Slashdot Mirror


Apollo 13 Engineers to be Honored

sconeu writes "Yahoo! News is carrying a story that the engineers who helped save the crew of Apollo 13 will be honored by GlobalSpec. The article mentions the jury rigged air scrubbers, and gives duct tape its due." Here is our coverage of the 35th anniversary.

183 comments

  1. The real hero was of course by beders · · Score: 5, Funny

    An inanimate carbon rod

    1. Re:The real hero was of course by Timesprout · · Score: 0

      No the real hero was human ingenuity, even if I sound like an alien extra from Star Trek when I say that.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:The real hero was of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In rod we trust!

    3. Re:The real hero was of course by dickrichardv8 · · Score: 1

      What's the big deal about that kind of engineering? Hillbillys and trailer park mechanics do it every day. Ok, granted, they don't do it with life and death on the line and they don't do it by remote control 10,000+ miles away. They do sometimes get shot when they substitute a 22 cal. shell for an automotive fuse, oh well.

  2. Obligatory duct tape joke by gowen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Duct tape is like The Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it's used to bind the universe together.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:Obligatory duct tape joke by telecsan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least with Duct Tape, the light side and dark side are always in equal proportion.

    2. Re:Obligatory duct tape joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I say KUDOS to the Red Green's of their day!

      The first men to demonstrate that you can fix ANYthing, even a rocket ship, with a little duct tape and a little ingenuity.

    3. Re:Obligatory duct tape joke by TheHawke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Until you mangle a strip by jamming the sticky sides together, then it's all DARK!

      I hate when that happens...

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    4. Re:Obligatory duct tape joke by davidmcw · · Score: 1

      http://www.cbc.ca/redgreen/ - Bloody great show

      --
      Just because your paranoid doesn't really mean they aren't out to get you
    5. Re:Obligatory duct tape joke by jat2 · · Score: 1

      Unless you twist it once and reattach the two ends to form a Mobius strip. Then it only has one side, which is both light and dark!

  3. Who? by FTL · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Who the heck are GlobalSpec? Is it news when some random company decides to award someone famous? Can I get also get front-page Slashdot story if my company gives "a crystal globe" to Linus Torvalds and/or Bill Gates?

    No criticism to the Apollo 13 engineers. What they did was amazing. But what's this story got to do with them?

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
    1. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Who the heck are GlobalSpec [globalspec.com]?
      They are, according to themselves "The Engineering Search Engine".
      Is it news when some random company decides to award someone famous? Can I get also get front-page Slashdot story if my company gives "a crystal globe" to Linus Torvalds and/or Bill Gates?
      No you probably wont get front page Slashdot publicity if you try and do something similar to what Globalspec has done. If only because they thought of it before you did. Unfortunately, for your company, this is how the world works.
    2. Re:Who? by gowen · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Who the heck are GlobalSpec?
      They're an engineering company. They make motors, bearing, compressors and the like. This is simultaneously
      i) a publicity stunt for themselves
      ii) an attempt to improve the standing of engineering (and engineers) as a profession.
      Is it news when some random company decides to award someone famous?
      Apparently so.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    3. Re:Who? by gl4ss · · Score: 0

      *No you probably wont get front page Slashdot publicity if you try and do something similar to what Globalspec has done. If only because they thought of it before you did. Unfortunately, for your company, this is how the world works.*

      ever heard of dupes? damn straight he could get anything he wanted on the frontpage of slashdot if he gave it, say, 8 hours of work(2 hours of submitting with aliases, 4 hours for googling for someone to honor, 2 hours for writing the story).

      frontpage of slashdot.. anything can get there. really.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Who? by artifex2004 · · Score: 3, Informative
      They're an engineering company.


      Actually,

      "GlobalSpec is a rapidly growing B-to-B, Internet-based, 'media-model' business linking buyers and sellers in the $500 billion electrical, mechanical and optical products markets."

      You must have mistaken their front page search links to mean they actually had something to do with those things?

      They do seem to be good at generating hot air and pageviews with press releases, anyway.
    5. Re:Who? by houghi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can I get also get front-page Slashdot story if my company gives "a crystal globe" to Linus Torvalds and/or Bill Gates?

      No, but give either/both an enema and it will be frontpage news.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    6. Re:Who? by cmowire · · Score: 1

      They are primarily google spammers. So if I want to get needle valves or any other mechanical part, I'll always see their little site and one of their competitors, before I see any actual useful Google search results.

    7. Re:Who? by jamesangel · · Score: 1

      And interestingly, they appear to have replaced their website content team with this script. Respect!

    8. Re:Who? by slapout · · Score: 1

      Maybe. Try it and see. Considering some of the stuff that gets posted, it wouldn't surprise me. :-)

      You might even get lucky and get a dupe posting! :-)

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    9. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding, don't know about Linus but Bill never sits still for his!

    10. Re:Who? by Acius · · Score: 1

      Hey! I've worked on stuff that hit the front page of slashdot, you insensitive clod!

      Oh wait ... point taken.

      --
      Acius the unfamous
    11. Re:Who? by mollymoo · · Score: 1
      Who the heck are GlobalSpec?

      An engineering search engine. They claim to offer loads of useful stuff, like parametric search of numerous manufacturers for a wide range of products. In reality they have an annoying website which never quite seems to tell you what you want to know and bombards you with crap if you subscribe.

      I would like somewhere where I can find suppliers for a 52mm galvanized obtuse flange-compressor and compare prices, but using GlobalSpec is little better than typing "52mm galvanized obtuse flange-compressor" into any other search engine.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    12. Re:Who? by UrgleHoth · · Score: 1

      Man, I haven't been to dack.com since before the dot bomb. I loved his take on the stock market.

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    13. Re:Who? by khallow · · Score: 1
      No, but give either/both an enema and it will be frontpage news.

      We'd like you to uh... "accept" our "crystal enema" award on primetime TV in front of millions of viewers.

  4. Duct tape.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 0

    It's odd how everyone seems to think duct tape is some universal god send. Why has no one imformed blue peter that duct table can be used for anything? Surely they could make a small tank or a space ship without toilet rolls if it's THAT good.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Duct tape.. by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 1

      Duct Tape == Sticky backed plastic

      Val Singleton - you shaped my childhood!

