That's what this boils down to...they have a TON of possible plans they could be running right now, but hardly any of them get off the ground because their budget is only about 13 billion. Considering that the U.S. was ponying up 60% of the ISS, this leaves little room for much else. Citizens need to speak up and show that America still wants a robust space program, and that we'll be willing to foot a larger bill to accomplish that goal.
I refuse to by a monitor that loses definition at odd angles, has a hard time with the color black, and is only sharp at one resolution. I especially refuse to buy them when they're twice as expensive. The only benefits are power use and desk space...two things that rank very low on the ladder of importance for me. I'm certain a LOT of other people feel the same way.
What's the deal with these? I mean Christ, people are acting like it's the first time that people are keeping a journal of their daily activities on the Internet. I don't quite understand why this has become the "new hotness."
Hopefully NASA doesn't repeat the Mars mission by making a unit conversion area. I think they'll be suspect if Lewis & Clark are shown to have discovered the Congo.
I've looked into this topic and found some very interesting quotes regarding the subject. Scientific American probably states that "while a minority of scientists perform bad science, most do go through the process" (Scientific American, 3). Some magazines might goes as far to say "our scientists should be hailed for their rigor and attention to detail in these works" (Popular Science, XVIII). Some detractors have maybe said "hey, these scientists are free-loading off government cheese" (Popular Mechanics, 12XVII424CVV). I hypothesize that most of scientists out there read what they write about. As you can see from my rock-solid sources, there is no disputing this fact.
Slashdot Mirror
...is when a Windows machine is cleaved in twine with a battle axe.
I annot wait till his opyright on the letter " " expires.
...that the device will be inaudible without a 3rd-party hack (AfterBurner Audio?). Seems to be Nintendo's modus operandi as of late.
That's what this boils down to...they have a TON of possible plans they could be running right now, but hardly any of them get off the ground because their budget is only about 13 billion. Considering that the U.S. was ponying up 60% of the ISS, this leaves little room for much else. Citizens need to speak up and show that America still wants a robust space program, and that we'll be willing to foot a larger bill to accomplish that goal.
You could just buy a *second* computer.
Destroyer captains were notably irritated after being presented with their newly mandated hats that included an embedded Airport base station.
An anonymous officer complained "I've got 10 pounds of circuitry on my head now...first the anti-homosexuality halo, now this!"
...that programmers intake half as many Cheetos but twice as many Doritos.
...I'll be hit with a classmates.com ad every time I strum G#?
I refuse to by a monitor that loses definition at odd angles, has a hard time with the color black, and is only sharp at one resolution. I especially refuse to buy them when they're twice as expensive. The only benefits are power use and desk space...two things that rank very low on the ladder of importance for me. I'm certain a LOT of other people feel the same way.
List of species known gets larger each year...
List of species that aren't extinct gets smaller each year...
The two numbers will eventually meet.
...AOL's $22.95 a month was too much even for him.
First they kill 3000 people...then they deny us the Internet for a COUPLE HOURS! This time...it's PERSONAL!
Now I'll be able to record the first 5 minutes of my favorite HDTV program!
Now I can finally print myself a woman...
Awww crap, I'm all out of nipple ink!
What's the deal with these? I mean Christ, people are acting like it's the first time that people are keeping a journal of their daily activities on the Internet. I don't quite understand why this has become the "new hotness."
"Define subliminible in three vowels or less!"
Does that mean I get to rewrite who won the civil war in my history book? SCORE!
...penguins will be able to actually sit down.
I think it's about time we added a "hydroponics" category. Honestly, most nerds will probably applaud it.
...till someone figures out how to attach DaVinci's helicopter design to an Apache.
Hopefully NASA doesn't repeat the Mars mission by making a unit conversion area. I think they'll be suspect if Lewis & Clark are shown to have discovered the Congo.
No self-respecting geek believes any other person to be geeky enough to be considered their "peer."
...until Pink Floyd uses them in concert.
1. Denial of service
2. Fried router
3. Blimp attack
I've looked into this topic and found some very interesting quotes regarding the subject. Scientific American probably states that "while a minority of scientists perform bad science, most do go through the process" (Scientific American, 3). Some magazines might goes as far to say "our scientists should be hailed for their rigor and attention to detail in these works" (Popular Science, XVIII). Some detractors have maybe said "hey, these scientists are free-loading off government cheese" (Popular Mechanics, 12XVII424CVV). I hypothesize that most of scientists out there read what they write about. As you can see from my rock-solid sources, there is no disputing this fact.