Slashdot Mirror


Paper Capable Of Playing Videos Developed

Makarand writes "Nature has posted an article describing paper capable of displaying video using rearrangeable electronic ink, being produced by Philips Research Labs (in the Netherlands). The paper-display draws power from a lightweight battery, and displays data stored in a portable chip. The display consists of pixels containing a drop of colored ink that can spread over a reflective white background under electrical control to create colors. With fast switching times and lower switching voltages, these paper-displays are capable of displaying video images."

332 comments

  1. It's a porno AND a tissue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    How convenient...

    1. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by blake8087 · · Score: 2, Funny

      All slashdot readers will care about is whether it runs linux. Porn comes second.

      --

      --Slashdot readers delight in generalizing the behavior of other Slashdot readers.
    2. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
      I have performed you boolean search ...
      enjoy

      porno AND a tissue

    3. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are there so many "Red Hot Chili Peppers" results in that search?

    4. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by kars · · Score: 1, Funny

      Watch out for those nasty paper cuts though, or you might just end up giving yourself a circumcision :)

      --
      Take life easy: one bit at a time.
    5. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More and more, it seems like a large percentage is sex-starved, I-want-to-be-funny goofballs

      This part is +1 insightful, rest looks like a typical flamebait. Note most nerds ARE sex-starved, funny goofballs - and this is their site with their news and their style comments! If you don't like that, move elsewhere, there are many science news sites on the web. The fact that slashdot is not as classy as YOU would like it, doesn't mean it needs to be changed. It means that YOU need to look for a more classy place.

      And hell, somebody mod me offtopic or flamebait and I'll get really pissed off!

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    6. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by hdparm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Particularly so if this invention finds use in a toilet paper factory in Utah.

    7. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of a dirty pig are you?? You're not circumised, wtf??? I'm not nor was brought up in a religious household, quite the opposite. My parents, and especially my father, are athiests. My mother is agnostic at best. To squelch any other reasons, my grandparents on both sides are lutheran (yes yes I know didn't say I am).

    8. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 0, Insightful

      People in civilised countries don't mutilate their children's genitals.

    9. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we need better filters

      No fucktard, we need better readers. There are too many stupid fuckers who waste space complaining when they could just change their preferences to kill funny comments. Maybe this would be a more enjoyable site for you to visit.

    10. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by leifm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The proliferation of Windows Media in porn makes Windows XP(R) the superior platform for digital pornography. Sure you can use MPlayer, but in the heat of the moment who wants to deal with that....

      --

      "Windows Me offers tremendous reliability and stability improvements..." -- Paul Thurott
    11. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your absolutely right, It's high time I moved on...

    12. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, of course porn comes second. When you can get linux to run on porn, you let me know.

    13. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -Circumcision reduces the risk of developing UTI 9Urinary Tract infection) in the first year of life by a factor of 12.

      -"invasive penile cancer could be virtually eliminated in the United States by routine newborn circumcision"

      -intact men had approximately 3 times the relative risk for HIV infection and increased risk for genital ulcer disease

      -Circumcision reduced the risk of genital ulcer disease, including syphilis and chancroid

      -circumcised men reported less sexual dysfunction than intact men

      -Women prefer circumcised sexual partners

      I'm sorry, what was your point again?

    14. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by garaged · · Score: 0

      Do some exploration and find that:

      UTI (Urinary Tract infection) is not really common, so, 12 times (almost) 0 == (almost) 0

      Actually, circumcision makes penis less sensitive, wich adds an impotent problem to an already premature eyaculator (belive, i have known that kind of cases)

      At least in Mexico, women dont have a special preference for mutilated men, as long as the one involved is capable of giving her pleasure

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    15. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by inteller · · Score: 1

      This is going to bring a whole new meaning to blowing your wad. It's the porno that cleans up after you :)

    16. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      REDUNDANT

      (was that 20 seconds that time /.?)

    17. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you please re-phrase the original, actually FUNNY post in yet another way, Captain Obvious?

    18. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, it's less sensitive, meaning you would have less problems with premature ejaculation. So women don't like guys that last longer?

    19. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, that's funny. In the UK and Europe, male circumcision is very unusual. Let's look at your points:

      1) I've never heard of UTI in infants *at all*. I know a lot of people with young children.

      2) How, exactly? Penile cancer is pretty rare anyway

      3)/4) Again, how? What actually makes this difference?

      5) What, apart from no longer having the sexually sensitive bit of their penis attached? I'd say that was a pretty major dysfunction

      6) Perhaps in the US. Certainly not in the rest of the world

      Mutilating children is wrong.

    20. Re:It's a porno AND a tissue. by tarius8105 · · Score: 1

      5) What, apart from no longer having the sexually sensitive bit of their penis attached? I'd say that was a pretty major dysfunction

      For crying out loud this is about paper with magic ink, not an anatomy lesson...Besides, its not the top cut off, its just the skin around the top. I take it you havent had it done to you? If so, I think they took a little bit too much off the top with you!

  2. Marketing madness! by Empiric · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, it might be way too late at night for me to be posting, but...

    I wonder if the advent of multimedia paper, as it were, will create a sea-change in the nature of all types of advertising.

    As it stands now, most every box/can/available-surface of products is in some way branded advertising for the product, like, your coke can says, naturally, "Coca-Cola". This advertising must translate into some approximately-calculable value for the Coca-Cola company, in terms of more coke sales.

    But... is there an inflection point at which an ad for something else (say, Porsche cars) would be more valuable than the advertisement for coke? If so, might companies sell space on all manner of products wrapped in this multimedia-paper like banner ads?

    It might be interesting to open my refrigerator and see a few-dozen multimedia presentations on various consumer goods, changing every morning, but... well, maybe a final trip in that Porsche to some Amish community might be more sanity-preserving.

    --
    ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    1. Re:Marketing madness! by jestill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am afraid that as costs come down you may be right. Combine this with low cost sound systems and you have a recipe for complete madness. This sort of thing has been explored in the Minority Report Movie, and to some extend in Neal Stephenson's 'The Diamond Age'.

      --
      "Asleep at the switch? I wasn't asleep, I was drunk!" -- Homer
    2. Re:Marketing madness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      E-Ink is partially owned by Inter Public Group, one of the larges advertising conglomerate in the world.

    3. Re:Marketing madness! by PowerPill · · Score: 1

      Spielberg showed us an exemple of what you are talking about in the movie Minority Report. The scene with the cereal box comes to mind mostly as well as the newspaper on the subway. With wireless devices becoming smaller and their range much greater I can see adverts like the one on your coke can or even simply a bill board changing at the advertisers whim. It'd save on labour costs and time no doubt. Imagine heading down to 7-11 to pick up your paper and never having to ever get another again. Now that would be cool. Of course a laptop could do the same but... Not as cool. =)

    4. Re:Marketing madness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Take it a step further... /BEGIN PATENT
      And you could have a newspaper or a can of coke changing it's ads wirelessly depending on your location.

      So if you went into the Sony store you would get sony ads or if you went into Fry's Electronics you would see their specials for that Fridays ads!

      Then I wouldn't have to get the weekend paper anymore just for the ads!

      But think of the nightmares this would cause with advertisers AMP'ing up their ads signals so that they would get better distance into a competitors store! /END PATENT

    5. Re:Marketing madness! by JohnPM · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the Futurama episode when Farnsworth has been waiting to log on to AOL with the VR suits for years and it finally goes through. They get bombarded with 3D ads. :)

      --
      Karma police, I've given all I can, it's not enough, I've given all I can, but we're still on the payroll.
    6. Re:Marketing madness! by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      When I saw the cereal box in Minority Report, my first thought was "Somebody at Kelloggs is working on that right now...".

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    7. Re:Marketing madness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > As it stands now, most every box/can/available-
      > surface of products is in some way branded
      > advertising for the product, like, your coke
      > can says, naturally, "Coca-Cola". This
      > advertising must translate into some
      > approximately-calculable value for the Coca-
      > Cola company, in terms of more coke sales.

      > But... is there an inflection point at which an
      > ad for something else (say, Porsche cars) would
      > be more valuable than the advertisement for
      > coke?

      We are way past that point. There have been movie adverts on these things for years.

    8. Re:Marketing madness! by Simon · · Score: 5, Interesting
      It's not all bad news. These things will contain computers. Imagine hacking your wheaties box to show something more interesting. You could directly recycle and reuse all of the 'paper' you receive.

      If annoying animation gets out of hand, a few seconds in a microwave oven will probably fix the problem. ;-)

      --
      Simon

    9. Re:Marketing madness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because I take the paper around with me to every store I visit. Y'know, in case I need something to read while I'm walking around shopping.

    10. Re:Marketing madness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Immagine the possibilities for april fools day! You could give EVERY can in the pantry a white label or extend expiration dates.

    11. Re:Marketing madness! by irving47 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll welcome them when slashdot runs the first story on some geek with too much time on his hands taking apart the displays from 200 (insert product here) packages and wrapping them around his car, putting cameras here and there, to build a cloaking device.

      You know it's coming...

      But seriously, when? I saw this stuff being touted by Xerox 5 or 7 years ago at EPCOT. They tried to impress so much with the little props and videos, only to try to gloss over the distinct LACK of Epaper on site. No true demo...

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    12. Re:Marketing madness! by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except the programming will probably be ROT13 "encrypted", and therefore getting in to modify it will violate the DMCA.

      No porn wheaties for you!

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    13. Re:Marketing madness! by bidaum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know much about electronic paper but I pressume
      A) it needs power
      and B) its easy to damage.
      As far as food products like soda are concerned I would think it might be taboo to package a product that holds a charge.
      Also, the way stores ship, store, and bundle all the bulk they buy would run down the batteries (or if its got some sweet solar array keep it out of the light) and probably damage the display. Magnets are probably used in much of the equipment used or kept around bundles of products while in some scattered shipping state. I could go on, but it just doesn't seem feasible to me...

    14. Re:Marketing madness! by __aaklbk2114 · · Score: 1

      It's too bad this technology requires power to keep the pixels in a "non-black" state. Which means, to display an image at all, this thing has to have juice.

      As I understand it, some of the other e-paper systems only require power when you want to change the image which is both a signifigant power reduction and also means the paper can hold an image when it's "unplugged".

    15. Re:Marketing madness! by shokk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Think of how quickly a marketing campaign gets old. I've seen cases of Coke lately with Star Wars Episode 1 (not 2!) on the side. What if this could be kept in sync with the latest marketing campaign so that cases on the display shelves all showed the latest logo or ad? RFID can keep track of what the product is and only display the ad for that particular brand out of the thousands that might be playing on shelves that day. Imagine a stack of sode cubes on the shelf displaying ads and leasing time to the supermarket to show promos. Little subtleties like an old trademark character occasionally winking at the customers as they pass by. Imagine the Trojan condoms horse dancing around on the box. Then hook that up to some sort of RFID for people and the shelves can recognize you a la Minority Report. Fantastic reminders like "Say Mr. Jones, isn't it time you refilled that gonorreah medication?" follow you around the store.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    16. Re:Marketing madness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so if you hack it, release instructions s3kr3tly, or don't release them at all.

    17. Re:Marketing madness! by thrillseeker · · Score: 1
      the programming will probably be ROT13 "encrypted", and therefore getting in to modify it will violate the DMCA

      Nah ... it'll be double-ROT-13 encrypted ... so merely looking at it will encompass a violation.

    18. Re:Marketing madness! by Eraser_ · · Score: 1

      Ever seen a coupon for Sea World/Six Flags/Etc on a coke can? I know I have. If thats not advertising on the coke can space then I don't know what is.

      I see this stuff as replacing pages in Wired.

    19. Re:Marketing madness! by Wardish · · Score: 0


      The power to run these is in effect as long as there's enough light for you to see the results.

      --
      Ward

      . Silence! Be thankful thy species is unpalatable! .
    20. Re:Marketing madness! by yo5oy · · Score: 1

      what about drm? you know they can't let you have the paper that cost them .03 USD to do what you will with it.

      --
      a slut did tulsa
    21. Re:Marketing madness! by BryanL · · Score: 1
      your coke can says, naturally, "Coca-Cola".
      1. Then along comes a corporate hacker and changes the label. Can you imagine hacking the nutrition information or changing to a generic label "Cola" (or even "Piss In A Can")?
    22. Re:Marketing madness! by meiocyte · · Score: 1

      You couldn't really make a cloaking device. Such a device could only cloak itself from one viewer per non-overlapping view at a time. Even then, the computational requirements would be enormous. It would need to calculate what the viewer expects to see by tracing lines from the viewer's eyes through the car to the objects obscured by the car, and compensate for the shading caused by the car, while tracking and updating the viewer's eye positions, etc. It would also need to have some stereo effect to project a different image to each of the viewer's eyes.

      Of course, that's if you want industrial-strength true invisibility cloaking. Camouflage would be much easier. It would be like an S.E.P. field..

      --
      The thing in the box has no place in the language-game at all; not even as a something; for the box might even be empty.
    23. Re:Marketing madness! by HelbaSluice · · Score: 1

      Imagine hacking your wheaties box to show something more interesting.

      I knew we'd get back to porn sooner or later.

    24. Re:Marketing madness! by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      That is much more scary than you seem to imagine. I have been suckered by clever goatse disguises* so often, I wonder how long it will be until someone hacks every cereal box in the store to change at noon the next day.

      *The SCO magic eye guy, for one. Damn him.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    25. Re:Marketing madness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      four letters, DCMA.

      -Nick (also four letters!)

    26. Re:Marketing madness! by Physics+Dude · · Score: 1

      You may be right, but... Go read the insane tolerance requirements for reading a DVD and then get back to me about what is and isn't feasable. Never underestimate the capabilities of a group of tallented engineers with vision and a few billion dollars backing them up. ;)

    27. Re:Marketing madness! by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1
      I think it would be possible to make a cloaking device. Instead of a screen where each pixel emits or reflects light in all directions, the pixel must be able to appear differently depending on the viewing angle. To get the perspective right, you would have to calibrate for the distance of the viewer you're hiding from to get the perspective right, though. You know those "hologram" things where clear grooved piece of plastic is placed over an interlaced image? I'm thinking something like that.

      And no, I don't think it will be practical for at least 30 years, if ever.

  3. Impressive. Now, when does it ship? by silentbozo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Color e-paper, great for display devices, able to replace LCDs, etc. Now when do these things go into mass production? I'd love to have flexible solar cells at pennies per yard, but I can't get those yet either.

  4. BBC News story... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the BBC's slant on the news: Electronic paper prepares for video.

