Slashdot Mirror


Californians Can Get Free MS-Settlement PCs

soliaus writes "Seeing as how Microsoft recently lost the anti-trust lawsuit in California, Lindows has taken charge and is offering people free Lindows-related goodies. Basically, Lindows files a claim on your behalf, they keep the money, and you can get a copy of Lindows; a Click-N-Run subscription; a free PC; or other Lindows goods. More information about filing a claim on your own can be found here." (Note that this only applies if you purchased a computer for use in California.) Other companies will probably come out with their own approach to trading settlement money for goods, too, so if Lindows isn't your choice, waiting is a good idea.

265 comments

  1. Other distros should be doing this. by jbottero · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, I really have no interest in Lindows, but this is a great idea! RedHat should be doing this!

    1. Re:Other distros should be doing this. by Marc2k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Free Lindows post-settlement PC + Free RedHat Download = Free RedHat PC (for all intents and purposes)

      --
      --- What
    2. Re:Other distros should be doing this. by mikesmind · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No matter what you think about Lindows, you must admit that Michael Robertson is quick to jump on an opportunity. His marketing skills far surpass other Linux vendors. It really grabs your attention to see the message that you can get a free computer. He even spins it well to call it "MS-free PC."

      --
      www.mikesmind.com - www.daddyworkathome.com - www.freetofarm.org - www.tenfoottable.com
    3. Re:Other distros should be doing this. by Anonymous+Canard · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Lindows webstation PC's that they are giving away are diskless Live-CD based machines. Mouse, Keyboard, Case + CPU + Memory, CD-ROM drive. Sound and video are integrated on to the motherboard. These are really cheap boxes -- still it looks from their normal sales price that Lindows will be losing money on the deal (the machines normally sell for $169, but the settlement terms require you to produce sales receipts for any claims over $100.) Full data on the webstation is located here.

      --

      --
      BitTorrent in C -- LibBT
      http://www.sf.net/projects/libbt
    4. Re:Other distros should be doing this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet russia, lindows gets YOU for free!

      Besides, Id rather have a free NATALIE PORTMAN NUDE STATUATE with optional HOT GRITS!

      PROPS TO MAUS AND MARC.

  2. Hope you already did your Christmas shopping... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the MSfreePC.com FAQ page:
    Q: Is there a deadline for me to make my claim using MSfreePC.com?
    A: Yes. The MSfreePC program is scheduled to end at the latest March 15, 2004. However, depending on demand levels, the ability to use MSfreePC.com to get an Instant Settlement* could end at ANY time [emphasis theirs], so you'll want to make your claim today! Also, keep in mind that the FREE PC offer is only valid for the first 10,000 claimants who acquire $100 worth of products through the MSfreePC program.


    Depending on the robustness of the MSfreePC.com server, "depending on demand levels" may mean that "the ability to use MSfreePC.com" could end about 10 seconds after the story shows up on Slashdot...

    If it does get Slashdotted, though, I've still got the FAQ in cache and would be happy to post it.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Hope you already did your Christmas shopping... by imscarr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The free PC requires to to pay for shipping & handling and we know that can sometimes be very expensive.

      --
      Like the beaver, it's just Dam one thing after another
    2. Re:Hope you already did your Christmas shopping... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      handling and we know that can sometimes be very expensive
      Yeah this chick wanted to charge $150 to handle me

  3. Creative marketing by Ratface · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now *that's* some good creative thinking there. Who ever said that all marketing folk are good for nothen eh? ;-)

    Seriously, I'm looking forward to seeing how this initiative pans out - getting it mentioned on Slashdot is a good step towards getting the viral marketing concept going though!

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
    1. Re:Creative marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      This isn't exactly new. A swedish law professor has done a nice write-up on viral marketing, its future and several cases of it during the past decade.

  4. And the sad news is... by klaxor · · Score: 2, Funny

    That this 1.1 billion dollars won't even come close to bankrupting Microsoft.

    But at least it's more the slap on the wrist that the Feds gave them.

    1. Re:And the sad news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That this 1.1 billion dollars won't even come close to bankrupting Microsoft

      The point of the settlement wasn't to bankrupt m$, it was to make them pay for damages caused by anti-competitive practices...

    2. Re:And the sad news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and why is that sad news? what would be the benefit of bankrupting MS?

    3. Re:And the sad news is... by zrm8y5m02 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Slap on the wrist ? It was a high five between the Feds and Microsoft.

  5. Scare tactics? by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

    Isn't this kind of a form of scare tactics? "Get it now, from us, or you may never be able to get it"

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:Scare tactics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah. Scare tactics. I know I always run straight to McDonalds when they say "Limited Time Offer." God forbid I miss out on 99 cent Big Macs.

      Who exactly is Lindows scaring with this offer? They don't even have to offer it at all. Why should they have to make it any longer than they want to?

    2. Re:Scare tactics? by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Isn't this kind of a form of scare tactics? "Get it now, from us, or you may never be able to get it"

      Yes, it is. Did you have a point to make?

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    3. Re:Scare tactics? by nolife · · Score: 0, Funny

      Duh, just like those Ginsu knives and the food chopper on the late night infomercials.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  6. GNU PCs! by Big+Mark · · Score: 3, Funny

    These PCs... are they distributed under the GPL, or aren't they truly free?

    1. Re:GNU PCs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly, how soon after arriving will they die?

    2. Re:GNU PCs! by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 1

      These PCs... are they distributed under the GPL, or aren't they truly free?

      Good question. Would I get into trouble by making copies of these PC's and then giving away or selling the copies?

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    3. Re:GNU PCs! by atrader42 · · Score: 1

      Sure they're GPL! I can't wait to see the derivative works and the innovative ways of distributing those PCs to anyone who wants one!

  7. I just made my claim by ImNotThatSmart · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am getting a copy of Lindows, a two button mouse, and a 486DX33mhz!

    1. Re:I just made my claim by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ohh, does it have Vesa local bus?

    2. Re:I just made my claim by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      I heard that you can over-clock those. How many megs of drive space?

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    3. Re:I just made my claim by UnknowingFool · · Score: 0, Funny

      Many times I've heard about it, but what the hell is a 486?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:I just made my claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A computer from 10+ years ago usually running at 33/66mhz.

    5. Re:I just made my claim by simong_oz · · Score: 2, Funny

      A 486 was one of them magic computers which finally allowed you to play civilization with all the computer players turned on and not have to wait at least 30 minutes for your turn to come around once you got past 1900AD. ah I remember the days ...

      --
      "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
    6. Re:I just made my claim by mesach · · Score: 1

      it's the predecessor to the new P4 Hyperthreading Extreme edition processor

      --
      moo.
    7. Re:I just made my claim by Salsaman · · Score: 1
      It's a bit like a 386, only faster.

    8. Re:I just made my claim by twoslice · · Score: 1

      much worse, it only has four PS2 Microchannel slots

      --

      From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    9. Re:I just made my claim by soulsteal · · Score: 1, Funny

      At least you're still one button ahead of all those Apple users!

    10. Re:I just made my claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you get the DX not the SX ;)

    11. Re:I just made my claim by agent+dero · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Damnit, I am sitting here in front of my Macintosh //gs thinking, what a sucker.......

      HEY! Who stole my other mouse button!!!!!!!

      --
      Error 407 - No creative sig found
  8. Lindows of $$ .. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    i think i'd much rather have the money than a crippled copy of debian. Is there no provision to get cash back instead of an operating system you don't want?

    1. Re:Lindows of $$ .. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Yeah. You can get back the exact amount that Lindows pays to license Linux.

    2. Re:Lindows of $$ .. hmm by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      mod this guy up -- even if it is AC -
      this post is bleeding irony.

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    3. Re:Lindows of $$ .. hmm by spectasaurus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's called filling out the form and sending it in yourself.

    4. Re:Lindows of $$ .. hmm by caferace · · Score: 1
      I'm guessing you live in North Carolina or thereabouts.

      Shouldn't you be evacuating or something?

    5. Re:Lindows of $$ .. hmm by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

      LindowsOS is not crippled in any way. It contains under the hood a fully functional Debian system, with a fully functional apt-get. Click-N-Run is just an interface for commercial software distribution and a much easier way for inexperienced users to install software. If you want, you can use apt-get to install all of your software in LindowsOS without a problem.

  9. Re:I'll bet you good money that you'll get... by Rogerborg · · Score: 0, Funny

    And the best bit is, when they renege, they'll get another front page Slashdot appearance and even more free advertising. It's win-win!

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  10. Gives an insight into how MS pricing works by kiwimate · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Q: What benefits are available under the settlement?

    A: You will receive vouchers redeemable for cash after the purchase of a wide variety of software and computer hardware products. The vouchers are worth: $16 for each Microsoft Windows or MS-DOS license claimed; $29 for each Microsoft Office license claimed; $5 for each Microsoft Word, Home Essentials or Works Suite license claimed; and $26 for each Microsoft Excel license claimed.

    {Emphasis added}

    1. Re:Gives an insight into how MS pricing works by frkiii · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Too bad I have never purchased Microsoft Office, Word, Home Essentials, Works Suite or Excel.

      Never needed them, nor would I ever use them on my home computers.

