doom3's lighting was a pain.. It was nearly impossible to get decent looking lighting that didn't also kill performance...unless you were going for a dark scene. In many ways, the static lightmaps of the previous engines gave more realistic lighting and shadow, especially with later versions of the q3map compiler..
That's what the LTS branches are for...and unlike Windows, you're free to upgrade whenever it suits you. Linux runs on 32 bit systems just fine, you just need a better distro.
I realize lawyers may look at it that way, but it's not really true.. Both refer to an external source.. The question is whether referencing the source should be treated the same as hosting the distribution point. Allowing this just enables the kind of witchhunt copyright crusades of the previous decade.
Is there? both can link to an external violating source. The only difference is that 'img src' is loaded automatically as part of the page and 'href's have to be clicked.
The old are more apt to become jaded because they gloss over critical differences in details when something is tried again, but the young are easily mislead into thinking the old is new and better because they weren't there the first (second/third/fourth) time it was tried. Both can be misleading.
Kinda like when the NYT publishes one of their passive-aggressive smears.. It's expected, so why get uptight about it? Facebook has made their political culture quite clear, long before this happened.
The right's got foxnews, the left's got NYT and NPR (list not all inclusive). I would take any 'journalism' from these outlets with a healthy dose of skepticism.
License it how you like. If you want it included in the kernel, you'll have to license that submission with GPLv2. As the copyright remains with you, you can choose to multilicense it as much as you like.
Slashdot Mirror
doom3's lighting was a pain.. It was nearly impossible to get decent looking lighting that didn't also kill performance...unless you were going for a dark scene. In many ways, the static lightmaps of the previous engines gave more realistic lighting and shadow, especially with later versions of the q3map compiler..
Good luck with that..
That's what the LTS branches are for...and unlike Windows, you're free to upgrade whenever it suits you. Linux runs on 32 bit systems just fine, you just need a better distro.
I realize lawyers may look at it that way, but it's not really true.. Both refer to an external source.. The question is whether referencing the source should be treated the same as hosting the distribution point. Allowing this just enables the kind of witchhunt copyright crusades of the previous decade.
Is there? both can link to an external violating source. The only difference is that 'img src' is loaded automatically as part of the page and 'href's have to be clicked.
Linking to and embedding data from other documents is the whole reason it's described as a web in the first place.
because the marketing execs haven't figured out that blue leds lost their novelty by 2002.
Then get the railgun and camp by the quad..
This is true..
..and sometimes the old stuff is actually better, eg: pre 2005 desktop interfaces vs post 2005..
not a chance.. There's no way 720x480 has a shot at conveying the same information as HD, upscaled and edge sharpened or not..
The old are more apt to become jaded because they gloss over critical differences in details when something is tried again, but the young are easily mislead into thinking the old is new and better because they weren't there the first (second/third/fourth) time it was tried. Both can be misleading.
It's always good practice to verify from a remote host.
Wouldn't having the cert signed by a public authority fix this?
well technically this would be an underlord that answers to systemd.
Yes, java does indeed have you by the balls..
So his views are the 'adult' views and anyone with critical views of that is a child?
A 1936 Packard, or a 1996 Packard Bell?
Kinda like when the NYT publishes one of their passive-aggressive smears.. It's expected, so why get uptight about it? Facebook has made their political culture quite clear, long before this happened.
The right's got foxnews, the left's got NYT and NPR (list not all inclusive). I would take any 'journalism' from these outlets with a healthy dose of skepticism.
A news media company that has a different bias in its news than the bias you're likely accustomed to.
You forgot to include a nice MS-DOS Abort? Retry? Fail loop in there for good measure.
License it how you like. If you want it included in the kernel, you'll have to license that submission with GPLv2. As the copyright remains with you, you can choose to multilicense it as much as you like.
The world doesn't revolve around you. I know I should've prefaced this with a trigger warning, but it's the truth.
Not at the same pricepoint as optical media.