Slashdot Mirror


Serial ATA Drives Mature and Get Faster

MojoDog writes "Serial ATA drives are still as scarce as hen's teeth but what models are trickling out from Seagate and Maxtor, are beginning to look promising. This article and performance analysis shows the new DiamondMax Plus 9 SATA Hard Drive putting up some impressive figures in standard SATA 150 and SATA 150 RAID 0 configurations."

189 comments

  1. Notes from the field...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Has anyone out there actually used serial ATA out there? Any stories, good/bad?

    1. Re:Notes from the field...? by KateKarnage · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes...

      I put a pair of barracuda Vs in my rebuilt (WinXP) PC this weekend, as I was rebuilding anyway, and managed to get hold of a couple. I mainly use my PC for audio recording and editing.

      Currently I have them in a RAID 1 conf as a mirrored data volume on an ASUS A7NX Delux & AthlonXP 2700+ (I do a lot of AV work for my band, and have had a few disks go down in the past 3 years, so I'm sacrificing the potential performance boost of RAID 0 for the piece of mind - I have plently of space anyhow.

      First thoughts - well installation was easy, cable routing and tidying was MUCH easier - the only niggle being the power adapters adding another point of connector failure and more length to already long power cables. This has also allowed me to put my PATA DVD rom and DVD -R drive on seperate IDE channels.

      So far, I haven't run any real benchmarks, apart from 'Well it all feels just as responsive as with PATA 133 drives' :) - I'm not expecting a massive performance increase, as the controller on the motherboard is a bridge to the existing ATA133 Controller IIRC, so although the drives may be communicating at 150, there's a bottleneck there, and anyway.

      Well, I left it doing a 24 hour set of video renders last night (partially as a burn-in test, partially because they needed doing) so I should see later if any major problems have shown up.

      --
      KateKarnage - Goth, Geek, Not all there......
    2. Re:Notes from the field...? by machine+of+god · · Score: 0

      can you mod a moderation funny?

    3. Re:Notes from the field...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was trying to build a Raid-0 system using a 3ware board 8508, 1 Maxtor SATA drive, and 3 bridged PATA drives.

      The stupid 15-pin power cable connector broke and the SATA then melted. Something shorted out or went to 0 volts and the SATA drive went hyper, turned red-hot and melted.

      Because of voltage/current spikes I also lost the 3 PATA drives(they chatter now). I just replaced the power-supply because I think the power supply has been compromised.

      Do not use the SATA power cables if you can, instead try to find a SATA Backplane.
      (http://www.enhance-tech.com/products/ peripherals. html#idefw)

    4. Re:Notes from the field...? by KateKarnage · · Score: 1

      Had the system on for 48 hours now doing video renders - not a glitch.

      Those baracudas run extreemley hot, but they have been very quiet.

      --
      KateKarnage - Goth, Geek, Not all there......
    5. Re:Notes from the field...? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      RAID 1 is the way to go for you obviously. Dont worry about performance. With RAID 0 you get double read/write but with RAID 1 you still get the double read speed. Since you can record at a set needed amount ot bandwidth your write speed should be fine. What you really need is what you have, safety and read speed. The time you really need speed is in editing a file, loading it up with an editing program can take a long time so i think you made the right choice.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    6. Re:Notes from the field...? by KateKarnage · · Score: 1

      I think the double read speed is going to depend on the implimentation of the RAID controller (I'm still not sure how good these low cost ata-raid controllers are - having spent most of my working life with enterprise class SCSI systems)

      Thanks for reminding me about potential double read speed - I'll be benchmarking that to check out the controller.

      As I said - the main reason I chose RAID 1 is I used to have a SCSI U2W card in the machine, and used SCSI 10k drives, I've lost 3 of them (from a variety of manufacturers) - even when being careful with cooling and so on, so, when I can effectively replace 1 SCSI drive with 2 SATA drives in a mirror for a similar price, and still have more storage than the allegedly more reliable SCSI drives. If these go well, then I definately think I'll be getting another SATA RAID controller, and just keep adding pairs of drives.

      So.. another convert from SCSI...

      --
      KateKarnage - Goth, Geek, Not all there......
    7. Re:Notes from the field...? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      Well my main point was that although i prefer ATA drives over SCSI anyday (sooooo much cheaper its almost throwing away money on SCSI), SCSI will still end up being faster. Because of the differance in the actual drives that are built for SCSI they can do many things better which no matter how quick your ATA bus is SCSI can still win. Personally im getting ready to buy some nice SATA drives in a RAID for my personal computer as soon as i can (as soon as i can get a job that is :)). I like the idea of having so much space on the bus i dont need to take out drives but as you said simple keep adding pairs.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  2. Not that promissing... by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 0, Insightful

    From the article: Our first look at a Serial ATA drive, quite frankly, was a little less than inspiring. That is to say that, even though the SATA 150 standard offers a higher bandwidth interface and those tidy, thin little cables, the performance of the first drive to hit our bench, a Seagate Barracuda V, was about on par with the average ATA100 or ATA133 drive on the market.

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
    1. Re:Not that promissing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good. you can post the part of an article that refers to part of a previous article, completely irrelevant to the current one.

      For your next trick, try posting comments about Win3.11 when the review of the next Windows appears.

      Also, make sure when Mac OSX Panther comes out that you refer to disappointments with System 7.

    2. Re:Not that promissing... by realnowhereman · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Except they're talking about their previous look, not this one. Read the rest of the article.

      The performance of this drive is raved about and their only complaint seemed to be the one year warranty instead of three.

      --
      Carpe Daemon
    3. Re:Not that promissing... by castroja · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is that really surprising to you? The Cuda V is slow regardless of interface so of course it's not going to 'showcase' SATA any differently than if the drive is was an ATA100 interface. The improved cabling alone is worth negligable increases in performace for the time being.

    4. Re:Not that promissing... by NomNet · · Score: 1
      Our first look at a Serial ATA drive, quite frankly, was a little less than inspiring. That is to say that, even though the SATA 150 standard offers a higher bandwidth interface and those tidy, thin little cables, the performance of the first drive to hit our bench, a Seagate Barracuda V, was about on par with the average ATA100 or ATA133 drive on the market.

      Er, what did they expect ? Internally, the IDE DiamondMax Plus 9 is identical to the SATA one. There's obviously not gonna be any performance difference between a pair of the same drives !

      You can't speed a drive up by changing the interface. If they ripped out the IDE electronics, and replaced em with SCSI, it would still be a Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9, and would still perform exactly the same.

    5. Re:Not that promissing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WRONG!

      Maximum transfer rate yes.. performance? no.. SCSI is much higher perofrmance than IDE os SATA. based on the fact that it is a peer- to peer device instead of a master-dumbslave combination.

      A Drive to drive copy will be much faster with scsi than with IDE or SATA.

    6. Re:Not that promissing... by NomNet · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Maximum transfer rate yes.. performance? no.. SCSI is much higher perofrmance than IDE os SATA. based on the fact that it is a peer- to peer device instead of a master-dumbslave combination.

      Assuming normal use (ie, non-RAID, one device), then master-slave/peer-to-peer makes no difference to performance, for obvious reasons. The physical discs themselves are the limiter - the interface has nothing to do with it.

      A Drive to drive copy will be much faster with scsi than with IDE or SATA.