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    2. Re:Duct tape.. by Timesprout · · Score: 1

      Are you insane? The little bastards are destructive enough without Blue Peter equipping them with duct tape tanks and other military goodies.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    3. Re:Duct tape.. by thevoice · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For that kind of industrial strength goodness you need gaffer tape.

      I've seen doors hinged on that stuff alone, it leaves duct tape for dead.

    4. Re:Duct tape.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      so have I.. I live in that kinda house.. quite funny really..

      --
      I like muppets.
    5. Re:Duct tape.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be familiar with gaffer tape's capability, but you aren't familiar with its specification. It's less sticky than ordinary duct tape to leave less residue when removed.

  5. Duct tape saves the day by kiljin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now we just have to figure out how to use duct tape to convert from english to metric units.

    1. Re:Duct tape saves the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imperial to metric.

    2. Re:Duct tape saves the day by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Now we just have to figure out how to use duct tape to convert from english to metric units.

      Duct tape transcends metric and imperial, and eschews units altogether.

      Put a slightly-too-large bolt over your slightly-too-small thread, tighten close enough, seal with duct tape.

      There is no need to convert between units, merely provide an interface between the two.

      Duct tape is good.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  6. Thing I'd like to know is... by Smiffa2001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...why the air scrubbers were different shapes in the first place? Was it because of an engineering reason (room/volume to fit into) or because two different teams were working on the designs of the two modules? Seems daft that on essentially the same spacecraft, there are two devices that do the same job with different designs. It's always bothered me...

    That aside, it is good to see these guys being recognised.

    1. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by jonwil · · Score: 4, Informative

      The command module was build by North American Aviation and the Lunar Module was built by Grumman Aerospace.
      So it could well be the case that since 2 different companies built the 2 different air systems, they used 2 different shapes of CO2 filters because no-one bothered to make them the same (after all, it didnt matter much at the time)

    2. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by macpeep · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because the command module was made by a different company than the lunar module and nobody thought about coordinating / unifying components between the two since nobody ever envisioned that there would actually be any need to use parts from one as spare parts for the other.

      Contrary to popular belief, NASA does very little itself. Pretty much everything is done by subcontractors.

    3. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by CausticPuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      done by subcontractors

      And not just any subcontractors, mind you... but the lowest bidders. :-)

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    4. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by Steven+Edwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes I laugh whenever I hear/read someone bitch about lowest bidders on a contract. The most impressive enginering feats were done with slave labor. Throwing money at a problem solves nothing.

      --
      Why clone Unix when I can clone Windows instead. http://www.reactos.org
    5. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by Illserve · · Score: 4, Funny

      The obvious answer is because the entire thing was a hoax. Ron Howard was contacted at the time (he was already 15 and NASA computers predicted he would be a great film director) and asked what would make his movie (already planned for production in 1995 back in the 70's) dramatic, and he came up with this idea.

      It should also be pointed out that Tom Hanks is a robot specifically made to star in Apollo 13, which explains his meteoric rise to acting stardom. In fact, Bosom Buddies was created to serve as his vehicle by NASA.

      NASA has more plans in place for both Ron and Tom in further upcoming movies about the "moon landings". Just you wait.

    6. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      The most impressive enginering feats were done with slave labor.

      Yup, it's truly amazing what can be accomplished when your workers fear for their lives.

    7. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by macrom · · Score: 1

      Hence the snide comment from Ed Harris' character, Gene Krantz, that it must be a government operation if one craft had square canisters and the other had round ones.

      You also have to think, it's not like these 2 engineering teams e-mailed each other daily and sat in on video conferences and such. Phone calls probably could have been made, but I doubt that they did much more than discuss the manner in which the 2 craft would be docked together. And I seriously doubt that either company flew their engineers out to the other's site to view what was going on. All of these things take place in our world, but back then they probably operated mostly in their own vacuums.

    8. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Which in gov't contract speak, still means "a price far heavier then if you were a private consumer....CHUMP!"

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    9. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by blueturffan · · Score: 1
      Throwing money at a problem solves nothing.

      You're forgetting the NASA mantra during the Apollo era -- Waste anything but time They threw a lot of money at the problem of putting a man on the moon.

    10. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Informative

      The most impressive enginering feats were done with slave labor.

      Please name some of these feats. If you're thinking of the Pyramids, BTW, you're wrong.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    11. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by kencurry · · Score: 1

      Don't believe everything you read.

      When was the last time you saw major building project that exhaulted the efforts of the working grunts on the ground?

      --
      sigs are for losers (except to point out that sigs are for losers)
    12. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      So you'd rather believe Hollywood history based on half-remembered folktales? [shrug] Up to you.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    13. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      well, IIRC, the whole problem was casued by two things

      1. coil in the oxygen tank was a old one which was desinged to use a lower voltage.

      2. oxygen tank tempature gadge maxed outr too low.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    14. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      i remember an interview with one of the apolo guys. he was asked what he was thinking just before lift off. "i was thinking, wait a sec, these things are built by the lowest bidder.."

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    15. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was the last time you saw major building project that exhaulted the efforts of the working grunts on the ground?

      That maybe true, but that doesn't imply the grunts are slaves. The pyramids were really combination royal tombs, vanity projects, and public works. In the egyptian beliefs of the time, the enternal welfare of pharoahs impacted the common man's spiritual welfare. There was probably an aspect of civic pride, something that seems just as denegrated on Slashdot as religion. On the pratical side, it was something to do during the low-intensity part of the growing season, and the workers were provided with food and decent accomodations (judging by the foundations of villages use by the workers), there is even evidence of medical care (though if this was an official benefit is unknown). So while I'm sure the work was hard and some days the laborers might have regreted being there, it doesn't mean that they were slaves or motivated by force alone.

    16. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you saw major building project that exalted the efforts of the working grunts on the ground?

      Cathedrals in Europe were built as a matter of civic pride by the various cities. A cathedral would bring pilgrims to the city. Those pilgrims would carry money that they would spend in the local shops. If you were a stoneworker or other craftsman, it was a prestigious thing to contribute to the building of the cathedral.

