Slashdot Mirror


Mandrake Linux... Not Dead Yet?

bloodeu writes "Mandrake Linux has been beaten down by linux experts alike, but this new release of Mandrake may hold many promising Linux users what they have been waiting for, like NTFS resizing(which is a first), Automatic Network config(zeroconf), Supermount, and many more. You can download the Mandrake 9.1 RC1 Here"

494 comments

  1. I'm not dead yet! by bryanp · · Score: 5, Funny

    The obligatory Monty Python reference. I'll go sit quietly now.

    --
    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
    1. Re:I'm not dead yet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "promising Linux users what they have been waiting for, like NTFS resizing(which is a first), Automatic Network config(zeroconf), Supermount,"

      How much does it really matter that they have all this? They don't make any money, thats their problem!

    2. Re:I'm not dead yet! by packeteer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ok first of all it does matter a lot that they have these improvments and its NOT true that they aren't making money. They do have sources of income which for certain areas actually create a profit. The overall Mandrakesoft situation is different. Mostly because of their failed investments such as their Mandrake Online Learning plan. Once they go through bankruptcy and rescructure their spending they will be able to turn a real profit.

      I dont understand why people are saying they are going away. The only place i hear about "Mandrake Linux is dying!" would be slashdot. I am surpirsed i dont see trolls more often screaming that since there are some good FUD opportunities here. If you read almost anywhere else about Mandrake all you see is people talking about the upcoming version which looks very good so far.

      To address your first point last i will say that most definetly what they release matters. Even without an increase in income they can probably turn a profit so by releasing a better product they can get even more profit. You know... that's what business's do. If Mandrake can put in many more firsts for linux yet continues to improve their ease of use and auto-configuration, which they did in this release, then more people will join the mandrake club.

      Also as a side note the Mandrake club is a great idea and i think if you download this and you like it you should join. Some people say that setting up a business on a subscription based model will scare off investors and you should buy the CD's instead. That is oh so very wrong. If MandrakeSoft can pull it's self out of debt and show everyone that their business model works i think we could potentially have many more sucessful open source companies make it.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    3. Re:I'm not dead yet! by mattfish · · Score: 1

      what packeteer is saying is totally correct.. I have run Mandrake for a long time and I dont know why people put it down so much.. I think it is one of the best linux distrabutions to start off as a newbie with

    4. Re:I'm not dead yet! by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

      "promising Linux users what they have been waiting for, like NTFS resizing(which is a first), Automatic Network config(zeroconf), Supermount,"

      Um... that's not what I want. I'm still waiting for an installer that handles failure cases well, doesn't foul up package dependencies, and properly sets up X-Windows so the desktop doesn't start up in a flickering mode that would kill an epilleptic. Give me something that actually works without hassle, or give me Windows.

      --
      Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  2. Still, inevitable demise :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their finances show it... if they're not dead yet, they soon will be. It was sort of obvious; if you give something away for free (as in speech or beer, either goes), you'll be lucky to break even.
    I guess I'll have to find another distro if I want to keep up... :/

  3. Lets hope they release it soon by Twister002 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So we can all go download it and not pay them a cent.

    uhhhhmmmmmm

    --
    "For a successful technology, honesty must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled." -Feynman
    1. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by Xpilot · · Score: 1, Troll

      I don't think you can purchase a release candidate

      --
      "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    2. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by Salsaman · · Score: 4, Insightful
      So we can all go download it and not pay them a cent.

      Yes of course. That's what the GPL is all about :-)

      But if you do that, please consider giving them a donation (e.g., by joining the Mandrake Club) so that they might be around for the next release.

    3. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by whereiswaldo · · Score: 4, Insightful


      I'd be more impressed if I could get in the Mandrake club by purchasing a boxed product from a retail outlet.
      Right now that's not possible (to my knowledge). Why should I pay twice?

    4. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by Hatter · · Score: 4, Informative

      The point is they only get a fraction of the money you spend at a retail store. It's divided up between the retail chain, the company which pressed the cds, Mandrake, and more than likely a middleman.

    5. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by whereiswaldo · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The point is they only get a fraction of the money you spend at a retail store. It's divided up between the retail chain, the company which pressed the cds, Mandrake, and more than likely a middleman.

      No offense, but how is that my problem? They might have more Mandrake fans if they didn't offend paying customers. It's still better than those who leech costly bandwidth _and_ pay zero dollars. At least the minimum level of membership and an explanation is in order, I think.
      Anyway, I've moved on to Red Hat at least for the forseeable future.

    6. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by swv3752 · · Score: 5, Informative

      All new purchases from the Mandrake store and new release box sets will come with a one month complimentary subscription the MandrakeClub.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    7. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by mattrix2k · · Score: 1

      I would if only they supported Solo, or PayPal, or NoChex, or Splashplastic, or anything that I could actually use to pay for it with! I don't have a credit card.

    8. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      J&R has it on their shelves.
      http://www.jandr.com/JRProductSearch.pro cess?Resta rtFlow=t&RowsPerPage=50&Merchant_Id=1&connector=AN D&SearchType=allproducts&SearchValue=mandr ake

    9. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      I'd be more impressed if I could get in the Mandrake club by purchasing a boxed product from a retail outlet.
      Right now that's not possible (to my knowledge).


      According to Deno, boxed sets of 9.1 will include a trial membership for MandrakeClub. I have almost no details, but remember a standard set (at $30) costs a lot more to produce, and generates less income than a 6-month membership.

      IMHO, membership is worth it, and Deno is planning a lot more.

      Think about it. Most people criticise Mandrakesoft for not having a business plan, while complaining that the music industry has not kept with the times. It seems like Mandrake free-loaders and music pirateers are all the same, just want everything for free. Distributing your product via the internet at almost no cost to you (ignoring original development/recording cost) is a viable business plan, if a substantial fraction of your "clients" become paying customers.

    10. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by dolson · · Score: 1

      Why should you pay twice? Because they aren't the same service, perhaps?

    11. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by packeteer · · Score: 1

      You really shouldn't be purchasing Mandrake anyway. If you want to pay join the Mandrake club. They get their money and you get your OS so it's KIND OF like purchasing but you get so much more in the mandrake club than 3 ISO's and instructions.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    12. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by More+Karma+Than+God · · Score: 1

      But buying at a bricks and mortar store makes money for the store. The store managers will see that this Linux stuff sells well, and they'll increase the amount of shelf space it gets. More people will see Linux and hopefully try it and like it.

      --
      Go here to create your own Slashdot dis
    13. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by PurpleWizard · · Score: 1
      Some of us do pay out cash from time to time because we like the idea that we are getting something we want and seek to contribute in one way or another to keep it alive.

      Guess most folk like Twister002 there are just tight and expect everything for free.

      Put up or lose it

    14. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by deno · · Score: 1

      Right. One month of trial membership, and you can even keeep the "alumni" status afterwards.

      It's good for advertising, as the folks will get a chance to take a look at the Club on their own, rather than listening to various FUD that's circulating.

    15. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PayPal ???

  4. ACPI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Will this be the first Linux distro with ACPI support enabled by default?

    I believe FreeBSD 5.0 is the other.

    If so, I'll wipe RH today.

    1. Re:ACPI? by udippel · · Score: 0

      Funny you mention this. FreeBSD is no Linux, as everyone knows (was waiting for the *BSDs to *flame* this Anonymous Coward !)

      Seems everyone who goes into ACPI is heavily on the downhill track.
      You might go for Mandrake - bankrupt a few weeks after.
      You might as well go for FreeBSD - dead only some time later. I'll really cry for FreeBSD, probably the best we could have ever got, but messed up horribly over time.

      Right, I'm also kind of waiting to wipe RH. But not with a candidate for the Death Row!

    2. Re:ACPI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm.. have you tried FreeBSD 5.0's ACPI support? You can't even find out how much battery life you have, at least on my dell latitude laptop.

      I didn't figure out how to go back to APM, so I deleted FreeBSD couple hours later.

    3. Re:ACPI? by djcapelis · · Score: 1

      Or you could just re-compile the kernel... it isn't that hard and allows you the oppurtunaty to apply invaluable patches. grsecurity.net

      --
      I touch computers in naughty places
    4. Re:ACPI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supposedly, Red Hat 8.1 could be the first with default ACPI in a month or so. I believe the Phoebe rc out right now has it in.

    5. Re:ACPI? by Thalias · · Score: 2, Funny

      What you mean actually get of your lazy @$$ do something. Way to much work.

    6. Re:ACPI? by fyonn · · Score: 1

      I believe FreeBSD 5.0 is the other

      rumour has it that freebsd 5 is not a linux distro but an OS in it's own right...

      but it does come with acpi enabled, this is true. and it's been rock solid for me so far...

      dave

    7. Re:ACPI? by ReinoutS · · Score: 1

      No. Beta3 and RC1 had ACPI enabled by default, but this created so many bug reports that 9.1 will ship with ACPI off. BUT: I hear that at installation time you will be able to check a box to indicate that you want ACPI and then you will have it, so no recompiling required.

    8. Re:ACPI? by djcapelis · · Score: 1

      Well at least some of us can mister, I'm not worthy enough to re-compile a kernel when the process is simple, and I'm gonna let everyone know it on /. by putting it in my profile. Anyways, good to see ya around here, what's for dinner?

      --
      I touch computers in naughty places
    9. Re:ACPI? by Thalias · · Score: 1

      I have no clue what you mean? I never said anything such thing. Though my friend is planning on letting me help(watch) him compile his. He's a really cool guy. So next time check your sources and have proof before you right, you insensitive clod. Oh and go bite your toe.

    10. Re:ACPI? by djcapelis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that friend of yours is a great guy actually. He'll let you figure out why cd-burning isn't working even though he has SCSI emulation set up right. grr.... either that or he'll already have it done.

      --
      I touch computers in naughty places
  5. NTFS by NickisGod.com · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Um, okay. Maybe I've been out of the loop when it comes to Linux/NTFS compatibility. I thought we were still kinda' afraid to write to NTFS partitions. Now we can resize them.

    Can someone please elaborate?

    1. Re:NTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were kinda' afraid to write to NTFS partitions. Now we can resize them.

    2. Re:NTFS by y2dt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mandrake is using ntfsresize which is part of the Linux-NTFS project.

      This is the project that contributed the NTFS driver to the Linux kernel

    3. Re:NTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember, kids: Nothing makes a better first impression than corrupting a user's existing NTFS partition during installation.

    4. Re:NTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Resizing NTFS isn't as difficult as writing to it. The resizer only has to alter a few pieces of metadata. This is relatively safe.

      Note that the resizer cannot defrag, yet, so it can only shrink NTFS partitions by the amount of free space you have.

      Mandrake are using a 2.4 kernel patched with the new NTFS driver. This driver has limited *safe* write support. It can overwrite existing files (using write or mmap). This is enough to read-write loopback mount an NTFS file as a filesystem and use it as your root filesystem.

      FlatCap (Rich)
      ntfs at flatcap dot org

      Linux NTFS Project

    5. Re:NTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I note on the resizers homepage (http://mlf.linux.rulez.org/mlf/ezaz/ntfsresize.ht ml) that they will commit to Gnu Parted only if user interest demands it.

      Yes! Please do so, Parted is not as useful as Partition Magic as it recognizes but won't touch NTFS. This tool can (and hopefully will) change that.

    6. Re:NTFS by MyHair · · Score: 1

      Note that the resizer cannot defrag, yet...

      Has anyone started such a project yet? My main selfish interest is in defragging the MFT, and as far as I see only pay-per-machine utilities exist for that when all I want is a utility disk to pop in each machine and defrag the MFT when it becomes necessary.

      I have a few high user PCs that bump the MFT into tens of fragments. That kills performance.

    7. Re:NTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carefull... don't give MS any ideas... or else we could find that the next SP to XP puts immovable data at the very end of the partition.

    8. Re:NTFS by Selanit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Another thing worth pointing out about NTFS is that Mandrake is not the first Linux distribution with NTFS resizing support. Xandros had it when they announced their first official release a few months ago. I suspect that they used the same code as Mandrake, though I don't know. Xandros's PR pages claim that they were the first with that capability.

      I have no idea who to believe, and frankly I don't care who got their first; I'm just glad it's implemented. Now, if we could just get decent NTFS write support, we'd be in much better shape. Being able to read/write your Windows partition from Linux makes dual-booting much more tolerable. On at least one occasion, being able to write a FAT32 partition from Linux has saved my butt. (Windows was refusing to boot because some vital configuration files had gotten corrupted; I couldn't boot from floppy 'cause my disk drive was dead, but I was able to replace them from Linux -- disaster averted!)

      Not being able to do similar things with NTFS partitions is a significant drawback which may be discouraging some people from trying Linux out on their shiny new 2K/XP machine. I hope it gets worked out in the not-too-distant future.

    9. Re:NTFS by Avakado · · Score: 1

      Note that the resizer cannot defrag, yet, so it can only shrink NTFS partitions by the amount of free space you have.

      If you want to shrink it by more than the amount of free space, you would have to erase files, not defrag them. What is more likely, is that you cannot shrink it by more than the amount of continuous free space at the end of the filesystem.

      --
      The world will end in 5 minutes. Please log out.
    10. Re:NTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Neither Xandros nor Mandrake was the first to support NTFS resizing during installation. It was ASPLinux almost two years ago. For more details see the beforehand mentioned ntfsresize web page.

      But Mandrake *is* the first who provide an easy to use free solution. Free both in the sense as "free beer" (no need to pay as for Xandros) and "free speech" (complete source code available, not for Xandros or ASPLinux). These additional values provided by Mandrake, and Linux-NTFS team of course, make a big difference for users benefit.

    11. Re:NTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On any dual-booat 2k machines I make, I say to hell with NTFS for C:, using it only for other partitions.

      That way I can still recover from DOS floppy or linux.
      Just make C: as small as possible and put as little as possible on it.
      D:\Program Files
      etc.

    12. Re:NTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm reliably informed that Xandros' resize utility is provided by PowerQuest. It's certainly not ours (linux-ntfs).

      FlatCap (Rich)
      ntfs at flatcap dot org

      Linux-NTFS

    13. Re:NTFS by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      On any dual-booat 2k machines I make, I say to hell with NTFS for C:, using it only for other partitions.


      Bah. NTFS is so much more stable. It's journaling, doesn't corrupt and need defrags like FAT32 does, etc, etc. FAT32 is an anachronism.

      Here's what I do: I have a 40 gig hard drive. I give the C: drive 3 gigabytes. I use it for Win2k. Just win2k. I install all of my programs on my D: and E: drives. That way if my OS gets douched, which actually has never happened before, the backup I have to do before reformatting is minimal. I can just reformat C:, reinstall windows, and I don't have to worry about the rest of my data. (Some programs of course, don't work when you reinstall windows-Can't handle having registry keys and such deleted. But most programs, such as UT, RtCW, Photoshop, and many others, do not need to be reinstalled at all.)

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    14. Re:NTFS by DickBreath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have no idea who to believe, and frankly I don't care who got their first

      FYI... off topic...

      In about 1982, PC World magazine says, on the front cover, that MS-DOS 2.0 is the first operating system with a hierarchical file system.

      The first in a long list of Microsoft innovations.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    15. Re:NTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is just outright STUPID. Who gives a SHIT how you reinstall your crappy Windoze box.

  6. Mandrake rocks. by Big+Mark · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, so it's the really simple distro for thickies and n00bs. It's also by far and away the easiest Linux distro to set up and use that I've tried (and I'm from the days of Yggdrasil, me) so it's my distro of choice - it has (or is easily made to have) all the power of "proper" distros but isn't as condescending as Lycoris and friends.

    Mandrake should be kept alive, it would be a loss to the Linux world if it were to die.

    -Mark

    1. Re:Mandrake rocks. by Hatter · · Score: 5, Informative

      I find it funny that so many people overlook urpmi. It's apt-get for rpms. It can retrieve packages from cdrom, or the internet and handles dependencies automatically.

    2. Re:Mandrake rocks. by motherball · · Score: 1

      I've just got to add 2-cents worth of reinforcement. Mandrake does Rock!! I've sampled the distros to see what I was missing out on and basically found Mandrake a better, more sensible, more feature filled, and smarter configured Redhat. They should get a little more agressive coroporately speaking. It would be a shame to see them go. Probably the best out of the box for the general user as far as I could tell.

      Oh well, it doesn't matter much anymore. If you're past newb stage you dont really need to be distro specific.

    3. Re:Mandrake rocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Are you by any chance a member of the MandrakeClub? I, for one, am. How about doing something tangible instead of sending best wishes and speaking out about how it should be kept alive?

      Open source is a great concept but it cannot work if everybody takes for granted that it's all free as in free beer. After all, 5$ a month is not that much a donation, given the fact that you get a great OS for it.

      Just a thought.

    4. Re:Mandrake rocks. by JSCarr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just installed urpmi for the first time last night, after ten minutes of snarling at the RedHat 8.0 package manager (which, frankly, needs a LOT of work). Apt-get for rpms is brilliant, in my noobish opinion.

      It's not funny though that it's overlooked - it's sad that it's not publicized more heavily. I wish I'd have known about it sooner. It would have saved me lots of frustration over the last six months.

    5. Re:Mandrake rocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, apt-rpm is the apt-get for RPM's..thanks for trying though :>

      http://freshrpms.net/apt/

    6. Re:Mandrake rocks. by cryptowhore · · Score: 1

      I don't think we need to get childish and superior about which distro we use. I know you were joking so don't take it the wrong way. I just wish we could stamp out the elitest attitude (which shows up in all of us) until Linux distros have at least half of Microsoft's market share. As far as Mandrake goes, I like the distro; it tries and often does get the important things right. Personally, I prefer SUSE but I have no strong brand loyalty because linux isn't really about brands. After many a long car trip (everyone lives 2hours away in Ontario it seems unless they're in Toronto) north to fix my parent's computer, I finally installed Mandrake 9.0 on their machine and kicked myself hard for not doing it earlier. Mandrake had excellent default settings that were user friendly and I even managed to go without doing an upgrade on the hardware. The moral of the story: If it works for someone, it works. Oh yeah....my Mom really likes the tea cooker...for her it's reason enough to switch. :)

      --
      Happiness is a slider variable
    7. Re:Mandrake rocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry urpmi came for first, thanks for trying though.

    8. Re:Mandrake rocks. by peter_gzowski · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, apt-rpm and urpmi do the same thing, only apt-rpm does it better :). To me, apt-rpm and synaptic are godsends to the upkeep of my box (Mandrake 9.0). I didn't invest too much time in figuring out urpmi. It's configured to handle security updates quite well, but I didn't want to fiddle with it to go grab KDE 3.1. I know, someone's going to reply saying it's easy, just do blah, blah, but I grabbed the apt package, and the synaptic package from texstar rpms and I was up and running after one rpm -Uv command.

      Great job, Mandrake! I've used Slackware (for quite a while) and Redhat, and I think Mandrake is the shit.

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    9. Re:Mandrake rocks. by dolson · · Score: 3, Funny

      it's easy, just do blah, blah

    10. Re:Mandrake rocks. by TKinias · · Score: 1

      scripsit Big Mark:

      It's also by far and away the easiest Linux distro to set up and use that I've tried...

      My experience seems to be counter to the norm here. I had a very painful experience with Mandrake (version 8 IIRC). The installer kept crashing, HardDrake did some very unpleasant things to my a couple of partitions, etc. In contrast, when I installed Debian on the same boxes, things Just Worked. I didn't come back to Mandrake after that, so I'm working from a very small sample, but I'd be reluctant to try it again. And PackageDrake (or whatever it's called), never worked properly. They only way I ever got anything to work was by downloading RPMs and running rpm manually.

      I'd hate to see them go, though. I'd like to think that things have improved since I tried it, and that they're giving others positive Linux experiences.

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    11. Re:Mandrake rocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      urpmi is great for upgrades too, just change you're sources to the version you want to upgrade to and --auto-select it.

      Long live Mandrake !!!

    12. Re:Mandrake rocks. by gomoX · · Score: 1

      The only thing about urpmi is that it doesnt work at all... Nothing to do with apt-get, im sorry but on mandrake i couldnt install anything directly from the net by using "software manager" (gui for urpmi) since when the dependencies went over 3 it would just give away errors...
      Imagine, i ended up using red carpet...
      Sheesh, do you realize how good apt-get is? It just *works*

      --
      My english is sow-sow. Sowhat?
    13. Re:Mandrake rocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not simply "kept alive" but taken off life support and given a new lease on life entirely.

    14. Re:Mandrake rocks. by 5KVGhost · · Score: 1

      Obviously the people who are actual or potential customers of Mandrake don't consider it to be much of a loss, or the company wouldn't be in this position.

    15. Re:Mandrake rocks. by dolson · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you are replying to my post; I use Debian. I do realize how good apt-get is. I know it *just works.*

      I've said it before, but people don't realize just how good Debian's apt-get really is, since there are no words that can describe it... It's simply a must-experience. Urpmi has nothing on it, neither does apt-rpm or apt-get for rpm, or whatever else there is. Debian's structure makes it work, and until any other distros mimick it, Debian will remain king as far as resolving dependencies goes.

    16. Re:Mandrake rocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am running 9.0 on my Sony Vaio 505JS right now!
      The install was a breeze, seeing all my hardware.

      This is a awesome distro. I like the security patch update tool as well.

    17. Re:Mandrake rocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've installed and used a bunch-o-distros; the earliest, I think, was RH5.2. In there was Corel, SUSE, more RH, and Mandrake. Never a problem *at all*. I only wish I had as much success with the ladies....

    18. Re:Mandrake rocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      obviously you are just spouting off and using a karma bonus to do it too.

      Mandrake's CEO during the dotcom insanity pushed several ill-advised ventures that generated almost all of the debt they are dealing with now. If you took that debt out of the picture then Mandrake would be on that short list of Linux companies making a profit.

      Why were so many people so stupid during that time?

  7. Galaxy Gnome Theme? by Kaypro · · Score: 1

    Anyone got a link to a screenshot showing Mandrake's "Galaxy" Gnome theme that made it in this release. Just curious what it looks like.

    1. Re:Galaxy Gnome Theme? by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I too am looking for screen shots of this theme. Will someone please post.

      --

      Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    2. Re:Galaxy Gnome Theme? by mac586 · · Score: 2, Informative
    3. Re:Galaxy Gnome Theme? by fcrozat · · Score: 1

      This is an somehow old screenshot of Galaxy GNOME theme.. There have been some little changes since but the screenshot is quite right..

  8. Their trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Trying to out live apple

    1. Re:Their trying by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      Their trying to out live apple does what? Did you, perchance, mean "They're trying to outlive apple."?
      bloodeu? Is that you?

    2. Re:Their trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAH your(just kidding "you're") ten minutes too late!
      The true grammar nazi beat you to the punch.
      No you must suffer the consequences of a redundant post!

      Foiled again!

    3. Re:Their trying by JPriest · · Score: 1

      And don't forget Sun

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  9. What's wrong with Mandrake? by swtaarrs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I tried it (9.0) for a few weeks and the only thing I didn't like was that wine wasn't installed/configured like in RedHat (7.3). Is this another case of some linux people hating a distro because it's too easy to use?

    1. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by Pike65 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is this another case of some linux people hating a distro because it's too easy to use?

      Too right!

      If everyone learns how to use Linux then I lose my smug feeling of superiority.

      Seriously, does this seem like hypocrisy run rife? Everyone says they want the world to use Linux, but when someone produces a distro that is easy enough for Win users to use as a stepping stone to *cough* 'greater things', everyone mocks it for being too dumbed down.

      I wish some people would keep their attitudes in line with their principles . . .

