Slashdot Mirror


CPU Convective Water Cooling

biso writes "The possibility of cooling a CPU with gravitational convective flow of water is here analyzed and experimented with positive results. Many liquid cooling systems have been experimented by overclockers to better dissipate the heat from CPUs. The major part of these coolers is characterized by a relatively complex system requiring pumps or other active devices. Sometimes even liquid nitrogen is used. I built a simpler cooler, able to dissipate the same heat flux of a normal heatsink."

267 comments

  1. /. effect by Exiler · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's going to be boiling noodles in a minute

    --
    Banaaaana!
    1. Re:/. effect by killthiskid · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm just impressed with a big bowl of water balanced on top of a open tower case. Now THAT takes balls.

      The guy obviously doesn't have cats or any other pets.

    2. Re:/. effect by Uncle+Flip · · Score: 1

      The guy obviously doesn't have cats or any other pets.

      Well, not anymore, anyway...

      -UF

    3. Re:/. effect by getitconnected · · Score: 1

      Yes, the major question here is...

      What are the other great uses for it?

      -Boiling Water
      -Cleaning the computer (without buying a can of air)
      -Making the processor and other goodies SHINEY!
      -Keeping the air moist

      Ahh, there are sooo many more to choose from.

    4. Re:/. effect by On+Lawn · · Score: 1

      I used to leave the cover off my firewall in the garage. That was until I evicted a family of mice in my garage, and they decided to get back at me by using one of the network cards as a restroom. Now any PC that card is plugged into will not even boot.

      ---------------
      OnRoad: dbDrag Racing, now showing...

    5. Re:/. effect by Lasuuco+Tulkas · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the water he is using is most likely de-ionized water as this prevents corrosion in the pipes and water block - although sometimes it is best to mix in some detergent to lessen the water tension in the lines to work out the bubbles.

    6. Re:/. effect by Kronovohr · · Score: 5, Funny

      <offtopic>That reminds me -- a few years ago, I went out of town for a few days, and when I got back my old P200 refused to boot. I yanked out cables and cards in an attempt to get the old beast up and going again, and when I yanked out the sound card, it booted. Well, I put everything back together, and then looked closer at the sound card.

      It had a nice, dried puddle of mouse piss on it, so I put it aside and waited for the next opportunity to grab another one.


      I thought (after I'd gotten another one) that I should have called Dell tech support and discussed the problem with them:



      (them) "Hello, <speil>"

      (me) "Yeah, I've got a mouse problem."

      (them) "What seems to be the problem?"

      (me) "Oh, it sort of pissed on my sound card."
      </offtopic>
    7. Re:/. effect by biso · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are two cats around here! :-D

      Anyway, the bowl will be replaced by a proper
      radiator when available.

      m

    8. Re:/. effect by Zemran · · Score: 1

      or even children :)

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  2. Water? by readc · · Score: 1

    Yes, but can I use it as a cooler at soccer games? THAT would be the day technology is far too self-serving...

    --
    Da comp cant tell u da emotional story.It can give u da exact mathematical design,but whatz missin is da eyebrows. -FZ
    1. Re:Water? by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      i dont see why not. all you would need is a computer, a cooler and some fuel cells. set up the cooler to hold the hard drive, mobo/proc, dremel some holes for the cable running to keyboard etc. hell you could even get a little 12 inch LCD and mount it on a hinge on the top, cut out a spot for it to fold down into the top (face down of course.).

      hell i have seen minifridge-pc's why not a cooler ? the only real issue is getting the batteries to somehow power everything. which cant be that hard since i have seen people do that as well.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
  3. odd by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ok, i can see the extra bit of silence from not having a pump would be nice. but ... isnt a bowl of water on top of your computer just asking for trouble? something tells me this guy doesnt have cats.

    1. Re:odd by havardi · · Score: 0

      It's called a Prototype.

    2. Re:odd by jafiwam · · Score: 4, Funny

      There's more than one way to boil a cat I guess....

    3. Re:odd by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      it is a prototype...I bet a fianl product would use say a welmade jug of water that is closed to the air or perhaps somehting that is mountable to a wall or somthing.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:odd by pfinder · · Score: 1

      Henry Ford's Model T used convection flow for cooling. Hot water rises, cool water falls, it makes its on circulation.

    5. Re:odd by aerojad · · Score: 1

      There's got to be a better phrase than "shameless pun" for this.

      Not that it's a bad thing...

      --

      SecondPageMedia - Wha
    6. Re:odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also the Scott motorcycle. It was a racing two-stoke motorcycle from the 1930's.

  4. neat idea... by awx · · Score: 1

    ...and one i've had for a long time. This must be the first person with any guts to try it out though. Must also be the first person I know of to balance a bucket of water on top of an open computer...

    --
    Feel that power? That's mah MOUSING FINGER
  5. not that complex... by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've built numerous different water cooled systems, and the $20 pump from the aquarium supply place is NOT the most complex piece. A good waterjacket for the cpu is by far the most complex and generally most expensive single piece, and also the one that is most critical for good performance. Still need the waterjacket in this design, so it isn't really saving anything...

    1. Re:not that complex... by jasonkohles · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure it is, he says right out he didn't eliminate the pump because it was the most expensive part, he wanted to eliminate it because it was the loudest part.

    2. Re:not that complex... by havardi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More importantly; it's a moving part. When computers have absolutely no moving parts... well, that will be nice.

    3. Re:not that complex... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry but I fail to see how a water jacket could be the most complex part. The jacket itself if made properly (which is to say, as simply as possible) will consist of two pieces. I would personally then weld/solder/braze/WTFever you call it the two pieces together. The whole thing could be made with a 2.5dimensional mill in a matter of seconds with only one or two tool changes and with repositioning each "half" of the block once.

      The pump, on the other hand, is going to involve either a motor and a turbine and something like it (dramatically more complex, perhaps 10-20 parts there alone if you break them down) or something similar. At the very least you'll have an impeller driven by magnetic induction which implies a certain parts count on its own.

      A water jacket is just one flat piece (a lid) and one channeled piece, and a couple of fittings.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:not that complex... by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      for 2 reasons water jackets are not produced in bulk like pumps and a good one like the one he uses, is more like a mini car radiator ( look at the pic) something like that is going to cost a lot to produce

    5. Re:not that complex... by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 1

      also, the jacket has to fit on the cpu and attachment points without cracking the cpu (athlon) or breaking the tabs. submersible aquarium pumps are several magnitudes quieter than the quietest hard drive, you will NOT hear them in a normal environment. Flow rate makes very little difference, even a very small rate is enough to keep liquid circulating through the jacket. (watch the output temp as an indicator of the needed flowrate.)

    6. Re:not that complex... by ickpoo · · Score: 1

      Actually fish tank pumps are about as simple as possible. They are made to handle fish crap as well as water.

      --
      I am not a script! .Sig?
    7. Re:not that complex... by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      But if you actually read the article you will see that he does use a pump:
      An aquarium pump provided the necessary pressure for circulation.


      So what exactly does this thing do that other water cooled setups don't? I don't see anything special. Although a portion of the heat is disappated by the circulating air over the pipes in the heatsink instead of using a radiator or a tower cooler (bong) this is nothing new.

      A. He is not overclocking the machine.
      B. It's a k-6 so it's not generating intense heat like some of today's chips do.

      There's a big difference between the heat output of a k-6 and an AMD XP2200. You can remove the heatsink outright on a k-6 and it will continue to run under normal operating conditions. I simply booted a AMD 2100 without the heatsink and it fried the chip! (Big mistake, I learned the hard way).

    8. Re:not that complex... by operagost · · Score: 1
      If you'll read further down the page, you'll see the point of this project was to eliminate the pump, which he did.

      He also says the temperature of the system dropped by 1 K as compared to a fan, so it's having a positive effect whether it's needed or not. It might actually be even more effective on a system which puts out more heat.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:not that complex... by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Gotcha, it didn't stand out when I read it. Guess I actually need to pay attention next time.

      I would like to see similiar tests ran on newer hardware, but this is a great start.

  6. Nitrogen is a GREAT coolant! by Tsar · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's cheap, reliable, odorless and environmentally friendly, and refills are available everywhere. I myself have been using a 78% nitrogen gas mixture at 14.7 PSI to cool all my computer components for years now. Where did I get the idea? I guess I just pulled it out of thin *SMACK*

    1. Re:Nitrogen is a GREAT coolant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The accidental nitrous oxide production isn't so bad either. Tee-hee!

    2. Re:Nitrogen is a GREAT coolant! by caesar79 · · Score: 2, Informative

      did anyone get this ? u cant mod that "INteresting."

      for those of you who evidently didnt get this, 78% nitrogen mixture at approx 14.7 psi is AIR!!!

    3. Re:Nitrogen is a GREAT coolant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You breathe 22% sulfrous oxide?
      I suppose you thought it was oxygen he mixed with the nitrogen, huh?

    4. Re:Nitrogen is a GREAT coolant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We aren't all idiots, i hopefully everyone did get it. If they didn't, they didn't deserve to. Oh yeah, KARMA WHORE

    5. Re:Nitrogen is a GREAT coolant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Everybody "got it" fine...

      Thats why it was modded "funny".. cuz it was.

  7. too hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really think that phase change cooling systems are the future of the PC. Only with phase change cooling systems do you get high quality cooling able to remove the utmost heat away from a CPU and cool it to below freezing.

    I saw a presentation by Intel last year in which it pointed out that modern CPU's emit more heat per area than molten lava, and they expect that within a few years they will emit more heat per area than the sun.

    With these considerations passive water cooling is only a good first step and bound to be insufficient, even over the short term.

    1. Re:too hot by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      The hottest area of a Pentium is the encoder/decoder, so they get the heat per area of that few square nm. Imagine if the whole processor emitted as much heat per area as the sun... and then a beowolf cluster... well, that would be one was to aid global warming.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:too hot by havardi · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was just thinking thinking about the same system he has setup-- but where the water is boiled off the chip into steam... If it could be totally sealed that would hella cool. Of course, it would have to be large. But, you could add plants and simple animals to the ecosystem and it would be an interesting conversational piece

    3. Re:too hot by PsychoKiller · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I saw a presentation by Intel last year in which it pointed out that modern CPU's emit more heat per area than molten lava, and they expect that within a few years they will emit more heat per area than the sun.

      Not quite true. I saw the same graph, and it was an extrapolation of current trends.

      Obviously we aren't going to emit more heat/area than a nuclear reaction, something is going to have to change in the design of Intel CPUs.

    4. Re:too hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, solid silicone emits more heat than molten silicone? Certainly a statement like that can't stand without a whole bunch of creativity, enough to turn a false statement into a true one. But once you've gone that far, is what you're saying even worth listening to?

    5. Re:too hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason processors get so hot is overly high clock speed. With a well designed processor this isn't necessary. What kind of company would build a processor that needed to clock up to 3ghz just to competitive?

      I guess the same type of company which assumes our processors will provide enough heat to replace radiators in a few years...

    6. Re:too hot by Sayjack · · Score: 1

      I saw a presentation by Intel last year in which it pointed out that modern CPU's emit more heat per area than molten lava, and they expect that within a few years they will emit more heat per area than the sun.

      Hrmm...I was going to buy a space heater, but I guess I'll just wait for the P5's to come out instead.

      All kidding aside, I suspect that we're running into some physical barriers with respect to clock synchronized computing. Seems to me that we really need a paradigm shift such as asynchronous computing to take us to the next level.