      Have Win98 SE, Win2K and WinXP systems at home, with the Win98 SE system soon to be turned in to a Debian Linux system. :)

      I have purchased Microsoft OSes (DOS, Windows, etc.) over the years, but that is the ONLY Microsoft software I have ever needed or wanted to purchase.

      I can tell you this, I have purchased my last Microsoft OS, I will never purchase another OS or anything from Microsoft ever again.

      Regards,

      Fredrick

    2. Re:Gives an insight into how MS pricing works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for sharing.

      What the hell is this MA (Microsoft Anonymous). Hi my name is Frederick and I used Microsoft products.

      Who cares what you used and what you didn't use? Who cares what your buying habits of the future are going to be? Nobody here I can assure you. You are just Karma-Whoring by saying that you will never buy an OS from Microsoft again.

      Here's a clue. The next time you go to post - read it to yourself and think whether you would care if somebody else had written the same thing. If it bores you then it will bore us.

    3. Re:Gives an insight into how MS pricing works by tshak · · Score: 1

      Yup - cheaper than Lindows is on the shelf and probably about the same per copy for schools or OEM's. It kind of dispells the "1/4th of your computer cost is MS software" myth for the majority of people who buy OEM. Although most of this is speculation, so take it with a bucket of salt, I've heard that Dell doesn't pay a whole lot more than this.

      I think this is why MS PR has continually said that they aren't going to compete on price. They really don't have to.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    4. Re:Gives an insight into how MS pricing works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I saw it as an insight into how much of the settlement goes to the lawyers.

    5. Re:Gives an insight into how MS pricing works by frkiii · · Score: 1

      I guess I rattled your chain, not intending to do so.

      So you found it boring, etc. Fine.

      I wanted to post what I did, so I did, no care for "karma", being boring or not, etc.

      I am not here to entertain "you". I guess that's who you were referring to with the general "us".

      I am kind of surprised you took such offense at my post. Oh, well.

      Regards,

      Fredrick

  11. Act Quickly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You must act quickly before your state or whatever entity decides to use the settlement money to make up for shortfalls in their budget, i.e. Tennessee and the Tobacco settlement.

    1. Re:Act Quickly by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

      You must be from Minnesota...

    2. Re:Act Quickly by Zigg · · Score: 1

      California's got its own track record, there. Actually pretty much everyone does, including the feds...

    3. Re:Act Quickly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Wisconsin, actually, where Scotty McCallum squandered it.

  12. Anybody in California by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    used the "Instant Settlement* Wizard" yet to see how much they can get?

    1. Re:Anybody in California by Horny+Smurf · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm not from california, but I used it anyhow. So far, I've recieved 5 offers to increase my penis size, 3 offers to refinance my house, and 6 ads for low-cost toner.

    2. Re:Anybody in California by giantsfan89 · · Score: 1

      I'm from California and I signed up. I used an unique alias to my mailbox, so I'll know how much spam (if any) is generated from this form.

      --
      Don't ping my cheese with your bandwidth!
    3. Re:Anybody in California by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

      Let us all know how it goes. I've never heard of Lindows spamming anybody, and I know they don't sell their database. You might get subscribed to their newsletter, but that's easy to disable.

      Since the only MS software I purchased for use in California was pre-installed on my laptop which I bought for a few week-long business trips there, and was purchased outside the settlement time period, I can't fill it out myself and find out.

  13. Only one state? by Hackie_Chan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This gave me a splendid idea!

    California is only one state, right? So why don't the rest of the 49 states in the US sue Microsoft so they have to pay up to 52.8 billion dollars in settlement instead?

    That should take care of 'em! Bwhahaahhahah!

    --

    What's so bad about being lazy? What if there was a war and nobody showed up?
    1. Re:Only one state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we all know that all of the states are as big as California!

    2. Re:Only one state? by in7ane · · Score: 1

      So, every state has the same number of people in it as Cali?

      With just as big an IT economy/market (probably a better measure for the size of a potential settlement than population)?

      I realize the parent post was probably intended as funny, but the mod's don't seem to ("Interesting" - wtf?)

      Regardless, doesn't MS have about 45 billion in cash?

    3. Re:Only one state? by Hackie_Chan · · Score: 1

      Regardless, doesn't MS have about 45 billion in cash?

      Yes! That's what makes this such an excellent plan!

      --

      What's so bad about being lazy? What if there was a war and nobody showed up?
    4. Re:Only one state? by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      That's like what, 10% of the total value of the evil empire? They won't even have to sell the death star back to the bank to recoup that loss.

    5. Re:Only one state? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Somehow I doubt Washington state will be terribly eager to fine what is probably the biggest company and largest source of jobs inside its borders...

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    6. Re:Only one state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They have $6 billion in Cash and Cash Equivalents according to their last 10K (warning Word Doc). That is up from $3 billion that last year. Don't follow what the media says and include Short-Term investments. If a short-term investment was easily converted to cash it would be a cash equivalent. Short term investments are investments with a maturity within 1 year. Cash equivalents are investments which can be converted to cash immediately or that mature within 90 days.

    7. Re:Only one state? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would hurt them. A lot.

  14. Relevant Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    According to research at an English university, the majority of normal people who buy PCs without Windows install copies of Windows borrowed from friends.

    1. Re:Relevant Research by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      According to research at an English university, the majority of normal people who buy PCs without Windows install copies of Windows borrowed from friends.

      So that gives them some kind of right to maintain their illegial monopoly? Please. All that says to me, is that Microsoft would do well to make registration mandatory for all copies of Windows, no exceptions.

    2. Re:Relevant Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice claim, you got a URL to that study? How was it conducted and by whom? Was it along the lines of "We spoke with 3 of our students that were known to have bought PC's without Windows installed and 2 of the 3...." Such a statment is nothing more the a TROLL, unless you can back it up with a link to valid research.

    3. Re:Relevant Research by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      It is not illegal for Microsoft to have a monopoly.

      You're right; Instead of, "maintain their illegial monopoly" I should have written, "illegialy maintain their monopoly".

    4. Re:Relevant Research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows installs on Macs? Maybe with Virtual PC, but then I'd be more worried about the Virtual PC pirating. You do realize that until after the MS case you paid for Windows whether or not you got it with the computer for virtually all OEMs, right? So, where are these mysterious PCs without Windows?

  15. Now THAT is marketing! by winstarman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whoever came up with that should be promoted. Just think, you can get someone else to screw over Microsoft on your behalf.

    God Bless the USA!

    R-

    --
    Hard loop..... huh?

    Dynamic Designs
  16. Good idea, and in defense of Lindows by heironymouscoward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Note that participating in this involves signing over your claim to Lindows. This is probably a good thing. Lindows are a major pain in the ass for the boys from Redmond, and they deserve our general support for this.

    It's hard to understand the hostility some people demonstrate towards Lindows, which is a good package, well-made and well-supported. It's not ideal for pioneer Linux users, but you do have a large choice of alternatives. What Lindows has done is to demonstrate the possibility of a migration path from Windows to Linux, and for we should be grateful.

    Incidentally, to those who say Lindows is "crippleware" it's very hard to cripple Debian, which classically bootstraps from a diskette. You do need to know what a shell prompt is, and how to use apt-get, but that's about it.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Good idea, and in defense of Lindows by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Lindows are a major pain in the ass for the boys from Redmond

      I wonder what Microsoft thinks of these guys?

    2. Re:Good idea, and in defense of Lindows by Strudelkugel · · Score: 1

      Here's my "Get started with Linux" experience:

      1. Go to Amazon.com
      2. Search for "Red Hat Linux"
      3. Order book which includes distro

      Time spent: < 3 minutes. Cost of book ~ $25

      So, now I have a nice install of Linux, plus a big book with info without having to go through the hassle of dealing with some other company which will no doubt start hitting me with marketing "messages" from now on. I think its much more cost effective to do things this way, especially when factoring in the time.

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    3. Re:Good idea, and in defense of Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am also using a version that is probably at least a year behind in security patches. Much better off buying a generic Linux book and downloading a current version of a distro (I prefer Slackware). This way you not only have a more secure OS but you are also not tied to RedHat.

    4. Re:Good idea, and in defense of Lindows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Lindows may be making more renewed Windows users than anything. It is a TERRIBLE "distro" that sends people running and screaming away from Linux (Maybe Apple benefits the most here afer all :) Linux's only hope is that Lindows doesn't really call themselves "Linux". Maybe no one will actually associate that piece of crap with Linux at all.

    5. Re:Good idea, and in defense of Lindows by jrockway · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lindows is a bit strange if you ask me. The default user is root, there's a "My Computer", there's a "My Documents" folder, and the icons are stolen from MacOS X. It's a lawsuit waiting to happen; you can't steal other people's icons!

      And the fact that it's debian doesn't make me feel any better. So what if it's Linux, they took all the good stuff* out!

      * Like apt, decent icons, stability, not having to pay for the Gimp (they charge you at their site!!), etc.

      --
      My other car is first.
    6. Re:Good idea, and in defense of Lindows by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

      the icons are stolen from MacOS X

      No, they weren't. They do their graphics in house. The guy who does most of the graphics is really good, and a cool guy.

      they took all the good stuf [like apt, gimp] out

      apt is still there! All you have to do to start installing software from debian's repository is apt-get update; apt-get install gimp (or some other package). You can edit /etc/apt/sources.list to add unstable and get more recent software versions, or add others custom repositories for packages not in debian.