      --
      "If being a geek means being passionate about something, then I pity those who aren't geeks." - Pike65
    2. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by 7-Vodka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      that's the thing about mandrake. It was never too dumbed down at all. I had to use mandrake as a rescue system last week and i was really overjoyed by how quick and easy it was to install a base system and from the cli, urpmi all the rescue packages I needed and use them.

      --

      Liberty.

    3. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by jonrkc · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear. there are intelligent people who can benefit from use of a computer but have only x number of years of life to pursue interests which may not include learning to be a programming whiz. there are other interests out there and many good reasons to push for easy-to-use distributions.

    4. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Geeks don't want everyone to learn Linux. Geeks want everyone to be as computer literate as they are and share their passion for computers so they won't be outcasts. Unfortunately, that's never gonna happen (for the same reason most geeks aren't jocks) so they just ridicule any half-assed attempt to do so.

    5. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by cryptowhore · · Score: 1

      I'm reposting this because it seems more applicable to this thread. Go recycling! repost follows: I don't think we need to get childish and superior about which distro we use. I know you were joking so don't take it the wrong way. I just wish we could stamp out the elitest attitude (which shows up in all of us) until Linux distros have at least half of Microsoft's market share. As far as Mandrake goes, I like the distro; it tries and often does get the important things right. Personally, I prefer SUSE but I have no strong brand loyalty because linux isn't really about brands. After many a long car trip (everyone lives 2hours away in Ontario it seems unless they're in Toronto) north to fix my parent's computer, I finally installed Mandrake 9.0 on their machine and kicked myself hard for not doing it earlier. Mandrake had excellent default settings that were user friendly and I even managed to go without doing an upgrade on the hardware. The moral of the story: If it works for someone, it works. Oh yeah....my Mom really likes the tea cooker...for her it's reason enough to switch. :)

      --
      Happiness is a slider variable
    6. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I used Mandrake throughout the 8.x series. A PowerPC person for years, I needed a PC running Linux and Windows at home and tried Mandrake. I was very impressed with its installation (far, far easier than Windows for someone unfamiliar with Windows) and other features like easy configuration and font importing.

      Why I've abandoned it:

      • The software updating blows. I use apt-get to update the Yellow Dog Linux on my laptop and it is vastly better. The ease of Debian, without having to be one of those irritating Debian users.
      • The user-friendliness got in my way when anything went wrong. Try adding a new window manager that Mandrake doesn't offer, or a secondary (CVS, for example) version of an existing one. Now fight the system until kdm learns about it. Or, when audio-CD or floppy mounting doesn't work, try making sense of the spaghetti in /etc/fstab.

      Still, having hosed that same PC trying to install Gentoo, and under orders from my wife to get some form of Linux running TODAY so she can run some software (she just doesn't get what using Linux is about ;-) ), I suspect I may be going back to that. Either that, or I'll be soon seeing some of you in #gentoo...

    7. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by mickwd · · Score: 1

      For your first point, read up on urpmi - Mandrake's version of apt-get, which handles dependencies automatically, and lets you install packages (and their dependencies) with a single command.

    8. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by cryptowhore · · Score: 1

      Yes, Mandrake is a little bloated. On the PowerPC I found it a little behind.

      I had installed Yellow Dog Linux and I was really impressed with the whole package (after the install that is). It was simply the best distro for PowerPC, an up-to-date Red Hat as it were. Installing an airport card was a lot less painful than I imagined.

      Also, the Yellow Dog Linux bricks are pretty damn cool: http://www.terrasoftsolutions.com/products/briQ/

      I know the feeling of getting pressure from the loved one for a working system. I've been busy perfecting the install, playing with her TV Card (which worked right away but I thought need some tweaking), setting up an alias here and there, etc... All she wants to do is play with GNOME and use the Gimp. :)

      --
      Happiness is a slider variable
    9. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by teslatug · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's my experience...

      I bought their 7.2 version at Best Buy. I thought it was pretty easy to install and use. Then I started having problems with packages. It would get to the point where I would install, uninstall a package, or even refresh the list of installed packages, and the rpm database would get corrupted. Being a newb, I didn't know how to recover from this other than a reinstall (the menus were screwed up, the installed packages went missing, etc.). I installed the updates and even got their updated CD in the mail (after badgering them for a couple of weeks -- which I shouldn't have had to do since they promissed it to registered users -- they sent me a used copy with visible wear). Even after all the updates, I still got a corrupted rpm database. After this third time, I gave up on Mandrake for good. Even though I haven't touched Mandrake for a few years, I still get occasional spam from them. Serves me right for registering.

      Maybe they have gotten better, maybe it's just my experience, but these are my reasons for not using Mandrake.

    10. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by sc00p18 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone says they want the world to use Linux, but when someone produces a distro that is easy enough for Win users to use as a stepping stone to *cough* 'greater things', everyone mocks it for being too dumbed down.

      I don't think most people in the community are really after that "smug feeling of superiority." Sure, there are elitist assholes. But I think the majority of the so-called elitist comments come as a result of frustration with those who want a free ride all the time. You see, what we REALLY want is for people to be self-sufficient, and able to figure things out for themselves. If everyone operated like this, then there would be very little time wasted explaining the documented solutions to common problems, which would free everyone up to concentrate on the real problems, in order to make progress.

    11. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by Otter · · Score: 1

      Sure, but...

      First, MandrakeUpdate is supposed to be the _right_ way to update Mandrake. It's well thought-out, and would be great if it worked, but it simply doesn't.

      Second, while straight urpmi might work as well as apt-get, I had zero luck with it. Maybe the registry was so snarled from all the hung or broken MandrakeUpdate runs that it wouldn't work correctly, but for whatever reason, it didn't.

    12. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incredible huh ? A great distro, fast, with latest technologies included and ... it's french !!!!

      Mandrake Linux have to live forever, I spent 3 days to configure a debian where 1/2 day is enough with Mandrake !

      I've already payed for it and I'will buy the next 9.1 to keep the greatest distro ever among the best opensource and Free software contributors.

      Mandrake rulez. Mandrake is alive. Mandrake will win !

      At least, I hope so ;-)

    13. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by gregmac · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You see, what we REALLY want is for people to be self-sufficient, and able to figure things out for themselves.

      But the thing is, 98% of people use computers because they are a tool to get a job done. They don't CARE to become self-sufficient, they want it to work. Like it or not, it's a reality of the computing world.

      If your car broke, and you took it to a mechanic, and he refused to do any service on it - even though he knew exactly what was wrong - until you read the engineering spec manuals for all the parts he had to replace, how happy would you be?

      --
      Speak before you think
    14. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by leviramsey · · Score: 1
      First, MandrakeUpdate is supposed to be the _right_ way to update Mandrake. It's well thought-out, and would be great if it worked, but it simply doesn't.

      All MandrakeUpdate (which hasn't really existed since 9.0) is is a GUI frontend to urpmi. I never used MandrakeUpdate, as I prefer urpmi from the command-line.

    15. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by dolson · · Score: 1

      I use apt-get to update the Yellow Dog Linux on my laptop and it is vastly better. The ease of Debian, without having to be one of those irritating Debian users.

      Just because someone uses a particular distro doesn't make them irritating or not...
      I was irritating before I started using Debian.

    16. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1
      If your car broke, and you took it to a mechanic, and he refused to do any service on it - even though he knew exactly what was wrong - until you read the engineering spec manuals for all the parts he had to replace, how happy would you be?

      I think he means self-sufficient enough to figure out things they *should* be able to figure out for themselves. If you need to take a car to the mechanic because something's wrong with it, he should fix it. If you take your car to the mechanic because you don't know how to change the time in the radio and haven't bothered to read the owner's manual, there's a problem.

      Likewise, bother the developers when something doesn't work as advertised, or when an "owner's manual" is not given. Not when it works, and you just haven't searched through the provided documentation to find out how to do what you want it to do.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    17. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by ReinoutS · · Score: 1

      Since you're implying you're not a 'newb' any more, I'm sure you could handle a 'sudo rpm --rebuilddb'.

      A lot has changed between 7.2 and 9.1, you might want to give it a try again.

    18. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      What you're saying is that you want people to have to become self sufficient so that we can all make progress. I agree. But I completely disagree as to your definition of self sufficient.

      You mean self sufficient such the users have to learn all kinds of arcane technical stuff. RTFM, etc. Make the man fit the machine.

      What I mean is make the machine fit the man. Ala, Macintosh, to pick one example. Or how almost any modern ergonomic thing is designed. The user is self sufficient. They can figure out how to solve their problems and make progress without pestering us (much). The computer isn't part of the problem, it is part of the solution, etc.

      The way I propose to make users self sufficient is what you call "dumbed down".

      And, as you say, I want users to concentrate on real problems so that we make progress. To a user, real problems are things like, taxes, payroll, accounting, playing a game, surfing the net, printing out a proposal. Not: how to repartition this drive, why are my dependancies screwed up, why don't I have the right library installed, why can't I print, etc.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    19. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by gregmac · · Score: 1
      But deciding if a problem like not being able to change the time is a problem that should be self-sufficient or requires outside help is also somewhat subjective. Really, to anyone who's been in a car before or seen any sort of moden electronics, setting the time is a trivial task, that, at most, will require a quick look in the manual to see how to get into time changing mode. If you put a caveman in the car, they're going to have a LOT more difficulty figuring out how to change the time, if for nothing else than they don't know where to look in the manual.

      Right now, on tdlp.org, there's 458 HOW-TO's and mini HOW-TO's, 826k of man pages (gzipped), and many various other faq's and articles. Google matches about 4 million records for "linux help". I think that it's fair to say that's a VERY big "manual" to search through, espessially if you don't know exactly what you're looking for (ie, "my network card doesn't work").

      Like I originally said, and I see being echoed in other comments replying to the same parent, users want to use the computer. No one - except those of us that read /. - has interest in using another system (even if it's superior) if it means they have to spend hours and hours setting it up, tinkering, and reading thousands of lines of technical manuals.

      OSDN claims 8.8 million unique visitors (probably a good number to use for the people that are "self-sufficient"). The world has around 6.2 billion people. Thats about 0.14% of the population of the planet that can solve their own computer problems. Obviously, thats not that fair, so saying there's about 605.60 million people on the internet, that's about 1.5% of people that can solve their own problems (interestingly, not far off from my 2% estimate :) ).

      Is it really fair to expect those 596 million people to read all that documentation? Do you think they read everything on msdn.microsoft.com when they installed windows? Now try wondering why windows has such a huge market share...

      --
      Speak before you think
    20. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1
      I have some small issues with your arguments.

      Right now, on tdlp.org, there's 458 HOW-TO's and mini HOW-TO's, 826k of man pages (gzipped), and many various other faq's and articles.

      Part of being self-sufficient involves the knowledge that you don't go looking into the FAQ to setting up your wheel mouse when you want to set up your network.

      Google matches about 4 million records for "linux help".,

      If you type in "linux help" google finds every single web page with the words linux and the word help. In fact, you only need to get to google listing page 46 to start getting things like tucows download (software for linux and a help page somewhere). If you actually enclose "linux help" in quotes, then you get around 70,000 pages, but that's also not a fair search...I don't think the number of pages google gives you is a fair estimate for the amount of documentation.

      OSDN claims 8.8 million unique visitors (probably a good number to use for the people that are "self-sufficient")

      I'm actually still sort of a newbie, and I never even heard of OSDN before you mentioned it in this post, and I went to check it out. I still consider myself self-sufficient, and have found information about things I need to do in a bunch of other places...most of which from the documentation included with the software I download and want to install

      Is it really fair to expect those 596 million people to read all that documentation? Do you think they read everything on msdn.microsoft.com when they installed windows?

      No, it's not. But I don't go sending microsoft tech support e-mails everytime something goes wrong in windows without first running a search on msdn. And I don't read msdn articles in alphabetical order until I find something that helps. Remember, you don't need to read the whole owner's manual to find out how to set the time on your clock radio...just the page with that information, and there's usually an index.

      To be fair though, I think you misunderstand my point, and probably the point of the original poster who started this discussion. I like mandrake. I use mandrake...I think easy setup is a wonderful thing, and when I saw that xine was working with my system with 5.1 surround and SPDIF passthrough right after mandrake install, I thought that was AWESOME...it's the way to go. This is what I understand sc00p's post to mean:

      Normal linux users/developers/whatnot are most of the time happy to help the new users. Complaints that experienced users are "elitists" come from those users that expect a free ride...examples of free rides would be that idiot who posts something to the effect of, "Your software is broken...this is the compiler error I get from gcc 3.2" when there's a warning in the readme install file, probably right at the top that says "compiles only with gcc 2.95". People who will post and ask for help the first time something doesn't work without first at least trying to see if the problem and fix is described...it's annoying...and it's a waste of time.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

  10. Mandrake, OS, dead at 6 by stud9920 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Operating system distro Mandrake was found dead in it's Paris siege this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss it - even if you didn't enjoy their work, there's no denying their contributions to the free software movement. Truly a French icon.

    1. Re:Mandrake, OS, dead at 6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard mandrake lives up in pittsburg..

    2. Re:Mandrake, OS, dead at 6 by iomud · · Score: 4, Funny

      You've got it all wrong, mandrake didn't die it surrendered to the axis of evil. So long Mandrake we barely gnu ye.

    3. Re:Mandrake, OS, dead at 6 by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I heard mandrake lives up in pittsburg..


      God, first it was Jim Morrison, then Elvis, now we are getting random "Mandrake" sightings. :)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    4. Re:Mandrake, OS, dead at 6 by jag164 · · Score: 1
      I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Operating system distro Mandrake was found dead in it's Paris siege this morning.

      From an apparent overdose?? I heard the same thing some 23 odd years ago. I'd be willing to bet that Jim Morrison uses Mandrake.

  11. attention, release candidate 1 ... by nicsterrr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's worth pointing out to anyone thinking of installing this as their main OS that this is an initial release candidate and is nowhere near prime time.. be warned unless you want to find and report bugs.

    1. Re:attention, release candidate 1 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats straange, the recent past Mandrake releases all seem to be release candidate type quality. I consider Mandrake 9.0 to have been a release candidate for the comming 9.1 and 9.1 will be the same for 9.2 which will be released a few later later and so on!

      Mandrake QA is all over the map and seem to be negatively driven by their money problems.

    2. Re:attention, release candidate 1 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. It would have been nice if the person submitting this story would put that in the submission. Oh wait...

    3. Re:attention, release candidate 1 ... by jdh28 · · Score: 1

      What is a release candidate if it is not something that is considered possibly ready for release?

      john

    4. Re:attention, release candidate 1 ... by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      I guess you never tried M$ release candidates.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    5. Re:attention, release candidate 1 ... by berzerke · · Score: 1

      What is a release candidate if it is not something that is considered possibly ready for release?



      Something to see if they have all the bugs worked out (they don't, I've filed bug reports on rc1 personally) before they release it on non-testers. That said, a release candidate is something that should be fairly stable, so the more timid beta-testers can start helping with the QA.

    6. Re:attention, release candidate 1 ... by Thing+1 · · Score: 3, Informative
      be warned unless you want to find and report bugs.

      And if you do want to report bugs, they have BugZilla set up to make it really easy.

      Sometimes it's difficult to determine which package things go in when reporting, but the developers have been very nice and helpful in moving my bugs around to the proper places. And as another comment mentioned, the turn-around time is quick.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    7. Re:attention, release candidate 1 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's worth pointing out to anyone thinking of installing this as their main OS that this is an initial release candidate and is nowhere near prime time.. be warned unless you want to find and report bugs."

      Windows XP Professional is a release candidate in which you'll find and report lots of bugs, but people still seem to be using it.

    8. Re:attention, release candidate 1 ... by deno · · Score: 1

      Honestly?

      RC1 is a sign that even a bit "faint at hearth", but willing to help folks can try it out now. You can call it "beta 4" if you prefer...

  12. As a distro... by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mandrake is great. They've really built something that's useful in its own right, and provides many useful things back into the community. Maybe it's not for you, but it's a great place to start for a lot of people. A nice introduction.

    The problem is, Mandrake as a business is like a comedy of errors. All sorts of crazy problems, some of which were outside their control, and some that could (and should) have been avoided in the first place. 20/20 hindsight is nice, so I can't carp too much, but if they could get their shit together for just one release (no distribution problems; keep the paying club members happy, and get them a box before it's been on shelves for 3 months), I think things could turn around in a hurry.

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    1. Re:As a distro... by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Mandrake the distribution is and always has been profitable. The problems are not with the distribution. The Mandrake has is they signed a bunch of e-education contracts during the internet boom, they have not been able to deliver and they owe money to financial distressed companies.

    2. Re:As a distro... by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 1

      Bad choice of words. To clarify, with no distribution problems, I meant 'distribution' as the process of getting box sets into buyers' hands, rather than Red Hat/Mandrake/Gentoo as a distribution. And while financially it may not affect them (since the sets have been paid for), it's certainly turning into a reputation where people may be reluctant about sending them money.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    3. Re:As a distro... by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Then you are still missing my point. Mandrake makes plenty of money selling box sets of software. If all they did was sell Mandrake Linux they would be a succesful Linux business and doing fine financially. Its another division of the business that is driving Mandrake inc into bankrupcy.

    4. Re:As a distro... by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 1

      I get your point. Re-read the parent. I'm not arguing anything about finances, I'm saying they're pissing people off who order a box set online, and then wait for months while nothing shows up. That's what I mean when I say "distribution problems." Financially, it's a great idea - take peoples' money, and don't give them anything.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  13. Good for Mandrake by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm looking forward to Mandrake 9.1. I had alot of gripes about Mandrake 9.0, not least of which is the separated package management, but I've gotten acustom to using kpackage so that doesn't bother me any more. Hopefully 9.1 will include many of the bug fixes for the other problems I had.

    Now all the new stuff I"m looking forward to, zeroconf network, kde 3.1, gnome 2.2, XFree86 4.3, 4.21 kernel and a cornacopia of other programs, are in mandrake 9.1. While in the end I intend to move over to debian completely, IMO mandrake is the best of the others for me. I can't wait for 9.1 to become available.

    --
    I do security
    1. Re:Good for Mandrake by Hatter · · Score: 2, Funny

      4.21 kernel

      Wow, I had no idea Mandrake was so advanced!

    2. Re:Good for Mandrake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > separated package management

      What are you talking about?

    3. Re:Good for Mandrake by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      4.21 kernel

      Wow, I had no idea Mandrake was so advanced!


      Lisdexia is a terrible disease.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    4. Re:Good for Mandrake by 1nv4d3r · · Score: 4, Funny

      Be careful, 4.21, being an odd-numbered release, is primarily for developers and advanced users.

      Ballsy move by Mandrake, since they're known as a beginner's distro.

      I'm waiting for 4.22 before I use it in production.

    5. Re:Good for Mandrake by TheRealFixer · · Score: 1

      Resizing NTFS is nice... I just hope they fix the annoying problem that logging out of any environment causes my USB mouse to stop responding.

    6. Re:Good for Mandrake by mickwd · · Score: 1

      "Lisdexia is a terrible disease."

      Didn't you mean Daily Sex ?

      Doesn't sound so terrible to me.....

    7. Re:Good for Mandrake by fcrozat · · Score: 1

      Did you report your problem to MandrakeSoft ? If not, Cooker Bugzilla is your friend.

  14. My experiance by hswerdfe · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've Been Using
    9.1 Beta 2 for about a month and I have to say ...
    it rocks

    it is much beter than Mandrake 8.0....

    it is by far the easiest distro I have ever used
    and with the exception of Knoppix the easiest to install...:)

    I personaly hope they survive....

    all of the needed aps are there I only have few complaints....

    1. I had to specially select Vi for install and emacs auto installed...(Flame away)..

    2. Gnome meeting was not installed...by default

    3. I am having trouble changing some of the default loggin, and boot manager stuff....

    other than that....I give the 9.1 Beta 2 an A+ ....
    give it to any newbee they will be happy

    --
    --meh--
    1. Re:My experiance by VAXGeek · · Score: 1

      the spell checker it came with must suck...

      --
      this sig limit is too small to put anything good h
    2. Re:My experiance by OneFix · · Score: 1

      1. I had to specially select Vi for install and emacs auto installed...(Flame away)..

      The most likely reason for this is that emacs needs to be installed to use "set -o emacs" and make the prompt behave like doskey in M$-DOS. Just a guess, but Mandrake probably has a good bit of "converts" from Windoze/M$-DOS systems...

      If not for this requirement, it is likely that neither would be installed...both are not really "easy" for the average user to pick up...

      I personally use VI, but I understand that a great deal of users would prefer to use another app (something more GUI friendly)...

      2. Gnome meeting was not installed...by default

      Should you really expect this??? I mean, if you know you need VoIP support, you'll probably already be looking for it...

      The other reason this is probably not installed by default is that H.323 requires opening of firewalled ports...which could be a bad thing if you're trying to harden your system...

      3. I am having trouble changing some of the default loggin, and boot manager stuff....

      How??? Are you using a command line or GUI...what exactly are you trying to change? This is rather vague...if you're a little more specific, maybe I can help...

  15. Heh, nice one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like it got beaten down and now it's back with a vengeance. Heh. More distros need such "reality checks" so that they could unleash everything they have been holding for "the next release".

  16. I thought.... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mandrake was a French distro....so it will never die.

    Surrender, yes, but die? Never (pronounced: Nev'air!)

    {SEG}

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:I thought.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You r completely wrong..

      "La garde meurt mais ne se rend pas"

      louis

    2. Re:I thought.... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Say it, Frenchy! Say, "Chowdaa!"

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  17. Re:YUO FAIL HETROSEXUALITY by robtm · · Score: 0

    So, what distro are you using?
    One for the smart guys, eh?

  18. Mandrake Tanks....... by BradlyLane · · Score: 0, Funny

    France Surrenders!!

  19. WTF? by zulux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mandrake Linux has been beaten down by linux experts alike

    Ok. I'm a Linux, more specifically a Unix "expert" and I can see nothing wrong with Mandrake:

    A easy to install, easy to use, full featured Linux desktop? How horrible! Oh the humanity! When will it stop!

    It's not like Mandrake Linux pissed in my Wheeties this morning.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Unix experts probably cant find anything wrong with it. It's the hordes of "Lee-nooks exp3rtz" that beat Mandrake because it's too easy to use. Not enough "g33k fact0r", dude!

    2. Re:WTF? by GammaTau · · Score: 1

      Ok. I'm a Linux, more specifically a Unix "expert" and I can see nothing wrong with Mandrake:

      One problem is that currently Mandrake is only for x86 hardware. If I recall correctly, they had PPC port earlier but they have dropped it. This problem naturally doesn't bother people with only IA32 architechture but it means that for people with different hardware, Mandrake is not a possible solution.

    3. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An expert that can't spell Wheaties?

    4. Re:WTF? by so1omon · · Score: 1
      damn, and i've moderated on this post, too. kiss those points goodbye.

      while there's no ppc downloads available on the site itself, their ftp mirors DO have 9.1 beta iso's available. the most recent being from 2/5.

      check out a review of 9.1 installed on an imac at distrowatch

      --
      i'm the jedidiahmarkfoster your parents warned you about
    5. Re:WTF? by anlprb · · Score: 1

      And in other news...
      Another Unix was shot down for its ease of use and gall to be pre-installed and working on machines. Apple was unavailable for comment on this latest attack on its EASY-TO-USE Unix.

      Ohh, Apple is wonderful for its ease of use, do that for Linux, DAMN, something is wrong. We NEED those Joe Sixpack types to get market share. That is the best market Gates ever went for.

      --

      One Token Ring to Rule them All, One Search Engine to Find Them, One WAN to bring them in, and TCP/IP Bind them...
    6. Re:WTF? by deno · · Score: 1

      PPC port was never dropped, but PPc is releases once/year, not twice like i586 distro.

