There are 3 types of people [etc] 0 - those who do not know binary 1 - those who know binary 2 - those who laugh cuz they think they do but don't 3 - ??
I would if only they supported Solo, or PayPal, or NoChex, or Splashplastic, or anything that I could actually use to pay for it with! I don't have a credit card.
Copyright reaches both published and unpublished works. It protects unpublished works primarily for reasons of privacy. There's no good reason to force people to take affirmative steps to protect work they have not published to others. So this proposal would only apply to work that people initially intended to make available publicly. The alternative (50 years after creation) creates very difficult problems of timing. I can know without asking you when a work was published. I can't easily know when the work was created.
I kept hearing that you were changing the name from Phoenix to something else. What happened?
That was just a giant publicity stunt. We've observed that in the past, the open-source community has instinctively favored David when big corporations complain of trademark infringement. We wanted to cash in on this sympathy by asking the community to send us money to fight the legal battle (obviously we'd really spend it on cool stuff), but with all the taxing issues and whatnot we decided to can the idea.
Uhhhh...really?
No, not really. This isn't like an action flick where the evil madman reveals the intricacies of his plans to hostages and then leaves them alone with a bomb set to detonate in like 10 hours. When we're ripping you off, we won't explain how in the FAQ. The truth is that we'd already had this 0.5 released planned for awhile, so it was okay to release under the Phoenix name. But under no circumstances will any future release be called Phoenix.
Is it's ability to link with up to 4 other SP32's wirelessly: http://www.gp32news.com/?page=showpage&lang=en&id= 6
The engineering team supports themselves? Slashdot editors support them? All slashdot readers support them?
Actually he did make his own comment, the title of the post was "Moron" Definetly worth +5 funny, right?
It was working a few minutes ago when it was in The Mysterious Future. Quickist slashdotting I've ever seen for a site with no large downloads.
"the Muslims"? I just hope that was badly worded sentence and not a reflection of your real views. Believe it or not, not all Muslims are terrorists.
If you want to start an OT discussion why not use This?
You can currently get SATAATA converters although they obviously limited by the speed of ATA.
I'm in the UK, and the day that our regular police carry firearms is the day that I'll start learning the language of a country where they don't.
Yes, note the name POPfile
Tools -> Customize -> Options -> Menus show recently used commands first
OK convert that to decimal:
... hmm...
There are 3 types of people [etc]
0 - those who do not know binary
1 - those who know binary
2 - those who laugh cuz they think they do but don't
3 - ??
Thats 4 types of people
Well if that was on then people wouldn't be able to set the common passwords so they wouldn't become common. If you see what I mean.
I know that there's no flamewar, but trying telling that to all the GNOME-using ignorant twats out there!
Hmmm .... how do you avoid buying cars from big companies? Surely you don't want ANY monster company to dictate or control your driving experience.
...I just don't quite see what he's actually getting at? Anyone know what I mean?
They haven't got bust AFAIK
I would if only they supported Solo, or PayPal, or NoChex, or Splashplastic, or anything that I could actually use to pay for it with! I don't have a credit card.
Err I'm getting black on light grey on Moz1.3b/Win98.. what kinda browser are you using?
It already does. :)
America's foreign secretary according to Jaque Chirac.
Actually it was Nelson Mandela that said that.
From the FAQ:
# Why limit this to "published" works?
Copyright reaches both published and unpublished works. It protects unpublished works primarily for reasons of privacy. There's no good reason to force people to take affirmative steps to protect work they have not published to others. So this proposal would only apply to work that people initially intended to make available publicly. The alternative (50 years after creation) creates very difficult problems of timing. I can know without asking you when a work was published. I can't easily know when the work was created.
From the FAQ: