorry guys, but I don't care enough about the games to be funneled through your approved channels. Likely the drama in Rio won't be the games, but the sad state of the host city/country anyway. Good luck squashing THOSE stories...

    1. Re:oh if only... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      But everyone loves the athlete sob stories. "Frank was born with no arms or legs, but somehow overcame that to become the greatest triathelete in history. And his dog died too."

    2. Re:oh if only... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

      I'm not even sure how long it's been since I gave a flying crap about the olympics. But yeah, they're at least as big a collection of overtly corrupt scum as FIFA, and possibly even worse. Everyone associated in any way with both orgs could be sucked in their entirety into a gigantic sinkhole, never to be seen again, and nothing of value would be lost.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    3. Re:oh if only... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      "The Olympics"? What is the Olympics? Does it have something to do with mountaineering?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:oh if only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They would not give a fuck, the money from sponsoring and tv rights is already in...

    5. Re:oh if only... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It'd be even better if they started covering the amount of economic and environmental damage every Olympic games causes to its host. The hosts think they're going to get a $500 billion tourism industry overnight, and expend tens of billions of dollars (a drop in the bucket for the U.S. Federal government; kind of hefty for a U.S. state; crippling for a city, U.S. or otherwise) ripping out forests, tearing down housing, excising shopping centers, and doing whatever else they need to do to place and supply an enormous stadium. Then it's over, and the stadium rots; tourism doesn't expand; and the heavy cost of hosting the Olympics turns into a long-term burden with no economic upside.

      The media doesn't cover this because the Olympics gives them a big ad spot to sell, and destroying the Olympics would cost them. Independent print-only online media with no broadcast sponsor could cover it, and they would get minimal circulation. The only way to hit the public mind is to get CNN, Fox, and NBC.

    6. Re:oh if only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But everyone loves the athlete sob stories. "Frank was born with no arms or legs, but somehow overcame that to become the greatest triathelete in history. And his dog died too."

      Put it to country music and you've got a hit on your (artificial) hands.

    7. Re:oh if only... by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      I would too. Just show the sporting event and not do any back stories trying to get users into the personal lives of the athletes; turning a sporting event into "The Real World."

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    8. Re:oh if only... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      Nah It has to do with Bruce Jenner on the Wheaties box. Last I checked anyways.

      --
      C|N>K
    9. Re:oh if only... by RevRagnarok · · Score: 1

      I'm not even sure how long it's been since I gave a flying crap about the olympics.

      I would guess when they moved one of them out of phase with the other, so now you have one every other year. When they only happened every four years, it was more of a "big deal" because you didn't have one for so long.

      --
      I should put something clever here. Maybe someday.
    10. Re:oh if only... by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      I just realized that this means a simple way of reducing the amount of Biannual Major International Sporting Event news in my feed is to replace the local NBC station in my news feed (for local news), with another local station.

      --
      End of Line.
    11. Re:oh if only... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Jenny, who overcame a life threatening hangail to compete in $SPORT, and she was an underdog because of it!!!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    12. Re:oh if only... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      "Put it to country music and you've got a hit on your (artificial) hands."

      'Frank was born with no arms or legs and is coming home from prison on the midnight train.'

    13. Re:oh if only... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Not going to happen, despite these costs and strictures, media companies still stand to make money so they will play ball. And the US committee is just following the Olympic committee, who have demanded (and gotten) similar injuctions against nasty free-loading IP pirates in previous editions of the Games. SA gave them special IP police. And some details were published from the Bid Book instructions given to the Dutch commission when they were preparing their bid. It had plenty of provisions to very strictly enforce what went on in the stadiums (including tweets), and they even demanded that all neon signs for beers other than the sponsoring brands to be removed from bars in a 3 km radius around all olympic locations. Oh and they wanted highway lanes closed off at set times so the brass could quickly shuttle between locations in their limos.

      It's the countries who should tell them to screw it. Sadly they will not do so either, the Games offer prestige and an enormous opportunity for politicians to shine (and have their pals make a bit of cash too). And the Olympic Committee know this, as well as the fact that if you can put something good on the table (or under it), any politician is willing to bargain, no matter how outlandish your demands.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    14. Re:oh if only... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how much of a hit if your song is about Frank swimming in raw sewage, coming down with dysentery from that, catching the Zika virus from hundreds of mosquito bites, and then being kidnapped for ransom, and then mugged after they release him.

      Why any athlete would want to go to Brazil, I have no idea.

    15. Re:oh if only... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      It's actually a very beautiful mountain range to the West of Seattle, forming the break between the Pacific Ocean and Puget Sound. The Olympics are snow-capped year-round, rugged, house the wettest place in the lower 48 States (Hoh river forest), and some great mountain goat, elk, and deer hunting.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    16. Re:oh if only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the IOC doesn't want "independent" coverage of the Olympics, then why not do independent coverage during the current Olympics, of the effects of previous Olympics on their host cities?

  7. Only a few will get sued. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cost of suing everyone would bankrupt the IOC. (and probably get the laws, i.e. treaties changed somehow) What will happen is a few unfortunate people will be ruined. All the rest of the little people will just carry one like nothing happened.