  17. hey. great. by inkedmn · · Score: 2, Informative

    while i'm all about microsoft taking it in the shorts, who cares about a free copy of lindows? it's a proprietary piece of software (not that being proprietary is necessarily a bad thing), and, um, linux is free?

    it's almost like buying fake dog shit when i've got a perfectly healthy dog producing the real thing every day before lunch...

    --
    well, it's nothing one behind the ear wouldn't cure
    1. Re:hey. great. by azaris · · Score: 1

      it's almost like buying fake dog shit when i've got a perfectly healthy dog producing the real thing every day before lunch...

      Then why not use some of it for flinging at Microsoft.

    2. Re:hey. great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "it's almost like buying fake dog shit when i've got a perfectly healthy dog producing the real thing every day before lunch.."

      Agreed. Why would anyone pay good money to eat fake dog shit for lunch* when they could get the real thing for free?

      * I presume that's the importance of your dog shitting before lunch every day.

    3. Re:hey. great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that fake dog stuff anything like this "sham poo" I keep hearing about?

    4. Re:hey. great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't throw real dog poo in your neighbor's pool.

      Likewise, you don't install a system requiring knowledge of administration responsibilities on your grandmother's machine.

  18. The even sadder news is... by alexd101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's really an advantage to them, when it is supposed to punish them. In exchange for giving away some free CD's that cost them about 1.4 cents each to press, they get a huge foothold in the CA schools, which are a main cash-cow for Apple. Bureaucracy as it is, once you get the momentum going with free crap from MS, you become beholden to it in the long term. In a few years when the vouchers run out but the computers are still around, you better believe they will be shelling out cash for Windows XYZ or whatever pourous OS comes down the pike. Remember, this is a company sitting on a savings account of $100 billion! They could give the stuff away and still make money just by charging for upgrades...

    --
    (With homage to Please, we all understand that you can build a "Most Excellent" PC with glowing neon lights and water
    1. Re:The even sadder news is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      a savings account of $100 billion!

      Wow! They must keep it pretty well hidden since their balance sheet shows only $6 billion in cash and cash equivalents. Even if you include short-term investments (which you really shouldn't because investments are not as liquid) you only get to $49 billion.

      I also wonder how much of a cash-cow are CA schools for Apple. I am guessing that they pretty much give the stuff away for the same reason that MS would be glad to give away their software. There is nothing forcing schools to switch to Windows and if they are already all Mac they probably wouldn't because it would require new hardware. This really should only benefit schools that already use Windows and in that case Microsoft gains nothing.

      Nice troll, though.

    2. Re:The even sadder news is... by tlianza · · Score: 1
      It's really an advantage to them, when it is supposed to punish them. [...] They could give the stuff away and still make money just by charging for upgrades...
      You have to realize what you're saying isn't exactly true. If this were in fact an "advantage" for them, they would have done it ALREADY. If Microsoft thought that handing out copies to these schools would eventually yeild them more profits than selling to them (and you'll have a tough time convincing me that they never thought of this idea) then they would have done that by now.
    3. Re:The even sadder news is... by alexd101 · · Score: 1

      Yes, true. My point was that if they could do it, they would have already. Obviously, monopoly laws prevent that from occuring. This settlement allows them to do what would normally be an antitrust violation in a settlement of an antitrust violation! screwy indeed.....

      --
      (With homage to Please, we all understand that you can build a "Most Excellent" PC with glowing neon lights and water
    4. Re:The even sadder news is... by Julian352 · · Score: 1

      They are already doing this, but for universities rather than schools. They already have the monopoly on OS, so they have no need to fight for more. It is the developers that they need to appease. So my CS dept. has signed a deal for small sum of money (I think under $3k) that gives them ability to get any copy of Windows, Office and Visual Studio to every PC in the labs and all the students enrolled. So I can go and get myself academic edition of VS.Net and use that instead of learning about gcc and/or Borland.

      We also get about monthly visits or lectures sponsored by MS at which they give out more of their software and a bit of hardware. (MS mouse isn't bad) This way they are keeping the future developers very dependant on MS tools, thus ensuring people will buy them once in workplace.

    5. Re:The even sadder news is... by rworne · · Score: 4, Informative

      Funny thing is, at some places the tide is a' changing.

      My university used to be all VAX and UNIX (HP hardware) and taught the requisite core computer software: Wordperfect, Lotus 123, DB III. Lab computers were a mix of PCs, Macs, VT100 terminals, and some HP Gecko and Sun boxes .

      MS came into the picture and showered the university with a nice load of software, and the next semester the university was busy putting in NT servers, NT workstations and teaching MS Office. The Macs were neglected and the Suns remained.

      Not to be bitter over all of it, but the Office move was a wise choice for the students because that was where the business world was going. Yes, it was feeding the problem but the students need jobs. Running the campus network from a bunch of NT machines really bit them hard over the past two years with all the worms going around. Nimda, Slammer and Blaster hit them pretty hard.

      Blaster was pretty amusing because right when they got the infection under control and the machines patched, the professors returned from the summer break and started powering up their personal (unpatched) systems and started the whole mess up all over again.

      Since going back for my Master's about two years ago I finally saw Macs making inroads on the campus network, running OS X server (in the campus IT dept) and OS X elsewhere. They really seem to like them over the NT machines as well.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
  19. How are they getting the money? by tbase · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From what I read, they don't require the proof that the settlement requires, so how are they going to get the money? And what's stopping you from filing claims with both MS and Lindows? I doubt MS is going to share it's data with Lindows.

    --

    666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    1. Re:How are they getting the money? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Lindows is just filing on your behalf.

      So Microsoft ends up with two claims from Rick Stallman.

      This just encourages a ton of kids to file bogus claims to get a free PC - not understanding that you make the claims under penalty of perjury.

      So what's stopping me? The thought of some time in a pound-me-in-the-ass prison, or best case scenario of being fined thousands of dollars.

      Come to think of it, this will work out great for MS - they'll make the 1.1 billion back many times over when settling all the the inevitable fraud cases.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:How are they getting the money? by soliaus · · Score: 1

      They do not require proof of purchase if you are claiming less than 5 copies of software.

      --
      Speaking at Defcon 12 - Credit Card Networks Revisted: Pen
  20. The lawyers are laughing all the way to the bank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure that the lawyers are very happy with this case against Microsoft because for every dollar that Microsoft is fined the lawyers will get a dime. It's the case of the lesser of the two evils - whilst Microsoft may have a few questionable business practices, it's the lawyers that are bleeding this country dry.

    And as you've pointed out, it's very hypocritical for Slashdot to cheer on this lawsuit whilst criticizing SCO.

  21. wake up & smell the coffee tax defeated in sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a true victory for taxpayers.

  22. But what happens... by johnwyles · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...if someone sues IBM? Do we get a free copy of SCO?

    --
    [[ the only 15 letter word that is spelled without repeating a letter is uncopyrightable: it may soon be, however. ]]
    1. Re:But what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You already can get a copy of SCO - it comes with Linux.

    2. Re:But what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why download a free copy when you can make your own a lot quicker?

      type this into your command line:

      echo '#include
      int main () { printf("Hello World!\n"); }' > hello.c

    3. Re:But what happens... by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      ...Do we get a free copy of sco?

      The company or the software?

      Not that I want either of 'em.

  23. Re:Great business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where can I get a PC for free? I guess I could go dumpster diving. Having said that I agree that this is a pretty sleazy offer.

  24. Hehe, I want to see Apple do this :) by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    Get a free copy of OS X Panther, iChat A/V, and an iSight for your settlement ^^

  25. Commercial by netherpunk · · Score: 0

    http://www.msfreepc.com/flash_main This is absolutely the most histerical thing I have seen in a while.

    1. Re:Commercial by I+am+Kobayashi · · Score: 1

      That is hillarious... It just keeps going and going too.
      It is like some cheap brainwashing attempt or something...

      --
      --Kobayashi--
  26. Because it sets a bad precedent. by Shivetya · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Allowing courts and governments to determine pricing is bad precedent.

    Californian's wonder why businesses are leaving in droves will soon see other effects. You cannot have predatory governments and courts and expect your economy to thrive.

    Right now the cost of doing business is not high enough to force everyone out, but inch by inch they leave. (iow, we know Ms will never leave, but there are smaller companies who other effects of the abuse of government and courts there)

    Don't cheer crap like this.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1


      It isn't crap, what you say is crap, and hardly insightful.

      By preventing predatory companies like Microsoft from crushing competition, government could do a lot to help economy. And California is probably the primary state to lose out to Washington-based Microsoft.

      And I'm ignoring your unsupported and ill-thought out statement of "businesses are leaving in droves". What the fuck is a drove, anyway? Is it like a herd or a pride? Is it a large truck like Kenworth or a Canyonaro?

      Even though you might have good points, we'll never know since you argue out of the wrong end.

    2. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      drove (drv)
      n.
      1. A flock or herd being driven in a body.
      2.
      a. A large mass of people moving or acting as a body.
      b. A large body of like things. See Synonyms at flock.
      3.
      a. A stonemason's broad-edged chisel used for rough hewing.
      b. A stone surface dressed with such a chisel.

      Definition 2b is the one you should look at.

    3. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by paulhar · · Score: 1

      Governments regularly determine pricing - usually in regulated industried such as power, telecoms, water.

