Slashdot Mirror


Prentice Hall To Publish Open Content Licensed Books

lma writes "Bruce Perens has convinced Prentice Hall to publish a series of books under an Open Source license. The 'Bruce Perens' Open Source Series' will be available first as hardcopy in bookstores, and the Open Source text will be available electronically a few months later. Prentice Hall is counting on people buying the books even though the electronic version will be freely available later. I like the model, since I prefer to read paper, but like the electronic version for reference."

239 comments

  1. I'll buy the books. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be the one amount the first to buy the books.

  2. My prediction... by Anand_S · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Microsoft Press will be pissed about this. "Open Source books will be the death of the industry!"

    1. Re:My prediction... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Let's give them a run for their money :-) To do that, we need to make this a big bookshelf. Want to write something? I need authors. It won't make you rich, but it will do good for both you and the world.

      Thanks

      Bruce

    2. Re:My prediction... by EvanED · · Score: 2

      What topics are you looking for? I'm not saying that I'll write anything; I don't think I'd have the skill. (I'm a freshmen (though officially entering my 4th semester; thanks AP credits!) going for simultaneous BS and MS/ME in comp sci at Penn State's honors program.) That said, I have toyed with the idea of doing an intro to C++ web site (because 70 gabollion isn't quite a big enough number) in a pseudo-book form. No sane person would actually want to use this as even a base for something to publish (not only because the quality of the work but because several section headings are stolen from C++ for Dummies), but I'm willing to put it up in the internet if you'd like to see it. That is, IF I can find it; I just did a search of the hard drive in my main computer with no hits.

    3. Re:My prediction... by packeteer · · Score: 2

      I can't write a good book. I know i can't and im ok with that but i WOULD like to support this. I am going to buy the books that interest me AND get the electronic data. Nobody will convince me books can be totally replaced with anything but i really like the ability to search an entire text for a certain string. I may not make you authors rich but i know i wont go broke giving you what support i can.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    4. Re:My prediction... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Mostly I am looking for user or developer documentation for Free Software. I would hope that I'll get some of the software authors, but I recognize that many of them would rather code. Note also that writing a book does not make you wealthy (me neither). It doesn't pay as well as consulting. On the other hand, if you aren't working anyway... The benefit of writing a book is that you are valued more as an employee, consultant, or scholar. You know the cliche: He wrote the book about it!

      Bruce

    5. Re:My prediction... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I own the HardCover and the CDROM for Design Patterns. They were both worth the money. If more books come out in e-text form, I will be supporting them. Go Bruce.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:My prediction... by AuMatar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's to hoping you read this- would it be possible to put a list of subjects that need doing (not an exclusive list, but a list of things that would make good additions) on a website? I'm sure a lot of people would be glad to contribute, but have no idea where to start, or what would be accepted for publication.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    7. Re:My prediction... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative
      I did a list a while back, and it turned out that my authors are more in touch with new stuff than I am. For example, I think I might have mentioned intrusion detection, but didn't put Snort on the list. I would rather that you think about what you have invested your time in, and what special areas you can contribute to. Is there an area you currently have expertise in where the rest of the world would profit from a brain-dump?

      Thanks

      Bruce

    8. Re:My prediction... by AntiFreeze · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, what kind of range in books are you looking for?

      Are you just looking for thicker technical manuals, or are you considering expanding some HOWTOs into books form, writing and expanding better and more detailed man and info pages, teaching certain tools from scratch, putting together cohesive references for the open source developer, or other documents like that?

      Some of these really need to be written. But as part of your series? What areas do you want to see covered, what areas do you think have been covered enough, and what areas do you think should be left to O'Reilley?

      Or to go backwards, there's one area I feel O'Reilley is extremely poor in: development with multiple tools. I'm not talking lex and yacc, but rather (off the top of my head) perl and C, or pyhton and shell scripts. They have "perl for sysadmins" and pocket references, but no good books on how to use separate tools well together. The closest they come to discussing the use of separate tools together (from what I've read, and I may be completely missing a section of their books) are their books on web CGI programming.

      If there were a good book out there on, say, how to use perl and python together to write text-intensive apps with killer object models, I'd buy it in a second. My point is, there are a lot of tools out there, and I think there just aren't good books out there on how to use the tools together -- each tools seems to be encased in its own book with very spartan references to how to use it with other tools. This can be fixed, easily. I think books bridging tools together could do very well.

      So what do you want to get written?

      --

      ---
      "Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller

    9. Re:My prediction... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 5, Informative
      What you need to do is put the electronic version online before or concurrently with the print version. See the Baen Free Library, Baen Webscriptions, and the Honor Harrington CD-ROM (now hosted on-line in its entirety by express permission of Jim Baen).

      And see this quote from Jim Baen, on the Baen Bar:
      Baen has experienced a mysterious 50% increase in gross dollar sales in the previous year. Also, our "sellthrough" (percentage of books placed in the market that sell to end-point customers) has improved from the rather startling 63% to the truly stunning 74%. I'm tentatively blamiing this on my wacko e-net proclivities. (Insert a Crazy Eddie ad pastiche here)
      There's every sign that having the books available for free or cheap on-line has done nothing but good for the sale of print books by Baen. It might do the same for you.
      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    10. Re:My prediction... by Micah · · Score: 2

      Bruce,

      In addition to the question on which topics you are looking for, I'd also ask what the qualifications would be for writing a book. I did fairly well in grammar classes, and I have written tutorials before (and was praised for them). I run a sole-proprietor consulting company, but things are slow so I might be interested in this if I can come up with a reasonable topic.

      Thanks!

    11. Re:My prediction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if there are books published under open source
      that means that we can copy the book modify it a little bit and it wont be considered plagerisim?
      oh cool
      oh wait my english teacher still wont like that eather
      oh well

    12. Re:My prediction... by ctrimble · · Score: 2
      You're ignoring the difference between technical books and recreational books.

      Recreational books are cheap and pleasure-oriented. They're also end-to-end. With any one of the Baen books, you outlay about six bucks and you've got 15-30 hours of reading pleasure ahead of you. Generally speaking, the book isn't random-access. You need to read the whole thing to derive pleasure from it (or, at least, pleasure is maximised by reading the entire book in sequential order).

      Technical books are expensive and solution-oriented and (generally) random-access. For example, maybe you work for a company that stores a bunch of information in a database that's shared across divisions. You're getting sick of being unable to make changes to the schema because everyone in the company is touching your data. You decide to wrap the whole thing up in a web service and allow people to access the database that way. So, you buy O'Reilly's web services book, learn a bit about SOAP, install Tomcat, and expose your data through a web services interface. Now, if the O'Reilly WS book were on line, you'd probably go in, look up the stuff you need, print out the appropriate pages, and write your interface. Once the job is done, you wouldn't go down to B&N and buy a copy of the book for your bookshelf.

      So, what you're comparing is a cheap book that needs to be entirely consumed versus an expensive book that can be used in small portions. For that reason, I don't think that you can generalise and say that because sci-fi sells well even when available for free, then the same relationship holds for technical books.

    13. Re:My prediction... by Greedo · · Score: 2

      Not to sound greedy or anything, but how "not rich" will it make authors?

      i.e. What would the author of an Open Source Book expect to make, compared to what a traditional publisher might pay?

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    14. Re:My prediction... by HiThere · · Score: 2

      You might look at the Pragmatic Programmers. Their book on Ruby isn't exactly open source, but it's freely available on the web. And I don't think it's hurt their sales any. (In fact, I believe that every serious Ruby programmer owns at least one published copy.)

      The licensing issue is important here, of course. Making a work easily available but requiring a special reader would limit you a lot, unless the special reader was freely adaptable and distributable.

      The books that this will work well with are the ones that actually provide value. Think about this when someone asks you to pay for a pig in a poke. When "Trust me, it's good" first started, it worked because the merchants were ... if not honorable, at least accustomed to working in public view. As time passed, however, certain sharpies noticed that you couldn't tell the quality of the merchandise until long after you had paid for it. So if corners were shaved, the customers probably wouldn't easily make the back connection to who had conned them. But it was a cheaper distribution model, so "pre-packaged" was sold as desireable, and the packages switched from being inspectable to having plastic windows to having printed images of the contents. And the images began to have less and less to do with the contents. But it was the images that were being sold.

      So... eventually, a reaction created "open" products. Whole grains. Open source. Now "open books". But these need distribution and sales models that can compete with the deceptive models. Not easy, and Prentice Hall is to be congratulated for attempting it. May they have great success!

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    15. Re:My prediction... by HiThere · · Score: 2

      FWIW:
      I use the Ruby book from Practical Programmers. It's freely available on the web, but I'm waiting for the updated print edition, as my first one is nearly worn out.

      The value to me of the print edition was much enhanced by haveing a web edition. I tend to use them in complementary ways. (Well, of course there's overlap, but not as much as you might expect.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    16. Re:My prediction... by Erore · · Score: 1

      It all depends upon how well the book sells of course.

      That said, I can speak with great inside knowledge, and tell you that a poorly performing booking will get you about 3-6k before taxes in a year. An average performer will get you about 9k-14k. Anything above that is doing suprisingly well.

      There are authors who make well over 20k per book on certain titles. If you want to make a living at it, you will need to have about 3 books in rotation during the year, with at least one of them being a great performer.

    17. Re:My prediction... by ctrimble · · Score: 2

      That's true. One of the factors why the ruby book sells in print, though, is because there's a lack of good Ruby books. However, let's say there was a better ruby book that wasn't available on the web. I'd bet that you would buy the better book, but still use the free version for your online needs -- grepping, cutting-n-pasting, etc. Given competition, the only way the free online version will sell print copies is if it's the best.

    18. Re:My prediction... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      You need to be able to show good writing samples, and keep to your schedule. We don't check your academic qualifications.

      Bruce

    19. Re:My prediction... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      5000 copies is a good run for a technical book. 20000 is a smash hit. I think you might make about $8 each, but don't hold me to that. I make $1. This really small number of copies is one reason I think Open Source won't hurt.

      Thanks

      Bruce

    20. Re:My prediction... by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 3, Informative
      What you need to do is put the electronic version online before or concurrently with the print version. See the Baen Free Library...

      I love the Baen Free Library (BFL), but I think you're misrepresenting the results. By and large the books in the BFL were placed online after the print version. In most cases, significantly after, long after the print version is selling only handfuls of copies. In this case, yes, there is strong evidence that a free online version can boost print sales. The BFL doesn't publish stuff in new release specifically because of concerns of gutting sales. Mind you, the BFL's concern doesn't mean that the free release will gut sales, just that they're not willing to be the one to do the experiment at the risk of sales.

      Relatedly, I encourage everyone to visit Baen Free Library, if only "Prime Palaver" articles in which the person manging the library discusses the plan and the actual results. It's very enlightening.

