It's like living 35% longer, except that the extra time is at your prime instead of at the end!
I get joy out of my hobbies and projects and would appreciate the extra 40 hours a week for them.
AEDs don't restart hearts. A flatline rhythm, AKA asystole, is not a shockable rhythm. The AED will figure out if it's a shockable rhythm though, but it's important I ruin all medical shows and movies.
AEDs are great if people know how to use them and know what else to do (check pulse, delegate someone to call 911), run chest compressions while someone else attaches pads, etc...
You should take a class though, because you don't want to have to figure everything out for the first time during an emergency. You get hands on experience with a trainer and mannequins and learn to handle and recognize some other emergency situations.
You'd be surprised. Being asked if things are more significant than normal or other similar questions can make you wonder because you don't normally think about the world that way.
There have been some interesting studies on the LSD placebos:
Salvinorin A is only comparable to LSD in potency, not duration or effects (unless you think any type of feeling weird or changes in perception are equivalent)
LSD is not a KORN, its effects are largely mediated by the serotonin 5HT2A receptor (blocking that receptor with ketanserin stops effects).
I'm not sure why 'increased insight' is your example of a negative side effect anyway.
The non-placebo group got an imperceptible dose, not a 10-strip. That's in the summary.
You tell them they can't drive, to have someone ready to pick them up, you get a medical history and screen for mental illness.
The test was conducted by having them reproduce a time period by holding a space bar, not by asking if they knew what time it was or how long had passed. That's in the summary.
Psilocybin is the best drug for smoking cessation by a large margin ( https://www.hopkinsmedicine.or... ). LSD may have the same promise. You may find that silly, but that could save tens of thousands of lives in the US every year. 70% of smokers want to quit: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/da... 480,000 people die per year from smoking https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/da... If all 70% that wanted to quit took psilocybin we'd be talking about over 200k lives saved per year.
And that's not the only thing psychedelics can be used to treat!
A lot is wrong with it. How hard is it? What information do you need? Can anything change with storage or reading to fix it? What?
Your common sense doesn't take you far when it's right, and when it's wrong, it's even worse.
https://www.newscientist.com/a... - here's a whole list of examples of common sense leading researchers astray. In short, common sense is easy when you already know the answer.
It could be triggered by being cut off for more than 10 minutes, it could shut itself down to make the only venue for attack the drive encryption (rather than memory, or screenlock attacks). It could require a password entered within 30 minutes to prevent wiping.
There are a lot of ways to approach this problem that balance how much data to destroy or inconvenience to impose along with how sensitive it could be.
For some people, false positives are strongly preferred to false negatives.
Alcohol is roughly the same level of addictive as cocaine. 15.4% of alcohol users will become dependent at some point in their lives compared to 16.7% of cocaine users.
> In summary, then, I have to disagree with you: alcohol is, objectively, a less risky psychoactive substance than the harder illegal drugs, especially opiates.
That's true by definition. Harder drugs are more dangerous. Not all illegal drugs are hard drugs.
Not all drugs significantly impact coordination and judgement. Not all drugs have a significant negative impact on mental health.
"Results: 21,967 respondents (13.4% weighted) reported lifetime psychedelic use. There were no significant associations between lifetime use of any psychedelics, lifetime use of specific psychedelics (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, peyote), or past year use of LSD and increased rate of any of the mental health outcomes. Rather, in several cases psychedelic use was associated with lower rate of mental health problems"
There are a lot of projects (SystemD, Linux kernel) where the maintainers are hostile to people submitting security patches or filing bugs relating to security.
Just because a file is not executable does not mean that it is not sensitive.
Replacing unauthenticated data takes different skills from owning a server and leave very different traces. Rooting a box can leave behind evidence and is higher risk than replacing unauthenticated traffic.
Plus, it doesn't take a global active adversary to replace http traffic, it just takes a WiFi pineapple and an afternoon of sitting in a coffee shop fiddling to do the former attack.
Without https, MiTM can be done trivially by anyone at a coffee shop/shared WiFi access point. With https, it's out of reach of nation state attackers.
Downloading executable files, downloading risky file extensions (doc, pdf), and downloading any document where integrity matters means that http is a risk.
If someone downloads some old games from an HTTP archive, malware could be added. If someone downloads some PDFs with an outdated reader, there could be malware. If someone downloads some forms they're going to fill out later, changing the location they're supposed to be emailed/faxed/whatever means someone could give out PII or financial information. If someone is reading old news stories, changing the content of those stories to suit an attackers narrative could be very valuable.
Just because the author can't imagine the security implications, doesn't mean organized crime, bored hackers, or nation state actors aren't thinking about it.
How would Monero help if a user continuously converted thousands from Monero into cash by mail per month using a DEA honeypot?
Paying Monero for cash would still be sufficient to get a warrant and I don't see how anything would change for the vendors.
Making it take significantly more work will greatly reduce its adoption, which is nearly as good as eliminating it entirely. Do you suppose even 1 out of 100 users would do that much work?
Slashdot Mirror
It's like living 35% longer, except that the extra time is at your prime instead of at the end! I get joy out of my hobbies and projects and would appreciate the extra 40 hours a week for them.
AEDs don't restart hearts. A flatline rhythm, AKA asystole, is not a shockable rhythm. The AED will figure out if it's a shockable rhythm though, but it's important I ruin all medical shows and movies.
AEDs are great if people know how to use them and know what else to do (check pulse, delegate someone to call 911), run chest compressions while someone else attaches pads, etc...
You should take a class though, because you don't want to have to figure everything out for the first time during an emergency. You get hands on experience with a trainer and mannequins and learn to handle and recognize some other emergency situations.
