Further there isn't really a TOP GUY... With drugs or smugled goods hundreds of sellers at street level are all controlled by one drug importer, grower or smuggler.
DVD producers are a distributed system they make their own often and only rarely buy from the big producers in China.
Who btw the cops can't touch unlike say columnbian drug lords.
Go to a place called Abova All they have been buying all the heat sinks they could find for like 30 years and they still have huge crates full. They have industrial illuminum heat sinks too big to mount on your car!
And they have tonnes of little ones, buy like $2 worth of aluminum heatsinks and get some thermal adhesive (available most hardware stores) you're done.
The same logic which would allow this should also allow sharing memory acces, which would double the amount of memory available to each CPU (less HD access) double their memory bandwidth (Considering the latency to the cpu is trivial) and double system memory trivially.
So really the concept has already been implemented, but managing these cores in applications which can't be optimized for them can yield a net loss in speed. So... But the 875 totally smokes even on old benchmarks.
Advertising is embattled in a ceaseless war to keep ads at a low price, you can produce a television show with just advertising revenue but not a movie.
The problem is that opportunities for near free advertising and it's subsequent universality and annoyance nescessitate further marketting by volume to compete.
Observe, in the old days people READ and concentrated on Ads... they would look at a car ad. Get a good idea about features and price and an insight into the companies philosophy expressed through advertising.
Now advertisers compete for mindshare (The ugliest form is called brand recognition)... very little objective testing on the boxes to demonstre superiority. Just a big logo and an allusion to idealistic visions, christian values like love, harmony, wealth, image. etc) it's ugly and it functions by total spamming users.
Even boxes are designed to show the corperate brand not describe the contents.
If the new version will have a method to store saves and the only other reason to have a HD is to store swappable data why don't they just make the data load onto the new and much larger memory?
Sure some games won't be backwards compatible because the memory will be lower than HD space (although the profussion of partitions on my Xbox HD seem to allow the possibility that swap space is limited).
Considering that the new xbox will be more than 10x more powerful there is also the possibility of massive compression or texture re-encoding to alleviate the diffrence in sizes.
You do realize the first billion is by far the hardest don't you.
Google isn't all powerful yet for a diffrent reason, they simply haven't had enough time at the top yet, yahoo, hotbot and all other search engines initially provided increadibly accurate results but were later spammed out of existance and are only now returning to functionality.
Google will likely face the same fate, the attacks on blogs has been one symptom the attack on googles adwords may be the next.
Commodore wants your money now go off somewhere and die.
Apple and Nintendo people are pretty much the same, they keep trying but really Nintendo is on the slope and will be gone soon enough... Apple on the other hand is doing fine, though if Microsoft releases a decent OS they will evaporate overnight.
They don't seem to be laughing in fact they said that they are still working on their controller design.
And they haven't told their devs what it's going to be which is causing tonnes of confusion and upset (Maybe what they did with the DS?) stupid thing to do.
There really isn't a diffrence in most cases, it's usually silly to buy the most expensive product as you can buy several of the cheaper product (especially as their price will tend to go down or you can invest the money in the mean time case I buy radeons 9000 pro not 9800 pro invest money ($400 now I have $1200 and can buy several 6800GT's in SLI)) People are bad with money, they don't consider the value of the thing they are buying.
Canadians wouldn't retaliate in this way against U.S. companies, the Byrd proposal is in direct violation of Nafta which was a pretty damn big deal and Canadians were largely against.
That out of the way I have faith in Canadian regulators to find public methods of stimulating Canadians arts into which to dump the money so it won't benefit corperations (like it would in the states)...
The main reason, well if the RIC (or whatever is pushing it) then it's simply because they don't want to negotiate with apple which is silly because we have the same large music corperations (Sony etc.) but who knows maybe they're bitter.
The main thing that Canadians have and many other countries also have is regulations requiring media distributers to distribute a certain level of Canadian content (it's not bad maybe 15% or 25% but it's well regulated and has to be in prime time etc.) This leads to strange effects where artists become huge in Canada without any international acclaim.
Anyway this tarriff could be used to replace this clause, since we're getting RIC lawsuits anyway (Despite the fact that our laws will rule against them) it seems the only possible reason.
