Slashdot Mirror


China Says It Lacks Skills To Hack US Systems

ScentCone writes "A spokesman for China's foreign ministry says that — China being the 'developing nation' that it is — he doubts that his country has the sophistication to hack foreign systems. This in response to statements by two congressmen regarding apparent probing by China-based crackers into congressional systems for information about communication between US officials and activists in China."

507 comments

  1. South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    How would we, chinese people with leetle leetle penises have the courage to do something like that against big americans with big penises?

    1. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, but it was used by Japanese, not Chinese.

    2. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so shmall, so shmall ^^

    3. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is an asshole thing to say, first of all + SouthPark? Imo, @ least, is a show for small minded idiots, period...

      The Chinese ARE a great culture with over 5,000 yrs. of recorded history behind them (when the caucasian race was still in caves that people were already culturally & scientifically advanced, by way of comparison), the only OTHER like it, is India, afaik!

      Plus? You have to consider this - does China get into wars? No... they're NOT that stupid!

      They're 1 bunch I'd never want to face in a "street fight"/all-out-war... there are JUST TOO MANY OF THEM, & yes, they have nukes too, so what is the point? It's destructive stupidity, everyone loses, in either scenario.

      I respect them, you ought to as well... & hope all those "chinese men" with little pencils don't decide to come take your nations' ladies away from you, @ the point of a gun during a war, ok?

      APK

      P.S.=> Personally, I think it is the "RBN" @ work, & they AREN'T chinese guys, they're Russians (Russian jews is my guess, not true "bialo rus") who hop between China & Russian hosting providers etc. regularly as needed... Because IF ANYONE has a great deal to fear from China? It's Russia... they took a good chunk of lands away from China & they're overpopulated and could use that land. Think this doesn't weigh on Russia's mind??

      I.E.-> The RBN's ("Russian Business Network") has SOME of the skill necessary for this (just based on their javascript/iframe/bad Shockwave + Flash & bad Adobe .pdf files they use in malicious site code injection & bad adbanner attacks they've been pulling the past few years now)...

      (I think whoever stands to gain from starting up a fight between the Chinese & the U.S. (or, whoever) is the REAL culprits here, & Lord knows, you CANNOT trust our gov't. when it comes to interpreting data (9/11 ring a bell here anyone?))

      If you can't take an opponent directly? Stir up crap between HE & his biggest opponent, & watch them BOTH "take a dive", while you end up the victor mopping up the spoils of war/walking out of the saloon with the wench over your shoulder & jug of wine in the other hand, is what I suspect this REALLY is... apk

    4. Re:South Park defense by BL08N0883N · · Score: 0, Troll

      Exactly - I don't believe this for a second. China is pissed that we've been getting on their case for the led in children's toys and the view that we're not giving them the respect they feel they deserve with the whole Olympic thing. At the same time, they own a lot of our national dept, and with a president like Bush I would not be surprised if they think of us as dumb Americans who will just believe what we're told by the media....but that's not true, right?

      --
      Jeff for President
    5. Re:South Park defense by datan · · Score: 4, Informative

      it's a polite way in China to receive a compliment

    6. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean dumb Americans who can't spell "lead" or "debt" and can't construct a logical paragraph? Why would they think that?

    7. Re:South Park defense by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      How would we, chinese people with leetle leetle penises have the courage to do something like that against big americans with big penises? God, that's the very first line that went through my head when I read the summary. The second line was Americans saying "Aw, shucks, you don't have to be much of a hacker, we don't know anything about system hardening."

      Of course, the really ironic thing would be if the Chinese were hacking the American systems to turn them into zombies to spam out ads for penis enlargement pills.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    8. Re:South Park defense by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Informative

      China is an amazing culture with lots of fantastic history, and racism/culturalism is bad. That does not mean that taking stereotypes and portraying them as ridiculous is, and most of your "facts" are silly.

      China does get into wars (though historically with itself, and is claiming areas taken by the Mongols(Tibet is not historically part of China). Though "The Art of War" advises against fighting, it was not written because of a history of peace.

      People started moving out of caves 8,000 years ago, with the advent of agriculture in the fertile crescent.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    9. Re:South Park defense by NFN_NLN · · Score: 1

      I respect them, you ought to as well... & hope all those "chinese men" with little pencils don't decide to come take your nations' ladies away from you, @ the point of a gun during a war, ok? Other way around champ... here's your info straight from asian chicks. wonk wonk wonk...

      "Why Asian Girls Like White Guys" (the video)

      http://youtube.com/watch?v=iU--47nvywc
    10. Re:South Park defense by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      If each nuclear warhead we have were to kill 125,000 people, they'd still win.
      They still would have a population greater than our own and the `fight` in them would be far greater as we would have attacked and wiped out 600,000,000+ citizens.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    11. Re:South Park defense by ivanmarsh · · Score: 0

      Wow! That's exactly what I was thinking, OOoooo.

    12. Re:South Park defense by ivanmarsh · · Score: 5, Funny

      That is an asshole thing to say, first of all + SouthPark? Imo, @ least, is a show for small minded idiots, period...

      The Chinese ARE a great culture with over 5,000 yrs. of recorded history behind them (when the caucasian race was still in caves that people were already culturally & scientifically advanced, by way of comparison), the only OTHER like it, is India, afaik!


      I bet the Chinese have a better sense of humor than you.

    13. Re:South Park defense by alexborges · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Racism and culturalism is bad.... for OCCIDENT. Chinesse have NO PROBLEM with being chauvinistic, ultranationalists, kind of like the japaneese.

      China is the longest living civilization/culture of earth. I would say that they are the most succesfull example of a civilization that the eyes of the world has ever seen.

      In 5k years of empire, they got to fuck arround with most of asia, all the way down to indochina, and all the way to the east till japan.

      What they are answering now, comes from a culture that is very, very, very smart. Old. Intelligent.

      This only is "plausible deniability" at its best. And kudos to the chinesse,they did it very well.

      --
      NO SIG
    14. Re:South Park defense by Nathrael · · Score: 1

      But their population centers are also much larger than the State's population centers. Yes, more people would die, but for the war, it would be neither more or less effective for the US to nuke China then for China to nuke the US, as long as you only see it from a statistical perspective. Oh, and, if you target a city, there would certainly be a lot more dead people than just 125k.

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    15. Re:South Park defense by alta · · Score: 1

      When I was 16 I drove a 73 corolla (this was in '93). I tried to tell the cop there was NO WAY I was going over 75... my car couldn't.

      He didn't buy it. Maybe I was going down hill.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    16. Re:South Park defense by tomithychen · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Mr. Ho's penis is especially small... So small.

    17. Re:South Park defense by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      403, they do not allow hot-linking.

    18. Re:South Park defense by Yetihehe · · Score: 4, Informative

      What they are answering now, comes from a culture that is very, very, very smart. Old. Intelligent.
      Yeah, especially after cultural revolution (1966-76), when they effectively removed scientists from public life and science never quite reborn after this. Very smart indeed.
      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    19. Re:South Park defense by gnick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If each nuclear warhead we have were to kill 125,000 people, they'd still win. I categorically reject your implied definition of "win".
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    20. Re:South Park defense by kiehlster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, they're hacking American systems to find out the real secret behind our big penises. Obviously the guinea pigs they get for their enlargement pill experiments are not showing the promised results they expected while attempting to perfect their own pills.

    21. Re:South Park defense by pragma_x · · Score: 0

      1. Call South Park "a show for small minded idiots"
      2. ?
      3. Profit!

    22. Re:South Park defense by TheSync · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "They still would have a population greater than our own and the `fight` in them would be far greater as we would have attacked and wiped out 600,000,000+ citizens."

      On the other hand, if we closed down the port of Long Beach, China would be bankrupt in a few months.

      Well, I suppose we'd also have to refuse to pay back US Treasury Securities owned by the Chinese government.

      Hmmm, then we'd probably be bankrupt as well as the world would refuse to purchase any more of our government debt.

      Prices at Wal-Mart would double as well.

      I hope we can all "just get along!"

    23. Re:South Park defense by pragma_x · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree.

      The only way to win is not to play.

    24. Re:South Park defense by BPPG · · Score: 1

      I categorically reject your implied definition of "win". I agree. The only way to win is not to play. If I just had two mod points left, you would both get them.
      --
      What's the value of information that you don't know?
    25. Re:South Park defense by Carewolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nonsense. China banned science and innovation more than 500 years ago, and science and technology has not since been more accepted and applied than recently under the so-called communist regime.

    26. Re:South Park defense by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      The cultural revolution set them back ~40-70 years, give or take. That doesn't mean that select individuals or groups of people with or without official backing could do things. To think otherwise is silly.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    27. Re:South Park defense by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Informative

      You have to consider this - does China get into wars? No... they're NOT that stupid!
      You must be Chinese because you know nothing of Chinese history. How about the Korean war? And Tibet? China is still slaughtering peaceful political dissenters. And as a Chinese person you probably know nothing of the slaughter of dissenters at Tiananmen Square.

      China gets in wars/military actions like anyone else, but when they do it, the purpose is to take away freedoms.
      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    28. Re:South Park defense by wytcld · · Score: 0, Troll

      Have you ever shopped for condoms in China? They come in small, smaller and smallest. (No, this is not a joke, just the fact.) The packages are identified with the international No sign - red circle with slash - over a picture of a baby.

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    29. Re:South Park defense by moogleii · · Score: 1

      That's what happens when moronic leadership takes control. It should be a lesson to everyone. Smart leadership? Who wants that?

    30. Re:South Park defense by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly.. as it says later,

      "The chinese will say they cannot do something even when they can."

      They are just being modest.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    31. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody wins in Global Thermonuclear War

    32. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they @ war, now? No... but, the United States surely is, a multi-front one no less & stupidly attempting occupation too (which historically usually always fails in the end/long haul)

    33. Re:South Park defense by squozzer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did someone forget to translate "The Art of War" into Chinese?

    34. Re:South Park defense by smclean · · Score: 3, Informative

      Right click it, do 'Copy Link Location', paste it in your address bar, hit alt-enter to open in new tab.. :)

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    35. Re:South Park defense by Slime-dogg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. The only way to win is not to play. Sometimes playing is unavoidable.
      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    36. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't tell if you're actually getting pissed off at him or you're just joking

    37. Re:South Park defense by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Lighten up Francis.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    38. Re:South Park defense by joeman3429 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's been my experience that small minded idiots are the one's who think that South Park, The Simpsons, Family Guy and other such shows are for small minded idiots, and don't understand the depth of intelligence and humor hidden inside of them.

      It's not just small minded idiots, of course. Other, more intelligent people also mistakenly think this way for some reason.

    39. Re:South Park defense by PachmanP · · Score: 3, Funny

      The only way to win is not to play. See it's exactly that kind of pussyfooting around that's causing this "global warming" thing today. They knew back in the 50s and 60's that fossil fuels would cause warming,and they pushed it to counter the nuclear winter!
      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    40. Re:South Park defense by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Actually, the US Congress has never technically declared "war" either. We are just having a little "civil disagreement" with some of our "friends" in the middle east.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    41. Re:South Park defense by joeman3429 · · Score: 1

      there's that modesty again. Bless 'em

    42. Re:South Park defense by MRe_nl · · Score: 0

      Oh, and another American is down! It's number, uh... oh, I don't know; all Americans look alike!

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    43. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China was not an Empire for 5000 years. In fact China held most of China for maybe 1000 years in total, but in that time are many epics of fragmentation, and then there is the total Mongol conquest of the country.

      If you measure success as length of existance, you could say they are the most successful I guess. I think most folks add many more requirements for 'success' however.

    44. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooooh, sounds like someone is really pissed @ their tiny little penis.

    45. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there are any mainland chinese reading this, could you please comment as to the truthfulness of these statements.

      The foreign minister Qin Gang has stated:
      "Is there any evidence? ... Even I don't believe it..."

      Was he referring to the large penis size issue or to the ability of hacking US systems.

      (Posted in the spirit of contributing to mutual understanding, trust and friendship between the U.S. and China)

    46. Re:South Park defense by alexborges · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What part of textbook mcarthism did you get this from?

      UNderestimating an enemy is stupid. Underestimating the eldest civilization on earth, borders on the insane.

      --
      NO SIG
    47. Re:South Park defense by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Plus? You have to consider this - does China get into wars? No... they're NOT that stupid! What's the point of history when you only study the last few years? China has been in many, many wars. Like you said, the Chinese have a great culture spanning over 5,000 years. Wars are part of this culture and history just as much as anything else.
    48. Re:South Park defense by Necrobruiser · · Score: 1

      So, by your statement, the people who don't like these shows are small-minded idiots and intelligent people? That's a pretty large portion of the population, as I see it.
      Stop helping!

      --
      "I planned within my means and got a fixed rate mortgage, so where's MY bailout?" -cafepress
    49. Re:South Park defense by joeman3429 · · Score: 1

      Yep. Way to cover my own ass right?

      I think the main point was that those shows are of a high quality and intellectual caliber for those who can see it

    50. Re:South Park defense by neomunk · · Score: 1

      Well, that's only mostly true. We ARE at war, with terror. Oh, and drugs. Soon we will fight the brave fight against modern pirates with a war on I.P. infringement too. Am I forgetting any other ephemeral concepts (aka ideas) that we've declared war upon?

    51. Re:South Park defense by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      and coming up next...The War on Thoughts. Help stamp out ThoughtCrime today!

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    52. Re:South Park defense by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That's fine because the US has no intention of "occupying" Afghanistan or Iraq any longer than it has to. Unless you consider Japan or Germany "occupied" by the US.

      If that's the case, then we'll need to differentiate that from Tibet, which is occupied and the Chinese don't even pretend on letting it go. Personally, I think they will be quite successful. But as you say: "stupidly attempting occupation too (which historically usually always fails in the end/long haul)".

      By the way, California was won in a war. In fact, if you go back just a few hundred years, nearly the entire continents of North America, South America, and Australia are all currently "occupied" by non-native inhabitants.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    53. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike Americans who are here to bomb the hell out of your country for FREEDOM(tm) and LIBERTY(tm) and DEMOCRACY(tm)! HELL YEAH!

      oh, and some oil while they're at it.

    54. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Professor Farnsworth.

    55. Re:South Park defense by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Funny

      They should have got the genuine penis enlargement pills then, instead of their own cheap Chinese knockoff equivalents.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    56. Re:South Park defense by gnick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. The only way to win is not to play. Sometimes playing is unavoidable. But, in such situations, winning is often unfeasible. Victory just means losing less.
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    57. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." - Mark Twain

    58. Re:South Park defense by just_another_sean · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hot, deep, who knew linking can be such a turn on?!

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    59. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Ender, my thoughts exactly.
      For some more fun with China, perhaps check the Weak-i-pedia:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wars_involving_China

      Just for a taste.

      I also seem to remember that "Great Culture" systematically eradicating the knowledge and culture of their own country on more than one occasion...

      However I disagree that the poster is Chinese, the Engrish is much worse than your average Chinese subsistence farmer.

    60. Re:South Park defense by assertation · · Score: 1


      How would we, chinese people with leetle leetle penises have the courage to do something like that against big americans with big penises?


      How long have you had an interest in men's penises?

    61. Re:South Park defense by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I said nothing of the USA's military action. I merely refuted one of your false statements.

      You have another false statement now, too. China is currently attempting an occupation--Tibet.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    62. Re:South Park defense by dshadowwolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Plus? You have to consider this - does China get into wars? No... they're NOT that stupid!

      Then what do you call the massive flood of chinese troops and equipment into Korea when the UN had pushed past the 38th parallel?


      China most certainly does "get into wars"

      If you can't take an opponent directly? Stir up crap between HE & his biggest opponent, & watch them BOTH "take a dive", while you end up the victor mopping up the spoils of war/walking out of the saloon with the wench over your shoulder & jug of wine in the other hand, is what I suspect this REALLY is... apk

      And guess what - the thing you describe was first used and put to paper more than 2000 years ago by Sun Tzu. It's part of "The Art of War". I'd suggest you go read it.


    63. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not saying that they wouldn't get their hair mussed.

    64. Re:South Park defense by wildem · · Score: 1

      My E-penis > your E-penis. Case closed.

    65. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just in case you haven't studied imperialism in the past couple centuries, China may have had a glorious empire (the Middle Kingdom) until Westerners showed up. After that they got bullied into doing whatever Western nations asked, and Japan even took advantage of them (a lot). It's only after World War II that China started back on the path towards regaining the status of World Power.

    66. Re:South Park defense by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Take out the main Chinese cities, and all you're left with is a billion or so illiterate farmers and sweatshop workers. Most of them probably wouldn't even realise that the rest of their country had been bombed.

    67. Re:South Park defense by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Whatever intelligence there is in South Park, and can't say it's hidden, it's in fact very blatant, obvious and simple. Usually with some sophomoric libertarian slant.

      Unless I'm missing the deep, satirical subtleties in 'Manbearpig'.

      As for Family Guy, if you think that's small-minded, remember that time when

    68. Re:South Park defense by Bazar · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've done this argument before many times.

      US Congress didn't declare war, what they did was that they gave authorization for Bush to use armed forces in defense of USA and for enforcing UN policies. Thus Giving Bush under conditions, the right to send America into war.

      Now heres where things get interesting.
      Firstly with Iraq, you were not at peace, you simply had a cease-fire arrangement. Peace was never officially declared after the Gulf war in 1990.
      Thus by UN standards, USA never started a war, they simply resumed the Gulf war many years later. Thus they were in compliance with UN requirements

      As we know, Saddam broke many un policies, including allowing UN weapon inspection teams.