      --

      -- Good judgement comes with experience. -- Experience comes with bad judgement.

    7. Re:too hot by Derg · · Score: 1

      Hrmm...I was going to buy a space heater, but I guess I'll just wait for the P5's to come out instead.


      Just do what I did 1) case with nice fans on the side, aimed at legs when sitting next to desk 2) OC'd proc, video card and memory. 3) Fans cooling the whole rig

      my room is about 4-5 degrees warmer on average than the rest of the house. To be honest, I have to keep a fan in the window to keep the ambient temp in my room, which is small and cluttered, around 70. This wouldnt be so bad, the fan thing, except I live in wisconsin, and the air temp is right about 5 atm. [drool] oh to have the money for a decent water cooling rig / the gumption to rig something like the article mentions [/drool]

      --
      I'm a little tea pot.
    8. Re:too hot by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

      Remind me to shitcan my furnace and buy a couple dozen Pentium VI's.

      --
      Click here if you just like to click on shit.
    9. Re:too hot by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      So, solid silicone emits more heat than molten silicone?

      Without the heatsink, a silicon CPU wouldn't be solid for very long.

      (As for your hypothetical silicone CPU, it probably wouldn't be considered fully solid even at room temperature.)

    10. Re:too hot by DaChesserCat · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the eco-system part, but the phase-change aspect has me wondering.

      According to the article, the external temperatures on the CPU cooler box was 24 C. According to this page, if you reduce the pressure in your water system down to 3% of 1 atm pressure (relative vacuum), that would be enough to get the water to boil. Once you got the pressure down, you probably wouldn't need any kind of pump. Simply have the water boil at the CPU cooler, then run it through a long heat-sink attached to a copper tube. The water would cool enough to condense back to a fluid, running back down the tube, and repeating the cycle.

      Oh, yeah. That already exists; it's called a heat pipe. The one in the linked article is relatively small and has a fan blowing through a radiator for active cooling. How long until somebody out there "rolls their own," with a long, passive heatsink? The author of the article was looking for "quiet," and that would certainly fill the bill.

      --
      ... by the Dew of Mountains the thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning
    11. Re:too hot by nojayuk · · Score: 1

      The only reason processors get so hot is overly high clock speed. With a well designed processor this isn't necessary. What kind of company would build a processor that needed to clock up to 3ghz just to competitive?

      Motorola? (No proper DDR support, no Hyperthreading, poor FP implementation...)

      I wonder if the 1.42GHz G4s used in Apple's Ultimate dualies are Golden Samples or genuine production devices?

    12. Re:too hot by fizbin · · Score: 1

      Except that you want the external temperatures to be sufficient to get water to condense, and you want it to boil when it's placed next to the CPU.

      Therefore, you'd probably want to set the boiling point somewhere between 40 and 50 degrees C, or (referring to that same page) air pressure of about 10% of one standard atmosphere. It should be quite possible to generate this by building a heat pipe, putting some water in it, heating one end until the pipe is filled with steam, and then capping the end without letting things cool down and having air back in there.

      Of course, doing that without getting seriously scalded is going to be very difficult, and you'll need to work out the pressure equations for what the pressure will be inside the heat pipe while the whole thing is in operation - it'd be a shame to have your pipe stop its cooling properties once the CPU boils off enough water.

      Ugh. Better leave this design to professionals.

    13. Re:too hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use alcohol (methanol?) instead of water. It has a lower boiling point, and resists freeze damage too. Heat pipes often use alcohol as the working fluid for these reasons.

    14. Re:too hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arthur C Clark's Venus Prime series has a fictional supercomputer the size of your fist that cools by screwing into the faucet; the cold water is turned on and comes out boiling hot:)

  8. Content of the page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Abstract

    The possibility of cooling a CPU with gravitational convective flow of water is analyzed and experimented with positive results.
    Introduction

    Many liquid cooling systems have been experimented by overclockers to better dissipate the heat from CPUs. The major part of these coolers is characterized by a relatively complex system requiring pumps or other active devices. Sometimes even liquid nitrogen is used.

    My intent was instead to build a cooler able to dissipate the same heat flux of a normal heatsink, but without the annoying noise of the fan.

    A first prototype was built out of a regular heatsink. Holes were drilled in the aluminium finning, and copper tubes passed through them. An aquarium pump provided the necessary pressure for circulation.

    Figure 1. First Prototype--Front View
    (picture)
    Figure 2. First Prototype--Side View
    (picture)

    The system was silent and reliable. But with bigger pipes and a lower pressure drop would it have been possible to take away the pump? Simple calculations showed that it would have been perhaps feasible and a prototype was built.
    Temperature on Heatsink Surface

    Roughly:

    Power to be dissipated: powd = 80 W

    If the heatsink is a little copper box to put over the CPU, a reasonable value for the surface available at copper-water interface can be: surfc = 0.01 m2

    The heat transfer coefficient on the water-copper boundary layer can vary from a few watt per square meter per kelvin if the flow is slow and laminar to more than 1 kW K-1m-2 when the flow is very fast and turbulent. If the coefficient is supposed to be: texc = 100 W K-1m -2

    The difference of temperature on surface will be: delt = powd / (texc surfc) = 80 K

    It appears that the water should boil on the surface of such a little heatsink, but radiation wasn't taken into account and the geometry of the box is complex, so it's not clear if there could be turbulence and with which effect. If necessary the surface could be enhanced with fins or by increasing the dimension of the equipment.
    Convection

    Supposing that the heatsink could be able to exchange the heat between the CPU and the water, would it flow through the pipes?

    Power to convey: powd = 80 W

    Length of the circuit branches between the CPU and the radiator on the top of the computer case: heigh = 0.8 m

    Equivalent length of the circuit (we take into account the bends too): len = 2 m

    Radius of the pipe: rdp = 9 10-3 m

    Rate of change of water density against temperature: dct = 0.55 kg m-3 K -1

    Water density: rho = 103 kg m-3

    Water viscosity: eta = 10-3 decapoise

    Specific heat of water: wsh = 4180 J kg-1 K -1

    Gravitational acceleration: grav = 9.8 m s-2

    Pi: pi = 3.14

    Difference of temperature between ascending and descending branch: deltat

    Difference of density of the water in the two branches: deltarho = deltat dct

    Difference of pressure due to the difference of density: deltap = deltarho grav heigh

    Volume of water conveyed per unit time: vot

    Pressure drop in the pipe: deltap = vot 8 eta len / (pi rdp 4)

    Power conveyed: powd = wsh rho deltat vot

    Putting it all together: deltat2 = 8 powd eta len / (wsh rho pi rdp 4 dct grav heigh) = 3.4 K2

    Everything should work with a temperature difference of less than 2 kelvin. Consequently the radiator isn't required to be very efficient.
    SIRPAL-1 Prototype

    The SIRPAL-1 prototype was made using a 5 mm thick copper sheet for the base, and 2 mm thick copper sheets for the walls. The edge of the square base is 55 mm long. Inside there are two plates 25 mm wide. One is vertically aligned, soldered to the base, to increase the exchange surface near the CPU, the other is horizontal, soldered between the input-output pipe fittings, to guide the fluid in the right direction.

    A test was performed on a K6-2 450MHz which dissipates a power of about 25 watt. The ambient temperature was 18 celsius degrees. After a few hours the CPU temperature, measured by the PC board sensor, was at least 1 kelvin lower than when the fan is used. External surface temperatures: 19 celsius degrees on the pipes; 24 celsius degrees on the copper box.

    A drop of ink in the water revealed a slow flow as expected. It worked so well that I think a more powerful CPU would be efficiently cooled too.

    Figure 3. SIRPAL-1
    (picture)
    Figure 4. SIRPAL-1--Testing
    (picture)

  9. Allow me to suggest... by Ikoma+Andy · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...using sponges as sound dampening material inside the case. Who knows, it just might save your computer when somebody bumps the frickin' table and dumps that bowl full of water over everything!!

  10. Welcome to the party, PAL! by freeze128 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Didn't I see that figure 3 photo in Die Hard with a vengance?

    1. Re:Welcome to the party, PAL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no clue what you are talking about.

    2. Re:Welcome to the party, PAL! by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      That depends... does it mean you admit to having seen Die Hard: With a Vengeance?

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:Welcome to the party, PAL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does it mean you admit to having seen Die Hard: With a Vengeance?

      Yippie-Kai-Aaaay Mother Fucker!!!!

  11. LIQUID AND ELECTRICITY AND $HSF $CPU = JOKE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .
    .
    .

  12. a few concerns.. by williwilli · · Score: 1

    heh, that picture of a bowel of water on top of an open pc tower case is not something I would necessarily run, but I would imagine that you could make the system safer by enclosing the bowel and lines and perhaps passing the lines in through an empty PCI slot bay..

    Still I would imagine you might need more space to accomplish this sort of solution. Has anyone looked into stirling engines as a method of heat transferal? They have no moving parts and are reportedly fairly effecient. I have been looking into using them to harness solar power.

    1. Re:a few concerns.. by ksuMacGyver · · Score: 5, Funny

      that picture of a bowel of water on top of an open pc tower case is not something I would necessarily run....

      Bowels of water on his PC, this is something I definitely DON'T want to see!

      --

      Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam

      Interested in AI? MACR
    2. Re:a few concerns.. by PerlHeadJax · · Score: 2, Funny

      you could make the system safer by enclosing the bowel

      You make your roommates happier when you enclose your bowel, too.

    3. Re:a few concerns.. by smithmc · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that you could make the system safer by enclosing the bowel and lines and perhaps passing the lines in through an empty PCI slot bay..

      You mean like these guys did?

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  13. Why not use transformer oil? by xtronics · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Trasformer oil is insulating and would not short-out anything. It could also cool the powersupply at the same time, without the inherint saftey risk water subjects us to.

    1. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      thats the problem its insulating i.e. not tranfering the heat outside of the case, people have tried it and found it just just transfer enough heat to matter

    2. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by corsec67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      he means insulating as in: does not conduct electricity. If they did not want heat transfer in a transformer, they would use air: cheap, does not conduct heat or electricity.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    3. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by chemmathguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll tell you why. It is extremely hazardous stuff. In order to increase the boiling point of the oil, PCB's (ya know, polychlorinated biphenyls) and other toxic nonvolatiles are added to the oil. If you spill that crap, it's worse for you and the environment compared to Freon.

    4. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by xtronics · · Score: 1

      He may have a point?

      I don't think the specific heat of trnsformer oil is as high as water. But it may only mean that there needs to be a bit more flow? I'm sure it has much higher specific heat than air.

      I'm not interested in this for over clocking, but for noise reduction - which would include cooling the powerspply - which would be unwise to cool with water.

    5. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by xtronics · · Score: 1

      I didn't think they have used PCB's in transformer oil for a decade or two.

    6. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually, I think the best liquid that I found came straight from the Hudson River...

      Although we are probably thinking the same thing..

    7. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by chemmathguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The use of PCB's in transformer oil continued into the early nineties. They just used the "less toxic" (i.e. less chlorinated) PCBs. Anyways, we've found out that these enantiomers are probably more dangerous than their heavier counterparts. Besides, if most /.ers had a choice between buying transformer oil and finding an old ruined transformer in a junkyard (yes, you can actually find them there) and making the oil "open source", what do you think they would choose?

