I have a better question: If we've agreed to start at "electronic voting machine" how can you get to "fraudulent and corrupt" without going through "errors in an audit log"? And if "errors in an audit log" aren't enough to convince you to throw-out the results, what actually would convince you? What kind of gold standard are you looking for? There is no proof that can convince them. Their guy won so it doesn't matter whether fraud played a part in the election.
As long as you didn't purchase a Land Rover, a Mercedes, a web domain from RegistryFly, eaten at Applebee's, or flown on American Airlines, then they haven't lost; they just didn't win. Yet.
I am not sure how not buying a Hummer or a Land Rover is a victory for Hummer. Hummer spent millions of dollars to encourage the viewers to buy a Hummer.
I doubt anyone in the boardroom at Hummer is saying, "sure we didn't generate any Hummer sales but at least none of those pricks are buying Land Rovers! Money well spent!"
For me, ALL the advertisers have lost. In the two weeks since the SuperBowl, I have not purchased a Hummer, a Cadillac, a web doman from GoDaddy, ate at the Outback Steakhouse or flown on United Airlines.
I thought if you double-clicked an application for the first time, OS X brings up a dialog box stating that this is the first time you have opened this application and if you want to continue. Is this still the case? Or did this trojan find a way around it?
The Bill of Rights is an amendment to The Constitution. The Constitution starts out "We the People of The United States of America..." If you aren't a citizen, you aren't part of that "We". No Bill of Rights, no Miranda Rights, no rights except those agreed upon with your nation of origin. Hard but true.
The preamble to the United States Constitution states;
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
After paring off the nonrestrictive elements in the sentence, the sentence reads;
"We the People of the United States do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
The pronoun "we" refers to the Founding Fathers who wrote and ratified this Constitution not as a determination for who is given Constitutional rights and priviledges.
The Constitution was established by the Founding Fathers for the United States of America.
I Still haven't bought one, and i won't until the offer what i want from a media player.
Proprietary software isn't needed, (Just shows up as a HD).
Audio Input with no extra adaptors. (2 jacks, 1 in, 1 out so i can monitor what i'm recording)
FM Tuner.
I was realy tempted to get one of the old Neuvos Media players, mostly because they had everything you could want in one unit. including FM Transmitter, Customizable EQ (Wish i could get more than a FSCKIN 5 band... 11 or 13? Come on!)
Until Apple does this I will not be owning an iPod. Still waiting on the perfect product....
...it's already been ruled that looking at email doesn't violate laws against wire-tapping.
Ha! Did you even read your own link?
On Thursday, by a majority of 5 - 2, the Court of Appeals overturned the ruling, making it clear that even though emails are stored in computer memory during transmission, it is still criminal to intercept those messages without the user's permission or a court-issued wiretap order.
According to Kevin Bankston, attorney with the EFF, "Today's decision reaffirms that email providers can't snoop on their customers' incoming messages any time they like, and that the law protects the privacy of your email just as much as it protects the privacy of your phone calls."
Well, enjoy your continuing insistence upon being right, despite specific evidence to the contrary.
I am not sure what specific evidence you are talking about. You seem to think that Apple is putting out some worldwide media blitz about Aperature and I don't see it. You mentioned Apple sending an email about Aperature and some vague reference to digital photography magazine and websites. Let's see some specific evidence. Anecdotal substantiation doesn't cut it.
I would much rather pay for phone service than to put up with ads on the telephone, of all places.
I bet they are going to put the ad right in the middle of your call. That way both sides of the line will hear the ad and will most likely listen to the whole ad since they haven't finished their conversation.
Here in Australia, the verb "to root" often has another meaning, and to make it more or less clear, the one doing the rooting is (more often than not) on top.
I am curious, do Australians still laugh when an American refers to eating Jack in the Box?
Slashdot Mirror
I have a better question: If we've agreed to start at "electronic voting machine" how can you get to "fraudulent and corrupt" without going through "errors in an audit log"? And if "errors in an audit log" aren't enough to convince you to throw-out the results, what actually would convince you? What kind of gold standard are you looking for? There is no proof that can convince them. Their guy won so it doesn't matter whether fraud played a part in the election.
I doubt anyone in the boardroom at Hummer is saying, "sure we didn't generate any Hummer sales but at least none of those pricks are buying Land Rovers! Money well spent!"
Hell the only commercial I remember from the game was the repeated ads of Grey's Anatomy coming up right after the game
....didn't see it.
For me, ALL the advertisers have lost.
In the two weeks since the SuperBowl, I have not purchased a Hummer, a Cadillac, a web doman from GoDaddy, ate at the Outback Steakhouse or flown on United Airlines.
This is WA!lter WA!ng from WA!lla WA!lla, WA!shington. I think it is a great name.
Well then,
fite da Powr!
I thought if you double-clicked an application for the first time, OS X brings up a dialog box stating that this is the first time you have opened this application and if you want to continue.
Is this still the case? Or did this trojan find a way around it?
The preamble to the United States Constitution states;
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
After paring off the nonrestrictive elements in the sentence, the sentence reads;
"We the People of the United States do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
The pronoun "we" refers to the Founding Fathers who wrote and ratified this Constitution not as a determination for who is given Constitutional rights and priviledges.
The Constitution was established by the Founding Fathers for the United States of America.
I went to Playstation.com. I found one game that uses the hard drive - Final Fantasy XI. My iPod has more games.
Vote
Adjusted Vote.
I call plagiarism.
The parent post is a cut and past job without attribution from http://www.gopbloggers.org/mt/archives/002834.html /.
Check the FAQ.
http://slashdot.org/faq/com-mod.shtml#cm2050
Great idea.
Write up a business plan.
Get some investors.
Make billions.
--
The PowerBar precedes the PowerBook by five years.
Ha! Did you even read your own link?
Your rite - their is many loosers that have pour grammer.
One more time: specific evidence?
Shouldn't the higher being that designed us given us a more sturdy head to withstand beatings from fundmentalists?
I am not sure what specific evidence you are talking about. You seem to think that Apple is putting out some worldwide media blitz about Aperature and I don't see it. You mentioned Apple sending an email about Aperature and some vague reference to digital photography magazine and websites. Let's see some specific evidence. Anecdotal substantiation doesn't cut it.
Good point.
What would bonobo do?
knock knock
who's there?
interrupting cow
interrupting co MOOO!
I bet they are going to put the ad right in the middle of your call. That way both sides of the line will hear the ad and will most likely listen to the whole ad since they haven't finished their conversation.
I am curious, do Australians still laugh when an American refers to eating Jack in the Box?