  8. "Says" does not mean "can't" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because they claim something, doesn't make it legally enforceable. It may mean they'll be a pain in the ass if you do, but unless they get special legal protections (like they did in London), they only have so much control. Heck, even the terms of service on Twitter probably say others can retweet them all they want without restriction.

    The Olympics has gone to shit. It's irrelevant these days. I hope Rio2016 is a disaster, but not in a way where anyone is hurt of course.

  9. This is what you get by itamblyn · · Score: 1

    This is what you get when you decide to sell public space to the highest bidder. If I were paying billions of dollars for the right to advertise, I would want to own it too. Maybe this is an indication that we should stop selling our public spaces and events to such and extent.

  10. Have a Coke and a Long Jump! by ZipK · · Score: 1

    You Deserve an Olympic Record Today!
    The Ultimate Swimming Machine!
    A Diamond Isn't as Good as a Gold Medal!
    America Runs the 4x100 Relay on Dunkin'!

    1. Re:Have a Coke and a Long Jump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Deserve an Olympic Record Today!
      The Ultimate Swimming Machine!
      A Diamond Isn't as Good as a Gold Medal!
      America Runs the 4x100 Relay on Dunkin'!

      Burma shave.

  11. Due to rights restrictions... by myowntrueself · · Score: 5, Interesting

    During one Olympics, the BBC world service news on the hour was replaced with the announcement:
    "Due to rights restrictions we are unable to bring you this program".

    I stopped listening to the BBC world service and stopped expressing any interest in the Olympics.

    Whats the point in having a world news that you can't broadcast due to rights restrictions??

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    1. Re:Due to rights restrictions... by Threni · · Score: 1

      That's a powerfully stupid reason to stop listening to the BBC World Service.

      The point of the Word Service is to provide a free, relatively unbiased news source. The point of the Olympic Games is to make a profit from sport events, including selling access to coverage of the events, which is controlled in ways entirely governed by the Olympic committee. The BBC is therefore prevented from accessing some coverage and is charged for the coverage it can obtain. It doesn't prevent the BBC from running stories about the Olympics; for example, the shocking lack of hygiene in the Rio games.

    2. Re:Due to rights restrictions... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      That's a powerfully stupid reason to stop listening to the BBC World Service.

      The point of the Word Service is to provide a free, relatively unbiased news source. The point of the Olympic Games is to make a profit from sport events, including selling access to coverage of the events, which is controlled in ways entirely governed by the Olympic committee. The BBC is therefore prevented from accessing some coverage and is charged for the coverage it can obtain. It doesn't prevent the BBC from running stories about the Olympics; for example, the shocking lack of hygiene in the Rio games.

      My problem is not that the BBC didn't cover the Olympics. Its that the BBC world service was literally a loop of "due to rights restrictions we are unable to bring you this program" repeated over and over again for half an hour. From when the Olympics started to when it finished.

      During the Olympics there WAS NO WORLD SERVICE, at least where I was.

      What the BBC should have done was not cover anything related to the Olympics at all and continue to deliver other news.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    3. Re:Due to rights restrictions... by Threni · · Score: 1

      I've not heard what you describe but the most likely explanation is some sort of territorial problem where other parts of the world got a programme but it wasn't licensed in your country. If so, it would be a crazy decision to not produce and broadcast a program anywhere because it's not allowed in one country. What if people in other countries wanted to hear about that story? Your anger is misplaced.

    4. Re:Due to rights restrictions... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      I've not heard what you describe but the most likely explanation is some sort of territorial problem where other parts of the world got a programme but it wasn't licensed in your country. If so, it would be a crazy decision to not produce and broadcast a program anywhere because it's not allowed in one country. What if people in other countries wanted to hear about that story? Your anger is misplaced.

      'The program' was the world service news, on the hour, every hour. Not just any old program of content. Blocking that is just insane. Why even bother having a world service? Thats the only thing I wanted to listen to, so why would I continue to 'patronize' it?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    5. Re:Due to rights restrictions... by Threni · · Score: 1

      It's a radio station. There's absolutely no way they'd know if you listen or not even if they wanted to, so i guess you put up with it or stage your silent protest.

  12. Turning the Olympics into a 5-ring circus by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they're more concerned about people tweeting out results or complaints.

    I also wonder which they'll have more of.

    1. Re:Turning the Olympics into a 5-ring circus by budgenator · · Score: 1

      No they are more concerned with the sponsor and licensing fees.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  13. Dear IOC, Barbara Streisand called by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    She wants her 'effect' back.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    1. Re:Dear IOC, Barbara Streisand called by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Umm... they want publicity about the games.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Dear IOC, Barbara Streisand called by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Umm... they want publicity about the games.

      They want *their* publicity about the games. They don't want anyone else with any naughty unauthorized publicity about the games. They are going to attract this in spades. People will feel encouraged to give the IOC the finger.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    3. Re:Dear IOC, Barbara Streisand called by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      They don't care about unauthorized publicity. Their sponsors care about their exclusive rights.

      But the IOC desperately wants any story on the games (other than "Rio will kill the athletes"), all press is good press, etc.