      (Note: I am not an expert, so someone else could probably give better details.)

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    17. Re:Thing I'd like to know is... by zoombat · · Score: 1

      Well, perhaps they're not as impressive as the egyptian pyramids, but I think it is pretty well established that the Mayans used extensive slave labor when constructing cities like Chichen Itza, Tikal, and Calakmul.

      And I imagine slave labor might have been used in the building of the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, but for all I know that's just as bogus as slaves with the pyramids..

  7. Damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    "the jury rigged air scrubbers"

    I knew they didn't get a fair trial...

  8. Good training and preparedness by GomezAdams · · Score: 5, Interesting
    One of the processes of setting up any critical mission whether for space or here below is doing the 'what if' drills. As a former submariner we trained to do our jobs under normal circumstances, then drilled even more for doing that job and several others under duress. Same with the space program. They have procedures for every almost every contingency and drill the crew and staff untl they could handle stress and deliver.

    Bravo to them and the Apollo 13 crew. Well done!

    --
    Too lazy to create a sig...
    1. Re:Good training and preparedness by sgant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's even more impressive is that the problems with Apollo 13 weren't even simulated...hell, they weren't even thought about. It's amazing that they all got together and actually solved the problem by winging most of it.

      All with computer systems with less power than the C64 and slide-rules...and yes, duct-tape!

      I'm in awe of these guys.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    2. Re:Good training and preparedness by peshewa · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, they did simulate almost this exact scenario. In fact, as a simulator exercise for Apollo 10 they "failed" the fuel cells at almost exactly the same point in the flight where they failed on Apollo 13.


      The "LEM as a lifeboat" scenario was pretty thoroughly considered a few times. While they did have some "real-time problems" to solve, the general approach had been worked out ahead of time.

    3. Re:Good training and preparedness by orac2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, if you read the original article in Spectrum, you'll see that a lot of it was simulated: in particular critical lifeboat procedures (including the important power-the-CSM-from-the-LM-through-the-umbilicals bit) were developed after an Apollo 10 sim where three fuel cells were failed at almost the same point that they did on 13.

      And they did have a bunch of mainframes on the ground for the heavy lifting with the trajectory calculations.

      While there was some brilliant improvisation (the LM controllers hack to power up the LM for example), the controllers were by no mean 'winging it': thanks to leadership, teamwork, dedication and skill, when it came to crunch time, they'd already had a lot of the work done.

      Disclaimer: I'm the author of the Spectrum article!

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
    4. Re:Good training and preparedness by sgant · · Score: 1

      THanks for the great info! I'm one, like millions, who only know the surface details of this story through the movie "Apollo 13"...and while I know it was a movie and they probably changed quite a few things...it's hard for someone, like myself, do see where the facts end and the fiction takes place.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    5. Re:Good training and preparedness by orac2 · · Score: 1

      Cheers, that was a big part of my motivation to write the article in the first place: while the movie was good, I felt there were useful insights and lessons in the events of Apollo 13 that could only be expressed through a more detailed and factual telling, in particular the importance of mission control's overall culture.

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
    6. Re:Good training and preparedness by EvanED · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, if you read the original article in Spectrum, you'll see that a lot of it was simulated: in particular critical lifeboat procedures (including the important power-the-CSM-from-the-LM-through-the-umbilicals bit) were developed after an Apollo 10 sim where three fuel cells were failed at almost the same point that they did on 13.

      I'll add to this another example:

      In the movie the over-dramatized manual burn is proceeded by Tom Hanks figuring out that they can use the Earth's terminator as a reference point they would be able to burn, an idea that fully escaped Houston.

      In real life, the whole (or at least most of the) procedure was tested during Apollo 8, which, coincidentally, Lovell was also on. When 13 was faced with that problem, Mission Control called up the procedure to 13, and Lovell responeded with something like "hey, that sounds like what we did on Apollo 8", and Mission Control responded "we were wondering if you would recognize that."

      The movie is pretty accurate if you ignore the things that are pretty much obviously dramatized (VERY accurate by Hollywood standards), but you should still read up on what happened, for things that are both changed and left out of the movie. I can't speak to the quality of the Spectrum article because I haven't read it (sorry!), but I strongly recommend Lovell's book. Depending on when it was printed and whether you have paperback or hardcover, it might be titled either Lost Moon or Apollo 13; in either case, it served as the basis for the movie.

  9. What about Ed Harris by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And Tom Hanks, and ...

    --
    init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    1. Re:What about Ed Harris by calculadoru · · Score: 1

      Ed Harris, and Tom Hanks, and ...

      It's Kevin Bacon, goddamnit. The poor bastard never gets any respect. Come on now, try to remember his name.
      Oh, and don't mention that other guy. He sucks.

      --
      The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
    2. Re:What about Ed Harris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Kevin Bacon, goddamnit. The poor bastard never gets any respect. Come on now, try to remember his name.
      Oh, and don't mention that other guy. He sucks.


      I wouldn't say that Kevin Bacon, has a game named after him. It's the one were you can connect anyone who's every appeared in film by degrees of seperation from a Kevin Bacon movie.

  10. Engineering 101 by jag2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    No engineering project is complete unless it's held together by copious amounts of duct tape. No exceptions.

    1. Re:Engineering 101 by mks113 · · Score: 1

      You would not believe the amount of "nuclear grade" (low halogen) duct tape we use at a nuke plant.

      It doesn't hold the plant together, but it has multiple uses for contamination control.

    2. Re:Engineering 101 by Wybaar · · Score: 1

      No. Certain things (airplanes and, ironically, heating and air conditioning duct work come to mind as good examples) should not be held together by duct tape unless necessary. However, there should always be sufficient duct tape available to hold important pieces in place should the need arise.

      --
      Y|
  11. Re:damned grammar. by bobstaff · · Score: 2, Informative

    Jury-rigged or Jerry-rigged are both valid with slightly different meanings http://www.yaelf.com/aueFAQ/mifjrrybltjryrggd.shtm l

  12. Dammit, they misspelled jerry-rigging by Nintenfreak · · Score: 0, Funny

    Okay jery-rigging I can understand, but jury-rigging? That sounds like something a tobacco company would do.