      How do you figure that out ?
      If the two physical drives can sustain 50MB/s, then your "drive to drive copy" is never gonna exceed 50MB/s. You've got 133MB/s to spare on the IDE bus, so your pair of drives aren't being limited by the interface (50MB/s read, 50MB/s write, leaves 33MB/s for overheads).

      WRONG!

      Quite.

      I suggest you go and do some research. There certainly are areas where SCSI performs *much* better than IDE, but you don't seem to know about them.

    7. Re:Not that promissing... by diablobynight · · Score: 1

      SCSI drives perform better because they are different drives, it is not simply because they are SCSI. Most current drives have a sustainable drive read rate of 48MBps, which is far under the 133. And I imagine, that in a drive to drive copy on the same system you will be limited on the write speed of a drive which is much slower than its read speed. SCSI drives are often faster because they are 10,000 or 15,000 RPM drives, as apposed to 7500 RPM drives. They are physically different drives. And why are you assuming he has them in a master dumb slave combination, most computer users take advantage of IDE raid these days. And why on earth would you be doing a drive to drive copy with SCSI, if you have SCSI wouldn't you have them in RAID 0,1,5 ? In which case you can't do a drive to drive copy because the computer sees the multiple drives as one drive? I am glad you posted under anonymous coward, I wouldn't have put my name on that post either.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    8. Re:Not that promissing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...most computer users take advantage of IDE raid these days.

      And, uhm, WHO are these users? I know many people of all walks of life and technical abilities, and none of them do RAID. I think you should step out your alternate reality and back into the real world.

    9. Re:Not that promissing... by packeteer · · Score: 1

      Well this only matters if your drive is native SCSI. If you put a regular old IDE drive on a SCSI bus it would perform the same. The differance is that SCSI drives are expected to be better so are made with higher quality drive parts. The actual disc to buffer rate is better than that of IDE. But you are mostly correct about the interface not mattering. The gain made from say ATA100 to ATA133 is small because of how it REALLY works. The gain made is not tranfering a whole 133 mb's a second. The differance is made when you are trying to transfer at maximum speed for say 1/8th of a second. The drive that can transfer about 4 mb's a second faster (ATA133) will empty out the buffer faster but in the end even the ATA100 drive will catch up in large I/O's. So really the interface IS noteworthy but if you want speed get SCSI or an 8mb buffer drive.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  3. Grrrrr Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any ideas if the xserve is upgradable to SATA? We've just bought 9 units late last year, and to see this tech out now is frustrating. I wish manufacturers could get their act together.

    A cheap card with 4x SATA connections offered as a discount to people who've just recently bought ATA equipment wuld go down very well from vendors! Not likely I'll see it happen Grrrrr

    1. Re:Grrrrr Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, I know how you feel. I purchased a Duron 1100 just last year, and now AMD have brought out the AthlonXP 2100+! They should provide a new motherboard and CPU cheap, as I recently purchased what is now obsolete technology. I mean, its only fair, isn't it?

    2. Re:Grrrrr Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's probably a PCI card out already, if not there will be soon, so yes the xserve will be able to handle SATA in time if not already.

      What I want to know is why you would expect anyone other than yourself to pay for it?. You obviously wanted xserves, so you got xserves and you paid for xserves. Is there some hidden part of the sale contract that makes you believe you're entitled to cheap future tech?

    3. Re:Grrrrr Apple by mattrix2k · · Score: 0

      You can currently get SATAATA converters although they obviously limited by the speed of ATA.

    4. Re:Grrrrr Apple by jridley · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, manufacturers should stop coming out with new stuff, it only makes people who bought stuff last week feel bad.

      Either that, or they should provide a roadmap of all technologies they plan on releasing for the next 10 years, with a timetable.

      Oh yeah, and be sure to include that schedule for unscheduled downtime and natural disasters. CNN might want a copy.

  4. Hidden wiring/tidiness by baryon351 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of the things I love about SATA is the simple clean wiring, but it's not something I see done very well in most case mods. Anyone seen images or sites related to making a truly minimal case inside? Hidden or extremely tidy floppy, CD, power and drive cables? I'd love to see how others have handled their tidy up jobs.

    1. Re:Hidden wiring/tidiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'd love to see how others have handled their tidy up jobs.

      Well, depending on where you're "working" I recommend using a dry tissue to clean up the mess first and then go over the area with a damp tissue afterwards to sanitize the area. You may have repeat these steps in order to clean up the entire mess.

    2. Re:Hidden wiring/tidiness by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Anyone seen images or sites related to making a truly minimal case inside?

      Uhhh.... Yeah. :-)
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Hidden wiring/tidiness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SATA wiring isn't very clean. You need twice as much wires and height of the connector is bigger.

    4. Re:Hidden wiring/tidiness by xyote · · Score: 3, Insightful

      SATA is just a start. There are other things that contribute to the problem. There's the wiring harness on the power supply. That's one mess of spagetti. Also, they still need to get ATAPI supported in SATA so you can get DVD/CDROM off of parallel cables. Case design is also a factor. Apparently, wire and cable routing is not one of the issues addressed in case design. Position and layout of physical components always seems to be the worst possible from a cable layout point of view. You always seem to be taking the long way around, forcing sharp right angle turns in fat cable/wire bundles and competing for too little space to place separate cables along side each other.

    5. Re:Hidden wiring/tidiness by Simonetta · · Score: 1

      Since nearly every PC has the same wiring, why not actually build the wires and connectors directly into the case? Most of the components (CD-R, DVD, floppy) are the same form factor so that cases could be designed for standardized compartments for drives and boards.

    6. Re:Hidden wiring/tidiness by jridley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was part owner of a clone building place once. We used to have informal contests to see who could build the neatest PC (using stock case/etc). We would clamp up custom flat cables (this was years ago, before the era of round cables), making them so that each connector was in exactly the right place, and facing the right way. We had what I thought was an innovative little feature; at the time it was almost standard to put in both 3.5 and 5.25" drives; so we put TWO controller connectors in, 1 inch apart, with a twist in between them; if you plugged on in, the 3.5" was A:, if you plugged the other in, the 5.25" was A:. We also clamped on an aux socket for the (then popular) floppy tape backup drive.

      We also did a lot of folding to make things lie flat (we called this "cablegami").

      If a setup had elements that proved easy enough to do, we incorporated them into our standard build. We got to the point where we were making custom cables for most one-off machines (the university's extremely-tightly-bid, low-low margin, 50-identical machines got stock cables).

      Even with the tech of the time, we got it pretty clean and hid a lot of the wires. Of course, we did this partially by running cables UNDER the mainboard. Also there were a lot of cable ties involved. The machines were super clean looking inside, but they were a bitch to upgrade.

      Also, obviously that was something that only worked because we were just 3 guys making machines in a small building; if we had to make 200 machines a day all that innovation never would have happened; we'd have been too busy to screw around with it.

  5. Re:serial ATA rox! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    but scsi is better!!!

    but scsi is old (lot of wires) and expensive.
    Are IDE/S-ATA disks less reliable than SCSI on purpose (marketing) or only because we remember they were and think they still are ?
  6. Painful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    what models are trickling out from Seagate and Maxtor, are beginning to look promising.

    The sound you can hear is the echo of the breaking of the hearts of ten thousand grammar nazis.

    1. Re:Painful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sound you can hear is the echo of the breaking of the hearts of ten thousand grammar nazis.

