Slashdot Mirror


Canada and Denmark using Google as Battleground

TedRiot writes "Canada and Denmark are fighting over Hans Island using Google as battleground. A quick search of 'hans island' revealed a paid advertisement with the banner headline: 'Hans Island is Greenland. Greenland natives have used the island for centuries.' The ad was linked to the Danish government's foreign affairs web page with the letter condemning Graham's visit. Toronto resident Rick Broadhead placed a Google ad and said the Canadian government needs to get with the times." Reuters has coverage as well.

341 comments

  1. Some "battleground"... by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Searching for "hans island" (both with and without enclosing quotes) returns nothing as described in the summary and articles.

    The first hit is an over-2-year-old Maritime Affairs (Canada) articleexplaining why Hans Island is (or should be) Canadian Territory. (Actually an interesting read...)

    The second hit is the Wikipedia article.

    In fact, the supposed site(s) is nowhere in the first page of hits.

    Or the second page.

    The news hits refer to Google supposedly having these ads, but that reference is somewhat circular, since I can't find the paid advertisement, banner, or site in question anywhere on Google.

    The sponsored (ad) links on the right sidebar include a Web Design ad, and the marginally entertaining:

    Hans Island - Dispute
    Why Worry about Hans Island When
    What you need is an Ergonomic Chair
    www.ergo4me.com


    A search for "Hans Island is Greenland" returns nothing but...you guessed it, the news articles claiming there's a paid site on Google that says "Hans Island is Greenland." Likewise for "Hans Island is {Canadian|Canada}." Now, I'm not saying the articles are lying (and perhaps Google pulled the ads for some reason), but since this article is exclusively about how the battle for Hans Island is being taken to Google, and is entitled "Politics: Canada and Denmark using Google as Battleground", well, I'd love to see it.

    Because I see nothing except someone pimping knockoff ergonomic chairs with eBay-style "searchsquatting".

    And, amusingly, as I'm typing this article, I see more paid hits appearing. Google started with one. Then the ergonomic chair ad was added. Now, as I'm about to post, there is a "Hans Island is Canada" link...by vaginainstitute.com, a site apparently dedicated to, erm, researching vaginas.

    1. Re:Some "battleground"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, say what you want about the U.S. Military, but at least their battlegrounds have explosions and stuff.

    2. Re:Some "battleground"... by winkydink · · Score: 1

      All I get is some searchsquatter web design firm

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    3. Re:Some "battleground"... by alphaseven · · Score: 2, Funny
      Searching for "hans island" (both with and without enclosing quotes) returns nothing as described in the summary and articles.

      I searched for "hans island" last week with google and saw the two text ads as described in the article. I found it quite funny, too bad they are gone now.

    4. Re:Some "battleground"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At first I thought the same as you, but then after a couple of page refreshes I noticed that the Ads displayed in Google are not always the same and finally stumbled on these two:

      Hans Island - Dispute
      Whats the big deal? Everyone
      knows it belongs to Canada!
      www.ergo4me.com

      Hans Island is Greenland
      www.um.dk
      Greenland natives have used the island for centuries

      So these ads do exist, you just didn't have any luck! Note it may also be that they are slowly being removed away from their servers since being publicly criticized. *shrugs*

    5. Re:Some "battleground"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daily limit spends. Google uses up your budget gradually through the day.

    6. Re:Some "battleground"... by hudmond · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone call up Bush; I say we move in and take it for the USA. We can use it as a prison camp to store such POW celebrities as Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden. Someone hurry up and call ask Bush so he can call his mom and ask her. ;)

    7. Re:Some "battleground"... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      The island is the size of a football field, one explosion would settle the argument.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    8. Re:Some "battleground"... by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1, Troll

      Good idea, but I propose it be used as a prison island FOR Bush.

      Sort of like corsica for napolean. =)

      --
      "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
    9. Re:Some "battleground"... by macdaddy357 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Here's a headline for this story: Danes claim Hans Island is part of Greenland, but Canadians are having Nunavut, they say it's theirs.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    10. Re:Some "battleground"... by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      One fifth of my country... is also Nunavut.

    11. Re:Some "battleground"... by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

      I dont see why they dont just divide the island between border points 122 and 123. (currently according to a 1973 agreement there is no border between these two points) I think some countries need to learn to share.....

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    12. Re:Some "battleground"... by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Didn't they already do this to Cuba? Great way to suspend human rights by placing your prisons in other countries.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    13. Re:Some "battleground"... by steve+french · · Score: 1

      "who cares" is the appropriate response. Chimp-brained politicians will squabble over anything and everything. We the people should offer to share the island with...whoever. If they can't share then Denmark can have it. Why does every rock on the planet have to be 'owned' by somebody anyway? Is the world one big territorial sandbox full of sniveling children? It's beyond moronic...we are approaching US levels of retardation in the vox pop. I am ashamed of my country's behaviour in such matters.

  2. blame canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    i hope the danes and canada go to war over this..
    with these two military powers squaring off somebody is bound to lose an eye

    1. Re:blame canada by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1
      I have an image of Danish troops getting into ships that look like a cross between a WWII-era Higgins boat and a viking longship, and raiding and pillaging all along Canada's east coast. Just as they're done herding the poor canadien peasants into the church (which they're about to burn), a regiment of Mounties comes down the road and routes the invaders.

      Maybe Canada will be able to kill two birds with one stone: Rename Quebec "danelaw" and give it to them in exchange for the danes stopping the raiding and pillaging.

    2. Re:blame canada by jessejesse · · Score: 1

      LMAO that is so true what a squabble over nothing between countries that push more paper than people around. Still cant say much because if things went wrong here in the United States I would rather go to Canada not Mexico not to mention they did what American should have done years ago legalize pot!!!

    3. Re:blame canada by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      That would be a laugh. The odd thing is that only Denmark has ships that are strong enough to sail in the area around Hans Island. The canadians can only get to the area by helicopters.

    4. Re:blame canada by kilrogg · · Score: 1
      not to mention they did what American should have done years ago legalize pot!!!

      Canada? Nope. They were talking about de-criminalizing small possesions (which is different than legalizing: you get a ticket, not a criminal record with possible jail time). Sale, growing, etc, would have still been criminal. However it was all just talk and never came into effect.

    5. Re:blame canada by Cyranith · · Score: 0

      http://www.ccg-gcc.gc.ca/vessels-navires/details_e .asp?id=A-1

      The Louis was refitted in the 80's for promoting Canadian sovereignty in territorial waters claimed by Canada. So I'm fairly certain she can, but I don't know if she has. And the Louis was definatly a little larger then the Danish ships that made the same voyage.

      Also, I think she has a sister ship, the CCGS Henry Larsen, which, while smaller, still makes regular summer voyages to the north (though normally not that far).

    6. Re:blame canada by zkn · · Score: 1

      Denmark would win!
      Even though we are smaller, we have strategic advantages: We have icebreakers, Canada does not and we have a submarine(4man sub called flipper), Canada does not!
      We may be a small country, but in viking days we owned the intire north and most of everything else.

  3. It has to be said: by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 5, Funny

    CRIPPLE FIGHT!!!!!

    1. Re:It has to be said: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As I proud Canadian, I have to say that comment is absolutely called for.

    2. Re:It has to be said: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True...but we can like sooo take Denmark, eh?

      We'll dress up like baby seals, and pummel them with Timbits!

    3. Re:It has to be said: by Zalbik · · Score: 1

      Canada would totally win this cripple fight!

      From the CIA factbook:
      Denmark Military: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ da.html)
      Military branches:
      Royal Danish Army, Royal Danish Navy, Royal Danish Air Force, Home Guard (Hjemmevaernet)
      Military manpower - military age and obligation:
      18 years of age for compulsory and volunteer military service; conscripts serve an initial training period that varies from 4 to 12 months according to specialization; reservists are assigned to mobilization units following completion of their conscript service (2004)
      Military manpower - availability:
      males age 18-49: 1,175,108 (2005 est.)
      Military manpower - fit for military service:
      males age 18-49: 955,168 (2005 est.)
      Military manpower - reaching military age annually:
      males: 31,317 (2005 est.)
      Military expenditures - dollar figure:
      $3,271.6 million (2003)
      Military expenditures - percent of GDP:
      1.5% (2004)

      Canadian military: http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ ca.html
      Military branches:
      Canadian Armed Forces: Land Forces Command, Maritime Command, Air Command, Canada Command (homeland security) to be operational in early 2006 (2005)
      Military manpower - military age and obligation:
      16 years of age for voluntary military service; women comprise some 11% of Canada's armed forces (2001)
      Military manpower - availability:
      males age 16-49: 8,216,510 (2005 est.)
      Military manpower - fit for military service:
      males age 16-49: 6,740,490 (2005 est.)
      Military manpower - reaching military age annually:
      males: 223,821 (2005 est.)
      Military expenditures - dollar figure:
      $9,801.7 million (2003)
      Military expenditures - percent of GDP:
      1.1% (2003)

      Or from NationMaster.com:
      Denmark: http://www.nationmaster.com/country/da/Military
      Armed forces personnel: 22,000

      Canada: http://www.nationmaster.com/country/ca/Military
      Air force personnel: 14,000
      Armed forces personnel: 59,000
      Army personnel: 20,900

      On the other hand, I guess they are freakin Vikings :-)

  4. Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by B11 · · Score: 5, Funny
    This is what happens when you aren't bloodthirsty war-mongers. Instead of invading each other you decide to launch marketing campaigns on the internet.

    Canada being soft I understand, but Denmark? These people used to be Vikings, shessh!

    I say the settle it with a friendly game of Risk and call it a day.

    --
    insert inflammatory anti-microsoft comment here
    1. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      I say the settle it with a friendly game of Risk and call it a day.

      The Canadian article describes the island as "little larger than a football field". Clearly, the issue should be settled by a game of football.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by mingot · · Score: 0

      American football or that off brand kind?

      This is going to hurt. A lot.

    3. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Since both countries use the metric system, the obvious choice is metric football.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    4. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by empaler · · Score: 1

      You're saying we're not blooddthirsty war-mongers?

      We have some the best trained elite soldiers in the world (they were deployed for Afghanistan, I don't recall whether they were deployed for Iraq) and we have a standing military for international operations - currently deployed at half a dozen hotspots throughout the world.

      We've probably already sent our submarine (yes, submarine, singular) up there to guard it against more crazy canadians.

      A canadian friend of mine actually once said
      "You'd best say Denmark is a very nice place
      lest the vikings come and tear off your face"

      That being said, I'm not speaking to him for as long as his dirty bastard nation lays claim to what clearly is danish soil... :p

    5. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Funny

      or hockey (duh)

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    6. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Splab · · Score: 1

      Well we were Vikings... But we got it all out of our system back then. Now a days we tend to go home if a conflict spans past tea time.

      Wullfmorgenthaler sums it up:
      WullfMorgenthaler

    7. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by IdleTime · · Score: 3, Funny

      There is only one type of football...

      The other should be called American Handoval or something equally silly.... It has nothing to do with football....

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    8. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by udowish · · Score: 1

      Soft eh? tell that to the Netherlands and how they were liberated in WW2 or should we go back to WW1 and Vimy ridge??

      --
      when in doubt press enter and we'll figure it out later..
    9. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by udowish · · Score: 1

      It continues to amaze me that any dispute that doesn't involve the US is sidelined as trivial. Just look at the comments (granted a few are simply out of jest), but this is a sovereignty issue. I would love to see the US give up some small islands off the coast of Alaska to Russia! If the tides were turned all you yanks would be screaming invade, so when it happens to Canada you snicker and point fingers..grow up people.