    1. Re:Dammit, they misspelled jerry-rigging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check it out, jury-rigging is a correct spelling. The jerry-rigging definition just refers back to jury-rigging, so I guess the original is jury-rig.

    2. Re:Dammit, they misspelled jerry-rigging by Vile+Slime · · Score: 1

      I,

      Think I'm correct on this one, and the reference sited in answers.com is wrong, somebody please feel free to slam me back down to earth...

      But jerry-rig originated in WWII when British soldiers started noticing how the Germans were using any means possible to keep their equipment in working order.

      The British referred to the Germans as Jerries and thus when the Germans rigged something up to work the term jerry-rigged was born.

      I believe in some circles it is considered somewhat racist.

      Have a nice day...

      --
      ---- Go ahead, mod me down, I'll just post it again and you lose your mod points.
    3. Re:Dammit, they misspelled jerry-rigging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      I guess we can all find examples and explanations for the origins of words.
      Check this one out: jury-rig stems from the nautical sense of jury meaning makeshift originally used for jury-mast.
      Apparently the term originates in the 17th century, which rather predates the jerries in the second world war (and even in the first world war).

      A second reference mentions this here (you have to scroll down a bit)
      You might be correct in saying that jerryrigging originated in the world war, but jury-rigging is the original (and more inoffensive) term - hence answers.com is correct.

    4. Re:Dammit, they misspelled jerry-rigging by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      The Answers.com site also refers to Jerry build, meaning poorly or shoddily built.
      It's probably all a tangled mess involving the English use of 'jerry' to refer to germans and and fixing jurries in currupt trials and multiple versions of the 'english' language in use.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  13. Good Idea by lbmouse · · Score: 4, Funny

    Congratulations to the Apollo 13 engineers.

    They should do something like this every year. They have the Grammies, Emmys, etc., why not the Nerdies? They could use Slashdot sections as the categories.

    1. Re:Good Idea by Infinityis · · Score: 1

      And the Nerdie award winner for best karma goes to..

  14. Wow... did you take the time to look that up first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because a quick search of bartelby.com would let you know that "jerry-rig" and "jury-rig" are valid terms, with "jerry-rig" implying shoddier work. Make sure you're right before you flame next time.

  15. Great quote about duct tape... by tyroneking · · Score: 4, Funny

    "One thing a Southern boy will never say is, 'I don't think duct tape will fix it.'"
    That's so cool, but obviously means I'll never want to visit the South without my own personal surgeon.

    1. Re:Great quote about duct tape... by plaiddragon · · Score: 1

      I'll never want to visit the South without my own personal surgeon.

      Don't worry. From what I've seen in Atlanta, we seem to be importing them. I don't think I've had a doctor with a Southern accent since the Reagan administration.

      --
      * * * --they cant all be your best, that would be confusing
  16. Redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the cost of failure, you take more stuff than you absolutely need. The trick is then to be able to reconfigure the stuff in ways that weren't originally intended. I think it was the Voyager that had its spare parts reconfigured after it had been in space a long time. The result was that its computers became much more powerful than when it was launched.

    Strangely, the masters of this seem to be the Russians. When Russian space crews work with American space crews, they complain that the Americans have poor bailing wire skills. The Russians are always working with broken down junk and have become adept at it. The Americans tend to be more helpless when something goes wrong. I think it shows something bad that has happened to the space program. In the beginning, the space program was quite primitive but it became more and more sophisticated. The result is actually less robust.

    1. Re:Redundancy by Phidoux · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mod +1 Redundant?

    2. Re:Redundancy by mikael · · Score: 1

      No, Mod +1 Interesting.

      I've seen this situation in the regular office world as well. It's amazing the amount of stuff that gets junked simply because one part has broken, and it's quicker to go across the street to buy a new item at the computer store, or to open a web-browser and make an online purchase, than it is too open the machine up and replace the broken component.

      The most obvious example - my cousin had a portable CD-player that had crackly audio (the headphone socket had worn away). So she decided to throw out both the headphones and the player...

      Or the computer with a broken video card - the maintenance company send a technician to replace the entire computer: desktop, keyboard, mouse and monitor.

      My personal gripe is with headphones - usually it's the wire that goes first, while the speakers are working perfectly. Unfortunately, because it's a once piece component, I have to throw everything out. However, if the headphones had a socket for the wire (and the wire then became a patch cable), then I could just replace the wire.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:Redundancy by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 1

      Some of the studio and dj sennheiser are like that, a tiny 1/8 inch stereo connector into the headphones, and you can replace the cord relatively cheaply (compared to buying new headphones). I have a pair of HD200, which are probably close to the cheapest pair that have this feature (got then on special for 75 australian), but they are pretty good sounding still and slimline for fully enclosing headphones. Also accidently yanking the cord only ends up with it coming out of the headphones, instead of breaking the wire connection in the headphones themselves.

  17. News? by dcw3 · · Score: 0

    Come on, it's a couple days old already. Ok, I'm expecting to the the obligatory "you're new here, aren't you" response.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
    1. Re:News? by AviLazar · · Score: 3, Funny

      When I first read this article on /. I was about to make a post "uhm hasn't this already been posted on /. before?" Then I realized I had read it on CNN one or two days ago...

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    2. Re:News? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I submitted it two days ago. 8:27 Tuesday 19 April 2005, according to my slashdot page.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  18. I'd have to say... by whitetiger0990 · · Score: 1

    Congratulations!

    "plastic bags, cardboard and duct tape"
    I shall go nowhere without them.

    --
    You have been warned.
    1. Re:I'd have to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geh, don't you know *anything*. All you need is a towel. Then others will give you anything else you need.

    2. Re:I'd have to say... by Ynza · · Score: 0

      annnnd thats why he has a girlfriend ^^ *coughmecough*

  19. Re:damned grammar. by Bush+Pig · · Score: 4, Informative

    No. It's "jury rigged" and "jerry built".

    "Jury rigged" implies a kludge that allows you to survive (say, if your ship got dismasted, or something). "Jerry built" applies mostly to extremely poorly built houses (the kind that has mortar made of flour paste).