      Long story short, giving the IOC the finger is good for their sponsors (they get publicity, but no backlash), good for the IOC (they get publicity for the games, sponsors happy), and not bad for the IOC (people mentally separate IOC from the games themselves - see FIFA governing body and World Cup)

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  14. Teams by darkain · · Score: 1

    #Team[COUNTRY] isn't just for the Olympics though. Pretty much EVERY multi-national competition of any kind that has teams identify with their nation uses this generic hashtag... Is the Olympic International Comity going to start suing everyone who has ever used this term???

    OH WAIT, THAT'S RIGHT! They already started suing every business around Olympia, WA and the Olympic Mountains for using "Olympic" in their name, despite the names coming from geographical location and some even being around longer than the modern Olympics... but why the hell should they care!? Suing is winning GOLD!

    1. Re:Teams by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      There's only one sane way for companies to respond: by continuing to post about the Ol****cs, but avoid using any of their trademarked terminology. For example, they could censor it (eg. Ol****c G***s), or even better, use hashtag #LameGames reflecting the way they are running things.

      And if they sue, countersue. Try for at least a ten-figure payout.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Teams by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      They already started suing every business around Olympia, WA and the Olympic Mountains for using "Olympic" in their name, despite the names coming from geographical location and some even being around longer than the modern Olympics

      And did the local judges in Olympia actually put up with this charade?

  15. U.S.A. only? by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So do they think they are the law in the U.S.A. only or all over the world?

    1. Re:U.S.A. only? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The law? That's for mere peons. The IOC believes they are aristocracy, and that if they took a collective shit in the Olympic rowing venue it would cleanse the water and make it smell like roses, because like Caroline, they "like to think their shit don't stink".

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:U.S.A. only? by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

      The USOC does that in the US. The Canadian Olympic Committee does the same thing in Canada. They were especially bad when we hosted the Winter Olympics in Vancouver. Every country has their own committee and they have to enforce the brand to protect the sponsors. I don't know if they are all as heavy handed though.

    3. Re:U.S.A. only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do they think they are the law in the U.S.A. only or all over the world?

      I imagine the argument is that Twitter is a U.S. company, so they have jurisdiction (to the extent that the U.S. laws provide) to dictate how they act. It happens to affect a global stage because numerous non-U.S. persons use it, but that's coincidental.

      It would be more surprising if they tried a similar thing to a French, a Chinese, or a Russian country.

    4. Re:U.S.A. only? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Didn't the COC try to trademark "With Glowing Hearts"?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:U.S.A. only? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      fwiw US copyright law was largely imported from Europe (the Berne Convention, which the US joined in the 70s or so)

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:U.S.A. only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They briefly tried to claim the word "winter," too.

    7. Re:U.S.A. only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And like the "english" language we use, we have made it our own special abomination over the past 30 years. This means that your point, while interesting, is rather pointless as it is all American at this point and time.

    8. Re:U.S.A. only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was, then they went rather nuts with it (ever expanding terms to keep Mickey Mouse out of the pubic domain, DMCA, etc)

    9. Re:U.S.A. only? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      In the UK they had to remove all non-sponsor logos from everything. Even the toilets had to have "Toto" sanded off.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  16. The Olympics are all about money by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This affirms it. The sports aspect of the Olympics is secondary, even tertiary. The primary reason for the existence of the Olympics nowadays is to enrich those who organise it and those who use the media content for their profit.

    1. Re:The Olympics are all about money by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      it should die. just end. it has its long run, it faded from what it was supposed to be about and now its a facade, at best.

      just end it. boycott it, interfere with them, cause them annoyance. they need to learn they don't own concepts so wide as they claim.

      but please, just end this. risking world health so more advertising can be sold? just nuke us all from orbit, if we can't seem to end this absurdity.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:The Olympics are all about money by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Where have you been? It's been about the money for a long time now. The various Olympic committees have been using heavy handed techniques to enforce the brand for years now. It was especially bad in Canada when we had the Winter Olympics in Vancouver in 2010. Letting professionals play was all about increasing the ratings as well as adding some events that are more suited for the X Games.

    3. Re:The Olympics are all about money by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      "just end it. boycott it, interfere with them, cause them annoyance."

      I think the best thing is for everyone to just ignore it.

    4. Re:The Olympics are all about money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it always has been so. The only thing new is maybe the scales have dropped from your eyes,.

  17. Olympic Mountains banned by IOC by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    In other news the IOC has demanded the name of the Olympic Mountains in Washington State be changed, as well as the name of the capital, Olympia.

    A few years back the Olympic ISP located in Silverdale, within sight of the Olympic Mountains, was forced to change its name by the IOC.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    1. Re:Olympic Mountains banned by IOC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Demanding name changes is for the weak, the USOC has demanded that the Olympic mountain be razed the the ground, the resulting debris be used to build a new artificial island called olympia where the IOC will be headquartered from now on, nations are expected to pay tribute to olympia or risk facing their wrath!

    2. Re:Olympic Mountains banned by IOC by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      And yet Olympic Paint is still in business (www.olympic.com). I wonder for how much longer?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  18. The Americans are killing the spirit of OLYMPICS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The spirit of open and friendly competition with mutual agreement of arms be set aside for the time being.

  19. What's the legal basis? by laird · · Score: 1

    If they're basing this on owning the copyright to the Olympics, this isn't going to work - owning a copyright on the name of a thing doesn't mean that you can prevent anyone from talking about your thing, just that nobody else can sell it. Lawsuits like this fail often - confused people think that they can use copyright to do more than control the right to copy...