You'd be surprised. Being asked if things are more significant than normal or other similar questions can make you wonder because you don't normally think about the world that way.
There have been some interesting studies on the LSD placebos:
http://www.gwern.net/docs/psyc...
http://www.gwern.net/docs/psyc...
No. LSD, mescaline, psilocybin, and many others (2C-X, 4-HO-xxT) are serotonin 5-HT2A agonists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Salvinorin A is only comparable to LSD in potency, not duration or effects (unless you think any type of feeling weird or changes in perception are equivalent)
LSD does not cause a flattening of affect, quite the opposite actually.
LSD is not a KORN, its effects are largely mediated by the serotonin 5HT2A receptor (blocking that receptor with ketanserin stops effects). I'm not sure why 'increased insight' is your example of a negative side effect anyway.
The non-placebo group got an imperceptible dose, not a 10-strip. That's in the summary. You tell them they can't drive, to have someone ready to pick them up, you get a medical history and screen for mental illness. The test was conducted by having them reproduce a time period by holding a space bar, not by asking if they knew what time it was or how long had passed. That's in the summary. Psilocybin is the best drug for smoking cessation by a large margin ( https://www.hopkinsmedicine.or... ). LSD may have the same promise. You may find that silly, but that could save tens of thousands of lives in the US every year. 70% of smokers want to quit: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/da... 480,000 people die per year from smoking https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/da... If all 70% that wanted to quit took psilocybin we'd be talking about over 200k lives saved per year. And that's not the only thing psychedelics can be used to treat!
Swedish doesn't have noun-verb agreement and a manageable amount of tenses.
Bitcoin uses SHA-256(SHA-256(nonce+data)) < target value. They don't actually look for collisions.
A lot is wrong with it. How hard is it? What information do you need? Can anything change with storage or reading to fix it? What? Your common sense doesn't take you far when it's right, and when it's wrong, it's even worse. https://www.newscientist.com/a... - here's a whole list of examples of common sense leading researchers astray. In short, common sense is easy when you already know the answer.
It could be triggered by being cut off for more than 10 minutes, it could shut itself down to make the only venue for attack the drive encryption (rather than memory, or screenlock attacks). It could require a password entered within 30 minutes to prevent wiping.
There are a lot of ways to approach this problem that balance how much data to destroy or inconvenience to impose along with how sensitive it could be.
For some people, false positives are strongly preferred to false negatives.
"The individual would've found another compound if booze wasn't available." That other compound is very unlikely to be as dangerous as alcohol.
> is substantially less addictive than morphine and cocaine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Alcohol is roughly the same level of addictive as cocaine. 15.4% of alcohol users will become dependent at some point in their lives compared to 16.7% of cocaine users.
> In summary, then, I have to disagree with you: alcohol is, objectively, a less risky psychoactive substance than the harder illegal drugs, especially opiates.
That's true by definition. Harder drugs are more dangerous. Not all illegal drugs are hard drugs.
You're begging the question quite a bit there.
Not all drugs significantly impact coordination and judgement. Not all drugs have a significant negative impact on mental health.
"Results: 21,967 respondents (13.4% weighted) reported lifetime psychedelic use. There were no significant associations
between lifetime use of any psychedelics, lifetime use of specific psychedelics (LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, peyote), or past
year use of LSD and increased rate of any of the mental health outcomes. Rather, in several cases psychedelic use was
associated with lower rate of mental health problems"
https://journals.plos.org/plos...
UCSC is a large school, it wouldn't be terribly difficult to find a student with a different major and then not take their classes.
"drunk driving may kill a lot of people, but it also helps a lot of people get to work on time, so, it;s impossible to say if its bad or not," @dril
https://twitter.com/dril/statu...
Maybe if the SF techies had to walk outside once in a while they'd disrupt the lack of public toilets. People have to poop somewhere.
There are a lot of projects (SystemD, Linux kernel) where the maintainers are hostile to people submitting security patches or filing bugs relating to security.
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/07/28/black_hat_pwnie_awards/
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/11/20/security_people_are_morons_says_linus_torvalds/
Eyeballs don't help when they find things and are told to fuck off.
Just because a file is not executable does not mean that it is not sensitive.
Replacing unauthenticated data takes different skills from owning a server and leave very different traces. Rooting a box can leave behind evidence and is higher risk than replacing unauthenticated traffic.
Plus, it doesn't take a global active adversary to replace http traffic, it just takes a WiFi pineapple and an afternoon of sitting in a coffee shop fiddling to do the former attack.
So what certificate do they use to serve the HTTPS traffic?
Without https, MiTM can be done trivially by anyone at a coffee shop/shared WiFi access point. With https, it's out of reach of nation state attackers.
Downloading executable files, downloading risky file extensions (doc, pdf), and downloading any document where integrity matters means that http is a risk. If someone downloads some old games from an HTTP archive, malware could be added. If someone downloads some PDFs with an outdated reader, there could be malware. If someone downloads some forms they're going to fill out later, changing the location they're supposed to be emailed/faxed/whatever means someone could give out PII or financial information. If someone is reading old news stories, changing the content of those stories to suit an attackers narrative could be very valuable. Just because the author can't imagine the security implications, doesn't mean organized crime, bored hackers, or nation state actors aren't thinking about it.
How would Monero help if a user continuously converted thousands from Monero into cash by mail per month using a DEA honeypot? Paying Monero for cash would still be sufficient to get a warrant and I don't see how anything would change for the vendors.
Making it take significantly more work will greatly reduce its adoption, which is nearly as good as eliminating it entirely. Do you suppose even 1 out of 100 users would do that much work?
That would actually show that chord changes are staying the same, not decreasing.