It's nice to be able to trust our government to have the interest of the citizens and artists at heart rather than industry, they do get a trifle misguided sometimes though I'll admit.
No... wrong. The chances of them finding a executable trojan which matches any hash is highly unlikely... It's far easier just to build into the wmv scripts... or some other evil hack.
Hasing works on individual peices... You can determine the size but they are small and fairly constand (256k or 512k) Breaking one individual peice is all it takes to make the file unusable and wouldn't be too difficult fyi...
I worked at blockbuster for a few months, there was quite a bit of theft. But they had those alarm things there.
With my mind free scanning endless blue boxes I came up with about 9-10 security problems and solutions that were totally transparent to the customer and staff. They were totally ignored.
Why? Because I also came up with some inherent flaws that could not be corrected, therefore closing security holes would lead theives to the perfect crime scenarios, the illusion of security bolstered by watchful staff and security devices was more important than real security because silly criminals will be scared off. Meanwhile I had flaskMpeg and a Modded Xbox so I didn't really care, enjoy the movies:P
I'm pretty sure I got fired for handing out photocopies of supernova.org and bittornado.com on little cards:P And calling Blockbuster the Devil to customers, what the hell I wasn't going to get a decent recommendation anyway.
Slashdot Mirror
It all depends on whether he's from Australia.
Further there isn't really a TOP GUY... With drugs or smugled goods hundreds of sellers at street level are all controlled by one drug importer, grower or smuggler.
DVD producers are a distributed system they make their own often and only rarely buy from the big producers in China.
Who btw the cops can't touch unlike say columnbian drug lords.
Go to a place called Abova All they have been buying all the heat sinks they could find for like 30 years and they still have huge crates full. They have industrial illuminum heat sinks too big to mount on your car!
And they have tonnes of little ones, buy like $2 worth of aluminum heatsinks and get some thermal adhesive (available most hardware stores) you're done.
Because there are no motherboards for dual 860's!
:(
Intel has no need to produce such as the chip is available in such low quantities
Because they could better be served by an internet distribution system?
They should definitly stick to 4.7 gigs for the immediate future.
Here's the damn solution include it.
They all pop up a list of software reporting your usage, this list is hand culled by the user.
By not including it they lose some moral authority.
The same logic which would allow this should also allow sharing memory acces, which would double the amount of memory available to each CPU (less HD access) double their memory bandwidth (Considering the latency to the cpu is trivial) and double system memory trivially.
I'm an AMD fan boy I was thinking it would smoke the Intel too hard.
The dual core is mostly tested in encoding an area where Intel has traditionally dominated. And it still kicks intel's ass.
Each chip has multiple calculation units.
So really the concept has already been implemented, but managing these cores in applications which can't be optimized for them can yield a net loss in speed. So... But the 875 totally smokes even on old benchmarks.
Well yes I suppose if you consider contractors an implacable malevalent force in the universe.
I know I do.
Advertising is embattled in a ceaseless war to keep ads at a low price, you can produce a television show with just advertising revenue but not a movie.
The problem is that opportunities for near free advertising and it's subsequent universality and annoyance nescessitate further marketting by volume to compete.
Observe, in the old days people READ and concentrated on Ads... they would look at a car ad. Get a good idea about features and price and an insight into the companies philosophy expressed through advertising.
Now advertisers compete for mindshare (The ugliest form is called brand recognition)... very little objective testing on the boxes to demonstre superiority. Just a big logo and an allusion to idealistic visions, christian values like love, harmony, wealth, image. etc) it's ugly and it functions by total spamming users.
Even boxes are designed to show the corperate brand not describe the contents.
If the new version will have a method to store saves and the only other reason to have a HD is to store swappable data why don't they just make the data load onto the new and much larger memory?
Sure some games won't be backwards compatible because the memory will be lower than HD space (although the profussion of partitions on my Xbox HD seem to allow the possibility that swap space is limited).
Considering that the new xbox will be more than 10x more powerful there is also the possibility of massive compression or texture re-encoding to alleviate the diffrence in sizes.
You do realize the first billion is by far the hardest don't you.