      Which is in my eyes a plus for PPC, but some folks see it differently. .-)

  20. Mandrake Uh ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it would be better for Mandrake to die a peaceful death. There are too many Linux distros. Red Hat is as easy to use as Mandrake, so what`s the point of it. Anyway your typical Mandrake user is just too greedy to stick their hand in their pocket and actually pay for the software - back to square one. Bye, bye Mandrake, killed by your own users.

  21. Re:YUO FAIL HETROSEXUALITY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Solaris. I am a sex machine. I hammer code all day and pussy all night. You could only hope to be half the man I am.

  22. Even if you don't *use* Mandrake ... by timothy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if you don't use Mandrake, you've probably benefited from the work they've put into "making the Linux desktop user friendly."

    (That's a category I'm in right now: I don't currently have any systems running Mandrake, but for about three years running -- until about a month ago -- I did.)

    - Mandrake concentrates on ease of install. Not that everyone's intuition is actually the same, goes the past-the-nipple argument, but Hey, Mandrake 6 did a lot better job with *my* intuition (and hardware) than did any of the contemporaries I can remember putting on.

    - Automount. Yes, it's come and gone strangely (back now?), but Automount is a very good thing. Try explaining to a Mac user the procedure of mounting a CD drive, or a simple %$#@ USB memory key thing.

    - Mandrake (afaik) was the first and so far only Linux distro to be sold as a standalone product in Walmart, and I bought several versions there (as the king of Swamp Castle says "... just to show 'em!"). Software specifics aside, this is another good reason to be grateful to Mandrake, whether you use their distro or not. Lindows was *not* the first Walmart-associated Linux :) [And I could be wrong -- perhaps they also had Red Hat, dunno.]

    Mandrake started to fade off my systems when I discovered how nice Red Hat 8 is, and then when I used Knoppix to convert some machines to Debian. (And since I need to reduce the number of machines floating around here, there are fewer computers with which I care to purely experiment.) However, I plan to try the 9.1 release candidate to see where it falls.

    Cheers,

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:Even if you don't *use* Mandrake ... by entrigant · · Score: 2, Funny

      - Mandrake (afaik) was the first and so far only Linux distro to be sold as a standalone product in Walmart, and I bought several versions there (as the king of Swamp Castle says "... just to show 'em!"). Software specifics aside, this is another good reason to be grateful to Mandrake, whether you use their distro or not. Lindows was *not* the first Walmart-associated Linux :) [And I could be wrong -- perhaps they also had Red Hat, dunno.]


      More power to you for defending Mandrake 'n all... but wtf. Wal-mart is Hell-On-Earth(tm). It's the kind of place you'd be sent there for an eternity as punishment for your sins. It's a clubhouse for the fat, ugly, and painfully stupid. If you escape the parking lot without being hit by someone you should be on your knees thanking whichever god you worship. Hell just the name alone screams redneck central :(. I would rather have hot pokers shoved up my ass than ever have to go to that place.

      Yay for Mandrake 'n all... but Wal-mart is NOTHING to brag about.

    2. Re:Even if you don't *use* Mandrake ... by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 4, Interesting

      - Mandrake (afaik) was the first and so far only Linux distro to be sold as a standalone product in Walmart, and I bought several versions there (as the king of Swamp Castle says "... just to show 'em!"). Software specifics aside, this is another good reason to be grateful to Mandrake, whether you use their distro or not. Lindows was *not* the first Walmart-associated Linux :) [And I could be wrong -- perhaps they also had Red Hat, dunno.]

      While my example is not Wal-Mart, but, FYI, I used to be able to buy Red Hat and Mandrake from Best Buy. As a matter of fact, I have still have the "Linux-Mandrake 7.2 Professional Suite" box set I bought from Best Buy. I believe that I have seen SUSE available at Best Buy as well. Now, mind you, the choices available at Best Buy have dwindled I think, but I know at least Red Hat is still available. (Right next to all the M$ stuff). Best Buy actually tried to keep a decent selection at one time... I remember BeOS (yes you read that right) on the shelf next to Red Hat, when BeOS was still kicking.

    3. Re:Even if you don't *use* Mandrake ... by gomoX · · Score: 1

      what i find great about mandrake is that its the newbie dist: if i was told i had to select kernel modules in the installation of linux i would say "wtf is this mi BSODs rox0rs".. I started with mandrake and after trying a few others i moved to debian. And its definitely better than mandrake... Everything works!!
      So it gives a big hand to the community by letting new users approach linux.. Another reason for Linux having zillion more users than any *bsd

      --
      My english is sow-sow. Sowhat?
    4. Re:Even if you don't *use* Mandrake ... by adolf · · Score: 1

      I bought OS/2 Warp 3.0 (red) from Best Buy, some months before the introduction of Win95. They had a good amount of shelf space dedicated to it, and it was in a fairly prominent spot.

      We all know what happened to that product.

      Now you're telling me that they did the same thing to BeOS?

      Of course! Now it all makes sense.

      So it must be official: *Linux is dying, because of Best Buy.

    5. Re:Even if you don't *use* Mandrake ... by Linuxathome · · Score: 1
      Mandrake started to fade off my systems when I discovered how nice Red Hat 8 is, and then when I used Knoppix to convert some machines to Debian. (And since I need to reduce the number of machines floating around here, there are fewer computers with which I care to purely experiment.) However, I plan to try the 9.1 release candidate to see where it falls.

      I contemplated moving from Mandrake to RedHat on my desktop machine after hearing all the good praises of RH 8.0. However, once I learned how to use urpmi from the PLF website, I chose to stick it out with Mandrake. PLF (and TexStar) packages software that the main Mandrake distro fails to include due to licensing issues and such. For example, just the other day I wanted to install gnapster. Previously in RedHat 6.2, I had to painstakingly search for RPMs and their dependencies at RPMFind.net or at google.com and hoped and prayed that the programs don't break any other software in my system. Urpmi (much like apt-get) made software installation so easy--less time-consuming, less mentally draining, less frustrating.

      In fact, once I learned about urpmi, I questioned how LindowsOS was going to revolutionize Linux implementation with their supposed "easy to use" software installation system to install programs on-the-fly. Urpmi has got to be just as easy as that of Lindows software manager (although I haven't tested it). The only requirement on the user's side is to make sure to correctly include source sites of RPMs. Short of trying out 9.1 RC's, I cannot see how Mandrake will fold, even if they don't pull out of this bankruptcy.

  23. Re:WHAT IS THIS??? by Hatter · · Score: 1

    Yea, that really isn't attractive... pick one look and go for it. Then again, they also have Avril Lavigne on their playlist so maybe they're masochists.

  24. zeroconfig? by cies · · Score: 1

    Can anybody explain to me what zeroconfig is?

    (Looks like something interesting...)

    -Cies.

    1. Re:zeroconfig? by ramdam · · Score: 4, Informative
      From the site of the ZeroConf technology :
      "
      • Allocate addresses without a DHCP server.
      • Translate between names and IP addresses without a DNS server.
      • Find services, like printers, without a directory server.
      • Allocate IP Multicast addresses without a MADCAP server.
      "
      Apple already uses this technology under the name RendezVous in Mac OS X.

      As a Mac OSX user I can say that this techno does exactly what is supposed to (since RendezVous is deeply embedded in the system and some third party software, and Rendevous-enable products are available, it's a true real world benefits, not just a lab's experiment)

      It's easy to understand the point when more OS, network devices, Consumer Devices (Philips is already doing prototypes), and P2P softwares (the mac version of Limewire is RendezVous enabled) will adopt the technology.

    2. Re:zeroconfig? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zeroconf is an implementation of IETF:s zeroconf protocols, just like Apple's Rendezvous.

    3. Re:zeroconfig? by MacOS_Rules · · Score: 1

      Zeroconfig (in the Apple world, rendezvous), is a technology that AFAIK allows autoconfig of ip addresses/routers/whatever, based on surrounding chatter on your subnet. The establishment of communication sbetween devices can be transparent
      to the user.

      More info is available at Apple's site

      http://www.apple.com/macosx/jaguar/rendezvous.ht ml

      --
      If a man's character is to be abused there's nobody like a relative to do the business. -Thackeray, William
    4. Re:zeroconfig? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      will Mandrake 9.1 machines be able to use a usb printer that's connected to the printer port on one of the new Airport Extreme Base stations? I have the printer configured as a Rendezvous printer. Apple states that only OS X machines with v.2.3 will be able to use the printer...

  25. Mandrake 9.1 RC1 burned me a bit. by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1

    I upgraded my MDK9.0 server to this yesterday.

    It loaded fine but on reboot my servers data disk was empty(WTF?) and I this was an upgrade so it should have left it alone.

    The volume was corrupt and no attempt with Diskdrake would properly create it. I had to do it all from the command line and restore data from the backup. Not a good sign for a system that was working fine in under 9.0.

    Still too early to tell if any other hiccups have occured and this was an upgrade and a beta so please use this information with plenty of salt! :-)

    On the other hand it appears to operating faster even in X which says alot as it is an old Celeron 500 and was not real suited to running X. Not that I use X much. I use it mostly as a MySQL and Samba server for my home/office net.

    Mostly I feel positive about this but the disk issues scare me a bit. Time will tell.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  26. Re:the french connection by Alex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mandrake is the ONLY good thing ever to come from France.

    Cheese, wine, food, women with hairy armpits ????

    (ok maybe not the last one) but the first 3 deserve some recognition

    Alex

  27. Write a fucking sentence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Mandrake Linux has been beaten down by linux experts alike"

    Alike what, exactly?

  28. Apache 2? by ptaff · · Score: 1

    Seems like people like to adhere to the principle "if it ain't broken, don't fix it".

    I browse through the package list and can't find the ol'and'reliable Apache 1.3 - why force the upgrade?

    They also include PHP4.3 which is known as unstable (despite the branch)

    Last complaint: galeon-1.3 is, IMHO, not ready for consumption and is barely usable next to galeon-1.2; as I enjoy the Mozilla project very much, it's fat and I like to have a slim graphical browser - skipstone and phoenix aren't there neither.

    1. Re:Apache 2? by JM · · Score: 5, Informative

      Apache 1.3 is still present, but it's in the Contribs (separate download or extra CD in PowerPack).

      What's more, you can install *both* versions, and with a simple command (advxrun1.3 or advxrun2.0), change from one to the other.

      PHP 4.3.1 has been tested a lot, and we fixed most major bugs. I use it on production on several servers, and I find it more stable than the 4.2 series.

    2. Re:Apache 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are not happy with the packages there is a simple solution. You register to the MandrakeClub and you vote for the packages you would like to have!

  29. Mandrake always cool looking and easy . . . by shamitbagchi · · Score: 0

    Mandrake 8.0 was great, this is their latest and in terms of LOOKS it has always been killer, but strangely the market has fallen for RedHat - more standard I guess . . . And moreover Mandrake has always been a maverick and innovative in their own way.
    Their installations are a breeze - need to see this new one quick!

  30. FRENCH DISTRO. ENOUGH SAID! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...

  31. NTFS resizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that if there is an existing win2k or winXP installation, you can resize the windows partitions and install linux in the available space ?

    1. Re:NTFS resizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Now you're catching on!

  32. Easiest to install by Yonder+Way · · Score: 2, Informative

    The distro has been dead for years, but I have yet to see a distro that is as easy to install as Corel Linux. IIRC, it prompted me maybe twice to make decisions about things, and had sensible defaults for the average user. If they had more fully exploited DHCP/DNS I think they could have gotten rid of one of those prompts (asking for a hostname).

    Corel was, for all intents and purposes, a Debian for the average joe. I have yet to see any other distros approach the friendliness of it.

    1. Re:Easiest to install by xsecrets · · Score: 1

      Yes Corel is dead, but it was bought out by Xandros, and they have done an excelent job with it. Just as easy to install as corel, all the hardware detection you could want, and it has NTFS resizing, So mandrake is not the first with that. It does cost money, but it is well worth it for someone who is not a linux expert.

    2. Re:Easiest to install by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3, Informative
      I have yet to see a distro that is as easy to install as Corel Linux.

      Maybe this is cheating, but could I suggest Knoppix? It really _is_ 'Debian for the average Joe', probably more so than Corel, since it requires no installation at all.

      (On a slightly related note - can anyone recommend a tiny Linux distribution that runs off floppies? I am hoping to run an X server, icewm, PPP and ssh.)

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    3. Re:Easiest to install by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      You're not gonna get X in less than 20 megs. At least not with any usable functionality. CD boot disks on the other hand..

    4. Re:Easiest to install by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Twenty megabytes for X seems excessive. XF86_VGA16 is about two megs big, libX11.so.6.1 is 800Kbyte. A lightweight window manager would presumably be another 100Kbyte or so. After piping through bzip2 the X server and libX11 come to about 1100Kbyte. Allowing for the window manager and some extra stuff I've forgotten (pixmaps, two or three bitmap fonts in small sizes) it should fit on a floppy formatted to 1920 kilobytes. You would need another floppy for Linux itself of course, and enough RAM to decompress and run from ramdisk.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    5. Re:Easiest to install by Ashish+Kulkarni · · Score: 1
      On a slightly related note - can anyone recommend a tiny Linux distribution that runs off floppies? I am hoping to run an X server, icewm, PPP and ssh.

      Try MuLinux -- it runs off those 1.7M formatted floppies. If you want to install a *nix like OS, you can use floppies to install FreeBSD (and some other Linuxes, too--although I can't recall any atm)
    6. Re:Easiest to install by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Neat... Now you have X at 640x480x8 and no apps.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    7. Re:Easiest to install by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Slackware used to install off floppies, but by the time of recent releases only the 'a' (base system) and 'n1' (basic networking) disk sets can still do it.

      Debian's base system can be installed from floppies, but I don't know if there is a convenient way to install further packages from there.

      But since trying Knoppix I've become obsessed with the idea of having nothing important on the local disk. Since I do most of my work over ssh anyway, this is certainly possible. The question is can it be done in a machine with no CD player?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    8. Re:Easiest to install by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd only want to run a window manager and xterm locally anyway... maybe not even xterm. I am looking for a thin X client on a floppy. I chose XF86_VGA16 as an example, you could equally pick a server for your particular graphics card and it probably wouldn't be much bigger (assuming you don't want hardware 3d).

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    9. Re:Easiest to install by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      The distro has been dead for years, but I have yet to see a distro that is as easy to install as Corel Linux.

      It's not dead, it was purchased from Corel by a group backed by Linux Global Partners, renamed Xandros, and developed further. I had them send a copy to my brother for Christmas.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    10. Re:Easiest to install by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can do a net install of OpenBSD using only floppies, just like FreeBSD. (actually i think you only need one floppy but ICBW)

    11. Re:Easiest to install by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      You can do a *network install* of pretty much anything using one or two floppy disks. The question is, what can you install from floppies?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    12. Re:Easiest to install by deno · · Score: 1

      Corel was for all intents and purpose a garbage. I rember an old Professor at university who tried installing that monester on his PC, and finally called me to give it a try.

      I believe in free choice, and I've been using various Linux versions for years by then, but that beast woudl simply not work as advertised.

      In the end I gave up, gave him my mandrake CDs, and said I'll come to install and configure the machine the next day. Guess what - next day his machine was already up and running, so I had nothing to do...

  33. Features by shamitbagchi · · Score: 0

    Now everyone adhering to the LSB (Linux Standards base) it seems. Also Mandrake Linux 9.0 features the following software: Kernel 2.4.19 XFree 4.2.1 & XFree 3.3.6 Glibc 2.2.5 GCC 3.2 KDE 3.0.3, GNOME 2.0.1, IceWM 1.2, WindowMaker 0.8, Enlightenment 0.16.5, BlackBox 0.62 OpenOffice.org 1.0.1, KOffice 1.2 Mozilla 1.1, The GIMP 1.2.3, XMMS 1.2.7

  34. Mandrake vs. RedHat by WhoDey · · Score: 1

    Can anyone compare Makdrake 9.1 to RedHat 8.0? Any reason for me to switch? I have to completely re-install a system on one box, so it wouldn't be that big of a deal to switch. Is there a major advantage to using 9.1 instead of RedHat? The last Mandrake I used was 8.0, and I liked RedHat 8.0 better, for sure.

    1. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by hogger · · Score: 5, Informative

      The biggest difference between Mandrake and Red Hat is urpmi. urpmi is the packaging system that Mandrake employees, and just about every desirable program is available (after a little setup) with a simple:

      urpmi (packagename)

      First though, it's very handy to setup urpmi so that it never requests the installation CDs, but rather gets the packages via the internet. Here's what I do immediately after installing Mandrake:

      1. Remove the three CD-based package sources:
      urpmi.removemedia "Installation CD 1 (x86) (cdrom1)"
      urpmi.removemedia "Installation CD 2 (x86) (cdrom2)"
      urpmi.removemedia "International CD (x86) (cdrom3)"

      2. replace them with an FTP source:
      urpmi.addmedia base-ftp ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrake/Mandra ke/9.0/i586/Mandrake/RPMS with ../base/hdlist.cz
      (That's a single command. It may appear wrapped.)

      3. add the contrib source:
      urpmi.addmedia contrib ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrake/Mandra ke/9.0/contrib/RPMS with synthesis.hdlist2.cz
      (That's a single command. It may appear wrapped.)

      4. add the plf software source:
      urpmi.addmedia plf ftp://plf.chem.yorku.ca/pub/plf/9.0 with hdlist.cz
      (That's a single command. It may appear wrapped.)

      After those four steps (don't forget to su to root before you run them) you'll be able to easily install just about any program that you run across . It brings the installation ease that Debian users enjoy (via apt) to linux newbies in Mandrake. Redhat has nothing that can touch urpmi. The term "RPM Hell" exists for a reason -- RedHat.

    2. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously RH 8.0 would be better then MDK8.0. It's much newer. If you want to compare Redhat versions with Mandrake 8.0 , you have to look at versions earlier then RH 7.3.

    3. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no point in comparing a beta product (Mandrake Linux 9.1 RC1) to a released product (Red Hat Linux 8.0). You also download a beta version of Red Hat Linux 8.1 (a.k.a. "Phoebe").

      Personally, I'm not a big fan of Mandrake Linux, because they tend to ship unstable software (though their penguin mascot is very cute). I like the Debian project for their non-profit high quality distribution. However, at home I'm running Red Hat Linux 8.0. Use what you're accustomed to!

    4. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by hogger · · Score: 1

      By the way, those instructions apply to Mandrake 9.0, not Mandrake 9.1. I suspect that there's an equivalent to them for 9.1, but I've not tried it because 9.1 is likely still two or three releases from production.

    5. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For server use I am using MDK 8.2 and it rocks.

    6. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by SiChemist · · Score: 5, Informative



      Without touching off a flame war, I will have to disagree with:

      Redhat has nothing that can touch urpmi.

      There is a version of apt for RedHat-- Here's how to install and use it in RH 8:

      Download and install these:

      http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/psyche/apt/ apt-0.5.4cnc9-fr1.i386.rpm
      http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/psyche/apt/ apt-devel-0.5.4cnc9-fr1.i386.rpm

      Make sure you're online, then, as root (or sudo)issue the following commands:

      apt-get update

      (You will see apt download package listings)

      apt-get -f install

      (This is to fix dependencies that will prevent apt from working.)

      Your output should look something like this:

      Reading Package Lists... Done
      Collecting File Provides... Done
      Building Dependency Tree... Done
      0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 removed and 0 not upgraded.

      If your output is different, make sure that you know what you are doing before you let apt make changes to your system.

      Now, do:

      apt-get install synaptic

      and run synaptic as root or sudo root. You now have a gui tool to resolve dependencies and install packages.

      This was shamelessly stolen from an excellent article by Robert C. Dowdy on OSNews:

      http://www.osnews.com/printer.php?news_id=1890

    7. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Red Hat has up2date which can be used to install packages with dependency checking. Type up2date package_name and it will install the package and dependecies from the net. It may not be perfect but it has worked 99% of the time for me ... of course it only works with official Red Hat packages.

    8. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by malthusan · · Score: 1

      A version of apt-get is available for Mandrake as well. I use it in conjunction with urpmi to make sure I have the stuff I need/want. Could be the same as the one for RH8 -- I found it through a series of links I couldn't reproduce for love or money.

    9. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm not a big fan of Mandrake Linux, because they tend to ship unstable software

      I guess that is why you went for a distro with a cvs snapshot of glibc2.3, instead of Mandrake 9.0 with glibc2.2??

      Now, you have a broken glibc (problems with mysql development and large groups via nss, for example winbind).

      Mandrake being unstable is a myth. Redhat is less stable.

    10. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by Strog · · Score: 1

      I agree with your setup except I change a couple things from this list.

      Remove the CD install media 1st thing. Copy the CDs to my fileserver and share it via NFS(alternately http or ftp). All future installs are done with a floppy and net installs. You won't have to remove CD sources in the future since it automatically sets up the install media (network in this case) for the default. Hard drive space is fairly cheap and it's worth it if you have multiple machines. It's faster than CD installs even with 10base and saves bandwidth over ftp.

      I add contribs and other mirrors too. I also add a cooker mirror in there so I can update packages. Make sure and cron urpmi.update since the packages do change fairly often. I upgraded to KDE 3.1.1 as slick as can be just using uprmi. I removed the KDE 3.0 packages and then urpmi --update kde.

      Urpmi, apt, ports are all great ways to keep your system up to date. I don't understand the distros/OSes that don't have some kind of package management like these.

    11. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > After those four steps (don't forget to su to root before you run them) you'll be able to easily install just about any program that you run across . It brings the installation ease that Debian users enjoy (via apt) to linux newbies in Mandrake. Redhat has nothing that can touch urpmi. The term "RPM Hell" exists for a reason -- RedHat.

      *cough* up2date-nox -u *cough*

  35. ive been around longer and dont agree by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I predate ANY distro, back when the kernel wouldn't even properly compile..

    And I've still found Caldera's to be the easiest for the newbie to install, if it supports your hardware..

    Though, with the incarnation of 'unitedlinux' and their recent SCO attitudes, I've stopped recommending them to clients as they cant be trusted..

    ( Disclaimer, I moved to FBSD for 'server land' a while ago, due to the progressively fragmenting Linux desktop community.. )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:ive been around longer and dont agree by Shadowlion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Disclaimer, I moved to FBSD for 'server land' a while ago, due to the progressively fragmenting Linux desktop community..

      Wait a sec. You changed what you used as a server based on the fragmenting desktop? I don't get that. Why change servers if the desktop situation is wierd?

    2. Re:ive been around longer and dont agree by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

      That's like saying "This is the best, most solid car there is, as long as you don't kick the tires". Because once Caldera (I refer to 2.2 here; I sure as hell wasn't going to pay for their bugfix 2.3 release) was installed, if you wanted to reconfigure something, you were pretty screwed.

      It shipped with an incompatible version of RPM, and had no development libraries, so upgrading something (like its glitchy version of X) involved compiling it from scratch, including its huge tree of dependencies. Changing other settings was done through the "Caldera Open Administration System", a linuxconf workalike except for the fact that it didn't work. It would often exit quietly without successfully changing any settings.

      When talking about the "ease of installation" of a distro, it's not just the original installation that matters. It should be easy to keep installing packages, and to upgrade the system without buying a new boxed release.

      It's amazing I kept using Linux after Caldera. They were a crappy distro even before they were a crappy business.

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  36. Re:the french connection by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mandrake is the ONLY good thing ever to come from France.
    I assume from this statement that you don't drink wine, and don't eat at all.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  37. Mandrake, it's easy, SO? by perotbot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So it's easy, when is the linux community going to drop this attitude of "Linux is supposed to be hard".