      In the UK they've been "privatising" off as much of the government owned bodies as they can, but they still control the prices via industry regulators.

      Recently the mobile phone regulator demanded that the various companies drop their prices by 30% or so.

      This is standard practice.

    4. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by paulhar · · Score: 1

      Also remember that the government _are_ people and are exactly the same as the rest of us because they _are_ the rest of us.

      Power mad, destructive, and childish.

    5. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by namespan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Predatory governments? What about the company that's getting punished here, who effectively figured out how to make everyone pay for something they didn't want in order to get something they did?

      There may be examples where the California government has mistreated businesses and driven them to leave, but this is not one of them. They've taken an action which serves as a remedy for a practice that should never have been allowed in the first place.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    6. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by Cyno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its not just governments and courts, capitalism is a predatory system. We thrive on it. Land owners, businesses, courts and governments, public utilities, TV and telephone services, and any other organization of authority will always use their power to take more money than they require or deserve.

      We're nothing but used car salemen. Which is why I keep saying capitalism is not the best form of society. I don't want to be another predator, and I hate being the prey. Its just frustrating.

    7. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by ManoMarks · · Score: 1

      But the courts didn't determine the pricing. The Slashdot intro to this case didn't accurately reflect the facts. It was a SETTLEMENT, between Microsoft and the lawfirm suing them: "California judge on Friday gave preliminary approval to a landmark settlement under which Microsoft will pay $1.1 billion to settle a class-action suit that claimed it overcharged consumers for Windows." This sentance from the article on CNET indicates that the judge merely approved the settlement, didn't determine the punishment. *

      --

      That's gotta fit into your schema somewhere

    8. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by QuidamBrujah · · Score: 1

      Go read some Ayn Rand, please.

      While not an ultimate authority, she does make some sense.

      If government didn't involve itself in every step of business it would be more likely to balance out. But rules and regulations that hinder one aspect open up unchecked opportunities for others.

      'Require' and 'deserve' are irrelevant and have nothing to do with business. Socialism and communism determine 'require' and 'deserve' and look how well those types of societies are doing?

      Our government filtered capitalistic society is the most productive, most powerful on the planet. Good, bad, or indifferent. I still want my water clean and my air unpolluted, but I want fewer tax regulations that end up unfairly benefitting big business and crazy regulations that allow some businesses to thrive like a virus and others to die on the vine.

      --
      (of course that's just my opinion: I could be wrong)
    9. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Its not just governments and courts, capitalism is a predatory system. We thrive on it. Land owners, businesses, courts and governments, public utilities, TV and telephone services, and any other organization of authority will always use their power to take more money than they require or deserve.

      You're forgetting individuals, too. I've never heard of anybody turning down a pay raise in my entire life. There is no "predator" and "prey". Read a basic econ book.

    10. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by kavau · · Score: 1
      ...but there are smaller companies who other effects of the abuse of government and courts there

      I seriously doubt that any of these "smaller companies" will be found guilty of violating antitrust laws. This lawsuit was about Microsoft abusing it's monopoly status, not about the government enriching itself.

    11. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Governments regularly determine pricing - usually in regulated industried such as power, telecoms, water.

      California hasn't had enough power during the past few summers because the government set prices so low that few suppliers would/could sell it at the price set by the gov't. I don't know about you, but I'd rather pay a bit more for something like power, just to ensure that I'd have it.

    12. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if MS wasn't based in Redmond Washington then, they are now. :)

    13. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      "Punished"?

      Yeah, I'm sure Microsoft will just open up its wallet and say, "Uh, you got change for a billion?", I left my small bills on the nightstand.

      As far as punishments go, this is peeing in the ocean... and on top of it all, MS ends up getting thousands of up-and-coming customers by flooding the schools with their software.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    14. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last century alone, GOVERNMENTS murdered over 140 million people. How many people were killed by corporations?

      And yet, that's who the loony left and their proles focus on.

      Riiiiight.

    15. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by Cyno · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The predator is the intelligent person who understands what it means to be an entrepreneur. They create marketing departments for the sole purpose of selling useless widgets for a profit. These marketing departments hire psychologists.

      The prey on the ignorant masses that purchase things they see advertised by "cool" people on TV. They are being manipulated every day by commercialism and our use of psychologists.

      interesting reference

      Here's a quote:

      "We are writing today about the latter prohibition. We are concerned that members of the APA are ignoring it, for monetary gain. They are not using their knowledge to mitigate the causes of human suffering. They are using it instead to promote and assist the commercial exploitation and manipulation of children. As individuals, that is their right, of course. But as a profession dedicated to human welfare, psychologists have a responsibility to the public. The APA should not condone such behavior among its members, nor should psychologists look the other way."

      Looks to me like they are preying on children. If children, like the elderly, in our society are not one form of prey I don't know what is. This is truely sick, btw. This is "our way of life".

    16. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by Cyno · · Score: 1

      I don't have time to read Ayn Rand.

      Socialism and communism determine 'require' and 'deserve' and look how well those types of societies are doing?

      Is that really a question? Hows about you read the reply I posted to the other reply to my original post.

    17. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Allowing courts and governments to determine pricing is bad precedent.

      They have ALWAYS been allowed to determine prices for Monopolies.

      Besides, this is a judgement that they were ripping-off consumers, not just that they wanted Microsoft to lower prices.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    18. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you are getting at... but there is an important point you ignore. People WITHIN an institution act differently from when they are individuals. The people who work for corporations or governments or militaries and so on are people too. BUT they act differently within those institutions. You could be the nicest guy around but when you work at the corporation, for example, you aren't doing the same thing.

      BTW, watch a documentary called The Corporation :)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    19. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      If you don't care about the welfare of the people, then yeah, capitalism rules...

      Sooner or later, capitalists like yourself will realize that there is more to life than efficiency and productivity...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    20. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by hachete · · Score: 1

      Microsoft have their offices in Washington. I'd be more sympathetic to your statements if it contained some factual correctness - some nice pie charts would have helped as well.

      I would add that letting companies collude to determine prices is Bad Practice as well. It's called a Cartel. I would agree that a Government which allows a monopoly (say, Microsoft - a cartel of one in this instance) to control prices is very bad indeed.

      h.

      Aaaah. I always have a nice,long sig after the event...

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
    21. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by QuidamBrujah · · Score: 1

      Neither did I (have time) -- it took me months to finish 'Atlas Shrugged' and I had to put it down each time she got on a rant/diatribe (which is about every fourth page) and come back to it later.

      You're right, it wasn't really a question. And if it was, it was rhetorical.

      And yes, I just read the reply to your your original post. And, while I agreee in spirit with some of what you say, as you point out people are interested in what makes them feel good. If not, then the psychologists/psychiatrists in your example would be out of work.

      In a perfect world, the touchy-feely 'from each according to their abilities and to each according to their needs' would work great. But this isn't that world. You can't legislate it and you can't enforce it with religion (which, historically, is a lot more successful than legislation but still not a long-term solution).

      The 'victims' of your psychiatrists, who are presented with something they desire (carrot) and something they fear (stick) in order to push them into specific directions, will be manipulated by whoever has the desire and ability to do so.

      I don't think that's good ethics and it should not be allowed. But then, it doesn't really address the original point I was trying to make which is your stand on 'require' and 'deserve'.

      Who determines what is 'required' or 'deserved'?
      You? If I work really hard at something, should I not benefit from the fruits of my labor? Whether physical or intellectual should make no difference, should it? (Those were all questions.)

      And if the guy next to me is slacking off, then I have to work that much harder because he knows I will. If we design a system that allows that (and in many ways we have) what's the end game?

      One of the problems that I was trying to point out is that by government getting in and trying to legislate how _everything_ works is, in a way, like trying to fine-tune the controls on a finite state machine to attain a set of desired results without having any clue of how the controls work.

      Maybe it doesn't go without saying that anything which is damaging to someone (and not in a 'it hurt my feelings' way, but real damage) should not be allowed and one should not be allowed to profit from that, but that's a whole other conversation.

      --
      (of course that's just my opinion: I could be wrong)
    22. Re:Because it sets a bad precedent. by QuidamBrujah · · Score: 1

      Your tagline says it all. I'll tell you what it means to me: the greed of a few looking to make a quick buck have screwed the rest of us.

      And that's what happens when people think they can get away without putting in some work. In order for the 'people' to benefit, someone must produce. If the 'people' produce, then the 'people' benefit.

      I know there's more to life than efficiency and productivity. I enjoy my weekends like anyone else and loafing can be unproductive and fun. But I'm not asking anyone else to do my work so that I can do that.

      --
      (of course that's just my opinion: I could be wrong)
  27. At the end of the wizard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I got all the way through the wizard and then they told me that these claims can be audited and that you could be prosecuted to fullest extent of the law. Well, damn.. when I read that you don't need receipts, I also think that I don't need any proof of purchase, including the software itself.

    Damn.

    1. Re:At the end of the wizard by calethix · · Score: 1

      " I got all the way through the wizard and then they told me that these claims can be audited and that you could be prosecuted to fullest extent of the law."

      I guess that CDR with a handwritten label of 'Office 2000' doesn't count then?

    2. Re:At the end of the wizard by soliaus · · Score: 1

      I think they would just check wether or not you lived in california during the time you claim you bought the software. They will not ask for copies of reciepts if you claim 5 or less copies.