      Because of the refusal in compliance to UN policies, and the authorization from congress a year earlier in defense of UN policies, Bush had legal entitlement to used armed forces.

      Thus we find that by legal UN loopholing, and by a no balls/brains congress, Bush legally sent USA into war.

      What i also find interesting, is that the USA are still at war with N. Korea, since they never made peace there either, its still a cease-fire arrangement after several decades...
      I guess Bush just had his hands too full with Iraq during his terms in office.

      --
      To avoid criticism; Say nothing, Do nothing, Be nothing.
    69. Re:South Park defense by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The rules of this game do not specify that there will be a winner. The victory conditions (don't get in the war) have already been failed.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    70. Re:South Park defense by ultranova · · Score: 1

      China is an amazing culture with lots of fantastic history, and racism/culturalism is bad.

      Racism is bad, because it is without basis: the actual physical differences between various human populations are very small and mainly cosmetic. Culturalism, on the other hand, has a basis: some cultures are better than others, for some values of better. For example, China seems to be stuck on dictatorship, which is a lot less pleasant to live under than a democracy.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    71. Re:South Park defense by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      They are at war with us. They also know a lot more about our computer systems than they are letting on. "Trusted Computing" is a Chinese plot. They do so have they ability to hack our machines!

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    72. Re:South Park defense by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      There was the war on poverty, but we obviously won that one!

    73. Re:South Park defense by ravenshrike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eh, the Eurocrats and Brits'll get there well before us.

    74. Re:South Park defense by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Not really, the problem is that without opening the nuclear option, and even with the nuclear option, the amount of SK civvies who would die from simple artillery bombardment would be absolutely horrific. Easily into the hundreds of thousands, possibly into the millions.

    75. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hell yeah! Crushed those evil poor under our heels real good.

    76. Re:South Park defense by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The UN does not recognize Tibet as a country. From an international law point of view, they are not occupying anything, other than the slivers of border disputes with India unrelated to Tibet. And "attempting" an occupation is pretty funny. That's like the US is "attempting" an occupation of Texas. Your wording indicates a possibility of failure. They will not lose. The ironic thing is that the claims of internal stability that brought them the Olympics, when it was in fact the Olympics that caused the recent actions in Tibet. If no one was watching, China would do what it has for years, claim Tibet and pretty much ignore the people there. But the Olympics are causing them to try to clean house. And it is their house. They are the recognized holder of those lands. There is no international dispute.

    77. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Mr. "Puny Pencil":

      That was simply for your sake, NOT mine (considering it's just you here, who have the puny pencil & mind, lol!)

      You see - Some of us are considerate of others (... & I was only thinking of YOU (some of us? Have manners, & class))

      lmao!

    78. Re:South Park defense by Hyperspite · · Score: 1

      Are you saying this ISNT the case?!

    79. Re:South Park defense by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Which civilisation introduced the concepts of human rights, liberal democracy, jury trial, separation of judiciary and legislature, freedom of speech, checks and balances, and a lion's share of the scientific advances which have propelled forward?

      Greece.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    80. Re:South Park defense by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Except that in the case of both Korea and the first Iraq war (and Vietnam, while we're at it), the US also did not officially declare war, so there technically wasn't anything to undeclare. The US hasn't declared a proper war since WWII, just a series of "military actions" of varying scale.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    81. Re:South Park defense by datan · · Score: 1

      sorry, but the ceasefire agreement was in accordance with a UN resolution therefore terminating the ceasefire must also be in accordance with a UN resolution. May I know which UN resolution was passed to terminate the ceasefire? btw, I recall UN weapon inspection teams poking around in Iraq, even in the presidential palace, in the month before the war...

    82. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is an asshole thing to say, first of all + SouthPark? Imo, @ least, is a show for small minded idiots, period...

      You are right. My 152 IQ takes up so much room it leaves me small minded. I am in awe of your "large mind" ability. Lets all watch Fox News!

    83. Re:South Park defense by vuffi_raa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I bet the Chinese have a better sense of humor than you. I am Chinese and I don't find it amusing (the post- not south park- though I think it has gotten really stale as of late).
      Honestly there are a lot of us- not just Chinese, but all Asians that get pissed off a lot because it's not okay to use the 'n' word or make black jokes or use derogatory terms for Jews or Hispanics- but I hear Gook and Chink and Slant eyed or and every other term in the book thrown around (my favorite was being called "indian nigger" when I was in the midwest) not to mention the lame assed white guy Chinese accent and it's just fine according to society. Honestly as much as I am not a fan of china (my dad escaped after the revolution) I honestly think it's funny that they are kicking our ass economically and love the fact that Japan and South Korea put our tech to shame because we are so afraid to get our heads out of our asses in this country and take anyone seriously who isn't white.
      I couldn't believe the other day I was flipping channels and "mind of mencia" was on and he had some rant about how stupid and dirty chinese people were and seriously, I was really offended. I mean if you were to put any other race in that rant of his most people would be angry, but chinese people *pfft* who cares right? they won't complain, they are a "model minority" because they don't say anything and are good at math (which I am not, really- I work in legal tech but have a degree in fine arts and have taught post graduate studies in design and audio composition and engineering).
    84. Re:South Park defense by vuffi_raa · · Score: 2, Informative

      China gets in wars/military actions like anyone else, but when they do it, the purpose is to take away freedoms. one word
      nanking
      look it up and shut your face
    85. Re:South Park defense by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      The "problem" with those shows is that you can take them either way. I tend to regard those shows to have a social criticism embedded in pretty much each show. However, many people can't see that and just regard it as stupid shows.

      Intelligence is in the eye of the beholder. ;-)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    86. Re:South Park defense by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      Factually incorrect, I'm afraid. Some people without a grasp of history modded my previous post Troll, but that's life. I suggest you read up on the relevant history.

    87. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What they are answering now, comes from a culture that is very, very, very smart. Old. Intelligent.
      Yeah, especially after cultural revolution (1966-76), when they effectively removed scientists from public life and science never quite reborn after this. Very smart indeed. Easy for you to say science boy. You look like the smart one-- maybe because that you never went through medieval. Oh wait a minute, you don't have such a long history to do that. Who lived at that time in North America then? The American Indians, who were mostly eliminated later by your ancestors. Apparently you did a better job to have removed most of the American Indians from public life and the American Indian Culture never quite reborn after that. Very smart indeed.
    88. Re:South Park defense by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      I emphatically restate my opinion. Thank your non-local democratically minded Indian code slinging outsource guru. They are likely the only thing standing between us and Chinese domination.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    89. Re:South Park defense by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      I guess it's better than the Chewbacca defense... if only slightly.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    90. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be Greece.

    91. Re:South Park defense by Atario · · Score: 1

      if we closed down the port of Long Beach, China would be bankrupt in a few months.
      Either that, or the port of Oakland would suddenly get much richer.
      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    92. Re:South Park defense by Nazlfrag · · Score: 2, Interesting
      They are all broad sweeping generalisations that have little bearing on the reality of the man on the street. Cultures are different, none better, none worse.

      Your assumption that democracy is inherently better than dictatorship only holds for your cultural values. All political systems or cultures are better than dystopia and all are worse than utopia, they all have benefits and flaws, yet while there are more similarities than differences we tend to ignore the familiar (including our own flaws) and divide the world into false dichotomies, black and white, good and bad, or in this case better or worse.

      Even if we take it for granted that dictatorship is a bad thing in and of itself, culture embraces far more than merely internal politics. Living under democracy might be great, but what if that democracy was overthrowing other democracies and installing dictators in those countries? Would that culture be better or worse than one that was a dictatorship that openly embraced democracy in a former territory that had been democratic for around 99 years? It's not so black and white as it first appears.

    93. Re:South Park defense by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      There are about 180 more countries in the world that have either invested directly in Chinese manufacturing, or benefit from Chinese exports.

      I should imagine the US would go bankrupt long before China does.

      That said, they do have some smart people building their encryption gear for their military and government, I seriously doubt they don't have anyone on payroll either domestic or foreign smart enough to pull off a little unauthorized access from time to time.

    94. Re:South Park defense by docwatson223 · · Score: 1

      What part of textbook mcarthism did you get this from? UNderestimating an enemy is stupid. Underestimating the eldest civilization on earth, borders on the insane. +3 and QFT
    95. Re:South Park defense by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Chinese, Japanese, dirty knees, look at these.

    96. Re:South Park defense by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      wouldn't this supposed 'Anglo-Saxon civilisation' start off with Germany?

    97. Re:South Park defense by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1

      Even earlier. In fact, I'd argue development halted in late Imperialistic China. They refused to accept globalism or trade with foreign entities with (at the time) superior technology.

      Actually it was during the early days of Mao's regime and the KMD's control of China when China was modernized for a bit, then of course, stopped. Afterall, Imperialistic China barely even had factories, while during the KMD's rule, there was a brief industrial boom. Mao did try boosting industry, but of course, backyard furnaces in the GLF were a complete failure.

      ~Jarik

    98. Re:South Park defense by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      well there's the problem! You have to make hte pill out of ground up rabbits, not guinea pigs.

    99. Re:South Park defense by sydneyfong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You must be Chinese because you know nothing of Chinese history. Heh. And you're the expert now?

      How about the Korean war? As I understood it, it was the "western powers" who decided to invade Korea to install a puppet government, and their troops got dangerously close to the Chinese borders. At that time China was considered a "hostile commie state" and if China didn't do something about it there was a high risk of being invaded next.

      And Tibet? There wasn't a "Tibetan war". You may be right on a forced occupation, but it wasn't war.

      China is still slaughtering peaceful political dissenters. Source? Imprisonment yes, but I've yet to hear people actually being "slaughtered" over this...

      And as a Chinese person you probably know nothing of the slaughter of dissenters at Tiananmen Square. And how is this related to "war"? If you're insisting on viewing the Chinese government as evil animals, it still doesn't refute the GP's argument that China isn't *stupid*. I'll give you a view consistent with both -- dissenters are easier to slaughter than militants of hostile enemy states.

      China gets in wars/military actions like anyone else, but when they do it, the purpose is to take away freedoms. As I understand it there's no ulterior intent of China to invade other countries just to take away freedoms. That's just plain stupid, and that's what the GP is trying to refute. I don't mind people saying China is "evil" (many governments are), but I really can't stand it when stupid people assume that the Chinese government (and the Chinese in general) are as stupid as they are.

      Of course, that being said, I have no idea what the GP is trying to say in general... (sounds like a rant by a drunken troll on crack) But the precise sentence you quoted is spot on. The point is it seems that people assume that China, when it gets "strong", would involve itself in stupid wars on intangible "ideologies", like "depriving other people of freedom", "anti-democracy", "evil oppression", etc. That's just bullsht.

      If China was really that war-mongering, it'd have invaded Taiwan already. Instead, it's going through negotiations to improve cross strait relationships (as long as the Taiwanese government isn't pressing for outright "independence", whatever that means) ... if it's not invading Taiwan, why on Earth would it try to invade other countries?

      Please enlighten me.
      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    100. Re:South Park defense by ultranova · · Score: 1

      They are all broad sweeping generalisations that have little bearing on the reality of the man on the street. Cultures are different, none better, none worse.

      Well then, doesn't that logically mean that a culture which considers another culture inferior is no worse than a culture which doesn't ? So why are you posting ?

      Your assumption that democracy is inherently better than dictatorship only holds for your cultural values.

      Those values include things like "I'm unlikely to be imprisoned, killed, or taken to a labor camp by the secret police". Said atroticities happen often in dictatorships and rarely in democracies.

      All political systems or cultures are better than dystopia and all are worse than utopia, they all have benefits and flaws, yet while there are more similarities than differences we tend to ignore the familiar (including our own flaws) and divide the world into false dichotomies, black and white, good and bad, or in this case better or worse.

      And sometimes, in our eagerness to reject a black and white worldview, we take it to the opposite and equally ridiculous extreme and claim that there are no differences whatsoever. It might be very politically correct and make its adherents think they're being open-minded, but it is still rubbish.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    101. Re:South Park defense by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      That's like the US is "attempting" an occupation of Texas Given that Texas is the home of the current USA president, and that he seems to be trying to undermine the USA constitution, the more apt description would be "Texas attempting an occupation of the USA" ;-p

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    102. Re:South Park defense by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      The whole cultural revolution thing was basically an insane endemic.

      You won't find the Chinese government saying it this bluntly, but any reasonable Chinese would agree it's not one of the finer moments in Chinese history.

      Everyone blunders once a while...

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    103. Re:South Park defense by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      No... the Angles and the Saxons were particular Germanic tribes. There is nothing more than a casual relationship between them and the concept of "Germany".

      At its root, all of humanity is an African civilisation, since all humans came from Africa. But this is useless information for a modern perspective.

    104. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If I had any mod points I'd log in and give them to you for correctly spelling "losing".

    105. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I wonder which MP3 decoding library does this target?

    106. Re:South Park defense by EvilErik · · Score: 0

      I think my just IQ plummeted to new depths after reading that.

    107. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      awesome

    108. Re:South Park defense by PeolesDru · · Score: 0

      Not surprising. Around here "Defense of Western Civilization" = "Troll"

    109. Re:South Park defense by PeolesDru · · Score: 0

      I've long thought that was a good use of modern humanities students' own arguments against them when they sneer at anyone who would hold one culture above another: If you believe that all cultures are relative and that no culture is better/worse than any other, then who are you to critisize my culture's feature of believing in its own supremacy?

      The only problem with that is that is not what they really believe - they believe that Western culture is inferior and all other cultures are superior - the more different, the more superior. Most likely born of the spirit of mindless rebellion against one's parent culture.

      Once upon a time, University professors adhered to a narrative that Western Civilization was the pinnacle of human culture. Then came the rebellion of the 60's, where students obstinately believed the opposite of whatever was promulgated by the authority figures. Then those students grew up and became tenured professors themselves. Hopefully we'll one day have a new rebellion against the new authority figures - especially since they're now teaching cultural suicide.

    110. Re:South Park defense by PeolesDru · · Score: 0

      Golly, your IQ is so big! Hey everyone - this guy's IQ is 152! It must be true, too, because he says so and - after all - his IQ is 152! Let's all stop arguing and just do what this guys says! 152! Wowwweeeee! 152!

      By the way, I myself know what I'm talking about because my IQ is 312.

    111. Re:South Park defense by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      ...appears that I was right.

      I'm perfectly okay with you being Chinese... I hope someday you are too.

      You do realize the South Park joke was a joke about stupid Americans and not a joke about asians with small penises?

    112. Re:South Park defense by fletton · · Score: 1

      You have to consider this - does China get into wars? No... they're NOT that stupid!
      You must be Chinese because you know nothing of Chinese history. How about the Korean war? And Tibet? China is still slaughtering peaceful political dissenters. And as a Chinese person you probably know nothing of the slaughter of dissenters at Tiananmen Square. China gets in wars/military actions like anyone else, but when they do it, the purpose is to take away freedoms. wow, someone killed almost all American Indian, now have got ass wiped clean
    113. Re:South Park defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering how many people live in China, the Chinese could probably use their own citizens as bombs and win a war against most other countries.

    114. Re:South Park defense by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      I couldn't believe the other day I was flipping channels and "mind of mencia" was on and he had some rant about how stupid and dirty chinese people were and seriously, I was really offended. You need to grow a sense of humor. Carlos Mencia makes jokes about EVERY ethnic group. You think you're special because you're Chinese? He jokes about his own people more than anyone else so chill the fuck out.
      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    115. Re:South Park defense by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      I killed no Indians and neither did my ancestors--later generation of immigrants. But if you had studied American history just a bit, you would realize that the majority of Indian deaths were caused by a lack of immunity to Old World diseases.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    116. Re:South Park defense by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Here is a place you can start learning about Chinese wars:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wars_involving_China

      With all the overwhelming evidence, I'm not sure how you can continue to defend the AC's statement ("does China get into wars? No... they're NOT that stupid!").

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    117. Re:South Park defense by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      Finer moment or not, many people in China still seem to think it was necessary.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    118. Re:South Park defense by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      I'm too lazy to read all the articles there.

      Point me a war which isn't a civil war, not a border conflict, and not a war China got into because it was invaded (or where invasion was imminent), in the last 300 years.

      I think that's a reasonable qualification. Basically all you guys are worrying is that when China becomes a "superpower" it will start outright invading other countries. *That's* the stupid thing.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    119. Re:South Park defense by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      "You guys are...[some junk you made up]"

      Since you have the ability to rewrite my statements I see no point in talking to you.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    120. Re:South Park defense by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Dont get me wrong. I stand by occident. We are a civilization that encumbers the human individual and i will defend that with my life.

      Alas, i think i will HAVE TO defend it with my life. In the years to come, its gonna be us (all of us, from germany to argentina), against whatever block cultures that DO NOT like our values of open dialog and people's right to incide in their government.

      --
      NO SIG
    121. Re:South Park defense by alexborges · · Score: 1

      Modern Anglo-Saxon culture is more latin than any kind of anglo or saxon. Specially since anglo and saxon cultures really were not civilized at all when compared with greece or rome.

      We need to start understanding, everywhere (im not an american), that WE are the culture of the Roman-Judeo-Christians. That is what we are. That ties all occident together.