    8. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by xtronics · · Score: 1

      First, I don't think "most /.ers" would use old oil. (Is this flame bait?) I happen to think most /.ers are more responsible than average.

      Second, I think you should check your facts about transformer oil. What is used today is no more dangerous than the oil in a car.

      I checked with a friend who tests transformer oil for a living. The oil in use is not an enantiomer nor is it toxic.

    9. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by Bastian · · Score: 1

      There are probably much less hazardous fluids than thransformer oil. Transformer oil probably wouldn't work for a convective system anyway, since my bet is it's way too viscous for the forces at hand to work efficiently.

    10. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by xtronics · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let's pump it and two read the following standards. The oil has to be thin to cool transformers.

      Polychlorinated Biphenyls (D 4059) Regulations prohibiting the commercial distribution of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) mandate that insulating oils be examined for PCB contamination levels to assure that new products do not contain detectable amounts.

      Viscosity (D 445) Viscosity is the resistance of oil to flow under specified conditions. The viscosity of oil used as a coolant influences heat transfer rates and consequently the temperature rise of an apparatus. The viscosity of an oil also influences the speed of moving parts in tap changers and circuit breakers. High viscosity oils are less desirable, especially in cold climates. Standard viscosity curves can be generated using Method D 341 by measuring two or three data points and plotting the data on special chart paper. The resulting curve can be used to interpolate or extrapolate values at temperatures where the viscosity is not measured directly.

    11. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by chemmathguy · · Score: 1

      I can name quite a few incidents where people have actually stolen old oil from discarded transformers and spilled the crap everywhere in the process. We folks at the EPA would then have to go out there and clean the frickin' mess up. If you read my comment, I said that PCBs were used until the early nineties, not through the nineties. And by the way, every compound that contains stereocenters is enantiomeric, and since most oils do in fact have stereocenters (they're not pure hydrocarbons as everyone seems to think) they do have enantiomers. Also, nearly all oils contain unsaturated carbons and are usuaully carcinogenic (even the quaker state you put in your car). And as far as /.ers being more responsible than average, most of them are applauding a guy who is balancing a bowl of water on a frickin' computer. Yeah, really responsible.....

    12. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by svvampy · · Score: 1

      I'm not that sure about transformer oil, it could be more than meets the eye...

    13. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by pwarf · · Score: 1

      "every compound that contains stereocenters is enantiomeric"

      #start nitpicking
      As a chemist, I have to nitpick. Meso compounds, such as 2,3-butanediol, are not enantiomeric. Likewise, 3-methyl-2-pentene has two stereocenters, but has E and Z stereoisomers, not an enantiomer pair. The defining characteristic of an enantiomer is that the mirror image of the molecule is nonsuperimposable on the original molecule.

      At least one source metions an earlier stop date for manufacture of PCBs:
      "The manufacture of PCBs was stopped in the U.S. in 1977 because of evidence they build up in the environment and can cause harmful health effects."
      http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/tfacts17.html
      Also,
      "During the 1970s, federal legislation2 mandated the elimination of PCBs from distribution in commerce; however, the use of PCBs in existing equipment was, for economic reasons, allowed to continue for the useful or normal life of the equipment as long as specific conditions were met."
      http://www.llnl.gov/es_and_h/hsm/doc_14.14/ doc14-1 4.html#toc3

      I can't speak to the lifespan of the existing equipment (transformers, in this case).

      #end of nitpick

    14. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by xtronics · · Score: 1
      Glad we have chemmathguy in context here.

      "He's from the Government and here to help"

      /.ers will be glad to know you hold them in disdain and are monitoring them for having bowls of water sitting on thier computers. We really have way too much government.


      My best memory of the EPA is seeing them in total body bunny suits to remove the asbestos from a locomotive in a park here, when all it takes is a simple wetting with a garden hose to keep any dust from going air born (besides its the cronic exposure that froms the risk). Later studies have shown that asbestos dust may not be much worse than fiberglass dust, but it did provide the livelihood of a generation of EPA lawyers.

    15. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by nojayuk · · Score: 1
      My best memory of the EPA is seeing them in total body bunny suits to remove the asbestos from a locomotive in a park here, when all it takes is a simple wetting with a garden hose to keep any dust from going air born (besides its the cronic exposure that froms the risk).

      As you say the problem with asbestos tends to be with repeated exposure. However you might like to consider the guys in the "bunny suits" do this for a living and are regularly exposed to the stuff. Wetting the dust to stop it from getting airborne doesn't help in the long term as it will dry out and become dangerous again. It needs to be collected, hence the big plastic tents and the guys in the bunny suits.

    16. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by Exedore · · Score: 1

      Well, I would guess that EPA cleanup crews do this sort of thing on a fairly regular basis, and therefore would have to worry about chronic exposure.

      If I worked with asbestos regularly, I'd much prefer the bunny suit to a garden hose, thanks.

      --

      I take drugs seriously.

    17. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by chemmathguy · · Score: 1

      On the flip side of your argument, what if the EPA guys you saw didn't wear their body suits? I mean, it's just one isolated incident, right? They shouldn't need full-body protection for a little dust. Well, EPA scientists (and most other environmental scientists) are involved in a lot more than one teeny-weeny cleanup and without these protective measures, they would have that chronic exposure you're talking about. So what would you rather have, an excess (it seems) of protection, or a risk of developing some health problem?

    18. Re:Why not use transformer oil? by xtronics · · Score: 1

      Why do I have to point this out? Have we become a nation of chemophobes? What in the world do they teach in school theses days? (Chemicals are bad - don't ever try to do anything with them )

      Asbestoses is NOT caused by skin contact..
      Asbestoses is caused by air-borne asbestos that is inhaled in enclosed poorly ventilated air spaces (like mines). The very health conscious might want to wet it down a bit with a hose, wait for a day with a bit of a breeze, or wear a respirator (I wouldn't bother). There is no reason to wear a body suit except that it enhances the perception that it is dangerous (spelled: expensive) work to remove when it is no such thing.

  14. tesla turbine... by Aine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...powered by water (or even antifreeze) could conceivably do two jobs: provide cooling for the cpu and produce power. It wouldn't have to be all that big either. It might not produce that much power, but probably enough to light a small desk lamp.

    --
    So far left, I'm right.
    1. Re:tesla turbine... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I doubt you could come anywhere near that level of power. While tesla's disc turbine is impressive it is not going to generate that much energy unless your "small desk lamp" is an ultra low power LED. Look at the basic facts of the situation, your CPU is only dissipating 40-120 watts, assuming it's modern. Less if it isn't. What kind of efficiency do you really think you're going to get between the cpu and the fluid? How much heat energy will be lost to radiation before it reaches the turbine? How efficient is the turbine? The generator?

      In the end you might be able to utilize excellent design to get enough power to light a small bulb. I think you could get more power more cheaply by using a sizable heat pipe system which ran into a stirling engine made out of soda pop cans :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:tesla turbine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes that's an excellent idea, but instead of powering a lamp, why don't you use the energy produced to power the computer. That way you don't have to pay any electricity bills.

  15. PC or 400psi TCM? by gelfling · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's kind of ironic istn't it that CMOS PCs will eventually need the same plumbing as the TCMs they were supposed to replace.

    Hey I had a 9021-721 MVS/ESA mainframe that used TCM's cooled by a 400psi cooling system. The great thing about the next gen CMOS mainframes was that even though one TCM was now replaced with 3-6 CMOS units, we didn't need a massive chiller system.

    Oh well, guess everything will have huge ass chiller pumps now.

    1. Re:PC or 400psi TCM? by eyegone · · Score: 1
      Maybe IBM can go back into the purified water business.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    2. Re:PC or 400psi TCM? by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > It's kind of ironic istn't it that CMOS PCs will eventually need the same plumbing as the TCMs they were supposed to replace.

      Actually there is more to the PC than being CMOS, like a popular, well-understood architecture that can run GNU/Linux -- AFAIK GNU/Linux S/390 still need VM and proprietary drivers to run. Not to mention being able to have control on your own instead of relying always on IT. OTOH, I am an advocate of POSIX hosts and X terminals, so this actually goes against the PC.

      Also, remember not all PCs run inefficient x86 or IPF processors. PowerPCs and ARMs won't need cooling anytime soon, probably never.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  16. Simpler, Cheaper Method... by jaybird144 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While I admire all of those who are willing to actually pipe water into their computers for the sake of keeping them cool, I am still more than a little frightened of this idea. Knowing me, something would end up leaking (probably through fault of my own) and my precious tower would go up in a ball of flame or some such. Rather, I choose to take your regular old air cooling and make it more effective. Through proper cable management, good airflow paths, a set of nice quiet fans, and the ability to control them with respect to how much they are needed, I keep my fan almost as cool as a friend of mine who does have a liquid cooling system, and with very comparable noise levels. If you're willing to do some work and set up a decent air-based system (and be willing to clean out the dust), there's no need to balance a bucket of water precariously on top of one's computer... : |

    1. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by Flamerule · · Score: 1
      Reading your post gave me an idea....

      The reason that generally only dedicated individuals go to the trouble of using a water-cooling system in their case is because water conducts electricity, right? And air doesn't, which is why air is much safer -- well, risk free. Spilling water on the innards of one's computer would short it out, or cause a surge, or some electrical-type thing; but no amount of air flowing through a case is going to cause any damage, unless we're talking hurricane-force winds.

      So why don't liquid water-cooling systems use some liquid with the useful thermal properties of water, but without its ability to conduct electricity? In other l33t cooling stories on /. I've read about liquid nitrogen being used, but I imagine it's so cold that the damage from a leak there would be largely from temperature. Surely there is some easily-obtainable liquid, oil or something, that wouldn't cause damage to computer components if it came into contact with them, but would be effective at cooling the system.

    2. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by Tidan · · Score: 4, Interesting
      So much for innovation...

      This guy is trying to be creative and show us a unique way of cooling a computer. Obviously this type of water cooling is somewhat of a new idea, and has yet to be perfected. I mean, he even says that he tested it on a K6-2 computer (relatively low power dissipation).

      Give the guy some credit here! Instead of saying why fans are better and that water (or any liquid) spells disaster, why not try and understand why this is better than the old system?

      First - liquid cooled without a pump = no mechanical parts to fail. Those heat-pipe heatsinks that are becoming popular have liquid inside them, and you probably aren't worried about having them leak. It's possible that there might be a commercial product that does the same thing with gravitational convection of liquids.

      Secondly - eliminating (or reducing) fans not only eliminates noise, it also improves reliability. How many of us have had fans get noisier over time and eventually die on us?

      Anyway, I say more power to this guy. someday we might have the CPU mounted at the bottom of our case, and have a cool lava-lamp looking effect running up the side wall. Let's not be quick to fear new technologies - look at the possibilities first!

      --
      free ipod? yeah.
    3. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      So why don't liquid water-cooling systems use some liquid with the useful thermal properties of water, but without its ability to conduct electricity?

      They do. It's known as 'distilled water'. Water is non-conductive (or close enough for most purposes) when it is free of salts.

      Some people have tried using Flourinert for cooling but it's very expensive and I don't know what the minimum quantity is but I think it's multiple gallons.

      In the end distilled water is probably your best bet. Putting filters on any intake fans or vents on your case will prevent distilled water mixing with conductive dust and shorting things out. If your case has multiple intake paths, either it's poorly designed, or you just need multiple filters. Most cases should have only one intake point, and air should more or less move throughout the entire machine before exiting, whether because you have multiple exhausts, or because air is forced to flow in such a manner.

