Normally, it is rare enough for people to give money , and I would not want to discourage that. Look carefully for the right charity organization, and make sure that they do not spend it all on administration and other internal costs. The right organizations will spend their money at the right time and the right cause. Your favourite charity organization will save it for you (and probably get better intrest as well, being an organization).
Great idea. I've started to collect bukkake already to implement your scheme. Maybe in a few years the collection will be big enough. I will let you know!
Just to fuel your imagination, I've put in some nice uses: - Networked camera's (more zooming, tilting and maybe even lighting with 39 W) - Networked printers - Home server appliances (my VIA EPIA runs great with DVD player and 3.5" HDD on 53W, it would run just great on 39W without the DVD player) - Media players (MPEG4 & MPEG 2 layer 3) - Downlink switches
And I do not have a clue why they never use this for PDA's. Use a common network plug to synchronize your PDA, and give the customer a nice powered switch or network adapter instead of those stupid cradles.
Currently the standard is mostly found in Remote Access Points. I would have put my access point (which is at the best place for RF, but not for cables) on power over ethernet, but these components are hard to find. Just putting 5 V and splitting it at the end does not seem to work, probably because of the distance.
That's why the devices first _check_ if the other device is a power over ethernet device. I've read the RFC of the standard, and this functionality is already included.
I agree...up till point 5. It's perfectly possible to use a stereo or even mono plug to put a digital signal over coax. You could even auto-sense (by default). It probably depends on the innards if an additional IC is needed. Most high end sound card have this feature (e.g. my soundblaster audigy). Optical might be more difficult.
Though I applaud the effort, I weep for the amount of energy that is used by people just to show off their house to their neighbours. This has nothing to do with a romantic christmas in my view. The amount of lights is going up here (the Netherlands) as well, probably due to the fact that we have too much money (or energy is too cheap). Some people still think its interesting to copy the USA for some reason...
And I wonder if they count the music DVD sales as "CD" sales. They probably wouldn't. What about iMusic, does that count? I always see them moan about CD sales. What about MUSIC sales? Since when does it matter through which medium you sell your music? Simple prediction: in 2020 the sales of CD's will have plummeted to an all time low, with most of the revenue coming from 2nd hand sales.
Yup, and then it should say that the word is equal. If I put a text into babelfish it won't make a list of the words that are not translated. This is a bad thing, since I don't know if the word is not in the dictionary or if the word is the same in both languages. Which makes quite a bit of difference in everyday use.
In defense of babelfish, it is about making pages understandable for the user, and not the other way around. But for other translators it should be a must.
Are the antenna's difficult to integrate into a phone? Or a laptop? I don't know, do you?
So if you cannot do this with wires, you cannot do it wireless? That the current rate would be thousands of dollars (now) does not matter. With 3G most operators charge per MB anyhow.
Wired links within a corporate infrastructure easily manage 1Gb/s. 10 Gb/s is not a problem, certainly not in 2015. Hell, you could put that over TP copper by then.
I agree with you that we won't see this soon. But the article stated 2015. Which is plenty of time.
Maybe there is a misunderstanding. If you refer to iiiii and jjjjj as 64 byte blocks you can calculate xxxxx and yyyyy to attach to iiiii and jjjjj so you get the same MD5 hash for certain weak iiiii and jjjjj. In the article you must place iiiiixxxxx and jjjjjyyyyy at the start of the code to get the same intermediate hash result. So both iiiiixxxxxcccccc and jjjjjyyyyyccccc result in the same hash. ccccc can be ANY code at all. Problem is that iiiiixxxxx and jjjjjyyyyy have no meaning. Note that normal (symetric) keys or random values have no meaning either.
It does not work if you put ccccc in front of the calculated blocks because that would distort the algorithm. Wang might be able to create bbbbbiiiiixxxxxccccc and bbbbbjjjjjyyyyyccccc within the hour, where b is any code.
I'm going to bed, I'm starting to get a headache. Tomorrow I am going to re-read the original Wang article (Ouch). Note that if you came this far without reading the original article, kudo's to you:)
Maybe you used a (slightly) different decoder. I've seen this happening after switching between (different versions) of decoders. I'll bet another 50 if you can back up your claims, no problem. Unless Wang is working for your competitor.