      --
      Speaking at Defcon 12 - Credit Card Networks Revisted: Pen
  28. What to do with the rebates by keester · · Score: 1, Funny

    You may have heard of Mohammed Abacha, but if you haven't, let me tell you that you should have. He and his family are the victims of "vindictive government officials" in nigeria. Basically, they have a lot of money in cash, ok, and they need a little more cash so that they move their current stockpile of cash to a safe place. It all sounds very reasonable to me, and it's a chance to make some money doing a good thing. I hope that everyone can chip in and help these people out.

    I'm sending this email in representation of,

    Barrister Bako Davis "Esq"

    N,B,
    Please, endeavour to make your correspondence to my confidential e-mail addresses below,
    bako_davis2@land.ru

    P.S. I'm not sure why the e-mail address is in Russia, but I don't think it really matters. Let's just send them some money.

    --
    Take it easy? I'll take it anyway I can get it . . .
    1. Re:What to do with the rebates by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Oh man... you just made my life even tougher. I am in a financial quagmire:

      (i) help some rich oppressed millionaries in Nigeria by helping them launder money

      OR

      (ii) pay the SCO license fee for using Linux

      hmm...so little money on hand... so little time :|

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  29. Appalling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This comment sits at +4 interesting, which mindlessly advocates bankrupting one of the most productive American companies there is.

    1. Re:Appalling by Hackie_Chan · · Score: 1

      It's Anti-American to have a monopoly.

      --

      What's so bad about being lazy? What if there was a war and nobody showed up?
    2. Re:Appalling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And since when did Microsoft have a monopoly, sparky?

    3. Re:Appalling by gantzm · · Score: 0

      Wow! Most people on Slashdot are too young to remember when Microsoft didn't have a Monopoly. You must be one of them, and just don't understand the situation.

      --


      Excessive forking causes un-wanted children.
    4. Re:Appalling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On what does Microsoft have a monopoly? Certainly not in OS, Office Suite, etc. They have violated anti-trust laws which are "statutes prohibiting monopolistic conduct, price fixing agreements, and other acts in restraint of trade." You do not have to have a monopoly to do these things.

      I know the media likes to throw around words that they don't understand but you really should at least try to understand them yourself.

    5. Re:Appalling by gantzm · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has an effective monopoly on the desktop OS market. Do they have a monopoly as defined by the dictionary, not technically. But, the alternative desktop operating systems don't add up to much of a challenge to Microsoft. Also, if you wish to do any significant amount of business with other entities you must be able to "talk microsoft". Are there exceptions? Sure, Ernie Ball being one of them, but that's an exceptional situation.

      It does look like Microsofts hold is slipping. But, they can always reel things back in by making more changes to their office file structures. It's a constant game of catch up with microsoft choosing how far ahead of second place they want to be. Sometimes they look better to the public if they let second place catch up for a while. After the moment passes it's business as usual.

      --


      Excessive forking causes un-wanted children.
    6. Re:Appalling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If there hold is slipping then they don't have an effective monopoly. I think I will stick with the dictionary definition instead of making one up. You also can't say they are maintaining their OS monopoly using Office because Office is not a concern to most Home users and Office is available on the Mac.

      Microsoft is guilty of bullying. They have a lot of companies by the balls and they use that to their advantage. They do not, however, have the home user by the balls. The home user sticks with Microsoft not because Microsoft has a monopoly but because they see no reason to switch. Most of them also see no reason to upgrade and that is why Windows 98 is still very common.

  30. And from the news article... by kiwimate · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nobody can submit claims until two months from now, at which time Alvarado is expected to approve the exact wording of the public notification of the settlement.

    So there will be a fairly short window of opportunity.

    But this, to me, is much more interesting.

    Two-thirds of the unclaimed money will go to California public schools in a mix of donated Microsoft software and cash grants. Although the maximum value of the settlement is $1.1 billion, Microsoft could end up paying as little as $367 million in cash, which is what it would owe to California public schools if no vouchers are claimed. If all vouchers are claimed, Microsoft would be required to pay the maximum, but schools would then get nothing.

    Now I wonder how this part of the negotiations worked out. The more that is claimed by Californians, the more they are effectively taking away from the public schools.

    So (in a fit of pure speculation and knowing bugger all about how these things work in that great state), is there a chance that educational organizations might start running radio advertisements encouraging people to voluntarily give up their claims so that the money can automatically go to the schools? And, if that were to happen, and be successful in any quantity, might it then be possible for Microsoft to turn around and say, "see, people really didn't care that much after all"?

    Now, my initial reaction is to think there's no way this could happen. But then I stop to consider just how little reimbursement would actually be involved for most people, and the fact that they have to go through the whole rigmarole of filling out the paperwork and submitting it and so on (unless they take up Lindows on their offer), and it just might work out that a fair quantity of people decide it's not worth it for them and they'd just as soon have it go to the schools.

    1. Re:And from the news article... by Cutriss · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What's to stop PTAs from banding together their members, having them filing claims the settlement as private users, only to donate the equipment to the schools? The schools (in theory) get more money, and the citizens get a nice tax break.

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    2. Re:And from the news article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Nothing will go to schools either way.

      All that tobacco settlement money that was earmarked for health care in Cali went where? Straight up someones ass.

      That state is so in debt, and so fucked up, that all that cash would be misspent anyways.

      And it ain't like Bustamante is going to fix things (and I guarantee he'll win - hell, he's a hardcore racist hispanic running in a state that will give a drivers license to illegals).

    3. Re:And from the news article... by dcgaber · · Score: 1

      you can donate/sell/do whatever you want with your vouchers. So the choice is to claim the voucher for yourself, for a school, or let 1/3 of unclaimed voucher go to schools.

      If you really want to help schools, not claiming a voucher is not the way to do it. Claiming it, and giving it to a school however is!

    4. Re:And from the news article... by ndogg · · Score: 1

      How about this for an idea that would make Microsoft pay the most and the schools would still win?

      10k people should claim their vouchers, and then turn around and donate it to the schools of their choice. That would mean $1.1b for schools than just $367m.

      I'm not a Californian, so I would the the wrong person to start this.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    5. Re:And from the news article... by ewhenn · · Score: 1

      Simple Answer: Greed

    6. Re:And from the news article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      10k people should claim their vouchers, and then turn around and donate it to the schools of their choice. That would mean $1.1b for schools than just $367m.
      10000 * $100 = $1100000000
      I'm not a Californian, so I would the the wrong person to start this.
      But you do have the clear grasp of basic mathematics required for administration of such an operation.
    7. Re:And from the news article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are not taking it away from the public schools. they never had it to begin with.

      they could potentially recieve it, but that is not the same as "guaranteed to get it"

      thats the same mentality as politicians and taxes. "we are losing xyz amount a year" (because they have yet to tax something)

    8. Re:And from the news article... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      No shit.

      This is also why parents are totally willing to waste oodles of money on less-essential things [like road-yachts, mansions, swiffers, etc] but when it comes to a 30$ english book they're all flabberghasted.

      Personally it wouldn't have bothered me so much if in English I had to buy my own novel to help subsidize the school. Now math/science texts is another problem. Though from what I recall science textbooks rarely were out of supply because students [specially in the advanced stream] took better care of them [re: didn't want to shell out the 140$ for the book if they broke it]. Whereas in classes like English students didn't care much for the 30$ Hamlet paperbacks and they were often in really shitty condition.

      The point is that I agree with your assessment. If students took better care of their free supplies, school boards didn't squander money on "fun" things like sports and rallies and people like Bush didn't allocate more money for war than school people might actually learn something during the 12 years of schooling they get.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    9. Re:And from the news article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to add absolutely nothing constructive to the topic.

      "me too"

    10. Re:And from the news article... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      The more that is claimed by Californians, the more they are effectively taking away from the public schools.

      You said it yourself:

      in a mix of donated Microsoft software and cash grants.


      Frankly, the less Microsoft software public schools get, the better off they all are. It's like saying that a drug-dealer over-charged the public, and now is being forced to give up to $1Billion worth of cocaine to public schools.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:And from the news article... by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      Well, assuming that you also don't care what the costs to MS are, the public schools are best off when people make their claims and then donate the money to the schools. As I read it, in that case the schools would get much more hard cash and not just some more boxes of Office 2003 that forces them to buy more copies of XP :). But if people really are willing to donate that money......

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    12. Re:And from the news article... by sgtrock · · Score: 1

      No, it's much, much worse. Since MS's cost to produce their product is close to nil, California is basically allowing the drug dealer to give out free samples to the already addicted to keep them in thrall.

    13. Re:And from the news article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could always work your way through school by CANNING THE MANHAM!

  31. No documentation required? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Stupid.

    Avoid giving in to the temptation to just list things you haven't purchased. You are declaring, under penalty of perjury, that you really did buy them. And unless you're the president of the US, perjury is a serious offense.

  32. Fraud? by I+am+Kobayashi · · Score: 5, Interesting
    *If you qualify, your "Instant Settlement" is the credit that Lindows.com will give to you to immediately purchase products using the MSfreePC program in exchange for the right to process your settlement claim on your behalf as described in more detail in Step 7 and Step 8 of the Instant Settlement Wizard.

