In the tech saturated city of Las Vegas, I have relied upon one head hunter to get me a job, when I need it. I have come to trust her, and the company she works for.
Diane Radunz of Resources Connection
This is not a plug, she is by far the best person I have ever dealt with.
If you have coke coming from faucet at home, how much would you pay for a bottle?
As much as I paid for the glass.
Your/their analogy is flawed, the bottle would be reusable, while a record is a set in stone thing. It cannot help you get more records, it cannot hold another type of record(liquid in this analogy). THink about that, then come back and asmack my ANTI-RIAA sticker on your head.
This is one of the only jokes on slashdot that has made me laugh, and you mod it down? I know the poster is an anonymous bastard, but come on....think about the joke.
If you stick to shrinkwrapped software, and DON'T run ANY other form of executable, then you DON'T need anti-virus software.
You sir, are wrong. There is a product on the market that comes shrink wrapped, and is by far one of the worst viruses ever made. They seem to have a legitimate business operation, but innocent users fall victim to their faulty coding every single day.
No. There does not need to be any form of middle ground. This is why we are American, because we can *legally* say what we want.
What about the programmers who were stupid enough to create a hole for the vulnerability? I know its hard to error check code, but some holes are just that...stupid. As for your blaster worm comments, I dont think the code was released. You obviously have not programmed anything, it is not as easy as copy and pasting code.
There are already first ammendment issues, thats a given with something like this.
The real question is, why wont symantec create software that will deal woth these issue as they arrise. It seems like someone is trying to take the load off the company. It would be like Ford trying to make the speed limits of all roads 10mph. Now, they dont have to worry soo much about making a safe car, as accidents are less likely to occur.
IANAL, but neither. Its for software usage in California. If you buy it in California, and then take it to Nevada and use it, it doesnt count. You can probably say you installed it on your computer in California, and then say you moved.
I think they would just check wether or not you lived in california during the time you claim you bought the software. They will not ask for copies of reciepts if you claim 5 or less copies.
Sorry, not true. 666 is the IFUDD (International FUD Database) number of SCO's claim that they own this patent, becuase the source contains Unix code, which we all know they own.
Slashdot Mirror
Diane Radunz of Resources Connection
This is not a plug, she is by far the best person I have ever dealt with.
Have you ever opened up an m3u file in a text editor? If not, here is an example. m3u is just a playlist format.
http://he1.magnatune.com/all/01%20-%20Class%20Dism embered%20-%20Skitzo.mp3t omp%20-%20Skitzo.mp3t %20-%20Skitzo.mp30 of%20America%20-%20Skitzo.mp3% 20a%20Vengeance%20-%20Skitzo.mp3e ssion%20-%20Skitzo.mp3R ain%20-%20Skitzo.mp32 0Hell%20-%20Skitzo.mp32 0blood%20red%20-%20Skitzo.mp32 0-%20Skitzo.mp3p ire%20-%20Skitzo.mp3
http://he1.magnatune.com/all/02%20-%20Monster%20S
http://he1.magnatune.com/all/03%20-%20Prom%20Nigh
http://he1.magnatune.com/all/04%20-%20Prisoners%2
http://he1.magnatune.com/all/05%20-%20Kill%20with
http://he1.magnatune.com/all/06%20-%20Last%20Depr
http://he1.magnatune.com/all/07%20-%20Heavenly%20
http://he1.magnatune.com/all/08%20-%20Gates%20of%
http://he1.magnatune.com/all/09%20-%20Color%20me%
http://he1.magnatune.com/all/10%20-%20Infections%
http://he1.magnatune.com/all/11%20-%20Insane%20Em
As much as I paid for the glass.
Your/their analogy is flawed, the bottle would be reusable, while a record is a set in stone thing. It cannot help you get more records, it cannot hold another type of record(liquid in this analogy). THink about that, then come back and asmack my ANTI-RIAA sticker on your head.
Not everyone is as intelligent as slashdot readers...
One feature I think is extremely unique is that people can choose what they pay. From $5-18, and the recommended amount is $8.
This is one of the only jokes on slashdot that has made me laugh, and you mod it down? I know the poster is an anonymous bastard, but come on....think about the joke.
Anyone have some more tech pron, or even some technical details?
You sir, are wrong. There is a product on the market that comes shrink wrapped, and is by far one of the worst viruses ever made. They seem to have a legitimate business operation, but innocent users fall victim to their faulty coding every single day.
More information is available here.
What about the programmers who were stupid enough to create a hole for the vulnerability? I know its hard to error check code, but some holes are just that...stupid. As for your blaster worm comments, I dont think the code was released. You obviously have not programmed anything, it is not as easy as copy and pasting code.
The real question is, why wont symantec create software that will deal woth these issue as they arrise. It seems like someone is trying to take the load off the company. It would be like Ford trying to make the speed limits of all roads 10mph. Now, they dont have to worry soo much about making a safe car, as accidents are less likely to occur.
...fork!
IANAL, but neither. Its for software usage in California. If you buy it in California, and then take it to Nevada and use it, it doesnt count. You can probably say you installed it on your computer in California, and then say you moved.
I think they would just check wether or not you lived in california during the time you claim you bought the software. They will not ask for copies of reciepts if you claim 5 or less copies.
They do not require proof of purchase if you are claiming less than 5 copies of software.
The best explanation/example for this is the fact that we still use the imperial measurement system
Americans do things in their own damn time. Ya!
They already exist, and have been observed gathering yearly for the overlord ritual, here
666...
Sorry, not true. 666 is the IFUDD (International FUD Database) number of SCO's claim that they own this patent, becuase the source contains Unix code, which we all know they own.
...dont tell them about a firewall, its a super-secret secret.
http://www.fsunews.com/vnews/display.v?TARGET=sho
Thats one hell of a soldering iron.
Kind of like how SCO execs claim they have taken advantage of the penis upgrade, but wont let anyone see the source unless they sign an NDA.
...they just didnt get the memo.
Hey man, got a dollar?
This is not funny, only asshats with mod points would consider this funny. Yes, thats you!!
I dont think its clever, boredom is a dangerous thing.
Oops, forgot to check the "Anonymous" box.