You label me a troll because I hold a point of view contrary to yours.
No, he labeled you a troll because you drew an invalid conclusion that was inflammatory and based it on no evidence. I mean, the article you linked to even shows that men have higher IQs. IQ tests have their flaws just like everything else in this world, but it's evidence nonetheless.
Unless you mean to imply that those of us who took Diebold's promise to deliver 2004 to Bush (and did so) at face value somehow count as conspiracy theorists.
The exact quote was, "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year."
I like how the concept of personal property is worthy of a troll mod here. Apparently property is wrong in the Slashdot moral system-- except when it's one's own house, car, computer, phone, etc.
How long does a tree live? How much of its mass becomes gaseous? Like the GP said, it doesn't evaporate. If it did, it would be a lot easier to haul away.
Parasites and non-human predators kill quite a few, as well. Not billions, but neither do humans: because your statement is a bald-faced troll with absolutely nothing behind it.
So if I posted a video of Al Gore on Youtube, he'd also become an instant hack? Sorry, trick question.
I'm not quite sure which fallacy your "rebuttal" uses: "appeal to ridicule" or "poisoning the well." I'll look it up and get back to you.
You can see there's no real need to worry about global warming. If the "explosions and conflagrations" don't get you, the smoke and dust might cause global cooling. Or global warming, it could go either way.
Which is like a meteorologist giving a 50% chance of rain. He looks competent either way.
I like being reactionary, then, because it is impossible to have a democratic communist society. The foundation of democracy is this: life, liberty, and the pursuit of property. Socialism eliminates the third, greatly reduces the second, and treats the first almost as badly as fascism (a form of government with which the philosophy is quite compatible.
Maybe you would have to prove that an individual's carbon emissions actually have any sort of impact on the climate. Maybe athletes have to pay more because they burn more calories. Would you penalize poorer people who have to drive to work in less efficient cars, or would you force them under threat of imprisonment to ride the bus?
Slashdot Mirror
No, he labeled you a troll because you drew an invalid conclusion that was inflammatory and based it on no evidence. I mean, the article you linked to even shows that men have higher IQs. IQ tests have their flaws just like everything else in this world, but it's evidence nonetheless.
The exact quote was, "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year."
I guess that rules out a film version of Jeff Foxworthy's game show.
At least they'll like the slender lorises on the cover of the O'Reilly book.
I don't like internets, they take days to deliver. They're not a truck you can just dump stuff onto, you know!
I rather like these:
Jamie Gorelick with Fannie Mae
Jamie Gorelick versus encryption (found via Google 2001 index)
Barack Obama and William Ayers
I hope this laptop doesn't have a webcam. Yeewww.
... which is a lot different from actually picking the cat. Either this is BS, or that program is about to become self-aware.
I like how the concept of personal property is worthy of a troll mod here. Apparently property is wrong in the Slashdot moral system-- except when it's one's own house, car, computer, phone, etc.
But largely not to the air, which is where CO2 is allegedly a problem.
How long does a tree live? How much of its mass becomes gaseous? Like the GP said, it doesn't evaporate. If it did, it would be a lot easier to haul away.
Intriguing! Really; there were millions.
I see the troll was just trolled.
Parasites and non-human predators kill quite a few, as well. Not billions, but neither do humans: because your statement is a bald-faced troll with absolutely nothing behind it.
So if I posted a video of Al Gore on Youtube, he'd also become an instant hack? Sorry, trick question.
I'm not quite sure which fallacy your "rebuttal" uses: "appeal to ridicule" or "poisoning the well." I'll look it up and get back to you.
Which is like a meteorologist giving a 50% chance of rain. He looks competent either way.
I like being reactionary, then, because it is impossible to have a democratic communist society. The foundation of democracy is this: life, liberty, and the pursuit of property. Socialism eliminates the third, greatly reduces the second, and treats the first almost as badly as fascism (a form of government with which the philosophy is quite compatible.
IDrive is not perfect, but it works.
A baseball bat works pretty well.
Liar... you last posted about MS moving its R&D to Canada on Thursday, July 05, 2007. :-P
01000100 01100001 01110010 01101110 00100000 01101011 01101001 01100100 01110011 00100001
I suggest Tatooine. It's only 324 suns short.
It could power enough Volkswagen Beetles to carry 400 standard hippies from San Francisco to a global warming protest in Boston in under three days.
Maybe you would have to prove that an individual's carbon emissions actually have any sort of impact on the climate. Maybe athletes have to pay more because they burn more calories. Would you penalize poorer people who have to drive to work in less efficient cars, or would you force them under threat of imprisonment to ride the bus?
Hey, Benedict Arnold was an excellent officer until he betrayed his brothers.