    I find it interesting you are unable to learn the details of their "instant settlement" plan until steps 7 and 8... after you provide your:
    (1) email address;
    (2) tell them the number of covered products you purchased, where you purchased them from, and when you purchased them;
    (3) tell them what Lindows package you want (sorry no returns or refunds...);
    (4) provide them your name, address, phonenumber, and LAST FOUR DIGITS OF YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER ; and then
    (5) digitally sign a verification under penalty of perjury...
    After giving them that information, then they will tell you the details of the "instant settlement" plan.... I hope someone files a class-action against this site soon....Or better yet, where is the California Attorney General on this one?
    --
    --Kobayashi--
    1. Re:Fraud? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      " LAST FOUR DIGITS OF YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER"

      When you file your claim for a voucher with the state that is required information:
      http://www.microsoftcalsettlement.com/PDF/Standard Instructions.pdf

      If you want Lindows to file the form for you then they need that information.

    2. Re:Fraud? by psm321 · · Score: 1

      But the point is that you are giving Lindows the information they need to file the form before they tell you the details of their "Instant Settlement" program.

    3. Re:Fraud? by H8X55 · · Score: 0

      But, but, but... uh, it's FREE stuff. Who doesn't like free stuff. I dunno, they say ignorance is bliss, but I'm happy.

    4. Re:Fraud? by Theolojin · · Score: 1

      (4) provide them your name, address, phonenumber, and LAST FOUR DIGITS OF YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER ; and then

      interestingly, when a company checks one's credit report, only the last four digits and the person's name is truly needed. for example, a social security number of 123-45-6789 is the same as 111-11-6789. now why would a company want *that* information?

      --
      Life is short; think quickly.
  33. Re:Great business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't get a "free pc", you get an "ms-free pc", ie a lindows CD

  34. What about earlier versions? by rikkards · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had an XT when we lived in California in 88 (I think) Do I still apply? :)

    1. Re:What about earlier versions? by ac7xc · · Score: 0

      If you purchased it afetr Feb 18, 1995 yes! ;-)

  35. Re:Bribery by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    I agree.

    This stinks of the ambulance chasers that go door to door looking to add names to their class action lawsuits when there's a fire in a nearby factory. They promise easy bucks, just sign here.

    I'm no fan of encouraging people to abuse the legal system for profit.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  36. They couldn't by siskbc · · Score: 1
    They could give the stuff away and still make money just by charging for upgrades...

    Actually, as a monopolist, I don't believe they'd be allowed to.

    Screwy, eh?

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  37. Re:Great business model by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    You'll pay more in shipping and handling than the "webstation" PC is worth.

    And all the software is available free.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  38. Perfect by Bamfsog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People will use Lindows for a few weeks, then sales of Windows XP will spike up as people decide to get work done instead of fighting their OS.

    Disclaimer:
    I am running Gentoo, RedHat, Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Windows 2003 in the room I am in. I belive they all have their uses. I just don't like Lindows.

  39. Re:Bribery by geekoid · · Score: 1

    well, if you read the settlement, this is not abuse of the legal system.
    If you qualify, you can file on your own to recieve 'vouchers' for computer goods. all Lindows is doing is offering you there goods in exchange for the voucher that te courts said you are entitled to.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  40. Re:Bribery by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Sure, without offering proof.

    This is no different than a lawyer collecting those signatures from people who live miles away from the company being sued.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  41. something ironic here by b17bmbr · · Score: 3, Funny

    to learn more information, you need to click on a flash presentation, which requires a plugin. hmmm...

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    1. Re:something ironic here by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      to learn more information, you need to click on a flash presentation, which requires a plugin. ...which is available at no cost for the most popular platforms, including yours I'll bet. If you choose not to install it, that's your business.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  42. Who cares? by HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Troll



    Kick Microsoft out of the country, Redhat will move in and take their place.

    There is no shortages of businesses, theres a short supply of big businesses but why do we care? Small businesses arent going to leave the state, local businesses wont leave, and new businesses just starting wont leave.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      geeks4dean? hehe

      Figures a democrat supporter would use lies and misdirection in order to promote their candidate.

  43. NOT ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is that ironic? I'm writing this from Mozilla on Linux and their Flash presentation worked fine. Nothing Microsofty about it.

    1. Re:NOT ironic by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "Why is that ironic?"

      Patent-holder says you can't use plug-ins.

  44. Hes a genius by HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Redundant



    Michael Robertson is a genius, be glad hes on OUR side.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  45. Get StarOffice 6.0 immediately also.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Part of this program allows you to get StarOffice 6.0 for either Microsoft Windows or LindowsOS which would cost $69 from Amazon.

    You can immediately download a fully functioning digital copy. So even if you're not interested in LindowsOS (which it seems dumb not to at least check it out) there is something else of real value.

    The whole tab is on Microsoft. This seems like a win-win.

    1. Re:Get StarOffice 6.0 immediately also.... by westlake · · Score: 1

      Not much value if you have Office on your system.
      I've downloaded OpenOffice.org more than once, out of curiosity, but in the end it just lies there, taking up space. I simply don't have the time or the desire to learn a new office suite, particularly when I am comfortable and productive with the one I have now.

    2. Re:Get StarOffice 6.0 immediately also.... by DarkDigger · · Score: 0

      I used to feel the same way, but I recently downloaded RC4 for v1.1.0 and it seems to be a step in the right direction. I've since removed Office XP. You might wanna check it out again.

  46. There is a Linux plugin for Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I run LindowsOS and the Linux Flash plugin comes pre-installed and works beautifuly.

    1. Re:There is a Linux plugin for Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah? trying using a site that requires a shift click or control click. Bzzzt, thanks for playing! You lose! Try telling yout 10 year old she can't play on neopets any more because daddy switched the computer to linux. Go ahead I DARE you! :)

      Flash for Linux has gotten worlds better in the last release, but it is clearly still a second class citizen to the main product :(

  47. The Flash Video is Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I found viewing the Flash Video about all this was an excellent way to quickly learn what this was all about.

    http://www.msfreepc.com/flash_main

    Roger

  48. Re:I'm waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm still waiting for the other Distro's to do a lot of things that Lindows gets right...and I keep waiting, and waiting...

    Lindows has it going on.

    Samuel

  49. Re:Sueing for Fun & Profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, these suits have nothing in common. One is about illegal business practices, the other is *soon* to be about illegal business practices. Totally different.

  50. Re:The lawyers are laughing all the way to the ban by Zebbers · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ummmm
    except this lawsuit has merit
    SCOs doesn't

    and...bitch all you want about lawyers...it's more work than it seems.

  51. Re:The lawyers are laughing all the way to the ban by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen. It seems that California is showing favoritism to one business over another. I wonder who Lindows had to bride to get this one. We should sue Lindows for unfair trade practices.

  52. Just what I don't need, a WAL-MART pc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Just what I don't need, a WAL-MART PC. Things from there are not made to last out the year, by design.

  53. hhhe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SCAM-O-MATIC, not news,advertising, take the beer goggles off!

  54. Re:The lawyers are laughing all the way to the ban by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ".it's more work than it seems."

    I am sure that 5 months of work is worth $127million.

    Plenty of us have worked 80-hours a week for less than $100,000/year. I doubt these leeches are working 1000x harder.

  55. Business can leave all they want by coinreturn · · Score: 1

    Californian's wonder why businesses are leaving in droves

    You sound like a Schwartzenegger supporter with that rhetoric. Businesses will not just leave CA; there are just way too many customers here. We are the 7th largest economy in the world. Businesses that leave are just plain foolish. Hyping that job loss is due to a Microsoft settlement is ridiculous. Even if they pay the full $1.1B, they're getting a mere spanking as they continue to prey on other businesses.

    Did Altria, or RJ Reynolds leave the United States after the tobacco settlements???

    1. Re:Business can leave all they want by Bartab · · Score: 2, Informative

      Businesses will not just leave CA; there are just way too many customers here.

      If you mean "service industry businesses" then you're right, if you mean all businesses in general then you're wrong and late besides. Manufacturing is gone. Intellectual is moving as I type this. Only in the service industry does the physical location of the business mean diddly to the customers.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
    2. Re:Business can leave all they want by coinreturn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Manufacturing and Services are not the only two businesses. Retail will not move. Agriculture will not move. Government will not move (ha, ha, okay not quite a business, but they do mean jobs). Intellectual is moving mostly only on the customer service side (to India, which is due to labor market, not any rules CA government may come up with). Other areas of intellectual are just plain dying on the vine due to the flailing US and world economy. There are still lots of jobs in engineering in California.

      Boeing has so many job openings that they are hiring almost anybody who can breathe (in Anaheim). It has been my experience that people who cry about loss of jobs are too lazy to get one or not as good as they think - ie they overprice themselves.

    3. Re:Business can leave all they want by Bartab · · Score: 1

      Manufacturing has moved, Boeing if of course a gov't contractor and gets kickbacks (in the form of tax benifits) for staying. Retail is a services industry. Agriculture is given cash subsidies or they would move. Intellectual is moving on the development side, or haven't you been paying attention? If you believe its not because of the high wage costs in California you're sadly mitaken.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
    4. Re:Business can leave all they want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not because of the high wage costs of California.

      It's because of the ultra-low wage costs of other parts of the world.

      Claiming California wages are too high is one thing, but no-one in the US can compete with developers on $6000-$8000. You'd be hard pushed to survive on that kind of money anywhere in the US, and such jobs are being lost all over the US, not just California, ie it's a National thing.