Google isn't all powerful yet for a diffrent reason, they simply haven't had enough time at the top yet, yahoo, hotbot and all other search engines initially provided increadibly accurate results but were later spammed out of existance and are only now returning to functionality.
Google will likely face the same fate, the attacks on blogs has been one symptom the attack on googles adwords may be the next.
I'm working on that, meet psychoanalyzeinsultbot.
/me is hurt...
bot:You're a nerd, your life is meaningless.
Deliveranc3 #$#@$#@@thingie.com leaves channel.
Commodore wants your money now go off somewhere and die.
Apple and Nintendo people are pretty much the same, they keep trying but really Nintendo is on the slope and will be gone soon enough... Apple on the other hand is doing fine, though if Microsoft releases a decent OS they will evaporate overnight.
They don't seem to be laughing in fact they said that they are still working on their controller design.
And they haven't told their devs what it's going to be which is causing tonnes of confusion and upset (Maybe what they did with the DS?) stupid thing to do.
Agreed AMD has 4 chipset makers. SiS, Via, Nvidia and um that other one... you know.
And they will probably get some ATi Mobo's assuming ATi doesn't fold after the x700 fiasco.
Well then what the fuck were they thinking everyone has raids now and 500 GB HD's just hit. Once again too little too late.
There really isn't a diffrence in most cases, it's usually silly to buy the most expensive product as you can buy several of the cheaper product (especially as their price will tend to go down or you can invest the money in the mean time case I buy radeons 9000 pro not 9800 pro invest money ($400 now I have $1200 and can buy several 6800GT's in SLI)) People are bad with money, they don't consider the value of the thing they are buying.
Canadians wouldn't retaliate in this way against U.S. companies, the Byrd proposal is in direct violation of Nafta which was a pretty damn big deal and Canadians were largely against.
That out of the way I have faith in Canadian regulators to find public methods of stimulating Canadians arts into which to dump the money so it won't benefit corperations (like it would in the states)...
The main reason, well if the RIC (or whatever is pushing it) then it's simply because they don't want to negotiate with apple which is silly because we have the same large music corperations (Sony etc.) but who knows maybe they're bitter.
The main thing that Canadians have and many other countries also have is regulations requiring media distributers to distribute a certain level of Canadian content (it's not bad maybe 15% or 25% but it's well regulated and has to be in prime time etc.) This leads to strange effects where artists become huge in Canada without any international acclaim.
Anyway this tarriff could be used to replace this clause, since we're getting RIC lawsuits anyway (Despite the fact that our laws will rule against them) it seems the only possible reason.
It's nice to be able to trust our government to have the interest of the citizens and artists at heart rather than industry, they do get a trifle misguided sometimes though I'll admit.
Considering the computing resources needed to breach an individual file they will be quite selective.
They aren't going to search the net traffic they are going to sign up as super seeders on torrent networks and distribute bad data... simple and evil.
No... wrong. The chances of them finding a executable trojan which matches any hash is highly unlikely... It's far easier just to build into the wmv scripts... or some other evil hack.
wma can execute code right?
Hasing works on individual peices... You can determine the size but they are small and fairly constand (256k or 512k) Breaking one individual peice is all it takes to make the file unusable and wouldn't be too difficult fyi...
Ironically the file name extension (in windows counts are part of the hash) as does your computers ability to execute code.
How long would it take a million monkeys at a million switches to produce a working peice of compiled code?
I worked at blockbuster for a few months, there was quite a bit of theft. But they had those alarm things there.
:P
:P And calling Blockbuster the Devil to customers, what the hell I wasn't going to get a decent recommendation anyway.
With my mind free scanning endless blue boxes I came up with about 9-10 security problems and solutions that were totally transparent to the customer and staff. They were totally ignored.
Why? Because I also came up with some inherent flaws that could not be corrected, therefore closing security holes would lead theives to the perfect crime scenarios, the illusion of security bolstered by watchful staff and security devices was more important than real security because silly criminals will be scared off. Meanwhile I had flaskMpeg and a Modded Xbox so I didn't really care, enjoy the movies
I'm pretty sure I got fired for handing out photocopies of supernova.org and bittornado.com on little cards