Yes, and they have currently only shown that you can calculate collisions (the damaging replacement) for certain weak data, and you can only replace that by a certain calculated value. This value is meaningless most of the time. But Wang (one of the cryptoanalists that found the problem) promisses more interesting holes.
I've halready come up with two bash scripts that prints out "MD5 is good, SHA1 is bad" and one that is _supposed_ to print "MD5 is bad, SHA1 is good". The scripts have the same MD5 hash value. The scripts are easy to program: make a switch if you find any changed bits and ignore the errors at the start.
The problem was a number that translated into the '(' character, which created an unrecoverable error.
Yep, same with me. When I was a small child I was interested in playing one (flashy colors, whooo!), so my dad explained how it worked and I got a quarter. First time: bingo! I've been in the plus ever since, and I am trying to keep it that way:)
I am using a tuner card right now. I only watch when something interesting catches my eye/ear or when I am bored with what's on my screen. Most of the time I get bored and put it on Discovery and switch to some news sites. Sometimes I won't watch it for about an hour and find that I am looking at the same commercial representation for 45 minutes. So let's say it counts as half, at most.
Afaik LDAP is quite a standardised protocol. You might ask your management why this restriction is set.
It's like only using exchange client as POP or IMAP server, just because the client has Outlook or Outlook Express installed on its computer (I honestly don't know which one of these screws up your security more btw). Or Netscape server because you are using the mozilla browser. The list goes on and on.
Explain to them what modules are, and that you better use the best module out there. In my opinion that means dropping anything that has "Netscape" and "Server" in the name, but that's not the point.
It is hard enough getting funding for a company that has no notion of what it's going to get out of a large contract. I would imagine that it would be really hard for a company to get funding if this is going to be the preferred method of buying.
I certainly would not go to work for such a company, the risk of loosing your job would just be too great. And in the race to get the best result your salary might be of secundary interest. You hear this a lot from companies racing against each other.
It may be great for technological advantages (man is build to compete) but it might have very negative side effects. Of course, that's from the point of view of the vendor, for NASA it would probably be great - if not a bit risky if you want something done in a certain amount of time .
Sycamore Street, Temple Bar, Dublin 2. I presume it's still there and still has the letters on the wall. It's (or was) pretty good Belgian food, especially if you notice that no-one of the staff is actually from Belgium.
That would negate the previous remark. It would leave the beefy prisoners playing video games and the nerds would probably go muscle up or something. Errr....
What I am missing from the enormous array of file sharing tools is a simple one. Sharing a virtual LAN with your friends. There are many VPN server/clients out there, but they are all point to point. What I would like is some software that emulates a workgroup LAN, so you could use simple SMB or FTP filesharing over a trusted, encrypted, distributed network. The tricky part would probably the broadcast packages and the IP range.
Funny. My ISP _protects_ me rather than snooping on me. Even port blocking and (free) spam/virus scanning can be turned off. They've only defaulted to it since a big number of clients did never turn it on. Seems you got your self the wrong provider. I should move to another one, if that's available in your region.
Then again, my ISP (www.xs4all.nl) is notorious for protecting its clients. It even sues spammers (and won) and took on Scientology when they had to remove content. Not many ISP's will go _that_ far.
Don't you want to start with just database design and SQL before you would want to move to a book about a specific RDBC implementation? If it is just about database design then the title of the book is wrong.
Then again, if you wish to explain about setting up the database itself, access rights and so on, then the book might be for beginners. Once again, the title would not fit the book.
As anyone should know, the steps in software development are: get it working, get it right, get it optimized. Let's hope that the book does not go to deep into the optimized part in a too early stage.
And mussels/oysters and fish. The mussels are bred in the Netherlands and prepared in Belgium. Talking about good cooperation with our Belgium friends. Then we have the Belgium fries. I'm sure we left some gastronomic experience out, but that's out the top of my head.
Belgo's in Dublin, Ireland has "bejaardentehuis" written all over its walls. In very large letters.
Normally, it is rare enough for people to give money , and I would not want to discourage that. Look carefully for the right charity organization, and make sure that they do not spend it all on administration and other internal costs. The right organizations will spend their money at the right time and the right cause. Your favourite charity organization will save it for you (and probably get better intrest as well, being an organization).
Great idea. I've started to collect bukkake already to implement your scheme. Maybe in a few years the collection will be big enough. I will let you know!