    In the last three weeks I've tried RedHat 8.0(too slow on a 366mhz machine), Yopper, Knoppix (lots of stuff) and Mandrake 9.0. Of them all, I'm using mandrake. Why? because everything worked, first time, everytime. So I went out and bought a copy. Voting with my wallet, the easiest thing to do. I hope they make it out of Chapter 11 or whatever the french equivalent is. They're providing the gateway to make it easier to switch, without the cost overhead that Lindows requires.

    --
    ~corporate tool, but employed~
    1. Re:Mandrake, it's easy, SO? by mojo17 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I hope they make it out of Chapter 11 or whatever the french equivalent is.

      You mean to say Le Chapitre Onze. :-) Oh la la.

  38. End to Freeloading by Idou · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since some posts appear to be made in ignorance of this fact, Mandrake apparently is no longer going to be the best distro to freeload off of.

    Only members will be able to download the new version, or order cheap cd sets when it is first released. Depending on what kind of member you are (I am a Silver member) will determine what kind of bandwidth priority you get. I think the free download version for 9.1 will only be available after the package version is in stores for a while. Maybe the free download to the public will not even be available until the first RC of the next distro is out.

    Complain all you want, but you brought this upon yourself. I became a member and was willing to let my membership fees go, in part, to allowing freeloaders download at the same time as everyone else. However, there were too many of you and too few of me, so now if you don't want to pay but want the newest version you will have to just use an RC (sounds fair to me).

    Anyway, Mandrake not being dead is not news to me or any other members. It is just news to the people who don't care enough to get involved. Why such people would even care about weither Mandrake is dead or not eludes me.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:End to Freeloading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Mandrakes popularity came BECAUSE they made it easy to get and try.

      Their fininical problems came because former management tried to branch into other areas of business such as e-learning etc and screwed up. It was pofitable before that.

      In other words mandrake's problems were self-inflected. Now you are laying the blame on all those "feeloaders" who made mandrake popular in the first place.

      Well I gonna tell ya something. This is linux not windows. There are options, REAL TANGABLE COMPETING OPTIONS.

      If Mandake is gonna begin to play the games you described, then they will have to really compete with other apt based distros such lycoris, who play the same game.

      A lot of these competing distos also are nice and easy to use (They even have a more professional polished appearace than mandrake).

      The big plus? They are built upon debian and use apt, unlike mandrake who are based on red hat, rpm and worse not compatable with its parent disto. In fact mandrake makes it very hard to use any rpms BUT their rpms. Contrast that to debian based distos where you can fire up apt and voila you have the huge debian community network of apt based software ready to seamlessly install. Debian is an open base with a setup that is commuity based and closest to the GNU ideal of software developement, meaning not at the mercy of commerical interests. IMHO the perfect base disto along the lines of the linux kernel itself.

      If I had to pay money for personal use of a distro, the debian based distos would be my choice not mandrake.

      With linux it is hard to turn the screws on the custumer in the manner you seem to be endorsing.

    2. Re:End to Freeloading by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

      I bought Mandrake 8.0 when it came out and it was a trusty friend. But I got Mandrake 9.0 from the cover of Linux Format magazine. It is now installed on my system. I have donated some money to Mandrake, but how much did they get from that cover disk? Probably not a lot.

      Bob

    3. Re:End to Freeloading by deno · · Score: 1

      That was one of the options we thought of for 9.1, but it was dropped in the end - for better or for worse.

  39. NTFS Resizing Done Before: Xandros OS by csisux · · Score: 3, Informative

    Xandros already supports resizing NTFS partitions.

    1. Re:NTFS Resizing Done Before: Xandros OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, where can I download the source to the Xandros NTFS resizer?

  40. Does it include... by rampant+mac · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...but this new release of Mandrake may hold many promising Linux users...

    Distributions keep getting larger and larger, but now they come with promising Linux users? Wow! What will they think of next?

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
  41. I didn't see it mentioned on /. so by bogie · · Score: 2, Informative

    I thought would point out that Redat 8.1 Beta 3 is also out.

    You can see the anouncement here

    https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/phoebe-list /2 003-February/002969.html

    Its got Gnome 2.2, KDE 3.1, kernel 2.4.20, OpenOffice 1.02, CUPS as default, etc

    So far I've found some bugs and the occasional app crash, but its shaping up to be real nice. Speed is better than 8.0, mostly due to the new kernel I suspect. (RH 8.0 sped up a lot for me by going to 2.4.20) Its great to see Redhat finally actually trying to put out a good desktop and the effort is really paying off. One last thing I've mentioned before, I pitty the distro that doesn't ship with as good a font setup as Redhat uses. They'll get put to the wall for it and rightly so. Its high time that not a single distro ships with shitty fonts anymore.

    Anyway its worth a look if you have the bandwidth.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:I didn't see it mentioned on /. so by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

      Yes, well I'll be sure to install it as soon as I buy more cds. The only problem with Beta 2 I had was that it didn't have Refresh Rates done automatically and I needed to go back to the 2.4.20 to get nVidia drivers installed. Though Red Hat seems to be doing a lot to XFree86 like removing old stuff and replacing the 15+ font rendering system

      Mandrake was a little too cluttered for me. It also was slowed down. Supermount also didn't function after a kernel compile and would cause X to hang unless you removed it or disabled it. I'm not surprised that they are going bankrupt they don't seem to have a real buissness model and their OS is a little too bulky for my liking.

    2. Re:I didn't see it mentioned on /. so by bogie · · Score: 1

      Maybe have a look at nvnews.net forums. I know the topic of nvidia drivers and phoebe has come up a bunch of times there. I think I recall someone evening posting fixed 3123 drivers.

      On a side note if you happen to read this post let me know if right clicking and dragging in gnome 2.2 works for you in beta 2. Right on my laptop you can't right click and drag anymore, you only get a context menu. Your supposed to be able to right click in Nautilus and then when you let you it usually asks if you want the file copied,moved,linked etc.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    3. Re:I didn't see it mentioned on /. so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Query-drag is now middle-button drag, or alt-drag.

  42. Re:not any more by cies · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So you say because of the USA joined the allied forces to stop Hitler's horrible campain in half Europe, the same half Europe should now -- 50 years later -- be _helping_ Bush in it's own horrible campain?

    You're nuts my son...

    - Hands of the Middle-East!
    - the USA should destroy their weapons! (just because like they want other counties to do so)
    - The UN should correct Iraq....

    Patriatism is a mental drug!

    _______________

    demo(n)cracy defroms (you)
    -- read on a wall in Rotterdam... ...it a nice one maybe something for the quote collection of /.

  43. Re:NTFS Xandros has been resizing NTFS for months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xandros linux ( http://www.xandros.com ) has had this NTFS resizing functionality included for months now.

  44. Re:Mandrake 9.1 RC1 burned me a bit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "an old Celeron 500 and was not real suited to running X"

    500MHz CPU isn't fast enough for X??? What do you think people were using 3-4 years ago? Intel released first 500MHz x86-CPU in the beginning of 1999.

  45. Freedom Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MandrakeSoft, the publisher of Mandrake Linux, is renaming their beleagured Linux distribution as "Freedom Linux" -- a decision that comes as Americans watch French officials back away from support for possible war in Iraq.

    "Because of the importance to show support for the American troops, we no longer sell Mandrake Linux. We now offer Freedom Linux", says a notice on the companies' website.

    MandrakeSoft said their intent is not to slight the French people, but to take a patriotic stance to show support for the United States and the actions of President Bush.

    "It's our way of showing our patriotic pride," they said, noting that their business has a lot of local military troops as customers.

    MandrakeSoft said the switch from Mandrake Linux to Freedom Linux came to mind after a conversation about World War I when anti-German sentiment prompted Americans to rename German foods like sauerkraut and hamburger to liberty cabbage and liberty steak.

  46. Dead, yes dead, completely dead. by gukin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just like Loki software is dead, no more games, the entire "linux game industry" collapsed when loki went away. All those great developers disappeared off the face of the earth never to think about a penguin again. Dan Vogel (the Really Smart Guy who ported UT to OpenGl) just disappeared, oh yeah except he ported UT2003 to OpenGL and got a Linux installer on the retail media. Loki is all gone, they've gone to the great icculus.org in the sky.

    Yes Mandrake is dead, the IT (Ironed Tee shirts) pissed off all the money and Mandrake is dead. Oh, there's still that 10-12 guys who put together the release candidates, and the betas. The guys who are busting their humps as we speak to put together the hippest easiest bestest distro ever to be released. Yes it's dead, RedHat 8.0 just cleaned it out. Nobody needs Little Mandrake anymore, nobody ever cared about DRI working immediately after installation, and EVERYONE is listening to ogg media instead of MP3's. Sure Mandrake is dead, nobody even cared that Redhat 8.0's kernel didn't work right with WineX.

    Dead dead dead, nobody needs an easy to use, easy to install, distro which can be installed on a computer with XP pre-installed without having to destroy the XP partition.

    Everyone is pure, everyone runs Pure Linux, nobody needs games, nobody dual-boots, nobody is a noob, nobody needs to RTFM.

    I renewed my Mandrake membership last week, did you?

    1. Re:Dead, yes dead, completely dead. by mauryisland · · Score: 1
      I renewed my Mandrake membership last week, did you?

      Yup. I've installed various versions of Mandrake Linux on quite a few pc's (friends, mostly, but some at work, too). None of them, unfortunately, pay Mandrake anything. "Hey, it's free software, isn't it?" So I do. One day I'll convince them

    2. Re:Dead, yes dead, completely dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I renewed my Mandrake membership last week, did you?

      Why would I? You just spent 5 minutes saying that it is dead. Duh!

    3. Re:Dead, yes dead, completely dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I renewed my Mandrake membership last week, did you?

      For just 80 cents a week, you can put food in these starving children's mouth. For just 80 cents a day, you can put shoes on their feet. Most likely you haven't already donated because you didn't get the phone number, so we're going to display it right now at the bottom of the screen.

    4. Re:Dead, yes dead, completely dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called Sarcasm dumba$$

  47. Re:WHAT IS THIS??? by LordNightwalker · · Score: 1

    And doing all that shit as root too... *sigh*

    --
    Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
  48. Re:YUO FAIL HETROSEXUALITY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Carpentry tools have no place in the bedroom, freak.

  49. Re:Mandrake 9.1 RC1 burned me a bit. by frohike · · Score: 1

    On the other hand it appears to operating faster even in X which says alot as it is an old Celeron 500 and was not real suited to running X. Not that I use X much. I use it mostly as a MySQL and Samba server for my home/office net.

    Whoa.. what planet are you from? :) My main desktop is a dual Celery 500 (has been for about 3 years now). I have only one complaint about the speed, and that's G++ compiling (which is slow for everyone...). I use this for lots of C development work, Java, Mozilla, heavy mail usage, it's got a web server, MySQL instance... it's not a slow machine!

    (Maybe if you put KDE/Gnome on it, but I use Golem instead. I wouldn't use KDE/Gnome if someone paid me to do so...)

    Sadly, this machine feels at least 3-4 times faster than the Athlon XP 1900+ running XP across the room that work sent me. And that's after removing Explorer and replacing it with LiteStep. It's got one of those super-crappy Via chipsets though, so that's not really even the same universe ;)

    I have a FreeBSD server running on a K62-266 w/64MB of RAM, and re-soldered motherboard traces for the HD (scratched 'em off during a case transplant one time). It is appropriately named "Dixie" for the Neuromancer fans out there. :) It runs Samba, NFS, MySQL, Apache+PHP, Squid, and djbdns in both cache and serve modes. Works great, less filling :)

    I dunno. I know you weren't making a big point out of the celery thing, I just don't understand why people feel like hardware is useless if it's more than a GHz behind the fastest hardware.

  50. Why? by Apreche · · Score: 1

    This is something I don't understand. Do people not get the concept of being a non-profit organization? I mean, you can make a company that makes software, and gets enough revenue to give employess wages and get hardware. And just, don't profit. Don't get more money than it costs. Don't try to get bigger and better. Just make software, and continue to make a living off it. These open source companies are trying to profit by giving stuff away for free. It seems like they have no common sense.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  51. No, they aren't dead by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Remember, bankruptcy does not mean the end.

    --
    This sig no verb.
    1. Re:No, they aren't dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no it could be the end of the begining or the begining of the end.

      All those "ends" sure make me nervous!

  52. Mandrake Get's It. by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope MandrakeSoft stays alive, simply because they seem to be the only major distro that "get's it" in the Linux community. They have consistently been pushing to make Linux easier to install and use, without browbeating newcomers into a "it must be bad if it's easy" mentality. I applaud them for it.

  53. I downloaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This bullshit distro yesterday (9.1) and it wont install on any of my machines I've got 6 boxes so I know its not the hardware. Here is the problem it cant load the Kernel into the ramdisk. The install works fine until then. I tried various kernel modules and various commands to the kernel and nothing. I've been working with linux since 1998 and I've tried every distro imaginable, but this is the first time I can honestly say Im bewildered as to what to do next. Lucky for me all my machine still run Slackware 8.1. Any advice? Could it be a faulty cd?

    1. Re:I downloaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have been using linux since 1998 and you still don't know how to use md5sum to check you validity of a CD/iso???

    2. Re:I downloaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did that. It says its a kernel bug, but Im not quite sure. Downloaded it off rutgers.edu so I doubt the iso was corrupt. Im not retarded.

  54. Re:the french connection by pi+radians · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Mandrake is the ONLY good thing ever to come from France.

    Considering how big of an American tourist trap this is, I'm sure there are a number of Americans who'll say that there is a few more things they cherish that came from France.

    Where's the US Army to rescue this group of dying frenchmen?

    I find it odd that Americans are all so willing to insult France for being defeated by one of the most powerful armies in modern time, but are now all upset when they don't want to aid an attack on a small, middle-eastern country who has shown no signs of a direct threat.

    --

    sin(6cos(r)+5A)
  55. "Bon jourrr..You cheese eating surrender munkies!" by PharCyDE · · Score: 1

    Anyway, I just recently installed Mandrake 9.0, Im still a relative newbie to the linux scene but this is the easiest distro to install and use. I like Mandrake, its allowing me to familiarize myself with linux, while making the crossover from Windows relatively painless.

  56. Re:Mandrake 9.1 RC1 burned me a bit. by nusuth · · Score: 1

    You upgraded your server with a pre-release OS? Your faith in Mandrake is exceptional, sir!

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

  57. Want to support Mandrake? by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Don't just post to slashdot. Go out, with wallet in hand, and BUY a boxed Mandrake distribution. Hell, buy two and get one for a friend. I've bought three mandrake distros in the last few years and will probably buy 9.1 when it comes out too.

    Just because it is available for free doesn't mean there isn't some merit in paying for it sometimes. I won't go up on some soap box about how "every download is a dagger in free software's heart" because that would be absurd. Free downloads are what spur the rapid discovery, reporting and repair of bugs as well as bring noobs into the fold. 95% of the noobs I've brought over have been swayed with the logic "Hey, no risk to try it other than the download time..."

    But at the same time, if you get good use out of Mandrake, (or any distribution) the best support you can give them is to vote with your dollars. Spend some money on Mandrake services or products. Buy a t-shirt... I bet your girlfriend would look smashing in a "Mandrake Club" t-shirt... (Is that the geek equivalent of having her wear your football jersey?)
    *money = &mouth; /* Put your money where your mouth is. */
    --
    Who did what now?
    1. Re:Want to support Mandrake? by puppet10 · · Score: 1

      I bought a boxed version around 7.0 partly because of limited bandwidth at the time. I ended up returning it to the store because it didn't come close to including what was on the freely downloadable version (yes it was the 'desktop' version, and it would have been fine if it didn't install by default a lot of the development tools but not having them at all was a mistake).

      So I ended up returning it to the store and buying a cheap CD-R burned version which had the full distribution on it instead and didn't feel bad about it.

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
    2. Re:Want to support Mandrake? by WetCat · · Score: 1

      I bought Mandrake Power Pack and it's great stuff.
      Including StarOffice.
      I use it for server and home computing and
      for now I found Mandrake the best distributive for my needs.

    3. Re:Want to support Mandrake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got Debian?

    4. Re:Want to support Mandrake? by mrkurt · · Score: 1

      Mandrake 8.0 was the first Linux distro I put on my computer; this was over a year ago. If I didn't need/want OpenOffice as much as I do, I would have stuck with them because of the ease of use and configuration. I appreciate the different applets they have available to make the experience easier, such as configuring internet connection sharing in one step. For a first distro, I lucked into a good choice.

      Now, I have Red Hat 8.0, which is a nice distro, and I feel more comfortable with Linux now than I used to. I really would prefer to have the "unconverged" versions of GNOME and KDE instead of Bluecurve. Maybe next time I will go back to Mandrake or choose another distro. It seems to me that Mandrake's niche is for first-timers to Linux or home or small office users who don't have time to fiddle with everything on the system. Their real competition is Lindows and other distros that are geared to reach the same crowd. As for paying for boxed distros instead of download, it's what I do, too. I don't have a broadband connection yet, and I prefer to have a full distro of packages on CD, instead of having to hunt for them on the 'net.

      --
      Always look on the briight side of life! (whistle, whistle)
    5. Re:Want to support Mandrake? by ninjadroid · · Score: 1
      I believe you mean:

      int money;
      int *mouth;

      *mouth = money

      Your version would put your mouth where your money is. Furthermore, what datatype is money? Unless it is a pointer to a pointer, your assignment statement is invalid.

      There are those who say I need a life...

    6. Re:Want to support Mandrake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not stupid enough to think that a free lunch can last forever. I bought RH 5.2, Mandrake 7.2, 8.0 and 9.0. In between, I downloaded close to 900 pounds of insecurity, new featuritis and general fixit bytes.

      All for one small fee.

      Linux kicks Windows tail all over the dance floor. But, at the end of the day, the programmers gotta eat. I LOVE using a rockin' OS ... so I don't mind buying lunch for the guys & gals who create it once in a while. I don't care if they have a Mercedes in the driveway so long as they keep parking a rocket on my hard-drive.

      I don't need NTFS resizing ... or writing or even reading. But I'll check out what else is new and if I see something that scratches one of my itches, I'll buy 9.1 (and beyond) too.

    7. Re:Want to support Mandrake? by MSG · · Score: 1

      Even your pseudo-code would SEGV. I believe it should be done thusly:

      opinion *shared;

      if( shared == &mouth ) {
      shared = &money;
      }

    8. Re:Want to support Mandrake? by ninjadroid · · Score: 1

      Even your pseudo-code would SEGV. I believe it should be done thusly:

      You're right, I forgot to malloc() =-O Although it wouldn't necessarily segfault... it should, but it might not, which would result in one hell of an insidious bug.

    9. Re:Want to support Mandrake? by Jack+Comics · · Score: 1

      When I was originally searching for Linux distrobutions to try a couple of months ago, I heard great things about Mandrake. I went to Mandrake's web site, and attempted to order Mandrake 9.0 boxed. But Mandrake's site told me that they were sold out and it may not be re-filled for a while. :( So I went to Xandros' web site and ordered Xandros instead. Too bad for Mandrake - they lost a potential customer, but I sure do like Xandros.

      --
      "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
  58. Wrong! by JM · · Score: 5, Informative

    The parent post is complete B.S.

    Yes, the Club Members will have a more complete list of mirrors, possibly including Club-Only mirrors.

    But as far as I know (and I am a Mandrake employee, so I should know), Mandrake Linux 9.1 will be available for everyone on public mirrors.

    Don't forget that it's 100% open-source, most of the stuff is GPL, so it has to be distributable by everyone.

    That said, I strongly suggest our users become members of the Club, it's the best way to support our work.

    1. Re:Wrong! by nusuth · · Score: 1
      Don't forget that it's 100% open-source, most of the stuff is GPL, so it has to be distributable by everyone.

      GPL doesn't force you to distribute your work to everyone; it just says you can't stop it if anyone else from does that.

      --

      Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

    2. Re:Wrong! by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      He said *by* everyone, not *to* everyone.

  59. Linux is dying... by OpperNerd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    OS X will take over!

    --
    -- unix is for people without a social life - Patrick van Eijk
    1. Re:Linux is dying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you've got it backwards

  60. "Release candidate" abuse by nusuth · · Score: 1

    This 91.RC1 defiently is not a proper release candidate. It isn't even frozen yet! I'm really getting sick of using RC tags in linux world, and Mandrake had been the prime offender until KDE released seven candidates...

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

    1. Re:"Release candidate" abuse by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 2, Informative
      This 91.RC1 defiently is not a proper release candidate. It isn't even frozen yet! I'm really getting sick of using RC tags in linux world, and Mandrake had been the prime offender until KDE released seven candidates...

      Not frozen yet? Better go read again...

      Quoting from the webpage:

      RC1 - Feb, 19th 2003 Release notes:
      • The list of packages is frozen
      • New Mandrake theme "Galaxy" is available
      • "Supermount" is back
    2. Re:"Release candidate" abuse by nusuth · · Score: 1
      This was last I heard about the freeze before posting the message:

      "...The freeze applies to main ... Contribs are run separately and aren't frozen yet." (19/02/2003 - "[Cooker] How to ask for a new version to go to 9.1" )

      Then I checked the website and saw all packages have indeed been frozen now. I tought some contribs make it to download edition too but I guess I was wrong.

      --

      Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

  61. Re:the french connection by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ah, how quickly we forget where the Statue of Liberty comes from, which way it faces, and *why?*

    Oddly enough the American armies who "saved" France did. That's one of the reasons they were there in the first place, to honor a debt that was defaulted in fact and unrepayable in philosophy.

    I live in upstate NY, just a couple blocks from the occasional local residence of a young French gentleman whom both Pershing and Patton are reputed to have payed homage to when first setting foot on French Soil.

    LaFayette, we are here, and some of us haven't forgotten.

    And don't forget the old saying, 60 million Frenchman can't be wrong. Hell, maybe when they became "Cheese eating surrender monkeys" it's simply because they knew something we didn't.

    Go figure.

    As for Mandrake. Good distro in its way. If the company deserves to live it just might pull it off. If it doesn't well, millions of Frenchman have died while singing La Marseillaise rather than surrender.

    Did you know that proper protocol for handling a French flag is that once it's raised it is never taken down again until reduced to rags? Think about it.

    KFG

  62. Re:the french connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    small, middle-eastern country who has shown no signs of a direct threat
    Colin Powell had a class for slow learners at the UN on that, apparently you did not attend, or was not invited.
    Now, fast forward a couple of months, tune in CNN, and see what sort of threats were uncovered by advancing American Armed Forces as they look for weapons of mass destruction. Today's keyword: "Tip of the Iceberg".

  63. Re:Mandrake 9.1 RC1 burned me a bit. by Ravenseye · · Score: 1

    I put it on a PII 333 yesterday morning with 256 MB RAM. Not a problem. Don't use X terribly much but there really is no speed problem here. Half the time, it's never the CPU speed that is an issue. It's RAM, vid card, etc. I get oh so tired of people who figure that the minimum acceptable hardware standard is what they just bought a little while ago. The fact is that everything goes faster on a faster chip (well...almost everything), but life is still peachy at almost any speed.

    This is a distro we're talking about...not a production database machine or compiler.

  64. It's all about the marketing by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

    I don't believe that freeloading is the reason why Mandrake is going down the toilet. Otherwise, Red Hat would be right behind them!

    It's all about the marketing. Otherwise, no one would buy M$ Crapdows or pay more for Pentiums! Let's say that there's a CIO for a large corp that knows nothing about Linux or BSD. He may not know/care about Madrake, *BSD, Red Hat, BUT Red Hat + IBM and Red Hat + Oracle may get his/her attention.

    Mandrake disallowing free downloads will only hurt it in the long run.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
  65. Opps, I was wrong by nusuth · · Score: 1

    I must have missed the deep freeze update on cooker. The package list is indeed frozen now.

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

  66. While your post certainly has a point by kfg · · Score: 1

    Nonetheless, would you remind me once again how much Mandrake pays Linus and Redhat for IP licensing?