      People have also used mineral oil but with any cooling medium other than distilled water (which also does not corrode things for obvious reasons) you have to ask yourself if the seals in your pump can handle it and so on. Water is the most commonly pumped fluid, so we're quite good with it these days.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by Migrant+Programmer · · Score: 1

      Flourinert is expensive stuff ($500/gallon). And yes, it's been tried.

      Mineral oil, too. Do some google searches, there are some interesting things to find. I know there's been a story on slashdot about the mineral oil submersion technique, but the search engine suxors.

      Aha, Google to the rescue! Mineral oil on /.

    5. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by zmooc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Water is corrosive. A small leak might not immediately be noticed but water will destroy everything on its path over the mobo if it gets the time.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    6. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Crays are submerged in a coolant (some kind of mineral oil) which is pumped through a rad.

      I also wondered about cooling the intake air, basically running water (outside the case) through a block attached to a peltier, which cools the water. Then it goes through the radiator, which is behind the intake fan. The air coming into the case is cooled a few degrees below ambient, and thus your case and CPU get a few degrees for that overclock.

      I've also wondered how much humidity affects air cooling. Water holds much more heat than 'air', and such 'moist' air holds much more heat than 'dry' air. My scheme above would likely behave as a dehumidifier of sorts, so maybe it would hurt more than help?

      All the same, I dont have the disposable cash to ghetto up my P4 rig with some goony experiment. Until then some quality low-noise fans, coupled with my Antec TruePower quiet PSU (with its variable fan-speed plugs) do the job.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    7. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That distilled water trick only works for actual distilled water too. There's enough dust on the inside of my computer such that it might conduct electricity again.

    8. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      While in the long term even distilled water is the 'universal solvent' and will take apart almost anything, that is a long. ass. time. For instance, if a cat pisses in your keyboard (happened to a VT100-AA of mine once) you can soak it in distilled water overnight, and let it dry.

      I should think it would be instructive to have some way to measure the water level in your cooling system. I would probably use an old-school water glass such as those used on steam locomotives, and of course thermal monitoring with automated shutdown, and/or cpu idling. You DO want to know if you have sprung a leak.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh.. I like the Lava Lamp idea.. very interesting.

    10. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by decaf_dude · · Score: 1

      I thought you were supposed to just spray the cat with a bit of water when it's bad, not soak it overnight...

    11. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      It also depends if there's power or not. If there's no power present, you can soak most components underwater for as long as you like without damage.

      If there's voltage present, the copper tracks will start to dissolve into the water, which is fairly bad by itself. As the water dries out the dissolved copper bridges adjacent tracks, so even a few seconds of water damage can totally ruin a board.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    12. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by alannon · · Score: 1

      Distilled water, when brought into contact with, well, just about anything (metals, for example) become conductive very, very quickly. Go ahead and soak your running computer in distilled water and see how long it remains non-conductive for.

    13. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by fgodfrey · · Score: 1

      Only two Crays have ever been submerged (the Cray 2 and the Cray T90). They are submerged in a synthetic fluid (originally designed as fake blood plasms, IIRC) called Fluorinert. The Flourinert is held at around 60 degrees by heat exchanging with chilled water. The Cray 1 and the Cray X-MP were cooled by a cold plate chilled with freon. The Y-MP, C-90, T3D, and T3E used cold plates chilled by Flourinert. The X1 uses spray-on flourinert (it gets sprayed onto the chips continuously while the machine is running). The EL series, J-90, SV1, and SuperServer all used air cooling.

      --
      Go Badgers! -- #include "std/disclaimer.h"
    14. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      60 degrees!!!!

      I thought that the point was to cool the thing!

      damn, that'd scald your skin!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    15. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by datadictator · · Score: 1

      I hear you.
      My previous system was heavilly overclocked, and ran very hot.
      The solution ?
      I took a standard desk fan (the type you use to cool yourself) mounted the box on a pair of legs, removing the bottom, and stuck the fan in there blowing upwards.
      Heat preffers the upwards route anyway, and I had a 200 RPM fan helping it out that way.

      The old Mobo ran all well and good at about 14 Deg C - in summer time, thats about 20 degrees cooler than room temperature in this country.

      Of course it was a huge noisemaker.

      A friend of mine cooled his box by mounting a radiator fan from a car to the side of it, ran at about 18 degrees, and the radiator fans have a pretty decent noise filter built in.

      So there you go. The best cooling for an overclocker (who doesn't mind some noise) is a HUGE fan powered from the outside.
      Of course I should add since I upgraded to my athlon I have not overclocked again, and cannot speak for newer cpu's.

    16. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by jaybird144 · · Score: 1

      The poster probably means 60 degrees Fahrenheit...these multiple systems of measuring things get too confusing sometimes.

    17. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Fahrenheit? Why would you do THAT? Does this person also measure depth in leagues, do you think? Is Fahrenheit an SI unit these days?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    18. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      While your method cooling probably worked, I don't think that you got the temperatures you're quouting unless you're leaving out parts.

      1. Without an AC unit or peltier, you can't really run a system below ambiant.

      2. Comparing the temperatures of two totally different computers, in different building (I'm assuming), with different cooling methods won't tell you which cooling method is better. Maybe your friend's computer produced more heat than your 'old mobo'. Maybe his computer room was hotter. Who knows. And a ~200 rpm fan wouldn't be that loud unless there's something wrong with it.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    19. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by jaybird144 · · Score: 1

      They probably use it for the same reason they use feet and pounds...because it's all they know. A lot of people in the United States can't visualize meters or degrees Celsius or kilograms...we've been too ingrained with the US measurement system, and we still have to use it every day. I'm not saying I personally like the US system, but for some of us, it's a necessary evil.

    20. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by fgodfrey · · Score: 1

      So, of course I meant Farenheit and of course you knew that. But since you wanna be pedantic, 60 degrees Celsius translates to 140 degrees F which is not hot enough to scald your skin or even come close (though it's pretty warm).

      --
      Go Badgers! -- #include "std/disclaimer.h"
    21. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by Bluetrust25 · · Score: 1

      > Secondly - eliminating (or reducing) fans not only eliminates noise, it also improves reliability. How many of us have had fans get noisier over time and eventually die on us?

      The fans on my two Athlon XP2100+ PCs sound like hair dryers. If I record my answering machine message with them on it sounds like I'm talking on a cell phone. Ack.

      Maybe water cooled is really the way to go.

    22. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by datadictator · · Score: 1

      You seem to have misunderstood me a litle.

      I was talking about the kind of fans you would use to cool your house if you live (like me) in the subtropics.
      Think 17" steel blades attached to a 100KW motor.

      And I wasn't comparing the cooling we got, just pointing out that his method also got good results.

      When the average room temperature is 35+ in a place, CPU lives are allready shortened, if you overclock them at that, you start frying eggs on the cases. Hence our severe overkill in cooling - round here, it's not really that much overkill.

      Everyday I see UPS's switches and other expensive things overheating and literally melting unless you took extreme cooling precautions - I'm talking sticking about aircon's in the cabinet for some places.

    23. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see you face if someone put your little penis in some 60 degree water.

    24. Re:Simpler, Cheaper Method... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Heh, I understood about the fan. What I apparantly misunderstood was that you were cooling to below ambient in your example. I've used a box fan as a cooler before. The larger the fan, the more efficient it is, and quieter (at least for the amount of air it moves). Trick is, without a peltier or AC system, you aren't going to get your CPU below room temperature.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  17. "Sometimes even liquid nitrogen is used. " by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, and other times they go a little nutz and use Fluorinert

    1. Re:"Sometimes even liquid nitrogen is used. " by alannon · · Score: 1

      And then they don't bother to check the material data sheet for the type of Nert they spent a good chunk of cash on, immersed dry ice in it, and had it turn into jelly. Smart. (As I understood, there ARE varieties of the stuff that can be cooled to that level without becoming viscous).

  18. I like my fan by DaHat · · Score: 1, Funny

    Heat sink and fan, such a nice and simple system, is best when you touch the heat sink wrong and can get a nice burn!

  19. I'm sure others have had this idea by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know I have. I think eventually we'll see some commercially available sealed systems that use some liquid (probably not water because of its corrosive properties) and convection to move it around.

    Something idiot proof and self contained with no mechanical parts, save perhaps a slower turning large fan to exhaust air.

    So far existing heat pipes are not much more than a novelty. The wick style ones with alcohol as a fluid (mentioned here awhile back) look promising.

    The giant skivved aluminum/copper blocks with the big ass fans aren't going to cut it, not just because of noise, but practicality.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:I'm sure others have had this idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Henry Ford successfully cooled several million model T's with convective water flow in their cooling systems. Water cooling isn't rocket science.

    2. Re:I'm sure others have had this idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least some HP 'K' series risc machines (circa mid 90's) had sealed fluid cpu cooling systems. Never opened one up to see what fluid was used.

  20. Top 5 reasons to water cool your PC by Amsterdam+Vallon · · Score: 3, Funny

    5 -- You just inherited $700 from your great-grandfather that's just waiting to be thrown out the proverbial case window

    4 -- A loud smelly watercooling kit is the perfect complement to your neon light tubes

    3 -- Why spend $200 for a brand new P4 when you can pay $500 for supplies and crank your P2 up 30 MHz?

    2 -- That rock fountain you got for Christmas can be put to a much geekier use

    1 -- To impress your classmates at Chubb Institute

    Free blogging for geeks at *nix.org

    --

    Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
    1. Re:Top 5 reasons to water cool your PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it ain't broken, don't try to fix it.

    2. Re:Top 5 reasons to water cool your PC by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      How about, you run a bunch of servers and are sick of taking them down to change fans.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:Top 5 reasons to water cool your PC by caino59 · · Score: 1

      i'm sensing sarcasm here...but i'm going to reply anyway.

      5. the last water-cooled system i did ran under 200 bucks.
      4. wasn't loud...the eheim 1250 (inside the case) was barely audible, definately wasnt smelly; i was running a closed loop, no reservoir system, even when i opened it up about 3 months later. (trick is to use something similar to anti-freeze...keeps corrosion down and nasty micro-bacteria that can cause it to stank.)
      3. uh, why not crank up that new p4 a bit(or athlonxp). the recent p4's have been quite overclockable. and think that's just a few MHz? the guys over at [H]ardOCP were able to get a *paltry* 4.44GHz out of 3.06 processor (yea, it was assited by a VapoChill unit, but it's still water cooled) with standard water-cooling alone, an increase of about 25-33% is pretty feasible
      I'd say that's a pretty decent increase...
      2. sorry to disappoint...but i dont have a rock garden.
      1. i didnt do it to impress anyone, i did it b/c having 2 quiet 120mm fans (on the radiator) and the pump was damn near silent. Far quieter than the 80mm fan i had on the alpha HS, or the 60mm ones on the alpha's in my main rig now.

      whee.

      yea, in most cases it's over-kill, some it's just absurd....
      but for those of us enthusiasts, looking to get the most out of a pc, water-cooling is definately something worth looking into.

      think of it as hot-rodding a car (i mean real rodding, not that rice crap)....some people think it's rediculous and wonder what the hell we're thinking. others just look and say "damn, that's just cool."

      if you don't like it, or appreciate it, move on.

    4. Re:Top 5 reasons to water cool your PC by anubi · · Score: 1
      Here's the problem...

      You have *many* things generating heat .. and the airflow touches all of them.