    21. Re:My prediction... by Erore · · Score: 1

      5k copies is a poor run for a technical book.

      A publisher like Pearson has many divisions, some of which compete against each other. Inside each division they might release several titles that on the same subject that compete with each other. They are throwing a lot at the wall and seeing what sticks. These titles also compete with titles from the other divisions of Pearson. So, at any given moment Pearson might have 9 books on Linux System Administration in print, all competing with each other. This is why Pearson publishing groups think 5k is a good run for a technical book.

      compare this to O'Reilly which prints only one title per subject (their failing is that they divide subjects into very small bits sometimes). If you are the author of Running Linux, you are not competing with any other books from O'Reilly for that subject matter. Thus, you get to sell 40k plus copies per edition.

      If you think you can write the definitive work on the subject, O'Reilly is the place to be published. If you think your book idea is pretty much an also ran, then you might as well publish with a Pearson group, because it won't matter to your sales one bit.

    22. Re:My prediction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now can someone tell me where the copyright statement is concerning the books available for download at "baen.com"?

      If there is no such statement the books aren't free
      for distribution in most legal systems. No license/copyright notice means most user rights are reseved by default.

      JoshZ

    23. Re:My prediction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered publishing as open source rather the just open content? Including, e.g., DocBook, on the CD-ROM would make it easier to extend.

      FWIW, I would not object to a license that required sending you a copy of any changes that I distributed.

  3. Novel Concept, But Not the First by CBNobi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bruce Eckel's been releasing his programming books electronically for the past few years. (Not sure of its licensing, however)

    This is probably one of the first cases of a publisher supporting this, however.

    1. Re:Novel Concept, But Not the First by Sky+Lemon · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm not familiar with Perens; could you at least site some specific examples of his 'fucking moron' nature? What do you dislike him so? How can someone be a jerk through their books on technical stuff (except for Stephen Wolfram who is clinically insane)?

    2. Re:Novel Concept, But Not the First by Sky+Lemon · · Score: 1

      I believe 'Open Starch Press' releases some open source books. Also those books with the black shiny covers... 'Orilios' I think may be the publisher.. and whoever published the first book on using Gimp (sorry for my vagueness)...

    3. Re:Novel Concept, But Not the First by Anand_S · · Score: 1

      "Novel Concept." Nice pun.

    4. Re:Novel Concept, But Not the First by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Eckel is to be commended for his bravery, and generosity in doing this.

      I own the printed versions of his Thinking in C++ & Java books, and keep the HTML versions at home & office.

      It would be nice if ORA did this more often, instead of leasing access to electronic copies through Safari.

      --
      Huh?
    5. Re:Novel Concept, But Not the First by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative
      I'm not claiming to be the first. Go look at Creative Commons for a list of people who got there before me. But Prentice is the world's largest technical book publisher and that's important. They have done individual titles under the OPL before, but never a series.

      Thanks

      Bruce

    6. Re:Novel Concept, But Not the First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.creativecommons.org/

    7. Re:Novel Concept, But Not the First by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here is a list of all the publishers I know of that are involved in print-publishing free books. If anyone knows of more, let me know!

    8. Re:Novel Concept, But Not the First by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Informative
      I believe 'Open Starch Press' releases some open source books.
      Do you mean No Starch Press? I poked around their web site briefly, but couldn't find anything but a book that had one free chapter. Do you know of any of their titles in particular that are free?

      and whoever published the first book on using Gimp
      Yes, Grokking the Gimp is published by New Riders. They have quite a few free books in their catalog. Some of them are really good (e.g., Grokking the Gimp), while others have, mmm, shall we say... low production values :-)

      Also those books with the black shiny covers... 'Orilios' I think may be the publisher
      You mean Coriolis? Do you know of any of their titles that are free?

    9. Re:Novel Concept, But Not the First by packeteer · · Score: 2

      There are other people who learn from a paper copy and then get the electronic version to be able to search and use as a reference.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    10. Re:Novel Concept, But Not the First by Erore · · Score: 1

      It's a little sad that you decided to go with Prentice/Pearson. As you point out, they are the largest, as such, it's kinda like you are supporting the Microsoft of the publishing world.

      Did you approach anyone else with this idea? O'Reilly for instance? They have done OPL before.

    11. Re:Novel Concept, But Not the First by skribble · · Score: 1

      Why in the world does it matter? Wouldn't the world be a better place if Microsoft OpenSourced it's code? or would you complain and say."Why do this with Microsoft? shouldn't you do it with some other company instead?"... I mean what's the logic there?

      BTW I work in publishing (Pearson Yes/ Prentice No) and most publishers will allow an author to publish the book freely/electronically *if* the author asks up front to do this.

      --Happy New Year!

      --
      --- Nothing To See Here ---
    12. Re:Novel Concept, But Not the First by Sky+Lemon · · Score: 0

      Sorry for all my technical innacuracies! Yes you are right about all that... As for Coriolis, I know at least their publishing of the Linux kernel source is of course, open source ;-), and I thought I've seen some logo or other on at least some of their books saying that the book is open source. No Starch Press... yeah... I don't know I just thought I saw some. In any case open books are being and have been (at least for a short while) published by various tech publishers. Of course any GNU documentation (which they do sell in SoftPro book stores at least) are of course, open source. If anyone has or can point to a compiled list of free (and recent) open books I would be delighted. Thanks, -Sky Lemon

  4. Well... by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2

    I read Using Perl 5 for Web Programming AND later dl'd the CD of it I must say the open source thingy works great with books.

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  5. Assuming the quality of the titles... by Nutrimentia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    this may prove to be a defining moment in the battle of copyright control. If these books sell, and continue to sell after the electronic copy is available, it will add some serious weight to the argument that digital availability of information precludes sales and marketability.

    I'm a bit surprised they are publishing in hardcover instead of a Sam's/O'Reilley/etc sturdy paperback though.

    1. Re:Assuming the quality of the titles... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's a soft cover. Pretty much like every other technical book these days. I haven't tested the binding for durability, but I'd hope these folks have that down by now.

      Thanks

      Bruce

    2. Re:Assuming the quality of the titles... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Knuth is in hardcovers. So is Tannenbaum, Jolitz and Jolitz, and most of the Prentice-Hall books on my shelf that are really important. Granted Schneier and all the O'Reilly books are softcover, but so are all those disposable Windows books (any book with the version number in it's title is a disposable book).

  6. Nice title by tmark · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I were less cynical, I might think that naming the series *after himself* wasn't *just* an ego-stroking maneuver, aimed at garnering maximum publicity. Please, someone inside Prentice-Hall tell me it was their idea to come up with that goofy series name and not Perens' - after all, we all know Perens seems to like to keep his name out of the press...

    1. Re:Nice title by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      yes, it is a name created by P-H:

      Why did Prentice Hall go with me? I guess they think I have "Open Source credibility". They named the book series after me - it's "Bruce Perens' Open Source Series". I suppose they're trying to make me into the Peter Norton of Linux :-)

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:Nice title by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative
      I sincerely did not ask for it to be named after me. That's Prentice's idea, and they need my name there to differentiate them from any other Open Source line that someone else does. I find it a bit embarassing, but will live with it for the good of making books that are Open Source licensed.

      Actually, it has created tremendous difficulty for me. I have to get all of the doors widened in my home now, so that I can get my head through them :-)

      Bruce

    3. Re:Nice title by djcapelis · · Score: 1

      Such hardship, lol. Way to go.

      --
      I touch computers in naughty places
    4. Re:Nice title by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      Could be worse. The series could be called the "GNU/Open Source Series."

    5. Re:Nice title by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Richard will be annoyed. But then I've done a few things to piss him off lately. I hope he will be somewhat consoled by the fact that the books are free software.

      Bruce

    6. Re:Nice title by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      I think I once even read Stallman sniping at O'Reilly for publishing all the important Unix books (i.e. the X11 series). They 'removed the itch' for people to write the free books that RMS would have preferred. That said, I am pretty sure the GNU Emacs Manual on my bookshelf (mine is Sixth Edition, Version 18 March 1987) costs money. Yep, the order form in the back says I can order it for $10. And the GNU Emacs source on 1600bpi industry standard magnetic tape in tar format for $150. But that's from the June 1988 price list. Prices may have changed. ;)

  7. Finally, I don't have to... by jmuzic1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    lug all my books home every day. I can see it now..."Open source may provide treatment for back pain"

    1. Re:Finally, I don't have to... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
      Note that Prentice Hall PTR is the technical book, not text book division.

      Bruce

    2. Re:Finally, I don't have to... by Zigg · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but I still had several tech books in my bag going home every day from the ISP where I used to work.

    3. Re:Finally, I don't have to... by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

      Note that Prentice Hall PTR is the technical book, not text book division.

      Yeah! And we all know that technical books don't weigh anything, right?

      Oh, ehm, hang on...

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
  8. Oreilly / MySQL Reference Manual by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 4, Informative

    >>This is a tremendous departure for a mainstream publisher.

    ORA has done this already with a MySQL book. At the time of publication no less.

    Granted, it's the printed version of the electronic reference manual. But it IS an open source book. I think they're calling it O'Reilly Community press.

    Additionally, ORA open sources some of their out of prints.

    --
    Huh?
    1. Re:Oreilly / MySQL Reference Manual by Katalyzt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes, I assume the logic behind keeping the source closed for a few months is that it will FORCE people to buy the book if they really want it. The secondary assumption is that no one will buy it if it is open. Both assumptions are FLAWED IMNSHO.

      Ah well, perhaps one day they'll have the guts to go the whole mile and start REAL open publishing by printing on demand the latest version of the book. Being first in the market with all the tools and support would be a great advantage, maybe they'll get IT one day.

      --
      version 0.0002
    2. Re:Oreilly / MySQL Reference Manual by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I don't want to diminish O'Reilly's efforts, they did the original Open Sources book mostly in Open Source, and a number of others, and some other publishers have as well (about my favorite is the Ruby book). But Prentice Hall is the largest technical book publisher in the world.

      Thanks

      Bruce

    3. Re:Oreilly / MySQL Reference Manual by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
      The assumptions are not necessarily flawed, they just may not apply to 100% of the people. We want to make some money. We're willing to experiment.

      This series is in retail stores. I appreciate that demand publishing can do great things, but it's more of a mail-order phenomenon until it gets inexpensive enough to put the unit in a vending machine. And will that change things!

      Bruce

    4. Re:Oreilly / MySQL Reference Manual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have also released a book on mozilla under the same license. View it online here http://books.mozdev.org/

    5. Re:Oreilly / MySQL Reference Manual by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2

      Bruce,

      I'm honored that you've responded to my comment.