    They're already up to 80 Hz refresh (12-13 ms respnose times). That's pretty damn impressive for a technology that's still in the basic R&D stage, and it augurs well for the future.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:BBC News story... by dmoynihan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bistable nematic screens can do 25 hz--difference is they're shipping it out right now.

    2. Re:BBC News story... by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      They just need to figure out a way for each pixel to respond to a different modulation on a radio frequency, and allow the radio waves to power it. I agree, it's still damn impressive without those innovations, but if they came about, you'd have your new foldable information revolution.

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    3. Re:BBC News story... by Dav3K · · Score: 1

      Hehe...you said 'augur.'

  5. high tech? by t0rnt0pieces · · Score: 1, Funny

    (With apologies to David Spade)
    I liked it better the first time...
    When it was called Etch-A-Sketch.

    --
    Karma: Excellent (In Soviet Russia, karma pimps YOU)
    1. Re:high tech? by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you can operate your Etch-a-Sketch quickly enough to display 80Hz video on it, then you really need to cut down on the caffeine...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:high tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can operate your Etch-a-Sketch quickly enough to display 80Hz video on it, then you really need to cut down on the caffeine...

      I think you misspelled "crystal meth." HTH. HAND.

    3. Re:high tech? by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      Given the description of how the stuff works, I think a Magnadoodle is a much better comparison...

      =Smidge=

    4. Re:high tech? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised no one had noted that video on paper has been around for years

    5. Re:high tech? by Physics+Dude · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you funny if I had some points. Great site! ;)

  6. The Daily Prophet by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 5, Funny

    Boring...they had all that in Harry Potter two years ago, and oil paintings that talk ;-)

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:The Daily Prophet by dockthepod · · Score: 1

      come on, they had this in myst way before that

    2. Re:The Daily Prophet by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Boring...they had all that in Harry Potter two years ago, and oil paintings that talk ;-)

      Which I guess proves the old saying that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

      Or in this case, any sufficiently advanced CGI is indistinguishable from sufficiently advanced technology.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  7. Good toilet paper ! by zymano · · Score: 1

    Maybe better than charmin and wont tear in your hand while doing business and watching Howard Stern.

    1. Re:Good toilet paper ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wack off to Howard Stern? Ewwwww

  8. But how do you get color? by panurge · · Score: 4, Informative
    The picture in the article has to be misleading. Although a camera has adjacent color receptor sites, print color doesn't work like that at all. If the cells are adjacent, they can only produce an approximate gray. In the CMYK standard printing process, the ink markings superimpose, so grays are achieved with different sizes of black dots, and red is obtained by superimposing yellow (-blue) and magenta (-green). This means that instead of being adjacent as in the picture, the cells would have to be stacked. There would also need to be some way of ensuring that when the cells were partially colored, the upper colored areas were not directly over the ones below (or they would be obscured and only the top color would show.)

    There may be some magical solution to this, but it looks to me as if color is very, very much more difficult than mono.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:But how do you get color? by no_mayl · · Score: 1

      How about using RGB instead? and the background would be K instead of white. Or maybe double layered thingy, with RBG on top, K, then the white at the bootom. The K cells would be under the RG and B.

    2. Re:But how do you get color? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 3, Insightful
      In the CMYK standard printing process, the ink markings superimpose

      This is partially true as I understand it. When the ink is layed down the screens for the four colors (cyan, magenta, yellow and black) are not aligned perfectly. They are offset so many degrees apart and a printer could tell you the optimum settings to avoid moire patterns. Perhaps this could have something to do with it.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    3. Re:But how do you get color? by achurch · · Score: 1

      I may have no clue what I'm talking about, but my impression was that they plan to get the dots really small, to the point where the eye can't distinguish them as individual points--then your eye just takes the average and gets whatever color was intended. They said something similar in the article with respect to getting clean shades of grey.

      If you think about it, even regular ink works the same way--whatever size it is, if you have a dot of ink on the paper then it's going to obscure whatever's below it. (Or maybe things work differently at the molecular level? IANAPhysicist.)

    4. Re:But how do you get color? by panurge · · Score: 1

      So how do you get 100% red? The maximum intensity of any primary color would be 33%.

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    5. Re:But how do you get color? by xoboots · · Score: 1

      They didn't seem to comment on resolution, but the suggestion seems to be that it is at least as good as traditional print. It seems fair to assume that optical mixing will come with their method just as it does in traditional print. Optical mixing may also explain the claims in regard to intensity and brightness.

    6. Re:But how do you get color? by MalachiConstant · · Score: 5, Informative
      In the CMYK standard printing process, the ink markings superimpose, so grays are achieved with different sizes of black dots, and red is obtained by superimposing yellow (-blue) and magenta (-green). This means that instead of being adjacent as in the picture, the cells would have to be stacked.

      I worked in a pre-press shop for a couple of years, so I've worked with printing on a very low level. The color dots don't need to be directly stacked on one another to achieve a certain color. In fact each color is printed at a seperate angle so the dots are rarely directly on top of one another

      Take a magnifying glass to your sunday comics and you can see that the black dots are at one angle (usually straight up and down) and each other color is rotated slightly. Even at relatively large dot sizes (72 dpi) the dots seem to merge together to form whatever color they're looking for.

      Since the dots are arranged in groups of four in this paper you could achieve the same result, except it may look a bit more like a computer image (made up of distinct pixels in a grid) as opposed to a magazine picture (pixels for each color are rotated). It also sounds like they can make the dots whatever size they want, which is how it is done in printing:

      The larger the applied voltage, the more the ink retracts. The ink is therefore capable of a continuous grey scale, not just of a two-tone contrast.

      And even if the dots were stacked directly on top of each other it would still work. The ink is spread so thin that it's transparent, that's why yellow on top of magenta shows as red. So if they could stack it somehow it would show correctly (assuming the ink they use is like regular ink in that way).

    7. Re:But how do you get color? by ejito · · Score: 1, Interesting

      RGB is meant for emission of colors, like from a glowing monitor. CMYK is meant for reflection fo colors, like from a piece of paper.

      The poster is trying to allude to the fact that a combination of colors creates whites and grays, not color. I do however disagree that the cots must be stacked to create visible color.

      If the dots were tiny enough, it would be possible to use CMYK by dropping uneeded colors to white, and using all of the colors together to create a very dark black, while still keep fairly vibrant colors.

      For example, a book with only the cyan and yellow colors highlighted would create a nice dark teal color. Now say if every other yellow was highlighted, it would make an even darker color.

      One interesting thing to note: in the picture of their array, it looks like K (blacK) is a very dark blue. I'm sure it looks black to the naked eye, though

    8. Re:But how do you get color? by ejito · · Score: 0

      For example, a book with only the cyan and yellow colors highlighted would create a nice dark teal color. Now say if every other yellow was highlighted, it would make an even darker color.
      Sorry mistake...
      I meant if you had a 2:1 cyan to yellow ratio it'd create a brighter color because of the white space. To make it darker you'd have to start adding black dots.

    9. Re:But how do you get color? by pVoid · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hmmm, the painter Georges Seurat was a pointilist. I'm not going to post a link to his picture because we would melt down any server I link, but a quick google for his name will find you pictures.

      My point is: if you look closely at those paintings, the dots aren't superimposed. They are side by side. And they are quite big: the size of small brushes... So it *does* work.

    10. Re:But how do you get color? by MalachiConstant · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's an image showing a close-up of a CMYK image.

      (And if I remember correctly black is actually printed at 45 degrees, not straight up and down like I said)

    11. Re:But how do you get color? by no_mayl · · Score: 1

      http://www.aecom.yu.edu/aif/instructions/pictrogra phy/printer1.htm
      This is a true RBG printer (not with internal rgb -> cymk convertion like some of the Epson 1270)

      So RGB/K/W could work just fine.

    12. Re:But how do you get color? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Look really, really close at your computer screen. The cells don't overlap. They abut. And you see all those intermediate colors just fine.

    13. Re:But how do you get color? by no_mayl · · Score: 1

      my bad. Ignore the previous post, that printer still does cym internally. Damn. I'm sure RGB could work, but would probably look ugly...

    14. Re:But how do you get color? by AlecC · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is not a question of working differently at a molecular level. In the thin film that actually ends up on the page, the inks are translucent - think Jello, not paint. Each ink absorbs the light at some frequencise and passes others, which then bounce of the white paper behind - unsess abosrbewd by another ink at the same point. It is not perfect, and in bulk the inks look opaque. But the inks are actually printed over each other.

      You are right that, if the dots are really small, the eye will average them out. This is, actually, how screen printing works: there are actually rows of dots in shaded areas. However, they are of the order of 30 times smaller than pixels on even the best screen, so it takes quite a powerfule glass to see them.

      What the article doesn't say, but the picture does, is that Cyan+Magenta+Yellow, which should theoretically produce black, actually produces a durty purplish brown. So you need some real black to get a good rendition. Each pixel will have to have four cells.

      Grandparent is correct. Because the cells are spatially separate, 100% red will actually only have 25% of the the background red, the rest remaining white. So I would expect a colour display, while having good readability, to be rather flat an uninteresting. The B/W display should be very good. Because it is reflective not emissive technology, it should have excellent readabilty and low poer consumption (but not the zero power consumption of the e-Ink in /. a coupel of weeks ago).

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    15. Re:But how do you get color? by Serious+Simon · · Score: 1
      In principle full-colour images might be produced this way, Hayes and Feenstra show.

      I think that you are correct, and that they have not actually tried it yet, or they would have discovered their mistake.

      Instead of stacking the cells they could use RGB as in color LCD's; the background of adjacent cells must be colored red, green or blue, and the ink in the cell will be black in each of them.

      However, this will mean that the brightness of the display will be considerably reduced.

    16. Re:But how do you get color? by danila · · Score: 1

      Because you can just add extra brightness for particular colour channel - it's not the case for reflective images. If you put this e-paper with red image on it and normal red paper, the latter will look much redder. The e-paper will either look pinker (if other cells are turned off and are white) or a darker shade of red (if other cells are on).

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    17. Re:But how do you get color? by leery · · Score: 1

      they'd have to replace the white backings with transparent ones to stack them, but that doesn't sound so far-fetched, does it? you'd probably need backlighting, though.

      --
      "This is not a sig." -- R.
    18. Re:But how do you get color? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cyan+Magenta+Yellow, which should theoretically produce black, actually produces a durty purplish brown.

      I believe this effect is due to the physical/chemical properties of printers inks, which react chemically when mixed (unlike colours produced by pure light, as in the (additive) RGB colour model). The article does not describe exactly what the electronic inks are or how they work, so maybe they will require a "black" ink.

    19. Re:But how do you get color? by himself · · Score: 1

      Actually, Cyan, Magenta, and blacK are all at 30 degree angles to each other, and Yellow is 15 (?) degrees. That is, the "grid" of C dots is aligned along 0/180 and 90/270 degrees; M is on 30/210 and 120/300; M is on 60/240 and 150/330; and Y is on 15/105 and 105/195. Or something -- you get the idea, however, that the grids should have a minimum of intersections.
      Anyway, if these angles are off (and the guys, called strippers -- and stop that giggling -- who used to make printing plates from film negatives *never* drank on the job, so this *rarely* happened) then you get moire patterns. Moires are visible swooping curves of no ink intertwined with other swooping curves -- admittedly less noticeable -- of more ink. These are tremendously entertaining to observe by holding two negative film exposures of the same image -- the C and M separations, say -- and rotating them back and forth in relation to each other. (Note: may cause nausea in pregnant women, accountants and the elderly; children are likely to enjoy it.)
      As stated, they would either stack four layers of the cells with transparent dividers, or come up with an alternative to four-color/process color-- to which I say "Har. Let's see it."

    20. Re:But how do you get color? by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Not a chemical reaction, but just that the particular dyes don't really absorb the full spectrum between them. Remember that, while eyes only see three colors (and combinations of them), there is a spectrum of wavelengths of light, and you have to stop all of them to get black. Doing so effectively is best done with a fourth ink.

    21. Re:But how do you get color? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      ...my impression was that they plan to get the dots really small, to the point where the eye can't distinguish them as individual points--then your eye just takes the average and gets whatever color was intended. They said something similar in the article with respect to getting clean shades of grey.

      I thought they were talking specifically about monochrome at that point and the shades of gray were accomplished by percentage of the pixel that was allowed to show white (size of ink dot) only.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    22. Re:But how do you get color? by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      If you think about it, though, the technology used to create that image would have been black magic in the olden days.

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    23. Re:But how do you get color? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      The picture in the article has to be misleading. Although a camera has adjacent color receptor sites, prin color doesn't work like that at all. [...] instead of being adjacent as in the picture, the cells would have to be stacked.

      That is correct.

      But this is a prototype. In the real product the cells would no doubt be stacked - with transparent ground planes between the color layers.

      A version with adjacent single-color pixels is a lot easier to fabricate for a proof-of-concept device.

      There would also need to be some way of ensuring that when the cells were partially colored, the upper colored areas were not directly over the ones below (or they would be obscured and only the top color would show.)

      Nope. You're assuming opaque ink. Printing ink it translucient - absorbing its complimentary color and passing the others. Stack the inks to suck out different bands as required.

      Exception is black - the "fourth color" which is present to make up for the fact that the other three dies aren't perfect when they're trying to suck out ALL the light. You have to take into account how the black overlaps the other colors, because the contribution of the other color inks is present only in the region NOT covered by the black ink.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    24. Re:But how do you get color? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      So invent a paper backlight.

      Or sell these with X-ray tables.

  9. Re:Yeah but I doubt by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 0

    they are up to 80 Hz. Pretty damn good already, eh? A poster up above has a link to the BBC article saying this.
    I'll have 2!

    --
    I have over 70 freaks, do you?
  10. "Great" frequency? by WegianWarrior · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The frequency would be great, would hurt your eyes after a couple minutes I would guess...

    I guess that depends on what you mean by a "great" frequency. In Europe, television has a frequency of 50Hz (it's 60Hz in the US) - even if I've heard that two and two frames are alike, in other words that the frequency is 25 or 30Hz. Movies in theaters are usually run at 24 frames per second, in other words a frequency of 24Hz.

    There is no real need to have frequencies running much higher than that to watch a movie - since a frequency of 72Hz would just mean that the same picture would be drawn three times over, and thats a waste on a device like this.