    You don't suppose they got started in the first place by simply downloading other people's work for free, dicking it around a bit, and reselling it?

    Them's the rules, and they knew it, and took advantage of it, when they entered the fray.

    Next thing you know people will be accused of "stealing" Mandrake because they downloaded Debian instead. It's doofey.

    KFG

  67. Re:the french connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do realize you're a troll, so you're probably not worth paying attention to anyway..however, it is worth noting that just because they're European doesn't mean that you're not being racist by making those remarks. Prejudice comes in all sorts of colours.

  68. zeroconf = Rendezvous? Apple did open source it. by alfredo · · Score: 1

    Inquiring minds want to know.

    --
    photosMy Photostream
  69. Re:Ability to write in English....Dead.... by kfg · · Score: 1

    Yeah, damn that Frenchman for being a little shakey in the English translation dept.

    I mean, who do they think they are, French?

    KFG

  70. stick to what you know by two_socks · · Score: 1

    "has been beaten down by linux experts alike,"

    Alike what? You need more than one thing to qualify for "alike".

    --
    I can't help it - I'm a 19D.
    1. Re:stick to what you know by Freezing+Polaris · · Score: 1

      By linux expert 1 and linux expert 2 alike ? Ok, ok, minus 1...

      --

      All generalizations are false, including this one...

  71. Prelinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know if they prelink their binaries?

    They could since gclibc2.3.1 is used.

  72. Mandrake not the first by jensend · · Score: 3, Informative

    Xandros Deluxe also resizes NTFS with PQDisk, proprietary software by PowerDesk (the makers of Partition Manager).

    Mandrake's market niche is getting squeezed at both ends, by Redhat working to make their system more user-friendly as well as by up-and-coming distros like Xandros working to make a simpler Linux experience. If RedHat decides to work more at their dependency/updating system (outdoing urpmi and apt rpm) for 9.0, Mandrake's niche will disappear.

    1. Re:Mandrake not the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there is one more thing Redhat would have to do and that is give at least = if not more
      emphasis to KDE.
      Because that is what 3/4 of Desktop users (not
      server users) want.

      Redhat is alright but it is nothing special.
      It is not my first choice.

    2. Re:Mandrake not the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bad xandros! using a non-free tool to resize ntfs. You cannot really call that the first linux distro doing ntfs-resize, can you?

  73. Knoppix owes a lot to Mandrake by bhsx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The beauty of Knoppix is obviously its automagic hardware configuration. Well, you know what that is? It's HardDrake, Mandrake's hardware recognition tool. That's the magic of Mandrake, and the common sense of Klaud Knopper, to tack it onto Debian.

    --
    put the what in the where?
  74. Re:the french connection by pmather · · Score: 2, Funny
    Colin Powell had a class for slow learners at the UN ... fast forward a couple of months, tune in CNN, and see what sort of threats were uncovered by advancing American Armed Forces as they look for weapons of mass destruction. Today's keyword: "Tip of the Iceberg".

    It's true. Powell's sattellite photos proved the Iraqis had a forklift AND two trucks. If they get a bulldozer they'll have Bob the Builder.

  75. Re:the french connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you know Colin Powell lies?
    His lips move.
    Every time he has said any thing about Iraq, it has been proved false by on the ground inspectors. He has made a career of lieing.

  76. Re:Mandrake is French, Mandrake is THE BEST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YEAAAAAAAAAAAA

    lets make Mandrake the official disto of IRAQ!

  77. Haven't we seen this one already?!!? by greenskyx · · Score: 1

    Oh wait... that was a post about Apple... move along...

  78. Re:WHAT IS THIS??? by identity0 · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the fact that they're using the Internet Explorer icon for Galeon, which is a rather blatant trademark violation... they'll probobly get sued by Apple for 'look and feel', too.

    I really hope Mandrake has enough sense to keep that stuff out of their final release...

  79. Re:YUO FAIL HETROSEXUALITY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an Apple user, I must add that it isn't what his dad doesn't says, either.

  80. Re:Mandrake 9.1 RC1 burned me a bit. by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 1

    I have only one complaint about the speed, and that's G++ compiling (which is slow for everyone...).

    I have noticed that... I had K Develop index the QT and KDE documentation on my Celeron 700 (large index) oops!!! It was still going after an entire night of running. I killed the process and said fsck it!

  81. Many promising Linux users... by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 1

    may hold many promising Linux users what they have been waiting for

    Slashdot may hold many promising trolls what they have been flamebaiting for.

    --
    "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
    -- Ryan Stiles
  82. Why Mandrake will be around by nettarzan · · Score: 1

    I think this kinda geeky attitude is preventing lot of good technology ventures becoming a business success.

    Believe me, I've been Linux user since RedHat 5.x.
    IMHO, these are the reasons why I settled with Mandrake. Please beware that I'm the kinda guy who would switch to Mac OS-X if it is as affordable as Mandrake. But Mandrake is the reason why I still haven't switched over to Mac-OS-X.

    The greatest hurdle for entry into Linux has been the installation nightmare. Mandrake removed that obstacle and made it available for masses.
    When I first installed Mandrake 8.0, I felt like this is what I've been looking for all along.
    C'mon, the damn thing configured and installed all the drivers for the hardware I've got in one installation step. Normally, I used to spend days and weeks just to get my Sound, network, display, CD-RW, etc working after I installed Linux.

    For people like me, who want run their home network server in the cheapest possible way without getting distracted by installation nightmare, Mandrake rocks.

    Being easy to install doesn't make it a dumbed down Linux. It just makes the chores of installation and configuration easy. So I don't have to remember minutia of configuring sound, display etc.

    Now if you download Mandrake, please consider making a donation, as there are many people like me who want it stay in the business as it provides an optimal solution.

  83. Screen shots? by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Anyone got screen shots of the new Mandrake theme?

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    1. Re:Screen shots? by fcrozat · · Score: 1

      Somehow old (it doesn't contains all the latest tweaking) screenshot of Galaxy GNOME

  84. Was just to clarify by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Was just clarifying that im not as much into the linux community, so that my statement was based on older info.. that things could have changed somewhat..

    Due to the fragmentation in the linux community i changed to FBSD for servers, yes. Cant have a community like that when it comes to the back room.

    I have stayed on linux for desktop, but at this rate that may change too..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Was just to clarify by eloki · · Score: 1

      Due to the fragmentation in the linux community i changed to FBSD for servers, yes. Cant have a community like that when it comes to the back room.

      I don't see that it's particularly fragmented, at least any more than the various *BSDs are. The Linux distros just happen to use the same kernel ;) Strong opinions don't mean that people won't simply pull in behind a particular solution.

  85. ACPI: Will it work? by PhillipC · · Score: 1

    Red Hat just dropped the new ACPI support from their latest Beta, Phoebe 3, because they didn't feel it was stable enough. I'll be curious to see what the Mandrake people do. Have they managed to fix it while RedHat couldn't, or are they just going to release it without sufficient QA?

    1. Re:ACPI: Will it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well don't be curous, it will included, it's mandrake's modus operandi.

    2. Re:ACPI: Will it work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ACPI is back in 9.1 RC1:

      http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/91beta.php3

      (and yes, I tried it on my laptop. Don't know if it works as promised, but at least the basic APM functions seem to be fixed relative to beta 3)

  86. Re:the french connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and don't eat at all"

    You mean!! NO! CAN'T BE! Cows are from France!?!?! No friggin' wonder I can't understand what they say!

  87. I heard that from Deno . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    "The parent post is complete B.S."

    That post was based on a "legitimate" post of Deno's. My post certainly reflects Deno's intention, but I made the horrible mistake of assuming that was where things were actually going. With the company being in ch. 11 in all, I really did believe Deno's (head of the club) post reflected Mandrake's direction. However, assuming JM is more in the know than Deno (or more influential), I guess I owe all you freeloaders an apology. Freeload your brains out . . .

    "Don't forget that it's 100% open-source, most of the stuff is GPL, so it has to be distributable by everyone."

    I am suprised that you work at Mandrake and yet are so uninformed . . . The GPL only specifies the source be available to those who are distributed binaries. It has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with having to distribute everything to everyone for free. And giving members priority as in servers and time was definitely discussed with Deno to the tone that "that is definitely something we will be aiming towards." Next time, I won't post until I hear "management has approved . . ."

    I don't know where you work (Mandrakestore? Mandrakeexpert?), but I would really hope you and your superiors would take a look at some of your "customers" (erh, paying customers) discussions with Deno. There really is a need to give those who pay a priority. For instance, why can people download, for free, a release over a MONTH before it is available in stores?

    Apparently I have dipped more into the politics of your company than I would have liked. But if there really is a political split on this issue, I hate to inform you that you are on the wrong side.

    BTW, before you claim one of your paying customers is full of sh!t, you might want to do a little research, or at least be a little more apathetic.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:I heard that from Deno . . . by JM · · Score: 1

      > "The parent post is complete B.S."
      > That post was based on a "legitimate" post of Deno's.

      Can you please post the exact URL?

      >However, assuming JM is more in the know than >Deno (or more influential)

      I don't say I'm more in the know or more influentual, but I haven't seen, read or heard about any policy of not releasing ISOs to the general public.

      One thing to note is that, last year, I was really mad because Cheapbytes and others were selling cheap burned Mandrake copies before we even had the time to receive our boxes. I suggested to our CEO to wait a couple of weeks before releasing the ISOs, and that suggestion was declined. The argument: the more people download the ISOs, the more people will come to the Club, and buy additional services.

      So I'm not against you, just stating that your post is not accurate.

      >The GPL only specifies the source be available >to those who are distributed binaries.

      Of course, but "if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have."

      This means that there's nothing stopping any mirror from re-distributing the ISOs. If there is a demand for it, there will be, no matter Mandrakesoft's decision.

      > And giving members priority as in servers and time was definitely discussed with Deno to the tone that "that is definitely something we will be aiming towards."

      I discussed this fact with Deno as well, and even volunteered myself to help.

      > There really is a need to give those who pay a priority. For instance, why can people download, for free, a release over a MONTH before it is available in stores?

      I totally agree with you on this, and I agree that Club members should have priority. However, I do believe the ISOs should be available to the general public, but not, as you say "not until the first RC of the next distro is out". A couple of weeks is okay, not 6 months.

      > I hate to inform you that you are on the wrong side.

      I am on the same side as you, just not as extremist as you, that's the difference.

    2. Re:I heard that from Deno . . . by leviramsey · · Score: 1
      I am suprised that you work at Mandrake and yet are so uninformed . . . The GPL only specifies the source be available to those who are distributed binaries. It has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with having to distribute everything to everyone for free.

      However, the GPL would not prohibit a Club member from, after downloading from a Club mirror, posting the ISO on their own mirrors.

      I don't know where you work

      JM (jmdault, actually) is on Mandrake's Apache team.

    3. Re:I heard that from Deno . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I currently use SuSe at work and love it so far. I have downloaded and installed Mandrake 9.0 on a test machine. It is okay as far as I can see. The one problem I see is that I have no idea what version I should order? I am pretty tired so it might just be me but I find the website a little confusing.
      We are really happy with SuSE but who knows.

  88. Re:the french connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe he's just Italian ;-P

  89. More or less out-the-box by buchanmilne · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here (195kB PNG) is a screenshot of Mandrake 9.1rc1 running Gnome with the Galaxy theme. I hae done almost no changes to Gnome (I don't usually use it), so this is pretty much how it looks currently out-the-box after changing to the Galaxy theme (which I assume will be enabled by default on rc2). The window decorations for KDE went in only a few days ago, wait till I update some stuff from cooker for a KDE screenshot.

    My USB flash disk was detected automatically, just had to right-click on the desktop and check "removable" (in KDE an icon appears which you can just double-click). ACPI works (though I am not sure how much functionality my Thinkpad 600X supports). Note the ACPI is not enabled by default (acpi=off is in the default append for the bootloader) due to problems with desktops. Zeroconf works (ie over a crossover to a windows box I get a "auto-configuration"-compatible IP address and can resolve my own hostname via "dns"), but the gui tools need a bit more work (config only works during install currently), but my NIC does not support ifplugd, so I do not get automatic interface management.

    I did make some changes to the fonts in Mozilla, which may have affected how Galeon displays.

    We just hope that freetype-2.1.4 will be out in time to make it, since the maintainer will not agree to shipping CVS versions (which Redhat seems happy with, even with glibc to the point of breaking things like winbind - for those of you who think Mandrake is not stable).

    1. Re:More or less out-the-box by Kaypro · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info + screenshot. Appreciated!

    2. Re:More or less out-the-box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That screenshot looks horrible compared to Red Hat.

  90. Grammar? by ChefPsyconaut · · Score: 1

    What exactly are these linux experts alike? What promises have these linux users made? Flowery... tsk tsk!

  91. Re:Mandrake installation by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    I agree, the installer is very slick. However, it's not simply something easy for beginners; of all the Linux distros I've tried, it gave me the most options to configure (e.g. Reiserfs root in early 2001).

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  92. and if you do... by 7-Vodka · · Score: 2, Informative

    wish to try it and report bugs, you won't regret it. In my experience they tend to have the fastest turn around I've ever seen fixing bugs. All of mine were fixed within 24hrs of reporting.

    --

    Liberty.

  93. REDHAT SUCKS, LONG LIVE DEBORA IAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /.

    slash

    dot

  94. Re:the french connection by MyHair · · Score: 1

    "Mandrake is the ONLY good thing ever to come from France."
    I assume from this statement that you don't drink wine, and don't eat at all.


    Mmmmmmmmm. Fries.

  95. being a newbie.. by Mir322 · · Score: 1

    i tried to install java on mandrake 9, aka the JVM.. v1.4.1 or whatever the most recent version is after finding out to my horror it doesn't come pre-installed as I need to use a java applet from the web everyday for hours on end.
    Nada.. i tried this & tried that, making sure to install the bunndle of joy DL'd from sun as su & still zilch.
    Then one day it just wouldn't boot after freezing solid while logging out of a user. On reboot, it just hung at "Kernal" something.. 2nd line in the boot sequence. endlessly. Wouldn't accept commands from the console, or give me an error number or explanation. I've not used it since. i'd like to. it's nice. but no java. & then total system death.
    I'd really like to use linux & use mandrake... but currently, i dunno.

    --
    "There is always some madness in love. But there is also always some reason in madness."- Friedrich Nietzsche
    1. Re:being a newbie.. by bygimis · · Score: 1

      I've been using Mandrake since version 7 with Java every day of the week, through Java versions 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 with JVM's from Sun, IBM and BEA, and I've never had any problems... just a simple install. It sounds more like you have Java installed BUT your browser isn't seeing a plug in. If your using Mozilla copy the plug in from your JRE folder to mozilla/plugins. This will work with Galleon as well. You can see if Java is installed by doing java --version at the command line.

    2. Re:being a newbie.. by luthe · · Score: 1

      I would try following the instructions at sun's site for regeristering the plugin with your browser again. It is not the easiest thing i have ever done, however Java2 1.4.(whatever the lastest is) will most definetly work with mandrake 9.

    3. Re:being a newbie.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, use the boot diskette it urged you to create at installation time to get it loaded and then fix whatever is wrong.

      You DID make the boot diskette when it suggested to, right?

    4. Re:being a newbie.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a jre-1.4.1 rpm in the club RPM repository, you just need to be a member to get it.

  96. Can't wait by MicroBerto · · Score: 3, Funny
    I can't wait for 9.1 - The installation will really clean up my system. After each release, I start installing rebuilding development cooker rpms, and by this time, my system is in such a state of terror that I haven't been able to compile a program for like 4 months :)

    But with a new release, I'll get everything on the same page... and then repeat the process until 9.2!

    --
    Berto
  97. Re:the french connection by yomegaman · · Score: 1

    Yeah, he really embarrassed himself there. I especially liked how he claimed that Iraq is aiding Al Queda, when in fact the Iraqi government is specifically listed on Al Queda's list of secular Arab governments that must be destroyed. How ridiculous can you get?

    I'm sure they'll come up with all sorts of stories about WMD's, just like all those stories about mass graves in Kosovo. Of course, after the need for them had passed nobody was ever able to locate any...

    --
    ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  98. Re:Mandrake 9.1 RC1 burned me a bit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What do you think people were using 3-4 years ago?

    Really slow X, or Windows.

  99. 2.4.21 is not UNSTABLE nor DEVELOPER version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the only number that must be taken in care in order to see if the kernel is stable or not is the second (4), so it is pair and COMPLETLY STABLE (when released), not unstable has of 21.

    Thanks.

    1. Re:2.4.21 is not UNSTABLE nor DEVELOPER version by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      He said 4.21, not 2.4.21

      --
      Luke-Jr
    2. Re:2.4.21 is not UNSTABLE nor DEVELOPER version by dolson · · Score: 1

      I think the only number that must be taken in care in order to see if the kernel is stable or not is the second (4), so it is pair and COMPLETLY STABLE (when released), not unstable has of 21.

      Thanks for coming out.

    3. Re:2.4.21 is not UNSTABLE nor DEVELOPER version by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1
      I think the only number that must be taken in care in order to see if the kernel is stable or not is the second (4), so it is pair and COMPLETLY STABLE (when released), not unstable has of 21.

      Right now, 2.4.21 IS unstable, since it doesn't exist yet.
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  100. Re:the french connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez, I can't believe you dunces believe all that jingoistic Stephen Ambrose revisionist history. England and the Soviet Union did far more to defeat Nazi Germany than the US did.

  101. Not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ooh how interesting and creative is your humour! Really, this comment is not funny. Sure in the right context (Fark, the Onion) people understand the humour. But I just don't see the humor in associating the excellent work by Mandrake with a war that's been over for over 55 years.

    1. Re:Not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      si je vous rencontre jamais je DONNERAI UN COUP DE PIED VOTRE ÂNE

    2. Re:Not funny by Freezing+Polaris · · Score: 1
      "Si jamais je vous rencontre, je donnerai un coup de pied à votre ane".

      "If ever I meet you, I will kick your mule". If you intended "I will kick your ass", the right translation is "Je vous botterai les fesses" or "Je vous botterai le cul"(more slangish).

      Hope it helps...

      --

      All generalizations are false, including this one...

    3. Re:Not funny by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

      si je vous rencontre jamais je DONNERAI UN COUP DE PIED VOTRE ÂNE

      It's a joke...De Gaulle of some people. /Run AWAAAAYYY, RUUUNNN AAAWWWWAAAYYY.

      And thanks Freezing Polaris for the translation, my French is rusty, but I was able to figure out what was being said, and it's nice to know the proper way to issue a threat in another language.

      .

      --
      Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  102. Re:Mandrake is French, Mandrake is THE BEST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid

    A french man.

  103. Mandrake Sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to like mandrake, but distro 9.0 really sux.To much fiddling around with it to get it to work correctly, like when you want to access a CD.Why on earth is /dev/cdrom now /dev/hdc?
    and what's with clicking on the cdrom icon, only to have Konqueror come up to say it can't find realnames.com?Also, the motherboard i installed it on,Soltek 75drv5, it doesn't detect the sound correctly, won't play CD's or mp3's ,etc. but it will play that awful music when kde splash screen comes up, and it plays flawlessly. Fuck Mandrake, they are crappy anymore.Can anyone suggest a distro that a bunch of confused crackheads haven't put together?I'd sure appreciate it.
    Thanks.

  104. I know a dead Operating System when I see one. by jspoon · · Score: 0, Troll

    And I'm looking at one right now.

    1. Re:I know a dead Operating System when I see one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still a Windows user, eh?

    2. Re:I know a dead Operating System when I see one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What version of Windows are you using? I'm running Mandrake Linux 9.0 and it just keeps rocking along.

      The first moment that opportunity permits, I plan to invest in that business. I think it is 'the next Microsoft'.

    3. Re:I know a dead Operating System when I see one. by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Are you running DOS again?

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    4. Re:I know a dead Operating System when I see one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first moment that opportunity permits, I plan to invest in that business. I think it is 'the next Microsoft'.

      Capitol idea! Invest in a company that gives their software away! Seriously, a single open source company could never achieve the dominance of Microsoft. Plus, Microsoft has an inherently better long term business plan: They charge money for their software.

  105. Now what we really need by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    ..is a -5 Unamerican moderation.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:Now what we really need by kfg · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, if you take the trouble to consult an almanac, you'll discover, perhaps much to your surprise, that most of the world is, quite literally, Unamerincan

      Go figure.

      On the other hand, if you consult a history book you'll find that above is just about as fine a traditional American sentiment as one could possibly devise.

      Again, go figure.

      Man, this whole patriotism thing turns out to be a bit more complicated than simply waving a flag and chanting jigoistic slogans, even in France.

      Who knew?

      KFG

    2. Re:Now what we really need by ninjadroid · · Score: 1

      I just gotta flap my yap a second...

      I'm about us unpatriotic as they come, but I think war with Iraq is a Good Thing. I'm not an expert, but for the love of god, did anyone forget that Iraq is a police state ruled by Sadam Hussein? It's not like the US is talking about bombing Canada or anything. Iraq is in a seriously sad state, and I guess it's high time we fixed that.

      Of course, much of the world is in a sad state, and we're not doing shit... so I don't know if war with Iraq is the Right Thing.

      ::sigh:: The world is confusing.

    3. Re:Now what we really need by kfg · · Score: 1

      Your knee is twitching. I never said anything about Iraq. I spoke entirely in the general philosophical case, and meant it that way.

      KFG

    4. Re:Now what we really need by TKinias · · Score: 1

      scripsit CausticWidow:

      Now what we really need is a -5 Unamerican moderation.

      Y'know, I was wishing for a mod point so I could mod this ``+1 Funny.'' Then I realized you might be serious, and it all seemed not very funny suddenly.

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
  106. Sorry. . . here it is by Idou · · Score: 1

    Here is Deno's post. I did speak too soon . . . but this is what SHOULD happen.

    JM, I don't know if you are idealistic or just a bit uninformed, but if you want to work for free, you could easily do so on your own instead of pulling down an entire company and its investors.

    I will rally as many people as possible to support Deno's efforts. We are paying customers and investors in the company, so I doubt management will be able to ignore us. I won't say this will get through by next distro (I have learned my lesson about being to optimistic), but this will definitely get through, whether it means losing people like you or not. The club IS the future of Mandrake, and everyone WILL see just how valuable memberships are in the near future.

    Here it is:

    Just for the record, here is what I will try to do:

    - ISOs aren't released to general public until packs are in the shop. This is almost certainly going to happen, because we have no choice anymore.

    - Club members get set of CDs or DVD with complete distribution for $30, and ahead of the crowd. This means burning CDs and/or DVDs in house as soon as we have finished the distribution, and sending them to you as soon as we have burned them. I am not sure if this will be accepted, but it has a fair chance of being accepted if we can do it, and if we do it, I'll personally make sure that everyone really gets his/her pack. That is, if we do it it will be a joint Club/Store thing, and not just a normal Store operation.

    - Club members get ISOs from our servers ahead of the crowd. This depends on two questions:
    1) can we do it, i.e. can we put enough servers on this work to keep the download time reasonably short?
    2) what will our marketing say about this.

    If we do this, higher level members will probably have priority access (or separate download quotas), so gold + above will be able to get ISOs imediately, and silver folks will be able to download even during the time servers say "overloaded" to standard members.

    WDYT?

    (Deno was greated by many club member posts saying how great this would be)

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:Sorry. . . here it is by JM · · Score: 1

      JM, I don't know if you are idealistic or just a bit uninformed, but if you want to work for free, you could easily do so on your own instead of pulling down an entire company and its investors.