    --
    What a long, strange trip it's been.
  20. A couple days late? by hydroxy · · Score: 1

    This was on cnn.com for a while http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/space/04/19/apollo13. engineers.ap/index.html That aside - they did do a damn nice job bringing Apollo 13 back to earth.

  21. do they deserve it? by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    sure they did a brilliant job duct-tapeing the pieces, but a really brilliant engineer would have a.o. forced all subcontractors to use the same type of scrubber....

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  22. 35 years to honour people who saved others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    2 years to honour the people who bungled the iraq planning.No wonder the US is a joke nation now.

  23. Wrong people awarded by AviLazar · · Score: 0

    This award should be given to MacGuyver - we know it was really him who did this.

    IN all honesty, this is geekdom at it's finest!

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    1. Re:Wrong people awarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your shit isn't funny, you can't tell the difference between it's and its, and you whine a lot.

  24. The term is jerry rig by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Jury rig is something a mafia don on trial gets away with.

    Jerry rig comes to us from World War II. The Germans were known amongst the allies, ever quick and able with a good racial nickname, as "Jerry". Toward the end of the war, with German industrial productivity crushed and little supplies available, the Germans had to improvise with scraps of whatever they could scrounge. Somehow, mostly by sheer guts, they managed to keep on fighting with their jerry-rigged junk.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:The term is jerry rig by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 2, Informative
      From dictionary.com (and my childhood)

      jury-rig (jr-rg) tr.v. jury-rigged, jury-rigging, jury-rigs

      To rig or assemble for temporary emergency use; improvise: The survivors of the wreck jury-rigged some fishing gear.

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    2. Re:The term is jerry rig by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a common corruption of the term. GIs weren't always known for their spelling prowess.

      Incidently, Google returns 173,000 hits for "jerry rig", while coming up with only 109,000 for "jury rig".

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    3. Re:The term is jerry rig by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 2, Informative

      But the term is far older than WWII. It was in common usage in the British navy in the 1700s. One posible origin is the old Frence 'ajurie' - to help.

      Sorry - you're WWII origin is an urban myth.

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    4. Re:The term is jerry rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean urban legend.

    5. Re:The term is jerry rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carter on Stargate SG-1 says jerry rig. If she says it, it is the correct way to say it.

  25. All I can say is: - by Phidoux · · Score: 0

    Thank God I'm not an astronaut.

  26. Houston We('ve) ha(d/ve) a problem? by McFadden · · Score: 5, Interesting
    What I found most interesting from the Yahoo! article was the "Houston we've had a problem" quote. Assuming the journalist has done his homework (and a quick Google search would indicate that he probably has), it's interesting that the phrase "Houston we have a problem" seems to be the one that has entered the public consciousness (or at least amongst the crowd that I hang out with).

    As for which was uttered on Apollo 13, I think the latter phrase is the one that accompanied the eponymous movie about the troubled flight (IMDB confirms this) and so has become more well known amongst a certain generation than the original.

    As someone who used to teach English, hats off to Swigert, who in his moment of crisis used the more appropriate present perfect tense (have + past participle) to suggest an incident that happened in the (recent) past but is still (extremely) relevant now.

    Sorry.... I really should get out more.

    McF

    1. Re:Houston We('ve) ha(d/ve) a problem? by peshewa · · Score: 5, Informative
      From the actual air-to-ground transcript:

      02 07 53 12 CMP Okay. Stand by.
      02 07 55 19 LMP Okay, Houston - -
      02 07 55 20 CDR I believe we've had a problem here.
      02 07 55 28 CC This is Houston. Say again, please.
      02 07 55 35 CDR Houston, we've had a problem. We've had a MAIN B BUS UNDERVOLT.
      02 07 55 42 CC Roger. MAIN B UNDERVOLT.

    2. Re:Houston We('ve) ha(d/ve) a problem? by McFadden · · Score: 1

      Thanks peshewa - that's cleared that one up.

    3. Re:Houston We('ve) ha(d/ve) a problem? by orac2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A note of caution: as Sy Liebergot says (the White EECOM on 13), says, you can't always trust the transcripts.

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
    4. Re:Houston We('ve) ha(d/ve) a problem? by fermion · · Score: 1
      In Houston we have an ad campaign. It is called something like Houston, it's worth it. The context is Houston is a horrible place, but there are some interesting benifits.

      To me one cool thing is being the first words from the moon. Houston, tranquility base here. The eagle has landed.

      It is not much, but when all we have is huge mosquitoes, intolerable heat, unbreathable air, and politicians' embarrassing their adopted state with grammatically offensive utterances, one takes what one can get.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  27. Remember! by Vo0k · · Score: 1

    Duct Tape for an Engineer is like the Dark Side for a Jedi Knight!

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  28. Ob. QDB ref by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    ducktape is merely a physical manifestation of regexps

    http://www.bash.org/?11397

    1. Re:Ob. QDB ref by telecsan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Duct Tape can be used for all sorts of neat things... duck tape, otoh, should only be used on Ducks. Well, I guess I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader.

    2. Re:Ob. QDB ref by telecsan · · Score: 1

      They don't have any vested interest seeing as how they manufature Duck(R) brand duct tape... seems there was some historical usage of duck tape (back to WWII) but it seems the proper usage now is duct tape.

  29. How about we honor them... by DaGoodBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...by putting the engineering plans and documentation on the Internet! Then we can build some and make a Beowulf cluster... oh wait.

    DaGoodBoy

    --
    My God! It's full of Voids!
  30. What about the engineer... by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    who put the 12 volt oxygen tank heater in a 72 volt circuit? I'd like to know what happened to that guy ;)

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:What about the engineer... by Mercano · · Score: 1

      The problem is the oxygen tank was made by a sub-subcontractor. NASA's original CSM specs called for 12 volt electrics. They latter changed the specs to a higher voltage, and informed North American. The problem is North American never told the folks making the O2 tanks, so they only built with 12 volts in mind.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    2. Re:What about the engineer... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 0

      He probably didn't know how to convert volts from metric to imperial. Actually, neither do I...

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  31. I was the film but can't remember by jago25_98 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Guess it was a while ago but I can't remember how they did it. That's Tom Hanks for you.

