The easiest way to get from here to there is to do nothing and keep reporoducing. Eventually we'll either trigger global nuclear war, ecological distaster or something else. Then only those with a lucky combination of mutated genes will survive. The more of us there are to more of us will survive. Then we may end up with a lucky million mutants.
Seriously, are we going to have both propriatory as well as free genetic code organisms? What's the legal status of a living being that's a result/offspring of a crossing/mating between a propriatory and a GPL organism?
I do not see any privicy issues if a program reads my email in a single pass and add ads as soon as it does not store the data, does not integrate and post-analyze the data, does not use the data for profiling, etc.
Plus, you do not have to use gmail at all.
However, if gmail raises privicy issues then what about anti-spam programs that read and analyze your email whether you want or not? Morever you do not even know if there is an anti-spam program when you send your email to foo@bar.net. Then what about censorship issues with anti-spam programs? If someone sends an offer for viagra to president@whitehouse.gov, and an anti-spam program stops it, is it an instance of anti-Consitutional censorship?
I do not say that anti-Spam progams are evil but rather just making a point about to harsh fear of the beast that was not even born yet (officially).
I was doing consulting for Philip Morris in the past. At that time the company was replacing their hardware and they had to get rid of many PCs. However they could not donated any of them to public school because someone could have said "Look PM is donating to the public schools in order to buy the students." They were actually trying to find
RIAA is countersuing SCO as the only legitimate owner of TCP/IP. Not only SCO is the owner of this evel protocol but it also was careless about it - so the protocol was stolen and included in all major OS-es including MS Windows, Un*x, Linux, OpenVMS, MVS, etc This evel protocol enables criminals to share copyrighted material over the Internet (which SCO in cooperation with the former vice President Gore invented)
Slashdot Mirror
The easiest way to get from here to there is to do nothing and keep reporoducing. Eventually we'll either trigger global nuclear war, ecological distaster or something else. Then only those with a lucky combination of mutated genes will survive. The more of us there are to more of us will survive. Then we may end up with a lucky million mutants.
Let me be the devil's advocate here. Maybe because it's beta.
but will they run Linux?
Seriously, are we going to have both propriatory as well as free genetic code organisms? What's the legal status of a living being that's a result/offspring of a crossing/mating between a propriatory and a GPL organism?
So, that's what his middle name (Benedict) stands for.
Wife: Hurricane Beta is approaching oue city. We must live the city now. Husband: Oh, commoon. It's just a beta.
Does it run on Diesel?
Now only outlaws will have antenas.
dick.mobi?
I've got a really big pocket on my pants. Still, I cannot fiind a laptop that can fit in.
If you don't want to by Nova because it does not go then just by a Yugo.
There is an exlusive look on the past. You can access the past but only in read only mode.
this is the first post.
I do not see any privicy issues if a program reads my email in a single pass and add ads as soon as it does not store the data, does not integrate and post-analyze the data, does not use the data for profiling, etc. Plus, you do not have to use gmail at all. However, if gmail raises privicy issues then what about anti-spam programs that read and analyze your email whether you want or not? Morever you do not even know if there is an anti-spam program when you send your email to foo@bar.net. Then what about censorship issues with anti-spam programs? If someone sends an offer for viagra to president@whitehouse.gov, and an anti-spam program stops it, is it an instance of anti-Consitutional censorship? I do not say that anti-Spam progams are evil but rather just making a point about to harsh fear of the beast that was not even born yet (officially).
Al Gore - Smart guy, but not expert in the field.
:)
Not an expert in the field??!! He invented the Internet!!
don't shave.
Oh, no! Change it to Caldera.
If it can get pinged it can get slashdotted. Is that what's happened?
I say tobato
Yes it is a game of reproduction .... in which gliders do not reproduce. Think about it.
is wether they used a single connection or they split the file in say 20,000 parts and used 20,000 connections simultaniously
Deos taht scpirt voilate the DCMA?
Because you belong to the largest group of developers. So whenever you apply to an ad, numbers of others do the same thing. Isn't that obvious?
I was doing consulting for Philip Morris in the past. At that time the company was replacing their hardware and they had to get rid of many PCs. However they could not donated any of them to public school because someone could have said "Look PM is donating to the public schools in order to buy the students." They were actually trying to find
RIAA is countersuing SCO as the only legitimate owner of TCP/IP. Not only SCO is the owner of this evel protocol but it also was careless about it - so the protocol was stolen and included in all major OS-es including MS Windows, Un*x, Linux, OpenVMS, MVS, etc This evel protocol enables criminals to share copyrighted material over the Internet (which SCO in cooperation with the former vice President Gore invented)