      Please don't think in any way that I'm trying to detract or slam your new project. I happen to think that Open Source in all forms, from all sources is a great thing.

      I wish you the best of luck.

      --
      Huh?
    6. Re:Oreilly / MySQL Reference Manual by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Please don't think in any way that I'm trying to detract or slam your new project.

      Of course not. The goal here is to get good documentation into Open Source, which is something we have had a problem with so far. The more of it, the better, wherever it comes from.

      And you don't have to be "honored", I'm just a fat old guy who posts on Slashdot.

      Thanks

      Bruce

    7. Re:Oreilly / MySQL Reference Manual by Spoticus · · Score: 1

      I'm just a fat old guy who posts on Slashdot.

      Heh... you're not the only one :P

    8. Re:Oreilly / MySQL Reference Manual by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2
      I was suprised nobody has mentioned this, but 'Linux Device Drivers' and several other current, important O'Reilly books are published under the GNU Documentation Liscense. I posted somthing like this post in todays /. O'Reilly anniversery post.

      I think it's a great model, because I, and almost anyone I know, will pay to have an important book in hardcopy.

      Kudos to O'Reilly and Prentice Hall for having the guts to do this, and to the authors also.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    9. Re:Oreilly / MySQL Reference Manual by mccoma · · Score: 2, Insightful
      just giving the link...

      "Programming Ruby" (aka "The Pickaxe Book") by David Thomas and Andrew Hunt Addison-Wesley Oct 2000 ISBN: 0201710897 is available online, download, or purchase.

      If you like the online edition, buy the book so the authors can do a second edition. I am sure this goes the same for Mr. Perens' new line of books.

  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. Good thing I'm not in charge of PR though! by Nutrimentia · · Score: 1

    Considering that I intended to say adds weight AGAINST the argument that the availability of free digital content precludes sales.

    What I was trying to say is that if this stuff sells, especially after the electronic versions are out, it would refute those who argue that easily accessible free versions of commercial goods damages their sales.

    As much as I would like to see this succeed, I suspect that many people and most libraries would just print and bind their own copy for a fraction of the cost of a hardcover ($49!). Good things for libraries and students though, for sure.

    1. Re:Good thing I'm not in charge of PR though! by jbolden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How would they do that. 1000 pages at $.04 / page = $40. Throw in binding costs, plus the disadvantage of lower quality... And I'll tell most libraries aren't getting $.04 a page after equipment, labor, consumables.

      Its very hard to beat the economics of a webpress.

    2. Re:Good thing I'm not in charge of PR though! by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Per-page cost may be a little lower than that. I usually pick up computerish titles at Costco or Sam's Club, where they go for about half of cover price, and I doubt if anyone is taking a loss along the way. The average 800 page brick thus goes for somewhere around $25. IIRC the hardcover of Upgrading & Repairing PCs (1530 pages plus a CDROM) was $29 at Sam's Club, tho the cover price is $55.

      I both buy hardcopy and download ebooks, largely depending on what I happened to trip over, but the end result is that I'm likely to wind up with both ebook and treebook of most titles. An ebook can encourage me to buy a hardcopy, or other titles from the same publisher, but it won't *prevent* me from buying hardcopy. Ebooks are great for searching and for extracting quotes, but nothing beats hardcopy for multiple bookmarks, margin notes, and for flipping between several sections at once.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  11. Amen to that! by rindeee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I will ALWAYS buy good 'ole ink and pulp as I much prefer reading them. For reference I much prefer the searchability and rapid access of electronic (and the ability to carry a bunch of them on my handheld). I have gone so far as to "un-bind" some of my favorites, scan them and OCR/index them so that I can search them electronically. Then I have to go buy another copy to replace the one I destroyed. No more! I say hurray for this. Now I just hope these books don't suck.

    1. Re:Amen to that! by HiThere · · Score: 2

      The electronic searches are great... if you know how to say what you're looking for. But it's hard to beat books for looking for things that you can't quite remember, not just for reading. If you remember that the thing you're looking for was somehow related to keys, or perhaps files, then no standard search engine will help you. Especially if you think that you would recognize a diagram that was near what you are looking for. So you flip through the pages in sections that look reasonable. Much faster!

      OTOH, if you know the word, and it isn't too common, then grep (or it's analogs) is the tool. And I've often wished for a local version of Google that ran over only my local hard disk. Sort of like locate, only with a bit more logic.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. Perens' vs Safari by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How does this stack up with Safari?

    Safari has a wider access (I assume Perens' line of books will take a while to reach their "ransom" target and be released openly) but which is the more useful? Safari's "Pay money, download all the ebooks we let you eat, right now" approach, or Perens' "Don't pay money, download and mess with the books all you want, but be prepared to wait"?

    1. Re:Perens' vs Safari by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'd position the current paradigm we are using in these terms:

      These are paper books just like all of the other paper books in the book store. We pay the authors the same, we wholesale them the same, and you pay for them the same. They happen to be under a license that lets you shove them in the copier with impunity. A bit later, not too long, you get nice clean electronic "source code". People who don't want to pay for the book could use it, but we don't think there really are a ton of them. The license is a real plus to the author, as the books need never die even if the publisher loses interest, and there is no fight about electronic rights as authors are having with most publishers. We might be able to do second editions a bit more often, if we get enough community help.

    2. Re:Perens' vs Safari by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I think I like this new model quite well. If I'm in a raving hurry to acquire a title, I can do so immediately; if it's something of marginal interest that I might not normally buy, I can wait for the ebook.. which I might then decide I like well enough that I want hardcopy too, or maybe it will set me to looking forward to the next similar title.

      Aside from the obvious opengoodness of free ebooks, it's cheap advertising for future hardcopy publications on the same subjects or by the same authors. Everybody happy!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Perens' vs Safari by Hellkitten · · Score: 2

      A bit later, not too long, you get nice clean electronic "source code".

      You really should try tro release at least a few of the books electronically at once, and compare the sales numbers to those released a few months after the paper copies

      I, and I expect others, like to download a book if possible, read part of it to verify that it's good, and then get the paper brick. I don't like to buy a book I haven't had a chance to look at, and most of the time I can't. (since the local bookstores don't have many computer books and I'll have to order specifically)

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
    4. Re:Perens' vs Safari by Choron · · Score: 1

      Safari's approach is not to let you download all the ebooks you want, at least not easily. You cannot download them automatically (and it's forbidden by the license to use a fetching tool), which makes the task annoying at best.

      --
      "Naughty, naughty, naughty, you filthy old soomka !"
  14. why do I suspect by SHEENmaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    that when it finally comes out, months after the book, it will be in a clunky format such as pdf rather than something like sgml that we can convert to linked html or plain text as we desire.

    cat ebook.txt | grep explorer | grep bug | less to get all the paragraphs relating to the latest explorer bug.

    For an ebook format, I want something parsable and convertabl; pdf meets neither requirement.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:why do I suspect by ocelotbob · · Score: 1
      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    2. Re:why do I suspect by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It will be in an editable format. We would like your changes for the second edition, after all. Unfortunately, they are still operating a .doc file shop there at Prentice. But we have OpenOffice, which can turn .doc files into its own XML format, as well as several other open formats. I have had no problem using OpenOffice to read the books.

      Bruce

    3. Re:why do I suspect by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Please ask them to use some other format. There are plenty of others that are doable. Likewise, above you avoided the discussion on topics. Please get that going to see how ppl react here.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:why do I suspect by Isofarro · · Score: 2
      But we have OpenOffice, which can turn .doc files into its own XML format


      I don't know what OpenOffice XML format is, but hopefully its something like DocBook (or richer).

      What would be great is having books in a consistent XML format (not just HTML or XHTML). That way its possible to build a customisable portal containing the snippets out of a book that are most relevant to a particular user (Almost like cutting part of a page out of a book - none of this bookmarking an entire chapter, just the relevant paragraph). A combination of XML format, XPointer and a Portal framework can produce something a bit more flexible.

      Dumping an entire book into a freely available electronic format is very useful. But having the availability to request a paragraph or two out of a chapter is another advantageous lever.

    5. Re:why do I suspect by stephenbooth · · Score: 2

      Given that every text I've seen on XML seems to use XMLing a book as at least one of the examples I don't think there's exactly a shortage of candidate schema designs.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
  15. Open Source? by Quaoar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does that mean I get to rewrite who won the civil war in my history book? SCORE!

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    1. Re:Open Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      begs the question

      what if i modified it and spread it out without indicating it was modified? is that illegal under gpl ;P

    2. Re:Open Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If so, then I get to write about how the US detonated a nuclear device inside Osama's cave on October 11th 2001.

    3. Re:Open Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      civil war? is that a new game?

    4. Re:Open Source? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
      I think the best example of how this is handled is Wikipedia. That project is AWESOME! They have written a whole darned encyclopedia as Free Software (under the GNU FDL), the level of scholarship is high, and it is coming up a lot on google of late because their page ranking is now very high. This means it is answering questions for a lot of "real" people, not just Free Software developers :-).

      They seem to have a meta-discussion process for handling argument, but I haven't looked very deeply into it. They get stuff done.

      Bruce

    5. Re:Open Source? by Micah · · Score: 2

      I was wanting to do something like that with travel guides -- i.e. a Lonely Planet type guide under an open content license, with all the data stored as XML so it could be regenerated in any way desired. Unfortunately I never got much interest in it, but if people want to run with it it's not too late...

    6. Re:Open Source? by Isofarro · · Score: 2
      I think the best example of how this is handled is Wikipedia


      Wikis thrive and are successful because of the peer-review nature of the content. Every page of a wiki is generally editable by anyone. I've contributed one or two articles to Wikipedia, and found the community especially friendly and generous. Wiki content tends to be text-based.

      But if a "wiki-like" front end is written that can store and retrieve in an XML format (Bruce mentions the XML format used by OpenOffice), then it will be a useful updating / annotation window, whilst always having the "live" XML document open to readers.

      Wikis have version control as a standard feature, so undoing bad changes is possible.

      I experimented some time ago with a wiki (hacking Usemod wiki) that could produce DocBook output - apart from the lack of wiki-isms to adequately express DocBook Type structures, it is technically a feasible option.
  16. Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Good for Bruce Perens, at least.

    He doesn't write them, he doesn't publish them, he just takes a piece of the action, and gives himself some more publicity.

    Listen, it's hard enough to succeed as an author. Works that aren't publishable still won't be published - believe me, reducing the earning lifespan of the books with make Prentice Hall more selective, not less - and even those authors that do get published will lose royalties to pay Perens.

    If you want to write and then give it away, you don't need this Perens to do that. And if you are good enough to get published, don't give Perens any of your hard-earned money.