      Petty differences will have us arguing for ages about the superiority of the occitane "culture" over the, cantabric "culture" in spain, for christ sakes.

      While the great china superpower is emerging as an uncontested giant in all of the far east: theyll end up gobbling indochina and japan, mark my words, and we will still be viewing spaniards and scotish as unjoinable cultures when, for christ sakes, they have just as much in common as the korean with the chineese and just as much in common when compared to what, say, the northern chineese provinces have with the southest Cantoneese provinces have in common.

      --
      NO SIG
    122. Re:South Park defense by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1

      Oh, thank God, I thought I was the only one who had that come immediately to mind.

    123. Re:South Park defense by dadatianpu · · Score: 0

      you are wrong!China Lacks Skills ? please click My god!Is this Chinese Truck(img) you can find china is development

    124. Re:South Park defense by dadatianpu · · Score: 0
      chinese people with leetle leetle penises have the courage to do something like that against big americans with big penises so

      we must continue to compete with Japan and China

    125. Re:South Park defense by dadatianpu · · Score: 0

      chinese people with leetle leetle penises have the courage to do something like that against big americans with big penises? i think you are right

    126. Re:South Park defense by dadatianpu · · Score: 0

      you are wrong

  2. so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They threaten to hack the universe and boast about hitting powerplants and such.. then a month or two later they get accused of hacking an important computer system and they suddenly don't have the sophistication to do so?

    1. Re:so.. by countSudoku() · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah, there was a ton of boasting about trying to bring CNN dot com down. Yet, it's still there. Just block all their IPs and be done with them already. Do not want *.cn

      Also, to you /.ers making the South Park American Penis jokes, very funny, but those came from an episode where they went to Japan, not China. You frickin' idiots! Get some jokes from the episode where they have the South Park volleyball team in the world championships in China. The announcers from the game were priceless! Use those for reference. Thanks!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    2. Re:so.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there were firewalls in place on the compromised systems I would be curious to know if the hardware was manufactured in China.

    3. Re:so.. by clam666 · · Score: 1

      Screw these lies. We know they're hacking, they know they're hacking. What are we stupid?

      Anyone who's played Red Alert Generals knows that the Chinese Generals ALL have hackers you can be bought after you buy the barracks and upgrades.

      Those bastards can endlessly hack for money or control buildings. They build their own internet cafe for Christ's sake! "We'll suck the internet dry" is the quote they say as when they steal money.

      Damn lying Chinese. They're craftier than the Soviets with their lies. Or is it "Ries"? Damn them to hell.

      --
      I'm a satanic clam.
    4. Re:so.. by TJamieson · · Score: 1

      Come on, Frenchie, 'fro ball!

      --
      For the last time, PIN Number and ATM Machine are redundancies!
    5. Re:so.. by notrandom · · Score: 1

      it's pretty much what you would expect from chinese diplomacy. nice. listen to bobby mcferrin - grace please

    6. Re:so.. by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there was a ton of boasting about trying to bring CNN dot com down. Yet, it's still there. Just block all their IPs and be done with them already. Do not want *.cn

      Also, to you /.ers making the South Park American Penis jokes, very funny, but those came from an episode where they went to Japan, not China. You frickin' idiots! Get some jokes from the episode where they have the South Park volleyball team in the world championships in China. The announcers from the game were priceless! Use those for reference. Thanks! Uh, I thought it was Dodgeball.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    7. Re:so.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uh, I thought it was Dodgeball.

      Look, if you're really trying to get nerdy, you're just going to have to go ahead and make some kind of comparison to Star Trek. Just correcting people about South Park isn't going to cut it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:so.. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      They threaten to hack the universe and boast about hitting powerplants and such. WTF you talkin bout willis?

      Unless you mean hitting powerplants with fallen trees that is...
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    9. Re:so.. by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      There are a few "they"s.

      There is the Chinese government.
      Then there are the Chinese "Nationalists", who IMHO are a bit insane. Most of these people are relatively young Chinese, having been indoctrinated a bit too heavily on "nationalistic" values, and probably aren't in any government positions.

      The ones who threaten to "hack the universe" and "hitting powerplants" are the latter.
      The ones who claimed they didn't have the sophistication to do it is the former. (not that I fully believe the claims though)

      Interestingly, people are saying "stop confusing the people from the government -- the Chinese government are NOT the Chinese people", and yet comments like this gets modded up :-/

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  3. China lacks the skills? by AmazingRuss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lacks the skills to lie convincingly to anybody it doesn't have the power of life or death over, more like.

    1. Re:China lacks the skills? by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not a lie, it's a strategy to receive compliments. Clearly Chinese men have issues with very low self esteem. I wonder what that could be based on?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:China lacks the skills? by datan · · Score: 4, Informative

      it's part of the Chinese culture. The polite way to receive a compliment is to be modest; in fact it's bad manners to receive a compliment without protest...so in this case, the Chinese foreign ministry is merely being polite

    3. Re:China lacks the skills? by arbiter1 · · Score: 1

      "China being the 'developing nation' that it is â" he doubts that his country has the sophistication to hack foreign systems." shoot could take a 233mhz win98 comp and it could be used to hack about anything

    4. Re:China lacks the skills? by tirerim · · Score: 5, Funny

      Right, because lying in the course of giving compliments, as Americans do as an integral part of our culture, is so much better.

    5. Re:China lacks the skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. I mean - if the nation from which all of my computer components are manufactured, who owns their own CPU and own Lenovo claims that they are too backwards to hack, then I'm breaking out my Underwood typewriter and ditching my "Made in China" computer. This lie is so outstandingly pathetic it's something I'd expect Leno to use as a joke (he'll probably comment on it). This guy is so used to dealing with his uninformed countrymen that lies seem to come automatically. I mean, to ask "do we have such advanced technology?" - while I'm writing this on the very technology that they manufactured and that can do the very "sophisticated" hacking that's been going on? A "backwards" nation with more people on the internet that we the "supreme forwards nation" has? Where's the sucker-punch! That's street-fighter tactics and a sucker-punch is coming!

      And "we should not be paranoid and should do more to contribute to trust and friendship" is the same as saying we should bare our bellies to their attack. When a star recently mentioned something about karma and their earthquake they said the same exact thing - while still attacking Tibet - where's the friendship there? She was right! They're not very nice people and expect that everyone else should be nice and accept their lies and their violence against their own citizens and neighbors. They lie so much that they probably believe it themselves.

      I for one will not be a supporter of the Olympics - China's government is not worthy to host the Olympics and they are not worthy to be a government to the wonderful people of China.

    6. Re:China lacks the skills? by Apollo_11 · · Score: 1

      As IF !

    7. Re:China lacks the skills? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The OOC is as morally bankrupt as the Chinese Government. They just don't have the same goals or political power.

    8. Re:China lacks the skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      it's part of the Chinese culture. The polite way to receive a compliment is to be modest; in fact it's bad manners to receive a compliment without protest...so in this case, the Chinese foreign ministry is merely being polite I think you're confusing Chinese culture with Japanese. While effusively praising others is an intrinsic part of life both nations, the excessive personal humility the permeates all aspects of Japanese life isn't really common in China.

    9. Re:China lacks the skills? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Part of the Chinese culture? That little tradition used to be polite behaviour in the west too.

    10. Re:China lacks the skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ease up, buddy. It's a diplomatic way of saying "why do you even bring up such a trivial matter to me?". No different "we have frank discussion."h

    11. Re:China lacks the skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >it's part of the Chinese culture.

      You need to get out more. Such modesty is universal in all cultures.

    12. Re:China lacks the skills? by 75th+Trombone · · Score: 1, Informative

      You seem to be laboring under the misimpression that China doesn't have the power of life or death over us.

      --
      The United States of America: We do what we must because we can.
    13. Re:China lacks the skills? by aplusjimages · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe its true. Maybe they hired the CIA to spy on those two Congressman to make sure they weren't going to do anything to embarrass the Chinese Government during the Olympics.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    14. Re:China lacks the skills? by Maestro485 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They don't lack skills...

      ...they rack disciprine

    15. Re:China lacks the skills? by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      Thanks for posting that. I know zero about Chinese culture, a bit about Japan. Any chance that the Chinese are simply making fun of us? The Japanese probably wouldn't do that (at least not in English and not before belting down a few drinks.) But the Chinese. I'm not sure they dislike us, but I doubt they respect us.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    16. Re:China lacks the skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't know how common it is in China and you don't know how much Japanese culture is influenced by Chinese culture. A thousand years ago, a powerful Chinese warlord effectively turned the emperor into a puppet , after his death, his son wanted to take over the throne himself based on the Mandate of The Heaven tradition, even though he forced the emperor to announce abdication and ask for him to assume the throne, he had to refuse the request three times claiming he's not good enough to be an emperor based on the tradition. So the poor emperor had to "ask" again and again.

    17. Re:China lacks the skills? by value_added · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Part of the Chinese culture? That little tradition used to be polite behaviour in the west too.

      Not to the extent it is elsewhere.

      A friend of mine told me a funny story years ago of his parents when they first arrived in the US. His mother received an invitation from the neighbours for a housewarming dinner. When she arrived, the hostess came up to her and suggested she help herself from the buffet. The conversation proceeded along the following lines:

      "No, thank you."

      "You really must."

      "I'm sorry, but I really shouldn't."

      "I insist."

      "Thank you for your hospitality, but I really can't."

      "Ok. Suit yourself, then."

      When his mother returned home in tears, her husband asked her what had happened. She said she had never felt so insulted, and didn't eat a thing. When he asked why she didn't eat anything, she replied, "The hostess didn't insist the third time!"

    18. Re:China lacks the skills? by gnick · · Score: 3, Funny

      Part of the Chinese culture? That little tradition used to be polite behaviour in the west too. Indeed - In fact my politeness excels beyond that of nearly all others because of my great humility. I may be the most humble person I know - Which is even more impressive because I have so little to be modest about and so many great qualities that I politely refrain from boasting.

      To attempt to quote an old Mac Davis tune that I remember from the Muppet Show:
      Oh Lord it's hard to be humble when you're perfect in every way
      I can't wait to look in the mirror 'cause I get better lookin' each day
      To know me is to love me, I must be a hell of a man
      Oh Lord it's hard to be humble, but I'm doin' the best that I can
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    19. Re:China lacks the skills? by eatfastnoodle · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Japanese culture is Heavily influenced by China, You would be amazed by how many Chinese characters there are in Japanese. Chinese who speak no Japanese and Japanese who speak no Chinese can communicate with each other using pen and a piece of paper. As for the statement, They just don't think it's a matter worthy of serious response. Of course they know nobody would believe it, modern Chinese culture are very pragmatic and very goal-oriented, they don't like to infuse too much morality into their discussion. In their view, everybody spies on everybody else, it's just how things work, they didn't whine to CNN or the statement department about CIA spying on China. why did the USãmake such a big deal out of it?

    20. Re:China lacks the skills? by gnick · · Score: 1

      I for one will not be a supporter of the Olympics - China's government is not worthy to host the Olympics Let 'em have it - As long as they're not in the U.S. China may want them for PR reasons (just like any other host, but maybe a bigger deal for China than most), but the Olympics are a terrible white elephant. The tourists that come in offset some of the cost, but the Olympics are terribly expensive to host. Any time they come to the U.S., it's a boon for whatever city hosts, but only because the federal government ponies up $$$. If somebody else wants 'em, take 'em.
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    21. Re:China lacks the skills? by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Saying you can read Japanese (kanji, whose characters came from the Chinese a long time ago) if you can read Chinese is like saying you can read German if you can read English.

      English and German may share the same basic character set but the way the language uses them is different (andthentherestheGermanknackofmakinglonguberwords). The characters may look the same but they carry different meanings between the Japanese and Chinese languages.

    22. Re:China lacks the skills? by Ma8thew · · Score: 1

      That tradition is alive and well in Britain. The traditional response to an injury here is to apologise to the person who inflicted it.

    23. Re:China lacks the skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out who now owns Lenovo and China Shipping. They are a division of the Chinese Army. The Chinese Army has been running profitable businesses to fun its self for hundreds of years.

    24. Re:China lacks the skills? by rworne · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's a big difference between a phonetic alphabet and an lolograph based language.

      To English and German, an "A" is an "A" and really does not mean anything in and of itself. The alphabet denotes sounds that when strung together have a meaning.

      In Chinese and Japanese, each character has a specific meaning in itself. It is that meaning that carries between both languages - one does not even need to know how to pronounce the character to understand its meaning.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    25. Re:China lacks the skills? by suggsjc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Chinese who speak no Japanese and Japanese who speak no Chinese can communicate with each other using pen and a piece of paper.
      I think just about any two people on earth can do that...its called drawing.

      In America, we even have a game where thats all you do. Its called Pictionary. Except that neither side can speak Chinese or Japanese.
      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    26. Re:China lacks the skills? by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe its true. Maybe they hired the CIA to spy on those two Congressman to make sure they weren't going to do anything to embarrass the Chinese Government during the Olympics.

      More likely that our intrepid congressmen were engaged in a lengthy session of viewing some "non-work-related sites" (i.e., "browsing porn") and managed to snag a worm. Rather than demonstrate any personal responsibility, they picked the first easy target.

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    27. Re:China lacks the skills? by eatfastnoodle · · Score: 1

      you know what I really meant.

    28. Re:China lacks the skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      lolograph
      I CAN HAS RAMEN?

      It is that meaning that carries between both languages
      This is simply not true in general. Yes, a lot of nouns use the same characters, in the same way that an English speaker might guess what the German word "Computer" means. But that doesn't mean the written languages are remotely similar. For example, the Chinese character for "peace" often means "cheap" in Japanese. The Japanese word for "all right" is written with characters that in Chinese would mean "big strong husband". And that's before we even get on to prepositions and the like.
    29. Re:China lacks the skills? by suggsjc · · Score: 1

      obviously.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    30. Re:China lacks the skills? by Dpaladin · · Score: 0

      However, a glance at their economy shows that they do, in fact, have the skills to pay the bills.

      --
      Bad puns gave me bad karma. =(
    31. Re:China lacks the skills? by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right, because lying in the course of giving compliments, as Americans do as an integral part of our culture, is so much better.
      Hmm... Kudos. That is very insightful of you.
    32. Re:China lacks the skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck that for a game of soldiers!

    33. Re:China lacks the skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you!!!!

      This is also where we in the states get the phrase "Excuse Me". For example, when someone is in your way you say 'excuse me' even though you really mean 'get the hell out of my way you asshole'.
      Or when someone insults you and you reply "Excuse Me?" instead of "Can you repeat that so I can beat the hell out of you?".

    34. Re:China lacks the skills? by waspleg · · Score: 2, Informative

      i was taught to only ask 2x, refusal once is polite.

      times they are a changing?

    35. Re:China lacks the skills? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because I'm Canadian, but I don't see anything the least bit unusual about that exchange.

      I might give up insisting on the third try, but it would be along the lines of "well, if you're really sure, but if you change your mind please tell me."

    36. Re:China lacks the skills? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Wait, let me try this one. "I'm sorry, did you intend to inflict Ringo Starr on the rest of the world?" How did I do?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    37. Re:China lacks the skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'M NOT AMERICAN YOU DICKBAG. WE'RE NOT ALL JINGO RETARDS LIKE YOU.

      Oh I'm sorry what I meant to say was "I respect your intelligent commentary"

    38. Re:China lacks the skills? by rworne · · Score: 1

      Peace in Japanese kanji "heiwa" is exactly the same in Chinese.

      Safety in Japanese kanji "anzen" shares a character in Japanese and Chinese with the word for cheap yasui. Is that what you mean?

      The written language was borrowed centuries ago. Slang and idiomatic expressions will cloud meanings, but the overall meanings of many of the characters are mostly the same.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    39. Re:China lacks the skills? by Slur · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, though, that we have the power of life and death over them too. We know we can't annihilate one another, and I don't think either side really wants to. There is a fine sense of respectful autonomy - or detente - going on there. Unless you think, perhaps China is planning to nuclear bomb every country in the world and deploy their entire population worldwide as a police force to assume dominance... I don't think any other aggressive option would be tenable for them.

      I mean, China may not like "us" - and frankly, I think that's a fat fiction - but that's just too bad. They seem to be fine with playing by the rules, and the rules are loose when it comes to espionage. Hackers in China are like hackers anywhere, and our job is to improve our security. That's where our best efforts are spent.

      Of course, the government and media like to spread the story, to let everyone know it's time to be scared of the yellow menace once again. Oooh, look, I'm shaking! China sends troops to beat up monks and rape nuns in Tibet, it locks up students and scientists! Look how mean and tough they are, attacking such enemies so bravely!

      But enough of my ridiculing big bad China....

      If we continue to act as if China en masse threatens us, we miss the more fine-grained picture of the world that exists among and between common people everywhere.

      In the common person's view, I personally don't see any country as being our enemy - at least certainly not an enemy of mine. In every country in the world I can find people with whom I share an affinity, whether it's things we like to do during our time off or a mutual wish for universal peace. Large interests bang into each other and get all adversarial, and sometimes ideologies catch hold and inspire alienation from the rest of the world. These are all just diseases that plague us in modes of fear and dominance.

      If more people acted on their best impulses and the facts of the common interests of common people throughout the world were to become widely recognized, pitting groups against each other would be much harder to do, and it might do something to prevent the excesses of the elite.

      I say, in the meantime, let us continue to spread the meme: Common people of the world, unite!