    In addition, there might not make much sence in talking about frequeny at all on a device like this; if they want to save on power, they only alter the state of the pixels that actually changes between each frame.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    1. Re:"Great" frequency? by watzinaneihm · · Score: 1

      And usually our eye hurts because of backlighting and the fixed focal length you have to hold for a long time. In this case they dont have a backlight and so may be better for your eyes/

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    2. Re:"Great" frequency? by ejito · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Video and televsion are recorded on film, which has a delay on each frame. this delay captures a set amount of time, also known as motion blur. When people move on film, their body movements are actually slightly blurred (but not so much that it coudl be noticed easily), creating the illusion of smooth animation. If you play videogames on your monitor, you'd immediately see the difference between 24FPS and 60FPS. If you're a habitual gamer, you'd even be able to see the difference between 80 and 100 FPS (depending on the game). As someone else has pointed out, interlacing plays an important role in visual perception as well. I can actually see my monitor flickering right now, while I'm running at 60hz (i have an old monitor). It's even more apparent on cheap screens, where I can see the mouse cursor flicker. On nice TFTs that interlace the image updates and also hold their "color"(persist between updates), it looks really smooth. On horrible flatpanels, it looks really awful, even at 80hz, if they don't use good refresh techniques.

    3. Re:"Great" frequency? by whm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In addition, there might not make much sence in talking about frequeny at all on a device like this; if they want to save on power, they only alter the state of the pixels that actually changes between each frame.

      This neglects that it takes power to simply maintain the image. As the article states, it's an application of voltage that controls the size of the inkdot pixel. The energy usage is only zero when displaying a completely black image.

    4. Re:"Great" frequency? by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 4, Informative
      Movies in theaters are usually run at 24 frames per second, in other words a frequency of 24Hz.

      Actually, movies are run at twice that, i.e. in order to reduce the flickering each frame is projected twice. And 48Hz is just barely acceptable for straight on viewing. You'll see the flicker clearly out of the corner of your eye.

      So, they actually need more than that, 72Hz is actually about right for something that you're sitting close to (such as a computer screen).

      There's a lot of info on the net if you want to dig deeper.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    5. Re:"Great" frequency? by AlecC · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I guess that depends on what you mean by a "great" frequency. In Europe, television has a frequency of 50Hz (it's 60Hz in the US) - even if I've heard that two and two frames are alike, in other words that the frequency is 25 or 30Hz. Movies in theaters are usually run at 24 frames per second, in other words a frequency of 24Hz.

      TV has a field rate of 50/50 hz. Fields are alternately the odd and even lines of the picture, so the frame rate is 25/30 hz. The two fields are spatially slightly separated, so even on a still picture they are not the same; the second field gives you more information than the first. But if the original capture mechanism was a video camera, the two fields are captured at different times as well as different places, so it gives better motion display.

      There is no real need to have frequencies running much higher than that to watch a movie - since a frequency of 72Hz would just mean that the same picture would be drawn three times over, and thats a waste on a device like this.

      You are correct that film is at 24 hz. However, cinema projectors deliberatly flicker the light at 48 hz to give an impression of better movement. Once you get the trick of it, it is quite easy to spot 24-frame film material on TV, and it can become annoying.

      50/60 hz field rate, and making a frame out of two fields, are both in fact economy measures. When TV was first invented, high rates were difficult and expensive, and there was a tradeoff between picture quality and cost. In fact, percieved movement quality increases up to frame rates in the low 70s of Hz - hence 80Hz being "as good as you will ever need".

      A frame will be displayed 3 times at 72 hz only if it is sourced from a traditional film camers - a breed which is slowly dying out. All news cameras are now electronic, and Lucas is filming the Star Wars series electronically - othere will follow, slowly. Some of the new HDTV standards have 60 true frames, not 60 fields, per second.

      As I say, existing TV standards are a compromise for the tradeoffs of an earlier day. We will eventially get newer standards, and hence better pictures. But once a set of standards are embedded in the comsumer marketplace, there is a massive lag in the adoption of new standards.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    6. Re:"Great" frequency? by JohnPM · · Score: 1, Funny

      I doubt the paper would flicker at the refresh rate like a CRT does though. Cheap LCD like on a mobile phone have a slow refresh rate that's usually insufficient for video. However they don't flicker and don't hurt your eyes.

      For example, a normal piece of paper has a refresh rate of 0, but doesn't hurt your eyes the way you're talking about.

      --
      Karma police, I've given all I can, it's not enough, I've given all I can, but we're still on the payroll.
    7. Re:"Great" frequency? by mphase · · Score: 0

      You sir are an ass hat.

      For the purpose of discussion it is much more accurate to say paper as a refresh rate of infinity and therefore doesn't hurt your eyes in the same way video does.

    8. Re:"Great" frequency? by RedWizzard · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, movies are run at twice that, i.e. in order to reduce the flickering each frame is projected twice. And 48Hz is just barely acceptable for straight on viewing. You'll see the flicker clearly out of the corner of your eye.
      Got any references to back that up? Everything I've ever seen says movie projectors run at 24 fps (see HowStuffWorks for example). A movie projector doesn't refresh an image like a CRT - the light source is always on, displaying whatever is on the film in front of it. So you can't really project each frame twice anyway, it's projected for exactly how long it's in front of the light for (1/24th of a second minus transport time). Any perceived flicker in movie projection is due to the border between frames of film, not the light source going on and off.
    9. Re:"Great" frequency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A movie projector doesn't refresh an image like a CRT - the light source is always on, displaying whatever is on the film in front of it. So you can't really project each frame twice anyway, it's projected for exactly how long it's in front of the light for (1/24th of a second minus transport time). Any perceived flicker in movie projection is due to the border between frames of film, not the light source going on and off.

      I've actually worked with 35 mm projectors (the ones they use in almost all movie theaters these days), and the parent is more correct than you. You are right that the lamp is always on, but there is a thick rotating disk between the lamp and the film. It has a cutout to let the light through for part of the revolution (little less than 1/2 if I remember correctly). This goes around twice for each frame of film. (i.e. flash-flash-advance, flash-flash-advance ...). There are 24 film frames per second for 35 mm film, but there are 48 flashes up on the screen.

      BTW, if you leave the light on the film too long (less than 1 s or so) you'll melt a hole in the film - and I know this from personal experience.

    10. Re:"Great" frequency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, were talking paper here. Paper does not flicker. CRTs (or movie screens) need to use a certain refresh rate as it is flickering light that is supposed to simulate a stable image.

      I imagine this electro-ink thing would work and be useful even if it changed only once during a second. 24Hz (and no ghosting) would actually render it useful for believable full-motion video.

    11. Re:"Great" frequency? by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 2, Informative
      Got any references to back that up? Everything I've ever seen says movie projectors run at 24 fps (see HowStuffWorks for example).

      Sure, see for example the explanation from the Australian film commision. But really searching for '48 fps' and 'projector' will get you tons of hits (though granted many will be about proposed improvements to the current system). Also my original post had a link with the same info, albeit from a TV-guy's perspective.

      A movie projector doesn't refresh an image like a CRT - the light source is always on, displaying whatever is on the film in front of it. So you can't really project each frame twice anyway, it's projected for exactly how long it's in front of the light for (1/24th of a second minus transport time). Any perceived flicker in movie projection is due to the border between frames of film, not the light source going on and off.

      While howstuff works is generally good, they're wrong on this particular point. However, had you read their description more carefully, you'd see that what you're saying isn't exactly right. While the lamp in the projector is always 'on', the light doesn't actually always reach the screen. There's a shutter (called 'gate' in projectionist circles) that blocks the light path as the film advances. Without it, you'd see the actual film advance, and that would look funny, to say the least. Now, just gating the movie at 24 Hz produced noticable flicker, and hence the film is double gated, i.e. the shutter (really a rotating disc with two holes in it) is closed twice for each film advance.

      Now if you want to go into the details of why the human perceptual system has a higher tolerance for the resulting experience, it gets involved and I don't actually know all the details, even though I really should (I do research in visualisation).

      It's interesting you make the comparison with a CRT though. It's almost the reverse. The afterglow from the phosphorous in the CRT between electron beam refresh is considerable, much more so than the film frame, the light through which is just cut off between frames (and once during). I've made a post about CRT's before, you might find interesting, though it's not exactly related to the subject at hand.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    12. Re:"Great" frequency? by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      Um, were talking paper here. Paper does not flicker. CRTs (or movie screens) need to use a certain refresh rate as it is flickering light that is supposed to simulate a stable image. I imagine this electro-ink thing would work and be useful even if it changed only once during a second. 24Hz (and no ghosting) would actually render it useful for believable full-motion video.

      Uhmm, yeah. My post was more in response to the original parent, which had gotten most of TV/Movie display wrong on the point of refresh rates.

      I'd say that the critical parameter here is what the actual switch looks like. It has to take some time to reconfigure the ink blobs. And if you can see that reconfiguration then you have (paraphrasing yourself) "flickering ink that's supposed to simulate a stable image".

      Whether it's emitted light or reflected light that flickers, doesn't matter much to the human eye. It's still flicker.

      I'd say that without knowing more about how the electronic ink paper actually works, reponse times and so on, it's still too early to tell what the minimum acceptable refresh rate to achieve a stable image is. Or how palatable the actual reconfiguration will be to the human eye. Might not look like flicker at all! (Might look horrible, who knows).

      Now, I'm old enough I've seen other supposedly revolutionary display techniques that never matured, but I have some hopes for this one, at least in niche products. Time will tell.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    13. Re:"Great" frequency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Large portions of most animation is shot "on twos" - each drawing is shot twice, for an effective framerate of 12fps. It saves a lot of time and effort and money. You can go lower, but I find that around 10fps is when the illusion of life really breaks down into a sequence of individual drawings in rapid succession, instead of a magically moving drawing.

      Give the brain something worth grabbing on to, and it will happily fill in the gaps.

    14. Re:"Great" frequency? by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      Large portions of most animation is shot "on twos" - each drawing is shot twice, for an effective framerate of 12fps. It saves a lot of time and effort and money. You can go lower, but I find that around 10fps is when the illusion of life really breaks down into a sequence of individual drawings in rapid succession, instead of a magically moving drawing.

      Sure, I never really thought about that. For an 'animated' paper that shows cartoon style animation, a few fps is probably enough (depending on what the transitions looks like, and that the image can be held steady in between). I was more thinking along the lines of an animated offset print, i.e. an animated photographic print. Then I'm sure much more than 12 fps would be needed for a life like experience.

      We of accept cartoon characters hopping arround because we have no frame of reference. The same low effective frame rate in CGI (say the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park) irritates me to no end. They just don't look like they're moving right.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    15. Re:"Great" frequency? by lightsaber1 · · Score: 1
      I'd say that without knowing more about how the electronic ink paper actually works, reponse times and so on, it's still too early to tell what the minimum acceptable refresh rate to achieve a stable image is. Or how palatable the actual reconfiguration will be to the human eye. Might not look like flicker at all! (Might look horrible, who knows).

      From the ARTICLE: Switching between dark and bright states takes only about ten milliseconds - fast enough to produce sharp video images.

      So, if it takes 10 milliseconds, although I doubt it could do this switch 1000 times/second, I think it would be safe to assum 80 Hz would be incredibly easy for it.

    16. Re:"Great" frequency? by lightsaber1 · · Score: 1
      The extra zero in 1000 in the parent is a typo. Read 100.

      come to a bbbq...the extra b is for byobb

    17. Re:"Great" frequency? by phliar · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Not exactly. With CRTs, the dot has to be refreshed every so often i.e. refresh rate so the image doesn't flicker. If the pixel stays the same colour i.e. doesn't fade, then it only needs to be refreshed at 24 Hz, the movie's frame rate. If you only care about showing a cine movie, you don't really need a refresh rate any better than 24 Hz. This is why LCD screens can get by with lower refresh rates. This is also why digital graphics can show much nicer movement, your refresh rate is not limited to 24 fps.

      On the other hand, I find movement in movies very distracting because the image flashes painfully. Widescreen movies are the worst because your peripheral vision is more sensitive to movement. I think 24 fps for movies is too low, we should have a new cine standard with a higher frame rate. Maybe 36 fps.

      Well, I can dream, can't I?

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    18. Re:"Great" frequency? by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      From the ARTICLE: Switching between dark and bright states takes only about ten milliseconds - fast enough to produce sharp video images

      Yeah, that's what I meant. If it takes 10 ms then all we know is that they're not going above 100 Hz. It doesn't actually say that they'll be able to produce steady sharp looking video at 100 Hz. The switch as such could look terrible, and at 100 Hz all you see is switching, there's no time for the image to remain steady.

      It could look acceptable, it could also look bad. Too early to tell.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    19. Re:"Great" frequency? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      But really searching for '48 fps' and 'projector' will get you tons of hits (though granted many will be about proposed improvements to the current system).
      I'm struggling to find anything more than that very brief description on the screensound.gov.au site. Searching with "film" "projector" "48 fps" "-maxivision" gives that as the third hit and nothing else relevant looking. I really want an explanation as to why displaying the same frame twice is going to help in any way. The length of time that shutter is closed must still be the same as when the film is projected at 24fps (still takes the same amount of time to move the film), or are you saying that the film is printed with each frame twice?
    20. Re:"Great" frequency? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Have managed to find a few more descriptions. Unfortunately none of them seem to explain why having an extra shutter break the display of each frame helps reduce flicker. I would have thought that reducing the duration of the shutter break (i.e. speeding up the pull down) would have been more effective. Instead it seems that the frequency of the shutter breaks is more important than the duration of the shutter breaks.

    21. Re:"Great" frequency? by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      Have managed to find a few more descriptions. Unfortunately none of them seem to explain why having an extra shutter break the display of each frame helps reduce flicker. I would have thought that reducing the duration of the shutter break (i.e. speeding up the pull down) would have been more effective. Instead it seems that the frequency of the shutter breaks is more important than the duration of the shutter breaks.

      Well that's film history by now, I remember reading about when it was discovered, but I cannot remember where. A trip to the library may help.

      As for increasing the pull down speed. Yes, that would help. But they were already pulling the film as fast as they could. Much faster and it would break (more often than it already did), and the holes were wearing out quickly enough as it was. As you know, F=ma, and there's no easy way around that if you have to stop the frame to project it. (Incidentally, high speed cameras do that to about 500 fps today if memory serves, above that you cannot stop the frame, but need to use a rotating prism assembly to expose the frame).

      So given that you cannot advance the frame any faster, blanking out the projector at 24 fps produces a noticable 'slideshow' effect. A simple experiment with a rotating disc (or propellers with different number of blades) and a flashlight in a dark room will demonstrate it. Cutting off the beam more often will seem to the viewer as a reduction in brightness, while cutting it off more seldom will be more noticable.