    As a result here's my executive summary:

    - oxygen tank exploded
    - 2 of 3 fuel cells lost
    "Houston, we've had a problem."

    - Ed Smylie, engineer at home watching TV disaster rushes into the centre
    - O2 buildup fixable with lithium hydroxide canisters to help CO2 buildup...
    but some of the backup square canisters were not compatible with the round openings in the lunar module

    "If you saw the movie (`Apollo 13'), it wasn't like that," Smylie said, adding there wasn't any hollering and screaming. "Everything is pretty calm, cool and collected in our business."

    - used duck-tape to convert the backup square canisters to fit the round lunar module fittings

    - this allowed the astronauts to breath just that little bit longer

  32. Re:The 13th hour of the 13th day of the 13th missi by Redrover5545 · · Score: 1

    In times like these, where we, the public, have lost faith in our news institutions after RatherGate and Fox News, I'm thankfull that we can still trust respected and sensible journalism sites like http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/www.ufos-aliens.co.uk for our news and information.

  33. Long Overdue... by IdJit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These guys deserved special recognition decades ago. What they did for those guys up there was nothing short of remarkable, especially in a highly dangerous environment such as space, and most remarkably with the fledgling technology they had available.

    Kudos to the often-uncelebrated ground crew and their determination to get Lovell and crew back safely.

  34. It was a saint by notherenow · · Score: 1, Funny

    A saint in India saved these guys. Without Him, there would have been no return. Ask them, they will tell you that at their worst moment, they suddenly saw things clearer, and were able to work without illusion... ask them

    --
    We all dance, we all sing.
    -The Streets
    1. Re:It was a saint by gaylenek · · Score: 1

      I don't have mod points our I'd give you -1, a saint indeed.

      The fumes are getting to you.

      --
      When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout.
    2. Re:It was a saint by notherenow · · Score: 0

      heh, I mentioned the word "saint" on slashdot, and received a -1 from someone called gay Lene K. The fumes aren't getting to me, it the FLAMES! hahahaaaa

      --
      We all dance, we all sing.
      -The Streets
    3. Re:It was a saint by notherenow · · Score: 0
      Okay, okay, it wasn't a saint. He was just a really kind guy with the ability to make a difference.

      I'm sure that those guys were not praying AT ALL. They were probably just thinking, "Man, I can't WAIT for Houston to come up with a solution for this little misshap, heh, they'll come up with something.... Houston... come in... Houston.... Hello?

      Does anybody remember what hapened? They lost contact for a while. If you care, then think about this really. You're a guy in space, right, and a major problem comes up, for which you have no training. Come on folks. I know when people get onboard an airplane, the thing that they do most is pray. Maybe they are not trying, but they do it. They do it, and so do we.

      Ask the guys that were on Apollo13 if they prayed to Houston, or to some sort of an idea of God. Ask them, and then ask yourself, if it was really duct-tape that saved their lives, or something special. If you look over the facts (which are probably highly classified) You'll probably come to the conclusion: "Holy shit! These guys got really lucky!"

      --
      We all dance, we all sing.
      -The Streets
    4. Re:It was a saint by orac2 · · Score: 1

      While I'm sure they prayed, the crew was in fact trained for this: (from the original Spectrum article):

      But Swigert and the rest of the crew powered up the Odyssey, seemingly effortlessly. "Therein lies the reason we chose test pilots" to be astronauts, says Kraft. "They were used to putting their lives on the line, used to making decisions, used to putting themselves in critical situations. You wanted people who would not panic under those circumstances. These three guys, having been test pilots, were the personification of that theory," explains Kraft.

      Nor are the facts "highly classified". You can read them in excruciating detail here, and the air to ground audio is also available, as is quite a bit of the mission control loop audio.

      They did get lucky, but as the saying goes "chance favors the prepared mind." The huge amount of preparation, skill and teamwork, onboard and on the ground, made the difference between success and failure: the gods help those who help themselves, after all.

      Disclaimer: I'm the author of the Spectrum article

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
    5. Re:It was a saint by notherenow · · Score: 0

      Pfff, I didn't call you stupid, nor am I trying to debate this idea. We can all say that they came home alive, because of some outstanding help, right? Okay, leave it. I was only trying to get others to consider that there was more to it. And no, I'm not trying to preach. I am just one that thinks that this Apollo 13 mission was in fact a REAL mission to go to the moon. The FIRST real mission mind you, but still, they gave it an attempt. They didn't know every little aspect of space, like the Russians did either. It's just that the Russians didn't think it was possible to go to the moon, due to the Van Allan radiation belt ( http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/sci/A0850404.html ) The Americans set out to go through this radiation belt and the rest is.... history?

      --
      We all dance, we all sing.
      -The Streets
  35. What about the... by dayid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ahem, what about the Central Floridian Middle-School Teacher who took out his astronomy class to chart stars, and found out that if NASA had "fired the thrusters" at the time they had planned to - because they had charted the moon's alignment improperly - would've completely missed the mood and sent these guys spinning out into the middle of no where?

    I mean, I figured when the movie came out that no one was going to mention that little "goof up" that NASA had - you know, it's not all good having your measurements and projections corrected by some teacher and his students from a junior high school while they're out stargazing with whatever telescopes their money could buy them - but I would love to see this at least mentioned somewhere.

    They each got a certificate and I think even perhaps a hand-shake.

    Ah, the little forgotten unsung heros of history.

    P.S. Yes, I do rant about this everytime anything with Apollo 13 comes up in conversation.

    1. Re:What about the... by Bucky_the_AV_Guy · · Score: 1

      There were quite a few of these unsung heros. I remember another story about a group of researchers at the University of Toronto who were contacted by Grumman to determine the conditions needed to allow for the explosives to be set in order to separate the lunar module and the command module. The funny part about this story is that the team at UofT simply thought they were one of several teams working on this problem and that NASA was looking for consensus on the parameters. It turns out they were the only ones working on the problem and their recommendations were what was going to be used.....

      http://www.news.utoronto.ca/bin/gopher/Aug21-95/ne ws.htm

    2. Re:What about the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious to read about this; do you have a link handy?