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
    40. Re:China lacks the skills? by vuffi_raa · · Score: 2, Informative

      yes, but if you can write katakana, there is a good chance of communicating in english with someone who can't speak it in japan- if you use simple enough language most words when written with the japanese enunciation have at least a common slang meaning in conversational japanese.

    41. Re:China lacks the skills? by sydneyfong · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm Chinese, and I can read Chinese without any problems.

      Depending on the number of Kanji in a piece of Japanese text, I can extract the meaning sometimes better than automatic online translations. I don't know any Japanese, but experience is that most of the important words are written in Kanji, while the Japanese characters are usually there for grammatical purposes.

      Usually the problem when reading Japanese is the heavy use of Katakana, due to Japanese adopting a lot of western terms (even for things not of western origin).

      For meaning of the characters, I can tell you that they aren't exactly the same, but are similar enough that usually Chinese are able to extract the general idea. The fact that Kanji was introduced to Japan a long time ago isn't really relevant. With a little bit of training a person who's proficient in (modern) Chinese can read ancient Chinese texts up to 2000 years ago (in its original form) without problem. The Chinese language has been remarkably stable/stagnant in the past 2000 years...

      I'm not sure whether the Japanese could read Chinese without training though, I think they learn less Kanji than Chinese learn Chinese characters, and a difficult piece of Chinese text might be indecipherable...

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    42. Re:China lacks the skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe (Communist) China doesn't like us, or maybe they just don't care. But bottom line and fact of the matter is this: today's ruling party of mainland China is perpetrating the largest single global economic scam in the history of the modern world. When a Chinese company competes in the free market, the rest of the market is never actually competing against that company. Rather, they are competing against an entire country, and no _single_ corporation (or even a sizable syndicate of such corporations) could possibly compete with a company who can always fall back on their government and trust that they will 'make things all better' for them. And I am not talking about simple subsidy, I am talking about total unwaivering support to the point that the company could never actually fail, no matter how inefficient it may prove to be. They can always maintain the illusion of efficiency so long as they have a Regierung that behaves in this way. Not just that, the gov't over their gets more than just taxes from their corporations, they actually have a substantial stake (read 'stock' if you'd like) in most (all?) companies based there. And what does that mean? That means that all the companies can behave as one, the gov't can always redistribute the wealth to keep everyone afloat if they wish. And that doesn't even take into account the strict controls they still have on their currency (which hurts _everyone_, even if you don't realize it, I know I know, we all want our Wal-Mart prices when we buy toothpaste....). I know that they have been 'lightening' up on that a bit, but it is nowhere near enough still. And on top of that, the way in which they subsidize the fuel/energy costs their citizens use in their day-to-day lives is killing us as well. They pay < $1.50 (yes, that is American dollars) for a gallon of gas/petrol while I am paying $4.01 now! And why will my gas prices _keep_ going up? Because so long as subsidy like this is in place, their population will never feel the pressure of a tight supply (they can't see it reflected in the prices), and the growing middle class will not curb their consumption like the rest of us will.

      What were we talking about again?

    43. Re:China lacks the skills? by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      Another thing I find odd is that people get offended if you don't keep putting food on their plate, instead of letting them serve themselves.
      Not at buffets, perhaps.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  4. Bald face liars. by alextheseal · · Score: 5, Funny

    So who did it then, elves?

    1. Re:Bald face liars. by BulletMagnet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No the Network Gnomes and Fairies did it....you know, the ones that make backups go bad, servers tip over in the middle of the night, when they get really drunk, they make your data magically find ways into the hands of the evil Chinese hackers.....

      Apparentely this foreign minister needs to go back to Marketing 101 - he missed the week where "how to lie convincingly" was taught.

    2. Re:Bald face liars. by snl2587 · · Score: 1

      Gnomes. Looking for underpants.

    3. Re:Bald face liars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marketeers don't lie, Advertisers do.

      Oh, but you understand computers, you must know how the business world works!

    4. Re:Bald face liars. by InlawBiker · · Score: 5, Funny

      If a teenager from Seattle can hack WOPPER with an acoustic modem and 8-bit computers....

    5. Re:Bald face liars. by antifoidulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      China loves using this "developing nation" bullshit whenever it wants to try to elicit sympathy or otherwise justify their actions. Want to pollute as much as you want? "We are a developing nation!" Want to not have to play by WTO rules? Again, "Developing nation"

      If China actually WERE a developing nation, that stuff wouldn't be so bad. But China has 0 problem throwing its weight around places like Sudan where it uses its ginormous reserves of foreign currency and military know-how to help the Sudanese slaughter their own citizens in exchange for oil.

      China, if you want the benefits of being one of the big boys, you are going to have to pay the costs as well. This whole "we are a developing nation when it suits us" bullshit has got to stop, but unfortunately anyone who is actually in a position to make them play by the rules is either a cheater themselves or just so hypnotized by the theoretical promise of China that they refuse to do anything about it.

    6. Re:Bald face liars. by JebusIsLord · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This IS off topic and also a bit of a troll, but I couldn't help but think you were describing the modern woman.

      --
      Jeremy
    7. Re:Bald face liars. by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      It was these nasty "daemons" that did it.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    8. Re:Bald face liars. by ericspinder · · Score: 1

      he missed the week where "how to lie convincingly" was taught. If George Bush has taught us anything, it's that lying will always fool a certain percentage of people; no matter how badly done. What that percentage is depends on a lot of factors, but the important part is just to take the leap, and lie. Because you never know if it will help, unless you try.
      --
      The grass is only greener, if you don't take care of your own lawn.
    9. Re:Bald face liars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the one benefit of being the big boy is to make his own rules and not have to play by the rules. US being the perfect example. China wants to supplant the US as the biggest boy. Why should it play by the rules devised by the USï¼Y If you really believed there were a universally accepted moral value upon the current international system is built, you should retake your history lesson and watch less cable tv. Seriously, it's just part of the game played by great powers since the dawn of human civilization. Why so riled up?

    10. Re:Bald face liars. by SportyGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I believe you mean WOPR (War Operation Plan Response), but I'll forgive you ;)

    11. Re:Bald face liars. by Drathos · · Score: 2, Funny

      It was WOPR, then McKittrick said to "beef up" the security and it became The Whopper®. He's just at some mid-point.

      --
      End of line..
    12. Re:Bald face liars. by WGFELyL5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the one benefit of being the big boy is to make his own rules
      ...
      China wants to supplant the US as the biggest boy.
      ...
      Why so riled up? Because every indication is that China's rules will be worse for the world?
    13. Re:Bald face liars. by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Can't we just make a rule that says any nation with MIRV'd thermonuclear ICBMs and the ability to put a man in orbit and get him back alive is not a developing nation anymore?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    14. Re:Bald face liars. by eatfastnoodle · · Score: 1

      who get to decide that? The same people who believe invading Iraq makes the world better or the same people who believe it's ok to flood the world market with subsidized American agricultural products. Open your eyes up, people, the world are far bigger than America. And the last time I checked, more people believed US is a bigger threat to world peace.

    15. Re:Bald face liars. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the last time I checked, more people believed US is a bigger threat to world peace.

      And what has that got to do with reality? More people believe in God than don't, but that doesn't make God any more factual. Get off your anti-U.S. pulpit for a moment, and grasp that the United States has been far more of a stabilizing factor in world affairs than otherwise. That's because any would-be Hitlers out there know very well what would happen if they tried anything nasty on a significant scale. Nobody but the Russians really tried to match us militarily, and they failed. However, that's in the process of changing.

      Face it, China has the same aspirations towards world domination as Russia does, and I can pretty much guarantee that at some point within the next decade even people practicing hard-core denial like you will sit up and take notice. Unlike Russia, there's a damned good chance that China will be able to pull it off: they're not making the same mistakes as their Soviet neighbors. We won't be able to outdo them on military spending because a. they're gradually taking over supplying our military and b. have successfully decimated large portions of our manufacturing sector. Once China finally turns on us and stops providing us with critical manufactured goods we're as good as dead. We may very well see a repeat of the collapse of the Soviet Union, only this time it will be us. It doesn't have to be that way, but it will because they've found our weak spots and are exploiting them viciously.

      That may not be a good thing for the rest of the world, no matter how much they may hate the U.S. at the moment. When China finally goes on the warpath, you'd better hope that the United States is still capable of taking them on. I don't think we will be: if nothing else China's government is almost preternaturally patient, and they'll bide their time until we're too weak to stop them.

      The European Union had better take note: the United States' days are numbered. Start looking to your own defense because sooner or later, you're going to need it. Bigtime. We never went on an empire-building spree in spite of having the most powerful military force ever assembled by a single nation, but I do not believe that China will exercise the same level of restraint.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    16. Re:Bald face liars. by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      Gnome again... I KNEW the FOSS community has something to do with this!

    17. Re:Bald face liars. by Ummu · · Score: 1

      Oh geez, they are obviously having fun forcing americans to acknowledge their mad hax0r skillz. They are responding to this issue with childishness, because they just don't care

    18. Re:Bald face liars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As oppose to what you say, central government of mainland China really don't want to pollute actually. That's because the land is already overly exhaused and the problems of pollutions and overuse of natural resources are already seriouly posting threat to the country.

      The central government continuously try to lower pollution. Problem though, is that their current government system is so badly organized that the local government continuously hide facts from the central government and violating what the central government says without them knowing. That's why recently, the central government did encourage the "people representatives" and mass medias to "do their job" and report whenever the local government violate the law or make evil decisions. But it doesn't work too well because the local police and court system are under local government's control. Takes time to change the mess I guess...

    19. Re:Bald face liars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good to see slashdot is still full of insecure kids. fucking racist asshole

    20. Re:Bald face liars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.
      Were you thinking up that reply while driving back in your oversized SUV? Dropped by a Starbucks for a coffee too I bet. Oh, and maybe when you turned on the news, you may have noticed that G W. Bush had his idea of 'enemy combatants' kicked back by your supreme court.

      Get off your moral high horse and stop being stupid. The Chinese are still developing, and in that phase, every country sees its priorities as coming first.
      Isnt the middle east a larger mess now that the coalition of the willing went into get some oil?

    21. Re:Bald face liars. by master_p · · Score: 1

      KDEs, not Gnomes.

    22. Re:Bald face liars. by xgr3gx · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's complete bullcrap.
      I read an article about how the Chinese have engineers and factories dedicated to reverse engineering of products for the purpose of creating counterfit products.
      Pretty much all the cracked/pirated software and media come from China.

      --
      Shameless plug alert: Game server control panel
    23. Re:Bald face liars. by bagsc · · Score: 1

      It is inappropriate to mock the Chinese inability to grow facial hair.

      Hehehe...

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  5. You gotta admit... by micahfk · · Score: 1

    ...that this is probably the most unique non-denial denial that would make our own politicians proud.

    1. Re:You gotta admit... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Not really. "We can't do it, we lack the ability and the wherewithal" is something that would get a US politician voted out of office to the repeated frat boy chants of "USA! USA! USA!"

      Nay, the US flavor of politician would go on about how we could, but wouldn't because we're such nice, peace-loving guys; besides, if we'd done it, it'd be so full of win that there'd be no doubt who pulled it off.

    2. Re:You gotta admit... by micahfk · · Score: 1

      You have to think in terms of the Chinese, not in terms of an American. It would make an American politician proud because he's making a non-denial denial to the international audience by playing to the standard concepts that people have of China being a developing nation. Yes, it would not be a phrase an American one would use, but it is the style and cleverness that would make them proud. Of course, we here at /. can see easily through the bs and think it's stupid nonetheless, but in terms of the 'average' media/folk... it'll pass for gold.

  6. Yeah, right by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China has the money and skills to build the Great Firewall. They are clearly capable.

    1. Re:Yeah, right by FunkyELF · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that they have the people. A billion people means if only 1 in a million people could hack it, then China has a thousand people that can hack it.

    2. Re:Yeah, right by hardburn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not to mention that a lot of the key mathematics that broke MD5 was done by Chinese cryptographers, among quite a few other mathematical and scientific breakthroughs over the last few years. Saying they don't have the capability is absurd.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    3. Re:Yeah, right by chthon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are certainly capable. I have here a stack of magazines, dating from 1978. One article shows a Chinese computer designed back then. If China is a developing nation, then so where the US and the USSR in the 1950's.

    4. Re:Yeah, right by maxume · · Score: 1

      1.3 billion...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Yeah, right by Chris+Burkhardt · · Score: 2, Informative

      among quite a few other mathematical and scientific breakthroughs over the last few millennia.

      There, fixed it.
      --
      "And there be unix which have made themselves unix for the kingdom of heaven's sake." - Matt. 19:12
    6. Re:Yeah, right by Deadplant · · Score: 1

      China has the money and skills to build the Great Firewall. They are clearly capable. I think we all agree that they are more than capable but I'm just not seeing the connection to the great wall...

      I mean it's a wall dude... not even a modern wall... it is built with stones and mortar by peasants over many decades...

      Still, i may just try putting that on my next resume when I apply for a programming position... "my grandfather built a really long wall!"
      I'll put it right after my "making snarky comments on slashdot" credentials.

    7. Re:Yeah, right by gnick · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that a lot of the key mathematics that broke MD5 was done by Chinese cryptographers MD5 was broken? I'm not a mathematician, but that's news to me - I thought we still had to use rainbow tables. I'm willing to accept ignorance if you're referring to some other exploitable weakness - Please fill me in if I'm missing something.

      Otherwise, here's the MD5 sum of my slashdot password. Post as me as I'll accept that MD5 has been cracked.
      ae028ba2307f2fc0be83b9b49e859224
      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    8. Re:Yeah, right by flosofl · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yes it was broken.

      On 1 March 2005, Arjen Lenstra, Xiaoyun Wang, and Benne de Weger demonstrated[8] construction of two X.509 certificates with different public keys and the same MD5 hash, a demonstrably practical collision. The construction included private keys for both public keys. A few days later, Vlastimil Klima described[9] an improved algorithm, able to construct MD5 collisions in a few hours on a single notebook computer. On 18 March 2006, Klima published an algorithm[10] that can find a collision within one minute on a single notebook computer, using a method he calls tunneling.
      The concern is less for password hashing than for cryptographic signatures based on MD5. It destroys one of the principles of a crypto signature: non-reputability. By being able to create an arbitrary collision, that is removed.

      Here's a good site to give you an overview.
      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    9. Re:Yeah, right by msormune · · Score: 1

      It's not broken. It just might be weakened.

    10. Re:Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can find no mention of this "Great Firewall" in official Chinese sources. More baseless American allegations!

    11. Re:Yeah, right by joeman3429 · · Score: 1

      Firewall. It's ok, happens to the best of us

    12. Re:Yeah, right by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Actually, Cisco did that.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    13. Re:Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has the money and skills to build the Great Firewall. They are clearly capable. I'd have to fully agree. Anyone who thinks the Chinese aren't capable of this is just stupid. And all 'Americans' aren't the same. Problem is, the few that understand hardening of systems, and real IT security don't end up with the power to make policy to enforce such things. And I agree that there are likely many many beautiful things about China, and it's people... But folks, lets not defend our idiot respective governments out of dumbsh*t nationalism. We in the US can at least call our govt stupid. Personally I think China needs to get to that point, but obviously there's too many loyalists that would be willing to shoot or run over their own people to keep this from happening still.

      So off our high-horses folks, Yes everyone is capable of hacking everyone. How many of us can hack our neighbors wifi, ect? Does that mean it's right to do so? ok, then lie about it?

      Get real folks,

      Melkor_TC

    14. Re:Yeah, right by ElMiguel · · Score: 1

      It destroys one of the principles of a crypto signature: non-reputability.

      I would think that a crypto signature should be reputable? Oh right, you mean non-repeatability. I wonder if the Chinese can spell their own language; perhaps that's what's giving them an edge.

    15. Re:Yeah, right by flosofl · · Score: 1

      Yes, spelling it wrong, I actually used the wrong word - thanks for pointing that out. I meant non-repudiation. As in the signature cannot be denied as having come from so-and-so at such-and-such a time.

      And no I did not mean non-repeatability. That would be stupid. Repeatable results are actually pretty damn important in crypto, otherwise nothing could ever be decrypted and no hash could ever be verified.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    16. Re:Yeah, right by ElMiguel · · Score: 1

      I thought repeatability would be a somewhat inaccurate way of referring to the feasibility of generating collisions, i.e. being able to "repeat" a particular value of the hash. Obviously cryptographic algorithms are deterministic and thus repeatable in a mathematical sense.

    17. Re:Yeah, right by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      Money, yes; Not so much on the skills in that case -- they paid Cisco and Juniper to build it for them.
      http://www.cfr.org/publication/9856/

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    18. Re:Yeah, right by bobbozzo · · Score: 1
      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  7. Could have fooled me.. by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 2, Funny

    The guy that delivers my chinese food seems to be pretty computer savvy, he farms WoW gold on his time off :)

    Okay.. flame away :P

    --
    I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    1. Re:Could have fooled me.. by TheLazySci-FiAuthor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll warm myself with these flames, thank you.

      I think your point (intentional or not) is in fact quite valid. In a country of billions how could there not be at least a few with the innate talent needed to accomplish this?

      Given, skill and talent are seperate but related things - talent you have or don't, skill you use or lose - yet with the right amount of inherent ability and the drive to learn, what isn't possible?