      We have no hearts, Herr Coward.

    2. Re:Painful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you did, they would be glad for a chance to show disdain for some fellow humans.

  7. Seems like they say wait... by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 4, Informative

    As the tech is still pretty new, and could use some tuning. Not too surprising, most new tech seems to follow ths path.

    Does being an early adopter really have much benefit besides bragging rights?

    I was planning on waiting anyhow, this just seems to confirm my original instincts.

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    1. Re:Seems like they say wait... by baryon351 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does being an early adopter really have much benefit besides bragging rights?

      Curiosity. Somewhat like nabbing and installing a beta copy of some software and checking out where it's at. If I had the cash and felt the satisfaction of my own curiosity was worth it, I'd have a few SATA drives running, just for the hell of it.

      It gives some geektypes something to talk about, ponder over, and throw opinions around on where stuff's heading.

      Then yes, there's bragging rights :)

      It's nothing too serious, really. People are people and some of us just like new stuff

    2. Re:Seems like they say wait... by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Beta software I understand, you can always upgrade... and as often as not, it's free.

      Early adopting hardware seems to be a risk, as you're spending money, and you have to be pretty lucky to get it for free.

      If I had the money to burn however....

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    3. Re:Seems like they say wait... by ostiguy · · Score: 1

      Nah,EMC and some others have held off for SATA 2, which will have better hot swap support and transfer rates, IIRC.

      ostiguy

    4. Re:Seems like they say wait... by Sgs-Cruz · · Score: 2, Funny
      I was planning on waiting anyhow, this just seems to confirm my original instincts. What does not kill me just postpones the inevitable.
      . People, people, people. You have to start checking for conflicts between your sig and your message. I mean, using Serial ATA might shorten the life of your data or something, but it won't kill you!
      --

      Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).

    5. Re:Seems like they say wait... by arkanes · · Score: 1

      Someone has to do that testing. Early adopters trade the risk of the technology being crap vrs. the odds of it working. If everyone waited for the price to come down, or whatever, it'd never happen. More than one decent technology has been pushed aside because of this.

    6. Re:Seems like they say wait... by jhawkins · · Score: 1
      I understand that technology is improved (at least partially) through trial and error, but why should I pay a higher price to be a guinea pig.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I've got a Pentium-90 system I have to install windows 95 on....

  8. More Information by leibnizme · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you want to know more about the Serial ATA technology:

    Cnet

    SATA and ISCSI

    Intel Dev Paper

    Maxtor White Paper

    Serial ATA Working Group

    1. Re:More Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Karma whore. But I'll also add T10, the SCSI and Serial-SCSI guys and T13, the ATA and S-ATA guys Draft standards and other documents galore!

  9. Re:"Per say" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Writing "per say" does not imply ignorance "per se".

  10. Bluetooth Wires! (or no wires) by creamandchives · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This may sound silly, but how cool would it be to have some kind of wireless cabling system for connection between all pc devices (like bluetooth) i know its totaly inpracticle, but u could have one of those cool induction charging matts with a motherboard, hard drive, cdrom, etc just sitting on it with no wires! very trippy 8-)

    1. Re:Bluetooth Wires! (or no wires) by baryon351 · · Score: 1

      Absolutely!. Incredibly impractical with current tech, probably highly expensive, and a bit pointless for 99% of users. But utterly cool all the same

    2. Re:Bluetooth Wires! (or no wires) by mgv · · Score: 4, Funny

      This may sound silly, but how cool would it be to have some kind of wireless cabling system for connection between all pc devices (like bluetooth) i know its totaly inpracticle, but u could have one of those cool induction charging matts with a motherboard, hard drive, cdrom, etc just sitting on it with no wires! very trippy 8-)

      Until your little sister walks in and picks up the hard drive for your web server to make a good doorstop. :)

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    3. Re:Bluetooth Wires! (or no wires) by creamandchives · · Score: 1, Funny

      but with long range bluetooth, it would still work (except may need new power source... mini nuclear fusion?)

    4. Re:Bluetooth Wires! (or no wires) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Devices next to each other and no wires! This is like when I was kid and copied the music without cables. Hint: Loudspeaker, microphone...

    5. Re:Bluetooth Wires! (or no wires) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Devices next to each other and no wires! This is like when I was kid and copied the music without cables. Hint: Loudspeaker, microphone...

      You had wireless speakers and microphones? Awesome!

    6. Re:Bluetooth Wires! (or no wires) by klui · · Score: 1

      Not impractical, just requires some standards. IEEE or whomever can say a new type of drive bay should be designed so that drives connect to power recepticles when you insert them all the way into the bays. You would then connect one set of wires from the power supply to your case's drive cage and be done. Standardize on serial ATA/SCSI, and you can eliminate data wires (or minimize them), providing hot-swappable devices.

  11. The size of future computers... by march · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I once heard that the size of future computers will be limited by their component's connectors.

    That said, I wonder if we will ever get to the point of performance where a drive can sit next to a computer and communicate via a (secure) wireless connection - either RF or IR (or ??).

    Of course, then the above phrase will be that the size of future computers will be limited to their component's antennas.

    Basically, I've *got* to find some way to get rid of the huge clump of cables under my desk!

    1. Re:The size of future computers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Basically, I've *got* to find some way to get rid of the huge clump of cables under my desk!

      So get an eMac or an iMac. Power cord plugs into monitor, keyboard+mouse plug into monitor, Airport connects you to the network. Voila. The only cable is the one plugged into the AC outlet on the wall for power. The trouble is when people want to add useful accessories like Firewire hard drives, USB connected scanners and printers, docking stations for your Palm, external firewire DVD burner, surround sound speakers, etc.

    2. Re:The size of future computers... by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      >So get an eMac or an iMac

      And get rid of the huge clump of bank-notes under your desk while you`re at it!

    3. Re:The size of future computers... by ceeam · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well - if you wish so, you can put your head into microwave right now without waiting for the future to come.

    4. Re:The size of future computers... by MoreDruid · · Score: 1

      Yay! Imagine that, holding your harddrive next to your Bosses PC using Snortlike tech... imagine all the pr0n you'll have access to... oh, and company secrets too...
      No, I don't think that will ever happen, it's just too big a risk. I mean, any black hat running around in your office pretending to be the plumber/cleaner/whatever could hold his disk next to the R&D section's PC.
      As a sysadmin myself, I would _NOT_ use that kind of tech, regardless of encryption etc. unless there's a dongle/hardware kind of tie in... but even then I would really wait until the tech matured enough for me to be comfortable with.

      --
      The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
  12. Re:serial ATA rox! by Powercntrl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are IDE/S-ATA disks less reliable than SCSI on purpose (marketing) or only because we remember they were and think they still are ?

    Can't say much for SCSI since they're so absurdly expensive per MB that I'd rather take a chance with my data than pay SCSI's going rates... But umm, yea... Modern IDE drives lose data. The most common problem isn't that they crash, it's that they end up with one or more inaccessable sector(s), you run the included recertification utility and it restores your drive to error-free status but it also *fucks up the filesystem in the process.

    End result: Lost data.

    With how often I've seen this happen with current 40GB, 80GB and 120GB drives, I'm beginning to think RAID isn't really a luxury anymore.