    3. Re:What about the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Google search, nothing found... Is dayid another "Moon Landing Hoax" crazy, possibly?

      Gotta love all them gub'mint smarties being out-intelligentized (thank you GWB for this new language tool - or for just being a tool...) by Joe-Bob McUnknown schoolteacher.

      The essence of valid arguements (unless you're Republican) is actually having some kind of substantiation.

      Provide linky-goodness or just refrain from posting next time.

    4. Re:What about the... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Ahem, what about the Central Floridian Middle-School Teacher who took out his astronomy class to chart stars, and found out that if NASA had "fired the thrusters" at the time they had planned to - because they had charted the moon's alignment improperly - would've completely missed the mood and sent these guys spinning out into the middle of no where?
      Got a reference? Because this sounds like utter bullshit.

      NASA never planned to fire any thrusters until *after* Apollo 13 was *already* rounding the moon. (The PC+2 burn.) Earlier burns were considered but quickly dropped.

      Not to mention the fact that is NASA had missed the moons 'alginment' (whatever the hell that means), they'd have never gotten to the right place for the PC+2 burn in the first place. (Or even entered orbit or landed as was originally intended.)

    5. Re:What about the... by orac2 · · Score: 1

      While I'm equally dubious about the parent post, you should know there was a burn before the PC+2 burn on Apollo 13, and it was done relatively soon after the explosion in order to get the spacecraft onto a free-return trajectory prior to pericynthion. Here's part of what I wrote about it in the original Spectrum article:

      There was, of course, a fly in the ointment. During earlier Apollo missions, the outgoing trajectory of the spacecraft had been selected so that if the service module's main engine failed for any reason, the slingshot effect would aim the command and service module perfectly at Earth, a so-called free-return trajectory. But this trajectory put very tight constraints on the mission timeline, and for Apollo 13, it had been abandoned.

      "We were on a non-free-return trajectory. If we did nothing, we'd whip back towards the Earth but miss it by several thousand miles," the Trench's Bostick explains. ...

      "In 2 or 3 hours we were able to come up with a free-return maneuver. I think it made everybody feel a lot better--including the astronauts." Bostick remembers talking to the crew after the mission. "When we executed the free-return burn it made them feel that they might get out of this thing alive," he says.

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
    6. Re:What about the... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      While I'm equally dubious about the parent post, you should know there was a burn before the PC+2 burn on Apollo 13, and it was done relatively soon after the explosion in order to get the spacecraft onto a free-return trajectory prior to pericynthion.
      I'm aware of that burn, but has discarded it from my thinking because it happened too soon after the accident for a school class to have had time to a) learn about the accident and then b) make an observation in time to notify NASA. The free-return burn occured at about 2AM Florida time.

      Come to think of it, they'd have already rounded the moon before any school class could have made an observation post-accident. (Unless you make the (huge) assumption that the moons 'alignment' was miscalculated pre-mission.)

    7. Re:What about the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The essence of valid arguements (unless you're Republican) is actually having some kind of substantiation
      Seeing as you bashed Republicans without any substantiation behind it...

      Thank you, Mr. Delay!
    8. Re:What about the... by dayid · · Score: 1

      If it REALLY mattered a lot, I'm sure I could hunt down the teacher again (if he's still alive). My father was in his class at the time, and somewhere there are photographs of them receiving their "Certificates of Merit" or some other BS piece of paper that said "you did something good" as a nice way of saying "thanks for saving our asses."

      If you're REALLY interested in it, you can look and find things - pending what you google on. Also, notice how I said these are "unsung heroes." If there was tons of information on the situation, then they would've been "sung," now wouldn't they?

      Come live here in Central FLA... 2 miles from KSC and talk to the old Grumman, Boeing, Lockheed, and KSC workers, and I'm sure you'll hear a lot more about these "spaces saves" that you aren't going to find published anywhere.

      I have the decency to - when hearing the same stories from multiple elders of mine who have never met each other - believe it.

    9. Re:What about the... by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      found out that if NASA had "fired the thrusters" at the time they had planned to ... they ... would've completely missed the mood

      My wife says I have this problem too.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  36. Its obvious... by DeathByDuke · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the Apollo engineers had been watching too much MacGyver.

    1. Re:Its obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they'd been watching _just_ _enough_ McGyver...

      N.

  37. A Top Ten Geek Movie by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Apollo 13 is easily one of the ten best geek movies out there. I really and truly admired the engineers the film portrayed---they were clever and resourceful, kluging up a solution to a life-threatening problem tens of thousands of miles away.

    The reason this is such a wonderful geek film is that there is no bad guy. No evil to overcome. It's not even man versus nature. It's man versus The Problem, and man, brandishing a slide rule and some duct tape, triumphs.

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
    1. Re:A Top Ten Geek Movie by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Well yes I suppose if you consider contractors an implacable malevalent force in the universe.

      I know I do.

    2. Re:A Top Ten Geek Movie by orac2 · · Score: 1

      Today is today, and 35 years ago is 35 years ago, so YMMV, but Kranz is very complimentary about the contractor support during the Apollo 13 mission.

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
  38. Trajectory calculations by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 1

    They should honor the guy who did those. He did not work at NASA when Apollo 13 happened. He had worked for them about five years previous as some kind of student intern or something. He figured out stuff like that and put it in the file. When they had a sudden need, they pulled the plan out, and it was good to go.

    1. Re:Trajectory calculations by orac2 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, as Jerry Bostick, the head of the Flight Dynamics branch notes in the Spectrum article, the bottleneck was that they didn't have the software in the Real Time Computer Complex (big bank of IBM mainframes) to compute the correct burn for the cojoined CSM and LM's trajectory using the LM's descent engine. The limiting issue for the Dynamics branch wasn't the trajectory options, it was executing them with the descent engine, without even the aid of the primary navigation system for later burns.

      Disclaimer: I'm the author of the Spectrum article!

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
  39. Lesson learned here... by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 1

    Duct Tape -- never leave home without it.

    --
    The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
  40. no, it's "jury rig" check wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    When in doubt, check wikipedia:
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_rigged
    On sailing ships, the jury rig is a replacement mast and yards improvised in case of loss of the original mast. The term "jury" is believed (Skeat) to have its source in a Latin and Old French root meaning "aid" or "succour".

