I'm sure it's nothing that crushing, confiscatory taxation on the "rich", plus the violation of a few basic freedoms for the good of the "global community" couldn't solve!
Oh and remember, Hitler was elected in a democracy.
No, he was appointed Chancellor by Hindenburg, who he later pressured into resigning and subsequently seized the power of the office instead of holding a presidential election. That being said, an actual democracy does result in mob rule and atrocity, and the repeated dissolution of the Reichstag that Hitler enabled had that effect.
W earned degrees from Harvard and Yale. If that's a chimp education, well then sign me up, Bonzo! BTW, Obama has a similar education: BA from Columbia, law degree from Harvard.
Well, at least he was entitled to payment for services rendered. But that's just the capitalist pig talking. I'm sure everyone else on Slashdot works for free.
Those bad habits were due to bad instructors and low-memory systems. I've never used a BASIC that didn't have a GOSUB and a computed GOTO (select-case even, since the 1980s DEC BASIC). Unfortunately, rudimentary books taught GOTO on about page 2 and my VIC-20 used to run out of RAM pretty quickly if you tried to write too many subroutines.
The key is that the article just points out the theory that women are becoming more beautiful due to natural selection. Since beauty is subjective, proving this theory would require more than forty years of study, and would have to include polling to determine whether a sample set of people really are more attractive. It's become fashionable to call anyone who questions evolutionary theory a holocaust denier or ignorant fundie, but I assure you that my opinion has nothing to do with that but the simple fact that seeing any changes due to evolution by definition requires historical data, of which this study appears to have little.
I mostly agree with you, except that shooting for any reason other to kill is a good way to get yourself killed. This isn't the movies, where to cop shoots the gun out of the crook's hand or pops him in the knee. If less-than-lethal force is required, they have nightsticks, tasers, and pepper spray.
The problem is a matter of properly accounting for the full cost to society. If I have a tree on my property and it falls in your yard, I have to pay for disposal. If I'm burning leaves in my yard and catch your house on fire, I'm on the hook. This makes sense.
It makes a lot less sense when you consider that cause and effect are temporally close in your analogy, while they are years apart in reality. Also, if your neighbor had PAID you to knock the tree down, or PAID you to burn leaves, absent a contract he would share the accountability-- but in your analogy, he's an innocent victim.
Reagan cut taxes across the board (although, yes, the ridiculously "progressive", confiscatory top tax bracket was the most affected) and the Republican Congress was responsible for creating the reasonable budget which Clinton was forced to sign if he wanted the government to start working again.
Slashdot Mirror
Continental USA, of course. Or we would have some sort of recursive paradox, there.
I'm sure it's nothing that crushing, confiscatory taxation on the "rich", plus the violation of a few basic freedoms for the good of the "global community" couldn't solve!
A polar bear is on the loose? Natalie must be positively petrified.
Our nuclear stockpile has been halved since 2001 and should be about 2,200 by 2012.
4. Health care
No, he was appointed Chancellor by Hindenburg, who he later pressured into resigning and subsequently seized the power of the office instead of holding a presidential election. That being said, an actual democracy does result in mob rule and atrocity, and the repeated dissolution of the Reichstag that Hitler enabled had that effect.
Circuit City is now defunct and all its holdings split up; so who owns those stores now?
W earned degrees from Harvard and Yale. If that's a chimp education, well then sign me up, Bonzo! BTW, Obama has a similar education: BA from Columbia, law degree from Harvard.
I would think a conservative area would be MORE likely to read 1984.
whoo ahh
Dust it off? It's been in constant use since Obama became president.
That's cute, but the beeping is for pedestrian walk signals.
Now, how about creating a vehicle that will help women to drive?
Well, at least he was entitled to payment for services rendered. But that's just the capitalist pig talking. I'm sure everyone else on Slashdot works for free.
Those bad habits were due to bad instructors and low-memory systems. I've never used a BASIC that didn't have a GOSUB and a computed GOTO (select-case even, since the 1980s DEC BASIC). Unfortunately, rudimentary books taught GOTO on about page 2 and my VIC-20 used to run out of RAM pretty quickly if you tried to write too many subroutines.
It's something like one billet to a thousand Millard Fillmores.
The key is that the article just points out the theory that women are becoming more beautiful due to natural selection. Since beauty is subjective, proving this theory would require more than forty years of study, and would have to include polling to determine whether a sample set of people really are more attractive. It's become fashionable to call anyone who questions evolutionary theory a holocaust denier or ignorant fundie, but I assure you that my opinion has nothing to do with that but the simple fact that seeing any changes due to evolution by definition requires historical data, of which this study appears to have little.
I think you mean: This way to the Egress --->
That's true, but it's not the same as being a criminal just for not carrying and presenting an ID card, is it?
I mostly agree with you, except that shooting for any reason other to kill is a good way to get yourself killed. This isn't the movies, where to cop shoots the gun out of the crook's hand or pops him in the knee. If less-than-lethal force is required, they have nightsticks, tasers, and pepper spray.
That's incorrect. More than one of them had overstayed their visas. This is a deportable offense.
I don't care about the cost. The federal government doesn't have the right to decide where we go and how we do it.
Not likely. These are the same fascists who are pushing through a bill that would require you to make your old home "green" before you could sell it.
It makes a lot less sense when you consider that cause and effect are temporally close in your analogy, while they are years apart in reality. Also, if your neighbor had PAID you to knock the tree down, or PAID you to burn leaves, absent a contract he would share the accountability-- but in your analogy, he's an innocent victim.
Reagan cut taxes across the board (although, yes, the ridiculously "progressive", confiscatory top tax bracket was the most affected) and the Republican Congress was responsible for creating the reasonable budget which Clinton was forced to sign if he wanted the government to start working again.