      I may be *a bit* idealistic and I do not possess, nor pretend, to have all the knowledge in the world. But I know this:
      - Mandrakesoft has built a business model on stuff they get for free from other people, under the knowledge that they must allow redistribution of their improvements. That's their choice, and so far, they have been committed to that choice (releasing ISOs, GPL'ing their installer and tools, etc).
      - What they get in return is the opportunity to sell additional products and services around that. Over the last 3 years, I have helped Mandrake in many areas: e-commerce, consulting, packaging of both GPL and proprietary applications, technical proofreading of the Corporate Server 1.0, I even *walked* a from our headquarters to the UPS office a couple of blocks away with a cart containing 100 Mandrake boxes so customers would get their products in time. Now I spend days and nights on Apache and PHP so we have a solid server product to sell customers. My work is maybe a drop of water in the sea of profitability, but I did help generate some revenue, and I continue doing that.

      However, I still think the ISOs should be released to the general public in a timely fashion. Even freeloaders will one day need support, manuals, commercial apps, training, they will need a box to give for christmas, they will want to wear a Mandrake Linux T-Shirt, a cap, they will want to vote for their favorite apps, will want Mandrake Online, support, or perhaps their company will want to sponsor the development of a feature. All this == $$$, which will help make the company profitable, and return a nice investment for the shareholders.

      If they don't need any of that, then they don't need MandrakeSoft, and probably would have never paid for a boxed set. However, if they download the product for free, and like it, they may recommend it to someone else who would need this stuff instead of buying the products of a proprietary company.

      [Quoting Deno]
      - ISOs aren't released to general public until packs are in the shop. This is almost certainly going to happen, because we have no choice anymore.

      See my previous post about me suggesting this to Management and having it rejected for the reasons above.

      - Club members get set of CDs or DVD with complete distribution for $30, and ahead of the crowd. This means burning CDs and/or DVDs in house as soon as we have finished the distribution, and sending them to you as soon as we have burned them.

      I have pushed for this for more than two years now, so whenever it happens, IT'S ABOUT TIME!

      - Club members get ISOs from our servers ahead of the crowd. This depends on two questions:
      1) can we do it, i.e. can we put enough servers on this work to keep the download time reasonably short?
      2) what will our marketing say about this.


      Again, I have pushed for that, and whenever it happens, IT'S ABOUT TIME ;-)

      In conclusion: there is a big difference between giving priviledged access to the Club Members, and not releasing at all the ISOs. As well, there have been numerous discussions on that topic, but as far as I know, no formal decision has been taken.

  107. Re:the french connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Defeated? Don't you have to fight in order to lose?

  108. Re:zeroconf = Rendezvous? Apple did open source it by KeyserDK · · Score: 1

    Partly right.

    zeroconf is NOTHING new, it's an open standard. Apple just branded it 'rendezvouz' (trademark) to make it a sexy mac thing ;).

    --
    still reading?
  109. Re:Mandrake 9.1 RC1 burned me a bit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...at least 3-4 times faster than the Athlon XP 1900+ running XP..."

    What? Sorry, that's complete bullshit (unless you only have 128MB RAM.) I've run XP Pro on 600MHz machines, 400MHz machines, etc. It runs beautifully on anything above about 500MHz (and fine, albeit more slowly, on anything above 300MHz.) You just have to have more RAM than 128MB -- 256MB is a bare minimum, and all my personal machines are 768 or above. RAM is the easiest and cheapest upgrade you can do to a system, anyway.

    I don't know about LiteStep, but if you're using Explorer, go into Display Properties -> Appearance -> Advanced and turn off the Transition Effect. Also, in Control Panel -> System -> Advanced -> first Settings button, you can turn off a lot of stuff that may use video memory if you have an older video card. I turned off all the Fade effects. BTW, I used to use LiteStep, but with themexp, it's no longer worth it. You can just theme XP now and it looks and feels better than LiteStep ever did.

    This is silly. You made the effort to make Linux faster, but you don't seem to understand how to make XP faster. XP really does rock on older systems -- you just have to know how to tweak it (like ANY OS.)

  110. What? by Idou · · Score: 1

    The idea is that Mandrake gives paying customer access FIRST. It doesn't mean it stop free downloads. There is just no way to stop free downloads.

    With MDK 9.0, people could download for free the distro MONTHS before it was available in stores! This is ludicrous! And when people bought these in stores, they were suprised to hear that announcement of 9.1rc1! No, if Mandrakeclub gets its way (read my replies to JM and know this is NOT YET OFFICIAL), next time FREELOADERS will only get access to the finished distro AFTER the RC1 of the next version is released.

    8.2 makes an EXCELLENT working demo of the distro, if you ask me. But if you want to newest and bestest, you are going to either have to pay or contribute.

    "Mandrake disallowing free downloads will only hurt it in the long run."

    We all are dead in the "long run."

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  111. Join Mandrake Club to support the company by Gernot · · Score: 1

    Just had a look at www.mandrakeclub.com and wanted to sign up for membership in their club, to support this fine distribution ... but then I saw the price: 60 Euros/year ?!?

    I swallowed twice, thought about it, but still wanted to give it a try (after writing a serious remark to them on the order page, hoping that they tell me if the company breaks down) - then I came to the payment page, and saw that 16% VAT were added ....

    That was too much.

    I gladly pay up to, say, 30 $ to support the company - but more than that, and especially yearly, no, sorry, not currently.

  112. You can get an alumni membership that way . . . by Idou · · Score: 1

    But to give you a full membership just wouldn't make economic sense . . . (alumni memberships still give you some access).

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  113. Hm.. by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    All i hear is bla bla..

    Do I have to remind you of France's stance in the whole Iraq/Turkey business?

    Face it. Either you are with us, or against us.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:Hm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, you people are scary. You're as scary as Taliban or Al Qaeda.

      It becomes more and more evident that the only difference between you and them is that you are fundamentalist zealots who run praising presidents and flags instead of gods and books.

      No, you aren't Americans, you are a cabal. You invoke the memory of a war 60 years gone--a war that you had nothing to do with--in order to justify your jingoism.

      Your cabal doesn't care how many lives are lost in the process of achieving your aims. Just like Al Qaeda.

      Face it, your cabal is an organization of terrorism. George Bush has never his agenda has never been to serve the citizens of the United States, it has been only to benefit those in the cabal.

    2. Re:Hm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All i hear is bla bla..


      No no, its better if you put your hands over your ears and sing "LA LA LA". That way you have more chance of the reality twisting to fit your warped views.
    3. Re:Hm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooops sorry wrong syntax. I am roxxored off my boxxor at the moment ;-@

  114. beaten down by linux experts alike by Rumagent · · Score: 1

    Sure if "expert" means self-inflating individual...

    1. Re:beaten down by linux experts alike by cranos · · Score: 1

      self-inflating individual...

      Ummm what industry do you work in again? Rubber?

  115. How can Mandrake be dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mandrake:
    * doesn't have bluecurve
    * has support for more video cards (well, at least
    it configured X perfectly on my computer with a
    SiS video card but RedHat 8.0 didn't)

  116. Free downloads by Idou · · Score: 1

    That's fine, no one is saying get rid of free downloads. We are only saying "delay the newest releases to the public." Codeweavers appears to be doing well with such a strategy.

    I can think of two ways this will be good from YOUR perspective:

    1. People who NEED the newest features will end up PAYING

    2. People who WANT to try things out do so on a version of the distro that has been out long enough for most of its bugs to all have fixes, and it will be easier to support these newbies on their exotic hardware with a version that has been out for a while.

    Also, you give Mandrake more bang for your buck becoming a member than buying the box set (its called "profit margins").

    As a fellow user, I appreciate your enthusiasm, but I think as an investor I have a much higher stake in seeing the company survive and, consequently, have given the matter a little more thought.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  117. Agree 100% by Idou · · Score: 1

    "I find it odd that Americans are all so willing to insult France for being defeated by one of the most powerful armies in modern time, but are now all upset when they don't want to aid an attack on a small, middle-eastern country who has shown no signs of a direct threat."

    Sorry I can't mod you up . . . I have been posting like crazy on this thread, and they have this weird rule about not allowing you to mod on threads you post on.

    Anyway, I can certainly add "clear thinking" to one of the great things to come from France since the U.S. began this whole Iraq ordeal.

    And for the record, I am American.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:Agree 100% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anyway, I can certainly add "clear thinking" to one of the great things to come from France since the U.S. began this whole Iraq ordeal.

      Yeah, that has nothing to do with TotalFinaElf's exploration rights to what are expected to be two of the world's biggest oil fields that just so happen to be in Iraq. Whoops - I forgot - only the US can possibly have ulterior motives. No more blood for oil my arse.
  118. Mandrake needs to merger with Apple by kireK · · Score: 2, Funny

    Then we'll cut the number of dead and dieing compnay storeies in half for the next 5-10 years.

  119. Which is going to die first by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

    race to the death-finish:

    BSD vs. Mandrake

    It had to be said. Sorry. *turns karma bonus off*

    1. Re:Which is going to die first by viperblades · · Score: 1

      mandrake. you don't see any of the BSD's going bankrupt do ya?

    2. Re:Which is going to die first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhh... i think that was supposed to be a joke

  120. Re:the french connection by HyperbolicParabaloid · · Score: 1

    are you high?

    --


    -------------------------
    A person of moderate zeal
  121. /. and grammer do not mix by HyperbolicParabaloid · · Score: 1

    "...beaten down by linux experts alike" and "... may hold many promising Linux users what they have been waiting for..."
    Huh?
    This has got to be one of the most poorly written /. posts I have ever seen. I really really hope you are not a native English speaker. If that is the case, I apologize.

    --


    -------------------------
    A person of moderate zeal
  122. Huh? by bonch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me get this straight...you consider a "free ride" like the ability to go from Windows to Linux frustrating? You want people to be "self-sufficient" and "figure things out for themselves?" In other words, you want them to take time out of their days learning to use their system in order to be productive, when they could be using that valuable time to actually BE productive?

    If everyone operated like this, then there would be very little time wasted explaining the documented solutions to common problems, which would free everyone up to concentrate on the real problems, in order to make progress.

    Instead of this ass-backwards view, how about developers get around to FIXING those common problems, so they don't need to be explained? Expecting people to make tinkering with their OS a hobby in order to use it--lest they get a "free ride"--is ridiculous to me. It reaks of the "smug feeling of superiority" you say isn't so prevalent. Linux being difficult to set up isn't a fault of the users. I am so tired of people who imply such. Some out there need to spend some time away from their command prompt and Emacs sessions and interact with the rest of the world and see how they use computers. Otherwise, Linux will forever remain just a nice file and web server.

    Sorry for the frustrated tone...I just want Linux to succeed, and I see so many attitudes holding it back.

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no he means freeride as in some fucking yahoo wants to switch from windows to linux except when you say things like "icon, folder, explorer"

      they get a glazed look in their eyes.

      they don't even know windows, and they want to switch.

    2. Re:Huh? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      The free ride is when people do not try to help themselves. I am so sick of seeing something like "my mouse is broke". And rather then check to post earlier that detail how to fix thier issue, they demand people help them.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    3. Re:Huh? by bonch · · Score: 1

      Yeah, gee, how dare people ask for help.

      Some people don't know what else to think when their mouse stops working. You're thinking in technical terms--a driver problem, a misconfigured XF86Config file, and so forth--when all they see is a cursor that's not working. Some people don't spend their lives in front of computers.

      So, they say "my mouse is broke." They simply don't know any better. It doesn't mean they're stupid, want a "free ride," or don't want to "help themselves." They don't have time to learn how to get their simple input devices working, nor should they have to. Some people own computers simply just to USE them, not to learn how every little thing works internally. Elitist techies seem to look down on people who own a computer and don't know every little thing about it. It's an attitude that never ceases to make me laugh.

      Do you know everything about how your car works? Or your fridge? Or television set? Would you like it if mechanics criticized you for not knowing any better about the internals of your appliances if you asked for help fixing it?

      Or would you just switch to an easier-to-use appliance that didn't give you such problems? Is that a "free ride?" I call it choosing the better product.

  123. NTFS resizing? About friggin time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    That isn't a knock at Mandrake (surprisingly), that's a knock at all the other distributions. (Especially RedHat.)

    How many years has NTFS resizing software been around? Quite a few! I do remember resizing (and sliding!) NTFS partitions back in the day. Had to use some shareware to do it, too, thanks to the lack of functionality in both fdisk and RedHat's Disk Druid.

    Considering how important MS-based operating systems are to the business world (If you think otherwise, you're an idiot. End of story.), that RedHat would have added NTFS resize/slide functionality to their install process. I mean, they're supposed to be the 'business' distro and all.

    *snert* Maybe Mandrake's work on it will beat RH and other distributions with the clue stick.

  124. Re:zeroconf = Rendezvous? Apple did open source it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh, ah, I thought ZeroConf/Rendez-vous was an Apple-originated technology like IEEE-1394? I remember reading somewhere that it came about when Steve J. demanded his minions to make TCP/IP plug and play like {Apple|Local|Ether|...}Talk was at the time.

    And I thought the IEEE comittee (sp?) defining this is being steered by Apple?

    Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm right, can someone confirm this? Thanks.

  125. This is a review??? by justsomebody · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That's a sorry excuse of you.

    If you wanna be superior then start learning to be better than others.

    There's no real knowledge needed to install a disk, camera or use desktop software.

    When it comes to maintaining of complex networks and servers....? That's a linux superiority you're talking about. Not the GUI.

    I even tryed out Mandrake Server,... well it sucks major. If admin is not smart enough to control (and choose) firewall, mail, web and other services. There's a little to be expected of him. Some baasic predefault settings are not enough to make a (really) trusted environment.

    Well, that's your superior edge you should be aiming for not some basic operations.

    Is this another case of some linux people hating a distro because it's too easy to use?
    Then again I love that linux is getting easy. I just hate to click zillion options to make my desktop as I imagine. Well, I used to like that in the past, but gnome2 "just works" out of the base and fills all my bassic GUI needs. So I can concentrate on the job I'm doing not on GUI. But for me Redhat is the way to go.

    I wish some people would keep their attitudes in line with their principles . . .
    Damn right! They should start to evolve instead of sitting on the knowledge they have (without progressing) and dumb down others that might become equal with no hard work.

    --
    Signature Pro version 1.13.2-3 release 83.5 beta3try7 after-breakfast edition
    1. Re:This is a review??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      totally agree with this post.

      if you guys like an easy to use OS, why not stick to mac or win?
      the bugs exists in ALL OSes so there's no big diff after all :) (oh, maybe the pop up "theme" might be fancier, LOL)

      btw, i once tried to install mandrake and it just hanged the machine, on, tisk, tisk, "video card autodetection";
      and I HATE kudzu!
      so i am back to my good ol' slack :)

    2. Re:This is a review??? by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      I even tryed out Mandrake Server,... well it sucks major. If admin is not smart enough to control (and choose) firewall, mail, web and other services. There's a little to be expected of him. Some baasic predefault settings are not enough to make a (really) trusted environment.

      Sure, but by the time you have got your Debian server booting, I would have a pretty secure box by choosing security level 4 or 5, and all updates installed during installation.

      msec will be setup by defualt, and will mail me daily with a summary of suspicious activity, and will maintain good permissions, unless I tell it not to, or configure other permissions.

      Plus, all the config tools I would want will run without X, but diskdrake is better if you run it remotely via X (only need X libs installed).

      Plus, for file-serving, I get ACLs working out-the-box since Mandrake 8.1 (RH 8.1 will be the first other distro after Mandrake and SuSE to have this, but only on ext2/3).

      Plus, Mandrakes apache is the best out-the-box, with the most available modules etc.

      You should consider trying Mandrake on a server, but do not come with preconceived ideas of what it should be ... because it is much better than that.

      Mandrake is not just a desktop distro!

  126. Re:the french connection by HomerJ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Colin Powell had a class for slow learners at the UN ... fast forward a couple of months, tune in CNN, and see what sort of threats were uncovered by advancing American Armed Forces as they look for weapons of mass destruction. Today's keyword: "Tip of the Iceberg".

    It's true. Powell's sattellite photos proved the Iraqis had a forklift AND two trucks. If they get a bulldozer they'll have Bob the Builder.

    Yes, but they can combine and form Devastator.

  127. Business Decisions... by anoopiyer · · Score: 1
    I'm typing this from my Mandrake Linux box.

    Mandrake's business decisions are sometimes hard to explain. The system I'm typing on used to have Mandrake 6.1, and I decided to upgrade a while ago. Mandrake 9.0 had just been released and was available for FTP. But it wasn't available for purchase on their website yet. I went ahead and installed by FTP anyway, but at that time, I was in the right mood to pay something for an official Mandrake distro in a box. Mandrake's delay in making the boxed CD set available the same time as the FTP download did cost them some. (There were third-party retailers selling CDs of the Mandrake 9.0 distro at the time, but I did just as well with the FTP install.)

  128. Re:f Ninnle p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares about Mandrake? If they fold, you all just have to kep in mind that Ninnle Linux will still have it's day, and will take over easily from where Mandrake left off.

  129. I like Mandrake a lot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    What I've really liked about Mandrake is that it comes with like... EVERYTHING on the damned cds. I hear about some obscure package, and I check and sure enough, drakconf shows it's on the cd and I can choose to install it. I have a modem dialup and I'm not very interested in downloading tens of megs over the internet. If I had a faster link I'd probably be more interested in thinks like the PLF and Texstar's additions for Mandrake.

    I tried out Redhat 8.0, and while I see the difference in focus between Redhat and Mandrake, I'm amazed at how LITTLE redhat came with. Nothing that can violate the MPEG licenses (no mp3, no xine, no mplayer, no video, no shit), nothing that can be construed as "fun" (this is BUSINESS LINUX).

    What I'm really looking forward to is Mandrake with Xft2 font setup. That's what attracted me to RH8 in the first place was the nice anti-aliasing. In the end I went back to Mandrake 9, and compiled and installed the Xft2 stuff myself, then compiled kde3.1 from source (what a colossal pain!). The problem is replacing the non-xft2 libs with their xft2 counterparts borks up the kde3.0 installation from Mandrake. Plus now the Gnome-Pango setup is all borked and makes compiling Gnome stuff hard. I haven't gotten up the ambition to download and compile gnome 2.2 for myself.

    I like linux, I do software development, but maybe I'm getting old I don't get much thrill anymore out of building the entire system myself from scratch. I like to put in the cd, run the installer, and have something nice and usable.

    1. Re:I like Mandrake a lot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      with mandrake, as soon as you have to do something with out thier mdkrpms you are in for a headache. Try upgrading GNU spell and see what a can of worms it opens.

    2. Re:I like Mandrake a lot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried Debian :) 4.7GB or a full DVD's
      worth??

  130. Re:YUO FAIL NINNLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a Ninnle Linux user, I think you're all fucked!

  131. Re:Mandrake 9.1 RC1 burned me a bit. by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1

    You are either very brave, or very foolish. Or you have lots of spare time.

    All the above! This is a HOME server. A toy. Not a production enviroment. I can afford to take foolish risks.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  132. Re:Mandrake 9.1 RC1 burned me a bit. by frohike · · Score: 1

    Well, I congratulate you for actually reading most of my post. Above-average AC ;)

    As I mentioned though, the problem is the machine, not XP. A lot of friends of mine have assured me that they have XP running very nicely on their boxes, so I'm aware of that. If you have a well-running XP box on an Athlon then it's probably not a Via chipset. Any search for "Via XP" on Google will turn up hundreds of horror stories.

    I've downloaded all the new drivers, tweaked all that stuff you've talked about, used X-Setup, installed AMD-specific XP patches, etc... nothing fixes the basic problems: disk access is DOG slow, and when I try to move windows or do other intensive graphics on the second monitor, the sound starts stuttering and getting staticy. Other people at my work have the same problem, and the common factor always seems to be the Via chipset.

    Oh and I've got 1GB of RAM in the thing, so I really doubt that's the issue. On the other hand, it's being used for Visual Studio.NET, so perhaps that's not enough :)

    My point, though, is that just because a machine is brand new doesn't make it "the shit", and just because it's old doesn't make it shit :)

  133. Re:the french connection by donnz · · Score: 1

    So sad to see so many ungrateful Americans :-).

    --
    -- Free software on every PC on every desk
  134. Re:Mandrake 9.1 RC1 burned me a bit. by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1

    You upgraded your server with a pre-release OS? Your faith in Mandrake is exceptional, sir!

    Naw, this is a home/toy/test server not a production enviroment. I wouldn't put this on something that HAS to run. And it proved me right in blanking my data drive. Irrating yes, crisis no.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  135. Amen. by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1

    Sorry I've allways thought that the Celeron 500 was slow. The mobo in the thing is an old Intel CA810A. It's a slow processor with a slow chipset and only 128mb of ram. As I really don't run X on it that is plenty fast. I use it mostly for an samba server. But for any GUI it is slow. It was in 1999 and it is today in 2003. Esp when you are used to running a P-IV 1.8 ghz that is overclocked at about 2.2.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    1. Re:Amen. by knobmaker · · Score: 1
      Sorry I've allways thought that the Celeron 500 was slow.

      This seems a bit of an overgeneralization. As a counterexample, my kids are using a box I fished out of a Dumpster. The drives and memory had been stripped but it still had a motherboard and a Celeron 366. I put in a 128 MB stick and drives from an even older box. I did replace the video card with a cheap GeForce 2 from Circuit City, but all in all the system cost me under $80 to revive.

      It's set up to dualboot Win98 (the kids like to play games and they're perfectly happy playing such over-the-hill stuff as Quake II and Tombraider) and Mandrake 9.0. I have to say that while I've always used Redhat for my serious stuff, I'm impressed with Mandrake 9.0

      X runs pretty snappy, so far as I can tell. I can't tell any difference in the GUI's apparent speediness between the kid box and my much newer work machine. Anyway, my point is that unless you're doing heavy development, editing video or doing a lot of graphic work, a machine like the kid box would be good enough for many if not most users. One of the things I really like about Linux is that most of the distros run just fine on old machines that wouldn't work very well with, say, XP.

      Or maybe I'm completely wrong.

    2. Re:Amen. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      My experience has been the same. It's not been the processor that has been the problem EVER, it's been the memory.

      A while ago I was running Mandrake 8.0 on my 200Mhz K6 (I have since given it to my sisters, who will only run Win98 on it). X was plenty fast enough.

      There where some problems with KDE - all of it's transition animations took loads of CPU time, and thsi machine also only had 64MB of memory. So I switched to icewm and the memory and CPU problems went away completely; it was as fast as the windows machine, and with a WAY underpowered system.

      If you're having trouble with a Celeron 500 you're doing something seriously wrong.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  136. Happiness.. by _marshall · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is knowing you downloaded The 3 ISOs before it was posted on slashdot.

  137. Unfortunately it can break things though by Euan+Buchanan · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong, I think urpmi is what the rpm format has been crying for, and it does deserve more recognition. It's a shame that the true power of it is hidden from most users by rpmDrake.I only found out about urpmi because I've this habit of opening everything from an X term, at least for the first few goes.) Bad thing though is that when I did a security update for the kernel, it broke my Masquerading. After poking in to the kernel, I found that that version of the kernel didn't have NAT compiled in which kind of upset me. That's what nudged me to Debian which so far I've had no problems with; howevere I'm using stock Woody which is just a tad out of date. Maybe I'd find the same issues that put me off Mandrake in unstable?

  138. Been using it since it was released... by ebbomega · · Score: 2, Informative

    The RC1 was actually released last Wednesday, and that would be the day I installed it and got it running.

    Fucking beautiful, except Wine keeps crapping out on me (expected considering it's still in bux-fix mode). Seriously, one of the reviews I read about Mandrake 9.0 was that they had evolved to a lot more of an "expensive" or "professional" look. While I'm sitting here hoping that the installer for RC1 is only a temporary thing and that they go back to the format they had for 8.2 and 9.0, I have to say that they actually outdid themselves for this release. Gnome 2.2 is slick, With a really _really_ nice new font set... New GnomeICU (one of the main programs I use) is a lot nicer than previous versions, etc. etc.