  17. Copyleft is important. by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I run a web site that catalogs free books (see my sig), and I've seen many many cases where books are originally free for downloading, but then the author's web site mysteriously disappears, and your only option is to buy the print version. This is exactly the sort of thing that gave Richard Stallman conniptions and led to the GPL for software: the idea that software could go from being free to being unfree. In fact, I see it as a much bigger problem for books than for software.

    Too bad there doesn't seem to be any information about what the license is, or what editable form they'll be available in. He does refer to the possibility that profs could edit it and make their own versions.

    1. Re:Copyleft is important. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
      Open Publication License 1.0 with no options taken. It passes the Open Source Definition in that form. OSI will not certify the license because it is actually 4 separate licenses, depending on which of those boxes you check, and only one of them is an Open Source license. I'll try to get an OSI-certified license in place for later works. OSI has really only done one so far that is for text rather than software.

      Thanks

      Bruce

  18. Linux Device Drivers (O'Reilly), 2nd Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Linux Device Drivers (O'Reilly), 2nd Edition is also available online at
    http://www.xml.com/ldd/chapter/book/index.html

  19. Electonic version GOOD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'cause you can't grep dead trees.

  20. Linux Device Drivers, 2nd Edition is available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux Device Drivers, 2nd Edition from O'Reilly is available online at
    http://www.xml.com/ldd/chapter/book/index.html

  21. _Text Processing in Python_ almost under model by Lulu+of+the+Lotus-Ea · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have recently completed a book for Addison-Wesley. Well, almost completed--it needs to make it through copyediting and indexing still, which will probably (unfortunately) mean several more months until it is printed.

    One thing that I did--with permission of my publisher--is make the text of the book completely available during writing, and it will remain so into the future. Shameless plug, you can find it at http://gnosis.cx/TPiP/. I cannot say honestly that being allowed to provide it this way was a deciding issue in choosing a publisher; but it certainly does make me feel better about writing the book.

    Admittedly, this is not quite the same thing as an OpenContent license. You are free to read the book at the URL listed, and print yourself a personal copy. But the book is under copyright, and you cannot reproduce and sell the text yourself. Still, I believe it is a step in the right direction... maybe my next book will manage to go a step farther.

    Yours, David...

    1. Re:_Text Processing in Python_ almost under model by bcrowell · · Score: 1
      I'm glad to hear that you're intending to keep the book free-as-in-beer indefinitely -- although it's cool that AW has had quite a few free-as-in-beer titles, I've also seen quite a few cases where the digital version's web site has mysteriously disappeared after the paper version was published by AW.

      Text Processing in Python is available for reviewing here

    2. Re:_Text Processing in Python_ almost under model by AndyMouse+GoHard · · Score: 1

      "I have recently completed a book for Addison-Wesley. Well, almost completed..."

      You could have edited your own post, removing the necessity of having to correct yourself in the second sentence.

      Now, I'll sit back and wait for edits of my post;) Sorry, in a funny mood.

      Bill

      --
      Upon seeing the box was too small, Schrodinger's Elephant breathed a sigh of relief.
    3. Re:_Text Processing in Python_ almost under model by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      Shameless plug, you can find it at http://gnosis.cx/TPiP/.

      Am I the only one who doesn't click on any ".cx" links these days? gnosis.cx...... gnosecx? Wha?

    4. Re:_Text Processing in Python_ almost under model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to feel guilty about it, David.

  22. Astronomy by ShoeHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The group my faculty advisor is in, here at Caltech, has already done this; I wouldn't be surprised if other universities have done it as well. His group published an astronomy textbook under the GPL (!). Readers are allowed to distribute, read, print, and edit the book, and even sell their revisions.

    !: I think this is just incredibly lame--a textbook?? under the GPL?? Sounds to me they're just in there for buzzwords. Surely there's a better way to describe the rights you want to give away / keep. Oh well...

    1. Re:Astronomy by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
      Please be sure to register the book with Creative Commons. I know that there's a Debian Astronomy package set, besides the ham radio package set which has a lot of satellite stuff. Lots of people can use it.

      Thanks

      Bruce

    2. Re:Astronomy by bcrowell · · Score: 2

      Hey, give us a link!! Where can we find the book?

  23. People still read books? by AshsZ · · Score: 0

    1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 seconds.. *sigh*

    1. Re:People still read books? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Those of us who cannot afford LCDs and who do not like eye strain, yes.

      That and you know how freakin hard it is to find even a splash resistant wireless color LCD with high DPI a small convent lightweight form factor and excellent battery life (exceeding 12 hours, preferably with some sort of rechargeable battery of course)?

      Well until those DO come along and are DIRT cheap, I will stick with books. :)

  24. This is perfect by RainbowSix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Take for example my paper copy of The Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy. I've read that thing probably a dozen times. A beautiful work of art. But, there is always that time when I want to find a quote for my website or to have a laugh with someone. That is when the text files are essential.

    I know I'll be buying more books when I know I can search through them, because not every book I've read has been easily locatable scans on my favorite ftp sites :)

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
    1. Re:This is perfect by Len · · Score: 1
      Take for example my paper copy of The Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy. I've read that thing probably a dozen times. A beautiful work of art. But,
      I was expecting:
      there is always that time when I just know I could have written a sentence better than Douglas Adams. That is when the Open Source license is essential.
    2. Re:This is perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is an electronic version of the Hitchhikers' Guide To The Galaxy here: http://www.h2g2.com/. It's rather good!

    3. Re:This is perfect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Take for example my paper copy of The
      > Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy. I've read
      > that thing probably a dozen times. A beautiful
      > work of art.

      I have the feeling that your reading background
      does not include anything much apart from THGttG. This book is certainly amusing and entertaining, full of charm and wit; but it is otherwise trivial and shallow, and I very much doubt that it can be described as a beautiful work of art.

      Beautiful works of art are things like Shakespeare's MacBeth and Cervantes's Don Quixote, to name two very well known ones. THGttG is a long, long way below.

      The average Slashdotter would do well to try and read other than the standard trivialities like this book or the infamous Lord of the Rings trilogy. For his or her own education.

  25. Paper pricing by MrWa · · Score: 1
    It will be interesting to see how much of an effect this has on sales but, more importantly, what will this do to pricing of the hardcover books?

    A lot of computer books are already quite expensive and I can see them becoming even more expensive with this model - the lost sales revenue is going to be made up somewhere, right?

    Also, what is the exposure going to be? I highly doubt B&N is going to be placing a link next to these titles saying "Oh, by the way, you can download this $60 book for free right here...but please buy it from us anyway." Will information about obtaining a softcopy be prominent in the books? What format are the books going to be released in - text, Acrobat?

    1. Re:Paper pricing by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Funny
      Anyone in the know about Open Source will understand that the books are free text when they see my name.

      The copyright page says it's OPL licensed, although there is a bug in the copyright page which I will fix in the electronic version, because someone didn't understand the OPL when putting together the copyright page. It goes to the trouble to say that you can use it under the OPL, and then after that says "no copying". Duh!

      Bruce

    2. Re:Paper pricing by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 2

      A lot of computer books are already quite expensive and I can see them becoming even more expensive with this model - the lost sales revenue is going to be made up somewhere, right?

      Actually, it is quite possible that online availability can increase sales revenue. Most writers are caught in a catch-22. They can't sell books without a reputation and they can't get a reputation unless people buy their books. The ability to "try before you buy" has offers an oportunity to expand the market. I know that I never make a book purchase without reading the introduction, index, and a key chapter in its entirety (thank goodness for bookstores with coffee shops.)

      I suppose that cost is a matter of comparison. I spent $60 last year creating a low-quality bound copy of a class reading packet of $40 pages.

    3. Re:Paper pricing by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Also, if a title has poor hardcopy sales but good e-circulation, maybe it was because no one knew what to expect ... so perhaps an updated edition would sell, because by then everyone would know it was worthwhile.

      If updated editions didn't sell, I wouldn't have 4 different deadtree editions of Upgrading & Repairing PCs (plus whatever are on the included CDs).. not to mention that I'll pick up another one in the next edition or so.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:Paper pricing by QQ2 · · Score: 1

      I think i speak on behave of a lot of us when i say, thnx Bruce.
      Now lets hope it works out as planned and shows that OPL can work for books

      -QQ2

    5. Re:Paper pricing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow nice little bug there i'm sure management up stairs was awfully upset at that one.

  26. I can modify this for what I want by SHEENmaster · · Score: 2

    or at the very least remove all the foo formatting crap. None of that is necessary or essential to the document!

    Thx for the link, I'll check into it when I get the time.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  27. forget extrans by SHEENmaster · · Score: 2

    <s pan class="ft0">foo</span></nobr></div>

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  28. Re:Proof reading! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
    Dan Gilmore pointed that out to me, and we are getting after Barnes and Noble about it. Somebody must be typing really fast! We think it might have happened at the wholesaler, who sends data batches to the bookstores.

    Bruce

  29. A first class publisher by Synn · · Score: 2

    Baen books has supported free novels for a while now, see http://www.baen.com/library/

    Their idea is that the more people read "free" novels, the more likely they are to purchase novels from the same author in the future.

  30. This will work for technical titles by Da+VinMan · · Score: 2

    How do I know? Because it worked for Bruce Eckel. Is there really a debate about it?

    The question now is: will it work for all different genres of books. I suspect we'll see some lines drawn in the sand where high margin entertainment titles are concerned.

    Also, we'll probably see a rash of lawsuits or lobbying by the textbook industry to help them maintain the monopoly they have. After all, we wouldn't want continually improving and affordable materials to fall into the hands of our students. Oh! The horror!

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
    1. Re:This will work for technical titles by EvanED · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >>Also, we'll probably see a rash of lawsuits or lobbying by the textbook industry to help them maintain the monopoly they have. After all, we wouldn't want continually improving and affordable materials to fall into the hands of our students. Oh! The horror!

      Really. It's my first year, second semester (well, that's misleading; officially it's my fourth, so I'm taking higher level stuff than your typical second semester person) at Penn State and I'll be paying ~$450 for ALL USED books. Outrageous, especially considering that tuition+room&board+fees for me is little over $1000/semester.

    2. Re:This will work for technical titles by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Informative

      You might find this thread about purchasing used textbooks from England at a substantial savings to be helpful:

      Tip on buying textbooks...

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:This will work for technical titles by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      But technical titles are a good start, and one of the more useful areas for electronic books anyway. I can't count the number of times I've wished I could do a full-text search on one of my technical reference books instead of clunkily looking through the index. This is useful for some other areas (philosophy in particular), but not so much for things like fiction books.

    4. Re:This will work for technical titles by nmg · · Score: 1

      Also, we'll probably see a rash of lawsuits or lobbying by the textbook industry to help them maintain the monopoly they have.

      I don't think that word means what you think it means.