    2. Re:Could have fooled me.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given, skill and talent are seperate but related things - talent you have or don't, skill you use or lose - yet with the right amount of inherent ability and the drive to learn, what isn't possible? Growing a larger penis? HAHAHA, you peepee so small!
    3. Re:Could have fooled me.. by master_p · · Score: 1

      Given that Chinese hackers defeated Windows XP activation the very next day Windows XP were out, the probability of being able to hack their way through any electronic defense approaches 1 quickly. And since all the communication protocols and operating systems used in the west are available to them as well as all the knowledge around them, I don't see how they can't do it.

  8. Oh come on. by Paranatural · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This kind of reminds me of the South Park episode.

    'We cannot achieve so much with such small penis, but you American, wow, penis so big, so big penis!'

    Get off it already, they have as much technical expertise as Japan, India, Russia, or the USA. This is a fairly lame attempt at placating the senate.

    1. Re:Oh come on. by snl2587 · · Score: 1

      Do they have a computer?

      *check*

      Do they have access to the Internet?

      *check*

      There. I've systematically determined that they're sophisticated enough.

    2. Re:Oh come on. by cmacb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forgot one:

      Are the target systems largely running stock versions of Windows?

      *check*

      ------

      For those that consider this Microsoft bashing substitute the following:

      Are the target systems running large, complex, "user friendly" operating systems with more permutations of options than you can shake a stick at and lots of known vulnerabilities that can only be fixed by downloading updates from a commercial source who is picky about who is allowed to download those updates?

      *check*

    3. Re:Oh come on. by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Actually the denial has far more politics associated with it. It is a mocking lie, a childish denial that the Chinese official knows no one will believe and emphasises that he and in turn the government of China doesn't care whether foreign countries believes it or not.

      It is simply a public face denial because the government of China knows the current US administration will do nothing about as it might threaten the profits of several administration controlling corporations. So China via greed controls the activity of major US corporations who in turn control the activities of the US administration.

      Hence an in your face mocking denial as the government of China has no respect for the US government and this time round did not even bother nabbing a few out of favour party members (there are always some available) to be used as scapegoats for the criminal hacking activities.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    4. Re:Oh come on. by peragrin · · Score: 1

      As a voting Citizen of the USA I have no respect for the US Government.

      It is a fickle mob of crazies who are always looking to lynch something or someone while accepting no responsibility for anything done by said mob.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    5. Re:Oh come on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they have a computer?

      *check*

      Do they have access to the Internet?

      *check*

      There. I've systematically determined that they're sophisticated enough.

      You just proved that any country that gets OLPCs can't be a developing country...
    6. Re:Oh come on. by Paranatural · · Score: 1

      Hey now, this wasn't redundant when I posted it, I saw no replies when I hit submit. Sheesh.

    7. Re:Oh come on. by snl2587 · · Score: 1

      No. I didn't.

    8. Re:Oh come on. by joeman3429 · · Score: 1

      Proved that they are capable.

      Though if what you said were true, it would be able to solve world hunger! No more developing countries! Yay for computers!

  9. He then followed... by MrBippers · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...they generally outsource all their hacking in exchange for WoW gold.

    1. Re:He then followed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, that's a *separate* Kam Fong enterprise. For the real hacking, he insists on payment in Euros.

  10. I have hacked the flist post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Solly.

  11. Not enough people by Bovius · · Score: 0, Troll

    They've only got, like, a billion people, and they're all needed to work the rice patties. They can't spare anyone to learn teh hax0rz.

    1. Re:Not enough people by wattrlz · · Score: 1

      If they have, like, a bajillion rice-farmers, couldn't they trade rice for H4x0rz?

    2. Re:Not enough people by joeman3429 · · Score: 1

      it's true, nerds like rice =)

  12. South Park? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, this is almost better than the Chewbacca defense. This is the ego-stroking social engineering attack at its finest. Oh, American penis so big...

  13. I for one... by Chas · · Score: 1, Funny

    Welcome our "we're too primitive to hack" hacker overlords.

    Oh yes. One more thing.

    *COUGH*BULLSHIT*COUGH*BULLSHIT*COUGH*

    Now where were we?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who mods this parent's post as a Troll should never be allowed to moderate again!!!

  14. step 1, hide source by Keruo · · Score: 4, Informative

    For talented crackers, it would be relatively easy to cover their tracks by using several compromised machines as proxies for their attack.
    China has large internet user base and the average Jin would likely secure their home machine as well as average Joe across the ocean.

    --
    There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    1. Re:step 1, hide source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For talented crackers, it would be relatively easy to cover their tracks by using several compromised machines as proxies for their attack.

      Then pray that one of your hops is not a honeypot. Going through a honeypot might be worse than exposing your source address (assuming the honeypot is not also your first hop). It would give someone the opportunity to analyze your methods and identify all of your targets.

      I guess it depends on whether you're out for fun or out for a specific target.

    2. Re:step 1, hide source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talented? Dude, I was a script kiddie along with most everyone else on efnet what... a decade ago? I can't even recall, but what I do recall is that it was pure common practice - for everyone, to operate through one or several boxes preferrably outside the "western" world.

      It should be a given that ANY hack that seems even remotely intelligent, is not from the source it's traced to be. Nor from the source traced from that source. Nor from the source... ad nauseum.
      Maybe it took talent before my time, but even from the days of the net that I remember as "old times"... it was the norm.

  15. Well... by geekmux · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...you do have the Great Firewall thing going for you...which is nice.

  16. whats more likely by thermian · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That China hacked the systems of two congressmen they are unlikely to have any interest in, or that someone else, knowing everyone would leap to blame China, hacked Chinese computers and used them to do the attack?

    Seems to me they could use the access to try and steal something they could sell.

    If it was an attack, I mean, has there been any evidence released? Or is this just finger pointing in the absence of proof?

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    1. Re:whats more likely by jimbobborg · · Score: 4, Informative

      Read the fine article. Quoted from second article:

      "The extent of the intrusions on Capitol Hill, which officials said began in August 2006, was unclear, although Rep. Frank R. Wolf (R-Va.), whose office had four computers affected, said that other members of Congress were targeted, as well as at least one congressional committee. "They got everything," Wolf said at a news briefing, describing the attack on his office systems.

      Wolf said that after one of the attacks, a car with license plates belonging to Chinese officials went to the home of a Chinese dissident in the Washington suburbs and took photographs of it."

    2. Re:whats more likely by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Both Congressmen have been openly critical of China in the past. They most certainly did have an interest in them.

    3. Re:whats more likely by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The obvious question I haven't heard anybody ask: why did these congressmen have sensitive information on machines connected to the Internet?

      In spy stories you commit things to memory because they're too dangerous to write down. Have we degenerated to the point where you not only write things down but you put them on the Internet with a big sign saying "steal me?"

    4. Re:whats more likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If they have cars that can drive themselves and take photographs, surely they can crack Congress' computers.

    5. Re:whats more likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the congressmen had computer systems like the government workers I know, then all of the sensitive information was kept on a spreadsheet anyway.

    6. Re:whats more likely by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 1

      The obvious question I haven't heard anybody ask: why did these congressmen have sensitive information on machines connected to the Internet?
      It's the same answer to the question, how did a clerk at congress e-mail the addresses of whistle-blowers to an entire list of people including VP Cheney?

      The answer is: it's a mixture of incompetence, inattentiveness and ignorance. Sensitive information really ought to be treated... sensitively.
      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    7. Re:whats more likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CongressWeasels and SenateHoles think of themselves as above the law, haven't you been reading the news the last 50 or 100 years? Of all the really big scandals that occur, about 70% are our elected officials thinking that the laws only apply to us little people.

      I could go on a rant here, for days! but I will leave it at that.

    8. Re:whats more likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In their defense, they didn't realize the signs were publically accessable...oh wait...wrong story...

    9. Re:whats more likely by thetagger · · Score: 1

      Probably US congressmen don't care as much about that kind of information as the Chinese government and the people who can be persecuted.

    10. Re:whats more likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The obvious question I haven't heard anybody ask: why did these congressmen have sensitive information on machines connected to the Internet? Obvious ans: Easier to download pr0n if you got internet access ;)
    11. Re:whats more likely by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      A spreadsheet on a computer that's not connected to the Internet is a big improvement over an encrypted file on a computer that is.

    12. Re:whats more likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >In spy stories you commit things to memory

      you vastly over estimate the ability of our congress

    13. Re:whats more likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They knew about the tubes, but they didn't think the chinese were small enough to crawl through them.

  17. Unlikely argument, SW skills are easily developed by cblack · · Score: 1

    Software cracking skills are much different from, say, ICBM technology. They can be developed by an individual through reading readily accessible texts and practice. The argument that China as a whole does not have the technical sophistication to crack into U.S. systems due to it being a "developing nation" is disingenuous.

  18. Job Opening: "Sophisticated Skill Set" Needed by zenmaster666 · · Score: 1

    Sure they lack the skill, and in related news "Pigs Can Fly".

    You dont need to have special "skills" to become a script kiddie, which is enough to get into vulnerable systems.

  19. Beowulf Cluster by i_ate_god · · Score: 1

    ... using the entire population of China.

    UNSTOPPABLE

    --
    I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    1. Re:Beowulf Cluster by fprintf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just like in Bug's Life. If we let the ants know how powerful they are, they will crush us!

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    2. Re:Beowulf Cluster by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Finally! We have used a pixar movie for our wisdom. I'm glad our kids are watching these things. Now to find a "Cars" reference...

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
  20. too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being so inept and young as a country... one of the oldest on earth... They are too stupid to build nuclear subs too - boo whooo.

  21. I feel sorry for them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next they'll tell us they don't have the know-how to put up satellites or to launch men into orbit...

    1. Re:I feel sorry for them! by n0084ever · · Score: 0

      ... or the tech to shoot down satellites

  22. uh huh. by sloth+jr · · Score: 1

    A country that manufactures most of the world's - well, everything - doesn't have the sophistication to hack a couple of lousy Windows boxen? Ummmmmmmmm....

  23. Chris Smith 's human rights computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It comes to me as strange to me that such a security blunder is made public.

    He called it his human rights computer to give it that extra amateuristic touch.

  24. Considering the age of China.... by Schnoogs · · Score: 0

    ...you'd think their politicians would have a bit more experience at lying.

    1. Re:Considering the age of China.... by Paranatural · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would they need to have any skill at it at all? They have no independent news sources. It's all state propaganda machines. After 50 years of that nonsense the average Chinese citizen has no real ability to question authority, thus the ability of people in authority to convincingly lie is lower.

    2. Re:Considering the age of China.... by chthon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hah, I just saw some unique pictures on television. In the vicinity of the last earthquakes, people lost their kids in school. A Belgian reporter was with some parents, and those people are mad at the Chinese government, and there are accusations of corruption. A local official and a policeman tried to remove those people from around the school, got scolded by their citizens and left with their tails between their legs.

  25. If they're not sophisticated enough by anglico · · Score: 5, Insightful

    then how did one of their submarines pop up in the middle of one of our Navy carrier groups undetected?

    1. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by tzhuge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Didn't South Africa pull off the exact same feat against some NATO naval forces during an exercise?

      If anything, it's probably an indication of just how much Western military forces oversell the effectiveness of high-tech toys.

    2. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by Mikkeles · · Score: 5, Funny

      Buoyancy.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    3. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      then how did one of their submarines pop up in the middle of one of our Navy carrier groups undetected? Buoyancy. With all the lead that goes into the typical Chinese product? Really?
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then how did one of their submarines pop up in the middle of one of our Navy carrier groups undetected? By knowing the path of the carrier battle group, sitting on the bottom in a SSK a few days before they arrived?
    5. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by 3.14159265 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly. Buoyancy should be made illegal.

    6. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Not enough left for the sub.

    7. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by Minwee · · Score: 1
    8. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 1

      That sucks for the sub designers that the only thing they have left to build their subs out of is steel and other non-toxic metals. The Chinese need to stop worrying about toys and start putting their lead where it is needed most.

    9. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      Easy, they waited. It's a very simple trick actually. Passive detection methods employed by submarines do not work if the other object is either not moving and is dead silent (dead is probably literal in the Chinese navy). So when the carrier group passed over they just popped up in the middle of them undetected. It's really not impressive at all, aside form their ability to guess where the carrier group was going.

    10. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How were they able to write the sophisticated targeting programs used to shoot down a satellite?

      The bullshit is so deep here you need a snow plow to dig the Chinese out.

    11. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by CaptainPatent · · Score: 1

      Buoyancy. With all the lead that goes into the typical Chinese product? Really? Exactly! That's how advanced they really are
      --
      Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    12. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how did one of their submarines pop up in the middle of one of our Navy carrier groups undetected? If it was undetected, how do we know it was even there??!?
    13. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by dwye · · Score: 1

      > If anything, it's probably an indication of just how
      > much Western military forces oversell the effectiveness
      > of high-tech toys.

      Or how much we got use to using nothing but passive sensors on the Soviets, back when. If we had been pinging away, we would have seen them long before the surfaced. Unless all the brain-blasted whale corpses blocked the signal, of course. The problem is that active pinging shows where you are better than it sees, and so is too unsubtle for the old game of cat and mouse, just like launching live torpedoes would have been.

    14. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty easy to sneak up on someone who is not engaged in hostilities with you and is not searching for you.

      The U.S. is not at war with any nation that has a submarine fleet, ergo the U.S. Navy does not constantly search for foreign submarines.

    15. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, it's hard to tell if the Americans really didn't detect that sub or not.

      By claiming failure to detect the sub, they can get more funding for naval research. Conversely, if they announced that they did detect the Chinese sub, then China would be motivated to spend more on their own submarine research.

    16. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      For all you know, we simply pretended not to have detected them. If I were in command of a Navy carrier group, I certainly wouldn't want to hand the Chinese any information on our submarine detection capabilities.

    17. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 1

      They've been engineering Duke Nukem Forever, the Coming of Godot and Jesus, and the heat death of the Universe - and they'll actually deliver one of these things eventually.

    18. Re:If they're not sophisticated enough by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      That's what the LIDAR satellites were supposed to help with. Not sure if they were deployed though.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  26. If they build it, they will come. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Train at Universities around the World.

    Manufacture a good chunk of our communications and electronic goods.

    Build nuclear submarines...

    They can hack as well as anyone.

  27. Crackers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else read "Chinese crackers" as white people working for the Chinese?

  28. wheres the NSA by reparks · · Score: 1

    It's the NSA's job to protect us from this kind of crap right? "The NSA is responsible for protecting U.S. government communications and information systems from similar agencies elsewhere." Throw them some more billions of CASH!!!

    1. Re:wheres the NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA cannot enforce security practices.

    2. Re:wheres the NSA by 1310nm · · Score: 1

      I think the Air Force is actually charged with it. Anyway, I seriously hope any "good" information is on machines physically separated from any network that has links that can even potentially route/switch to the Internet.

  29. Cheap Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China can SAY whatever it wants. The fact of the matter is that computer hardware is not outside their fiscal reach, and information wants to be free.

  30. I read this title as by Overkill+Nbuta · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Headline on slashdot reads : China Says It Lacks Skills To Hack US Systems

    I read it as : China doesnt have da 1337 skills.

    Unless they are talking about driving skills, then its total bull. 1 Billion people, im pretty sure there has to be atleast 1-2 tech savvie people working for the goverment.

  31. Hacked By Chinese by Piata · · Score: 1

    is apparently a grossly inaccurate stereotype.

  32. Maybe There Was No "Hacking" by longacre · · Score: 1

    Maybe there are bootleg Cisco routers in the Capitol office building.

    1. Re:Maybe There Was No "Hacking" by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're just getting those random connects on their SSH port with fake passwords (something everyone with SSH server gets), and the government security scare monkey publicizes that someone is `hacking' them (and they need to hire more security experts and an expensive package to beef up their IT defense). Wouldn't be the first time some ignorant `specialist' blew something out of proportion for their own benefit. How the heck do they define `hacking' anyway? No hacker would ever refer to themselves as a hacker---so by definition, any self admitted hackers out there aren't.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  33. The Jar Jar Defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Weesa nots smart enough for yousa craaazy Americans with your knock-off Cisco boxes...weesa kinda sold you.

  34. They ough to hire Tariq Aziz! by Dareth · · Score: 3, Funny

    If they can get the US to let him go, Tariq Aziz, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tariq_Aziz would make the perfect spokesperson for the Chinese denial of attacks.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:They ough to hire Tariq Aziz! by micahfk · · Score: 1

      Tariq was the ultimate spokesperson...that guy would be worth it for any country's administration as a spokesperson.

    2. Re:They ough to hire Tariq Aziz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!

      Tariq Aziz is not the guy you're looking for, The Iraqi Information Minister was Muhammad Saeed as-Sahaf :-)

    3. Re:They ough to hire Tariq Aziz! by Boetsj · · Score: 1

      Err - actually they'd be better off hiring Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf instead ;)

      Aziz was the deputy PM, al-Sahaf the 'information' minister.

    4. Re:They ough to hire Tariq Aziz! by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      Exactly right, there's nothing funny about the other guy except that Sadam always had his breakfast at the same time Tariq Aziz. (Doh, doesn't quite work in past tense, why did they have to go and kill him and ruin my joke, wankers)

  35. Not just educated there... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Remember, they readily come here to get educated at our grad schools as well. Not only could they have learned there, they could have learned HERE as well.

    1. Re:Not just educated there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just educated in the west...
      I did a English teaching stint at a couple of technical universities in Beijing a while back. One of them had a course on computer security (or hacking as the students referred to it).