    1. Re:What's the legal basis? by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      If they're basing this on owning the copyright to the Olympics, this isn't going to work - owning a copyright on the name of a thing doesn't mean that you can prevent anyone from talking about your thing, just that nobody else can sell it. Lawsuits like this fail often - confused people think that they can use copyright to do more than control the right to copy...

      They don't have to (and probably don't expect to) win, but they have the power to ruin anyone they choose to that violates their demand (they will simply sue them into the ground, regardless of merits, and their resources will significantly exceed that of their targets).

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    2. Re:What's the legal basis? by irrational_design · · Score: 1

      What about someone like Nike? I don't think they are an Olympic sponsor, but I bet their pockets are deep enough to fight this.

    3. Re:What's the legal basis? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Nike is a major Olympic sponsor.

  20. Freedom of the press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    enough said - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_the_press

  21. Fuck off and die already by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

    What a cherry on the overall sucktitude of US Olympic coverage. Instead of the actual events, we're forced to watch hour after hour of human interest stories and other "puff pieces" which are written to pluck our heartstrings -- all "Sponsored by VISA" or some other shill -- while the events are time-shifted to crazy hours. We need to stay off the Internet so we don't spoil what happened for ourselves. And when we do get the actual events, it's only the US athletes. Fuck that. I mean, that's great and I want to see them, but I want to see *all* the best athletes in the world compete -- not just the sports that have US competitors. I don't care what country they're from -- show me the best. Less crap and more sports. Oh, and the US Olympic Committee might want to hire a marketing person that actually understands things like hashtags instead of this douchebag. Yet another thing the US media has absolutely fucked up for the plebs. This is the first Olympics that I'll be illicitly streaming from another country because I already know the US coverage will blow hard.

    1. Re:Fuck off and die already by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      Get HideMyAss or something else, and stream from CBC :-) Live Events at crazy hours plus some recasts during "normal" North American times.

      Oh yeah, and no puff pieces.

    2. Re:Fuck off and die already by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1

      That's the plan. I've heard some of the UK coverage is really good too.

    3. Re:Fuck off and die already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Get HideMyAss or something else, and stream from CBC

      What, so he can watch Canadian Women fail at Softball? Yeah, that shows how long it's been since I gave a shit about the olympics, it's not even a sport anymore, apparently.

      CBC is not particularly better at showing only the best. They still remain rather biased towards Canadian athletes, even when they suck.

    4. Re:Fuck off and die already by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Comcast/NBC is streaming pretty much every event live. No additional cost, if you subscribe to cable/satellite/Telco TV.

    5. Re:Fuck off and die already by sconeu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here's a little piece I wrote back in 2000...

      An Excerpt from NBC's Olympic coverage

      BC: Hi! I'm Bob Costas, and welcome to NBC's incredibly wonderful coverage of the Olympics(tm). In fact, our coverage is so wonderful that we want you to enjoy the anticipation so much, that we wait till tomorrow! Now let's go to the events.

      Cut to the 10000 meter run

      Announcer1: Look! There's an American running in this race. He hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell of winning, but we're going to keep the camera trained on him, because we know you don't care about who wins if it's some foreigner.

      Announcer2: That's right! Hey, look, the American guy just got lapped by some foreign dude. They should change the rules so that the Americans always come in first.

      Cut to 20 minutes of commercials for Nike, IBM, and Coca-Cola

      BC: Hi! I'm back. And weren't those commercials thrilling? Oh yes, here are the results of the 10,000 meter race. It was actually held yesterday, but we know you didn't want to know about them today. Some foreign guys won, so you don't care. But now we'll cut to a clip from four days ago at the pool, because we know you love to watch Americans accept their gold medals!

      Cut to a clip of some US swimmer accepting their gold medal with the Star Spangled Banner playing in the background.

      BC: Doesn't that just bring a tear to your eye? He managed to win a gold meal, even after he suffered a hangnail last year that almost ended his career. And we'll be showing you that clip every day!

      Looks off camera for a minute...

      What? Oh, I'm sorry. It appears that that athlete has been banned from the Games, and had her medal stripped because she said that she believes that Nike(tm) uses sweatshop labor. Darn. Now we'll have to find another heartwarming clip of an American accepting a medal. Meanwhile, it's off to the fencing competition.

      Cut to yet another 20 minutes of commercials.

      BC (showing bruises on his face): Sorry, I lost my head there for a minute. Management has "reminded" me that Americans don't care about fencing coverage, so we'll go to something else. Here's Rhythmic Gymnastic coverage...

      Cut to the Rhythmic Gymnastic coverage...

      Announcer1: Hi. We're just down to the part where some pre-teen girl runs around the floor holding a huge ball, and we pretend it's a sport. We know you love this coverage.

      Announcer2: Oh! She dropped the ball! Darn it, and she was an American, too! Now we'll probably have to broadcast some pictures of a foreigner. They should change the rules!

      Cut to 20 more minutes of commercials.

      BC: Well, that wraps it up for our Olympic coverage for tonight. After your local news, we'll rerun this entire show, instead of showing other sports that WE know you don't want to watch.