    The only main problem I have is with the installer, which I'm guessing is because they're not quite done with it yet... It seems to be missing a whole thwack of packages that are on the CDs (Apache and Wine to name a couple) but all in all this distro is very very slick.

    So I've pretty much decided now that I'm a bona-fide Mandrake user....

    As soon as I garner up enough money I'm going to be sending in for a 9.1 boxed set... I'd honestly hate to see them go under, because as I see it they're offering me a really quality product.

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  139. SELECT english_translation WHERE summary like='% by MySQL+Troll · · Score: 0

    bloodeu writes "Mandrake Linux has been beaten down by linux experts alike, but this new release of Mandrake may hold many promising Linux users what they have been waiting for, like NTFS resizing(which is a first), Automatic Network config(zeroconf), Supermount, and many more. You can download the Mandrake 9.1 RC1 Here%'

    Translation result:
    bloodeu writes "Everyone picks on Mandrake because they're French like me, but looks like they're going to prove all of the (probably American) naysayers wrong! They've added a feature that virtually no one in their right mind would use if they care about their data (NTFS resizing), the lazy man's configuration tool (zeroconf), and automount, which they inexplicably took out of their distribution, possibly to drive everyone crazy with a step backwards in time. You can download the ISOs of this beta distribution which is bound to have problems (but only because it's beta) from here!"

    Ya know, I'm not sure that's much better...

    --
    "Linux is for geeks, beos is for nobody, Mac OS is for actors, XP is for people" - Anonymous Coward
  140. What about the kernel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,

    It's treu Mandrake-9.1 will have a pre (alfa/beta) kernel?

    I think it must use a stable kernel since the begining of betas. I don't understand the reason because of the se of this kernel.

    Anyone want to explain this.

    FreeBSD: turning PC into workstations

  141. Re:the french connection by tuffy · · Score: 1
    Rmemeber, this is America, where stereotyping and nationalism are okay so long as they're aimed at countries voicing a dissenting opinion about going to war.

    I, for one, would like to see a bit more attention paid to the economy, countries with nukes and some guy named Osama. But that's just me.

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  142. Mandrake Debs? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    I won't pay for a distrobution that I don't use, even if I do recommend it to those first trying Linux.

    Mandrake packages of their configuration programs, which kick ass regardless of our prejudices against luser-friendliness, for Debian and other distros might make the Mandrake Club worth joining.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:Mandrake Debs? by deno · · Score: 2, Informative

      Paying for something you don't use is really not something I woudl ask you to do - even if it ends up feeding me. .-)

      Not paying for something one does use (which is what many people do these days) is on the other hand a very stupid thing. One day you wake up, and the "free lunch" is gone... ;-)

  143. Do they have freetype2/xft2 yet? by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 1

    I have been using Mandrake since the 7.x days and am eagerly looking forward to this release. The one thing that I don't like about 9.0 is the fact that they don't use freetype2/xft2 for the rendering. This makes the display quality of the fonts terrible. Anybody know whether they have switched to freetype2/xft2? Their Changelog does not say anything.

    Magnus.

    1. Re:Do they have freetype2/xft2 yet? by LinuxGeek8 · · Score: 1

      Yup, they have fontconfig/Xft2 with freetype 2.1.3.
      Rendering of fonts is really nice now :-)
      And with a bit of luck the Bitstream fonts are released in time that they can be included in 9.1

      --
      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
  144. Ok, a BAD experience with Mandrake 9.1... by badasscat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I admit I'm a noob, but I haven't had very good luck with 9.1 so far. I desperately want to run a Linux desktop and I'd heard Mandrake was the easiest (which it still may be for all I know - just because it's hard for me doesn't mean the others aren't harder). But so far, here are the problems I've had starting with 9.0 and now actually getting worse in 9.1:

    1. Network doesn't work. This is new in 9.1 RC1. It worked in the betas and in 9.0, but doesn't in RC1. I have heard various workarounds but being a noob haven't really tried getting my hands dirty yet. It detects my card but does not connect to the net, and will not even connect to my router (so it's not just an internet thing).

    2. Font import doesn't work. This has never worked for me, in any Mandrake release. I have pared my Windows fonts down to the minimum and it still hangs at various points during the import - hangs to the point where I need to restart the system in order to kill the process.

    3. Mounting of pretty much anything other than the Linux partition on my hard drive takes about 10 minutes, as does doing any operation at all once mounted. This includes simply listening to a CD, or browsing my pictures on my Windows partition. Again, just trying to listen to a CD last night necessitated a reboot.

    Any one of these is almost enough to get me to give up on Linux as a whole for now. Windows, for now, is much more useful as a desktop, however "easy" Mandrake is to use. I've spent almost 100% of my time with Mandrake so far just trying to get it set up, and I still can't get some pretty important things to work at all. I hope Mandrake and other distros continue to improve to the point where a newbie like me can actually use them, but I don't think we're at that point yet.

    1. Re:Ok, a BAD experience with Mandrake 9.1... by nicsterrr · · Score: 1

      Do you understand that this isn't a realeased product? If you are a noob you should stay away from 9.1 beta versions and realease candidates and wait for the actual product in a month or so.

    2. Re:Ok, a BAD experience with Mandrake 9.1... by fcrozat · · Score: 1

      Have you report all your problems to MandrakeSoft ? If not, Cooker Bugzilla is your friend (please, separate each problem in its own bug report). If you don't report bugs, you can't be sure we will be able to fix them all !!

    3. Re:Ok, a BAD experience with Mandrake 9.1... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      That's really weird. The combined problem with mounting times and font import makes me wonder if your windows install might be in the process of dying, and mandrake not knowing what to make of what it finds there. I've had mandrake on a couple machines, and none have ever needed more than a second or three to mount anything. I suppose it could also be supermount coughing a dying breath with 9.0, but I keep hearing it's problems were fixed with 9.1, so I suppose that's somewhat unlikley to be the cause.

      You might want to try booting with knoppix a try, just to see if it shares the same problems with mounting.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    4. Re:Ok, a BAD experience with Mandrake 9.1... by badasscat · · Score: 1

      Do you understand that this isn't a realeased product? If you are a noob you should stay away from 9.1 beta versions and realease candidates and wait for the actual product in a month or so.

      Did you read my post? I said I've been with Mandrake since 9.0 - this is not my first install. 2 of the 3 problems I described have been present since 9.0, and with every new release I hope they're fixed, and they aren't.

      The point of any new release is to fix bugs in previous versions and add new functionality. It's fine when new things don't work in betas and release candidates, but I don't expect things that worked fine before (network) to suddenly stop working in a release candidate (especially when it worked perfectly in the betas!). And regardless, font import and auto-mounting didn't work for me in the supposedly stable 9.0 release either.

      Besides, I wonder if some people around here have forgotten what the term "Release Candidate" means. RC means it's out of the beta stage; all functions should work at this point.

    5. Re:Ok, a BAD experience with Mandrake 9.1... by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      When the distribution updates the network software, it is not unusual to break something that was a kludge to begin with. Just because something works in an earlier distribution does not mean that it was working the way it should. An example is Intersil varients of 802.11b nics. My experience with this was that I could get my Speedstream or D-Link cards to work in 8.0, though for some reason it was only running at 802.11 speeds of 2mbps. 9.0 broke my D-Link card, but I was able to get the SpeedStream card to work, and it actually worked at 11mbps.

      The 9.2Beta2 would not recognize my D-Link card, and since I was building a new system I had to temporarily string cat5 to get the system on the network. (built in ethernet on the motherboard) After I downloaded and burned the ISO's for RC1 I decided that for SNG to put the D-Link card in while installing RC1. I was tremendously happy to see the installer recognize both interfaces and was happily ripping out the now un-needed cat5 that very night.

      The installer is not perfect. At one point I selected an app to install, and had to go through a dozen of the same dialog messages letting me know that it had to install something else as well.

      Yes, RC means it is out of the Beta stage. That does not mean that _all_ functions _will_ work. It means we have a strong belief that using this software will not cause your printer to burst into flames, your supported hardware should be working (but may not) and you can probably get productive work done on your computer with this software. You still may run into problems, and we (Mandrake developers) want to know about them to get those problems resolved. We believe that it is ready to be released, but having been bitten before by releases that ended up being buggy, we want to have some people check things out for us ahead of time.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
  145. USB Mice by NorthWoodsman · · Score: 1

    Does it finally fix USB Wheel mice? Mine only works plugged into a PS/2 port. I use it in USB, and I Left Click, it slides the cursor to the right...

    --
    1p}{ 1 sp34k |33+ +|-|e|\| p30p13 \/\/il| 8e i/\/\pr3553|)
    1. Re:USB Mice by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      I use a 4-button USB mouse. Never had any problems with it. During advanced install it calibrates the mouse. I can't see why so many people have had problems with these mice. Do you use advanced install or standard install?

    2. Re:USB Mice by NorthWoodsman · · Score: 1

      I think it has to do with what kind of USB host you plug it in to. I had it plugged into the system USB ports and they worked fine, until an unfortunate wiring accident rendered them nonfunctional. I plug it into my USB2 PCI card and it doesn't work

      --
      1p}{ 1 sp34k |33+ +|-|e|\| p30p13 \/\/il| 8e i/\/\pr3553|)
    3. Re:USB Mice by BigLonely · · Score: 1

      I always wait till after an install to configure the USB mouse. I have a Logitech Optical Wireless USB wheel mouse. Just plug it into uour USP port. Leave your serial mouse connected. Go to the Mandrake Control Center. Choose Mouse. Choose USB three button wheel mouse if that description applies. Click APLY, then OK. Many times, the system will seem to freeze a bit, rather the process doesn't seem to end. Just close the control center, and if there is no widget response when you click on "close" still with your old mouse, just kill the process. Log out. Log back in using your USB mouse.

    4. Re:USB Mice by rusty0101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      While my experience is not perfect with it, Beta3 and RC1 recognized my Wacom Graphire2 tablet, including the wheel mouse component. The imperfection of it relates to the fact that positioning is treated as a combination of relative and absolute. As you place the pen or mouse on the tablet, it is positioned absolutely. Once you start moving it, it is relative, and apparently not mapped nicely to the movement of the mouse pointer on the screen.

      The installer did recognize a usb mouse, including the wheel, but would not recognize a USB Keyboard, even though I did try teling the bios to tell whatever OS was running on top that the USB Keyboard was a PS2 keyboard. The Installer apparently recognized that it was not a PS2 (or older) keyboard, and didn't know what to do with it. After the install, the keyboard does work in the running OS. I can live with a PS2 keyboard during the install for now, but I would prefer that the USB keyboard work during the install.

      Those are just my experiences. Others may be different.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
  146. Don't forget urpmi.setup by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

    Since urpmi.setup (see the web version) went into main, it will actually be even easier.

    Just hope they install it by default and put an icon in the menu and Mandrake Control Center. Will mean urpmi is trivial to setup.

    To those mentioning apt/apt4rpm, remember that you have to install non-RH tools to get this functionality. For people looking for an ultra-stable distro (apparently the only reason for subjecting yourself to RH), you would not want to install 3rd-party software that you don't need.

    Mandrake comes with it's own tool, integrated into all the other tools (will RH-config tools install software via apt when it realises you need something? - I would guess not), plus the genhdlist tool to generate your own urpmi sources.

    Plus, there are a number of guaranteed sources for additional software that can be used with urpmi, including all the commercial software that normally ships on the CDs at Mandrake Club.

    Sorry, apt on RH just does not measure up to urpmi.

    Plus, there are many advanced features (and more coming), such as parallel installation (via ssh for real networks or ka-run for clusters), usage of ssh or rsync for accessing urpmi sources, plus in 9.1 the ability to install (with solved dependencies) directly from a url (if you just want a few packages without setting up a source).

    Finally, one important aspect security-wise, is that if you keep your urpmi sources current (specifically updates sources), Mandrake tools will always install the most up-to-date package, so you should never have an old (ie potentially compromised) package on your system.

    Many cooker users and all the Mandrake developers keep their systems up-to-date with urpmi. Do RH developers use apt in-house daily?

  147. Re:the french connection by NorthWoodsman · · Score: 1

    Which way does it face, and why?

    --
    1p}{ 1 sp34k |33+ +|-|e|\| p30p13 \/\/il| 8e i/\/\pr3553|)
  148. What if? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if - the unthinkable scenario happens? What if Mandrake truly goes bankrupt? What will the best exit out be for us Mandrake users? RedHat, SuSE, Debian, or some other? I don't wan't to freeze my preciously downloads and compilations in a cul-de-sac.

  149. Mandrake Business Model by cornice · · Score: 1

    I really like Mandrake. It's easy to install. It contains all kinds of really great stuff that works right out of the box. Contrary to popular belief, it makes a really nice server. Mandrake even does a spectacular job when it comes to security.

    What others have stated already, however, is that their business model sucks. Running a business like a charity does not work. I like the Mandrake Club idea but I think they need to expand it. For example, Ximian does a far better job updating Mandrake (Red Carpet) than Mandrake does. The Mandrake mirrors in the US mostly suck. Mandrake should have a premium service that allows users to update their systems quickly, securely and easily. I personally think that Mandrake should give their CDs away in stores like AOL. It would save a ton of bandwidth and attract thousands of new users but to make this work, they have to have a real incentive to join Mandrake Club. That is where they need to focus their efforts right now. I happen to be a member of Mandrake Club and I have purchased a half dozen boxed sets over the years but I don't think that others are so compelled to pay for something that is essentially free. This is especially true if by some miracle they become wildly successfull.

  150. Re:the french connection by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    I find it odd that Americans are all so willing to insult France for being defeated by one of the most powerful armies in modern time, but are now all upset when they don't want to aid an attack on a small, middle-eastern country who has shown no signs of a direct threat.

    It's because these days we Americans pride ourselves on our ability to destroy countries smaller and weaker than us. France is raining on our parade dammit!

  151. I installed 9.1 rc1 last night by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    But it had some issues with the kernel that made it difficult for a n00b (6 months now) like me to install the Nvidia drivers. I also noticed some rather irratating bugs that I thought would end up being a serious hamper.
    I use MC frequently and it seemed to not bet there.
    And the Drax version of grpmi seemed to lock up when I would try to install anything through MCC..

    The number one item that sent me running back to 9.0 was the kernel / Nvidia issue. I reinstalled 9.0 then dropped Texstar's KDE 3.1 into it and had my system back to pretty much normal in nothing flat.

    IF I had a second machine to PLAY with, I would love to try 9.1 but I need to use this machine, not fight with it..

    I first tried out Redhat but went to Mandrake because it seemed to have better support for a fonky video card I was using last year. At this point, I have been using it for several months, I'm familiar with it now so I guess I'll stick with it as long as I can.

    BUT, the first distro to come out with native support for my Geforce 4 - Ti4200 VIVO card will get my vote and I'll switch to them. I bought this card for doing editing video and getting it to do that with Linux is a bear.

    Mandrake gets my vote for being fairly friendly to n00bs, it's what I recommend to first timers.

    Oh yeah, I hope they fix that STUPID SUPERcrapMOUNT in 9.1 !!! Stupidmount is total garbage and makes n00bs go insane! I can deal with it but some people just never will get the hang of it..

  152. Re:the french connection by TKinias · · Score: 1

    scripsit MyHair:

    Mandrake is the ONLY good thing ever to come from France.

    I assume from this statement that you don't drink wine, and don't eat at all.

    Mmmmmmmmm. Fries.

    Um, frites (=``French fries'') are Belgian, not French.

    --
    In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
  153. Clue.. by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    ..is keeping your Mandrake distro up to date via ftp/rsync mirrors, not wasting bandwidth/time/CDRs on ISO downloads whenever a new version comes out.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  154. Re:Mandrake-land of cheese eating surrender monkey by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    troll

  155. Vietnam trounced the US by kupci · · Score: 1

    So what does that makes us? Super power wimps?

    1. Re:Vietnam trounced the US by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      No they didn't. We beat them on the battlefield every time they faced us. We gave up because we weren't supported at home and the South Vietnamese people hated their own government. The Viet Cong were much more effective at winning hearts minds than we were.

  156. Nah, it's Oil (Black Gold!) contracts by kupci · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Both France and Germany have USD Billions of contracts with Iraq ... that's about to be null and void, eh?

    1. Re:Nah, it's Oil (Black Gold!) contracts by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Mod this up!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  157. Not dead yet.. by Zapdos · · Score: 2, Funny

    But after having to pay for that bandwidth spike caused by slashdot.

  158. Re:the french connection by Centinel · · Score: 1
    In Heaven...

    _all the chefs are French
    _all the mechanics are German
    _all the police are British
    _all the lovers are Italian
    _and the whole place is run by the Swiss!

    In Hell...

    _all the chefs are British
    _all the mechanics are French
    _all the police are German
    _all the lovers are Swiss
    _and the whole place is run by the Italians!

  159. Re:the french connection by TKinias · · Score: 1

    scripsit Alex:

    Cheese, wine, food, women with hairy armpits ????

    s/women with hairy armpits/Laetitia Casta/

    --
    In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
  160. Re:Knoppix owes a lot to Mandrake-kudzu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually both owe to RedHat that created the kudzu library. Knoppix built upon that, as well as Mandrake.

  161. urpmi vs. apt by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

    I don't think that urpmi compares to apt for Debian yet. apt-get dist-upgrade is something I don't think Mandrake can do yet and I have never had any problems with broken packages, lib dependencies, lib dependencies, and more lib dependencies while using apt.
    urpmi is nice but why not just use apt for rpm? More rpm-based distributions running apt repositories, the better. As far as I know the apt repositiories I use are run by volunteers so I need to go volunteer a little cash to thank them :)
    Before anyone flames me, I do realize apt for rpm doesn't have the capabilities of Debian apt either. I just believe apt is a better tool than urmpi.

    1. Re:urpmi vs. apt by RedBear · · Score: 1

      Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that "urpmi --auto-select" is pretty much the equivalent of "apt-get dist-upgrade". It will upgrade all packages for which there are newer versions in the urpmi database.

      I used Debian for about 18 months on my personal computer and liked it, but I also had a host of dependency problems with apt-get. If you're updating from a source that changes on a regular basis, you have to use "apt-get update" or "urpmi.update SOURCENAME" religiously before you do any upgrading. Otherwise either one will happily crap out with broken or missing packages.

      I finally gave up on Debian and switched to Mandrake because it's easy to use and very easy to install. It's nice to have the kind of control over everything that Debian gives you, but it's also nice to be able to install the OS and get everything configured in under 2 weeks. I was even able to set up encrypted swap and an encrypted storage partition just by checking a box in the Mandrake installer and putting in a passphrase. In Debian, I still have no clue how to begin to set up encrypted partitions. You have to figure out how to set up loopback devices and probably get an updated kernel, maybe even compile it yourself with the right options, etc.

      The long and short is I got tired of messing with Linux and decided I just wanted to *use* my computer. And with the new gcc 3.2 base, Mandrake Linux is passably fast even on my old 300MHz laptop, whereas before the only distro that wasn't intolerably slow on that machine was Debian.

      Mandrake makes a good distro. Most of their financial troubles have nothing to do with the distro. That all came about because the previous CEO decided they should focus on setting up some sort of poorly-defined "educational services", which he then dumped tons of money into and it never went anywhere. They finally got rid of him and now they're getting back to focusing on what they do best, making a damn fine Linux distribution.

      I really, really, really wish that people would do just a little more research and stop giving Mandrake a weekly beat-down for all the wrong reasons. They deserve a little more moral support from the community, even if you don't happen to like or use their Mandrake Linux. For those of us who just want to *use* Linux, not experiment with it, Mandrake Linux rocks. Give it a try.

    2. Re:urpmi vs. apt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the reason apt for Debian is so good is that, in Debian, there are set policies regulating the packages. Running apt-get install x on Debian downloads the package, configures it with debconf, and installs that package's files according to Debian policy. The weakness of apt for rpm is that it is not part of a larger packaging system. urpmi is a little better than apt for rpm only because the packages generally come from Mandrake and, consequently, are a part of a larger packaging system. But the weakness with apt for Debian, and the entire Debian packaging system, is that everyone must follow the Debian policy, or the system breaks somewhat. An example are the Dan Bernstein packages: they break Debian policy, but their binaries can't be modified to conform. (By the way, Debian gets around the problem by offering source packages that can be modified to conform.)

  162. Re:not any more by Centinel · · Score: 1
    "Actually, Americans weren't quite so selfless. During both World War II and the Cold War, they were told that their own freedom depended on saving Europe's freedom. They were strongly opposed to entering World War II until Pearl Harbor -- by which time more than 100,000 of those allegedly cowardly Frenchmen had died fighting Germany, only to be conquered. Yet to hear today's hawks tell it, the French surrendered without a struggle and welcomed Hitler to Paris; and today they are spurning their benefactors -- us Americans -- who are nobly trying to save them from today's Hitler, Iraq's Saddam Hussein.

    Well, the French remember the first Hitler, and they don't see the analogy. They think the United States is pushing for a needless war against a regime that poses no threat to them, let alone to the United States, which, with typical Gallic effrontery and ethnocentrism, they consider to be across the Atlantic, out of reach of Iraq. They see nothing to be gained by such a war, but they see dangers for everyone; and they don't want to be dragged into it. This is now 'anti-Americanism.'

    [...]

    'Experience keeps a dear school,' Benjamin Franklin said, 'but a fool will learn in no other.' The Europeans have learned bitter lessons in that school; Americans are just now enrolling."

    --Joseph Sobran, "The School of Experience"

    Before you're so quick to diss the French, you might want to bone up on your history and recall just who saved America's ass at Yorktown.

  163. Re:the french connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Cheese, wine, food, women with hairy armpits ????

    Hey, hairy armpit chicks rule! They usually have those sexy thick bushes, too.

  164. But does RH ship apt? by buchanmilne · · Score: 1
    Without touching off a flame war, I will have to disagree with:

    Redhat has nothing that can touch urpmi.


    There is a version of apt for RedHat-- Here's how to install and use it in RH 8:

    Download and install these:


    (a whole bunch of links to freshrpms.net for apt etc)

    In other words, freshrpms.net has something that can touch urpmi, but not Redhat.

    BTW, Mandrake includes apt in the contribs ...
  165. Well.. by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    I'm not American, so..

    --
    USA, One nation under God - UK, One nation under USA

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:Well.. by TKinias · · Score: 1

      scripsit CausticWindow:

      USA, One nation under God - UK, One nation under USA

      Elsewhere:

      You're either with us or against us.

      All right, you've truly confused me. If you're not happy about the UK being the 51st state (as your sig implies you're not), why bash the French for not queueing up to be the 52d?

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    2. Re:Well.. by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about 51st or 52nd states, or anything like it.

      I was merely commenting on what seems to be the prevailing US worldview. God -> USA -> UK - Truely ruling other lands liberty

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  166. supermount? by kinaole · · Score: 0

    I run mandrake on a laptop, and supermount renders the cd/rw unusable - disabling and putting a normal mount point in fstab works tho.

  167. Re:the french connection by MyHair · · Score: 1

    Um, frites (=``French fries'') are Belgian, not French.

    I know they aren't French; that was part of my lame joke. :-)

  168. Re:the french connection by ALundi · · Score: 1

    "Mandrake is the ONLY good thing ever to come from France. I assume from this statement that you don't drink wine, and don't eat at all."