      There's no doubt that China has people locally trained in computer security to a reasonably high level.

  36. I'm just a frozen Chinese computer guy... by DrHackenbush · · Score: 0

    ... your western computer systems frighten and confuse me.

    1. Re:I'm just a frozen Chinese computer guy... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Funny, that's exactly the bit that I was thinking of. The whole thing is really rather insulting - that someone would trot out a playing-dumb platitude so obviously lame that only a lawyer with a handpicked jury of idiots would try on this side of the Pacific. I always thought that Frozen Caveman Lawyer was one of SNL's best sketches - Phil Hartman died way too young. What a shame.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  37. You have to admit by j_166 · · Score: 1

    You have to admit, that was one hell of a zing.

  38. If by "developing nation"... by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    If by "developing nation" they mean the nation developing (or at least producing) all of the hardware, with the access to put whatever back doors they want into firmware in nigh untraceable ways, then perhaps he at least has that part right.

    I'm not buying it, and not just 'cause of Lou Dobbs.

  39. O RLY? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    If they do not have the skill to crack into those laptops, then we should stop sending all this hi-tech software development work over to them

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  40. Dirty Laundry by dontPanik · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to see the rest of China's dirty laundry that will be exposed as the Olymics start

    --
    "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." - Pablo Picasso
  41. Right... by JakeD409 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm far too simple-minded to post a satirical comment on Slashdot.

    1. Re:Right... by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ya know, a bunch of us were just talking about how simple minded JakeD409 was, but couldn't quite come up with a defining statement -- "too simple minded to...?" Someone suggested "Pour piss out of a boot with the instructions printed on the heel", but that was overstating things a bit - and nobody was really sure you could read so having the instructions printed might not help you much. Someone else thought "Eat a box of chocolates (My momma says, 'Life is like...')", but, while getting closer, just didn't quite state the obvious strongly enough. Imagine my delight when I went to slashdot and found the perfect defining statement!

      I'm far too simple-minded to post a satirical comment on Slashdot.

      Thanks, JakeD409 (cause the world ain't ready for 410!)!

      disclaimer: no actual humor was used in the making of this post, although I did hit my funny bone while typing that bit about the box of chocolates.

      PS. I don't know JakeD409. He just put the "kick Me" sign on and bent over and I could not resist.

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
    2. Re:Right... by JakeD409 · · Score: 1

      What did I ever do to you :(

  42. bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets look at the situation now. They are buying commodities like they are going out of style. They are buying oil in massive amounts (two bidders on Saudi oil means oil goes from 55 per barrel to 140 per barrel). They are building opteron processors for AMD at plants onshore, and they designed their own dragon chip, roughly equivaent to a '486 but now enanced and manufactured in millions of pieces. Further, they have rockets that can now go to space (although the Americans are yelping that some of the technology may have leaked from them, they were well on track to come up with it on their own). There are 1.1 billion of them, but nowhere is there any who can hack a web site..... (ok, yeah thats what they said, but its just soo much BS)...

  43. Obligatory by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nothing to see here, western capitalist lackeys. Move along.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Obligatory by zerocool^ · · Score: 1
      Here's something to see:

      pam_unix Begin

      sshd:
      Authentication Failures:
      unknown (124.42.9.109): 412 Time(s)
      unknown (41.248.254.95): 127 Time(s)
      root (sd-10758.dedibox.fr): 66 Time(s)
      unknown (61.199.196.219): 38 Time(s)
      root (61.199.196.219): 35 Time(s)
      root (41.248.254.95): 15 Time(s)
      adm (124.42.9.109): 3 Time(s)
      ftp (124.42.9.109): 3 Time(s)
      adm (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      apache (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      apache (61.199.196.219): 1 Time(s)
      backuppc (61.199.196.219): 1 Time(s)
      bin (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      daemon (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      ftp (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      games (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      gopher (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      halt (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      lp (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      mail (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      mailnull (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      mysql (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      news (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      nfsnobody (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      nobody (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      operator (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      postfix (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      root (124.42.9.109): 1 Time(s)
      rpc (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      rpcuser (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      rpm (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      shutdown (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      smmsp (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      sshd (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      sync (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      tomcat (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      uucp (41.248.254.95): 1 Time(s)
      Invalid Users:
      Unknown Account: 577 Time(s)



      Yeah, two of those are APNIC addresses (whois.arin.net). The third is African.

      ~W
      --
      sig?
  44. Chinese humor at its best by tnk1 · · Score: 1

    Its not like they have to train a whole division of PLA troops to execute a hacker attack. There are enough people in China who work for development shops for Western companies to more than provide the expertise necessary. Not to mention that its not like we have never let a Chinese national into a Computer Science program in a major university.

    I think that this announcement was some sort of ironic joke, sort of like an Arab oil sheik calling himself a camel jockey during a conversation using his satellite phone located on his 200ft yacht. Who ever said the Chinese have no sense of humor?

  45. Doubtful claim, but is China really the source? by chaostaco · · Score: 1

    What is more likely:
    1. China is conducting military hacking activities against allies in such a way that will attract negative attention.
    2. China has a lot of easy-to-hack computers that more sophisticated non-Chinese hackers are using as relays for their own hacking.

    Perhaps it is both, but I would bet that there is a whole lot of #2 going on.

  46. Not only are they capable... by JimboFBX · · Score: 1

    But Zero Hour has taught me that they stick a bunch of these hackers in an internet center, stealing 5 dollars at a time from our bank accounts. As they get more skillful at hacking, they are able to steal... 6 dollars at time! Then 7!

    Sounds pretty sophisticated to me. Sophisticated enough to satellite hack our command center- I mean government.

  47. OUCH by willy+everlearn · · Score: 1

    I hurt myself laughing so hard!!!

    --
    No hour on a horse is ever wasted. Winston Churchill
  48. DAMN YOU! by db32 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I almost died! I almost choked on my lunch reading this summary. I sit down...take a bite, open slashdot, and nearly choke! Damn you editors!

    I propose that stories with claims THAT ridiculous this should have title and summary hidden with a warning so that readers eating or drinking can be prepared! I mean really...think how many geeks you might endager with a headline of "Openly Gay Republican Elected to Office"

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    1. Re:DAMN YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "Openly Gay Republican Elected to Office"

      After being sworn in, President Andrew Sullivan was quoted as saying, "I've nether been tho honored in all of my lithe!"

  49. Dear Comrades In China: Don't Despair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Please hack this war criminal.

    Thank you for helping to spread democracy and freedom around the world.

    Communistically Yours,
    Kilgore Trout

  50. In a separate story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Reports show outsourcing to Chinese programmers is on the outs, since they just don't have the POWER!

  51. titan rain by unspokenchaos · · Score: 0
    1. Re:titan rain by kaaona · · Score: 1

      In the operation code-named TITAN RAIN, the Chinese (or hackers cleverly appearing to originate from a trio of Chinese military bases) systematically broke into U.S. government, military, and contractor computer systems looking for anything and everything they could steal. According to the story in Time magazine, their objective was to steal anything that would take them longer than five years to develop on their own. Their haul is still classified, but among the things they reportedly stole from a contractor site was the Air Force Flight Planning Software. While not classified, it's a very sophisticated package that took thousands of programmer man-hours to develop and refine. While the Chinese may not have 21st century tools targeting our systems, their methods are described as extremely deliberate and thorough. If you have an unpatched vulnerability in your system, they can find and exploit it.

  52. Ah, naivety at its finest by biolysis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "then how did one of their submarines pop up in the middle of one of our Navy carrier groups undetected?"

    It didn't, that's what the Navy said to convince people like you to give them more money.

    And you fell for it.

    1. Re:Ah, naivety at its finest by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Interesting

      that's what the Navy said to convince people like you to give them more money

      No, that's what the Navy said to make the Chinese feel overly confident and to underestimate our ability to track them. Classic move... make your opponent complacent enough that you can then later make them completely doubt their ability to do anything when you rip the rug out from under them, as the situation warrants. Nothing makes people doubt their abilities more than the sudden discovery that they've been completely wrong about their own success. We should know (as should the former Soviets and everyone else), since it's happened to us, too.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Ah, naivety at its finest by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      State your source.

    3. Re:Ah, naivety at its finest by level_headed_midwest · · Score: 1

      So then it looks like we're both playing the same game:

      China: "We lack the capability to infiltrate your networks." (False, they already did it.)
      U.S. Navy: "We lack the capability to defend against your subs." (False, the incident didn't happen.)

      --
      Just "gittin-r-done," day after day.
    4. Re:Ah, naivety at its finest by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      So then it looks like we're both playing the same game

      Not really. They lie about the fact that they're being aggressive in their hacking attempts to uncover communication with people in their own country that they'd like to arrest for speaking out in favor of liberty. We play dumb to lull them into a false sense of security about how well we can detect their aggressive moves to interfere with naval operations as they continue to posture themselves towards their stated goal of forcing the people of Taiwan back under their thumb.

      We don't say, "We're too dumb to have a fancy Navy" (which is obviously not true), but we're happy to leave them wondering just how fancy it is. Not telling them what we can do - and not showing, through action, either - isn't at all the same as catching them lying about what we've caught them doing as they hack overseas systems.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:Ah, naivety at its finest by Arccot · · Score: 1

      that's what the Navy said to convince people like you to give them more money No, that's what the Navy said to make the Chinese feel overly confident and to underestimate our ability to track them. Classic move... make your opponent complacent enough that you can then later make them completely doubt their ability to do anything when you rip the rug out from under them, as the situation warrants. I think, if the Navy were indeed able to track this particular sub underneath a convoy, the battlestations alarm and radio chatter (if the Chinese can intercept it... not sure about the sub's specs) would have made it obvious to the Chinese that they were found out, once they periscoped or surfaced.

      The Navy wouldn't sit there waiting for a torpedo, just to make the ship believe it couldn't be tracked.
    6. Re:Ah, naivety at its finest by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      The Navy wouldn't sit there waiting for a torpedo, just to make the ship believe it couldn't be tracked.
      What torpedo? Since when were we at war with China?

      Okay, so we probably wouldn't have been able to tell it was a Chinese submarine. So, for the last few years we've been at war with al-Qaida, the Taleban, various insurgent militias in Iraq, Terror, Poverty, and Drugs. Exactly which of those groups do you believe has submarines in the Pacific?

      I'm perfectly willing to believe that the submarine was indeed undetected, but I don't think the evidence is quite 100% conclusive.
    7. Re:Ah, naivety at its finest by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

      American XO: here he comes.
      American CO: wait for it ...

      [Chinese sub pops to the surface]

      American CO (over radio): Lordy! Where do you come from?
      Chinese CO: Where did you come from? I hope I am not interrupting anything?
      American CO: Oh, nothing important. You sure surprised me, popping up out of nowhere like that!
      Chinese CO: Did I? Please excuse me! We had no idea anybody was up here. We're having a little trouble with our engines!
      American CO: Do you need help?
      Chinese CO: Any chance you could give us a jump?

      [American XO and CO exchange looks]

      American CO: Uh, sure, can you take 440 volts?
      Chinese CO: One moment, I check with engineer...

      [sounds of argument in Chinese]

      Chinese CO: So sorry. My Engineer says 440 volt no work!
      American XO: That's not right, they should have...
      American CO (cutting in): Uh, don't you have an operators manual or something?
      Chinese CO: Engineer says cook used pages to wrap leftovers. No problem, I fix

      [sound of large spanner being whacked against steel hull of sub]

      Chinese CO: Hah! Now engines go!
      American CO: That's very amazing! You fixed your boat by whacking the hull with a spanner?
      Chinese CO: Oh, yes, you know us primitive Chinamen. Our boats are junk! Get it? Junk! Ha ha!
      American XO and CO: Ha ha!
      Chinese CO: Well engine make go now, so we leave. We be lucky to make back to Hainan without sinking.
      American CO: I'll be lucky to make it back to Honolulu without having a heart attack. You took ten years off my life, popping out of nowhere like that! I honestly had no idea there was anybody else in the area.
      Chinese CO: Sorry! We not know you here, really. You know Chinaman navigation equipment! No good! We go in straight line until bump into something!
      American CO: Sorry to hear that. I hope you stay clear of us, we run into things all the time, since I dropped my sextant.
      Chinese CO: Me too, since lousy Chinese boat leak on my chronometer! I go now! Bye!
      American CO: Bye!

      [Chinese sub submerges]

      American CO (under breath): Asshole.
      Chinese CO (under breath): Asshole.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:Ah, naivety at its finest by biolysis · · Score: 1

      "No, that's what the Navy said..."

      I would respond, but your arrogant dismissal of my point, which is perfectly capable of being true alongside your point, shows you're not interested in anything but spouting your opinion.

      There is no function of your point which makes mine impossible, so you appear to be saying "No" to something for no reason than your own self assured arrogance.

      Frankly, your point is far less likely than mine, so your "No" there is especially misplaced.

    9. Re:Ah, naivety at its finest by MrWa · · Score: 1
      No, that's what the Navy said to make the Chinese feel overly confident and to underestimate our ability to track them. Classic move... make your opponent complacent enough that you can then later make them completely doubt their ability to do anything when you rip the rug out from under them, as the situation warrants. Nothing makes people doubt their abilities more than the sudden discovery that they've been completely wrong about their own success. We should know (as should the former Soviets and everyone else), since it's happened to us, too.

      Actually, it's not that far fetched that the Chinese sub was successful. When operating on batteries, as the diesel boat would have been doing underwater, is very quiet and difficult to track. That is part of the tradeoff between battery vs. nuclear submerged operation: longevity vs. stealth vs. speed. Operating a nuclear reactor under water isn't exactly a quiet activity but spinning a motor with batteries is about as quiet as you can get.

    10. Re:Ah, naivety at its finest by biolysis · · Score: 1

      How about I just make fun of your stupid comment instead?

      As an aside, are you genuinely retarded or do you just like to pretend on slashdot?

  53. A bit late for modesty, isn't it? by wattrlz · · Score: 1

    I don't know who perpetrated the hacks in question, but saying that the most populous country in the world, a country that was chosen to host the 39th Olympic games, a country that maintains the largest known firewall and surveillance systems on the planet, Can't scrounge up a few people capable of it isn't just laughable. It's vaguely insulting.

  54. Port 22 by rlp · · Score: 1

    I guess I was imagining all those attacks on port 22 (ssh) from China in my server logs.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Port 22 by CronoCloud · · Score: 1
      Like this one? I got it a couple of years ago when I opened up my SSH port so I could log in remotely from an event I was attending.

      Apr 29 19:08:35 midgar sshd[27467]: Could not reverse map address 222.198.150.16
      .
      Apr 29 19:08:35 midgar sshd[27467]: Failed password for ROOT from 222.198.150.16
        port 60824 ssh2
      Apr 29 19:08:35 midgar sshd[27467]: Received disconnect from 222.198.150.16: 11:
        Bye Bye
  55. It's their own fault by Farenji · · Score: 1

    They shouldn't have blocked all those freedom loving hacking sites with their Great Chinese Firewall.

    1. Re:It's their own fault by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      No shit. Trying to read security articles while I was in China was hell. And trying to circumvent was probably a bad idea as I was on a relative's internet connection. WiFi is unheard of.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  56. Re:Unlikely argument, SW skills are easily develop by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    And unlike ICBM technology, you can't buy cracking skills from Russians.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  57. Toy Recall by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 1

    China might have smarter intruders if they'd just stop making so much stuff with lead paint.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  58. lolz by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

    best hacking is done through social networking. What are they gunna do? Pretend to be the chinese delivery people asking for an admin password or something?

    Besides, everyone knows the best hackers are in Jails. US Jails.

  59. Lacks the sophistication? HA! by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Surely a country as limited as China who is more than capable of building the single largest most ambitious damn ever conceived by man lacks the know how to probe foreign governments via a computer.

    Hell even the AOL'ers of old knew how to h4x0r a Gibson, or at least probe it.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    1. Re:Lacks the sophistication? HA! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I hadn't heard of that project. Did they get everybody in China to walk out of their houses, face west across the Pacific and shout "damn!" all at the same time? Did they add a subject, like "damn Americans!" or even some adjectives, like "damn you western dogs?"

      Oh, following your link it appears they only built a large dam.

    2. Re:Lacks the sophistication? HA! by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      They damn sure did.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  60. tennesseejim by tennesseejim · · Score: 1

    If ten year old script kiddies can hack a Windows system, I'm sure the Chinese will have no problems.

  61. Re:Unlikely argument, SW skills are easily develop by cblack · · Score: 1

    True, instead they are given away on the internet.

  62. Two words: Orange Chicken by sohmc · · Score: 1

    The Chinese have found a way to make chicken taste like an orange! Now you're telling me they can't hack into a US computer? Come on!

    --
    We don't live in Shouldland.
  63. chinpokomon! by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 0, Troll

    President Hirohito: There is nothing to worry about. We at Japan Toy Compnay are in awe of your large penis.
    Mr. Garrison: What?
    President Hirohito: You see, Japanese penis so small [holds his hands about an inch apart]
    Mr. Ose: [set his index finger an inch from his thumb] So-eh small.
    President Hirohito: You Americans have such humungous burbous penis.
    Mr. Garrison: Well, uh-I guess that's true.
    Mr. Ose: Oh, suh-n nice-a big penis American.
    President Hirohito: What can we possubruh do with such small penis? We cannot take over your city, filled witha men awith such mastodonic penis.
    Jimbo: Huwell, uh he's got a point there.
    Randy: Well, I guess that settles that.
    Fr. Maxi: We're sorry we took your time, gentlemen. e. Well, I guess that settles that. We're sorry we took your time, gentlemen.