      --
      when in doubt press enter and we'll figure it out later..
    10. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by TheSunborn · · Score: 1

      Not really. We(Denmark) Just scraped our last submarine, after it had been damaged in the Iraq war. (No not damaged by the Iraq military, it just was not build to that kind of weather)

    11. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can throw in all the elite soldiers and subs you want, we still have our superweapon: at the first hint of trouble, we'll drop Celine Dion on the island and half a song later, all the fish will be scared away from there all the way to the Baltic Sea.

      Your turn.

    12. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by udowish · · Score: 1

      OH SHIT! Man, DON'T TELL THE WORLD ABOUT THAT! in true Napoleon Dynamite fashion GAWD!!! The Celine Dion superweapon is classified you idiot!!

      --
      when in doubt press enter and we'll figure it out later..
    13. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      The other should be called American Handoval or something equally silly.... It has nothing to do with football....

      True, but we Yanks aren't the only ones with a game called "football" that involves oval-shaped objects thrown around by hand. Those two flavors do have some differences.

    14. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Played on the island itself.

    15. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is obviously not a huge issue for either nation. If it did involved the United States I think you would find most US citizens on here would react about the same way. Most who visit this site are analytical people and are not as driven by nationalism as the average person.

      The fact that people are viewing this with some degree of whimsy is a good thing in my view. Even if it was between the US and Russian I would view it the same way.

      Ordinarily I wouldn't say anything about this but I don't think enough people are speaking up for the majority of Americans whose views don't mimic that of the white house and talking heads on radio and cable news.

    16. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      You may have something there, TFA states it's the size of a football field.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    17. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by empaler · · Score: 1

      Det havde jeg faktisk ikke opdaget... Men jeg ser heller aldrig tv længere.

    18. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by empaler · · Score: 1

      Who's to say we're not planting giant fishnets in our waters, ANTICIPATING THAT MOVE?

      We'll control the world's fish sales, and IT WILL BE YOUR OWN DOING.

      Your turn.

    19. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Jettamann · · Score: 1

      Football? No way..

      The Canadian and Danish Olympic Hockey Teams should head up there during one of the -40C=-40F weekends this January 2006 with a good supply of Beer and Ice Scraper, clean the ice to make a rink, and settle it over a Good o'l Game of Drunk'n'Stuper Sponge Hockey.

      Heston T. Holtmann, B.Sc.Eng.

      --
      - No Sig for you!
    20. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Funny
      We have some the best trained elite soldiers in the world

      Yes, Canadian soldiers are elite and highly trained.

      Both of them.

    21. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Danes better watch out, or our Canuck political leaders might start thinking about providing enough weapons to our military to bring us up to Danish standards. A bonafide arms-race.

    22. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      It's funny how whatever people are left in country when the music stops assume all historical karma points for all the people who used to live there until just before the music stopped.

      Any Vikings left in Denmark, please raise your hand? The successful vikings invaded Scotland and other places, and then, after attempts to dig the Panama Canal with claymore in 1700, they helped found Canada.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    23. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      American football or that off brand kind?

      American football, obviously, as it's the only one of the two that has a standard size for a regulation field, which allows you to say "the size of a football field" and have it mean something. I mean, come ON! A regulation FIFA field can be anywhere from 50 to 100 yards wide by 100 to 130 yards long. Asking "how many footy fields big is it" is like asking how many angels can dance on the head of pin. Not a good SOLID measurement, like american football fields, libraries of congress, or statues-of-liberty-on-its-side. And besides, it's technically a "pitch", not a "field".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    24. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He clearly says he's danish...

    25. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were a military power in the past.

      It's sad how we've fallen into near irrelevance.

    26. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by klang · · Score: 1

      As it so happens, the Vikings are having a meet this weekend:

      picture

    27. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Hockers · · Score: 1

      And you yanks aren't the only people in North America :)

    28. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada being soft I understand, but Denmark? These people used to be Vikings, shessh!

      The operative word is "used to". The last time when the Danes actually won a battle was in 1565, at Axtorna, and even then their army was composed of German mercenaries.

    29. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by zonix · · Score: 1

      Canada being soft I understand, but Denmark? These people used to be Vikings, shessh!

      I usually like to bring up this info from state.gov:

      "Viking raids brought Denmark into contact with Christianity, and in the 12th century, crown and church influence increased. By the late 13th century, royal power had waned, and the nobility forced the king to grant a charter, considered Denmark's first constitution. Although the struggle between crown and nobility continued into the 14th century, Queen Margrethe I succeeded in uniting Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, the Faroe Islands, Iceland, and Greenland under the Danish crown. Sweden and Finland left the union in 1520; however, Norway remained until 1814. Iceland, in a "personal union" under the king of Denmark after 1918, became independent in 1944."

      Unfortunately, Christianity tamed the Vikings, as it were.

      Which leaves Greenland and the Faroe Islands. The Faroe Islands will leave the union, eventually, when they can support themselves. No problem there! And I suspect Canada can have the little island in dispute, if they ask nicely. :-)

      z
      --
      What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    30. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      And you yanks aren't the only people in North America :)

      Sí, es verdad. :-) (Not that I said we were....)

    31. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by tomjen · · Score: 1

      Wrong. The last time was in 1848, where we beat the Germans. Got our ass kicked by them in 1864.

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    32. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they should start bombing NOW!

    33. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you implying that some countries don't use the metric system? Which ones?

    34. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by hemanman · · Score: 1

      Hehehe, rotfl! I wish I had some mod points right now, because she should be written into the Geneva convention as an illegal weapon, right next to nukes, biological warfare etc....

      -H

    35. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by LegionX · · Score: 1

      Don't worry.. well meet you on the half way

    36. Re:Wow, two superpowers battle it out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, canucks with weapons were really nasty bastards. probably why your gov keeps you all unarmed (military included).

  5. So there really isn't anything new under the sun? by ucahg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a Canadian, I must admit I've never heard of this debate until now. I find it intriguing, but even more so is the nature of the argument. Now perhaps its just me, but does it not remind you of two siblings fighting over a small toy?

    Except on a grander scale.

  6. Let's see what googlefight has to say! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hans Island belongs to Greenland
            5,200 results
    Hans Island belongs to Canada
            39,500 results

    1. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by shobadobs · · Score: 1

      Hans island belongs to Denmark
      20,600 results

    2. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you combine both of those, canada still wins. :P

    3. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by shobadobs · · Score: 4, Funny

      And let's not forget:

      Hans island belongs to USA
      40,300

      Hans island belongs to Mexico
      31,300

      Hans island belongs to Britain
      60,700

      So much for that.

    4. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Obligatory......

      all your base are belong to us

                          2,590,000 results.

    5. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by mattis_f · · Score: 1

      Hans island belongs to me
      64,300

      I think it's time to rethink my garden...

    6. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now: 64,301

    7. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by nebulus4 · · Score: 0

      Hans island belongs to me
      AllTheWeb returned 71,400

      So, you can forget about your garden. This island is mine and mine alone.

      --
      "It would be wrong to refuse to face the fact that everything is fundamentally sick and sad."
    8. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Hans island belongs to me

      = Mattis_f_HansIslandCount + 1

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hans island wants to be free
            191,000 results

    10. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by nocomment · · Score: 1

      Hans island belong to me
      62,200

      I win!

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    11. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do relize that the site you link to in your sig has many falsehoods, lies, and manipulation in there data, right?

    12. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by nocomment · · Score: 1

      Ack! You beat me to it!!

      Google confirms it.
      Hans Island belong to you
      65,500

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    13. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by le_jfs · · Score: 1

      hans island is mine
      300000 results

      But it can be yours for 1000000 !!!
      Contact me for details :)

      --
      main(char O){O++&&(((O-291)*O+27788)*O-868020?1:putchar(O++) )&&main(O);}
    14. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by ocie · · Score: 1

      all your Hans island are belong to us
      88,800
      someone set us up the Hans island
      190,000

      --
      JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    15. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah,we can milk it just a little more...

      All your Hands Islands are belong to us - 1,120,000 results

    16. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hans island belongs to Hitler: 15,600

      Hans island belongs to Bush: 31,700

    17. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Hans island belongs to Germany
      48.300

      Europe belongs to Germany
      754.000

      I see a headline coming: Attack of the Google Nazis. They do share the same sense for realistic goals:

      Earth belongs to Google
      240.000

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    18. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by onepoint · · Score: 1

      Hans island is mike's home

      410000
      ha ha

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
    19. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to point them?

    20. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Hans island belongs to you
      68,800
      A lot of people agree .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    21. Re:Let's see what googlefight has to say! by ogewo · · Score: 1

      Hans island belongs to my penis 23,600

  7. Searching for a battleground by WindozeSux · · Score: 3, Funny

    What are they gonna do with Google, search for locations to fight at? :)

    --
    Fallout 3 will suck.
  8. More old news... by wcdw · · Score: 0

    yet another piece of 'news' that has already had wide exposures on other sites.

    Someone remind me again why I read this site?

    Oh yeah - for the dups!

    --
    If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
    1. Re:More old news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sure ain't for the spelling.

  9. As if... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    Because fighting over barren sand isn't interesting enough, now we have folks bickering over a barren rock in the middle of the Arctic Ocean. Yeah- go Western Civilization! w00t!

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:As if... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Go humanity! Let's fight and die over how we Crack the shell off a boiled egg! (with a knike, vs. with a spoon!)

      Yes, that's a literature reference

    2. Re:As if... by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      How about the middle east? It kind of reminds me of Ariel Sharon visiting the temple mount a few years ago... not long after the 2nd Intifada was in full swing. Will the Danes exhibit the same fervor over disputed lands? I sure hope not, Canada will be devastated.

    3. Re:As if... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      Forget knife vs. spoon, what's important is which end you crack! Clearly, one should eat starting at the large end!

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    4. Re:As if... by empaler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who else would be so stupid as to vote a guy into office who was dubbed "the butcher from the Golan heights" when he was running against a Nobel Peace Prize winning man?

    5. Re:As if... by Mindjiver · · Score: 0

      Maybe because they ffered everything they could to Arafat and all they got was suicide bombers. Maybe that is why they elected Sharon, just maybe.

      --
      I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!
  10. My favorite quote... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

    A piece of rock barely as big as a football field.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:My favorite quote... by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 0

      Real football or metric?

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    2. Re:My favorite quote... by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      They're roughly the same size though soccer is a tad
      larger (esp. width) although it depends on which
      soccer field standard you apply. Then again, if you
      allow for the 100yd Canadian football field...

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    3. Re:My favorite quote... by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      110.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    4. Re:My favorite quote... by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      CFL (canadian football, not futball/soccer) fields are quite a bit bigger than their american competitors... 65 yards wide vs 53... the endzones in the CFL are bigger too (20 yards..)

      Also 3 downs & two 50 yard lines in the CFL...

    5. Re:My favorite quote... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      A piece of rock barely as big as a football field.

      Interesting. In that case they should do ownership rotation and simply build a football field there and nick name it "The most remote Danish/Canadian football field" :)

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  11. It's mine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO! That's MY ice-field!

  12. A solution... by tktk · · Score: 3, Funny
    they should fight it out over Counterstrike.

    It's 1.3 square km. in the Arctic. The only good use for that spot is another Starbucks.

    1. Re:A solution... by matt-larose · · Score: 1

      Its canadian!.

      So the only suitable coffeeshop is tim hortons!..

      Double double and a dog sled, svp.

      --
      "Be glad you sailed for a better day, But dont forget there will be hell to pay" - Dave King/Flogging Molly
    2. Re:A solution... by rascal_one · · Score: 1

      in 1.3km probably 3 tim hortons

    3. Re:A solution... by senor_burt · · Score: 1

      I'm Canadian, so I say it should be used for a Tim Hortons. Maybe a Harvey's.