      If you water-cool, you will have to plumb all of the heat sources.

      ( I understand the Cray's were freon-cooled, that is they submerged the whole kit'n'kaboodle into a tank of freon - a nonconconductive nonionic noncorrosive fluid - to cool it. Any component radiating heat would have it absorbed by the liquid coolant a heckuva lot better than air could, but I am counting on another slashdotter to verify/confirm this. )

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    5. Re:Top 5 reasons to water cool your PC by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1

      Can somebody think of the "Top 5" ways to stop this guy doing "Top 5" posts? Please?

    6. Re:Top 5 reasons to water cool your PC by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      ... except that since I often use cases (like the S50 by Elan Vital at http://www.elanvital.com.tw/) with hot-removable fans for the drive bays (or SCA bays for SCSI drives with built-in hot-changeable fans), the only heat sinks needing touching are the power supply and CPU.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    7. Re:Top 5 reasons to water cool your PC by anubi · · Score: 1
      I was just speaking as an old analog designer. I often counted on, say, a 1-watt resistor being able to dissipate 0.6 watts easily in a biasing circuit.. but if the airflow was impeded, the resistor would overheat. Over time, with 0.6 watts (thermal) being generated in the resistor, and no transport to remove it, it was trouble waiting to happen. The resistor did not need a heat sink normally, as its body itself presented adequate surface area to the coolant stream. I'm not saying that *will* happen, but in today's cost conscious environment, don't count on things like the transformers, resistors, and maybe even inoccous things like driver transistors *not* overheating if their designer assumed there would be airflow.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    8. Re:Top 5 reasons to water cool your PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can somebody think of the "Top 5" ways to stop this guy doing "Can somebody think of the "Top 5" ways to stop this guy doing "Top 5" posts? Please?" posts? Please?

      Your asshole-licking buddy,
      Sven

    9. Re:Top 5 reasons to water cool your PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, you're on a roll today!

    10. Re:Top 5 reasons to water cool your PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why REAL servers have hot-swappable fans.
      Yes, for the CPU too.

  21. Newer processor would be more interesting by eamber · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Alright - dude did this on a K6-2 450. They're about HOW many years old now?

    I'd be much more interested to see him cooling an overclocked Athlon XP 2100+ with 1.9 vcore running at 2400 MHz - or something of the like - with the method in the article.

    Ah well, I'm happy with my good 'ol pumps and radiator, myself.

    1. Re:Newer processor would be more interesting by HFXPro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes that would be interesting. Infact, it might work even better especially if his water column was better designed with the larger processor. Larger processor = more heat = less dense water = faster rising water = more water moving to replace the warmer water. But I have nothing to back this up. But hey, Ford was able to cool the Model T with passive water cooling, so it could work. Key word is could. Don't quote me on it. Side Note - Nuclear subs now use convection cooling to end even the *quite* pump noise.

      --
      Reserved Word.
    2. Re:Newer processor would be more interesting by unitron · · Score: 1
      The question here is how much heat can be removed how quickly regardless of the processor involved. If the processor puts out x amount of heat and this setup can remove y amount of it, it should be able to do that for any processor that puts out x amount of heat. Besides, if the new processors ran any hotter than the old socket 4 waffle irons, overclocking would be far and away the prime cause of house fires.

      If you were doing this as an experiment to see if it's workable or not, wouldn't you try it out on old equipment before risking the expensive new stuff?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:Newer processor would be more interesting by Stigmata669 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Alright, maybe he didn't want to spill water on a new comp? Obvious? I guess not.

      --
      Yawn.
  22. You know...for the cost of a cooling system... by Quaoar · · Score: 3, Funny

    You could just buy a *second* computer.

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    1. Re:You know...for the cost of a cooling system... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      b8t then you need to cool both.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  23. You wanna build a quieter computer? by jsse · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You may look here

    Without the need to implement that bulky bowl of water. :)

  24. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a beow...oh, forget it.

  25. recycling? by axxackall · · Score: 1
    How about recycling? A water, being heated, can become as a steam. It's energy can be used to produce a rotation to for fan propeller. Just kidding.

    Seriously, the steam can condensate in pipes outside of PC and come back as a liquid. Just add a compressor and we've got a refrigerator. Can I keep my soda cool inside my PC?

    --

    Less is more !
    1. Re:recycling? by HFXPro · · Score: 1

      Steam? That would mean the water would have to be 100 C or 212 F. I am not sure this is a good idea, since most processors I know are only rated to a temperature of 90-95C. So if the processor is hot enough to generate steam, then its too hot to be in its acceptable levels. Obviously different chip materials and other liquids would change these figures.

      --
      Reserved Word.
    2. Re:recycling? by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      err, assuming the thing works, your not going to get any steam, my cpu a p4 2ghz, runs about 65C (with fan) way below 100 required for steam, even if it failed chances are the cpu would fail before it got hot enough for steam to be produced esp with that much water

    3. Re:recycling? by axxackall · · Score: 1

      Seems like the job for freon.

      --

      Less is more !
    4. Re:recycling? by axxackall · · Score: 1

      All right. Just keep your motherboard working in a fridge. But warn your wife to avoid placing some chicken on a top.

      --

      Less is more !
    5. Re:recycling? by anubi · · Score: 1
      Note: he may pull a vacuum on the water circuit. That will cause water to flash into steam at a lower temperature.

      Remember the old high school science class where the teacher would hook a vacuum pump to a bell jar and the beaker inside would boil when he pulled a vacuum?

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    6. Re:recycling? by HFXPro · · Score: 1

      Well you could use water by pulling a vaccuum on it. I'm not sure if we could get the water boiling low enough though for a safe range of the processor.

      --
      Reserved Word.
    7. Re:recycling? by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      thats couse a fridge keed things cold enough for water to form from the air, what this guy set up keeps the water at room temp if the guy used a pump (he does not) and the cump was fast enough the water would get colder then room temp and water would form around the pipes

    8. Re:recycling? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      so put the water/rubbing alcohol in a 18" piece of 1"x1" box aluminum, put a cap on either end (weilded), drill a hole in the side, fill it with about 1 fluid Oz of alcohol, put a tire style valve in the hole, and suck the air out until you're at about .25 atm and drop the boiling point is around 65-70C. go ahead and glue/clamp on some old heatsinks to the sides and top for the hell of it, maybe mount a neon light to the side.

      p.s. this only works in desktop systems and not tower cases. you gotta make some sacrifices for silent computing. you're sacrificing desktop space for dollars spent on more expensive means to cool the system.

      i'm tired so sorry if this came out sounding like i'm an asshole.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    9. Re:recycling? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      alcohol in everclear has a boiling point of 178 degrees, which is 19% lower than water. it also is noncorrosive and doesn't conduct electricity to the best of my knowledge.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    10. Re:recycling? by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      Could always try a *real* refrigerant.

      R11, for example boiled at about 20 degrees C, but you can't get that anymore, due to nasty ozone-depletion. However, one of the other commonly-available R's (R123 perhaps?) boils at around 30 degrees. Sounds like what's needed here, as long as room temp doesn't get above 30 so you can condense it again without too much hassle.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    11. Re:recycling? by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      From the steam tables, the boiling point of water is in about the right range (40-50C or so) at around 0.1 atmospheres. You're going to need a big pump.

      Dammit, I went into computing to escape from my chemical engineering background and it's catching up with me.

  26. I found it! by LongJohnStewartMill · · Score: 3, Funny

    What? You guys are still using water? I found The Ultimate Cooling Device: Hilary Rosen (aptly named The Ice Princess).

    1. Re:I found it! by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but w/ her sitting on your processor, she'll just nag you about downloading stuff. A water cooling system would be *much* quieter.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:I found it! by unitron · · Score: 1

      Sorry, Ms. Rosen is going to be busy running for elective office. I'm not kidding, I saw her on a talk show the other day discussing a number of issues unrelated to the RIAA. She didn't announce any intention to run for anything, but she's obviously positioning herself for a run for some office and based on what I heard and saw she's going to be a very effective candidate.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  27. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just pay up and get the processor with the cache; It's much less than these wild overclocking schemes.

  28. damn cpu makers by Squarewav · · Score: 1

    everytime there is a new inovation in cpu disign that reduces heat insted of just remaking a p4 to run cool enough to run without a fan, they crank up the clock so that its putting out even more heat then before, making water cooling required for a quiet system

    1. Re:damn cpu makers by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Actually, Intel uses the CPU technology they develop to make a CPU that runs cooler. It's called the strongarm; it runs at 200Mhz and is cool enough to keep in your pocket. They've got a faster CPU (the xscale), but it's got some problems in the current revision.

      The x86 market is still pushing for speed, but I suspect that the next generation of the cheap PC will run cool instead of being faster.

    2. Re:damn cpu makers by aderusha · · Score: 1

      there's a really easy solution to that: buy that latest shit hot processor (which has been designed to run as cool as possible), and clock it at 1/10 it's normal speed. viola', a cool cpu that's not too fast for ya...

  29. Re:Nitrogen is a GREAT coolant!-Blow on it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got it, but why can't a gas be used to cool a computer? True it's not as efficient as water, but it is safer from a safety standpoint.

  30. liquid and open cases by trmj · · Score: 4, Funny

    I leave the sides off of my computer for better air flow and less dust collection, but mainly because I'm too lazy to put in case fans.

    Since my case has to sit on top of my desk, this also gives me a little more space to put stuff (inside the case, out of the way of boards / wires etc).

    What do I keep in there? First is the reciever for my wireless keyboard / mouse, the syncing cradle for my handspring visor edge, and a few important papers. Those are the things that don't really move.

    The fun things in there are the mountain dew beer glass, the caffeine shot glass, and usually 2 - 3 open cans of dew. All have soda / caffeine in them and are actively used.

    No, nothing has spilled yet, and yes, I do have cats. 3 of them. They know that if they go near the sacred tower, they get stuff thrown at them (usually a slipper, but on occasion a t-shirt if I find that first).

    On a side note: I in no way have the balls to water-cool my case, other than replacing the cold soda every 30 minutes.

    --
    Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
    1. Re:liquid and open cases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    2. Re:liquid and open cases by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

      I keep a colony of dust bunnies inside my tower case. It was a $99 upgrade when we bought it, but I figure it'll sell for about $437.24 on eBay now--they're growing pretty big!

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

  31. And will this by josh+crawley · · Score: 1

    And will this water-cooling pump disentgrate pthe cpu pump and leak water all over that nice chip?

    Oh well. The chip was probably a DOritos..

  32. Wait a second... by jandrese · · Score: 1

    Is that a 5 1/4 floppy drive in that machine? What's he running, a 486?

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Wait a second... by HFXPro · · Score: 1

      I have a 5 1/4 drive. In fact, I still have many programs that will work even now and files that are on 5 1/4. So do not knock the old tech. It still works, he might have stuff that uses it. Deal with it.

      --
      Reserved Word.
    2. Re:Wait a second... by ShadowDrake · · Score: 1

      And is there something wrong with that?

      I'd actually be interested to see how far yesterday's chips go with today's OC techniques.

      I recall the legend that "with a really big heatsink/fan", you could run a 5x86/133 at 200MHz. With the aid of an Athlon-designed HS/Fan, I was able to boot my K6/233 at 3.5x83=292. From there, I guess the next step is to grab a Super Socket 7 board and crank it to 3.5x95.