    Although ships were observed to perform reasonably well under jury rig, the rig was quite a bit weaker than the original, and the ship's first priority was normally to steer for the nearest friendly port and acquire replacement masts. The term "jury-rigged" has since passed into general usage, denoting some improvised substitute was employed temporarily or in an emergency.

  41. You can joke about it... by Zentac · · Score: 1

    But I still have no idea what that sentence is supposed to mean...

    And another question I have, wich might be out of line, I'm not sure, was it not the same engineers who build a spacecraft that exploded in the first place? I mean, terific job of saving the day, but explosions generaly don't happen by itself, do they..

    1. Re:You can joke about it... by orac2 · · Score: 1

      Engineers at the contractors built the spacecraft to NASA specs and oversight, and a whole different bunch of engineers acted as mission controllers.

      --
      "Just once, I'd like to meet an alien menace that wasn't immune to bullets." -- The Brigadier, Dr. Who
    2. Re:You can joke about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But I still have no idea what that sentence is supposed to mean...
      Jury Rig : Transitive Verb; to erect, construct, or arrange in a makeshift fashion.

      It's in the damn dictionary, fer cryin' out loud!
  42. Re:damned grammar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're stupid. "It's" and "grammatical."

  43. Re:The term is who gives a flying f**k! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what guys, who gives a rat's ass where the term came from....jury rigged, jerry rigged, who friggin' gives a shit...both terms are used by folks and 99% of the population know what the terms imply.....apparently except for you guys bickering over what is the correct term.

  44. Re:damned grammar. by Illserve · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering why Jerry built means poorly built?

    Surely they aren't referring to German concrete structures in WWII? Yea they looked ugly as hell but just you try to get rid of 5 foot thick rebar concrete in a dome shape.

  45. Re:damned grammar. by compro01 · · Score: 1

    the original term was "jour rig" IIRC. "jour" is french for "day" so hence "rigged for the day" is the raw translation. language shifted, and "jury rig" became the new spelling of it

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  46. Basic Engineering by TimeForGuinness · · Score: 1
    If it is supposed to move and doesn't, use WD-40.

    If it is not supposed to move and does, then use duct tape.

  47. Re:damned grammar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the original term was "jour rig" IIRC. "jour" is french for "day" so hence "rigged for the day" is the raw translation. language shifted, and "jury rig" became the new spelling of it

    Well I always thought it came from the idea that what you are doing works, but it is not the right thing to do. Like rigging a jury in your favor would get positive results, but that's not how the system is supposed to work. Of course, "mayday!" is actually a corruption of the a french phrase that means "help me!" so your explaination is possible.

  48. Engineer recognition...what a concept!! by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see good engineering work finally get the recognition it deserves. I seriously think that one of the main reasons people are turned off from engineering/science is that they see it as non-rewarding. Most business professionals get a lot more recognition for their work, even though it's less challenging. Everyone is aspiring to be that "celebrity CEO" type rathen than focusing on doing their best in a job that's less visible.

    That said, I wonder if it would even be possible to pull off something like this in the US anymore. With such low interest in math and science, and a low level of education, how would we find people qualified enough to think through things like this?

  49. there's a jury involved? by prurientknave · · Score: 1

    Does anyone on slashdot know how to spell? It's not jury rigged it's jerry-rigged; a nautical term. A rigged jury is usually illegal and has no bearing at all on this article.

    Go ahead mod me down you imperial unit using dyslexic twits.

    1. Re:there's a jury involved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=146838 &threshold=1&commentsort=0&tid=160&tid=99&mode=thr ead&pid=12301553#12301578

    2. Re:there's a jury involved? by Truth_Quark · · Score: 1
      Dude, jury-rigged is the actual word.

      Jerry-rigged is later addition from people who didn't know that everyone else was saying jury-rigged, and thought that it must have something to do with jerry-build; which is not a nautical term.

      Apart from that good post! (Except for the troll at the end)

      Perhaps you were thinking of jackass rig, which is a nautical term?

  50. Apple Rocks! by dry_cough · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    OSX and iPods Rock. Windows blows...

    What's that? What?

    Sorry, my bad. The article says "Apollo", not "Apple".

    It is Slashdot afterall. Surely you understand the misread. You'll forgive me, right?

  51. too late by Penguinoflight · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My next door neighbor who worked on the apollo 13 mission died over a year ago. A nice old guy who wasn't too ashamed to admit that the problem was with the rutine checks before launch. I suspected foul play when I saw this honor being made now, and it's really unfortunate/offensive that half the engineers are probably dead now.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  52. Ironically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Duct tape was actually used for it's intended purpose in saving the Apollo 13 astronauts.

    The tape was used to actually seal an air duct that put air through the CO2 scrubber.

  53. Re:damned grammar. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Perhaps because the word "jerry" also used to mean a guzunder, aka a chamber-pot?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  54. Re:damned grammar. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Quite possibly, 'journeyman' originally meant a worker hired on a day-by-day basis.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  55. Re:The 13th hour of the 13th day of the 13th missi by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 0

    That's right. I mean the flags are all wrong and the shadows are fluttering. Or something.

    --
    It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  56. Re:damned grammar. by compro01 · · Score: 1

    a worker who travels and/or is hired to work on a day-to-day basis.

    this is why i love this language, however often i may mangle it.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  57. Re:damned grammar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite possibly, 'journeyman' originally meant a worker hired on a day-by-day basis.

    No, the origin to that is more straight-forward. In most medieval guilds you had at least three ranks. They were apprentice, journeyman, and master. An apprentice learned and practiced the basics of the trade from the resident master (or masters). Then when apprentices had sufficient expertise they were sent out into the world to ply their trade on their own. There were two main reasons for this, a chance to gain experience they wouldn't otherwise have, and to also limit direct competetion between members of the same guild. This is why they were called "journeymen".

  58. Uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't part of the problem also do impart to funky engineering?

  59. A little late... by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

    I'm not trying to be a troll here, but aren't we a little late with that? Or is it just a celebration thing and they are recelebrating their good deeds?

    --
    "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher