Alex Roy, founder of the The Human Driving Association, is proposing a third option called "augmented driving" -- allowing people the option to drive, but helping them do it better.
Then he's a pillock.
A wise man once said: "Should drive yes or drive no, not drive guess so".
I've been on an autonomous bus that was faster than that. Well, it was like a bus but longer and instead of running on a road it ran on two narrow ones.
Likely more fuel was burned getting the item to your door within the US than was spent moving it all the way from China. And that is expensive road fuel not incredibly cheap bunker oil.
The bunker oil probably generates more pollution though. Filthy stuff.
This sounds like your standard sigmoid growth curve; lower slope - early adopters, steep slope - going mainstream, flattening off near the top - saturation.
Property left in the middle of a public sidewalk is not abandoned. It *might* be abandoned. It might also be lost, or mislaid.
It's definitely obstructing a public right of way. I'm under no obligation to put myself at risk by walking in the road, so if it accidentally gets knocked over as I squeeze past it gets knocked over.
Slashdot Mirror
What's wrong with wooden wings?
This little beauty went like shit off a shovel and could carry two tons of bombs to boot.
http://www.eaa.org/~/media/ima...
Then he's a pillock.
A wise man once said: "Should drive yes or drive no, not drive guess so".
There'll be an app for that.
I've been on an autonomous bus that was faster than that. Well, it was like a bus but longer and instead of running on a road it ran on two narrow ones.
You could make it so the types of files (though how it identifies them is another question) is opt-in. IOW it accepts nothing out of the box.
What exactly is the SI unit of squishiness anyway?
How many standard[1] footballs is that?
[1] i.e. not Patriot ones.
India already did it.
P.S. There should probably be some punctuation in there.
Manifest domain. Or eminent destiny. Something like that.
Are you working under the assumption that being hit by a bike won't cause injury?
https://www.theguardian.com/uk...
There's also issue of robberies.
The bunker oil probably generates more pollution though. Filthy stuff.
Or at least, everyone who wants one.
This sounds like your standard sigmoid growth curve; lower slope - early adopters, steep slope - going mainstream, flattening off near the top - saturation.
But where's the story in that?
Sheila O'Neill.
I was under the impression that, in the UK at least, bicycles were considered vehicles from the outset.
Though that was a little bit before my time.
Bezos is keeping all the good stuff for himself and selling it on fleabay.
So it's like a house? Why didn't they say that?
It's definitely obstructing a public right of way. I'm under no obligation to put myself at risk by walking in the road, so if it accidentally gets knocked over as I squeeze past it gets knocked over.
As a pedestrian who walks a small child to and from school I don't see what's unfortunate about that.
I don't even use the darn thing and it depresses me. Its mere existence is enough.
Anyone else trying to figure out how that looks significantly different from a right-way-up one?
Apart from the line drawing of an obscure animal, of course.
It means it doesn't use joins.
It can also use /dev/null for storage, which is extremely fast plus you never run out of space.
None of the things you wrote contradicts anything I wrote. Comprehension fail, you little Belgian twat.
Arr, now aye sea.
Well if the first sentence, of the article, is anything to, go by, then a plague of, commas probably didn't help.
Sometimes it just writes itself.