[...] and accidentally revealing the truth that someone is innocent doesn't necessarily ruin their case.
Yes it does. Revealing that someone is innocent while trying to prove they are guilty is exactly ruining the case against the person. Unless you're judging the quality of a case by its outcome. But that's a poor criterion for judging the quality of a case; one which only an attorney would accept:-p
I agree of course, but how exactly do you go about identifying these people so that they don't open another account? Credit card numbers? PayPal accounts?
exploitation, esp. of those who cannot prevent or counter it.
That is what "ripping off" means in this context, but that is not what it literally means. Literally it means something more like, "to break off with a shearing force." It's humorous how often English speakers use the word literally when they mean the actually mean the thing figuratively.
The best port of the original PoP that I've played is definitely the classic Mac version. And yes, it stands up to the test of time (or the sands of time?).
Zoroastrianism is quite dualistic (though, as I understand it, ultimately the good, uncreated God will win). It also predates Manichaeism by about a millennium.
There were four versions which preceded the Sands of Time. But maybe you meant in the current series? I've only played the first two, on my Color Classic Mac. I remember seeing the first 3D version... the graphics were quite painful compared to the smooth animation the the 2D versions. I think most video games jumped to 3D about 15 years before they should have.
Slashdot Mirror
No. It's just that next year's April Fool's came 8 months and 6 days early.
[...] and accidentally revealing the truth that someone is innocent doesn't necessarily ruin their case.
Yes it does. Revealing that someone is innocent while trying to prove they are guilty is exactly ruining the case against the person. Unless you're judging the quality of a case by its outcome. But that's a poor criterion for judging the quality of a case; one which only an attorney would accept :-p
The DA both PROVED they where wrong in locking him up, AND completely and utterly ruined their case
Isn't proving they were wrong in locking him up the same thing as ruining their case?
> This wasn't a normal father. He was a criminal.
That's not fair. There are many criminals, who are also fathers, who love and don't harm their children.
> Yes, apt-get is good, but it's not yet in the Mac's "drag-and-drop" league.
Hehe. That's a joke.... right?
You're right. I asked my information his opinion on the matter, and he clearly said that he should be free, not so much that he wants to be free.
You know, I asked my data for their opinion, and they said the very same thing.
As for my datum, it disagrees. An argumentative little datum it is.
You're right. I asked my information his opinion on the matter, and he clearly said that he should be free, not so much that he wants to be free.
Epic Fale.
What's that? Like a really big Samoan thatched roof house?
... but they can upgrade to the latest version of Camino.
Neither can Mac OS X 10.3 (Panther) users.
13. Try not to get hit by truck as you maneuver Frogger machine across street.
Forgot to say that his VERY OPPRESSIVE PARENTS installed the device on his car...
Only to protect him from the cops.
And what about deniability, then?
You could try TrueCrypt. I think it works on Macs.
yup, ...until some folks showed flaws in TrueCrypt deniability
You should just use a Mac. I've never experienced any bugs with its built-in encryption options.
So, just to play along, what software do you propose to use on the mac to provide deniable encryption?
You could try this program called TrueCrypt. It seems to work okay.
There's a piece of ASCII art depicting a stick figure with something whooshing over its head waiting to be posted in reply to that.
Yes.
From your link:
That is what "ripping off" means in this context, but that is not what it literally means. Literally it means something more like, "to break off with a shearing force." It's humorous how often English speakers use the word literally when they mean the actually mean the thing figuratively.
Many of these would probably suit you: List of ECMAScript Engines.
Some helpful documentation:
How to embed SpiderMonkey in your C/C++ program (try Rhino for Java apps).
Although in my opinion Lua is so similar to JavaScript in all the right ways, and is so easily embedded, that it might be a better choice anyway.
There, fixed it.
Which came first, the Abraham or the Zarathustra?
The best port of the original PoP that I've played is definitely the classic Mac version. And yes, it stands up to the test of time (or the sands of time?).
Zoroastrianism is quite dualistic (though, as I understand it, ultimately the good, uncreated God will win). It also predates Manichaeism by about a millennium.
Zoroastrian
There were four versions which preceded the Sands of Time. But maybe you meant in the current series? I've only played the first two, on my Color Classic Mac. I remember seeing the first 3D version... the graphics were quite painful compared to the smooth animation the the 2D versions. I think most video games jumped to 3D about 15 years before they should have.
He used Ada, not Groovy