    * I couldn't say fscks here, it might get taken in the wrong context.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  13. 'Maturing' offers more promise than 'innovation' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    One fact I am compelled to revisit upon reading these press releases of "stronger, faster, better" technology, particularly that which is promised to be coming real soon now, is that virtually all recent advances in industry techniques have been incremental. This is not a claim that there is nothing new to be found in the business; rather, I am inclined to state that if you want to peer into the future all you need to do is apply a bit of chrome to today's offerings.

    Case in point: while stories of (distant future) storage technology consistently fill all the typical industry rags, a very real technique is already available and well-known to insiders. DVDA, one of the newer ideas that has taken off, promises to roughly quadruple conventional hard-medium storage techniques. Although more prone to tolerance faults because the scheme involves replacing the typical single-head approach with four carefully-positioned around the box, the increase in input capability has lead many to believe that consumer demand for DVDA will rise rapidly as it begins to hit the shelves in larger numbers.

    We've all chuckled over the "640K is enough for anybody" quote, but the reverse approach of industry visionaries who predict teraflops of holographic storage or similar pie-in-the-sky schemes is similarly unlikely to lead us to tomorrow's breakthroughs. Don't be fooled into thinking that we've fully exploited the potential of current techniques.

  14. Slightly Off-Topic by epicstruggle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now that it looks like HD manuf. are getting SATA drives out the door. Does anyone know when we could expect to see optical drives out too?

    Id love to see the end of all IDE cables in my computer. Im using a small form factor(sff) shuttle, and one of the problems with circulating air is the IDE cable. Also is there any plans/ideas about all the wires coming out of the PSU, as in any way to make those wires thinner and less obstrusive(sp?)

    thanks for any and all responses.
    later,

    --
    "Im drowning here, and you're describing the water!"
    1. Re:Slightly Off-Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Make Use longer and softer wires, and tape/tag them down to surfaces inside the machine. If they have to wind around components on the motherboard to reach the mobo power connector, then do that.

      It works, and looks seriously cool, like some bizarre tentacled thing stretching across a vast post-apocalyptic landscape of capacitors, ICs, smt components and tracks.

    2. Re:Slightly Off-Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. Now you've just introduced a whole bunch of inductive interference into your cables, not to mention you've screwed up your airflow, and increased the crosstalk by using longer cables.

      Nice one.

    3. Re:Slightly Off-Topic by uspsguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Given the power requirements of ever faster processors, I think you may see bigger, fatter power supply cables. The physics of wire size / current capacity are pretty well established. Unless room temp superconductors become a cheap reality, plan on a wad to power the MB.

      --
      Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
    4. Re:Slightly Off-Topic by Sarcazmo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They could start using five 8 guage wires instead of the many small ones :)

      Eliminating the negative voltages that aren't really used anymore for much could help. Most modern implementations of RS-232 cheat and use inverted TTL anyway.

    5. Re:Slightly Off-Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works, and looks seriously cool, like some bizarre tentacled thing stretching across a vast post-apocalyptic landscape of capacitors, ICs, smt components and tracks.

      So you're claiming that laying cables across your motherboard in all directions somehow increases the airflow? Just because your machines run "rock solid" doesn't mean you have poor airflow. Your computer was not designed to be run with cables covering the motherboard components; they need to be cooled by an airflow too.

  15. Re:Not that promising... by IanBevan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The one versus three year warranty is an interesting one. The trend of IDE manufacturers like Maxtor and Western Digital is to offer one year for "normal" IDE drives and three years for "Special Edition" (read: 8MB cache) drives. I'm not sure how this stacks up with SATA drives though.

    Didn't drives used to come with a five year warranty ? Did I just make that up, or am I showing my age ?

    Of course if, like me, you live in New Zealand, none of this makes any difference anyway. Under the consumer protection legislation here the seller of the drive must warrant it for the expected "useful life" of the drive, which is certainly longer than one year.

  16. Why serial ATA? by DrXym · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Out of curiosity, what is the point? Firewire presumably offers comparable performance doesn't it, or is there some compelling reason not to use it such as lower bandwidth or contention issues? And firewire seems to be a standard feature on an increasing number of PCs these days.


    Now, I would welcome any replacement to conventional IDE / ATA which has been the bane of my life. I couldn't count the number of times I've had to screw around swapping cards and drives in order to accomodate that ribbon. I will be happy to see that particular technology go the way of the dodo.

    1. Re:Why serial ATA? by Psiren · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the main thing (feel free to correct me anyone) is that SATA is a drop in replacement for Parallel ATA. It should just work, without requiring a whole bunch of new drivers. That's not to say that writing a whole bunch of new drivers wouldn't get more out of the technology, but it's not a requirement in order for it to work. Firewire on the other hand does require special drivers, and it's not yet *that* common on desktop PC's. Also, although I'm not sure of the state of Firewire support in Linux, I would bet anything it's nowhere near as good as the IDE support (which still has its own problems of course).

    2. Re:Why serial ATA? by NomNet · · Score: 5, Informative
      Out of curiosity, what is the point? Firewire presumably offers comparable performance doesn't it, or is there some compelling reason not to use it such as lower bandwidth or contention issues? And firewire seems to be a standard feature on an increasing number of PCs these days.

      Firewire gives a maximum throughput of 400Mb/second (50MB/second), with future versions giving 800Mb/second (100MB/second).
      SeialATA gives a maximum throughput of 150MB/second, with future versions giving 300MB/second and then 600MB/second.
      SerialATA is MUCH faster. Now granted, modern Hard Drives can't get anywhere near 150MB/second, but one day they will :)

    3. Re:Why serial ATA? by videodriverguy · · Score: 1

      Firewire is designed as an external interface, and as such is limited by long cable speed etc. Serial ATA is an internal only interface, and can achieve much faster speeds. It's also a point to point system, so it doesn't suffer from Firewire's need for device identification etc.

      Also, Firewire is designed to supply power over the interface - Serial ATA dedicates lines for this, which aren't optional.

    4. Re:Why serial ATA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, you are forgetting that Firewire doesnt offer comparable performance in the slightest! FW400 = 400Mbps SATA = 150MBps = 1200Mbps A fair difference dont you think? Tom...

    5. Re:Why serial ATA? by samael · · Score: 5, Informative

      Firewire can be connected in a multitude of different ways, to different devices. It therefore needs a fairly complex protocol.

      ATA can be connected in very few ways to only one controller. It therefore has a nice, simple protocol.

      The simpler the protocol, the higher the throughput, because you're not having to send messages and wait for replies to work out where things are going.

    6. Re:Why serial ATA? by ed1park · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This reminds me...

      http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/20020827/inde x. html

      A review of USB 2.0 and Firewire drives at Tom's site indicates that real world throughput is bottlenecked by the interface to about HALF the theoretical max.

      Why so slow? Is it all overhead? Poor optimization? Should we always assume that real world performance is approx half that of the theoretical max?

    7. Re:Why serial ATA? by DrXym · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I think other responses explained the general reasons that serial ATA might be better than firewire but I thought I'd make one point. The absence of a driver in Linux is not a reason in itself to not adopt a technology. Linux gets a driver when there is a demand and motivation for such a driver. The emergence of snazzy firewire drives, camcorders etc. is exactly such a reason and will fuel development of such features. The same happened when USB first appeared.


      As far as I'm aware IEEE 1394 (firewire) is a readily available standard and assuming specific chipsets are documented there should be no barriers to making Linux talk happily with such devices. I'm no kernel engineer but I would guess that great big chunks of their bus / device abstraction are readily applicable to firewire too.