    4. Re:A solution... by squarefish · · Score: 1

      I think WalMart has already started construction.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    5. Re:A solution... by hemanman · · Score: 1

      No problemo, know who SOA are/were? Danish ofc...

      -H

  13. Oh how cute... by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

    Oh how cute...unarmed Western nations bickering and threatening each other...(pats each on their fluffy heads)

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    1. Re:Oh how cute... by danharan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's cute. The really odd thing is this is the first time I hear of a government using text ads to further its PR war in an international dispute.

      This could legitimize adwords and similar programs for many governments and advocacy organizations- and spell more profits for Google. Hopefully, this will also raise the level of discourse!

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    2. Re:Oh how cute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumbass, we have more guns per capita than you rednecks (supposedly 3x more). A significant percentage of canadians have handled a firearm before they get their drivers license (I recall its about about 40%, but I cant find a source to back it up).

      http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/Cukier1.htm
      http://www.faqs.org/faqs/talk-politics-guns/canadi an-faq/

    3. Re:Oh how cute... by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      well thats fucked up

      i think your talking about anywhere BUT canada?

  14. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Well, let's face it, all the really good territory was long ago claimed, so all that's left are miscellaneous chunks of rock that are sticking out of the water here and there. My solution is to bring in about fifty thousand pounds of dynamite.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  15. Poor innocent people who took out the ads. by Fireflymantis · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can confirm that the ad does show up. the link goes to here.

    What I feel bad about is the fact that these ads were placed by citizens of their respective countries. Now that slashdot will be battering the click-through into oblivion... at $.05 a click...

    might get mighty expensive...

  16. I don't get it by WildBeast · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's an unhabitable island. Can't even get to it during the winter and it's really tiny.
    What do they want from it exactly?

    1. Re:I don't get it by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Nobody wants anything from it. There's nothing else to fight over, and as Canadians largely don't give a damn about soccer, this is pretty much the only thing that Canucks and Danes can argue about. Well, perhaps it's revenge for sending over a Montreal Mafia stooge to be ambassador to Denmark.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the reasons is probably the extension of naval territory.

      I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure there's some sort of international law that says a country has complete jurisdiction(sp?) over naval territory within 200Km of its land mass.

      So yes, the island itself may be quite small, but the naval territory (and possible oil, mineral deposits etc) are actually quite significant.

    3. Re:I don't get it by puppetman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It sets a precedent.

      Canada is arguing with the US about the Northwest Passage. The US claims it's international waters, and Canada claims it's within it's boundries, and thus internal waters.

      Make a slip in international law once, and it may haunt you for all times. The maritime border between the Yukon and Alaska is under dispute, as is Canada's claim to the continental shelf in the Artic. Canada can't concede here, or it may have to concede elsewhere, when it's more important.

      Of course, Canada has no ability to patrol it's northern border. The Canadian Coast Guard is a fine institution stuck with aging ships, few of which have ice-strengthened hulls.

      A good description is here

      In the spirit of french-fries becoming freedom fries, I ask all fellow Canadians to stop using the word danish for that flakey, overly sweet pastry, and instead use the term freedom-pastry.

    4. Re:I don't get it by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      From what I heard on NPR, the thought was that global warming might make the island more accessible to shipping traffic in the future, at which point there may be natural resources that can be economically extracted from the island and its vicinity.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    5. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fishing rights and shipping rights in an area that is seeing higher water levels due to global warming.

      It's a primary potential shipping route, and it's already near prime fishing grounds. Who has sovereignty will determine a LOT financially since those rights extend out from national land boundaries.

    6. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard also that they are investigating oil/mineral resources in the sea floor around the island.

    7. Re:I don't get it by SilentShriek · · Score: 1

      Well, it's good and cold. Perhaps they both want a new hockey rink.

    8. Re:I don't get it by empaler · · Score: 1

      Even worse, it could be 200 nm (nautical miles, not nanometers)

    9. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    10. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. To expand their maritime claims in the off chance oil, natural gas, etc is found.

    11. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This french/freedom fries still make me laugh, I'm french and here in France fries are known to be from Belgium.
      So not only was it a ridiculous and cheap move, but I think i can speak for my fellow citizens to say that we are in fact quite happy that France is no longer associated with this shame for gastronomy.

    12. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the spirit of french-fries becoming freedom fries, I ask all fellow Canadians to stop using the word danish for that flakey, overly sweet pastry, and instead use the term freedom-pastry.

      Please tell me this is a joke. Because otherwise, it would be the saddest, lamest thing I've ever heard.

    13. Re:I don't get it by udowish · · Score: 1

      I am affraid that article is not totally correct. In fact DND has announced new sat based imaging and recon systems that will be online within three years and the Canadian Navy can operate in the north, I know I have been there.

      --
      when in doubt press enter and we'll figure it out later..
    14. Re:I don't get it by puppetman · · Score: 1

      Ya, I'm joking.

    15. Re:I don't get it by Jambon · · Score: 1
      Because, in the words of Stewie Griffin:

      "It's good to have land."

    16. Re:I don't get it by dangitman · · Score: 1
      It's an unhabitable island. Can't even get to it during the winter and it's really tiny. What do they want from it exactly?

      Underpants!

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    17. Re:I don't get it by matt-larose · · Score: 1

      Psh. Remember when you say french you also mean a good population of the people here in Canada. While "french fries" may be a shame to you, cover them in gravy and cheese and you've got ambrosia.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poutine

      --
      "Be glad you sailed for a better day, But dont forget there will be hell to pay" - Dave King/Flogging Molly
    18. Re:I don't get it by typical · · Score: 1

      It's an unhabitable island. Can't even get to it during the winter and it's really tiny.
      What do they want from it exactly?


      Why do all your suburbanite neighbors spend time and money growing masses of grass, which are no good to them, since they never leave their air-conditioned house?

      It's all about penis length.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    19. Re:I don't get it by Durrik · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, and not to raise a flame war, but the US treats almost all coastal Canadian waters as International waters.

      The small straight between Vancouver Island, and the mainland coast of Canada is under dispute as well. The US likes to use it as a torpedo proving ground. Which of course upsets all the whale watchers. Since the torpedos use sonar, which the enviromentalists claim distracts the whales. Of course the US Navy claims it doesn't, its a royal mess.

      The Northwest Passage is also one of the reasons the US got real upset when the Canadian Navy started to look at acquiring a nuclear submarine. Which is why we're stuck with second hand diseal boats, that catch on fire when they leave port. Not that Canada's military can afford a nuclear boat now. But it is what is needed to patrol the waters of the north.

      I'm not sure which set of conventions the US follows when it comes to waters. I think they claim the 200 mile limit, and reconigze 3 mile limits. Except where Canadian waters are concerned, since I don't know of any waters that Canada claims, that the US recongizes. Of course this is one of the many frustrations Canada has with the US governement.

      --
      Software Engineer & Writer of Military Science Fiction and Fantasy Blog: petermwright.com Twitter: WrightPeterM
    20. Re:I don't get it by Nanoda · · Score: 1
      I ask all fellow Canadians to stop using the word danish for that flakey, overly sweet pastry, and instead use the term freedom-pastry.

      Our government has already weighed in on the matter. (Last paragraph)

    21. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the spirit of french-fries becoming freedom fries, I ask all fellow Canadians to stop using the word danish for that flakey, overly sweet pastry, and instead use the term freedom-pastry.

      The danes calls it "Wienerbrød" after the Austrian capital, so i guess they wont care.

    22. Re:I don't get it by zonix · · Score: 1

      In the spirit of french-fries becoming freedom fries, I ask all fellow Canadians to stop using the word danish for that flakey, overly sweet pastry, and instead use the term freedom-pastry.

      I don't even know why it's called a Danish? AFAIK, we didn't even invent it! We call it Weinerbroed ... as in bread from Vienna.

      And yes, I'm from Denmark.

      z
      --
      What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    23. Re:I don't get it by kilrogg · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think you're wrong about the Straight of Georgia, look at any map and you see a U.S.-Canada border marked across the straight. The waters are considered "internal waters", any foreign warships entering those waters without prior consent could be viewed as engaging in an act of war.

      The nanoose bay torpedo range you talk of is jointly run by the Canadian armed forces and the US Navy. The area was owned by the BC gov until the Feds expropriated it a few years ago. It has geographical features that make it an ideal range, something our allies lacked. More info: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/na noose.htm

    24. Re:I don't get it by bluGill · · Score: 1

      the full name is french fried potato's, referring to how they are cooked, not the origion. I have no idea if the French would deep fry potato's, but that is a whole different issue

  17. Nostradamus was wrong by spudchucker · · Score: 1

    World War III begins here!

    1. Re:Nostradamus was wrong by Fireflymantis · · Score: 1

      umm... us canadians have absolutly no decent military to speak of... the Danish would kick our ass if we actually tried to fight over this probably. so yeah. lets just do what we did before and draw a line down the center, eh?

    2. Re:Nostradamus was wrong by empaler · · Score: 1

      The Danish military was until recently grouped for holding the Red Army out of Denmark for 24 hours... I don't think we'll be swimming there, bayonettes first, any time soon XD

  18. The Future of War by chia_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    And all this time when they said "future wars will be fought by computer", I had a totally other idea in mind.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    1. Re:The Future of War by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      How soon before the 2 countries start using 302 redirects to hijack each other's sites and get them knocked out of the index? :)

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    2. Re:The Future of War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I had a totally other idea in mind."

      A totally other idea???
      Heh.

  19. Han's Island is name of Enter The Dragon Sequel by objekt · · Score: 1

    Just search google GROUPS:

    http://groups-beta.google.com/groups?q=han's+islan d

    Turns up this gem:

    "Return to Han's Island" ETD2

    (bouncing off an original suggested title "Han's Island",
    besides, "Blood and Steel" was taken)

    Bolo [Yang Tze] is alive and now controls the island,
    which is now a training ground. The island is a shadow of
    its former self. Everything has been dismantled by the
    authorities. No radios, electricity, no drugs or servants.
    It's a primitive island. Bolo is much older now and needs
    glasses because he's become extremely nearsighted.

    Meanwhile, a tiny ship sets out on a three hour tour and
    quickly finds itself storm tossed on the rough sea waters.
    Passengers and crew of "The USS Minnow" Gilligan, the skipper,
    the millionaire, his wife, the movie star, the professor and
    Mary Ann are on the ship which sets ground on the opposite side
    of Han's Island.

    The castaways at first think they are alone on an uncharted
    desert isle, but gradually come to realize they are not alone.
    As fate would have it, Gilligan loses his hat and clothes in the
    wreck, but finds some kung fu pants and a white gi.

    Extremely nearsighted Bolo trips over a sleeping Gilligan
    while practicing martial arts on the beach, Bolo loses his
    glasses in the sand and he mistakes Gilligan for Bruce Lee.
    Gilligan is taken prisoner by Bolo's men and is prepared to
    participate against his will in a fight to the death with Bolo.

    The castaways each try to free Gilligan from captivity.
    Skipper knows judo and tries to fight Bolo ("Little buddy,
    I'll save ya!") and is knocked on his butt. The millionaire
    tries to bribe Bolo, but his million-dollar check written
    on the back of a leaf is torn up ("Must be a Yale man!").
    The movie star tries to seduce Bolo, but is rebuffed.
    Mary Ann tries to get to Bolo by feeding him a big meal,
    but he eats and drinks everyone under the table.

    During the feast, the Professor use the diversion to search the
    island and discovers the old prison compound and finds the HAM
    radio that Bruce Lee used in Enter The Dragon. With a little
    knowhow and a few cocoanuts, he manages to get the radio working
    and tries to send a distress signal.