      So as someone else noted, it's really two things working at once here. 24fps to produce acceptable animation (cartoons do even fewer) (and to be honest 24fps was choosen to give acceptable sound quality, not animation quality, they could have gotten away with less), and 48 Hz to reduce the flickering to acceptable levels.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    22. Re:"Great" frequency? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      And 48Hz is just barely acceptable for straight on viewing. You'll see the flicker clearly out of the corner of your eye.

      I tend to notice the flicker quite a bit. I've stopped going to the MEGA-screen theaters due to this effect - on a giant screen the flicker, for me, moves beyond the peripheral vision to the full screen. The medium-sized screen theater with a full surround setup seems preferable. I'm not sure why the bigger screen has this effect. I also have slightly diminished color vision and very good night vision, so perhaps I have a higher rods/cone ratio than average.

      IMAX runs @ 60 real frames per second, IIRC, to eliminate this problem but makes for huge and heavy film reels. I suppose we need digital distribution first before we can deal with this problem on a large scale - then they can shoot hi-def movies @ 60 frames. The beauty is with delta-frame compression, it won't add a huge amount of size to the transmission.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    23. Re:"Great" frequency? by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      I tend to notice the flicker quite a bit. I've stopped going to the MEGA-screen theaters due to this effect - on a giant screen the flicker, for me, moves beyond the peripheral vision to the full screen. The medium-sized screen theater with a full surround setup seems preferable. I'm not sure why the bigger screen has this effect. I also have slightly diminished color vision and very good night vision, so perhaps I have a higher rods/cone ratio than average.

      Hmm, I know some of my friends complain more about this than other (me included) I don't seem to notice the effect. It could well be that the bigger screen covers more of your field of vision and hence more rods see the picture. But I've never seen a study of this (though I'm sure someone must have made one). I've never thought about the connection to color/night vision, that may well be an effect.

      Also the larger the screen the longer (vertical) distance the front of the scan (the electron beam in CRT:s or the edge of the gate in a movie, though some cinema projectors have two gates blanking from both the bottom and the top of the frame) has to travel to complete the frame update. In doing so activating more rods/cones in the eye, probably making the effect more visible. I've noticed this myself in big screen TV:s (PAL), it's really the larger sizes that benefit the most from 100Hz, the smaller sizes look OK at 50Hz.

      IMAX runs @ 60 real frames per second, IIRC, to eliminate this problem but makes for huge and heavy film reels. I suppose we need digital distribution first before we can deal with this problem on a large scale - then they can shoot hi-def movies @ 60 frames. The beauty is with delta-frame compression, it won't add a huge amount of size to the transmission.

      Well, that and the larger frames. We'll see about the digital distribution of movies, where the formats will go etc. As we've said, for TV it's the opposite, more channels compressed harder, looking like sh*t, rather than higher quality. Then again is all docu-soaps anyway. :-)

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
  11. I forsee problems with this technology. by grimsweep · · Score: 1

    Sounds great. Let's just hope junior doesn't mix up 'touch screen' with 'crayola-responsive'.

    I'd hate to come home and find my Toshiba notebook was turned into Little Billy's coloring book.

    1. Re:I forsee problems with this technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's when Little Billy gets the belt or the backhand because daddy forgot to lock the door of his study.

  12. Excellent by SpiffyMarc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We're that much closer to those creepy animated singing cereal boxes from Minority Report...

  13. A young Lady's illustrated primer by no_mayl · · Score: 1

    Neal Stephenson's "The Diamond Age or, A young Lady's illustrated primer." focuses on a book that uses re-arangeable ink (a book with an AI).
    Nice reading for SF fans.

    1. Re:A young Lady's illustrated primer by desertfish · · Score: 1

      I'm reading it right now, and it's the first thing I thought of when I read the original post! It's possibly my favorite Stephenson book yet.

  14. I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Funny
    That's right - I said overloads. As soon as this is cheap enough, it's going to go on every bit of packaging, junk mail, and flat surface. Each one will vie for your attention. Imagine walking into a Target or Krogers or Walmart and seeing aisle after aisle of seizure-inducing, moving displays that blur into a undulating mass of 'buy ME!' and over-stimulation.

    When is it enough? How much can our wee little monkey brains take? I'm guessing that the 'eXtREEEM' of the future will be advertising that may kill old people or small children.

    Of course, the perfect app for this is e-paper voting! Now elections can be rigged *and* everyone can have a copy of their vote!

    (Note: Votes subject to change)

    1. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1
      At the Willy:s (cheapest supermarket chain in Sweden but with crap selection) here in Orebro, they have installed TVs in every checkout aisle. TVs which play nothing but ads (ads for Willy:s products and for anything else [e.g., Hotel in town] that is paid for).

      So much for peace and quiet while waiting (and we wait much longer here in Sweden at the checkout than in the U.S.--something about the midnight sun or cheap-ass companies who don't hire enough part-timers)

      tssfulk

      PS. You must finish your citation:
      Later that day . . .

      Well, this reporter was...possibly a little hasty earlier and would like to...reaffirm his allegiance to this country and its human president.

      May not be perfect, but it's still the best government we have. For now.

      [notices "HAIL ELECTRONIC PAPER" sign taped up, tears it down]

      Oh, yes, by the way, the spacecraft still in extreme danger, may not make it back, attempting risky reentry, bla bla bla bla bla bla.

      We'll see you after the movie.

    2. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by stuffman64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was at a gas station in the Southside (a part of Pittsburgh) the other day to get some crappy coffee, and there was a monitor at the cash register playing ads for various car-related products and other crap. Since there was a line, and I have a short attention span, I just kept watching the ads when I was waiting. Apparently, the cashiers hate the thing because it repeats every few minutes or so (I would imagine this would be the only thing worse than listening to a pop or hip-hop radio station for an hour). It will only be a matter of time before these are everywhere.

      --
      --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    3. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by mayns · · Score: 1

      And you really think that someone from 100 years ago wouldn't have a fit if they walked into a Wal-Mart and saw all of the brightly coloured packaging? They were used to everything being packaged in a lovely shade of brown paper. And they were the first generation who had the pleasure of nationally available prepackaged merchandise. This will be a big deal for a few years and then we'll be use to it and be incapable of imagining a world without it.


      future=different
      get used to it

    4. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Your point almost makes sense, until you consider the fact that all people are in fact suffering from more stress and enduring more psychological problems than previous generations.

      You can blame better diagnosis (or misdiagnosis) if you want, but really I'm not sure the typical human is really meant to be as smart as society now days expects it to be. A natural human living off of the land really needs to know nothing more than how to make a spear, run from big beasts, and keep out of the rain.

      Technology (be it tending crops or inventing holodecks for wild endless regret-free sexual encounters), builds on technology. Each generation has tools and knowledge that previous generations didn't have. At what point will it reach a level where few people can cope? Even now days most poeple haven't got a clue what's going on inside a computer. Most people haven't got any idea how a telephone, automobile, or television works.

      How many times have you heard someone say "I don't need that many features on my TV/VCR/Microwave/etc"?

      Some people evolve with the times, others just learn to cope, but more and more I think we're going to see people who simply can't hack it all. As more and more people become unable to deal with it, I can honestly see us finding a name for whatever disorder they supposedly have, fiding some medication for it, and then sending them on along their way.

      We'll think they're slow, or stupid, or have no common sense, but in reality, these people could probably make a spear and hide in a cave as well (maybe even better) than the other overly cereberal upright hairless apes.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    5. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by gobbo · · Score: 1

      "A natural human living off of the land really needs to know nothing more than how to make a spear, run from big beasts, and keep out of the rain."

      Oh, puhleeze. People who live in the rainforest in huts have incredibly sophisticated knowledge about that environment, much of it codified in oblique narratives and ritual. A good way to think of that kind of awareness is "pattern-literate." It is a complex system of knowledge that interweaves culture and ecology.

      I'd like to watch a reality show where you and your buddies are given a lesson in spearmaking and lean-to building, and let loose in the australian rainforest or the kalahari for real, then you could report back to us about how stupid hunter/gatherers are.

    6. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by Rary · · Score: 1
      "Imagine walking into a Target or Krogers or Walmart and seeing aisle after aisle of seizure-inducing, moving displays that blur into a undulating mass of 'buy ME!' and over-stimulation."

      Get serious. I mean, sure, that'll start to happen. But soon people will be so fed up with it that even the thick-skulled advertising industry types will realize that they've gone too far. And then this kind of advertising overkill will go the way of spam and popups.

      Oh, wait........

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    7. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by ZackSchil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Scott Adams, author of Dilbert, addresses this in one of his books. He calls it the competancy line. It's rising every day. He realized that he'd been overtaken it when a trip to the airport to sign up for a flight, use free airline miles, and run through the whole process got so complex that he couldn't do it all by himself. The problem is, it's a pretty scary truth. People these days have to remeber how to do so many things just to get through everyday life!

      Most of us are so used to all the things we need to know by now but many people out there, my parents for example, are afraid of ATM machines, TiVo, computers, cell phones, fax machines, digital answering machines, call waiting, cd players, DVD players (why do you need a menu, I want to push in the tape and press play!). They just simply can't deal with much modern technology. My mother doesn't want to have to remeber how to do anything. If she can't figure it out on intuition, then she won't be bothered. That said, many Slashdotters may be aware of the sudden loss of literacy many people suffer from wjile in front of a computer :^D

      (I get a call in my room at school. It's my mother. It's [I assume the computer] asking me: "Do you wish to save this document," what should I do? Well, do you want to save it? Yes. Then press Save. Oh, ok, that took care of it, thanks, click)

      I end up being goaded into doing all her typing because she simply doesn't want to learn how to use a word processor. They can't cope for some reason.

      I, however seem to maybe force a bit too much of it on them because I'm a huge technophile. Gotta go, my mother is in the next room screaming: "What is this TiVo central thing. WHERE IS MY TELEVISION!"

    8. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When is it enough? How much can our wee little monkey brains take? I'm guessing that the 'eXtREEEM' of the future will be advertising that may kill old people or small children."

      Blipverts. Max Headroom. 'Nuff said.

    9. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 1

      no need to be afraid - that's thinking negative.

      embrace the schism.

      the rocket for venus will be leaving shortly.

      don't get on it.

      --
      Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
    10. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Technology (be it tending crops or inventing holodecks for wild endless regret-free sexual encounters)
      Didn't Lt. Barclay teach you about the problems of combining sex and the holodeck?

    11. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

      Most of us are so used to all the things we need to know by now but many people out there, my parents for example, are afraid of ATM machines, TiVo, computers, cell phones, fax machines, digital answering machines, call waiting, cd players, DVD players...

      Or maybe they just honestly have no need for all that crap?

      My great grandmother used her microwave as a bread box. She lived just nigh a 100 years just fine that way, and seemed quite joyful for most of those years, too.

      Peace be with you,
      -jimbo

    12. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by zpok · · Score: 1

      Well, eventually most everyday technology will evolve to the point of being "magic", where some people will be very good at it, say "wizards" or geeks if you will and be able to do the weirdest things, but the vast majority of people will be proficient enough to say "give me the news of today, say the funny pages" and get what they asked for.

      Electricity is pretty standard now, and most people don't have a clue how it actually works. To be more correct: nobody knows EXACTLY how electricity works. Still, we all manage to switch on the light. Maybe not everybody can change a lightbulb, but that's getting obsolete real fast as well. The more we integrate a thing, the more we adapt it to our limited understanding.

      Computers are still pretty new and not yet stupified enough to be 100% accepted. They'll get simpler to use someday - or better still they'll be largely replaced with one-trick ponies and appliances.

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
    13. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people evolve with the times, others just learn to cope, but more and more I think we're going to see people who simply can't hack it all.

      It's already happening in Japan. Google for hikikomori to find out more. Basically it's a name given to what are essentially urban hermits. The Japanese people are pushy when it comes to lining up to buy food, for instance. The Japanese people, as a whole, are so stressed out that children don't have any hobbies other than shopping or listening to music. They have no aspirations of the future, either. If you ask Japanese children what they want do be when they grow up, they will shrug their shoulders and respond with "an office worker". No future astronauts, firemen, doctors, or engineers. Pretty sad. Even sadder still, Japan is a foreshadowing of the future for all countries mechanizing themselves to death. Granted, the western world may never see some of the problems Japan has, such as pedophilia (which is related partly due to laws and the lack of enforcement), if society keeps going on the track it is going (i.e. advertising everywhere on buses in the news; pouring more and more money into the entertainment industry and propping up more and more idols), it will look very much like the disarray that is modern Japan.

    14. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can honestly see us finding a name for whatever disorder they supposedly have

      its called being Amish. they dont like new technology. they've been around for a while.

    15. Re:I welcome our new e-paper overloads... by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      In and around NYC, they have flat screen panels in a lot of delis that display advertising as well. However, I don't remember the ones in NYC having sound, so they weren't that annoying and actually rather nifty.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  15. Not e-books, perhaps, but... by achurch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'll still take real dead trees over electronic paper for my leisure reading, I think, but how about the opposite application: writing? "Print" a document to the paper, mark it up in a meeting, and have the changes all saved without having to go back and mark it up again on your PC. Alternatively, take the paper to your favorite country getaway, write up a story, and (assuming your handwriting is decently legible) have it automatically OCR'd into text for later editing, without needing to lug a laptop around and all the associated annoyances.

    I dunno, sounds good to me . . .

    1. Re:Not e-books, perhaps, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is already something like this. Anoto has developed a pen with built in scanner/OCR functionality. It even has bluetooth so you can transfer it to your computer or fax it immediately. The only drawback is that it requires you to write on a special paper (with a fine grid printed upon it).

    2. Re:Not e-books, perhaps, but... by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll still take real dead trees over electronic paper for my leisure reading, I I think, but how about the opposite application: writing? "Print" a document to the paper, mark it up in a meeting, and have the changes all saved without having to go back and mark it up again on your PC.

      With a touchscreen-enabled piece of electronic paper writing shouldn't pose a problem. Combined with advanced text recognition it might even be superior to regular prints, as the document could be updated on the fly.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    3. Re:Not e-books, perhaps, but... by lipi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...but how about the opposite application: writing?