    1. Re:chinpokomon! by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 1

      troll huh :D

      i knew that was an obscure joke

    2. Re:chinpokomon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all. The first dozen or so people to post it were modded funny. The next dozen, redundant. You just have either poor luck or slow typing skills and have to accept what mods are left...

  64. Sophistication? by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

    Lack the sophistication? Are you kidding me? Some of the best hackers turn out to be 14 year old kids futzing around in their parent's basement. Is this guy seriously trying to claim China lacks the "sophistication" of a 14 year old ADD brat?

  65. China's claim falls to quick analysis by whit3 · · Score: 1

    China's official denial is ... laughable.

    I met a lot of chinese in grad school (hint: when
    attending a conference, make sure at least one US
    citizen attends with any group of chinese... because
    your rental car agency will want to see a credit card).
    The expertise might be thin on the ground in China,
    but it isn't absent.

    More to the point, if that expertise IS thin on the ground,
    the likelihood of a chance encounter with a hacker is small.
    The observed events must therefore have been OTHER than
    chance, perhaps arranged by some Chinese nationwide
    agency...

    Chinese insistence on information control (declaring all sorts
    of information 'state secret') implies a mindset that all US
    acquisition of information is 'stealing state secrets', and
    it's very likely that cracking open visitors' computers is
    expected behavior for any Chinese who welcomes an
    American congressman. Sad, but not unexpected.

    In this and other matters of diplomacy, China is uncivilized.

  66. Developing Nations! by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    Developing Nations! Developing Nations! Developing Nations! Developing Nations!

    China's only been "developing" itself for the last 5000 or so years. They have nukes and rockets.

    Their population is beyond huge. Even if .01% of their population was capable of computer programming, it's a vastly huge number of DevelopersDevelopersDevelopersDevelopers -- more than enough to hack through the US Gov's self-assessed "C-" grade IT security.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  67. bullshit by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

    if I can hack into stuff, they can too.

  68. Chinese racks the skills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Racks the skills to rie convincingry to anybody it doesn't have the power of rife or death over, more rike.

  69. In another development the French Foreign Minister by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... says that he doubts that his country has the sophistication in culinary skills necessary to cook a gourmet meal.

  70. If pigs could fly by j00bhaka · · Score: 1

    If pigs could fly, they would be flying like a brilliant bi-plane.

  71. China can't hack, but they can screw a light bulb! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of an old joke:

    Q: How many Chinese does it take to screw in a light bulb?

    .
    .
    .

    A: Many! Because Confucious say, "Many hands make light work!"

  72. Shared source? by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    Isn't China a buyer of Microsoft Shared Source technology? Hard to imagine they DON'T know what's going on under the hood.

  73. But how could we hack such huge American penis? by Asmor · · Score: 1

    Our penis so small, American penis so big. I mean, wow, such big American penis. Chinese cannot hack America with such small penis.

    (yes, I know that they were Japanese on South Park :p)

  74. Bullshit - Illidan down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the chinese lacked suck technical skill then how the hell did they down Illidan with half their raid still in Tier 3???????

  75. Hate to spoil the punchline... by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Informative

    I mean really...think how many geeks you might endager with a headline of "Openly Gay Republican Elected to Office" Just for the record, this openly gay man was elected to Congress after coming out, and at the local level there are probably quite a few folks like this guy.
    1. Re:Hate to spoil the punchline... by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Then the apocalypse started in August 1996. Moped Jesus is only a matter of time, now.

    2. Re:Hate to spoil the punchline... by db32 · · Score: 0, Troll

      That was my point. That really was a real story with a headline that could kill. As is this (despite how insane the claim being made really is). Though I did ponder saying "Openly Gay Pope Chosen", but I was afraid it might be more believable due to that problem they have been having with the priests.

      Personally...the murderous headline I am waiting for is "Ann Coulter proven to be a man" just so I can hear the simultaneous gunshots of thousands of right wingers kill themselves after realizing they have been jerking it to a man.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  76. Developing nations dont have a space program by alanshot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry, the Developing nation excuse is lame. Developing nations dont produce and design electronics devices, design and build ICBMs, submarines, warships, launch GPS satellites, etc.

    And using thier logic, the USA is also a developing nation. Maybe we are a little more developed, but we still have a way to go and are making progress.

    1. Re:Developing nations dont have a space program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USA is undeveloping nation.

  77. MOD PARENT INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, you know you want to. ;)

  78. The Eddie Haskell defense. by jpellino · · Score: 1

    "Gee, Mrs. Cleaver, I was just telling Wallace here how we could never figure out how to break your really great security features, weren't we? Golly, I'd better be getting home to help mom and dad clean up that really bad flood. That's a lovely dress, Mrs. Cleaver."

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  79. Better hackers than liars by DustoneGT · · Score: 0

    They hack better than they lie...or maybe they aren't aware that Americans don't have only one source for news...

  80. I dunno about that.... by thewils · · Score: 1

    Wasn't Sun Tzu Chinese?

    Anyway, why bother to hack? They're probably dropping off a Chow Mein with Sweet and Sour Pork at the Pentagon as I type this...

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  81. I hereby name... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    this phenomenon the stone knives and bearskins defense.

    ("we couldn't POSSIBLY do this kind of advanced stuff, yadda yadda...")

    or rather, I attach that well-known ST phrase to this kind of laughable defense.

    imagine, the country that makes 95% of all the electronics parts in the world saying 'we are too dumb to do techie stuff'.

    what a farse.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:I hereby name... by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      This is, of course, assuming they've had time to evolve into bipeds. China really needs to get the ball rolling on developing!

  82. Just hack them back, it's easy by Mazin07 · · Score: 1

    Easy way to infiltrate their intelligence network: Just stand outside the Chinese government buildings selling pirated copies of Windows with rootkits.

  83. Of course they dont... by pjr.cc · · Score: 1

    Only 16yr olds in russia with leet bot nets have those kinds of skills.

    Besides, the chinese are too busy producing iPod clones to bother with such things. After all, what are they going to find out? "Oh, look, apparently we killed Kennedy - and we're martians who landed in the US desert. Interesting, we can now rule the world".

    Maybe its a conspiracy theory in the making, maybe apple hacking into the US and made it look like china. Next, a rumor will start about oil fields in Tibet and suddenly the distinct lack of democracy will be apparent.. OMG... i've said too much!

  84. If China has a high school... by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 1

    ...they have the skills.

    The guy who said this knows nothing about computers nor how trivial most of these "hacker" skills are to develop. Either that or he's just a liar. Given that this is China we are talking about neither would surprise me.

  85. Not quite as impressive as you suggest. by Drenaran · · Score: 2, Informative

    While the "Great Firewall" is expansive within China's borders, it isn't all that technically impressive. There are internet gateways leading in and out of the country - you already have to have hardware managing that as those pipes lead downwards to major infrastructure backbones, government networks, individual ISP's, etc. Not particularly difficult a step to add filtering/blocking/poisoning to internet requests from the subsidiary networks (not to suggest that it isn't a lot of man hours/hardware involved, but it isn't exactly rocket science - just extensions off of established filtering techniques).

    Most of the filtering isn't even being handled by the "Great Firewall" but is instead handled by individual ISP's instituting their own filtering methods and complying with government issued blocklists, as well as citizen self censorship. While I don't mean to suggest that China doesn't have the programming talent to attack other nations networks (especially our American soft and squishy ones), but the "Great Firewall" is hardly a golden example of technological achievement.

    (Wikipedia has a fairly good outline of China's known practices, those interested might want to take a look at it before doing some more in-depth research: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_the_People's_Republic_of_China)

    1. Re:Not quite as impressive as you suggest. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Notice that I also said money. Money also buys skills. The Chinese have the 5th largest economy in the world. They can afford to hire some skilled people.

  86. Re:Unlikely argument, SW skills are easily develop by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, that probably applies to both

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  87. China has many students in US by pythonist · · Score: 1

    so, wouldn't borrowing several computers from them and attack from US located systems be much easier? Is it too foolish to initiate an attack from a Chinese computer if the Chinese government really wanna hack?

    Cyber hacking is actually nontracable.

  88. Let's all come bash Chinese government by diegocn · · Score: 1

    I thought /. has an above average user base. Then I was surprised to see how rational thinking can go down to toilet when it comes to Chinese/Russian/Iranian bashing. No doubt there are Chinese capable to hack systems. But individual actions does not mean Chinese government is starting a cyberwar. Otherwise, US would be attacking everyone worldwide with spams everyday now.

  89. It's Bagdad Bob all over again by Teilo · · Score: 1

    As China continues to lead the world in technologically sophisticated counterfeit products, their spokesperson declares, "We are definitely a 3rd world developing nation. Even now we are just learning what a kee-bored is."

    My company has been hacked by .CN IP addresses at least twice. I see portscans and brute-force SSH bots coming out of China all the time.

    Maybe THAT's where Elbonia is.

    --
    Mir tut es leid, Menschen daß Einfältigfehlersuchenbaumfolgendenaffen sind.
  90. The Scorpion and The Frog by UttBuggly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My company is expanding into China in 2009-2010. Over 100 locations with Windows boxes acting as POS terminals (Point Of Sale and Piece Of Shit both apply here, unfortunately), connecting back to our network infrastructure in the U.S.

    I'm a Network Systems Analyst, but not in a Information Security role. Still, I felt it prudent to ask recently; "so, how are we hardening the systems going into China?" only to be met with the deer in the headlights look. I pointed out the inception of this story and then went on to describe how people could buy in iPhone 1.0 in China last year...30-60 days before last June's U.S. launch. And the fact that virtually ANY software you wanted was available, for pennies, in China. Hacked, cracked, and pre-loaded with malware galore in many cases, to be sure, but available nonetheless.

    I didn't get the sense my comments got anyone in power even a little concerned. Luckily, I can retire in Fall 2009. I'll get to read about this upcoming disaster in the easy chair with a cup of joe. I may even think it funny since I won't have to do any mitigation of the virtually guaranteed compromise(s) that will occur.

    Underestimating the potential threats in this part of the world is painfully stupid. Which explains the idiot who left an unsecured laptop unattended in a foreign country that isn't exactly an ally, economic or otherwise. There are several firms in that part of the world that offer services to Fortune firms doing business in Asia BECAUSE of the increased risks.

    Disingenious? Naw...this is an outright lie, plain and simple.

    --
    I am my own gestalt.
    1. Re:The Scorpion and The Frog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you might be overly cautious this time. The first lesson any Chinese hacker learn, whether he's a script kiddie or a sophisticated cracker, is never fu*king with local business, especially local business with connections. As long as your company is in good standing with the government and is smart enough to maintain good relations with the local government, any attack on your system will be swiftly dealt with and people responsible will be punished very very severely. Chinese hackers are nationalistic, but they aren't stupid, they attack US target so much not because they can really get anything. They do it to practice and to boost their own egos without having to worry about spend the rest of his lives in jail. (One porn web site owner got sentenced to life in prison, trust me, hackers and other "non-conformists" learned their lessons)

  91. Tiny penis by furbyhater · · Score: 1

    We Chinese have very, very little penis. Tiiiny penis. You Americans have so enoooormous penis! American penis is so much overwhelmingly gigantic penis!

  92. We are weak, we submit, please accept this... by CYDVicious · · Score: 1

    gift Horse, you deserve it because you are so much more sophisticated than us...

    --
    //Nothing to see here, please move along.
  93. Sun Tzu by lufo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    18. All warfare is based on deception.
    19. Hence, when able to attack, we must seem unable; [...]

    The art of war, Sun Tzu (6th. cent. B.C.), I.18 and 1.19

    1. Re:Sun Tzu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. Couldn't have said it more succinctly.

  94. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  95. NSFL by street+struttin' · · Score: 1

    I'm going to trademark NSFL. "Not Safe For Lunch". This could serve multiple purposes, from hilarity induced choking to depravity induced nausea.

  96. I'm skeptical by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't buy China's official story on this one.

    Damn you, falling U.S. dollar!

  97. China = bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I proposed to my company that we ban all Chinese IPs. Why put our business at risk from hackers? We don't have any customers or even potential customers from China, anyway. Between cheaply made gadgets and excessive hacking, I've about had it with China.

  98. Fast BS Learners by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    They've learned a valuable lesson from US offshore/H1B biz lobbyists: Make up stuff about how your citizens are "dumb" to justify something.

  99. skill needed to hack systems .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    An autistic sixteen year old could hack the wests security and I know I've seen him do it. He would be dangerous if he wasn't so totally absorbed in Manga comic and his hamster .. :)

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  100. Duh! by proc_tarry · · Score: 1

    While they may lack computer hacking skills, their nunchuck skills are awesome!

  101. Wow... by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

    And I thought the US government were bad liars.

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is an election year after all...

      Hacking of elected officials computers goes up, and the "I'm taking a stand against the evil empire, vote ME!" a well.

      That being said, China hacked them.

  102. Riiiight by gardenzombie · · Score: 1

    China saying they don't have the skill to hack US resources is like when reps for the advertising industry claim that they don't have the wherewithal to create specific, targeted subliminal advertising. Who do they think is going to buy this stuff?

  103. Of course the don;t have the skills! by setrops · · Score: 1

    That's why like every company in north america, they outsourced their hacking to india.

  104. Top news: A developing nation sends man into space by jfbilodeau · · Score: 1

    If a developing nation is able to put a man in orbit, I wonder where that ranks Canada in the world...

    --
    Goodbye Slashdot. You've changed.
  105. China holds a trillion dollars of US debt by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting." Said over 2500 years ago. That's before Jesus Christ superstar, btw.

    You should all read Sun Tzu and have a bash at playing "Go" as well.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:China holds a trillion dollars of US debt by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      I have read The Art of War. I play Go, though not well. It makes chess look like tic-tac-toe in comparison.

      That said, you're describing notable accomplishments of people who have been dead for a really, really long time. I admire the longevity of the culture, but the phrase "What have you done lately?" comes to mind.

      You might also ask why China has a trillion of their money in our hands. Any decent economist will tell you it's safer here (more stable government, institutions, rule of law, etc) and it earns better risk adjusted returns here. Think about it. If your economy was going gangbusters, would you invest it in someone else who wasn't doing as well? Of course not.

    2. Re:China holds a trillion dollars of US debt by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      They've pulled 500 million people out of grinding poverty in 20 years. Just another 500 million to go...

      --
      Deleted
  106. but... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    have lasers being used against American sats, have hit a weather sat, are building 1-2 nuclear power attack subs/year, 1-3 nuclear powered SBSN, and they do not have the sophistication to attack computers?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  107. We Chinese are no threat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So small.

  108. a solutions to hack attacks .. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "The Pentagon acknowledged last month at a closed House Intelligence committee meeting that its vast computer network is scanned or attacked by outsiders more than 300 million times each day"

    How about designing a VPN network that runs on embedded hardware that provides end-to-end encryption and identity management. That way none of these hacks would even work as they wouldn't be able to get on the network.

    To all the certified sandwich makers reading this: For each excuse that follows as to how this isn't feasible, just shorten it to - I'm too stupid to figure it out .. :)

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:a solutions to hack attacks .. by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      Ummm, that is sandwich artist ...

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
  109. I like chinese. by Icegryphon · · Score: 0

    I like Chinese. I like Chinese. There's nine hundred million of them in the world today. You'd better learn to like them; that's what I say.

    1. Re:I like chinese. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, no you didn't.

      Wait, yes you did.

      Hip-hip-hooray for M.P. Nice reference.

  110. Bzzzt. India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India launches spacecraft too. Are you claiming that India is not a developing nation?

  111. duh. by eyeareque · · Score: 1

    Just because the packets are coming from China doesnt mean they did it. That would have been an excellent cover up if someone was to compromise specific Chinese systems, and then route their attacks to the US sourced from China.

    Also, if China did this... why the hell would they admit to it? That is laughable.

    "lacking skills" that is also laughable. Every high school in the world has one or two (maybe a lot more even) capable "hackers" (I hate that name)in it.

  112. Re:Bzzzt. India by alanshot · · Score: 1

    I claim we are ALL developing. Some are just more "developed" than others.

    Its like me saying my family isnt smart enough to do something. Maybe 95% of my extended family is a bunch of hilljacks that can barely form coherent sentences, but there is a small % that are doctors, lawyers, computer geeks, etc.

    So by China's logic, because the masses are ignorant rural farmers there is no way they could have done it. Bull. They are conveniently "forgetting" about the very small part of their population that can (and do) things like this in their sleep.

  113. firewall logs by raind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what are they just practicing on my Pix?

    --
    Get up!
  114. Nvm... by TheSubAtomic · · Score: 0

    Disregard my previous comment about America getting pwnt by china. They suck cocks.

  115. Was it really a case of predatory hacking? by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

    Or do we have some Congressman and their employees who like to look at Hot Asian Porn and simply picked up some malware?

    --
    Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
  116. Oustsourcing by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

    If this is true, (unlikely) they should outsource their hacking jobs to Russia, who could outsource them to India. Failing that, they could do what every other intel agency in the world does, honeytrap and blackmail someone with access.

  117. But Officer, this POS car couldn't possibly speed! by questhe · · Score: 1

    It only has a measly 1.5 liter diesel. Your radar must be wrong. My econobox can't go any faster than 55 mph.