    All seems lost as the fight draws near. Before the fight,
    the professor slips Gilligan a mild does of curare which
    paralyses Gilligan moments after the fight begins. Bolo
    declares victory.

    A rescue boat arrives but Bolo and his henchmen take it over
    and leave the island and the castaways behind. Gilligan is now
    revived and the Skipper beats him over the head with his hat
    as the rescue boat drifts into the sunset.

    THE END

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
    1. Re:Han's Island is name of Enter The Dragon Sequel by Carthag · · Score: 1

      The name is Hans as in Hans Hendrik/Suersaq, the Greenlander it was named for.

  20. Google Ad by justasecond · · Score: 5, Informative


    I wonder if the publicity (and slashdotting) forced the Google ad. over it's daily limit? (For those who don't know, when you buy a Google ad. you specify how much you want to pay for clicks per day -- go over that limit and your ad. doesn't appear.)

    Hmmm...now to "research" the vaginainstute.com ad...

    1. Re:Google Ad by nocomment · · Score: 4, Informative

      That might be. When the Article was first posted i tried it (there were zero comments then) and I saw the ad, clicked blah blah. Now nothing.

      For those interested here's the URL.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    2. Re:Google Ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I saw the story on CNN the ad also disappeared when I did the search.

    3. Re:Google Ad by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      We bankrupted Denmark!

      Now THAT'S a Slashdotting.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    4. Re:Google Ad by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      We bankrupted Denmark!

      No that was Napolion.

    5. Re:Google Ad by Alsee · · Score: 1

      From the story: "Eight cents per click - or $200 a month - is money well spent to assert our sovereignty in the North," said Broadhead

      That's 2500 clicks, or less than 15 minutes under the Slashdot Effect.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  21. RIck Broadhead - attention whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is nothing but Rick Broadhead looking for a little attention - I guess the "consulting" biz has been a little slow lately.

    To confirm you're not a script,
    please type the word in this image: relative

  22. It is not the island by HermanAB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it is the surrounding waters that are important. If you own a tiny spec of an island, then you can claim 200km or economic sea waters around it. This area may contain oil, manganese nodules, fish, whatever. One example is a tiny little French island in the middle of the Canadian oil fields off the coast of Newfoundland. Canada doesn't want that to happen again. As the sea ice keeps melting, the northern tundra and sea passage becomes more important. Canada has to enforce its authority there.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:It is not the island by aaronrp · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's true that sovereignty over the island will grant rights to the marine area around it. But the strait it's in is quite small enough to be entirely covered by Canadian or Danish marine rights anyway. (See the map on wikipedia.) So at most it's going to be a small area around the island, no more than a few tens of square km. I think Canada and Denmark should agree to divide the island between them. Each of them only has one other country with which it shares a land border (Canada's with the US a bit longer than Denmark's with Germany) and this would give them a second.

    2. Re:It is not the island by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      Also, the fact that Canada and Denmark are 'squabling' over it, makes it less likely that a third party will butt in and claim it, since it would then face the wrath of both countries. There are actually quite a few peacefully disputed islands around the world. For example, the British island of St Helena has been administered by South Africa for a very long time. Same with Gough Island in the southern Atlantic ocean.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  23. A diplomatic overture... by KingSkippus · · Score: 1
    "Notwithstanding the disputed area, the Canadian foreign affairs ministry is allowing its cafeteria to sell Danish pastries as a goodwill gesture toward the Danish government and people," said ministry spokesman Reynald Doiron.

    It seems that there is hope that this senseless war can be avoided. I don't like the thought of so many brave Canadian and Danish soldiers being tragically lost in the frozen wasteland of the Arctic. And the last thing that ANYONE wants to deal with is the Hansian insurgency.

    Perhaps the Danes could respond by offering pizza with Canadian bacon in their cafeteria...

    1. Re:A diplomatic overture... by empaler · · Score: 1

      Why would we want to have any canadian bacon when we're one of the prime pork exporters in the world?

      Then again, I'm mostly vegetarian, though I wouldn't mind seeing fresh seal on the menu...

    2. Re:A diplomatic overture... by Matilda+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      All sarcasm aside, it's nice to see that nobody's renamed them Freedom Pastries yet...

      Oh, wait. All sarcasm aside. Sorry.

      --
      Tluin natha Linux xxizzuss uriu olt bwael mon'tun.
  24. Why won't Slashdot post THIS story about Google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Will it interefere with Slashdot's "business relationship" with Google?

    Google, which was about the last one in the contextual advertising space to jump on the (somewhat annoying, honestly) "ads in RSS" bandwagon, has now filed for a patent on embedding ads in syndicated content.

  25. Hey you Danes ... by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 4, Funny

    Get your friggin' Hans off our island, okay?

    1. Re:Hey you Danes ... by sn0wflake · · Score: 1

      It's ridiculous to say that Canada own Hans Island simply because of the name. Hans is a classic danish name. I'd see why Canada should have the island if it was named Johns Island, Gilbert Island, etc. because those aren't danish.

    2. Re:Hey you Danes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not funny

    3. Re:Hey you Danes ... by PKFC · · Score: 1

      Get your friggin' Hans off our island, eh?

    4. Re:Hey you Danes ... by klang · · Score: 1

      The name of the place is "Hans Ø", get it right! ;-)

  26. Not anymore... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's the slashdot bias (i bet lot of ppl coming from slashdot are googling it), but the only sponsored ad I see is "WebDesign By Skilled Team
    Very professional and affordable".

    1. Re:Not anymore... by Fireflymantis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah... Just did another google and it did not show up for me. hmm. Just curious, but is this the first slashdot story covering a google ad? I wonder if there is a precident for google to immediatly take down the ad if suddenly hundreds of thousands geeks start plowing their way into it. :)

  27. Familiar sounding by inkswamp · · Score: 4, Funny
    Isn't this reminiscent of what was said about the British and the Argentinians fighting over the Falkland Islands: It was like watching two bald men fight over a comb?

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    1. Re:Familiar sounding by Splab · · Score: 1

      Well except for the fact that we wont go into armed combat (danes) - we got like 2 submarines (not those fancy "nucular" ones, but good old diesel powered) - some 16 jets (give or take) and a few thousand soldiers who are more or less going to surrender within a few minutes of combat...

    2. Re:Familiar sounding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two things spring to mind.

      This first is that various nations are fighting about various islands for mineral rights. In the North Sea, this means oil.

      You do the math.

      The Falkland Islands (or Malvinas) dispute was slightly charged by the fact that the islands in question have a permanent population which is actually self-sufficient in financial terms, and farm the islands, and have done so for over a century under british rule, and when invaded by the troops of a brutal military junta, they asked the UK for the protection which their colonial relationship supposedly accorded them.

      You may not like the brits. You might not have liked Maggie Thatcher, then or now. But to their credit they paid their dues.

      Disclaimer: I'm not british, I'm not canadian, I'm not danish, nor south american at all. I'm not a party to any of these disputes, nor do I have anything to gain nor lose. Flames to the roundfile.

    3. Re:Familiar sounding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair enough, but while we may overpower Denmark militarily, Canadians don't want to make enemies. Heck, Danes are even more friendly and peaceful than Canadians, so it would make us look like bastards if we made a fuss.

      Plus, it may make the Queen sad if we decide to tangle with an EU country. Can't have that.

      Chances are we'll alternate ownership every six months, or give it to Portugal or something.

    4. Re:Familiar sounding by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Both countries should cede the islands to Google in exchange for having positive information on their countries get a higher Page Rank (TM) than negative information.

      Then, everybody wins! :)

      And no threats of "Google bombing" :)

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  28. Ode to Hans by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

    'Twas a bitter day, that day they came,
    Canucks and Danes, both ready to say,
    "This isle is ours, so piss off you jerks,
    Or we'll Google and Slashdot the entire works!"

    Well, Canada blustered, and Denmark stomped,
    And some nerdie netizens submitted the lot,
    To Google fine, that online star,
    To win an island that could fit in a jar.

    When it came to blows, aye those blows did ring,
    As North Atlantic seals all gathered to see,
    These crazy goddamn bastards fight for Hans,
    The most ludicrous, uninhabitable chunk of land.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  29. Behold by VonSkippy · · Score: 1

    The Inhumanity of War.

    //It's dirt, who cares.

  30. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by twilight30 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As another Canadian recently returned to Canada, I can tell you why they're fighting over it -- however stupid the whole notion is.

    We are fighting with the Danish over this to enforce our sovereignty. Unfortunately, like private arena disputes over copyright, failure to exert sovereignty means you effectively cede control over an area. Lose it if you don't use it, more or less.

    We actually have a First Nations military unit dedicated to looking after our interests in remote northern communities.

    You can read an entertaining article about the Canadian Rangers here.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
  31. Mod parent down (offtopic rant) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An opinion is an opinion.. If you don't like what someone says, thats why we have the reply button.

    Reverting to "MOD PARENT DOWN" when you don't like someone or their argument is pretty childish and pretty pathetic.

  32. Northwest Passage Skirmish by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Informative

    This battle is not merely over tiny little Hans Island. It is part of the positioning of Arctic countries, including Canada and Denmark (via Greenland), for access to the Arctic Sea. The Sea is now clearly destined to remain navigable for most, if not all, of the year, due to Greenhouse warming that has melted over 40% of the previous Summer ice. At 9% melt per decade, already begun, many ohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_passagef us will live to see the European "holy grail" of the Northwest Passage finally gained. The more national territory around the circle, the easier it will be for ships to travel under that nation's "protection". Subject to its rules and taxes, of course.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by arch-absurd · · Score: 0

      Why don't they just share the fucking island? These disputes are enervating and pointless.

    2. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      If you don't see a point, then you're an idiot.

    3. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

      Sure, but that'll come at a price. At least the surfing will be great in Vegas!

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    4. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Sure as hell it won't be Denmark that has to deal with tanker spills, pollution turning the ice black and melting it, endangered species, and military protection of the other zillion islands in the Arctic.

      So IMO, Denmark can just F.R.O. They bring nothing to the party, but want to take it all away.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    5. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      We'll all be dealing with their Greenland ice melting. Unlike the floating Arctic ice, which brings subtler (though devastating) problems, Greenland's landborne runoff will probably raise the global seas around 20 feet, on average. Which means 10 feet some places, and 30 feet other places. Or just higher amplitude global tides, or both. Combined with 16 feet from the landborne part of the Western Antarctic Ice Shelf, most humans will be affected. Either directly by Bangladesh-style inundation, or from the fleeing hordes of mostly poor people with nothing to lose.

      The greedy nations "ignoring" the Greenhouse while they count their windfalls are merely hastening their complete demise, and that of our civilization. Neither "Denmark" nor "Canada" will survive long enough to reap anything from the Greenhouse but drowning and chaos.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by udowish · · Score: 1

      when it comes to nations above sea level, Canada has little to worry about compared to the coastal US that is.

      --
      when in doubt press enter and we'll figure it out later..
    7. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      When everyone is fleeing to "high ground", Canada will have everyone in the coastal US, and points between, to worry about. Just like everyone else. Except "Canada", "the US", and all those veneers of civilization will be long gone, too late to worry about anything.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      With a name like "Hans" surely it must be Danish, but what happens when the big meltdown puts it below sea level?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    9. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by phliar · · Score: 1
      We'll all be dealing with their Greenland ice melting. Unlike the floating Arctic ice, which brings subtler (though devastating) problems, Greenland's landborne runoff will probably raise the global seas around 20 feet, on average.
      Not just that: the decreased salinity in the North Atlantic will result in the Gulf Stream "shutting off" -- in other words, Europe will enjoy the same climate that Siberia does today. Look up Global Conveyer, for instance.
      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    10. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Cool, bring it on!