      Cut to 20 more minutes of commercials

      Closing Credits. Includes the line: This is the property of NBC and the IOC. If you even talk to your friends about who won before we broadcast it, we'll sue your asses off!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:Fuck off and die already by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      Canadian Women are like American Women...well except for that pesky Puritan heritage bit.

    7. Re:Fuck off and die already by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      An even better idea: don't watch the Olympics at all.

    8. Re:Fuck off and die already by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Announcer1: Look! There's an American running in this race. He hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell of winning, but we're going to keep the camera trained on him, because we know you don't care about who wins if it's some foreigner.

      If it makes you feel better, I've lived in four different countries and the coverage was all pretty similar. I don't bother any more, the production is always dumbed down to idiot level and removes any of the interest of the global nature of the event.

    9. Re:Fuck off and die already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the 30-45 minute backstory and interview of the swimmer before showing only the last 10 seconds of gold medal swim.
      This is then followed by a 1 hour expose about Brazil or Rio, and some cause de jour - like deforestation of the amazon.

  22. Banned from tweeting by VAXcat · · Score: 4, Funny

    My good taste and good judgement bans me from tweeting about anything, ever.

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  23. Sponsors are not allowed to congratulate athletes by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Kate Grace won the 800m Women's Final trial in a crazy finish a few weeks ago and became an Olympian for the first time. Her sponsor Oiselle posted pictures afterwards congratulating her on Instagram and their website. They were threatened by the US Olympic Committee to remove all posts and pictures of her, their own athlete. Needless to say they and her boyfriend were not happy about this. But since he was not a sponsor he re-posted the "offending" Instagram picture. After a while (and maybe some media backlash) they were allowed to post "compliant" pictures of her win. Effectively they had to censor out any logos relating to the US Olympic trials or Olympics.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  24. But we're all "sponsors" are we? by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    If we buy anything at all, some of that money probably goes to the IOC®, even if the path meanders a bit. I sure it's being used for a good purpose, like fixing up the slums, and cleaning the water, building the stadiums, curing zika, cancer, and mental retardation, amirite? Quit your bellyaching. If you don't buy at least two tickets when thinking about the Olympics®, you are evil, and a thief. Those that do watch are treated the flashy thingy afterwards.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  25. well, that really only applies to Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, based on that gizmodo article it's not an IoC ruling or anything, it's just #TeamUSA

    So.... whatever, who cares?

  26. My company is a sponsor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steroids International & Associates.

    So, we're all set. Whoo hoo!

  27. They are a fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Avoid.

  28. Corrupt bastards by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Commercial entities may not post about the Trials or Games on their corporate social media accounts

    Good luck with that.

    Apparently the letter says that any company whose primary mission isn't media is forbidden from using any pictures taken at the Olympics, sharing, and even reposting anything from the official Olympics account.

    Reminds me of the time when the IOC decided the card game Legend of the Five Rings somehow infringed on their trademarks.

    This from the same crowd that refuses to ban Russia in the face of clear evidence of a state sponsored doping program.

    1. Re:Corrupt bastards by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the time the IOC sued "The Gay Olympics" and made them change their name to "The Gay Games". Apparently it IS possible to own the rights to a word that has been in common use for thousands of years. And apparently you can pick and choose what organizations can use that word (e.g. how much does the Special Olympics pay for the use of the trademark?)

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  29. Intended Streisand Effect by JDHannan · · Score: 2

    Is this an intentional Streisand Effect? Are they just trying to get their name out more by claiming they don't want you to talk about them?

  30. Not an idle threat by sjbe · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can bluster and threaten as much as you want, but reporting on the facts is perfectly legal.

    That's true but the IOC and USOC don't care. They will sue you even if you did nothing illegal and I don't think this is an idle threat. They (mistakenly) think they are protecting their corporate sponsors by doing this. They sued Wizards of the Coast for using a symbol that could not possibly have been mistaken for the Olympic rings.

    1. Re:Not an idle threat by janimal · · Score: 1

      Next, they will ban the carpet beater.

    2. Re:Not an idle threat by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      They threatened a pizza place called Olympia Pizza in Vancouver back before the 2010 games. [According to the Wayback Machine they only started using the rings in their website header in 2014.]

    3. Re:Not an idle threat by unrtst · · Score: 1

      They sued Wizards of the Coast for using a symbol that could not possibly have been mistaken for the Olympic rings.

      #OoOoO ridiculous trademark

    4. Re:Not an idle threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my understanding this is how the U.S. justice system now works too... they offer to cut you a deal while holding the threat of an immense penalty over your head if you don't confess.. guilty or not.
      Am I wrong?

  31. Use RICO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The IOC is obviously a corrupt organisation, so proscribe them and prosecute them under RICO. Get rid of the commercialism in the Olympics and make it an amateur contest for individuals rather than national teams.

  32. Just Lisa Baird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think everybody knows that Lisa Baird is an asshole.
    Does this mean that Scott Blackmun and Larry Probst
    want to join the club?
    I can see the podium now!
    The Gold Medal Asshole in the center flanked by Silver and Bronze.
    Please feel free to Tweet this to the whole fucking world.

  33. Trademark infringement mostly by sjbe · · Score: 1

    If they're basing this on owning the copyright to the Olympics, this isn't going to work - owning a copyright on the name of a thing doesn't mean that you can prevent anyone from talking about your thing, just that nobody else can sell it.