    8. Re:Why serial ATA? by IcePic · · Score: 1

      Can you boot off your firewire? Otherwise you still
      need some cheap drive (that cant be bought in less
      than 40-50G nowadays!) to boot from, and then let
      control over to the firewire disk.

      --
      -- I'm as unique as everyone else.
    9. Re:Why serial ATA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Err, maximum theoretical thoroughputs are about as meaningful as posting on Slashdot. Btw, FireWire 400 is now out of date. FireWire 800 is already on shipping products (having long ago been approved by the IEEE standards body). SerialATA only allows one device on the bus. One. That one hard drive of yours doesn't have a bat's chance in hell of saturating the bus. Optical drives are an even bigger waste due to S-ATA's architectural constraint. FireWire, on the other hand, lets you have more than 60 devices on the same bus talking in real time with quality of service guarantees (that's why it is used for A/V work). With FireWire you can actually use the bandwidth.

    10. Re:Why serial ATA? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Well that really depends on your BIOS/firmware and the drive. Modern Macs can boot off firewire drives such as SmartDisk's so I imagine a PC could too if the hardware supported it.

    11. Re:Why serial ATA? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Firewire1 maxes at 40MB/s SATA1 is 150MB/s, Firewire2 is 80MB/s SATA2 will be 300MB/s. Also the electronics for SATA are relativly simple, in fact once they are up to volume they will probably costs LESS than current PATA chips whereas Firewire is kind of expensive. Firewire is good for external drive enclosures and as a transport for timing senesitive data (such as video in a pc-less setup or next generation MIDI which will use Firewire for both note and sampling data)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    12. Re:Why serial ATA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The absence of a driver in Linux is not a reason in itself to not adopt a technology

      How about the absence of a driver in Linux, NetWare, OS/2, Windows 98, Windows 95, Windows NT 4.0, SCO UNIX, DOS 6.22 ...

      A huge number (maybe even a majority) of new computers are shipped to customers using "legacy" operating systems. You can't just dump proven technology because Windows XP SP3 has a driver, especially when that tech is critical in the boot phase of the OS.

    13. Re:Why serial ATA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, S1600 (versus s400 or s800) has already been spec'ed and 1394 supplies power over the same cable. SATA needs 2.

  17. Re:"Per say" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Huh huh huh... in Finnish "perse" means ass.

  18. solid state? by khuber · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm still waiting for affordable solid state disks. Magnetic storage seems so crude.

    -Kevin

    1. Re:solid state? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Damn credit cards!

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:solid state? by khuber · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah! Damn credit cards!

      Exactly - credit cards have been using the same magnetic strip "technology" since the early 70s.

      Japan and Europe have smart cards in wide use, but the U.S. lags. We still manually input name and address information into disparate point of sales systems for every vendor. That's just sad.

      -Kevin

    3. Re:solid state? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      crude is hand feeding magneticaly striped ledger cards into a NCR 500 for mass storage, and a deck of punch cards for inputing the transactions.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    4. Re:solid state? by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 1

      Warning: horribly offtopic

      There are bigger problems with the credit card system than the magnetic strip.
      There is no good reason for me to give my credit card number to ANYONE, even a retailer. The credit system should use a public key system so I can make purchases at retailers and not have to worry about the kid at the register walking away with my card number. The powers that be invested heavily in fraud protection rather than a good system.

    5. Re:solid state? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      We still manually input name and address information into disparate point of sales systems for every vendor.

      Uhhh... We still input our pin numbers as well. I wouldn't consider that a bad thing. Inputting an address that is required to match with the CC company's record is the best basic security, and the only security that CC have right now.

      You've got the same mindset as all the "experts" that say that Japanese consumers are so far ahead of the USA in technology... as if buying another crappy little useless gizmo every week is a good thing...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:solid state? by khuber · · Score: 1
      You've got the same mindset as all the "experts" that say that Japanese consumers are so far ahead of the USA in technology.

      I think smartcards could potentially offer better physical security than credit cards since they can hold cryptographic keys.

      So then I get dumped into a group of your invisible monsters? Dude, we are all here, hiding under your bed, pressuring the American public to buy microminiature 3G phone/camera/breadmakers. And yes, they use nonstandard sized batteries. Moohahaha!

      -Kevin

    7. Re:solid state? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I think smartcards could potentially offer better physical security than credit cards since they can hold cryptographic keys.

      Well, gee... Ya think? Then again, an armed guard would be even more security, and so you assume we should all have armed guards?

      So then I get dumped into a group of your invisible monsters? Dude, we are all here, hiding under your bed, pressuring the American public to buy microminiature 3G phone/camera/breadmakers. And yes, they use nonstandard sized batteries. Moohahaha!

      You've got the wrong idea. It's not that I'm afraid it's going to happen; it's annoying that it's a common... baseless... asumption that we hear all too often as if it is a fact... You know... a lot like Evolution. Muwahahahaha! (yeah, I have no idea why you were saying "Moo")
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:solid state? by khuber · · Score: 1
      I have no idea why you were saying "Moo"

      Mu is that Greek letter before nu. My evil laugh is Moo-haha, not Mu-haha or Mwah-haha. HTH.

      -Kevin

  19. Re:'Maturing' offers more promise than 'innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For what it's worth, Ninnle linux was the first distro to supports DVDA

  20. Re:serial ATA rox! by evilviper · · Score: 1
    Can't say much for SCSI since they're so absurdly expensive per MB that I'd rather take a chance with my data than pay SCSI's going rates...

    SCSI is only slightly more expensive than IDE. I will admit that, since it's so un-popular (for reasons beyond me) 99% of shops do not have inexpensive SCSI drives. But they are out there. Thanks to the internet, you can find some if you look hard enough.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  21. Re:serial ATA rox! by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    SCSI is more expensive mostly due to the ammount of QA done on the drives compared to IDE. Now that being said you can find reasonably priced drives on the internet granted nowhere close to the cheapness of IDE. SCSI still wins out due to protocal differences in a system with lots of random disk IO. SATA is nice but is realy still limited to drives built into the case and did they get hotswap built into that spec??? It's one thing to down a workstation to swap out a raid drive it's entirly another thing to shutdown a server to do so. Even with SCSI disks in an 18 month old datacenter the techs are swapping out failed HD's weekly but there are over 1000 servers on site.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  22. What about drive failures? by jspectre · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok. It's nice to see new technologies getting out there for hooking drives up and making them lickety-split fast. But in the past year or two I've purchased 20something hard drives of various sizes from leading manufacturers and had AT LEAST one drive from each fail, if not two or more. This includes Quantum, IBM (who smartly got out of the business), Segate, Toshiba and others.

    How about someone making a hard drive that isn't going to give up after a year? Or are these guys only in the business to sell me new hard drives after a year? Many are also reducing their warranties from 3 or 5 years to one year. Have they no faith in their own products?

    --

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    1. Re:What about drive failures? by nmg196 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      How about someone making a hard drive that isn't going to give up after a year?

      I think I have a solution for you - or rather Western Digital do. It's 10,000 RPM, 5.2ms average seek time, SerialATA 150, 1.2 million hours MTBF, and a 5 year warranty! With those stats, it should really fly if they've put some effort into the controller...