    5. Re:This will work for technical titles by ctrimble · · Score: 2
      The reason it worked for Bruce Eckel is because he is an extremely talented writer/teacher who invests considerable time into his writing. He has chosen a career as a educational consultant and by ensuring that his books are the highest quality possible helps provide him with consulting gigs.

      The thing about having a book available for free in addition to a dead-trees version is that it requires your book to be the best. If your book is merely useful, people will just download it. If you're going to sell it, you need to demonstrate utility far beyond what someone would get from simply downloading it.

    6. Re:This will work for technical titles by EvanED · · Score: 2

      *Very* nice. Thanks a bundle for that link.

  31. looks great by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2

    The Linux Development Platform: Configuring, Usin and Mainting a Complete Programming Environment

    Heh, open source is always full of bugs. :-)

    Seriously, this looks great, it's good to see a large publisher trying this. It makes a lot of sense to me, especially for computer docs (I own many of the books I read on Safari in paper form for instance). Heck, I wish all books came with a plaintext version of the text on CD or something, just for the grep value.

    I'll definitely be getting the Snort book, and keeping my eye on the series. Kudos all around.

  32. $50 -- too much. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $30 soft cover would be OK.

    For me to spend $50 the book must be very useful and well written or required for a course.

    I would even pay $20 for the download version if it wasnt full of DRM crap and allowed me to print and bind my own copy.

    I actually prefer spiral bining that kinkos will do for a few bucks. -- You dont have to break the binding to make it lay FLAT on the desk.

  33. Not quite open source but... by Synn · · Score: 2

    Baen is another publisher that has put books out for free on the internet for downloading.

    http://www.baen.com/library/

  34. There should have by jsse · · Score: 1

    "Ask Bruce Perens" section, or icon for Bruce. :)

    Nice move Bruce. Do you think they'd publish opensource book for other languages, like this one? Can I submit those opensource document even I'm not the author, provided that we credit where its due?

    1. Re:There should have by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
      I would like to hear from translators who want to produce Open Source books and make a little money too.

      When we put the books online, there will be an "ask bruce" on the site.

      Thanks

      Bruce

  35. O'Reilly XForms book to be under GFDL by mdubinko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Also of note, the XForms book I'm writing for O'Reilly will be published under the GFDL.

    Before publication, the text-in-progress is also available, but under a somewhat more restrictive license, at http://dubinko.info/writing/xforms/.

    This policy at O'Reilly dates back to at least May 2002, when I signed the contract.

    .micah

    --
    --- Learn XForms today: http://xformsinstitute.com
    1. Re:O'Reilly XForms book to be under GFDL by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      Excellent! I would just love to get into a do-gooding competition with Tim. It would be great fun and would get a lot of good documentation into Open Source.

      Please make sure Creative Commons knows about it. Oops, I'd better register my books there too.

      Thanks

      Bruce

  36. PLEASE MOD UP PARENT! by Da+VinMan · · Score: 2

    This is the same David Mertz that has written a number of Python and XML articles for IBM's developerWorks. It would be nice to see his material get more exposure.

    David, thanks for your great articles and good luck with the book!

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
  37. Hardware vendors by jbolden · · Score: 2

    Actually Microsoft Press in the same position relative to Microsoft that the software being donated to Linux is from most of the Hardware companies. That is Microsoft doesn't really make that much money of their Microsoft Press books (many of which are very good BTW). Further most of these books teach people about their products.

    It might be an excellent way for Microsoft to experiment with a BSD type licensing scheme on products where they would be willing to see sales dry up in a worst comes to worst type scenerio.

  38. David Weber by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2

    David Weber's "War of Honor" came with a very cool CD. The CD contains a copy of the entire Baen Library, as well as all of the previous Honor Harrington books.

    On the front of the CD is stated "This disk and its contents may be copied and shared but NOT sold."

    I think that this is all very cool and encouraging. On the other hand, I'd like to point out that they don't have much legal ground for the "NOT sold" requirement. I can certainly sell the CD itself, it's my property. What they should have said was: "You are granted the right to copy and share this information, provided that you agree not to sell the copies."

    And, unfortunately, the book sucked too. I enjoy politics. Real politics. 1000 pages of fictional politics falls flat in any number of ways. The other books in the series are very good though.

  39. poor (or cheap) college students by exhilaration · · Score: 2
    Hey, it sounds like a great idea, but come on - if college students can get the book for FREE, then they'll just put off that class for a semester to avoid paying for it.

    College students are NOT a population that anyone should expect to fund this experiment.

  40. A note about the license by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative
    The license, at present, is the Open Publication License with no options taken. If any of the options were taken, it would not be an Open Source license (the options restrict modification and commercial use). We are open to other Free Software licenses, my contract explicitly allows the GNU Free Documentation License (which I would like to see used without immutable sections, which I feel make the work not Open Source).

    Thanks

    Bruce

    1. Re:A note about the license by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      Cool! What formats will the source be available in? DocBook that compiles to PDF or something?

    2. Re:A note about the license by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
      Whatever we can convert the .doc file into. Yes, Prentice PTR is still a .doc file shop. I think the XML format used by OpenOffice might be best. I have used OpenOffice to read the books.

      Bruce

    3. Re:A note about the license by Hellkitten · · Score: 2

      Whatever we can convert the .doc file into

      Why not the other way around? The format could be anything that can be converted to an acceptable .doc file.
      If a book is to be a project involving several authors I don't think msword is the ideal format

      Another question: Will they be considering printing books that are already open-sourced but doesn't exist on paper (yet). e.g if an author wishes a book to be available on the net from day one, or perhaps in "beta" form. Would they still consider it for printing it?

      Second question: will they/you need voulenteer reviewers? If the topic is relevant for me I would give feedback in exchange for beeing able to read the material while unfinished, and a free copy once the book is done
      (Not to mention I would love my name in print in an acknowledgments section :-) )

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
    4. Re:A note about the license by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bruce Perens must have more accumulated karma than most good Bhuddists.

      I think he's saving it all up for a goatse.cx trolling spree.

    5. Re:A note about the license by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in order to write about a Open Source platform, I have to use a copy of Microsoft Word which is only available for non-Open Source platforms! No thanks.

  41. Ripping off college students one edition at a time by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Funny

    The books will cost $50-$75 dollars while they're being sold at university bookstores, then released free as soon as the course is over so that the resale value of the book is zero.

    However, the free book will be useless for the next semester's courses, because a new edition will have been released to update the book for the changing technologies, of course.

    See, it is possible to make big money with open source... although this wasn't what we had in mind.

  42. Bolstering the "Perens" brand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what this is about, and nothing else. Oh, except the money that goes in your pocket, of course.

  43. Don't forget by Jemini · · Score: 1

    Hopefully they won't "forget" to release it as Open and then say Oh sorry, like some past publishers have.

    1. Re:Don't forget by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Don't worry. They wanted me on board for credibility. That would lose it for them.

      Bruce

  44. If you were less lazy... by AndyMouse+GoHard · · Score: 1

    You might have read the note on Mr. Peren's web-site saying it was a PH idea to name the series after him.

    Hmmm... how did you get modded up? By moderators who also hadn't read the note:)

    Bill

    --
    Upon seeing the box was too small, Schrodinger's Elephant breathed a sigh of relief.
  45. Re:MOD THIS DOWN!! BLATANT WHORING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    socialist utopia garbage.
    If a doctor donates time to help others their motivations aren't socialist utopia garbage.

    It's about balance. Do it all the time and you're right. Do it not at all and you don't have a heart. Getting computer experts to write free books is a good idea.

    I contribute to OSS in my spare time because I have time to get it right and write great code. I love being on the mailing lists and talking to others about this guff. Writing a book however is a solitary experience. There is a crummy publisher who gets an individual author to write each chapter (they produce books in a few weeks)... can anyone think of a collaborative and distributed model for writing?

  46. Will those books be available in Spain? by vadim_t · · Score: 2

    Two of those books, the one about Linux development and the one about Snort sound interesting and I'd like to get them. A translation to Russian or Spanish would be nice, but not necessary.

    1. Re:Will those books be available in Spain? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Interesting
      We would like to hear from people who want to translate books.

      Bruce

    2. Re:Will those books be available in Spain? by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately that's way beyond my abilities, although I'm thinking about trying to translate a HOWTO or some small KDE app some day.

      My English grammar isn't great, but I can read it pretty well, so if it's going to be available in English that's good enough for me.

    3. Re:Will those books be available in Spain? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      No problem. Keep your ears open, maybe you can help find someone who is interested.

      Thanks

      Bruce

  47. Redefine the history of the civil war by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
    Yes, the link here will let you do just that.

    Bruce

  48. I think they have something here by Qzukk · · Score: 1

    I like the model, since I prefer to read paper, but like the electronic version for reference.

    I think the submitter is on to something here. Real books still beat e-books for actual reading. However, trying to find a specific fact can be pretty difficult, even with keyword searching (also known as "the index") and directory searching (also known as "the table of contents"). Having an electronic version and paper version of every coursebook I had in college would have been a godsend for me.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  49. Thanks to Bruce Perens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks to Bruce Perens and the others involved in this. I hope they succeed and I'll be buying the books.

  50. topics? by drDugan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    really -- this was asked above but not aswered.

    What topics are you looking for? Do they have
    to relate to open source software? Some
    guidelines would be niec if you are soliciting
    authors.

    1. Re:topics? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3
      Well, I think I have only seen one book proposal refused so far. So, we are open to what you propose.

      They should relate to Open Source software, either as user documentation or as developer documentation. I suppose there are some "Open Source" topics that are not about software - either hardware or policy - and those would work too. If you want to do something else, but it's a technical book, we might be able to help.

      Generally you can ship a CD with the book, so you can make sure that all of the examples are distributed, and you can make sure the version of the software you are writing about is distributed with the book.

  51. Re:MOD THIS DOWN!! BLATANT WHORING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can anyone think of a collaborative and distributed model for writing?

    CVS?

    You'd need a 'book maintainer', I suppose, to do editing and fact checking and whatever else needs a single person's decision, and you could accept 'patches' on the book's text.

    Us spelling/grammar nazis could finally make our corrections quietly, efficiently, AND get some credit for a change.

  52. Bigger Implications... by blissful+ignorant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This looks very promising outside the tech industry, too. Time and again the media reports on errors in school textbooks - Prentice Hall being a main publisher of these books. With an electronic version, schools could purchase the book, then, as time goes on, print out the most current e-version in a course packet format. Instead of purchasing a whole new series of books, they only have to pay for the ink. This is a good thing.

    --
    Valete!
    1. Re:Bigger Implications... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well, Prentice Hall PTR is not the division that makes text books. PTR makes technical books. One victory at a time, and that next one might be a good deal more difficult. But it's already happening at the colleges, rather than the publishers.