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
    3. Re:Wait a second... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      I recall the legend that "with a really big heatsink/fan", you could run a 5x86/133 at 200MHz.

      I am not sure that is so much a legend as maybe a fact - many of the AMD 5x86/133's could be pushed to 166MHz, with little in the way of a temperature increase, and no problems with stability. I have done this to a few of them myself. I wouldn't be surprised if you could push one to 200MHz with a good heatsink and fan (though I wonder if stability would be an issue)...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  33. Obsolete? by MSBob · · Score: 1

    Well, gravity based home heating systems have been obsolete with the advent of the water pump? Why bother when it's well known that forced water flow will provide better thermal conductivity?

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
  34. Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these IN SOVIET RUSSIA.

  35. Excellent by worst_name_ever · · Score: 3, Funny

    Always good to see continuing advances being made in the field of compu-bong technology.

    --

    In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
  36. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chubb Institute.

    That was great.

    1. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eric Krout's Top 5 is going to be a nightly feature over at *nix.org. The first Top 5 there was the one about Red Hat Certs > http://starnix.org/node.php?id=39

  37. I was going to agree, but... by djupedal · · Score: 1

    I think you meant to say 'better heat dissapation'? Thermal conductivity (of water) is fixed, based on the medium, as I recall.

    1. Re:I was going to agree, but... by MSBob · · Score: 1

      You're right. The conductivity stays the same but it's the faster flow in a pump system that ensures more reliable heat transfer.

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    2. Re:I was going to agree, but... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      You're right. The conductivity stays the same but it's the faster flow in a pump system that ensures more reliable heat transfer.

      Only more reliable if the pump doesn't fail. This method has no pump to fail, making it more reliable.

  38. same heat as normal heatsink by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    I built a simpler cooler, able to dissipate the same heat flux of a normal heatsink."

    So it works as well as a regular heatsink? whats the purpose then?

  39. So? by blair1q · · Score: 1


    When do we see the first Lava Lamp mod?

  40. Re:Nitrogen is a GREAT coolant!-Blow on it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gas? Hey, that's a good idea, but we'll have to find a way to get it to flow across the chip, or better, mount a heatsink on the chip, then force some air across that sucker.

  41. What was that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry, I wasn't listening

    By the way, typical bowls of water neither exhibit nor possess 'bulk'.

    A bowl of water can, however, demonstrate: placidity; loneliness; readiness; refreshment; murkiness and of course, my favorite...non-distention pending external force or vibration. Bulk is for those things it takes a forklift to move, like my opinion :)

    1. Re:What was that? by jsse · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot.

  42. RMS Is that YOU? by arcadum · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Thanks reminding me of fixing my grandparents PC.

  43. This is how liquid cooling should be done by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The thing that should be pointed out is this is how liquid cooling should have been done from the start. The reason their not is because most if not all of the home pc case cooling systems are things slapped together by people without engineering background in such things. Good liquid cooling systems are designed like this. There should be no pump to cool your cpu. The problem is to do it right involves doing some calculations which most don't do so they just use a pump. It's not a very hard thing as you can see by the article.

    Now on a side note, if you like the idea of passive cooling loops Shuttle XPC cases now come with them. They use very similar ideas. You have liquid in a tube, when it vaporizes it rises to the upper radiator where it condenses and a fan carries the heat away and the water returns to the cpu side of the loop. Not sure if it vaporizes or just gets hot to move up the tube, really just a matter of effectiveness. It does a good job in lowering cpu fan noise. Unfortenly the noise of the PSU is very high in these things, or at least my SN41g2, though i belive the P4's have same PSU. The need the same thing on the PSU as the cpu. Also the "heat pipe" is a work of art.

    1. Re:This is how liquid cooling should be done by Animats · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Shuttle XPC breadbox-sized machine does that. I have one on my desk. The plumbing is a permanently sealed rigid all-metal system. It's a nice little piece of engineering. Works fine.

    2. Re:This is how liquid cooling should be done by Technician · · Score: 1

      I think it uses the liquid gas phase change to carry the heat. This allows the heat to be carried the distance to the radiator without the high temprature diffrence needed to create a convection flow. The unit uses a set of heat pipes, not a loop with a warm side and a cold return side typical of a convection loop.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:This is how liquid cooling should be done by Mangelwulf · · Score: 1

      I've been contemplating buying the SN41G2 myself, any comments on the experience? Trying to stay in topic,what would happen if you put a peltier cooler on the heat pipe? Does anyone know the thermal properties of the liquid in the tubes?

    4. Re:This is how liquid cooling should be done by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

      I like the computer, it looks great and the construction is top notch. To put it togther involves some nerves do to size, but you can manage. I don't think a pltzer would help you. Shuttle warns not to put anything like a fan or heatsink on the heat pipe by the cpu or you will mess up the cooling. The fan at the top is also a case fan that pulls air through the case, so it must stay. It's the PSU fan that is the problem. I don't know of any fix asside from ripping it out and making an external one. Actully just thinking about it, if one could get a quiet P4 PSU and make a box for it and make some long power leads for it you could have something. A peltzer may work for the nvidia chipset, it has a small one. Though i would thing a big heat sink could alow for it's removal but i don't think it make much noise.

  44. Re:Nitrogen is a GREAT coolant!-Blow on it. by SUB7IME · · Score: 1

    I forgot that water was so much more dangerous than nitrogen gas! Remind me to stay away from that glass of water next time I'm thirsty. (J/K, I understand your point). From a physical point of view, for equal volumes of gas and water, there will be many more particles in the _water_ phase. This will allow much more heat to be contained within the water phase, and the water should be a much better heat-absorbing substance than any gas.

  45. efficiency by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Sure, heat convection flows, but your efficiency goes way up if you have an active flow. Same principle with hot water heating. They used to not have pumps to circulate the water - because it worked - but it's more efficient to have a pump.

    1. Re:efficiency by La+Temperanza · · Score: 1

      Does that have anything to do with why it always takes ten minutes to get any actually hot water when I turn on the tap?

      --

      --
      est modus in rebus
    2. Re:efficiency by purrpurrpussy · · Score: 1

      Yuup... almost.

      Efficient is a highly subjective term! Whilst it may be more efficient in terms of heat removal it may not be more efficient in terms of price/performance or indeed in terms of maintenance. Any mechanical system can break down but there is far less chance that a purely passive heat pumping system will break. This seriously hits price/performance if the failure of the pump causes your CPU to melt!

      --
      "None of this shit works" -W.Shatner
  46. Re:Nitrogen is a GREAT coolant!-Blow on it. by AsbestosRush · · Score: 1
    True it's not as efficient as water, but it is safer from a safety standpoint.

    And the department of redundancy department strikes again.
    --
    EveryDNS. Use it. It works.
    AC's need not reply
  47. I've never understood why... by rmdyer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...the motherboard manufacturers just don't put the processors on the back side of the motherboards.

    Think about it. If the processor and other heat generating chips were on the reverse side you could mount the motherboard in such a way as to press against the large metal backside of your case cabinet. The case cabinet could be designed in such a way as to have indentations that force the processor flat against the case with heat sink gel. In fact the entire case back could be a water-cooled heat sink. This would keep the inside of the case "water-free".

    Sure, this would take a radical new case design and motherboard (another industry standard), but that seems to be where we are headed right? I mean processors are getting hotter and Intel and AMD are trying to figure out what to do.

    Why not?

    BTW, I think it has something to do with the fact that the motherboard components are all wave soldered on one side. This would melt most plastic components on that side. I'm not sure about this.

    1. Re:I've never understood why... by StressedEd · · Score: 3, Interesting
      force the processor flat against the case with heat sink gel


      A nice idea in principle, but cases are there to protect the components inside. If you go physically attaching the components to the case, all you have to do is knock the case and end up stressing the CPU die.


      That said however, I agree some sort of more "holistic" approach could be wise.

      --
      Be nice to people on the way up. You will meet them again on your way down!
    2. Re:I've never understood why... by brightertimes · · Score: 1

      rmdyer, thats a pretty good idea actually. Or they could have an extention lead of somesort with the processor on the end so it could be moved away from the same motherboard or something. I think you should patient it now m8 ;)

    3. Re:I've never understood why... by stienman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm glad you're not too sure about this. Since wave soldering requires getting the metal bits (pins, copper traces, etc) up to soldering temperature for the soldering process to actually work it doesn't matter where the plastic is if it touches metal that needs to be soldered.

      Typicially medium temperature plastics can easily handle the 300-500 F temperatures needed for soldering. The problem with mounting the socket on the backside is that you'd have to solder the opposite side of the board, and the socket would have to be covered so the wave soldering process wouldn't force solder into the socket holes.

      Since the chipset is often BGA (Ball Grid Array), and many components are surface mount and require a seperate process anyway (usually infrared heating, sometimes oven heating) then the extra soldering isn't that much of an issue, nor is the protective cover over the socket. Rerouting the board backwards would be a pain though, and since it'd essentially require new case designs and could cause burns if not properly vented...

      Well, there really isn't a *good* reason to go to that amount of trouble for what appears to be a very small market of people who would trade $200 - $300 for a passive heatsink on the outside case. (define very small as < 5 million units sold worldwide)

      -Adam

    4. Re:I've never understood why... by Bishop · · Score: 1

      It would be a pain in the ass (read expensive) to manufacture. Single sided boards are easier to make, which results in fewer defects, which drives costs down. To put the cpu holder on the opposite side would probably require a new socket design, or that the socket be hand soldered. The manufactureing technique generally does not allow for pin through hole components on both sides of the board.

  48. Re:This is how liquid cooling should be done-Two. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggested awhile back. Might have to rearrange things a bit, but it's doable, and could even be stylish. No sense having the liquid that close, and one could cool some other items.

  49. Re:This is how liquid cooling should be done-Two. by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 1

    well many computer heat issues could be helped if both sides of the mobo was used.

  50. Watercooled PC available here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  51. Heating as well by mphase · · Score: 1

    Hmm insteresting, I think I'll try adapting my old method of heating a room over to heating water. A cluster of overlocked chips might even replace my water heater...hmm...

  52. Seen this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Water Cooled PCs? Try Notebook. Water cooled processor powered notebook has been on sale in Japan for almost a year by Hitachi. Whisper quiet operation. Running Pentium 4 2.2Ghz http://www.hitachi.co.jp/Prod/comp/OSD/pc/flora/pr od/note/flora270wnw4/index.html Pics of the innards http://ascii24.com/news/i/topi/article/2002/02/28/ images/images677847.jpg On display http://ascii24.com/news/i/keyp/article/2002/03/02/ images/images678064.jpg

    1. Re:Seen this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which one was it that cooked the weenie?

  53. Re:No moving parts by Technician · · Score: 1

    A stirling engine has no moving parts? That's news to me. I followed your link to the sterling engine page and cliped the specs.

    Specifications:

    Height: 9.7" (24.6 cm.)
    Diameter: 6.5" (16.5 cm.)
    Weight: 1 lb. 3.3 oz. (547 g.)
    Temperature differential required: 18 degrees F (10 degrees C).
    Precision Ball Bearings: 4.
    Piston Material: Graphite.
    Power Cylinder Material: Borosilicate Glass.
    Flywheel Material: Acrylic.
    Metal Parts: Anodized Aluminum and Steel.

    Rotational Speed: Approximately 150 rpm (speed depends on temperature differential, barometric pressure, and other factors) When running on your warm hand, the engine will run faster in cold rooms, slower in warm room, and not at all in very hot rooms.