      It hasn't been released yet, but I'm going to wait and see what the reviews say before upgrading my machine - it looks good on paper.

      They have a press release here.

      Nick...
    2. Re:What about drive failures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      COOLING. I believe is you see these failures cooling might be something you should look into.

    3. Re:What about drive failures? by Surak · · Score: 3, Interesting
      From the article:


      Although clearly this is a high end product, the warranty from Maxtor for this type of drive is lack-luster. Maxtor only warranties the drive for 1 year, while many other high end desktop products, like the WD SE drive, sport 3 year warranties. We would like to urge Maxtor to reconsider upping the anti here. Clearly this is a well built product, there is no reason not to stand behind it for a longer duration
      /blockquote

      The reviewers clearly felt that the Maxtor SATA drive was well-built and that there was no reason that Maxtor SHOULDN'T stand behind it for longer.

      Personally, I think that hard drive manufacturers aren't standing behind their drives for longer for a few reasons. One is that margins are razor thin. You'll be able to pick up an 80GB Maxtor SATA-150 drive for $80-$125, once they begin to ship in quantity. Just a few years ago, the top-of-the-line ATA drives (whatever their size is is irrelevant..I'm talking line positioning here) were selling more than 3 times that price. Inflation has gone up, but technology has deflated in price quickly. (Personally, I'm waiting for them to come free in my box of Lucky Charms(TM). :-P) So if they have to warranty their drives for 3 years, they may not be able to stay in business.

    4. Re:What about drive failures? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Maxtor has similar plans with their MaxLine II P + SATA Drives. Not quite as impressive as WD promises, 7200 Max RPM, 3 year warantee, but a claimed MTBF that is as high as their SCSI line.

      MaxLine II should be less vapor than the WD offering at least, they had planned to have it out 1Q 2003, but it seems they are still hard to find. Some places are accepting orders, however.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:What about drive failures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are saying I have to have hot and noisy to get basic reliability. No thank you.

      I hate to see the price on those hot and noisy buggers also.

    6. Re:What about drive failures? by toddestan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1.2 Million hours? Sure, I know some drives do last a long time but 137 years? And I certainly wouldn't put my money on a fast, hot, 10,000RPM drive lasting that long either.

      I would like too see any relatively complex machine last 137 years without repair, even under ideal conditions. Especially something as sensitive as a hard disk.

    7. Re:What about drive failures? by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Anandtech did a review on the WD 10K drive where it showed some very good results beating out the 10K SCSI drives on most benchmarks.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    8. Re:What about drive failures? by Smid · · Score: 1

      "Personally, I think that hard drive manufacturers aren't standing behind their drives for longer for a few reasons. One is that margins are razor thin."

      With my second Maxtor 120 gig drive to go and start "clicking" on me on 4 months, I would say its for "another" reason....

    9. Re:What about drive failures? by Surak · · Score: 1

      Strange. I've had my IBM DeskStar 120G (which is SUPPOSED to be a real dog in terms of reliability, based on reputation) for almost a year now and have had no real problems with it. At all. (Well, okay, no problems that aren't related to that buggy XFS implementation on Linux 2.4.x ;)

    10. Re:What about drive failures? by jspectre · · Score: 1

      well it's not like anyone advertises that their drives fail after a year. they just do. anyone can warranty their drive for 5 years and it still gives up after 6 months!

      --

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    11. Re:What about drive failures? by jspectre · · Score: 1

      cooling isn't the issue.. the systems are kept very cool.. but thanks for the suggestion.

      --

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    12. Re:What about drive failures? by abhisarda · · Score: 1

      Many manufacturers have reduced their warranties to 1 year but the difference between 3 year and 1 year warranty is only 1 dollar or so according to this story from the inquirer.
      Therefore going in for a longer warranty makes more sense now.

  23. Re:*** WAR THREAD *** by mattrix2k · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you want to start an OT discussion why not use This?

  24. Toms Hardware by nmg196 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Toms Hardware also has posted a review of this Serial ATA drive.

    Summary: "Extremely High Performance, Excessively Short Warranty Period"

    Nick...

    1. Re:Toms Hardware by amorsen · · Score: 3, Funny
      Summary: "Extremely High Performance, Excessively Short Warranty Period"
      "The light that burns twice as bright lasts half as long, and you have burned so very, very bright, Roy!"
      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  25. Re:Not that promising... by loraksus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    5 year warranties, sigh. The good old days - actually I just got a 13 GB drive replaced by maxtor - refused to spin up, thankfully the freezer trick worked so I could get the data off it.
    BTW, if anyone wants to explain the physics behind that, that would be really cool.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  26. Re:serial ATA rox! by kasperd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    SCSI is only slightly more expensive than IDE.

    Typically you pay at least four times as much per GB if you buy SCSI instead of IDE.

    inexpensive SCSI drives.

    Though a massproduced SCSI drive should be possible at prices comparable to an IDE drive of the same size and speed, they are very rare. In fact I never saw one. So I guess a lot of people would be happy if you would tell us where they can be bought.

    --

    Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  27. mod parent up or it's parent down by mike300zx · · Score: 1

    they loved the drive and it smoked any and all ATA drives around. This is pretty cool for sure.

  28. Re:Not that promising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes they DID come with 5 year warranties.. and all my quality drives (SCSI) still do.

    This SATA stuff is still a pipe dream until I see it available in the stores and easily bought.

    Right now the SATA pci cards are overpriced, the cables are overpriced and you cant buy the drives.

    Oh yay... I'll think about them in 18 months.

  29. Re:Not that promising... by dirkdidit · · Score: 4, Funny
    if anyone wants to explain the physics behind that


    Freezer Gnomes. The same ones who make the ice disappear and food get freezer burn. The do wonders with gum in hair as well. Amazing little creatures if you ask me.
  30. Induction power? Maybe... by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

    While induction might be a really convenient method to power devices, you'll have to be careful how powerful your magnetic field is. With magnetic devices like hard disks and floppy disks, you'll need to be careful not to corrupt your data.

    I think it could make for really nice connectors, though. Especially in extreme environments, where dirt and grime are likely to get in between the contacts. You have something like teflon-coated springs, to serve as air-core inductors. This has the double-benefit of protecting against power surges, since air-core inductors can't really pass much of a large pulse of energy.

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  31. Re:Shock and awe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >1/10 for patriotism.

    I resent that. I deserve no more than 0. Patriotism is for stupid fucks.

  32. Already? by imaniack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bet 99% of computers does not even have one single SATA drive and it's MATURE already? Where are the beta testers, ummm I mean cutting edge users?

  33. Re:serial ATA rox! by xyote · · Score: 2, Funny

    So instead of have to run a separate utility to screw up your filesystem by replacing bad blocks with good ones so there will be no indication that data was lost or corrupted, scsi will corrupt your files for you automatically.

  34. Just one question... by gekkotron · · Score: 1

    Why is it called serial? As far as I can tell, only one drive can be connected per port on the motherboard. Why not "single" ATA? When it's called serial, I envision something like SCSI, with the ability to daisy-chain multiple drives.

    1. Re:Just one question... by mchasal · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It's called serial because the data comes down the cable serially, that is 1 bit after another. As opposed to parallel data where a bunch of bits come down the cable at once, that's why current drives use those multi-conductor ribbon cables.