Just to fuel your imagination, I've put in some nice uses:
- Networked camera's (more zooming, tilting and maybe even lighting with 39 W)
- Networked printers
- Home server appliances (my VIA EPIA runs great with DVD player and 3.5" HDD on 53W, it would run just great on 39W without the DVD player)
- Media players (MPEG4 & MPEG 2 layer 3)
- Downlink switches
And I do not have a clue why they never use this for PDA's. Use a common network plug to synchronize your PDA, and give the customer a nice powered switch or network adapter instead of those stupid cradles.
Currently the standard is mostly found in Remote Access Points. I would have put my access point (which is at the best place for RF, but not for cables) on power over ethernet, but these components are hard to find. Just putting 5 V and splitting it at the end does not seem to work, probably because of the distance.
That's why the devices first _check_ if the other device is a power over ethernet device. I've read the RFC of the standard, and this functionality is already included.
I agree...up till point 5. It's perfectly possible to use a stereo or even mono plug to put a digital signal over coax. You could even auto-sense (by default). It probably depends on the innards if an additional IC is needed. Most high end sound card have this feature (e.g. my soundblaster audigy). Optical might be more difficult.
Though I applaud the effort, I weep for the amount of energy that is used by people just to show off their house to their neighbours. This has nothing to do with a romantic christmas in my view. The amount of lights is going up here (the Netherlands) as well, probably due to the fact that we have too much money (or energy is too cheap). Some people still think its interesting to copy the USA for some reason...
Now, let's see if I can turn these lights off.
And I wonder if they count the music DVD sales as "CD" sales. They probably wouldn't. What about iMusic, does that count? I always see them moan about CD sales. What about MUSIC sales? Since when does it matter through which medium you sell your music? Simple prediction: in 2020 the sales of CD's will have plummeted to an all time low, with most of the revenue coming from 2nd hand sales.
Yup, and then it should say that the word is equal. If I put a text into babelfish it won't make a list of the words that are not translated. This is a bad thing, since I don't know if the word is not in the dictionary or if the word is the same in both languages. Which makes quite a bit of difference in everyday use.
In defense of babelfish, it is about making pages understandable for the user, and not the other way around. But for other translators it should be a must.
Are the antenna's difficult to integrate into a phone? Or a laptop? I don't know, do you?
So if you cannot do this with wires, you cannot do it wireless? That the current rate would be thousands of dollars (now) does not matter. With 3G most operators charge per MB anyhow.
Wired links within a corporate infrastructure easily manage 1Gb/s. 10 Gb/s is not a problem, certainly not in 2015. Hell, you could put that over TP copper by then.
I agree with you that we won't see this soon. But the article stated 2015. Which is plenty of time.
Maybe there is a misunderstanding. If you refer to iiiii and jjjjj as 64 byte blocks you can calculate xxxxx and yyyyy to attach to iiiii and jjjjj so you get the same MD5 hash for certain weak iiiii and jjjjj. In the article you must place iiiiixxxxx and jjjjjyyyyy at the start of the code to get the same intermediate hash result. So both iiiiixxxxxcccccc and jjjjjyyyyyccccc result in the same hash. ccccc can be ANY code at all. Problem is that iiiiixxxxx and jjjjjyyyyy have no meaning. Note that normal (symetric) keys or random values have no meaning either.
:)
It does not work if you put ccccc in front of the calculated blocks because that would distort the algorithm. Wang might be able to create bbbbbiiiiixxxxxccccc and bbbbbjjjjjyyyyyccccc within the hour, where b is any code.
I'm going to bed, I'm starting to get a headache. Tomorrow I am going to re-read the original Wang article (Ouch). Note that if you came this far without reading the original article, kudo's to you
Maybe you used a (slightly) different decoder. I've seen this happening after switching between (different versions) of decoders. I'll bet another 50 if you can back up your claims, no problem. Unless Wang is working for your competitor.
Yes, and they have currently only shown that you can calculate collisions (the damaging replacement) for certain weak data, and you can only replace that by a certain calculated value. This value is meaningless most of the time. But Wang (one of the cryptoanalists that found the problem) promisses more interesting holes.