    I just don't get the 150 RPM and ball bearing portions of the specification if there are no moving parts. ;-)

    On a serious note, the sterling engine requires a larger temprature diffrential than most people want to have with their cooling solution.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  54. Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Propert by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nah... I'd use transformer oil, and I don't think a Lipton Cup-a-Soup would taste quite the same.

    Transformer oil, however, is probably quite suitable for use in a CPU cooling system.

    It has a higher breakdown voltage than air and is almost infinitely less conductive than real-world (ie. impure) water. Transformer oils are specifically designed for use as an insulating material in large power distribution transformers. Electric utility transformers at power substations, operating in the range of hundreds of thousands of volts, would arc between windings if the oil leaked out of them and air - with its lower breakdown voltage - seeped in. (Air breaks down at about 3kV per millimeter.) You can feel pretty confident that leaked oil won't short out IC pins on your motherboard. Hell, you could also ditch your power supply fan and fill that full of oil, too - just beware of relays and other mechanical components.

    Heat transfer is a big reason for oil, too. In a car engine, much of the heat is generated by friction in the bearings, and motor oil pumped through the bearings takes that heat away. Transformer oil doesn't have to lubricate, nor does it have to carry away huge amounts of impurities or combustion by-products as in a car engine - the biggest requirements are heat carrying capability and high breakdown voltage. Large pole pigs (pole-mounted power transformers) are usually oil-filled and often have pipes coming from the bottom and going to the top - they serve as radiators. Oil flow is not by pump, the reliability would be too low - they're convective, too.

    Finally, viscosity. Yes, this might be difficult, but transformer oils are available in a variety of thicknesses. You want a viscosity corresponding to SAE 0, which is the same as water. Even less might be available, though I've personally never seen it.

    Density changes with temperature rise will have to be considered, since the lower density of hot liquids causes them to rise in the system (and is also the physics behind lava lamps). The system that guy designed is based on the density changes of water. Transformer oil won't behave the same way; accordingly, you'll have to whip out the old slide-rule and do some math. Calculus is your friend. Fortunately, the data on transformer oil should be readily available, it's an important design criteria.

    Voltesso and Diala are good trade names which I've personally used in transformers loaded to hundreds of kilowatts at over 250,000V, at RF frequencies. (FAA obstruction lights on large VLF radio transmitting towers.) They're ALL PCB-free, and while you don't want to drink it, they're no more toxic than motor oil. And it takes a hell of a lot of work to make them catch fire.

    In short, transformer oils are available in a variety of viscosities, are specifically engineered for their thermal transfer capabilities, are not electrically conductive, not dangerous, and are suitable for almost all of your electronic cooling needs.

    The only problem I forsee is that you're gonna have a hard time buying them in quantities less than 45-gallon drums... though the drum would make a great passive radiator. Seriously, talk to a couple of linesmen with your local power utility, maybe you'll be able to talk your way into a couple of gallons of it.

    And once that's done across all the machines in your compile farm, you can get to work tackling the big problems of why Linux isn't ready for the desktop yet.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  55. Re:Nitrogen is a GREAT coolant!-Blow on it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Temperature is the average motion of molecules, not the number of molecules. Bearing away heat is really a matter of a temperature gradient. Different fluids have different heat transfer functions - it's true that it's typically higher for a liquid, but not always. So it's not just the number of molecules, it's the way they bump into each other, which is all about their structure. There are liquids which are very good insulators.

  56. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That was a very informative post, does anyone know if motor oil is conductive, I would think that a quart of 5W20 or another light oil would flow pretty well through a small submersable pump. My favorite transformer oil story was from a local Utility guy who came to our school years ago. He asked us if we ever wanted to shoot the transformers with our pellet guns, and then told us that he used to want to as a kid, but that it would be a bad idea since the oil would leak and the transformer would fail possibly explosivly.
    What I found funny was that I don't think a single person had ever thought about shooting a transformer until he mentioned it, and the fact that they could explode might be something that would encourage young boys to shoot one with their pellet gun.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  57. I live in wisconsin by codepunk · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is about -12 deg outside at the moment. Why do this when I can just put my machine outside my window. You guys in California have to resort to something like this? Time to move....

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:I live in wisconsin by raynet · · Score: 1

      Come to Finland, just a month ago we had -42deg outside :)

      --
      - Raynet --> .
  58. specs don't always explain mechanical principal :) by williwilli · · Score: 1

    A stirling engine has no moving parts? That's news to me. I followed your link to the sterling engine page and cliped the specs...... I just don't get the 150 RPM and ball bearing portions of the specification if there are no moving parts. ;-)

    that's because that particular application of the stirling engine is trying to get mechanical energy out of it. (IANAME (mechanical engineer)) but as I understand it a pure stirling engine, essentially an external combustion engine, has no moving parts. Only the expansion and contraction of a gas medium inside the engine causes its motion. I'm not sure they would be any kind of solution because I think you would have to get the 'hot' end of the engine hotter than the cpu you are trying to cool, but then that may be an easier place to work with the thermal energy dissipation issues than the CPU itself. But if you are trying to use the engine for the purpose of thermal energy control, as this would be, the engine itself would have no moving parts.

    the engines available at the link provided in the parent are pretty small, intended primarily for educational and entertainment purposes as opposed to real work, I just figured there are some links there to real information on how the stirling engine actually works. they are kind of intersting..taking a bit of time to get up to speed (perhaps another issue in their use for this particular application) but as I was saying they are supposed to be fairly efficient. I'm not sure how this is different than a peltier unit, though.

    lots of free music downloads! earth2willi.com

  59. cool! by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    I hope this can be implemented for modern PCs soon. the fans on modern PCs are the single most dangerously unreliable parts of the PC -- when it goes, the PC dies a slow and painful death. Not everyone has the know-how to clean these fans sporatically, and even among computer people, the knowlege to lubricate fans manually is a rarity. I'd really like to see systems like this, which rely on natural forces, and are less prone to mechanical failure, used instead of high-RPM dust magnets used in heatsinks today.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  60. Very old technology by panurge · · Score: 1
    If you ever go to a farm show you may see the people who restore old industrial engines. These things used to drive small farm generators, milk pumps, air pumps and the like. They were almost all water cooled by convection, and the smaller ones did not have radiators (so called) but just had a tank of water on top which was allowed to boil off slowly and be replaced from time to time. Exactly the same as this cooler method. The benefit was, in fact, generally increased longevity and reliability, provided that the ports in the jacket and the head were properly designed to prevent dead spaces where the slow convective flow did not circulate.

    I saw one guy once using one of these to cook his lunch, using a pan in the water tank as a water bath to heat soup, and they can also get water to the boiling point to make tea. However, and computer system which gets water to the boiling point is not likely to be terribly effective (unless we go back to tube technology, of course)

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  61. Apples and ... oranges? by shoppa · · Score: 1
    I built a simpler cooler, able to dissipate the same heat flux of a normal heatsink

    No, that's not what you did. The cooler you built was substantially more complex than a normal heatsink+fan. It was more expensive in materials, took more time for you to make, and required you to make more mods to your case.

    It might have been quieter, though :-)

    1. Re:Apples and ... oranges? by Amroarer · · Score: 1

      Agreed, it wasn't simpler than a regular heatsink and fan arrangement.

      I suspect he meant 'simpler than a forced convection cooler' though.

  62. Re:You wanna ...MOD THIS UP by geeklawyer · · Score: 1

    seriously useful links

    --
    -he who laughs last, is a bit slow.
    journal
  63. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    While probably not as high a dielectric as transformer oil, refrigeration oil is designed to have the coils of operating compressor motors submerged in it. There are three types of refrigeration oil- mineral, alkybenzene, and polyolester. All three are available in quarts and gallons in various weights. Mineral will be least expensive.

  64. Boiling Water Cooling by schimmi · · Score: 1

    It may be a good idea to reduce the presure in the Water System to reduce the temperature to boil the Water. This may result in a much improved efficency if done the right way (The Steam has to go up from the top of the heatsink all the way to the top of the radiator, the Water has to be allowed to flow down from the bootom of the radiator to the bottom of the heatsink)

  65. Nuclear reaction? by dirtyhank · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I guess Intel meant the surface of the Sun. This outer layer (photosphere) has a temperature of 6000C aprox. Yeah, it's damn hot but quite below from the 15000000C of the core (where the nuclear reactions take place).

    Molten lava temperature is ~1000C so only 5000C to go :-)

  66. Cooling CPU by Cintentions · · Score: 1

    Why don't you just build a CPU that cannot heat up at all ?

    Grear Idea eh?

  67. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by TheLink · · Score: 1

    I dunno, and even if someone did the motor oil they used would probably be different from yours.

    So the best way is to check it yourself - stick a multimeter and measure the resistance. Given that most stuff on a motherboard is low voltage I wouldn't be overbothered by resistance-voltage properties of the oil.

    --
  68. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    simple multimeter tests don't just cut it, unless it can measure the 'hit through'(sorry, my english sucks and i don't know the proper word) capabilities of the substance.

    water would make a fine insulator unless the 'hit through'(amount of voltage differential needed for the electricity to jump/hit like lighting through something) was small(and no, i'm not an electricity-engineer).

    anyways, this kind of cooling has been done(submerging the whole mobo in something), couple of times. one guy used some biograde mineral oil succesfully.

    theres at least one no-pump commercial solution too for liquid cooling, but it has a fan on the radiator.

    though, in my opinion, getting rid of the pump doesn't bring you anything 'extra' since the pump makes next to zero noise, and noise damping the pump from environment is easy too. the real problem lies in how to get the water to keep cool without having extra fans(heatload on it gets quite big if you have cpu, gfx-card, chipset, psu, hd's and etc watercooled for silence). the bowl of that size that's in the article won't cut it.

    and really, k6-2 could be cooled enough with just about any lump of metal compared to the 76w+ modern cpu's.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  69. Forced circulation for geeks by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
    If I remember my chemical engineering degree properly, forced circulation gives a higher Nusselt number (fluid engineers love their dimensionless groups) due to higher turbulence, which reduces the effect of the fluid insulating itself. More stuff here.

    Water is a very bad conductor of heat without good convection - you can boil water in the top half of a test tube while ice is happily sitting at the bottom - wrapped in gauze to make it sink, obviously.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Forced circulation for geeks by MSBob · · Score: 1

      OK. Given what you said why are gravity based systems considered too ineffective to use nowadays? I'm not being cocky just curious about the dissonance....

      --
      Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
    2. Re:Forced circulation for geeks by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
      If we're talking about central heating, it's mainly because gravity based systems require much larger diameter pipes; there is no pump pushing the water around the circuit, so water would hardly flow if there was any appreciable resistance.

      Some old gravity systems you see in churches and schools have cast iron pipes 2 or 3 inches in diameter. A pumped system can use 8mm OD "microbore" copper pipe, although 15mm is more common.

      Smaller pipes are cheaper, and can be more easily run between walls and floors, especially if being retro-fitted. There is also some reduction in heat losses from the pipe itself (the radiators are supposed to do the heating!).

      The electricity cost of adding a pump is quite modest. Of course, a pumped system means you have no heating in the event of a power outage, but then most modern boilers are also dependent on electricity (spark ignition and fanned flues).

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  70. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by ozbird · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why not take in one step further and install a CPU-powered lava lamp? It's the next logical step from AOpen's valve amplifier motherboards.

