The problem here is your hollywood trained sensibilities and expectations of robotics and AI. We can't even fully automate trains yet, and these drastically simplify the problem with fixed locations and physical motion controlled by a track. Then there's the issue of network security which still hasn't been solved yet (since most AV proponents are demanding that these things be fully networked). Lets succeed at these first before trying to build networks of free range roving robots and having them roam the streets.
But we don't always get everything we want.
No kidding. So put your phone down and pay attention while you drive.
Ever thought of having a dock AND having lots of IO on the machine? This provides lots of IO at remote sites and the ability to easily de/reintegrate with a home workstation setup.
..and you trust computers to do that safely while it is obvious they can't even fill the corner cases for much simpler problems (eg: fully automated trains)? Old farts have experience with life that you lack.. You may want to reconsider what you consider reality.
I read at -1. It's really not that bad. Here are the steps:
1. use the scroll wheel/bars to move past posts that are obvious spam (there usually aren't that many of those) 2. choose whether to moderate or participate 3. benefit from considering opinions that don't jive with groupthink. it's ok to consider ideas without accepting them or taking them personally 4. don't take the internet so seriously.
How can you assume all of those things? You don't know that person in question, white male or not. Talk about racist generalizations.
I don't think you understand what 'conservative government' is. The us-vs-them rhetoric these days comes from the left: whites vs nonwhites, straights vs gays, fat vs thin, etc. Talk about divisive narratives and defaults.
I'm not sure we should promote those reasons for entering a field. Go into computer science because it's interesting/rewarding and have aptitude for it, not just because it happens to pay well. Encouraging people to choose it for the latter when they lack the former will lead to misery for them and for society.
Using zuckerberg as an example to aspire to doesn't do much for your argument either.
People who don't agree with the socjus narrative apparently lack it. Of course, this is just an ad hominem issued to cover up the fact their own position not only lacks empathy, it dehumanizes as it 'deconstructs' what it doesn't approve of.
Looks good, but the geometry's fairly simple in that scene and there's only one or two light sources. Also, does that engine use a complete model like the OP I replied to suggested is needed?
Slashdot Mirror
That's what the horn is for. Usually it straightens them right out.
The problem here is your hollywood trained sensibilities and expectations of robotics and AI. We can't even fully automate trains yet, and these drastically simplify the problem with fixed locations and physical motion controlled by a track. Then there's the issue of network security which still hasn't been solved yet (since most AV proponents are demanding that these things be fully networked). Lets succeed at these first before trying to build networks of free range roving robots and having them roam the streets.
But we don't always get everything we want.
No kidding. So put your phone down and pay attention while you drive.
Since when do these freedom restricting technologies ever apply to the ruling class?
I believe monopole would be a more accurate metaphor.
The 'real woman' and anti-porn bits are common feminist diatribes.
Sounds like someone majored in 'gender studies' rather than STEM. Any regrets?
You offer good advice if the goal is to be friendzoned.
Their bullshit propaganda/FUD campaigns?
I have no sympathy. It's like they did everything possible to lose public trust and then they whine about being exposed? Too fucking bad.
Don't bother trying to prove who's worse. Once you scale the historical context out far enough (at least a few decades) it balances out..
They're all criminals. Washington needs an enema.
Ever thought of having a dock AND having lots of IO on the machine? This provides lots of IO at remote sites and the ability to easily de/reintegrate with a home workstation setup.
for spineless hipster progressives maybe.. Normal people just laugh at his hair just like they cringe at hillary's gaping smiles..
Are you serious? Perhaps it's time to find a new school for your child...or at least a new teacher.
killing anonymity..
depeering whole networks..
over copyright?
wtf?
..and you trust computers to do that safely while it is obvious they can't even fill the corner cases for much simpler problems (eg: fully automated trains)? Old farts have experience with life that you lack.. You may want to reconsider what you consider reality.
They would if they could. less nth-degree regulation and a greater acceptance that nothing in life is certain would be best..
Only to a point.. Adoption will slow once the inconveniences start to mount.
Yes because governments over the last century have never lied or bullshat their peoples for the sake of ideology..
That position leaves you blind to groupthink. Curation doesn't work well with controversial topics.
I read at -1. It's really not that bad. Here are the steps:
1. use the scroll wheel/bars to move past posts that are obvious spam (there usually aren't that many of those)
2. choose whether to moderate or participate
3. benefit from considering opinions that don't jive with groupthink. it's ok to consider ideas without accepting them or taking them personally
4. don't take the internet so seriously.
No. I'm not working anywhere near that hard to not be funny.
How can you assume all of those things? You don't know that person in question, white male or not. Talk about racist generalizations.
I don't think you understand what 'conservative government' is. The us-vs-them rhetoric these days comes from the left: whites vs nonwhites, straights vs gays, fat vs thin, etc. Talk about divisive narratives and defaults.
I'm not sure we should promote those reasons for entering a field. Go into computer science because it's interesting/rewarding and have aptitude for it, not just because it happens to pay well. Encouraging people to choose it for the latter when they lack the former will lead to misery for them and for society.
Using zuckerberg as an example to aspire to doesn't do much for your argument either.
People who don't agree with the socjus narrative apparently lack it. Of course, this is just an ad hominem issued to cover up the fact their own position not only lacks empathy, it dehumanizes as it 'deconstructs' what it doesn't approve of.
It's a game about a marine killing demons from hell...on mars... What the hell did you expect? bright pinks and blues?
Looks good, but the geometry's fairly simple in that scene and there's only one or two light sources. Also, does that engine use a complete model like the OP I replied to suggested is needed?