    2. Re:Just one question... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 5, Informative

      In the days of yore, when you could send only a few bits per second down a wire, which is serial, it was noticed that you could lump eight wires side by side, send one part of a byte down each wire, and boom, you've got parallel. Like this:

      Serial:
      0
      1
      1
      0
      0
      0
      1
      0
      Parallel:
      001100010

      Now, however, they've noticed that our ability to send bits down a wire is so improved, you're actually wasting time by trying to synchronize between eight separate wires; it's faster to just blitz the 8 bits down one wire.

      Hence, this new ATA is serial, whereas (E)IDE is parallel (those flat ribbon cables give it away nicely, don't they?)

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:Just one question... by gekkotron · · Score: 1

      Makes sense. Still wish they'd gone for serial wiring of drives, though.

  35. Get SCSI by spanky1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, I'm not trying to start another flamewar. IDE vs SCSI is an old argument. But one thing is certain: SCSI drives are much, much more reliable. They are designed for server use (24x7x365) and can be much faster. Get the Cheetah 15k.3 and you'll never look back!

    Notice: You will pay for SCSI reliability.

    1. Re:Get SCSI by nmg196 · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Get the Cheetah 15k.3 and you'll never look back!

      Warning: Never put Seagate Cheetah drives where there are people. They sound like a circular saw trying to cut though a piece of reinforced concrete. Really not a very nice sound. At all.

      Nick...

    2. Re:Get SCSI by spanky1 · · Score: 1

      Apparently you have never heard a Cheetah 15k.3. It is VERY quiet... barely audible. Also, it runs extremely cool to the touch. Your observation was accurate for first gen 15k drives, but not current 3rd generation ones.

    3. Re:Get SCSI by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      No I confess - it was an old Seagate Cheetah 10K. It was most unpleasant.

      If you want quiet/fast drives anyone (normal ATA) I highly recommend the Western Digital JB range (8mb cache versions). You can hardly hear them and they seem to be very quick compared to my IBM equivalent. It might be psychological though - now that I don't get a grinding noise everytime I do something, everything seems much quicker :)

      Nick...

    4. Re:Get SCSI by spanky1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those WD JB drives are very quiet. I have a 120GB drive in my system for "junk" like MP3s and games. My Cheetah 15k.3 is a hell of a lot faster though so I use it for my system/app drive. The WD JB was cheaper and has 4 times the capacity though. :) But I expect the Cheetah to outlive it by quite a bit.

  36. Re:'Maturing' offers more promise than 'innovation by Carbonite · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...industry visionaries who predict teraflops of holographic storage...

    Yes, I would have some doubt in visionaries who measure storage in floating point operations per second.

    --
    ich muß mehr Kuhglocke haben
  37. Why was this flaimbate? by diablobynight · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounded like an honest question. Yes we have started to test Serial drives, on a couple of the newer motherboards. I own a consulting company and we like to test all hardware before allowing any of out clients to deploy it. So we were running tests on the Seagate Barracuda series, as you well know is about the only drive we could get our hands on. For our motherboard we used a Abit KD7-S RAID. I happen to love Abit, but I have no data to prove this is the best board, I guess it's just a gut feeling. The install went easy, and yes, it freed up a lot of space in the computer, which may be an advantage to dual CPU people who have heat problems in their cases. Maybe in the future they'll make cases around the idea of having the heat output of the hard drive farther from the CPU because of the length available to serial ata. But if your looking for a big performance jump. I am terribly sorry. It is a very nice system, and runs fine, I will say, I had no troubles whatsoever and have added this box to my home network, and use it for encoding my home videos of my sons soccer tapes, 7 years of soccer, 15 games a year= lots and lots of divx encoding time. lol. But seriously, if your a gamer, or for that matter, just a performance computer enthusiast that is still concerned with cost, then get yourself a good ATA133 drive. For the cost of the drives and the larger drive sizes you can buy, I think it isn't worth it to make the jump to Serial ATA yet. But we have found something to use these Serial ATA drives for. I now have a small computer installed into the trunk of my TA and I run serial ATA and power to a mount I installed in my dash, where I now have a place that I can push in a Serial ATA drive to use in my in car DVD/MP3/Fuel control system computer. It's great, I can plug in an 80GB hard drive in my house, transfer all the divx movies, MP3s and whatever else I want for my week of commuting to and from the office, pop the drive out of my case at home, (I made it so I can slide it in/out of the face) and pop the drive in my dash in my car, and watch my divx's on my in dash LCD when I am sitting in high traffic. So this technology certainly has its advantages. even if it really isn't speed yet.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
  38. How quaint. by fbg111 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm waiting for quantum optical storage cubes. Solid state seems so crude. ;)

    --
    Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
  39. my understanding of the freezer trick by diablobynight · · Score: 5, Informative

    I believe the freezer trick is designed for drives that are suffering bearing issues. In a lot of drives, their problem is that the bearings have gotten flat spots or other problems and as they heat up because of too much friction, they make it impossible for the drive to spin up. But when you put these drives in thefreezer you constrict the size of the bearings and reduce the temperature of the drive as a whole. It only works for a while, because eventually the bearings expand with heat, and cause too much friction again, and put the drive to a hault.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    1. Re:my understanding of the freezer trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the vast majority of cases, if you manage to get a drive spinning, by cooling it down or shaking it a bit, it will stay spinning unless something really terrible happens.

      One of my drives died like that, and it took me over 8 hours to get the 60BG off of it so I could get it replaced. But it was spinning (slowly :) and reading correctly the whole time.

    2. Re:my understanding of the freezer trick by Lxy · · Score: 1

      back in the MFM days you could pull out the drive and drop it about 1 inch to fix a stuck bearing. Can't count how many times I did that on my Seagate 40MB MFM. Finally got smart and made a quick release latch out of duct tape. That drive is around somewhere, still works too IIRC.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
  40. Re:Yeeesh by Furry+Ice · · Score: 1

    Who modded this offtopic? Apparently you haven't seen Orgazmo. Parent is right on target and damn funny! As long as you get the reference, that is.

  41. In theory ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SCSI drives can do drive to drive transfers if they are on a single cable.

    In practice noone supports it.

  42. Re:Shock and awe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amusing you used the word `friend`, given that the US armed and financed him. So either way it's your fault.

  43. Re:Shock and awe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our Glorious Leaders George Bush II (All Hail!) will bring us riches beyond our dreams. All Hail the Great Leader George Bush II! ALL HAIL!

  44. 802.11b LCD screens by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Microsft will sell you an wireless LCD screen.

    The marketing goes somthing like
    'be the first on the block to get a....'

    and misses off, because when 10 people have them there ain't no bandwidth left.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  45. Product page on WD site for the drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Searching the WD site, I found the product page for the drive you are talking about, the "WD Raptor Enterprise Serial ATA Hard Drive 36.7 GB 10,000 RPM", a.k.a WD360GD.

    Also, Pricewatch has a listing for the yet-to-be-shipped drive, with an E.T.A. of "end of March." Price: About $165. Not too cheap for a 36 GB ATA drive...

    1. Re:Product page on WD site for the drive by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      > Not too cheap for a 36 GB ATA drive...

      I think it's the only drive of it's class around and should be compared to 10,000 RPM SCSI drives rather than ATA drives. I can't find any other 10,000 RPM Serial ATA drives anywhere... The price is probably loaded because of it's uniqueness - it'll go down with time I'm sure. Besides - if it's fast enough that you no longer need to buy a RAID array to edit your video - then you'll have made a saving.