    It's not only a copyright but a trademark too. They Olympics and symbols relating to it are all trademarks so the primary argument would be trademark infringement though in many cases their argument would be a weak one. Often they don't have a solid legal leg to stand on but they have demonstrated in the past that they will no hesitate to sick their flesh eating lawyers on anyone who crosses them.

    Basically they are trying to protect the (substantial) money they get from their "official sponsors".

    1. Re:Trademark infringement mostly by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

      Using a trademark when discussion the trademarked item is what trademarks are for. You can't ban anyone from using your trademark for talking about your item.

      Of course, you can sue them, but that's because you can sue for any reason at all, in the US.

  34. Wishful thinking by sjbe · · Score: 1

    if only all media companies would just say "screw it" and not post anything about the Olympics.

    If they can't resist talking about Donald Trump and his douchebaggery they sure as heck won't resist talking about the Olympics and their corrupt douchebaggery. Even when they should...

  35. Waits for /. takedown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since clearly that article is violating their copywrite

  36. Another example of top management ignorance by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Funny

    At the next Olympics, trademark security will be even stronger! No one will be allowed to know where the Olympics is held! You will have to pay a fee to use the word "Olympics".

  37. No talk of the games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I would be absolutely thrilled to not have to hear about the Olympics at all, except in this kind of light - the hue that makes it look fucking stupid.

    I say they should crack down even more so I can enjoy the pure silence.

  38. Die, please. by RevRagnarok · · Score: 2

    I really hope this year is the year that this farce dies. Between Zika and Russia, there's a chance. Such a waste of time and money.

    --
    I should put something clever here. Maybe someday.
  39. Let's not speak about it then by AncalagonTotof · · Score: 1

    Not at all.
    Let's them play their money games in private.

    I know, it will be hard.

    --
    Totof
  40. Starter pistols no longer loaded with blanks by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Starer pistols will no longer be loaded with blanks, because I can tell you the results of the race; but then I have to kill you.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  41. Re:The Americans are killing the spirit of OLYMPIC by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    To be fair, while this latest idiocy is the USOC, the IOC is even worse about this same sort of bullshit.

  42. Is this legal? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Other than Trademark law, how exactly is this ban enforceable? I suspect legally companies are free to tweet anything they want as long as they don't include terms specifically trademarked by the IOC, much as advertisers referred to the Superbowl as "the big game" instead of the trademarked "Superbowl" term.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Is this legal? by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      I suspect legally companies are free to tweet anything they want as long as they don't include terms specifically trademarked by the IOC, much as advertisers referred to the Superbowl as "the big game" instead of the trademarked "Superbowl" term.

      Even if they did use the trademarked terms, the use of trademarks for purely descriptive purposes is not trademark infringement, whether or not you have the trademark holder's permission. Trademarks only exist to prevent confusion, not to censor discussion.

      Calling your own event "the Superbowl"—trademark infringement.

      Accurately referring to the Superbowl as "the Superbowl"—not infringement.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  43. The IOC has a special treaty with all nations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over the years the IOC has buried this special status that have. Try and find information of the treaties the IOC has, it will be hard. The IOC is outside of national laws, they are protected by treaty status enforcement. The best you will probably find is the Nairobi Treaty from 1981. But there are numerous rulings from the WIPO that have made the IOC have more and more power then they should have ever been allowed.

    The bottom line, you are not breaking some US law, or British law, or what ever nation law. Your are breaking an international law, and those are special. No one wins, only nations win, and then only when that nation says fuck you "make me".

    1. Re:The IOC has a special treaty with all nations by Holi · · Score: 1

      The Constitution is the law above treaties. No treaty can take away your right to free speech.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    2. Re:The IOC has a special treaty with all nations by Holi · · Score: 1

      At least here in America.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    3. Re:The IOC has a special treaty with all nations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting a picture of the Olympics is not free speech. You did not utter some speech. You posted a image of a protected venue, that is not covered by free speech. You can still say you saw something, or were there.

      Yet, the treaty covering the Olympics, does not allow you as an individual to let anyone else know what you saw specifically until well after the fact. Unless,
      you pay for the privilege. Treaties do not supersede the constitution. Copyright is a constitutional right. As long as no law exists for perpetual copyright, you lose.

    4. Re:The IOC has a special treaty with all nations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're rich.

  44. One thing I don't understand by edbob · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are the Summer Olympics being held in Brazil IN WINTER?

    1. Re:One thing I don't understand by cpotoso · · Score: 1

      Have you been to Rio in winter?

    2. Re:One thing I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being Caption Obvious(ooops trademark violation!): besides the usual comment about Imperialist Masters all being from the non-tropical Northern Hemisphere ... It is too damn hot(!) in Brazil in the summer. (Not that it matter in Socci in the "winter")

    3. Re:One thing I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Rio is located 22 degrees, 54 minutes, and 30 seconds (+- city boundaries) south of the equator.
      The Tropic of Capricorn is 23 degrees, 26 minutes south of the equator.

      While close (roughly 35 miles or 55 kilometers), this does technically mean that Rio is in the tropics and functionally does not have winter.
      Living just under 5 degrees temperate of a tropic line myself, I can vouch that "winter" in or near the tropics is only slightly cooler than summer, and we are not likely to be buried under snow even if the interglacial period ends tomorrow.

