Magnets kill people. Well...people with assault magnets using guns kill people. BAN ALL ASSAULT MAGNETS! Think of the children! (who may have magnets...so BAN THEM TOO! Those mouthy little bastards...)
The "law" on the books states -no- searches are to be done. None. Kinda like, "no murdering", or "no robbing", etc.
That means "none". "zero". "zip". "nada"
So...if the state has 626,000+ people as of 2015 and there are probably ~320,000 with a license, and there were 126 searches of ~320,000 people over 48 months that's equal to ~40,320,000 violations of the law which tells them not to do these searches. That's an average of ~840,000 violations per month
Microsoft announced today the acquisition of the Webroot Antivirus program in order to incorporate its detection technology into Microsoft Defender. Steve Ballmer is quoted as saying, "No one fucks with our users, well...except for us, and this provides an excellent means by which to do so."
1 - Posted as AC? If you can't put your name next to your statements, STFU, coward. 2 - The CIA's job is to spy. Evidently, they use vulnerabilities discovered in software to do that. 3 - After re-reading your response, I can see why you'd post as AC. If you were any more dense you'd achieve spontaneous fission. That drivel isn't something I'd want my name next to, either. 4 - Again, it's not the CIA's responsibility to uphold the privacy rights of citizens and, until you post links to or the directive(s)/regulation(s) themselves stating it "is" their responsibility, refer to #1 & #2 above. 5 - Stop releasing shitty code full of holes.
...Even spy agencies like the CIA have a responsibility to protect the security and privacy of Americans.
Section 202 of the National Security Act of 1947 established the CIA, and nowhere in the charter does it state it's their responsibility to protect the privacy of Americans.
Since the spammers had personally identifiable information, they're now required to contact those affected to notify them of the breach and what those affected by the breach should do to protect themselves, and get larger breasts naturally.
Slashdot Mirror
Shut up and take my identity!
cause company to consider alternatives...
whoodathunkit?
"I don't come nearly as much as I used to, and I hardly ever post any more."
Marriage will do that...
It goes without saying because, well, who doesn't?!
Magnets kill people. Well...people with assault magnets using guns kill people. BAN ALL ASSAULT MAGNETS! Think of the children! (who may have magnets...so BAN THEM TOO! Those mouthy little bastards...)
The average annual income for Americans is ~$56000 - $58000
>50% of one's yearly income "is" expensive. At least, it is in my humble opinion
Yellow, then orange (once convicted) is the new black
Your argument is nonsensical.
The "law" on the books states -no- searches are to be done. None. Kinda like, "no murdering", or "no robbing", etc.
That means "none". "zero". "zip". "nada"
So...if the state has 626,000+ people as of 2015 and there are probably ~320,000 with a license, and there were 126 searches of ~320,000 people over 48 months that's equal to ~40,320,000 violations of the law which tells them not to do these searches. That's an average of ~840,000 violations per month
Yeah...They do need to be stopped
Actually, I'm pretty sure you can.
Microsoft announced today the acquisition of the Webroot Antivirus program in order to incorporate its detection technology into Microsoft Defender. Steve Ballmer is quoted as saying, "No one fucks with our users, well...except for us, and this provides an excellent means by which to do so."
Maybe your kid(who didn't starve) grows up to be the drug addict who steals my car again.
you BOTH suck and I want my cars back!
This pretty much summed up our last CIO Meeting.
Actually, the starbucks cup contains poisoned latte and the reason it was discarded was the Putin critic dropped it when he died.
You say that now but just wait until we send back Celine Dion...
bad batteries
See #1 and #2
until you post links to or the directive(s)/regulation(s) themselves stating it "is" their responsibility, refer to #1 & #2 above
There's nothing in that italicized statement that states it's their responsibility to ensure your right to privacy.
There's nothing in that statement that states it's their responsibility to disclose vulnerability information to the holes can be patched
1 - Posted as AC? If you can't put your name next to your statements, STFU, coward.
2 - The CIA's job is to spy. Evidently, they use vulnerabilities discovered in software to do that.
3 - After re-reading your response, I can see why you'd post as AC. If you were any more dense you'd achieve spontaneous fission. That drivel isn't something I'd want my name next to, either.
4 - Again, it's not the CIA's responsibility to uphold the privacy rights of citizens and, until you post links to or the directive(s)/regulation(s) themselves stating it "is" their responsibility, refer to #1 & #2 above.
5 - Stop releasing shitty code full of holes.
...Even spy agencies like the CIA have a responsibility to protect the security and privacy of Americans.
Section 202 of the National Security Act of 1947 established the CIA, and nowhere in the charter does it state it's their responsibility to protect the privacy of Americans.
manufacturers to consider cyber security and privacy we'll be good to go.
Since the spammers had personally identifiable information, they're now required to contact those affected to notify them of the breach and what those affected by the breach should do to protect themselves, and get larger breasts naturally.
The line starts at the end user's mouth.
No eating the profits!
Well played, sir. Well played.
I fell in the shower this morning and now I have a crack in my butt.