      Xerox has been there, done that:

      "Through a chemical process that Xerox is holding as a trade secret, "each ball is given an electric charge, with more on one side than on the other," Sheridon explains. So when an electric field is applied to the surface of the sheet, the balls are lifted in their oil-filled cells, rotated like the needles of tiny compasses to point either their black or their white hemispheres eyeward, and then slammed against the far wall of the cell. There they stick, holding the image, until they are dislodged by another field. At high voltages, the balls stick before completing their rotation, thus producing various shades of gray. Sheridon's group has also produced red-and-white displays and is working on combining balls of various hues to produce full-color ones.
      (...)
      But the real goal, Sheridon says, is also the most distant: an electronic surrogate for paper. Engineer Matt Howard hands me a wooden pencil that is plugged into a weak power supply. As I write on the sheet, the tiny electric field conducted through the pencil's graphite core darkens the screen wherever the tip touches. Howard is working on a handheld wand that will receive text and images from a computer and scan them onto a Gyricon page, which would then be annotated, photocopied, erased--but not discarded."

      Copy of the Scientific American article is here , but you may find other references.

    4. Re:Not e-books, perhaps, but... by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1
      "...each ball is given an electric charge..."


      No thanks!

    5. Re:Not e-books, perhaps, but... by zobier · · Score: 1

      It's called a tablet PC.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    6. Re:Not e-books, perhaps, but... by euxneks · · Score: 1

      Xerox has been there, done that

      I think that Xerox has been there, done that for everything in computers and interaction. Examples? The mouse, smalltalk, window-based O/S.. etc...

      =D
      Nowadays you have a pretty good chance to say "Xerox has been there, done that" to pretty much everything. =) Too bad they didn't want to capitalize on that, we might have Xerox as the leader in O/S dev. instead of M$. Although, there might not be much of a difference...?

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  16. Hey! by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1
    Hey! What ever happened to the "Paperless Society"?

    My desk is buried in mounds of paper, and now they want be to find the one that is used as the display?

    Sigh.

  17. does anyone else here feel old? by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    remember those old, cabinet-sized gothic beautiful wooden radios with huge glowing tubes visible from the back? some of you might have only seen them in museums

    did you think to yourself "good gosh, what archaic times" when you saw them? we probably all did

    and then i see news like this, and know how people like us, who grew up with crt screens and space heater-looking computer cases with noisy fans in the back, will be seen as archaic some day ;-P

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:does anyone else here feel old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im a 24 year old fan of 20th century nostalgia. I guess you could call me a modern anthropologist. I see these old stereos and electronics that my dad finds from renovating old houses that people have left. One old lady gave him this old Curtis Matthews stereo that is gigantic and built like a tank! It has this beautiful oak finish and has a cabinet for records. In its day it was _the_ high end stereo to get. It still works good and it sounds great. I dont know what it is but old albums just seem have great bass that I can't get on digital stereos.

      You can still get them for real cheap at thrift stores like goodwill, especially in urban areas.

    2. Re:does anyone else here feel old? by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 0

      Well, I for one, welcome our new advertisment overlords.

      /horribly misconfigured

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

  18. Magazines will never be the same. by CherniyVolk · · Score: 4, Funny


    Tired of the bored centerfolds that just sit there?

    1. Re:Magazines will never be the same. by ubugly2 · · Score: 1

      not many of them are actually sitting.

  19. Nothing more than paper Flash! by bobobobo · · Score: 1, Funny

    No, no more Flash! Make it stop!

    1. Re:Nothing more than paper Flash! by KillerHamster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is this stuff combustible? Whenever I see Flash, I always feel like setting something on fire. This could be my chance to let out years worth of repressed rage.

  20. It's a big step, but... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    ...what I read in a science-fiction book (can't remember the title now) seemed to be the right future for me.

    A computer the size of matchbox, or something similar. Some pretty, neat shape. One button. Upon pressing, a holographic image of the keyboard and display are created. Follow as with normal computer :) Well, not quite, holographic creation overrides all that standard hardware limitations. Just load the right program and you have any keyboard layout you desire, manipulation by reading your hands position etc.

    2d displays like that have quite a few years of future yet, but far future belongs to 3d. And real 3d, not as in "seen from sweet spot, flat makes illusion of 3d", but so you could watch your pr0n from all sides by walking around it.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  21. Re:Nothing! by Roger_Explosion · · Score: 1

    http://www.io2technology.com/ :)

  22. With lots of small dots by LauraW · · Score: 1
    Although a camera has adjacent color receptor sites, print color doesn't work like that at all. If the cells are adjacent, they can only produce an approximate gray

    If you can vary the intensity of size of the cells, you can get lots of colors other than gray. I have a fairly high-end inkjet CMYK printer that produces great prints. (It's an Epson 2200, fwiw.) To the naked eye, colored areas look, um, colored. But if you look at a print with a loupe (even my relatively cheap 4x one) you can see zillions of different-colored dots. By varying the relative sizes and positions of the dots, they can get lots of different colors.

    CRTs and LCD monitors work similarly. There are lots of small, single-color dots of varying intensities. Unless you get really close, the eye blends them all together into solid colors.

    I hope that was coherent. The drugs I took for my backache seem to be taking effect, so I may wake up in the morning and discover I posted something horrendous. (Which would be better than the time that I didn't remember making a post at all and wondered who had hacked my account.)

  23. Get a sense of humour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that was one of the funniest things I've read all day

  24. Diamond Age, anyone? by LauraW · · Score: 1

    Did someone say that hard, predictive SF was dead?

  25. Re:Nothing! by Roger_Explosion · · Score: 0

    *sigh* I gotta learn to use 'preview' :)

  26. Re:Made out of Thin Air by naztafari · · Score: 1
  27. Basics of television technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    I guess that depends on what you mean by a "great" frequency. In Europe, television has a frequency of 50Hz (it's 60Hz in the US) - even if I've heard that two and two frames are alike, in other words that the frequency is 25 or 30Hz. Movies in theaters are usually run at 24 frames per second, in other words a frequency of 24Hz.

    The 50/60 Hz number is for fields per second. As you might know, (standard) television is interlaced; one field has the the odd lines of the picture and the other has the even lines.

    If the source material was video, which stores its pictures in fields, you can see this in fast-moving objects (there's a ripping effect; occasionally you can see this effect in badly encoded DVDs also). Video source material is used mostly in documentaries, news, etc.

    If the source material is film (most TV series are shot on film, as are all movies ;-) then you have 24 FRAMES (not fields) from which to construct your 50/60 fields per second. In this case, adjacent fields do come from the same picture, and effective frame rate is 24 Hz.

    (If you have 60 Hz TV, the method is called 3:2 pulldown; one film frame provides 3 and 2 fields alternately. 50 Hz TV just speeds up the film a bit and uses two fields per one frame).

  28. Animation on paper? Try LSD-25 by minnkota · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who needs this type of technology?

    Shit, we've had all we need to watch the drawings on our paper move around since 1938!


    Turn on, tune in, drop out!

  29. Wow! A CMYK Monitor... by naztafari · · Score: 1

    No need to worry about out of Gamut warnings when working on RGB...

    Hmm... the core technology behind this is something called 'electrowetting'... isn't that what the barnyard masturbators from the worst jobs in science article from PopSci used to extract sperm from pigs?

    I for one welcome our new electrowetting masters!

  30. Marketing material needed by MacroRex · · Score: 1

    We need to know how this thing works. Could we have a video about it?

    1. Re:Marketing material needed by Cunk · · Score: 1

      There's a PowerPoint presentation that contains some embedded video of this technology at Philips. Follow the link on the right hand side of the page.

      --

      I am the inventor of the hilarious refrigerator alarm.
  31. Filter:It's a porno AND a tissue? by Porthwhanker · · Score: 3, Informative

    With the quality of certain top posts on Slashdot, you really start to wonder what the general mentality is around here... Taco, we need better filters.

    There *are* better filters: Preferences, Comments, Scroll down to Reason Modifiers, -6 for "Funny", Scroll down to Save. No more funny jokes.

    Personally, I like to laugh once in a while.

    1. Re:Filter:It's a porno AND a tissue? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      here's a recipe that's working well for me:

      Insightful +1
      Interesting +1
      Funny -2
      Informative +12
      Offtopic +1
      Flamebait 0
      Troll +1
      Rudundant 0
      Friend +4
      Fan +4
      Foe -1
      Freak -1
      FOF's - 0
      Anonymous -6
      Karma +1
      Subscriber 0
      New users 0

      Threshold 4

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  32. When can I paint my Yugo with this? by InsaneCreator · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about "video" car paint? I'm sure noone would notice I don't own 5 different cars or that I'm not really sitting in a Porsche. :)

    1. Re:When can I paint my Yugo with this? by GMontag451 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Forget paint, imagine your car's paint job as one giant, instantly changable bumper sticker. Now you can finally tell the guy who just cut you off, or the jackass who is sitting on your bumper just where he can stick his tailpipe in large-type plain english!

    2. Re:When can I paint my Yugo with this? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I can't wait to see the new hippie buses with this technology.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:When can I paint my Yugo with this? by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, we can camaflauge(sp?) material surfaces! Nothing more sweet than being a chameleon...

  33. Not exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Effectively, films and TV go at 25/30 (europe/US)frames per second. However, as you've noticed, TVs have twice the frequency needed to show such frame rates. In fact, 100Hz TVs are becoming quite common in Europe, and I guess 120Hz TVs will also be available in the US. This is because, althought 25 fps is enough to make your brain see continous motion, it's actually so slow that you would notice a lot of flickering on the TV screen if it had a 25Hz refresh rate (because of the way the screen is redrawn). I have not seen any of these papers working, but I guess that the same thing might be applicable here.

    1. Re:Not exactly by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      In fact, 100Hz TVs are becoming quite common in Europe, and I guess 120Hz TVs will also be available in the US.
      It seems to me the trend is toward displays capable of progressive scan, which show the entire frame at once rather than splitting it into two screens' worth of fields. My DVD player can already output to my fancy TV in this way, and HDTV tuners can also.
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  34. I'd never finish my thesis ... by Potor · · Score: 1, Funny

    with paper like that.

  35. Rant about calling it "Paper" by fruey · · Score: 1
    It's clearly not Paper, or electronic Paper.

    These are displays, ultra thin, ultra flat, paperlike. However I suspect that the wood (more accurately cellulose?) content is minimal, and that it does not absorb water, cannot be written on with washable ink or pencils, and cannot be torn easily.

    Surely someone can come up with something better than "electronic paper" anyway. People these buzzwords are designed for (those who don't understand, somehow, and have to have things dumbed down) end up just getting alienated anyway. It's MUCH clearer to say "the super flat paperlike thing that your TV will become" rather than saying electronic paper, which the average technophobe will just laugh at?

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    1. Re:Rant about calling it "Paper" by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      Fine, you call it "Super flat paperlike thing that your TV will become", I'll stick to "electronic paper".

      I've learned a long time ago that simplicity trumps completeness, especially if you want to have a stab at marketshare.

    2. Re:Rant about calling it "Paper" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The electronic paper name comes from the visual properties of the material. Everybody knows paper reads better than screens.

    3. Re:Rant about calling it "Paper" by fruey · · Score: 1

      Well how about superflat display, papersharp display, screen on a card, etc... especially in the UK, where "paper" is synonymous with newspaper, I would like to see a linguistic separation. But then, I'm just ranting, as I made perfectly clear.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    4. Re:Rant about calling it "Paper" by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      It's MUCH clearer to say "the super flat paperlike thing that your TV will become" rather than saying electronic paper, which the average technophobe will just laugh at?

      That's GNU/the-super-flat-paperlike-thing-that-your-TV-wi ll -become.
      --
      -Dave
  36. guess what: by teemu.s · · Score: 1

    -> the first release of magazins on this e-paper will come for free
    - youll be able to download all the books, zines, etc. for free
    - but these will _still_ consist of 75% ads and 15 % content -
    so whats the difference?

    1. Re:guess what: by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just wait until someone develops a proxy filter for your downloadable newspaper content.

      Ads? What Ads? :-)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    2. Re:guess what: by Are+We+Afraid · · Score: 0
      but these will _still_ consist of 75% ads and 15 % content

      What will the remaining 10% consist of?

      --
      Rot-13 my address to e-mail me.
      "So I hurry back to little earth / For another life another birth"
    3. Re:guess what: by teemu.s · · Score: 1

      maybe UBE (but it should be 25 % content :-))

    4. Re:guess what: by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Hmm, suppose you download the bible (of anyother manual of mass suppresion) and they include those all famous penis enlargement ads in it. Damn, I should have gone to law school.

    5. Re:guess what: by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

      .. and "hacking the New York Times" will take on a whoe new meaning.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
  37. A one page book? by MacFury · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Since the "paper" can be refreshed with any content...would there be any practical reason for an eBook to have multiple pages? The only reasons I can think of are; to save power by refreshing multiple pages only one time, thus longer battery life, and to transition between the habit of turning pages of a dead tree book.

    Often time I like the tactile feedback of holding a book in my hands. I like that it doesn't make a noise unless I ruffled the pages, no humming fan or whining battery...but, I don't like turning pages and diverting my eyes from the left to right sides, especially when reading in bed.

    All jokes aside, I like to read with one hand curling the left side underneath the back of the book which makes reading the right side of the book great, and the left side a pain.

    1. Re:A one page book? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      deadtree books are a bit better for grokking. Plus, battery, RAM, all that things weight a bit and make that not quite as a single sheet of paper.

      But one-page hard cover book, that wouldn't be so bad :)

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    2. Re:A one page book? by kreyg · · Score: 1

      would there be any practical reason for an eBook to have multiple pages?

      Do you ever have more than one application/window open? Ever want to be able to see them side-by-side or switch back and forth easily and intuitively?

      --
      sig fault
    3. Re:A one page book? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's time to dispel the age-old myth of "curling up with a book". Double-blind studies have shown that there is no measurable increase of satisfaction or comfort when reading curled-up in bed. In fact, the unbalanced forces acting on your torso (and especially your spine) have detrimental effects, notable arthritis. Please, heed this, and read responsibly from now on.

    4. Re:A one page book? by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      AHH! I'M BLIND! TWICE!

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  38. Re:Impressive. Now, when does it ship? by Joel+Carr · · Score: 1

    Well the article says that: High-resolution monochrome electronic paper is already on the verge of commercialization, produced by Massachusetts-based company

    So if the monochrome technology is reasonably priced, I'd imagine there would be a strong consumer demand. Since colour e-paper would be the obvious next step, and there are people willing to shell out money for the stuff, one would expect development on the colour technology to increase.