    I would hope this was meant in gest. If not, I would encourage the writer to keep in mind that many of the principles embraced by Jefferson and others in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the U.S. were based on the ideas of Voltaire and Rousseau. Or, I would encourage the author to read some Anatole France, Zola, Camus, or Dumas, or really take in the beauty of a Cezanne, Renoir, Monet, or Matiesse, and perhaps listen to Ravel, Couperien, or Debussy. Even sampling a small amount of these other creations of France by a Mandrake user would be appreciated.

  169. What about VNC? by Euan+Buchanan · · Score: 1
    Assming that what you're after is hooking in to a remote machine graphically. Runs on top of Windows or *nix so pretty portable

    Also has the advantage of being stateless on the client, i.e. disconnect from the server, reconnect and you're back where you you were. http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/

    1. Re:What about VNC? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      I'm familiar with VNC but I would prefer to use plain X if possible - VNC seems like the low-budget option somehow (only full screen display is possible, no cut and paste, and other things). But in the end it might come down to speed. Which is more usable over a modem link: X with some extension like lbx, or VNC with some form of compression?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  170. Re:Mandrake 9.1 RC1 burned me a bit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what I thought ... to quote Kelly What's her name in "Top Gun" ... "That's some of the gutsiest flying I've ever seen."

    Then I read the machine specs. Obviously a fool-around server.

  171. I got it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Use prerelease version of MDK on production server
    2. Whine on slashdot when said prerelease version eats HD
    3. ???
    4. PROFIT!!!!

  172. Re:Mandrake installation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True ... but ReiserFS wasn't the default. You could have played "truly noobie" and just kept clicking the defaults, answered a small handful of straightforward questions and watched it reboot into a working system (far simpler than a Win 98 install) in about 45 minutes from breaking the seal on the box to logging in for the first time (and finding that sound greated you because all that stuff was already done.)

    I use ReiserFS on all of my partitions ... and have since it was introduced as an install option. Smooth!

    What journaling filesystem does Windows offer?

  173. Not exactly 55 years by Freezing+Polaris · · Score: 2, Informative
    It would be more like 188 years, actually...

    The famous sentence "La garde meurt mais ne se rend pas" (the guard dies but does not surrender) is attributed to general Cambronne, in Waterloo, as he was already wounded, and the English troops commanded him to surrender with the imperial guard, which he leaded. Hugo would write later that the real winner of Waterloo was Cambronne, for his heroic behaviour in front of adversity.

    More accurate evidences seem to suggest that the sentence actually was from general Michel, who found death during this battle. Cambronne's answer was shorter, although no less heroic, in the form of the famous "word of Cambronne": Merde ! (Shit !).

    Supposed dead during the battle, Cambronne was captured by the english military, then freed and sentenced to martial court by the new french monarchy for having served under Bonaparte, before being freed again to serve the Bourbons.

    So perharps it makes the citation more appropriate for poor Mandrake, willing to fight until its last breath without admitting defeat, the way real stubborn french people do.

    Reminds me of another famous citation, from Cyrano de Bergerac, a fictional character of Edmod Rostand:

    Que dites-vous ? C'est inutile ? Je le sais, mais on se bat pas dans l'espoir du succès.

    (Lame translation: What do you say ? it's useless ? I know that, but one does not fight hoping for success).

    --

    All generalizations are false, including this one...

  174. I feel happy! I feel happy! by leonbrooks · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I dont understand why people are saying they are going away. The only place I hear about "Mandrake Linux is dying!" would be slashdot.

    And Open For Business (unusual for Tim Butler to make this kind of blue, but...)

    Gael Duval made the mistake of comparing the "bankruptcy protection" that Mandrake is under with a US Chapter 11. They are completely different. The idea in the US is that at this point the vultures gather and peck the unfortunate company to death (although when this happens to Microsoft I expect a number of uncultured louts to be gathered around EULA bonfires wearing party hats and making toasts with MSDN CDs); in France, the idea is that the company is repaired and gets a chance to catch its breath. The French government has approved Mandrake's plan for doing so.

    It's worth reiterating that Mandrake are making a profit, but they've got some financial baggage from the halcyon dot-com days when a bright-eyed bushy-tailed and basically dumb management team spent too much money chasing non-core-business dreams.

    I personally don't like some of the things Gael has done, but Mandrake as a whole is enthusiastic and productive. They're helping efforts like KDE enormously as well, and unlike certain other noisy for-profits who run everything as root, Mandrake GPL everything they do and actually publish the sources. They about as close to Debian as an RPM-based for-profit corp can be, and with a much more obvious concern for usability.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  175. Okay. You're right. by Idou · · Score: 1

    I now look at the scenario this way:

    Exclude iso downloads to club members and cheapbytes buys one membership so that it can download the iso and then sell it for $5 each. Exclude all iso downloads for a while and cheapbytes buys the box set and starts selling cds for $5 each. Since one of the things that makes Mandrake so great is its lack of restrictive licensing, I guess there really is no way around this.

    If Mandrake depends on the community supporting it, I am afraid you guys will only get just enough to eat and will have to broadcast a "crisis" every once in a while to get funding (like PBS, here in the states).

    That leaves services. Being able to vote for packages, access the mirror script, and use the splat forums are real services. Having dedicated servers for members will be great, but they may also be expensive, which means less money to developers like you. Also, services can take time to catch on.

    Restricting access to the ISO's seemed the perfect way to increase revenue without expenses, but as you pointed out, there is just no way for it to work, and I am sure Deno has come to that conclusion since that post.

    So I guess there is not much more that I can do besides continue to support Mandrake, hope that others will do the same, and wish someone smarter than me would come up with a better way for Mandrake to make more money.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  176. No, he plugged Win2k into the 'net by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    Friend of a friend did that to download the updates, and the machine was history 11 minutes later. He went back to using Linux. (-:

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  177. Bells and whistles by the pound? by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    Everyone says they want the world to use Linux, but when someone produces a distro that is easy enough for Win users to use as a stepping stone to *cough* 'greater things', everyone mocks it for being too dumbed down.

    Perhaps what they want is a simple `UI Complexity' slider somewhere, like they used to have for their installer so you could set the slider to the right amount of disk space and the distro would select enough packages to fill that space for you.

    The UI slider could be set to near zero when installed, you could slide it all the way down to `George Jetson' mode for those, er, special clients and lock it there, or redline it if you like to decide what values get poked into what registers with what timing to set up your video card.

    Just don't let on that the `UI' stands for `User Intelligence' and you'll be fine. <G/D/R>

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  178. Re:the french connection by Freezing+Polaris · · Score: 1

    To the west, looking France, because this is the way your independance came from...

    --

    All generalizations are false, including this one...

  179. Re:Ability to write in English....Dead.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are evidence of the current, shitty calibre of trolls.

  180. what is Linux all about? by binarie · · Score: 0

    Oh common, every Bobby on the block has it's own home made disto of Linux now. Please, Linux is not about flavors and what software comes automaticaly installed durring the instalation of the Operating System. Every option/program that comes with Mandrake can be installed on any other flavor running same kernel. it's like this. int linux = kernel; int *redhat = int *mandrake = int *thenewbestdistroultra = It's all the SAME!

  181. Idea- Suggestion- Will never work- You decide by qwiqshot · · Score: 1

    I am in no way a programmer, linux expert, advertising pro, businesss guru or an all around genious..... But I had an idea & was wondering how hard this would be & if it would help the movement.... P2P, its everywhere, It puts a hurting on even the biggest of industries (Music, Movies & Software), Why not make a Ditro P2P app for all the peeps that want to support their (or all) distros? I for one am on cable & have no reserves on letting this thing run when Im out of the house, Hell I allready do this with Gnutella, Kazaa, Did on napster etc etc If all of the distros didnt have to pay for any bandwidth at all, Seems like it would be a big savings to me, Now I know they have mirrors at educational institutions & all, but it sure seems they would benifit if even more people got their distibutions & called for technical support & or went out & bought the newest release of a given distro's book.. Just a rant... Any suggestions or slaps in the face? ***** I reserve this idea to be given ONLY to people who want to use it under GPL Mark B

  182. Re:the french connection by thgreatoz · · Score: 0

    "...no signs of a direct threat."
    Yeah, nothing at all. Well, except for it's repeated refusal to now comply with UN weapons resolutions it agreed to years ago...apparently only to buy time for themselves once they saw there was no way to win the Gulf War.
    Yeah, there's no threat from Iraq. Well, no threat to the US, but maybe just a bit of a threat to Iraq's neighbor, Iran, who has been poison gassed repeatedly using chemical weapons banned by the above mentioned weapons treaties. Indeed, Saddam has gassed his own people with nerve toxins.
    Sure, Iraq may not be a direct MILITARY threat to us...we proved that back during Desert Storm. But he is certainly a direct threat to our way of life, one way being that he more or less controls the flow of a great deal of oil out of the arab states. (please leave out comments about our way of life being one of conquest and other nonsense.) And even if we didn't need his oil, the disgusting crimes against humanity that he is perpetrating cannot be allowed to continue. So why is it that the French were so glad to recieve our aid when THEY needed it, but now are so unwilling to help us aid another country that needs our help?

    --
    When their numbers dwindled from 50 to 8, the dwarves began to suspect Hungry.
  183. AAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRGHHHH... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Supermount!!! no! :(
    Mandrake has included supermount since 9.0, which i have running on my ACPI laptop cause it had the best compatibility with the hardware than other distros at the time. Supermount is one of the stupidest things to include in a distro, cause its hella buggy, unstable and screws a lot of other things up and can crash the kernel. Its also a pain in the ass when you want to compile a new kernel as it does not include supermount be default.

  184. Pulling me back? by StormReaver · · Score: 1

    I looked at the list of packages, and I'm tempted to switch back to Mandrake from Red Hat. Most of the packages missing from prior releases (kdevelop, slocate, and a few others) are directly listed. kcalc isn't there, but I presume it's bundled in with the kdeutils package.

    KDE 3.1 is there (I ran one of the first betas, and it was good even back then), and the wireless package is there (hopefully my two currently-useless Linksys WUSB11 2.6 cards will work out of the box).

    In two weeks, when I'll have my credit card paid off, I'm ordering 9.1 to replace my Red Hat 8.0 system (which I bought just last month). Here's hoping Mandrake has touched all the right bases this time.

  185. Re:the french connection by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

    Mandrake is the ONLY good thing ever to come from France.

    Hmm, the ext2 filesystem was mainly written by a French student way back when Linux wasn't so well known. Of course, it's importance is a bit smaller now with next generation filesystems (like ReiserFS, XFS ... and ext3, although ext3 owes a lot to ext2) but having it was crucial for Linux a few years ago so I would copnsider it to qualify as another good thing coming out of France.

    Although, if you are American you might consider the military help that came out of France during the independance war to be another good thing coming from France given that you might still be using sterling pounds if it wasn't for it.

    Just because you are prejudiced against a country doesn't mean that nothing good comes from it.

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  186. Re:the french connection by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

    "So why is it that the French were so glad to recieve our aid when THEY needed it, but now are so unwilling to help us aid another country that needs our help?"

    Because they don't agree with your reason to attack Iraq. When they agree on your reason to fight they are willing to help you, as shown during the American independence war, when France sent troops to help the revolutionaries.

    Just because France doesn't support the US in all and every situation doesn't mean that they are unwilling to help, it is simply a difference of opinion between two nations.

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  187. Re:the french connection by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

    "To the west, looking France"

    Whoa, unless you mean that the Statue of Liberty is looking west towards France across the whole US, pacific ocean and Asian continent or unless I am very much mistaken about it being in NYC and NYC being on the US east coast, near the Atlantic ocean, they it may be possible that you just might have been confused between east and west ;)

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  188. Re:the french connection by thgreatoz · · Score: 0

    That may be, but I think it's more a matter of convenience for them. They don't want to get involved so they cite a difference of opinion.

    --
    When their numbers dwindled from 50 to 8, the dwarves began to suspect Hungry.
  189. Logical fallacy man to the rescue! by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

    This is known as a hasty generalization.

    Have you read any of Slashdot today?

    How many people have you read that are criticizing Mandrake because of it's ease of use?

    THINK!

    I personally don't use Mandrake because of all of the problems I had getting it to install new versions of stuff that wasn't part of Mandrake's distribution page. Moreover, I noticed that you can't use the repositories for the previous version when the next version comes out - you have to upgrade when Mandrake does, or else you can't install any new packages without violating the dependencies. Obviously, this isn't going to be a problem for anyone that thinks that Mandrake has every package they will ever need, so for them it probably is a walk in the park to use.

    I'm sorry, but that's just not easy enough for me to use. Plus, the compiler version they've been shipping with blows, in my experience (maybe they've upgraded by now and it works - haven't given it another chance). It failed most of the time when compiling new packages for me (I couldn't even get the kernel to compile with the default options that Mandrake had on it). I switched because I wanted a distro that was flexible when it came to changing the dependencies, and which I could easily add take advantage of the package system to add my own very quickly.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Logical fallacy man to the rescue! by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      I personally don't use Mandrake because of all of the problems I had getting it to install new versions of stuff that wasn't part of Mandrake's distribution page.

      Did you try using contrib or PLF?

      Moreover, I noticed that you can't use the repositories for the previous version when the next version comes out

      Wrong, many mirrors keep old versions, otherwise you can mirror internally (as we do). Try ftp://mandrake.redbox.cz

      Obviously, this isn't going to be a problem for anyone that thinks that Mandrake has every package they will ever need

      Either that, or you are competent enough to package software properly (rpm is good at enforcing discipline in software management), and if suiteable, submit it to contribs.

      I couldn't even get the kernel to compile with the default options that Mandrake had on it

      # urpmi kernel-source
      # cd /usr/src/linux
      # make mrproper
      # make config
      # make bzImage modules install modules_install

      (you probably left out the mrpoper target, which is documented in the readme ...)

      I switched because I wanted a distro that was flexible when it came to changing the dependencies, and which I could easily add take advantage of the package system to add my own very quickly.

      $ genhdlist .

    2. Re:Logical fallacy man to the rescue! by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      Wrong, many mirrors keep old versions, otherwise you can mirror internally (as we do). Try ftp://mandrake.redbox.cz
      I spent about three hours back when I had 8.2 looking for one. If they're that hard to find, I'd rather switch distros. And yes, I did look in contrib. I'm not going to mirror internally. That's too much data for my little hard disc.

      Either that, or you are competent enough to package software properly (rpm is good at enforcing discipline in software management), and if suiteable, submit it to contribs.

      If I can't get the packages to compile, I can't make an RPM, can I? Besides, I don't *want* to have to make an rpm to include it in my package management system. I want it to be easy (not necessarily easy to learn - easy to use). It's a distro-breaker for me.

      (you probably left out the mrpoper target, which is documented in the readme ...)
      No I didn't. I read, and reread the readme, and tried different stuff to get it to work, including that. I thought there was something wrong with me. The thing that finally worked was "upgrading" the version of gcc using an rpm from redhat. Unfortunately, that broke a lot of other stuff on my system.

      Mandrake has not been a developer's distro in the past. Perhaps it is now, but that's why I switched.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    3. Re:Logical fallacy man to the rescue! by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      I spent about three hours back when I had 8.2 looking for one. If they're that hard to find, I'd rather switch distros.

      It takes you 3 hours to run a simple google search?

      And yes, I did look in contrib. I'm not going to mirror internally. That's too much data for my little hard disc.

      And you were complaining about too few packages? Anyway, 4GB is enough to mirror main and contrib for 1 release, hardly an unmanageable amount of data if you *really* care about ensuring you do not lose access to it.

      If I can't get the packages to compile, I can't make an RPM, can I?

      Well, that is the part I don't understand. I have been running Mandrake since 7.1, and have *never* had problems compiling any package using *only* RPMs in Mandrake (or extras which I made myself if they were not packaged).

      Besides, I don't *want* to have to make an rpm to include it in my package management system.

      Whichever package management system you use, you kind of have to use it for everything if you do not want to break it. There isn't really a way around that AFAIK.

      I want it to be easy (not necessarily easy to learn - easy to use).

      You could try checkinstall, but really, rpm is pretty simple, you could learn have a new package made from scratch in under an hour.

      The thing that finally worked was "upgrading" the version of gcc using an rpm from redhat

      Maybe you didn't have a compiler installed? How do you thing the Mandrake kernel maintainers compile the kernel? With RH compilers?

      Hint:
      [bgmilne@bgmilne bgmilne]$ cat /proc/version
      Linux version 2.4.19-16mdk (root@ttla) (gcc version 3.2 (Mandrake Linux 9.0 3.2-1mdk)) #1 Wed Sep 24 12:02:09 EDT 2003

      Mandrake has not been a developer's distro in the past. Perhaps it is now, but that's why I switched.

      Oh well, I wander what I have been doing then since Mandrake 7.1? And what did you switch to? Can not possibly be Redhat, since they also use RPM? Debain? Gentoo? LFS?

  190. What kind of experts? by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

    Mandrake Linux has been beaten down by linux experts...

    These are obviously "experts" who don't have to support non-technical users, which makes me wonder if their expertise is limited to their bedrooms in their parents' home. My experience has been that Mandrake is a pretty sweet deal if you're the only sysadmin in the department and have better things to do with your time than configure crap for the receptionist.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  191. Why I like Mandrake but would never support them by yoink! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mandrake huh? I remember when I walked into a friend's apartment and asked what that strange looking Windowing System was. KDE was the response; KDE included with the Mandrake Distribution of Linux. I believe it was version 5 at the time.

    So intrigued I was that, upon my return home, I downloaded and installed Mandrake right away. I was hooked. Having never used Linux before, I immediately downloaded Debian as well and started reading about this strange little kernel called Linux. So whilst I read all I could about Debian, I used Mandrake, learning far more in the using than in the reading. I in fact never got Debian to work they way I wanted and continued to use only Mandrake.

    My self-owned small business signed on with Mandrake to become Quebec's only distributor of the Power Pack series (at the time.) It was here that I ran into trouble. I was caught between my love of the distribution, and the hatred of their distribution system. I was forced to pre-buy large quantities of boxed Power Packs. I never got rid of a version set without having to buy more of the new version set. When all was said and done, and I was ready to give up the ghost, I had leftover power packs of 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 7.0, 7.1 and 7.2. Altogether I had spent over $1000K on Linux Mandrake Power Packs. I never made a cent, and in fact lost plenty. There was no response from any Mandrake offices; complaints and questions remained unanwered. Additionally, it took them several years to get my name of their list of resellers.

    So here I find myself, years later, introduced to Linux and the OpenSource community by then-little Linux Mandrake. I still have a Mandrake-based Linux install running at my home. The distro has been modified heavily and possibly retains little resemblance to any known Mandrake products but that's how it started. I have now used many OSes that would not have made their way into my life without Mandrake. I recently discovered the joys of the BSD OSes, all thanks to Mandrake.

    As much as I would like to say that I will be forever indebted to Linux Mandrake, the fact is that MandrakeSoft is really endebted to people who took a real hit early on simply because they loved the distribution so much. Although they have continued to put out a very useful distribution one has to wonder how other projects (with a much smaller bankroll) have survived and prospered.

    Nonetheless, I will still recommend Mandrake to anyone who asks, and proudly exclaim it still remains part of my home network. My previous finacial and promotional support met with no rewards and even less satisfaction. They seem unable to run a economically viable ship and as has been the case with many other companies producing good products, tough luck. I do hope they survive, and I hope people have had a better experience with the business side of things than I have. Their product opens up a world of possibilites for those who want an easy-to-use and inexpensive alternative to the costly but widely accepted operating systems for the x86 platform. I wish them luck in their future endeavours.

  192. Re:the french connection by IceFreak2000 · · Score: 0
    s/women with hairy armpits/Laetitia Casta/

    s/Laetitia Casta/Vanessa Paradis/

    Phwoar!

    --
    Life is like a sewer; what you get out of it depends on what you put into it...
  193. 4.21 IS unstable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... not that it exists yet but when it does
    it will be unstable. The poster didn't write 2.4.21, he wrote 4.21, hence the fun.

    Peder

  194. Re:Ability to write in English....Dead.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you're posting to an English news site, then you should try and make sure your submission is in English.

    Then again, if you're an editor at an English news site, you should EDIT FOR FUCKS SACKE

  195. It is a damn complicated tool! by rastos1 · · Score: 1
    > is ridiculous to me

    For me it is ridiculous, that you want to use a tool zillion of times more complicated than a hammer in the same way as you use a hammer.

    You don't need a manual to operate a hammer. However you should read the manual for a tool that can calculate your taxes, play music/video, animate Titanic, serve data in network, connect you to your bank, handle your schedule, ...

    I don't know how it is in your country, but when I buy a radio here, there is a manual included with big letters: Read the instructions before use! I don't have to read it. Also you don't have to learn everything about your tool. But 'ignoring the instructions may void varanty on this product' ...

  196. Re:the french connection by Freezing+Polaris · · Score: 1

    East, sorry. Almost grown up now, and still mistaking left and right...

    --

    All generalizations are false, including this one...

  197. You must like XP then ... by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

    since that is what RH8.x looks like (ie too childish for a corporate network).

  198. Used to have this ... by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

    Mandrake used to have this (IIRC in 7.x), but they took it out since users installed too much software and never configured it, then complained when (after not keeping up with updates, which were more frequent than necessary since they installed all the servers) they were hacked.

    Better to know which software you need, and install it. Both (knowing which softare to install, and installing it) are trivial.

  199. proprietary software by deno · · Score: 1

    Guess what: MadnrakeLinux has no proprietary components in the core of its distribution.

    Interesting difference with some other folks, no?

    Guess further: what will be the next step when some distro gets you hooked on because of some proprietary add-on they have? By-by the reason for having Linux in the first place.

  200. Huh??? by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

    Hello??? This is a users screenshot. Maybe he has IE running (legally, if he has windows) under Wine.

    Mandrake most certainly does not include the IE icon or the aqua theme the user is using.

    Try one of the other screenshots (the Galaxy ones) to see Mandrake 9.1rc1 out-the-box.

  201. Mandrake is close enough ... by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

    [bgmilne@printserver mandrake]$ du -sh cooker \
    contrib
    2.2G cooker
    1.7G contrib

    And I am not even including all the extras (such as Tomcat) on the CDs, or the software in PLF,rpmhelp etc.

  202. Please mod parent up by Idou · · Score: 1

    Of all that is holy, please mod parent up.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  203. Yorktown? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Before you're so quick to diss the French, you might want to bone up on your history and recall just who saved America's ass at Yorktown [pbs.org]." Not even worth doing. The French people involved with that are long LONG dead. The current French with their appalling lack of knowledge of global affairs and their censorious government and lack of respect for worker rights are what is the reality today.

  204. t-shirts for girlfriends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what you mean geeks have girlfriends that havent bought there own mandrake t-shirt yet.

  205. mod parent up by ReinoutS · · Score: 1

    And by the way, the reason the JRE isn't included in the *download* version (it's in the boxed version, mind you), is that the Sun JDK is proprietary software. The download version of Mandrake is one hundred percent GPL.

  206. Re:Ability to write in English....Dead.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fucking fuck off -- you fucking fucker fucker! FUCK YOU and all the fucks you fuck. FUCKER!

  207. Agree, but not talking about packages... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...talking about a `UI-complexity slider' as a means of adjusting a whole flock of UI settings to expose or mask various features of the UI. I only used the package selector as an illustration of something akin to this which had already been tried.

    Perhaps I should take it to Cooker as a serious suggestion?

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  208. Boxed sets (Re:Wrong!) by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    One thing that bothers me is the lag time between the release and the boxed sets. I frequently buy software at CompUsa, and it takes a long time to get Mandrake after the ISO is released. They never DID get 9.0! And I heard that ordering direct from Mandrake wasn't much better. I'm in favor of keeping free downloads, but it seems to me that having a long period where you CAN'T get a boxed set encourages freeloading.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  209. Re:Ability to write in English....Dead.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    calibre? calibre? fuck off you POS brit fuck.