    4. Re:One thing I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the southern hemisphere the seasons are reversed. So Christmas is warm and Fourth of July is cold, etc.

    5. Re:One thing I don't understand by dafradu · · Score: 1

      What is the problem? You probably can even host the winter olympics during the summer in some places, it would be harder but still possible i think.

      The "summer" games is much easier, they can happen any time given you have stadiums with a roof to avoid snow if that happens in that city. Given the average temperatures in Rio, i'm sure it could be the coldest winter in 100 years and it wouldn't be a problem to any competition taking place.

      Pretty much the same happened in 2000, the games in Sidney were on September...

    6. Re:One thing I don't understand by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      because money...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    7. Re:One thing I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I've only read/heard people calling it the "Summer" Olympics in english. People just call it the olympics in other languages (that's certainly the case in portuguese).

    8. Re:One thing I don't understand by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Well, Brazil goes from Tropical to Subtropical and thus never really gets cold anywhere in the country even in winter. In fact it might still be really hot and humid during the Olympics.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  45. Re-Tweet This, Please! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

    Please re-tweet this. It asserts your constitutional right to free speech.

    1. Re:Re-Tweet This, Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod up! Or do what I do and just don't watch the Olympics.

  46. any terrorist incidents will be seen on nbc only w by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    any terrorist incidents will be seen on nbc only with there editing and tape delay.

    And they can block from showing any thing in rio / enforce blackouts CNN, cnn international, BBC World News America, fox news, CBC, BBC America, FOX
      News Channel, FOX Business Network, ETC.

  47. I refer to it as the Super Bowel by HBI · · Score: 1

    It's a big turd every year, anyway.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  48. No Problem! #FuckTheOlympics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No problem! I'll also block that shit from my social media accounts as well!

    #FuckTheOlympics

  49. TPP by blackomegax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the future of how all companies will behave under the TPP.

  50. lol the olmpics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a bunch of niggers running around catching zika

    i hope all of their babbiess head area shrunk

  51. TOO BAD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free speech is a right and I will tweet any damn thing I like.

  52. This is NOT a matter of trademark violation by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

    You violate a trademark if you mis-represent a good or service as that of the trademark holder. And it has to be in the same trademark category that they registered. Having a trademark does not grant ownership of a word, and does not prevent anyone else from using that word. Use of a trademark in reporting and normal discussion is not a violation.

    1. Re:This is NOT a matter of trademark violation by cdogg4ya · · Score: 1

      Mod this up...

    2. Re:This is NOT a matter of trademark violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A commercial entity using the trademark in conjunction with promotion of their own product would be a violation.

      theoretical example: "Nice work on the 100m Kendra! Now run to the border and grab yourself a free taco! #TeamUSA #TacoBell"
      (I don't know twitter, so I'm guessing that's what a tweet looks like)

    3. Re:This is NOT a matter of trademark violation by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

      Not necessarily. Take a look at the relevant portion of the Lantham Act. It would have to fit one of the provisions therein. It might make a false suggestion of affiliation, but it's arguable.

      15 U.S.C. 1125 - False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden

      (a) Civil action

      (1) Any person who, on or in connection with any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false or misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact, which

      (A) is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person, or

      (B) in commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of his or her or another person's goods, services, or commercial activities,

      shall be liable in a civil action by any person who believes that he or she is or is likely to be damaged by such act.

  53. Aye sir! by aglider · · Score: 1

    Any company tweeting about Olympics will be ... banned ... sued ... slapped on buttocks ... deleted from any social media (whatever this means)!
    We have full powers now !

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  54. The IOC is run by clueless, stupid lawyers by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    This is not a facetious comment - I've been involved with a few things for kids over the years and the Twitter restrictions listed in the article are minor compared to what you have to put up with trying to promote *their* event with kids.

    For example, you can't have any kind of media publicity without the local IOC's permission. You cannot use the terms "Olympian" or "Olympic Athlete", instead you must use "Athlete that has/is going to compete in the Olympics". You cannot display the five rings (even if it's adorably drawn by a five year old). You cannot have your own "Olympic medals".

    It's amazing because you are promoting *their* event for free, for them.

  55. You've received your marching orders by ip_vjl · · Score: 1

    All of you (non-commercial) people on the tweetspaces ... you now need to start using those hashtags for all sorts of unsavory things. If they're going to be that way about it, make sure the tags are useless.

    Did they learn nothing from the whole "Santorum" debacle?

  56. As Colbert would say by paiute · · Score: 1

    I am sending my reporter Joe Olym to Brazil and he will be sending us photos. #OlymPics

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  57. NFL says.... by Killer+Instinct · · Score: 1

    "Any other use of this telecast or any pictures, descriptions, or accounts of the game without the NFL's consent is prohibited,"

    Obviously people talk and post pics...etc....

    --
    #include bier;
  58. I think we might find out by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Goodness knows this one stunk before it ever started.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  59. This has been challenged in US courts.. by Killer+Instinct · · Score: 1

    This story from arstechnica Any use of this article without the NFL’s express written consent is prohibited is a good read, including

    Attempts to alter these copyright claims have yet to produce real change, but the sports leagues have been forced to alter some of their behavior relating to copyright. Major League Baseball, for instance, has long claimed that fantasy sports leagues must take out a license in order to use real player names and stats—despite the "fact" that facts aren't copyrightable.