    So my guess is soon , read sometime in the next 10 years :)

    ---

    --
    Any man who can drive safely while kissing a pretty girl is simply not giving the kiss the attention it deserves. -- AE
  39. Got to get rid of it by ExCEPTION · · Score: 0, Funny

    Time to get rid of my old habit of wiping my ass with the newspaper I just finish reading.

    And a beowulf cluster of these will make some funky toilet paper rolls.

  40. Re:Made out of Thin Air by arbi · · Score: 1

    Light reflecting off of clean air seems technically impossible to me. The fogscreen machine from Finland reflects light off water vapors but this one appears to require nothing?

  41. Hah! by Solokron · · Score: 1

    Now you can take your freshly downloaded porn wherever you go!

    --
    30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
  42. FINALLY! by SharpFang · · Score: 1, Funny

    You will be able to print webpages with the tag properly!

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  43. Demonstration movies - ZIP file torrent! by eaglebtc · · Score: 1

    Click this link to download a torrent that contains a 5MB zip file of the demonstration movies from Nature.com (free registration required to obtain, so I saved you all the trouble).

    --
    Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
    1. Re:Demonstration movies - ZIP file torrent! by eaglebtc · · Score: 1
      Sorry, if you're getting 10061 "refused" errors, then you need to register at the tracker site: http://headhunterstracker.no-ip.com:6969 in order to connect to the torrent.

      Just create a free account, login, and don't close the browser window until the torrent is open.

      --
      Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
    2. Re:Demonstration movies - ZIP file torrent! by iapetus · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight, in order to avoid having to undergo free registration to download the file, you're offering a torrent of it that we can't download without free registration.

      I see a flaw in the logic somewhere...

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    3. Re:Demonstration movies - ZIP file torrent! by eaglebtc · · Score: 1

      no - the free registration was for the tracker i selected, unawares that it would require people to register in order to connect. my bad. i won't use them in the future.

      the free registration @ nature was to access the zip file, but they would be slashdotted by the time you all got to it. so i created a torrent of the zip file.

      --
      Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
  44. Cast Your Mind Back A Few Years by Farley+Mullet · · Score: 1
    Why are there so many "Red Hot Chili Peppers" results in that search?
    The Chilli Peppers had a single called "Scar Tissue" a few years ago. So how is it connected with porno? Well, you're searching the internet. That's enough of a connection.
  45. Overclocking... by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 4, Funny

    So if I overclock one of these, "burned out" will finally become a whole new meaning...? :)

  46. Re:Impressive. Now, when does it ship? by Hyler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, I would like to have at least monochrome now. It would be great for, for example, (interactive) billboards. I get the feeling that monochrome "electronic paper" could be rolled out tomorrow, but the developers are holding back waiting for the 25 fps, 32-bit color, GeForce compatible version. I don't want to watch video or 3D graphics on "paper".

    --
    It's its. They're their, there. You're your. Who's whose? A looser loser, though those two too threw through the trough.
  47. Now if... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    ...someone would invent paper capable of playing cards.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  48. But can they rig up an octopus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The octopus has been doing this for millenia. Check it out:

    http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/octopus/chameleons. html

    Check out the video (unfortunately, Real One player only). This PBS show is my favorite of all time.

  49. Stephen Baxter "Softscreens" by SlightOverdose · · Score: 1

    "Honey, can you fold the TV up and put it away?"

    Ok lame jokes aside... Anybody here a fan of Stephen Baxter? In his book "Titan", they use something just like this called "Softscreens" which had pretty much replaced television, books, etc. I remember wishing someone would invent it.

    Guess my wish came true.

    So, I propose, we call this newfangled thingys Softscreens. In honour of Baxter and all. (Althogh I doubt he's the first one to come up with the idea :p)

  50. paper that would play solitare? by eaglebtc · · Score: 1
    then we would have the ultimate excuse for pretending to work! And when the boss comes, we hold our wands to the paper, say the words "I solemnly swear I am up to no good" and poof! the ink disappears! Boss'll never know you were playing Freecell on your notepad.


    ON that note, so much for the Tablet PC...

    --
    Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
  51. Voila! by rwaldin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Print one of these and you'll have all the magic animated paper you need without electronics or drugs!

    1. Re:Voila! by johnjay · · Score: 1

      Very nice. Thanks for the links.

    2. Re:Voila! by Meenky · · Score: 1

      This makes my eyes feel like they're crawling out of my head.

    3. Re:Voila! by Kredal · · Score: 1

      That first one is painful. I might have to take it to a printing shop and have it blown up really big to hang in my living room or something. (:

      I wonder how much I can mess with the colors and still have it work...

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    4. Re:Voila! by johnjay · · Score: 1

      You know, I could see this as a torture device. If you wallpapered an entire cell with it, then every time the inmates' eyes moved, the walls would start crawling again.

      After a few hours of that, I'd confess everything...

    5. Re:Voila! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These images dont WORK! What gives?

    6. Re:Voila! by sl0wp0is0n · · Score: 1

      Nice! The images appear to be animated because of the small changes in relative positioning of colors in successive circles. And that happens only if you keep moving your eyes. Stare at one particular point and the animation goes away!

      I wonder if this concept could be exploited to generate small, more interesting, animations!

      --
      My other dog is a Wienerschnitzel.
    7. Re:Voila! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turing test... YOU FAIL IT!!!

  52. Licensing of books by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

    I foresee a new market growing, the licensing of books. You buy a license for six months, and even if you haven't finished it by then, the text will be erased automaticly...

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  53. Re:Impressive. Now, when does it ship? by JohnPM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This type of post is starting to get about as interesting as "First Post!!" and "Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!"...

    Every single new technology article covered gets someone saying "that's all well and good but they've been saying this for years. speak to me when i can buy one.".

    Take the article for what it's worth. It's not a sales brochure or an investment prospectus, it's a science/tech piece.

    --
    Karma police, I've given all I can, it's not enough, I've given all I can, but we're still on the payroll.
  54. The future is coming hard and fast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the late 80's and early 90's I'd play a Role Play Game with a few of my mates every weekend.

    We'd sit around on Sundays and roll those d6's, pushing our imaginations, as we pushed our characters, to "render" in our minds each scenario, each event, as the Game Master described them in wonderful clarity.

    My main character was a "decker", a 2050's hacker extraordinaire (cause I sucked at it :), and he had a wonderful little cyberdeck.

    It had a very fast 3D graphical environment OS, with icons and software that you interfaced with as though it was all real world objects inside the deck's "cyberspace" - a full sensorium environment.

    You plugged into the "matrix" through a datajack, or portable wireless connection in 2056/57, and could immerse yourself in the datagrid - a combination of data and communications in one system that used special address codes like "LA/218-26-43" (forget the actual format but it was like that), and could simply pull up menus from the local restaurant or hack the police department.

    Friends could come along with extra jacks as long as they had the relevant jack-port in their heads, or you could use roll-out flat displays that held their shape when electrified and were just a sheet of paper-thin material.

    Wonderful game, and when I'm in 2050, and in my mid-seventies, tinkering on my deck, it'll be then that I know the guys at FASA who created Shadowrun were the modern Soothsayers of tech.

    Let's just hope to fucking hell that they got the politics, magick and other stuff wrong or we're all in for a big shit storm on February 23rd, 2012.

    Zero Kelvin.
  55. Just Imagine by curtlewis · · Score: 1

    The fun you could have with contracts? Leave the signature intact and reword the contract to provide... shall we say... more favorable clauses?

    Or maybe if Coke hacked a Pepsi 12 pack to say Pepsi sucks? (but we all know Pepsi sucks anyways)

    Or maybe an over-zealous support of Arnold hacked into Huffington posted and put a Fu Manchu mustache on her? (or does she already have one?)

  56. E-Ink Again? by goodEvans · · Score: 1

    Oh for God's sake.

    Will you just hurry up and SHIP IT! They've been going on and on about this for as long as I've been reading /.!

  57. Voltage ISNT power - it's energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Voltage is a measure of electric field, which is not power, but energy. Rather, changing the voltage requires power. This is why capacitors store energy in the form of voltage and do not continuously require power.

    Power = Voltage X Current

  58. What is "smart"? by Steeltoe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You forgot to mention there are many people that simply are tired of prepackaged/regurgitated news, packaging, advertising, telemarketing, pop-ups, spam, artificial food, TV, schools, politicians, corporations, governments, etc, etc.

    I consider those people who are logging out of the asylum that the current society is, to be the smartest. You're in to something when you say human beings are not really made for living like we do. It's just a matter of time and escalation before the masses realizes this too.

    Being smart or not, has nothing to do with it. Nor does "coping" with it. It's a sign of strength to stamp down your feet and say "enough's enough" and seek an alternative living, even if you're tired. It's when you're just learning to "cope" with it, go with the program, I'd consider that person a zombie- or a sleepwalker, until he/she wakes up.

    1. Re:What is "smart"? by yerricde · · Score: 1

      I consider those people who are logging out of the asylum that the current society is, to be the smartest.

      When this planet was not fully explored, that may have been a viable option, and it was for the refugees who sailed from Europe to America in the seventeenth century. But now that 100 percent of Earth's habitable land is property owned by partners in the asylum, how is this possible?

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    2. Re:What is "smart"? by CommieLib · · Score: 1

      Wow. We ought to do an Ask Slashdot on this, I'm sure we could get some good feedback. This is a question that occupies a great amount of brainspace for me. I think it all depends on how far "off the grid" you want to go.

      I think more than anything, the most important thing to do is to escape the strangulation of American popular culture. I make a distinction between "culture" and "popular culture", because American culture is incredibly rich and rewarding (Aaron Copland, George Gerswhin, Mark Twain, Ernest Hemingway, and to a lesser degree, Lovecraft, King, on and on). Notice the thread runnning here? No TV.

      Now don't get me wrong here, there is some absolutely terrific TV on, both in the high drama sense (ER) and in the pulp / adventure sense (24). The problem is, IMHO, that tv is a default action; it is an open port that Americans constantly listen on. Sit down in front of the tv, flip it on, flip through the channels. Disconnect from your family, your friends, your neighbors, your church, your community.

      I have some other opinions regarding urban-ness and personal space, but I've known enough people who seem perfectly happy and fulfilled living in the city to realize that it's more likely my own cultural biases that influence my views. Which doesn't mean that they're wrong, only non-universal.

      I think the challenge for post-20th century man is to create the paradox of an individual culture; something unique to us and yet not solely of us (because we are not enough by ourselves to achieve the connectedness that fulfillment requires). At the same time, we can't utterly connect because our popular culture is corrupting in every sense, and sometimes explicitly designed to be.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    3. Re:What is "smart"? by yerricde · · Score: 1

      American culture is incredibly rich and rewarding ... George Gerswhin

      So now you're approving of the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act? Next to The Walt Disney Company, the Gershwin estate was one of the biggest forces in lobbying for the Bono Act.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    4. Re:What is "smart"? by CommieLib · · Score: 1

      Standby...keyword "Gershwin" search in progress...Completed.
      Results>>>

      1. Gershwin estate - Sonny Bono Copyright Extension Act

      Sonny Bono Copyright Extension == BAD

      Post to Slashdot to kiss Slashdotter Ass == TRUE

      Please, please, please listen to Gershwin and form your own opinion independently of what some computer nerds think about a totally unrelated law. Listening to Gershwin will make you a better human being. I mean it.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    5. Re:What is "smart"? by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

      I make a distinction between "culture" and "popular culture", because American culture is incredibly rich and rewarding (Aaron Copland, George Gerswhin, Mark Twain, Ernest Hemingway, and to a lesser degree, Lovecraft, King, on and on)

      Don't forget Lee and Kirby! :)

      Peace be with you,
      -jimbo

    6. Re:What is "smart"? by CommieLib · · Score: 1

      Amen. I really, really agree with this point, and now that you've pointed it out, I wish that I'd included it in my original post. Comic books are analogous to the folk legends that evolved into mythology.

      People dismiss them because, well, those reasons have been discussed into the ground, but comics persist, like mythologies persist, because they address universal human truths.

      Anyhow, another note in the simultaneous attack / defense of American culture.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  59. Wow - mods, you know what to do by iamacat · · Score: 0

    This was the most amusing thing I saw for long time. A picture that actually makes by brain run an animation! Do you have more links like that?

  60. Semi-digital cryptography? by Cazis · · Score: 1

    If the paper feels / looks like "normal" print paper, this could very well be used for sending encrypted messages that looks like, say, a story about how many girls you got laid during the summer hols. All you'ld need was a chip/key with the proper digi-signature, and the paper would turn into the real message, by rearranging the ink-dots.

    1. Re:Semi-digital cryptography? by wa5ter · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. it would have to be a really short secret message in that case.

    2. Re:Semi-digital cryptography? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      If the paper feels / looks like "normal" print paper, this could very well be used for sending encrypted messages that looks like, say, a story about how many girls you got laid during the summer hols

      Gee, it only takes one bit to represent that. Actually, only half a bit (the 0 part).

  61. They already have those by iamacat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its called paperbacks and they pretty much disintegrate if you read them for 6 months.

  62. Why colored inkt instead of micro particles ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A while ago there were these interesting articles of using particles in liquid to make the colors, you could change the color by changing the mixture.

    so why don't they use something like that, so you can have 1 pixel with all the colors instead of this wastefullness.

    As reading the article shows that the colored liquid they use expands and contracts under an electric voltage then some micro particle emultion should be perfect , or am I missing something

    godless

  63. Free screens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be a truely great day when all cereal boxes ( or any packaged product ) used this technology and could display full colour video on "paper", for the simple reason that every time you bought a packaged product you would essentially be getting a new screen. You could simply remove the little chip or reprogram it to display what you wanted. Eventually you would have enough of these boxes to cover an entire wall in your house, so you cut up all the boxes, connect them all up and you have your own essentially free 8 foot high tv screen.

    If I let my conscious thought ramble on I could come up with litterally millions of ways to enjoy myself with this packaging where as before it was simply waste ( except when I was around 5 and played in big boxes for hours ).

    Now for another possibility, imagine all these screens are equiped with wifi, why would they you ask? Well, for ease of programming, a company might simply want to set up and entire shipment that was going to spain in spanish, so as the cargo boards the plane he just sets spanish on his pda and there you go. Now this is where the fun comes in. Imagine an entire store fulled with products all displaying there different logo's and adverts, now imagine you hacked into them using a wifi enabled laptop, someone would do it and I'll let your imagination flow on the possibilities.

    1. Re:Free screens. by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Scene from the cereal isle of your local store in the not-so-distant future...

      "Mommy, can we get a box of Porn Pops? There's a cool toy inside!"

