Is that an elected politician saw an opportunity to purge any resistance to his regime and the fact that innocents were caught up in it didn't mean a damn thing to him.
It took me longer to write this post than it did to google those terms. Maybe you should do something about the log in your eye, before criticizing the speck in others.
Ah the smug tut-tutting of the status quo. If only MLK and his followers would stop their boycotts and protests and informed themselves of the political process they'd get so much more. If only those rowdy suffragettes would stop chaining themselves to parliament, we would have women voting in no time.
FTFY
Firstly you'll have to prove that self-driving cars would reduce road fatalities.So far I haven't seen any evidence that robocars are better than humans at driving, and I doubt I will in my lifetime.
Secondly you're asking for the self-driving cars manufacturers to get a break that no other industry gets. Airline safety is far better than it was fifty years ago, but if you tried to use that to lobby for a reduction in manufacturer's liability they'd look at you as if your head is on fire.
Just because you're desperate to have a nap whilst you drive to work doesn't absolve manufacturers from their responsibility. I'm also sure that your attitude towards company liability would change the moment your Uber robocab ploughs into a wall
Nope, Nazis lost that right 70 years ago when they started a war that killed 50 million people. Six million of which were deliberately murdered for the crime of not being them.
No doubt you'll piss and moan when the Nazis at that rally lose their jobs, get kicked out of the apartment, etc. Yet when people are harassed off the net, or receive death threats there's nothing but deafening silence from you.
Given a choice I'm sure a pedophile would always try to have sex with a human child rather than a robot one. Because in the depths of their hearts they don't believe what they are doing is wrong. I don't think many actual pedophiles would use this type of technology. Nor do I think that this type of technology would encourage pedophilia any more than inflatable sheep encourage bestiality.
Is that a reason to create panic just to make money with the fear of yet another apocalypse? I find that disgusting.
Or you know, stop pumping so much CO2 into the air, move away from a hydrocarbon economy, figure out ways of getting the carbon in our atmosphere underground again. That sort of stuff.
The weather/climate system is a complicated, chaotic system. If we do enact this system then what happens to the countries that go through drought/floods/ etc. due to this system? Will they be compensated? And what if that country is a heavy weight like China, or Russia? Do you think they're going to sit back whilst your magical aerosol fucks with their economies? Or would they bomb the shit out of it? The US almost certainly would.
This may come as a shock to you, but we nerds have eclectic interests. Sure we love tech, but we also love science fiction and fantasy. Two subjects that crop up here a lot. Some of us enjoy sports, art, and literature, and other subjects that crop here from time to time.
And some of enjoy discussing politics. Particularly when we have, without a doubt, the worst president in history. A man who is a climate denier and anti-vax. A president who releases classified intelligence on his phone in a country club for all and sundry to see. Whose political aides are so stupid that they can't even find a damn light switch. I fear I don't have time to document this administration's mistakes as they create even bigger gaffes in the time it takes me to write this.
46% of Americans want him impeached, and it was 43% last week. Also using the term SJW marks you as a bumbling entitlement warrior bravely trying to drag the world back to an era that never existed.
In the 40 years to 2015, not a single American was killed on US soil by citizens from any of the seven countries targeted - Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen - according to research by the conservative-leaning Cato Institute.
When the Cato Institute is calling you out on racist policies you know you're up shit creek.
I work in intellectual disability care. If I have a verbal client who likes to chat about rubbish I'll hand the phone over to them. The longest call lasted three minutes.
Actually the ball is still in your court. You are trying to claim that there is a systematic effort to kill patients on organ donor lists and all you have produced is a two half baked sites that appear to run by pro-life sites that would make Terry Schiavo's relatives wince with their conspiracy mongering. The news article is from 14 years ago, couldn't find anything more relevant?
There is nothing in the site you have given that doesn't appear to be cherry-picked justifications for people's selfish, paranoia. I won't call you a denier, but I will call you a conspiracy crank. Because you'd rather believe dedicated, trained health professionals would make less of an effort to save your life due to a tick on a card.
Slashdot Mirror
Is that an elected politician saw an opportunity to purge any resistance to his regime and the fact that innocents were caught up in it didn't mean a damn thing to him.
I suppose stating your address and the fact that I'm unhappy with you and that I have a large collection of guns isn't a threat either?
Yes, because Hitler was such a big fan of Free Speech, that the dangerous concept must be suppressed. For the Greater Good[tm].
He was also a fan of hate speech. Had there been laws against it back then his rise to power and WW2 may have been curtailed.
Without citations, this is all meaningless FUD.
Do you even read what you wrote? How about Steven Harper suppressing science. What about Trump's banning the use of certain terms such as 'diversity', 'vulnerable', and 'evidence-based'. What about banning a group of people from actively serving their country.
