The "known source" could be eliminated if each antenna controller changed the frequency it listened on based on the random noise generated from the other antennas.
the students should not be forced into a subscription via tuition. I just finished my first year of college and I did not once download music from a peer to peer network. Assuming that all students do is a blunder. I would be very upset if I was locked into a plan to purchase music "legally" when I'm not breaking the law in the first place.
India has some of the best medicin and education in the world. Much of the country is still remote though. It's happening, faster than it did in the US/Europe too.
In a country where the people have little power or voice if someone up high wants it to be that way it is. In the US you have too many people complain. Sometimes Americans need to suck it up. (I'm an American)
No but if you sent that add to someone else Levis kept track of how many people got it and will be sending you a pile of free clothes in a month to thank you for testing their new add tracking system.
It only seems like a big deal to admit you were tricked because you weren't. Remember, most people can just make the excuse that they are not "tech savvy" and therefore were vulnerable to false advertising. Whether or not this is valid is beside the point, in their mind it's a good excuse and they won't have any problem admitting that they are mindless idiots. Oh, and when there is money involved people will do and say anything.
In all the years I have spent playing games I can't think of much I've learned. I'm sure I would have learned more -- a lot more -- if the games were my only source of information, but reading and REAL LIFE covered 99% of any game long before I played the game. What kids should really be doing is reading and have parents that encourage and take part in teaching/learning.
Re:Small island nations shouldn't count for firsts
on
Niue Gets Island-Wide WiFi
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
UCSD has 5,500 on campus students and we've had wireless for two years now.
Free except for all the Tax Dollars that go to pay for it. And Korea has amazingly fast internet...for a hefty price. The actual cost is probably immeasurable because the money comes from all over but trust me, it isn't free.
10^51 happens to be about 2^170. IPv6 has 2^128 addresses. So I guess if we needed to assign every atom on earth an IP we may run into a problem.
Remember "640k should be enough for everyone"? Well this time 2^128 should be enough for everyone.
It isn't a matter of one person or group moving to IPv6. The backbone support has to be there if they are going to be able to communicate with anyone else. The infastructure needs to be there and it isn't right now.
This sounds great but also a lot of work and as one reader wrote, one adapter is not the most usefull router in the world. How about go out and buy one of those Walmart Lindows OS PCs for like $199-$250, it's running Linux. Put another ethernet adapter or two in it, configure it and set it up. Now you have a firewall/router/NAT/spare computer for less that $300. Not exactly a Dreamcast but more versitile faster and more usefull.
Windows 9x itself can not support NTLM. Windows 95/98/ME use the LM (Lan Manager) protocal and can not communicate with NTLM. Most windows 2000/XP machines have both NTLM and LM authentication turned on for backwards compatibility. If you turn that backwards compatibility off for security windows 9x will not be able to fully comunicate with NT/2000/XP. Mozilla will only be able to use NTLM on a machine that can support it.
This may be so but it still doesn't explain their 44mbps "4x" mode that you can upgrade to with a firmware upgrade. If 2x is only full duplex then my testing would not have seen an increas since I was testing maximum one-way bandwidth.
It is funny you mention the Dlink 650+. This is the exact card I had when I decided to go wireless. I couldn't get it to work so I sold it and bought a Lucent Orinoco. But, a few months later I see people using the DLink line (650+ and others) on Linux without a problem. Of course not with the X2 support or the X4 (44mbs) with an upgraded firmware. But then DLink claimed double speed and I did a few experiments when I was using the 650+ in windows and I could not find a speed difference running between 11 and 22. The card and the router were only about 6 feet away when I did the testing. So so much "twice as fast" like they claim. So the 650(+) is supported, just not it's "faster" 2x setting.
Because the company gets respect and it's name out there amonge a group of power users and frequent buyers. Look at NVidia. They sure get a lot of coverage on Slashdot. Much of this is due to their
great Linux drivers. If they made great cards that wern't supported or had poor/shotty support many fewer Slashdot readers would care one witt about what NVidia does. When Apple embraced open source all of a sudden they got a whole second army of geeks following. Why does it make sense to write drivers in support of linux? Because the 5% of the people that will use those products have a lot of influence in a much larger comunity. (IT, business settings)
The "known source" could be eliminated if each antenna controller changed the frequency it listened on based on the random noise generated from the other antennas.
Six Lava Lamps not to mention six photo-sensors? Why not six cheep antennas to measure radio noise? Probably take up less room too.
the students should not be forced into a subscription via tuition. I just finished my first year of college and I did not once download music from a peer to peer network. Assuming that all students do is a blunder. I would be very upset if I was locked into a plan to purchase music "legally" when I'm not breaking the law in the first place.