      Nick...

    2. Re:Product page on WD site for the drive by palp · · Score: 1

      Check froogle for WD360GD.. I see one for 149.94 + $7 S+H.

      --
      -palp
  46. Quicker than freezing by scatter_gather · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One trick I have used a few times over the years is the wrist twist. When I have a drive that is getting wonky and won't spin up I remove it and hold it in the palm of my hand with the axis of the spindle right about at the base of my palm. Grab the edges of the drive between fingers and thumb and, with a quick twist of the wrist, snap the drive around its spindle axis. It you do it quickly you can sometimes feel or hear the disk assembly move a bit inside.

    This tends to get the drive past whatever dead spot is preventing the spin up - they have rarely failed to come up when I use this trick. Of course when it spins up you then quickly remove all data that has any meaning for you since if it did this once. . .

    No worries about fingers stuck to the frozen drive or about condensation.

    Disclaimer:
    Use this trick in moderation, not responsible for lost data, broken wrists/fingers, or errant "smart" bombs.

  47. About ATA drives by mr_stark · · Score: 4, Informative

    What Does ATA stand for?

    ATA = AT Attachment

    AT = Advanced Technology (as in IBM's first PC)

    Basically the old IDE (Integrated Drive Electronics) and the later UDMA (Ultra Direct Memory Access) drives are parallel ATA devices, that is data is sent over multiple 'lines' Serial ATA send data over 1 'line' but at a much faster rate.

    In theory parallel transmission should be faster, more lines = more bandwidth but in practice serial connections are quicker as they don't suffer from cross talk and other complications (big cables - easily damaged)
    .

    --
    I can't think of anything witty right now
    1. Re:About ATA drives by another+blockhead · · Score: 1

      Off-topic but I'll keep it short:

      The AT was IBM's third PC. The first one was, well,
      the PC (8088-based, no hard drive, one or two 5.25"
      360Kb floppies). The second one was the PC/XT -- a
      PC with a small hard drive (5 or 10 Mb), which AFAIK
      was the first one to run UNIX (version 6), without
      memory management. The PC/AT had an 80286 and a 10
      or 20 Mb hard drive.

  48. Not much diffrence right now...... by Krizhek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    During a PCWORLD article I read up on the difference between SATA and the PATA. While Serial was able to do better on searching and moving a bunch of smaller files. Parallel was still able to beat Serial in opening a single 1.7 gig file. And the difference in some cases was only by a few seconds. This, to me, doesn't want to make me change anytime soon. I don't see this coming into play for a few more years when they are able to make the transfer's faster for big files or they just decide to change it anyway and leave us in the dust..... Like dell and how they are getting rid of A drives.

    1. Re:Not much diffrence right now...... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Really, I don't care too much about any speed difference, or lack thereof. I HATE RIBBON CABLES. *That* is a good enough reason to switch right there.

  49. Parallel ATA legacy connectors by xyote · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Given the mobo manufacturers' tendency to leave legacy connectors on long after the need for them has all but disappeared, i.e. parallel & serial connectors, I suppose we'll still see PATA connectors on the mobo's for years.

    1. Re:Parallel ATA legacy connectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually think manufacturers will get rid of parallell connections because of their size. They might instead supply you with a couple of converters like RocketHead 100.

  50. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Seriously. What's the point of SATA? One drive per channel. Yippee! There's a real step forward. Hell, you don't even have the option of sacrificing performance by hooking up two drives per channel. Want to set up a RAID? No more SCSI with it's single cable. If you've got 5 drives, you'll have 5 cables, each going from the drive to the controller. Yeah. That's a real clean setup. Don't want flat ribbon cables? THEN DON'T USE THEM. Round IDE cables have been available for years.

    SATA doesn't solve anything.

  51. Re:Not that promising... by Cerberus7 · · Score: 1

    I was looking at drives this weekend and saw a 60GB Maxtor. It was perhaps the last 3-year warranty drive I'll ever see, and the only one of its kind on the shelf, so naturally I snatched it up. All of the drives with newer packaging, including the 8MB cache drives, were labeled as having 1-year warranties. Truly sad.

    --
    I don't know about you, but my servers run on the power of cotton candy and happy thoughts. -Anonymous Coward
  52. Re:'Maturing' offers more promise than 'innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of nine track tapes.....

  53. Re:Not that promising... by stanmann · · Score: 1

    SATA drive and controllerHmmm... looks like you can, and for almost the same price as ATA133.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  54. No SMART Diagnostics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    SATA is nice and all, but I have yet to find any software that will talk over it to do SMART diagnostics. So I have to plug my dying drive back in with the old IDE cables to figure out why it is dropping off my SATA RAID setup. Kinda sucks!

  55. Re:serial ATA rox! by evilviper · · Score: 1
    Typically you pay at least four times as much per GB if you buy SCSI instead of IDE.

    No... It's just that 4x cheaper IDE drives are easy to find.

    In fact I never saw one.

    Ah, I see. You must be an expert then.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  56. Cables by Dryheat · · Score: 1

    Why don't they just replace all the cables with optical fibre. This would mean each device is not limited by the cable but the chipsets.

  57. Re:'Maturing' offers more promise than 'innovation by ChanxOT5 · · Score: 1

    "DVDA, one of the newer ideas that has taken off, promises to roughly quadruple conventional hard-medium storage techniques"

    Note to Anonymous Coward:
    Most Women refuse to do DVDA.
    Look somewhere else for your "hard-medium storage" you sick bastard!

  58. Re:serial ATA rox! by afidel · · Score: 1

    actually I'm suprised anyone sees bad sectors at all anymore, most drives electronics are so good they detect dead/dying spots before they effect data and use the spare sectors at the outside of the disk and just add an entry to the mapping table. Through SMART interface you can get a report of the number of remapped sectors, and if you are an oldtimer it gives your heart a little jump thinking about how much data would have been lost on an old drive without automatic re-mapping =)

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  59. If you arent a cocksucker.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then you can tell us where to get them.

    If you are keep being the typical slashdot fatty

  60. Naw man, you get something better: XServe RAID by Heretic2 · · Score: 1

    XServe RAID == badass

    You just get one of those and run fiber channel to your XServes. A lot more bandwidth. If you bought 9 XServes, you could surely afford one 3U Fiber Channel IDE RAID box to feed them. These are sexier than the XServes themselves. You get full redundance everywhere, lots of bandwidth, and hot-swat capability.

  61. Re:Shock and awe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the OPs photo was one of a few spread around in the Iran/Iraq war"

    Wrong, fuckhead.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle _east/28847 69.stm
    It's from Basra.

  62. Re:serial ATA rox! by OrenWolf · · Score: 1

    You have that totally wrong.

    SCSI Drives are more expensive because they are tested individually, because of VOLUME ISSUES, not because the tests are any more robust!

    Makes no sense for a company to build a 100-drive-wide testing array for SCSI drives, because so many fewer are produced.

    This drives up costs considerably.

  63. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    +#if defined(__alpha__) && defined(CONFIG_PCI)
    + /*
    + * The meaning of life, the universe, and everything. Plus
    + * this makes the year come out right.
    + */
    + year -= 42;
    +#endif
    -- From the patch for 1.3.2: (kernel/time.c), submitted by Marcus Meissner

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...