  71. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by Albinoman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember posting in a car forum after doing some research. Oils are very BAD.

    Thermal contuctivity for water is .6W/mK (bout halfway down the page)
    The oil I found was from some company called Slovnaft out of Slovakia (the only one I could find that would provide details). But their oil that is specifically meant for moving heat has a thermal conductivity of .13W/mK.

    Another thing I might point out is if youve ever got motor oil on your hands youll notice it feels warmer than water of the same temperature. It doesnt carry heat away like water will.

  72. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by GothicManSlut · · Score: 1

    Alas, Olive Oil burns less calories ;)

  73. Pi by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

    pi = 3.14

    Oh, thanks for clearing that up. Didn't they rule that pi=3?

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  74. Simple multimeter tests will cut it. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Unless you're dealing with things in the kilovolt range, you won't be reaching the field strength needed for breakdown of the material. (I can't remember the exact term, it's not "hit-through", and it's not "breakdown voltage" either since what matters is the field strength (in volts/meter) rather than the pure voltage.

    The problem with water is that even small amounts of impurities cause it to conduct. Pure water has a pretty low conductivity and a high breakdown field strength, but even a tiny amount of impurities will change that.

    MOST if not all oils you're likely to use in a computer are going to have much higher breakdown potentials than air. What matters is whether they're conductive or not (Most aren't)

    If you use motor oil, two things:
    a) Get the lowest weight possible.
    b) Don't get a multigrade oil. (Denoted in the form nW-m, for example 10W-40) These oils are designed to increase their viscosity as temperature increases. (To provide good protection at high temperatures while not being total sludge that prevents an engine from moving at low temps)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  75. Haven't I read this story before? by swinginSwingler · · Score: 1
    This story was interesting the first 3-4 times I read it. I'd like to propose a ban on new "Hey look what I did" water cooled stories. Below is a partial list of "water cooled" stories that have appeared here on /. in the past

    water cooled power supply
    Water Cooling Made Easy
    Some water cooled case
    A guide to water cooling
    Yrt another DIY Guide
    On OTS water cooled...
    Another water cooled Power Supply
    Fish tanks says it all...
    Another water cooled story..
    When physicists do water cooling...
    Hmmm let me guess... another water cooled story
    The original?

  76. K.I.S.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I built a simpler cooler, able to dissipate the same heat flux of a normal heatsink.

    Doesn't this strike everyone as pointless?

  77. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by hughk · · Score: 1

    The term you are looking for is the electrical breakdown voltage. Oils for transformers are off in the multi-KV range.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  78. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2, Informative

    if youve ever got motor oil on your hands youll notice it feels warmer than water of the same temperature. It doesnt carry heat away like water will.

    True, but water is about a zillion times more evaporative than oil, so if you get any water on you, especially if it's warmer than body temp, it's already evaporating and thus feels cooler than warm oil would.

    If you have ever got your hands wet in the winter time, you'll notice that it literally sucks the heat right out of your hand because the relative humidity in winter is usually very low and it doesn't take much to make the water on your hands start evaporating. If you got cold oil on your hands (at the same temperature as the cold water) it won't feel nearly as cold as it's not evaporating. It will pull enough heat out of your hands to reach thermal equilibrium and then stop.

    If you have ever splashed hot water on yourself, you'll notice that even if you get burned, the inital 'hot' part of it is over with almost immediately. Hot oil on the other continues to feel hot and will continue to burn you much longer.

    In an enclosed system where there is no evaporation, the difference won't be nearly as great.

    Has anyone ever built a water-cooled PC that uses an external fountain as a radiator? Obviously you would want it far enough away from the PC so as to prevent splashing, but I think one of those little zen rock fountains would make an interesting and relaxing radiator, as long as you remembered to keep adding water... :-)

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  79. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by kiatoa · · Score: 1

    Nah... I'd use transformer oil, and I don't think a Lipton Cup-a-Soup would taste quite the same.

    Transformer oil, however, is probably quite suitable for use in a CPU cooling system.


    I've been considering just dipping the whole computer in a vat of oil. Should work fine (at least for awhile). Of course the disk drives would be external to the vat. Now if I could just get 10 or 15 litres of fluorinert (sp?) - that would be very cool (pun not really intended). Dead silence in the computer room. Wow.

    --
    90% of the wealth is in 2% of the pockets. Bummer to be in the majority.
  80. Other fresh water tricks by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Water (even distilled) is probably bad news if it comes in contact with active powered-on circuitry. Enough stuff will dissolve in the water on contact to make it conduct.

    Powered-off circuitry is a different story. Salt water will corrode anything FAST. (This is why designing marine electronics is such a pain.) Tap water and distilled water won't corrode stuff nearly as fast - i.e. the occasional soaking followed by a good drying-off won't damage the equipment at all.

    I've heard that this was used sometimes in the Navy - If a piece of equipment was accidentally splashed on by salt water, they'd take it into the showers (Not distilled, but much fresher than seawater) to rinse out the corrosive saltwater and then put it into a warm dry place to dry out.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  81. Simple - Complex != Genious by PSL · · Score: 1

    I built a simpler cooler, able to dissipate the same heat flux of a normal heatsink."

    So you built something more complex than something simple and it only works as well as the simple item? I hardly say that is worth mentioning.

    Stay in the shallow end.

    --

    "Times may change, but standards must remain the same." - George Carlin.
  82. Others have had this idea by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, Jon "Maddog" Hall was speaking at Cornell. The local LUG treated him to lunch before his presentation, and he told us about a phase-change convective heating attempt Digital once tried. It was to cool a CPU that was half CMOS half ECL. (ECL is VERY fast logic, but it's known for being a horrendous power hog, far worse than even TTL).

    The problem was that the system would promptly stop working and the CPU would melt if it were tilted too far.

    As to heat pipes - They are FAR more than a novelty. Look at Shuttle's small form factor systems. If you consider those to be a novelty, look at any recent Dell laptop. I know for a fact that the Inspiron 8x00 (8000,8100,8200) series use heatpipes for cooling the CPU. These use wicks and hence function even when the heat source is above the radiator.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  83. Notebook manufacturers have. by hughk · · Score: 1
    So far existing heat pipes are not much more than a novelty.
    On notebooks, heatpipes are very common and have been for many years now. They are also in use on some of the 'brick' PCs. The problem is that the subassemblies in a are too close, so you have to move the heat to another area which you can then cool with the fan.

    The longer a heat pipe is, the less efficient it is and it only moves heat, so you still need somewhere to dump it, whether convection, conduction or radiation.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  84. Interesting paralllel by onthefenceman · · Score: 1

    This discussion is an interesting parallel to a letter that appeared in last month's Cycle World magazine about air vs. liquid cooling in motorcycles.

    The main advantage put forth for liquid cooling over air cooling in motorcycles is the ability to route the cooling water directly to the components that need it most rather than hoping that some of the fast-moving air makes it to the cooling fins of an air-cooled machine. The situation in CPUs is arguably worse because you have to artificially generate the fast-moving air that is readily available in a moving vehicle.

    It seems to me that by building water jackets for CPUs you are already missing out on a great deal of theoretical efficiency available from water cooling, which would be to design the chip with cooling passages built in. Most of the projects I have seen are pretty similar to this - low budget efforts that obviously wouldn't take chip design into account.

    I did a brief search and wasn't able to find much beyond these types of projects. Does anyone know details about projects out there that involve liquid cooling from the start?

    --
    Have you seen my stapler?
  85. It won't work in Zero-G by luzrek · · Score: 1

    Damn it, now we are restricting our computing to Earth's (or other planets' surfaces). Convective cooling doesn't work without gravity.

    --

    Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

  86. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by Giggles+Of+Doom · · Score: 1

    You may also want to try mineral oil. I have it running in my rig and it works pretty well. Its a bit easier to come by, as you can get it at your local big-name farm supply store. Only problem is that, being oil, once it gets on something its really hard to clean off.

    --
    "A coward dies a thousand deaths, the brave but one."
  87. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by Carnivore · · Score: 1

    A less hard-core alternative would be mineral oil. Cheap, easy to get in smallish quantities, and I've seen it used in this way (on slashdot, even.)

    It doesn't have the same properties as transfomer oils, but they may not be obtainable.

  88. Urine instead of water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a waste, people need to conserve water. They should be using urine instead of water.

  89. Case mod! by phorm · · Score: 1

    someday we might have the CPU mounted at the bottom of our case, and have a cool lava-lamp looking effect running up the side wall

    This indeed does sound like quite and awesome idea for a case mod. The only problem I see is that on my lava lamp... the glass itself gets hot - so what's the actual internal temperature of the lamp fluid (does it draw off enough heat or just retain it?)

  90. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by tuxhead · · Score: 1

    It has indeed been done (sort of) ... http://www.overclockers.com/tips699/index.asp

  91. people keep talking about steam/phase change by dunedan · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm crazy but if your processor is vaporizing water doesn't that mean that its running at 100 deg celcius?

    Isn't that a slightly less desireable temperature for your CPU to run at?

    1. Re:people keep talking about steam/phase change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Maybe I'm crazy but if your processor is vaporizing water doesn't that mean that its running at 100 deg celcius?

      Only if you're at atmospheric pressure. If you're dealing with a sealed system, reducing the air pressure reduces the boiling point of liquids. Like those notes in recipes that mention different baking times for different altitudes.

      Or, have you ever seen one of those hand-boilers? They've got a near vacuum inside along with a fluid (water? alcohol?). The warmth from your hand is enough to make the liquid bubble.

  92. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Transformer Oil! Make sure you get the stuff with PCPs.

  93. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

    Cool! I was thinking of using one of those little desktop ones, but this guy went one step further!

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  94. Improved flow in one easy step by frostfreek · · Score: 1

    The picture shown indicates the cold-input pipe is almost at the same level as the hot-output pipe.

    I would tend to believe the flow past the CPU could be improved simply by making the cold-input pipe longer, making it loop down a bit lower before connecting to the CPU hat. This might produce a slight boost in gravity/convection.

    A piece of insulation between the tubes would eliminate any pre-heating of the input water, as well, if the selected tubes are not good insulators.
    Jamie.

  95. Re:Transformer Oil - Warning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Transformer oil is a powerful cancer agent. Be careful to NOT touch or smell too much of it.

  96. Shuttle does that already by redshield3 · · Score: 1

    Seem to recall that Shuttle uses convective cooling in their mini system's heatsinks... i'd have to check though.

  97. Mouse piss... by SirTreveyan · · Score: 1

    You can try wiping that card down with a moist paper towel. More than likely the mineral salts in the mouse urine is shorting out the card. Unless you have a very cheap card, the mineral salts should be strictly on the surface.

    --

    SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0

    0 rows returned

    1. Re:Mouse piss... by On+Lawn · · Score: 1


      Actually I tried automotive electrical parts cleaner, to no avail.

  98. Re:Transformer Oil - Electrical & Thermal Prop by Albinoman · · Score: 1

    Im sure both answers are right. I only say this from removing my engine in cold weather. Of course you have to drain all the coolant and motor oil. Youre obviously right about the humidity levels affecting it.

    The hot fluid splashing on you was one I was going to use. I was going to say that the oil likely burns longer because it insulated much better.

    The only instance that I could think of that would be a more closed system (albeit not very scientific) would be to have bucket of cold water and cold oil. Stick your hand in and learn. I dont have that much old motor oil around so count me out.