      I'd love to have an ocean nearby instead of having to drive 4 hours on treacherous I-15.

      As for it getting even warmer, it won't be too bad, its a "dry heat" here. :)

      (actually it's been humid due to the monsoon season here lately).

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    11. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why people thing it will happen in such a hurry. I'm sure the US will have plenty of time to send say half a million people wearing green into high parts of canada.

    12. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither you, nor I, nor anyone alive today will still be around when the last veneers of civilization are fading into the twilight. I say lighten up.

    13. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      If you read the article, you'd see that scientists are predicting total Arctic ice melt by 2080. Greenland and other glacier melt is at the same pace. That means that at least half the people being born today will be around, barring their premature deaths as civilization drowns. Then consider that the Greenhouse has always grown only faster than any predictions, and lots of us start looking at paddling away our golden years. The last veneer might last through the collapse, as some of our current idiosyncrasies date from before the last ice age. But "lighten up" is the way to go out laughing, not to survive the end.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    14. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Besides, "in the long run, we're all dead" doesn't mean we should use up the world by the time we go. Maybe we can take it with us, but we don't get to keep it when we're gone.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    15. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, "in the long run, we're all dead" doesn't mean we should use up the world by the time we go.

      Fuck that! I for one am not going to leave anythng for the goddamn cockroaches to have when we're gone. Total war, baby!

    16. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The cockroaches will eat your brains out of your skull, while you're lying in your grave. Life is for the living: get it while you can.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  33. Wow by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    Why didn't Argentina and Britain think of that? They could have saved all money painting the QE2. Since there was no Google at the time, they could've used finger or gopher or something.

    --
    What?
  34. Fishing rights by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 1

    Which might become more important as time goes on with global warming--I don't know how much fishing might go on at that latitude. Nations sometimes go all out for fishing rights. Right now South Korea has troops on the Takeshima (as the Japanese call them) or Dokdo (in Korean) island and it's causing a little bit of tension. Of course there's also some oil in the region which probably doesn't help matters either.

  35. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by empaler · · Score: 1

    Well, you started it by occupying it.

    I'm from Greenland and have only ever once noted the dispute; looking in the CIA World Factbook entry for Denmark, at the bottom you can see the dispute at the bottom of the page, mentioned in one sentence.

  36. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by Medgur · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As another Canadian, I'm far more concerned by the USA's refusal to recognise the water between Canadian Arctic Islands as internal waters of Canada. This has resulted in a few environmental and militaristic shinnanigans.

    Here's hoping no one finds oil off the coast up there.

  37. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since when did canada have a military?

    hell, since when did denmark have a military?

    i say let denmark have it, that way they could double their land mass.

    the only good thing about denmark is they are not german.

  38. New York by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My fellow Dutch-men, the time has come to reclaim New Amsterdam! Let's all buy ads claiming our land!

  39. reminds me of when I was a kid by DrKludge · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of myself and my sister fighting over a cookie when we were a kids. My mother solved the dispute by making one of us divide the cookie in two, and the other got to choose which half they wanted.

  40. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by captain_craptacular · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is actually far more important than siblings fighting over a toy.

    For one there is a natural resources issue. There are billions of barrels of oil buried along the north slope of Alaska and Canada not too far from this island.

    Second, and possibly more importantly, there is a key territory issue. The polar ice caps are melting and it is predicted that within the next 50 years they will have melted enough to allow circumpolar shipping routes to open through the arctic. The country who controls the waters this route passes through effectively controls the route and will therefore own what will likely be the worlds most important shipping lane. (Europe to west coast USA, and Europe to China/East Asia) The idea here is that this route will pass within the territorial boundary marker of Hans Island. Denmark has far more to lose in this regard, because without Hans Island their westernmost border is Greenland which is nowhere near the upcoming shipping lanes. Canada on the other hand will probably get a piece of the pie either way.

    --
    They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
  41. Re:Mod parent down (fundie troll) by daveschroeder · · Score: 1, Informative

    Wow.

    I think you've trolled me before, but anyone is welcome to look at my web page:

    http://das.doit.wisc.edu/

    There is nothing remotely having anything to do with Christianity, much less fundamentalist Christianity, anywhere in it. In fact, there's nothing even about politics or religion in it.

    And since I know of troll of this nature would probably claim that I "just changed it", please feel free to look at the http://das.doit.wisc.edu/>wayback machine archives of my web page.

    Further, this Google comment has nothing to do with Bush, right wing politics, religion, or anything asserted in this troll post. And yes, please do look at my posting history. You'll find that out of my over-1000 posts, probably 5 of them are along the lines of the "before anyone bashes Bush..." variety. They're all also typically highly moderated, meaning they're not trolls or flamebait in the opinion of mods and metamods (because they're generally not). Further, I have not said anything remotely related to evangelism or fundamentalist Christianity, or indeed really Christianity or religion at all except tangentially, in any of my posts, or anywhere else on the web.

    So in short, I have no fucking idea what you're talking about.

  42. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we may get our pie either way, but this time we are going to be "American" and what the fucken cake too!!

  43. Dr Evil's secret hideout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    and 1 meeelion dollars

  44. Google Map by molo · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    1. Re:Google Map by mtdenial · · Score: 1

      You mean to say that the description in the article of "south of the north pole" wasn't terribly helpful? :)

      --
      I assert reality.
    2. Re:Google Map by gwait · · Score: 1

      I used your google map link to find the same lovely place in Google Earth, and posted the kmz link into current events on the Google Earth BBS.

      I also appended the name Looney Island to commemorate our Canadian $1 coin...

      Now someone post a photograph of this home away from home eh? You Danes got one handy??

      We should have a hockey series between Canada and Denmark, winner gets the rock!

      I guess a post about Freedom Patries will get me modded down for lame humour won't it??

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    3. Re:Google Map by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      Zoom out.

      It's totally closer to Canada!

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    4. Re:Google Map by geekster · · Score: 1

      Here

      Now please don't take our island from us or our already small country will disappear completely... Nah, I don't really care.

    5. Re:Google Map by gwait · · Score: 1

      The best solution I've heard showed up in the Vancouver Sun paper this morning: Split the rock down the middle, and set up a shrine for peace. But that's not funny.

      I prefer we build a wall splitting the island in two, then we could invite Pink Floyd to come tear it down!

      Nah. Too damn cold.

      --
      Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    6. Re:Google Map by geekster · · Score: 1

      I like that idea... either that or just send a man with a shovel. It shouldn't take him long to dig it below sea level.

  45. Easy solution: by Guppy06 · · Score: 0

    Deny both Canada and Denmark: have the US annex Greenland. That way we can have the Canadians surrounded on three sides, and it's a long, cold swim to Russia! Mwa-ha-ha! :)

  46. Why don't both countries just divide the island by AngryWookiee · · Score: 1

    Why don't both countries just divide the island in half?

    1. Re:Why don't both countries just divide the island by klang · · Score: 1

      what would they want with half a football field?

    2. Re:Why don't both countries just divide the island by DrMowinckel · · Score: 0

      I can just imagine the signs and barbed wire at the checkpoint:


      YOU ARE ENTERING THE CANADIAN SECTOR
      CARRYING WEAPONS OF DUTY FORBIDDEN
      OBEY TRAFFIC RULES

      VOUS ENTREZ DANS LE SECTEUR CANADIÉN
      DEFENSE DE PORTER DES ARMES EN DEHORS DU SERVICE
      OBÉISSEZ AUX REGLES DE CIRCULATION

      DU INDTRÆDER NU I DEN CANADISKE SEKTOR
      BÆRELSE AF TJENESTEVÅBEN FORBUDT
      FØLG TRAFIKREGLERNE

      Poor seabirds, seperated forever by world politics....

      --
      In soviet Russia, Raymond loves Everybody, including, but not limited to, YOU!
  47. FIGHT AGAINST THE INVAISON by i_ate_god · · Score: 3, Funny

    ANY MOVE THAT INFRINGES UPON CANADIAN SOVERIEGNTY SHOULD BE MET WITH THE GREATEST OF FORCE AGAINST THE DANES.

    THE DANISH GOVERNMENT HAS ATTEMPTED (without success) TO INVADE CANADA A TOTAL OF THREE TIMES IN THE PAST 15 YEARS. It is bad enough that true and proud Canadian culture is being ENCROACHED UPON by less than tasteful americanism, but to be invaded by WARSHIPS is UNACCEPTABLE.

    Here are somethings that we can do to protest the Danish government and it's hostile actions:

    - Rename danishes to Artic Freedom Delights and boycott resturants like Tim Hortons if they do not abide.

    - Burn Hans Christian Anderson books

    - If you haven't already, boycott Metallica, which you should be doing anyways because of their unwaivering support of the RIAA.

    - Fight against danish lies. It was an ITALIAN who discovered electromagnetism. But Danish propaganda fooled most of the world.

    - Declare PHP a Canadian invention. The Danish Government doesn't want you to know this, but Mr. Lerdorf WAS A CANADIAN CITIZEN.

    These are all peaceful political protests, but we Canadians should be ready to face the reality of the situation. After all, the danes did try to invade Canada at least three times. We still have to explore all diplomatic possibilities, but if you are a proud Canadian, when the time comes, you will take up arms to defend the Great North from the invaders. This is the Cold War of the 21st Century. CANADIAN INTERESTS AND SOVEREIGNTY MUST BE PROTECTED AT ALL COSTS.

    OH CANADA, I STAND ON GAURD FOR THEE

    --
    I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    1. Re:FIGHT AGAINST THE INVAISON by typical · · Score: 1

      Funny stuff!

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    2. Re:FIGHT AGAINST THE INVAISON by hemanman · · Score: 1

      - Declare PHP a Canadian invention. The Danish Government doesn't want you to know this, but Mr. Lerdorf WAS A CANADIAN CITIZEN.

      Nice, and what language is PHP written in? C++? Which was invented by... A Dane! See for yourself.

      -H

  48. Re:Northwest Passage Skirmish -MOD PARENT UP by erbmjw · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not the island by itself that is important to these two nations - the important point is that the island grants the nation maritime territorial rights.

  49. All military resources by data64 · · Score: 1

    As a Canadian, I want my government to commit all military resources. Both the boats and all four canoes.

    1. Re:All military resources by udowish · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't joke, it would take all of 10 minutes for the Canadian Navy to dispense with the might Dane surface ship. Yes I said "the" Danish surface ship.

      --
      when in doubt press enter and we'll figure it out later..
  50. Obviously the Danish are wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been researching the territorial dispute of Hans Island for the last six years in my graduate studies in Geology.

    Hans Island is 12.3 km away from the Canadian territory, while it is 52.2 km away from Greenland (which is under the Danish protectorate). As defined by International Fishing Law, the country with the nearest border can claim the island. It has happened in Samoa, Madasgascar, and of course New Hampshire in the past.

    The Danish would be wise to retreat as the Canadian troops can occupy and defend the island a lot quicker than the troops stationed in Greenland. Considering the nuclear capabilities of Canada, it would ill-conceived to launch a conventional assault at Hans Island. While Denmark would have the ecominical leverage of the EU, Canada would count on the support of the NATO especially considering recent fishing treaties with Spain, Portugal and Morocco.

    Which is nice.

    1. Re:Obviously the Danish are wrong! by matt-larose · · Score: 1

      Clearly they are wrong. But, while Denmark may be unable to deploy large numbers of troops quickly, they have a greater capacity for ice breakers, transport planes, fighters and attack helicopters. (Most canadian airforces operating in the area use greenland as a base)

      It takes almost as long for the CF18s to get to greenland from alberta as it does for Danish F16s to get there from Arlborg.