      Claiming it's because of California government and/or regulation is bullshit.

    5. Re:Business can leave all they want by Bartab · · Score: 1

      Except that I was referring to jobs leaving California for other parts of the states. Manufacturing is leaving the country, but intellectual work isn't leaving as much as some people would like to make it seem. It is massive movement out of California though.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
    6. Re:Business can leave all they want by coinreturn · · Score: 1

      If you believe its not because of the high wage costs in California you're sadly mitaken.

      Of course it's because of high California wages! In case you've forgotten, the comment that started this subthread alleged that the lawsuit settlement was sending businesses out of California. That is what I ridiculed and you supported.

    7. Re:Business can leave all they want by Bartab · · Score: 1

      I suggest you read it again. You suggested that businesses would not leave because there are too many customers here. That's simply not relevant for most businesses.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
  56. Re:The lawyers are laughing all the way to the ban by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
    and I am sure the bankers are laughing all the way to thier office.

    For every dollar of lease or loan for Wintel machine, they keep a dime. Even when a refund from the MS occurs, they still get to keep thier dime.

    Who cares if the bankers provide a service. Who cares if the bankers have evey right to try to make a profit just like everyone else. Who cares if nothing large gets bought or sold without such services.

    No, lets just complain that they are making profits while doing nothing. That is the mature, educated, and informed thing to do.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  57. Not free, but better than M$. by twitter · · Score: 0
    Many of the things listed on the M$ free products page are non free.

    No big deal, as they are also cheaper and better at what they do than Microsoft is. The package delivers what the vast majority of home computer users say they want, and it does it for much less than Dell, Gateway and other M$ corrupted PC makers can. In the last few months, the vast majority of home computer users have been let down by Microsoft in one way or another. If Microsoft is the metric, Lindows will come out 1.0+.

    The staying power of Lindows has surprised me. I thoght they would be washed out by now. That they are still here verifies their plan and it's implementation.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  58. And in other news... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    After the settlement, newsgroups saw a sharp increase in requests for XP Pro Corporate and ensuing license keys.

    Microsoft replied with "No Comment" through a background of snickers, guffaws and peals of laughter.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  59. California by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is only for PCs purchased in store in CA or what if I ordered a Dell FROM CA?

    1. Re:California by soliaus · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but neither. Its for software usage in California. If you buy it in California, and then take it to Nevada and use it, it doesnt count. You can probably say you installed it on your computer in California, and then say you moved.

      --
      Speaking at Defcon 12 - Credit Card Networks Revisted: Pen
    2. Re:California by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      Yep, sure did install it in CA. Need to check the time slot since I installed it last year.

  60. This is not new.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In norway, you've been able to deny to take a piece of program with a computer. At least you have on the paper.
    The shops respond to it by saying that well, you have that right, but we don't have to do, because pc's come with windows installed, and by denying to take it, you are breaking the license agreement.
    Maybe I am, but that won't help me! I just want to get rid of it!

  61. Re:I'm waiting... by Void_of_light · · Score: 1

    I never thought of XP as an UPgrade

  62. The Walton Family makes Gates look like a pauper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd be supporting a bigger monopoly than M$ anyway.

  63. Where the heck ,you think your software come from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Michael >ha>ha>ha Samuel ,

    "I'm still waiting for the other Distro's to do a lot of things that Lindows gets right..."

    Since all Lindows does is renaming other people software it would be interesting to know what you claim they did that the others did not do ?

  64. Site doesn't work by Animats · · Score: 1

    When I tried to use that site, it claimed I "already had an account". This is impossible, because I created a new E-mail address for just that purpose, using one of my own domains. Then they sent me the "password" for "my account". Attempting to "log in" with that led to an endless login loop. After clearing all "can't store a cookie" site in Mozilla, the site tried to sign me up for a "free trial" at $14.95.

    1. Re:Site doesn't work by Animats · · Score: 1
      More info:
      • Bonus FREE PC Offer Details

        To qualify to receive the Bonus FREE PC, you must be one of the first 10,000 people who purchases $100 of products at the MSfreePC.com web site using your Instant Settlement*. The FREE PC will be a version of a WebStation PC.

        After the court-appointed settlement claims administrator has paid your claim, and the monies have been received by us and any checks have cleared, we will email you (at the email address you provide to MSfreePC.com) the details on how to receive your FREE PC.

        Should you qualify and once you have been notified of how to claim your FREE PC and should you accept the offer to receive the FREE PC, you will be required to pay only Shipping and Handling charges. The FREE PC offer will only be available if and when the settlement claims administrator disburses the claim monies and such funds have cleared and are available in our bank account.

        The computer images used on the MSfreePC web site are for graphical representation purposes only. Monitor is not included. The FREE PC may or may not be the same configuration as the images shown on the MSfreePC.com website.

      That offer sounds slimy.
  65. Well-Supported? by goldspider · · Score: 1
    "It's hard to understand the hostility some people demonstrate towards Lindows, which is a good package, well-made and well-supported."

    If by "well-supported" you mean "we're sorry, the application you are attempting to run/install will not run on this operating system", I would have to agree!

    The truth is that Lindows would probably confuse the Linux-curious more so than another distro. running Gnome or KDE. At least they would KNOW they're using something different, as opposed to having an anuerism over trying to install Windows software on an OS/shell that closely imitates Windows.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  66. MS user in California for 10 biz days you qualify! by ac7xc · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you used a licensed MS product that qualifies you are eligible. I live in Oregon and I just provided proof of my employment and temporary residence address to prove my claim. If you ordered a PC from California you do not qualify or if you did not reside in California for more then 10 days. To boost tax revenues if you are in California for any business purpose you become a resident under California law on the 10th day of arrival and luckily I still have my California tax papers work from 1996 ;-) Although it is not required I'm sure those outside the state will get the most scurtiny, so documentation or a letter should help out.

  67. You mean... by dsfox · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Redhat should be smart and aggressive?

  68. Can someone answer this for me? by greymond · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think I might still have my original cd's for 95, 98, and 2000. But the problem is I don't have ANY of the paperwork that came with them. I might have the cd's on a little slip of paper with them, but I never thought i'd get anything back for them so I never bothered to keep that stuff, plus it's been oh 8 years since I bought win95 and i'm not a pack-rat. Since they ask for the "original certificate of authenticity" can I just send them my original cd's? I'm sure they'd be able to tell that they are real and not "fake" whatever that means...

    any ideas suggestions?

    1. Re:Can someone answer this for me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also - I hate to reply to my post but I forgot to mention I didn't use a credit for these, my parents unfortunately ingrained in me to always pay cash for everything.

    2. Re:Can someone answer this for me? by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 1

      No receipts or proof are required if you are claiming less than $100.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

  69. Linux = dog sh*t? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's almost like buying fake dog shit when i've got a perfectly healthy dog producing the real thing

    Wait, are you calling Linux real dog shit?
    You may want to rethink your analogy...

  70. Well, since you ask.. by poptones · · Score: 1
    The site's STILL slashdotted so there'll be no free peecees today. And since when is it really a good thing for public schools to be given tens of Millions of dollars worth of software that really costs MS nothing in the first place? ALL THAT DOES IS GIVE THEM MORE CONTROL OF THE MARKET.

    Claiming vouchers and then NOT spending the money on microsoft goodies actually costs MS money AND erodes their hold on the market, which is what this settlement was supposed to do. If you want to help the public schools, donate some equipment. Or donate some time. Doesn't even have to be at the schools, it could be at a community center. All those things would do more good for your community than MS giving away another "free" XP license.

  71. WARNING - GOATSE.CS LINK IN PARENT!! by heironymouscoward · · Score: 1

    Damn, that hurt my eyes! You evil bastard!

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  72. Piracy Claim? by notcreative · · Score: 2, Funny


    Am I a member of the class if I stole MS software from a location in California sometime during the period in question?

  73. If you ACQUIRED a license for use in California by QuidamBrujah · · Score: 1

    It doesn't say that you had to have paid for the license, you only need have 'acquired' it.

    I worked for a company during that time that went on an upgrade binge for Win98; they visited used software outlets and picked up old copies of DOS and Windows for pennies on the dollar.

    I guessing there might be a small rush on old licenses or media in the event that they require paper or media as proof of licensing.

    --
    (of course that's just my opinion: I could be wrong)
  74. Strange, why get another pc by sheimers · · Score: 1

    Sounds strange. Why schould you get another PC, you already have one and payed too much for the software, why don't you just get the money back? This ms-free-pc offer does not make any sense.

  75. Yes. . . . Lindows . . . by Tzaquiel · · Score: 1

    $50 says those free Lindows PCs wind up running bootlegged Win2k.

    1. Re:Yes. . . . Lindows . . . by xchino · · Score: 1

      Considering they are diskless and run a Live CD, I doubt very much you will see a great deal of people adding HDD's so they can run win2k.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    2. Re:Yes. . . . Lindows . . . by StormKrow · · Score: 1

      re-read the description of those machines. They have ATA interfaces, they just lack the HD. A trip to your local hardware store, and 5 minutes later, POOF, you have a new computer suitable for installing one of many OS's.

      --
      Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
    3. Re:Yes. . . . Lindows . . . by xchino · · Score: 1

      re-read my post. I said I doubt there would be a great deal of people ADDING the drive, so obviously I know it's possible, I just don't think it's likely. I'm sure a few will, but a majority will leave it as is.