      Thanks

      Bruce

  53. this works :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While Bruce Momjian was in the process of writing a book on PostgreSQL he (or somebody) released one or more PDFs of a draft version. The PDF was pulled before publishing, but I of course kept a copy. I personally purchased a copy of his book and so did my brother. I use the PDF for reference regularly but even my 17" LCD can't appease my eyes for lengthy reading (when I was actually trying to learn the subject). I'd guess that titles that are not strictly reference material would net a negligible loss, if at all. This dual medium availability will definately influence my purchasing decisions.

  54. So long as they're published . . . by kfg · · Score: 2

    in any form that can be at least "ripped" to ASCII by an open source tool we'll be alright.

    You have to admit though that there's irony in having Open Source (tm) books being published in everybodies most hated MS propriatary file format.

    Of course, note that I'm not saying which "side" the irony jabs its pointy little head into. I wonder if use of the .doc format for OSS texts will "infect" MS's own documents made with the same tool. At least it's a thought worth having a chuckle over.

    KFG

  55. Re:Ripping off college students one edition at a t by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Well, the instructors can actually customize the books for their own courses, although they will have to comply with the OPL terms when they do it.

    Bruce

  56. print on demand by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Informative
    Print-on-demand (POD) is the great technology that never happened. It does exist, but it's pretty much a vanity press phenomenon --- you know, the kind of book that only gets bought by the author's friends and relatives. The POD publishers I've seen also had truly horrible contracts.

    When you come right down to it, a book is something that it makes sense to mass produce. Printing and binding a book is a specialized, highly technical skill. You have to know what you're doing. You have to pick what kind of paper to use. If it's not just a one-color job, it gets very complicated.

    Being first in the market with all the tools and support would be a great advantage, maybe they'll get IT one day.
    It sounds to me like a market that would be inherently very competitive and low in profit margins.

    Yes, I assume the logic behind keeping the source closed for a few months is that it will FORCE people to buy the book if they really want it. The secondary assumption is that no one will buy it if it is open.
    It doesn't sound like you understand the economics of print-publishing. In print publishing, it's all about quantity. Printing 10,000 copies of the books doesn't even cost that much more than printing 1,000. Because of this extreme economy of scale, you print as many books as you can possibly hope to sell -- more, actually, because they cost virtually nothing to produce once the job is set up. With a technical book, you certainly do not sell all those books in the space of a few months.

    I think more likely Printice Hall has a realistic idea of how they can use a free book as a cheap and effective sales tool.

    1. Re:print on demand by Katalyzt · · Score: 1
      Yes that is because Print On Demand has never been seriously tried yet AFAIK and there is still enough money to be made the traditional way.

      I see POD as a natural extension of a provider such as amazon (who will probably get it first) you order a print version and they produce it and send it to you. by a print version i mean a full quality one.

      look the problem is one of numbers. print runs are getting smaller and smaller, printing on demand with completely automated technology is only a matter of time. low profit margins are GOOD - that's what drives efficiency and produces high value for the CUSTOMERS. many businesses don't want that because it's much more comfortable living in a high margin, highly regulated (by copyright laws etc etc) world.

      the future IS coming.

      --
      version 0.0002
    2. Re:print on demand by Hellkitten · · Score: 2

      What I would love about print on demand is if the format the books come in is somewhat flexible when it comes to layout. So that when I order a POD book I specify the paper size (among a few standard choices i suppose) and the text is adapted to it. Then if I can choose the binding too I can have all my books the same size and binding, it'll look beautiful in my bookshelf

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
  57. The ZooLib Cookbook is under the GNU FDL by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 2
    The ZooLib Cookbook is under the GNU Free Documentation License. The DocBook XML source is in ZooLib's CVS at SourceForge.

    I only have a few chapters written so far, and have a lot of work left to do to complete it, but I have made it my New Year's Resolution to complete it by the end of the year.

    To make it more convenient to write, I have used Fink to install DocBook, OpenJade and psgml on my iBook. (Note - fink's psgml is in unstable).

    ZooLib is a multithreaded C++ cross-platform application framework. You can write a single set of sources and compile native applications for Mac OS (classic, 68k and OS X native), Windows, BeOS and Linux, with very little need for platform-specific client code.

    ZooLib itself is fairly portable, it could be brought to a completely new platform in a few weeks of work by someone experienced with it.

    A brief introduction to ZooLib is on it's homepage at http://zoolib.sourceforge.net/.

    Thank you for your attention.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  58. What about tomorrow? by glamslam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This model seems to be very good now (most people prefer to read a hard copy to an ebook) and printing a single book is prohibitively expensive.

    But, what happens when books become like CDs (easy and inexpensive to make exact functionality copies)? Would enough people pay for the hardcopy to support the author enough to put food on his table?

    1. Re:What about tomorrow? by yeOldeSkeptic · · Score: 4, Interesting
      But, what happens when books become like CDs (easy and inexpensive to make exact functionality copies)? Would enough people pay for the hardcopy to support the author enough to put food on his table?

      Yes they will. If they value their time and the book enough. Even if a laser printed copy of a downloadable is cheaper by a few dollars from the press-printed book, I strongly believe that most people would still go for the convenience and quality of the latter. Why?

      Well, 10 dollars is certainly worth much less than the time that I have to spend printing, collating and having the book bound professionally. I would rather pay the extra ten bucks and avoid the aggravation. So, yes, there will be a market for open books for as long as the value of the book is much greater than the cost of buying it.

      As I see it, open books will revolutionize the industry in the following way.

      1. No book will ever be out of print. Troff is several decades old but it is still alive and kicking in the form of groff. Because groff is open sourced, it will continue to exist in the net somewhere and it will continue to be improved even if only incrementally. Compare that with say, WordPerfect which is almost on the way to extinction. (Please no counter-arguments about warez or how it is still on your hard disk!)
      2. Financially successfull open licensed books will be of a better quality than comparable closed-licensed books. Why? Because in order for the book to succeed it must be of the quality where people are willing to pay for it when a downloadable copy is available. This leads to...
      3. Cost of publishing will drop. Publishers will be able to test probable success of any book cheaply by having it downloadable on the net. All the publisher has to do is log all downloads (in order to count popularity) and provide a survey form inquiring whether the reader would buy a hard-copy of this book if it is available on the market and for how much. No need to print 10,000 copies of a book and then discover what a crap it is. However, it could also mean...
      4. Writing will cease to be as profitable a profession as it is today. But as RMS himself will say (with paraphrasing) just because book writing is not very profitable does not condemn you to write books. If writing books won't put food on your table, then perhaps you better find some other profession. On the other hand...
      5. Some Joe will discover a hidden talent in writing. It is so easy to publish an open book, (put a copy on the net while he is creating it) that many bored and talented individuals may just give it a try. Publishers may just discover the next Stephen King, Richard Feynmann and Donald Knuth this way! It could even be you!
  59. Yep, ya just can't grep dead trees by kfg · · Score: 2

    As they say. On the other hand, have you ever tried to curl up with a good CRT and mini tower? Hell, I haven't even been able to curl up with a good laptop, although lord knows I've tried. I've also noticed that a book's batteries never run down, an admirable quality.

    No doubt about it. The *best* solution is to have a hard copy and an electronic copy and make use of each where each is best. Particularly for technical books, where I think this model not only has promise, but ought to work like a frickin' charm.

    KFG

  60. Re:Proof reading! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prentice Hall is counting on people buying the books even though the electronic version will be freely available later.

    HAHAHAHAHA. Guess what, people that would read these books are free-loaders. You won't see a penny in sales. Big surprise.

  61. Best of Both Worlds by Ashcrow · · Score: 1

    I generally can not read an 'e-book' for more than 30 minutes before my eyes getting droopy. This is exactly why I love buying books that come with an electronic version ... I can use it for searching up small things while reading the book for instruction. This model makes perfect sense and is a breath of fresh air from the ever-so-closing publishing companies!

    This also might spark better translations; It's costly (and risky) to translate a book into another language while it's easy to post a new translated book on the net.

  62. I don't know. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . anyone who would rather format hundreds of pages for printing in book format and handily bind them than shelve out 10 bucks for the hardcopy.

  63. Can't register at Creative Commons by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 2
    In a number of comments so far, Bruce has asked that people register their Open Source books at Creative Commons.

    So I went there to register The ZooLib Cookbook, but found that they only provide for registration of books licensed under one of the licenses that they themselves publish.

    The ZooLib Cookbook is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License, so I can't register it there. I really don't want to change the license just to register my book.

    Bruce, may I suggest you recommend to people that they register at The Assayer instead?

    The Assayer also allows readers to post reviews.

    And perhaps you could lobby the folks at the creative commons to allow the registration of books on their site that are under other licenses, as long as the licenses are compatible with their aims.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  64. Re:MOD THIS DOWN!! BLATANT WHORING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    CVS?
    Sorry, I mean a social model. Has anyone attempted this before?
  65. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only reason they're daring to do this is the fact that paper books have added value over their electronically-stored equivalents. If book-printers, croppers and automatic binders were standard equipment on a PC as CD- and DVD-R drives now are, you can bet they wouldn't touch this with a 10-foot pole. This isn't a demonstration of open-mindedness (the added value guarantees niche appeal, it's no risk and no philosophical statement), and it for-damn-sure isn't a demonstration of how information can be open-sourced without making information publishers obsolete, since the publication type is already archaic (According to Gallup in 2000, about 17% of US citizens read newspapers, half of half of that read books).

    Crow about this if you want, but I don't see how this is important, or even newsworthy. OSS advocates have long known - or should have known, anyway - that 'added value' is the magic phrase for profiting on open source work. What remains to be seen is if any profit can be made from open sourced information when adding value of significance (enough to make a consumer consume despite the free nature of the content) is difficult or impossible. Not surprising, considering that, when reduced, it's really a paradoxical situation at heart. Added value is only necessary when the real value is not salable. If security through obscurity is a bad motto, how is the mantra of added value any different?

    Oh, well. Have your party.

  66. Bruce Perens - The biggest karma whore ever? by tmasssey · · Score: 3, Funny
    Wow! I've never seen someone respond so much to a topic they were related to, and get so much karma because of it. Share the wealth, buddy! :)

    Actually, it's nice to see someone so personally involved: with his own projects, the community in general, and with individuals. If the content of these books are competitive, they will definitely move to the front of my buying list.

    1. Re:Bruce Perens - The biggest karma whore ever? by finkployd · · Score: 2

      I'll second that. It is nice to see someone really committed to answering all the questions, responding to all the comments, and feeding some of the trolls here :)

      Reminds me of the very early days of slashdot, when useful discussion took place.

      Finkployd

  67. Will they charge for the digital version? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2


    Bruce,

    Will they charge for the digital version, or will that version be free?

