W3C doesn't create standards, they document status-quo as a recommendation for standardization. Most major browser vendors have a chair on the W3C, and they hash out differences there, however many browsers have not fully implemented what people want in HTML5 or even HTML4 for that matter fully. The lesser used features are not implemented consistently, so the W3C cannot really document them accurately without much discussion.
Basically the typical model for standard creation does not exists here. There is no reference implementation like there is in all of the examples you mention.
Try This
-Download Movies to D: secondary drive so torrents don't slow down primary disk use.
-Convert said movies to VOB format
-Burn movies to DVD5 or DVD9 disks
-Write name of movie in sharpie
-Watch movies on PS3 in HD
This reminds me of the water cooled computer from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0448134/ . It seems like a pretty cool idea, I don't know why it hasn't been used before.
This is not a troll...
The problem with your assertion is that you believe Open Office to be a competing product to Microsoft Office; it isn't. This is not the same as Firefox vs IE6, Firefox was a way better product and the market saw this and switched. This will not happen here because even without the oft touted file format lock in, Office is still a solid choice in my opinion.
Microsoft's current policy on standards has totally changed, this is expected behavior in my opinion. We no longer live in the J++ and JScript days. Web is the future and the web is based on standards not just because of Firefox vs Internet Explorer vs Opera but because of mobile, desktop and embedded. Microsoft understands that to achieve market penetration they need to adopt and work with standards in their products. This behavior is also seen in products from Adobe and other large software vendors.
M$, windoze... I'm sure you can fit more acrimonious spelling in there. Wow and just when I thought everyone was moderately mature here. Are you new here?
Yes, I don't doubt that a considerable portion of Slashdot viewers use IE, even though the population of browsers used here would be more diverse than your average website.
The problem with your stance is your emotionally charged world view concerning something that is intrinsically neutral; thus you to polarize everything that you reasonably can with a good or evil bias where none is necessary leading to your irrational position as stated above.
Slashdot Mirror
W3C doesn't create standards, they document status-quo as a recommendation for standardization. Most major browser vendors have a chair on the W3C, and they hash out differences there, however many browsers have not fully implemented what people want in HTML5 or even HTML4 for that matter fully. The lesser used features are not implemented consistently, so the W3C cannot really document them accurately without much discussion. Basically the typical model for standard creation does not exists here. There is no reference implementation like there is in all of the examples you mention.
In comes "Direct to consumer marketing" making the science behind equivalent drugs a non-issue.
Try This -Download Movies to D: secondary drive so torrents don't slow down primary disk use. -Convert said movies to VOB format -Burn movies to DVD5 or DVD9 disks -Write name of movie in sharpie -Watch movies on PS3 in HD
http://www.jmccaffrey.net/torrent_dl/get_blizzard_torrent.php is one that I made, simply gives you a torrent download for a downloader exe link.
You can use gmail with a custom domain
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AECkG_LmzQA
Seriously? Slashdot is not even a blip on their traffic...
This reminds me of the water cooled computer from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0448134/ . It seems like a pretty cool idea, I don't know why it hasn't been used before.
Your tinfoil hat is showing. Seriously, do people think like this?
http://www.dota-allstars.com/hero/1916/index.html
I am all for freedom from keyboard hunch
Because firefox has the best tools for web developers and therefore web developers use it to develop on.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/johnmcnicholas/2199035401/
IronPython
This is not a troll... The problem with your assertion is that you believe Open Office to be a competing product to Microsoft Office; it isn't. This is not the same as Firefox vs IE6, Firefox was a way better product and the market saw this and switched. This will not happen here because even without the oft touted file format lock in, Office is still a solid choice in my opinion.
Microsoft's current policy on standards has totally changed, this is expected behavior in my opinion. We no longer live in the J++ and JScript days. Web is the future and the web is based on standards not just because of Firefox vs Internet Explorer vs Opera but because of mobile, desktop and embedded. Microsoft understands that to achieve market penetration they need to adopt and work with standards in their products. This behavior is also seen in products from Adobe and other large software vendors.
But there already is a WoW movie... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y25XCwOBSUQ
Yes, I don't doubt that a considerable portion of Slashdot viewers use IE, even though the population of browsers used here would be more diverse than your average website.
The problem with your stance is your emotionally charged world view concerning something that is intrinsically neutral; thus you to polarize everything that you reasonably can with a good or evil bias where none is necessary leading to your irrational position as stated above.
I never married.