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  64. We will need Virtual Reality Vision.. by DriftingDutchman · · Score: 1

    ..to block out the flashing advertisement frenzy in urban areas. Maybe that will let us hold on to our last shred of sanity.

  65. What about power? by Durzel · · Score: 1

    Where will the power come from to illuminate these wonderous paperlike display devices?

    I would've thought one of the major attractions of a book (besides the obvious) is that it can be used in circumstances where AC/DC power is unavailable - e.g. camping, travelling in most forms of transport (e.g. cars, planes, etc). It's a form of "entertainment" with zero technological requirements.

    If you make something like this require power from a wall socket, or require the user to lug around a Li-Ion battery everywhere they go (for 1 hour of uninterrupted reading before it requires a recharge) isn't the technology effectively largely redundant before it gets off the ground?

    1. Re:What about power? by zackeller · · Score: 1

      The point of it is that it's a very low power device - low enough to use batteries that would add very little to the weight of the "paper." If not, the technology will die before it's born.

    2. Re:What about power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It uses a thermonuclear power source for illumination - the sun. Or the moon if you squint. Or a lamp. Perhaps a campfire...

      Reflection is the key - that's why it is "paper".

  66. This would definately.. by PimpNinjaWannaBee · · Score: 0, Funny

    ..increase the market for Paper-view [sic] movies..

    (strange that that one hasnt turned up yet)

  67. If all else fails, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or for added fun, a flamethrower would solve these problems too.

  68. Cabling? by mt-biker · · Score: 1

    The ink in itself is pretty cool. But the articles raise many questions without answering them. Like:

    - How fragile is the stuff?

    - How are the pixels wired up?

    - Are we going to be able to handle a sheet of this paper, or are they going to be mounted in some device (like in the photo on the nature article - doesn't look much different to a laptop)?

    In short, the stuff looks pretty easy to damage...

  69. Junk mail.. by adeyadey · · Score: 1

    Hmm, junk mail pouring through your letter box in the morning with strobing, annoying videos. Oh joy..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  70. wrong department by toby · · Score: 0

    I think this should be filed under "i'm-gonna-sit-right-down-and-write-myself-a-Lette rman"

    --
    you had me at #!
  71. The question now is... by wouterke · · Score: 1

    ... how do I print out a .mpg?

  72. "Diminished Reality" by Mawbid · · Score: 1

    Steve Mann is way ahead of you

    --
    Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
  73. a detailed paper (no pun!) by zarniwhoop · · Score: 2, Informative

    on this by the authors is available here

    See how the 'shape' of the pixel can determine where the ink goes when voltage is applied. hmm interesting!

  74. Remember "Digital Ink On Billboards" Last Week? by Mad+Man · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Digital Ink On Billboards

    Posted by timothy on Wednesday September 17, @04:23AM
    from the starting-big dept.

    cdneng2 writes "The New York Times has this article on a revolutionary new billboard. It uses digital ink, versus the typical CRT, LCD, Neon, or Plasma displays that are so prominent on the newer billboards that wastes electricity. From the article: 'By creating a paste made of tiny helix-shaped particles that can be minutely manipulated with electric charges to reflect light in highly specific ways, Magink can produce surfaces that look like paper but behave like electronic screens, rendering high-resolution, full-color images without ink - or, as Magink executives like to refer to the process, with digital ink.' The billboard can display images at 70 frames per second." You can find more articles on the billboard technology on the Magink website.

  75. I can't read by joeslugg · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who read "Paper Capable Of Playing Video Games Developed"?

    I was imagining some origami figure fragging away in the night...

  76. minority report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how soon it will be before we have news papers that download their stories from the net and display them in real time on the paper (as seen in the minority report tube scene).

    Damn.. that movie has so many ideas that are so close to reality.

  77. Use time? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    If halftoning and similar techniques are impossible, you could alternate colours with appropriate duty cycles for the shade?

    Hey, this is the kind of obvious solution which warrants an unnecssary patent!

  78. *YAWN* Wake me when it ships by osgeek · · Score: 1

    How many of these digital paper technologies are going to be announced before we actually see them in use in the market?

    I realize that digital paper isn't a total hoax, but it sure feels like one.

    It seems as though the last-mile technical barriers must be really high. Maybe they're having trouble making these things last or making them in quantity?

  79. The electronic office by master_p · · Score: 1

    I hope that one day this electronic paper will be used to pass around documents, instead of printed ones. Maybe we save the forests that way.

  80. Science fiction/fact by gregarican · · Score: 1
    I think what's impressive about modern technology is how whatever fictional gadget is dreamed up for TV and movies can be made into reality. Think back to the old Star Trek shows. They had CD's (that library episode with the wacky video librarian who could bring up landscapes to jump into), flip cell phones (communicators), flat screen TV's (the screen on the brdige).

    The video newspaper displays even echoes something that started in sci-fi. Wasn't that featured in that Tom Cruise film "Minority Report?"

  81. rejection by Lust · · Score: 0

    Offtopic troll alert!

    What's the deal...I submit these same stories days in advance of when they make it onto /. and get rejected. Nice level of QC. I'm done.

    2003-03-07 14:25:55 National News Archives Translated to Internet (articles,news) (rejected)

    2003-09-24 18:30:56 e-Paper...now with colour video (articles,science) (rejected)

  82. Digital Ink?! In my day... by Gudlyf · · Score: 1

    we didn't have no fancy-schmancy digi-ink! We did things the hard way and watched videos on Flip Books!

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  83. Philips NewsCenter coverage by Raveolution · · Score: 1

    Here, also a link to the official Press Release.

  84. I prefer Magink by *weasel · · Score: 3, Informative


    It's also full-color, but it's static so it only draws power when changing the image, it has a refresh rate of up to 70hz (plenty for displays) and it's not backlit (making it behave just like current paper, and again, draws -0- power when not changing the image).

    It sounds like the way to go imo. backlighting may be a required feature for TVs (cultural emphasis on watching movies in the dark) - but for laptops/pdas/cellphones/handheld gaming/etc - it'd easily be a killer tech. yeah, you'd have to have some sort of a front-light (like the new light on the GBA SP) for Eg. dialing in the dark, using your laptop on a plane, etc.

    But having the light only when you need it will save ridiculous quantities of battery power. Imagine your gadget battery lasting 2-3x as long.
    Good stuff.

    article

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    1. Re:I prefer Magink by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1

      Cool, but at 5 DPI it's really only useful for billboard sized things.

      -- this is not a .sig

  85. Playing cards that would play solitare? by LeBlueBoy · · Score: 1

    It would add a whole new dimension to the game, or a solitare deck would require a lot fewer physical cards.

  86. origami by PedsDoc · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our folded masters.

  87. Closeups of the blue eBook? by CommandNotFound · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if (a) the blue eBook is using this technology, and (b) does anyone have links to larger images of these displays? I'm curious about what kind of resolution these things produce; I couldn't find any dpi numbers in the article, but I skimmed it pretty quickly.

  88. Diamond Age anyone? by Heathren-bert · · Score: 1
    This reminds me of Stephenson's book Diamond Age, the Primer was made up of paper like this. The same technology was also used for all packaging.

    Let's plug our MC's into the Feed and go into some ractives!!

  89. I think I read the title wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paper Capable Of Playing Videos Developed
    Bet I can still kick the paper's ass at Super Smash Bros Melee! How did they make paper strong enough to push down all the buttons on the controller?

  90. I can finally complete my Global! by James+McP · · Score: 1

    parts list:

    plastic & titanium shell: check
    HD-capable web cam: check
    1GB+ flash memory: check
    broadband/3G wireless voice/data: check
    power efficient processor: check
    high energy-density rechargeable batteries: check
    flexible, low-power, FMV capable disply: SOON!

    Now if I can only get the skrills to breed true...

    --
    I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
  91. The Really Bad Thing Is... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

    when you see that chick on the cover of Playboy winking at you and doing a come hither look, you're not going be able to tell if it's that new paper technology, or if it's all that acid you did in the sixties.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  92. Re:Impressive. Now, when does it ship? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


    Well the article says that: High-resolution monochrome electronic paper is already on the verge of commercialization, produced by Massachusetts-based company


    High resolution monochrome electronic paper has been on the verge of commercialization for years now, ans I expect it to stay on the verge for years to come.

    This material may actually become useful in the near term for billboards and other signs where high resolution is not needed. (though in the samples I have seen they still have a significant problem with the contrast being too low. But I'll believe in commercially viable high resolution electronic paper when I can buy it at Fry's

    The killer app that I would like this stuff to enable is a compact, lightweight, high battery life e-book reader that doesn't make you want to pluck your eyeballs out after reading a couple of paragraphs. If they could get the resolution up (Yes, I know I'm dreaming, but I want 1200 dpi) and resolve all issues with contrast and glare AND deliver to market at a reasonable price this could be exciting stuff. At least that's my take when I started watching for its imminent commercialzation (4 years ago)

  93. Harry Potter vs. Fahrenheit 451 by userw014 · · Score: 1
    "Harry Potter" made reality. My kid'll be thrilled to see moving pictures.

    I suppose the next step is "talking newspapers".

    I'm sure it's excessively alarmist to follow the "Fahrenheit 451" theme. Really. I'm sure.

    More seriously, this suggests to me that newspaper articles could be rented on a time-basis.

    This luddite prefers paper.

  94. Singing cereal boxes by revscat · · Score: 1

    The video newspaper displays even echoes something that started in sci-fi. Wasn't that featured in that Tom Cruise film "Minority Report?"

    Yup, and that's exactly what I was thinking when I saw this article. Except in Minority Report it was a box of cereal that started singing at him after he poured a bowl; it wouldn't stop, so he threw the damn thing across the room.

    Yeah. More avenues for evil marketdroids to ply their wares with.

    NUKE IT ALL, I SAY.

  95. Reading the Nature article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so I went to Nature and read the report. The technology is really quite clever, and has some great properties. The biggest problem I see immediately is that they need -20V to achieve 70% exposure of the white substrate (about 35% reflectivity). The electro-optic curve plateaus up at about 90% exposure but the authors don't say how high the voltage has to be to get it.

    This is unlike the black and white display technology from e-Ink, which only requires an applied voltage to switch the pixels. The display in this article would require significantly more power.

    Also these cells are very thick, on the order of 100 microns, compared to less than 5 microns for a typical LCD. The authors don't mention whether they've been able to get this to work in a flexible display.

    I think they're still in the proof-of-concept stage.
    pretty promising stuff.

  96. Power Usage by pavon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One thing that has been noted about E-Ink and it's like is that it only needs power to change display, while a static image is retained with no power usage. This is because the fluid that the particles are suspended in is viscous enough that they pretty much stay in place, unless a voltage is applied. This means that they can operate at very low power levels.

    While it didn't say so in the paper, it appears that this new technology requires continous voltage to be applied to keep the ink from spreading out acrossed the full surface of the pixel. So this paper would likely use more power than the particle approach, and would be pure black when no power was applied, basically functionally equivalent to LCD's today. I wonder how the power consumption / price of this device will compare to LCD's once they are being mass produced. Regardless, it would be worth it to have a laptop that was easily readable outside.

    1. Re:Power Usage by Photar · · Score: 1

      "This is because the fluid that the particles are suspended in is viscous enough that they pretty much stay in place, unless a voltage is applied"

      What if you shook it Etch-a-Sketch style?

      --
      He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
  97. PopSci by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

    This sounds like the winner in the PopSci/Core77 design contest: movie polaroids. The "flapping" of the polaroid could theorhetically charge the "battery" and pushing a button would play back what you just recorded. Check out the idea here.

    --
    Not All Who Wander Are Lost
  98. Name determination in action... by chiark · · Score: 1

    From the article: Its devisers, Robert Hayes and Johan Feenstra...

    Slightly interesting fact: fenestra is latin for Window.

    Feenstra could conceivably be a nederlandisation of fenestra.

    And this technology might be used as computer displays for popular graphical user interfaces?

    The guy was destined to do this! :-D

    Cheers,
    Nick.

  99. One word: Microwave by Storebj0rn · · Score: 1
    How does this ink react to magnetrons? My guess/hope is that it will expand, so you'll have the caviar effect (no, the harddisk, the stuff you eat)...

    Even better when you put it on all consumer goods packing, sooner or later some kid will go: "Hey Mom, look I've painted the microwave"

    --
    "Windows are for cheaters" - Bruce Springsteen
  100. Heh by boschmorden · · Score: 1

    Just think of the implications to the paper porn industry.... titilating!

  101. Xerox drops the ball... er gyricon again by MCRocker · · Score: 1
    The folks at Xerox pioneered this field, but like other things they pioneered, others seem to be the ones taking it to market. One good overview of the topic mentions that
    Xerox has a history of failing to commercialise great ideas developed inside PARC
    . It's too bad it's taken them so long to get Gyricon technology to market, but it's good that something better seems to have come along.
    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  102. Those screens aren't flexible... by DaleBob · · Score: 1

    Those screens are all using ito-coated glass substrates from what I can tell. Just like the twisted nematic displays in current LCD screens, but you don't need to supply continous voltage, which is the real benefit of a bistable system... huge power savings.

    A ferroelectric LC display has switching times in the microsecond regime (that's thousands of Hz). You can drive an FLC cell at 440 Hz and listen to it hum an A for you.

  103. Re:Impressive. Now, when does it ship? by ifreakshow · · Score: 1

    This Philips paper is good but there is already a Full color version capable of running video at 70fps produced by Magink. There was an article in the International Herald Tribune and New York Times in August!

  104. KVMs become KVs by kdsolutions · · Score: 0

    You can flip a page on your desk to switch monitors!

    As well, consider what this means for tablet PCs! The PC can fit in your pocket or in a pouch around your waist, while you can unfold the screen (15 inches should be good enough, you DO have to cary it), which has a cable attatching it to the PC. All of this could fold down to 3x4x1 inches when not in use.

    --
    Error 666 - Satanic SCO code found in your Linux kernel.
    1. Re:KVMs become KVs by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 1
      I think that this stuff will be great for some applications (like portable PCs), but bad for others. I don't know about you guys, but I will never give up my dead-tree versions of 'The Moon is a Harsh Mistress,' or 'Fahrenheit 451.' I'm sorry, I just think that for some applications (most literature), the media has been mature for quite a long time. I think there's just a catharsis about having a real book in my hands.

      Also, what happens if sometime in the future, the government decides that Fahrenheit 451 is too subversive to allow the masses access to? Or that 'Catcher in the Rye,' or EE Cummings' poetry is too obscene? Would it be going too far to think that the Dept of Homeland Security (or whatever passes for it in the future), would be able to remotely crash all copies of them before a modern G. Montag could memorize it?