It took me longer to write this post than it did to google those terms. Maybe you should do something about the log in your eye, before criticizing the speck in others.
All too often it's a senior manager with little direct experience with the product that makes that 'suggestion'.
Ah the smug tut-tutting of the status quo. If only MLK and his followers would stop their boycotts and protests and informed themselves of the political process they'd get so much more. If only those rowdy suffragettes would stop chaining themselves to parliament, we would have women voting in no time.
I noticed that you upheld the tea party as a model in another post. I'd also like to point out that they did direct action, and encouraged members to disrupt congress and the senate. Tactics you seem to deplore.
He might have hit one of the turtles.
I'm wondering if this is the sort of technology that can be defeated with chicken wire.
I really enjoy shows about genealogy.
XKCD already beat you to it.
https://xkcd.com/1897/
FTFY
Firstly you'll have to prove that self-driving cars would reduce road fatalities.So far I haven't seen any evidence that robocars are better than humans at driving, and I doubt I will in my lifetime.
Secondly you're asking for the self-driving cars manufacturers to get a break that no other industry gets. Airline safety is far better than it was fifty years ago, but if you tried to use that to lobby for a reduction in manufacturer's liability they'd look at you as if your head is on fire.
Just because you're desperate to have a nap whilst you drive to work doesn't absolve manufacturers from their responsibility. I'm also sure that your attitude towards company liability would change the moment your Uber robocab ploughs into a wall
Nope, Nazis lost that right 70 years ago when they started a war that killed 50 million people. Six million of which were deliberately murdered for the crime of not being them.
No doubt you'll piss and moan when the Nazis at that rally lose their jobs, get kicked out of the apartment, etc. Yet when people are harassed off the net, or receive death threats there's nothing but deafening silence from you.
It's based on the very important legal concept of 'Quia Ego Sic Dico'
Given a choice I'm sure a pedophile would always try to have sex with a human child rather than a robot one. Because in the depths of their hearts they don't believe what they are doing is wrong. I don't think many actual pedophiles would use this type of technology. Nor do I think that this type of technology would encourage pedophilia any more than inflatable sheep encourage bestiality.
Me, I always put my faith in Gold-Pressed Latinum.
Is that a reason to create panic just to make money with the fear of yet another apocalypse? I find that disgusting.
Or you know, stop pumping so much CO2 into the air, move away from a hydrocarbon economy, figure out ways of getting the carbon in our atmosphere underground again. That sort of stuff.
Damn you Bobby Drop_Tables.
The weather/climate system is a complicated, chaotic system. If we do enact this system then what happens to the countries that go through drought/floods/ etc. due to this system? Will they be compensated? And what if that country is a heavy weight like China, or Russia? Do you think they're going to sit back whilst your magical aerosol fucks with their economies? Or would they bomb the shit out of it? The US almost certainly would.
With Teslas and hookers. Ah, screw going to Mars.
1/100,000 of a library of congress.
He should have used Dvorak brain scanner. Sure it involved implanting 2-ton liquid helium magnets in his head, but it's so much more intuitive to use.
This may come as a shock to you, but we nerds have eclectic interests. Sure we love tech, but we also love science fiction and fantasy. Two subjects that crop up here a lot. Some of us enjoy sports, art, and literature, and other subjects that crop here from time to time.
And some of enjoy discussing politics. Particularly when we have, without a doubt, the worst president in history. A man who is a climate denier and anti-vax. A president who releases classified intelligence on his phone in a country club for all and sundry to see. Whose political aides are so stupid that they can't even find a damn light switch. I fear I don't have time to document this administration's mistakes as they create even bigger gaffes in the time it takes me to write this.
46% of Americans want him impeached, and it was 43% last week. Also using the term SJW marks you as a bumbling entitlement warrior bravely trying to drag the world back to an era that never existed.
Key phrase.
When the Cato Institute is calling you out on racist policies you know you're up shit creek.
What? Are they burning them as fuel for their steam locomotives?
I work in intellectual disability care. If I have a verbal client who likes to chat about rubbish I'll hand the phone over to them. The longest call lasted three minutes.
Actually the ball is still in your court. You are trying to claim that there is a systematic effort to kill patients on organ donor lists and all you have produced is a two half baked sites that appear to run by pro-life sites that would make Terry Schiavo's relatives wince with their conspiracy mongering. The news article is from 14 years ago, couldn't find anything more relevant?
There is nothing in the site you have given that doesn't appear to be cherry-picked justifications for people's selfish, paranoia. I won't call you a denier, but I will call you a conspiracy crank. Because you'd rather believe dedicated, trained health professionals would make less of an effort to save your life due to a tick on a card.