    1. Re:Will they charge for the digital version? by Micah · · Score: 2

      I'm not Bruce, but the Open Content license is almost like the GPL for code. Yes, it will be free. (supposedly)

    2. Re:Will they charge for the digital version? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

      It's free.

  68. Re:MOD THIS DOWN!! BLATANT WHORING!! by Com2Kid · · Score: 2
    • Sorry, I mean a social model. Has anyone attempted this before?


    *looks up*

    You are freakin kidding me.

    Of COURSE it has been done before, yeesh. There have been countless Science Fiction collaborative projects. Collaborative worlds, stories, books, essays, you name it.

    Many Bulletin Board Systems also had a "Never Ending Story" thread or board where each user in turn added X paragraphs to the story. Heck the "pass the paper around" methodology is darn nearly a cliche within writing classes!

    There are also many stories of professional authors going over the script of young but highly creative writers and doing collaborative works with them. One could say that John Campbell's editing style was pretty much a collaborative one.
  69. Open E-Book reader? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I wonder if it is possible to get an open e-book reader? Perhaps the good ppl at transmeta would like to come up with a design, perhaps similar to the Newton. Keep it simple and keep it cheap. Backlighting, cheap on energy, and size of paperback would go a long way. I wonder if the indian pda would work for this?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Open E-Book reader? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, just buy a Palm or something. Only $100 for a quite usable e-book reader.

    2. Re:Open E-Book reader? by Hellkitten · · Score: 2

      Well since these books will be open-source you could convert them to any format you like, most pda's are able to display text and probably html too

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
  70. Need to centralize efforts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see links people are posting here from OReilly, Bruce Eckel, "Text Processing in Python", "Linux Device Drivers", etc. All freely available books. However finding free books is not exactly easy.

    Anyone know of a centralized location of all these books? I think that would be a great project for someone out there - Centralize links or mirror these books so people know where to go to find them.

  71. Reasonably off-topic... by Rainier+Wolfecastle · · Score: 1

    Yes, I know this is off-topic, but I was so flabbergasted after seeing this that I have to mention it. Ralph Nader's new book (Crashing the Party) is available in 3 formats on Amazon.

    Hard-cover - $17.47
    Soft-cover - $10.47
    Digital - $24.95 (requires MS reader, can't be printed, Palm not supported)

    Can someone please explain to me how this can be possible? And people wonder why ebooks aren't getting much mainstream attention.

  72. Re:Expanding HOWTOs by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2

    What's great about HOWTOs is that they arent as thick as a book. Expand one to book-form and you've got yourself a worthless fucking book.
    "No, what's great about HOWTOs is that they tell you HOW TO DO IT, it doesnt matter how long they are."
    ^-- Shut up.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  73. Reference vs. Introductory by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 5, Informative

    What I've noticed when I buy dead tree books is that I get much more value out of the books that can be used as reference tools. Typically these are books that touch on subjects that aren't quickly moving targets. For example, I recently bought an O'Reilly book on Bash at a used book store. The book isn't 100% up to date (1999 I believe), but it has helped me move a long way in my Bash scripting and is still very relevant. It's a great reference book. However, I also bought a book that explained what W.I.N.E. is and provided some usage examples at about the same time. Unfortunately, that book is incredibly out of date now and since it was also published in 1999. At this point, it's just s brick. (The W.I.N.E. project changed the way the config files work, so this book is really useless as a reference book)

    With that said, I'd like to point out that if these books are expected to sell as dead tree items, they should probably be more "reference" books than introductory books and probably deal with subject matter that changes slowly over time. The addition of the electronic version makes it relatively easy to keep THAT version up to date, but it doesn't help the owners of the dead tree version when they are not able to access the Internet.

    As an aside, I'd also like to point out the electronic books might benefit from being on CD-RW as opposed to CD-R. Considering that CD-RWs are pretty ubiquitous these days, a dead tree book could come with the book in electronic format on a CD-RW. That way, a user could keep their electronic version up to date by running an "updater" program that would check for the latest version, open the disc for writing, add changes to the disc, and then close the session to make it readable again. THAT would add enough value to the dead tree version that I think people would be kept interested in all three approaches: Paper Book, Online Version, and CD-RW distributed with book. The only reason people don't typically care about included CDs is that they become irrelevant VERY quickly. Just a thought.

    1. Re:Reference vs. Introductory by stephenbooth · · Score: 2
      However, I also bought a book that explained what W.I.N.E. is and provided some usage examples at about the same time. Unfortunately, that book is incredibly out of date now and since it was also published in 1999. At this point, it's just s brick. (The W.I.N.E. project changed the way the config files work, so this book is really useless as a reference book)

      Surely the advantage, for the readers, of these books is that when something changes the electronic version can be updated to reflect that. To take your example of the WINE book, when the project changed the format of the files someone could have edited the book to add a section on the new format.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
  74. Re:MOD THIS DOWN!! BLATANT WHORING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Of COURSE it has been done before, yeesh.
    There's documentation and opinion pieces on running OSS development, where's the Book development analog?
  75. Wow by T0mWil5on · · Score: 1
    My only Prentice Hall title
    Computer Sorting*
    by Ivan Flores
    (c)1969
    Library of Congress # 69-14804
    may have companions soon!

    *Despite being 34 years old and showing examples in IBM-360 Basic Assembly Language and some weird mnemonics called FLAP, it's actually quite useful.
  76. Saving Trees Electronically by mccormick · · Score: 0

    I typically prefer electronic versions of programming language references as opposed to hard-copy, primarily because I don't need yet another typically hundred page "imagine you're computer is a big forest ..." type of introduction (that is, introduction to programming as well as an introduction to using a computer, just for good measure.) However, it appears that this series is not focused on these types of books, so all is well again.

    --
    Pete
  77. Tax On Air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fucken freeloader. Fuck off and choke.

    1. Re:Tax On Air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, I pay for things. Sorry.

  78. Calling Carly's Bluff on HP's Linux push...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Went to Mr. Peren's site and saw this...

    Employment

    Hewlett-Packard Corporation - 2000 to 2002

    Senior strategist, Linux and Open Source. I was the first Open Source evangelist to gain a role in top management of a multi- Billion-dollar corporation. On the org chart there were only three people between me and the CEO - a general manager, a vice president, and a president. Among my assignments was to challenge HP management. It was a great job, but when the HP- Compaq merger replaced the HP Linux management with Compaq folks, I was terminated.

    All the more reason NOT to use HP products....

  79. great for accessibility! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an electronic format, straight from the publisher, will be great for access by the print-disabled. do you know what format they plan to use?

  80. ok mad props by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

    to bruce for replying to all these comments here. I noticed this post go up a few hours ago and he's still replying. how's that carpal tunnel coming?

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  81. a practice that needs to catch on by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

    I have often wondered why schools don't decide to write open source textbooks. textbook licening fees are pretty hefty. it would save cash strapped schools a ton if they could download and custom tailor at book free of charge. some classes would lend themselves to this more than others, but still it would be a good thing if only they were aware of the conept...

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  82. not to worry! by Teflik · · Score: 1

    I'm with you there; I was very hesitant to click on the link. But don't worry, there's actually a book about Python at that link.

  83. Browsing this thread at +3 or more is kinda funny by Kjella · · Score: 3, Funny

    It looks like an article about Bruce Perens, commented by Bruce Perens and almost nobody else. Any karma you'd like to burn off, I think now is the time. After this article you should have enough to go around.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  84. Mozila applications by krishy · · Score: 1

    Adding another to the list of this-has-been-done-already..

    Creating application with Mozilla

    Cheers,
    kris

  85. Forking? by stephenbooth · · Score: 2

    How are you going to handle forking of the text? If two different authors both make mods will their versions be merged or left to exist as separate entities? Will there be a CVS (or other source control system) tree of the books?

    Stephen

    --
    "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    1. Re:Forking? by handsomepete · · Score: 1
      "How are you going to handle forking of the text? If two different authors both make mods will their versions be merged or left to exist as separate entities? Will there be a CVS (or other source control system) tree of the books?"
      I bet it'll be like those 'choose your own adventure' books.
  86. Hats off to Bruce by videodriverguy · · Score: 1

    Like many here, I read Slashdot a lot (perhaps too much), and it's really nice to see Bruce getting involved with discussions etc.

    Although we often see other luminaries mentioned, he is one of the few that takes the time to actually discuss matters he is concerned about. Only the other day, a discussion he was involved with brought comments from Jim Gettys and others that were very enlightening.

    Thanks again, Bruce, for your articles and (unlike some of us) your unfailing ability to get to the point, instead of some of the superfluous stuff that appears here.

  87. You are allowed to charge for the delivery... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2


    But you are allowed to charge for the delivery of GPL code. Redhat does this, for example.

    1. Re:You are allowed to charge for the delivery... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      There are not presently plans to establish a download fee. Note that even if we did, mirrors could still be free.

      Bruce

  88. O'Reilly's Open Books Project by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 2, Informative
    O'Reilly does release out-of-print books (and selected other books), like the DocBook definitive guide, under their Open Books Project.

    Some of the books are a little dated, but some of them are quite useful.

    Some other great books I've found on-line are:
    • Grokking The Gimp
    • Vi IMproved - Vim
    • Karl Vogel's Open Source Development with CVS
    • Thinking In Java


    The book I think is really needed in the series is a new "Intro to Python" book. "Learning Python" covers Python 1.5 and is so, like, 1990s. Guido's tutorial doesn't cover it either. The "Python: Visual QuickStart Guide" by Chris Fehily is a good replacement for now, but an open book would be better.
    --
    My father is a blogger.
  89. meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Australian Personal Computer (apcmag.com) recently released all of their 2002 issues on pdf on their jan 2003 cover cd. Im pretty stoked, normally back issues cost $8.99 each.

    yes, Im cheap..

  90. C++ Reference Card by nycsubway · · Score: 1

    I've created a C++ Reference Card... but i'm actually selling it. I wasn't happy with the reference cards already available, and I wanted to make one. There is something very good about having a paper copy of something, or in this case a laminated paper copy. eBooks are nice, but any book that you can actually hold and flip through is much easier to use than something on the computer screen.

    There are other open source reference cards out there as well.

  91. Bruce Perens e-mailed *me*! by tmasssey · · Score: 1
    Wow. It sure seemed that Mr. Perens was involved before, by the sheer volume of replies here. But it's even more than that: when the SlashCode prevented him from posting anymore, he sent me a personal e-mail!

    A personal e-mail for someone making snide comments at his expense? I'm impressed... If he puts anywhere near as much effort into these books, I'm sure they will be a success.

    And I just became Mr. Perens' friend.

  92. Re: Oreilly by davecb · · Score: 1
    The Samba book (on which I was the second author) is also under a free content licence, described at http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/licen seinfo.html

    And it jumped off the shelves, despite substantial competition.