      --
      Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
    4. Re:Yes. . . . Lindows . . . by StormKrow · · Score: 1

      my mistake. I misunderstood your post, seemed like it read "you can't"...must've been the lack of coffee.

      --
      Who cares about the ozone layer?...thanks to CFC's I can write my name......IN CHEESE!!!
  76. in case you're serious by dsfox · · Score: 1

    the settlement terms specify that you only get vouchers for computer hardware and software, nobody gets cash.

  77. Re:Bribery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, come on. We all have our hypocrasies. It's Microsoft getting the shaft, in the sweetest way possible!

  78. Re:I'm waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know. I mean, "X" and "U" are a long ways away from each other on my keyboard, so it wasn't a typo. I dunno how they could have thought THAT one up.

    Maybe they're using a DVORAK layout.

  79. Pay Attention Brain Donar by thelizman · · Score: 1
    Um, these suits have nothing in common. One is about illegal business practices, the other is *soon* to be about illegal business practices. Totally different.

    The hell they don't have "anything in common". They are both clear abuses of the law for profit purpouses. Only the targets are different. They are both about illegal business practices - as you said. What kind of raving idiot...oh wait, you're an anonymous coward.
  80. June 2004! by scosol · · Score: 1

    From the confirmation letter:

    Free Bonus PC

    If you qualified for the FREE PC offer, once the court-appointed settlement claims administrator has paid your claim, and the monies have been received by us and any checks have cleared, we will email you the details on how to receive your FREE PC. Claims are not scheduled to start being paid until June 13, 2004 at the earliest, so please be patient in waiting for this notification.

    If you have any questions regarding this order or your My Lindows Account, please visit http://support.lindows.com.

    Thank you for using MSfreePC.

    --
    I browse at +5 Flamebait- moderation for all or moderation for none.
  81. Michael Robertson by bryam · · Score: 1

    I feel that Michael Robertson is the businessman that the Linux commercial trend need like catalyst.

    He maybe is not a community representative member from the "star system" or stronger support for the Free Software or Open Source Movement but this guy know the Business weapons.

    And business weapons is one of the best tools for propose one alternative to the weapon's emporium (Microsoft).

    Michael Robertson is good example of the agile business person and this skill is needed for Linux enterprises. Lindows have to show if they found the rigth way to the profit but I see that make stronger steps to it.

    Maybe, is not one ideal for me from the Open Source/Free Software perspective but I think that is a good reference for Linux's business to learn.

  82. Oh, only for PCs by BanjoBob · · Score: 1

    I bought a couple of computers when I was in California but sadly they were both Motorola 68xxx Multibus Unix Sys-V systems. I guess that doesn't count ;-}

    --
    Banjo - The more I know about Windoze, the more I love *nix
  83. Invented victim status. by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Most of these so called victims of Microsoft here are imaginary. Their use is to, a:inflate the payment to the legal firm who is the true beneficiary, or b:give money to California by means other than direct tax.

    Sorry, but I doubt you can come up with more legitimate "victims" here than non legitimate. This is a simple "soak the deep pocket corporation" lawsuiit. These work wonders when there is benefit to the government.

    Desktop usage of Linux variants in no way can justify the numbers that this lawsuit covers. Face it, it was not done for the consumers benefit.

    Yes Microsoft is a damnable corporation at times, but these types of lawsuits are far worse than anything they have done. This type of suit closely mimics government taking of land for private developers. They are deciding through a court what you or a corporation is permitted to charge. If you do not understand that issue then I cannot help you.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Invented victim status. by Tony-A · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are deciding through a court what you or a corporation is permitted to charge.
      Only if you or the corporation is a convicted monopolist.
      The normal assumption is that market forces will ensure a reasonable degree of equity. In the case of a monopoly, those market forces do not exist and some other form of relief is necessary.

  84. yay! by spagnitz · · Score: 1

    Strangely the form at: http://www.microsoftcalsettlement.com/ only seems to work properly (generating a custom claim form) for those running a MS web browser.. How odd

  85. HEAR! HEAR! by narftrek · · Score: 1

    I second this guys opinion. The /. world has been bitching & moaning about getting a windows desktop replacment based on linux for a long time. Now that Lindows has stepped up to the plate and created one people are still complaining. Look guys, just because it isn't perfect Linux and you have to pay (GASP!) for add ons and such doesn't make totally bad. Redhat & Mandrake, etc have the ability to do what Lindows has done but with thier versions which alot of you like. But they haven't. Gripe at them about it, not Lindows at least they have tried. What alot of you think is that any grandma should be able to do a Redhat install. Ain't gonna happen. Lindows kinda just works (most of the time) which is what Joe Consumer wants. I don't know anyone who wants to spend all day tring to get thier network card working to share with thier windows workgroup for files and printers which is what most home networks are about. I know I hated it. Lindows is also a BUSINESS. They have costs to cover so you really can't slam them for trying to make a buck by sell Lindows specific support & progs.

    Stop shooting down everything that comes along. You guys ask for a Windows replacement. Ya got one. If ya don't like it let your wallet speak and go make your own solution.

  86. But hopefully.... by narftrek · · Score: 1

    But hopefully Lindows is a company that honors it's customers requests and does not file anything until you do agree...or is any company, whether it peddle Windows or Linux, just as fallable and evil as the next?

  87. Equal Opportunity hater by narftrek · · Score: 1

    Well I'm glad to see that you guys aren't discriminating between Windows or Linux companies about sueing these days. I'd have figured the /. crowd would be dancing around a bonfire waiting for M$ heads to presented on a pike. Looks though like you guys just want ANY head on a pike :D

  88. Watch out for sales tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you bought your California computer from Dell or another out of state vendor and, um, forgot to pay the use tax (aka sales tax) then you might want to skip this "offer" or else Sacramento might hit you up for the tax you owe.

  89. Results by robogun · · Score: 1

    I used their settlement wizard, results are below. I claimed purchase of 3 copies of Windows and 2 copies of excel, which I am sure I did over the years, plus or minus.

    So they get the $100 from microsift, used to pay for downloadable copies of lindows 4.0 (some kind of windowized Linux) and star office (with license), and I get a place in line for one of the 10,000 free PCs, once the settlement is final (June 2004).

    ---

    Dear

    You have successfully completed your purchase at MSfreePC.com and everything has been paid for with your Instant Settlement. A copy of your invoice is attached below.

    Start enjoying your new software right now!

    If you purchased digital products, such as LindowsOS, LindowsOffice, StarOffice, and so on, you can download this software to start enjoying it immediately. To do so, simply visit http://my.lindows.com and log in to your "My Lindows Account." (New users, see the login information below.) Once you are logged in, to download the software you've purchased, go to the My Products section and then to My Downloads.

    If you purchased LindowsPlus, which includes software from the Click-N-Run Warehouse, your My Lindows Account will also be credited with additional time on the expiration date of your Click-N-Run Membership. You can view your membership expiration date at http://shop.lindows.com/user/my_subscription_libra ry.php.

    Login Information

    If you did not already have a My Lindows Account, one has been set up for you.

    Your Login Email Address:
    Your password:

    Once logged in, you can change your password at anytime by visiting: https://shop.lindows.com/user/mylindows_passwordin fo.php.

    Free Bonus PC

    If you qualified for the FREE PC offer, once the court-appointed settlement claims administrator has paid your claim, and the monies have been received by us and any checks have cleared, we will email you the details on how to receive your FREE PC. Claims are not scheduled to start being paid until June 13, 2004 at the earliest, so please be patient in waiting for this notification.

    If you have any questions regarding this order or your My Lindows Account, please visit http://support.lindows.com.

    Thank you for using MSfreePC.

    Please let your friends know about MSfreePC.com so that they too can find out if they qualify to purchase computer products as part of the settlement. Click here to tell your friends about MSfreePC.com.

  90. I take exception to that comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's completely unfounded to suggest that people are using illegal copies of Windows borrowed from friends...
    most people steal a copy from work

  91. first you'd have to win. by beckett · · Score: 1

    good luck (:

  92. Re:I'll bet you good money that you'll get... by lord_nightrose · · Score: 0

    Why is this post rated as a troll? It's a very real possibility.

    --
    This is not part of my post. It's my signature. I bet you're disappointed.
  93. Corporate murder is just coming of age... by monkeyfamily · · Score: 1

    Shall we start with Union Carbide in Bhopal? How about Shell in Nigeria? Let's add up all the deaths caused by preventable pollution from power plants that would rather profit more than install scrubbers. How about everyone poisoned by pesticides, sickened by E.Coli-tainted meat sold at a fast-food chain that lobbies against USDA funding, "disappeared" union organizers, and all those killed on the job for lack of proper safety mechanisms. Maybe not 140,000,000 last century, but then again corporations are still gaining power at the expense of governments (see WTO). I'll bet you a trillion dollars that corporations kill more people that governments in the 21st century. Are we on?

  94. Re:I'll bet you good money that you'll get... by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    >Why is this post rated as a troll?

    Because metamoderation ensures that anyone who disgrees with the majority (which is still "lunix r0x0rz!!!!") doesn't get to moderate. It's a wonderful system that appears to be democratic while ensuring that dissenting voices are effectively stifled.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.