    --
    #include bier;
  60. Finally, a reason to use my twitter account by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    I have like one post from 4 or 5 years ago. Now I'm going to start tweeting about the olympics. Because fuck you.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  61. Hades 2026 by epine · · Score: 1

    Last Week Tonight Winter Olympics 2022

    The ending here is not one of his best, but the two bits with Brian Williams are priceless. The other good bit: 7000 pages of host-nation demands.

    Apart from the women's hockey finals, I can hardly recall the last minute of Olympic coverage I've watched in ten years, just because I hate IOC with the burning intensity of a thousand suns.

    You might think I'm exaggerating, but consider that it's only one sun per seven pages of arrogance from geriatric gargoyles that even the French don't want.

  62. It is time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to starve the blood sucking ticks. This is the moment to cry out to all digital slaves, "Turn your attention elsewhere, look away, do not feed such monomaniacal machinations." This is the only way. let 7 billion voices cry out, about everything else, except the olympics, let that organization starve as a new social pariah.

  63. The Olympic Corporate Circle Jerk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Olympic Corporate Circle Jerk is obstensibly a competition that takes place to see which country can pump athletes full of the greatest amount of drugs without being detected. However, there are also the less well known events where corporations get to compete to find how many new laws and special conditions they can get local authorities to concede to, the greatest area of environmentally sensitive land destroyed, and recently a new event the 100m global pandemic.

  64. Time for DDOS by Tweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EVERYONE with a Twitter account needs to flood TwitterSpace with EVERY SINGLE THING about the Rio Olympics.

    Let's get it to the point where Twitter's Servers can't stand the load.

    Oh, and a nice, constant DDOS attack against the IOC would be a nice touch, too...

    CAPTCHA: Bleats

  65. I tweet about the Olympics all the time by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    In fact, I can see the mountain range from my window and the whole National Park.

    Try to stop me, greedheads!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  66. London did this... by NotRightAway · · Score: 1

    ... everybody ignored it. No action was taken. The end.

  67. USA by Kindaian · · Score: 1

    Read the title...

    Meaning they may have a trademark in the USA, but for it to be valid outside of it, it's another question altogether.

    Good luck...

  68. Guess IOC didn't read Twitter's ToS by laughingskeptic · · Score: 1

    With regard to the Olympics' official twitter account, anything that the IOC posts can't be restricted in this manner as is very clear in clause 5 of the Twitter ToS. https://twitter.com/tos?lang=e...

  69. Ummm... wait... what agreements *are* in place? by dbc · · Score: 1

    So.... let's say I have a company with no agreement with the IOC to be a sponsor or any other thing. Said company can tweet what they damn well want. There is no agreement in place between IOC and said company, ergo, no agreement to either break or enforce. The IOC is firing blanks.

    1. Re:Ummm... wait... what agreements *are* in place? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      That only matters if you have enough money to defend yourself against a lawsuit. Even if you'd obviously win the suit from a legal perspective, that doesn't matter if you go bankrupt before the case ends.

  70. Twitter is bullshit anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you want to tweet your heartfelt feelings about the Olympics to the masses? It is frivolous.

  71. Los Angeles Olympics 1932-1982 Helm's Bakery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 1932 Helm's bakery in Los Angeles somehow supported the Olympics. I think they gave free bread to the athletes. After the Olympics their Bakery on Venice Blvd, Culver City, continued to display a had a large sign in the shape of the Olympic seal. The stayed on top of the building after Helms Bakery closed in 1969.
    For the 1984 Olympics the Olympic goons demanded the sign come down. Or the building owners cough up a lot dough--hey! A pun!
    I forget the details, but the sign stayed, and I'm pretty sure no money was paid.
    We loved getting doughnuts off their delivery trucks.

  72. #OlymPricks2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's get it trending!

  73. Another Nail in the Coffin by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

    I gave up when I started realising the Olympics stopped being about sportsmanship and your average sports person and all about who has the best genetic freaks and the smartest drugs and the best corporate sponsor. For example they now know that you can give enhancement drugs to an athlete withdraw them months even years before the event and the athlete will still retain some of the advantage of taking the drugs. So when you hear of past drug cheats getting back into the Olympics with times that are almost the same as when they were a drug cheat, well now you know why.

  74. I wish nobody would talk about it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish nobody would talk about it.

  75. all the more reason not to watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had already planned to not watch one minute of the games. I used to watch them. Caught most of them 76 games from start to finish. Back then it was amateurs competing. And they did it for their country.

    Now, it is all about the money, for athletes, companies and officials.

  76. Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good luck with that USOC. You have invited an Internet Shit Storm (tm). I hope EVERYONE tweets about the Olympics while they are one and you can go an prosecute them.

    An appropriate hastag #usocaredouchebags

  77. Dickish Behaviour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CMO Lisa Baird is a dick. Also, anyone else at the IOC who thinks this is a good idea.

    The Olympics are a cultural event. They existed long before your transient IOC and they will exist in some form long after. They are bigger than your branding and intellectual property issues. That's life, we don't care what you think, and stop being a bunch of dicks.