India has some of the best medicin and education in the world. Much of the country is still remote though. It's happening, faster than it did in the US/Europe too.
In a country where the people have little power or voice if someone up high wants it to be that way it is. In the US you have too many people complain. Sometimes Americans need to suck it up. (I'm an American)
It's stuff like this that keeps me from subscribing.
Why do you keep reading? It's the news and the articals that matter.
Smooth? It's been smooth because it hasn't happened yet.
The best lies have some truth to them.
No but if you sent that add to someone else Levis kept track of how many people got it and will be sending you a pile of free clothes in a month to thank you for testing their new add tracking system.
Internet History
ISP Logs
Cookies
They look like and idiot
It only seems like a big deal to admit you were tricked because you weren't. Remember, most people can just make the excuse that they are not "tech savvy" and therefore were vulnerable to false advertising. Whether or not this is valid is beside the point, in their mind it's a good excuse and they won't have any problem admitting that they are mindless idiots. Oh, and when there is money involved people will do and say anything.
In all the years I have spent playing games I can't think of much I've learned. I'm sure I would have learned more -- a lot more -- if the games were my only source of information, but reading and REAL LIFE covered 99% of any game long before I played the game. What kids should really be doing is reading and have parents that encourage and take part in teaching/learning.
UCSD has 5,500 on campus students and we've had wireless for two years now.
Free except for all the Tax Dollars that go to pay for it. And Korea has amazingly fast internet...for a hefty price. The actual cost is probably immeasurable because the money comes from all over but trust me, it isn't free.
10^51 happens to be about 2^170. IPv6 has 2^128 addresses. So I guess if we needed to assign every atom on earth an IP we may run into a problem. Remember "640k should be enough for everyone"? Well this time 2^128 should be enough for everyone.
The Earth has about 2^170 atoms. IPv6 only provides 2^128 addresses. Bummer.
It isn't a matter of one person or group moving to IPv6. The backbone support has to be there if they are going to be able to communicate with anyone else. The infastructure needs to be there and it isn't right now.
Address space is going so fast by 2008 the question wont be "What is your ip address?" it will be "Do you have an ip address?"
BSD might be allowed to slip by just this once. Berkeley is involved after all.
This sounds great but also a lot of work and as one reader wrote, one adapter is not the most usefull router in the world. How about go out and buy one of those Walmart Lindows OS PCs for like $199-$250, it's running Linux. Put another ethernet adapter or two in it, configure it and set it up. Now you have a firewall/router/NAT/spare computer for less that $300. Not exactly a Dreamcast but more versitile faster and more usefull.
How did people live before there was TV? We've got better uses for the radio spectrum now and we'd like to use it. Not end lives.
Windows 9x itself can not support NTLM. Windows 95/98/ME use the LM (Lan Manager) protocal and can not communicate with NTLM. Most windows 2000/XP machines have both NTLM and LM authentication turned on for backwards compatibility. If you turn that backwards compatibility off for security windows 9x will not be able to fully comunicate with NT/2000/XP. Mozilla will only be able to use NTLM on a machine that can support it.
This may be so but it still doesn't explain their 44mbps "4x" mode that you can upgrade to with a firmware upgrade. If 2x is only full duplex then my testing would not have seen an increas since I was testing maximum one-way bandwidth.
It is funny you mention the Dlink 650+. This is the exact card I had when I decided to go wireless. I couldn't get it to work so I sold it and bought a Lucent Orinoco. But, a few months later I see people using the DLink line (650+ and others) on Linux without a problem. Of course not with the X2 support or the X4 (44mbs) with an upgraded firmware. But then DLink claimed double speed and I did a few experiments when I was using the 650+ in windows and I could not find a speed difference running between 11 and 22. The card and the router were only about 6 feet away when I did the testing. So so much "twice as fast" like they claim. So the 650(+) is supported, just not it's "faster" 2x setting.
Because the company gets respect and it's name out there amonge a group of power users and frequent buyers. Look at NVidia. They sure get a lot of coverage on Slashdot. Much of this is due to their great Linux drivers. If they made great cards that wern't supported or had poor/shotty support many fewer Slashdot readers would care one witt about what NVidia does. When Apple embraced open source all of a sudden they got a whole second army of geeks following. Why does it make sense to write drivers in support of linux? Because the 5% of the people that will use those products have a lot of influence in a much larger comunity. (IT, business settings)