      What nuclear capability does canada have ?. We used to have bomarc missles here, but that was a long time ago. While theoretically we could build a bomb rather quickly, and have the resources to do it in country, I just cant see that ever happening. (Maybe just wishful thinking)

      --
      "Be glad you sailed for a better day, But dont forget there will be hell to pay" - Dave King/Flogging Molly
    2. Re:Obviously the Danish are wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be surprised if Canada would beat denmark in a nuclear Arms race http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada_and_weapons_of _mass_destruction

      But that's a silly thing to even contemplate.

  51. If Danes get Hans Isl.then the terrorists have won by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    n/t

    --
    This space available.
  52. Where else would it be? by dlleigh · · Score: 4, Funny
    I loved this line:

    The Danes say the countries' history of friendly relations should not be subjected to periodic squabbles over a frigid rock barely larger than a football field just south of the North Pole.

    At least it's accurate; they could have said something really stupid like "just west of the North Pole".

    1. Re:Where else would it be? by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      I think "just" is the keyword my friend.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  53. Never tell me the odds! by atari2600 · · Score: 1

    You think that Solo would be mad if Canada went to war with Denmark over his island? What are the odds?

    1. Re:Never tell me the odds! by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

      Did you know that Han Solo was Danish? His real name was Hans Ole...

  54. Ahh...this is real news. by William+Robinson · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Fuck Hans Island. Lemme have a look at vaginainstitute.com.:D

  55. Pleonasm by jon_oner · · Score: 1
    quote FTA: "frigid rock barely larger than a football field just south of the North Pole".

    This is the first double Pleonasm i've ever seen.

    The rock is next to the north pole, so it is obviously cold -duh.

    The island is south of the North pole. Yes, the entire planet is south of the north pole -duh!

    For those that dont understand http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleonasm

    1. Re:Pleonasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop posting this crap to Slashdot.

  56. Re:an authoritarian, not a fundie by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And this matters to the OP post how?

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  57. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently it has been going on since 1973, so it is not a new debate. Just that from time ot time somone need to say, we still want this little rock (and the 200 nautical mile around it). So hte others don't get it.
    http://www.navalhistory.dk/Danish/SoevaernsNyt/200 5/HansOe.htm
    Has a nice picture of the island.

  58. How to lose money with your art by EternityInterface · · Score: 0

    That reminds me of How to lose money with your art:

    "mary !!!
    I love you
    come back
    john"

    Surely these "ads" of the same kind will be removed soon?

    --
    the sun is god
  59. This issue may be moot soon... by The+Lord+of+Chaos · · Score: 1

    I say Canada and Denmark wait this one out a while. After a decade or so of global there won't be anything left of this island.

  60. Re:an authoritarian, not a fundie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a reply to the OP. It's a reply to its parent post.

  61. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by Medgur · · Score: 1

    Wow, I didn't mean that as a troll. I'm actually concerned by that prospect.

  62. JUST GIVE IT TO GREENLAND! WHO CARES! by Negativeions101 · · Score: 0

    This is nausiating to say the least. We (Canada) have so much land, we don't needs hans. Let's stop acting like fucken god damn 2 year olds and let Greenland have it, who cares! It makes me sick that this is even is even deemed newsworthy in the slightest!

    --

    I'm not anti-microsoft. I'm anti-bullshit. Which means I'm anti-microsoft.
    1. Re:JUST GIVE IT TO GREENLAND! WHO CARES! by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      It's not about the slightly larger than football field sized island. It's about the 200 miles (or whatever the claim distance is these days) of ocean bottom and resources around it. It's a small island but it casts a large shadow.

      Let's ice it up and play hockey for it!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:JUST GIVE IT TO GREENLAND! WHO CARES! by Negativeions101 · · Score: 0

      As I said, who cares. Do we really need that area? We can live without it... it won't really make 2 shits of a difference if we have it or not.

      --

      I'm not anti-microsoft. I'm anti-bullshit. Which means I'm anti-microsoft.
  63. You laugh, but if they play favorites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait until Google decides that one of the ads isn't popular enough (or whatever) and yanks all the ads from whichever side they disagree with.

    I mean, they've not been above taking sides elsewhere--search for "gay marriage" and look at the sponsored links. You'll see only one side of the issue represented.

    Perhaps you agree with them in this case, and it's certainly within their perogative to censor whomever they please--that's one thing--but if the issue is so divisive, why do they only sponsor one side of it?

    Given how important Google is becoming to computer users everywhere, their neutrality (or the lack thereof) may become important for anyone who finds their ideas to be unpopular with Google.

    Especially with what they're willing to do in places like China.

    1. Re:You laugh, but if they play favorites? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      just wait until Google decides that one of the ads isn't popular enough (or whatever) and yanks all the ads from whichever side they disagree with.
      I mean, they've not been above taking sides elsewhere--search for "gay marriage" and look at the sponsored links. You'll see only one side of the issue represented.


      OMG! When I do a Google serach on "gay marriage" all of the adwords results that came up were either entirely neutral on the subject or were advertizing towards gays! OMG!!11!oneoneone!

      I think maybe you have a persecution complex. You're claiming that Google is "yanking" ads on your side of the issue, yet you provide no absolutely no reason to believe that any anti-gay marriage group ever had any interest in buying the "gay marriage" adwords. You certainly have not shown that Google has ever "yanked" such an ad.

      If Google has done that, well it would probably make for front page Slashdot news reguardless of which side of the issue Google was "yanking" ads.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  64. Politicians: stay the hell away from online ads by dezmund · · Score: 1

    The thought of internet ads becoming a battle ground like tv ads during the 2000/2004 US presidential campaign is a nightmare.

    1. Re:Politicians: stay the hell away from online ads by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 1

      not really. You can block internet adds.

      Also internet ads are generally less misleading. That is because they have to use reasoned writing (not soundbites and suggestive imagery as in TV) and if someone is already at the internet, they can easily do a search to check the other side's position.

    2. Re:Politicians: stay the hell away from online ads by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      You obviously haven't seen enough P.1.L.L.Z Fr0m |\/|eXIc0 spam ads have you?

  65. All Your Base by +InvaderSkoodge · · Score: 1

    All Your Hans Island Are Belong To Us!

  66. Falklands all over again by anarkhos · · Score: 1

    This is like two bald men fighting over a comb

    --
    >80 column hard wrapped e-mail is not a sign of intelligent
    >life
  67. Let's Sink It by herbicidal+maniac · · Score: 0

    As a Canadian I feel we should solve this problem once and for all... just sink the island... how much could it cost for a dredging platform. It's only the size of football field.

    1. Re:Let's Sink It by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      By the time it is usefull for shipping it will be underwater anyway.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  68. 2006: Bush calls Junkbuster "Terrorist Tool"... by argent · · Score: 1

    The thought of internet ads becoming a battle ground like tv ads during the 2000/2004 US presidential campaign is a nightmare.

    I can just see the senate debate in 2007 or 2008 over the use of popup-blockers and ad-killing proxies.

  69. Re:Mod parent down (fundie troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    As it should be. Same with anti-Muslim, anti-Jew, and anti-everything else that is irrational, unscientific, and downright stupid.

    Hope that helps.

  70. Re:an authoritarian, not a fundie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Irrelevant. This issue and all replies (including this one) are offtopic and irrelevant to the debate. The issue isn't whether or not what the offtopic issues being raised are true or not, or even if they deserved to be raised, but the fact that it has NOTHING at all to do with the topic of the story.

    This is not a proper venue for having this type of discussion, especially when the attacks are ad hominem and do not even remotely affect the statments the person in question is making, since he made no political opinions whatsoever.

    This entire thread is pathetic and the people who are wasting everyone's time and bandwidth by starting this bullshit should be ashamed for being so petty and callous.

  71. A Canadian's perspective by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    They used it for centuries and I'm sure people in northern Canada have too since they are probably the same people.

      How about letting the Inuit (not sure if they are the same in Greenland) have the island as an autonomous region? In a way it would be shared by Canada, Greenland and the indeginous people of the area.

    1. Re:A Canadian's perspective by wk633 · · Score: 1

      That or give it the legal status that Antarctica has, it belongs to nobody.

  72. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The vestiges of colonialism rears its ugly, racist, nationalistic head.

  73. Re:an authoritarian, not a fundie by TapeCutter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    A cowardly troll if ever I saw one.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  74. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by thatnerdguy · · Score: 1

    I'm with you on that one, I think I actually saw a show about that recently. I believe that they were saying as there's less and less of an ice cap, that companies/countries are looking to exploit the northwest passage and stuff...if only we had a way to defend it--like submarines.

    --
    I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
  75. Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was with the Canadian Hydrographic Service surveying the area in 1976. Boy is it barren.

    The claim that Greenland Natives used the island for centuries is quite suspect. There are not now, nor have there ever been a lot of people up there. Southern Greenland (where the vikings settled) is near unfrozen sea. The sea between Greenland and Ellismere Island is frozen for most of the year. There have been periods of hundreds of years when there was no settlement at all near there. There were probably as many Canadian Innuit on the island as there were Greenlanders. Good luck proving it though.

    The high arctic is so barren that the Canadian government actually had to resettle eskimos (now they call themselves Innuit) there in the fifties. Most of the life is below the ice and it is quite thick. Most of the plant life is quite small, a few lichens and sedges (like grass). There are a few rodents, some foxes, some wolves and polar bears. The polar bears hunt seals by pulling them up through their breathing holes in the ice. Human life isn't quite impossible there.

    Given that there is hardly any settlement there, Canada has to work at maintaining soveriegnty.

  76. The US may actually have to intervene...no kidding by voss · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The territory was unclaimed prior to 1985,
    Allowing a European nation (denmark) to effectively claim new territory in waters of North America violates the Monroe Doctrine. While Canada is not a very good claimant its the only claimant that is compatible with US interests. If Greenland were independent it wouldnt be an issue, but I dont like the idea of Canada being forced to cede territory in North America to the EU(denmark).

  77. Reminds me of Toys (1992) ! by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 1

    Patrick Zevo, "Toys" (1992): I can't even eat. The food keeps touching. I like military plates, I'm a military man, I want a military meal. I want my string beans to be quarantined! I like a little fortress around my mashed potatoes so the meatloaf doesn't invade my mashed potatoes and cause mixing in my plate! I HATE IT when food touches! I'm a military man, you understand that? And don't let your food touch either, please?

    --
    "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
  78. Re:I'll just take a bit of swamp in Florida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a small patch of land in Florida that nobody uses because it's a deep, festering swamp. Nobody can live there, so who cares if I take it?

  79. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  80. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Excellent points. Considering the rate of Artic melting, perhaps Canada should go back and plant a flag with a somewhat taller flagpole?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  81. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  82. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

    Well, you started it by occupying it.

    The natives in Canada say that sometimes too... but look what happened in the end. :D

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  83. Re:The US may actually have to intervene...no kidd by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

    Here we have a dispute over territory between two fairly civilized and democractic countries, and military action extremely impropable.

    There's no way the US can come claim it harbors terrorists or evil dictators. So why can't we just leave the US out of this? The countries involved are Canada and Denmark...

    --
    - These characters were randomly selected.
  84. Overheard in a Canadian War Room by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

    General: Let's go get those Danish hosers! Troops: General: uhhhh....and then we'll go fishing, eh? Troops: YEA! LET'S GET 'EM!

    1. Re:Overheard in a Canadian War Room by DaveM753 · · Score: 1

      I hate formatting problems. Let's try that again:

      General: Let's go get those Danish hosers!
      Troops: (slack mumbles of disapproval)
      General: uhhhh....and then we'll go fishing, eh?
      Troops: YEA! LET'S GET 'EM!

  85. Open Source it by Packet+Pusher · · Score: 1

    Islands want to be free!