    --
    You don't understand: I am not locked up in here with you, you are locked up in here with ME!
  118. what a dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the Chinese are so great then how come after 5000yrs+ they still don't control the world? I mean they can barely even feed their own people. The "cultural revolution" was a sham and a farce and Mao deserved what Mussolini got.

    And if China is anybodies idea of a social/cultural "success" I'd hate to see their idea of a failure...

  119. tag by mark72005 · · Score: 1

    tag should read "shanghaied"

  120. massively muliplayer online real hacking game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there was an Atlantic article a few months ago that exposed how the Chinese military is offering hacking contests. there are kids living on this skill with quiet CPC consent. it's a pretty smart distributed system to foster the raw talent. and an easy war, so far.

    (didn't find atlantic article in their search engine. perhaps other readers could help.)

  121. In Other News by Drakonik · · Score: 1

    Murderer says, "There's no way I could do that!"
    Kid Caught With Hand in Candy Jar says, "It wasn't me!"
    Philandering Neighbor Caught With Friend's Wife says, "This isn't what it looks like."

  122. And yet they are technologically advanced by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    They are technologically advanced enough for a modern manned space program and to plan lunar exploration. Somehow I think adapting the known works of others for cyber attacks is easily within their grasp given a governments worth of resources. Especially since they send students to the US and to England and elsewhere for technological training. And they make a huge portion of the systems they are allegedly attacking! AND!!! They can crank out a clone of an Apple consumer device between the announcement by Apple and when Apple can actually ship the device. The argument they present rings very very hollow.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  123. what sensitive information? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    Maybe their machines are full of porns and they can just preemptively deny their responsibility of download porns by claiming it is uploaded in there by the Chinese government.

    1. Re:what sensitive information? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If so there's a judge who would probably like to talk to them about the details of that defense.

  124. Only One Way To Call It: by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    Bullshit. They've had the skills for years. They've had the skills to do so stealthily for fewer years, but still years. They're just not so good as to not to be able to go undetected very often for very long. We're better at that.

    And it's still a bullshit story. It's not even newsworthy, it happens so often (from both sides). It only gets dragged out and waved around when there's something else going on they want to detract attention from. China isn't responding in order to deny. They're participating in perpetuating a ruse for The US's benefit that will cost them nothing at home because it won't make the news there. That suggests the story being passed by may involve both, though I still lean towards this serving to deflect people from the impeachment articles against Bush. My money says that when that story dies down in the lesser media, the Chinese hacking stories will disappear from the larger media without any resolution at all or very little impression or memory in most peoples minds.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  125. Or maybe you have no real ability to question? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    After 5 years of biased coverage over China, you have no real ability to question the media. (And definitely, no ability to read Chinese; otherwise, you can read these 1,873,610+ comments related to the stock tumbling of the last two days, even though government shouldn't really be blamed for it at all.)

    1. Re:Or maybe you have no real ability to question? by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Although, I would agree that the GP's post was more than a bit myopic, I fail to see the purpose of your comment other than it being along the same lines as the GP.

      Now, that being said, the United States isn't particularly different than China with respect to our media outlets being propaganda machines; we simply have a few more of them so there's just more bullshit to sift through.

      Propaganda has always made the world go round, people in power have no reason to let it be otherwise.

    2. Re:Or maybe you have no real ability to question? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      The GP claimed that Chinese citizens have no real ability to question the government. The link I post shows the contrary -- they are actively blaming their government -- in fact, I feel more so than US citizens

  126. Yeah, launching a guy into orbit is easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    firing up script-kiddie tools and breaking into an un-patched server? Why, you'd need to land on the Moon before you could do that.

  127. Lacks Skills !? by Sigmon · · Score: 1

    Then how might he explain the barrage of hack attempts from China IP addresses that begin promptly every Friday afternoon just after 5:00 pm in the time zone where my servers are located? Those goobers know EXACTLY when we geeks go home for the weekend and aren't keeping _as_ keen an eye on our systems.

  128. Just as insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to ignore the incredible negative of your "positive". That's all the GP did: no "mccarthism" here.

  129. Sarcasm by assertation · · Score: 1


      China being the 'developing nation' that it is -- he doubts that his country has the sophistication to hack foreign systems


    -- but their sarcasm is the most advanced in Asia.

    Fuck them. They are our largest trading partners after the EU and Canada. The poison our pets and put lead paint in our children's toys. Now they are spying on us and flippng us the bird as if they were the ones insulted.

  130. China wrote the systems by heroine · · Score: 1

    Funny, since China wrote all of US's systems.

  131. In that case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too lack the ability to hack anything...please quit questioning me authorities...nothing to see here move along. ;) Dude, if I had known I could just tell them this mess would have been solved years ago. ;)

  132. Living: by deesine · · Score: 1
    because success by any other standard is just capitalism. Really, I think the next comment down says that, if seen in the context of the last 500 years, China has never been more pro-science than under under communism. See, another success!

    You, my lady, are bringing in some very Anglican and provincial ideas. Why, didn't you read yesterday's New York Times: it appears that we need to update our sense of freedom of speech to be more in line with the rest of the world.

    --
    damaged by dogma
    1. Re:Living: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, my lady, are bringing in some very Anglican and provincial ideas. Why, didn't you read yesterday's New York Times: it appears that we need to update our sense of freedom of speech to be more in line with the rest of the world. Are you claiming that NY Times isn't biased here? Not trying to ad hominem or saying that this first amendment right to say what you say about muslims isn't good but then, try saying whatever you want about the US government and you might be taken to jail with no proof because of Patriotic act.

      Being able to critisize others isn't free speech if you don't also have the right to say what you want about your goverment without the fear of being suspected as a terrorist and arrested. Currently that right is very loosely supported by the first amendment in USA.
    2. Re:Living: by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      If you disagree, do you mind arguing facts instead of personal attacks? Because you haven't got a leg to stand on -- I stated only facts, easily verifiable ones.

    3. Re:Living: by deesine · · Score: 1

      Are you claiming that NY Times isn't biased here?

      I call them the New Duranty Times. Also, I'm not aware of the cases where people have spoken out against the government only to then be prosecuted under the Patriot Act. Perhaps you could enlighten me here?

      --
      damaged by dogma
  133. Thanks by roystgnr · · Score: 2, Funny

    A direct click-through worked for me when I tried it from the "Preview" page for my comment, but I guess my browser must have just been pulling the file out of cache rather than hitting up the server again.

    Also, I notice that between the two of us we've currently received three "+1, Informative" moderations for helping people hear penis jokes in exaggerated accents. Thanks for helping me do my part in making the internet such an amazing informational resource.

  134. Sounds like Cave Man Lawyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds just like the arguments made by the great SNL skit CaveMan Lawyer. How could one so backwards ever hope to understand your complex laws when it's a mystery how a car moves?

  135. 5,000 years, and yet by Phoenix666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Chinese have yet to invent anything remotely resembling a decent breakfast. (Thin rice gruel does not count)

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:5,000 years, and yet by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure I'm not getting it quite right, but Dennis Miller once pointed out that Eskimos eat blubber not because it's delicious but because it's the only thing on the Arctic buffet. Obviously this is a bit of an exaggeration (they can eat fish on occasion, too) but close enough to the truth for our purposes here today.

      If you think the big swinging dicks (figuratively in this case, obviously) running China are eating rice gruel for breakfast, you have another fucking think coming. On the other hand, they're probably not having Eggs Over My Hammy, either.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:5,000 years, and yet by sydneyfong · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess you might be kidding, but have you tried "dim sum" for breakfast?

      And well China is a geographically vast place. Different places have different preferences for breakfast, I'm just talking about the local tradition here.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  136. China Suxor!! by oldhack · · Score: 1

    Or something like that. No such post? Sorry, I'm no good at l44t talk (or something). See my handle.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  137. Of course they're capable by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    China has a lot of people. Most of them are poor and undereducated. But the Party has been cherry picking the country's best and brightest for 40 years now, sending them to the best schools and universities in China, and then to the best foreign universities. Those people are as competent as engineers and scientists as any from the rest of the world.

    Unfortunately given the system and ideology they're raised in, they largely possess an aggrieved sense of innate superiority to everyone else. In their eyes, Western countries, Japan, South Korea, and a handful of others have gotten where they are by cheating, essentially. Likewise China has "fallen behind" ("luohouzhuyi"--"fallen-behind-ism") because Western countries, Japan, and others have been engaged in a conspiracy to keep them down.

    They're wrong, of course, just as are those who buy the line that Chinese are just a developing country incapable of such technological feats. But it behooves the rest of the world to keep a close eye on China's actions, given the nasty reasons that drive them and the chilling implications of their national sense of victimhood.

    The real trick is to welcome China's arrival as a modern power, while curbing their deep desire to get revenge for past wrongs, real or imagined.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  138. Doh! by Dareth · · Score: 1

    Damn it, your Jedi mind tricks will not work on me, even if you are right!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  139. The plot thickens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real question is...who's lying? Is it the US or China?? Both have reasons....

  140. iz teh m@rx of teh truly 1337... by Zarf · · Score: 1

    The truly 'leet hide their 'leet-ness behind a bamboo curtain to misdirect the non-'leet. Truly 'leet masquerade as neophytes. So that from this secreted stance they might strike a more devastating blow.

    Or in 'leet speak:

    d4 1337 b3 h1d3z d4 h@x0rzn' an b3 sh@d1n' d4 n00bz f0 wh00pin' y0 @zz! th@n d4 1337 s3z: Ah n0 n00b! 0u+ w1d d4 p0wn@g3!

    In summary it is my belief that while China may claim to lack the m@d sk1llz to h@x0rz USian b0x3n they probably do have d4 1337 sk1llz ... but on the same token it is unfair to lay blame. Because there are plenty of 3v1l l33t out there.

    All joking aside... We still live in a world where a small team of highly skilled computer programmers and networking experts acting on their own can wreak havoc. It is possible that not even higher ups in the Chinese government realize that they have this capability... or can hire it...

    After all, seriously, what does it take to do this? Millions of dollars? A few skilled people? Finding a few skilled people willing to sell their skills to the highest bidder? An Internet connection? You're telling me China can't rally that? Of course they can...

    --
    [signature]
  141. Obviously ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't know what they know.

  142. Enough about Chinese hackers by microbee · · Score: 1

    Why every news story on slashdot about China is about hackers (or its rebuttal) these days? I think some people just need an enemy so they can keep their jobs. Since China isn't provoking wars, and they do not dare either, let's fight some imaginary cyberwars!

  143. you buy for 99 cents, they ship for 500$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd consider the chinese extremely dishonest.

    The average ebay listing that comes out of mainland china is:

    a) for a counterfeit item
    b) low buy it now, only to get an insane shipping price that is excessive, even by EMS standards.

    Now one would say you would have to be stupid to buy anything from mainland china, but guess where all manufacturing is outsourced to? The kids and pets really paid for it last year.

    So no, I don't buy this chinese don't hack. I'll give you server logs of millions attempted dictionary attacks against servers. If someone gets hacked, it's either because their system was was just short of being real secure, or the company who owned the servers outsourced something to China and it's an inside job.

    There are plenty of tales of chinese espionage, so I think we are really underestimating the problem.

  144. Tell that to the Indians by atari2600 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Tell that to the Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell what to the Indians?

  145. Idiotic logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Idiot! You think a country cannot be a developing nation because it simply has a larger population than other countries? Even though most people in this country still live in very poor condition?!

  146. It's not skills they lack, it's interest by pseudorand · · Score: 1

    Obviously they're lying, since any 17-year-old nerd with a modem can hack into US government systems. Maybe "Global Thermonuclear War" just doesn't translate into mandarin.

    But still, I believe the Chinese government isn't hacking into US computer systems. After all, what would they want with US intelligence when we can even get a simple thing like the presence of WMD's in Iraq right to avoid a 1/2 Trillion dollar (and climing) war! It's just not worth the effort.

  147. I view it as the infinite monkey hacking strategy by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Now I'm not tryingg to call anyone by names, but the country has a BILLION people! So the depth of talent and skills has to be phenomenal. There surely must be hundreds of people who have the skills to hack USAs computers.

    Out of poverty often comes greatness (I view it as an excuse not to be distracted by crap like MTV and the NBA, and thereby spend more time of productive achievements). Look at India - it produced many of the great mathematical geniuses of our time - Ramanujan, etc.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  148. So many slashdots are racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    time to fuck up the liberal left. Fuck the jew. heil hitler!

  149. If members are going to be running Windows... by Slur · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    "If members are going to access websites in China, you are engaging in risky behavior," said Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose). "You are going to get malware, and you are going to lose your data." Malware is software designed to infiltrate or damage a computer system without the owner's consent. Oh come on now! Why aren't they running an operating system that's invulnerable to most malware, like BSD, Mac OS X, or Linux? If they really need to use Windows applications they can run them in a sandboxed VM or under WINE on any of those platforms.

    I think it's time they got some security standards for all government computers so hackers, wherever they may be, will have to work a lot harder. Not to mention, there should be a firewall with a white-list, where every person doing government business must register for access... a VPN setup can work well for this kind of thing.

    Mush! Mush!
    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  150. Who knows... by Slur · · Score: 1

    ...maybe these congressmen are lying through their teeth, and when the FBI comes forward they won't exactly back up the accounts. Wouldn't surprise me at all.

    --
    -- thinkyhead software and media
  151. well it's not quite the headline you are awaiting by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    but enjoy.

  152. China Says It Lacks Skills To Hack US Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the people of Communist China lack the skills to hack computers, then why is it that companies want to build factories there? Further more, why is the companies in the U.S. want to bring these "highly skilled" people into this country under the H1-B visa program?
    Me thinks China is taking lessons on how to speak B.S. from their North Korea neighbors.

  153. Their argument makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They" do not have the capacity to do this? The country of China? It takes one single cracker or a small group at best to break into a system. This is not the Moon landing or building a nuke. It doesn't take a whole nation to crack into computers.

  154. Modesty is a good thing by jandersen · · Score: 1

    To be fair, being only a spokesman he probably doesn't really know anyway. But of course China has the capability.

    This is simply part of the diplomatic game - you can't expect a government official to admit that his government does things that are less than absolutely angelic in its very nature. Would the US government admit to hiring assassins or having a policy of abducting people and taking them abroad to be tortured? Of course not. So let's put these sanctimonious outbursts to one side, everybody.

    The real reason why this incident, if it actually happened, is not likely to have been perpetrated by Chinese government operators is that they would probably not be as clumsy as that. There is no need to hack you way through anything, for one thing - all you need is to have somebody, say a cleaner, go in and copy the stuff on to a USB stick. Like Terry Pratchett notes in his books - who cares about a lowly sweeper? This kind of thing is more likely to have been done by an amateur.

  155. No problem. .US, .EU, .RU, .RO etc has the skills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for a reasonably small fee

  156. Tor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can they be so sure it's state sponsored? A lot of Tor exit nodes are based in China, surely attackers from anywhere else in the world using Tor for anonymity could be to blame?

  157. Re:so.. is this the chinpokamon strategy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't we seen this strategy on southpark?

    Ooh you american, such big penis. Chinese such small small penis. We no hurt computer american who has such mammothian big penis, we give you woman. ....Well, it was the japanese in that episode, but leave it to the chinese government to tap into truly brilliant strategy for international security diplomacy....

  158. Re:well it's not quite the headline you are awaiti by db32 · · Score: 1

    I actually stumbled across that once. I never thought I could be so completely disgusted whie laughing that hard at the same time. That is really like a horrible car wreck that you just can't pull your eyes away from no matter how aweful it is.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  159. Oblig South Park reference by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Chinpokomon Executive: You are American.

    South Park Toy Store Owner: Yes.

    Chinpokomon Executive: Ohhh, you must have very big penis!

    South Park Toy Store Owner: Excuse me, I was just asking you what your up to with these toys.

    Chinpokomon Executive: Nothing, we are very simple people with very small penis. Mr. Hosik's penis is especially small!

    Mr. Hosik: So small.

    Chinpokomon Executive: We cannot achieve so much with such small penis, but you American wow, penis so big, so big penis!

    South Park Toy Store Owner: Well aah I guess it is pretty good size.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  160. US Needs Enemies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the US supposed to do? We helped beat Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany, then we had the Cold War and the evil Communists. Now we have no real enemies left. Terrorists? That is like the war against drugs, there is no end to it. Not to mention guys wearing rags living in barren fields doesn't exactly make for a dramatic foe. We need REAL enemies! What could be better than China? Lots of people who not only speak a different language but look different (always good), write different, aren't 100% Christian, and best of all are still (technically) Communist! If the US doesn't have an enemy then we start to look inward and realize that we are a materialistic, pointless, self centered, shallow society. That would hurt worse than any bombing.

  161. Were I to disagree by deesine · · Score: 1

    with you, then I certainly would be in a tight spot. Not only do I not disagree with your position, but I was inspired by it and chose to take a rhetorical stroll, as it were, down Satire Lane. I think someone just asked me to get off their lawn...

    --
    damaged by dogma
    1. Re:Were I to disagree by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      Oh, I apologise for misunderstanding you. It is worrying that it came across as a lawn thing -- I'm only 20 years old -- but I plead the excuse that the satire over IP protocol is still not very well supported. Cheerios!

  162. Not Greece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and a lion's share of the scientific advances

    You missed that part.

  163. Re:well it's not quite the headline you are awaiti by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    I know .... tweaking with Noam is pretty crazy too....