    --dave

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  93. Writing vs. brain-dumping by ctrimble · · Score: 2
    Writing a book is not equivalent to dumping your brain. Writing a book requires the author to determine a vision for the book, identify an audience, determine what needs to go in the book in order to fulfill the vision and what needs to be left out so as not to obscure the vision, and how to present the material in a clear and coherent manner.

    Writing a book is (in many ways) akin to developing a large software project. It requires the skill to work in the trenches as well as at 1E4 feet and still see how everything hangs together. The difference between developing software and writing a book is that in the latter case, everyone reads your source code. If you're writing a spreadsheet application and it passes all the unit and functional tests, it doesn't matter if it's pure spaghetti code (ignoring factors like maintainability, scalability, cost-of-ownership, etc.) The purpose of the app is number-crunching. The purpose of a book is to transmit information. However, the clarity of the "code" is integral to fulfilling this function. A book doesn't have unit tests and functional tests to validate its success. It only has usability tests.

    My experience comes from both sides of the fence. I've been a software architect for a Fortune 500 corporation and I was the acquisitions editor (and part-time developmental editor) for a technical publishing company. As an acquisitions editor I realised pretty soon that a large percentage of technical people look at writing as a brain dump. These are people who would never dream of sitting down to code without, at the very least, sketching out some designs on an index card. But they feel perfectly comfortable sitting down to write chapter one with a blank page and no notes and expecting to finish 450 pages later. As you might expect, most of these books were either never completed or were unpublishable. (This is probably what you'd expect if a software project were managed the same way.)

    My question for you, Bruce, is this -- what kind of editorial support will PH be offering? Is this just going to be documentation that is bound and offered for sale? Or will there be an editorial process that help prevent these books from being more than a brain dump (which, IMHO, is about as intelligible as a core dump).

    Cheers,
    Alex

    1. Re:Writing vs. brain-dumping by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      Mark Taub, executive editor for Prentice Hall PTR, works with these books in the same way as he does with all of their print technical books. He fields a pretty large team - I see about 8 names credited, and one of them is a company so I don't know how many people that is. I do not play much part in the book production, my role is acquisition of new books and setting policy for the overall series, although I can get more involved if I see a need to do so.

      Thanks

      Bruce

  94. Open Hype by werdna · · Score: 2

    I strongly respect Bruce's efforts, thinking this is an excellent approach to publishing, and do not intend this remark to diminish that effort in any way at all. Nor do I want to diminish P-H's contributions to technology -- P-H has been excellent with their technology books in the past, agreeing freely to publish one of my books in electronic form at no cost, substantially as they are doing for Bruce.

    However, shouldn't we be somewhat more jealous how the term "Open Source" is used? Is this really open source in any meaningful way? Will I be able to use, make derivative works and republish from Bruce's book in any manner , or am I just being given a copy for personal use?

    In short, docs are different from programs in several important ways, a point that many anti-copyright people repeatedly made in the past with respect to the copyright act being applied to software. Likewise, the needs for "open source" for code is fundamentally different from the utility of "open access" to text. All of this is different from freedom, as used by RMS and crew, which is a different thing altogether.

    In short, are we confusing our message by using the terminology "open source" with respect to media and content that (1) doesn't have source; and (2) is distributed under terms quite different from OSI code?

    Many good things come in different packages: (1) the harvard group's collaborative on-line brief-writing efforst; and (2) various "freer" versions of publishing. That I suggest we don't lend the term open source does not mean that I don't think they are as good or less good than open source software. but they are different, and we shouldn't confuse or diminish our mission.

  95. I've seen this before by Bri3D · · Score: 1

    The 2001 Sams book KDE 2 Development was published with a licence called "Open Publication."

  96. So what's to stop other publishers from printing by geekee · · Score: 2

    Seems to me if these books become popular, another publisher can simply ride the coat tails of the original publisher. That is, print an identical copy, which should cost no more, and sell it slightly cheaper since no royalties need to be paid to the author and the promotional costs have already been taken care of by the original publisher.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  97. May you all rot in M2 hell! by LostCluster · · Score: 2

    I hate to break it to you, I wasn't looking for +1 Funny this time... the parent post was serious.

    This open-source "donation" is coming at the expense of the college student's textbook resale value... are we sure we want to cheer at this?

  98. What the FSF is selling lately by yerricde · · Score: 2

    I am pretty sure the GNU Emacs Manual on my bookshelf (mine is Sixth Edition, Version 18 March 1987) costs money. Yep, the order form in the back says I can order it for $10. And the GNU Emacs source on 1600bpi industry standard magnetic tape in tar format for $150. But that's from the June 1988 price list.

    The FSF now sells a distribution of all the GNU source code for $345 to organizations or $85 to individuals. The Emacs manual, 15th edition for Emacs 21, costs $45.

    Sure, the price increase is quite a bit more than inflation, but as Emacs gets bigger, the documentation also must grow to cover the new features. And not only do you get the full source for all GNU programs from a trusted source (Free Software Foundation Inc.) through a trusted channel (a well-known shipping company), making the distribution extremely hard to spoof, but you also help support the development of the free GNU/* operating system.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  99. Not open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the material at that URL, it would appear that these books are open content but not open source. The error appears to be slash-dot's rather than the authors.

    That is unfortunate, because a true open source book would be easier to mark up and enhance.

  100. Why .doc format. by skribble · · Score: 1

    The reason why it's hard to convert from something else to .doc is that most of the upfront stuff is done in MS Word. This is beginning to change some, but it's still not feasible to do it the other way. For example, you can't always expect a copy editor with a strong english background to be an expert at dealing with various file formats, and technologies needed to accomidate them (i.e. Word tracks revisions, not too many English majors can use CVS to track docbook files.) Exceptions are made, and of course we've allowed authors to use StarOffice/OpenOffice for a while too.

    As for printing existing OpenSourced books... That's difficult due to the licensing and copyright things. Keep in mind that Publishiers *are* in business to make money and there *very* big risks in publishing some OpenSourced content. If however there's money to be made, or at least some evidence that it wouldn't be a money loosing proposition, Then it's certainly possible.

    --
    --- Nothing To See Here ---
    1. Re:Why .doc format. by Hellkitten · · Score: 2

      So if I understand you correctly it's simply a requirement that proofreaders and layouters (yes it's a word, I just created it) can use msword to do their work. Then the author should be free to create the text in any format that can be converted to something msword can open when he hands it over to the publisher?

      If I were to write a book (I won't because I haven't the knowledge to write one yet) I would avoid word if at all possible, I've had to read a 400+ page document in word and its not a suitable tool once the text becomes that long (newer versions may be better though, I haven't tried)

      And there is ofcourse the issue that a lot of potential opensource writers can't or will refuse to run word on their systems

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
    2. Re:Why .doc format. by skribble · · Score: 1

      Essentially you are correct. The thing is is that the file generally passes between the author and production *at least* twice and things will get lost in translation back and fourth.

      Also, fyi, a book is usually submitted as seperate files for each element (chapter, appendix, etc...) so one would rarely have a 400 page document (if so we've got bigger problems then the format :P ).

      Now, *if* Microsoft actually delivers what they promise in Office 11 (full XML compatibility) then that would solve many of these problems (since ideally an author could submit a docbook file and an editor could open it in Word without any added complexity) We'll see.

      --
      --- Nothing To See Here ---
  101. Peter Norton... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Bruce's website: They named the book series after me - it's "Bruce Perens' Open Source Series". I suppose they're trying to make me into the Peter Norton of Linux :-)

    Linux isn't the only thing open source...

    -yb

  102. Palmversion of Baen books by tamarik · · Score: 1

    At the moment, I'm reading the 3rd book in the Honor series on my palm. On this boat, there's plenty of electricity to charge my Handspring Edge but no weight allowance for books. Books melt in this hot, wet weather, anyway...

    I can read the palm anywhere, anytime. It's 1-handed, readable in the dark and automatically keeps my place. Always gotta hang onto something and the paper versions of these books are rather thick. In the dark of the bunk or on deck (but not when steering :) the internal light lasts at least all night. It automatically starts back where I shut it off

    I've d/led at least 7 of the books onto the laptop before we left shore. I can load 3 on the Edge at a time easily. There's still room in there for the CelestNav s/w and a running log.Oh yea, and ShinsenSho.I will mention the .prc versions of the Baen books have a lot of imbedded html that took getting used to. I wonder if I d/led them incorrectly, somehow.

    Don't ever intend to buy the books; I learned about the series at the local public library.

  103. I like this scheme better - for a while ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    What you need to do is put the electronic version online before or concurrently with the print version. See [several examples]

    I like this scheme - for a while, as an experiment. Just think...

    If you see a sudden jump in sales of the hardcopy book when the e-version comes out, it immediately discredits the theory that free softcopies (or even so-called "piracy") REDUCE the total sales of the hardcopy version by replacing more hardcopy sales than they generate.

    So if we and Jim Baen are right, that free softcopy availablity INCREASES hardcopy sales, Bruce and Prentice Hall are doing us all a GREAT service by foregoing a little profit to prove it.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  104. Tell the FSF about your free books! by AaronSw · · Score: 1

    The Free Software Foundation keeps a list of free books available -- please submit your books to them by emailing <free-books@gnu.org> I'm also going to see if we can start listing books with other licenses on the Creative Commons site.

  105. Re:So what's to stop other publishers from printin by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 2

    And your point? People will still buy the original makers version. This practice has been done for a long time. Look at pharmacy drugs. People still buy Tylenol even though they can buy generic drugs that have acetaminophen (the active drug in Tylenol) for way less. There hundres and thousands of other drug examples as well as other non-drug related.

    --
    ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
  106. Re:So what's to stop other publishers from printin by geekee · · Score: 2

    My point is the author and original publisher get screwed, lowering the incentive to write and publish new works. This is a bad thing. IN the case of patents, they limit them since no invention is built from nothing. A book or film however, is a unique work which deserve protection.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  107. Getting rich by Felinoid · · Score: 2

    Maybe not you but it's pritty good advertising to just be published.
    Oh hell yeah I'd write a book (science fantacy) if I thought it'd be published. I'd forfit proffit even. Just get the name out.
    I take that back. I would never get rich writing fiction...
    assuming I could get published..

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  108. Re:So what's to stop other publishers from printin by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 2

    So do you feel this is true?
    1 copied cd/dvd/book = 1 lost sale?

    And you still havn't mentioned *what* is being stolen?

    --
    ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
  109. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    The problem with engineers is that they tend to cheat in order to
    get results.
    The problem with mathematicians is that they tend to work on toy
    problems in order to get results.
    The problem with program verifiers is that they tend to cheat at
    toy problems in order to get results.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...