  86. Re:Mod parent down (fundie troll) by Archangel_Azazel · · Score: 1

    ...apparently so are idiot coward um...AC's. (Yeah, redundant I know, but I just got off work and I'm tired and really fucking cranky.) If you have an opinion, chime in with it, but AT LEAST have the balls to log in first and not post AC...or are you afraid of a lil' Karma?

    (Speaking of which...sigh...oh well, it happens.)

    A.A

    --
    Your mind is like a parachute. It works best when it's been opened.
  87. War between Canada and Denmark by theolein · · Score: 1

    Ice hockey sticks vs. cans of Tuborg

  88. Here's my solution by Will2k_is_here · · Score: 1

    The Danes can have Hans Island if they give us Greenland. It'll help satisfy our expansionistic tendancies and we'll make the Russians uneasy. Look out Alaska!

    Little known fact, the Alaskan panhandle is American simply because the Brits felt giving it to the U.S. would help encourage them to join a war against the Kaiser. Course they balked on the deal and didn't show up until 3 years into it. America should give it back.

  89. Sovereignty? Bah! by phliar · · Score: 1
    A little postage-stamp size rock that's ice-bound 364 days of the year with a population of exactly zero (0) -- who gives a shit? These governments need to get out more: go to the pub, lift a drink or two, get a date, get a life!

    (At least we geeks only argue about important things like the superiority of emacs over vi.)

    --
    Unlimited growth == Cancer.
  90. I DOES belong to Denmark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For your information I am neither Canadian nor Danish. However after reading the info on both sides it seems to me that Denmark is the rightful owner. After all Denmark owned Greenland long before Canada even existed. Canada is a very young country.

    I believe that whenewer there is a conflict between a young an an old country the old country must prevail, the young MUST respect the old.

    Another example: Iraq is the oldest country on Earth (Summer, the oldest state on Earth was in Mesopotamia), while US is only 200+ years old. Therefore Irak should prevail, the young must respect the old. BTW, I am neither Arab nor Muslim, I am an Atheist of Christian background.

    1. Re:I DOES belong to Denmark by flubbergust · · Score: 1

      We Swedes kicked out the Danes looong ago (what do you think we and the Norwegians celebrate on our national day? Independence from Denmark of course) so I do NOT belong to Denmark. Thank God for that.
      Okay, I am part Danish on my maternal grandmothers side but I am more Norwegian and even more Swedish. Would that make me a super Viking?

      Ohhh, now I see. Typo. "It does belong to Denmark." Ahh. Thank God that you don't belong to Denmark either :-) Sweden did belong to Denmark once (and they slaughtered us and massacred far too many Swedes) and after losing Sweden and Norway the Danes cant afford to lose anything else. But they cant do much anyway in Denmark. I wouldn't be surprised if they lost that island. And they cant build cars in Denmark. Any country that cant build cars is just sad and pathetic.

    2. Re:I DOES belong to Denmark by hemanman · · Score: 1

      We should have kicked your ass when we had the chance, damn drunk swedes! ;-)

      Seriously, how many cars are going to be made in Trolhättan from now on?!?

      -H

    3. Re:I DOES belong to Denmark by geekster · · Score: 1

      Ooooh a swedish troll, how appropriate! :)

      BTW, I have nothing agaisnt Sweden. I just find such excessive national pride to be quite pathetic really.

    4. Re:I DOES belong to Denmark by Mysund · · Score: 2, Funny

      No. You are so wrong at serveral points...:
      You say danes cant build cars. Look at this http://www.leitra.dk/
      No swedish "car" has that fuel efficiency.
      Today Sweden still occupies the danish teritorys Skåne, Halland and Blekinge, stolen in the 1650's by Sweden, while the danes was fighting off germans from our borders, so dont talk about occupation
       
      I remember some years ago when another nation on the american continent (these nations was btw. build by european "emigrants" (read: criminals unwanted in europe, put on boats, and ordered "Go west!")), claimed ownership of an island owned by a european country...
      Today the Falklands are still european ground. And so will Hans Island be.
      Heh' its fun to be rude... 80P
       
      Well quite frankly Hans Island belongs to the Inuits, that lives in Alsaka Canada and Greenland. Not Denmark, Canada or USA should claim it. I think it should be part of an international Inuit zone.
      But if oil or other resources are found there, Bush will claim that the local Inuits are "lead by an evil dictator, and Hans Island produces weapons of mass destruction. We dont need any more proof than that. Its simply a matter of doing the right thing". Then it would be renamed to Hansiburton Island.

  91. You know what you Googling... by Mad+Bad+Rabbit · · Score: 1

    Yes, and by using Google + phrases from Zero Wing,
    we soon find a peaceful solution to this conflict.

        Take off every Hans Island 468,000
        Move Hans Island 523,000

    --
    >;k
  92. Re:Mod parent down (fundie troll) by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

    Apparently (at least one of) the moderators hate Christians too.

    Well, waste your mod points on your hate.

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  93. Please? by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 1

    Can they both lose?

    --
    Fuck it
  94. It has to be said by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

    All your Hans Island are belong to us
    92,300

  95. Re:The US may actually --- Comment and by erbmjw · · Score: 1

    The territory was involved in the Denmark-Canada artic territories dispute in the 1970s so it was not left unclaimed until 1985, both nations have claimed the island and the resulting maritime area.

    No the US would not have to intervene, but the US governement could choose to do so, as a means to push other maritime territorial issues into the public arena.

    Would you please clarify your statement that Canada is not a very good claimant in this dispute?

  96. Possession is 9/10 of the law! by sssmashy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The solution to this territorial dispute is really quite simple.

    Canada should build a permanent settlement on the island - a humble cabin equipped with a satellite dish, diesel fuel tanks, a generator, and a large store of rations.

    Some lucky private from the Canadian armed forces would be dispatched to guard the island in 3-month shifts, equipped with lots of pornography and a 50 calibre machine gun to scare off any encroaching Danish helicopters.

    1. Re:Possession is 9/10 of the law! by Ravnsgaard · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's not a solution, but an invasion of danish territory..

    2. Re:Possession is 9/10 of the law! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're right. it should be an american private.

  97. The Danes send an ice-breaking frigate by craXORjack · · Score: 1
    "There is speculation the Danes will once again send an ice-breaking frigate to the island. But how is Canada prepared to match this show of muscle?" Gordon O'Connor said in a statement.

    In response, Canada sends its most powerful warship...

    What! Canada has a warship?

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  98. The Danes send an ice-breaking frigate by craXORjack · · Score: 0, Redundant
    "There is speculation the Danes will once again send an ice-breaking frigate to the island. But how is Canada prepared to match this show of muscle?" Gordon O'Connor said in a statement.

    In response, Canada sends its most powerful warship...

    What! Canada has a warship?

    --
    Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
  99. I say by dimeglio · · Score: 1

    Nuke the island and be done with it.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  100. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by k98sven · · Score: 3, Interesting

    +5 insightful?! Misinformed at best.

    For one there is a natural resources issue. There are billions of barrels of oil buried along the north slope of Alaska and Canada not too far from this island.

    Look on a map? Here's one. That white spec is Hans Island, in the sound between Greenland and Ellesmere Island. Now zoom out and check the distance to the Canadian-Alaskan border where the oil. It's pretty damn far. (Yes, the distance is distorted in this projection, but it's still about half the width of the USA.)

    The idea here is that this route will pass within the territorial boundary marker of Hans Island. Denmark has far more to lose in this regard, because without Hans Island their westernmost border is Greenland which is nowhere near the upcoming shipping lanes.

    This is complete nonsense. Again, Hans Island is in the sound between Ellesmere island and Greenland. Not Baffin Island. It is not anywhere near the North Western passage. (Heck, the island isn't even in-frame on Wikipedia's map)

    And Denmark hasn't made any claim to the Northwest Passage anyway. The USA has though. (Or rather, the USA does not recognize it as Canadian waters)

  101. Vagina's Last Laugh.... by blantonl · · Score: 0

    It appears that the vagina had the last laugh.

    --
    Lindsay Blanton
    RadioReference.com
  102. Re:Mod parent down (fundie troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Just shuddup ,will you? Who cares if you "just got off work" and are "really fucking cranky". If you're challenging the AC posts, kindly post your full name and contact details here.

    ATLEAST (as you would say in CAPS) have the balls to reveal your real name and address and not post under a pseudonym....or are you afraid of a lil' Karma?

    A.C.

  103. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by SuneSpeg · · Score: 1

    I better start saying im a proud Dane.
    I havent heard about it until a few weeks ago either. The "case" has been resting since the 70's -where i was actually busy fighting with my brother about small toys.
    I have no clue who is actually entitled to it, im sure there are many opinions about that, but i think most wouldnt give a damn about the island itself - which is more useless than melted snowball, but...
    When/if climate changes, the island can become more important,actually the vicinity around it. I have heard oil and fishing industry mentioned too in this context. So i can understand why nobody just wants to let go of it.
    Maybe we should split the island like Berlin after WW2.. :)
    Or maybe Denmark should just send the entire fleet (both ships) and invade Canada !

  104. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    50 years? MAn!! Try next 20 years. The polar ice cap will be melted completely for at least the "summer" by 2025 with only floating ice.

    In 50 years there will be very significant melt in the Antarctic (ie. the land based ice). Greenland might be green again in 50-100 years.

    The Global Warming is not gradual in the Arctic. It is accelerating, FAST. There are already 5-6C average increase in temp. there. And that is NOW.

  105. Bleargh! by Biomechanical · · Score: 2, Funny

    This whole thing reminds me of the Terry Pratchett novel Jingo.

    Overnight, an island basically pops up out of the sea, right smack-bang equidistant between Klatch and the city-state of Ankh-Morpork, and suddenly everyone's arguing about going to war to "knock johnny foreigner" off of their bit of land.

    Damn shame there's no roundworld equivalent of Sir Samuel Vimes who's going to go and arrest everyone forcing the argument over this for "disturbing the peace", "loitering with intent to cause an affray" (occupying the island with troops), and basically throw the dickheads claiming it as their own into prison for 30 days.

    It would be nice if Hans Island just sunk into the ocean and disappeared. Wouldn't the people claiming the place as their own have egg on their faces then?

    `Haha, you silly bastards lost an island!'

    --
    His name is Robert Paulsen...
  106. No European Nation cares about the Monroe Doctrine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as I know there is no diplomatic treaty between any European Nation and the US about the Monroe Doctrine and thus no European Nation has to respect it. If US wants to enforce the Monroe Doctrine they should sign diplomatic treaties with other sovereign nations about it.

    When Monroe was president US was a new and weak nation, no European power cared about what Monroe said or wanted. For example, five decades after Monroe, when Napoleon III sent an army to Mexico, he did not care about the Monroe Doctrine and neither did the US. If US cared, they would have sent an army to Mexico to fight the French troops.

  107. holy meta paradox Batman! by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

    To quote google:

    News results for hans island - View today's top stories
    Island squabble goes Google - CNN International - 28 Jul 2005

    How trippy is that? The top thing on the page is a news link about how the issue has hit google. Still no sign of what the article is mentioning, but the story about it is quite prominent!

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  108. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by zsau · · Score: 1

    Actually, if that's true about sovereignty, it's totally unlike copyright. One reason there's so many people who object to current copyright laws is that failure to enforce your copyright means ... absolutely nothing to the future enforceability of it. Hence, something someone created and published in 1930 and then died fifty years later is still copyrighted, but it might be very difficult to find out who holds the copyright and get to license it. Patents similarly last until their expiration, which is why GIFs were under-the-radar till the holder of a patent covering an aspect of the format decided they wanted to enforce it.