      OTOH, it would be great for portable computing. As a helpdesk tech, I *hate* having to carry 21" CRTs up 3 flights of stairs.

  105. "Guns, Germs & Steel" Look in the intro. by chadjg · · Score: 1

    Jared Diamond makes some interesting points about the sophistication of hunter-gatherers and what it takes to surive in their world vs. ours. I think his point was that there are so many things that can kill you that all the dumb ones get taken out of the gene pool faster than the same kind of person in a modern society. I think the idea that our world is more sophisticated is sheer conceit. It's changing and maybe that has the lizard parts of our brains freaked out. It's slightly off topic, I know, but what mighty egos we all have!

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  106. details available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.sidmembers.org/source/papers/ uploadedpapers/idrc2003_P-51.pdf

  107. Very interesting by nnnneedles · · Score: 1

    ..but what's the resolution of this?

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
  108. OB Patent dig: Patents to file by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    Now that we have this entirely new medium, I'm going to patent the following novel inventions:

    • Displaying text on digital paper so that it appears like normal paper
    • Displaying text on digital paper so that it appears like a computer screen
    • Using pulse-width modulation on digital paper to display shades of grey
    • Using antialiasing to enhance the text on digital paper
    • Using 'subpixel rendering' on digital paper
    • Putting a web browser on digital paper
    • Using hyperlinks on digial paper
    • Using scrollbars on digital paper
    • Wireless network connected digital paper
    • Touch-sensitive digital paper
    • Using a keyboard as input for touch sensitive digital paper
    • Pens which can write 'digitally' on digital paper
    • Simulating a computer on digital paper
    • Using digital paper for animated advertising
    • Combining digital paper with audio
  109. Re:Impressive. Now, when does it ship? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

    I don't want to watch video or 3D graphics on "paper".

    Gee, why not? Have you seen the prices on the really nice flat panel televisions (big screen)? Why not paper a wall with this stuff and have a really big screen that will likely cost less to produce?

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  110. What about white? by MacGod · · Score: 1

    If I read the article correctly, the background of the "paper" is white, the ink is on it at all times (and does not move from place to place), but the ink's intensity is controled by how much of a charge is applied: apply greater voltage the ink becomes a smaller, more-spherical droplet, and more of the white background shows through.

    What I wonder, though, is how well this "paper" could show a completely white image on some or all of its surface. With the ink still there, I would imagine it would not be a very clean white colour.

    --
    "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    1. Re:What about white? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of like an LCDs "black" color.. We'll just have to live with it.

  111. Inspector Gadget ... by pierreg0 · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does the picture in the article look just like Penny's book/computer from Inspector Gadget (the cartoon)?

  112. RE: "the compentency line" by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Sure, but I wonder how much of this is simply history repeating itself - except none of us are old enough to have observed it in a past generation?

    The grandparents who are "afraid of the ATM machine" and can't master the VCR have already spent many years on this planet learning and mastering other things. Retirement should be somewhat of an escape from all the work and learning one has to do throughout their life. Fact is, they're not going to be on this planet that much longer - and their decisions to avoid new technologies shouldn't necessarily be interpreted as "warning signs" that things have gotten "too complicated".

    I can't help but think that before my time, the older folks were just as scared of such new things as the automobile or the railroad, or electricty in the home.

  113. Indian superiority by heroine · · Score: 1

    "Philips Research laboratory in Eindhoven, the Netherlands" whatever.

    This latest release from Phillips' Indian R&D is another example of the kind of technological lead that India has over the west. Considering all the breakthroughs they're not releasing, the west must be at least 5 years behind.

  114. as in Voices from a Distant Star by demo9orgon · · Score: 1

    By 2057 we could see this technology on the front of newspapers.

    And aside from mech-pilots in japanese school-girl uniforms, this was an excellent Anime. Short, but then brevity is the soul of wit.

    Or in this case, the soul of a particular atreur.

    --
    Every new form of media has it's own Requirimento
  115. Re: "the compentency line" by ZackSchil · · Score: 1

    To a certain degree that's true. History does have a good track record of people being afraid of technology, but never before since electricity has an invention like the silicon chip and all the other technologies that came with it (digital optical storage media, PCs, the Internet, etc) invaded so quickly and had such an impact on society. That sort of impact our grandparents may have caught the very tail end of (they were children of the electrical age, just like most of us are children of the computer age.) Not very much changed in the way average people conducted everyday life in my parent's lifetime. They've lived their whole lives without a change as dramatic as the silicon chip.

    My dad can't figure out for the life of him how to set a digital, embedded clock. Microwaves, cars, alarm clocks, watches, VCRs (which people joke about but it's honestly not that hard).. it just baffles him. I bet most of us here are able to recognize the regular patterns and behaviors of electronic controls for such things. It's not something that can be easily taught. You can't teach instinct. I believe that every time something truly revolutionary comes around, people who were born without it have an extremely difficult time adapting. The competency line moves up and down in relation to the general population.

  116. The Breakthrough application! HOLODECKS! by jameskojiro · · Score: 0

    Could I just use this paper to wallpaper a room in my house with it?

    Imagine my Neighbors envy when i am the first to have a fully working HOLODECK! Now the next challenge is to find a beowolf cluster powerful enough to run an entire room of the stuff! Could you imagine what resolution you would run an entire room sized display with!!!

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  117. hmmm this remind me off somthing by DuckLaw · · Score: 1

    Am i the only one who get to think of the Hitchikers Guide to The Galaxy. Just need to write Don't Panic on the front off that book. And another thing.. Where can i get one :)

  118. Big by 56ksucks · · Score: 1
    Remember in the movie "Big" staring Tom Hanks, where Tom Hanks's character worked at a toy company and he had an idea to make a comic book with a microchip that could change the story depending on the desire of the reader? Remember how they all laughed at him and mocked him for his silly idea? Well who's laughing now!?

    ----

    --

    ---- "Excuse me. Where's the children's gun section?"

  119. YAWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We've been on the cusp of having electronic reusable paper for thirty years now. Wake me up when there's an actual product I can buy.

  120. Open wide, Jar-Jar by mrogers · · Score: 1

    Finally, finally I can wipe my arse on Episode I.

  121. Color = false goal by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

    There may be some magical solution to this, but it looks to me as if color is very, very much more difficult than mono.

    I'd suggest that reaching perfection with a color page/screen is a false goal. When I'm reading a book, I don't get upset that the page doesn't have web-style [font color=x backcolor=y] attributes, especially when x=RED and y=BLUE. In fact, the last thing I want in an eBook is something like this!

    Yes, there's surely a need for fully illustrated books. But I won't be terribly upset if the first commercial applications are simple black and white. Heck, I'm doing just fine with green and black with my Palm Pilot.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  122. I'll see your patents, and raise you... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1
    • using digital paper as a display device for a personal computer
    • using digital paper as a display device for an attached / embedded processor
    • using cookies to preserve user state in digital paper's patented web browser
    • displaying rendered html in the digital paper's patented web browser
    • reading the rendered html in the digital paper's patented web browser
    • software that causes the digital paper to react as the result of traffic from the patented wireless network adapter
    • the use of digital paper's patented text and patented image display technology, to display both text and images at the same time
    • the actual reading of text that is displayed on digital paper
    • the actual viewing of images that are displayed on digital paper
    • usage of non-ink pens (stylus) to write 'digitally' on digital paper
    • usage of pencils to write 'digitally' on digital paper
    • usage of sharpies to write 'digitally' on digital paper
    • usage of crayons to write 'digitally' on digital paper
    • usage of any marking device to accidentally ink or mark the face of the digital paper with real ink
    • usage of software to create / edit files for usage with digital paper
    • usage of software to delete files for usage with digital paper
    • using the patented network adapter to transfer data to or from the digital paper
    • usage of 'virtual white-out' or 'erasers' to blank regions of digital paper
    • usage of scissors or other cutting instruments to physically modify digital paper
    • using digital paper to file 50,000,000,000 spurious patents, simultaneously


    Err...
    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  123. White is easy, black will be hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correct - Imagine trying to create black. All of the cells are the darkest they can be, which means that the picture is composed of 25 percent of black, red, green, and blue. That is NOT black. White will be pure, but black will be bleah. Also, any pure primary color will look like crap.

  124. Embedded linux! by infonick · · Score: 1

    take one sheet of electronic paper, and put it in a case with a slim battery and componets for embedded linux, and add a usb port at the bottom for a miniturized qwerty keyboard, or maybe 2 or 4 for extras! demensions 8.5"x11"x.05". basicly an imbedded linux tablet!

    --

    You are confusing me with someone who cares.
  125. Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess a book could never be the same with this ink

    s dat wrait writen

  126. Refresh rate != frame rate by CreateWindowEx · · Score: 1
    If you're displaying a 24 fps movie on a CRT running at 72 Hz, there are three refreshes per frame. Each refresh on a CRT is a transition between a dark blank and a bright image, which is a noticable high contrast change, whereas on an electronic ink method it could just be a transition from one bright frame to another, with a high degree of coherency between the two images. (This is assuming that the intermediate state of an ink pixel while changing colors lies somwhere between the old color and new color, which seems likely.)

    For CRT refresh rates, it seems like 60 Hz is about the minimum for a display in the center of your vision (at least to my NTSC-tuned eyes, PAL looks noticably flickery), and for peripheral vision, it seems like about 75 Hz is required. However, for *frame* rates, it seems like 24 fps is acceptable to most people (e.g., movies), although I think that while 30 fps for CG looks "smooth", 60 fps has this additional "glasslike" quality. The worse cases are rapid pans or trains moving past the screen horizontally. There may be an argument that temporal antialiasing could make a 30 fps rendering look almost as good as 60 fps.

    I also wonder whether a true 24 Hz device would display a 24 fps movie better than an interlaced 60 Hz device due to the annoying 3:2 "beat" pattern you can see on NTSC conversions of movies.

    1. Re:Refresh rate != frame rate by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      (This is assuming that the intermediate state of an ink pixel while changing colors lies somwhere between the old color and new color, which seems likely.)

      Could well be. I've never seen one, so I'll hold off judgement. I've been fooled by the (some say "wonderful" I'm more leaning towards "screwed up") human visual system more than once in my research so I'll hold off judgement. It's interesting though.

      For CRT refresh rates, it seems like 60 Hz is about the minimum for a display in the center of your vision (at least to my NTSC-tuned eyes, PAL looks noticably flickery

      Yeah, I've heard that argument often from Americans. And I'd be inclined to give it to you given that NTSC is inferior to PAL in other important parameters such as colour reproduction and resolution. And for larger screens I agree, "PAL" TV-s in Europe today are more often than not 100Hz (and digital sound). BUT, I've never really experienced this effect myself. Comparing PAL-50 to PAL-60 I cannot see the difference (50-60 vs 100 is clear though). I cannot help but to wonder whether there's something else going on, such as watching PAL on a tube made for NTSC (the 'phosphorus' sometimes have different formulation)?

      However, for *frame* rates, it seems like 24 fps is acceptable to most people (e.g., movies), although I think that while 30 fps for CG looks "smooth", 60 fps has this additional "glasslike" quality. The worse cases are rapid pans or trains moving past the screen horizontally. There may be an argument that temporal antialiasing could make a 30 fps rendering look almost as good as 60 fps.

      No argument here. I think 24fps is the minimum, it's not for nothing that you don't see that many rapid pans in source material, they just don't look good. I'd like to see the frame rates raised. But unfortunately the trend seems to be in the other direction, compressing the hell out of everything, making it look like crap. Then again most content on TV in particular is crap to begin with... :-)

      I also wonder whether a true 24 Hz device would display a 24 fps movie better than an interlaced 60 Hz device due to the annoying 3:2 "beat" pattern you can see on NTSC conversions of movies.

      Well, I'd say yes. In Europe we don't usually do any pulldown, but instead just run the movie slightly fast, at 25fps. And it's not the same as watching NTSC at all (add to that the increased vertical resolution which makes letterboxing not quite as horrible). (Cineasts will cringe at the idea, but what the hell).

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
  127. repost? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    It's a old post, but still a repost from 2 years ago.

    I say screw books, I want a Pocket PC with one of these displays. Sounds thrifty on battery power.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  128. Uh oh, Nature's covering computers again by Animats · · Score: 1
    Nature's coverage of computers is very spotty. They're a major journal in biology, but the further they get from the life sciences, the worse they get.

    Nature's "popular summary" doesn't describe what the actual state of the technology is. It's not clear whether this is "Volume shipments started today", or "interesting technology being explored that might turn out to work", or, worse, "vague lab result being used to hype stock".

    Nature's writeup is so bad that the Philips press release is better. Now that's bad journalism.

    It's encouraging to hear this from Philips, though. They might actually make it work. E-Ink seems to be more hype than product. I hope we get big displays out of this. I'm tired of hearing about zowie new "big screen" display technologies like OLEDs that end up only on cell-phone sized screens.

  129. for the lazy.. by mrthoughtful · · Score: 1
    Here is the best video url to the video of the research

    http://ntstream2.ddns.ehv.campus.philips.com/efi/8 6090/electro_wetting/philips.wmv

    Still have a little way to go!

    --
    This comment was written with the intention to opt out of advertising.
  130. So whats new by whoisvaibhav · · Score: 1

    They have been showing this all the time in Harry Potter haven't they... Its just that you muggles thought that was magic and this is sciene...

  131. At last! by hplasm · · Score: 1

    Moving picture chocolate frog cards!

    --
    ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  132. Creepy moving images by Ithika · · Score: 1

    Is there any current technology that would relate to this - with reflected instead of projected light. I just can't imagine what a video on paper would look like, without any backlighting.

    There's something very disturbing about the whole idea, although I still think it's the first real advance in ultra-low power static displays for electronic newspapers, books, maps and things that can be read outdoors. Exciting. After that comes the ability to fold them up, update the contents like a real PDA.

    I can't wait.

    Sun-Earther Dougal Ithika Stanton of Dunbar.

  133. Old tech... by CyberDong · · Score: 1
    these paper-displays are capable of displaying video images

    All you need is about 100 of them, and something to flip them with...

  134. Troll, heh? :) by danila · · Score: 1

    Moderators are on their usual crack. I wasn't trolling at all, I was just trying to be helpful. I read the mentioned Straight Dope article, but it all wasn't clear enough that I could give the explanation in my own words. That's why I just posted the link with the warning that it's not very clearly written. And you moderate this as troll?!

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.