I've halready come up with two bash scripts that prints out "MD5 is good, SHA1 is bad" and one that is _supposed_ to print "MD5 is bad, SHA1 is good". The scripts have the same MD5 hash value. The scripts are easy to program: make a switch if you find any changed bits and ignore the errors at the start.
The problem was a number that translated into the '(' character, which created an unrecoverable error.
Yep, you are still wrong. I've tried some code and the (precalculated) different blocks MUST be at the start of the code. So it's more like
file1: xxxxccccccc....
file2: yyyyccccccc....
%file1 = %file2
Which is the example given in the article.
However, Wang said she could get to a collision from any intermediate hash code within the hour (according to the article). That would mean:
file1: ccccxxxxccccccccc......
file2: ccccyyyyccccccccc......
%file1 = %file2
Where xxxx and yyyy are (pre?)calculated and cccc.... is the payload.
If _I_ am not mistaken.
Inches, feet or metres, make up your mind! We're not walking calculators you know!
Yep, same with me. When I was a small child I was interested in playing one (flashy colors, whooo!), so my dad explained how it worked and I got a quarter. First time: bingo! I've been in the plus ever since, and I am trying to keep it that way :)
I am using a tuner card right now. I only watch when something interesting catches my eye/ear or when I am bored with what's on my screen. Most of the time I get bored and put it on Discovery and switch to some news sites. Sometimes I won't watch it for about an hour and find that I am looking at the same commercial representation for 45 minutes. So let's say it counts as half, at most.
That's true, I've never fallen asleep using the internet. Uh oh, there goes my karma.
Afaik LDAP is quite a standardised protocol. You might ask your management why this restriction is set.
It's like only using exchange client as POP or IMAP server, just because the client has Outlook or Outlook Express installed on its computer (I honestly don't know which one of these screws up your security more btw). Or Netscape server because you are using the mozilla browser. The list goes on and on.
Explain to them what modules are, and that you better use the best module out there. In my opinion that means dropping anything that has "Netscape" and "Server" in the name, but that's not the point.
It is hard enough getting funding for a company that has no notion of what it's going to get out of a large contract. I would imagine that it would be really hard for a company to get funding if this is going to be the preferred method of buying.
I certainly would not go to work for such a company, the risk of loosing your job would just be too great. And in the race to get the best result your salary might be of secundary interest. You hear this a lot from companies racing against each other.
It may be great for technological advantages (man is build to compete) but it might have very negative side effects. Of course, that's from the point of view of the vendor, for NASA it would probably be great - if not a bit risky if you want something done in a certain amount of time
.
Sycamore Street, Temple Bar, Dublin 2. I presume it's still there and still has the letters on the wall. It's (or was) pretty good Belgian food, especially if you notice that no-one of the staff is actually from Belgium.
That would negate the previous remark. It would leave the beefy prisoners playing video games and the nerds would probably go muscle up or something. Errr....
What I am missing from the enormous array of file sharing tools is a simple one. Sharing a virtual LAN with your friends. There are many VPN server/clients out there, but they are all point to point. What I would like is some software that emulates a workgroup LAN, so you could use simple SMB or FTP filesharing over a trusted, encrypted, distributed network. The tricky part would probably the broadcast packages and the IP range.
Funny. My ISP _protects_ me rather than snooping on me. Even port blocking and (free) spam/virus scanning can be turned off. They've only defaulted to it since a big number of clients did never turn it on. Seems you got your self the wrong provider. I should move to another one, if that's available in your region.
Then again, my ISP (www.xs4all.nl) is notorious for protecting its clients. It even sues spammers (and won) and took on Scientology when they had to remove content. Not many ISP's will go _that_ far.
Don't you want to start with just database design and SQL before you would want to move to a book about a specific RDBC implementation? If it is just about database design then the title of the book is wrong.
Then again, if you wish to explain about setting up the database itself, access rights and so on, then the book might be for beginners. Once again, the title would not fit the book.
As anyone should know, the steps in software development are: get it working, get it right, get it optimized. Let's hope that the book does not go to deep into the optimized part in a too early stage.
And mussels/oysters and fish. The mussels are bred in the Netherlands and prepared in Belgium. Talking about good cooperation with our Belgium friends. Then we have the Belgium fries. I'm sure we left some gastronomic experience out, but that's out the top of my head.
Belgo's in Dublin, Ireland has "bejaardentehuis" written all over its walls. In very large letters.