    Trademarks, however, do require enforcement to remain, because if I start referring to all cola softdrinks as 'coke', then when I say 'coke', you don't know if I'm talking about Coca-Cola's softdrink, or Pepsi's, or Tarax's, or whoever else's who make a cola softdrink. (Of course, I do, and so do most people unless they looove Coca-Cola and haaate Pepsi, but its fair enough that legal recognition of genericisation of trademarks is a slow process.)

    (This post says nothing about the requirement of enforcing sovereignty to maintain it. I don't know anything about that.)

    --
    Look out!
  109. If they really can't find any way to decide... by Murasaki+Skies · · Score: 1

    ...why don't they bid against each other for it? Then the winner pays a price they thought was worth it, and the loser gets more money than they viewed the island as being worth.

    --
    Waiiii!!!!!! I have bad karma!
  110. Sounds smart, but you're -1 wrong by raehl · · Score: 1

    Here is Hans Island:

    http://maps.google.com/maps?q=hans+island&ll=80.64 3463,-67.236328&sll=37.062500,-95.677068&spn=3.465 168,16.699219&sspn=68.872962,70.312500&num=4&start =0&hl=en

    As you can see, this island is in a straight between Canada and Greenland. It's not in international waters - it's pretty much right on the line between Canada and Greenland. Control of this island has no bearing whatsoever on control of natural resources, nor does it have any bearing on control of a shipping route - both because Canada and Greenland each control one half of the straight no matter who controls the island, and because nobody would ship through this straight in the first place - it's quite a bit north of any northwest passage route (and also nowhere near alaska).

    Maybe next time you should figure out where the island is before you pretend you have a clue. ;)

  111. Re:The US may actually have to intervene...no kidd by lxs · · Score: 1

    So why can't we just leave the US out of this?

    What? Leave the US out when the poor Hansians have been living for decades under a brutal dictatorship?

    Who's going to liberate all that oil, uh I mean all those poor Hansians?

  112. Actually, it belongs to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hans island belongs to me
    64,400 results

    So quit fighting over my property!

  113. Okay, I'm not ready for retirement yet, but.... by Patchw0rk+F0g · · Score: 1

    ...if you're a successful, Canadian /. reader, perhaps you could be swayed by the likes of this page http://www.efficientmarket.ca/article/Hans_Island? code=hi5 to ensure that our heritage, land mass and common property stays where it needs to be: in the land of the snapping beaver!

    Perhaps we could pursuade Conrad Black to retire there, and get the annoying pus-bag out of the headlines for a whil... Oh. He's British now. Nevermind. Call Dalton McGuinty instead.

    --
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. ~~ Hunter S. Thompson
  114. Hans Island first, THE WORLD NEXT! by Roland+of+Gilead · · Score: 1

    Hans Island first, THE WORLD NEXT!

    Fear Canada!!
    /drinking Tim Horton's coffee and eating a Freedom Pastry

    This War is being fought on Americas Army server 126.967.54.37:136 Hans Island Map - Canada ahead 35 frags to the Danes 9!

  115. Yeah, right... by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    You will be crushed under the the Danish military might...

  116. Re:Mod parent down (fundie troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually, I have also had you do your pro-bush crap on me as well, but you got modded down for it (of course, from your POV, it is just the liberal side of /. rather than a rant by you).

    But you know what, I still believe in freedom, so you are free to do as you see fit (sadly, you would deny me that if you were allowed; that is they difference between a right-winger and a liberatarian).

  117. US is more likely to support Denmark by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    The real issue is whether the nothern passage is Canadian or International. US supports the later claim. Hans Island going to Canada would lend weight to the Canadian ownership of the Northern Passage.

    1. Re:US is more likely to support Denmark by udowish · · Score: 1

      there is no claim, Canada OWNES the Northen passage, period.

      --
      when in doubt press enter and we'll figure it out later..
  118. Do you realize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    An opinion is an opinion.. If you don't like what someone says, thats why we have the reply button.Reverting to "MOD PARENT DOWN" when you don't like someone or their argument is pretty childish and pretty pathetic.

    that you did the very same thing you claim to be arguing against in your comment? The GP was expressing an opinion (and you say "An opinion is an opinion" whatever that is supposed to mean). Then you reverted to your own "MOD PARENT DOWN" because you didn't like the argument/opinion, THUS implying that you yourself are childish/pathetic by your own argument. WTG *clap* *clap*

  119. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  120. Re:The US may actually have to intervene...no kidd by FFFish · · Score: 1

    While Canada is not a very good claimant its the only claimant that is compatible with US interests.

    If that's what it comes down to, I say we give it to Denmark, just to spite the USA. Those fuckers are still screwing us over softwood trade despite several international rulings that what they are doing is wholly illegal. And there's the beef embargo. And there's the assholes in some podunk state wanting to pump all their polluted water into Manitoba. And there's the whole issue of NAFTA and its screwing-Canada terms on all natural resources.

    Grrr. Being allied with the USA sucks.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  121. Re:The US may actually have to intervene...no kidd by deesine · · Score: 0


    Grrr. Being allied with the USA sucks.

    Ya, I'm sure it's better being an enemy of the USA.

    --
    damaged by dogma
  122. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are billions of barrels of oil buried along the north slope of Alaska and Canada not too far from this island.

    You're uninformed and/or wrong. This island is absolutely nowhere near Alaska.

  123. at ease! Greenland is not EU by sita · · Score: 1

    The territory was unclaimed prior to 1985,
    Allowing a European nation (denmark) to effectively claim new territory in waters of North America violates the Monroe Doctrine. While Canada is not a very good claimant its the only claimant that is compatible with US interests. If Greenland were independent it wouldnt be an issue, but I dont like the idea of Canada being forced to cede territory in North America to the EU(denmark).


    Greenland is not a part of the Union:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_member_state_ territories_and_their_relations_with_the_EU#Greenl and

    If Greenland claiming Hans Island would be a problem with the Monroe doctrine, then Canada claiming it would be too, considering who's queen.

  124. When i searched for "hans islands" by SMitra72 · · Score: 0

    I got the following caption in the "sponsored links"

    Hans Island - Dispute
    Whats the big deal? Everyone
    knows it belongs to Canada!
    www.ergo4me.com

    And it links to an article about how the guy is a Canadian and thinks it should be part of Canada.
    http://www.ergo4me.com/howtobuy.php

  125. Simple geek solution, seriously. by Alsee · · Score: 1

    Damn politicians. Does it REALLY take a geek to see the obvious solution here?

    According to the linked article:
    The countries agreed in 1973 to draw a border halfway between Greenland - a semi-autonomous Danish territory - and Canada's Ellesmere Island.

    Just go on eBay and buy two bloody GPS units. Give one to the Canadian representative and one to the Danish representative. If they want to be anal about it just flip a coin to decide who gets each one.

    Phase one the Canadian places his GPS unit anywhere he likes on dry land on Canada's Ellesmere Island and the same for Danish representative placing his GPS unit anywhere in Greenland. Obviously the each wants to place their GPS units as close to Hans Island as possible.

    In order to avoid stupid tide-based games each GPS unit must remain in place for 24 hours, if a unit gets wet then that side forfits. If both units get wet then they're both idiots and they both obviously forfit Hans Island to Paraguay ownership.

    Phase two is to find the center of Hans Island. The two representatives place their GPS units on opposite ends of the island. Obviously each side wants to place their unit as close to their own territory as possible. Again the units are left in place for 24 hours with the same forfit rule if a unit unit gets wet, except this time if both units get wet the idiots obviously forfit of Hans Island to Kazakhstan ownership.

    You then average the two readings on Hans Island and calculate the distance to each of the readings in the first phase. Whichever side is closer wins.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  126. Re:The US may actually have to intervene...no kidd by Tesla+Tank · · Score: 1

    As a fellow Canadian, I'm rather alarmed by this knee-jerking reaction. I don't mean to pick on you particularly, it really is a problem with a lot of Canadians.

    See, a lot of Canadians hate the US because they're so evil, for lack of a better term. I share a similar view actually. However, we mustn't let feelings overcome rational thinking. Else, we would be harmed in the end.

    In this specific issue, I believe there is a border dispute between Yukon and Alaska. If Canada is to lose Hans Island, it might set a dangerous precedent. The US would take advantage of this and try to redraw the border between Alaska and Yukon. So you see, more research is always preferable than knee-jerking reaction.

  127. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I happy to see that US high schools aren't the only ones turning out illiterate, profane idiots.

  128. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by ukmountie · · Score: 1

    Canada has some very nice submarines bought from the UK. No wait....

  129. It does NOT matter if no European nation cares... by voss · · Score: 1

    Its not a treaty, it is a stated cornerstone of US foreign policy. The United States does not allow European powers to gain new colonies in the Americas. If any European power feels ready to go head to head with the US armed forces...feel free to try.

    Lets put it this way, I oppose the war in Iraq but I have no problem with the US enforcing its monroe doctrine and if that includes the US supporting independence for Greenland from Denmark to settle the matter I have no problem with that either.

    As for Napoleon III we DID Care... in 1863 however we were a little busy with something called the American Civil War. A mere year and half after the civil war ended, Napoleons little puppet was executed.

  130. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by ucahg · · Score: 1

    Or maybe Denmark should just send the entire fleet (both ships) and invade Canada !

    Well, it would have to be quick. We need to gear up for the 200th anniversary of the War of 1812 with our pals to the south.

  131. It's really quite simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The place is called "Hans Ø". Even if we write it "Hans Island" it's still a distinctly Scandinavian name. So let's do what we always do: Blame Canada.

  132. Re:The US may actually have to intervene...no kidd by FFFish · · Score: 1

    Touche'. Let's take Alaska while we're at it, then. They seem more like Canucks than Americans anyways, what with their marijuana initiatives, salmon, and midnight sun.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  133. The Monolith Says... by SirBruce · · Score: 1

    All These Islands Are Yours
    Except Hans.
    Attempt No Landing There.
    Use Them Together.
    Use Them In Peace.

  134. Re:Mod parent down (fundie troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troof. Muzzies and Jews have weird logic.

    Jew logic:
    Me: 2 + 3 = 5
    Phil "Jew" Kaplan: 2 + 2 = $423,095,092

    Q.E.D.
    This must explain why they have all of the money and control Hollywood

    Muzzies oppose the advancements of higene:
    Frederick the rational atheist: Toilet paper is used for higenic applications
    Abdullah Mullah Muzzie: Wipe the ass with fist, praise Allah, eat, praise Allah again

    Yick.

  135. Re:The US may actually have to intervene...no kidd by Tesla+Tank · · Score: 1

    Ha! With oil fields up there? No way in hell would US ever give it up. I think they just passed a new bill to drill for oil up there.

  136. Re:Mod parent down (fundie troll) by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

    Anti-Christian hate speech is popular on Slashdot.

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  137. Canada wouldn't be so cruel by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    Rename Quebec "danelaw" and give it to them

    That would make for one of the quickest war crimes trials in Hague history.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  138. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when is the Rangers a "First Nations military unit"!?

    Get a grip.

  139. Tim Horton's if Canada had their way by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

    Any Canadian would tell you so.

  140. Re:So there really isn't anything new under the su by Dmitri_Yuriescu · · Score: 1

    You may think the mentioned reasons for the dispute here sound stupid, but they are the actual reasons for the dispute! Wars are known to be fought for non-existent reasons these days, you know. The free map of oil resources doesn't have any oil around Hans Ø (Hans Island as it has always been called in Danish) because it hasn't been found yet, but it is likely that that there is some oil.

    I'm Danish, but I'd welcome a Canadian invasion as Denmark partakes in the US invasion of Afganistan, Iraq a.o. and lets the US Army build military bases on Greenland - including Weapons of Mass Destructions (TM), Missile Shilds and the gods only knows what other evils.